Roman Nijmegen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Nederlandse Oudheden 19 Four approaches to the analysis of (pre-)Roman Nijmegen Aspects of cultural evolution, acculturation, contextual function and continuity J.H.F. Bloemers (ed.) Four approaches to the analysis of (pre-)Roman Nijmegen Aspects of cultural evolution, acculturation, contextual function and continuity J.H.F. Bloemers (ed.) Nederlandse Oudheden 19 Cover illustration: Overview from the east Four approaches to the analysis of (pre-)Roman Nijmegen of the western half of the small early Roman Aspects of cultural evolution, acculturation, contextual function and fortification during the excavation in 1973 before continuity the reconstruction of the Trajanusplein. Authors: J.H.F. Bloemers, J.S. Boersma, R.M. van Dierendonck, M. Erdrich, The publication of this book has been R.C.G.M. Lauwerier, J. Raap, D. Teunissen and J.R.A.M. Thijssen supported by the Cultural Heritage Agency With contributions by S.Y. Comis, W. Dijkman, E. Schouten, L. Smits, of the Netherlands (RCE, Amersfoort), the A. Vanderhoeven, G.F. IJzereef. Amsterdam Centre for Ancient Studies and Archaeology (ACASA; University of Amsterdam) Editor: J.H.F. Bloemers (ed.) and the Stichting Nederlands Museum voor Anthropologie en Praehistorie (SNMAP, Illustrations: H. de Kort, A.M. Nijs (Werkvoorzieningschap Nijmegen e.o.) Amsterdam). Editor of illustration: M. Haars (BCL-Archaeological Support) English translation: C. Jefferis Design and layout: uNiek-Design, Almere Print: Xerox/OBT, Den Haag ISBN/EAN: 9789057992537 © Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands, Amersfoort, 2016 Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands P.O. Box 1600 3800 BP Amersfoort The Netherlands www.cultureelerfgoed.nl Contents Summary 6 3 The pre-Flavian occupation: an aspect of acculturation 35 Samenvatting 8 3.1 The great early Roman fortress as a topographical element 35 Zusammenfassung 10 3.1.1 Introduction 35 3.1.2 The ditches 35 1 Introduction 13 3.1.3 The road 39 1.1 The excavations at Nijmegen 13 3.1.4 Conclusion 39 1.2 The relation with the surrounding Batavian area 15 3.2 The small early Roman fortification 40 1.3 Four themes for the analysis of the (ROB) 3.2.1 Introduction 40 excavations at Nijmegen 1957-1981 15 3.2.2 The fortification 40 1.4 Scales and legend of illustrations 16 3.2.3 The datable finds 47 1.5 Acknowledgements: teamwork over generations 16 3.2.4 Conclusion 50 3.3 The pre-Flavian settlement around the Valkhof 51 2 A small Middle Iron Age cemetery with a 3.3.1 Introduction 51 cart burial in Nijmegen: an aspect of cultural 3.3.2 General orientation 51 evolution 20 3.3.3 The periodization and the stratification 54 2.1 The cemetery 21 3.3.4 The buildings 55 2.2 The cart burial no. 60/9 21 3.3.5 The clay pit 58 2.2.1 The grave and the retrieval method 21 3.3.6 Special pits or cesspools 64 2.2.2 Description of the grave goods 22 3.3.7 Conclusion 67 2.2.3 The burial ritual and the deposition of the 3.4 The pre-Flavian cemetery on the Hunerberg 68 grave goods 28 3.4.1 Introduction 68 2.2.4 Man or woman? 29 3.4.2 The location, shape and size of the cemetery 69 2.3 The remaining burials 29 3.4.3 The graves 70 2.3.1 Grave no. 60/21 29 3.4.4 The dating of the cemetery 80 2.3.2 The other graves 30 3.4.5 Conclusion 83 2.4 Dating and parallels 30 3.5 The boundaries of the early Roman settlement 2.5 The feasibility of a socio-cultural interpretation 31 around the Valkhof 83 2.5.1 Theory and method 31 3.5.1 Introduction 83 2.5.2 The analysis of the Nijmegen cemetery 32 3.5.2 The excavated segments of the ditch 83 2.5.3 Pater familias, ‘big man’ or chief? Or big woman? 32 3.5.3 The outwork 86 3.5.4 Conclusion 90 3.6 Synthesis and interpretation 90 3.6.1 Early Roman Nijmegen: from military base to proto-urban settlement 90 3.6.2 The relation between the Roman occupation at Nijmegen and the surrounding Batavian tribal territory 93 3.6.3 A comparison with observations elsewhere in the northern Meuse and Rhine region 95 3.6.4 A wider context of the establishment of colonial cities and the early phase of integration with the native society 98 4 The Flavian-Trajanic legionary fortress: 5 The fourth-century defence system around a pilot study for future analysis the Valkhof and the problem of continuity (with R.M. van Dierendonck) 101 during the early medieval period 4.1 Introduction 101 (with J.S. Boersma, W. Dijkman, M. Erdrich, 4.1.1 Definition of the problem 101 R.C.G.M. Lauwerier, J. Raap, D. Teunissen and 4.1.2 Aim and starting-points 