DOCSLIB.ORG

A Generic Stability and Control Tool for Flight Vehicle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Generic Stability and Control Tool for Flight Vehicle A GENERIC STABILITY AND CONTROL TOOL FOR FLIGHT VEHICLE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN: AEROMECH SOFTWARE DEVELOMENT by GARY JOHN COLEMAN JR. Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AEROSPACE ENGINEERING THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON May 2007 Copyright © by Gary John Coleman Jr. 2007 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work could not have been possible without the support of several individuals whom I wish to acknowledge. I would like to express my appreciation to my advisor, Dr. Bernd Chudoba, for his support, encouragement, feed-back and even his constructive criticism. The high level of academic, professional and engineering standards he sets drive and challenges his students to grow and learn throughout their education. This Thesis is the implementation and application of methodology and mathematical frame work derived by Dr. Chudoba. With out this foundation the current research could not have been conducted. I would like to acknowledge the contribution of Kiran Pippalapalli of the AVD Lab to the present research. His initial work on the AeroMech software has been invaluable, and has provided an excellent starting point for my research. I would also like to thank him for his guidance, advice and friendship during my graduate studies. Dr. Edward Lan of the University of Kansas has been instrumental during this research in aiding with the use and application of his aerodynamic prediction tool VORSTAB. His insight into both the computation and physical aspects of aerodynamics have been of great value during this research Gerald C. Blausey (former Lockheed Martin flight dynamists) and Robert G. Hoey (former USAF flight test engineer) have contributed greatly to my understanding iii of stability and control and its application to both design and flight testing. Their experience, insight, and timely response to my questions are greatly appreciated, and have directly influenced this research. I would like acknowledge the contributions of Dr. Danielle Soban (Georgia Institute of Technology) and John Jeffery (J2 Aircraft Solutions Ltd.). Their timely feed-back and experience with the application of stability and control in design have been very helpful for this research. I would like express my appreciation to the AVD lab team members, Xiao Huang, Andy Huizenga, Amit Oza, Bryan Mixon, Kristen Roberts, Brad Mixon, and Nauman Mhaskar. Their friendship and assistance have made my graduate studies at the University of Oklahoma and the University of Texas at Arlington an enjoyable experience. I would like to thank my parents, for their support, direction and encouragement. I would also like to thank my younger brothers, Daniel, Dennis and Nick for their “constructive” criticism and feed-back during my Masters research. I hope I can return the favor someday. Finally, I would like to thank my fiancé Jessica, without her love, understanding and support this work could not have been possible. Her friendship and laughter constantly remind me of what is truly important. April 19, 2007 iv ABSTRACT A GENERIC STABILITY AND CONTROL TOOL FOR FLIGHT VEHICLE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN: AEROMECH SOFTWARE DEVELOMENT Publication No. ______ Gary John Coleman Jr., M.S. The University of Texas at Arlington, 2006 Supervising Professor: Dr. Bernd Chudoba During the conceptual design (CD) phase, various solution concepts must, and should, be explored to select the best flight vehicle size and configuration in order to meet the mission requirements. As the aerospace industry advances novel aerospace flight vehicle configurations promising larger operational performance and overall efficiency, demanding integrated flight vehicles like the flying wing configuration (FWC) or blending wing body (BWB) are under investigation. Some of these novel configurations rely on novel control effectors (CE) and complex flight control systems in order to obtain the desired performance objectives. Clearly, stability and control plays an important roll in the design of advanced flight vehicles. v Chudoba1 recognized that that the conceptual design of such vehicles requires a truly generic stability and control approach to enable consistent comparisons of novel aircraft configurations with conventional aircraft aircraft shapes. Consequently, AeroMech analyzes both symmetric and asymmetric flight vehicles in symmetric and asymmetric flight conditions. The methodology and software AeroMech contributes to (1) sizing primary control effectors to possess adequate physical control power throughout the flight envelope, the tool (2) provides trimmed aerodynamics for improved performance-optimal stability and control solutions, and (3) it analyses static and dynamic stability in all axes (open and closed loop) for ensure flight vehicle safety and compliance with