Near South Community Plan INTRODUCTION

NNearear SouSouthth CommunityCommunity PlanPlan Draft

SHEDD AQUARIUM December 2003 FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

SOLDIER FIELD

McCORMICK PLACE NORTH

HYATT McCORMICK PLACE

McCORMICK PLACE SOUTH

EXPRESSWAY NSON TEVE E. S LAI AD Prepared by: Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. The Near South Community

NEAR NORTH

C hicago Ave.

RIVER NORTH STREETERVILLE

Ohio Ave.

Wacker Drive NEAR WEST WEST LOOP EAST LOOP

R andolph S t. y a w

s LOOP s e

r Madison S t.

p . x e e v E v

i . r A t

. D S v n y t

r r a d e S l

e g l D i e

k e a t h c e n r c S a a i t n o a LAKE S M e h L W S K

e MIICHIIGAN k a L C ongress P arkway Grrantt Parrk

. t S

d e t s UNIVERSITY l a

VILLAGE H Area 1

R oosevelt R d. Museum

r Campus e

i Near South Community y a R

SOUTHWEST w o s s LOOP g e a Burnham r Soldier c i p h x Field Harbor C E

n .

t Area 2 Meigs a S y

l Field a R n

a n C a D

PILSEN

. ve A C ermak R d. er ch Ar

CHINATOWN

S tevens on E xpres s way

ii G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan INTRODUCTION

Chicago's Near South Community The Near South Community, once a The City of Chicago is preparing the encompasses the area bounded by commercial/industrial area, is becom- Near South Community Plan in Congress Parkway to the north, ing increasingly residential in charac- order to address the many land use, Lake Michigan to the east, the ter. This change in character com- zoning and "character" issues con- Stevenson Expressway (I-55) to the menced when abandoned railroad fronting this diverse and dynamic south, and the Chicago River and properties were transformed into new community area. Wentworth Avenue to the west. At residential communities, including The Near South Community Plan two square miles, it is roughly Dearborn Park, River City, and Central involves a three-phase planning double the geographical size of Station. process. Phase One, summarized Chicago's Loop. The Near South has also seen the con- in the Appendix, entails the analysis The Near South is home to many of version of former industrial buildings of existing conditions and identifica- Chicago's outstanding attractions; to residential use, including many in tion of key issues and concerns. including several famous museums; Historic Printing House Row. In Phase Two consists of preliminary the nation's largest convention cen- addition, large-scale public land use, zoning, and "community ter; four miles of waterfront along improvements have been undertaken character" recommendations. Lake Michigan and the Chicago in recent years, including the Phase Three includes preparation River; and four Chicago Landmark relocation of Lake Shore Drive in 1997 and discussion of the draft and final Districts: Printing House Row, and the construction of the District 1 versions of the Near South Commun- Motor Row, Prairie Avenue, and Police Headquarters in 1999. ity Plan document. Historic Michigan Boulevard.

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Near South Community Plan pres- The Plan strives to enhance the Near The Plan recognizes the distinguish- ents policies and guidelines for improve- South Community as a mixed-use urban ing characteristics of the “development ment and redevelopment of the area neighborhood that complements districts” that compose the Near South bounded by Congress Parkway on the Chicago’s nearby commercial, office Communtiy, and strives to link and inter- north, Grant Park and Lake Shore Drive and institutional developments. connect these districts into a cohesive on the east, the Stevenson Expressway The Plan builds upon the existing urban neighborhood. on the south, and the Chicago River on qualities of the Near South Community, The Plan is based on several guiding the west. Roosevelt Road divides the including its rich street life; residential principles, as highlighted below. two study areas (Area1 and Area 2) that orientation; pedestrian scale; historic make up the Near South Community. character; and unique shops, services, and institutions.

ROOSEVELT ROAD

S SHEEDDD

AAQQUAARIRUMIUM

V I FIELFIDELD M MUSSEUEMU OMF OF

R NATURAL HISTORY H L

T NATURAL HISTORY

U R E O

D 13TH STREET M E Y F L

O P

S . S

CONGRESS PARKWAY G

C I

E E E T U U

U H E N N N E E E E R V V V

T C A A S A

14TH5 STREET 1 2 7 E A N H T S N A Congress Parkway Overlay e Congress Parkway Overlay A A A T G I I T S B

h E D

H A

E .

N t C S I W I R

M . . S

S S

. K S

R o

L C

. SOLDIER

E H S FIELD

E SOLDIER 14TH PLACE R

HARRISON STREET C

T FIELD S

E N U N

15TH STREET N E R V

E A A

O E I U R I

B R A N R R E P

. B V S

H H S

A T B

R U W E 1 2 3 7

8 16TH STREET

O V

I S

R L 3 BALBO AVENUE A

O K

G 17TH STREET E

10 S C

I H

H O POLK STREET

C 18TH STREET

POLK E R E U e E 5 8 N

N E E h I V

U L t A

R I

H D

A T

f 8TH STREET N S R E O

o L R

E R

W 19TH STREET

A T

H N I

V H C . V

T W

C A E

N A

CULLERTON STREET R A

I IE H

M 4 E E E T E E E

V U

U T E

A U

H U

9TH STREET N N R R N E

E E T N McCORMICK T E V T

H E V S

U 21ST STREET C V A V A E E C

T T K R PLACE A

A R E A T A

E R

E T I

E . I

R E A N

E H EXPOSITION S O S

R L S M T I A R R E I C A S A U T

CENTER T

S D L B R 5 A S S 4 6 S T A K A N

P M

I 9 S .

C S

E . R W

. S

. S L . T S McCORMICK A S S L A

L Grant Park McCORMICK E TAYLOR T P L PALCACEE E C

S NORTH W U NORTH N

CERMAK ROAD E V A

A HYATT HYATT G S I . MccCCOORMRIMCKI CK H C PLACE O C

I T PLACE 11TH STREET T M A

. E

6 G R O S

9 E

A 23RD STREET

R T

E E

A L

R U E

T D

E H

McCORMICK

. K M c C O R MPILCAK CE S I PLACE N S O U TSHOUTH G

24TH STREET D

E E

Roosevelt Road Overlay R

Roosevelt Road Overlay T

N NORTH

B R

A EXPRESSWAY E SON

D EN

EV ST . . AI E S L ROOSEVELT ROAD AD ADLAI E. STEVENSON EXPRESSWAY NORTH

The Development Districts within Area 1 include: The Development Districts within Area 2 include: 1. Franklin Point District 1. River Corridor District 2. Wells Street District 2. Dearborn Park II District 3. Clark Street District 3. Dearborn South District 4. River City District 4. South State Street District 5. LaSalle Park District 5. Wabash-Michigan District 6. Dearborn Park I District 6. Motor Row District 7. Printers Row District 7. Central Station District 8. State Street District 8. Prairie Avenue District 9. Wabash Avenue District 9. McCormick Place District 10. Michigan Avenue District

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G v Executive Summary (continued) Guiding Principles G Public, institutional, and educational walk widths; an unattractive underpass uses should be permitted throughout the at the Metra tracks; and a narrow, con- A Diverse and Exciting Mix of Uses: Near South Community. In particular, strained intersection at Wells Street. The Near South Community should educational facilities should be encour- G Traffic operational improvements continue to be improved as a vibrant aged in the northeastern portion of Area should be undertaken along Congress and diverse urban neighborhood serv- 1; along State Street, Wabash Avenue, Parkway to improve traffic circulation ing residents, employees, students, and Michigan Avenue. and enhance pedestrian safety and and visitors alike. Various land uses convenience along this major and activities should support and com- Safe and Convenient Access and Circula- “gateway” route. plement one another, adding to the tion: The Near South Community should overall vitality of Near South Commun- be served by a street system that pro- G Traffic operations should also be ity. Recommendations include: vides safe and convenient access and cir- improved at other locations, including culation, enhances the neighborhood’s the intersections of Harrison /State G The trend of an increasing residen- land development pattern, and unites and Polk/8th Streets. tial population should be encouraged the Development Districts. and promoted, with a range of hous- G The need for and feasibility of addi- ing types to support the community’s Recommendations that apply throughout tional bridges over the Chicago River diverse population. Residential uses the Near South Community include: should be studied in more detail, in coordination with development west should be located on the upper floors G Chicago’s traditional grid pattern of of the River. Possible bridge locations of buildings throughout the Near streets and blocks should be extended include Polk Street, Taylor Street, and South Community. Residences are into the LaSalle Park, River City, Franklin 15th or 16th Street. appropriate on all floors of many build- Point, and River Corridor Districts to ings in the southern and western por- enhance east-west circulation and G Continue development of an tions of Area 1 and the eastern and improve connections between adjacent “intermodal transit center” at LaSalle/ western portions of Area 2. districts. Congress, including a CTA bus turnaround, to provide connections G Retail, restaurant, entertainment G Wells Street should be extended between Metra trains at the LaSalle and service uses should be located on through Area 1 and Area 2 to create an Street Station and CTA buses. the ground floors of buildings along important, continuous, N-S street, linking primary shopping streets and pedes- the various riverfront development dis- Recommendations that apply to Area 2 trian corridors, as described in the tricts. New east-west streets should be include: Land Use System and Pedestrian Sys- built to intersect with Wells Street. G As one of only two river crossings tem recommendations for each Area. G The Clark and Roosevelt intersection within Area 2, 18th Street should be G Additional ground floor retail and will be improved to facilitate through upgraded and connected to the new service uses that will meet the day-to- traffic movements on Clark Street and Wells Street/Wentworth Avenue exten- day needs of the growing residential Roosevelt Road, improve turning move- sion. and academic communities should be ments, and provide better access to G Traffic operations at the intersection encouraged. future developments in the immediate of Clark Street and Cermak Road G New retail development should be vicinity. should be improved. compatible in scale and character G Transit facilities and operations should G The operations and aesthetics of with nearby existing development. be expanded throughout the Near South the underpasses at the Stevenson Neither Area 1 nor Area 2 is an appro- Community, as the area continues to Expressway should be reviewed and priate location for traditional “big box” gain residents. The proposed CTA Circle upgraded. or strip commercial site designs. Line, following the route of the existing G The possibility of additional connec- G Office uses should be located north Red Line through Area 1 and Orange tions to Lake Shore Drive should be of Polk Street, near the central busi- Line through Area 2, should be pursued. explored. ness area in Area 1, and on the upper Recommendations that apply to Area 1 G One or more new transit stations in floors of buildings throughout the include: Area 2 (particularly in its southern por- Near South Community. G Polk Street should be upgraded as an tion) should be developed. G Hotel uses should be located in the east-west route through the heart of G Continue to explore the develop- northern and eastern portions of Area Area 1. Of special concern is the segment of a new CTA/Metra "intermodal 1, particularly along and near Michi- ment between Wells and Clark Streets, transit center" north of Cermak on gan Avenue, and in Area 2 near which is characterized by relatively nar- Wentworth as part of the develop- McCormick Place. row right-of-way, pavement, and side- ment of the CTA Circle Line.

vi G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Executive Summary (continued)

Well Designed and Appropriately A Rich Variety of Open Spaces and Public A Pedestrian-Friendly Neighborhood Located Parking Facilities: The Near Amenities: The Near South Community Environment: Streets and walkways South Community should be served should be characterized by a planned should be safe and convenient and by attractively designed and appropri- and coordinated system of parks, plazas, should encourage pedestrian activity. ately located parking facilities that are open spaces, “gateways,” and land- Recommendations for the Near South compatible with the area’s historical scaped streets that serves the needs of Community include: scale and pedestrian orientation. Rec- local residents and employees, and helps G Pedestrian connections along east- ommendations include: organize and provide focus for the neigh- west streets should be significantly G The development of public transpor- borhood. Recommendations include: improved in order to better link tation and pedestrian facilities should G The Chicago River corridor should be development districts and provide continue to reduce the need for off improved as a continuous greenway and more direct connections between the street parking in the South Loop neigh- public promenade serving pedestrians Chicago River, Grant Park, and the borhood over time. South Loop's role and bicyclists, with places for both recre- lakefront. as parking support for Central Loop ation and relaxation. Overlooks and pub- G Shops, restaurants, and similar uses should be reduced. lic access points should be provided at should be encouraged on buildings' G On-street parking should be pro- key locations that are accessible from ground floors to provide an interest- vided wherever possible for conven- the remainder of the Study Area. ing pedestrian environment. ience of Near South visitors and G Grant Park should continue to be G Directional signs and kiosks should pedestrian confort. enhanced as a major amenity for the be installed to help pedestrians find G Surface parking lots should be well entire Near South Community in accord- the riverwalk, the lake, transit stations, maintained and attractively edged ance with the recently completed Grant and other amenities and attractions in with landscaping and decorative fenc- Park Framework Plan. the Near South Community. ing. The development of new non- G Federal Park (at Federal and 24th G Wabash Avenue and State Street accessory surface parking lots should Streets), Teachers Academy Open Space should be improved as pedestrian not be permitted. (at 24th and Dearborn Streets) , Ping routes to the Loop and between G Signage should be provided to Tom Park expansion, and a new three- Areas 1 and 2 . Generous and direct motorists to parking locations in acre park are to be developed west of comfortable sidewalks should be and near Areas 1 and 2. Signs should the tracks within the LaSalle Park Plan- provided along State Street. ned Development. Several new open be limited as to number and size. G Primary pedestrian routes should spaces will be created as part of the Riv- G Attractively designed parking struc- include Wells Street, State Street, and erside Park Planned Development. tures and underground parking should the riverwalk, and perhaps one or G be promoted to serve new develop- New accessible public open spaces more routes internal to the existing ments and to replace existing surface should be provided as new development Planned Developments. New north- lots. Parking structures should reflect occurs, commensurate with the City’s south pedestrian routes should be the architectural style and character of standard of at least two acres of public developed west of the Metra tracks. open space per 1,000 population. nearby existing buildings and conform G Polk Street should be enhanced as Parks should be created within a short to design requirements in the City's the primary east-west pedestrian walk of every Near South resident. Standards for Parking Garages. route for Area 1, extending from State Garages should have ground floor G Gateways to the Near South Com- Street to the river. Harrison Street retail, restaurants, and other active munity form the first impression of the should also be improved for pedes- uses. Upper floors of parking struc- area for visitors, and should be trians. tures should be adequately screened enhanced wherever possible. Gateways G Eighteenth Street and Cermak with landscaping or decorative fenc- of particular importance are identified in Road should be upgraded as impor- ing/mesh. the Framework Plan. Improvements tant east-west routes in Area 2. G could include landscaping, sculpture, The developers of new buildings G The pedestrian overpass near 18th should be required to provide new on- lighting, signage, and architectural treatments. Street and Calumet Avenue should be site parking to serve their develop- replaced, and additional pedestrian G Planted medians should be provided ments and, where appropriate, encour- links to the lakefront should be pro- along Michigan Avenue from Roosevelt aged to provide replacement parking vided. to serve the surrounding area. Road to Cermak Road, and considered for Motor Row.

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G vii Executive Summary (continued) G One or more new east-west pedes- G The reuse and rehabilitation of underu- G In addition to City leadership, active trian and bicycle corridor(s) should be tilized upper floor space should be support, participation, and implemen- established, perhaps utilizing the actively promoted, particularly in historic tation of Plan initiatives and projects Taylor Street right-of-way west of Clark buildings and in those areas such as are required by a variety of Plan part- Street. If the St. Charles Air Line is no Wabash Avenue, Clark Street, and Motor ners including: the Park District, the longer needed for freight trains in the Row that have a higher percentage of Board of Education, the Chicago future, it might be adaptively reused buildings with vacant upper floors. Transit Authority (CTA), Metra, for a pedestrian and bicycle trail. G New developments should be based schools, churches, institutions, busi- G The existing pedestrian under- on Chicago’s traditional grid pattern of nesses, community groups, residents, passes at Polk, Harrison, and 18th regularly shaped blocks and parcels. property owners, and developers. Streets; Archer Avenue; and Cermak G New developments should relate to Zoning Reform: Road should be kept clean and attrac- and connect with surrounding existing G Zoning for the Near South should: tive, and made more comfortable and developments. Isolated enclaves and a) help ensure that the intensity of convenient for pedestrians. internally-oriented “development islands” new development is consistent with G Safe and convenient pedestrian should be avoided. existing and proposed neighborhood crosswalks should be provided G To promote visual continuity and unin- scale and character; b) preclude the throughout Areas 1 and 2. In particu- terrupted pedestrian and retail environ- establishment of incompatible land lar, pedestrian crossings should be ments, buildings should generally be uses; c) foster design and character improved along Congress Parkway built out to the property line. Except in recommendations; and d) help to con- and Cermak Road. residential areas, street level setbacks serve historic buildings and areas that An Attractive and Compatible Mix of should be discouraged. are not protected by landmark status. Old and New Buildings: G The heights of new buildings should G The designation of new Planned reflect the predominant height of nearby Developments or the review of con- The Near South Community should existing buildings. The heights of new struction plans within existing Planned be characterized by an attractive mix buildings should consider the scale and Developments should consider the of old and new buildings that reflects character of nearby districts, pedestrian use, design and improvement recom- and complements the neighborhood’s ways, “gateways,” view corridors, and mendations of the Plan. In some cases, established development pattern and other pertinent features. existing Planned Developments building context. Recommendations should be amended to incorporate include: Implementation Plan land use and design recommenda- G New construction within historic dis- Three primary strategies underpin tions of the Plan. tricts, and adjacent to historic build- the Implementation Plan for the Near ings, should be designed to relate to South Community: a) leadership and existing buildings and deal sensitively partnerships; b) zoning reform; and c) with the district’s historic resources, in project financing. terms of scale, proportion, and materi- Leadership and Partnerships: als. G The City must assume the leadership G Buildings with architectural and his- role in implementing the Plan through torical interest, which help give the public projects as well as financial and Near South a distinctive image and technical assistance to a variety of part- identity, should be preserved, pro- ners including other public agencies, tected, and enhanced. local businesses, community organiza- G The City should continue to pro- tions, property owners, and developers. mote the renovation and adaptive reuse of older existing buildings. In particular, the ground floors of commercial buildings, which are highly visible to pedestrians and passing motorists, should be improved and upgraded.

viii G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Executive Summary (continued) Project Financing: G Many of the projects and actions called for in the Near South Community Plan can be implemented through policy and administrative decisions and/or funded through existing municipal programs. G The City has established five TIF districts within the planning area: the Near South TIF District, the River South TIF District, the Michigan and Cermak TIF District, the Calumet/ Cermak TIF District, and the 24th and Michigan TIF District. Each of these districts provide potential funding sour- ces for actions such as roadway and intersection improvements; streetscape improvements; construction of gateway design features; pedestrian crosswalk and underpass improvements; land assembly; riverwalk construction, neighborhood park and plaza facilities, and the rehabilitation of older, deteriorating buildings (especially those with architectural or historical significance). The Implementation section of this Plan provides details as to how each TIF district can be best utilized for improvements in the various Development Districts it overlaps. G The City has various other programs that may benefit the Near South Community; these are described in the Implementation section. They may be tailored to the specific needs of the Near South area as opportunities arise.

