sign in sign up
<<
Home , Aminopeptidase, Ligand (biochemistry), Notch signaling pathway, NUMB (gene)

SnapShot: Pathway Signaling SnapShot:Notch Ma. Xenia G. Ilagan and Raphael Kopan University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63 11 0, USA Washington Department of Molecular Biology and ,

246 Cell 128, March 23, 2007 ©2007 Elsevier Inc. DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.011 See online version for legend and references. SnapShot: Notch Signaling Pathway Ma. Xenia G. Ilagan and Raphael Kopan Department of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

The Notch signaling pathway is a short-range communication transducer that is involved in regulating many cellular processes (proliferation, and stem cell niche maintenance, cell fate specification, differentiation, and cell death) during and renewal of adult tissues. Notch signaling is mediated by and does not appear to involve any secondary messengers. However, depending on cellular context, the amplitude and timing of Notch activity can be regulated by posttranslational modifications to and receptors and their trafficking. (1) Maturation Notch receptors are large single pass type I transmembrane . Upon translation, the Notch is fucosylated by the chaperone O-fut, a modification es- sential for the production of a functional receptor. In cells expressing Fringe, the fucose is extended by the glycosyltransferase activity of Fringe, altering the ability of specific ligands to activate Notch (see below). The mature receptor undergoes proteolytic cleavage by protein convertases (PC5; Furin) at site 1 (S1) and then is targeted to the cell surface as a heterodimer held together by noncovalent interactions. (2) Endosomal Sorting Several mechanisms control the steady-state levels of the Notch receptor at the cell surface and therefore regulate its availability for binding of . For example, Numb, in cooperation with the AP2 component α-adaptin and AP2- or Numb-associated kinase (NAK), can promote Notch and degradation. Several E3 —Deltex, Nedd4, Su(Dx)/Itch, Cbl—target Notch, shifting receptor trafficking toward degradation or recycling. Other proteins prevent inappropriate receptor activation in the absence of ligand binding. Mutations in certain ESCRT complex proteins lead to accumulation of Notch in endosomal vesicles, which surpris- ingly permits ectopic activation of Notch via γ-secretase-dependent proteolysis (NICD*). Another protein, Lethal Giant Discs (LGD), is also required to maintain Notch in the OFF state. Therefore, ESCRT and LGD complexes are normally involved in Notch downregulation, indicating that endosomal sorting is a key way to restrict activation of Notch to the cell surface and that defects in endosomal sorting may contribute to pathogenesis. SE, sorting endosome; RE, recycling endosome; MVB, multivesicular body. (3) Ligand Maturation Notch ligands are also type I transmembrane proteins characterized by an N-terminal DSL domain. The two major classes of ligands are Delta and Jagged (Serrate in ), the latter containing a -rich domain. In addition to Delta and Jagged, the neural adhesion molecule F3/contactin, the related NB-3 protein, the EGF repeat protein DNER, and a diffusible protein in C. elegans have been identified as potential Notch ligands. Endocytic trafficking of the DSL ligands is crucial for -en hancing their signaling activity: Ligands are ubiquitinated by the E3 ubiquitin ligases, Neur and Mib, triggering Epsin-mediated endocytosis; an undefined modification produces an active ligand that recycles to the cell surface in a Rab11-dependent process. Current models explaining the nature of ligand modification include ligand clustering, posttranslational modifications, and/or recycling into specific membrane domains. (4) Regulated Proteolysis The Notch receptor is activated by binding to a ligand presented by a neighboring cell. Productive receptor-ligand interactions depend on the state, for example, a Fringe-modified receptor may favor binding of Delta. Ligand endocytosis is thought to generate sufficient force to produce partial or complete domain , thereby exposing Notch to cleavage at site S2 by ADAM metalloproteases (perhaps following heterodimer dissociation at S1). The Notch extracellular domain is transendocytosed into the signal-sending cell, whereas the membrane-anchored NEXT (Notch extracellular truncation) fragment is recognized by the inactive aminopeptidase domain of nicastrin (NCT), which transfers NEXT to the of γ-secretase, an enzymatic complex composed of (PS), NCT, PEN2, and APH1. γ-secretase then cleaves the Notch transmembrane domain sequentially starting near the cytosolic surface (sites S3 and S4) to release the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) and Nβ , respectively. γ-secretase cleavage can occur at the cell surface or in endosomal compartments, perhaps following monoubiquitination. The apical polarity protein Crumbs appears to play a role in restricting γ-secretase activity thereby limiting the extent of Notch activation. Like many type I proteins, Notch ligands are also subject to extracellular cleavage by ADAM followed by transmembrane domain cleavage by γ-secretase. Ligand processing may be important to reduce its ability to antagonize Notch signaling in cis and for its downregulation and membrane . Alternatively, it could generate biologically active fragments, e.g., soluble ligands (that may act as antagonists of Notch signaling) and/or ligand intracellular domain fragments. (5) Transcriptional Switch and Target Expression In the absence of NICD, the DNA-binding protein CSL associates with ubiquitous (Co-R) proteins and histone deacetylases (HDACs) to repress transcrip- tion of target . When NICD enters the nucleus, its binding to CSL may trigger an allosteric change that facilitates displacement of transcriptional repressors. The NICD/CSL interface is then recognized by Mastermind (MAM), and this tri-protein complex recruits coactivators (Co-A)—such as histone acetylases (HATs), chromatin- remodeling factors, and a mediator complex— to assemble an active transcription complex on target promoters. (6) Signal Downregulation During transcriptional activation, NICD is phosphorylated on its PEST domain by kinases such as CDK8 and targeted for proteasomal degradation by E3 ubiquitin ligases such as Sel10/Fbw7. This terminates the Notch signal and resets the cell for the next round of signaling.

References

Bray, S.J. (2006). Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 678–689. Ehebauer, M., Hayward, P., and Martinez-Arias, A. (2006). Notch signaling pathway. Sci. STKE 2006, cm7. Haines, N., and Irvine, K.D. (2003). Glycosylation regulates Notch signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 786–797. Kadesch, T. (2004). Notch signaling: the demise of elegant simplicity. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14, 506–512. Kovall, R.A. (2007). Structures of CSL, Notch and Mastermind proteins: piecing together an active transcription complex. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 117–127. Le Borgne, R. (2006). Regulation of Notch signalling by endocytosis and endosomal sorting. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 213–222. Lubman, O.Y., Korolev, S.V., and Kopan, R. (2004). Anchoring notch genetics and ; structural analysis of the ankyrin domain sheds light on existing data. Mol. Cell 13, 619–626. Mumm, J.S., and Kopan, R. (2000). Notch signaling: from the outside in. Dev. Biol. 228, 151–165. Schweisguth, F. (2004). Regulation of notch signaling activity. Curr. Biol. 14, R129–R138. Wilkin, M.B., and Baron, M. (2005). Endocytic regulation of Notch activation and down-regulation (review). Mol. Membr. Biol. 22, 279–289.

Acknowledgments

M.X.G.I., R.K., and Washington University may receive income based on a license of Notch-related technology by the University to Merck. Merck did not support this work.

1246.e1 Cell 128, March 23, 2007 ©2007 Elsevier Inc. DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.011