Still Hooked Our First 50 Years

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

L HOOK STIL ED O UR RS FIRST 50 YEA Joe G. Dillard Amanda Rosenberger Emily Tracy-Smith L HOOK STIL ED O UR RS FIRST 50 YEA Joe G. Dillard Amanda Rosenberger Emily Tracy-Smith Copyright © 2018 by Missouri Chapter of the American Fisheries Society ISBN 978-1-61600-518-4 Design by Cassidy Shearrer Printed in the United States of America A NOTE FROM JOE You may wonder what ever possessed me to undertake compiling this history of the Missouri Chapter of the American Fisheries So- ciety (MOAFS). A few reasons that come to mind include: having really good records to work with, a sense of duty, attending all of the meetings except two, lack of good judgment, and too much time on my hands. Did I mention having a mini-stroke?! Be that as it may be, I am glad that I undertook the challenge. But, as usually happens in my major undertakings, I somehow get other folks involved. Some say that I dump on them; nay, I say that I share growth opportunities with them. You stick your nose under the tent and you are in! MOAFS and this project were truly blessed when Amanda Rosenberger and Emily Tracy-Smith offered to help. You will have to ask them the reasons that they did, other than out of pity for me, wanting to see a finished project, and bribes of chocolate. You should know that you would not be reading this had it not been for the other two authors. They bailed me out on this project when it was totally stalled. For that I am forever grateful. And, you should be, too. Along the way, Gary Novinger and Lee C. Redmond made many helpful suggestions. Since I had the records and Amanda and Emily didn’t, guess who is to blame for errors. The good news is that eventually all of the MOAFS records will be archived at the Center for Missouri Studies in Columbia, Missouri which houses the records of the State of Missouri Historical Society. You or anyone else can dig through them and set the record straight. Thank you in advance. Now, for the future. I am hoping that you will seriously con- sider volunteering for the History Committee, encourage saving MOAFS records and either in 2039 or 2064 compiling the 75th and/or 100th version of this tome. May we not become un-hooked! History happens and must be reported. Joe G. Dillard MOAFS Historian Emeritus April 2018 5 John L. Funk’s letter to each of the 53 AFS members living in Missouri in 1964 informing them of the intent to form a Missouri Chapter. 6 CONTENTS A Note from Joe 5 Preface 9 Our Beginnings 13 Our Officers 14 Our Subunits 16 Our Milestones and Significant Accomplishments 17 Our Awards Given 40 Our Awards Received 50 Our Annual Meetings 54 Our Future 264 Appendices 268 1. Celebrating A Golden Anniversary: Still Hooked After 50 Years 268 2. A Tribute to John L. Funk, Founder 270 3. List of Attendees at the Organizational Meeting 271 4. List of Attendees at the 50th Meeting of MOAFS 272 5. Golden AFS Members 274 6. Past Presidents of AFS and NCD/AFS who were members of MOAFS 275 7. List of MOAFS Life Members and AFS Life Members from Missouri 275 8. Resolutions 276 9. Guiding Documents 285 10. History of the History Committee 288 Endnotes 289 7 John L. Funk’s handwritten notes about forming an AFS chapter in Missouri. 8 PREFACE We believe that history is important. Or, as E. Sydney Stephens, one of the founding fathers of the Missouri Department of Con- servation, said, “No organization, whether governmental or pub- lic-private, is worth a damn unless it develops a history, a philos- ophy, and guiding ethics.” We believe that the Missouri Chapter of the American Fisheries Society, hereafter, MOAFS, is rich in all three. Our chapter is particularly blessed with a good collection of re- cords. We owe this in large part to former Chapter President Gary D. Novinger for establishing the position of Chapter Historian, whom he appointed to collect, compile, and maintain our histor- ical documents. Because of his foresight, we possess resources to draw from as many past officers and committee chairs saved their records and passed them on. Committee members have been few but busy, including Joe G. Dillard and Lisa (Dillard) Miles, Mark Zurbrick, Vince Travnichek, Craig Paukert and, more recently, Amanda Rosen- berger and Emily Tracy-Smith. This history of MOAFS is a straightforward account of the im- portant events marking its first 50 years. Those unfamiliar with MOAFS may find it a useful introduction to the organization, while long-term members may view it as a trip down memory lane. Written history is limited by the records available and what the compilers chose to include. We have made every effort to include the truly important events