DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill HOUSE OF LORDS HOUSE OF COMMONS Joint Committee on the Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill Session 2007–08 Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill Volume II: Evidence Ordered to be printed 22 July 2008 and published 12 August 2008 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London : The Stationery Office Limited £price HL Paper 166-II HC Paper 551-II CONTENTS ORAL EVIDENCE Page Professor Vernon Bogdanor CBE FBA, University of Oxford, Professor Stuart Weir, Democratic Audit, University of Essex and Mr Peter Riddell, Chief Political Commentator, The Times Written evidence, Democratic Audit (Ev 04) 1 Oral evidence, 13 May 2008 19 Ms Elizabeth Wilmshurst, Associate Fellow, Chatham House, Professor Stephen Haines, University of London and Professor Adam Tomkins, University of Glasgow Written evidence, Professor Adam Tomkins (Ev 01) 27 Oral evidence, 13 May 2008 32 Admiral Lord Boyce, Field Marshal Lord Bramall and Marshall of the Royal Air Force Lord Craig of Radley Oral evidence, 14 May 2008 38 Supplementary written evidence, Lord Bramall (Ev 64) 47 Professor Robert Hazell CBE, Constitution Unit, University College London Written evidence, Constitution Unit (Ev 07) 49 Oral evidence, 14 May 2008 56 Bar Council and Law Society of England and Wales Written evidence, Bar Council (Ev 55) 63 Written evidence, Law Society of England and Wales (Ev 42) 71 Oral evidence, 20 May 2008 76 Ms Frances Gibb, Legal Editor, The Times and Mr Joshua Rozenberg, Legal Editor, Daily Telegraph Oral evidence, 20 May 2008 81 Mr Sebastian Payne, University of Kent, Mr Peter Facey, Unlock Democracy and Mr Michael Hammer, One World Trust Written evidence, One World Trust (Ev 03) 89 Oral evidence, 21 May 2008 93 Supplementary evidence, Unlock Democracy (Ev 58) 103 Rt Hon the Lord Falconer of Thoroton QC Oral evidence, 21 May 2008 105 Liberty, Bindmans Solicitors, Countryside Alliance and Mr Milan Rai Written evidence, Countryside Alliance (Ev 13) 115 Oral evidence, 3 June 2008 119 Supplementary written evidence, Countryside Alliance (Ev 28) 133 Judicial Appointments Commission Written evidence, Judicial Appointments Commission (Ev 52) 135 Oral evidence, 4 June 2008 142 Metropolitan Police, Westminster City Council and Greater London Authority Written evidence, Mayor of London (Ev 14) 148 Oral evidence, 4 June 2008 150 Supplementary written evidence, Metropolitan Police (Ev 61) 165 Supplementary written evidence, Mayor of London (Ev 14a) 167 First Division Association (FDA) and Council of Civil Service Unions/Public and Commercial Services Union Written evidence, First Division Association (FDA) (Ev 21) 168 Written evidence, Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) and Prospect (Ev 25) 172 Oral evidence, 10 June 2008 176 Sir Christopher Kelly KCB , Chair, Committee on Standards in Public Life, Sir Christopher Foster, Chairman and Sir Richard Mottram GCB, Better Government Initiative Written evidence, Committee on Standards in Public Life 188 Written evidence, Better Government Initiative (Ev 19) 191 Oral evidence, 10 June 2008 193 Lord Wilson of Dinton, Lord Turnbull, and Professor Peter Hennessy, University of London Oral evidence, 11 June 2008 199 Supplementary written evidence, Lord Dinton (Ev 60) 209 Supplementary written evidence, Lord Tunrbull (Ev 59) 210 Clerk of the House of Commons, Clerk of the Parliaments, Black Rod, and Serjeant at Arms Written evidence, Clerk of the House of Commons (Ev 02) 211 Written evidence, Clerk of the Parliaments (Ev 12) 213 Oral evidence, 11 June 2008 214 Supplementary written evidence, Clerk of the House of Commons and Serjeant at Arms (Ev 02a) 221 Supplementary written evidence, Clerk of the House of Commons and Clerk of the Parliaments (Ev 65) 224 Rt Hon Tony McNulty MP, Minister of State, Home Office Written evidence, Home Office (Ev 57) 230 Oral evidence, 17 June 2008 236 Supplementary written