DOCSLIB.ORG

VM10 Dijkstra New Vm3hermosillobehrensdef.Qxd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
VM10 Dijkstra New Vm3hermosillobehrensdef.Qxd Vita Malacologica 10: 1-108 6 April 2013 Pectinoidea (Bivalvia: Propeamussiidae and Pectinidae) from the Panglao region, Philippine Islands Henk H. DIJKSTRA Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Department of Marine Zoology, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] Key words: Bivalvia, Pectinoidea, Propeamussiidae, Pectinidae, Panglao, Philippines, Recent, taxonomy, nomenclature, new species, distribution ABSTRACT Genus Similipecten ............................................................ 22 Similipecten eous .............................................................. 22 Sixty one Pectinoidea species (11 Propeamussiidae and 50 Pectinidae) collected by the 2004 Panglao Marine Biodiv- ersity Project (PMBP) to Panglao, Philippines, and the Family Pectinidae ............................................................ 24 PANGLAO 2005 Deep-Sea Cruise are described. One Prope- Subfamily Camptonectinae ............................................... 24 amussiidae species is new to science: Parvamussium largoi Genus Delectopecten ........................................................ 24 spec. nov. Three pectinoidean species (1 Propeamus-siidae, 2 Delectopecten alcocki ....................................................... 24 Pectinidae) are new records for the Philippines: Similipecten Delectopecten musorstomi ................................................ 25 eous (Melvill in Melvill & Standen, 1907), "Mimachlamys" kauaiensis (Dall, Bartsch & Rehder, 1938) and Haumea Subfamily Palliolinae ........................................................ 26 rehderi (Grau, 1960). Records of species in the ZMA collec- Tribe Palliolini .................................................................. 26 tion (now Naturalis Biodiversity Center) from the Philippines, Genus Palliolum ................................................................ 26 not sampled by PMBP 2004 and PANGLAO 2005, are given. Palliolum minutulum ......................................................... 26 Amussium electrum Pelseneer, 1911 is newly synonymised with Propeamussium caducum (E.A. Smith, 1885). Type data, Subfamily Pectininae ........................................................ 27 references, descriptions, horizontal and vertical distribution Tribe Decatopectinini ........................................................ 27 and habitat of each species are provided. Genus Decatopecten ......................................................... 27 Decatopecten plica ............................................................ 27 Decatopecten radula radula ............................................. 30 CONTENTS Genus Anguipecten ........................................................... 33 Introduction ......................................................................... 2 Anguipecten picturatus ..................................................... 33 Materials and methods ........................................................ 3 Anguipecten superbus ....................................................... 34 Abbreviations ...................................................................... 3 Results ................................................................................. 5 Genus Bractechlamys ........................................................ 34 Systematic part .................................................................... 5 Bractechlamys oweni ........................................................ 35 Family Propeamussiidae .................................................. 5 Genus Excellichlamys ....................................................... 35 Genus Propeamussium ........................................................ 7 Excellichlamys spectabilis ................................................ 38 Propeamussium caducum ................................................. 10 Propeamussium jeffreysii .................................................. 13 Genus Glorichlamys .......................................................... 39 Propeamussium rubrotinctum ........................................... 13 Glorichlamys elegantissima .............................................. 39 Propeamussium sibogai .................................................... 14 Glorichlamys quadrilirata ................................................ 40 Propeamussium siratama .................................................. 15 Genus Gloripallium .......................................................... 42 Genus Parvamussium ........................................................ 17 Gloripallium pallium ........................................................ 42 Parvamussium araneum .................................................... 17 Gloripallium speciosum .................................................... 43 Parvamussium cristatellum .............................................. 18 Parvamussium largoi spec. nov. ...................................... 19 Genus Juxtamusium .......................................................... 44 Parvamussium pauciliratum ............................................. 19 Juxtamusium coudeini ....................................................... 44 Parvamussium scitulum .................................................... 21 Juxtamusium maldivense .................................................. 46 VITA MALACOLOGICA, 10: 1 Dijkstra, H.H. - The Pectinoidea from Panglao Genus Mirapecten ............................................................. 46 Tribe Mimachlamydini ..................................................... 88 Mirapecten mirificus ......................................................... 47 Genus Mimachlamys ......................................................... 88 Mirapecten moluccensis .................................................... 47 Mimachlamys albolineata ................................................. 88 Mirapecten rastellum ........................................................ 49 Mimachlamys cloacata ..................................................... 89 Mimachlamys gloriosa ...................................................... 92 "Mimachlamys" kauaiensis ............................................... 93 Tribe Amusiini .................................................................. 50 Mimachlamys lentiginosa ................................................. 93 Genus Amusium ................................................................ 50 Mimachlamys sanguinea ................................................... 