DOCSLIB.ORG

Pirate Party (Slovenia)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pirate Party (Slovenia) Pirate Party (Slovenia) Party name: Piratska Stranka Slovenije (Pirate Party of Slovenia). Website: https://piratskastranka.si/. Official contact: Nina Konvalinka (international coordinator). Observer members. Pirate Party Japan. Party name: 日本海賊党 (Pirate Party Japan). Website: http://www.piratepartyjapan.org/. Membership fees, delegates and votes â“ European Pirate Party on Invitation to the 1st Annual PPEU Council Meeting Brussels 17/18 July 2015. European Pirate Party â“ Whatâ™s next on Proposals for new statutes. Pirate Party of Slovenia (Slovene: Piratska stranka Slovenije) is a political party in Slovenia. The party was officially registered on 17 October 2012 in Ljubljana.[1]. The party was founded on the same common grounds and principles as other Pirate parties throughout the world, most notably the Swedish Pirate Party, it became a member of the Pirate Parties International[2] on 12 March 2011 at the Pirate Parties International conference in Friedrichshafen, Germany.[3]. This is the english representation of Pirate Party Switzerland. In Switzerland we speak four languages. Our homepage is mainly available in German and French. The Italian representation is the page of the Canton of Ticino, because the Italian speaking part of Switzerland is mainly in Ticino. This english Representation is thought to be an entry point for international visitors. Please proceed to: https://piratenpartei.ch. The Pirate Party ran 2 candidates in Hamilton East and Wellington Central. In Hamilton East our Candidate Bruce Kingsbury won 0.41% of the vote with 137 votes, placing him 7th out of 8 candidates. In Wellington Central our Candidate Gynn Rickerby won 0.72% of the vote with 277 votes, placing him 7th out of 12 candidates. If we received this share of votes nationwide in the party vote, and there was no threshold for representation, the Pirate Party would have won 1 seat. Slovenian Pirate Party was created in 2009. 1 person found this useful. When was Pirate Party Luxembourg created? Pirate Party Luxembourg was created on 2009-10-04. Share to: When was US Pirate Party created? United States Pirate Party was created on 2006-06-06. Share to: When was Pirate Party Ireland created? Pirate Party Ireland was created in 2009. Share to: When was Pirate Party of Ukraine created? Pirate Party of Ukraine was created on 2011-09-27. Share to: When was Slovenian People's Party created? · Slovenia is Ours · Slovenian National Party · Slovenian Pirate Party · Youth Party â“ European Greens · Zares ⢠⢠Former ACTIVE SLOVENIA. · Slovenia is Ours · Slovenian National Party · Slovenian Pirate Party · Youth Party â“ European Greens · Zares ⢠⢠Former Slovenia is Ours. Positive Slovenia Surprise Winner of Election ( II ). Slovenian Press Agency . 4 December 2011 . â¢^ http :// www å…‹ç¾… 埃西亞人. 2004 , gives a 44 , 035 number â¢^ Slovenian census 2002 â¢^ La Croatie . Party of Serbia, Pirate Party of Montenegro, Pirate Party of Poland, Pirate Party of Ukraine, Pirate Party of Austria, Pirate Party of Romania, Pirate Party of the Netherlands, Pirate Party (Belgium), The Pirates Center of Belarus, Pirate Party of Galicia, Pirate Party of Luxembourg, Pirate Party of Morocco, Pirate Party of Tunisia, Pirate Party of Canada, Pirate Party of France, Pirate Party (Slovenia) Slovenian Pirate Party (Slovene: Piratska stranka Slovenije) is a political party in Slovenia. Pirate Party of Slovenia is a political party in Slovenia. The party was officially registered on 17 October 2012 in Ljubljana.[1]. For faster navigation, this Iframe is preloading the Wikiwand page for Pirate Party (Slovenia). Home. News. Pirate Party of Slovenia (Slovene: Piratska stranka Slovenije) is a political party in Slovenia. The party was officially registered on 17 October 2012 in Ljubljana. The party was founded on the same common grounds and principles as other Pirate parties throughout the world, most notably the Swedish Pirate Party. It became a member of the Pirate Parties International on 12 March 2011 at the Pirate Parties International conference in Friedrichshafen, Germany..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romanian Political Science Review Vol. XXI, No. 1 2021
