DOCSLIB.ORG

An Assessment of the Forest Resources of Massachusetts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Assessment of the Forest Resources of Massachusetts AN ASSESSMENT OF THE FOREST RESOURCES OF MASSACHUSETTS Avril L. de la Crétaz1, Lena S. Fletcher1, Paul E. Gregory2, William R. VanDoren1, and Paul K. Barten1 1 University of Massachusetts Amherst Department of Natural Resources Conservation and 2 Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Prepared for the USDA Forest Service June 2010 AN ASSESSMENT OF THE FOREST RESOURCES OF MASSACHUSETTS Avril L. de la Crétaz1, Lena S. Fletcher1, Paul E. Gregory2, William R. VanDoren1, and Paul K. Barten1 1 University of Massachusetts Amherst Department of Natural Resources Conservation and 2 Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Prepared for the USDA Forest Service June 2010 An Assessment of the Forest Resources of Massachusetts Rick Sullivan, Commissioner Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation 251 Causeway Street Boston, MA 02114 617-626-1250 http://www.mass.gov/dcr/ Authors: Avril L. de la Crétaz, Ph.D., Research Assistant Professor, University of Massachusetts Amherst Lena S. Fletcher, M.S., Research Associate, University of Massachusetts Amherst Paul E. Gregory, M.S., Asst. Management Forester, Myles Standish State Forest, Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation William R. VanDoren, Research Assistant, University of Massachusetts Amherst Paul K. Barten, Ph.D., Professor, University of Massachusetts Amherst, and Chair of the Massachusetts Forestry Committee The development and publication of this document were facilitated by grants from the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation and the National Association of State Foresters, and in-kind support from the Uni- versity of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Natural Resources Conservation. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue. Cover photographs by: Michael Jones (salamander), Lena Fletcher (children and canopy), and the Department of Conservation and Recreation. Section title pages and criterion photographs by Michael Jones (spotted turtle), Paul Barten (various), Lena Fletcher (various), and the Department of Conservation and Recreation (various). Front cover art by Jim Taylor; back cover photo by Paul Barten. Table of Contents Section 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Massachusetts Statistics 2 USDA Forest Service Subsections and Ecoregions 4 Forest Types 6 Patterns of Population and Development 6 Land Use History 7 Land Use of Massachusetts 10 Section 2. Forest Conditions and Trends .................................................................................... 13 Criterion 1: Conservation of Biological Diversity ............................................................... 15 Forest Ownership 16 Biological Communities and the State Wildlife Action Plan 18 The Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program— Biomap and Living Waters 19 The Conservation Assessment and Prioritization System (CAPS) and the Index of Ecological Integrity 22 Forest structure and condition 22 Forest management for biodiversity 24 Privately owned forestland 24 State owned forestland 25 Drivers, Issues, and Threats 26 Loss of native species and the spread of invasive species 26 Forest conversion and fragmentation 26 Climate change 30 Criterion 2: Maintenance of Productive Capacity of Forest Ecosystems ............................ 33 Timber Resources 34 Timber Harvesting 37 Productive Capacity 38 Drivers, Issues, and Threats 39 Forest conversion and timber harvesting 39 Forest conversion and fragmentation 41 Timber products 42 Criterion 3: Maintenance of Forest Ecosystem Health and Vitality .................................... 45 Weather Related Natural Disturbances 46 Windstorms 46 Thunderstorms and microbursts 46 Ice storms 46 Wildfires 49 Fire risk 49 Prescribed burning 49 DCR forest fire control 51 Invasive Plant Species 51 Pests and Diseases 52 Environmental Stressors 57 Tree Mortality 58 Drivers, Issues, and Threats 60 Potential invasive forest pests 60 Climate change 60 Criterion 4: Conservation and Maintenance of Soil and Water Resources ......................... 65 Forest Hydrology 66 Massachusetts Soils 67 Watersheds of Massachusetts 69 Ability to Produce Clean Water 71 Forests and Public Water Supplies 75 Surface water supplies 75 Groundwater 78 Drivers, Issues, and Threats 79 Forest conversion and fragmentation 79 Forested watershed area, forested riparian area, and impervious surface area 79 Criterion 5: Maintenance of Forest Contribution to Global Carbon Cycles ........................ 