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G ix Section 1: FRAMEWORK PLAN

The Framework Plan presents policies The Framework Plan establishes Figures 9 & 10: Transit System and guidelines for improvement, the basis for the more specific present policies and guidelines for development and redevelopment improvement and development rec- public transit service and transit facili- within the Near South, which is ommendations set forth in the ties. It addresses Metra and CTA lines bounded by Congress Parkway to the Development District Guidelines, pre- and stations, as well as the appear- north, Lake Michigan to the east, the sented in Section 2 of this report. ance and maintenance of transit facili- Stevenson Expressway (I-55) to the The components of the Frame- ties. south, and the Chicago River and work Plan, briefly highlighted below, Figures 11 & 12: Parks and Open Wentworth Avenue to the west. are described on the following pages. Space System present policies and The Framework Plan is based on Figures 1-4: Land Use System guidelines for the location and design surveys, investigations, and analyses present policies and guidelines for the of public open spaces. It addresses undertaken by the Consultant; advice location, mix and arrangement of the River corridor, Grant Park, the and assistance from City of Chicago land uses. While much of the area is Lakefront, streetscape treatments, Staff; and input and suggestions from designated for "mixed-use" develop- "gateway" areas, views and vistas, and a number of residents and business ment, the Plan indicates the the provision of parks and open persons within the Near South "predominant" uses to be promoted in spaces. Community. The Framework Plan various locations. Figures 13 & 14: Pedestrian Sys- also reflects many of the ideas and Figures 5 & 6: Traffic Circulation tem present policies and guidelines concepts included in the City's previ- System present policies and guide- for pedestrian movement and facili- ously prepared plans and studies for lines for vehicular access and circula- ties. It addresses pedestrian ways, the area. tion. It addresses existing streets to street crossings, underpasses, and the The Framework Plan is comprehen- be upgraded, intersections to be impact of building design and ground- sive in scope and coverage. It improved, and new streets to be con- floor land uses on the pedestrian envi- addresses all of the physical compo- structed. ronment. nents of Areas 1 and 2, including: 1) Figures 7 & 8: Parking System Figures 15 & 16: Building Improve- land use, 2) traffic, 3) parking, 4) pub- present policies and guidelines for the ment and Development present poli- lic transit, 5) parks and open space, 6) location, arrangement, and design of cies and guidelines for the building pedestrian circulation, and 7) building parking facilities. It addresses on- "fabric" within the Near South. It improvement and development. street parking, parking lots, parking addresses the rehabilitation of exist- The Framework Plan strives to: a) garages, and the provision of parking ing buildings, the preservation of his- maintain and enhance the unique and to serve new developments. toric structures, and the design and distinguishing characteristics of the orientation of new construction. Near South Community, b) link and unite the various "districts" within each area, and c) promote compatible new development and redevelopment in selected locations.

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G 1 Area 1: Land Use System The Near South should continue to Retail uses should be located on Convenience commercial uses ori- be improved and developed as a ground floors along primary retail ented to the day-to-day needs of mixed-use urban neighborhood with streets and pedestrian corridors, par- nearby residents should be located a diverse mix of residential, retail, ticularly in the northern and eastern on ground floors throughout the area, office, service, educational, institu- portions of Area 1. Primary retail cor- and in commercial nodes proximate tional, and recreational land uses. A ridors include Michigan, Wabash, to the large-scale residential develop- blend of complementary, mutually- State, Dearborn, Wells, Roosevelt, ments in the southern and western supportive land uses should be and Congress. portions of Area 1. encouraged in order to promote day New retail development should be Office uses should be located in the and evening activity. compatible in scale and character northern portion of Area 1, near the The location and arrangement of with nearby existing development. central business area, and on the land uses in Area 1 that would best Traditional “big box” or “strip com- upper floors of buildings throughout promote a true “mixed-use neighbor- mercial” site designs are not appropri- much of Area 1. Larger office uses hood” are described on the following ate in the Near South Community; should be concentrated in the north pages. The land use descriptions however, buildings that are designed part of the study area. appear below. Following this section, to fit in with the urban context shall Hotels should be focused in the the mix of land uses to be encour- be considered. Features to be en- northern and eastern parts of Area 1, aged in each of the Development Dis- couraged include: mixed-use struc- particularly along and near Michigan tricts is described. tures, multiple stories, and minimal Avenue. building setbacks. Siting and design Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the gener- Public, institutional, and educa- of large retail uses also must consider alized land use pattern for ground tional uses should be permitted traffic access, circulation, and volume floors and upper floors, respectively, throughout most of Area 1. In particu- impacts. of Area 1 buildings. lar, educational facilities should be Additional detail relating to the pat- Concentrations or "nodes" of retail encouraged in the northeastern por- tern of uses in each District is and other active uses are appropriate tion of the area, along State Street, included in Section 2: Development along the Riverwalk, intersections of Wabash Avenue, and Michigan Ave- District Guidelines. primary pedestrian and retail streets, nue. This location has become and near large residential develop- Residential uses are appropriate and known as the "Education Corridor." ments. desirable throughout the entire area, Parks, plazas, and other open spaces and should be diverse in both type Restaurants and small entertainment should be encouraged throughout and size. In the northern and eastern uses should be located on ground Area 1. At least one public open portions of Area 1, residential uses floors of buildings along primary retail space should be available within a should be located on the upper floors. and pedestrian corridors, especially short walk of each resident. In the southern and western portions along Wabash Avenue and in the (except on the pedestrian/retail corri- northern and eastern sections. dors) residences may be located on Commercial service uses, including all floors. business and personal services, could be located on the ground and upper floors of buildings throughout much of Area 1, particularly in the northern and eastern portions of the area.

2 G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan

Area 2: Land Use System Development Districts: Each of the nine Development South State Street District - Existing Central Station District - New low- Districts which compose Area 2 residential and educational uses west to high-rise residences and compati- should be characterized by a some- of State; mixed-use buildings, some ble uses consistent with the what different mix of land uses, as with upper story residences, east of adopted Planned Developments. highlighted below. Additional land State. Convenience commercial uses Prairie Avenue District - Primarily a use recommendations are pre- should be encouraged in this area, residential area in and near the sented in Section 2: Development particularly along the east side of Prairie Avenue Chicago Landmark District Guidelines. State Street. District, with ground floor commer- River Corridor District - A mix of Wabash-Michigan District - A mix of cial and cultural uses along Indiana. new residences, open spaces, hotels, ground floor commercial uses, loft This area is becoming known as and restaurants, with commercial and town home residences, and high- "Prairie Avenue Museums and uses on Roosevelt Road and small- rise residential buildings. Retail uses Gardens." scale retail at key locations along should initially be concentrated north McCormick Place District - Institu- the future riverwalk. The Riverwalk of the St. Charles Air Line. tional, business service and technol- should be the focal point of this Dis- Motor Row District - A variety of ogy, entertainment, and retail uses, trict. retail and entertainment establish- with residential uses on upper Dearborn Park II District - Predomi- ments and other active ground floor floors of buildings north of Cermak nately residential uses, with suppor- uses should be promoted, particularly Road. tive retail along the east side of along Michigan and Cermak. Com- State Street. mercial and light industrial uses are appropriate in this area. Potential Dearborn South District - A mix of exists for residential uses in upper sto- industrial, commercial, and govern- ries. mental uses. Mixed-use buildings with ground floor commercial and ROOSEVELT ROAD upper story residences should only S SHEEDDD

AAQQUAARIRUMIUM

R E

be located along the east side of V I FIELFIDELD M MUSSEUEMU OMF OF

R NATURAL HISTORY H

L NATURAL HISTORY

U T R A 13TH STREET E D Y M O

F O

P L

S . S .

State Street. G

I H N U E V E N U V E N U V E

T R E C

1 2 14TH5 STREET 7 A T E S

A N e A A S H

T h H I G

A B t

S .

T R E

S f S . I N D A S . W

S . M I C o

A R K

SOLDIER H S . C S FOIELLDDIER 14TH PLACE

C FIELD

E N

15TH STREET N U

V E

A R

P R A I E B

S .

T U

16TH STREET

O S 3 L A

K 17TH STREET E

S H

O 18TH STREET RE E 5 8 IN L V E N U A D IR

A T H S E L O R RI R W 19TH STREET The Development Districts within Area 2 include: A T

H N C . VE T

S W E

S .

1. River Corridor District CULLERTON STREET

IE M 4 VE E A ER T R E McCORMICK

H V E N U 2. Dearborn Park II District V E N U 21ST STREET C V E N U A AR V E N U PLACE A . T R E S A R K S EXPOSITION M E T A A S H U T E S CENTER D I A N A S . C L T A L A B S . P R A I E S . I N

S . McCORMICK S . C S . W McCORMICK 3. Dearborn South District P L PALCACEE NORTH CERMAK ROAD NORTH V E N U

A N HYATT S HYATT . MccCCOORMRIMCKI CK H I G C PLACE O PLACE 4. South State Street District T T A G E

S . M I C

6 G R O S

9 E

23RD STREET AR T

5. Wabash-Michigan District T

E E

A L

R U E

T D

E H

McCORMICK

6. Motor Row District . K McCORMICK

PLACE S I PLACE N S O U TSHOUTH G

24TH STREET D

E E

T S

7. Central Station District

N NORTH

B R

A EXPRESSWAY

E ENSON D

STEV

. . AI E S L 8. Prairie Avenue District AD ADLAI E. STEVENSON EXPRESSWAY 9. McCormick Place District

8 G Draft G Arril 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan

Area 1: Traffic Circulation System Wells Street should be extended While there are existing cul-de-sacs The Near South Community should southward under Roosevelt Road, within the Dearborn Park 1 District, be served by a street system that pro- connecting to Wentworth Avenue. the development of new cul-de-sacs vides safe and convenient vehicular This extension would improve north- and other street discontinuities in access to and within the neighbor- south traffic circulation and connect Area 1 should be discouraged. hood, and supports the area’s mixed- neighborhoods within the Near South Bridges. There are currently no use development pattern as shown in Community and beyond. bridges over the Chicago River Figure 5. Potential vehicular and pedestrian between Harrison Street and Roose- Major traffic routes within Area 1 connections at Wells Street and velt Road. As new development takes include Congress Parkway, State Roosevelt Road should be studied. A place in the Franklin Point, River City, Street, Roosevelt Road, Clark Street, boulevard cross-section with a land- and LaSalle Park Districts, options for and Michigan Avenue. In addition, scaped median and on-street parking additional bridges should be studied. Harrison Street and Wabash Avenue should be considered for Wells Street Possible bridge locations include Polk provide important connections to the south of Polk or Taylor Street, Street and Taylor Street. Additional Loop, West Loop, and the subareas although this would require additional bridges would help relieve pressure south of Roosevelt Road. right-of-way. on existing east-west traffic routes, particularly Roosevelt Road. In addition to serving traffic circula- Polk Street should be upgraded as tion needs, the street system should an important east-west route through Other possible traffic improvements. serve to link and unite the districts of the heart of Area 1. Of special con- Other traffic-related recommenda- Area 1 and the larger Near South Area. cern is the segment of Polk between tions within Area 1 include: Pedestrian and automobile links to Wells and Clark Streets, which is char- a) improve traffic operations at the Roosevelt Road should be maximized. acterized by relatively narrow right-of- “off-set” intersections of Harrion/State way, pavement, and sidewalk widths; and Polk/8th Street; b) improve, While street system and traffic an unattractive underpass at the expand, and upgrade the Wells/Polk operational improvements should be Metra tracks; and a narrow, con- and Dearborn/Polk intersections; c) undertaken as required, priority within strained intersection at Wells Street. phase traffic signals to provide for Area 1 should be given to pedestrians more efficient traffic operations, and transit patrons, as highlighted in Traffic operational improvements should be undertaken along Polk except where this would negatively other components of the Framework impact pedestrian safety or pedes- Plan. Street to improve the efficiency of traffic circulation, and improve pedestrian circulation; d) reduce traffic con- Congress Parkway is a major trian safety and convenience. gestion, particularly at Roosevelt “gateway” to the Loop and the Near Road; e) reduce speeding along Clark Street grid. Chicago’s neighborhoods South Community. It provides direct Street; and f) reassess the desirability have traditionally featured a grid pat- connections between the expressways of retaining one-way traffic along tern of streets and blocks. To the maxi- and Michigan Avenue, Grant Park, Clark, Federal, and Plymouth Streets mum extent possible, the street grid and Lake Shore Drive. and Wabash Avenue in Area 1. should be extended into the LaSalle Traffic operational improvements Park, River City, and Franklin Point Dis- should be undertaken along Congress tricts in order to enhance east-west cir- NOTE: Recommendations related to the design Parkway in order to: a) enhance this culation and improve connections and appearance of streets within Area 1 are presented in the Pedestrian System recommenda- major gateway route, b) provide effi- between adjacent districts. cient traffic circulation, and c) tions. improve pedestrian safety and conven- Polk and Taylor Streets should be ience. extended over the Chicago River. Cre- ating one or more additional east- west routes between Clark Street and the River should also be considered.

10 G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Traffic Circulation System, Area 1 G Figure 5

CONGRESS PARKWAY

HARRISON STREET T T E E T E E U E E E T U E R N T R T E T E N T R E T R E E E E C S T S V E E R U S V A A R T R L A O T S T

P S

T A

I L O

U AVENUE E. BALBO A C

R R N

A A M

E D Y

L E I

F P F

. . .

S S S

POLK ST.

POLK

V I

R E. 8TH STREET

. O

T G

I H

N C

A e C

G h A

H f E R L

T C o E L

A T R A

T H M S

A S .

C L A . S L S

C N

S . A S

S R L

B E. 9TH STREET

. T

O S

H Grant Park TAYLOR RK S PA A S. B A W

. S H T

U E. 11TH STREET O M Y L P

. S

ROOSEVELT ROAD

NORTH

Major Arterial Minor Arterial Neighborhood Collector Street Grid Extension Intersection Improvement Location Roadway Improvement Location Possible Pedestrian or Vehicular Bridge

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G 11 Area 2: Traffic Circulation System The Near South Community should Wells Street Extended. Wells Street improve circulation and improve be served by a street system that (and an additional street such as Went- connections to adjacent districts provides safe and convenient vehicu- worth) should be extended southward should be sought. Street discontinu- lar access and circulation, and through Area 2 in order to: a) provide ities should be discouraged. enhances the area’s mixed-use land north-south traffic circulation between Efforts should be undertaken to development pattern. The street sys- the Metra tracks and the River; and b) reconnect the Hilliard and Ickes tem should serve to link the various create a continuous north-south street Chicago Housing Authority proper- Development Districts which com- to connect the riverfront Develop- ties to the surrounding community. pose Area 2 and areas beyond. Fig- ment Districts through the Near South Possible circulation improvements ure 6 depicts traffic recommenda- Community and to adjacent areas, include the extension of 23rd Street tions. including Chinatown. from State Street to Federal Street. Major traffic routes within Area 2 18th Street. As one of only two river The potential removal of the St. include the Stevenson Expressway crossings in Area 2, 18th Street should Charles Air Line would enable exten- (I-55), Lake Shore Drive, Cermak be improved and upgraded as an sion of the street system eastward, and Roosevelt Roads, Michigan important east-west route through the permitting better access to the land Avenue, State and Clark Streets, study area. An at-grade connection to just west of the Metra Electric line. Martin Luther King Drive, and a possible Wells/Wentworth exten- Bridges. Currently, the Chicago Archer Avenue. Wabash and Indi- sion is crucial to create connectivity in River is a major barrier between ana Avenues and 18th Street also this western area. 18th Street needs Area 2 and neighborhoods to the provide important connections to resurfacing or reconstruction; its west. No bridges exist between the Loop and across the Chicago underpass at the Metra tracks needs Roosevelt and 18th Street; opportu- River, respectively. aesthetic treatment such as improved nities to provide a new river cross- lighting, painting, and landscaping. While street system and traffic ing location should be sought as operational improvements should The area between and beneath development occurs. be undertaken as needed, enhance- the two "L" tracks on 18th Street Other possible traffic improvements to the pedestrian environ- between State and Wabash Streets ments. Other traffic-related recom- ment should be a priority within would benefit from aesthetic improve- mendations within Area 2 include: Area 2, as highlighted in other com- ments. Potential connections to Lake a) improve traffic operations at the ponents of the Framework Plan. Shore Drive at or near 18th Street offset intersections on Cermak should be studied. Roosevelt Road. Roosevelt Road Road at the Clark Street/Dan Ryan should be maintained as a major Street grid. Chicago’s neighborhoods Expressway connection, b) improve gateway to the larger Near South are generally characterized by a grid the visibility and functionality of community. It provides direct con- system of streets and blocks. How- intersections near underpasses at nections between the highways and ever, major barriers to extension of the Stevenson Expressway, and Michigan Avenue, the Museum the street grid exist in Area 2, includ- c) investigate the feasibility of an Campus, and Lake Shore Drive. ing the River, the St. Charles Air Line, additional connection to Lake Shore a n d t r a n s i t li n e s . A s d e velopment proj- Drive between 16th and Cullerton ects in the River Corridor and Central Streets. Station Districts are planned, opportu- NOTE: Recommendations related to the nities to extend the street grid and design and appearance of streets within Area 2 are presented in the Pedestrian System recommendations.