and omit the more mundane. Nevertheless, some readers may feel that some have been left out. For these and any other shortcomings of this history, we offer our apologies. Why is history important? Larry Nielsen, former President of the American Fisheries Society (AFS) in an essay published in Fisheries, listed four practical uses of history: it helps avoid the repetition of bad decisions and gives us a more accurate perspec- tive, supports strategic planning and allows for experimentation with the past. He ended his piece with a plea for all of us to record 9 our history so future generations can benefit in the ways listed above. This is what your History Committee is all about. Larry ended his essay with these observations from the Penguin Dictionary of Modern Humorous Quotations. “History, N. an account, mostly false, of events mostly unim- portant, which are brought about by rulers, mostly knaves, and soldiers, mostly fools.” —Ambrose Bierce (1911) “History is too serious to be left up to historians.” —Iian Macleod (1961) —Joe G. Dillard, Amanda Rosenberger and Emily Tracy-Smith 10 1963 John L. Funk’s letter of invitation to attend the first Missouri Fishery Conference that later became the Missouri Chapter of the American fisheries Society. 11 John L. Funk 12 OUR BEGINNINGS The first meeting of the soon-to-be Missouri Chapter of the American Fisheries Society was held on February 23, 1963 when American Fisheries Society (AFS) member, and former President of the North Central Division of the American Fisheries Soci- ety (NCD/AFS), John L. Funk organized a Missouri Fisheries Conference. Funk, then in charge of Fisheries Research for the Missouri Department of Conservation, said, “It was time to get the aquatic workers of Missouri organized to: promote commu- nication, increase professionalism, share our fisheries information with others, and to better serve local AFS members.” Funk served as General Chairman of that first conference. The Missouri Chap- ter had not yet been officially formed, and there were only 37 AFS members in the state. MOAFS was officially chartered March 10, 1964, a scant few days after a unanimous vote on the proposal to form a Missouri Chapter of AFS at the second Missouri Fishery Conference held on February 29, 1964. Funk was elected to the office of President and served in that capacity through 1965. By 1964, Missouri had 53 AFS members. The Chapter has a long history of involvement in AFS affairs. Four AFS presidents came up through the ranks of our Chapter, as well as eleven presidents of the NCD/AFS. The Chapter has had a lot of experience in meeting manage- ment. We host the Missouri Natural Resources Conference (A combined meeting of the Missouri Chapters of the American Fisheries Society, The Wildlife Society, The Missouri Show-Me Chapter of the Soil and Water Conservation Society and the Missouri Chapter of the Society of American Forest which of- ten is attended by 700-800 participants) every four years, the Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference (every 10 years), and the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (every 10 years). In addition, we hosted the AFS meeting in 2000. Much of the support work for these conferences come from AFS Chapter members. 13 MOAFS is now a highly organized NGO with several active committees, several Executive Committee meetings per year, an an- nual work plan, and a host of activities to advance the science and professional aspects of the aquatic resources in the state of Missouri. OUR OFFICERS (1963-2014) Year President1 President-Elect3 Secretary2 Treasurer2 1963 John L. Funk3 Initial Meeting 1963-64 John L. Funk3 Organizational Meeting 1964-65 John L. Funk James W. Kahrs Willis D. Hanson 1965-66 James W. Kahrs Richard O. Anderson Willis D. Hanson 1966-67 Richard O. Anderson Charles A. Purkett, Jr. Willis D. Hanson 1967-68 Charles A. Purkett, Jr. Robert S. Campbell Willis D. Hanson 1968-69 Robert S. Campbell George G. Fleener Joe G. Dillard 1969-70 George G. Fleener Paul E. Osborn Joe G. Dillard 1970-71 Paul E. Osborn Arthur Witt, Jr. Arvil D. Ming 1971-72 Arthur Witt, Jr. Willis D. Hanson Arvil D. Ming 1972-73 Willis D. Hanson Richard A. Schoettger Blake F. Grant 1973-74 Richard A. Schoettger Dean A. Rosebery Blake F. Grant 1974-75 Dean A. Rosebery Joe G. Dillard Lee C. Redmond 1975-76 Joe G. Dillard Foster L. Mayer4 Lee C. Redmond 1976-77 Foster L. Mayer Donald A. Kangas Stanley M. Michaelson 1977-78 Donald A. Kangas James B. Reynolds Stanley M. Michaelson 1978-79 James B. Reynolds5 Stanley M. Michaelson Gary D. Novinger 1979-80 Stanley M. Michaelson John R.
Recommended publications
  • Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from The

    Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from The

    Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from the 1940s to the 1990s by MATTHEW R. WINSTON Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO 65201 February 2003 CONTENTS Page Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 10 Methods……………………………………………………………………………….. 17 The Data Used………………………………………………………………… 17 General Patterns in Species Change…………………………………………... 23 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 26 Results………………………………………………………………………………… 34 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 30 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 46 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………….. 63 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 53 Conservation Status of Species………………………………………………. 63 Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………. 66 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………………….. 66 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………… 72 FIGURES 1. Distribution of samples by principal investigator…………………………. 20 2. Areas of greatest average decline…………………………………………. 33 3. Areas of greatest average expansion………………………………………. 34 4. The relationship between number of basins and ……………………….. 39 5. The distribution of for each reproductive group………………………... 40 2 6. The distribution of for each family……………………………………… 41 7. The distribution of for each trophic group……………...………………. 42 8. The distribution of for each faunal region………………………………. 43 9. The distribution of for each stream type………………………………… 44 10. The distribution of for each range edge…………………………………. 45 11. Modified
  • Neogobius Melanostomus (Round Goby) [Original Text by J

    Neogobius Melanostomus (Round Goby) [Original Text by J

    Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, June 2019 Revised, September 2019 Web Version, 11/18/2019 Photo: E. Engbretson, USFWS. Public domain. Available: https://digitalmedia.fws.gov/digital/collection/natdiglib/id/5112/rec/2. (June 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Fuller et al. (2019): “Eurasia including Black Sea, Caspian Sea, and Sea of Azov and tributaries (Miller 1986).” 1 From Freyhof and Kottelat (2008): “Native: Azerbaijan; Bulgaria; Georgia; Iran, Islamic Republic of; Kazakhstan; Moldova; Romania; Russian Federation; Turkey; Turkmenistan; Ukraine” Status in the United States From Fuller et al. (2019): “Already spread to all five Great Lakes, with large populations in Lakes Erie and Ontario. Likely to find suitable habitat throughout Lake Erie and in all Great Lakes waters at depths less than 60 m (USEPA 2008). Established outside of the Great Lakes basin in 1994 (Dennison, personal communication), and in 2010 spread into the lower Illinois River (K. Irons, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL, personal communication)” “Round Goby was considered extremely abundant in the St. Clair River in 1994. Short trawls made in Lake Erie in October 1994 turned up 200 individuals. Frequent trawling in 1995 collected over 3,000 individuals near Fairport Harbor, Ohio (Knight, personal communication). Densities in Calumet Harbor exceed 20 per square meter (Marsden and Jude 1995). Gravid females and different size classes have been found in Lake Erie (T. Cavender, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, personal communication). In Lake Superior, primarily established in Duluth-Superior Harbor and lower St.
  • Biological Synopsis of Largemouth Bass (Micropterus Salmoides)

    Biological Synopsis of Largemouth Bass (Micropterus Salmoides)

