DOCSLIB.ORG

Revolutionary Democracy’

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revolutionary Democracy’ chapter 12 The October Revolution and the End of ‘Revolutionary Democracy’ Formally, the insurrection began on the morning of 23 October in response to repressive measures taken by the Provisional Government against the Petro- grad Soviet and the Bolshevik Party.The immediate reason for the government’s action was an order of the Military-Revolutionary Committee of the Petro- grad Soviet placing the city’s garrison under its command. On the night of 23– 4 October, the government shut down the Bolshevik newspapers Rabochii put’ and Soldat for inciting insurrection. It ordered the arrest of Bolsheviks involved in anti-government agitation and opened criminal proceedings against the Mil- itary Revolutionary Committee. At the same time, Kerenskii summoned troops from outside the capital (since the garrison was fully under Bolshevik influ- ence), posted Junkers (officer cadets) at strategic points, ordered the bridges linking the centre to the working-class districts raised, and sent the destroyer Aurora, docked for repairs at the Franko-Russkii shipbuilding factory, out to sea, supposedly on a training exercise. Telephone lines to Smol’nyi, seat of the Petrograd Soviet and the Bolsheviks’ Central Committee, were cut. The Military Revolutionary Committee, acting in the name of the Petro- grad Soviet, immediately went into action, beginning with the reopening of the newspapers that had been closed. By the afternoon of 25 October, the entire capital, with the exception of the Winter Palace, seat of the Provisional Gov- ernment, was in its hands. At 2.35p.m., Lenin made his first public appearance since the July Days, addressing the plenary session of the Petrograd Soviet. Comrades! The workers’ and peasants’ revolution, about whose necessity the Bolsheviks have spoken all the time, has taken place … We will have a Soviet government, our own organ of power, without any participation whatsoever of the bourgeoisie … The third Russian revolution must in its final analysis bring the victory of socialism … To end this war, closely linked with the present capitalist system, it is clear to everyone that we must overcome capital itself. In that cause, we © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2018 | doi: 10.1163/9789004352834_014 332 chapter 12 will have the help of the worldwide workers’ movement, which is already beginning to develop in Italy, England and Germany … We must immediately publish all the secret treaties … We will gain the confidence of the peasants by a single decree that will destroy the landed property of the aristocracy … We will establish genuine workers’ control over production …1 These words were received with a long ovation, after which the Soviet adop- ted a resolution of full support for the ‘workers’ and peasants’ revolution’.2 V.K. Arsen’ev, a Menshevik-Internationalist delegate from Crimea who had arrived in Petrograd for the Soviet Congress, recalled that session of the Soviet: When Trotsky informed the Soviet that ‘power had passed to the people’, there followed a thunder of applause. Then Lenin and Zinoviev came out. Such a triumph. Trotsky’s speech in particular carved itself into my mind … It was some kind of molten metal – every word burned the soul … And I saw that many people were clenching their fists, that a definite, unshakeable determination was being formed to fight to the end.3 The insurrection ended with the seizure of the Winter Palace and the arrest of the ministers of the Provisional Government after a siege that had lasted late into the night. It was during that siege that the Congress of Soviets opened. Shortly thereafter, the Menshevik and sr (defencist) delegates demonstratively walked out, ostensibly in protest over the insurrection, which, they claimed, had been carried out ‘behind the back of the Congress’. They proceeded to the City Duma, around which a Committee for the Salvation of the Revolution and the Country had been formed, which included deputies of the City Duma, members of the outgoing TsIK that had been elected at the Soviet Congress in the spring, the Executive Committee of Peasant Soviets, also elected in the spring, the two defencist parties, members of the pre-parliament, and representatives of certain army committees from the front. This became the principal centre of organised resistance to the new regime. 1 Lenin 1958–67, vol. 35, pp. 2–3. 2 Novaya zhizn’ (Oct. 26, 1917). 3 Kudelli 1924, p. 121..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE MENSHEVIKS in 1917 by Olegpmwkov Bachelor of Arts
