Quest of Reality

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Quest of Reality Quest of Reality D. R. Khashaba “Quest of Reality,” by D.R. Khashaba. ISBN 978-1-62137-252-3. Published 2013 by Virtualbookworm.com Publishing Inc., P.O. Box 9949, College Station, TX 77842, US. 2013, D.R. Khashaba. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of D.R. Khashaba. Manufactured in the United States of America. CONTENTS PREFACE………………………………………………………..i I IN THE BEGINNING…………………………………..1 II THE IONIAN VENTURE……………………..………17 III SOCRATES.……………………………………………31 IV PLATO…………………………………………………45 V ARISTOTLE…………………………………………...61 VI SPINOZA………………………………………………65 VII KANT…………………………………………………..75 VIII WHITEHEAD……………………………………...…115 IX REALITY………………………………………..........131 X PHILOSOPHICAL THINKING………………….......139 XI REASON, RATIONALISM, AND RATIONALITY...159 XII EMPIRICISM…………………………………………175 XIII THE SOUL……………………………………………187 XIV GOD…………………………………………………..199 XV TIME, DURATION, AND ETERNITY……………...211 XVI THREE METAPHYSICAL PRINCIPLES…………...225 XVII CREATIVE ETERNITY……………………………...241 XVIII HUMANITY …………………………………………249 Annex I: AN INTERVIEW…………………………….…..…257 Annex II: THOUGHTS ON LANGUAGE…………...………265 PREFACE This book offers a philosophy. Yes, a philosophy. For that is all any philosopher has ever given or can ever give: a personal, private vision of life, of the world, of Reality. Embedded in the vision here presented is the view of the nature of philosophical thinking implicit in these preceding words. We can say, then, that this book has a dual theme: a special view of the nature of philosophical thinking and, conformably with that view, a special vision of Reality. This, like all of my books and other writings, is a personal statement. I make no pretence of learning. My sources are a limited selection, largely dictated by chance, of such classics as are accessible to all. I do not count this among my misfortunes. Every single truly good book raises all the fundamental questions that face humanity, and the true value of such a book does not reside in any conclusions it reaches, but in the challenge it offers the reader to wrestle with those fundamental questions herself or himself and articulate her or his own position. I have often found more enlightenment and inspiration in re-reading a book I had read before – perhaps more than once before – than in ten new books. So in this book I give my personal account of my wrestling with the questions that have puzzled all thinking humans from the beginning and this personal account is not offered for acceptance, but as an incitement and a challenge to help the reader puzzle on, for it is in this ferment of puzzling that we live as thinking human beings. There is nothing in this book that I have not already said before in essence. My main purpose here has been to highlight the two features of my philosophy that, being opposed to common acceptations, readers find difficult to absorb despite all my insistence and reiteration: (1) the oracular nature of i philosophy and, in consequence, the essentially mythical character of philosophical expression; (2) the principle of creativity as an original dimension of reality which alone renders free will possible and renders becoming intelligible. The book traces the human quest for Reality from the first gropings of primitive humans through the speculations of modern philosophers to my own confessedly personal vision. Chapter one, “In the Beginning”, gives a sketchy outline of the human quest of Reality in the earliest times. No erudition or originality is claimed. This is a simple outline drawn from commonly available sources. Chapter two, “The Ionian Venture”, a brief survey of the earliest Greek philosophers. Again, no pretence of scholarship or originality, though the interpretation may be ‘personal’. Chapter three, “Socrates” and chapter four, “Plato”: In these two chapters I claim to offer an original interpretation, opposed to the mainstream academic reading, laying the foundation for my original version of Platonism. Chapters five to eight on Aristotle, Spinoza, Kant, and Whitehead respectively: I show my agreements and disagreements with these four great thinkers to develop my own vision. My intention is neither expository nor critical; my approach is not scholarly and I have no use for ‘secondary literature’. Chapter nine, “Reality”, mainly explaining my special terminology where I distinguish between and oppose ‘reality’ and ‘existence’, a distinction which I think is needed to clear much confusion in philosophical thinking. Chapter ten, “Philosophical Thinking”, expounding one of two radically original features in my philosophy, namely, the oracular nature of philosophy. The other feature is what I call the Principle of Creativity. Chapters eleven and twelve are critical of Analytical and Empirical approaches in philosophy. Chapters thirteen to eighteen, “The Soul”, “God”, “Time, Duration, and Eternity”, “Three Metaphysical