Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Vol. XXVII, pp. 215-220 October 31, 1914 PROCEEDINGS OF THE BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON CIENERAT. NOTES. THE SYSTEMATIC NAME OF THE BRAZIIAAN CRAB-EATING RACCOON. The name Procyon cancrivorus hrasiliensis Von Ihering (Revista do ]Musen Panlista, Vol. S, p. 228, 1911) applied to the crab-eating raccoon of Brazil, is antedated by P[rocyon] nignpes Mivart (Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1885, p. .847). The latter name has been generally overlooked. It is based on the black-footed crab-eating raccoon of Sclater (Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1875, p. 421) from “Brazil down to Paraguay.It is clear from Von Ihering’s account that his name refers to the same sub¬ species, which should, therefore, be known as Procyon cancrivorus nigripes Mivart. —A"- Hollister. THE GENERIC NAME OF THE COLLARED PECCARIES. \Vhen selecting* the species labiatus as type of the genus Dicotyles I overlooked the fact that the species torquatus had already been formally chosen.T On account of this earlier selection the collared peccaries must take the generic name Dicotyles Cuvier, 1817, with Pecari Reichenbach, 1885, as a synonym. The name Tayassu Fischer, 1814, with Notophorus Fischer, 1817, and Olidosus Merriam, 1901, as synonyms, will remain in use for the white-lipped group. —Gerrit S. Miller, Jr. THE TECHNICAL NAAIES OF THE COMMON SKUNK AND MINK OF THE EASTERN STATES. The name Viverra nigra Peale and Beauvois, 1796 (Scientific and De¬ scriptive Catalogue of Peale’s Museum, p. 87), type locality Maryland, antedates Mephitis putida Boitard, 1842, for the common skunk of the eastern United States. In a like manner Mustela mink Peale and Beau¬ vois (1. c., p. 89), type locality Maryland, has precedence over Mustela lutreocephala Harlan, 1825, for the common mink of the middle and eastern States. These two formst should be called Mephitis nigra and Mustela vison mink. _ _ N. Hollister. * List of North American Land iVIainmals in the United States National Mnsenin, 1911, p. 384. December 31, 1912. + Palmer, Index fieri. Mamm., p. 930. January 23,1904. tSee Howelh.North Amer. Fauna, No. 20, p. 2,i, 1901; and Hollister. Proc. U. 8. Nat. Mus., Vol. 44, p. 473, 1913. 43—Proc. Biol. Soc. W.vsh., Vol. XXVII, 1914. (215) .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Neofelis Diardi, Sunda Clouded Leopard
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T136603A50664601 Neofelis diardi, Sunda Clouded Leopard Assessment by: Hearn, A., Ross, J., Brodie, J., Cheyne, S., Haidir, I.A., Loken, B., Mathai, J., Wilting, A. & McCarthy, J. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Hearn, A., Ross, J., Brodie, J., Cheyne, S., Haidir, I.A., Loken, B., Mathai, J., Wilting, A. & McCarthy, J. 2015. Neofelis diardi. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T136603A50664601. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T136603A50664601.en Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Taxonomy Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Mammalia Carnivora Felidae Taxon Name: Neofelis diardi (G.
[Show full text]
The 2008 IUCN Red Listings of the World's Small Carnivores
The 2008 IUCN red listings of the world’s small carnivores Jan SCHIPPER¹*, Michael HOFFMANN¹, J. W. DUCKWORTH² and James CONROY³ Abstract The global conservation status of all the world’s mammals was assessed for the 2008 IUCN Red List. Of the 165 species of small carni- vores recognised during the process, two are Extinct (EX), one is Critically Endangered (CR), ten are Endangered (EN), 22 Vulnerable (VU), ten Near Threatened (NT), 15 Data Deficient (DD) and 105 Least Concern. Thus, 22% of the species for which a category was assigned other than DD were assessed as threatened (i.e. CR, EN or VU), as against 25% for mammals as a whole. Among otters, seven (58%) of the 12 species for which a category was assigned were identified as threatened. This reflects their attachment to rivers and other waterbodies, and heavy trade-driven hunting. The IUCN Red List species accounts are living documents to be updated annually, and further information to refine listings is welcome. Keywords: conservation status, Critically Endangered, Data Deficient, Endangered, Extinct, global threat listing, Least Concern, Near Threatened, Vulnerable Introduction dae (skunks and stink-badgers; 12), Mustelidae (weasels, martens, otters, badgers and allies; 59), Nandiniidae (African Palm-civet The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most authorita- Nandinia binotata; one), Prionodontidae ([Asian] linsangs; two), tive resource currently available on the conservation status of the Procyonidae (raccoons, coatis and allies; 14), and Viverridae (civ- world’s biodiversity. In recent years, the overall number of spe- ets, including oyans [= ‘African linsangs’]; 33). The data reported cies included on the IUCN Red List has grown rapidly, largely as on herein are freely and publicly available via the 2008 IUCN Red a result of ongoing global assessment initiatives that have helped List website (www.iucnredlist.org/mammals).
