DOCSLIB.ORG

'Retail Apocalypse' Wreaking Havoc on Shopping Malls Across US

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'Retail Apocalypse' Wreaking Havoc on Shopping Malls Across US AMHERST CAPITAL MARKET COMMENTARY MARCH 2018 ‘Retail Apocalypse’ wreaking havoc on shopping malls across U.S. – but which malls fail is no surprise • Retail malls have seen significant distress from store closures as part of the ‘Retail Apocalypse,’ leading some malls to be foreclosed or shutdown entirely • However, which malls fail is not random. The purchasing power of the surrounding community, along with other mall competition, can be a strong predictor of a mall’s ability to avoid distress • When evaluating U.S. cities with more than 10 retail malls, we found that San Francisco, Chicago, New York City, Seattle and Dallas to be the “strongest” cities for malls. The weakest cities for malls include: Orlando, Las Vegas, Charlotte, Tampa and San Bernardino. • We use demographic and mall location data to rank which malls are geographically advantaged/disadvantaged – we analyze 18 Atlanta-area malls as a case study to determine the strongest and weakest malls AMHERST CAPITAL MARKET COMMENTARY | March 2018 1 STRUGGLESAMHERST CAPITAL OF BRICKMARKET & COMMENTARY MORTAR RETAILERS WIDELY KNOWN, MARCH 2018 OUTPACED BY E-COMMERCE SALES GROWTH Brick and mortar retailers have faced store growing only 25% from 2011. Furthermore, closures and declining sales with the rise of the rise in e-commerce sales has been e-commerce and a shift away from spending pronounced in apparel, with the e-commerce on higher-end and mid-tier apparel. This has market share reaching 18% in 2015 and led to distress in the retail commercial real growing at an 11% annual rate in 2015 vs. estate (“CRE”) market, particularly in enclosed 2% annual rate for physical stores, according malls. While retailers have posted positive to the Census Bureau, and has likely growth during the current economic cycle, continued to climb since then. Additionally, almost all of that growth has come from e- of the little growth in brick and mortar commerce sales (Figure 1), which has grown apparel, most has come from discount/off- 164% cumulatively since 2011. On the other brand retailers who are generally not in hand, brick and mortar sales have languished, enclosed mall locations (Figure 2). F I GURE 1. E-COMMERCE SALES HAVE GROWN DRAMATICALLY MORE THAN BRICK AND MORTAR IN 2010s 300 10 250 8 200 6 150 4 100 50 2 SHARE (%) COMMERCE COMMERCE MARKET 0 0 - Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-16 Jan-17 Jan-18 E (100=DEC (100=DEC 2010 SALES) CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE SALES GROWTH E-commerce market share (Right Hand Side, %) E-commerce cumulative sales growth Brick and Mortar /other cumulative sales growth Source: U.S. Census Bureau data as of February 2018. F I GURE 2. APPAREL IS STILL HOT – JUST NOT AT DEPARTMENT STORES COMPARABLE SAME STORE SALES ANALYSIS: OFF-PRICE BRANDS PRESENT JUST AS BIG, 6 IF NOT BIGGER, A CHALLENGE TO MID-PRICED APPAREL 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Traditional Department Stores Off Price Department Stores Source: CreditNtell, Cushman & Wakefield Research as of February 2018. AMHERST CAPITAL MARKET COMMENTARY | March 2018 2 STOREAMHERST CLOSURES CAPITAL MARKET ARE EXPECTEDCOMMENTARY TO CONTINUE MARCH 2018 TO TAKE A TOLL ON MALL PERFORMANCE Many mall store operators have already These store closures and subsequent rental shown distress from the decline in sales, and income reductions have caused many malls we expect this trend to continue. Buying to face financial distress, often leading to online or at discount/off price apparel stores mortgage defaults with large losses and even (such as Burlington, Saks Off Fifth, Macy’s entire closures in some cases. From 2010- Backstage, etc.) has taken away sales from Jan 2017, just in commercial mortgage large mall-anchor department stores such as backed securities (CMBS), 93 malls have JCPenney, Sears, Bon-Ton, Macy’s and many defaulted on their mortgages or have been mall specialty retailers such as Rue21, Radio modified, and we expect this number to Shack, Aeropostale, Payless and The Limited. continue growing (Deutsche Bank, Intex). As a result, retailers have closed thousands of However, while some malls have faced these stores in 2017 and this trend is expected to difficulties, many malls, even within the same continue in 2018 (Figure 3). metro area, have continued to perform In 2018, this has already been confirmed by successfully. Which malls in a metro will the bankruptcy of Toys R Us, which