DOCSLIB.ORG

Black Watershed WRIA 23

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Black Watershed WRIA 23 Black Watershed WRIA 23 Chapter Includes: Beaver Creek Black River Deep Lake Salmon Creek Beaver Creek #667 PART OF BLACK RIVER including Scott and Deep Lakes. It has WATERSHED extensive wetlands associated with it. LENGTH OF RIVER: 11.4 miles GENERAL WATER QUALITY: BASIN SIZE: 21 square miles Good – Part II of the fecal coliform standard was not met at the Littlerock Rd. site for both STREAM ORDER: 3 water years 2003-04 and 2004-05. Low dissolved oxygen levels occur occasionally at PRIMARY LAND USES: the upstream Case Road site due to low stream gradient and flow. Light industrial and commercial in the Maytown and Littlerock communities, and OTHER DATA: agriculture and rural residential Thurston County Department of Water and FISHERIES RESOURCES: (From A Waste Management, (360) 357-2491 or Catalog of Washington Steams and Salmon www.co.thurston.wa.us/monitoring Utilization, WDOF) Thurston County Environmental Health Coho Division, (360) 754-4111 or www.geodata.org/swater GENERAL TOPOGRAPHY: Beaver Creek is a tributary to the Black River and drains the east side of the river basin, 11 Beaver Creek #667 Beaver Creek @ Littlerock Rd The water quality standard for fecal Part I of Fecal Coliform Standard 100000 coliform bacteria has two parts: Part I - the geometric mean shall not exceed 100 10000 Part I - Mean less than 100 cfu/100 mL colony forming units per 100 milliliters of 1000 sample and, Part II - no more than ten 100 percent of the samples shall exceed 200 10 cfu/100 mL. 1 93 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 FC Range & Geometric Mean (cfu/100mL) Water Year (October - September) Data was not collected in water year 1993 - 94. Part II of Fecal Coliform Standard 100 The creek met both parts of the fecal 80 coliform standard at the Littlerock Part II - no more than 10% of samples over 200 cfu/100 mL 60 Road site between 2000 and 2003. But in the 2003/04 and 2004/05 water 40 years, it failed part II of the standard. 20 Percent of Samples >200 cfu/100 mL 0 93 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 Water Year (October - September) Dissolved Oxygen Levels by Year 15 The water quality standard for 14 dissolved oxygen is a lowest one-day 13 minimum of 8 mg/L. There have been 12 11 no recorded violation of the dissolved 10 oxygen standard at the Littlerock Road 9 site, but low dissolved oxygen has been Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) 8 measured farther upstream at Case 7 Water Quality Standard - greater than 8 mg/L 6 Road. 93 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 Water Year (October - September) pH Levels by Year 9 Water Quality Standard - between 6.5 and 8.5 The standard for pH requires the pH 8.5 to be within the range of 6.5 to 8.5. 8 There have been three violations 7.5 measured in the period of record pH since 1993. 7 6.5 6 93 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 Water Year (October - September) 12 Beaver Creek #667 Beaver Creek was monitored at two locations as part of the ambient monitoring program, Littlerock Road Bridge (formerly Hwy 121 Bridge) and Case Road Bridge. The Littlerock Road site is the downstream-most location before the creek discharges to the Black River. The Case Road site was an upstream site used for comparison. Monitoring at the Case Road site was discontinued in 2005. A Washington Department of Ecology study on the Black River and Beaver Creek identified a large dairy operation, located downstream of Case Road, as a major contributor of bacteria and nutrients to the creek. In the late 1990’s the dairy owner implemented many changes in the farm’s operation to mitigate the pollution load to the creek. Those efforts substantially reduced the bacteria levels in the creek and water quality improved. However in the last two water years, 2003/04 and 2004/05, part II of the standard was violated again after 4 years of meeting the standard. It is likely that livestock access issues upstream are contributing to