    THE MENSHEVIKS IN 1917 r:. = BY OLEGpmwKOV Bachelor of Arts Moscow State Pedagogical Institute Moscow, USSR 1983 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS July 1992 THE MENSHEVIKS IN 1917 Thesis Approved: Thesis Advisor 0 Dean of the Graduate College 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express sincere appreciation to Dr. George F. Jewsbury and Dr. Joel M. Jenswold for their encouragement and advice throughout my graduate program. Many thanks also go to Dr. W. Roger Biles for serving on my graduate committee. Their suggestions and support were very helpful throughout the study. To Wann Smith for his expert typing and proofing skills; to Oscar Kursner for his help in translation. My wife, Y elaina Khripkov, encouraged and supported me all the way and helped me keep the end goal constantly in sight. Thanks go to her for her undivided time in the final stages of the project. She prov 1ded moral support and was a real believer in my abilities. 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. The Main Approaches to the Study of the Russian Revolution in American Historiography 2 The Study of Menshevism in the U.S. 6 Soviet Scholars on Menshevism 8 Sources 1 2 Themes and Problems 14 II. Tiffi "HONEYMOON' OF Tiffi REVOLUTION_~-~-~! 8 The Necessity for the Dual Power 1 8 The Essence and Structure of Dual Power 2 7 Establishing of the Revolutionary Defensists Policy3 5 III. THE APRIL CRISIS AND ITS CONSEQUENCES _____4 7 The First Clash.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialism in Europe and the Russian Revolution India and the Contemporary World Society Ofthefuture
    Socialism in Europe and II the Russian Revolution Chapter 1 The Age of Social Change In the previous chapter you read about the powerful ideas of freedom and equality that circulated in Europe after the French Revolution. The French Revolution opened up the possibility of creating a dramatic change in the way in which society was structured. As you have read, before the eighteenth century society was broadly divided into estates and orders and it was the aristocracy and church which controlled economic and social power. Suddenly, after the revolution, it seemed possible to change this. In many parts of the world including Europe and Asia, new ideas about individual rights and who olution controlled social power began to be discussed. In India, Raja v Rammohan Roy and Derozio talked of the significance of the French Revolution, and many others debated the ideas of post-revolutionary Europe. The developments in the colonies, in turn, reshaped these ideas of societal change. ian Re ss Not everyone in Europe, however, wanted a complete transformation of society. Responses varied from those who accepted that some change was necessary but wished for a gradual shift, to those who wanted to restructure society radically. Some were ‘conservatives’, others were ‘liberals’ or ‘radicals’. What did these terms really mean in the context of the time? What separated these strands of politics and what linked them together? We must remember that these terms do not mean the same thing in all contexts or at all times. We will look briefly at some of the important political traditions of the nineteenth century, and see how they influenced change.
    [Show full text]
  • TIMELINE of EVENTS March 1917 Tsar Nicholas Abdicates and The
    TIMELINE OF EVENTS March 1917 Tsar Nicholas abdicates and the Provisional Government takes over supported by the Soviet. It now has to deal with all the problems which led to the downfall of the Tsar – the war, food shortages and peasant demands for land…. April 16th 1917 Lenin arrives in Russia. He makes a speech demanding an end to the war with Germany, land for the peasants and nationalisation of banks. He insists that no support be given to the Provisional Government – instead the Soviets (there are Soviets in other cities) should get together and form a new government. These ideas became known as the April Theses. June 1917 The Provisional Government orders the armies to attack Austria. This fails and turns into a retreat. Soldiers began to desert in large numbers. Many go to Petrograd and join the Bolsheviks demanding an end to the Provisional Government July 1917 100000 soldiers and Bolsheviks are out in the streets demanding ‘All power to the Soviets’. These three days of rioting in Petrograd are known as the July Days. Kerensky sends loyal troops into the city to deal with the uprising. He claims the Bolsheviks have been paid by Germany to make trouble and Lenin is a German agent. Lenin has to leave Russia to avoid arrest and goes to Finland. Other leading Bolsheviks are arrested. The Bolsheviks have become unpopular and weak. August 1917 Kerensky become leader of the Provisional Government. He has to deal with a challenge from General Kornilov, Commander in Chief of the army who wants to take control.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 03: 1917 — Did the War Cause a Revolution? Context