certification regulations throughout the flight envelope. The development of this methodology and software has been following three fundamental steps: (1) derivation of the AeroMech methodology and mathematic frame- work, (2) development of the stand-alone AeroMech prototype software for validation purposes, and (3) integration of AeroMech into the multi-disciplinary design tool AVDS-PrADO for multi-disciplinary flight vehicle synthesis. With the first step accomplished by Chudoba1, the second step initiated by Pippalapalli6, the present work describes the completed development of the stand-alone AeroMech prototype software and its validation using the Northrop YB-49 flying wing as the primary case study demonstrating physical correctness of the algorithm but in particular the software’s potential to enable true control-configured vehicle (CCV) design during the early conceptual design phase. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................................iii ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... v TABLE OF CONTENTS ...............................................................................................vii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS........................................................................................... xi LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................... xv NOTATION.................................................................................................................xviii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES.............................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background, Research Approach and Objectives .......................................... 8 1.2.1 Research Objectives....................................................................... 10 2. STABILITY AND CONTROL IN CONCEPTUAL DESIGN.......................... 12 2.1 Review of Stability and Control Techniques in Conceptual Design ............ 12 2.1.1 Assessment of the Classical Approach.......................................... 15 2.1.2 Assessment of the State-of-the-Art................................................ 22 2.2 Summary of Results and Prototype System Requirements .......................... 26 3. AEROMECH METHODOLOGY AND THEORY........................................... 28 3.1 Methodology Overview................................................................................ 28 3.2 Input and Control Allocation........................................................................ 32 vii 3.3 Aerodynamic Prediction ............................................................................... 35 3.4 Stability and Control Analysis...................................................................... 40 3.4.1 Steady State 6-DOF Trim Equations of Motion............................ 41 3.4.1.1 Steady-State Straight-Line Flight (SSLF) ........................... 45 3.4.1.2 Steady-State Pull-Up/Push-Over (SSPUPO)....................... 48 3.4.1.3 Steady-State Roll Performance (SSRP)............................... 49 3.4.1.4 Steady-State Turning Flight (SSTF).................................... 52 3.4.1.5 Quasi-Steady-State Take-Off Rotation (QSTORM) ........... 54 3.4.2 Trimmed Aerodynamics ................................................................ 57 3.4.3 Dynamic Stability and Control Analysis ....................................... 60 3.4.3.1 Small Perturbation Equations of Motion............................. 60 3.4.3.2 Dynamic Open and Closed Loop Analysis ......................... 65 3.5 Output Definition.......................................................................................... 70 4. AEROMECH PROTOTYPE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT .............................. 71 4.1 AeroMech Development Background and Process ...................................... 71 4.1.1 AeroMech Background.................................................................. 71 4.1.2 AeroMech Prototype Software Development Process .................. 74 4.2 Evolution of the AeroMech Prototype Stand-alone Software ...................... 79 4.3 Future Work and Recommendations .......................................................... 104 5. APPLICATION OF AEROMECH IN CONCEPTUAL DESIGN .................. 106 5.1 Stability and Control ‘Road Map’ to Conceptual Design........................... 106 5.2 Validation Case Study: Northrop YB-49 Flying Wing .............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flying Wing Concept for Medium Size Airplane