Principles”, “Creative Eternity”, ii “Humanity”, these six chapters give the substance of my special philosophy. The two annexes are self-explanatory. The method I followed in composing this book gives parts of it a chaotic shape. It consists mostly of distinct passages or reflections arranged under various headings. All the passages taken together form a consistent and integrated whole but successive passages are not always linked consequentially. To have tried to streamline the whole would have required more effort and time than one past his mid-eighties could reasonably expect to have at his disposal. Nevertheless I proudly, one might say arrogantly, aver that the book presents a system of philosophy in the grand manner that has been out of fashion for nearly a century but that I believe is the only genuine form of philosophy worth the name. D. R. Khashaba Sixth-October City, Egypt, 6 March 2013 iii CHAPTER ONE IN THE BEGINNING I. RELIGION, SCIENCE, AND PHILOSOPHY We cannot know what the earliest members of the human species thought or what they experienced. Moreover, as it is not really possible to draw a sharp line to mark the emergence of the human species, it is futile to speculate – and utterly idiotic to dogmatize – on the subjective condition of our animal kin. But we may perhaps safely say that religion accompanied the emergence of humans from the very start. For we can imagine that when humans found themselves encompassed by a world harsh, bountiful, hostile, friendly, mysterious, all at once, they must have been awed and puzzled. The roaring thunder was a more frightful animal than the roaring lion and the raging storm was as fierce an enemy as the deadly tiger. The sun that brought warmth and light was as gracious as the cooling and refreshing stream, as the tree that freely gave its fruit. More close at home, woman for 1 Quest of Reality man and man for woman were no less puzzling, no less propitious, at times no less menacing. We can understand how humans worked out myths to explain the puzzle of the sun waning, dying, and being swallowed up on one side and then coming up again on the other side; the puzzle of water falling from the sky above; and the ultimate puzzle of death. We can understand how humans sought, by gifts and supplications, to appease the angry god in the dark cloud that thundered and hurled bolts of fire from on high; to propitiate the willful sky-water; to ensure the goodwill of the sun-god. From the start these two parallel strains stood side by side in all religion: the attempt to explain, to understand, how things came about and the attempt to conciliate the powers behind the things. The explanatory myth-making produced dogmatic beliefs and the attempt to influence and win over the forces and powers controlling the natural processes produced the rites, rituals, and forms of worship in the various religions. In time the urge to find explanations and to understand broke loose from the confines of religion and developed into science and philosophy: again twins that issued from the same womb but each having a distinct character and destined to have a distinct life history. Primitive peoples did not have to infer or to hypostatize the existence of gods. They were all the time confronting the gods, coming in contact with them. The gods are the forces beyond our control. There are benevolent gods and there are malevolent gods. When the gods were personalized and gathered in a pantheon, it was natural that there should be chief gods and a first-ranking god. At first there were several different ways in which the world was thought to have come about. Some time, in certain cultures, the chief god had a hand in shaping the world. It seems that only the Hebrews had the preposterous idea that their favorite god (or the god who favored them) made the world out of nothing — an idea absurd in itself and which leaves the 2 In the Beginning problem of the origin of things exactly where it was in the beginning. To go back to the gods that primitive peoples knew — when modern science advanced considerably in the art of manipulating and directing those ‘gods’ – a process which had begun very early in the human venture – scientists foolishly thought that they had emptied those gods of life: they created the myth of matter and the useful fiction of mechanical forces was believed to be the whole truth; what is more, those forces were believed to be completely subject to the ‘laws’ the scientists formulated for them. Kant’s insightful but half-hearted ‘Copernican revolution’ did not open the eyes of the Empiricists drunk with the strong wine of their practical successes. When Wittgenstein wrote, “The whole modern conception of the world is founded on the illusion that the so-called laws of nature are the explanations of natural phenomena” (Tractatus Logico- Philosophicus, 6.371), his heresy was indulgently overlooked because of his earlier fervent declaration of faith — though it is hard to say faith in what.