evidence, Minister of State (Ev 79) 243 Further supplementary written evidence, Minister of State (Ev 80) 245 Ms Janet Paraskeva, First Civil Service Commissioner, and Sir Gus O’Donnell KCB, Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Home Civil Service Written evidence, Civil Service Commissioners (Ev 50) 246 Oral evidence, 17 June 2008 250 Rt Hon the Lord Lyell of Markyate, Rt Hon the Lord Morris of Aberavon and Rt Hon the Lord Mayhew of Twysden Written evidence, Lord Lyell of Markyate, Lord Morris of Aberavon and Lord Mayhew of Twysden (Ev 40) 261 Oral evidence, 18 June 2008 263 Supplementary written evidence, Lord Morris of Aberavon (Ev 68) 271 Supplementary written evidence, Lord Mayhew of Twsden (Ev 67) 272 Lord Carlile of Berriew, and Professor Jeremy Horder, Criminal Commissioner, Law Commission Oral evidence 18 June 2008 273 Supplementary written evidence, Jeremy Horder, Law Commission (Ev 63) 278 Attorney General, Public Prosecutions, Serious Fraud Office and Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office Written evidence, Attorney General (Ev 72) 282 Supplementary written evidence, Attorney General (Ev 72a) 287 Oral evidence, 24 June 2008 289 Further supplementary written evidence, Attorney General (Ev 74) 298 Further supplementary written evidence, Attorney General (Ev 76) 299 Supplementary written evidence, Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office (Ev 69) 302 Lord Goldsmith Oral evidence, 24 June 2008 302 Supplementary written evidence, Lord Goldsmith (Ev 77) 309 Mr Graham Allen MP Written evidence, Mr Graham Allen MP (Ev 17) 311 Oral evidence, 25 June 2008 315 Rt Hon Jack Staw MP, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice and Mr Michael Wills, Minister of State, Ministry of Justice Written evidence, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (Ev 73) 321 Oral evidence, 1 July 2008 322 WRITTEN EVIDENCE Page Anthony Aust (Ev 16) 338 Peter C Beauchamp (Ev 11) 339 Sir Franklin Berman (Ev 34) 340 M J Bowman (Ev 41) 341 Sir John Brigstocke (Ev 35) 344 Lord Butler of Brockwell (Ev15) 346 Campaign Against Criminalising Communities (Ev 37) 346 Campaign to Make Wars History (Ev 53) 348 R D Cramond (Ev 24) 353 Professor Eileen Denza (Ev 51) 356 Professor David Feldman (Ev 66) 357 Maria B T Gallasteguz (Ev 49) 363 Global Witness (Ev 39) 364 Lord Goodhart (Ev 05) 366 Lord Guthrie (Ev 33) 367 Dennis Harrison (Ev 48) 368 House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee (Ev 75) 371 House of Lords Constitution Committee (Ev 71) 372 House of Lords Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee (Ev 70) 375 ILEX (Ev 54) 376 Joint Committee on Human Rights (Ev 78) 380 Justice (Ev 45) 381 Law Society of Scotland (Ev 30) 384 Local Government Association (Ev 27) 386 Local Government Information (Ev 26) 388 Lord Chief Justice (Ev 56) 391 Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Ev 47) 395 Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Ev 23) 396 Joe Parker (Ev 31) 400 David Pybus (Ev 29) 401 Mohammad Abdul Qavi (Ev 43) 401 Kiron Reid (Ev 22) 402 Mark Ryan (Ev 36) 405 Emma Sangster (Ev 46) 407 David H Smith (Ev 09) 409 Gabriel John Spence (Ev 08) 412 Peter Steadman (Ev 06) 413 The Corner House (Ev 10 and Ev 38) 420 Don Touhig MP (Ev 44) 431 UK Parliamentary Ombudsman (Ev 32) 431 Sir Michael Wood (Ev 18) 433 Derek Wyatt MP (Ev 62) 436 The following paper received by the Joint Committee has not been printed but can be inspected in the House of Lords Record Office (020 7219 2333), e-mail [email protected]: Dr Julian Lewis MP: Response to the Government’s consultation on managing protest around Parliament. NOTE: The Report of the Committee is published in Volume I, HL Paper No. 166- I, HC 551-I The Evidence of the Committee is published in Volume II, HL Paper No. 166-II, HC 551-II (published 12 August 2008) Processed: 07-08-2008 19:01:31 Page Layout: LOENEW[ex 1] PPSysB Job: 404620 Unit: PAG1 Minutes of Evidence TAKEN BEFORE THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE DRAFT CONSTITUTIONAL RENEWAL BILL TUESDAY 13 MAY 2008 Michael Jabez Foster, in the Chair Present Armstrong of Ilminster, L Mr Christopher Chope Campbell of Alloway, L Martin Linton Gibson of Market Rasen, B Fiona Mactaggart Hart of Chilton, L Emily Thornberry Maclennan of Rogart, L Sir George Young Norton of Louth, L Tyler, L Williamson of Horton, L Memorandum by Democratic Audit (Ev 04) Introduction 1. The government’s green paper, The Governance of Britain (Cm 7170) in July 2007 proclaimed the ambitious goal of “reinvigorating our democracy” through a variety of constitutional and political reforms that set out to achieve a “new constitutional settlement—a settlement that entrusts Parliament and the people with more power”. The green paper set out proposals that were presented as being intended to answer “two fundamental questions: how should we hold power accountable, and how should we uphold and enhance the rights and responsibilities of the citizen?” 2. The most tangible product of this process is the Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill under examination by your committee and the accompanying Constitutional Renewal white paper. The draft Bill represents the government’s answer to the first of fundamental questions that it posed. Answers to the second question remain at a formative stage. 3. In the following paper we have pulled together, rather hastily, a briefing on and response to the Ministry of Justice white paper The Governance of Britain—Constitutional Renewal (Cm 7342-I) and the Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill (Cm 7342 III), both published in March 2008. In order to provide an overview of the draft Bill’s place in the eVort to re-balance power between the executive and Parliament and improve the government’s accountability to Parliament, we have drawn on matters beyond the contents of the Bill, as well as examining them closely. We have assumed that one of the values of pre-legislative scrutiny is that it need not be confined by the rules of the traditional legislative process.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anti-War Movement Online, Preprint
    The UK Anti-War Movement Online: Uses and Limitations of Internet 1 Technologies for Contemporary Activism Kevin Gillan, University of Manchester [email protected] Abstract This article uses interviews with committed anti-war and peace activists to offer an overview of both the benefits and challenges that social movements derive from new communication technologies. It shows contemporary political activism to be intensely informational; dependent on the sensitive adoption of a wide range of communication technologies. A hyperlink analysis is then employed to map the UK anti-war movement as it appears online. Through comparing these two sets of data it becomes possible to contrast the online practices of the UK anti-war movement with its offline ‘reality’. When encountered away from the Web recent anti-war contention is grounded in national-level political realities and internally divided by its political diversity but to the extent that experience of the movement is mediated online, it routinely transcends national and political boundaries. Keywords Anti-war movement; Internet; email; hyperlink analysis. This is a preprint of an article submitted for consideration in the Information Communication & Society , 2008 © Taylor and Francis. Information Communication & Society is available online at: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/ 1 Introduction – Connecting the ‘Virtual’ and the ‘Real’ Internet communication has become vital to social movement organizations and participation in the latest anti-war movements has been boosted by activists’ Internet practices (Nah, Veenstra and Shah 2006). The more central the Internet has come to political activism, the more it has become the route through which individuals first experience key collective actors.