12 G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Traffic Circulation System, Area 2 G Figure 6

S HSHEEDDD ROOSEVELT ROAD AAQQ U AARIRU MIUM

E E E T T T E U U U E E E E N N E N R E E R E R T T V V V T S S S A A A

E FIELD MUSEUM OF V FIELD MU SEU M O F

I H

R NANTAUTURRAALL HHISITSOTROY RY L T A U R E O

D 13TH STREET M E Y F L

S .

I H

14TH STREET C E A N H T S N A A E A A T G I U I S B N

E H A

V . N C A S I W I

M . .

S S

S . K L S R L A E L W C

. SO LDIER S

F S S OFIELLD IER

O 14TH PL.

FIELD

E 15TH STREET I R I H L A R C A P

K .

N S E

R H

B O

STREET 16TH

17TH STREET

I V

E 18TH STREET T

E E E

IN R L T

R I

S E L R 19TH STREET A H C . T S

CULLERTON STREET

E E E E E U T

E U U U U N U E E N N N N N

V R E E

E E E A T V V V V V S

A A A A A

ER McCORMICK H K 21ST R C STREET PLACE A T

R A H E E A L I S E N EXPOSITION T C . R A M

I S A

I A B

A U CENTER T

A D L S

R .

A N P W S

. S

. S . S McCORMICK S S McCO RMICK P L A C E PLACE N O R T H NO RTH CERMAK ROAD E N U

A HYATT N HYATT G S E I . McCORMICK V McCO RMICK

H C A

O P L APLCAECE C

I T H T T M A

R G

T . E

E O S

E G W R R

T T O

E E

STREET

23RD

T S

N L

A L

R U E

T D

E H

McCORMICK

. K M c CPOLRAMCICEK S I PLACE N SOUTH G SO U TH

24TH STREET D

B R

A EXPRESSWAY E SON

D EN

EV ST . . I E

S LA AD

NORTH

Major Arterial Minor Arterial Neighborhood Collector Street Grid Extension Intersection Improvement Needed Reconstruct 18th Street to improve street condition/pedestrian access

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G 13 Area 1: Parking System The Near South Community should Parking structures. Attractively Provision of new parking. Develop- be served by attractively designed designed parking structures should be ers should be required to provide and appropriately located parking promoted to serve new develop- new on-site parking to serve new facilities (see Figure 7) that are com- ments within Area 1 and to replace developments. In the case of residen- patible with the area’s historical scale existing surface lots. Parking decks tial and mixed-use developments, and pedestrian orientation. should be screened where apropriate parking should be provided for both While an adequate supply of park- with such treatments as flower boxes, residents and visitors. Parking provi- ing is essential, the overall need for vines, and/or decorative metal work. sion should also be considered for parking within Area 1 should be de- New parking structures should con- retail uses. emphasized by further improving and form to the City's Standards for Park- To minimize impacts on the street- enhancing public transportation and ing Garages. scape and to preserve land for build- pedestrian facilities throughout the In general, parking structures ings and open space, the provision of neighborhood. should be designed to reflect the parking structures and underground On-street parking. On-street parking architectural style and character of parking rather than surface lots is quite convenient for shoppers, busi- nearby existing buildings. Stores, res- should be strongly encouraged. The ness customers, and visitors to an taurants, and other active uses should development of shared parking facili- urban neighborhood. Curb parking, be located on the ground floors of ties that can serve several different which provides a buffer between the parking facilities along major streets uses should also be encouraged. sidewalk and moving traffic, is also and pedestrian routes. Parking Reduced parking requirements considered to be “pedestrian friendly.” garages should be “fronted” with resi- should be considered for develop- Metered, on-street parking should be dential units or commercial space. ment near transit. maintained wherever possible within Along State Street and Wabash Ave- Redevelopment of selected parking Area 1, including along the new Wells nue, parking should be designed and facilities. The large number of surface Street extension, to serve retail and located to provide a buffer between parking lots within Area 1 tends to dis- other commercial uses. the “L” structure and buildings where rupt street life and pedestrian activity. possible. Surface parking lots. Surface parking The redevelopment of selected sur- lots within Area 1 should be well Parking access and signage. As part face parking lots and older parking maintained. Lots used at night should of the City’s overall system for identify- decks should be encouraged, particu- be adequately illuminated. All lots ing parking facilities, attractively larly along major street frontages and should comply with city codes regulat- designed signage should direct moto- pedestrian routes. ing landscaping and operations. rists to parking within Area 1. The Replacement parking. Area 1 will size, number, and location of signs New accessory parking lots within continue to provide parking support should be carefully regulated. Area 1 should be located behind for the commercial developments buildings or in mid-block locations. Parking access drives, which inter- located north of Congress Parkway, Parking lots in front of buildings or on rupt the “street wall” and the pedes- but this role should be gradually corner parcels should be avoided. trian environment, should also be lim- reduced. As existing surface parking ited. Access to parking facilities lots are redeveloped, replacement The development of new non- should generally be from east-west parking should be encouraged as a accessory surface parking lots should streets. There should be no curb cuts part of new developments, particu- not be permitted in Area 1. along Michigan Avenue, Congress larly in the northern portion of Area 1. Parkway or Dearborn Street.

14 G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Parking System, Area 1 G Figure 7

CONGRESS PARKWAY

HARRISON STREET E T T E T E E U E E E U N E R T T R T T E E N T E R R T E E E V C S E T S E E U A S V A R R R L T A O T T P S S S

N H

T R A E. BALBO AVENUE

I L

O A C

B O

R N

A M

D Y

N E

L E I

F D P F

. . . .

S S S S

V I

R POLK ST.

C I

H E. 8TH STREET

. e

h t

H C

E N C

A A

R R E R

B E L K S T L

R A H L S

A T E

L A U L W C

. . O S S S S E. 9TH STREET N E A T W. Taylor H G Grant Park S A RK I T A A H P S B

. .

S C A I S W M

. . S S H T

U E. 11TH STREET O M Y L P

. S

On-street parking should be provided along Wells S treet extended

ROOSEVELT ROAD

NORTH

Existing on-street parking Area in which new surface parking lots should be discouraged Existing surface parking lots subject to redevelopment

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G 15 Area 2: Parking System The Near South Community should Parking structures. Attractively parking to serve customers and rid- be served by attractively designed designed parking structures should be ers. To minimize the presence of and appropriately located parking promoted to serve new developments surface parking in the area, the facilities that are compatible with within Area 2. Adequately screened development of shared parking facili- the area’s historic character and parking structures should be designed ties that can serve several different pedestrian orientation. with flower boxes, vines, and/or deco- uses should also be encouraged. Although an adequate supply of rative metal work/fencing. Above- Wherever possible, the develop- parking is essential, the overall need grade parking structures should reflect ers of new buildings within Area 2 for parking within Area 2 should be the architectural style and character of should be required to provide new de-emphasized by further improv- nearby existing buildings. Stores, res- on-site parking to serve their devel- ing public transportation and pedes- taurants, and other active uses should opments. Commercial and institu- trian facilities throughout Area 2. be provided on the ground floors of tional projects should, at a mini- parking facilities located along major On-street parking. On-street park- mum, provide parking for employ- streets and pedestrian routes. Architec- ing should be maintained and ees. All residential projects should tural screening of parking levels above added in Area 2 wherever possible provide parking for both residents the ground floor should be promoted for convenience, traffic calming, and visitors. Reduced parking to continue street rhythm and architec- and pedestrian comfort. On-street requirements should be considered tural consistency. New parking struc- parking is particularly important for development near transit. tures should conform to the design near area destinations. Parking When they are necessary to guidelines contained in the City's meters should be installed wherever accommodate new developments, Standards for Parking Garages. on-street parking is provided. accessory parking lots should be In appropriate locations, new park- Surface parking lots. Surface park- located behind buildings or in mid- ing facilities should be designed to ing lots within Area 2 should be well block locations. Parking lots in front proivde a buffer between the "L" and maintained. Lots used at night of buildings or on corner parcels adjacent buildings. should be adequately and appropri- should be avoided. When possible, ately illuminated. All lots should be Parking access and signage. As part street-fronting parking lots should be attractively edged with landscaping of the City’s overall system for identify- combined or shared between uses and/or decorative fencing, consis- ing parking facilities, signage should to minimize the number of breaks in tent with the Chicago Landscape direct motorists to parking within Area the "street wall." Ordinance. 2. The size, number, and location of Large-site residential develop- signs should be carefully regulated. Redevelopment of selected parking ments should, when feasible, incor- facilities. The large number and Parking access drives, which inter- porate below-grade or enclosed poor condition of surface parking rupt the “street wall” and the pedes- parking in order to provide retail or and outdoor storage areas within trian environment, should also be care- other recommended uses at ground Area 2 detract from the area's fully controlled. Where possible, level. appearance. As such lots offer access to parking facilities should be McCormick Place. McCormick larger sites with few physical obsta- from rear alleys and from east-west Place creates a large traffic and park- cles, the redevelopment of selected streets. The number of curb cuts in ing burden on Area 2. Recent park- surface parking lots and outdoor each block should be minimized. ing additions near McCormick Place storage areas should be empha- Provision of new parking. As the area have helped to meet the demand it sized, particularly lots at major inter- continues to develop, many new com- creates. Future expansions should sections and along major street fron- mercial uses and increasingly popular be designed to incorporate parking tages and pedestrian routes. transit stations will require off-street to continue this trend. Surface parking lot locations that may be good redevelopment sites are highlighted in Figure 8.

16 G Draft G Apri l 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Parking System, Area 2 G Figure 8

SHEDD ROOSEVELT ROAD AQUARIUM

E E E E T T E

V U U U FIELD MUSEUM OF E I E N N E N R H

R L E E T E R T

A NATURAL HISTORY U V V V T S R E O S A A A D M E

Y 13TH STREET F L

S .

I H

C 14TH STREET E U N E V A N

A H A G S I N A E H A I B T C

I A A

D T

F M N W S

O . K

. .

14TH PL.

. SOLDIER S

R S S S L

L FIELD

C K

R E I .

H 15TH STREET

A S S R

C P

S O

A R

R E B

16TH STREET

17TH STREET

I V

18TH STREET E U N

E E N V A

I L H

IR T R

A T E S O E E W 19TH STREET L R T R T S N A

. T

S . S

CULLERTON STREET

E E E E T U E E U U U N U

U E E N N N V N N R E E E A E

E T V V V V S V

A A A A

ER CH 21ST STREET McCORMICK

R T H A K E A PLACE E I S E . R N T R S A M A

I EXPOSITION A A B L I A U T A C L CENTER S R D

A P

. S . S McCORMICK

. . S S S S PLACE NORTH CERMAK ROAD

HYATT McCORMICK S PLACE .

C O T

T N T

E A A E G

R G E S I T

. S G

M C

A M

E 23RD STREET

R . S

A R

E L

D U E

F T

. R S

K I N McCORMICK G PLACE

24TH STREET D SOUTH

D E

R EXPRESSWAY S T NSON S TEVE E. S LAI AD

NORTH

Existing free/timed curb parking Residential permit on-street parking Existing metered on-street parking Existing surface parking or storage lots subject to redevelopment

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G 17 Area 1: Transit System The Near South Community is con- G Improve the appearance of the G Explore the possibility of reopening venient to a number of public transit Metra Rock Island rail corridor as it the Polk Street entrance of the Red lines and station facilities, as shown in passes through Area 1, perhaps Line "L" Harrison Street Station, Figure 9. through the use of landscaping, berm- and/or an additional station along the Public transportation service will ing, and/or special architectural treat- Orange and Green lines. become increasingly important as ment of the retaining wall. G Maintain an “intermodal transit cen- additional new residential units and G As new development occurs in the ter” at LaSalle/ Congress, including a educational facilities are developed southwestern portion of Area 1, it CTA bus turnaround, to provide con- within the Near South Community. may be possible to better integrate nections between Metra trains at the In general, public transportation the transit corridor into adjacent build- LaSalle Street Station and CTA buses. services should continue to be ing developments, or actually build G Rebuild the transit station at improved and upgraded in order to over the tracks. Roosevelt Road on the Metra Electric increase personal mobility and mini- G The Museum Campus operates a line. mize the need for private auto trips “Museum Trolley” that passes through G Provide vertical pedestrian connec- and extensive parking facilities within Area 1 and provides access to and tions between the elevated Roosevelt the Near South Community. from the Museum Campus. The City Road and the Wells Street extension Transit Lines: is expanding trolley service along in order to facilitate transfer between Michigan Avenue within Area 1. Recommended improvements and CTA bus lines. G enhancements related to transit lines Maintain and promote the two-lane, G Maintain the new tunnel connec- within Area 1 include: grade-level, limited-access bus route tion for pedestrian transfer for fare- in the Metra Lakefront Electric rail- G As new development occurs within paid customers of the subway and ele- road right-of-way between Randolph vated train lines at Roosevelt Road. the Franklin Point, River City and Street and McCormick Place to pro- G Provide attractive and convenient LaSalle Park Districts, provide new vide connections between the hotel bus stops and shelter facilities along bus service along the Wells Street developments to the north and bus routes throughout Area 1. extension. McCormick Place to the south. If it is G Proceed to develop the CTA Circle feasible in the future, a stop should G In the past, a multi-modal transpor- Line, which would follow the route of be provided at Roosevelt Road. tation center has been discussed for the existing Red Line through Area 1, the the area along Roosevelt Road providing a convenient link between Transit Station Facilities: east of Michigan Avenue. If new trans- the Near South and the Near West Recommended improvements and portation facilities are eventually con- neighborhoods (including the Univer- enhancements related to transit sta- structed at this location, they should sity of Illinois Medical Center employ- tion and pedestrian access facilities be below grade in order to maintain ment district and the United Center). within Area 1 include: the image and character of Grant G Improve the appearance of the “L” G Provide convenient pedestrian con- Park. structure and associated stations nections from the Metra LaSalle through cleaning, lighting, painting, Street Station to: a) the LaSalle/ and signage. Congress subway station, b) the LaSalle/Van Buren “L” station, and c) the sidewalk along Congress Parkway. Provide connections from the station’s platform to both Harrison Street and Polk Street.

18 G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Transit System, Area 1 G Figure 9

22 2 10 146 CONGRESS 24 29 PARKWAY 2 6 10 146 36 145 LaS alle S treet S tation 62 147

2 145 147 HARRISON STREET 22 6 E T 10 24 T E T E E U E E E U N E R T T R T T E E N T E R R T E E E V

C 29 S 14 E T S E E U A S V A R R R L T A O T T P S S S

146

N H

T R A E. BALBO AVENUE

I L

O A C

B O

R N

A M

D Y

N E

L E I

F D P F

. . . .

S S S S

E 36 36 V

I 62

R POLK ST.

A C

I 1

H E. 8TH STREET

. e

T 3

h t

f o

H C

E N C

A A

R R E R

B E L K S T L

R A H L S

A T E

L A U L W C

. . O S S S S 29 E. 9TH STREET

24 N E A T H

W. Taylor G Grant Park S A RK I T A A H P S B

. .

S C A I S W M

. . S S H T 1 U E. 11TH STREET O M

Y 3 L P

S 29 24 4 62

12 N62 ROOSEVELT ROAD 12 N62

NORTH

Blue Line (Subway) Red Line (Subway) Green Line (Elevated) Orange Line (Elevated) Metra Rock Island District Bus Routes 1 Bus Route Numbers Museum Trolley McCormick Place Busway Transfer Station Potential Future Bus Route

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G 19 Area 2: Transit System The Near South Community is con- l To improve the appearance of the G Explore the possibility of a new venient to a number of public transit Orange Line "L" structure, repair at the Green Line "L" station south of 16th lines and station facilities, as shown curve at 18th and State Streets. Street in Area 2. in Figure 10. Public transportation l Improve the appearance of the l Provide convenient pedestrian services will become increasingly Metra Rock Island rail corridor as it access and signage to existing and important as the area continues to passes through Area 2, perhaps future stations along the Metra see development of new residential, through the use of landscaping, berm- Electric and South Shore Lines. commercial, and public uses, partic- ing, and/or special architectural treat- ularly in the southern and eastern l Provide vertical pedestrian con- ment on street overpasses. portions. nections between the elevated New development next to the Roosevelt Road and the Wells Street In general, public transportation Metra lines in the Central Station and extension in order to allow transfer services should continue to be River Corridor Districts should between CTA bus lines. improved and upgraded in order to attempt to minimize the physical sepa- minimize the need for private auto l Provide attractive and convenient ration caused by the transit lines, for trips and extensive parking facilities, bus stops and bus shelter facilities example, by building over the tracks. increase the mobility of residents, along bus routes throughout Area 2. and enhance the desirability of the l Maintain and promote the two-lane, l Continue with plans to improve Near South Community. grade-level, charter bus route in the the exit from the "L" (orange and Metra Electric railroad right-of-way Transit Lines: green lines) on the south side of between Randolph Street and Roosevelt Road. Recommended improvements and McCormick Place to provide connec- l A multi-modal transportation cen- enhancements related to transit tions between the hotels to the north ter has been discussed for the north- lines within Area 2 include: and McCormick Place to the south. A east corner of Michigan Avenue and l Proceed to develop the proposed bus stop and pedestrian access point Roosevelt Road. If new transporta- CTA Circle Line, which would follow at Roosevelt Road should be pro- tion facilities are constructed at this the route of the existing Orange vided, if possible, to permit intermo- location, they should be below Line through Area 2, linking the dal access to the McCormick Place grade in order to maintain the char- Near South and Near West areas. Busway. acter of Grant Park and the vistas to l Investigate a connection from the Transit Station Facilities: the Museum Campus. McCormick Place Busway to Soldier Recommended improvements and Field. enhancements related to transit sta- l Continue to improve the appear- tion and pedestrian access facilities ance of the “L” structure and sta- within Area 2 include: tions through cleaning, lighting, G Explore the possibility of a new "L" painting, and signage. station at Cermak/Wentworth that l As new development occurs and would connect to a new Rock Island density increases within the River Line Metra Station and link the Corridor Districts, provide new bus Orange, Red, and new Circle Lines. service along the Wells Street exten- These two new stations, along with sion. the existing CTA Red Line station at Cermak-Chinatown, would be core components of a new "Chinatown Intermodal Transit Center."