96 Amusium pleuronectes ...................................................... 50 Tribe Aequipectinini ......................................................... 98 Genus Dentamussium ........................................................ 54 Genus Cryptopecten .......................................................... 98 Dentamussium obliteratum ............................................... 54 Cryptopecten bullatus ....................................................... 98 Cryptopecten nux .............................................................. 99 Tribe Pectinini ................................................................... 54 Genus Serratovola ............................................................ 54 Genus Haumea ................................................................ 100 Serratovola rubicunda ...................................................... 55 Haumea rehderi .............................................................. 100 Subfamily Chlamydinae .................................................... 57 Discussion ....................................................................... 101 Tribe Chlamydini .............................................................. 57 Acknowledgements ......................................................... 101 Genus Complicachlamys ................................................... 57 References ....................................................................... 101 Complicachlamys wardiana .............................................. 57 Genus Coralichlamys ........................................................ 58 INTRODUCTION Coralichlamys madreporarum .......................................... 58 In the first decades of the nineteenth century only a very Genus Hemipecten ............................................................ 60 few scallop species were known from the Philippine Archipe- Hemipecten forbesianus .................................................... 61 lago. During a voyage to the Philippines in 1836-1840 H. Cuming collected several unknown pectinids, which were Genus Laevichlamys ......................................................... 61 described by G.B. Sowerby 2nd in 1842 and by L.A. Reeve Laevichlamys aliae ............................................................ 64 during the years 1852 and 1853. The first expedition after Cu- Laevichlamys cuneata ....................................................... 64 ming's voyage was H.M.S. "Samarang" (1843-1846), treated Laevichlamys deliciosa ..................................................... 65 by Adams & Reeve in 1849 and 1850 (Trew, 1992). Only a Laevichlamys gladysiae .................................................... 66 few pectinids were discovered as new for science, viz. Hemi- Laevichlamys mollita ........................................................ 68 pecten forbesianus Adams & Reeve, 1849 (Petit, 2007: 99) Laevichlamys multisqualida .............................................. 68 and Pecten fulvicostatus Adams & Reeve,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Synonymous Codon Usage Patterns in Sixty-Four Different Bivalve Species
    Analysis of synonymous codon usage patterns in sixty-four diVerent bivalve species Marco Gerdol1, Gianluca De Moro1, Paola Venier2 and Alberto Pallavicini1 1 Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy 2 Department of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy ABSTRACT Synonymous codon usage bias (CUB) is a defined as the non-random usage of codons encoding the same amino acid across diVerent genomes. This phenomenon is common to all organisms and the real weight of the many factors involved in its shaping still remains to be fully determined. So far, relatively little attention has been put in the analysis of CUB in bivalve mollusks due to the limited genomic data available. Taking advantage of the massive sequence data generated from next generation sequencing projects, we explored codon preferences in 64 diVerent species pertaining to the six major evolutionary lineages in Bivalvia. We detected remarkable diVerences across species, which are only partially dependent on phylogeny. While the intensity of CUB is mild in most organisms, a heterogeneous group of species (including Arcida and Mytilida, among the others) display higher bias and a strong preference for AT-ending codons. We show that the relative strength and direction of mutational bias, selection for translational eYciency and for translational accuracy contribute to the establishment of synonymous codon usage in bivalves. Although many aspects underlying bivalve CUB still remain obscure, we provide for the first time an overview of this phenomenon
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the Peer Reviewed Version of the Following Article: JM Serb, E
    ACCEPTED VERSION "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: J. M. Serb, E. Sherratt, A. Alejandrino & D. C. Adams Phylogenetic convergence and multiple shell shape optima for gliding scallops (Bivalvia: Pectinidae) Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2017; 30(9):1736-1747 © 2017 European Society for Evolutionary Biology which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13137 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving." PERMISSIONS https://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/licensing-open-access/open- access/self-archiving.html Publishing in a subscription based journal Accepted (peer-reviewed) Version The accepted version of an article is the version that incorporates all amendments made during the peer review process, but prior to the final published version (the Version of Record, which includes; copy and stylistic edits, online and print formatting, citation and other linking, deposit in abstracting and indexing services, and the addition of bibliographic and other material. Self-archiving of the accepted version is subject to an embargo period of 12-24 months. The embargo period is 12 months for scientific, technical, and medical (STM) journals and 24 months for social science and humanities (SSH) journals following publication of the final article. • the author's personal website • the author's company/institutional repository or archive • not for profit subject-based repositories such as PubMed Central Articles may be deposited into repositories on acceptance, but access to the article is subject to the embargo period. Journal of Evolutionary Biology - 12 months embargo The version posted must include the following notice on the first page: "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI].