    [Show full text]
  • A Human Rights Approach to Policing Protest
    House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights Demonstrating respect for rights? A human rights approach to policing protest Seventh Report of Session 2008–09 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 3 March 2009 Ordered by the House of Lords to be printed 3 March 2009 HL Paper 47-I HC 320-I Published on 23 March 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Joint Committee on Human Rights The Joint Committee on Human Rights is appointed by the House of Lords and the House of Commons to consider matters relating to human rights in the United Kingdom (but excluding consideration of individual cases); proposals for remedial orders, draft remedial orders and remedial orders. The Joint Committee has a maximum of six Members appointed by each House, of whom the quorum for any formal proceedings is two from each House. Current membership HOUSE OF LORDS HOUSE OF COMMONS Lord Bowness John Austin MP (Labour, Erith & Thamesmead) Lord Dubs Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) (Chairman) Lord Lester of Herne Hill Dr Evan Harris MP (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Lord Morris of Handsworth OJ Abingdon) The Earl of Onslow Mr Virendra Sharma MP (Labour, Ealing, Southall) Baroness Prashar Mr Richard Shepherd MP (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Mr Edward Timpson MP (Conservative, Crewe & Nantwitch) Powers The Committee has the power to require the submission of written evidence and documents, to examine witnesses, to meet at any time (except when Parliament is prorogued or dissolved), to adjourn from place to place, to appoint specialist advisers, and to make Reports to both Houses.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction 1
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. A debate exists whether a ‘Second Cold War’ did in fact break out or whether this merely a changing phase of the ongoing Cold War. This changing situation in East-West relations from the late 1970s onwards will henceforth, be referred to as the Second Cold War. See, for example, Fred Halliday, The Making of the Second Cold War (London: Verso Editions and NLB, second edition, 1986). 2. Private discussions. In 1979 only 2 per cent of the electorate thought defence was a major issue in the election. By 1983 this had risen to 38 per cent. Michael Heseltine, ‘The United Kingdom’s Strategic Interests and Priorities’, RUSI Journal, vol. 128, no. 4, December 1983, pp. 3–5, p. 3. The 1983 election campaign was noteworthy for the action of the previous Labour Prime Minister, James Callaghan, who took the unprecedented step of repudiating his own party’s defence policy; Ian Aitken, ‘Callaghan Wrecks Polaris Repairs’, Guardian, 26 May 1983; Peter M. Jones, ‘British Defence Policy: the Breakdown of the Inter-party Consensus’, Review of International Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, April 1987, pp. 111–31; Bruce George and Curt Pawlisch, ‘Defence and 1983 Election’, ADIU Report, vol. 5, no. 4, July/August 1983, p. 2; Michael Heseltine, Life in the Jungle: My Autobiography (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 2000), p. 250. 3. Peter Calvocoressi, ‘Deterrence, the Costs, the Issues, the Choices’, Sunday Times, 6 April 1980. 4. Nicholas J. Wheeler, ‘Perceptions of the Soviet Threat’, in British Security Policy: the Thatcher Years and the End of the Cold War, edited by Stuart Croft (London: HarperCollins Academic, 1991), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Programme for the Winter Gathering
    January 2010 Nottingham Organised in cooperation with Nottingham Student Peace Movement and Notts Anti-Militarism Sumac Centre, 245 Gladstone St NG7 6HX Peace News, established in June 1936, is Britain’s oldest peace publication, appearing ten times a year. Co-edited by Emily Johns and Milan Rai, PN reports anti-war news, dissects official propaganda and hosts debates on issues of concern to anti-militarists and others using nonviolence to achieve social change. Peace News opposes the brutal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan - and throughout the world - and the retention and renewal of nuclear weapons in the shape of Trident. But these are only the most extreme forms of the violence which is inherent in our society. This violence manifests also as sexism, racism, homophobia, hunger, inequality, corporate domination, government repression and the exploitation of people, animals and the environment. Peace News seeks to oppose all forms of violence, and to create positive change based on co-operation and responsibility. To create a nonviolent world, we believe we must avoid violence in our struggle for change. Peace News draws on the traditions of pacifism, feminism, anarchism, socialism, human rights, animal rights, and green politics - without dogma, but in the spirit of openness. Britain’s entire arrogant and aggressive foreign policy is unpopular among British people. In March 2007, a Telegraph poll asked whether people agreed with this statement: “Some people say that, although Britain is now only a middle-ranking power, Britain should as a nation continue to try to ‘punch above its weight’ – that is, have more influence in the world than our military and economic strength would seem to indicate.” 