[Show full text]
Carnivore Hotspots in Peninsular Malaysia and Their Landscape
1 Carnivore hotspots in Peninsular Malaysia and their 2 landscape attributes 3 Shyamala Ratnayeke1*¶, Frank T. van Manen2¶, Gopalasamy Reuben Clements1&, Noor Azleen 4 Mohd Kulaimi3&, Stuart P. Sharp4& 5 1Department of Biological Sciences, Sunway University, Malaysia 6 7 2U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team, Bozeman, 8 MT 59715, USA 9 10 3Ex-Situ Conservation Division, Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Malaysia 11 12 4Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK 13 14 15 16 *Corresponding author 17 Email: [email protected] 18 19 ¶SR and FTVM are joint senior authors 20 &These authors also contributed equally to this work 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Disclaimer: This draft manuscript is distributed solely for purposes of scientific peer review. Its content is 34 deliberative and pre-decisional, so it must not be disclosed or released by reviewers. Because the 35 manuscript has not yet been approved for publication by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), it does not 36 represent any official USGS finding or policy. 37 Abstract 38 Mammalian carnivores play a vital role in ecosystem functioning. However, they are prone to 39 extinction because of low population densities and growth rates, large area requirements, and 40 high levels of persecution or exploitation. In tropical biodiversity hotspots such as Peninsular 41 Malaysia, rapid conversion of natural habitats threatens the persistence of this vulnerable 42 group of animals. Here, we carried out the first comprehensive literature review on 31 43 carnivore species reported to occur in Peninsular Malaysia and updated their probable 44 distribution.
[Show full text]
Density and Carrying Capacity in the Forgotten Tigerland: Tigers in the Understudied 21 22 Nepalese Churia
Integrative Zoology 2017; 12: 211–227 doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12240 1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 Density and carrying capacity in the forgotten tigerland: Tigers 6 7 7 8 8 9 in the understudied Nepalese Churia 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 Kanchan THAPA1,2 and Marcella J. KELLY1 13 14 14 1 2 15 Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA and Conservation Science Unit, WWF 15 16 Nepal, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 Abstract 21 22 While there are numerous wildlife ecology studies in lowland areas of Nepal, there are no in-depth studies of 22 23 the hilly Churia habitat even though it comprises 7642 km2 of potential wildlife habitat across the Terai Arc. We 23 24 investigated tiger, leopard and prey densities across this understudied habitat. Our camera trapping survey cov- 24 25 ered 536 km2 of Churia and surrounding areas within Chitwan National Park (CNP). We used 161 trapping lo- 25 26 cations and accumulated 2097 trap-nights in a 60-day survey period during the winter season of 2010–2011. In 26 27 addition, we walked 136 km over 81 different line transects using distance sampling to estimate prey density. 27 28 We photographed 31 individual tigers, 28 individual leopards and 25 other mammalian species. Spatial capture– 28 29 recapture methods resulted in lower density estimates for tigers, ranging from 2.3 to 2.9 tigers per 100 km2, than 29 30 for leopards, which ranged from 3.3 to 5.1 leopards per 100 km2.
[Show full text]
Federal Trade Commission § 301.0
Federal Trade Commission § 301.0 NAME GUIDE § 301.0 Fur products name guide. NAME GUIDE Name Order Family Genus-species Alpaca ...................................... Ungulata ................ Camelidae ............. Lama pacos. Antelope ................................... ......do .................... Bovidae ................. Hippotragus niger and Antilope cervicapra. Badger ..................................... Carnivora ............... Mustelidae ............. Taxida sp. and Meles sp. Bassarisk ................................. ......do .................... Procyonidae .......... Bassariscus astutus. Bear ......................................... ......do .................... Ursidae .................. Ursus sp. Bear, Polar ............................... ......do .................... ......do .................... Thalarctos sp. Beaver ..................................... Rodentia ................ Castoridae ............. Castor canadensis. Burunduk ................................. ......do .................... Sciuridae ............... Eutamias asiaticus. Calf .......................................... Ungulata ................ Bovidae ................. Bos taurus. Cat, Caracal ............................. Carnivora ............... Felidae .................. Caracal caracal. Cat, Domestic .......................... ......do .................... ......do .................... Felis catus. Cat, Lynx ................................. ......do .................... ......do .................... Lynx refus. Cat, Manul ..............................
