DOCSLIB.ORG

Security Council and to Pursue Its Po:!.Ici Es of Apartheid and It S Ruthless Repression of Persorl S in South Africa Who Oppose Those Policies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Security Council and to Pursue Its Po:!.Ici Es of Apartheid and It S Ruthless Repression of Persorl S in South Africa Who Oppose Those Policies Distr. GENERAL SECURITY s/81g6/iida.P 30 October 1967 COUNCIL ORIGINAL: ENGLISH REPORT OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON THE POLICIES OF APARTHEID OF THE GOVERNMENTOF 'I%E REPUBLIC OF SOUTH &?RICA Rapporteur: Mr, Abdulrahim ABBY FARAH (Somalia) ADDEMDUM ANNEX II. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTSIN THE REPUBLIC OF ,SOUTH AFRICA SINCE THE REPORT OF 21 OCTOBER1966 y * Also issued maa- the symbol A/6864/Aaa.l. I-./ For the report of the Special Committee ana Annex I, see S/8196. 6745253 -2- CONTENTS Paragraphs INTRODUCTION. , , a . n , . s . , . 1 - 58 A. Defiance of United Nations decisions on South West Afxica.. 0 I . , . *, . 6 - 16 B. Defiance of United Nations decisions on Southern Rhodesia., . , . , ., V ". , . 17 - 24 c. Hostility and contempt toward the United Nations . 25 - 31 D. Preparations to resist international pressure . , 32 - 4-l E. Relations with other States . e . 42 - 50 F. Intensification of propaganda . e . 51 - 50 MEASURESOF RACIAL EEPARATION AND DISCRIMINATION . 53 - 155 A. Implementation of the Group Areas Act of 1950 . 7s - 67 B. Removal of Africans from "White areas" . 4 . 88- 105 C. Apartheid in sports 0 . n . .' . 106 - 125 D. New legislation . jl . 0 . , . 126 - 155 REPRESSIVE MEASURESAGAINST TKE OPPONENTSOF APARTHEID ~36 - 236 A. New legislation (I . , . , . , . 160 - 18.5 B. Political trials . s . 186 - 191 C. Prison conditions and ill-treatment of prisoners . 192 - 201 D. Banning orders, house arrests and banishments . 202 -. 224 E. Harassment of opponents of apartheid . 225 - 236 THE BUILD-UP OF MILITARY AND POLICE FORCES . 237 - 272 A. The Defence Amendment Act No, 85 of 1967 . 243 - 246 B. Expansion of the military and police forces . 0 . 247 - 250 C. Manufacture of arms and ammunition and military equipment V . , . 0 . , 251 - 256 D. Import of military equipment . m , . , . 257 - 266 E. Military co-operation with other States , . , 26’; - 272 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs V. DANGER OF VIOLENT CONFLICT . , . * q e . 273 - 314 A. Violent incidents in South West Africa 1 + . , , . 383 - 288 B. Clashes between Sout,h African nationals and the forces of the r@ime in Southern Rhodesia . 289 - 299 C. Anti-"terrorist" measures on South Africa's borders 300 - 304 D. Entry of South African forces into Southern Rhodesia 305 - 314 I. IN!.t%ODUCTI@3’ 1. ijur irig Qze past year, the &n.~t,h African Gx~ernment has cnntinue~ t.2, defy hl1e . &c,j.sj.ons of the General Assembl-y and the Security Council and to pursue its po:!.iCi eS of apartheid and it s ruthless repression of persorl s in South Africa who oppose those policies. 2 Instead of abaalwing the policies of apartheid., 1;he South African Government has proceeded to intensify racial. separation a.n:? ~disc~:i&.nation by new laws 9 xq;,#Latl.ons and administrative measures . 3* Instead of ending its persecui;.i..?n of the opqx~ents of apartheid and. Liberating the pol.%tical prisoners, as repeatedly called fo:.* bg,’ t!:x Genera!- Assc~dd,~ c?uC.tk Security Council!) the South African Government has inclxaseii Yeplession and enacte!d ad.c?it;ionai arbitrary IiS;hlat ion. Des,pite res~.~l.?ri:ions of the Gene1:a.l. Assembly and the Security Council which called upon it to refrain P~c)m excc&ion of oppxronts i;3” a,parthcid, it h.as executed severan. members of tF&a Pan Afxicarlist C!ongi;rass of Seth Africa .~GP offences al.legedly committed sevcra.1. yews ago, anti has enacted F. new law - ,the Terrosism Act - providing Po.~ death sentsnces, 4. The South African Government has not given the sI:ightest ind,i.cati.on bhal; i!; .Ls ,prc;.x~ed to seek a ,peatx:Cul. soli:tioh to the expl..xive situation, in aCi3oS(‘iaMx? 7iii.111 the principles of the United Matiuna Charter anir. by c..>nsuItat1 on with the ;;“n?~i.n:‘: Irewnseatatives*_ ;li’ the pe’.,pl.e, Instead, it haa cc&,im:.ed. the rapid e~_nansinn -1t’ its secu7:it;y forces in o:ci!.er to impose its inhuman p!.j.I5cies by force. 5. These p01Li~i.c~ and attitudes of the South African Government c;?nstftut,e ilot only a bLa.tant defiance of the decision& ,xE’ the Generai Assembly and %he Secu~Lty COuhciL with respect to the policies of apartheid in the Re,pubXc of Sout’h Af~;‘!.za, but a challea::e to the United NaM.ons in the whole o.r’ ~uthern Africa. 