the recent bacteria increase seen. Thurston County is addressing unrestricted livestock practices at one site. Major Issues: # Livestock access practices may be contributing to pollution. # Development pressures are continuing to increase in the area. Funding Sources: # Thurston County 13 _______________________________________________________________________________ Beaver Creek#667 Water Quality Summary Conventional Parameters Beaver Creek at Littlerock Road (formerly Hwy 121) Water Year Data: Cumulative Data: 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 1992-2003 Parameter Units WQ Standard WAC 173-201A # samples Water Mean Range violating Mean Range Year standard Highest 7-DAD 03/04 5.88 – 17.8 Temperature EC 2.90 - 18.25 Max of 17.5EC 04/05 3.46 – 16.78 Dissolved Lowest one-day 03/04 9.29 – 12.16 0 of 9 mg/L 8.53 - 14.4 Oxygen minimum of 8.0 04/05 9.86 – 13.1 0 of 12 03/04 93 70 - 118 Conductivity Fmhos/cm 85 43 - 160 14 04/05 91 70 – 121 03/04 7.3* 6.8 - 7.5 0 of 9 pH 6.5 - 8.5 6.3 - 7.8 04/05 7.1* 6.2 - 7.8 1 of 12 not to exceed 5 Turbidity NTU NTU over 03/04 1.9 0.7 – 2.6 0 of 9 2.98 1 - 10.0 background 04/05 2.23 0.9 – 4.2 0 of 12 % exceeding GMV: <100 colonies/ 03/04 12** 0 - 245 200 Fecal Coliform and < 10% not 115** 0 – 26000 100 ml 04/05 64** 10 - 800 11% to exceed 200 25% Total 03/04 0.041 0.029 - 0.07 mg/L 0.07 0.03 - 0.43 Phosphorus 04/05 0.045 0.022 - 0.089 Nitrate + Nitrite- 03/04 0.7 0.327 – 0.996 mg/L 0.944 0.369 – 2.61 nitrogen 04/05 0.846 0.389 – 2.06 Ammonia mg/L 0.078 <0.010 - 0.407 * Median ** Geometric mean value (GMV) _______________________________________________________________________________ Water Quality Summary Conventional Parameters Beaver Creek at Case Road Cumulative Data: Water Year Data: 1996-2003 Parameter Units WQ Standard 2003/2004 WAC 173-201A Water # samples violating Mean Range Mean Range Year standard Highest 7-DAD Temperature EC 03/04 5.63 – 17.49 3.26 - 17.59 Max of 17.5EC Dissolved Lowest one-day mg/L 03/04 7.08 – 11.5 1 of 9 5.88 - 12.4 Oxygen minimum of 8.0 15 Conductivity Fmhos/cm 03/04 105 63 – 168 93 41 – 181 pH 6.5 - 8.5 03/04 6.9* 6.7 - 7.2 0 of 9 6.4 - 7.6 not to exceed 5 Turbidity NTU NTU over 03/04 2.0 1.1 – 3.3 0 of 9 2.4 0.9 - 6.4 background GMV: <100 and % exceeding colonies/ Fecal Coliform < 10% not to 03/04 40** 10 - 245 200 26** 0 – 510 100 ml exceed 200 11% Total mg/L 03/04 0.028 0.014 - 0.051 0.03 0.009 - 0.18 Phosphorus Beaver Creek#667 Nitrate + mg/L 03/04 0.328 0.176 - 0.519 0.356 0.081 – 1.48 Nitrite-nitrogen Ammonia mg/L 0.020 <0.010 - 0.045 * Median ** Geometric mean value (GMV) Thurston County Water Resources Monitoring Report 2003 - 2004 Beaver Creek @ Littlerock Road _______________________________________________________________________________ Beaver Creek#667 Date Time Temp pH DO Cond @25c FC Turb Flow TP NOx COMMENTS C mg/L umhos/cm cfu/100mL NTU cfs mg/L mg/L 12/17/2003 1:10:00 PM 5.88 6.8 11.82 70 02.2 0.0340.668 FC <5. Too fast and deep to measure flow 1/20/2004 1:45:00 PM 7.17 7.0 11.41 74 02.5 0.0290.690 FC <5. Too fast and deep to do flow 2/18/2004 11:00:00 AM 6.61 6.9 11.56 71 101.8 0.0360.672 Too fast and deep to wade. 3/16/2004 10:20:00 AM 9.06 7.2 12.16 89 51.9 38.8 0.032 0.832 4/20/2004 1:20:00 PM 10.92 7.5 11.62 93 501.6 31.6 0.038 0.754 5/17/2004 2:20:00 PM 14.82 7.4 10.62 106 02.5 13.3 0.0410.996 F.C. result is <5 7/14/2004 1:40:00 PM 17.80 7.3 9.69 111 1150.7 3.7 0.050 0.741 16 8/25/2004 1:45:00 PM 17.31 7.2 9.29 103 2452.6 11.0 0.070 0.327 9/21/2004 11:30:00 AM 12.24 7.4 11.38 118 501.4 10.1 0.036 0.622 Thurston County Water Resources Monitoring Report 2003 - 2004 Beaver Creek @ Case Road _______________________________________________________________________________ Date Time Temp pH DO Cond @25c FC Turb Flow TP NOx COMMENTS C mg/L umhos/cm cfu/100mL NTU cfs mg/L mg/L 12/17/2003 1:30:00 PM 5.63 6.8 10.98 63 103.3 0.0160.519 Too deep & too fast to measure flow. 1/20/2004 2:10:00 PM 7.10 6.7 11.50 67 201.8 39.3 0.014 0.450 2/18/2004 10:30:00 AM 6.19 6.9 10.60 63 301.3 0.0170.390 Too deep to wade 3/16/2004 9:45:00 AM 8.65 7.2 