Recommended publications
  • Beginnings – Philosophy and Science
    BOOK I: Greek and Roman Thought I. Beginnings — Philosophy and the Scientific World View 1. PRELITERATE THOUGHT — SPIRITS AND MAGIC The owners of fish magic will often dream that there is plentiful fish. The cause of it is the magician’s ancestor spirit. Such a magician would then say, “The ancestral Spirit has instructed me in the night, that we should go to catch fish!” And indeed, when we get there we find plenty of fish, and cast our nets. A Pre-literate Fisherman1,2 How people saw the world and their place in it before writing arose must be inferred from the thought of early literate and modern preliterate societies.3 Although these societies vary a great deal in their views of the world and their ways of life, widespread in them is one notion to which people in modern civilized cultures, or at least in their intellectual elites, do not generally subscribe, that everything that happens in the natural world happens because of the activity of spirits. I would not suppose pre-literate people see spirits where we see trees and rocks—their everyday world is surely much like ours, and more often than not, they take no note of the spirits. The difference lies in the 1A remark on my footnotes and endnotes is in order. I use endnotes (in conjunction with the bibiography) to cite my sources and my evidence (keeping myself honest), and suggest good secondary literature and good translations, in case someone wants to track these things down for herself. When engaged in a consecutive discussion of a single work or author I will use abbreviated parenthetical citations in the text, to save space.
    [Show full text]
  • MINEOLA BIBLE INSTITUTE and SEMINARY Philosophy II Radically
    MINEOLA BIBLE INSTITUTE AND SEMINARY Page | 1 Philosophy II Radically, Biblical, Apostolic, Christianity Bishop D.R. Vestal, PhD Larry L Yates, ThD, DMin “Excellence in Apostolic Education since 1991” 1 Copyright © 2019 Mineola Bible Institute Page | 2 All Rights Reserved This lesson material may not be used in any manner for reproduction in any language or use without the written permission of Mineola Bible Institute. 2 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 7 Alexander the Great (356-323 B.C.) ........................................................................................... 8 Philip II of Macedonia (382-336 B.C.) ....................................................................................... 12 Page | 3 “Olympias the mother of Alexander was an evil woman. .......................................... 13 Philip II (of Macedonia) (382-336 BC) .............................................................................. 13 Aristotle (384-322 BC) ............................................................................................................... 15 Works .................................................................................................................................... 16 Methods ............................................................................................................................... 17 Doctrines ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Early Greek Alchemy, Patronage and Innovation in Late Antiquity CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES
    Early Greek Alchemy, Patronage and Innovation in Late Antiquity CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES NUMBER 7 Editorial Board Chair: Donald Mastronarde Editorial Board: Alessandro Barchiesi, Todd Hickey, Emily Mackil, Richard Martin, Robert Morstein-Marx, J. Theodore Peña, Kim Shelton California Classical Studies publishes peer-reviewed long-form scholarship with online open access and print-on-demand availability. The primary aim of the series is to disseminate basic research (editing and analysis of primary materials both textual and physical), data-heavy re- search, and highly specialized research of the kind that is either hard to place with the leading publishers in Classics or extremely expensive for libraries and individuals when produced by a leading academic publisher. In addition to promoting archaeological publications, papyrolog- ical and epigraphic studies, technical textual studies, and the like, the series will also produce selected titles of a more general profile. The startup phase of this project (2013–2017) was supported by a grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Also in the series: Number 1: Leslie Kurke, The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy, 2013 Number 2: Edward Courtney, A Commentary on the Satires of Juvenal, 2013 Number 3: Mark Griffith, Greek Satyr Play: Five Studies, 2015 Number 4: Mirjam Kotwick, Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Text of Aristotle’s Meta- physics, 2016 Number 5: Joey Williams, The Archaeology of Roman Surveillance in the Central Alentejo, Portugal, 2017 Number 6: Donald J. Mastronarde, Preliminary Studies on the Scholia to Euripides, 2017 Early Greek Alchemy, Patronage and Innovation in Late Antiquity Olivier Dufault CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES Berkeley, California © 2019 by Olivier Dufault.
