Subscriptions: Free unit subscriptions are available by emailing the Editor at [email protected]. Include the complete mailing address (unit name, street address, and building number). Don’t forget to email the Editor when your unit moves, deploys, or redeploys to ensure continual receipt of the Bulletin. Reprints: Material in this Bulletin is not copyrighted (except where indicated). Content may be reprinted if the MI Professional Bulletin and the authors are credited. Our mailing address: MIPB (ATZS-DST-B), Dir. of Doctrine and Intel Sys Trng, USAICoE, 550 Cibeque St., Fort Huachuca, AZ 85613-70 Commanding General MG Robert P. Walters, Jr. Purpose: The U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence publishes the Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin Chief of Staff (MIPB) quarterly under the provisions of AR 25-30. COL Douglas R. Woodall MIPB presents information designed to keep intelligence Chief Warrant Officer, MI Corps professionals informed of current and emerging devel- CW5 Matthew R. Martin opments within the field and provides an open forum Command Sergeant Major, MI Corps in which ideas; concepts; tactics, techniques, and proce- dures; historical perspectives; problems and solutions, etc., CSM Warren K. Robinson can be exchanged and discussed for purposes of profes- STAFF: sional development Editor Tracey A. Remus [email protected] By order of the Secretary of the Army: Associate Editor MARK A. MILLEY Maria T. Eichmann General, United States Army Design and Layout Chief of Staff Emma R. Morris Official: Cover Design Robin H. Crawford GERALD B. O’KEEFE IAPA-INSCOM Public Affairs Administrative Assistant to the Military Staff to the Secretary of the Army CPT John P. Mones 1814308 CPT Emily R. Morrison From the Editor We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge and thank INSCOM’s CPT Andrew Harris for the significant con- tributions he made to the development of this issue. Other INSCOM contributors include Robin Crawford, COL Nichoel Brooks, CPT Gretchen Pace, and INSCOM’s Public Affairs Office. Without the planning, coordination, support, and other key contributions of these dedicated professionals, this highly informative edition could not have been accomplished. As always, articles from you, our reader, remain important to the success of MIPB as a professional bulletin. We are cur- rently looking for a few good articles to feature in our new recurring department—Know Your Enemies, Adversaries, and Threats. The focus of these articles will be on specific countries and groups whose objectives may be at odds with the interests of the United States. The following themes and deadlines are established: January–March 2019, Intelligence Support in Large-Scale Combat Operations. This issue will focus on the challenges of intelligence support in a complex environment against a peer threat. Deadline for article submission is 4 October 2018. April–June 2019, Intelligence and Special Operations. This issue will focus on how intelligence professionals provide support to special operations forces. Deadline for article submission is 17 December 2018. July–September 2019, Security Force Assistance Brigade S-2. This issue will focus on the roles of the SFAB S-2 in conducting security cooperation activities. Deadline for article submission is 2 April 2019. Please call or email me with any questions regarding article submissions or any other aspects of MIPB. We welcome your input and suggestions. Tracey A. Remus Editor July - September 2018 PB 34-18-3 Volume 44 Number 3 The views expressed in the following articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Departments of the Army or Defense, or the U.S. Government. Article content is not authenticated Army information and does not supercede information in any other Army publication. FEATURES 5 What is the Intelligence and Security Command For? –MODERNIZING FOR GREATER LETHALITY– by MG Christopher S. Ballard, COL Nichoel E. Brooks, LTC Jarred M. Lang, MAJ Christopher D. Thornton, 61 Innovation and Modernization: INSCOM’s Aerial CPT Charles F. Nadd, CPT Gretchen L. Pace, and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Mr. Thomas J. Stokowski by LTC Tony K. Verenna, LTC Keith A. Haskin, MAJ Trevis C. Isenberg, Mr. Stephen A. Gasparek, and Mr. Marco 10 The U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command at A. Garavito Four Decades Part I: Inception by Mr. Michael E. Bigelow 65 OSINT: Increasing Readiness by Leveraging the Digital Environment 12 Seeing the Elephant: INSCOM’s Exercise of Mission by Mr. Daniel Zieminski Command by LTC Ryan H. Beery 69 The U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command at Four Decades Part IV: Global War on Terrorism 18 Intelligence and Security Command Mission by Mr. Michael E. Bigelow Command by Mr. Richard Harfst and Mr. Thomas Stokowski 71 The Road to the Data Strategy for Army Intelligence by Mr. Kirk G. Brustman, Mr. Erik K. Christensen, Dr. Holly A. Russo, LTC Russel J. Edmiston, and –ENABLING READINESS FOR THE Mr. Richard H. Saddler INTELLIGENCE ENTERPRISE– 78 Developing a Big Data