10.55 82 502.3 17.2 0.021 0.290 4/20/2004 1:50:00 PM 10.62 7.2 89 153.2 11.0 0.0290.238 Dissolved Oxygen field recording error 5/17/2004 3:00:00 PM 14.20 7.0 9.56 115 751.7 3.4 0.0350.277 DO-93%saturation 7/14/2004 2:20:00 PM 17.49 7.2 9.87 155 201.1 1.4 0.037 0.259 17 8/25/2004 2:15:00 PM 16.10 6.7 7.08 168 2451.8 4.7 0.051 0.352 9/21/2004 11:10:00 AM 11.45 7.2 8.40 145 1051.3 2.7 0.031 0.176 Beaver Creek#667 Thurston County Water Resources Monitoring Report 2004 - 2005 Beaver Creek @ Littlerock Road _______________________________________________________________________________ Beaver Creek#667 Date Time Temp pH DO Cond @25c FC Turb Flow TP NOx COMMENTS C mg/L umhos/cm cfu/100mL NTU cfs mg/L mg/L 10/20/2004 1:30:00 PM 11.64 6.7 10.09 93 403.5 30.6 0.0660.412 Salmon in creek.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chehalis Basin Fisheries Task Force 25 Years of Action
    CHEHALIS BASIN FISHERIES TASK FORCE 25 YEARS OF ACTION CHEHALIS BASIN FISHERIES TASK FORCE 25 YEARS OF ACTION Chehalis Basin Fisheries Task Force 115 S Wooding Street Aberdeen, WA 98520 Phone/Fax: (360) 533-1766 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.cbftf.com Prepared by: Ellie McMillan Project Data Provided by: CBFTF Technical Staff CBFTF Board Members ©2004 Chehalis Basin Fisheries Task Force Our Mission: Producing salmon for sport and commercial fisheries; Enhancing steelhead and cutthroat trout resources; and Restoring, enhancing and protecting stream habitat critical to these anadromous species. Who are we? The CBFTF is a non-profit organization dedicated to increasing populations of salmon, steelhead, and searun cutthroat trout by and for the citizens and the communities in the Chehalis River Basin. Who is involved? Operations are governed by twenty member (maximum) Board of Directors. These community leaders represent a broad range of Chinook Salmon fisheries interests including commercial and sport fishing enterprises, Tribes, government agencies, private and public organizations and community members. The Board of Directors oversees the operations of the Task Force, determines direction and policy, evaluates projects for funding, seeks out future funding sources and conducts the business of the corporation. The Task Force does not discuss fisheries allocations or other user specific differences. At our table differences are laid aside in favor of enhancing and protecting the Chum Salmon resource for the benefit of all. What do we do? We believe the best way to restore fish runs for the long term is through a balanced approach that includes: · Basin-wide habitat restoration and protection efforts with emphasis on both fisheries restoration and water quality; · Native/wild stock restoration · Enhancement programs that are cost effective and efficient; and, · Community outreach and education that is Coho Salmon focused toward the grassroots citizenry.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report
    Final Draft THURSTON COUNTY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE Inventory and Characterization Report SMA Grant Agreements: G0800104 and G1300026 June 30, 2013 Prepared By: Thurston County Planning Department Building # 1, 2nd Floor 2000 Lakeridge Drive SW Olympia, WA 98502-6045 This page left intentionally blank. Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 1 REPORT PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATES FOR CITIES WITHIN THURSTON COUNTY ...................................................................... 2 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................. 2 SHORELINE JURISDICTION AND DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3 REPORT ORGANIZATION .................................................................................................................................................. 5 2 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 DETERMINING SHORELINE JURISDICTION LIMITS ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F Description of Wetland Types, Complexes, and Mitigation Banks in the Chehalis Basin
