DOCSLIB.ORG

Sir William Davenant, the Senses, and Royalism in the Seventeenth Century

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sir William Davenant, the Senses, and Royalism in the Seventeenth Century Abstract Within the last decade, there has been a renewed level of interest in civil war general, writer and theatre proprietor, Sir William Davenant (1606-1668). The field of sensory studies has also flourished in recent years and, over the past two to three decades especially, research into royalism and royalist literature has produced numerous extensive studies. However, scholarship dealing with royalism only provides vague allusions to the place of the senses and sensuality within royalism and royalist literature. Davenant’s work is striking in that it engages both overtly and more subtly with the relationship between the senses, sensuality, royalist identities, and the values accommodated by royalist ideologies. This thesis offers a thorough re-evaluation of Davenant’s writing in relation to the senses, contributing towards a better understanding of the way in which royalists conceptualise their own sensory experiences, and those of others. In turn, this is vital in understanding royalism as a whole and the way in which such concepts contribute towards its varied nature and accommodating ideologies. It also enables a deeper appreciation of the impact of Davenant’s own forms of royalism upon his literary output. My approach builds upon the critical field of sensory studies by considering the way in which royalist identities may influence writers’ approaches to the sensory experience during the seventeenth century. THE UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD – SCHOOL OF ENGLISH Sir William Davenant, the Senses, and Royalism in the Seventeenth Century A dissertation presented by Kate Louise Gath In fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the subject of English Literature. March 2018 Contents Acknowledgements Sir William Davenant, the Senses, and Royalism in the Seventeenth Century: An Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 Intro.1 ............................................................................................................................... 1 Intro.2: The Senses in the Seventeenth Century .............................................................. 8 Intro.3: Sensory Studies ................................................................................................. 16 Intro.4: Royalism ............................................................................................................ 22 Intro.5: Davenant’s Work ............................................................................................... 29 Chapter 1: Seeing and Being Seen in Davenant’s Early Work .......................................... 32 1.1: Seeing in the Seventeenth Century ......................................................................... 32 1.2: The Eye, Religion, and Theatre............................................................................... 41 1.3: Plays Written Before 1630 ...................................................................................... 49 1.4: Plays 1637-1642 ...................................................................................................... 63 Chapter 2: ‘Little pastime upon Earth without Bodies’: Platonic Love and the Sensory Experience in the Masque .................................................................................................. 68 2.1: The Masque and the Body....................................................................................... 68 2.2: Love at the Caroline Court ...................................................................................... 73 2.3: Stuart Masque Culture ............................................................................................ 76 2.4: Davenant’s Masquing Career .................................................................................. 91 Chapter 3: Moderating Pleasure in the 1650s .................................................................. 107 3.1: Pleasure and the Senses ......................................................................................... 107 3.2: Gondibert and Staging Didactic Performance in the Interregnum........................ 115 3.3: Opera ..................................................................................................................... 133 Chapter 4: Sensuality, Virtue, and the Restoration Actress ............................................. 138 4.1: Theatre at the Restoration ..................................................................................... 138 4.2: The Actress in the 1660s ....................................................................................... 142 4.3: Shakespeare Adaptations ...................................................................................... 153 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 166 Bibliography .................................................................................................................... 