105 J.R.A.M. Thijssen) 175 4.1.3 The choice of three sub-areas 106 5.1 Introduction 175 4.1.4 The choice of analysed features and finds 5.2 The features 175 and the method of analysis 107 5.2.1 Foundations and foundation trenches 175 4.2 Description of the building features 112 5.2.2 The multiperiod ditch system 175 4.2.1 Area 3 112 5.2.3 The single period ditch 181 4.2.2 Area 5 117 5.2.4 The system of two parallel ditches 183 4.2.3 Area 9 120 5.3 The finds and samples 184 4.3 Description of the pits 123 5.3.1 The method of collecting the finds and samples 184 4.3.1 Introduction 123 5.3.2 Pottery finds from the late Roman fortifications 4.3.2 Area 3 123 at Nijmegen (by M. Erdrich) 188 4.3.3 Area 5 125 5.3.3 Numismatic evidence for the dating of the 4.3.4 Area 9 127 late Roman defence system (by J.S. Boersma 4.4 Analysis of the finds (by R.M. van Dierendonck) 128 and J.Raap) 193 4.4.1 Introduction 128 5.3.4 Animals and animal food in fourth-century 4.4.2 Analysis of the pottery 129 Nijmegen (by R.C.G.M. Lauwerier) 194 4.4.3 Conclusion and interpretation 157 5.3.5 Palynological investigation of the late Roman 4.5 Synthesis of building features, pits and single period fortification ditch at Nijmegen selected groups of finds, mainly pottery 159 (by D. Teunissen) 203 4.5.1 Introduction 159 5.3.6 Miscellaneous finds 208 4.5.2 The relation between the surface area of 5.3.7 The distribution and deposition of the finds 208 (sub-)areas, pits and finds 159 5.4 The dating, periodization and evolution of 4.5.3 Relation between character and number of the defence system 211 finds, use and deposition of finds and pits 166 5.4.1 The dating 211 4.5.4 Relation between features, finds and the 5.4.2 The periodization 211 socio-economic function of the (sub-)areas 168 5.4.3 The evolution of the defence system 213 4.6 Evaluation of the results in the light of the 5.5 Synthesis and interpretation objectives of the pilot study 172 (by J.H.F. Bloemers & J.R.A.M. Thijssen) 213 4.6.1 Introduction 172 5.5.1 Introduction 213 4.6.2 The spatial and socio-economic aspects 172 5.5.2 The defence system in relation to the 4.6.3 The method 173 fourth-century topography and occupation 4.6.4 Conclusion 174 of Nijmegen 213 5.5.3 Generalization of some morphological aspects of the fourth-century defence system at Nijmegen 215 5.5.4 Evidence of habitation in Nijmegen between c. AD 400 and 750 216 5.6 Reflections on the continuity of settlement at Nijmegen between AD 400 and 750 224 5.6.1 Introduction 224 5.6.2 Continuity in the late Roman period and the early Middle Ages and processes of formation 224 5.6.3 Continuity and formation processes in Nijmegen 226 5.6.4 A hypothetical model for the continuity of occupation at Nijmegen 228 References 232 List of contributors 255 Appendices 256 6 — Summary This monograph presents a selection of The third chapter covers the early Roman period conceptual and methodological framed issues from c. 15 BC to AD 70, the episode in which relating to the excavations in ‘Roman Nijmegen’ the invading Romans brought into use the 3 which were carried out by the State Service for km2 area on the Nijmegen push moraine and Archaeological Investigations in the Netherlands developed it as a location for a military force (ROB) from 1972 until the end of 1981. This of over 12,000 soldiers plus smaller units and investigation is characterized by its focus to build a capital for the Batavian civitas in the on the wider surroundings of the previously making. In this period, large military and civilian excavated fortress of the Tenth Legion on the groups of ‘immigrants’ from far and wide settle Hunerberg dating from the late first century in Nijmegen, whether or not permanently, AD. This broadening of perspective resulted in and they are recognizable from their ‘foreign’ substantial new insights into the organization material culture and burial methods. and spatial development of an area 3 km2 in size For the interpretation of this radical process between the town centre of Nijmegen and the that was to influence the character of Roman Kops Plateau from the late first century BC to Nijmegen for centuries, use was made of the beginning of the fifth century AD, the various concepts from developmental geography elements of settlement and the nature and and anthropology such as acculturation and role of the different groups of inhabitants and articulation.
Recommended publications
  • Resettlement Into Roman Territory Across the Rhine and the Danube Under the Early Empire (To the Marcomannic Wars)*