succeed or fail can at times seem random; announced it will close all stores on March however, we feel that using robust 15, 2018 (Bloomberg). Department store demographic and geolocation data helps us operator Bon-Ton is also bankrupt and faces rank malls overall and in a particularly metro a significant chance of closing all U.S. stores to highlight which malls are most at risk of as well (Bloomberg). financial distress. F I GURE 3. MAJOR CHAIN STORE CLOSURES – 2017 SURPASSED GREAT RECESSION LEVELS 12,000 RadioShack PayLess Gymboree 10,000 Hancock Fabrics Teavana Sears/Kmart 8,000 Sports Authority RadioShack Walmart Office Depot Aeropostale 6,000 Dots Sears/Kmart Wet Seal Teavana A&P 4,000 2,000 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Major Chain Closures Forecast Major Chain Closures Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research as of February 2018. AMHERST CAPITAL MARKET COMMENTARY | March 2018 3 AREAAMHERST PURCHASING CAPITAL MARKET POWER COMMENTARY AND COMPETITION MARCH 2018 CAN BE USED TO WEIGHT MALLS To determine a ranking system for each mall, is because many malls in secondary and we use a Costar dataset of mall properties tertiary locations may not have sufficient combined with demographic data for each population and disposable income to support mall. Malls depend on having sufficient a mall even if competition is minimal, as even purchasing power, taking into account the a modest switch to e-commerce can size of the population and the amount of jeopardize a mall. For example, the Rushmore disposable income that population has to Mall in Rapid City, South Dakota has a support sales and traffic at the mall. Malls ranking of just the 4th percentile due to the surrounded by fewer people with lower relatively small population and income incomes are most exposed to a decline in served. Unsurprisingly, the mall has already demand from ecommerce and discount seen distress through a hope-note (principal retailers, particularly if there are better forgiveness) modification of its existing positioned malls nearby. To analyze malls mortgage (Trepp). While the percentile across these metrics, we use census ranking cannot capture all features about population and income data to estimate the performance for aspecific mall, it can provide disposable income within 20 miles of each a quick relative ranking – however, it does mall, and then divide this by the number of not on its own, indicate that a specific mall Costar malls within 20 miles to take into will fail. account competition. From this data, we When evaluating ranking of U.S. cities with arrive to a score for each mall, and then greater than 10 malls, we found that San percentile rank the entire mall dataset. Francisco, Chicago, New York City, Seattle As illustrated in Figure 4, scoring the nation’s and Dallas are best-positioned. On the other malls provides a quick relative ranking of hand, we believe that the weakest cities for malls across the country. The mall score malls are Orlando, Las Vegas, Charlotte, ranking generally favors malls in dense, high Tampa and San Bernardino, Calif. income cities versus those in rural areas. This F I GURE 4. LOCATION SCORING FOR U.S. RETAIL MALLS Source: Costar, US Census Bureau, Amherst Insightlabs, Amherst Capital Management as of Q4 2017. AMHERST CAPITAL MARKET COMMENTARY | March 2018 4 CASEAMHERST STUDY: CAPITALATLANTA'S MARKET COMMENTARY WORST PERFORMING MALLS MARCH 2018 HAVE ONE THING IN COMMON – THEY’RE POORLY LOCATED The mall rankings by demographics are A map highlighting the size, location and particularly useful to compare malls within a percentile ranking of each Atlanta mall can be metro area. Beyond the national percentile seen in Figure 5. Blue malls indicate a higher ranking, it is a negative sign if a mall is the ranking, while orange-red malls indicate a weakest mall within its Metropolitan lower ranking and higher risk malls based on Statistical Area (“MSA”). To take a closer look location. at this, we analyze the Atlanta metro area, which has 18 malls according to Costar, with a wide variation in mall percentile rankings based on our system. F I GURE 5. ATLANTA HAS A WIDE VARIATION OF MALL LOCATION QUALITY Note: Map based on Longitude (generated). Color shows 2017 Household Effective sum of Score Rank Count Percentile. Size shows sum of Buying Income (median) GLA. Details are shown for various dimensions. Source: Costar, US Census Bureau, Amherst Insightlabs, Amherst Capital Management as of Q4 2017. AMHERST CAPITAL MARKET COMMENTARY | March 2018 5 AMHERST CAPITAL MARKET COMMENTARY TheMARCHpercentile 2018 ranking for malls in