    ICAS 2002 CONGRESS FLYING WING CONCEPT FOR MEDIUM SIZE AIRPLANE Tjoetjoek Eko Pambagjo*, Kazuhiro Nakahashi†, Kisa Matsushima‡ Department of Aeronautics and Space Engineering Tohoku University, Japan Keywords: blended-wing-body, inverse design Abstract The flying wing is regarded as an alternate This paper describes a study on an alternate configuration to reduce drag and structural configuration for medium size airplane. weight. Since flying wing possesses no fuselage Blended-Wing-Body concept, which basically is it may have smaller wetted area than the a flying wing configuration, is applied to conventional airplane. In the conventional airplane for up to 224 passengers. airplane the primary function of the wing is to An aerodynamic design tools system is produce the lift force. In the flying wing proposed to realize such configuration. The configuration the wing has to carry the payload design tools comprise of Takanashi’s inverse and provides the necessary stability and control method, constrained target pressure as well as produce the lift. The fuselage has to specification method and RAPID method. The create lift without much penalty on the drag. At study shows that the combination of those three the same time the fuselage has to keep the cabin design methods works well. size comfortable for passengers. In the past years several flying wings have been designed and flown successfully. The 1 Introduction Horten, Northrop bombers and AVRO are The trend of airplane concept changes among of those examples. However the from time to time. Speed, size and range are application of the flying wing concepts were so among of the design parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • CANARD.WING LIFT INTERFERENCE RELATED to MANEUVERING AIRCRAFT at SUBSONIC SPEEDS by Blair B
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19740003706 2020-03-23T12:22:11+00:00Z NASA TECHNICAL NASA TM X-2897 MEMORANDUM CO CN| I X CANARD.WING LIFT INTERFERENCE RELATED TO MANEUVERING AIRCRAFT AT SUBSONIC SPEEDS by Blair B. Gloss and Linwood W. McKmney Langley Research Center Hampton, Va. 23665 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION • WASHINGTON, D. C. • DECEMBER 1973 1.. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA TM X-2897 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date CANARD-WING LIFT INTERFERENCE RELATED TO December 1973 MANEUVERING AIRCRAFT AT SUBSONIC SPEEDS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. L-9096 Blair B. Gloss and Linwood W. McKinney 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address • 760-67-01-01 NASA Langley Research Center 11. Contract or Grant No. Hampton, Va. 23665 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Technical Memorandum National Aeronautics and Space Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington , D . C . 20546 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract An investigation was conducted at Mach numbers of 0.7 and 0.9 to determine the lift interference effect of canard location on wing planforms typical of maneuvering fighter con- figurations. The canard had an exposed area of 16.0 percent of the wing reference area and was located in the plane of the wing or in a position 18.5 percent of the wing mean geometric chord above the wing plane. In addition, the canard could be located at two longitudinal stations.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 11 Subsonic and Supersonic Aircraft Emissions
    CHAPTER 11 Subsonic and Supersonic Aircraft Emissions Lead Authors: A. Wahner M.A. Geller Co-authors: F. Arnold W.H. Brune D.A. Cariolle A.R. Douglass C. Johnson D.H. Lister J.A. Pyle R. Ramaroson D. Rind F. Rohrer U. Schumann A.M. Thompson CHAPTER 11 SUBSONIC AND SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT EMISSIONS Contents SCIENTIFIC SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 11.1 11.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 11.3 11.2 AIRCRAFT EMISSIONS ................................................................................................................................. 11.4 11.2.1 Subsonic Aircraft .................................................................................................................................. 11.5 11.2.2 Supersonic Aircraft ............................................................................................................................... 11.6 11.2.3 Military Aircraft .................................................................................................................................... 11.6 11.2.4 Emissions at Altitude ............................................................................................................................ 11.6 11.2.5 Scenarios and Emissions Data Bases ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Propulsion and Flight Controls Integration for the Blended Wing Body Aircraft