    Resettlement Into Roman Territory Across the Rhine and the Danube Under the Early Empire (To the Marcomannic Wars)*

    Eos C 2013 / fasciculus extra ordinem editus electronicus ISSN 0012-7825 RESETTLEMENT INTO ROMAN TERRITORY ACROSS THE RHINE AND THE DANUBE UNDER THE EARLY EMPIRE (TO THE MARCOMANNIC WARS)* By LESZEK MROZEWICZ The purpose of this paper is to investigate the resettling of tribes from across the Rhine and the Danube onto their Roman side as part of the Roman limes policy, an important factor making the frontier easier to defend and one way of treating the population settled in the vicinity of the Empire’s borders. The temporal framework set in the title follows from both the state of preser- vation of sources attesting resettling operations as regards the first two hundred years of the Empire, the turn of the eras and the time of the Marcomannic Wars, and from the stark difference in the nature of those resettlements between the times of the Julio-Claudian emperors on the one hand, and of Marcus Aurelius on the other. Such, too, is the thesis of the article: that the resettlements of the period of the Marcomannic Wars were a sign heralding the resettlements that would come in late antiquity1, forced by peoples pressing against the river line, and eventu- ally taking place completely out of Rome’s control. Under the Julio-Claudian dynasty, on the other hand, the Romans were in total control of the situation and transferring whole tribes into the territory of the Empire was symptomatic of their active border policies. There is one more reason to list, compare and analyse Roman resettlement operations: for the early Empire period, the literature on the subject is very much dominated by studies into individual tribe transfers, and works whose range en- * Originally published in Polish in “Eos” LXXV 1987, fasc.
  • 16109431 Lprob 1.Pdf

    16109431 Lprob 1.Pdf

    Günter Neumann Namenstudien zum Altgermanischen Ergänzungsbände zum Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde Herausgegeben von Heinrich Beck, Dieter Geuenich, Heiko Steuer Band 59 ≥ Walter de Gruyter · Berlin · New York Günter Neumann Namenstudien zum Altgermanischen Herausgegeben von Heinrich Hettrich und Astrid van Nahl ≥ Walter de Gruyter · Berlin · New York Țȍ Gedruckt auf säurefreiem Papier, das die US-ANSI-Norm über Haltbarkeit erfüllt. ISBN 978-3-11-020100-0 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. © Copyright 2008 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, 10785 Berlin. Dieses Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung außer- halb der engen Grenzen des Urheberrechtsgesetzes ist ohne Zustimmung des Verlages unzulässig und strafbar. Das gilt insbesondere für Vervielfältigungen, Übersetzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und die Einspeicherung und Verarbeitung in elektronischen Systemen. Printed in Germany Einbandgestaltung: Christopher Schneider, Berlin Druck und buchbinderische Verarbeitung: Hubert & Co. GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen Günter Neumann Vorwort Das Œuvre des Sprachwissenschaftlers Günter Neumann (1920–2005) kon- zentriert sich um drei Schwerpunkte: Die indogermanischen Sprachen des alten Kleinasien, die klassischen Sprachen Griechisch und Latein sowie die altgermanischen Sprachen. Zu allen drei Bereichen liegt eine Fülle von Aufsätzen und Beiträgen vor, die nicht nur sprachvergleichend, sondern fast im gleichen Maße philologisch ausgerichtet sind. Es ist deshalb sinn- voll, wenn die Kleinen Schriften dieses Gelehrten nach diesen Themen- gebieten getrennt veröffentlicht werden. Für die bis Anfang der neunziger Jahre vorliegenden Aufsätze zu den altkleinasiatischen Sprachen und zum Griechischen ist dies bereits in Form der „Ausgewählte[n] Kleine[n] Schrif- ten“ erfolgt, die 1994 von E.
  • Map 10 Rhenus-Albis Compiled by J.H.F