    [Show full text]
  • Christianity Religions and Philosophies of Roman Empire
    ROME 250 MIDTERM Midterm review sheet available at class website Midterm exam in class on Tuesday. Bring Blue/Green Book Part I. Time Line: you provide date or event corresponding to date Part II. Multiple choice/fill in blanks (visual and written) Part III. Identification of images and terms: A substantial paragraph written in full sentences. Tell us what you know. For images, identify image and approximate date, describe its important features, tell us something about its significance. Part IV Essay question: argument and supporting data Religion and Spirituality in the Roman World * * * The Christianization of the Roman Empire and the Romanization of Christianity Religions and Philosophies of Roman Empire • 1) Roman religion: polytheistic, anthropomorphic, inclusive [respect for traditions] – Religious syncretism [mixing and adaptation] (interpretatio romana) – Household gods [lares and penates], major gods – Gods: in charge of natural forces – turned to for the protection and welfare of individuals and all of Roman society --propitiatory [gain the good will]--proper ritual to ensure approval and guarantee pax deorum --pietas: recognition, respect, reverence --ritual: temples, cult, prayer, sacrifice, divination (augury, haruspicy, interpretation of signs: prodigia) Marcus Aurelius sacrificing in front of Capitoline temple 176-180 CE Trajan’s column --haruspicy during sacrificial ritual • 2) State Religion: worship of traditional Roman state gods and imperial cult of emperors [deus vs. divus] --emperors were comites [companions] to
    [Show full text]
  • Greco-Roman Religions & Philosophies
    Greco-Roman Religions & Philosophies The New Testament World – Week 3 Adult Education Greco-Roman Religions Temple – in Greek and Roman was the home of the deity, not a place of worship. Greeks worship with their heads uncovered, Romans were always covered (seeing omens). Dominant tone in the NT is Greco-Roman influence Greek gods & Roman gods – became the same with different names Acts 19 – Diana of the Ephesians Each city/region had a patron god and cult Two categories of Hellenistic religion: (Each had old religion that developed) State religion o Official (polis) o Polytheistic o Had patron god, temples, feasts, priests o Statues of the deity were found throughout the city o Existed for the good of the state, not the individual o Everyone was eligible to perform ritual (not professional priest) o No systematic theology (geographic theology) o The Here and Now – not the afterlife (legal systems) o Mythology focused on the intervention of the gods (Acts 14:11-18) Mystery religion o Personal o Belonged by choice, not birth o Requires initiation o Tendency toward monotheism (or supreme god) o No geographical area, race or tribe o Available to those who swear to keep the mysteries a secret o Included communication with the god(dess) o Deals with the afterlife for the faithful, connected to the underworld o Judaism and Christianity are a mixture of both Combined civil and religious (ethical) law Local Mysteries - Early mysteries were rites to assure fertility, safety, or the like. Panamara o Southwest Asia Minor o Promised only terrestrial benefits. Mother of Gods Cabirir at Samothrace o Non-Hellenistic o Numbers varied o General protective; mostly of seamen.