87 Forest Carbon 88 Forest carbon pools 88 Carbon by forest type 90 Carbon by forest age 91 Carbon in old growth 92 Climate change and carbon 92 Forest management for increased carbon sequestration 93 Carbon registries 93 Drivers, Issues, and Threats 95 Forest conversion and fragmentation 95 Climate change 95 Criterion 6: Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Multiple Socioeconomic Benefits to Meet the Needs of Society ................................................................................ 99 Forest Ownership 100 Local Wood Production and Forest Sector Employment 100 Biomass 106 Forest biomass 106 Biomass harvesting 106 Biomass harvest guidelines 108 Controversy surrounding biomass markets 109 Non-Timber Forest Products 109 Ecosystem Services 111 Social Services (Recreation) 112 State Support for Private Forest Landowners 115 Current Use tax programs: Ch. 61 115 Forest Stewardship 116 The Working Forest Initiative 117 Support for Forestry Programs 118 State spending 118 Federal funding 119 Research funding 121 Drivers, Issues, and Threats 122 Local wood production and marketing 122 Funding/human resources reductions 123 Criterion 7: Legal, Institutional, and Economic Framework for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Management ..................................................................................................... 127 Legal Framework—History 128 Legal Framework—Forestry 129 The Forest Cutting Practices Act 129 The Forest Land Assessment Act (Current Use) 130 The Wetlands Protection Act 130 The Rivers Protection Act 130 The Massachusetts Endangered Species Act 131 Management Guidelines 131 The Slash Law 131 Old Growth Policy 131 Snowmobiles and ATVs 131 Legal Framework—Open Space Protection 132 Conservation Land Tax Credit Law 132 Conservation Restrictions 132 Community Preservation Act 133 Land Use Partnership Act 133 Legal Framework—Climate Change 133 Institutional Framework 134 State agencies 134 Educational institutions 135 Conservation organizations and land trusts 137 Forest landowners 139 Economic Framework 139 The 2008 Environmental Bond Bill 139 Monitoring at the State Level 140 Drivers, Issues, and Threats 141 Legal, institutional and social factors 141 Financing DCR operations 142 Section 3. Existing and Emerging Benefits and Services ........................................................... 145 Section 4. Issues, Threats, and Opportunities.............................................................................. 149 Forest Conversion and Fragmentation 151 Local Wood Production and Consumption 152 Exotic Invasive Pests and Plants 154 Climate Change 155 Steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 155 Planning for an altered climate 156 Biomass energy 157 Section 5. Priority Landscape Areas .......................................................................................... 159 National Theme Overlays 162 Conserve and Manage Working Forest Landscapes 162 Protect Forests from Threats 163 Enhance Public Benefits from Trees and Forests 164 Synthesis Overlays 166 Forest Functions, Benefits and Values 166 Forest Vulnerability 166 Priority Areas 167 Multi-State Areas 168 Section 6. Summary .................................................................................................................... 173 Please contact Paul Barten ([email protected]) to request an electronic copy of the Appendix Section 7. Appendix ................................................................................................................... A.1 Introduction A.1 Forest Conditions and Trends A.4 Criterion 1 A.4 Criterion 2 A.9 Criterion 3 A.12 Criterion 4 A.22 Criterion 5 A.27 Criterion 6 A.28 Criterion 7 A.35 Methodology of the Geospatial Analysis A.38 Data Gaps A.83 References A.85 PREFACE This report describes and quantifies the remarkable set of functions, benefits, and values that emanate from the forests of Massachusetts. It also discusses a daunting array of drivers, issues, and threats that influence the size, continuity, character, and condition of our forests. The seven sustainability criteria developed by the Ca- nadian Council of Forest Ministers were the framework for this assessment; they highlight the diverse, complex, and inter-connected nature of forests and people in Massachusetts. After the grand successes for forest protection and restoration work in the early-20th century, foresters