    Romanian Political Science Review vol. XXI, no. 1 2021 The end of the Cold War, and the extinction of communism both as an ideology and a practice of government, not only have made possible an unparalleled experiment in building a democratic order in Central and Eastern Europe, but have opened up a most extraordinary intellectual opportunity: to understand, compare and eventually appraise what had previously been neither understandable nor comparable. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review was established in the realization that the problems and concerns of both new and old democracies are beginning to converge. The journal fosters the work of the first generations of Romanian political scientists permeated by a sense of critical engagement with European and American intellectual and political traditions that inspired and explained the modern notions of democracy, pluralism, political liberty, individual freedom, and civil rights. Believing that ideas do matter, the Editors share a common commitment as intellectuals and scholars to try to shed light on the major political problems facing Romania, a country that has recently undergone unprecedented political and social changes. They think of Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review as a challenge and a mandate to be involved in scholarly issues of fundamental importance, related not only to the democratization of Romanian polity and politics, to the “great transformation” that is taking place in Central and Eastern Europe, but also to the make-over of the assumptions and prospects of their discipline. They hope to be joined in by those scholars in other countries who feel that the demise of communism calls for a new political science able to reassess the very foundations of democratic ideals and procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the European Court of Justice Case of Breyer Mr. Alan S. Reid Sheffield
    The European Court of Justice case of Breyer Mr. Alan S. Reid Sheffield Hallam University Abstract This case note analyses the impact and significance of the European Court of Justice decision in Breyer. The European Court of Justice has expanded the definition of personal data to include dynamic IP addresses. The judgment improves the privacy situation of internet users across the European Union. The facts of Breyer1 Patrick Breyer is a German politician and activist who belongs to the Pirate Party. The Pirate Party was originally set up in Sweden in 2006, as a single issue political party, committed to the modernisation of copyright law in Sweden, following the crackdown on The Pirate Bay peer-to-peer network. After limited success in Sweden, sister parties sprung up across Europe, in order to capitalise on the notoriety of The Pirate Bay. In order to broaden their appeal, the European Pirate Parties set out common themes of campaigning interest, in particular, on issues surrounding the internet, such as open access to information, freedom of expression and privacy. As a technophile and politician committed to internet freedoms, Patrick Breyer vociferously objected to various Federal German government websites retaining details of his dynamic Internet Protocol (IP) address after he had completed browsing. Internet Protocol (IP) addresses are the essential backbone of the internet. Internet protocols are the method by which interconnected computers and devices communicate, share and transfer data between themselves. An IP address consists of either four pairs of numbers (version 4)2 separated by three colons or eight pairs of numbers separated by six colons (version 6).3 The US organisation ICANN4, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering, is tasked with overseeing the interconnectivity and compatibility required for the continued successful operation of the internet infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Media and the Arab Spring Philip N. Howard & Muzammil M
    Digital Media and the Arab Spring Philip N. Howard & Muzammil M. Hussain Philip N. Howard is associate professor at the University of Washington. He is the author of The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Information Technology and Political Islam (2010). Muzammil M. Hussain is a doctoral student in communication at the University of Washington. As has often been noted in these pages, one world region has been practically untouched by the third wave of democratization: North Africa and the Middle East. The Arab world has lacked not only democracy, but even large popular movements pressing for it. In December 2010 and the first months of 2011, however, this situation changed with stunning speed. Massive and sustained public demonstrations demanding political reform cascaded from Tunis to Cairo, Sana’a, Amman, and Manama. This inspired people in Casablanca, Damascus, Tripoli, and dozens of other cities to take to the streets to call for change. By May, major political casualties littered the ground: Tunisia’s Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali and Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, two of the region’s oldest dictators, were gone; the Libyan regime of Muammar Qadhafi was battling an armed rebellion that had taken over half the country and attracted NATO help; and several monarchs had sacked their cabinets and committed to constitutional reforms. Governments around the region had sued for peace by promising their citizens hundreds of billions of dollars in new spending of various kinds. Morocco and Saudi Arabia appeared to be fending off serious domestic uprisings, but as of this writing in May 2011, the outcomes for regimes in Bahrain, Jordan, Syria, and Yemen remain far from certain.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union Launches Full Scale War Against Internet Privacy with #Chatcontrol (Eprivacy Derogation)