    [Show full text]
  • Creatio Ex Nihilo: Matter, Creation, and the Body in Classical and Christian Philosophy Through Aquinas
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 1995 Creatio ex Nihilo: Matter, Creation, and the Body in Classical and Christian Philosophy Through Aquinas James Noel Hubler University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, History of Religion Commons, Other Classics Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Hubler, James Noel, "Creatio ex Nihilo: Matter, Creation, and the Body in Classical and Christian Philosophy Through Aquinas" (1995). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 980. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/980 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/980 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Creatio ex Nihilo: Matter, Creation, and the Body in Classical and Christian Philosophy Through Aquinas Abstract Creatio ex nihilo marked a major redefinition of the material cosmos by the Christian apologists of the late second century, Tatian and Theophilus of Antioch. Other scholars have properly assigned the origin of creatio ex nihilo to these thinkers, notably Gerhard May and David Winston, but the reasons for the teaching' s appearance remained unexplained. By examining the Classical philosophical views of matter, the challenge that Greek views of matter raised for the Christian message become evident. For Stoic, Platonist, and Peripatetic alike matter imposed the natural necessity of corruption upon the body. The moral limitations imposed by matter made a bodily resurrection seem offensive. Christian hopes for a resurrection seemed misguided both intellectually and morally.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Greek Mathematics
    CORNELL UNIVERSITY LBRAaY Cornell University Library QA 22.H43 V.1 A history of Greek mathematics, 3 1924 008 704 219 A HISTORY OF GREEK MATHEMATICS VOLUME I A HISTORY OF GKEEK MATHEMATICS BY SIR THOMAS HEATH K.C.B., K.C.V.O.. F.R.S. Se.D. CAMI). ; HON. D.SC. OXFORD HONORARV FEt.r.OW (FORMFRLV FELLOw) OF TRI>fITY COLI.FHF, CAAIBRIDGE ' . An independent world, Created out of pnre intelligence.' Wordsworth. VOLUME I FROM THALES 'JO EUCIJD OXFORD AT THE CLARENDON PRESS 1921 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS London Edinburgh Glasgow Copenhagen New York Toronto Melbourne Cape Town Bombay Calcutta Madras Shanghai HUMPHREY MILFORD Publisher to the University PREFACE The idea may seem quixotic, but it is nevertheless the author's confident hope that this book will give a fresh interest to the story of Greek mathematics in the eyes both of mathematicians and of classical scholars. For the mathematician the important consideration is that the foundations of mathematics and a great portion of its content are Greek. The Greeks laid down the first principles, invented the methods ah initio, and fixed the terminology. Mathematics in short is a Greek science, whatever new developments modern analysis has brought or may bring. The interest of the subject for the classical scholar is no doubt of a different kind. Greek mathematics reveals an important aspect of the Greek genius of which the student of Greek culture is apt to lose sight. Most people, when they think of the Greek genius, naturally call to mind its master- pieces in literature and art with their notes of beauty, truth, freedom and humanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermes and Plato
    Brigham Young University :aii So X HERMES AND PLATO HERMES AND PLATO BV EDOUARD SCHURE TRANSLATED BY F. ROTHWELL, B.A. LONDON WILLIAM RIDER & SON, Limited 8 PATERNOSTER ROW, E.G. 4 1919 UBRA,\ . mmo, UTAH — CONTENTS HERMES (the mysteries of Egypt) CHAP PAGE I. The Sphinx 3 II. Hermes lO III. Isis The Initiation—The Tests 20 IV. Osiris. Death and Resurrection ' 35 V. The Vision of Hermes . 44 PLATO (the mysteries of eleusis) I. The Youth of Plato and the Death of Socrates .... 63 II. The Initiation of Plato and the Platonic Philosophy 78 III. The Mysteries of Eleusis . -91 HERMES (THE MYSTERIES OF EGYPT) ! Blind soul! Arm thyself with the torch of the Mysteries, and in the night of earth shalt thou uncover thy luminous Double, thy celestial Soul. Follow this divine guide and let him be thy Genius, for he holds the key of thy lives, both past and to come. Appeal to the Initiates (from the Book of the Dead). Listen within yourselves and look into the infinitude of Space and Time. There can be heard the songs of the Con- stellations, the voices of the Numbers, and the harmonies of the Spheres. Each sun is a thought of God and each planet a mode of that thought. To know divine thought, O souls, you descend and painfully ascend the path of the seven planets and of their seven heavens. What do the Constellations ? What say the Numbers ? What revolve the Spheres ? O lost or saved souls, they speak, they sing, they roll . your destinies Fragment (from Hermes).