    Appendix F Description of Wetland Types, Complexes, and Mitigation Banks in the Chehalis Basin Appendix F Wetland Types Open Water Wetlands The open water cover class includes areas that are primarily composed of deep (greater than 6.6 feet), permanent open water with less than 25% cover by vegetation or exposed soil (Ecology 2013). These areas are not technically considered to be wetlands under the Cowardin system, but rather deepwater habitats (Cowardin et al. 1979). Areas mapped as open water in the Chehalis Basin include the Pacific Ocean, deeper portions of Grays Harbor (including the Grays Harbor Navigation Channel), much of the mainstem Chehalis River, lower portions of many of the larger rivers in the Chehalis Basin (including the Humptulips River, Johns River, Elk River, Hoquiam River, East Hoquiam River, Wishkah River, Wynoochee River, Satsop River, Black River, Newaukum River, Elliot Slough, Grass Creek, and Dempsey Creek), and most lakes, reservoirs, and larger borrow and mine pits in the Chehalis Basin (including Horseshoe Lake, Plummer Lake, Fort Borst Lake, Hayes Lake, Skookumchuck Reservoir, Scott Lake, Deep Lake, Pitman Lake, Black Lake, Moores Lake, Vance Creek Lake, Huttula Lake, Sylvia Lake, Lake Aberdeen, Failor Lake, Wynoochee Lake, Nahwatzel Lake, Lystair Lake, Lake Arrowhead, Stump Lake, and others). The excavated canal system in Ocean Shores, on the Point Brown Peninsula of Grays Harbor, is also classified as open water. Estuarine Wetlands The estuarine wetland type includes tidally influenced wetlands that occur in coastal areas where ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land, and where salinity, due to ocean-derived salts, is equal to or greater than 0.5% (Cowardin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Water Year Report
    2019 Water Year Report Summary of Thurston County Precipitation, Groundwater, Stream and Lake Data from October 2018 to September 2019 Thurston County Community Planning and Economic Development Water Planning February 2020 Comments, Questions, or Errors Please Contact Nathaniel Kale – Water Resource Specialist 2 [email protected] | (360) 786-5549 Acknowledgements The following people contributed to this report: Nathaniel Kale – Water Resource Specialist 2 – Report author, data collection and processing Howard Hama – Water Resource Specialist 2 – Collection and processing of field data, proofreading Mark Biever – Water Resource Specialist 3 – Monitoring program supervisor, proofreading Kevin Hansen – Hydrogeologist – Data analysis, proofreading Comments, Questions, or Errors Please Contact Nathaniel Kale – Water Resource Specialist 2 [email protected] | (360) 786-5549 SUMMARY REPORT and ANALYSIS for WATER YEAR 2019: including Atmospheric, Streamflow, Groundwater and Lake Level Data – Thurston County Water Planning Table of Contents Monitoring Stations and their Basin Codes ............................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary- Water Year 2019 .......................................................................................................................5 Activities .................................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Aquatic Plant Management Society Abstracts 16Th Annual Meeting Seattle, Washington March 27 and 28, 1997
    The Western Aquatic Plant Management Society Abstracts 16th Annual Meeting Seattle, Washington March 27 and 28, 1997 Wetland Monitoring to Support Lake Herbicide Treatments. DAVID S. LAMB, The Lambert Group, Inc., Spokane, WA When planning for whole lake herbicide treatment using Sonar® aquatic herbicide, permanent adverse effects to emergent wetland plants are not anticipated. However, in order to protect project proponents against claims of adverse effects, and to document any changes which do take place, wetland monitoring is recommended. Wetland monitoring should include aerial photography as well as ground level assessment of plant species present and their relative health. The wetland monitoring procedure used at Sacheen Lake (Pend Oreille County, WA) and the Little