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Softwood Insect Pests
    Forest & Shade Tree Insect & Disease Conditions for Maine A Summary of the 2011 Situation Forest Health & Monitoring Division Maine Forest Service Summary Report No. 23 MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION March 2012 Augusta, Maine Forest Insect & Disease—Advice and Technical Assistance Maine Department of Conservation, Maine Forest Service Insect and Disease Laboratory 168 State House Station, 50 Hospital Street, Augusta, Maine 04333-0168 phone (207) 287-2431 fax (207) 287-2432 http://www.maine.gov/doc/mfs/idmhome.htm The Maine Forest Service/Forest Health and Monitoring (FH&M) Division maintains a diagnostic laboratory staffed with forest entomologists and a forest pathologist. The staff can provide practical information on a wide variety of forest and shade tree problems for Maine residents. Our technical reference library and insect collection enables the staff to accurately identify most causal agents. Our website is a portal to not only our material and notices of current forest pest issues but also provides links to other resources. A stock of information sheets and brochures is available on many of the more common insect and disease problems. We can also provide you with a variety of useful publications on topics related to forest insects and diseases. Submitting Samples - Samples brought or sent in for diagnosis should be accompanied by as much information as possible including: host plant, type of damage (i.e., canker, defoliation, wilting, wood borer, etc.), date, location, and site description along with your name, mailing address and day-time telephone number or e-mail address. Forms are available (on our Web site and on the following page) for this purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use and Exchange of Biological Control Agents for Food and Agriculture
    BACKGROUND STUDY PAPER NO. 47 October 2009 E COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE THE USE AND EXCHANGE OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE by Matthew J.W. Cock, Joop C. van Lenteren, Jacques Brodeur, Barbara I.P.Barratt, Franz Bigler, Karel Bolckmans, Fernando L. Cônsoli, Fabian Haas, Peter G. Mason, José Roberto P. Parra 1 This document has been prepared at the request of the Secretariat of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture by the Global Commission on Biological Control and Access and Benefit-Sharing of the International Organisation for Biological Control of Noxious Animals and Plants (IOBC), as a contribution to the cross-sectoral theme, Consideration of policies and arrangements for access and benefit-sharing for genetic resources for food and agriculture , which the Commission will consider at its Twelfth Regular Session. The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the views of the FAO, or its Members. 1 For affiliation of the authors see Annex 2. BACKGROUND STUDY PAPER NO. 47 i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THIS PUBLICATION .................................................................................................................1 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • What's Your Sign?
    September / October 2010 No. 37 What’s Your Sign? Trail Marking and Signage “Signs are probably the quickest and easiest way to leave the trail user with a positive impression. If the signs are high quality, well maintained, and properly located, other trail problems are often over-looked. Consistent signs are the quickest way to increase the trail’s identity and the public’s support for the trail.” (National Park Service) Trail system signs and markers are not just about helping people find their way in the woods. Trail signage helps to create an identity for your system, set expectations, educate the users, draw people to new places and experiences, and promote safety. Signs and markers, and even in some cases the lack of signs, can be a critical component to creating the desired trail experience. Types of Signs and Markers Trail signage can be divided into the following general categories: Trailhead Signs Intersection Directional Signs Reassurance Markers Interpretive Waysides Safety Signs Trailhead signs can come in a variety of shapes, sizes and styles, from professionally designed “kiosks” to simple painted wood signs. But the trailhead is where the user makes her first and most important decisions – What experience should I expect from this trail? What can I accomplish with the time I have? Is this trail at the right level of difficulty for me? Is my preferred mode of travel allowed? – as a result, trailhead signs are vital for both welcoming users to the trail and setting appropriate expectations. Even the character of the sign sets the tone for the entire trail experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing to Compete in the 21St Century