20 G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Transit System, Area 2 G Figure 10

S HSHEEDDD 12 ROOSEVELT ROAD AAQQ U AARIRU MIUM

E E E T T E U U U E E N N E N R E E E 12 R T V V V T S S A A A

E FIELD MUSEUM OF V FIELD MU SEU M O F I 146 H

R NANTAUTURRAALL HHISITSOTROY RY L T A U R E O

D 13TH STREET M E Y F L

S . S 1

O 24 4

I H

14TH STREET C E A N H T S N A A E A A T G I U I S B N

E H A

V . N C A S I W I

M . .

S S

. K S R A L C

. SO LDIER

F S S OFIELLD IER

O 14TH PL.

FIELD

E 15TH STREET I R I H L A R C A P

K .

29 S E

R H

B O 62 R E

STREET 16TH

17TH STREET

I V M E 18 18TH STREET 18 E T

E U E N N E

I E L R V

T S R A

H A

S E R L O R 19TH STREET A W H T

C N 3 . E T W S

. 24 S 62

CULLERTON STREET

E E E E E U T

E U U U U N U E E N N N N N

V R E E

E E E A T V V V V V S

A A A A A

ER McCORMICK H K 21ST R C STREET PLACE A T

R A H 1 E E A L I S E N EXPOSITION T C . R A M

I S A

I A B

A U CENTER T

A D L S

R .

A N P W S

. S

. S . S McCORMICK S S McCO RMICK P L A C E PLACE 21 X21 N O R T H NO RTH CERMAK ROAD 21 X21 N

A HYATT HYATT G S I . McCORMICK McCO RMICK

H C O P L APLCAECE C

I T T M A M

T . E

E 29 G

R R

S T O

23RD STREET

24 N L

A L

R U E

T D

E H

McCORMICK

. K M c CPOLRAMCICEK S I PLACE N SOUTH G SO U TH

24TH STREET D

R 4

B R

A EXPRESSWAY E SON

D EN

EV ST . . I E

S LA AD

NORTH

CTA Red Line (Elevated) Bus Routes

CTA Red Line (Subway) 1 Bus Route Numbers CTA Green Line (Elevated) Museum Trolley CTA Orange Line (Elevated) McCormick Place Busway Metra Electric/South Shore Line Potential Future Bus Route M Metra Stations Transfer Station Metra Rock Island Line

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G 21 Area 1: Parks and Open Space System The Near South Community should l Decking over the Metra tracks south for expansion of the existing Printers have a planned and coordinated sys- of 9th Street for potential playgrounds Square Park. Further community tem of parks, open spaces, land- or ball fields. input should be sought and a traffic scaped streets, and other public amen- Park sites. New parks and public study performed prior to any street ities that serves the needs of local resi- open spaces within Area 1 should vacation. dents and employees, and helps link include: Gateways. Attractive and distinctive and unite the various parts of the com- l A new park of approximately three “gateways” should be provided at key munity, as shown in Figure 11. acres will be developed west of the intersections around the periphery of All park and open space improve- tracks as the LaSalle Park Planned the Near South Community. Possible ments in the Near South Community Development is constructed. “gateways” include Congress/Wells, should comply with CitySpace and Congress/State, Congress/Michigan, l As part of its overall Campus Improve- Michigan/Balbo, Michigan/Roosevelt, other adopted City plans and policies. ment Plan, Columbia College is con- State/Roosevelt, Wells/Roosevelt, Riv- Riverwalk. The Chicago River corri- sidering one or more new parks along erwalk/Roosevelt, and Harrison Street dor should be improved as a continu- Wabash Avenue. ous greenway and public promenade and the River. l As large-scale new residential devel- Gateway treatments might include serving pedestrians and bicyclists, opment takes place within the signage, landscaping, lighting, and/or with places for recreation and relaxa- Franklin Point, River City and LaSalle a small sculpture or architectural fea- tion. Stairways, overlooks, and public Park Districts, new public open space ture. access points should be provided at should be provided commensurate key points along the riverwalk. with the City of Chicago’s standard of The Zoning Ordinance requires at least two acres of public open that new developments be set back a space per 1,000 population. minimum of 30 feet from the top of New park sites within these Dis- the river bank and consistent with the tricts should be located adjacent to or Chicago River Corridor Design Guide- near primary pedestrian walkways lines and Standards. Public access to and should be accessible to the pub- the riverwalk should be encouraged. lic. A public park or open space Grant Park. Grant Park is a major should be within a short walk of each amenity for the Near South, and resident. improvements should be undertaken l Additional new public plazas and to make the park more usable and open spaces should be considered at accessible for employees, residents key locations along primary pedes- and visitors. The Chicago Park Dis- trian routes. Possible locations trict recently completed the Grant include vacant sites and surface park- Park Framework Plan. Possible ing lots near the intersections of actions include: Polk/Clark, Polk/State, and State/9th l Creation of open space "rooms" Streets. along Michigan Avenue at the south In addition to the new park sites end of Grant Park for small gather- highlighted above, consideration ings, informal activities, and other should be given to closing one of the neighborhood-scale uses; and as an short east-west streets between enhanced gateway to public uses to Dearborn and Federal Streets to allow the east.

22 l Draft l April 2003 l Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. l City of Chicago l Near South Community Plan Parks and Open Space System, Area 1 G Figure 11

S treetscape improvements along key roadways enhance the overall open space system

CONGRESS PARKWAY

HARRISON STREET

New “gateway” T T R E T R E V E N U C E S

design features T R E S A S V E N U A T R E A O U R T R E

to signify T R E entrance into the Near S outh C ommunity

E. BALBO AVENUE O R N S C I A L P

A N New parks Y M O U T H C have been S . F E D R A L S . D E A R B S . P L S . F I N proposed over

R the Metra

E V

I tracks

R POLK ST.

C I

H E. 8TH STREET

h t

C T

N C E

B Improvement of S T E R A

A L E

H A R K T the south end A S U of G rant P ark

S . C L O S . L

S . W E L S E. 9TH STREET A N

W. Taylor T E RK A T A A S H S. P H I G Grant Park A B S . S . W S . M I C

E. 11TH STREET Y M O U T H

Additional S . P L R iver’s edge to be neighborhood park improved as a should be provided continuous to serve new greenway and residential “riverwalk” development promenade serving pedestrians and bicyclists

ROOSEVELT ROAD

NORTH

Existing Park, Plaza or Open Space Riverwalk Open Space Corridor Proposed Park or Open Space Potential Neighborhood Park Site (General Location) Gateway Design Feature Proposed Streetscape Improvements New Development Area Streetscape Improvements

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G 23 Area 2: Parks and Open Space System The Near South Community Better access to the lakefront rec- New park sites should be located should have a coordinated system reational areas would benefit the adjacent to or near primary pedes- of parks, open spaces, landscaped entire Near South Community. This trian walkways and accessible to rights-of-way, and other public amen- regional open space is a significant the public, especially at the intersec- ities that serves the needs of local amenity to be expanded upon. The tion of 24th and Dearborn, and residents and employees, and helps Pedestrian System section suggests near the Teachers Academy. unite the various parts of the com- ways to improve access to the lake l Ping Tom Park is to be extended munity. and nearby amenities. north of 18th Street. Related improvements should Park sites. A variety of new parks and l Additional new public plazas and comply with CitySpace and other open spaces should be developed or open spaces should be considered City plans and policies, including enhanced to serve Area 2: at key locations along primary the goal for provision of park space l Explore the possibility of a recrea- pedestrian routes, such as on (two acres per 1000 residents). A tional facility (e.g. playground equip- vacant sites and surface parking lots. public open space should be availa- ment and a field house) and increased Gateways. Attractive and distinctive ble within a short walk of all Near space for families and children in gateways should be provided at key South residents. Grant Park and elsewhere. intersections on the periphery of The Pedestrian System also pro- l The proposed new open spaces on the Near South Community: vides suggestions for enhancing the the Hilliard Homes and Ickes Homes l The existing gateway at Roosevelt open space environment. redevelopment sites, the expansion of Road and Columbus Drive should Riverwalk. The Chicago River corri- Ping Tom Park, and any other parks be enhanced to highlight this highly dor should be improved as a contin- and open spaces should attempt to visible intersection as an entry into uous greenway serving pedestrians connect with the larger neighbor- the community. hood. This could be done by enhanc- and bicyclists, with places for recrea- l Other possible gateway locations ing public access to the park, and by tion and relaxation. The Zoning include: Roosevelt at Michigan, Streetscape. The design and appearance of streets and including seating areas or other public Ordinance requires that new devel- Clark and State; the Stevenson pedestrian ways are important components of the open amenities. opments be set back a minimum of Expressway at Michigan, State and space system within the Near South Community. 30 feet from the top of the river l A 3-acre linear park (which could Martin Luther King Drive; the Metra While streetscape improvements should complement bank and consistent with the Chi- potentially span the Metra Electric line Rock Island viaduct at Cermak; the those implemented in Area 1, unique features might also cago River Corridor Design Guide- between Roosevelt Road and 14th Riverwalk at the Rock Island via- be used to distinguish particular subareas or districts: lines and Standards. Stairways, over- Street) and a small park just south of duct, Roosevelt Road and 18th l Cermak Road - improving pedestrian connections looks and public access points are the St. Charles Air Line at Indiana Ave- Street. required at key points along the riv- nue and 16th Street are planned for across this street, a major focal point for visitors to McCor- Gateway treatments might erwalk. New riverwalk additions the area. If the St. Charles Air Line is mick Place. include signage, landscaping, light- should connect to Chinatown and removed, the park spaces north and l Prairie Avenue - enhancing the unique architecture and ing, and/or sculptures or architec- Ping Tom Park. south thereof could be combined. character of this historic and emerging district. tural features. Lakefront/Grant Park/Burnham l As new residential development l Michigan Avenue - additional pedestrian amenities such Park. Better visibility and access to takes place within the Central Station as benches and garbage cans. Grant Park from Roosevelt Road Planned Development, between Clark should be provided. The Grant Park Street and the Chicago River, and else- Framework Plan recommendations where in Area 2, new public open reflect the increasing demands of space should be provided. residents throughout the Near South Community.

24 G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Parks and Open Space System, Area 2 G Figure 12

S HSHEEDDD ROOSEVELT ROAD AAQQ U AARIRU MIUM

E E E T T E U U U E E N N E N R E E E R T V V V T S S A A A

E FIELD MUSEUM OF V FIELD MU SEU M O F

I H

R NANTAUTURRAALL HHISITSOTROY RY L T A U R E O

D 13TH STREET M E Y F L

S .

I H

14TH STREET C E A N H T S N A A E A A T G I U I S B N

E H A

V . N C A S I W I

M . .

S S

. K S R A L C

. SO LDIER

F S S OFIELLD IER

O 14TH PL.

FIELD

E 15TH STREET I R I H L A R C A P

K .

N S E

R H

B O

STREET 16TH

H D

T R

U I V S O E T

S .

C H A R 17TH STREET L E S

A I R

L I N E

18TH STREET E T U E N E E R V T A S

R O STREET W 19TH T N

. S

CULLERTON STREET

E E E E E U T

E U U U U N U E E N N N N N

V R E E

E E E A T V V V V V S

A A A A A

ER McCORMICK H K 21ST R C STREET PLACE A T

R A H E E A L I S E N EXPOSITION T C . R A M

I S A

I A B

A U CENTER T

A D L S

R .

A N P W S

. S

. S . S McCORMICK S S McCO RMICK P L A C E PLACE N O R T H NO RTH CERMAK ROAD N

A HYATT HYATT G S I . McCORMICK McCO RMICK

H C O P L APLCAECE C

I T T

M A

. T E

E S

E G

R R

S T O

A STREET 23RD

N L

A L

R U E

T D

E H

McCORMICK

. K M c CPOLRAMCICEK S I PLACE N SOUTH G SO U TH

24TH STREET D

B R

A EXPRESSWAY E SON

D EN

EV ST . . I E

S LA AD

NORTH

Existing Park, Plaza, or Open Space Riverwalk Open Space Corridor Proposed Park or Open Space Potential Neighborhood Park Site (General Location) Gateway Design Feature Proposed Streetscape Improvements New Development Area Streetscape Improvements

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G 25 East-west pedestrian routes. Pedes- Bump-outs: Bump-outs may be used trian connections along east-west at intersections to shorten pedestrian streets within Area 1 should be signifi- crossing distances and calm traffic to Area 1: cantly improved to link the Develop- improve pedestrian comfort. Pedestrian System ment Districts and provide more Frontage development along pedes- direct connections between the The Near South Community should trian routes: Stores, restaurants, and Chicago River and Grant Park. Pedes- have a strong pedestrian orientation, similar uses should be encouraged on trian connections to transit stations with safe and convenient streets and ground floors of buildings along pri- should be top-priority for streetscape walkways that encourage pedestrian mary pedestrian routes to maintain a improvements. movement and pedestrian activity. lively, active pedestrian environment. Pedestrian routes should link develop- Polk Street should be enhanced as Sidewalk cafes and other sidewalk ment districts within the Near South the area’s primary east-west pedes- uses are encouraged but should main- Community and nearby destinations trian route, extending from State tain an adequate walkway clearance. (Refer to Figure 13). Street to the river. Sidewalks should In addition, the location and orien- be widened, particularly along the Pedestrian Routes: tation of buildings, doorways, display south side of Polk west of Clark Street. windows and open spaces should All streets within Area 1 -- even those Harrison Street should also be enhance the Near South’s pedestrian- with higher traffic volumes -- should improved for pedestrians, especially friendly environment. have attractive and well-maintained at the State Street intersection, with Views and vistas: Views and vistas sidewalks, and all streets should be additional streetscape elements, cross- along the public rights-of-way toward safe and convenient for pedestrians. walks, and wider sidewalks. the lakefront, the river, Dearborn Several north-south and east-west One or more new east-west pedes- Station and other major landmarks streets should be designated as trian and bicycle corridors should be within and around Area 1 should be “primary pedestrian routes.” established, perhaps utilizing the protected and enhanced. Primary pedestrian routes might Taylor Street right-of-way, extending Signs and directional information: have special sidewalk and streetscape from the river to Clark Street. The pos- Consistent with the City’s overall treatments and a variety of other sibility of extending these new pedes- “wayfinding” system for the Central conveniences and amenities. Bicycle trian ways between Clark and State Area, new directional signs and infor- routes within the area should connect Streets should also be explored. New mational kiosks should be developed to each other and the rest of the routes should connect to the existing to direct motorists and pedestrians to existing bicycle system. bicycle system. the transit stations, riverwalk, Grant North-south pedestrian routes. Pedestrian Facilities: Park and other destinations and attrac- Wabash Avenue and State Street Viaducts: The existing pedestrian tions within and around the Near should be improved as pedestrian underpasses on Polk and Harrison South Community. links to the Loop and to Area 2. Streets (beneath the Metra tracks, Streetscape. An attractive and distinc- Attractive sidewalks should be pro- between LaSalle and Financial) tive “streetscape” can help to vided along State and Wells Streets as should be kept clean and attractive, enhance the image and appearance these Districts are improved and rede- and made more comfortable and con- of the community area; link the Devel- veloped. Michigan Avenue and venient. If feasible, new pedestrian opment Districts; and establish Dearborn Street should also be main- underpasses or overpasses should be “pedestrian friendly” shopping, living tained as important pedestrian routes. provided at the Metra tracks south of and leisure-time environments. A comprehensive street- Primary pedestrian routes in this scape design system should be Polk Street, in conjunction with new Streetscape amenities might include area should include State Street, the established which defines a east-west pedestrian ways described street trees, planted medians, special Riverwalk, and perhaps one or more family of streetscape facilities previously. paving of sidewalks and crosswalks, routes internal to the Planned Devel- to be applied in the Near Crosswalks: Pedestrian crossings lighting, banners, and benches, consis- opments. New north-south pedes- South Community. This system should be improved along Congress tent with appropriate Central Area trian routes should be developed should be consistent with Parkway, perhaps through enhance- and City standards. west of the Metra tracks as this area ment of the small existing islands, other City and Central Area undergoes development in the future. which provide a refuge for pedes- standards, and should include trians. The existence and timing of crossing signals is also important.

26 G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Pedestrian System, Area 1 G Figure 13

CONGRESS PARKWAY

HARRISON STREET

P olk S treet should T T R E T R E V E N U C E S become the major T R E S A S V E N U A T R E A O U R T R E east-west T R E pedestrian route through Area 1; it should be extended to the riverwalk E. BALBO AVENUE O R N S C I A L P A N Y M O U T H C S . F E D R A L S . D E A R B S . P L S . F I N S

POLK ST.