[Show full text]
Viverra Tangalunga, Malay Civet
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T41708A45220284 Viverra tangalunga, Malay Civet Assessment by: Duckworth, J.W., Mathai, J., Wilting, A., Holden, J., Hearn, A. & Ross, J. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Duckworth, J.W., Mathai, J., Wilting, A., Holden, J., Hearn, A. & Ross, J. 2016. Viverra tangalunga. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T41708A45220284. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T41708A45220284.en Copyright: © 2016 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Taxonomy Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Mammalia Carnivora Viverridae Taxon Name: Viverra tangalunga Gray, 1832 Common Name(s): • English: Malay Civet, Malayan Civet, Oriental Civet Taxonomic Notes: Veron et al.
[Show full text]
Dramatic Decline of Wild South China Tigers Panthera Tigris Amoyensis: Field Survey of Priority Tiger Reserves
Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2004 Dramatic decline of wild South China tigers Panthera tigris amoyensis: field survey of priority tiger reserves Ronald Tilson Hu Defu Jeff Muntifering Philip J. Nyhus Colby College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the International and Area Studies Commons Recommended Citation Tilson, Ronald; Defu, Hu; Muntifering, Jeff; and Nyhus, Philip J., "Dramatic decline of wild South China tigers Panthera tigris amoyensis: field survey of priority tiger reserves" (2004). Faculty Scholarship. 10. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/faculty_scholarship/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. Oryx Vol 38 No 1 January 2004 Dramatic decline of wild South China tigers Panthera tigris amoyensis: field survey of priority tiger reserves Ronald Tilson, Hu Defu, Jeff Muntifering and Philip J. Nyhus Abstract This paper describes results of a Sino- tree farms and other habitat conversion is common, and American field survey seeking evidence of South China people and their livestock dominate these fragments. While tigers Panthera tigris amoyensis in the wild. In 2001 and our survey may not have been exhaustive, and there may 2002 field surveys were conducted in eight reserves in be a single tiger or a few isolated tigers still remaining at five provinces identified by government authorities as sites we missed, our results strongly indicate that no habitat most likely to contain tigers.
[Show full text]
Collaborators
An investigation into the taxonomy of the Malabar Civet, Viverra civettina. R. Nandini, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore, India 560012. [email protected] •The Malabar Civet, Viverra civettina, is one of two species of small carnivores Collaborators worldwide that is listed as Critically Endangered by the IUCN Red List, and is Dr Uma Ramakrishnan described as endemic to the lowland evergreen forests of the Western Ghats. National Centre for Biological Sciences •However, this species has never been sighted with certainty in the wild and Dr Divya Mudappa knowledge of its ecology comes from two reports both over 60 years old. Nature Conservation Foundation •6 skins of the species are deposited in various museums, and have all traded Dr Carlos Fernandes hands before reaching their current destinations, with their primary origins being Lisbon University, Portugal unknown. At least 4 are thought to have been of individuals from captivity, and 2 Dr C Radhakrishnan & Dr JK De were obtained from hunters within Kerala. Zoological Survey of India (Nandini and Mudappa •A recent review The Malabar Civet (top) has been the 2010) summarised the diagnostic subject of numerous field surveys since the characteristics of the Malabar Civet and 1980s. This flyer (left) was produced by NG George, Calicut University, as part of one of provided a critical account of the persisting the earliest field surveys for the species. uncertainties in the taxonomy and ecology of the species, current conservation status, and potential threats. Progress •If the Malabar Civet is indeed a valid species it is important to determine its closest Molecular Analysis relatives and its evolutionary origins before •A combination of skins and skulls of five of the Malabar Civet samples have conservation plans can be drawn up.
[Show full text]
Two Endemic Viverrids of the Western Ghats, India
Two endemic viverrids of the Western Ghats, India N. V. K. Ashraf, A. Kumar and A. J. T. Johnsingh The Malabar and brown palm civets, Viverra civettina and Paradoxurus jerdoni, are both endemic to the Western Ghats of south-west India. Little is known about them and in 1990 a survey was conducted in three parts of the Western Ghats to assess their status. This revealed that isolated populations of Malabar civet still survive in less disturbed areas of South Malabar but they are seriously threatened by habitat destruction and hunting because they are outside protected areas. The brown palm civet is not immediately threatened because there are about 25 protected areas within its distribution range. Recommendations have been made for conservation action to ensure the survival of these animals. Introduction Mountains, Madurai, Tamil Nadu. In the last 40 years, there have been only two possible Two of the seven species of civets in India, the sightings, one in Kudremukh in Karnataka Malabar civet Viverra civettina and the brown (Karanth, 1986) and the other in Tiruvella in palm civet Paradoxurus jerdoni, are endemic, Kerala (Kurup, 1989). Listed as 'possibly ex- being confined to the Western Ghats of south- tinct' in the IUCN Mammal Red Data Book of west India (Figure 1). These are the only two 1978 (Thornback, 1978), the species was redis- Indian viverrids described as priority species covered in Elayur, a locality in the lowland for conservation by the Mustelid and Viverrid Western Ghats, in Malappuram district, Specialist Group (M&VSG) of the IUCN/SSC Kerala (Kurup, 1989).