Pend Oreille Lakes (Stevens County, WA) is described and post- treatment results from Sacheen Lake are presented. FasTEST for Sonar®, A New Management Tool to Optimize the Efficacy and Application of Sonar® . MARK MONGIN, SePRO Corporation, Carmel, IN The commercialization of an immunoassay to determine the Sonar® concentration in water has been completed. This test system, Sonar® FasTEST, provides an alternative to conventional chemical assay procedures. Sonar® FasTEST provides the plant manager/applicator an opportunity to monitor the concentration of Sonar® in the water and make adjustments necessary to maintain the optimum concentration of Sonar® in the water over time. The potential use of this new technology with Sonar® will be discussed. Chehalis River Parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum) Management. BILL WAMSLEY and KEVIN HUPP, Lewis County Noxious Weed Control Board, Chehalis, WA In 1994 an aquatic weed was found growing in the Chehalis River in the Southwest region of Washington State.
    [Show full text]
  • TIRE SALE 1211 Harrison Spring Centralia Starting at √ All-Season 748-0295 Passenger GREAT 99 Traction 36 N
    Shining on $1 State Stage Early Week Edition Local Teams Bring Home Tuesday, Trophies / Sports Serving our communities since 1889 — www.chronline.com March 8, 2016 Forecast for Coho ‘Celebrate Your Families’ Could Hundreds Come Together to Remember Children Lost in Fire Put a Pinch on Anglers, Guides FISHING: Chehalis System Set to See 96 Percent Fewer Wild Silver Salmon in 2016 By Jordan Nailon [email protected] The forecast for 2016 salmon returns are in, and the outlook is not promis- ing for coho. Low returns are predicted almost across the board, and that could mean the cancellation or extreme abbreviation of popular fish- eries on a number of local waterways, including Grays Harbor, Chehalis River, Co- lumbia River, Willapa Harbor Paul Dunn / For The Chronicle and Puget Sound. A large crowd of mourners hold candles at George Washington Park Saturday night during a vigil for the victims of Friday morning's house ire in Centralia. The forecasts, which were formulated by the Washing- ton Department of Fish and Wildlife and treaty tribes, TRAGEDY: Father of project especially dire silver Victims Described returns for the Chehalis River system. Children as the ‘Light of His Life’ in a Statement please see COHO, page Main 14 Prior to Saturday’s Vigil By Kaylee Osowski Gov. Inslee [email protected] A constant drizzle didn’t Threatens stop hundreds of people from coming together to mourn and Bill Vetoes if remember three children lost in Friday’s early morning house No Budget by fire in Centralia. Dozens of people offered Thursday hugs and condolences to the children’s father, Brad Tower, at OLYMPIA (AP) — Gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors: Chehalis Basin and Nearby Drainages, Water Resource Inventory Areas 22 and 23
    SALMON AND STEELHEAD HABITAT LIMITING FACTORS CHEHALIS BASIN AND NEARBY DRAINAGES WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREAS 22 AND 23 WASHINGTON STATE CONSERVATION COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Carol J. Smith, Ph.D. Washington State Conservation Commission 300 Desmond Drive Lacey, Washington 98503 And Mark Wenger Columbia Pacific RC&D Aberdeen, Washington May, 2001 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was developed by the WRIA 22 and 23 Technical Advisory Group for Salmonid Habitat Limiting Factors. Their expertise and cooperation made this report possible. Participants included: Bob Amrine, Lewis Conservation District Bruce Baxter, WA Dept. Fish and Wildlife Scott Brummer, Thurston Conservation District Lonnie Crumley, LWC Consulting Brian Erickson, Columbia Pacific RC&D Doug Fricke, Chehalis Fisheries Task Force Craig Graber, WA Dept. Ecology Lee Hansmann, Grays Harbor County Kahle Jennings, WA Dept. Ecology Mike Kelley, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mike Madsen, Mason Conservation District Mike McGinnis, Chehalis Indian Tribe Osa Odum, NWIFC, SHHIAP John