55% said no, Britain should not “punch above its weight”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Military and the "Decommissioners"
    The Israeli Military and the "Decommissioners" On the 17th of January 2009, Israeli warplanes pounded the terrified inhabitants of the densely populated Gaza strip in over 50 air-strikes. It was the 22nd day of Operation Cast Lead, the Israeli military assault on Gaza that left an estimated 1400 dead, including over 300 children. In the early hours of that morning on a quiet industrial estate 2000 miles away, six peace activists scaled the perimeter fencing of the UK factory EDO/ITT, which, it is claimed, makes vital components for Israeli F-16s – the backbone of the airforce bombarding Gaza. After entering the factory through a broken window, the six set about systematically destroying computers and machinery with hammers. When they were finished ‘decommissioning’ the factory, they had caused an estimated $300,000 worth of damage. They then lay on the floor and waited to be arrested. The trial of the activists, who have become known as the ‘Decommissioners’, began a week after Israel once again caused international outcry – this time with killing of nine peace activists, whom Israel accused of being a violent ‘lynch mob’. Like the attempts to defend the Mavi Marmara from Israeli commandos, the actions of the Decommissioners have sparked fierce debate over the line between passive resistance and aggressive action and how far it is reasonable to go in defying aggression. The activists stand accused of conspiracy to commit criminal damage. They are pleading not guilty on the grounds that they were acting to prevent a greater crime – the
    [Show full text]
  • OX CND JAN FEB 2018 FINAL.Pdf
    Oxford OXFORD CND NEWSLETTER CND January/February 2018 NHS hospitals told to take drastic measures amid winter crisis A&E: People on beds ‘as far as you could see’ Trident replacement A&E doctor sorry costs (£205 billion) for ‘third world could be shifted from conditions’ as NHS the MoD budget winter crisis bites Jeremy Hunt apologises to patients over cancellation of thousands of NHS operations MoD under fire over plans for £1.3 billion expansion of Scottish nuke bases Oxford Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament 01865 248357 [email protected] www.oxfordcnd.org.uk Nuclear Winter Daniel Ellsberg, famous for having leaked Papers. But I hope that his personal narrative will the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam War, has not get in the way, when the book is reviewed, of delivered a darkly seasonal present for Christmas: a the message he now seeks to convey, namely that reminder in his new book of the consequences of “The present risks of the current nuclear era go far ‘nuclear winter’, and a warning that existing nuclear beyond the dangers of proliferation and non-state weapons systems could still deliver it – all the terrorism that have been the almost exclusive focus of more to be feared with Donald Trump in the White public concern for the past generation and the past House. And he introduces us to a grim word which decade in particular. The arsenals and plans of the should be part of our discourse as we campaign to two superpowers represent not only an insuperable abolish those weapons – Omnicide. obstacle to an effective global anti-proliferation When working in the Pentagon on nuclear campaign; they are in themselves a clear and present strategy in 1961, Ellsberg asked the Joint Chief of existential danger to the human species, and most Staffs this question: how many people would die others.” if their plans for general nuclear war were carried Ellsberg bases his argument on three counts: out.