Strategy: Where We Are and 25 The Army Intelligence Program of Analysis Where We Need to Go by Ms. Rita McIntosh, Ms. Kelly Nelson, and by COL Ingrid Parker Dr. Crisanna Shackelford 83 Army Processing, Exploitation, and Dissemination 29 Setting the Theater: A Critical Intelligence Function by MAJ James Chester Capabilities: Adapt, Evolve, Innovate by CW3 Otis Griffin III 33 Efforts in Africa: The New Frontier by CW5 David Bassili and CW3 James Macfarlane 86 Building a Strong Europe Through Collaborative Intelligence 38 The U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command at by COL David W. Pendall and LTC Christopher J. Four Decades Part II: Winning the Cold War (1981 to Heatherly 1989) by Mr. Michael E. Bigelow 89 Joint Certification of Service Human Intelligence Collector Training and Professional Development 40 Return of the Technical Control and Analysis Elements by CW5 Joseph P. Lancaster for Theater Signals Intelligence Support by MAJ Jason Elphick by Mr. Scott R. Hammon 90 MG Oliver W. Dillard Award 91 BG Roy M. Strom Award by MAJ Jason Elphick 43 How INSCOM Supports Intelligence Readiness in Europe 109 A Tribute to Military Intelligence Legend Lieutenant by Mr. Steve Hughes General James Arthur Williams by COL Nichoel E. Brooks and CPT Jessica A. Tarsa –ENABLING READINESS IN THE DEPARTMENTS KOREAN THEATER OF OPERATIONS– 2 Always Out Front 48 The Stage: Land of Interrupted Calm 3 CSM Forum by COL Derrick S. Lee and MAJ Margaret Dervan 4 Technical Perspective Hughes 92 Distinguished Members of the MI Corps/ 58 The U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command MI Corps Hall of Fame at Four Decades Part III: Regional Conflicts and 100 Doctrine Corner Drawdown (1989 to 2001) 102 USAICoE Lessons Learned by Mr. Michael E. Bigelow 104 Culture Corner 106 Moments in MI History Always Out Front by Major General Robert P. Walters, Jr. Commanding General U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence In 1977, 10 years before the development of the Military delivers an Army intelligence team capable of supporting Intelligence (MI) Corps, the Army established the U.S. Army organizations at the tactical and operational levels regard- Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM). The need less of the threat or operational environment. Near-term for INSCOM came during a time when numerous conflicts objectives focus on enhancing the capabilities and capacity arose throughout the world: the Cambodian Campaign, at the brigade combat team, division, and corps echelons the Vietnam War, and the Lebanese Civil War, along with with the existing systems and force structure that are avail- Hutu genocides in Burundi and the Moro Rebellion of the able today. Mid-term objectives concentrate on identifying Philippines. With a multitude of conflicts occurring within capability gaps to optimize current sensors, while far-term most every region of the world, the Army established objectives emphasize developing future sensors on up- INSCOM to integrate all intelligence disciplines under one graded platforms. command to meet the increasing demands for intelligence. Since INSCOM is a critical component of all future intelli- As the Army continues to change, so does Army intel- gence operations, I decided to dedicate this quarter’s MIPB ligence and INSCOM. The Army G-2 recently created the to INSCOM. As you read this issue of MIPB, you will find Army Intelligence Plan to ensure intelligence readiness perspectives from MG Ballard and his team who composed and modernization issues are synchronized and energized. articles on the history, organizational design, and intricate Driven by recommendations from the Bottom Up Review relationships INSCOM has with the combatant commands. and various other intelligence studies and strategies, this This issue of MIPB is a comprehensive guide to INSCOM plan requires INSCOM and the U.S. Army Intelligence Center and is a must-read for the Army’s intelligence profession- of Excellence (USAICoE) to collaborate; ensuring the G-2’s als seeking to understand and leverage national to tactical concept of “One Vision, One Vector, One Voice” is achieved. intelligence in support of tactical, operational, and strategic The plan calls for cooperation and communication between level operations. Take this opportunity to continue to learn INSCOM, USAICoE, and the G-2 staff. about the many different aspects of our MI Corps and the The Army Intelligence Plan is separated into near-, mid- ways that intelligence drives operations. and far-term objectives culminating with an end state that Always Out Front! 2 Military Intelligence CSM FORUM by Command Sergeant Major Warren K. Robinson Command Sergeant Major of the MI Corps U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence This is my first article as your Military Intelligence (MI) Corps enables MI Soldiers to sustain intelligence skills pertinent to Command Sergeant Major. Humbled and excited are the their unit’s mission and to improve their individual and col- best words to describe my feelings at the opportunity to lective technical and analytical skills.