Atlanta 2018). These percentile rankings are range from 23% to 87% on a national scale, somewhat limited by other factors which may but it is even more valuable to compare the have an impact on mall performance. For malls within the metro area. Of the 18 malls example, the Cumberland Mall is a lower in Atlanta, seven have experienced distress ranked mall (45th percentile) in our model, from either CMBS defaults/modifications or but its location is well-positioned at a reported sales at distressed valuations. These highway intersection, owned by a higher-end seven malls all fall within the bottom half of mall operator (GGP), and current CMBS data our percentile rankings, highlighting the indicate this particular mall is performing well.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Track Record of Prior Experience of the Senior Cobalt Team
    Track Record of Prior Experience of the Senior Cobalt Team Dedicated Executives PROPERTY City Square Property Type Responsibility Company/Client Term Feet COLORADO Richard Taylor Aurora Mall Aurora, CO 1,250,000 Suburban Mall Property Management - New Development DeBartolo Corp 7 Years CEO Westland Center Denver, CO 850,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and $30 million Disposition May Centers/ Centermark 9 Years North Valley Mall Denver, CO 700,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and Redevelopment First Union 3 Years FLORIDA Tyrone Square Mall St Petersburg, FL 1,180,000 Suburban Mall Property Management DeBartolo Corp 3 Years University Mall Tampa, FL 1,300,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and New Development DeBartolo Corp 2 Years Property Management, Asset Management, New Development Altamonte Mall Orlando, FL 1,200,000 Suburban Mall DeBartolo Corp and O'Connor Group 1 Year and $125 million Disposition Edison Mall Ft Meyers, FL 1,000,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and Redevelopment The O'Connor Group 9 Years Volusia Mall Daytona Beach ,FL 950,000 Suburban Mall Property and Asset Management DeBartolo Corp 1 Year DeSoto Square Mall Bradenton, FL 850,000 Suburban Mall Property Management DeBartolo Corp 1 Year Pinellas Square Mall St Petersburg, FL 800,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and New Development DeBartolo Corp 1 Year EastLake Mall Tampa, FL 850,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and New Development DeBartolo Corp 1 Year INDIANA Lafayette Square Mall Indianapolis, IN 1,100,000 Suburban Mall Property Management
    [Show full text]
  • Generalgrowthproperties
    BUILT TO LEAD BUILT TO GROW BUILT TO PROSPER GENERALGROWTHBUILT PROPERTIES TO LASTANNUAL REPORT 2002 COMPANY PROFILE General Growth Properties and its predecessor companies have been in the shopping center busi- ness for nearly fifty years. It is the second largest regional mall Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) in the United States. General Growth owns, develops, operates and/or manages shopping malls in 39 states. GGP has ownership interests in, or management responsibility for, 160 regional shopping malls totaling more than 140 million square feet of retail space. The total retail space is inclusive of more than 16,000 retailers nationwide. General Growth provides investors with the opportunity to participate in the ownership of high-quality, income-producing real estate while maintaining liquidity. Our primary objective is to provide increasing dividends and capital appreciation for our shareholders. Creating shareholder value is the company’s mission. The Bucksbaum family, which founded General Growth, is still engaged in the operation of the company’s day-to-day business activities. As owners of a major stake in the company, General Growth management’s interests are aligned with those of each and every GGP shareholder. CONTENTS Shareholders’ Letter 4 Operating Principles 7 Portfolio 17 Financial Review 29 Directors and Officers 85 Corporate Information 86 Financial Highlights SHOPPING CENTERS OWNED at year end * 1997 64 1998 84 1999 93 2000 95 2001 97 2002 125 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OWNED in millions 1997 52 1998 71 1999 83 2000 85 2001 89 2002 114 REAL ESTATE ASSETS AT COST in millions 1997 $2,590 1998 $4,760 1999 $6,237 2000 $6,735 2001 $7,319 2002 $9,902 MALL SHOP SALES in millions ** 1997 $2,651 1998 $5,176 1999 $6,931 2000 $7,243 2001 $7,326 2002 $9,061 DIVIDEND GROWTH PER SHARE dollar/share declared 1997 $1.80 1998 $1.88 1999 $1.98 2000 $2.06 2001 $2.36 2002 $2.74 FFO GROWTH dollar/share 1997 $2.89 1998 $3.35 1999 $4.02 2000 $4.42 2001 $4.96 2002 $5.58 * Includes regional malls only.