I R

E. 8TH STREET O E xisting .

G pedestrian

A C T C

I underpasses

P ossible H should be C

new pedestrian e

upgraded C E h

bridge t

o crossings at S T E R A

P olk and/or H A L E

A R K C A S

Taylor S treets N A S . L

S . W E L S . C L R B

E. 9TH STREET

O S W. TAYLOR ST. A N T E Grant Park RK A T A A S H S. P H I G A B P ossible new S . pedestrian/bike S . W S . M I C route connecting the river, G rant E. 11TH STREET Wells S treet P ark and points extended

in between Y M O U T H should become

the new “Main S . P L S treet” for the area west of the Metra tracks

ROOSEVELT ROAD

NORTH

Primary Pedestrian Ways/ Existing Streets to be Enhanced Bicycle Routes for Pedestrian Use Existing Pedestrian Underpass Wells Street and Polk Street Possible New Pedestrian Extensions to be Enhanced Underpass or Overpass for Pedestrian Use Riverwalk Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvement Pedestrian/Bicycle Links to Surrounding Areas

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G 27 East-west pedestrian routes. Pedes- Bump-outs: Bump-outs may be trian connections along east-west used at intersections to shorten streets within Area 2 should be pedestrian crossings and calm traf- improved to provide more direct con- fic to improve pedestrian experi- Area 2: nections between the Chicago River, ence. the lakefront, parks, and transit. Frontage development along pedes- Pedestrian System 18th Street should be enhanced as trian routes: Stores, restaurants Area 2 should be oriented to pedes- a primary east-west pedestrian route, and similar uses should be encour- trians, with safe, convenient streets extending from the River to Lake aged on the ground floors of build- and walkways that promote walking. Shore Drive. Sidewalks should be wid- ings along pedestrian routes to Pedestrian routes should link devel- ened and street trees or parkway land- maintain a lively and welcoming opment districts within the Near scaping installed to create a safer, pedestrian environment. Sidewalk South area, and provide convenient more comfortable pedestrian environ- cafes and other sidewalk uses are access to nearby destinations and ment. Connections to Ping Tom Park encouraged but should maintain an attractions (refer to Figure 14). should be enhanced. adequate walkway clearance. Pedestrian Routes: Cermak Road should be improved In addition, the location and ori- All streets in Area 2 -- even those for pedestrians as a primary link from entation of buildings, doorways, dis- with higher traffic volumes -- should Chinatown to Motor Row, McCor- play windows, and open spaces have attractive and well-maintained mick Place, and the lakefront, with should enhance existing or potential sidewalks, and all should be safe improved crosswalks at intersections, pedestrian-friendly streets. and convenient for pedestrians. Sev- improved signage, more landscaping, Views and vistas: Views and vistas eral streets should be designated as and wider sidewalks. along public rights-of-way should be “primary pedestrian routes.” One or more new east-west pedes- protected and enhanced. Specific Primary pedestrian routes might trian and bicycle corridors should be view corridors toward the Down- have special sidewalk and street- established. Opportunities for con- town skyline, the lake, and the river scape treatments and a variety of nections across the Metra tracks should be maintained as unique fea- pedestrian amenities, such as should be sought. If its use for freight tures of the Near South Commun- benches and directional signs. transport is discontinued, the removal ity. of the St. Charles Air Line could pro- North-south pedestrian routes. Signs and directional information: vide right-of-way for a new pedestrian Because of their commercial and Consistent with the City’s overall and bicycle link between the Lake and institutional activities and links to “wayfinding” system for the Central the River. major mixed-use areas to the north, Area, new directional signs and State Street and Michigan and Other Pedestrian Facilities: informational kiosks should be Wabash Avenues should be desig- Viaducts: The existing pedestrian and developed to direct motorists and nated as primary pedestrian routes vehicular underpasses at 18th Street, pedestrians to the riverwalk, through the Area. Attractive new Archer Avenue, and Cermak Road Museum Park, Prairie Avenue, streetscape treatment along Indiana beneath the Metra Rock Island line Motor Row, and other destinations Avenue makes it a good pedestrian should be rehabilitated to be made and attractions within and around route as well, particularly to link resi- more comfortable for pedestrians. Area 2. dential developments to Grant Park. If feasible, the pedestrian overpass Streetscape. While streetscape New north-south pedestrian near 18th Street and Calumet Avenue improvements should complement routes should be developed west of should be replaced with an accessible those implemented in Area 1, Clark Street and the Metra tracks as overpass to improve access from 18th unique features might also be used this area undergoes development. Street to the lakefront, Soldier Field, to distinguish particular districts: Primary pedestrian routes in this and transit stations. l Prairie Avenue - enhancing the area should include Wells Street, the Crosswalks: Safe and convenient unique architecture and character Riverwalk, and perhaps additional pedestrian crosswalks should be pro- of this historic and emerging district. routes as development occurs in the vided throughout Area 2, especially l Michigan Avenue - Continue the River Corridor area. along Cermak Road, perhaps through pattern of benches, trash cans, and the addition of islands. The existence other street furniture southward and timing of pedestrian crossing sig- from Roosevelt. nals is also important. 28 G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Pedestrian System, Area 2 G Figure 14

S HSHEEDDD ROOSEVELT ROAD AAQQ U AARIRU MIUM

E E E T T E U U U E E N N E N R E E E R T V V V T S S A A A

E FIELD MUSEUM OF V FIELD MU SEU M O F

I H

R NANTAUTURRAALL HHISITSOTROY RY L T A U R E O

D 13TH STREET M E Y F L

S .

I H

14TH STREET C E A N H T S N A A E A A T G I U I S B N

E H A

V . N C A S I W I

M . .

S S

. K S R A L C

. SO LDIER

F S S OFIELLD IER

O 14TH PL.

FIELD

E 15TH STREET I R I H L A R C A P

K .

N S E

R H

B O

STREET 16TH

17TH STREET

I V

E 18TH STREET E U T E N E E R E V T A

N I S

L H

R R

I A O S E W 19TH STREET L T

R N A E H W

T S . S

CULLERTON STREET

E E E E E U T

E U U U U N U E E N N N N N

V R E E

E E E A T V V V V V S

A A A A A

ER McCORMICK H K 21ST R C STREET PLACE A T

R A H E E A L I S E N EXPOSITION T C . R A M

I S A

I A B

A U CENTER T

A D L S

R .

A N P W S

. S

. S . S McCORMICK S S McCO RMICK P L A C E PLACE N O R T H NO RTH CERMAK ROAD N

A HYATT HYATT G S I . McCORMICK McCO RMICK

H C O P L APLCAECE C

I T T

M A

T . E

E S

E G

R R

S T O

23RD STREET

N L

A L

R U E

T D

E H

McCORMICK

. K M c CPOLRAMCICEK S I PLACE N SOUTH G SO U TH

24TH STREET D

B R

A EXPRESSWAY E SON

D EN

EV ST . . I E

S LA AD

NORTH

Primary Pedestrian Ways/Bicycle Routes Pedestrian/Bicycle Links to Surrounding Areas Existing Auto/Pedestrian Underpass Existing Streets to be Enhanced for Pedestrian Use Possible New Auto/Pedestrian Underpass or Wells/Wentworth Streets Extension to be Enhanced Overpass for Pedestrian Use Existing Pedestrian Overpass Pedestrian Crosswalk Signal Replacement of 18th Street Pedestrian Overpass Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvement Riverwalk CTA Underground Transfer

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G 29 Area 1: Building Improvement and Development The Near South Community should Storefronts. The ground floors of Street wall effect. To promote visual be characterized by an attractive mix commercial buildings within Area 1 continuity and uninterrupted pedes- of old and new buildings that reflects are highly visible to pedestrians and trian and retail environments, build- and complements the community’s passing motorists. In general, the con- ings within Area 1 should be built out established development pattern and dition and appearance of commercial to the property line. Except in residen- building context (refer to Figure 15). storefronts should be improved and tial areas and where additional side- Existing Buildings: upgraded, particularly along major walk width is needed to enhance the streets and pedestrian ways. The gen- pedestrian experience, street-level set- Historic structures. The presence of erous use of display windows should backs should be discouraged. A con- many buildings with architectural and be encouraged on the ground floors tinuous and uninterrupted street wall historical interest helps give Area 1 a of non-residential buildings. Long is particularly important along distinctive image and identity. Historic blank walls without windows or archi- Michigan and Wabash Avenues and structures are most prominent within tectural articulation, particularly along State, Dearborn, and Wells Streets. the Printing House Row Chicago sidewalks, should be discouraged. Building heights. In general, the Landmark District and the Historic Upper floors. The upper floors of heights of new buildings should Michigan Boulevard Chicago Land- many buildings are partially or totally reflect the predominant height of mark District. Structures with architec- vacant, particularly along State, nearby existing buildings. In areas des- tural and historical interest should be Wabash and Clark. The reuse and ignated for redevelopment or new preserved, protected, and enhanced. rehabilitation of underutilized upper construction, the heights of new build- Views and vistas: Views and vistas floor space should be actively pro- ings should consider the scale and along the public rights-of-way toward moted, particularly in historic build- character of nearby districts, pedes- the lakefront, the river, Dearborn ings. Upper floor spaces within Area trian ways, gateways, and other perti- Station and other major landmarks 1 are suitable for offices, institutional nent features. Except for townhouses within and around Area 1 should be uses, housing units, and other uses. and similar housing types, new build- protected and enhanced. When upper floors include residential ings should have a minimum height of Building improvements and renova- units, balconies should not be permit- three to five stories in order to main- tions. While portions of Area 1 will ted to extend over the public right-of- tain and reinforce the urban character experience redevelopment and new way. of Area 1. Building height recommen- construction, the emphasis in many New Construction: dations for each district are made in locations should be on the retention the Development District Guidelines Overall development pattern. Most and improvement of existing build- section. The Planned Development developed portions of Area 1 are char- ings. The City should continue to pro- process provides an opportunity for acterized by Chicago’s traditional grid mote the renovation and adaptive consideration of building heights that pattern of streets and regularly reuse of existing buildings, particu- exceed those possible under existing shaped blocks and parcels. New larly those with historical or architec- zoning. tural interest. While poorly main- developments west of Clark Street should be based on this traditional New building design and construc- tained buildings are widely scattered tion. It is essential that new buildings throughout the area, they are particu- grid pattern. New development should consist of blocks ranging in respect and complement the existing larly prominent along Wabash scale and architectural character of Avenue and Clark Street. size from three to five acres. New developments should relate to and existing buildings within Area 1, with connect with surrounding existing varying heights, careful detailing, and developments. Isolated enclaves and lower floors that enhance the public internally-oriented developments realm. should be avoided.

30 G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Building Improvement and Development, Area 1 G Figure 15

P romote building Maintain and protect improvements and the scale and char- new infill develop- acter of the P rinting ment along C lark House R ow Historic S treet District

CONGRESS PARKWAY

P romote compatible new infill development along Wells S treet

HARRISON STREET E T E U E U N E T T T T E E N E R E R E E V C E T E E U A V A S R R R L T A T O T P T S S S

N H

T R A E. BALBO AVENUE I L U O A C B O R N R E A M Maintain and A D Y N E L E I protect the His- F D P F

. . . . S S S S toric Michigan

R Boulevard Dis-

E V

I trict

R POLK ST.

C I

H E. 8TH STREET

H C

E N C .

A A

R C R

R B

K S T

R H L

A T E

L U W C

. . O S S S E. 9TH STREET P reserve and protect buildings with architectural and historical E T W. Taylor H interest. S RK A T A A

P S B

S . A S W

. The develop- S H

ment of vacant T N A land should U E. 11TH STREET G O I M establish C hi- H Y C L I

cago’s tradi- P

M .

. tional grid pat- S S tern of streets, blocks and building orienta- Grant Park tion

ROOSEVELT ROAD

P romote high-quality rede- Improve and upgrade velopment of underutilized buildings and store- NORTH properties along the east fronts along Wabash side of S tate S treet. Avenue

Promote Development of Improve and Upgrade Buildings Chicago’s Traditional Grid Pattern. Within the Wabash Avenue District. Promote Compatible New Infill Maintain and Protect the Historic Development in Wells Street District. Michigan Boulevard Chicago Landmark Promote Building Improvement and District. Development in Clark Street District. Maintain and Protect the Scale and Character of Printing House Row. NOTE: Additional recommendations are Promote Redevelopment Along the East presented in Section 2: Development District Side of the State Street District. Guidelines.

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G 31 Area 2: Building Improvement and Development The Near South Community should Storefronts. The condition and Street wall effect. To promote visual be characterized by an attractive appearance of commercial storefronts continuity and an uninterrupted mix of old and new buildings that should be improved and upgraded, pedestrian environment, buildings reflects and complements the com- particularly along major streets and along commercial corridors within munity’s established development active pedestrian ways. The generous Area 2 should be built out to the pattern and building context (refer use of display windows should be property line. Ground level win- to Figure 16). encouraged on the ground floors of dows should be encouraged to Existing Buildings: non-residential buildings. Long blank enhance the streetscape. walls without windows or architec- In residential areas and where Historic structures. The presence tural articulation, particularly along additional space is needed to of many buildings with architectural sidewalks, should be discouraged. enhance the pedestrian experience, and historical interest helps give Upper floors. The upper floors of street-level setbacks should be con- parts of Area 2 a distinctive image many buildings are partially or totally sistent with historic and recent build- and identity. Historic structures are vacant, particularly along State and ing patterns. A continuous and unin- most prominent within the Prairie Michigan, and throughout the area terrupted “street wall” is particularly Avenue Chicago Landmark District south of Cermak. Although much reha- important along Michigan, Wabash, and the Motor Row Chicago Land- bilitation and conversion has already State/Indiana south of 16th Street, mark District along Michigan Ave- taken place, the reuse and rehabilita- and the Wells Street extension. nue. Structures with architectural tion of functional upper floor space and historical interest should be pre- Building heights. In general, the should be actively promoted, particu- served, protected, and enhanced. heights of new buildings should larly in historic buildings. Upper floor reflect the predominant heights of Building improvements and renova- spaces within Area 2 are suitable for nearby existing buildings. In areas tions. While portions of Area 2 will offices, institutional uses, housing designated for redevelopment or experience redevelopment and new units, and other uses. When upper new construction, the heights of construction, the emphasis, espe- floors include residential units, balco- new buildings should consider the cially in historically and architectur- nies should not be permitted to extend scale and character of nearby dis- ally significant areas, should be on over the public right-of-way. tricts, pedestrian ways, “gateways,” the retention and improvement of New Construction: view corridors and other pertinent existing buildings. Overall development pattern. Most features. New buildings should have The City should continue to pro- developed portions of Area 2 are char- a height of at least two stories in mote the renovation and adaptive acterized by Chicago’s traditional grid order to maintain and reinforce the reuse of existing buildings, particu- pattern of streets and regularly shaped character of Area 2. Building height larly those with historical or architec- blocks and parcels. New develop- recommendations for each district tural interest. While poorly main- ments west of Clark Street should be are made in the Development Dis- tained buildings are widely scat- based on this traditional grid pattern. trict Guidelines section. tered throughout the area, they are New building design and construc- particularly prominent south of Cer- New development should consist tion. It is essential that new construc- mak Road. of “blocks” ranging in size from three to five acres. New developments tion respect and complement the should relate to and connect with sur- existing scale and architectural char- rounding existing developments. Iso- acter of existing buildings within the lated enclaves and internally-oriented different Development Districts in “development islands” should be Area 2. avoided.

32 G Draft G April 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Building Improvement and Development, Area 2 G Figure 16

SHHEDEDDD ROOSEVELT ROAD AAQUUARAIURMIUM

E E E T T E U U U E E N N E N R E E E R T V V V T S S A A A

E FIELD MUSEUM OF V FIELD MUSEUM OF

I H

R NANTAUTURAAL HLI SHTOIRSYTORY L T A U R E O

D 13TH STREET M E Y F L

S .

I H

14TH STREET C E A N H T S N A A E A A T G I U I S B N

E H A

V . N C A S I W I

M . .

S S

. K S R A L C

. SOLDIER

F S S FOIELDLDIER

O 14TH PL.

FIELD

E 15TH STREET I R I H L A R C A P

K .

N S E

R H

B O

STREET 16TH

17TH STREET

I V

E 18TH STREET E E U T E IN N E L E R V T

R A

I S

A H

T S

R E L R O

A W 19TH STREET H T

C N . E T S W

. S

CULLERTON STREET

E E E E E U T

E U U U U N U E E N N N N N

V R E E

E E E A T V V V V V S

A A A A A

ER McCORMICK H K 21ST R C STREET PLACE A T

R A H E E A L I S E N EXPOSITION T C . R A M

I S A

I A B

A U CENTER T

A D L S

R .

A N P W S

. S

. S . S McCORMICK S S McCORMICK P L PLAACEE N ONORTTHH CERMA K E. C E R M A K ROAD N

A HYATT HYATT G S I . McCORMICK McCORMICK

H C O P L PACLEACE C

I T T

M A

T . E

E S

E G

R R

S T O

23RD STREET

N L

A L

R U E

T D

E H

McCORMICK

. K M c C O R M ICPKL ACE S I PLACE N SOUTH G SOUTH

24TH STREET D

B R

A EXPRESSWAY E SON

D EN

EV ST . . I E

S LA AD

NORTH

Promote Development of Chicago’s Traditional Grid Pattern Promote Street wall Infill Development along State, Wabash, Michigan, and Indiana Protect and Enhance the Scale and Character of the Prairie Avenue Chicago Landmark District and Surrounding Blocks Protect and Enhance the Scale and Character of the Motor Row Chicago Landmark District and Surrounding Blocks Promote Physical Connections to Surrounding Streets and Blocks

NOTE: Additional recommendations are presented in Section 2: Development District Guidelines.