    Map 10 Rhenus-Albis Compiled by J.H.F

    Map 10 Rhenus-Albis Compiled by J.H.F. Bloemers, 1995 Introduction The map covers a large part of what Ptolemy (2.Prolog.; 2.11) called Germania Megale, that immense part of Germania outside the formal north-west limits of the Roman empire, bordered by the North Sea and Baltic Sea. During the Roman period the landscape was, as elsewhere, quite different from the present; in this region the coast, estuaries, rivers and moors deserve special attention. Long-known historical information has to be combined with knowledge acquired after World War II by intensive geological and palaeogeographical research in the Netherlands and northern Germany. Due to the rise in sea level and post-Roman shoreline changes, the coast along the southern North Sea has changed considerably since the Roman period, retreating landwards. In general, with the help of well-founded geological data, it can now be reconstructed in advance of the present-day shoreline (Kossack 1984, 51-82; van Es 1988, 88-94). Even so, it still seems prudent to render long stretches as approximate. In antiquity, principal rivers such as the Rhenus, Visurgis and Albis spread over wide flood-plains, but are now channeled between embankments. Large areas in the north of the modern Netherlands and Germany were covered by peat, and consequently almost inaccessible. Today, these are drained and cultivated, with the result that the ground level is now many feet lower than during Roman times. In addition, ancient Germania Megale was famous for its extensive, dense forests. All the Greek and Roman texts relating to the region are conveniently assembled by Byvanck (1931) and Goetz (1995).
  • Romans and Barbarians in Tacitus' Battle Narratives

    Romans and Barbarians in Tacitus' Battle Narratives

    ROMANS AND BARBARIANS IN TACITUS’ BATTLE NARRATIVES by RYAN MICHAEL SEEGER (Under the direction of Dr. Susan Mattern-Parkes) ABSTRACT The purpose of the study is to examine how Tacitus constructs ethnic stereotypes, namely those of the Romans and of the barbarians, in his battle narratives. The first section of the study explores his descriptions of technical aspects of the battle narrative, such as topography, use of weaponry, battle formations, and sieges. The second section examines the value judgments that Tacitus makes about the combatants and their actions, discussing the themes of discipline and virtus, as well as the leaders’ ability to lead by example and stifle dissent. In his descriptions of both the technical and the “moral” aspects of battle, Tacitus shapes his Romans quite differently from his barbarians. Tacitus constructs identities in his battle narratives possibly to satisfy his audience’s expectations or to make the scenes more understandable. Such constructions indicate that ethnocentrism plays an important role in Latin historiography, revealing racial prejudice in Roman society. INDEX WORDS: Tacitus, battle narratives, Roman army, barbarians, ethnicity. ROMANS AND BARBARIANS IN TACITUS’ BATTLE NARRATIVES by RYAN MICHAEL SEEGER B. A., Appalachian State University, 1998 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2002 © 2002 Ryan Michael Seeger All Rights Reserved ROMANS AND BARBARIANS IN TACITUS’ BATTLE NARRATIVES by RYAN MICHAEL SEEGER Approved: Major Professor: Susan Mattern-Parkes Committee: James Anderson Erika Thorgerson-Hermanowicz Electronic Version Approved: Gordhan L. Patel Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2002 iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Several people were instrumental in the completion of this thesis.
  • Roman Soldier Germanic Warrior Lindsay Ppowellowell