    Choosing to Compete In the 21st Century An Economic Development Policy and Strategic Plan for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Prepared by the Economic Development Planning Council pursuant to Chapter 240 of the Acts of 2010 of the Massachusetts Legislature December 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Context 4 Five Steps Towards a More Competitive Massachusetts Economy 8 Next Steps 28 Membership of the Economic Development Planning Council 30 The Language of the Enabling Statute 31 Appendix 32 Acknowledgements 33 2 Introduction “We can’t be satisfied until every single resident who seeks work can find it. That means we must invest in education, in the innovation industries that are expanding opportunity around the Commonwealth, in the small businesses that are the backbone of our economy, and in the infrastructure that supports it all. We must reduce the costs of doing business here, and make it easier for companies to hire people by removing unwarranted barriers, be they outdated regulations, escalating health insurance premiums, or limits on capital access for small businesses.” –Governor Deval Patrick, Second Term Inaugural Address, January 6, 2011 In August 2010, the Massachusetts Legislature passed sweeping economic development legislation that calls upon each gubernatorial administration to develop and publish, with the assistance of an economic development planning council, an economic development policy and strategic plan for the Commonwealth. Over the course of the past eight months, an economic development planning council of 34 public and private sector representatives led by Secretary of Housing and Economic Development Greg Bialecki has developed this strategy and plan, which builds on the job creation strategy of the Patrick-Murray Administration over the last five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroecology and the Search for a Truly Sustainable Agriculture 1St Edition
    Agroecology and the Search for a Truly Sustainable Agriculture 1st edition Miguel A. Altieri Clara I. Nicholls University of California, Berkeley 9 Basic Textbooks for Environmental Training First edition: 2000 (Spanish version) First edition: 2005 (English version) © United Nations Environment Programme Environmental Training Network for Latin America and the Caribbean Boulevard de los Virreyes 155, Colonia Lomas de Virreyes 11000, Mexico D.F., Mexico ISBN 968-7913-35-5 CONTENTS PREFACE 5 INTRODUCTION 9 Chapter 1 MODERN AGRICULTURE: ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS AND THE ALTERNATIVES TO CONVENTIONAL FARMING 13 Chapter 2 AGROECOLOGY: PRINCIPLES AND STRATEGIES FOR DISIGNING SUSTAINABLE FARMING SYSTEMS 29 Chapter 3 TEN REASONS WHY BIOTECHNOLOGY WILL NOT ENSURE FOOD SECURITY, PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT AND REDUCE POVERTY IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD 39 Chapter 4 THE ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF TRANSGENIC CROPS 53 Chapter 5 A DIALOGUE OF WISDOMS: LINKING ECOLOGISTS AND TRADITIONAL FARMERS IN THE SEARCH FOR A TRULY SUSTAINABLE A GRICULTURE 73 Chapter 6 AGROECOLOGY: THE SCIENCE OF NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FOR POOR FARMERS IN MARGINAL ENVIRONMENTS 99 Chapter 7 ENHANCING THE PRODUCTIVITY OF LATIN A MERICAN T RADITIONAL PEASANT FARMING SYSTEMS THROUGH AN A GROECOLOGICAL A PPROACH 145 Chapter 8 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL IN AGROECOSYSTEMS THROUGH MANAGEMENT OF ENTOMOPHAGOUS INSECTS 179 Chapter 9 AN AGROECOLOGICAL BASIS FOR INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT 199 Chapter 10 DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING A HABITAT MANAGEMENT STRATEGY TO ENHANCE BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL IN AGROECOLOGY 239 Chapter 11 AGROECOLOGY: TRANSITIONING ORGANIC AGRICULTURE BEYOND INPUT SUBSTITUTION 263 Cahpter 12 A RAPID, FARMER-FRIENDLY AGROECOLOGICAL METHOD TO ESTIMATE SOIL QUALITY AND CROP HEALTH IN VINEYARD SYSTEMS 277 PrefacePreface Environmental education and training is the process whereby new knowledge and practices evolve to understand and to intervene in the solution of the complex socio-environmental problems of our time.