    [Show full text]
  • The Retail Apocalypse - Fact Or Fiction?
    The Retail Apocalypse - Fact or Fiction? May 10, 2019 Panel Introductions • Moderator: • Manuel Farach, Member, McGlinchey Stafford • Panelists: • Sarah Lemke, Vice President, Project Development, New England Development • Matt Epstein, Director, Goulston & Storrs, P.C. Agenda • Current State of Retail • Is It Really an Apocalypse? • Strategies for the New Future of Retail • Conclusion and Q&A Current State of Retail- Store Closures Abound ▪ Over 12,000 stores closed in 2018 ▪ Over 5,800 stores have already announced closures planned for 2019, including: ▪ Payless- 2,500 stores ▪ Gymboree- 805 stores ▪ Family Dollar- 390 stores ▪ Shopko- 371 stores ▪ Gap- 230 stores ▪ Sears- 70 stores ▪ Victoria’s Secret- 53 stores ▪ Abercrombie & Fitch- 40 stores ▪ Other retailers closing: Aerosoles, American Apparel, BCBG, Bon-Ton, Children’s Place, CVS, Dollar Tree, Foot Locker, Guess, JC Penney, Limited, Macy’s, Michael Kors, Toys R Us, Victoria’s Secret, Wet Seal © New England Development 4 Current State of Retail - Store Closures Abound © New England Development In 2018, over 145 million square feet of retail closed 5 Current State of Retail - Bankruptcies Continue © New England Development 6 What’s Causing Widespread Closures and Bankruptcies? ▪ Retailers facing massive debt from private equity financings ▪ E-Commerce and the “Amazon Effect” ▪ “Over-Retailing”/Saturation of the Market ▪ Changing Consumer Demands ▪ Inability to Adapt © New England Development 7 E-Commerce - Part of the Problem E-commerce continues to gain steam- growing 15% in 2018,
    [Show full text]
  • Municipality
    TheMunicipality Your Voice. Your Wisconsin. January | 2019 2019–2020 LEAGUE LEGISLATIVE AGENDA Split Party After the Retail Apocalypse, Preparing Wisconsin New Records Control is Good Small State Agency — Prepare for the Property Opportunity Zones Schedule Approved for Municipalities Big Statewide Impact Tax Meltdown for Investment for Municipalities 4 8 The Municipality12 | January 2019 20 24 1 Is there a company that insures only cities and villages? Oh yes, dear Why LWMMI, of course For 33 years, the League of Wisconsin Municipalities Insurance Program has responded to the coverage needs of local cities and villages, saving them substantial amounts of money in the process Protecting The Communities We Live In. 608.833.9595 | www.LWMMI.org A Mutual Company Owned by Member Cities and Villages. TheMunicipality The Municipality Official Monthly Publication of the League of Wisconsin Municipalities January | 2019 Volume 114, No. 1, January 2019 Editorial Offices 131 W. Wilson St., Suite 505, Madison, WI 53703 Feature Dial (608) 267-2380 In-State (800) 991-5502 Fax: (608) 267-0645 Small State e-mail: [email protected] Split Party Agency — Here’s to Did You Website: www.lwm-info.org Control is Good for Big Statewide You Know? The Municipality serves as the medium of Municipalities Impact exchange of ideas and information on municipal affairs for the officials of Wisconsin cities and villages. Nothing included herein is to 3 4 8 11 be construed as having the endorsement of the League unless so specifically stated. The Municipality (ISSN 0027-3597) is published monthly at $25 per year ($5.00 per copy, back After the Retail Preparing issues $5.00 each) by the League of Wisconsin Apocalypse, Wisconsin Municipalities, 131 W.