    [Show full text]
  • The Reception of the Egyptian One God in Neoplatonism and the Greek Magical Papyri
    2021 The god Amun. The Great Harris Papyrus, Dyn. XX, British Museum. The Ascent to the Hidden One: The Reception of the Egyptian One God in Neoplatonism and the Greek Magical Papyri Word Count: 39,935 Tiana Blazevic The University of Adelaide Department of Classics, Ancient History and Archaeology Table of Contents Declaration 3 Abstract 4 Acknowledgements 5 Abbreviations (used in the notes and appendices) 6 Introduction 7 The Research Aims 8 The Background: The Supreme Being, ritual acts, and power dynamics 10 The Sources 12 The Greek Magical Papyri: Background and problems of authorship 14 Methodology 16 Chapter Overview 19 Chapter 1 21 1.1 Introduction: Historical Context 21 1.2 Egyptian Mouthpieces: Plato and Egypt 24 1.3 A Greek Egypt: Plutarch’s On Isis and Osiris 28 1.4 Orientalising discourse in Iamblichus and Porphyry 31 1.5 Thinking with the Egyptians: The Egyptian priests in the exchange between Porphyry and Iamblichus. 33 1.6 Conclusion 36 Chapter Two 38 2.1 Introduction 38 2.2 Amun in the Hymns & Egyptian Theology 39 2.3 The Evolution of the One God 43 2.4 Comparing Cosmogonies: Egyptians and Neoplatonist 45 2.5 Creation and Manifestation: New Sources Analysed 46 2.6 Creation and the One God 49 2.7 The One and All: New Evidence 53 2.8 Egyptian Theology in Neoplatonic Terms 55 2.9 Conclusion 61 Chapter Three 63 Introduction 63 3.1 Communing or Coercing? Ritual Mastery and Magic 63 3.2 Theurgy, Theosophy and Ritual Authority 67 3.3 Knowledge of the Gods: Porphyry the High Priest of Philosophy 70 3.4 Ritual Mastery and the
    [Show full text]
  • Ephesus & Smyrna
    THE REVELATION OF JOHN Bible Study Day 2 Study by Lorin L Cranford Text: Rev. 2:1-11 All rights reserved © QUICK LINKS Texts: Rev. 2:1-11 Studies: Appendices: Greek New Testament Rev. 2:1-7 Messages Die Gute Nachricht Rev. 2:8-11 New Revised Standard Version New Living Translation Ephesus & Smyrna Greek NT Gute Nachricht Bibel NRSV NLT 2.1 Τῷ ἀγγέλῳ τῆς ἐν Ἐφέσῳ 2.1»Schreibe an den En- 2.1 “To the angel of the 2.1 “Write this letter to ἐκκλησίας γράψον· gel* der Gemeinde in Ephe- church in Ephesus write: the angel of the church in Τάδε λέγει ὁ κρατῶν sus: These are the words of Ephesus. τοὺς ἑπτὰ ἀστέρας ἐν τῇ So spricht Er, der die sie- him who holds the seven This is the message from δεξιᾷ αὐτοῦ, ὁ περιπατῶν ben Sterne in seiner rechten stars in his right hand, who the one who holds the sev- ἐν μέσῳ τῶν ἑπτὰ λυχνιῶν Hand hält und zwischen den walks among the seven gold- en stars in his right hand, the τῶν χρυσῶν· 2 οἶδα τὰ ἔργα sieben goldenen Leuchtern en lampstands: 2 “I know your one who walks among the σου καὶ τὸν κόπον καὶ τὴν einhergeht: 2 Ich weiß von all works, your toil and your pa- seven gold lampstands: 2 “I ὑπομονήν σου καὶ ὅτι οὐ dem Guten, das ihr tut: von tient endurance. I know that know all the things you do. δύνῃ βαστάσαι κακούς, καὶ eurem Einsatz und eurer Aus- you cannot tolerate evildoers; I have seen your hard work ἐπείρασας τοὺς λέγοντας dauer.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Aristotle's Metaphysics Of