    [Show full text]
  • Serie B 1997 Vo!. 44 No. 1 Norwegian Journal of Entomology
    Serie B 1997 Vo!. 44 No. 1 Norwegian Journal of Entomology Publ ished by Foundation for Nature Research and Cultural Heritage Research Trondheim Fauna norvegica Ser. B Organ for Norsk Entomologisk Forening F Appears with one volume (two issues) annually. tigations of regional interest are also welcome. Appropriate Utkommer med to hefter pr. ar. topics include general and applied (e.g. conservation) ecolo­ I Editor in chief (Ansvarlig redaktor) gy, morphology, behaviour, zoogeography as well as methodological development. All papers in Fauna norvegica ~ Dr. John O. Solem, Norwegian University of Science and are reviewed by at least two referees. Technology (NTNU), The Museum, N-7004 Trondheim. ( Editorial committee (Redaksjonskomite) FAUNA NORVEGICA Ser. B publishes original new infor­ mation generally relevan,t to Norwegian entomology. The Ame C. Nilssen, Department of Zoology, Troms0 Museum, journal emphasizes papers which are mainly faunal or zoo­ N-9006 Troms0, Ame Fjellberg, Gonveien 38, N-3145 ( geographical in scope or content, including check lists, faunal Tj0me, and Knut Rognes, Hav0rnbrautene 7a, N-4040 Madla. lists, type catalogues, regional keys, and fundamental papers Abonnement 1997 having a conservation aspect. Submissions must not have Medlemmer av Norsk Entomologisk Forening (NEF) far been previously published or copyrighted and must not be tidsskriftet fritt tilsendt. Medlemmer av Norsk Ornitologisk published subsequently except in abstract form or by written Forening (NOF) mottar tidsskriftet ved a betale kr. 90. Andre consent of the Managing Editor. ma betale kr. 120. Disse innbetalingene sendes Stiftelsen for Subscription 1997 naturforskning og kulturminneforskning (NINAeNIKU), Members of the Norw. Ent. Soc. (NEF) will r~ceive the journal Tungasletta 2, N-7005 Trondheim.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure of Noctuid and Geometrid Development Stages in Oak Forests
    Glavendekić & Mihajlović: Exposure of noctuid and geometrid development stages in oak forests EXPOSURE OF NOCTUID AND GEOMETRID DEVELOPMENT STAGES IN OAK FORESTS Milka M. Glavendekić, Ljubodrag S. Mihajlović Faculty of Forestry University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava 1, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract The research was carried out in the period 1985-2005 in oak forests in Serbia. During the research of winter moths in oak forests of Serbia we recorded 9 outbreaking winter moth species: Colotois pennaria L., Agriopis aurantiaria Hbn., Erannis defoliaria Cl., Alsophila aescularia D.& Sch., A. aceraria D.& Sch., Operophtera brumata L., Apocheima pilosaria D.& Sch., Agriopis leucophaearia D.& Sch., A. marginaria F. The most significant noctuids are Orthosia spp. There are 38 parasitoids of the winter moths recorded and they fall into the families Braconidae, Ichneumonidae, Eulophidae, Torymidae, Trichogrammatidae, Scelionidae and Tachinidae. Egg parasitoids were recorded at 3 localities: Brankovac, Mala Moštanica and wide area of National Park Djerdap. Hyperparasitoids of winter moths in Serbia have also been studied. We recorded altogether 12 species of winter moth hyperparasitoids. The method of exposure was applied in egg and larva stages. While total parasitism in the natural population varies between 12.50-28.57 %, in the exposed conditions there were between 27.31-43.75 % parasitized caterpillars were recorded. The method of host exposure could be suitable for the local increase of abundance of parasitoids of winter moth eggs, larvae and pupae. Keywords: Defoliators, oak, Geometridae, Noctuidae 1. Introduction In Serbia forests cover about 2,313,000 ha, or 26.2 % of the whole territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrick-Murray Administration Creates Ports of Massachusetts Compact - the Office of the Governor - Mass.Gov