    [Show full text]
  • I-20 East Transit Initiative the Study Schedule Below Provides an Overview of the Work in the Year Ahead of the I-20 East Transit Initiative
    4 Study Schedule I-20 East Transit Initiative The study schedule below provides an overview of the work in the year ahead of the I-20 East Transit Initiative. We are kicking off our environmental studies with Public Scoping Meetings. The Scoping Meetings will be an opportunity Newsletter No. 3 Fall 2012 to introduce the LPA to the public, and a venue for the public to provide comment on any impacts to the social, cultural or natural environment that could arise from the construction of the LPA. If you are unable to attend any of I-20 East Corridor Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) the meetings advertised below, please provide your written comments to Janide Sidifall, Office of Transit Systems The Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA), as adopted by the MARTA Board of Directors in April 2012, is comprised of the Planning, MARTA, 2424 Piedmont Road, NE Atlanta, GA 30324-3330, by October 15, 2012. Comments may also be extension of the existing east-west heavy rail transit (HRT) line from the Indian Creek Station to the Mall at Stonecrest submitted online at the project website: http://www.itsmarta.com/120-east-corr.aspx. For project updates, visit the in eastern DeKalb County and a new bus rapid transit (BRT) service along I-20 between downtown Atlanta and Wesley project website or find us on Facebook. Chapel Road, east of I-285 in DeKalb County. The proposed HRT service would I-20 East LPA I‐20 East Transit Initiative Environmental Schedule extend the existing MARTA rail line Heavy Rail Transit (HRT) 2012 2013 south parallel to I-285, then east parallel Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC. 2001 Annual Report on Behalf of All the Employees Of
    GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC. 2001 annual report On behalf of all the employees of General Growth Properties, I would like to extend our condolences to anyone who lost a loved one, a friend, an acquaintance or a co-worker in The regional mall business is about relationships. the tragedy of September 11, 2001. We do not forge them lightly, but with the intent We are a country of strong individuals to nurture and strengthen them over time. Even in periods of distress, the relationships with who will continue to unite as we have rock solid our consumers, owners, retailers, and employees keep throughout our history.We will not us rooted in one fundamental belief: that success can be achieved allow horrific acts of terrorism to destroy when we work together.The dynamics of our the greatest and most powerful nation industry dictate that sustainability is contingent upon in the world. God bless you. the integrity of our business practices.We will never lose sight of this fact and will carry out every endeavor to reflect the highest standards. contents Financial Highlights . lift Portfolio . 12 Company Profile . lift Financial Review . 21 Operating Principles . 2 Directors and Officers . 69 Shareholders’ Letter . 4 Corporate Information . 70 Shopping Centers Owned at year end includes Centermark 1996 75 company profile General Growth Properties and its predecessor companies 1997 64 have been in the shopping center business for nearly fifty years. It is the second largest regional 1998 84 mall Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) in the United States. General Growth owns, develops, 1999 93 operates and/or manages shopping malls in 39 states.
    [Show full text]
  • Shops at Turner Hill 8200 Mall Parkway, Lithonia, Ga 30038 ™ Offering Memorandum Confidentiality & Disclaimer Statement
    SHOPS AT TURNER HILL 8200 MALL PARKWAY, LITHONIA, GA 30038 ™ OFFERING MEMORANDUM CONFIDENTIALITY & DISCLAIMER STATEMENT This Offering Memorandum contains select information pertaining to the business and affairs of Shops at Turner Hill located at 8200 Mall Parkway, Lithonia, GA 30038 (“Property”). It has been prepared by Matthews Retail Advisors . This Offering Memorandum may not be all-inclusive or contain all of the information a prospective purchaser may desire. The information contained in this Offering Memorandum is confidential and furnished solely for the purpose of a review by a prospective purchaser of the Property. It is not to be used for any other purpose or made available to any other person without the written consent of Seller or Matthews Retail Advisors . The material is based in part upon information supplied by the Seller and in part upon financial information obtained from sources it deems reliable. Owner, nor their