1.1 -m.mw..--“---w~Defiance of Unxlted--.---~.,-~~..---.--~*“~~ Nations d& lsions on South West AfYica .- .’ b The South African Government has rejected ,i,ke historic reso.Iution 214.5 (XXI) adopted by ,tlze General Assembly on 27 October l(,l% decitl.?.ng that the Mandate ovw Eputh West Africa was terminated and that *f;he Territory henceforth came v.n3z~ t3.e direct responsibility of the United Nations, and it; has even threatened vio.lcnt resistance to the implementation of that decision. "to get into South West Africa only to get at us". He added that Fareign Minister Sr. huller had "spoken for all South Africa when he warned that South Africa would resist with all the gower at its disposal any attempts whicn endanger the safety of South Africa or of its peoples committed. 'ta i.,ts care I! .)4J' 12. In a New Year's message broadcast on 31 December 1366, the Prime Minister described the General Assembly resolution as a "clearly unlawful and senseless decision". 13. On 23 May 1967, he declared that South Africa cou.l.d not even recognise the United Nations Council for South Africa. If they "knocked on the door", he would not even bother to open and he would have nothing to discuss with them.. z/ 14. On 6 June 1967, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Dr. Muller, accused the United Nations of wasting its time with a special emergency session on South West Africa, struggling with t?:e phantoms and ghosts of Its ima@nation, 6/ 15. On 11 June 1967, Prime ?&ini.ster Vorster said that South Africa was not iIl.?lWeSh3~ in the United Nations decision on South West Africa and wodd not take any notice of it. I./ 16. Meanwhile ., the Smth African Government has been proceeding more openly T&T,h the implementation of the Odendaal Plan of lcj&, ?:hich was condemned by the United Nations organs and which is designed to partition the Territory VJith half the area left to the small white minority and the rest divided into several tribal reserves. Prime Minister ‘Vorster told the Rouse of Assembly on 10 February 1967, in answer tb a question, that the Government had purchased 2,500,OOO acres of land for Banlx. tribal reserves in South.1Jes-t Africa from the beginning of l$lb. Y These purchases were designed to im@ement the partition plan, On 21 March 1967, the South African Minister of Rantu pdministration and Development, Mr. M.C. Botha, announced that the South African Government would assist the Ovambo people of South West Africa towards the attainment of " sel.f-de~terinination" in the tribal reserve. i/ I'bid., 15 November 1966. S/ Ibid., 211 May 196’7. 6/ Ibid., 7 June 1967. I/ Ibid., 12 June 196-7. House of Assembly~~ts, X0 February 1967, ~01s. 1013-1014. / . l B. Defiance of United Nations decisions on Southern Rhodesia 17. The South African Government has continued to defy the resolutions of the Security Council and the General. Assembly on the question of Southern Rhodesia, claiming that the "dispute" between the United Kingdom and Southern Rhodesia is their, exclusive responsibility. 13. In an address to the Transvaal Congress of the National. Party in Pretoria on 9 Nove.mher 3.966, 14~. Vorster stded: "I say again that the Rhodesian question is a domestic affair between Britain and Rhodesia, It loay not be placed in the arena of world politics.... "South Af?;ica has clearly stated her attitud.e towards boycotts. We a0 'I., not take part in them and we dare nut allow ourselves to he forced to take part in them." z/ 19. On 14 December 3.966 the Ministex' of Agricultural Technical Services and of Water Affairs, Mr. Fouche3 said that the Republic was determined to continue its trade with Rhodesia as it had done in the past. 20. In his New Year's eve broadcast, Prime Minister Vornter described Security Council. resolution 232 (1.966) on Southexr Rhodesia as one which had "created a very serious prr3blem for South Africa - a problem which if not handled very delicately . can lead to confrontations with very far-reaching effects". 