    Patrick-Murray Administration Creates Ports of Massachusetts Compact - The Office of the Governor - Mass.Gov State Agencies State A-Z Topics Alert - No Active Alerts Skip to main content Need help resizing text? The official website of the Governor of Massachusetts Governor in Governor's Office Deval Patrick Legislation & The Administration Constituent Services Press Office Agenda Get Involved Executive Orders Home Press Office Press Releases DEVAL PATRICK For Immediate release - April 30, 2012 GOVERNOR TIM MURRAY LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR PATRICK-MURRAY ADMINISTRATION CREATES PORTS OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPACT Media Contact Agreement to coordinate seaport development in Boston, New Bedford, Fall River, Gloucester and Salem Kim Haberlin Alec Loftus NEW BEDFORD – Monday, April 30, 2012 – Lieutenant Governor Timothy Murray today announced the formation of the Ports of Bonnie McGilpin Massachusetts Compact, an agreement designed to boost economic development and capitalize on resources in the 617-725-4025 Commonwealth’s seaports. Lauren Jones (LG) 617-725-4000 The compact was signed by the mayors of Boston, New Bedford, Fall River, Gloucester and Salem; in addition to the Massachusetts Secretaries of Transportation, Energy and Environmental Affairs, Housing and Economic Development, Massport; Cyndi Roy (MDOT) and the Legislature’s Joint Committee on Transportation. Lieutenant Governor Murray will serve as chair. 617-973-8166 “With approximately 2,800 miles of coastline, there are valuable opportunities for increased transportation and economic development
    [Show full text]
  • Deval Patrick - Wikipedia
    11/16/2019 Deval Patrick - Wikipedia Deval Patrick Deval Laurdine Patrick (born July 31, 1956) is an American politician, civil Deval Patrick rights lawyer, author, and businessman who served as the 71st Governor of Massachusetts, from 2007 to 2015. He was first elected in 2006, succeeding Mitt Romney, who chose not to run for reelection to focus on his presidential campaign. He was reelected in 2010. He is the first African American elected Governor of Massachusetts. A Democrat, Patrick served from 1994 to 1997 as the United States Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division under President Bill Clinton. He is a candidate for President of the United States in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Raised largely by a single mother on the South Side of Chicago, Patrick earned a scholarship to Milton Academy in Milton, Massachusetts in the eighth grade. He went on to attend Harvard College and Harvard Law School, where he was president of the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau. After graduating, he practiced law with the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund and later joined a Boston law firm, where he was named a partner at age 34. In 1994, 71st Governor of Massachusetts Bill Clinton appointed him as the United States assistant attorney general for the civil rights division of the United States Department of Justice, where he In office worked on issues including racial profiling and police misconduct. January 4, 2007 – January 8, 2015 Lieutenant Tim Murray During his governorship, Patrick oversaw the implementation of the state's Preceded
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between the Winter Moth (Operophtera Brumata) and Its Host Plants in Coastal Maine Kaitlyn M
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Summer 8-2015 The Relationship Between the Winter Moth (Operophtera brumata) and Its Host Plants in Coastal Maine Kaitlyn M. O'Donnell University of Maine - Main, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, and the Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation O'Donnell, Kaitlyn M., "The Relationship Between the Winter Moth (Operophtera brumata) and Its Host Plants in Coastal Maine" (2015). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2338. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2338 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE WINTER MOTH (OPEROPTHERA BRUMATA) AND ITS HOST PLANTS IN COASTAL MAINE By Kaitlyn O’Donnell B.S. Saint Michael’s College, 2011 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (in Entomology) The Graduate School The University of Maine August 2015 Advisory Committee: Eleanor Groden, Professor of Entomology, School of Biology and Ecology, Advisor Francis Drummond, Professor of Insect Ecology and Wild Blueberry Pest Management Specialist, School of Biology and Ecology and the University of Maine Cooperative Extension Joseph Elkinton, Professor of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Charlene Donahue, Forest Entomologist, Maine Forest Service THESIS ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT On behalf of the Graduate Committee for Kaitlyn O’Donnell I affirm that this manuscript is the final and accepted thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 North American Forest Insect Work Conference