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G April 2003 G Draft G 33 Section 2: DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLANS The Development District Plans are tricts should be reserved for retail, res- Building Height. Tables 1 and 2 indi- based on the general policies and taurant, and other pedestrian-oriented cate the preferred building height guidelines established in the uses. In other districts, a wide variety within each district. In most districts, Framework Plan, and present more of uses are acceptable. the heights of new buildings should specific improvement and develop- Upper Floor Land Uses. Tables 1 and complement and reflect the predomi- ment recommendations for the dis- 2 also indicate the preferred and/or nant height of existing buildings. In tricts that compose the Near South acceptable upper floor land uses other districts, the District Plans estab- Areas 1 and 2. within the various districts. While a lish new height guidelines. There are The District Plans focus on land variety of upper-floor uses are accepta- also recommended minimum building use and development character, and ble in most districts, there are prefer- heights in several districts. The Dis- encompass: a) ground floor land uses; red upper floor uses for some districts. trict Plans assume an average building b) upper floor land uses; c) develop- For example, while upper floor resi- height of 10 to 12 feet per floor. ment pattern; d) building improve- dential units are acceptable through- Streets and Pedestrian Amenities. ment and construction; e) building out the area, they are preferred in cer- Tables 1 and 2 establish guidelines for height; f) streets and pedestrian ameni- tain locations. streetscape treatments and pedestrian ties; and g) open spaces and other Development Pattern. Tables 1 and 2 amenities within the various districts. considerations. indicate the predominant develop- Streets within most districts should The Development District Plans ment pattern to be promoted within have a strong pedestrian orientation. strive to enhance the distinct charac- each district, including the placement These streets should have generous teristics of each individual district, as and orientation of buildings, and the sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian light well as link and interconnect the vari- relationship of buildings to the street. fixtures, and other basic amenities. ous districts into a single, cohesive Most districts should reflect Chicago's While streets in other districts may be urban neighborhood. traditional grid pattern of streets and characterized by vehicular orientation, they should also have safe and The Development Districts for blocks, with building facades that are attractive sidewalks, crosswalks, and Areas 1 and 2 are identified in Figures aligned with and facing the street. In other pedestrian conveniences. 18 and 19 on the following pages. An the vacant Planned Development overview of the recommendations for properties, the District Plans suggest Open Spaces and Other Considera- each district precedes each graphic. the new development patterns to be tions. Tables 1 and 2 also highlight More detailed policies and guidelines established. other design and development consid- are presented in Table 1: Develop- Building Improvement and Construc- erations that are unique to the individ- ment District Guidelines, Area 1 and tion. While most districts will require ual Development Districts, including: Table 2: Development District Guide- a range of actions, Tables 1 and 2 indi- a) the provision of new parks, plazas, lines, Area 2. cate the preferred approach to build- and open spaces; b) special landscaping and screening along rights-of-way; The Development District ing improvement and construction. c) the creation of new "gateway" fea- Guideline tables address the follow- For example, the emphasis in some tures; and d) measures to accommo- ing: districts is on the preservation and pro- tection of existing buildings. In other date the new riverfront greenway and Ground Floor Land Uses. While districts, the emphasis is on reuse and public access to the riverfront. most Development Districts are rec- rehabilitation; on small-scale infill ommended for a mix of uses, Tables 1 development; on replacement and and 2 indicate the preferred and redevelopment; or on new construc- acceptable ground floor land uses tion. within each district. For example, the ground floor of buildings in some dis-

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G January 2003 G Draft G 35 Area 1: Overview of the Development Districts While the Development Districts that 4 8 An attractive new image and iden- compose Area 1 share many common The predominantly vacant River tity should be established for the State features and characteristics, each also City District should be developed for Street District. Surface parking lots has it own unique conditions and a mix of new residential uses oriented and other underutilized properties potentials that are addressed in the to the Chicago River. Public access to along the east side of State Street Near South Community Plan. The and views of the river corridor should should be redeveloped for a mix of Districts are outlined in Figure 18. be preserved. Higher intensity mixed- use development should be consid- commercial and residential uses. The Recommendations for the ten dis- ered at the south end of this district, clustering of educational and institu- tricts in Area 1, briefly highlighted with access off Roosevelt Road. tional uses near Congress Parkway below, are described in more detail in 5 The vacant LaSalle Park District and State Street should continue to be Table 1: Development District Guide- encouraged, coordinated and lines, Area 1. will be developed for a mix of commercial and residential uses, consis- enhanced. 1 The vacant Franklin Point District tent with the approved Planned 9 The Wabash Avenue District should be developed for a mix of com- Development (PD). While all new should be substantially improved and mercial, residential, and entertainment improvements and developments will revitalized as an exciting pedestrian- uses. New development should conform to the approved PD, the Dis- oriented commercial area. Retail, com- enhance this highly visible gateway trict Plan also suggests several addi- mercial service, entertainment, and location, provide direct access to the tional guidelines for consideration by educational uses should be promoted Chicago River, and become a center- the City and developers of the prop- on the street level, with educational piece for Area 1. erty. facilities, residential units and offices 2 The Wells Street District should 6 The Dearborn Park I District on the upper floors. The redevelop- be improved for a mix of residential should be retained as the site of town- ment of underutilized properties and commercial uses. Adaptive reuse homes and mid- to high-rise condo- should be encouraged. and compatible new infill construc- miniums. New pedestrian linkages 10 Hotel, institutional and residential tion should be encouraged. Wells should be considered to connect this uses should be maintained within the Street itself should be extended and innovative planned development to Michigan Avenue District. The his- enhanced as an attractive new “Main neighboring districts. toric Michigan Avenue street wall Street” for the series of districts west should be preserved and enhanced by of the Metra tracks. 7 The distinctive historical scale and character of the Printers Row District encouraging improvements and devel- 3 The Clark Street District should should be maintained and enhanced. opments that reflect the scale, place- be significantly upgraded for a mix of The district should be characterized ment, character and height of existing office, service, retail, and residential by a mix of small stores, shops and buildings. uses. Adaptive reuse and compatible commercial services which create an In addition to the ten Develop- new construction should be pro- exciting and vital pedestrian-oriented ment Districts highlighted above, the moted. New retail, restaurant, and environment. The “street wall” along frontage properties along Congress entertainment uses should be encour- Dearborn Street should be protected, Parkway and Roosevelt Road (desig- aged on the street levels of buildings and new construction should be com- nated as overlay districts) should be along Clark and Polk Streets. patible with existing buildings. upgraded and coordinated as dramatic entryways to Chicago’s Central Area and the Near South Community through the use of distinctive streetscape improvements and building and site enhancements.

36 G Draft G January 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Development Districts, Area 1 G Figure 18

CONGRESS PARKWAY Congress Parkway Overlay T E E

HARRISON STREET R T S

N R E O U B N R E A V E A

D H S A B A

1 2 3 7 8 W Franklin Point Wells Street Clark Street Printers Row State Street District District District District District BALBO AVENUE 10 Michigan POLK STREET Avenue

POLK District

V I

R 8TH STREET

R E

B 9TH STREET

N T

H E E

T T E V

E U R E A E

R O N S T T

S 4 S 6 A S 9 K

S G E R I L T A L H A

L Grant Park

River City E LaSalle Park Dearborn Park I Wabash Avenue TAYLOR T C C I S W

District District District District M

11TH STREET

Roosevelt Road Overlay ROOSEVELT ROAD

NORTH

Development Districts: Area 1 should be composed of a series of distinct but interconnected Development Districts which complement and enhance the overall image and character of the Near South Community.

Note: Detailed recommendations for improvement and development within the ten "develompent districts" are presented in Table 1: Development District Guidelines, Area 1.

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G January 2003 G Draft G 37

Table 1: Development District Guidelines, Area 1

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Features Other Considerations 38

1: The Franklin Point New development should High-quality new building Wells Street should have a A new neighborhood park,

Draft Franklin District should contain a reflect Chicago’s established construction should be strong pedestrian orientation, preferably adjacent to the Point mix of residential, street grid pattern. promoted as a part of the including generous Riverwalk, should be

District restaurant, and small Planned Development in this sidewalks, street trees, provided as part of the Building facades should be

retail uses; and District. Building design and pedestrian light fixtures, and Franklin Point Planned January 2003 aligned with and face both appropriately-scaled Wells and Harrison Streets. If orientation should enhance other amenities. A setback Development to serve new entertainment and office buildings are setback along this highly visible gateway might be considered along nearby residents. development. Wells or Harrison, setbacks location. The northern part of Wells to allow for the A new gateway plaza or Retail and other active should be consistent in order this District should be widening of sidewalks, other design feature should

Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. uses should be focused to establish a “street wall” designed and developed as parkways and pavement be provided in this District; at several nodes within effect along each street. a “signature” project for Area width. A minimum of 14 feet at Oscar D’Angelo Park or this District. 1. is desirable to accommodate near the intersection of Buildings should also be a sidewalk and parkway. The mix of land uses is aligned with and face the A variety of building types Congress and the River. envisioned to include: Polk Street extension west of and heights should be Both Wells and Polk Streets Landscaping, lighting and encouraged to avoid a should serve as pedestrian signage should also be Ground Floor: Wells; this new roadway should not be designed as a “monolithic” image and “connectors” to nearby used to enhance and Preferred: Retail, “service street.” character within this District. districts. At least one new emphasize this key service, restaurant, east-west street or intersection. Franklin Street might be The heights of buildings entertainment. should “step down” from pedestrian way (in addition The Riverwalk will be built extended south of Harrison to to the Polk Street extension) Acceptable: Office, north to south. Taller as sites along the River are connect with Polk Street. should be established residential (except along However, this new roadway buildings are appropriate in developed. Opportunities

through this District to

City of Chicago Harrison and Wells the north half to emphasize for additional Riverwalk should serve primarily the provide access to the river. Streets). development within Franklin the key gateway along width, and adjacent public Congress Parkway. spaces, should be sought Upper Floors: Point and should not become a “cut-through” or by-pass Buildings in south half of the in this District. Acceptable: Residential, route for through traffic. District should reflect the The location and office, entertainment, heights of existing

orientation of streets and hotel Polk Street should be development to the south.

buildings should preserve Near South Community Plan extended west of Wells to provide access to the river, The height of buildings along views toward the river and and a new pedestrian and/or Wells Street should be enable public access to the vehicular bridge over the compatible with predominant Riverwalk. River should be considered heights that exist along the at Polk Street extended. east side of the street, perhaps through the use of The possibility of widening or upper-floor setbacks. otherwise upgrading the intersection of Wells and Polk Improvements to designated should be explored. This Chicago Landmarks and

intersection is currently a buildings in Chicago “choke point” for traffic Landmark Districts are circulation. subject to review by the City's Commission on Chicago Landmarks.

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Features Other Considerations

Near South Community Plan 2: The Wells Street District The grid pattern of streets Within the Wells Street Streetscape improvements While no new parks or Wells should include a mix of and blocks is already in District, the emphasis should along Wells Street extended open spaces are Street residential and office place. be on maintaining existing should include sidewalks, recommended, the District uses, with neighborhood A strong and continuous buildings and on undertaking trees, pedestrian light intersection of Wells and retail, services, and “street wall” should be improvements and fixtures, and crosswalk Polk should be a focal entertainment uses at established along the east rehabilitation as required. treatments. At least 14 feet point for the Districts west the street level. side of Wells Street to Compatible new infill is desirable to accommodate of the Metra tracks. Buildings along Wells enhance this important new construction should be a sidewalk and parkway. Landscaping, lighting and Street, in particular, neighborhood collector street; promoted, particularly along Polk Street will become a signage should also be should have active uses building facades should be Wells Street. major east-west pedestrian used to enhance and in their ground floor emphasize this key

aligned with and face both way and, should be New buildings within this spaces. intersection.

Wells and Polk Streets. improved in a similar City of Chicago District should generally Ground Floor: Wells Street should be reflect the predominant manner. The Polk Street Several parks are planned Preferred: Retail, extended through the River character and heights of underpass at the Metra line in adjacent Districts. restaurant, small Corridor District, under existing buildings along the should be upgraded for entertainment, Roosevelt Road, and east side of Wells Street. pedestrians.

commercial service. improved as a primary Building and site While Financial Place

Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. Acceptable: Office, pedestrian-friendly street for improvements within the currently functions as a public, institutional. the area west of the Metra eastern portion of this District service street, it should be tracks. enhanced with landscaping Upper Floors: should strive to minimize the noise and visual impacts and other appearance Acceptable: Office, generated by the Metra rail improvements to provide a service, public, line. Landscaping should be pedestrian-friendly institutional, residential. used to soften the atmosphere as this area appearance of the rail continues to be improved. corridor.

January 2003

Draft

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Features Other Considerations 3: The Clark Street District The grid pattern of streets Existing development is Streetscape improvements Opportunities for new

40 Clark should contain a mix of and blocks is already in characterized by should be undertaken along plazas or public open Street office, service, place. underutilization, vacancies Polk Street, including spaces should be sought

Draft District institutional, and retail Clark Street will continue to and some deterioration. The sidewalks, street trees, within this District. uses; with residential have a strong automobile overall image and pedestrian light fixtures, and

uses limited to the upper traffic orientation. appearance of this District other features. The January 2003 floors. should be significantly pedestrian underpass at Polk Building facades should be Ground Floor: improved. The emphasis Street should also upgraded aligned with and face both should be on improving and and enhanced for pedestrian Preferred: Retail, Clark and Polk Streets to upgrading older buildings use.

restaurant and small establish a consistent “street

Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. with architectural or historical entertainment uses wall.” Sidewalk and streetscape interest, and on promoting improvements should be along the Polk Street Visual and noise impacts of compatible redevelopment frontage. undertaken along Clark the Metra rail line should be and new construction. Street, although it will Acceptable: Retail, minimized through site and New buildings within the continue to be a major traffic restaurant, building design and Clark Street District should route. entertainment, landscaping. generally be compatible (in While LaSalle Street will commercial service, height and mass) with the office, public and continue to function as a existing buildings to remain service street, landscaping institutional uses along and near Clark Street. throughout the District. and sidewalk improvements Some variety in building should be undertaken to Upper Floors: heights is desirable. soften the appearance of this

Preferred: Office, Special height restrictions route and provide a City of Chicago service, public, may apply to portions of this pedestrian-friendly institutional. District; building construction atmosphere. within Chicago Landmark Acceptable: Residential Districts are to be reviewed by the City’s Commission on

Chicago Landmarks. .

Near South Community Plan

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Features Other Considerations

Near South Community Plan 4: The River City District New development should High-quality new building Wells Street should have a A small new park, River should be characterized reflect Chicago’s established construction should be strong pedestrian orientation, preferably adjacent to the City by new residential grid pattern of streets and promoted as a part of the including sidewalks, trees, Riverwalk, should be District developments oriented blocks. Building facades River City Planned pedestrian light fixtures, and provided as part of the to the Chicago River; should align with and face Development in this District. other amenities. Planned Development to higher-intensity mixed- Wells Street. Placement of The heights of buildings Streets within the interior of serve new residents in the use development is new buildings should be should generally “step up” this District might be River City District. appropriate near consistent in order to from north to south. Buildings residential in character. A new gateway plaza or Roosevelt Road. establish a new “street wall.” in the northern portion should Multiple east-west other design feature should Ground Floor: Higher-intensity development be compatible with the pedestrian/ vehicular ways also be provided near

at the south end should existing River City Roosevelt Road and Wells Preferred: Residential, should be provided through

City of Chicago convenience commercial “front“ the Roosevelt Road development. this District to enable access Street, compatible with the uses at small “nodes” viaduct and be accessible Building design near to the Riverwalk recent bridge design from both Wells Street and treatments along along Wells Street; Roosevelt Road should higher-intensity Roosevelt Road. recognize and enhance the Roosevelt Road. development, including Wells Street should be south end of the River City The Riverwalk within this retail and hotel uses, at extended under Roosevelt District as a gateway to the District will be constructed

Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. Roosevelt Road. Road, and connect to Near South community. as new development Acceptable: Public, Wentworth Avenue. Taller buildings will be occurs. The design of institutional, office at Automobile and pedestrian acceptable along Roosevelt sites and buildings should small “nodes” along links to Roosevelt Road Road to emphasize this preserve views toward the Wells and at Roosevelt should be maximized. gateway location. river and enable public access to the Riverwalk. Road. Taylor Street should be While new buildings should Upper Floors: extended west to provide respect the heights of existing buildings, some Preferred: Residential. access to the river, and a new pedestrian and/or variety in building heights is Acceptable: Office, vehicular bridge over the desirable. public and institutional at River should be considered small “nodes” and at at Taylor Street extended.

Roosevelt Road. January 2003

Draft

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Features Other Considerations 5: The LaSalle Park District Opportunities should be High-quality new building Wells Street should have a A new neighborhood park

42 LaSalle should include a mix of sought to extend Taylor construction should be strong pedestrian orientation, will be provided along the

Park new commercial and Street between Financial promoted as a part of the including generous west side of the Metra Draft District residential development Place and the east side of the Planned Development in this sidewalks, street trees, tracks to serve new (consistent with the Chicago River District. pedestrian light fixtures, and residents in this area. A

Planned Development Wells Street should be Building design near other amenities. second new neighborhood

January 2003 for the area); and retail extended southward, under Roosevelt Road should Pedestrian and streetscape park would also be highly uses along Roosevelt Roosevelt Road, and connect recognize and enhance the improvements should be desirable east of the Metra Road. to Wentworth Avenue. south end of LaSalle Park as undertaken along Polk tracks. Ground Floor: To supplement the provisions a gateway to the Near South Street. Landscaping and building

Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. Acceptable: Residential, of the LaSalle Park Planned Community. Sidewalk and streetscape and site improvements office, commercial Development, the following Buildings along the Clark improvements should be within this District should service, public and guidelines should be Street frontage should undertaken along Roosevelt strive to minimize the noise institutional are all considered: complement the scale and Road, which should become and visual impacts acceptable under the character of Dearborn Park I, a more pedestrian-friendly generated by the Metra rail a) New development should line. approved LaSalle Park reflect and connect to but should not “turn their route at the south end of this Planned Development. Chicago’s established grid backs” on Clark Street. District. To supplement the pattern of streets and Building heights should Sidewalk and streetscape provisions of the blocks; gradually step up as they get improvements should also closer to Roosevelt Road. approved PD, it is b) Building facades should be undertaken along Clark suggested that: be aligned with and face Upper floor setbacks should Street, although it will a) Retail, restaurant and Wells, Clark, or Polk be encouraged along Clark continue to be a major traffic

route. City of Chicago service uses be Streets; corner buildings and Wells Streets. promoted along Polk should include finished At least one new east-west and Clark and at facades and inviting pedestrian and/or vehicular small “nodes” along entries and/or display connection should be Wells Street; windows along both sides; provided either under or over

the Metra tracks to provide b) Higher-intensity c) If setbacks are permitted

additional east-west Near South Community Plan development, along Wells Street, including retail and setbacks should be connections to the rest of the hotel uses, be consistent in order to Near South Community. considered at establish a “street wall;” Roosevelt Road; and and Pedestrian links to Roosevelt c) Residential uses be d) New development at the Road should be maximized. promoted in the south end of the District interior portions of the should be aligned with District. and face Roosevelt Road. Upper Floors:

Acceptable: Residential, office, commercial service, public and institutional are all acceptable under the approved Planned Development.

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Features Other Considerations

Near South Community Plan 6: Dearborn Park I is built In contrast to most of Area 1, This District is fully While the interior portion of Two parks are currently Dearborn out, and includes Dearborn Park I was developed and the emphasis Dearborn Park I is a safe located in Dearborn Park I; Park I townhomes, mid-rise, developed as an internally- will be on maintaining and attractive pedestrian- these areas should be District and high-rise oriented residential existing residential buildings. oriented environment, this maintained as residences; and limited neighborhood. Its street Changes in building height innovative planned neighborhood amenities commercial uses. pattern includes cul-de-sacs are not anticipated. development is not well and improved and Ground Floor: and other modifications to Dearborn Station is within connected to neighboring enhanced as needs or Chicago’s grid pattern of districts. To the extent opportunities arise. Preferred: Residential. the Printing House Row streets and blocks, and the Chicago Landmark District, possible, east-west Acceptable: Public, street system is not well- and is subject to review by pedestrian linkages should institutional and linked with other streets in be improved between State the Commission on Chicago the area. Buildings are and Clark Streets, perhaps

convenience commercial City of Chicago Landmarks. th th in limited and selected oriented inward, away from along 9 Street and/or 11 locations. Retail and the surrounding streets and Street. restaurant uses are sidewalks. If any new Roosevelt Road should also appropriate in Dearborn construction is proposed, this be enhanced for pedestrian trend should be gradually Station. use, and connected to mitigated. Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. Upper Floors: Dearborn Park pedestrian amenities. Acceptable: Residential.