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 506 22 February 2010 No. 42 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 22 February 2010 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT.HON.GORDON BROWN,MP,JUNE 2007) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt. Hon. Gordon Brown, MP LEADER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS,LORD PRIVY SEAL AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN AND EQUALITY—The Rt. Hon. Harriet Harman, QC, MP FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE,SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,INNOVATION AND SKILLS AND LORD PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL—The Rt. Hon. Lord Mandelson CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt. Hon. Alistair Darling, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt. Hon. David Miliband, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE AND LORD CHANCELLOR—The Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt. Hon. Alan Johnson, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt. Hon. Hilary Benn, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT—The Rt. Hon. Douglas Alexander, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT—The Rt. Hon. John Denham, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR CHILDREN,SCHOOLS AND FAMILIES—The Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue
    ethical space The International Journal of Communication Ethics Vol.15 Nos.3/4 2018 ISSN 1742-0105 Special Issue: The ethics of the journalistic memoir: Radical departures Edited by Sue Joseph PAPERS • Lara Pawson’s genre-bending memoir – gravitas and the celebration of unique cultural spaces – by Richard Lance Keeble • When journalism isn’t enough: ‘Horror surrealism’ in Behrouz Boochani’s testimonial prison narrative – by Willa McDonald • On being unfair: The ethics of the memoir-journalism hybrid – by Lisa A. Phillips • Stan Grant and cultural memory: Embodying a national race narrative through memoir – by Sue Joseph PLUS • Liberal mass media and the ‘Israel lobby’ theory – by T. J. Coles • Media trust and use among urban news consumers in Brazil – by Flávia Milhorance and Jane Singer • Balancing instrumental rationality and value rationality in communicating information: A study of the ‘Nobel Older Brother’ case – by Lili Ning www.abramis.co.uk abramis • Dumbs gone to Iceland: (Re)presentations of English national identity during Euro 2016 and the EU referendum – by Roger Domeneghetti • ‘An eye in the eye of the hurricane’: Fire and fury, immersion and ethics in political literary journalism – by Kerrie Davies abramis academic • The science communication challenge: Truth and disagreement www.abramis.co.uk in democratic knowledge societies – by Gitte Meyer Publishing Office Aims and scope Abramis Academic ASK House Communication ethics is a discipline that supports communication Northgate Avenue practitioners by offering tools and analyses for the understanding of Bury St. Edmunds ethical issues. Moreover, the speed of change in the dynamic information Suffolk environment presents new challenges, especially for communication IP32 6BB practitioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Roots of Terrorism
    Exploring Roots of Terrorism Dipak K. Gupta Distinguished Professor in Political Science Research Associate, Fed J. Hansen Institute for World Peace Program Chair, International Security and Conflict Resolution San Diego State University Forthcoming in: Tore Bjørgo (ed.) Root Causes of Terrorism. London: Routledge (2004). 2 3 Exploring Roots of Terrorism Dipak K. Gupta Department of Political Science Fed J. Hansen Institute for World Peace San Diego State University Factors of Individual Motivation Terrorism has a long history, but its systematic analysis has a short past. Within this relatively brief period of time, spanning perhaps not much longer than three decades, analytical literature on the causes of terrorism has simply mushroomed.1 The rate of publications of academic and journalistic books and articles is getting even more accelerated since the days when the United States and other western countries started to feel its nefarious effects. Despite its sheer volume and diversity, if there are a few thin but resolute threads that run through this rapidly burgeoning literature, they are: • It is nearly impossible to define “terrorism.” • The link between sociopolitical and economic structural factors, such as poverty, lack of economic opportunity, etc. and terrorism is weak • There is no single profile of a “terrorist” All of these above conclusions define the contours of not what we know, but what we don’t know about terrorism. In favor of this meager harvest, we may do well to recall the Socratic wisdom: “What you know may be less important than what you don’t know.” Facing such a conundrum in looking for the “root causes” of terrorism, in this article, I would like to start with a different approach.