    [Show full text]
  • DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project
    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 1 Comprehensive International Points List
    Table 1 Comprehensive International Points List FCC ITU-T Country Region Dialing FIPS Comments, including other 1 Code Plan Code names commonly used Abu Dhabi 5 971 TC include with United Arab Emirates Aden 5 967 YE include with Yemen Admiralty Islands 7 675 PP include with Papua New Guinea (Bismarck Arch'p'go.) Afars and Assas 1 253 DJ Report as 'Djibouti' Afghanistan 2 93 AF Ajman 5 971 TC include with United Arab Emirates Akrotiri Sovereign Base Area 9 44 AX include with United Kingdom Al Fujayrah 5 971 TC include with United Arab Emirates Aland 9 358 FI Report as 'Finland' Albania 4 355 AL Alderney 9 44 GK Guernsey (Channel Islands) Algeria 1 213 AG Almahrah 5 967 YE include with Yemen Andaman Islands 2 91 IN include with India Andorra 9 376 AN Anegada Islands 3 1 VI include with Virgin Islands, British Angola 1 244 AO Anguilla 3 1 AV Dependent territory of United Kingdom Antarctica 10 672 AY Includes Scott & Casey U.S. bases Antigua 3 1 AC Report as 'Antigua and Barbuda' Antigua and Barbuda 3 1 AC Antipodes Islands 7 64 NZ include with New Zealand Argentina 8 54 AR Armenia 4 374 AM Aruba 3 297 AA Part of the Netherlands realm Ascension Island 1 247 SH Ashmore and Cartier Islands 7 61 AT include with Australia Atafu Atoll 7 690 TL include with New Zealand (Tokelau) Auckland Islands 7 64 NZ include with New Zealand Australia 7 61 AS Australian External Territories 7 672 AS include with Australia Austria 9 43 AU Azerbaijan 4 994 AJ Azores 9 351 PO include with Portugal Bahamas, The 3 1 BF Bahrain 5 973 BA Balearic Islands 9 34 SP include
    [Show full text]
  • The Lower Bathyal and Abyssal Seafloor Fauna of Eastern Australia T
    O’Hara et al. Marine Biodiversity Records (2020) 13:11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-020-00194-1 RESEARCH Open Access The lower bathyal and abyssal seafloor fauna of eastern Australia T. D. O’Hara1* , A. Williams2, S. T. Ahyong3, P. Alderslade2, T. Alvestad4, D. Bray1, I. Burghardt3, N. Budaeva4, F. Criscione3, A. L. Crowther5, M. Ekins6, M. Eléaume7, C. A. Farrelly1, J. K. Finn1, M. N. Georgieva8, A. Graham9, M. Gomon1, K. Gowlett-Holmes2, L. M. Gunton3, A. Hallan3, A. M. Hosie10, P. Hutchings3,11, H. Kise12, F. Köhler3, J. A. Konsgrud4, E. Kupriyanova3,11,C.C.Lu1, M. Mackenzie1, C. Mah13, H. MacIntosh1, K. L. Merrin1, A. Miskelly3, M. L. Mitchell1, K. Moore14, A. Murray3,P.M.O’Loughlin1, H. Paxton3,11, J. J. Pogonoski9, D. Staples1, J. E. Watson1, R. S. Wilson1, J. Zhang3,15 and N. J. Bax2,16 Abstract Background: Our knowledge of the benthic fauna at lower bathyal to abyssal (LBA, > 2000 m) depths off Eastern Australia was very limited with only a few samples having been collected from these habitats over the last 150 years. In May–June 2017, the IN2017_V03 expedition of the RV Investigator sampled LBA benthic communities along the lower slope and abyss of Australia’s eastern margin from off mid-Tasmania (42°S) to the Coral Sea (23°S), with particular emphasis on describing and analysing patterns of biodiversity that occur within a newly declared network of offshore marine parks. Methods: The study design was to deploy a 4 m (metal) beam trawl and Brenke sled to collect samples on soft sediment substrata at the target seafloor depths of 2500 and 4000 m at every 1.5 degrees of latitude along the western boundary of the Tasman Sea from 42° to 23°S, traversing seven Australian Marine Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of the Rumphius Biohistorical Expedition to Ambon (1990)