168 Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank my supervisors, Marcus Nevitt and Cathy Shrank for their expert guidance and support on this project. Cathy supervised my undergraduate dissertation, and Marcus has taught me in some capacity almost throughout the entirety of my time at the University of Sheffield, from being a new undergraduate to the final months of this PhD. When I started my studies as a postgraduate researcher in 2014, he warned me that there would be ‘dark nights of the soul’. Alongside happy and productive periods, there have been difficult days, weeks and even months on this project, but his patience and encouragement has made all the difference. I would also like to thank The School of English and the University of Sheffield more widely, as well as every PGR and academic who has offered feedback and pearls of wisdom at conferences, talks and other events. The city of Sheffield is a wonderful place, and being able to live in a lovely home, surrounded by green space, friendly people, and beautiful views has made all the difference to my quality of life. My excellent landlord, Roger Greatrick, has had a huge part to play in this. My local gym and its fantastic fitness class instructors, Lynn Sykes and Alison Haslam, have kept me going throughout the PhD. With every bench press, bicep curl and Step routine not only have I become fitter, happier and stronger, but have grown in confidence in all areas of my life. I would also like to thank Sara Brindley, Joanna Cholewa, Laura Jacobs, Molly Preger, Elin Reeves, and Kerry Sayer for their loyal friendship, shared laughter, and support. I am indebted to Sheila Walters, for her kindness and good company, and James Gath, for being not just a thoughtful sibling but also a friend. My late mother, Barbara Gath, was a very hardworking, determined, and perceptive individual who encouraged me to embrace everything education and learning has to offer, and to forge a career and aim high. I was sixteen when she died, and she never got to see the woman I have become, and will never be able to read this thesis, but I hope she would have been pleased that I followed her advice to pursue an area of study I really enjoyed. I cannot emphasise enough my thanks to my partner, Pete Walters, who brings me so much happiness, serenity and contentment, for his unwavering emotional and practical support. Finally, I would like to thank my father, Jerry Gath, who has been a very special parent from the moment he drove home with a tiny baby in a bundle of blanket. Without this, and his financial support, this project would not have been possible. 1 Sir William Davenant, the Senses, and Royalism in the Seventeenth Century: An Introduction Intro.1 During the 1650s, Wiltshire-born royalist poet Lady Hester Pulter wrote of the disfigured writer, civil war general, and future theatre proprietor, Sir William Davenant (1606- 1668), that, without his nose, he was ‘like Cheapside without a Cross’.1 This simile can be found in her satirical but sympathetic poem, ‘To Sir Wm D: Upon the Unspeakable Loss of the Most Conspicuous and Chief Ornament of his Frontispiece’, which discusses what Davenant’s nose, partly lost to syphilis over twenty years earlier, had come to signify. Pulter’s reference to Cheapside’s missing cross refers to a particularly famous episode in parliament’s history of iconoclasm, and compares Davenant to a missing landmark which nevertheless endures in the collective memories of royalists; he becomes a ‘shared reference point’.2 Davenant’s ruined nose was an integral part of the identity ascribed to him by his peers and it operated as an unavoidable marker of his promiscuous lifestyle.3 This type of lifestyle was one associated with a stereotypical, ‘cavalier’ royalist, and the identities of royalists such as these continue to preoccupy modern scholarship. Such royalists have been, and still are, heavily associated with ‘triviality and sensuality’, which is ‘admired’ or ‘censured’ by scholars depending upon their own moral or political viewpoints.4 However, scholarship dealing with royalism only ever provides 1 Philip Bordinat and Sophia B. Blaydes, Sir William Davenant (Boston: Twayne, 1981); Mary Edmond, Rare Sir William Davenant: Poet Laureate, Playwright, Civil War General, Restoration Theatre Manager (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987); Mark Robson, Pulter [née Ley], Lady Hester, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography [online, accessed 23 February 2018]; Hester Pulter,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Repertory and Riot: the Relocation of Plays from the Red Bull to the Cockpit Stage
    132 Issues in Review 28 Knutson, Playing Companies and Commerce, 62. 29 Leggatt, Jacobean Public Theatre, 4. Repertory and Riot: The Relocation of Plays from the Red Bull to the Cockpit Stage On 4 March 1617 the newly built Cockpit playhouse in Drury Lane was assailed by a band of ‘lewde and loose persons, apprentices and others’.1 Writ- ing four days after the event, Edward Sherbourne claimed that between three and four thousand apprentices had mobilized themselves, ‘wounded divers of the players, broke open their trunckes, & whatt apparreil, bookes, or other things they found, they burnt & cutt in peeces; & not content herewith, gott on the top of the house, & untiled it’.2 Consequences were not limited to loss of property. Sherbourne elaborates that ‘one prentise was slaine, being shott throughe the head with a pistoll, & many other of their fellowes were sore hurt’.3 On the same day, John Chamberlain wrote to Dudley Carleton of the disorder in town, adding that the players of Queen Anne’s Men, the current occupants of the Cockpit, ‘defended themselves as well as they could and slew three of them [the rioters] with shot, and hurt divers’.4 The gravity of the situation, at least as far as city authorities were concerned, is clear. In a letter to the lord mayor and aldermen of London, it was reported that ‘there were diverse people slayne, and others hurt and wounded’. Later that month, the privy council ordered security and vigilance against the behaviour of citizens and apprentices to be tightened.5 A number of historical narratives have prioritized the riot, which took place on Shrove Tuesday that year.