January 2003

Draft

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Features Other Considerations 7: The Printing House Row The grid pattern of streets The emphasis should be on A full range of streetscape The existing plaza along

44 Printing District should continue and blocks is already in maintaining the ensemble of improvements and the west side of Dearborn House to include a mix of small place. existing buildings which pedestrian amenities should Street should be retained.

Draft Row stores, shops, and The strong and consistent gives Printing House Row be provided along Dearborn One of the small east-west District services at the street “street wall” should be Historic District a unique Street, including generous streets between Dearborn

level; with residential maintained along Dearborn image and identity. sidewalks, street trees, and Federal Streets could January 2003 units, offices, and hotels Street. Any new development New infill construction should pedestrian light fixtures, potentially be closed to on the upper floors. should be aligned in be compatible with the seating areas, and other expand the existing plaza. Ground Floor: continuous rows and be existing scale and character features. Traffic circulation impacts positioned at the sidewalk of the District. Streetscape and pedestrian would need to be Preferred: Retail, considered prior to such a

Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. line. improvements should also restaurant, small Buildings with architectural closure. entertainment uses. All buildings along Dearborn and historical interest should be undertaken along Polk Street should have active, be protected. Buildings Street. North-south One or more small new Acceptable: Office, pedestrian crosswalks at plazas and gathering service. pedestrian-oriented uses on located within the Printing the ground floor. House Row Chicago Dearborn and Polk should be places should be Upper Floors: Landmark District, and improved. encouraged within this Federal and Plymouth District. Preferred: Residential. Streets will continue to individual designated Landmarks, are subject to Views down Dearborn Acceptable: Office, function as “service streets” review by the Commission Street toward historic service, hotel, public, within this District. on Chicago Landmarks. Dearborn Station should institutional. Building heights should be maintained and reflect the historic context, enhanced.

which is largely City of Chicago characterized by structures between 90 and 180 feet tall.

Near South Community Plan

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Features Other Considerations

Near South Community Plan 8: The State Street District The grid pattern of streets The emphasis should be on State Street features a wide A new urban park or plaza State should be characterized and blocks is already in improving older buildings and right-of-way and is space has been proposed Street by retail, service, office, place. on promoting high-quality convenient to transit for the southwest corner of District educational, and A strong and consistent redevelopment of services, and should State Street and Congress institutional uses; with “street wall” should be underutilized properties continue to function as an Parkway. This new space residences limited to the established along the east along the east side of State important pedestrian route. is likely to be utilized by upper floors. side of State Street. New Street. A full range of streetscape many students and staff of A mix of stores, shops, development should be Existing development along and transit-oriented the surrounding services, and other aligned in continuous rows the east side of State Street amenities should be educational institutions. active uses at the street and be positioned at the is characterized by maintained along State Any new parks and plazas Street.

level is desirable. sidewalk line, with finished underutilization and marginal at the north edge of the

City of Chicago Ground Floor: facades and inviting windows uses, including a large Pedestrian crossings on District should incorporate, and doors along all street number of parking lots. The State at Harrison and at to the extent possible, Preferred: Retail, frontages. overall image and Congress should be features that enhance the restaurant and appearance of State Street improved to reinforce links to function of Congress commercial service uses Buildings at the far south end of the District should be should be improved. the Loop. Parkway as dramatic

(east side), retail, gateway to the Near South restaurant, public and aligned with and face Building and site Polk, Balbo, Harrison, and

th Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. educational (west side). Roosevelt Road. improvements within the 9 Street should also be Vehicular and pedestrian eastern portion of this District improved for pedestrian use. Acceptable: Public, should strive to minimize the institutional, office. traffic operations should be improved at the “off-set” noise and visual impacts of Upper Floors: intersection of State and the CTA elevated structure. Acceptable: Office, Harrison. Existing buildings do not service, public, establish a predominant institutional, residential. scale and character along the State Street corridor. Higher intensity development should be permitted, particularly along the east side of State Street.

While new buildings should January 2003 respect the heights of existing buildings, some variety in building heights is

desirable.

Draft

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Features Other Considerations 9: Retail, service, The grid pattern of streets The overall image and Wabash Avenue features a Small new plazas, seating

46 Wabash entertainment, and and blocks is established. appearance of Wabash wide right-of-way and areas and gathering places Avenue educational uses should Avenue should be excellent proximity to transit should be encouraged to

Draft A consistent “street wall” District be located at the street should be established along significantly improved. The amenities, and should be enhance the pedestrian level within the Wabash emphasis should be on improved for pedestrian use. orientation within this

Wabash Avenue. New Avenue District to improving buildings with Streetscape treatments District.

development should be January 2003 maintain an active, aligned in continuous rows architectural or historical should be undertaken to In addition to the existing pedestrian-oriented and be positioned at the interest, and on promoting establish a new visual Campus Park at Wabash character. Residential sidewalk line, with finished compatible redevelopment continuity along this Avenue and 11th Street, uses should be limited to facades and inviting windows and new construction on important connecting route. Columbia College—as part upper floors. underutilized properties. Sidewalks might be

Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. and entryways along all of its overall Campus Ground Floor: street frontages for corner Existing buildings do not expanded at intersections in Enhancement Plan—is buildings. provide consistency in scale order to define the exploring opportunities for Preferred: Retail, crosswalks and “protect” restaurant, Buildings at the far south end and character along Wabash additional open spaces Avenue. Higher intensity curbside parking spaces within this District. entertainment and of the District should be along Wabash. educational. aligned with and face development could be Roosevelt Road. permitted along both sides of The pedestrian crossing at Acceptable: Commercial the corridor, provided it does Wabash and Congress service, office, public, not detract from the image should be improved to and institutional. and character of the adjacent reinforce linkages to the Upper Floors: Michigan Avenue District. Loop. Acceptable: Office, Building and site Several east-west streets improvements in the western that pass through this District service, educational,

City of Chicago public, institutional, portion of this District should should also be improved for residential. strive to minimize the noise pedestrian use, including and visual impacts generated Balbo and 9th Street. by the “L” structure. Upper floor setbacks above 6

to 8 stories should be Near South Community Plan encouraged to reflect the predominant roofline of historic buildings in this District. The Commission on Chicago Landmarks will review designated Landmark buildings and Districts. While new buildings should respect the heights of existing buildings, some variety in building heights is desirable.

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Features Other Considerations

Near South Community Plan 10: The Michigan Avenue The grid pattern of streets The emphasis should be on Michigan Avenue is an While no new parks or Michigan District should contain a and blocks is in place. maintaining the ensemble of important pedestrian route, open spaces are Avenue mix of entertainment, Michigan Avenue’s signature existing buildings that gives characterized by a full range recommended, gateway District hotel, educational, “street wall” should be the Historic Michigan of streetscape improvements design features should be institutional, retail, and maintained, protected and Boulevard Chicago and pedestrian amenities, considered along service uses; with enhanced. New development Landmark District a unique including generous Congress Parkway and residential units and should be aligned in image and identity. New sidewalks, street trees and Roosevelt Road, as space orfices on the upper continuous rows and be construction and planters, pedestrian light permits. floors. All buildings along positioned at the sidewalk redevelopment should be fixtures, seating areas, and Grant Park should continue Michigan Avenue should line, with finished facades compatible with the existing other features. These to be maintained as a have active, pedestrian- scale and character of the pedestrian-oriented elements

and inviting doors and display world-class open space

oriented uses on the District. are an important part of the City of Chicago windows facing all street amenity. Any ground floor. frontages. The Commission on Chicago District’s appeal and should transportation or parking be maintained. Ground Floor: Infill development at the far Landmarks will review related improvements Preferred: Retail, south end of the District building improvement and Balbo Avenue and 9th and should be below grade in restaurant, should be aligned with and development projects within Harrison Streets should also order to respect the image entertainment, public, face Roosevelt Road and the Landmark District. be improved for pedestrian and character of the park.

Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. institutional, hotel (north Michigan Avenue. Guidelines for building use. of 11th Street). heights within the Historic New curb cuts, loading Acceptable: Office, Michigan Boulevard Chicago zones, and drop-off areas service. Landmark District (between should be prohibited. Randolph and 11th Streets) Upper Floors: are as follows: Preferred: Hotel, public, Minimum: 55 feet. institutional (north of 8th Street), residential Maximum for streetwall: 270 (south of 8th Street). feet. Acceptable: Office, Maximum (with upper floor public, institutional, setback above 270 feet): 425 feet.

residential.

Somewhat taller buildings January 2003 south of 11th Street would enhance this gateway location.

Draft

Purposes of the Overlay Development Pattern Buildings Pedestrian Amenities Guidelines

48 Congress In addition to the Development A strong and continuous To establish visual continuity Streetscape improvements should Parkway District Guidelines described “street wall” should be along this key route, building be undertaken along Congress

Draft Overlay above, several additional design maintained along the south heights should be generally Parkway to further enhance this and development guidelines side of Congress Parkway consistent along both sides of important entryway route, consistent

should be applied as an “overlay” to enhance this dramatic Congress Parkway between with City guidelines for lighting and January 2003 to the properties along the south entryway to Downtown. Wells Street and Michigan other features. side of Congress Parkway New structures should be Avenue. While efforts should continue to be between Wells Street and aligned with and face New buildings should reflect the made to improve traffic flow and Michigan Avenue. Congress Parkway. context provided by heights of traffic safety along Congress

Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. The purposes of the Congress existing buildings. Parkway, improvements should also Parkway Overlay are to: Building setbacks above the be undertaken to make the corridor a) highlight the significance of average cornice line should be more comfortable and convenient Congress Parkway as an encouraged along the south for pedestrians. In particular, northeast-west corridor; side of Congress to allow south pedestrian crosswalks should be improved. b) promote a consistent design building heights to “transition” and appearance along both into the height limits of the sides of this dramatic and underlying Development highly visible “entryway” to Districts. Chicago’s Central Area and the Near South Community, and

City of Chicago c) strengthen the linkages and connections between Area 1 and surrounding areas, including the Loop, Grant Park, and neighborhoods

south of Roosevelt Road.

Near South Community Plan

Purposes of the Overlay Development Pattern Buildings Pedestrian Amenities Guidelines Roosevelt In addition to the Development A strong and continuous No additional building height A full range of streetscape Near South Community Plan Road District Guidelines described “street wall” should be guidelines are recommended for improvements should be maintained Overlay above, several additional design maintained along the north the Roosevelt Road Overlay along Roosevelt Road to reflect the and development guidelines should side of Roosevelt Road to District. The heights of buildings significance of this entryway be applied as an “overlay” to the frame this corridor to the along Roosevelt Road should corridor. properties along the north side of Museum Campus, Grant be subject to the guidelines of Roosevelt Road should be Roosevelt Road between the river Park, and the Lake. the individual Development comfortable, convenient and and Michigan Avenue. Buildings should be aligned Districts described above. “friendly” for pedestrians, with The purposes of the Roosevelt with and face Roosevelt The scale and massing of crosswalk improvements made as Road Overlay are to: Road. Building entrances buildings along Roosevelt Road opportunities arise. should be provided along should be prominent enough to

a) promote a consistent design

the Roosevelt Road frame the gateway. City of Chicago and appearance along this highly visible “entryway” to frontage wherever possible. Heights of buildings on both Chicago’s Central Area and Street level setbacks should sides of Roosevelt should be the Near South Community; be discouraged. generally consistent. b) create a more comfortable, convenient and “friendly”

Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. pedestrian environment along the Roosevelt Road corridor; and c) strengthen access and connections for automobiles between Area 1, Area 2, and the greater Central Area.

January 2003

Draft

Area 2: Overview of the Development Districts While the Development Districts that 3 The Dearborn South District 7 The Central Station District is compose Area 2 share many com- includes a mix of light industrial, com- dominated by a large Planned mon features and characteristics, mercial, and governmental uses; and Development, primarily consisting of each also has its own unique condi- mixed-use buildings with ground floor townhomes and residential high-rise tions and potentials that are commercial and upper-story residen- buildings. Supportive commercial addressed in the Near South tial on the east side of State Street. uses along the west side of Indiana Community Plan. Several potential infill parcels exist in Avenue are essential to this area, as Recommended land uses for Area this District. are the existing and proposed open 2's nine districts (as mapped in Figure 4 The South State District is made spaces. 19) are briefly highlighted below. up of residential and institutional 8 The Prairie Avenue District Additional and more detailed recom- buildings west of State Street, and includes an historic district and sev- mendations regarding land use, devel- mixed-use buildings with ground floor eral cultural facilities that should be opment patterns, and physical commercial and upper story office, protected and preserved. New devel- improvements to each of these Dis- service, or residential uses on the east opment in this area will be primarily tricts can be found in Table 2: Devel- side of State Street. Low-rise housing residential along Prairie, although sup- opment District Guidelines, Area 2. could be provided surrounding the portive uses such as boutique hotels 1 The vacant River Corridor Dis- Chicago Housing Authority buildings should be allowed. Surrounding the trict should be developed with a mix in this area. Additional retail and sup- historic district, taller residential and of retail, hotel, and entertainment portive commercial uses are needed. mixed-use buildings are appropriate. uses to the north, with residential and 5 The Wabash - Michigan District 9 The McCormick Place District mixed-use buildings on much of the will continue to house many of the will see significant development in site; all with access to the riverwalk supportive commercial uses in Area 2 the near future as a major expansion open space feature. An east-west link on ground floors of its buildings. It of the exposition center occurs between the river and the lake should contains a mix of ground-floor com- between Indiana and Prairie Streets. be provided along the St. Charles Air mercial uses with upper story residen- The design of the site and building Line if the opportunity arises. The riv- tial or offices, along with townhomes should strive to complement, rather erwalk should also connect to Ping and high-rise residential buildings. than overpower, the nearby historic Tom Park, in the south end of the Retail, restaurant, and other "active" districts and smaller-scale buildings. River Corridor District. The riverwalk uses should initially be concentrated Safe and convenient pedestrian links and at least one new north-south in area A of this District, north of the to surrounding areas such as Motor street should be extended under St. Charles Air Line. Row should be provided to encour- Roosevelt Road to the north. 6 The historic Motor Row District age patronage of surrounding busi- 2 The Dearborn Park II District is contains a variety of commercial uses, nesses by McCormick Place event largely built out, with a blend of town- including service, retail, and some attendees. homes and low-rise residential build- light industry. This area is likely to ings west of State Street, and suppor- transition toward more residential tive retail and commercial services uses over time, particularly in upper east of State Street. A number of infill stories of buildings. Pedestrian link- opportunities exist in this area. Addi- ages and streetscape amenities tional retail and service uses should should be provided here, in particular be encouraged in this area on the to encourage foot traffic from the east side of State Street. McCormick Place District.

48 G Draft G January 2003 G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G City of Chicago G Near South Community Plan Development Districts, Area 2 G Figure 19

S HSHEEDDD ROOSEVELT ROAD AAQQUAARIRUIMUM

R E FIELD MUSEUM OF V FIELD MU SEU M O F

I H

R NATU RAL HISTO RY L NATURAL HISTORY T A U R E O

D 13TH STREET M E Y F L

S .

G E E

E A T U U U

E C N N N

E I E E E R V V V

T H A A S

2 A

14TH STREET 7

C E A N H T S N A A A A T G I I T S B

E D

H A

E River Corridor Dearborn Park . 2 N

C Central Station S I W I R

M . . S

S S District District . K District S R A L C

. SO LDIER

F S S OFIELLD IER

O 14TH PLACE

FIELD

5 E

15TH STREET N E H L V A

A E I K R

N Wabash-Michigan I A E

A R P

. H S B District O

I V

16TH STREET

O 3

S Dearborn South 17THD STiRsEETtrict

18TH STREET E

U 8 E N

IN E L V A IR H

A T Praire Avenue

S R E L O R W 19TH STREET District

A T

H N

C E .

T W

. S

CULLERTON STREET

IE 4

M E E E T E E E

V U U E A U U N N R R N E

E E T N McCORMICK T E V

H E V S E

21ST STREET C V A V A E PLACE South State K R A

A A R T A

E T

E EXPOSITION . I A N H S S

R L S M I District A CENTER E I C A A U T

. D L B R A S T A A N P I

S .

. W

. S

. S . S McCORMICK S S P L A CMcECO RMICK

E PLACE

U N O R T H NO RTH N

CERMAK ROAD E V A

A HYATT HYATT G S I . McCORMICK McCO RMICK

H C O P L APLCAECE C

I T T

M A

. E

S 6 G R O S

. 9

Moto23rR DR SoTRwEET A

R T

E McCormick Place E District I

T S

District L

A L

R U E

T D

E H

McCORMICK

. K M c CPOLRAMCICEK S I PLACE N SOUTH G SO U TH

24TH STREET D

B R

A EXPRESSWAY E SON

D EN

EV ST . . I E

S LA AD

NORTH

Development Districts: Area 2 should be composed of a series of distinct but interconnected Development Districts which complement and enhance the overall image and character of the Near South Community.

Note: Detailed recommendations for improvement and development within the nine "develompent districts" are presented in Table 2: Development District Guidelines, Area 2.