officers, employees, or agents makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this Offering Memorandum or any of its contents and no legal liability is assumed or shall be implied with respect thereto. Prospective purchasers should make their own projections and form their own conclusions without reliance upon the material contained herein and conduct their own due diligence. By acknowledging your receipt of this Offering Memorandum for the Property, you agree: 1. The Offering Memorandum and its contents are confidential; 2. You will hold it and treat it in the strictest of confidence; and 3. You will not, directly or indirectly, disclose or permit anyone else to disclose this Offering Memorandum or its contents in any fashion or manner detrimental to the interest of the Seller.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 20-13076-BLS Doc 67 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 14
    Case 20-13076-BLS Doc 67 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------------ x : In re: : Chapter 11 : Case No. 20-13076 (BLS) FRANCESCA’S HOLDINGS CORPORATION, : et al.,1 : Joint Administration Requested : Debtors. : Re: D.I. 8 ------------------------------------------------------------ x SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF SHERYL BETANCE IN SUPPORT OF THE DEBTORS’ APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE RETENTION AND EMPLOYMENT OF STRETTO AS CLAIMS AND NOTICING AGENT, NUNC PRO TUNC TO THE PETITION DATE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1746, I, Sheryl Betance, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief: 1. I am a Senior Managing Director of Corporate Restructuring at Stretto, a chapter 11 administrative services firm with offices at 410 Exchange, Ste. 100, Irvine, CA 92602. Except as otherwise noted, I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein, and if called and sworn as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto. 2. On December 3, 2020, the Debtors filed the Debtors’ Application for Entry of an Order Authorizing the Retention and Employment of Stretto as Claims and Noticing Agent, Nunc Pro Tunc to the Petition Date [D.I. 8] (the “Application”),2 and the Declaration of Sheryl Betance in Support of the Debtors’ Application for Entry of an Order Authorizing the Retention and 1 The Debtors in these cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are Francesca’s Holdings Corporation (4704), Francesca’s LLC (2500), Francesca’s Collections, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Decatur's Transportation Network, 2007
    3 • Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 CHAPTER • 3 Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 othing speaks louder of a city’s transportation system than how its residents use it. A public survey conducted as part of the CTP revealed that sixty-seven N percent of commuters drive alone to get to work or school. Over 20 percent of commuters in Decatur either walk, bike or take transit. Even more interesting, 79 percent of residents reported having walked or ridden a bike to downtown Decatur. Additionally, the majority of residents feel that it is easy to get around the City. These results indicate a system that already provides a lot of choice for travelers. The following sections detail the extent of these choices, i.e. the facilities that make up the existing Decatur transportation network. The CTP uses this snapshot of how Decatur gets around in 2007 to recommend how the City can build upon its existing strengths to realize its vision of a healthy and well-connected community. Existing Street Network Streets are where it all comes together for travel in and through Decatur. The streets and their edges provide places for people to walk, bicycle and travel in buses and other vehicles. Compared with the MARTA rail system and off-road paths and greenways, the street system in Decatur accommodates the majority of travel and is detailed below. Roadway Classification in Decatur In 1974, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published the manual Highway Functional Classification - Concepts, Criteria and Procedures. The manual was revised in 1989 and forms the basis of this roadway classification inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Shack Closing Locations