    [Show full text]
  • October 8, 2019 Elist MILLER
    RULON~ October 8, 2019 eList MILLER BOOKS To Order: Call toll-free 1-800-441-0076 Outside the United States call 1-651-290-0700 400 Summit Avenue E-mail: [email protected] St. Paul, Minnesota Other catalogues available at our website at Rulon.com 55102-2662 USA Member ABAA/ILAB ~ R a r e & f i n e b o o k s VISA, MASTERCARD, DISCOVER, and AMERICAN EXPRESS accepted. If you have any questions regarding billing, methods of payment, in many fields shipping, or foreign currencies, please do not hesitate to ask. Manuscripts 1. Aesop. Fables of Aesop and other cution of Charles I, and in the midst of the eminent mythologists: with morals and controversy over the oath of loyalty demanded reflections. By Sir Roger L'Estrange, Kt. by the new republican government. Addresses London: printed for R. Sare, T. Sawbridge "Paying taxes," "Personall service," "Taking oaths," etc. Wing A3920. [et al.], 1692. $1,500 First L'Estrange edition, folio, pp. [10], 28, [8], 306, 319-480; gatherings S and T switched but the book is complete; this is a variant as noted by ESTC with p. 144 (first occurrence) misnum- bered 132; engraved portrait frontispiece of L'Estrange and plate of Aesop surrounded by animals; full speckled calf with a 20th-century rebacking, black morocco label on spine; light wear to boards, dampstain to upper right corner, very good. With the armorial bookplate of John Lord De La Warr. Wing A-706. 2. Ascham, Antony. A discourse wherein is examined, what is particularly lawfull during the confusions and revolu- tions of government.
    [Show full text]
  • An A2 Timeline of the London Stage Between 1660 and 1737
    1660-61 1659-60 1661-62 1662-63 1663-64 1664-65 1665-66 1666-67 William Beeston The United Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company @ Salisbury Court Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company & Thomas Killigrew @ Salisbury Court @Lincoln’s Inn Fields @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Rhodes’s Company @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ Red Bull Theatre @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields George Jolly John Rhodes @ Salisbury Court @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane The King’s Company The King’s Company PLAGUE The King’s Company The King’s Company The King’s Company Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew June 1665-October 1666 Anthony Turner Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew @ Vere Street Theatre @ Vere Street Theatre & Edward Shatterell @ Red Bull Theatre @ Bridges Street Theatre @ Bridges Street Theatre @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ Bridges Street Theatre, GREAT FIRE @ Red Bull Theatre Drury Lane (from 7/5/1663) The Red Bull Players The Nursery @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane September 1666 @ Red Bull Theatre George Jolly @ Hatton Garden 1676-77 1675-76 1674-75 1673-74 1672-73 1671-72 1670-71 1669-70 1668-69 1667-68 The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company Thomas Betterton & William Henry Harrison and Thomas Henry Harrison & Thomas Sir William Davenant Smith for the Davenant Betterton for the Davenant Betterton for the Davenant @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Milling
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE ‘“For Without Vanity I’m Better Known”: Restoration Actors and Metatheatre on the London Stage.’ AUTHORS Milling, Jane JOURNAL Theatre Survey DEPOSITED IN ORE 18 March 2013 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10036/4491 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Theatre Survey 52:1 (May 2011) # American Society for Theatre Research 2011 doi:10.1017/S0040557411000068 Jane Milling “FOR WITHOUT VANITY,I’M BETTER KNOWN”: RESTORATION ACTORS AND METATHEATRE ON THE LONDON STAGE Prologue, To the Duke of Lerma, Spoken by Mrs. Ellen[Nell], and Mrs. Nepp. NEPP: How, Mrs. Ellen, not dress’d yet, and all the Play ready to begin? EL[LEN]: Not so near ready to begin as you think for. NEPP: Why, what’s the matter? ELLEN: The Poet, and the Company are wrangling within. NEPP: About what? ELLEN: A prologue. NEPP: Why, Is’t an ill one? NELL[ELLEN]: Two to one, but it had been so if he had writ any; but the Conscious Poet with much modesty, and very Civilly and Sillily—has writ none.... NEPP: What shall we do then? ’Slife let’s be bold, And speak a Prologue— NELL[ELLEN]: —No, no let us Scold.1 When Samuel Pepys heard Nell Gwyn2 and Elizabeth Knipp3 deliver the prologue to Robert Howard’s The Duke of Lerma, he recorded the experience in his diary: “Knepp and Nell spoke the prologue most excellently, especially Knepp, who spoke beyond any creature I ever heard.”4 By 20 February 1668, when Pepys noted his thoughts, he had known Knipp personally for two years, much to the chagrin of his wife.