21. In his opening address to the Parliament on 20 January 1967, State President Mx. Swart said: "As to the Anglo-Rhodesian dispute, the Government perseveres in its conviction that the dispute remains the exclusive responsibility of the <two parties concerned...." l0/ 22. The South African Minister of Economic Affairs, Dr. PJ. Diederichs, said in Vienna in January 1967: "Ou?: trade with Rhodesia develops within the normal tdl/ pattern. We do not intend to prevent - or support - the United Nations boycott. - a/ The Star, Johannesburg daily, 10 Noveriiber 19%. lO/ guse of Assembly Debates, 20 January 1967, col. 3. :s 4 i -ll/ The Star, daily, 5 January 1~67. c. _Lrn”IHosti.l.ity and con%e~,pt toward ‘the TJnited “.I---Nations 25. Illustral;ive of the a”i%:it;u.de of the Soutqh African Governmentl ‘to the United African Min.ister of Transpost, FP. 33.J. Ek.hem,~, ,Cefemirq to General Assetibly k*esolu-tion 2245 (XXI) on South West, Africa, said trhat the United.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reflections on Apartheid in South Africa: Perspectives and an Outlook for the Future
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 415 168 SO 028 325 AUTHOR Warnsley, Johnnye R. TITLE Reflections on Apartheid in South Africa: Perspectives and an Outlook for the Future. A Curriculum Unit. Fulbright-Hays Summer Seminar Abroad 1996 (South Africa). INSTITUTION Center for International Education (ED), Washington, DC. PUB DATE 1996-00-00 NOTE 77p. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *African Studies; *Apartheid; Black Studies; Foreign Countries; Global Education; Instructional Materials; Interdisciplinary Approach; Peace; *Racial Discrimination; *Racial Segregation; Secondary Education; Social Studies; Teaching Guides IDENTIFIERS African National Congress; Mandela (Nelson); *South Africa ABSTRACT This curriculum unit is designed for students to achieve a better understanding of the South African society and the numerous changes that have recently, occurred. The four-week unit can be modified to fit existing classroom needs. The nine lessons include: (1) "A Profile of South Africa"; (2) "South African Society"; (3) "Nelson Mandela: The Rivonia Trial Speech"; (4) "African National Congress Struggle for Justice"; (5) "Laws of South Africa"; (6) "The Pass Laws: How They Impacted the Lives of Black South Africans"; (7) "Homelands: A Key Feature of Apartheid"; (8) "Research Project: The Liberation Movement"; and (9)"A Time Line." Students readings, handouts, discussion questions, maps, and bibliography are included. (EH) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ******************************************************************************** 00 I- 4.1"Reflections on Apartheid in South Africa: Perspectives and an Outlook for the Future" A Curriculum Unit HERE SHALL watr- ALL 5 HALLENTOEQUALARTiii. 41"It AFiacAPLAYiB(D - Wad Lli -WIr_l clal4 I.4.4i-i PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY (4.)L.ct.0-Aou-S TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Johnnye R.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa
    <*x>&&<>Q&$>ee$>Q4><><>&&i<>4><><i^^ South Africa UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA HE political tension of the previous three years in the Union of South TAfrica (see articles on South Africa in the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, Vols. 51, 52 and 53) broke, during the period under review, into a major constitutional crisis. A struggle began between the legislature and the judi- ciary over the "entrenched clauses" of the South Africa Act, which estab- lished the Union, and over the validity of a law passed last year by Daniel Francois Malan's Nationalist Government to restrict the franchise of "Col- ored" voters in Cape Province in contravention of these provisions. Simul- taneously, non-European (nonwhite) representative bodies started a passive resistance campaign against racially discriminatory legislation enacted by the present and previous South African governments. Resulting unsettled condi- tions in the country combined with world-wide economic trends to produce signs of economic contraction in the Union. The developing political and racial crisis brought foreign correspondents to report at first hand upon conditions in South Africa. Not all their reports were objective: some were characterized by exaggeration and distortion, and some by incorrect data. This applied particularly to charges of Nationalist anti-Semitism made in some reports. E. J. Horwitz, chairman of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies (central representative body of South Afri- can Jewry) in an interview published in Die Transvaler of May 16, 1952, specifically refuted as "devoid of all truth" allegations of such anti-Semitism, made on May 5, 1952, in the American news magazine Time.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Removal of Population the Apartheid Regime Has Sought to Enforce Strict Territorial Segregation of the Different ‘Population Groups’