Penberth, Chehalis Basin Partnership Jim Park, WA Dept. Transportation John Sims, Quinault Indian Nation Margaret Rader, Chehalis Basin Partnership Dr. Carol Smith, WA Conservation Commission Chad Stussy, WA Dept. Fish and Wildlife Mark Wenger, Columbia Pacific RC&D Ron Wisner, Grays Harbor Conservation District In addition, an additional committee was formed to develop the prioritization processes. This committee was comprised of technical and non-technical participants, who included: Bob Amrine, Lewis Conservation District Brian Blake, Dept. Corrections, Stafford Creek Facility Lonnie Crumley, LWC Consulting Earl Emerson, Thurston County Citizen Brian Erickson, Columbia Pacific RC&D Doug Fricke, Chehalis Fisheries Task Force Craig Graber, WA Dept. Ecology Lee Hansmann, Grays Harbor County Kahle Jennings, WA Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-2016 Water Year Report
    2015-2016 Water Year Report Summary of Thurston County Precipitation, Groundwater, Stream and Lake Data from October 2014 to September 2016 Thurston County Water Resources – Environmental Monitoring Program April 2017 Acknowledgements: Thank You to the following people who greatly assisted in preparing this report Howard Hama - Water Resource Specialist 2 – Collection and processing of almost all field data used in this report. Nat Kale – Water Resource Specialist 2 – Data analysis, graphics, text and review Sue Stedman - Admistrative Assistant 1– Compiling, editing and formatting the entire report Pat Allen, P.E. – Senior Civil Engineer – Review and editing Comments questions, suggestions or errors please contact: Mark Biever, L.G. L.E.G. –Water Resource Specialist 3 [email protected] SUMMARY REPORT and ANALYSIS for WATER YEARS 2015 -2016 including Atmospheric, Streamflow, Groundwater and Lake Level Data – Thurston County Environmental Monitoring Program Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................1 General ...................................................................................................................................................................1 Weather and Atmospheric Monitoring ......................................................................................................................3 Notable Events .......................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Team Fall 2011 Newsletter • 7 Stream Team Volunteers Plant Native Shrubs Along the Deschutes River in Tumwater
    NEWSLETTER FREE FALL EDITION Inside... Sept-Oct-Nov 2011 Henderson Inlet Tour | 3 A River Runs Through It: Pacific Pond Turtle | 12 Thurston County’s Deschutes River | 8–9 Return of the Salmon | 4–5 Kid’s Page | 14 The First Flush: Fall Rain | 10 Fall is Ideal Planting Time | 6 Calendar of Events | 15 The Elusive but Delectable Chanterelle | 11 Ask a Volunteer | 7 ON THE COVER: Stream Team volunteer, Andrew Davis peers into a shellfish while visiting STREAM TEAM MISSION Henderson Inlet. Photo taken by Rhonda Davis. To protect and enhance the water resources and associated habitats and wildlife in Thurston County through citizen action and education. Steam Team is funded and jointly managed by the stormwater utilities of the Cities of Lacey, Olympia, and Tumwater and Thurston County. Stream Team programs meet the requirements for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for stormwater. STREAM TEAM INQUIRIES IN LACEY: City of Lacey Water Resources Program P.O. Box 3400, Lacey, WA 98509-3400 Attn: Erin Keith Tel: 360-438-2687 TDD: 1-800-833-6388 Get Involved IN OLYMPIA: WITH STREAM TEAM City of Olympia Water Resources Program ! P.O. Box 1967, Olympia, WA 98507-1967 Attn: Patricia Pyle to receive weekly Tel: 360-570-5841 s Get on our email list TDD: 360-753-8270 emails with upcoming events and the electronic IN TUMWATER: version of this newsletter! Send an email request City of Tumwater Water Resources Program 555 Israel Road SW, Tumwater, WA 98501 to [email protected] and we will add Attn: Debbie Smith you today! (Your email will not be shared with Tel: 360-754-4148 anyone outside of Stream Team).