    Cranfield University Naveed ur Rahman Propulsion and Flight Controls Integration for the Blended Wing Body Aircraft School of Engineering PhD Thesis Cranfield University Department of Aerospace Sciences School of Engineering PhD Thesis Academic Year 2008-09 Naveed ur Rahman Propulsion and Flight Controls Integration for the Blended Wing Body Aircraft Supervisor: Dr James F. Whidborne May 2009 c Cranfield University 2009. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner. Abstract The Blended Wing Body (BWB) aircraft offers a number of aerodynamic perfor- mance advantages when compared with conventional configurations. However, while operating at low airspeeds with nominal static margins, the controls on the BWB aircraft begin to saturate and the dynamic performance gets sluggish. Augmenta- tion of aerodynamic controls with the propulsion system is therefore considered in this research. Two aspects were of interest, namely thrust vectoring (TVC) and flap blowing. An aerodynamic model for the BWB aircraft with blown flap effects was formulated using empirical and vortex lattice methods and then integrated with a three spool Trent 500 turbofan engine model. The objectives were to estimate the effect of vectored thrust and engine bleed on its performance and to ascertain the corresponding gains in aerodynamic control effectiveness. To enhance control effectiveness, both internally and external blown flaps were sim- ulated. For a full span internally blown flap (IBF) arrangement using IPC flow, the amount of bleed mass flow and consequently the achievable blowing coefficients are limited. For IBF, the pitch control effectiveness was shown to increase by 18% at low airspeeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolving the Oblique Wing
    NASA AERONAUTICS BOOK SERIES A I 3 A 1 A 0 2 H D IS R T A O W RY T A Bruce I. Larrimer MANUSCRIP . Bruce I. Larrimer Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Larrimer, Bruce I. Thinking obliquely : Robert T. Jones, the Oblique Wing, NASA's AD-1 Demonstrator, and its legacy / Bruce I. Larrimer. pages cm Includes bibliographical references. 1. Oblique wing airplanes--Research--United States--History--20th century. 2. Research aircraft--United States--History--20th century. 3. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration-- History--20th century. 4. Jones, Robert T. (Robert Thomas), 1910- 1999. I. Title. TL673.O23L37 2013 629.134'32--dc23 2013004084 Copyright © 2013 by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The opinions expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the United States Government or of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This publication is available as a free download at http://www.nasa.gov/ebooks. Introduction v Chapter 1: American Genius: R.T. Jones’s Path to the Oblique Wing .......... ....1 Chapter 2: Evolving the Oblique Wing ............................................................ 41 Chapter 3: Design and Fabrication of the AD-1 Research Aircraft ................75 Chapter 4: Flight Testing and Evaluation of the AD-1 ................................... 101 Chapter 5: Beyond the AD-1: The F-8 Oblique Wing Research Aircraft ....... 143 Chapter 6: Subsequent Oblique-Wing Plans and Proposals ....................... 183 Appendices Appendix 1: Physical Characteristics of the Ames-Dryden AD-1 OWRA 215 Appendix 2: Detailed Description of the Ames-Dryden AD-1 OWRA 217 Appendix 3: Flight Log Summary for the Ames-Dryden AD-1 OWRA 221 Acknowledgments 230 Selected Bibliography 231 About the Author 247 Index 249 iii This time-lapse photograph shows three of the various sweep positions that the AD-1's unique oblique wing could assume.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsonic Aircraft Wing Conceptual Design Synthesis and Analysis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by GSSRR.ORG: International Journals: Publishing Research Papers in all Fields International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) ISSN 2307-4531 (Print & Online) http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subsonic Aircraft Wing Conceptual Design Synthesis and Analysis Abderrahmane BADIS Electrical and Electronic Communication Engineer from UMBB (Ex.INELEC) Independent Electronics, Aeronautics, Propulsion, Well Logging and Software Design Research Engineer Takerboust, Aghbalou, Bouira 10007, Algeria [email protected] Abstract This paper exposes a simplified preliminary conceptual integrated method to design an aircraft wing in subsonic speeds up to Mach 0.85. The proposed approach is integrated, as it allows an early estimation of main aircraft aerodynamic features, namely the maximum lift-to-drag ratio and the total parasitic drag. First, the influence of the Lift and Load scatterings on the overall performance characteristics of the wing are discussed. It is established that the optimization is achieved by designing a wing geometry that yields elliptical lift and load distributions. Second, the reference trapezoidal wing is considered the base line geometry used to outline the wing shape layout. As such, the main geometrical parameters and governing relations for a trapezoidal wing are
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Design Final Design Review