    Radio Shack Closing Locations Address Address2 City State Zip Gadsden Mall Shop Ctr 1001 Rainbow Dr Ste 42b Gadsden AL 35901 John T Reid Pkwy Ste C 24765 John T Reid Pkwy #C Scottsboro AL 35768 1906 Glenn Blvd Sw #200 - Ft Payne AL 35968 3288 Bel Air Mall - Mobile AL 36606 2498 Government Blvd - Mobile AL 36606 Ambassador Plaza 312 Schillinger Rd Ste G Mobile AL 36608 3913 Airport Blvd - Mobile AL 36608 1097 Industrial Pkwy #A - Saraland AL 36571 2254 Bessemer Rd Ste 104 - Birmingham AL 35208 Festival Center 7001 Crestwood Blvd #116 Birmingham AL 35210 700 Quintard Mall Ste 20 - Oxford AL 36203 Legacy Marketplace Ste C 2785 Carl T Jones Dr Se Huntsville AL 35802 Jasper Mall 300 Hwy 78 E Ste 264 Jasper AL 35501 Centerpoint S C 2338 Center Point Rd Center Point AL 35215 Town Square S C 1652 Town Sq Shpg Ctr Sw Cullman AL 35055 Riverchase Galleria #292 2000 Riverchase Galleria Hoover AL 35244 Huntsville Commons 2250 Sparkman Dr Huntsville AL 35810 Leeds Village 8525 Whitfield Ave #121 Leeds AL 35094 760 Academy Dr Ste 104 - Bessemer AL 35022 2798 John Hawkins Pky 104 - Hoover AL 35244 University Mall 1701 Mcfarland Blvd #162 Tuscaloosa AL 35404 4618 Hwy 280 Ste 110 - Birmingham AL 35243 Calera Crossing 297 Supercenter Dr Calera AL 35040 Wildwood North Shop Ctr 220 State Farm Pkwy # B2 Birmingham AL 35209 Center Troy Shopping Ctr 1412 Hwy 231 South Troy AL 36081 965 Ann St - Montgomery AL 36107 3897 Eastern Blvd - Montgomery AL 36116 Premier Place 1931 Cobbs Ford Rd Prattville AL 36066 2516 Berryhill Rd - Montgomery AL 36117 2017 280 Bypass
    [Show full text]
  • Tucker Medical Center | 4445 Cowan Rd, Tucker, GA 30084
    TUCKER MEDICAL CENTER 4445 COWAN RD | TUCKER, GA 8.25% 10-YEAR $57,824 CAP RATE LEASE NOI 1 | OFFERING MEMORANDUM CONTENTS 03 EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 06 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW 08 TENANT OVERVIEW 10 AREA OVERVIEW LISTED BY: RYAN BURKE Associate D: (949) 226-8385 M: (847) 361-4181 E: [email protected] License No. 02100941 (CA) RAHUL CHHAJED Associate Vice President & Director D: (949) 432-4513 M: (818) 434-1106 E: [email protected] License No. 01986299 (CA) MICHAEL MORENO Associate Vice President & Director D: (949) 432-4511 M: (818) 522-4497 E: [email protected] License No. 01982943 (CA) KYLE MATTHEWS Broker of Record License No. 67120 (GA) ™ EXECUTIVE SECTION OVERVIEW 01 3 PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS • Easy Access: This easily accessible property experiences excellent visibility, demonstrating the revitalization of the medical care setting, which is ideal from a location and viability standpoint • Continuous Rent Growth: Attractive annual increases of 2.5% provide a favorable hedge against inflation to LIST PRICE ensure the growth of your investment dollars year after year $700,897 • Development Opportunity: This real estate sits on 2.31 acres of land in the heart of Tucker, Georgia, allowing for considerable development opportunities • High Yield Investment: Achieve a healthy cashflow and return on your investment dollars with an attractive year-one 8.25% cap rate. LOCATION HIGHLIGHTS • Downtown Tucker: Nestled among multiple strip centers, service centers, and national tenants such as UPS, Wendy’s, Publix, and Staples, this location
    [Show full text]
  • Bankruptcy Forms for Non-Individuals, Is Available
    Case 16-10056-RAM Doc 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 47 Fill in this information to identify your case: United States Bankruptcy Court for the: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case number (if known) Chapter you are filing under: Chapter 7 Chapter 11 Chapter 12 Chapter 13 Check if this an amended filing Official Form 201 Voluntary Petition for Non-Individuals Filing for Bankruptcy 12/15 If more space is needed, attach a separate sheet to this form. On the top of any additional pages, write the debtor's name and case number (if known). For more information, a separate document, Instructions for Bankruptcy Forms for Non-Individuals, is available. 1. Debtor's name Goodman and Dominguez, Inc. 2. All other names debtor DBA Traffic used in the last 8 years DBA Traffic Shoe Include any assumed DBA Traffic Shoes names, trade names and DBA Traffic Shoe, Inc. doing business as names DBA Goodman & Dominguez, Inc. 3. Debtor's federal Employer Identification 59-2268839 Number (EIN) 4. Debtor's address Principal place of business Mailing address, if different from principal place of business 10701 NW 127 St Medley, FL 33178 Number, Street, City, State & ZIP Code P.O. Box, Number, Street, City, State & ZIP Code Miami-Dade Location of principal assets, if different from principal County place of business Various retail stores located in several states in the US and Puerto Rico Number, Street, City, State & ZIP Code 5. Debtor's website (URL) www.trafficshoe.com 6. Type of debtor Corporation (including Limited Liability Company (LLC) and Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)) Partnership Other.
    [Show full text]