    Biological Synopsis of Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) T.G. Brown, B. Runciman, S. Pollard, and A.D.A. Grant Fisheries and Oceans Canada Science Branch, Pacific Region Pacific Biological Station 3190 Hammond Bay Road Nanaimo, B.C. V9T 6N7 CANADA 2009 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2884 Fisheries and Oceans Peches et Oceans 1+1 Canada Canada Canada Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Manuscript reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which deals with national or regional problems. Distribution is restricted to institutions or individuals located in particular regions of Canada. However, no restriction is placed on subject matter, and the series reflects the broad interests and policies ofthe Department ofFisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Manuscript reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts and indexed in the Department's annual index to scientific and technical publications. Numbers 1-900 in this series were issued as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Biological Board ofCanada, and subsequent to 1937 when the name ofthe Board was changed byAct of Parliament, as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 1426 - 1550 were issued as Department ofFisheries and the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Manuscript Reports. The current series name was changed with report number 1551. Manuscript reports are produced regionally but are numbered nationally. Requests for individual reports will be filled by the issuing establishment listed on the front cover and title page.
  • Zootaxa, Cottus Immaculatus, a New Species of Sculpin

    Zootaxa, Cottus Immaculatus, a New Species of Sculpin

    Zootaxa 2340: 50–64 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Cottus immaculatus, a new species of sculpin (Cottidae) from the Ozark Highlands of Arkansas and Missouri, USA ANDREW P. KINZIGER1 & ROBERT M. WOOD2 1Department of Fisheries Biology, Humboldt State University, One Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, 3507 Laclede Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63103–2010, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Cottus immaculatus, new species, is described from the Current, Eleven Point, Spring and White river systems of the White River drainage, in the Ozark Highlands of Arkansas and Missouri, USA. Cottus immaculatus is a member of the Uranidea clade and distinguishable from all members of the genus Cottus using genetic and morphological characters. Cottus immaculatus possesses a previously unreported but possibly widespread character in the genus Cottus, enlargement of the tips of the dorsal-fin spines of males. The description of Cottus immaculatus brings the total number of species recognized within the genus Cottus to 68. Key words: sculpin, Cottidae, Cottus, Cottus immaculatus, Cottus hypselurus, Cottus bairdii, Missouri, Arkansas, Ozark Highlands, fin knobs Introduction Cottus hypselurus, the Ozark Sculpin, is a relatively small (< 80 mm SL) freshwater sculpin endemic to cool to cold streams of the Ozark Highlands in Missouri and Arkansas (Robins & Robison, 1985; Pflieger, 1997). Molecular phylogenetic analyses of the genus Cottus have resolved C. hypselurus as a member of the Uranidea clade (Kinziger et al., 2005). Intraspecific molecular phylogenetic studies have revealed that C.
  • NRSA 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Appendices (Pdf)

    NRSA 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Appendices (Pdf)

    National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 Appendix A: Equipment & Supplies Appendix Equipment A: & Supplies A-1 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 pendix Equipment A: & Supplies Ap A-2 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 Base Kit: A Base Kit will be provided to the field crews for all sampling sites that they will go to. Some items are sent in the base kit as extra supplies to be used as needed. Item Quantity Protocol Antibiotic Salve 1 Fish plug Centrifuge tube stand 1 Chlorophyll A Centrifuge tubes (screw-top, 50-mL) (extras) 5 Chlorophyll A Periphyton Clinometer 1 Physical Habitat CST Berger SAL 20 Automatic Level 1 Physical Habitat Delimiter – 12 cm2 area 1 Periphyton Densiometer - Convex spherical (modified with taped V) 1 Physical Habitat D-frame Kick Net (500 µm mesh, 52” handle) 1 Benthics Filteration flask (with silicone stopped and adapter) 1 Enterococci, Chlorophyll A, Periphyton Fish weigh scale(s) 1 Fish plug Fish Voucher supplies 1 pack Fish Voucher Foil squares (aluminum, 3x6”) 1 pack Chlorophyll A Periphyton Gloves (nitrile) 1 box General Graduated cylinder (25 mL) 1 Periphyton Graduated cylinder (250 mL) 1 Chlorophyll A, Periphyton HDPE bottle (1 L, white, wide-mouth) (extras) 12 Benthics, Fish Vouchers HDPE bottle (500 mL, white, wide-mouth) with graduations 1 Periphyton Laboratory pipette bulb 1 Fish Plug Microcentrifuge tubes containing glass beads
  • Cave Fauna of the Buffalo National River