    Group 7 AIRCRAFT DESIGN FINAL DESIGN REVIEW March 20, 2013 Sagun Bajracharya Roger Francis Tim Tianhang Teng Guang Wei Yu Abstract This document summarizes the work that group 7 has done insofar regarding the design of a radio-controlled plane with respect to the requirements that were put forward by the course (AER406, 2013). This report follows the same format as the presentation where we inform the reader where the current design is, how the group progressed towards that design and how we started. This report also summarizes a number of the important parameters required for a conceptual design like the cargo type & amount,Wing aspect ratio, Optimum Airfoil lift(CL), Thrust to weight ratio & Takeoff distance. In addition, this report presents the plane's wing and tail design, stability analysis and a mass breakdown. The report finally ends with pictures of the current design. 2 Contents 1 Design Overview6 2 Required Parameters6 3 Trade Studies6 3.1 Wing Design....................................... 7 3.2 Wing Configuration................................... 8 3.3 Fuselage Design..................................... 8 3.4 Tail Design ....................................... 9 3.5 Overall Selection .................................... 10 3.6 Parameters from Reference Designs.......................... 11 4 Flight Score Optimization 11 4.1 Cargo Selection..................................... 11 4.2 Propeller Selection ................................... 12 4.3 Flight Parameter Selection............................... 13 5 Wing Design 16 5.1
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft of Today. Aerospace Education I
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 068 287 SE 014 551 AUTHOR Sayler, D. S. TITLE Aircraft of Today. Aerospace EducationI. INSTITUTION Air Univ.,, Maxwell AFB, Ala. JuniorReserve Office Training Corps. SPONS AGENCY Department of Defense, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 71 NOTE 179p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS *Aerospace Education; *Aerospace Technology; Instruction; National Defense; *PhysicalSciences; *Resource Materials; Supplementary Textbooks; *Textbooks ABSTRACT This textbook gives a brief idea aboutthe modern aircraft used in defense and forcommercial purposes. Aerospace technology in its present form has developedalong certain basic principles of aerodynamic forces. Differentparts in an airplane have different functions to balance theaircraft in air, provide a thrust, and control the general mechanisms.Profusely illustrated descriptions provide a picture of whatkinds of aircraft are used for cargo, passenger travel, bombing, and supersonicflights. Propulsion principles and descriptions of differentkinds of engines are quite helpful. At the end of each chapter,new terminology is listed. The book is not available on the market andis to be used only in the Air Force ROTC program. (PS) SC AEROSPACE EDUCATION I U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO OUCH) EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG INATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN 'IONS STATED 00 NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EOU CATION POSITION OR POLICY AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC MR,UNIVERS17/14AXWELL MR FORCEBASE, ALABAMA Aerospace Education I Aircraft of Today D. S. Sayler Academic Publications Division 3825th Support Group (Academic) AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC AIR UNIVERSITY MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, ALABAMA 2 1971 Thispublication has been reviewed and approvedby competent personnel of the preparing command in accordance with current directiveson doctrine, policy, essentiality, propriety, and quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Aerospace Engineering
    Introduction to Aerospace Engineering Lecture slides Challenge the future 1 Introduction to Aerospace Engineering Aerodynamics 11&12 Prof. H. Bijl ir. N. Timmer 11 & 12. Airfoils and finite wings Anderson 5.9 – end of chapter 5 excl. 5.19 Topics lecture 11 & 12 • Pressure distributions and lift • Finite wings • Swept wings 3 Pressure coefficient Typical example Definition of pressure coefficient : p − p -Cp = ∞ Cp q∞ upper side lower side -1.0 Stagnation point: p=p t … p t-p∞=q ∞ => C p=1 4 Example 5.6 • The pressure on a point on the wing of an airplane is 7.58x10 4 N/m2. The airplane is flying with a velocity of 70 m/s at conditions associated with standard altitude of 2000m. Calculate the pressure coefficient at this point on the wing 4 2 3 2000 m: p ∞=7.95.10 N/m ρ∞=1.0066 kg/m − = p p ∞ = − C p Cp 1.50 q∞ 5 Obtaining lift from pressure distribution leading edge θ V∞ trailing edge s p ds dy θ dx = ds cos θ 6 Obtaining lift from pressure distribution TE TE Normal force per meter span: = θ − θ N ∫ pl cos ds ∫ pu cos ds LE LE c c θ = = − with ds cos dx N ∫ pl dx ∫ pu dx 0 0 NN Write dimensionless force coefficient : C = = n 1 ρ 2 2 Vc∞ qc ∞ 1 1 p − p x 1 p − p x x = l ∞ − u ∞ C = ()C −C d Cn d d n ∫ pl pu ∫ q c ∫ q c 0 ∞ 0 ∞ 0 c 7 T=Lsin α - Dcosα N=Lcos α + Dsinα L R N α T D V α = angle of attack 8 Obtaining lift from normal force coefficient =α − α =α − α L Ncos T sin cl c ncos c t sin L N T =cosα − sin α qc∞ qc ∞ qc ∞ For small angle of attack α≤5o : cos α ≈ 1, sin α ≈ 0 1 1 C≈() CCdx − () l∫ pl p u c 0 9 Example 5.11 Consider an airfoil with chord length c and the running distance x measured along the chord.