    AN INTRODUCTION TO ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS OF TIME Historical research into the mythological and astronomical conceptions that preceded Aristotle’s philosophy 3 4 AN INTRODUCTION TO ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS OF TIME Historical research into the mythological and astronomical conceptions that preceded Aristotle’s philosophy BY Régis LAURENT Translated by Trista Selous VILLEGAGNONS-PLAISANCE EDITIONS 16 bis rue d’Odessa 75014 PARIS www.editions-villegagnons.com 5 6 Forthcoming from Éditions villegagnons-plaisance: METAPHYSICS: - Régis LAURENT: Aristotle’s Metaphysics of Time - II - VILLEGAGNONS-PLAISANCE EDITIONS, 2015 ISBN: 978-2-9533846-11 7 8 To Frédéric… Acknowledgements: Francine Letouzé 9 10 CONTENTS PROLOGUE ....................................................................................... 15 I TIME IN ARISTOTLE’S PROTREPTICUS. INTRODUCTION AND QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION ........................................... 19 A. FROM ETERNITY TO TEMPORALITY: ON INITIATION.................. 27 B. FROM TEMPORALITY TO ETERNITY: WISDOM OVER THE LONG TERM ............................................................................................... 41 II. TIME IN GREEK TRAGIC POETRY AND IN HOMER’S EPIC POETRY. UNFINDABLE CIRCULAR TIME .......................... 49 A. ON FATE, OR TRAGIC POETRY AS A TECHNIQUE FOR VEILING TIME. ............................................................................................... 53 B. ON THE HERO, OR EPIC POETRY AS A TECHNIQUE FOR UNVEILING TIME. ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Approaches to Egyptian Mythology
    Egyptian Mythological Manuals Mythological structures and interpretative techniques in the Tebtunis Mythological manual, the manual of the Delta and related texts Jørgensen, Jens Kristoffer Blach Publication date: 2014 Document version Early version, also known as pre-print Citation for published version (APA): Jørgensen, J. K. B. (2014). Egyptian Mythological Manuals: Mythological structures and interpretative techniques in the Tebtunis Mythological manual, the manual of the Delta and related texts. Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet. Download date: 08. Apr. 2020 Egyptian Mythological Manuals Mythological structures and interpretative techniques in the Tebtunis Mythological manual, the Manual of the Delta and related texts Jens Blach Jørgensen December 2013 Abstract This thesis consists of an analysis of two ancient Egyptian mythological manual; the Tebtunis Mythological Manual and the Mythological Manual of the Delta. The analysis is focused on the different modes of structuring and interpreting mythology found in the manuals. The first chapter is a critical overview of the different Egyptological theories on Egyptian mythology, with special emphasis on aetiological myth and etymology. Structuralist theories are drawn upon to formulate two approaches to the mythological material found in the manual and utilized by the Egyptians themselves, viz. the paradigmatic and the syntagmatic. The manuals are found to use model mythological narratives or key myths built upon the myths of the Heliopolitan Ennead to structure the wealth of local mythological traditions. This creates a redundant structure in which the mythology of the individual district becomes an echo or actualization of basic mythic patterns. The Delta manual demonstrates the heuristic nature of this system by adding an extra deity to the Ennead in the form of the female Horus.
    [Show full text]