    [Show full text]
  • Supp IV a Issues Overview
    Supplement Section IV — Watershed Management Plan Issues/Recommendations For the Chehalis Basin, WRIA 22/23 Part A — Overview Issue Paper Overview The Partnership requested that the Steering/Technical Committee select the top priority water resource issues in the Chehalis Basin and develop an ap- proach to address each issue. That Committee opted to prioritize the com- prehensive list of issues (see page III–12 through III–28) and then to draft a paper for each of the high priority issues. Each paper would include the following information about a particular water resource issue: • Definition of the Issue • Background - What we know - How it came up - Parties involved - Existing state, federal, local laws & regulations • Summary of Technical Information • Existing Conditions • Discussion of Options for Addressing, Including Management/ Implementation • Analysis of Options • Recommendations - Jurisdictions - Policy or policies needed - Resources/funding needed - Volunteer options • Unanswered or Associated Issues • References/Suggested Reading Process for Selecting Issue Papers The Steering/Technical Committee rated each issue on the comprehensive matrix as high, medium or low priority. These ratings were then totaled, averaged and ranked from highest to lowest priority. The Committee then discussed the list of high priority issues to finalize a suite of issue papers for inclusion in this Plan. The group added or combined where necessary to ensure thorough coverage of water resource concerns in these papers. Once the list was developed and agreed upon by the Steering/Technical Com- mittee, it was presented to the Partnership for review, discussion, amend- ment, and approval. Members of the Steering/Technical Committee then Supplement Section IV 4–9–04 IV-1 volunteered to draft particular issue papers according to their area of exper- tise or interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Thurston County Critical Areas Ordinance Update July 24, 2012
    Thurston County Critical Areas Ordinance Update July 24, 2012 Board of County Commissioners This Page Intentionally Left Blank Critical Areas Ordinance Table of Contents Adopting Ordinance (No. 14773) …………….........................................................................1 Attachment A: Best Available Science and Information List ………................................31 Attachment B: Title 24 – Thurston County Critical Areas Ordinance……..........................89 Chapter 24.01 General Provisions…………………..........………………………………...........90 Chapter 24.03 Definitions………………………………………………………............……......96 Chapter 24.05 Administrative Provisions……………………....................................................125 Chapter 24.10 Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas……………………………............…………..134 Chapter 24.15 Geologic Hazard Areas……………………………………............……………156 Chapter 24.16 Seismic Hazard Area………………………………………............……………182 Chapter 24.17 Volcanic Hazard Area…………………………………............………………..183 Chapter 24.18 Mine Hazard Area……………………………………………............…………186 Chapter 24.20 Frequently Flooded Areas…………………………………............……..……..191 Chapter 24.25 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas……………............…………....214 Chapter 24.30 Wetlands……………………………………………............…………………...268 Chapter 24.35 Special Reports……………………………………................………………….320 Chapter 24.40 Critical Area Review Permit………………………............……………………364 Chapter 24.45 Reasonable Use Exception…………………………………............…………...367 Chapter 24.50 Nonconforming Uses, Structures
    [Show full text]