    [Show full text]
  • After Iraq: Stanley Hoffmann and the Role of the United States in the International System
    Essays – peer-reviewed USAbroad – Journal of American History and Politics. Vol. 1 (2018) https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-2752/7156 ISSN 2611-2752 After Iraq: Stanley Hoffmann and the Role of the United States in the International System Alice Ciulla Submitted: July 13, 2017 – Accepted: February 6, 2018 – Published: March 1, 2018 Abstract The article analyzes Stanley Hoffmann’s view on US foreign policy in the aftermath of September 11, 2001, and especially on the Bush administration’s decision to invade Iraq in 2003. It is based on his books, including his earlier ones, Gulliver’s Troubles, Janus and Minerva, and Duties Beyond Borders, and on the essays he published in the New York Review of Books from 2001 until 2006. Hoffmann’s analysis represents a powerful example of how “unfinished” the debate on American foreign policy is and will probably always be. Keywords: Stanley Hoffmann; Iraq; September 11 Alice Ciulla: Università Roma 3 (Italia) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3726-4603 Contact: [email protected] Alice Ciulla is a PhD candidate in European and International Studies at Roma Tre University. Her dissertation focuses on the U.S. intellectual debate on the Italian Communist Party (1964-1980). Copyright © 2018 Alice Ciulla Art. #7156 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons BY License. p. 1 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ After Iraq USAbroad. Vol. 1 (2018) 1 World Disorder and International Terrorism: the Aftermath of September 11 The attacks on the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., and United Airlines Flight 93 that crashed in Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001, represented both the cause and the symptom of a trembling world order.
    [Show full text]
  • The Risk of Nuclear Terrorism
    Scientists for Global Responsibility Newsletter No. 28 November 2003 The Risk of Nuclear Terrorism Frank Barnaby explores the ways in which terrorists could seek to use nuclear material. This paper was presented at the SGR Conference “Nuclear Weapons: Issues for UK Policy” in September (see p16). Mass killing by weapons of mass terrorists would probably prefer to set destruction may fit well into the off a nuclear explosive, perhaps using Armageddon and apocalyptic visions a stolen nuclear weapon or more of some religious groups, Christian likely using a nuclear explosive and Islamic, some of which believe fabricated by them from acquired that they are under divine instruction fissile material. Terrorists would be to maximise killing and destruction. satisfied with a nuclear explosive There is, therefore, clearly a danger, device that is far less sophisticated some would say an inevitability, that than the types of nuclear weapons terrorists will acquire, or develop and demanded by the military. Whereas fabricate, and use weapons of mass the military demand nuclear weapons destruction – chemical, biological or with predictable explosive yields and nuclear. very high reliability, most terrorists Plutonium would be satisfied with a relatively Recent experience - for example, the primitive nuclear explosive. use of nerve agents by the AUM group in Tokyo and the use of anthrax • attacking a nuclear-power reactor [continued on p8] in the USA - shows that terrorist to spread radioactivity far and biological and chemical weapons are wide; unpredictable and difficult to use effectively (i.e. to give a large number • attacking the high-level of casualties). Effective dispersal of radioactive waste tanks at a Contents both biological and chemical weapons reprocessing plant to spread the is difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • British Prime Minister Tony Blair's Decision to Go to War in Iraq
    BRITISH PRIME MINISTER TONY BLAIR’ S DECISION TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ: AN EVALUATION OF MOTIVATING FACTORS Kimberly LaCoco, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2009 APPROVED: Denis Paz, Major Professor Randolf Campbell, Committee Member Gustav Seligmann, Committee Member Richard McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Michael Monticino, Interim Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies LaCoco, Kimberly. British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s Decision to Go to War in Iraq: An Evaluation of Motivating Factors. Master of Science (History), May 2009, 136 pp., bibliography, 120 titles. Blair sent British troops to join U.S. forces in the invasion of Iraq in 2003 at great political cost to himself. What motivated him to take this step? Sources for this work include: autobiographies and biographies of individuals close to Blair; journal and newspaper articles and monographs on this topic; Prime Minister’s speeches and press conferences. Part one is comprised of five chapters including the Introduction; Blair’s years at school; Blair’s early political career; and From Parliament to Prime Minister. Part two includes four chapters that analyze motivating factors such as, Anglo-American Relations; Blair’s personality, faith, and his relationship with Gordon Brown; and finally, Blair’s perception of Britain’s Manifest Destiny. All of these factors played a role in Blair’s decision. Copyright 2009 by Kimberly LaCoco ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to gratefully acknowledge the assistance I received from Professor Emeritus Sir Brian Harrison who has recently published Seeking a Role: The United Kingdom 1951-1970.
    [Show full text]