    Cave Fauna of the Buffalo National River

    G. O. Graening, Michael Slay, and Chuck Bitting. Cave Fauna of the Buffalo National River. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. 68, no. 3, p. 153–163. CAVE FAUNA OF THE BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER G. O. GRAENING The Nature Conservancy, 601 North University Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA, [email protected] MICHAEL E. SLAY The Nature Conservancy, 601 North University Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA, [email protected] CHUCK BITTING Buffalo National River, 402 North Walnut, Suite 136, Harrison, AR 72601, USA, [email protected] The Buffalo National River (within Baxter, Marion, Newton, and Searcy counties, Arkansas) is completely underlain by karstic topography, and contains approximately 10% of the known caves in Arkansas. Biological inventory and assessment of 67 of the park’s subterranean habi- tats was performed from 1999 to 2006. These data were combined and analyzed with previous studies, creating a database of 2,068 total species occurrences, 301 animal taxa, and 143 total sites. Twenty species obligate to caves or ground water were found, including four new to sci- ence. The species composition was dominated by arthropods. Statistical analyses revealed that site species richness was directly proportional to cave passage length and correlated to habitat factors such as type of water resource and organics present, but not other factors, such as de- gree of public use or presence/absence of vandalism. Sites were ranked for overall biological significance using the metrics of passage length, total and obligate species richness. Fitton Cave ranked highest and is the most biologically rich cave in this National Park and second-most in all of Arkansas with 58 total and 11 obligate species.
  • Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Status of the Native Freshwater Fishes of the Southern United States by Melvin L

    Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Status of the Native Freshwater Fishes of the Southern United States by Melvin L

    CONSERVATION m Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Status of the Native Freshwater Fishes of the Southern United States By Melvin L. Warren, Jr., Brooks M. Burr, Stephen J. Walsh, Henry L. Bart, Jr., Robert C. Cashner, David A. Etnier, Byron J. Freeman, Bernard R. Kuhajda, Richard L. Mayden, Henry W. Robison, Stephen T. Ross, and Wayne C. Starnes ABSTRACT The Southeastern Fishes Council Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the diversity, distribution, and status of all native freshwater and diadromous fishes across 51 major drainage units of the southern United States. The southern United States supports more native fishes than any area of comparable size on the North American continent north of Mexico, but also has a high proportion of its fishes in need of conservation action. The review included 662 native freshwater and diadromous fishes and 24 marine fishes that are significant components of freshwater ecosystems. Of this total, 560 described, freshwater fish species are documented, and 49 undescribed species are included provisionally pending formal description. Described subspecies (86) are recognized within 43 species, 6 fishes have undescribed sub- species, and 9 others are recognized as complexes of undescribed taxa. Extinct, endangered, threatened, or vulnerable status is recognized for 28% (187 taxa) of southern freshwater and diadromous fishes. To date, 3 southern fishes are known to be extinct throughout their ranges, 2 are extirpated from the study region, and 2 others may be extinct. Of the extant southern fishes, 41 (6%) are regarded as endangered, 46 (7%) are regarded as threatened, and 101 (15%) are regarded as vulnerable. Five marine fishes that frequent fresh water are regarded as vulnerable.
  • Long-Term Trends of Stream Fish Community Assemblages in Southern Missouri with Contemporary Land Use Impacts

    Long-Term Trends of Stream Fish Community Assemblages in Southern Missouri with Contemporary Land Use Impacts