    [Show full text]
  • Dressing to Delight: the Spectacle of Costume and the Character of the Fop on the Restoration Stage, 1660-1714 Lyndsey Bakewell
    DRESSING TO DELIGHT: THE SPECTACLE OF COSTUME AND THE CHARACTER OF THE FOP ON THE RESTORATION STAGE, 1660-1714 Lyndsey Bakewell … for costume and ornament are arrived to the heights of magnificence. —Richard Flecknoe The English Restoration theatre has long been associated with lavish spectacles. This is due in part to developments in scenery and machinery following the return of Charles II and the monarchy in 1660. Drawing influence from European practices experienced by playwrights, players, and audiences while in exile, theatrical practice included an increased technical potential for spectacular visual feats of scenographic and mechanical wonder.1 Contemporary research has often defined the theatrical practices of the Restoration in terms of these advances (see Powell 1984, Hume 1976, and Milhous 1984). When considering the spectacular nature of the English stage in this period, these discussions tend to overlook more traditional elements of stage production, such as costume, acting, and scenography. In contrast, accounts from writers during, and immediately after the Restoration, regularly discuss these elements of production, assuring us of the significance of their contribution to this period’s stage spectaculars. This paper will therefore draw on firsthand accounts and playtexts from the period, as well as reflections on stage practices in the decades that immediately followed the Restoration, in order to broaden notions of what spectacle meant to contemporary audiences and how this was achieved—particularly in relation to costume. By paying close attention to the ways in which clothes were exploited for their portrayal of character and their visual appeal, this paper will demonstrate the spectacular qualities of the seventeenth-century stage.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Tis Pity She's a Whore
    From Womb to Tomb: John Ford’s ‘Tis Pity She’s a Whore1 John Ford’s controversial Caroline tragedy wrestles with incest, adultery, murderous revenge, and the corruption of religious power. Set in the Italian city-state of Parma, the story opens on Giovanni, a young intellectual, debating with his mentor and spiritual counselor on the virtues of incestuous romance. Meanwhile, a seemingly never-ending line of suitors stalks Annabella’s balcony, seeking attention from the wealthy merchant’s daughter. Despite the number of eligible bachelors vying for her hand in marriage, the titular character turns her sights on the one man she cannot marry: her ruminating, cerebral brother, Giovanni. In spite of religious and moral counsel, Annabella and Giovanni pursue their mutually found romantic love, throwing their family and community into upheaval. Written in the early 1630s for the Queen’s Men, ‘Tis Pity She’s a Whore was first performed at the Cockpit Theatre in Drury Lane. Also known as the Phoenix, the Cockpit was one of London’s leading indoor playhouses, designed by famed architect and theatrical visionary, Inigo Jones. Although a contemporary of popular Jacobean playwrights such as Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher, Ford’s work belongs to a later era. As a second-generation playwright in London’s professional theatre scene, well versed in the work of Elizabethan and Jacobean dramatists, Ford’s playwrighting recycles theatrical conventions established by his predecessors. As many scholars have noted, ‘Tis Pity She’s a Whore’s Annabella and Giovanni echo another ill-fated romance: that of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet.
    [Show full text]
  • Drama at the Courts of Queen Henrietta Maria'
    H-Albion Campbell on Britland, 'Drama at the Courts of Queen Henrietta Maria' Review published on Saturday, September 1, 2007 Karen Britland. Drama at the Courts of Queen Henrietta Maria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. ix + 292 pp. $85.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-521-84797-1. Reviewed by Julie Campbell (Department of English, Eastern Illinois University) Published on H- Albion (September, 2007) Reading Religio-Political Visions in Caroline Court Entertainments Considering the court entertainments associated with Henrietta Maria, queen consort to Charles I, from the wedding ballets performed for the royal couple in 1624 to the entertainments at the French court during her exile, Karen Britland employs carefully researched close readings to counter the long-standing image of Henrietta Maria as vain and frivolous. Britland especially takes issue with Alison Plowden's assertion in Henrietta Maria (2001) that the queen consort "was simply not interested in affairs of state" (quoted, p. 1). In the process, Britland demonstrates, in intriguing detail, how the allegories of the sumptuous Caroline court entertainments illustrate Henrietta Maria's and Charles's religious and political goals. Critical considerations that inform Britland's study are as follows: she strongly asserts that Henrietta Maria had a socio-religious role at the English court mandated by her mother, Marie de Médicis, that she was to protect English Catholics and be merciful to Protestants, so that, by her example, they (including her husband) would wish to convert. In the same vein, Henrietta Maria was to embody the notion of a "peaceweaver," Britland's term for a royal female peacemaker who traveled between courts and whose role it was to use her fertility, her deportment, and her rhetoric to negotiate between national powers.