    [Show full text]
  • Unusual Attitudes and the Aerodynamics of Maneuvering Flight Author’S Note to Flightlab Students
    Unusual Attitudes and the Aerodynamics of Maneuvering Flight Author’s Note to Flightlab Students The collection of documents assembled here, under the general title “Unusual Attitudes and the Aerodynamics of Maneuvering Flight,” covers a lot of ground. That’s because unusual-attitude training is the perfect occasion for aerodynamics training, and in turn depends on aerodynamics training for success. I don’t expect a pilot new to the subject to absorb everything here in one gulp. That’s not necessary; in fact, it would be beyond the call of duty for most—aspiring test pilots aside. But do give the contents a quick initial pass, if only to get the measure of what’s available and how it’s organized. Your flights will be more productive if you know where to go in the texts for additional background. Before we fly together, I suggest that you read the section called “Axes and Derivatives.” This will introduce you to the concept of the velocity vector and to the basic aircraft response modes. If you pick up a head of steam, go on to read “Two-Dimensional Aerodynamics.” This is mostly about how pressure patterns form over the surface of a wing during the generation of lift, and begins to suggest how changes in those patterns, visible to us through our wing tufts, affect control. If you catch any typos, or statements that you think are either unclear or simply preposterous, please let me know. Thanks. Bill Crawford ii Bill Crawford: WWW.FLIGHTLAB.NET Unusual Attitudes and the Aerodynamics of Maneuvering Flight © Flight Emergency & Advanced Maneuvers Training, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Enhancement by Wing Sweep for High-Speed Dynamic Soaring
    aerospace Article Performance Enhancement by Wing Sweep for High-Speed Dynamic Soaring Gottfried Sachs *, Benedikt Grüter and Haichao Hong Department of Aerospace and Geodesy, Institute of Flight System Dynamics, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748 Munich, Germany; [email protected] (B.G.); [email protected] (H.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Dynamic soaring is a flight mode that uniquely enables high speeds without an engine. This is possible in a horizontal shear wind that comprises a thin layer and a large wind speed. It is shown that the speeds reachable by modern gliders approach the upper subsonic Mach number region where compressibility effects become significant, with the result that the compressibility-related drag rise yields a limitation for the achievable maximum speed. To overcome this limitation, wing sweep is considered an appropriate means. The effect of wing sweep on the relevant aerodynamic characteristics for glider type wings is addressed. A 3-degrees-of-freedom dynamics model and an energy-based model of the vehicle are developed in order to solve the maximum-speed problem with regard to the effect of the compressibility-related drag rise. Analytic solutions are derived so that generally valid results are achieved concerning the effects of wing sweep on the speed performance. Thus, it is shown that the maximum speed achievable with swept wing configurations can be increased. The improvement is small for sweep angles up to around 15 deg and shows a progressive increase thereafter. As a result, wing sweep has potential for enhancing the maximum- speed performance in high-speed dynamic soaring.
    [Show full text]
  • After Concorde, Who Will Manage to Revive Civilian Supersonic Aviation?
    After Concorde, who will manage to revive civilian supersonic aviation? By François Sfarti and Sebastien Plessis December 2019 Commercial aircraft are flying at the same speed as 60 years ago. Since Concorde, which made possible to fly from Paris to New York in only 3h30, no civilian airplane has broken the sound barrier. The loudness of the sonic boom was a major technological lock to Concorde success, but 50 years after its first flight, an on-going project led by NASA is about to make supersonic flights over land possible. If successful, it will significantly increase the number of supersonic routes and increase the supersonic aircraft market size substantially. This technological improvement combined with R&D efforts on operational costs and a much larger addressable market than when Concorde flew may revive civilian supersonic aviation in the coming years. Who are the new players at the forefront and the early movers? What are the current investments in this field? What are the key success drivers and remaining technological and regulatory locks to revive supersonic aviation? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Commercial aircraft are typically flying between 800 km/h and 900 km/h, which is between 75% and 85% of the speed of sound. It is the same speed as 60 years ago and since Concorde, which flew at twice the speed of sound, was retired in 2003, there has been no civilian supersonic aircraft in service. Due to a prohibition to fly supersonic over land and large operational costs, Concorde did not reach commercial success. Even if operational costs would remain larger than subsonic flights, current market environment seems much more favourable: since Concorde was retired in 2003, the air traffic has more than doubled and the willingness to pay can be supported by an increase in the number of high net worth individuals and the fact that business travellers value higher speed levels.
    [Show full text]