    Roman Soldier Germanic Warrior Lindsay Ppowellowell

    1st Century AD Roman Soldier VERSUS Germanic Warrior Lindsay Powell © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com 1st Century ad Roman Soldier Germanic Warrior Lindsay PowellPowell © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION 4 THE OPPOSING SIDES 10 Recruitment and motivation t Morale and logistics t Training, doctrine and tactics Leadership and communications t Use of allies and auxiliaries TEUTOBURG PASS 28 Summer AD 9 IDISTAVISO 41 Summer AD 16 THE ANGRIVARIAN WALL 57 Summer AD 16 ANALYSIS 71 Leadership t Mission objectives and strategies t Planning and preparation Tactics, combat doctrine and weapons AFTERMATH 76 BIBLIOGRAPHY 78 INDEX 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com Introduction ‘Who would leave Asia, or Africa, or Italia for Germania, with its wild country, its inclement skies, its sullen manners and aspect, unless indeed it were his home?’ (Tacitus, Germania 2). This negative perception of Germania – the modern Netherlands and Germany – lay behind the reluctance of Rome’s great military commanders to tame its immense wilderness. Caius Iulius Caesar famously threw a wooden pontoon bridge across the River Rhine (Rhenus) in just ten days, not once but twice, in 55 and 53 bc. The next Roman general to do so was Marcus Agrippa, in 39/38 bc or 19/18 bc. However, none of these missions was for conquest, but in response to pleas for assistance from an ally of the Romans, the Germanic nation of the Ubii. It was not until the reign of Caesar Augustus that a serious attempt was made to annex the land beyond the wide river and transform it into a province fit for Romans to live in.
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

    PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/26532 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-09-30 and may be subject to change. Zum Namen des „oppidum Cugernorum” Im späten August 1979 wurden von den Xantener Ausgräbern des Rheinischen Landesmuseums Bonn im Gebiet der Colonia Ulpia Traia- na zahlreiche Kalksteinbrocken gefunden, die sich nachher als Reste eines besonderen römischen Votivaltares mit Inschrift herausstellten. Dieses Denkmal, das im obenerwähnten Museum aufbewahrt wird(J), ist, nachdem die vielen Bruchstücke mit größter Mühe und Geschicklich­ keit zusammengefügt waren (Abb. 1 und 2), schon bald von C. B. Rüger i veröffentlicht worden(2). Dabei hat dieser u.a. dargelegt, daß der Altar in der Vorgängersiedlung der Colonia Ulpia Traiana während der Regierung des Nero (54-68 n. Chr.) geweiht wurde, jedenfalls nach 55/56, vermutlich erst zwischen dem 1. März und dem 9. Juni 68. Infolge der nach seinem Tode am 9. Juni 68 über ihn ausgesprochenen damnatio memoriae hat man den Namen des Kaisers in Zeile 3 und 4 der Inschrift getilgt. Gleichzeitig mit der Zerstörung der Siedlung während des Bataveraufstandes im August oder September 69(3) ist der Altar zugrun­ de gegangen. Nach dem Aufstand sind die Überreste des Denkmals aus dem Brandschutt weggeräumt und in einer Grube beigesetzt worden. Da diese nicht vollständig ausgegraben werden konnte, befinden sich jetzt zweifellos noch Teile des Altares im Boden. Dem so weit wie möglich zusammengesetzten Weihestein fehlt u.a.
  • Were Used by the Romans and in What Contexts Frisii and Frisiavones Used Their Own Ethnic Names

    Were Used by the Romans and in What Contexts Frisii and Frisiavones Used Their Own Ethnic Names

    FRISII AND FRISIAVONES M.C. GALESTIN University of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, Groningen, the Netherlands ABSTRACT: A study was made of the literary and epigraphical evidence referring to Frisii or Frisiavones, with the aim of assessing their relations with the Romans. The similarity of their names makes it difficult to distinguish between the two tribes. It emerges that the Frisii and Frisiavones probably were not related and lived in different territories. Both groups had contacts with the Romans, who made their names part of recorded history. Both Frisii and Frisiavones served in the Roman army and received Roman citizenship afterwards. The Frisiavones made their appearance around the middle of the first century and towards the end of the first century they formed an ethnic unit which served in Britain during the 2nd and 3rd centuries. Frisii were active in the Roman army from their first encounter in 12 BC, but their name did not become linked to an ethnic unit until the 3rd century, when several Frisian units were deployed in forts along Hadrian’s Wall. The Frisiavones had become incorporated into the Roman Empire, while the Frisii remained outside. The Frisii adopted some Roman habits but largely retained their own cultural identity. Members of both groups were present in Rome, as equites singulares, where their ethnic names are found combined with Roman names in their epitaphs. Their relations with the Roman Empire also provided new identities for Frisii and Frisiavones. KEYWORDS: Frisii, Frisiavones, Roman army, Roman Empire, ethnic identity. 1. InTRODUCTION were used by the Romans and in what contexts Frisii and Frisiavones used their own ethnic names.
  • Iron, Steel and Swords Script - Page 1 Charibert I These Kids Did Not Do All That Well - They Fought Each Other Over Women