    residence, commercial activities and industry for members of the White, Coloured and Asian groups (each in separate zones). Based on these group areas are segregated local government structures, and a segregated tricameral parliament with separate White, Coloured and Indian chambers, designed to preserve white political power while extending limited participation in central government to small sections of the Indian and Coloured communities. The majority of the population in South Africa is united in rejecting the segregated political structures of apartheid. Forced Removal of Population The apartheid regime has sought to enforce strict territorial segregation of the different ‘population groups’. People are forcibly evicted from their homes if they are in a zone which the government has asigned to another group. The government speaks, not of forced removal or eviction, but of Relocation and Resettlement. The evictions take place in many different kinds of areas and under different laws. In rural areas people are moved on a number of different pretexts. The places in which they live may be designated Black Spots — these are areas of land occupied and owned by Africans which the government has designated for another group, usually white. The occupiers are moved to a bantustan. Others are moved in the course of Consolidation of the bantustans, as the regime attempts to reduce the number of fragments of land which make up the bantustans. Over a million black tenants have been evicted from white owned farms since the 1960s. Tenants who paid cash rent to the farms were called Squatters, implying they had no right to be on the land.
    [Show full text]
  • Activism in Manenberg, 1980 to 2010
    Then and Now: Activism in Manenberg, 1980 to 2010 Julian A Jacobs (8805469) University of the Western Cape Supervisor: Prof Uma Dhupelia-Mesthrie Masters Research Essay in partial fulfillment of Masters of Arts Degree in History November 2010 DECLARATION I declare that „Then and Now: Activism in Manenberg, 1980 to 2010‟ is my own work and that all the sources I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. …………………………………… Julian Anthony Jacobs i ABSTRACT This is a study of activists from Manenberg, a township on the Cape Flats, Cape Town, South Africa and how they went about bringing change. It seeks to answer the question, how has activism changed in post-apartheid Manenberg as compared to the 1980s? The study analysed the politics of resistance in Manenberg placing it within the over arching mass defiance campaign in Greater Cape Town at the time and comparing the strategies used to mobilize residents in Manenberg in the 1980s to strategies used in the period of the 2000s. The thesis also focused on several key figures in Manenberg with a view to understanding what local conditions inspired them to activism. The use of biographies brought about a synoptic view into activists lives, their living conditions, their experiences of the apartheid regime, their brutal experience of apartheid and their resistance and strength against a system that was prepared to keep people on the outside. This study found that local living conditions motivated activism and became grounds for mobilising residents to make Manenberg a site of resistance. It was easy to mobilise residents on issues around rent increases, lack of resources, infrastructure and proper housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Apartheid Laws & Regulations
    APARTHEID LAWS & REGULATIONS : INTRODUCED AND RESCINDED A Short Summary The absurdity of apartheid legislation, which incorporated legislation passed by the (minority) white governments prior to 1948, is reflected in the following list . Although the legislation was seemingly passed in the interest of the white minority, to maintain both political and social hegemony, it is obvious that most of the measures carried little or no economic benefit for the ruling class and that its scrapping would be in the interests of the capitalist class as well as the majority of blacks . For blacks the end of apartheid laws meant that the hated pass system was abolished, that the legality of residential apartheid was removed from the statute book and that antu education was formally ended . Nonetheless there was little freedom for the poor to move from their squatter camps or township houses and most children still went to third rate schools with few amenities to assist them . It