    Module 03: 1917 — Did the War Cause a Revolution? Context Russia Under the Tsar The narrative below provides a brief overview of the main developments between the outbreak of World War I in August 1914 and Russia's withdrawal from that conflict in March 1918. On the eve of the war, Russia remained one of the most politically antiquated regimes in Europe. An autocratic system of government accorded nearly unlimited power to the tsar, who expected obedience and reverence from his 163 million subjects. The population under his rule included representatives of nearly seventy non-Russian ethnic groups dispersed over more than eight million square miles of territory. The overwhelming majority of the population relied on agriculture for their livelihood, although state-sponsored industrialization programs in the late nineteenth century had stimulated urbanization and social diversification, as the ranks of professionals and other "middling" orders increased along with those of the industrial working class. While supporting some measure of economic modernization, the government remained steadfastly hostile to any form of independent civic organization or political activity, whether it derived from liberal hopes for a parliamentary system and the rule of law, or the more radical socialist ideologies embraced by Russian workers. The Russo-Japanese War The aspirations of a rapidly changing society and the growing tensions between the population and a regime intent on avoiding political reform burst into the open in 1905, as the autocracy grappled with a humiliating defeat in the Russo- Japanese war. The country erupted in revolution after troops guarding the Winter Palace gunned down unarmed demonstrators on what became known as "Bloody Sunday." Faced with widespread rebellion in the countryside, debilitating strikes in the cities, and liberal professionals' demands for civil and religious liberties, Tsar Nicholas II reluctantly agreed to the establishment of a national legislative body and the rule of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Revolution Timeline
    Russian Revolution in Dates 1905 Jan Bloody Sunday - Tsarist troops open fire on a peaceful demonstration of workers in St Petersburg. 1905 October General Strike sweeps Russia which ends when the Tsar promises a constitution. 1905 December In response to the suppression of the St Petersburg Soviet the Moscow Soviet organizes a disastrous insurrection that the government suppresses after five days 1906 The promised parliament, the Duma, is dissolved when it produces an anti government majority even though elected on a narrow franchise. 1911-1914 A new wave of workers unrest ends with the outbreak of the First World War 1917 Feb After several days of demonstrations in Petrograd (formally St Petersburg) the government orders troops to open fire. The next day, these troops mutiny. The Tsar abdicates when he hears that Moscow too has joined the Revolution. An agreement is reached between the Petrograd Soviet and the Provisional Government headed by Lvov. 1917 June 18 Offensive launched by Russia against Austria Hungary. 1917 July The July Days. (3rd and 4th) Workers and soldiers in Petrograd demand the Soviet takes power. Sporadic fighting results and the Soviet restores order with troops brought back from the front. Trotsky arrested. Lenin goes into hiding. A new provisional government is set up with Kerensky at it's head (8th). 1917 Sept The Bolsheviks win control of the Petrograd Soviet. In the countryside peasant seizure of land from the gentry continues and reaches the level of near insurrection in Tambov. 1917 Oct The Bolsheviks overthrow the Provisional government on the eve of the meeting of 2nd All- Russia Congress of Soviets.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucas Goodman Worker Support of the Bolshevik Party in July 1917
    Lucas Goodman Worker Support of the Bolshevik Party in July 1917 After the ousting of Tsar Nicholas II in February of 1917,1 the Russian people might be forgiven for thinking that the revolution had run its course. The tumultuous months that followed, however, quickly revealed that the revolution had just begun, with many political groups vying to fill the power vacuum. In particular, the months of April and May saw the Bolshevik party beginning to gain strength and popular support, being best positioned to tap into the building desire for action by the proletariat. However, this movement faced a crisis in early July, when a Bolshevik-led demonstration resulted in bloodshed. This development could easily have been the death knell of the Bolshevik movement; instead, the party recovered very quickly. This setback was insufficient to stop the party’s later seizure of power in October. I present two conflicting documents written by workers and workers’ groups to demonstrate the intense controversy that erupted in July. These documents represent the voices of the proletariat, on whose support the Bolsheviks depended and for whose needs the Bolsheviks claimed to be fighting. I also present three documents—a factory workers’ resolution and two personal anecdotes from the time period—to illustrate the strength of the Bolsheviks before the July Days and particularly how the movement got back on its feet so quickly. During the month of June, dissatisfaction with the Provisional Government grew after a military offensive resulted in carnage for the Russian army. Many in the military mutinied; the Bolshevik leadership decided to fan this uprising into a full-scale rebellion against the Provisional Government, starting on the day of July 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Worker Support for the Bolshevik's October Revolution