    Iron, Steel and Swords Script - Page 1 Charibert I These Kids Did Not Do All That Well - They Fought Each Other Over Women

    The Frankish Empire And Its Swords Born to Rule (or to Be Killed) The Frankish Empire (also known as Frankish Kingdom, Frankia, Frankland) was the territory inhabited and ruled by the Franks, a confederation of Germanic tribes, during Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. It starts with the Merovingians, who we know from before. Here is a very brief history of the Fankish Empire (mostly based on Wikipedia). Clovis (ca. 466 – 511) was the first King of the Franks and the founder of the Merovingian dynasty that ruled the Franks for the next two centuries. His father was Childeric I, whose sword hilt we so admire. In the 150 or so years before his coronation in 496, a confederation of various tribes like Sicambri, Saliens, Bructeri, Ampsivarii, Chamavi and Chattuarii, fought the Romans, each other, or were allies of the Romans. Nevertheless they established some "Frankish" territory in what is now France. Around 428 the Salian King Chlodio, a member of the Germanic Franks from the Merovingian clan, ruled over an increasing number of Gallo- Roman subjects on both sides of the Rhine. Advanced His name is Germanic, composed of the elements "hlod" = "fame" and "wig" = combat. The French, of course, later wrote it "Clovis" and pronounced it like "Louis", the name born by 18 kings of France. The Frankish core territory then was Austrasia (the "eastern lands"); see the map below or on a larger scale here. Chlodio was a Christian and, like his forebears, under constant attack from the heathen Saxons in the North. After his death in 511 the Kingdom was partitioned into 4 parts, ruled by his four sons: Frankish empire evolution Numbers give date of "acquisition".
  • XANTEN-VETERA Analyse Et Caractérisation Du Processus De Colonisation Et De Romanisation D’Une Région Frontière En Germanie Inférieure

    XANTEN-VETERA Analyse Et Caractérisation Du Processus De Colonisation Et De Romanisation D’Une Région Frontière En Germanie Inférieure

    XANTEN-VETERA Analyse et caractérisation du processus de colonisation et de romanisation d’une région frontière en Germanie inférieure Mémoire Luc L’Heureux Maîtrise en études anciennes Maître ès arts (M.A.) Québec, Canada © Luc L’Heureux, 2016 XANTEN-VETERA Analyse et caractérisation du processus de colonisation et de romanisation d’une région frontière en Germanie inférieure Mémoire de maîtrise Luc L’Heureux Sous la direction de : Christel Freu, directrice de recherche RÉSUMÉ Ce mémoire analyse le processus de romanisation et de colonisation de Xanten-Vetera, une région frontalière de l’Empire romain située en basse Rhénanie dans la province romaine de Germania inferior. À l’intérieur d’un cadre temporel inclus entre les conquêtes de Jules César et le milieu du second siècle apr. J.-C., l’étude cherche à comprendre et à restituer la présence militaire ainsi que le développement des peuplades civiles sur place, du fait des transferts de population et de l’immigration gallo-romaine. Le processus de romanisation est analysé en tenant compte des réalités ethnographiques, sociales et culturelles et selon les théories les plus actuelles de la recherche moderne sur ce sujet. Comme il s’agit d’une agglomération située sur une voie fluviale en périphérie de l’Empire, le concept de « frontière » y est évalué afin d’estimer si Xanten-Vetera constituait une zone de convergence ou de divergence par rapport à l’espace rhénan. Dans un deuxième temps, cette recherche analyse le contexte militaire et social durant lequel l’empereur Trajan prit la décision d’octroyer le statut de colonie à ce territoire qui devint la Colonia Ulpia Traiana.
  • Freedom, Warriors' Bond, Legal Book. the Lex Salica Between Barbarian