was only a section of the wealthier blacks and those who ran the political machine that benefited most fully from the changes . The vast majority saw no improvements in their way of life, a matter that is dealt with in this issue of Searchlight South Africa . It is also not insignificant that many measures were repealed before the unbanning of opposition political movements and before negotia- tions got under way. The pressure for change came partly from the activities of the internal resistance movement and the trade unions, from covert discussions between movements that supported the government and the ANC, from the demographic pressure that led to a mass migra- tion to the urban areas and also from the altered relations between the USSR and the west - a change which was interpreted by the govern- ment as removing the communist threat from the region .
    [Show full text]
  • Apartheid Legislation in South Africa
    Ralph Glücksmann Apartheid Legislation in South Africa I. Introduction On 31 May 1910 the Union of South Africa was formed as a dominion in the British Empire. It was exactly eight years after the signing of the Treaty of Vereeniging, which had brought the Second Anglo-Boer War to an end and stipulated full British sovereignty over the Boer republics of Transvaal and Orange Free State. Although the South Africa Act 1909 (9 Edw. VII c. 9) was passed by the British Parliament at Westminster, it was wholly constructed by South African representatives in South Africa. Agreement had not been reached without acrimony, and there were times when it seemed that the national convention of representatives of the four colonies Cape, Natal, Transvaal and Orange River might break up among recriminations. Das Kap wurde 1806 britische Kolonie. Davor war das Kap eine niederländische Kolonie, gegründet von der Niederländischen Ostindien-Kompanie (Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie), die vom niederländischen Staat Hoheitsrechte erhalten hatte. Als die Niederlande 1795 im Zuge des ersten Koalitionskrieges von Frankreich be- setzt wurden, nutzten die Briten eine Rebellion in der Kapkolonie, um diese unter ihre Herrschaft zu bringen und den Franzosen zuvorzukommen. 1803 zogen sich die Briten nach dem Frieden von Amiens zunächst wieder zu- rück und überließen das Kap der Batavischen Republik als Rechtsnachfolgerin der 1798 aufgelösten Niederlän- dischen Ostindien-Kompanie. Bereits 1806 annektierte Großbritannien nach der Schlacht von Blauberg die Kap- kolonie jedoch endgültig, nachdem die napoleonischen Kriege in Europa wieder aufgeflammt waren. 1815 wur- de die Abtretung an das britische Kolonialreich auf dem Wiener Kongress von den Niederlanden bestätigt, die als Kompensation die früheren Österreichischen Niederlande erhielten.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit on Apartheid Papers
    Unit on Apartheid Papers No. 14/70 NOTES AND DOCUMENTS* May 1970 This Is Apartheid - II Pajge APARTHEID DAY BY DAY 1 South African Muslims protest demolition of mosques 1 White delighted at "redassification" as Coloured 2 Witwatersrand Principal denounces police intimidation of students and staff 3 Police spy on student leaders 4 Dutch theologian calls South Africa "police state" 4 Swedish archbishop shocked 4 No "white" eggs for Blacks in a Volksrust chain store 5 Poor matriculation results 5 African painters in Transvaal may apply first coat of paint, tout not the second 6 High school student released after eight months T detention 7 Mr. Eli Weinberg and Mr, Ivan Schermbrucker placed under house arrest on release from jail 8 Chinese barred from sports in South Africa 9 Lying spy remains free 10 She turns non-white to marry a Chinese 12 MORE FACTS AND FIGURES ON APARTHEID 15 WORLD AGAINST APARjgiEID 20 Reports from Canada, Uni-bed Republic of Tanzania, Ireland, Zambia, United Kingdom, Japan, Australia, *AHmaterias in these notes and documents may be freely reprinted. Acknowledgement, together with a copy of the publication containing the reprint, would be appreciated. Apartheid Day by Day South_ AJ^.Cjan_Nij^ The Musli-Hi community in South Africa is strongly protesting the recent threat to demolish the Pier Street Mosque in Port Elizabeth (which is in an area recently proclaimed a "white area") and the threatened demolition of many other mosques. A petition which is being circulated among worshippers at mosques all over the country explains that Islamic law lays down that no mosque or ground on which it is "built can be sold, given away or bartered.