    Results of the Rumphius Biohistorical Expedition to Ambon (1990) Part 6. Mollusca, Bivalvia, Pectinidae H.H. Dijkstra Dijkstra, H.H. Results of the Rumphius Biohistorical Expedition to Ambon (1990). Part 6. Mollusca, Bivalvia, Pectinidae. Zool. Med. Leiden 71 (27), 30.xii.1997: 313-343, figs 1-49, tabs 1-3.— ISSN 0024-0672. Henk H. Dijkstra, Institute of Systematics and Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, Zoolog• ical Museum, Department of Malacology, P.O. Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e- mail: [email protected]). Key words: Rumphius Biohistorical Expedition; Indonesia; Ambon; Mollusca; Bivalvia; Pectinidae. During the Rumphius Biohistorical Expedition (1990) to Ambon 17 Pectinidae species were collected, nine of which were described by Rumphius (1705) and five illustrated by Rumphius. One species, viz. Decatopecten plica (Linnaeus, 1758), illustrated in Rumphius (1705: pi. 44, fig. O), has not been refound. No decisive evidence is found of Rumphius' pectinids kept in either the Gualtieri collection at Calci, or in the Naturhistorisches Museum at Vienna. Introduction During the Rumphius Biohistorical Expedition (4 November 1990 - 14 December 1990) to Ambon (Moluccas, Indonesia) 68 samples of Pectinidae including 17 species were collected from 18 stations in the shallow coastal waters around the island (see table 2). All pectinids mentioned by Rumphius (1705, 1741, 1766), excepting D. plica (Linnaeus, 1758) (fig. 59), were rediscovered by the present expedition. Rumphius (1705) described nine species from the same region. Altogether c. 62 (sub)species of Pectinidae are known from the Indonesian Archipelago (see table 2) from littoral to bathyal depths. Most likely additional pectinid species could be found around Ambon by dredging or trawling in deeper waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Pectinidae, Bival- Biological Lines. Peamussium, Une Espèce Est
    Bull. Inst. r. Sci. nat. Belg. 47 32 Brux. Bull. K. Belg. Inst. Nat. Wet. 30.11.1971 SYSTEMATIC REVISION OF ENTOLIUM, PROPEAMUSSIUM (AMUSIIDAE) AND SYNCYCLONEMA (PECTINIDAE, BIVALVIA, MOLLUSCA) OF THE EUROPEAN BOREAL CRETACEOUS by Annie Dhondt (Brussels) (With 4 plates) SUMMARY The present paper contains a systematic revision of the genera Entolium and Propeamussium (Amusiidae) and Syncyclonema (Pectinidae, Bival- via, Mollusca) in European Cretaceous boréal seas. In Entolium two species are described, in Propeamussium one, and in Syncyclonema eight of which one (S. hagenowi) is new to science, two (S. gamsensis and 5. haggi) are renamed and a former variety is given spécifie status (S. haldonensis). Stress is laid on redefining the species, mostly along biological lines. Material has been studied from as many localities as possible; a nomen- clatorial critical revision is undertaken; type-specimens have been located; type-strata and type-localities are indicated. RESUME La présente étude contient la révision systématique des genres Entolium et Propeamussium (Amusiidae) et Syncyclonema (Pectinidae, Bivalvia, Mollusca) qui ont vécu dans les mers boréales du Crétacé d'Europe. Pour le genre Entolium, deux espèces sont décrites; pour le genre Pro¬ peamussium, une espèce est décrite; pour le genre Syncyclonema huit espèces sont décrites : de celles-ci une est nouvelle (S. hagenowi), deux autres ont reçu un nouveau nom (S. gamsensis & S. haggi) et une der- 2 A. DHONDT 47, 32 nière considérée jusqu'ici comme variété est élevée au rang d'espèce (S. haldonensis). Les espèces sont redéfinies d'après des critères biologiques; les spéci¬ mens étudiés viennent d'autant de localités que possible; une révision cri¬ tique de la nomenclature a été faite; les types ont été recherchés; les localités-types avec leur niveau stratigraphique sont indiquées.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    Index Page numbers in italics refer to Figures and page numbers in bold refer to Tables. acanthodians 74, 75, 77, 78 ostracode case study 106,107, 108-111 accuracy and database management 172, 173 Astraspis 77 acrotetides 26 athyridides 27 Actinodonta 41 Atlantic, Caribbean and East Pacific (ACEP) realm Actinostereon gregareum 133 153, 160, 163, 164 age of fossils, reliability assessment 173,174 atrypides 27 Allonychia 43 Australia 63,183 Aloconconcha 38 Australia/New Guinea block collision 160-162 alpha diversity 2, 99 Autolamellibranchia 39-45 Amadeus Basin 72 Avalonia 19 Ambonychia 43 biodiversity 86, 92, 95 Ambonychiopsis 43 brachiopod diversity profiles 31 Amorphognathus Biofacies 90 conodonts 88, 89, 91 amphibian diversity 183-187,188, 188,189, 191,192, Ordovician bivalves 36 193 Ordovician palaeogeography 28 analytical time averaging 174 palaeolatitudes 95 Ananterodonta 41 anaspids 74, 75, 78 Anatolepis 70, 72, 76, 79 Babinka 4142 Andean Basin Jurassic bivalve populations Baltica diversity 128, 134-136 biodiversity 92, 95 effect of Hispanic Corridor 131-134 conodont provinces 90 extinction rates 129, 130 Ordovician 18-19, 19-20, 28 immigration rates 131 rynchonelliformean brachiopods 15, 18 Angarella 19 Baltoscandian conodont provinces 86 angiosperms 1, 5, 5-6 Bambachian megaguilds 25 Cenozoic biodiversity 158 Bavarilla hofensis 56, 58 Cretaceous radiation 141,143-144 Belodella 90 Antarctic Peninsula 145, 146-147 Belodina 90 Anomalocoelia 43 Bennettitales 144,145 Anomalodesmata 44-45 beta (between habitat) diversity 2, 99, 157
    [Show full text]
  • The Lower Bathyal and Abyssal Seafloor Fauna of Eastern Australia T
    The lower bathyal and abyssal seafloor fauna of eastern Australia T. O’hara, A. Williams, S. Ahyong, P. Alderslade, T. Alvestad, D. Bray, I. Burghardt, N. Budaeva, F. Criscione, A. Crowther, et al. To cite this version: T. O’hara, A. Williams, S. Ahyong, P. Alderslade, T. Alvestad, et al.. The lower bathyal and abyssal seafloor fauna of eastern Australia. Marine Biodiversity Records, Cambridge University Press, 2020, 13 (1), 10.1186/s41200-020-00194-1. hal-03090213 HAL Id: hal-03090213 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03090213 Submitted on 29 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. O’Hara et al. Marine Biodiversity Records (2020) 13:11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-020-00194-1 RESEARCH Open Access The lower bathyal and abyssal seafloor fauna of eastern Australia T. D. O’Hara1* , A. Williams2, S. T. Ahyong3, P. Alderslade2, T. Alvestad4, D. Bray1, I. Burghardt3, N. Budaeva4, F. Criscione3, A. L. Crowther5, M. Ekins6, M. Eléaume7, C. A. Farrelly1, J. K. Finn1, M. N. Georgieva8, A. Graham9, M. Gomon1, K. Gowlett-Holmes2, L. M. Gunton3, A. Hallan3, A. M. Hosie10, P.