    Derek Ju Worker Support for the Bolshevik’s October Revolution The revolution that took place in February of 1917 deposed a tsarist regime and began Russia’s road towards a socialist state. Yet during this time the Bolshevik party exerted very little power and influence in the country. However, by late October of the same year, under chants of “All Power to the Soviets,” the Bolsheviks were successful in wresting control of the Russian government. The rise of the Bolshevik party was buoyed by the support they generated among many of the proletariat, who supported them for political, economic, and social reasons. Worker radicalism and support for a socialist revolution reached a crescendo in the months preceding the October Revolution of 1917, although there still existed worker factions that were staunchly anti-Bolshevik before and after the revolution. Primary documents, such as worker resolutions and first hand accounts, can shed light on the internal and external forces that influenced the various working class groups during October and November of 1917. In October of 1917 the majority consensus among workers was that the Provisional Government was ineffective, and political change was needed to improve the increasingly dire situation in urban Russia. By October 25 th in Moscow alone, thirty-eight plants representing 54,000 workers had already written resolutions calling for transferring all power to the soviets.1 Serving as a snapshot of the workers’ revolutionary desires, the workers of the Putilov metalworking plant published a resolution on October 24 th signaling their approval of the Military Revolutionary Committee (MRC).2 The MRC, created by the Bolshevik-dominated Petrograd Soviet, was organized for “the protection of the city” due to a 1 Koenker, Diane.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviets Agree to Support Provisional Government
    The months of June and July of 1917 were marked by instability and turmoil. The February Revolution’s effects were still being felt throughout Russia, and various factions rushed to fill the political vacuum created by Tsar Nicholas II’s removal. The Provisional Government, established by the Duma immediately following the February Revolution, managed to function as Russia’s governing body despite constant challenges to its authority from all sides of the political spectrum. As the Provisional Government retained control, the local and regional Soviets, comprised mostly of workers, peasants, and soldiers, continued to grow in popularity as a means for Russia’s historically underrepresented majority to have their views heard. The relationship between the two groups was the main political issue of the June- July time period, and the outcome would determine the direction of the Russian government well beyond 1917. In 1917, Russia was still locked in World War I, a bloody and unpopular war that was particularly cruel to the Russian soldiers. The Russian soldiers fighting the Germans on the Eastern Front were short on funds, arms, morale, and almost everything else an army would need to fight armies as powerful as the Central Powers were. The soldiers were not the only Russians who opposed Russia’s continued participation in the war. Russian citizens were mostly against the war as well, as it put additional stress on Russia’s already-strained infrastructure. Many observers also viewed the war as a continuation of the Tsarist regime’s policies, something they had hoped would end with the February Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Supposed Role of the Military Revolutionary Committee in October
    Billy Huang Professor. Elizabeth Wood 21H.467 The Supposed Role of the Military Revolutionary Committee Before, During, and After October The Russian Revolution played a pivotal role in exacerbating, if not creating, an ideological split between Russia and the westernized world in the 20th century. When the Bolsheviks rose against the Provisional Government in the fall of 1917, they utilized a hodgepodge of units, known uniformly as the Red Guard, to position themselves into a seat of power in Petrograd. From this seat the Bolsheviks vied to finally end the centuries long autocratic traditions of Russia as well as the brief experiment with a parliamentary system known as the Provisional Government. During the subsequent power vacuum, the Bolsheviks hoped to impose their vision of a socialist state on the Russian people. The Military Revolutionary Committee (MRC) was vital to the success and viability of the Bolshevik cause. Vladimir Lenin, the de facto leader of the Bolshevik Party, had long theorized the need for a proletarian militia, a role fulfilled by the Red Guard, and the MRC was to be a serviceable interim command for the organization of the Red Guard. Officially created on October 22, 1917, the MRC was the brains behind the muscle that the Bolshevik Party was trying to flex at that time. Lasting for two months, the MRC directed the logistics behind the seizure of power by the party in Petrograd, Moscow, and other critical locations during the first days of the October Revolution. When the MRC was disbanded in December, 1917, the lessons learned from having a centralized planning committee proved to be invaluable in setting up Bolshevik bureaucracies.