    [Show full text]
  • Apartheid) Content Overview
    Learner Notes Turning points in modern South African History (apartheid) Content overview • The apartheid system was built on racism; a false idea that certain groups of people are better than others. • Racism divides the human race into different race groups and maintains that it is acceptable to exclude or dominate certain of these groups on the grounds of race. • The National Party adopted apartheid as a model for separate development between blacks and whites. The separation was not equal and served only to preserve white supremacy and to discriminate against black South Africans. • Apartheid was based on the idea that white people were superior to everyone else. • South Africans were thus classified into different racial groups. Black South Africans were further divided into coloureds, Indian and African. • The whites’ only government ruled the country and held all positions of power. • All laws benefited the white people. • The races were kept separate in every possible way, studying in different institutions and living in separate areas. • It is important to note that apartheid only extended an existing system of segregation which had been in place since the formation of the Union of South Africa in 1910. • Many of the laws passed by this government, such as the Native Land Act and the Colour Bar laws laid the foundation for apartheid. 1948: NATIONAL PARTY AND APARTHEID. RACIAL SEGREGATION BEFORE APARTHEID Foundations for apartheid were laid long before the National Party (NP) came into power. Previous governments had introduced racial segregation in land ownership, labour market, access to towns and cities, and administrative systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Apartheid Successfully Defy the International Legal System?
    UCLA National Black Law Journal Title Can Apartheid Successfully Defy the International Legal System? Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/04b828d9 Journal National Black Law Journal, 5(2) ISSN 0896-0194 Authors Feimpong, J.K. Tiewel, Sylvanus Azadon Publication Date 1977 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California CAN APARTHEID SUCCESSFULLY DEFY THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM? J. K. Feimpong* S. Azadon Tiewel** INTRODUCTION South Africa's policy of apartheid has engaged the attention of the world community for the past thirty years. The world community has determined that apartheid cannot be regarded as a purely internal South African concern; on the contrary, it has been determined that its practice constitutes a challenge to the essential principles of world order and consequently that it legitimately falls squarely within the scope of international prescriptions. In a previous article one of the present authors reviewed the action under- taken within the framework of the United Nations Organization with a view to bringing about a termination of apartheid.I That review showed the progressive culmination of a series of pertinent United Nations Resolutions and Declarations into the view that apartheid qualifies as a crime against international law. The discussion which follows builds upon that review and is designed to show why, as a matter of both law and policy, that qualification is supportable, the implications to be drawn from the qualifications themselves and the ways in which these might conceivably be operationalized in the continuing struggle against apartheid. A preliminary and a brief account into the factual aspects of apartheiddoctrine and practice as well as the legal bases of concern in international institutionalized bodies will be helpful in putting the problem in proper perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Historians and Political Biography of South African Parliamentary Politics, 1910-1990
    “THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY”: PROFESSIONAL HISTORIANS AND POLITICAL BIOGRAPHY OF SOUTH AFRICAN PARLIAMENTARY POLITICS, 1910-1990 FA Mouton1 Abstract Biography strengthens the historian’s attempts to decipher the behaviour of individuals and also provides a historical window on a certain era, contributing to our knowledge and understanding of the past. Biographical studies of those who were involved in parliamentary politics between 1910 and 1990, the prime ministers, presidents, cabinet ministers, party leaders, humble backbenchers and unsuccessful parliamentary candidates can help to explain why the white minority, after decades of acquiescing the abuse of South Africa’s limited democratic tradition, decided to peacefully surrender its political power. And yet, despite the proven value of political biography in the United States and Britain, the library shelves of South African universities are bare of biographies on pre-1990 parliamentary politicians by professional historians. This article explains the reasons for this dearth of biographies, as well as the reasons why it is essential for professional historians to write them and concludes with a recommendation on how such biographies should be written. 