    [Show full text]
  • WRAP Theses Crowther 2017.Pdf
    A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/ 97559 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications James Shirley and the Restoration Stage By Stefania Crowther A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Renaissance Studies University of Warwick, Centre for Renaissance Studies June 2017 2 3 Acknowledgements This thesis was supported by the James Shirley Complete Works Project, and funded by the AHRC, and Centre for Renaissance Studies, University of Warwick. I would like to thank these organisations, and in particular Jayne Browne, Ingrid de Smett, David Lines, Jayne Brown, Heather Pilbin, Paul Botley, and especially Elizabeth Clarke and Paul Prescott for their very helpful guidance during the upgrade process. Special thanks are due to Hannah Davis, whose URSS project on Restoration Shirley, supervised by Teresa Grant, provided the starting point for this thesis. I am also enormously grateful to the colleagues, friends and tutors who have inspired and supported my work: Daniel Ashman, Thomasin Bailey, Stephen Clucas, Michael Dobson, Peter Foreshaw, Douglas Hawes, Simon Jackson, Victoria Jones, Griff Jameson, Peter Kirwan, Chris Main, Gerry McAlpine, Zois Pigadas, Catherine Smith, Lee White, Susan Wiseman.
    [Show full text]
  • The Protectorate Playhouse: William Davenant's Cockpit in the 1650S
    The protectorate playhouse: William Davenant's cockpit in the 1650s Item Type Article Authors Watkins, Stephen Citation Watkins, S. (2019) 'The protectorate playhouse: William Davenant's cockpit in the 1650s', Shakespeare Bulletin, 37(1), pp.89-109. DOI: 10.1353/shb.2019.0004. DOI 10.1353/shb.2019.0004 Publisher John Hopkins University Press Journal Shakespeare Bulletin Download date 30/09/2021 15:44:41 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10545/624483 1 The Protectorate Playhouse: William Davenant’s Cockpit in the 1650s STEPHEN WATKINS University of Southampton Recent work on the history of the theater during the decade of republican experiment in England (1649–59) has revealed a modest but sophisticated performance culture, centering on the entrepreneurial and politically wily figure of Sir William Davenant. Despite the ban on stage plays enforced in various forms from 1642, by the mid-1650s Davenant, poet laureate to Charles I and Royalist aid during the civil wars, succeeded in gaining the Protectorate’s approval to produce a series of “Heroick Representations” (Davenant, Proposition 2) for public audiences, first at his private residence of Rutland House and later at the Cockpit theater in Drury Lane. These “Representations” embody a unique corpus in the history of English theater. They were radically innovative productions, introducing the proscenium arch, painted, perspectival scenery, and recitative music to London audiences. The Siege of Rhodes even boasted the first English female performer to appear on a professional public stage. Davenant’s 1650s works were not strictly plays in the usual sense—what John Dryden would later term “just drama” (sig.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Quarto Edition of Shakespeare's Othello William Shakespeare, Othello. London: Thomas Walkley, 1622. 7 Inches X 4
    The first quarto edition of Shakespeare’s Othello William Shakespeare, Othello. London: Thomas Walkley, 1622. 7 inches x 4 3/4 inches (178 mm x 121 mm); [4], 80, 89–99, [1] pages; A2 B–M4 N2 (Title, A2, B1–D4, I2, I3, K1–N2 in facsimile). The | Tragœdy of Othello, | The Moore of Venice. | As it hath beene diuerse times acted at the | Globe, and at the Black-Friers, by | his Maiesties seruants. | Written by VVilliam Shakespeare. | [Okes’ device] | London, | Printed by N. O. for Thomas Walkley, and are to be sold at his | shop, at the Eagle and Child, in Brittans Bursse. | 1622. Shakespeare’s quartos, so named because of their format (a single sheet folded twice, creating four leaves or eight pages), are the first printed representations of his plays and, as none of the plays survives in manuscript, of great importance to Shakespeare scholarship. Only twenty-one of Shakespeare’s plays were published in quarto before the closure of the theaters and outbreak of civil war in 1642. These quartos were printed from either Shakespeare’s “foul papers” (a draft with notations and changes that was given in sections to actors for their respective roles); from “fair copies” created from foul papers that presented the entire action of the play; from promptbooks, essentially fair copies annotated and expanded by the author and acting company to clarify stage directions, sound effects, etc.; or from a previously published quarto edition. The quartos were inexpensive to produce and were published for various reasons, including to secure the acting company’s rights to the material and to bring in money during the plague years in London when the theaters were closed.