    [Show full text]
  • TREATISE ONLINE Number 48
    TREATISE ONLINE Number 48 Part N, Revised, Volume 1, Chapter 31: Illustrated Glossary of the Bivalvia Joseph G. Carter, Peter J. Harries, Nikolaus Malchus, André F. Sartori, Laurie C. Anderson, Rüdiger Bieler, Arthur E. Bogan, Eugene V. Coan, John C. W. Cope, Simon M. Cragg, José R. García-March, Jørgen Hylleberg, Patricia Kelley, Karl Kleemann, Jiří Kříž, Christopher McRoberts, Paula M. Mikkelsen, John Pojeta, Jr., Peter W. Skelton, Ilya Tëmkin, Thomas Yancey, and Alexandra Zieritz 2012 Lawrence, Kansas, USA ISSN 2153-4012 (online) paleo.ku.edu/treatiseonline PART N, REVISED, VOLUME 1, CHAPTER 31: ILLUSTRATED GLOSSARY OF THE BIVALVIA JOSEPH G. CARTER,1 PETER J. HARRIES,2 NIKOLAUS MALCHUS,3 ANDRÉ F. SARTORI,4 LAURIE C. ANDERSON,5 RÜDIGER BIELER,6 ARTHUR E. BOGAN,7 EUGENE V. COAN,8 JOHN C. W. COPE,9 SIMON M. CRAgg,10 JOSÉ R. GARCÍA-MARCH,11 JØRGEN HYLLEBERG,12 PATRICIA KELLEY,13 KARL KLEEMAnn,14 JIřÍ KřÍž,15 CHRISTOPHER MCROBERTS,16 PAULA M. MIKKELSEN,17 JOHN POJETA, JR.,18 PETER W. SKELTON,19 ILYA TËMKIN,20 THOMAS YAncEY,21 and ALEXANDRA ZIERITZ22 [1University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA, [email protected]; 2University of South Florida, Tampa, USA, [email protected], [email protected]; 3Institut Català de Paleontologia (ICP), Catalunya, Spain, [email protected], [email protected]; 4Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA, [email protected]; 5South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, [email protected]; 6Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA, [email protected]; 7North
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Clams (Bivalvia : Cardiidae : Tridacninae)
    Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 2017, 55, 87-388 © S. J. Hawkins, D. J. Hughes, I. P. Smith, A. C. Dale, L. B. Firth, and A. J. Evans, Editors Taylor & Francis GIANT CLAMS (BIVALVIA: CARDIIDAE: TRIDACNINAE): A COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE OF SPECIES AND THEIR DISTRIBUTION, CURRENT THREATS AND CONSERVATION STATUS MEI LIN NEO1,11*, COLETTE C.C. WABNITZ2,3, RICHARD D. BRALEY4, GERALD A. HESLINGA5, CÉCILE FAUVELOT6, SIMON VAN WYNSBERGE7, SERGE ANDRÉFOUËT6, CHARLES WATERS8, AILEEN SHAU-HWAI TAN9, EDGARDO D. GOMEZ10, MARK J. COSTELLO8 & PETER A. TODD11* 1St. John’s Island National Marine Laboratory, c/o Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore, 18 Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119227, Singapore 2The Pacific Community (SPC), BPD5, 98800 Noumea, New Caledonia 3Changing Ocean Research Unit, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, AERL, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada 4Aquasearch, 6–10 Elena Street, Nelly Bay, Magnetic Island, Queensland 4819, Australia 5Indo-Pacific Sea Farms, P.O. Box 1206, Kailua-Kona, HI 96745, Hawaii, USA 6UMR ENTROPIE Institut de Recherche pour le développement, Université de La Réunion, CNRS; Centre IRD de Noumea, BPA5, 98848 Noumea Cedex, New Caledonia 7UMR ENTROPIE Institut de Recherche pour le développement, Université de La Réunion, CNRS; Centre IRD de Tahiti, BP529, 98713 Papeete, Tahiti, French Polynesia 8Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, P. Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand 9School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia 10Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Velasquez Street, Quezon City 1101, Philippines 11Experimental Marine Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117557, Singapore *Corresponding authors: Mei Lin Neo e-mail: [email protected] Peter A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hagoth and the Polynesian Tradition
    Hagoth and the Polynesian Tradition Jerry K. Loveland n what amounts to an aside in the story of the Book of Mormon I peoples, there is in the 63rd chapter of Alma a brief reference to a “curious man” named Hagoth. And it came to pass that Hagoth, he being an exceedingly curi- ous man, therefore he went forth and built him an exceedingly large ship, on the borders of the land Bountiful, by the land Desolation, and launched it into the west sea, by the narrow neck which led into the land northward. And behold, there were many of the Nephites who did enter therein and did sail forth with much provisions, and also many women and children; and they took their course northward. And thus ended the thirty and seventh year. And in the thirty and eighth year, this man built other ships. And the first ship did also return, and many more people did enter into it; and they also took much provisions, and set out again to the land northward. And it came to pass that they were never heard of more. And we suppose that they were drowned in the depths of the sea. And it came to pass that one other ship also did sail forth; and whither she went we know not. (Alma 3:5–8) What we have here, is an account of a colonizing movement of men, women, and children who went out in ships presumably into the Pacific Ocean sometime between 53 and 57 b.c. And they were never heard of again.
    [Show full text]