1. INTRODUCTION By deciphering the behaviour of individuals, providing in the process a historical window on societies of the past, the historian as biographer plays a crucial role to convey knowledge and understanding of our history to the reading public. Biographical studies of the lives and careers of parliamentary politicians between 1910 and 1990 are for example essential to comprehend South African history in the twentieth century. And yet, despite the internationally proven value of biography, the library shelves of South African universities are bare of biographies by professional historians on pre-1990 parliamentary history.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Poverty and Respectability in Early Twentieth-Century Cape Town1
    This is the accepted version of an article that will be published by Cambridge University Press in The Journal of African History: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-african-history/all- issues Accepted version downloaded from SOAS Research Online: http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/25963/ Poverty and respectability in early twentieth-century Cape Town1 Wayne Dooling (School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London) Abstract Despite the challenges of overwhelming poverty, characterised by poor housing, ill health and shortened lifespans, Cape Town’s black population of the early twentieth century actively pursued lifestyles that might be described as respectable. But respectability was expensive and poverty stood in the way of some of its most essential elements: cleanliness, sexual restraint, sobriety, and the creation of nuclear and gendered households. Black respectability, therefore, could not simply replicate that of the dominant white bourgeoisie. Most challenging was the development of rampant black criminality, often seen by contemporary observers as the result of the failure of black women to realise respectable households. Even attempts on the part of the state to create respectable citizenries floundered, partly because these initiatives were incompatible with the policies of racial segregation. The state and the dominant bourgeoisie put their faith in the black elite as the standard-bearers of respectability, but the reality was that the respectability of the ‘superior’ class was frequently indistinguishable from those below, a consequence of the fact that the boundary between these classes was highly porous. Introduction This paper asks whether Cape Town’s poor of the interwar years had values and a way of life that might be described as ‘respectable’.
    [Show full text]
  • South African Apartheid Legislation Ii: Extension, Enforcement and Perpetuation*
    SOUTH AFRICAN APARTHEID LEGISLATION II: EXTENSION, ENFORCEMENT AND PERPETUATION* ELIZABETH S. LANDIS-t THE lawyer, who is intimately concerned with the structure of his own society, is by profession fascinated by the mechanics through which a foreign country puts into effect a social philosophy antithetical to that of his own. Therefore, he must be at once disturbed by and curious about the Union of South Africa, which is resolutely attempting to reverse the whole trend of modern civilization towards racial equality. EXTENSION OF APARTHEID In a previous article ' I have described the fundamental structure of apartheid, or racial isolation, in the Union- the society which it affects and the basic statutes which provide its "constitution." In this article I shall at- tempt to explore the techniques that have been adopted to extend apartheid to every aspect of existence and to enforce and perpetuate the racial separa- tion which is its goal. Labor Apartheid in labor relations differentiates between white and nonwhite in numerous ways, but it affects Africans most disadvantageously. It applies to individual master and servant relationships as well as to collective labor re- lations. The restrictions on individual African employees are perhaps one of the most startling aspects of apartheid. The Cape Province Masters and Servants Act of 1856, which is still on the books,2 attaches criminal liability to breach of an individual employment contract-as do other provinces' laws which were modeled after it.3 The Native Labour Regulation Act 4 makes it a criminal *This article constitutes the last of a two-part discussion of apartheid by the author.
    [Show full text]