    [Show full text]
  • Sidney, Shakespeare, and the Elizabethans in Caroline England
    Textual Ghosts: Sidney, Shakespeare, and the Elizabethans in Caroline England Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Rachel Ellen Clark, M.A. English Graduate Program The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Richard Dutton, Advisor Christopher Highley Alan Farmer Copyright by Rachel Ellen Clark 2011 Abstract This dissertation argues that during the reign of Charles I (1625-42), a powerful and long-lasting nationalist discourse emerged that embodied a conflicted nostalgia and located a primary source of English national identity in the Elizabethan era, rooted in the works of William Shakespeare, Sir Philip Sidney, John Lyly, and Ben Jonson. This Elizabethanism attempted to reconcile increasingly hostile conflicts between Catholics and Protestants, court and country, and elite and commoners. Remarkably, as I show by examining several Caroline texts in which Elizabethan ghosts appear, Caroline authors often resurrect long-dead Elizabethan figures to articulate not only Puritan views but also Arminian and Catholic ones. This tendency to complicate associations between the Elizabethan era and militant Protestantism also appears in Caroline plays by Thomas Heywood, Philip Massinger, and William Sampson that figure Queen Elizabeth as both ideally Protestant and dangerously ambiguous. Furthermore, Caroline Elizabethanism included reprintings and adaptations of Elizabethan literature that reshape the ideological significance of the Elizabethan era. The 1630s quarto editions of Shakespeare’s Elizabethan comedies The Merry Wives of Windsor, The Taming of the Shrew, and Love’s Labour’s Lost represent the Elizabethan era as the source of a native English wit that bridges social divides and negotiates the ii roles of powerful women (a renewed concern as Queen Henrietta Maria became more conspicuous at court).
    [Show full text]
  • Roy Strong (RS)
    Roy Strong (RS) This archive collection has not yet been catalogued. The material remains unsorted and in its original order. File titles given are those assigned by Roy Strong. Box numbers have been allocated by the Centre. If you wish to consult any material from this collection, please specify the box number and file title (where applicable). Please note that it is only possible to request 10 files per retrieval. Access will be provided in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 1998. Full details relating to access to the Centre’s collections can be found here: http://www.paul-mellon-centre.ac.uk/23/ The material in this archive comprises correspondence, images, articles, research notes, photocopies of published & unpublished material. Box number Box title File title Description of material Extent Covering (if applicable). Dates Sequence 1: Inigo Jones Photographs of prints and sketches (some mounted) by Inigo Jones of designs for masques relating compiled and collected by Strong during the course of his work for the publication: Orgel S. & Strong R., (1973) Inigo Jones: the theatre of the Stuart Court. Sotheby Parke Bernet. A copy of this text can be found in the PMC library 1 Jones – I -Cecil House 1607 6 files & 2 loose Unknown c.1610 photographs Blackness; Queens; Barriers; Oberon; Lords -Lord Hayes Masque 1607 -Queens 1609 -Barriers 1610 -Oberon 1611 -Lords Masque 1613 2 Jones – II -Misc. C. 1615 23 files & 2 Vision of delight; to loose Somerset House c.1629/30 photographs -Tilt or Barriers c. 1618 -Pleasure reconciled to virtue 1618 -Unknown Masque 1619 -Unknown play at Somerset House 1619-20 -Antimasquers c.1620 -Anti-masquers c.
    [Show full text]