    2021 North American Forest Insect Work Conference Shaping Forests: Action in a Changing World May 26-28, 2021 1 2021 North American Forest Insect Work Conference Organizers Organizing Committee: Jess Hartshorn (Chair) – Clemson University, Clemson, SC Brian Aukema – University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN Rachael Arango – USDA Forest Service, Madison, WI Jeff Garnas – University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH Rich Hofstetter – Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ Kier Klepzig – The Jones Center at Ichauway, Newton, GA Robert Rabaglia – USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC Program Committee: Kier Klepzig (Co-Chair) – The Jones Center at Ichauway, Newton, GA Rich Hostetter (Co-Chair) – Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ Deepa Pureswaran – Canadian Forest Service, Quebec, QC Jeff Garnas – University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH Nathan Havill - USDA Forest Service, New Haven, CT Sponsorship: Kevin Chase - Bartlett Tree Experts, Charlotte, NC Posters: Rich Hofstetter - Northern Arizona University 2 Tuesday, May 25 2:00 Forest Health Task Force 4:00 SFIWC Business Meeting Wednesday, May 26 8:00 Welcome Remarks 8:15 Plenary Session 1 A. Shannon Lotthammer, Assistant Forestry Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources B. EAB impacts: what does the loss of ash mean for wildlife? - Alexis Grinde, Wildlife Ecologist, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota - Duluth C. Connections - Eli Sagor, Cloquet Forest, University of Minnesota 9:45 Break 10:30 Student Paper Competition - 1 - Jess Hartshorn A. Following Celtis laevigata Willd. mortality and the commonly associated insects in the southeastern US - Emilee M. Poole, Michael D. Ulyshen, and Scott Horn. Celtis laevigata Willd. (sugarberry) is a native tree commonly found along floodplains and rivers in the southeastern US.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) As Biological Control Agents of Pests
    Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) As Biological Control Agents Of Pests A Bibliography Hassan Ghahari Department of Entomology, Islamic Azad University, Science & Research Campus, P. O. Box 14515/775, Tehran – Iran; [email protected] Preface The Ichneumonidae is one of the most species rich families of all organisms with an estimated 60000 species in the world (Townes, 1969). Even so, many authorities regard this figure as an underestimate! (Gauld, 1991). An estimated 12100 species of Ichneumonidae occur in the Afrotropical region (Africa south of the Sahara and including Madagascar) (Townes & Townes, 1973), of which only 1927 have been described (Yu, 1998). This means that roughly 16% of the afrotropical ichneumonids are known to science! These species comprise 338 genera. The family Ichneumonidae is currently split into 37 subfamilies (including, Acaenitinae; Adelognathinae; Agriotypinae; Alomyinae; Anomaloninae; Banchinae; Brachycyrtinae; Campopleginae; Collyrinae; Cremastinae; Cryptinae; Ctenopelmatinae; 1 Diplazontinae; Eucerotinae; Ichneumoninae; Labeninae; Lycorininae; Mesochorinae; Metopiinae; Microleptinae; Neorhacodinae; Ophioninae; Orthopelmatinae; Orthocentrinae; Oxytorinae; Paxylomatinae; Phrudinae; Phygadeuontinae; Pimplinae; Rhyssinae; Stilbopinae; Tersilochinae; Tryphoninae; Xoridinae) (Yu, 1998). The Ichneumonidae, along with other groups of parasitic Hymenoptera, are supposedly no more species rich in the tropics than in the Northern Hemisphere temperate regions (Owen & Owen, 1974; Janzen, 1981; Janzen & Pond, 1975), although
    [Show full text]