Near South Community Plan G City of Chicago G Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. G January 2003 G Draft G 49

Table 2: Development District Guidelines, Area 2 DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Features Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Other Considerations 1: The River Corridor District A grid street network should be High-quality new building All new streets should include side- The proposed Riverwalk 50 River should contain a mix of new constructed in the area, extending construction should be pro- walks and pedestrian amenities, should be a significant

Corridor residences, open spaces, ho- existing streets where feasible. moted in this area. Variety in including lighting and street trees. open space feature within Draft District tels, and restaurants, with com- Wells Street, at least one addi- building types should be en- East-west streets should have gen- this District. It should be mercial uses on Roosevelt Road tional north-south street, and sev- couraged to avoid a monolithic erous sidewalk widths to permit easy at least 30’ in width, in-

and small scale retail and res- eral east-west streets should be character and provide a access to the Riverwalk. cluding a multi-use path,

January 2003 taurant uses at key locations extended through the area to con- choice of housing styles. and will be constructed as Pedestrian and automobile links to along the future Riverwalk. The nect to the rest of the Near South development occurs in Building design and orienta- neighborhoods and destinations sur- this District. Riverwalk should be the focal Community. At least one new tion should recognize and rounding this District should be pro- point of this District. north-south street should provide enhance entryways to the vided in connection with new devel- Complete the Expansion access to Roosevelt Road. Ground Floor: area. opment in the area. The St. Charles of Ping Tom Park be- Development should be set back Air Line is a potential pedestrian and tween 18th and 16th, the Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. Preferred: Residential, retail, Buildings should be aligned service, hotel, restaurant, and from the river as required to pro- with and oriented toward bicycle link between the River and River and Wentworth vide space for the Riverwalk. Addi- the Lake. Avenue extended. entertainment along Roosevelt streets rather than facing in- th tional setback distance should be Road and 16 Street; small ward. Corner buildings should The extension of Wells/Wentworth A new community park, retail and restaurant uses along considered for outdoor cafes, include finished facades with should include landscaping and a along with one or more plazas, and pedestrian amenities. the Riverwalk. entryways and display win- strong pedestrian orientation. Spe- new neighborhood parks, The setback distance could vary dows on both primary front- cial treatments, such as a land- should be developed to Upper Floors: depending on use and building ages. scaped median, should be consid- serve nearby residents. type. Preferred: Residential. ered. Along with the Riverwalk, this The parks should be Taller buildings along Roose- linked to the Riverwalk. Acceptable: Office, hotel. The location and orientation of velt Road should “frame” the new street should be a primary pe- streets and buildings should pre- destrian route. An additional north- gateway to the area. A mix of The Riverwalk should be serve river views and public ac- south street should be constructed in building heights (with taller connected to future de- cess. Buildings along the river buildings away from the river) this District as development in the velopments to the north should not “turn their backs” to the area occurs. is appropriate to take advan- and south of the River water.

City of Chicago tage of river views. Taller Metered, on-street parking should be Corridor District. buildings would also be ap- permitted wherever feasible. Natural and environmen- propriate along 16th Street. tally sensitive areas Lower floor area ratios (FARs) should be evaluated as with taller allowable building part of development plans heights may be utilized to for this District. increase density while en-

couraging substantial public open space. Near South Co m munity Plan

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Features Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Other Considerations 2: Dearborn Park 2 should consist The area west of State Street is The existing character of the Pedestrian amenities in this area are Open space is estab-

Near South Community Plan Dearborn predominately of residential fully built out. Its existing devel- area should be maintained, in place and should be maintained. lished in this area; it Park 2 uses, with supportive retail along opment pattern should be main- with existing buildings im- Links to surrounding areas and future should be maintained and District the east side of State Street. tained. proved as needed. Infill devel- development, including the River- improved as opportunities opment should be encour- walk, to the west should be provided arise. Ground Floor: New structures should align with where appropriate. and face State Street, contributing aged, reflecting the scale of The emphasis should be Preferred: Residential west of nearby existing buildings to the street wall effect on the east On-street parking should be permit- on directional signs and State; retail, service, restaurant, along State Street. side. There should be minimal ted. links to various open and entertainment on the east building setback at ground level on Masonry construction should space amenities. side of State Street. The St. Charles Air Line should be the east side of State Street. be promoted, with large considered for a potential pedestrian Small plaza areas could Acceptable: Hotel, office, and ground-floor windows, appeal- and bicycle link between the River, be encouraged in this institutional on the east side of ing building entries, and other Museum Campus, and the Lake. area to provide pedestrian

State Street. traditional building elements gathering spaces and Connections to Roosevelt Road and where appropriate. City of Chicago Upper Floors: “rest stops.” neighborhoods to the north and south If wider-than-typical building Preferred: Residential. should be maximized. Linkages lots are developed, articulation between the River and Lake should Acceptable: Office, service, and of facades should be em- hotel. also be improved as opportunities ployed to reflect the pattern of arise. nearby buildings.

East of State Street, mid-rise Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. buildings should be encouraged, in order to achieve vertical separation between upper floors and the “L” tracks. 3: Dearborn South should contain The grid street pattern in this dis- Infill development, reflecting 18th Street should be improved as a The recreational area at Dearborn a mix of industrial, commercial, trict is well established; streets in the scale of nearby existing major east-west pedestrian way. 18th Street under the “L” and governmental uses. Mixed- the area should be retained. buildings along State Street, should be improved, with South Pedestrian and bicycle connections District use buildings with ground floor New structures should align with should be encouraged. to the river should be provided along the addition of landscap- commercial and upper story Mixed-use buildings could be th ing, bicycle parking, and and face the north-south streets, 18 Street. The St. Charles Air Line residences should be located employed to provide a transi- other amenities. particularly State and Clark, if should be considered for a future along the east side of State feasible. If corner buildings have tion between residential and development as a pedestrian and Street. commercial uses. their primary facades along the bicycle link between the River and Ground Floor: east-west streets (as may be the Traditional architectural styles the Lake. th

case on 16 St. south of the St. and masonry buildings should Preferred: Light industrial, ser- Directional signs to points of interest, be encouraged. January 2003 vice, educational, governmental, Charles Air Line), they should be such as the Riverwalk and open designed with finished facades on institutional west of State Street; If wider-than-typical building spaces, should be among the pedes- both street frontages. retail, service, restaurant, enter- lots are developed, articulation trian amenities provided. tainment, office, and other Structures should be built to the of facades should be used to On-street parking should be retained

commercial uses east of State sidewalk. help reflect the historical build- wherever it is currently permitted.

Draft Street. ing pattern. Streets in the area should be re- Upper Floors: paved or reconstructed as The low-rise character west of

needed. State should be maintained. Preferred: Office and commer- th East of State, taller buildings

51 cial, institutional, service, educa- 16 Street between Dearborn and would allow for vertical sepa- tional, and governmental on the Clark Streets should be consid- west side of State Street. ered for two-way traffic. ration between the “L” tracks and upper stories of buildings. Acceptable: Residential (east side of State Street).

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Features Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Other Considerations 4: The South State Street District Some potential infill parcels exist Infill development should be Streets and sidewalks in the area South Loop Park (east of South should include residential and on Clark Street; new buildings on encouraged, and should re- should be repaved or reconstructed South Loop Branch

52 State educational uses west of State; these parcels should face and flect the scale of nearby build- as needed. On-street parking should School) should be re-

Street and mixed-use buildings, some align with Clark Street. New struc- ings. be retained. tained as a neighborhood

Draft with upper story residences, tures should generally face and amenity. The Park should District High-quality construction While Cermak Road has a new land- align with north-south streets. east of State. Convenience should be promoted, with scaped median and lighting this area, encompass the school commercial uses should be site once the school build-

An improvement plan for the Ickes minimal building setback on crosswalk and sidewalk improve- encouraged in this area, particu- ing is demolished.

Homes should be developed and the east side of State Street. ments are still needed to increase the January 2003 larly along the east side of State implemented; the plan should If wider-than-typical building level of pedestrian comfort. New public open space in Street. include ways to improve the lots are developed, articulation the southwest corner of Visibility and pedestrian crosswalks th Ground Floor: connectivity between the Chicago of facades would help to re- th the area (at 24 and Fed- at the intersection of 24 and State Housing Authority properties and flect the historical building eral Streets) and other Preferred: Residential west of Streets should be improved. pattern. State; retail, restaurant, and surrounding development districts parks and open spaces

Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. and amenities. should be accessible to entertainment east of State Heights of new buildings nearby residential devel- Street. should generally reflect those opments. of existing structures. East of Acceptable: Institutional, governmental, educational, and State Street, taller heights allow for vertical separation service uses throughout; com- between upper building stories mercial and office uses east of State Street. and the “L”. Taller buildings along Cermak Road should be Upper Floors: permitted to frame this impor- Preferred: Residential tant arterial street. Acceptable: Office, institutional, retail, service 5: The Wabash-Michigan corridors The grid street system in this area Infill development of tradi- A full range of streetscape amenities Encourage construction of

City of Chicago Wabash- should include a mix of ground is well established. New buildings tional, mid- to high-rise, should be provided and maintained public plazas or small Michigan floor commercial uses, loft and should face Wabash or Michigan, mixed-use structures should throughout this District. parks in connection with be promoted. District town home residences, and as well as east-west streets, if on The St. Charles Air Line should be new development and as high-rise residential buildings. A a corner (especially at major inter- opportunities arise. Street level facades should used as a potential pedestrian and concentration of pedestrian- sections). include architectural detail, bicycle link between the River and Directional signs should oriented, “active” uses should be Building setbacks at ground level inviting entryways, and large the Lake. be provided to the River-

encouraged, beginning north of should not be allowed, in order to display windows when build- walk, Lakefront and Mu- the St. Charles Air Line. Convenient and comfortable pedes-

provide a continuous street wall. ings contain first floor com- seum Campus, and the trian connections to Roosevelt Road Ground Floor: mercial uses. Prairie Avenue and Motor Near South Co and north thereof should be provided. Row Landmark Districts. Preferred: Retail, service, hotel, Buildings should be tallest restaurant, entertainment, and near Roosevelt Road and institutional. gradually “step down” as one moves south from Roosevelt. Acceptable: Residential, office. Several buildings within the m Upper Floors: munity Plan Wabash-Michigan District are Preferred: Residential, office, part of the Motor Row Chicago hotel. Landmark District, and are Acceptable: Retail, restaurant, subject to review by the entertainment, and service. Commission on Chicago

Landmarks.

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Features Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Other Considerations 6: The Motor Row Development The grid street system in this area Historically accurate restora- Unique thematic streetscape and Small plazas and public

Near South Community Plan Motor Row District should feature a variety is well established. Michigan and tion (including removal of false pedestrian amenities should be pro- gathering spaces should District of retail establishments, enter- Cermak should continue to func- facades) is encouraged. Infill vided. Michigan Avenue should be be provided in this area. tainment, and other active tion as the main streets in this development should reflect the top priority for streetscape fea- Ideally, their design ground floor uses, particularly District. New construction should historic development patterns. tures. should be reflective of Motor Row history. along Michigan and Cermak. face Cermak, Wabash, Michigan, Buildings at Cermak and East-west streets should also be Commercial and light industrial or Indiana, preferably with an Michigan should serve as improved with amenities, providing a uses are appropriate in this additional front facade on corner anchors for Motor Row and physical and visual connection to the sites. area. Potential exists for resi- include a visible, active mix of McCormick Place expansion. Side- dential uses in upper stories. Building setbacks at ground level uses. walks should be repaired in deterio- Ground Floor: should not be allowed in order to rating areas. Somewhat taller buildings provide a continuous street wall. Preferred: along Cermak Road are ap-

propriate to frame this impor- Retail, restaurant, service, cul-

City of Chicago tural, office, entertainment. tant arterial street. Along the “L”, mid-rise heights allow for Acceptable: vertical separation between Commercial, educational, institu- the tracks and buildings’ upper tional, hotel. stories.

Upper Floors: Within and near the Motor

Row Chicago Landmark Dis- Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. Preferred: trict, buildings should reflect Office, service, museums, and the existing low-rise character cultural uses. of Motor Row; very tall buildings are not appropriate in this Acceptable: District. Institutional, governmental, com- While general guidelines re- mercial, residential, hotel, light garding building heights are industrial. included here, designated Landmark structures and buildings located within Chi- cago Landmark Districts are subject to review by the Commission on Chicago Landmarks.

January 2003

Draft

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Features Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Other Considerations 7: Central Station will consist of The Central Station Planned De- Building style should respect When its freight operations are dis- Under the Planned De- Central new low- to high-rise residences velopment covers most of this and complement nearby struc- continued, the St. Charles Air Line velopment agreement,

54 Station and compatible uses consistent Development District. Develop- tures. should be considered for a pedes- parks should be con- th District with the Planned Development. ment in this district between 13 trian and bicycle link between the structed and public ac-

th At the north edge of the Cen- Draft Structures along Michigan Ave- and 16 Streets is already com- River and the Lake. cess provided for sur- tral Station District, high-rise pleted or approved. rounding area residents. nue and Roosevelt Road should buildings should frame Grant The grid street system should be

contain active uses wherever The development pattern in the Park and Roosevelt Road. extended if the Air Line is removed. A park has been pro- possible. th

January 2003 area south of 16 Street is re- posed to span the Metra The Central Station Planned An additional connection from exist- Ground Floor: stricted by the presence of the Electric tracks between Development includes the ing streets to Lake Shore Drive be- th Preferred: Residential, retail Metra tracks and Lake Shore following guidelines for build- tween 16th and Cullerton Streets Roosevelt Road and 14 Drive. The retention or removal of Street. If this option does and hotel on Roosevelt and ing heights within its bounda- should be considered. Michigan frontages. the St. Charles Air Line also im- ries: not prove feasible, other pacts building and access In general, pedestrian and automo- open space areas should th

Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. Acceptable: Personal service. configurations. Opportunities to Maximum (Roosevelt to 13 bile connections to Roosevelt Road, be provided to serve the Street): 400 feet Grant Park, and nearby Development Upper Floors: improve connections with north part of this District. Districts should be maximized. surrounding areas should be ex- Maximum (NW,NE,SW cor- Preferred: Residential, hotel plored. along Roosevelt and Michigan Where feasible, remaining con- ners of Indiana and 13th): 350 feet frontages. struction in the area should be oriented toward streets. Street Acceptable: Maximum (along Lake Shore extensions including the extension Drive): 200 feet Office, educational, institutional. of Prairie Avenue to the north, should be made where possible. Maximum (elsewhere in the District): 200-225 feet, consistent with the Central Station Planned Development. Several historic properties within the Central Station

City of Chicago District (on the west side of Wabash St.) should be preserved.

Near South Co m munity Plan

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Features Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Other Considerations 8: The Prairie Avenue Develop- The predominant development The Prairie Avenue Chicago Pedestrian elements such as trees, A new park is planned for

Near South Community Plan Prairie ment District should be a primar- pattern of the Prairie Avenue Chi- Landmark District should be parkway improvements on Prairie, the northeast corner of Avenue ily residential area in and near cago Landmark District should preserved and enhanced as Cullerton, and 18th; and pedestrian- Indiana and 16th Streets. the Prairie Avenue Chicago guide the pattern of new construc- the “centerpiece” for this Dis- scale lighting should be incorporated District Additional access should Landmark District, with ground tion on the block between 18th and trict. as needed. be provided to Mark Cullerton Streets. th floor commercial uses along Low-rise structures are most The pedestrian bridge at 18 Street Twain Park (north of the Indiana. Buildings should be set back ten appropriate in the immediate should be reconstructed to improve St. Charles Air Line). Ground Floor: feet along either side of Prairie Prairie Avenue area, with a pedestrian and bicycle access to the The Chicago Women’s Avenue from 21st to 16th Streets, gradual transition to the lakefront. Preferred: Residential, retail th Park and Gardens should along Indiana. 18 Street from Calumet Avenue higher-rise residential and The St. Charles Air Line is a potential continue to be improved. to the alley west of Indiana Ave- mixed-use buildings in sur- Acceptable: Institutional, gov- pedestrian and bicycle link between The system of historical nue, and along either side of Cull- rounding blocks. Building the River and the Lake.

ernmental, office, boutique markers and signs to erton Street from Calumet Avenue materials and styles that are

(small-scale) hotel. An additional connection to Lake points of interest should to Indiana Avenue. compatible with the historic City of Chicago th character of Prairie Avenue Shore Drive between 16 and Culler- be expanded, and should Upper Floors: Upper level setbacks should be should be used. ton Streets should be provided if include signs to the pe- encouraged above 50 feet in this Preferred: Residential. feasible. destrian way across Lake District. Suggested building heights for Shore Drive. Acceptable: this area should be in context with development along the

Hotel, office, cultural, institutional. block face and immediate

Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. surrounding area. Taller buildings should be approximately 60 feet along the Prairie, Cull- erton, and 18th Street frontages: and up to 250 feet elsewhere in the Development District The City’s Commission on Chicago Landmarks reviews building improvement projects for Landmark Districts and individual Landmarks.

January 2003

Draft

DISTRICT: Land Uses Development Building Scale and Features Pedestrian Amenities Open Space and Pattern Other Considerations 9: The McCormick Place District The McCormick Place Planned Several historic buildings in As streets are vacated in the Directional signs to points Mc should include supportive retail Development covers most of the this area should be preserved McCormick expansion area, pedes- of interest, including the

56 Cormick uses, such as restaurants and area in this District. and restored, subject to review trian elements should be added. nearby Motor Row and

business services, should be by the Commission on Chi- Access through structures and dedi- Prairie Avenue Chicago Place Edge definition to the McCormick

Draft encouraged along the Cermak cago Landmarks. cated pedestrian paths should be Landmark Districts and District campus should be enhanced to included to maintain pedestrian links. Road and Indiana Avenue front- provide a noticeable transition to Transition areas between the McCormick Place, should ages. be added in this District.

the Motor Row and Prairie Avenue Exposition Center area and Pedestrian crossings at Cermak

Ground Floor: Landmark Districts. However, the Prairie Avenue and Motor Road should be improved in several Outdoor seating areas January 2003 substantial visual and physical Row Landmark Districts locations as foot and auto traffic in- should be added over Preferred: Institutional, hotel, creases in this area. business service, restaurant, linkages between the two areas should be recognized and time around McCormick should be included as new devel- defined through building orien- Place.. entertainment, retail along Cer- Better linkages are needed to the opment and redevelopment take tation and architecture, as well mak and Indiana. McCormick Center pedestrian bridge place. as landscaping and signage. across Lake Shore Drive.

Acceptable: Office. Prepared by Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne, Inc. Mid- and high-rise develop- Improved east-west pedestrian con- Upper Floors: ment is in character with the nections (using various streetscape McCormick area, except near Preferred: Institutional, hotel, elements) should be provided be- service, restaurant, office, and the Prairie Avenue Chicago tween McCormick Place and Motor entertainment. Landmark District. Taller Row at and south of Cermak Road. buildings along Cermak are Acceptable: appropriate, framing this corri- Landscaping along Cermak Road Residential north of Cermak. dor between McCormick Place should be maintained to help define and Chinatown. its role as the primary east-west corridor in the south part of the area.

City of Chicago

Near South Co m munity Plan