    BearWorks MSU Graduate Theses Summer 2018 Long-Term Trends of Stream Fish Community Assemblages in Southern Missouri with Contemporary Land Use Impacts Stephanie Marie Sickler Missouri State University, [email protected] As with any intellectual project, the content and views expressed in this thesis may be considered objectionable by some readers. However, this student-scholar’s work has been judged to have academic value by the student’s thesis committee members trained in the discipline. The content and views expressed in this thesis are those of the student-scholar and are not endorsed by Missouri State University, its Graduate College, or its employees. Follow this and additional works at: https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses Part of the Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Sickler, Stephanie Marie, "Long-Term Trends of Stream Fish Community Assemblages in Southern Missouri with Contemporary Land Use Impacts" (2018). MSU Graduate Theses. 3308. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/3308 This article or document was made available through BearWorks, the institutional repository of Missouri State University. The work contained in it may be protected by copyright and require permission of the copyright holder for reuse or redistribution. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LONG-TERM TRENDS OF STREAM FISH COMMUNITY ASSEMBLAGES IN SOUTHERN MISSOURI WITH CONTEMPORARY LAND USE IMPACTS A Masters Thesis Presented to The Graduate
  • Colorado River Aquatic Resources Investigations Federal Aid Project F-237R-18

    Colorado River Aquatic Resources Investigations Federal Aid Project F-237R-18

    Colorado River Aquatic Resources Investigations Federal Aid Project F-237R-18 R. Barry Nehring General Professional V Co-Authors Brian Heinold Justin Pomeranz Tom Remington, Director Federal Aid in Fish and Wildlife Restoration Job Progress Report Colorado Division of Wildlife Aquatic Wildlife Research Section Fort Collins, Colorado June 2011 STATE OF COLORADO John W. Hickenlooper, Governor COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Mike King, Executive Director COLORADO DIVISION OF WILDLIFE Tom Remington, Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION Tim Glenn, Chair Robert G. Streeter, Ph.D., Vice Chair Kenneth M. Smith, Secretary David R. Brougham Dennis G. Buechler Dorothea Farris Allan Jones John W. Singletary Dean Wingfield Ex Officio/Non-Voting Members: Mike King, Department of Natural Resources John Stulp, Department of Agriculture AQUATIC RESEARCH STAFF George J. Schisler, General Professional VI, Aquatic Wildlife Research Leader Rosemary Black, Program Assistant I Stephen Brinkman, General Professional IV, Water Pollution Studies Eric R. Fetherman, General Professions IV, Salmonid Disease Investigations Ryan Fitzpatrick, General Professional IV, Eastern Plains Native Fishes Matt Kondratieff, General Professional IV, Stream Habitat Restoration Jesse M. Lepak, General Professional V, Coldwater Lakes and Reservoirs R. Barry Nehring, General Professional V, Stream Fisheries Investigations Brad Neuschwanger, Hatchery Technician IV, Research Hatchery Kyle Okeson, Technician III, Fish Research Hatchery Christopher Praamsma, Technician III, Fish Research Hatchery Kevin B. Rogers, General Professional IV, Colorado Cutthroat Studies Kevin G. Thompson, General Professional IV, GOCO - Boreal Toad Studies Harry Vermillion, General Professional III, F-239, Aquatic Data Analysis Nicole Vieira, Physical Scientist III, Toxicologist Paula Nichols, Federal Aid Coordinator Kay Knudsen, Librarian i Prepared by: R. Barry Nehri g, General essional V, Aquatic Wildlife Researcher Approved by: George J.
  • Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Status of the Native Freshwater Fishes of the Southern United States by Melvin L

    Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Status of the Native Freshwater Fishes of the Southern United States by Melvin L