    [Show full text]
  • MAXIM GORKY and the RUSSIAN REVOLUTIONS a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate Scho
    THE PROPHET DISILLUSIONED: MAXIM GORKY AND THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTIONS A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In History By Anita A. Kondoyanidi, Ph.D. Washington, DC December 7, 2019 Copyright 2019 by Anita Kondoyanidi All Rights Reserved ii THE PROPHET DISILLUSIONED: MAXIM GORKY AND THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTIONS Anita Kondoyanidi, Ph.D. Thesis Advisor: Michael David-Fox, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This study investigates Maxim Gorky’s public and literary life based on new materials from Italian and Russian archives (Archivio Centrale Dello Stato and the Archives of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs), which bring to light Gorky’s reasons for returning to the Soviet Union in 1928 and to travel back and forth to Italy until 1933, when he decided to remain in the Soviet Union. The period under examination, the years of Gorky’s life (1868-1936), witnessed the Revolution of 1905, World War I, the February and October Revolutions, the Civil War, NEP, and a cultural revolution of which Gorky became a zealous architect. This study argues that Gorky’s personal experiences with violence at the hands of the Russian petit bourgeoisie and peasantry generated his strong and tenacious desire to recast Man and heal Russia and Russians from their innate pessimism and laziness. Once Gorky accepted selective use of violence in building an ideal Soviet society and offered Russia a utopian project – the creation of a new, improved human being—he contributed to the horrifying reality of the 1930s, making himself an unintentional accomplice in the Soviet revolutionary and repressive experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • The War Aims of the Russian Provisional Government Susan Parker
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research Winter 1969 The war aims of the Russian provisional government Susan Parker Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Recommended Citation Parker, Susan, "The aw r aims of the Russian provisional government" (1969). Honors Theses. Paper 318. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The War Aims of the Russian Provisional Government by Susan Parker History Honors Seminar Dr. Ryle January, 1969 The outbreak of the first World War marked the end of an era in the history of Europe; novhere vas this to be more true than in Russia. At the outset there vas a great shov of popular support for the var, much more so than for the Russo-Japanese War in 1904. Anti-government and revolutionary activity had soon revived folloving the temporary hiatus after the seemingly successful Revolution of 1905, but it disappeared almost entirely in the rise of national feeling and loyalty that accompanied the declaration of var on August 1, 1914.1 On July 8 the Duma met to vote on var credits, vhich vere quickly adopted. The parties of the left refused to vote for reasons of principle, but they still joined in a call for national def ense.2 Outstanding revolutionaries like the Marxist/ Plekhanov/ and the anarchist Prince Kropotkin supported the var, fearing that a German victory vould mean the triumph of militarism and reaction.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the July Days, 1917 Nikita A. Khlystov
    The Flame That Turned Into a Fire: An Analysis of the July Days, 1917 Nikita A. Khlystov March 28, 2011 21.467J/17.57J: Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society ȃȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱǯȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ Russian Revolution,Ȅȱ declared Leon Trotsky following the events of July 3-7, 1917.1 Known today as the July Days, this pivotal moment in the Russian Revolution saw half a million frustrated workers and soldiers take to the streets of the Russian capital Petrograd. Unlike in any previous protest of the revolution, these lower-class workers and troops were armed for a ȃȱ ȱ ȱ Ȅȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ǰȱ ȱ instead that all power be given to the All-Russian Soviet of ȂǰȱȂǰȱȱȂȱ Deputies.2 The Provisional Government under Alexander Kerensky immediately brought loyal troops and Cossacks to restore order. Soon after intense street fighting erupted, lasting for three days and resulting in hundreds of demonstrator casualties.3 The aftermath saw the Bolsheviks severely blamed and repressed for their supposed involvement in the events. This led many leading Bolsheviks to commit to an urgent course of armed revolution, which would ultimately result in the successful overthrow of the government in October.4 1 Trotsky, Leon. "The July Uprising." Leon Trotsky: The Struggle for State Power. Marxists Internet Archive Library, 12 Sept. 2006. Web. 23 Feb. 2011. <http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1917/power/art04.htm>. 2 Steinberg, Mark. "Crisis and Upheaval: From the July Days to Bolshevik Power." Voices of Revolution, 1917. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 2001. 149-57. Print. p. 150, 152.
    [Show full text]