    European Union launches full scale war against internet privacy with #ChatControl (ePrivacy Derogation) On July 6, 2021, the European Union voted on the new “ChatControl” proposal. With a shocking number of 537 Members of the European Parliament voting in favor, 133 voting against and 20 abstentions, it was approved. The proposal was put forward under the banner of “emergency measures” and it allows internet companies to scan users’ private messages for material containing child sex abuse. This controversial decision is supposed to fix problems with the European Electronics Communications Code, which came into force last December. The so called “e-Privacy Interim Regulation” (2020/0259(COD)) requires online messenger and email service providers to automatically scan private message content in real time for suspicious text and image content using error-prone artificial intelligence. All cases identified by AI would be automatically disclosed to investigative authorities in the EU, without the individuals concerned knowing about it. This is intended to counter the spread of child pornography on the internet, at least that is the story behind it. But the EU’s plans for ChatControl have beenconfirmed to violate fundamental rights by a former judge of the European Court of Justice. The delegation of the European Pirate Party inserted in the Greens / EFA group has strongly condemned what it considers automated mass surveillance, which as they say means the end of privacy in digital correspondence. German Pirate Party Member of the European Parliament Patrick Breyer plans to take legal action against the regulation and is looking for victims of abuse who would file such a complainant.
    [Show full text]
  • Piratpartier Över Hela Världen Stöder Katalanska Pirater Mot Censur
    2017-10-11 17:44 CEST Piratpartier över hela världen stöder katalanska pirater mot censur Vi, Piratpartierna och de icke-statliga organisationerna i Piratrörelsen runt om i världen, uttrycker vår solidaritet med de katalanska piraterna, vars kampanjwebbplatser rörande folkomröstningen gällande självbestämmande samt användningen av Tor för närvarande censureras av de spanska myndigheterna. Dessutom uttrycker vi vår solidaritet med alla medborgare i Katalonien som har blivit mötta med våldsamt statligt förtryck när de utövat sin demokratiska rösträtt i folkomröstningen om oberoende. Vi fördömer all politisk censur. Den Internetcensur som sker av spanska myndigheter är en oacceptabel kränkning av de mänskliga rättigheterna och de politiska friheterna, oavsett lagenligheten av den katalanska folkomröstningen och de secessionistiska grunderna. Vi uppmanar Europaparlamentet, Europarådets parlamentariska församling och alla demokratiska regeringsorgan över hela världen att ingripa till stöd för demokrati och yttrandefrihet i Katalonien. Mänskliga brott, som det här blatanta åsidosättandet av yttrandefriheten, är aldrig en inre angelägenhet i något land utan hela mänsklighetens angelägenhet. Pirate Parties International (PPI), Geneva http://www.pp-international.net Pirate Party Switzerland - https://piratenpartei.ch - https://partipirate.chPirate Party Canada - https://pirateparty.ca/Pirate without Borders - https://pirates- without-borders.org/Pirate Party of the Netherlands - https://piratenpartij.nl/Pirate Party of Catalonia - http://pirata.catAustrian
    [Show full text]
  • PL&B International
    ANALYSIS European Union court rules that IP addresses are personal data The Breyer case, another landmark ruling on key data protection notions, covers the definition of personal data in relation to dynamic IP addresses and the “legitimate interest” legal basis for data processing. By Monika Kuschewsky . he Court of Justice of the EU only temporarily assigned and change website was accessed, or that of another (CJEU) has yet again issued an each time there is a new connection person who might use that computer. important ruling, interpreting from a computer or device to the Inter - The CJEU then considered whether Tkey notions of the EU Data Protection net. Website operators (as opposed to dynamic IP addresses may be treated as Directive (the Directive) in its recent Internet service providers, ISPs) do not