    Freedom, Warriors' Bond, Legal Book. the Lex Salica Between Barbarian

    1 Jean-Pierre Poly Freedom, warriors’ bond, legal book. The Lex Salica between Barbarian custom and Roman law Liberté, lien des guerriers, li re de droit. La lex salica entre coutume barbare et loi romaine !bstract" #alic Law, t$e most %amous o% t$e so-called barbarian lege, was bot$ barbarian and roman. &t was made during t$e 't$ century %or t$e Frankis$ military de(endants )dediticii* and t$eir %amilies settled in t$e Extrema Galliae, t$e Far +aul. &ts main goal was to eradicate t$e %eud system, unacce(table in t$e Roman army. &t did not succeed in t$e long run but it ga e t$e Franks t$e co$esion w$ic$ allowed t$em to con,uer +aul, t$e te-t turning ultimately into an element o% national identity down to t$e Frenc$ re olution. Résumé " La loi #ali,ue, la (lus cél.bre des lois dites barbares, était / la %ois barbare et romaine. Elle fut %aite au &1e si.cle (our les déditices Francs et leurs %amilles établis dans les Extrema Galliae, 2 les régions ultimes de la +aule 3. #on (rincipal ob4ectif était d’éradiquer le syst.me indicatoire, inacce(table dans l’armée romaine. Elle n’y réussit 5nalement (as mais elle donna aux Francs la co$ésion ,ui leur (ermit la conquête de la +aule, le te-te de enant un élément d’identité nationale 4us,u’à la Ré olution française. 8eywords" army 9 barbarians 9 custom 9 democracy 9 0uro(e’s legal $istory 9 %eud 9 Franks 9 national identities – Salic Law.
  • People, Place, and Power in Tacitus' Germany

    People, Place, and Power in Tacitus' Germany

    People, Place, and Power in Tacitus’ Germany Leen Van Broeck Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics Royal Holloway, University of London 1 Declaration of Authorship I, Leen Van Broeck, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: Date: Wednesday 20 December 2017 2 Abstract This thesis analyses Tacitus' account of Germany and the Germans through a re- reading of all passages in the Tacitean corpus set in Germany. The focus is on the nature of power exerted in spaces and by spaces. The aim is to uncover the spatial themes within Tacitus’ work and offer new perspectives on his treatment of space and power. Throughout, I see landscape as a powerful influence on those who inhabit it. That landscape can be managed and altered, but is resistant to imperial power. Chapter one discusses the limits of violent Roman repression in overcoming the landscapes and people of Germany during the Batavian revolt. Chapter two demonstrates that the revolt’s ultimate demise can be located in Rome’s undermining of the unity of purpose and identity of the alliance created by Civilis. Chapter three traces lexical and thematic similarities in the discourses of Roman mutineers on the Rhine in AD14 and the German rebels of AD69-70, suggesting Tacitus – through repetition – sees imperial power as inevitably producing certain forms of resistance that are replicated in a variety of instances and circumstances, whatever the identities involved. Chapter four evaluates Germanicus’ campaigns in Germany as assertions of power and identity through extreme violence.
  • TFA Observances

    TFA Observances

    Notes on Holy Tides: Fîron: The -Fîron (to celebrate) in TFA is recognized as a celebration taking place in the household. It is a time for wirdskap (worship meal), where the divine is invited into the home to take part in the holy meal. The meal may be comprised of specific offerings. Under the dark new moon, celebrations are closer to the hearth - the divine come nearest to the world of man even into the home. Naht: The -Naht (night) in TFA is the tide held on the moon before the full. Celebrations held within the home and nearest the hearth move onto the land of the Hêm. Worshipers may offer at the home-tree or some other natural feature of the land. The divine ride above along their celestial course. Fol: The -Fol (full) in TFA is the most liminal tide, straddling the divide between the waxing and waning moon. The method and area of worship will be a combination of indoor and outdoor activities within and without. This tide is when the worlds of men and gods are bought together in many ways. Drinking, recalling to mind, making merry and being boisterous is the natural tone for sacred affairs. Tîd (or Thing): The -Tîd (or -Thing) in TFA is a full tide lasting from the after-full moon until the following new moon. Whereas the pre-Fol month is waxing and spirits are rising until the pinnacle of the Fol, the second half is the waning where the divine are sought out in places beyond the Hêm and into the Civitas.