    CONSERVATION Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Status of the Native Freshwater Fishes of the Southern United States By Melvin L. Warren, Jr., Brooks M. Burr, Stephen J. Walsh, Henry L. Bart, Jr., Robert C. Cashner, David A. Etnier, Byron J. Freeman, Bernard R. Kuhajda, Richard L. Mayden, Henry W. Robison, Stephen T. Ross, and Wayne C. Starnes ABSTRACT The Southeastern Fishes Council Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the diversity, distribution, and status of all native freshwater and diadromous fishes across 51 major drainage units of the south- ern United States. The southern United States supports more native fishes than any area of compara- ble size on the North American continent north of Mexico, but also has a high proportion of its fishes in need of conservation action. The review included 662 native freshwater and diadromous fishes and 24 marine fishes that are significant components of freshwater ecosystems. Of this total, 560 described, freshwater fish species are documented, and 49 undescribed species are included provi- sionally pending formal description. Described subspecies (86) are recognized within 43 species, 6 fishes have undescribed subspecies, and 9 others are recognized as complexes of undescribed taxa. Extinct, endangered, threatened, or vulnerable status is recognized for 28% (187 taxa) of southern freshwater and diadromous fishes. To date, 3 southern fishes are known to be extinct throughout their ranges, 2 are extirpated from the study region, and 2 others may be extinct. Of the extant south- ern fishes, 41 (6%) are regarded as endangered, 46 (7%) are regarded as threatened, and 101 (15%) are regarded as vulnerable. Five marine fishes that frequent fresh water are regarded as vulnerable.
  • Stable Isotope Analysis

    Stable Isotope Analysis

    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2012 Stable Isotope Analysis (delta nitrogen-15 and delta carbon-13) and Bioenergetic Modeling of Spatial- Temporal Foraging Patterns and Consumption Dynamics in Brown and Rainbow Trout Populations Within Catch-and-Release Areas of Arkansas Tailwaters Jon M. Flinders University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Other Animal Sciences Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Flinders, Jon M., "Stable Isotope Analysis (delta nitrogen-15 and delta carbon-13) and Bioenergetic Modeling of Spatial-Temporal Foraging Patterns and Consumption Dynamics in Brown and Rainbow Trout Populations Within Catch-and-Release Areas of Arkansas Tailwaters" (2012). Theses and Dissertations. 301. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/301 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STABLE ISOTOPE ANALYSIS ( δ15 N and δ13 C) AND BIOENERGETIC MODELING OF SPATIAL-TEMPORAL FORAGING PATTERNS AND CONSUMPTION DYNAMICS IN BROWN AND RAINBOW TROUT POPULATIONS WITHIN CATCH-AND-RELEASE AREAS OF ARKANSAS TAILWATERS STABLE ISOTOPE ANALYSIS ( δ15 N and δ13 C) AND BIOENERGETIC MODELING OF SPATIAL-TEMPORAL FORAGING PATTERNS AND CONSUMPTION DYNAMICS IN BROWN AND RAINBOW TROUT
  • National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018/19 Laboratory Operations Manual Version 1.1 June 2018

    National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018/19 Laboratory Operations Manual Version 1.1 June 2018

    United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Washington, DC EPA 841-B-17-004 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018/19 Laboratory Operations Manual Version 1.1 June 2018 2018/19 National Rivers & Streams Assessment Laboratory Operations Manual Version 1.1, June 2018 Page ii of 185 NOTICE The intention of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018-2019 is to provide a comprehensive “State of Flowing Waters” assessment for rivers and streams across the United States. The complete documentation of overall project management, design, methods, quality assurance, and standards is contained in five companion documents: National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018-19: Quality Assurance Project Plan EPA-841-B-17-001 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018-19: Site Evaluation Guidelines EPA-841-B-17-002 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018-19: Non-Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA-841-B- 17-003a National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018-19: Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA-841-B-17- 003b National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018-19: Laboratory Operations Manual EPA-841-B-17-004 Addendum to the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2018-19: Wadeable & Non-Wadeable Field Operations Manuals This document (Laboratory Operations Manual) contains information on the methods for analyses of the samples to be collected during the project, quality assurance objectives, sample handling, and data reporting. These methods are based on the guidelines developed and followed in the Western Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (Peck et al. 2003). Methods described in this document are to be used specifically in work relating to the NRSA 2018-2019.