personal data relating to an “identifi - judgement of 19 October 2016 in the usually possess all the information to able natural person”, who can be iden - Case Patrick Breyer vs. Bundesrepub - identify the users behind the IP tified indirectly. In interpreting this lik Deutschland (C -582/14). In particu - address. provision, the CJEU made two lar, the CJEU answered two questions, Though initially dismissed by a important statements: namely: (1) whether dynamic IP lower court, the case was brought • first, “it is not necessary that that addresses constitute personal data for before Germany’s highest civil court information alone allows the data website operators and (2) concerning (the Bundesgerichtshof or BGH), subject to be identified;” and, the permissible scope of Member which referred two questions for a pre - • second, “it is not required that all States’ implementing legislation con - liminary ruling to the CJEU.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear President of the European Parliament, Dear President of The
    Dear President of the European Parliament, Dear President of the European Council, Dear President of the European Commission and Dear President of the French Republic, We all have a responsibility for the shared future of Europe. In this time of crisis, it is high time to re-evaluate some of the rules we have upheld till now and focus on the most important aspects of the European project, which will help us move forward. An unprecedented health crisis is currently affecting millions of people in Europe and tragically taking thousands of lives. However, this is not the end. The economic crisis will crush the hopes and dreams of generations of Europeans. We sincerely hope that we will all do whatever is in our power not to leave anyone behind. We firmly believe that the European Parliament needs to take on its responsibility and share the burden since it is the highest European directly elected body. We need to be part of the solution, not part of the problem. If we want the people to have confidence and trust in the European project, we need to show them that we are also ready to make concessions. Therefore, we would like to ask you to do everything in your power to change the treaties in order to have just a single seat of the Parliament in Brussels. This call has again gained a large majority of support in the 2018 Parliament discharge resolution adopted on 13 May 2020 and shall now be taken into account and acted upon. The financial and environmental costs of moving the Parliament are, especially in these times of digitally connected Europe, extremely high and hard to justify.
    [Show full text]
  • Denis Simonet (DS), Thomas Bruderer (TB), Pat Mächler (PM), Michael Gregr (MG), Jos Doekbrijder (JD)
    Piratenpartei Schweiz PROTOKOLL Datum: Samstag 28. Mai 2011 10:00h-18:30h Ort: Petersgraben 50, Basel Anwesend: Denis Simonet (DS), Thomas Bruderer (TB), Pat Mächler (PM), Michael Gregr (MG), Jos Doekbrijder (JD) Abwesend: - Text Zuständig Datum/Zeit 1. Kommunikationskonzept Präsentation Vorschlag Kommunikationskonzept. Siehe Anhang 1 und 2. Fazit: Die Positionsdokumente sollen regelmässiger, übersichtlicher, einfacher und strukturierter sein. Ziele: 1. Professionalität 2. Branding 3. Wiedererkennungswert 4. Hohe Reaktionsfähigkeit 5. Transparenz (Intern und Extern) 6. PPS Knowledge-base Das heutige System der Positionsdokumentation ist nicht genügend DS, TB 2011-06-02 strukturiert und führt zu Hinterfragung und Unzufriedenheit. Es genügt nicht unseren Anforderungen. Wir werden beim Vorstand beantragen, den vorgeschlagenen Prozess des Kommunikationskonzeptes gemäss Anhang um zu setzen. Unser Ziel ist, einen Mechanismus zu haben, um ein volles PPS Parteiprogramm, basierend auf unsere Grundwerten, zu erreichen. Die gesamte PPS Kommunikation wird auf unsere Grundwerten aufgebaut und deshalb nachvollziehbar und konsistent. Wir gehen davon aus, dass dies als selbstverständlich empfunden wird und zu einer effizienten Kommunikation führt. 1.1. Die heutige PPS hat eine Struktur, welche nicht zu einem offenen Alle Informationsaustausch einlädt. Wie hoffen, dass eine Kommunikationsstruktur wie oben unter Punkt 1 vorgeschlagen dazu beiträgt, dies zu verbessern. Alle 1.2. Mitglieder: Die gegenseitige Wahrnehmung sollte verbessert werden. – Idee: Eine „PPS -Zeitung“, Multimedial auf unser Webseite, wo einzelne Mitglieder ihre PPS-Arbeiten präsentiert können. – Idee: Mitglieder können vorschlagen, für welche PPS-Projekte ein Teil ihres Mitgliederbeitrags verwendet werden sollte. – Die Organisation von verschiedenen Treffen sollte ausgedehnt werden. d.h. mehr Ortschaften. 2. Finanzierung Alle Es ist zu erwarten, dass eine professionelle Kommunikation zu einer besseren externen Wahrnehmung unserer Partei führt.
    [Show full text]
  • (2020) Deliberative Democracy and Political Parties: Functions and Consequences. European Political Science, 19, Pp
    \ Gherghina, S. , Soare, S. and Jacquet, V. (2020) Deliberative democracy and political parties: functions and consequences. European Political Science, 19, pp. 200-211. (doi: 10.1057/s41304-019-00234-0) The material cannot be used for any other purpose without further permission of the publisher and is for private use only. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/211417/ Deposited on 02 March 2020 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 1 Deliberative Democracy and Political Parties: Functions and Consequences Sergiu Gherghina Department of Politics University of Glasgow Sorina Soare Department of Political Science University of Florence Vincent Jacquet Department of Political Science Catholic University of Louvain Abstract Research on intra-party deliberation focuses extensively on its normative aspects and its potential benefits for democratic quality. Little is known about how deliberation functions in practice and the consequences it has. This symposium aims to fill this gap in the literature by bringing together four examples of political parties that use deliberative practices: the Czech Pirate Party, the Danish Alternativet, the Romanian Demos, and the Spanish Workers’ Socialist Party. The symposium maps the use of deliberation and identifies effects such as high quality of internal decision-making process, legitimacy of those running for public office, and electoral performance. Keywords: deliberation, political parties, consequences, legitimacy, elections Introduction Traditional deliberative democratic theory has treated political parties as the least likely environment for good deliberation (Cohen, 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • Encore the ANNUAL RESEARCH MAGAZINE of the ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT INSTITUTE for INTERNET and SOCIETY
    encore THE ANNUAL RESEARCH MAGAZINE OF THE ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT INSTITUTE FOR INTERNET AND SOCIETY VOLUME 2015 encore THE ANNUAL RESEARCH MAGAZINE OF THE ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT INSTITUTE FOR INTERNET AND SOCIETY VOLUME 2015 EDITORIAL Jeanette Hofmann, Director of the Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Not a day goes by without news about the digitalisation of our everyday life, its great promises but also its clashes with established norms and values. Are we ready for chips to be implanted under our skin? Do we embrace the idea of a decentralised digital currency? Will we be outperformed by the miracles of artificial intelligence and what can we expect from algorithmic regulation? Schumpeter’s “creative destruction” challenges us to shed new light on all the things we usually take for granted and to ask ourselves how we can give direction to the ongoing processes of transformation that modern societies face. As an interdisciplinary research institute, the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG) contributes in many ways to address these big questions. First of all, the HIIG has established itself as an important node in a growing network of researchers in the area of Internet and society. In 2015, Julian Staben, one of our first PhD students, submitted his thesis; many more will follow him in 2016. In view of the completion of our first generation of doctoral students, we revised our research programme and placed greater emphasis on interdisciplinary and cross-divisional issues. In addition to the Digitaler Salon, by now a well-established monthly discussion panel co-organised with DRadio Wissen, we organised a number of public and academic events.
    [Show full text]