[Show full text]
Table S1. Brain Volume Endocranial Volume in Milliliters and Body Mass Adult Sex-Averaged Mass in Kilograms Data for Carnivora F
Table S1. Brain volume endocranial volume in milliliters and body mass adult sex-averaged mass in kilograms data for Carnivora Family Genus Species Status Body Source Brain volume Refs. New taxa or Proxy mass data in this study Caniformia* Ailuridae Ailurus fulgens Extant 4.90 16 40.85 17 Bead Amphicyonidae Amphicyon ingens Fossil 311.82 18 257.94 12 Skull Amphicyonidae Amphicyon galushai Fossil 258.48 19 253.42 12 Skull Amphicyonidae Amphicyon longiramus Fossil 162.69 19 270.30 New taxon Skull Amphicyonidae Cynelos rugosidens Fossil 24.64 20 115.00 13 Endo Amphicyonidae Ischyrocyon gidleyi Fossil 500.37 19 311.41 12 Skull Amphicyonidae Pliocyon medius Fossil 181.20 21 222.22 12, 22 Endo, Skull Amphicyonidae "Miacis" cognitus Fossil 2.65 22, 23 11.98 New taxon Skull Amphicyonidae Pseudocyonopsis ambiguus Fossil 65.03 24 68.00 22, 25 Endo Amphicyonidae Adilophontes brachykolos Fossil 167.08 26 95.33 12 Skull Amphicyonidae Daphoenodon superbus Fossil 88.47 19 133.00 13 Endo Amphicyonidae Daphoenus vetus Fossil 15.42 19 63.38 12, 25 Endo, Skull Amphicyonidae Daphoenus hartshornianus Fossil 9.35 19 49.64 12, 25 New data Endo, Skull Amphicyonidae Paradaphoenus cuspigerus Fossil 2.84 19 21.52 12 Skull Canidae Aelurodon taxoides Fossil 42.98 27 148.65 12 Skull Canidae Aelurodon ferox Fossil 35.75 27 134.40 3, 12 Skull Canidae Aelurodon asthenostylus Fossil 27.01 27 92.31 3 Skull Canidae Aelurodon mcgrewi Fossil 28.10 27 62.59 12 Skull Canidae Borophagus littoralis Fossil 32.04 27 127.02 12 Skull Canidae Borophagus secundus Fossil 34.77 27 119.17
[Show full text]
Notes on the Distribution of Large Indian Civet Viverra Zibetha in Nepal
Notes on the distribution of Large Indian Civet Viverra zibetha in Nepal Yadav GHIMIREY* and Raju ACHARYA Abstract The distribution range of Large Indian Civet Viverra zibetha locality records presented here, and records from neighbouring India, suggest that it occurs widely across Nepal. Some pub- in Nepal is treated inconsistently in various sources. Verified point Keywordslished localities: citizen require science, verification. documentation, Kathmandu valley, locality, photograph नेपालमा ठु लो ननरबिरालोको भौगोललक वितारिारे टिꥍपणी सारा車श ठु लो निरबिरालो कहा更देखि कहा更स륍म पाइꅍछ भꅍिे कु रा भभꅍि श्रोतह셁का अिुसार भभꅍि हुिे गरेको पाइꅍछ | िेपाल तथा भारतमा भेटिएका प्रमाखित त镍यह셁का आधारमा यो प्रजानत िेपालभरी िै पाइिे देखिꅍछ | यस लेिमा हामीले १९९० पनछ िेपालमा पाइएका रेक셍डह셁 प्रतुत गरेका छ㄂ | यसको अवथा अझै पनि सामाꅍय रहेको तर मानिसस更ग हुिे 饍वꅍदका कारि मानिसले यसलाई मािे गरेको पाइꅍछ | Introduction central and south India, in most of which it does not occur). Large Indian Civet Viverra zibetha is native to South and South- This paper presents some locality records of the species in Ne- east Asia (Corbet & Hill 1992). There is considerable incon- - The IUCN Red List of Threatened Methodspal, in the context of this uncertainty. Speciessistency maps in the it definition west only of tothe central western Nepal extent (84°30 of its ′globalE) (Duck dis- worthtribution et range.al.
[Show full text]
Documenting the Demise of Tiger and Leopard, and the Status of Other Carnivores and Prey, in Lao PDR's Most Prized Protected Area: Nam Et - Phou Louey
Global Ecology and Conservation 20 (2019) e00766 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Global Ecology and Conservation journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/gecco Original Research Article Documenting the demise of tiger and leopard, and the status of other carnivores and prey, in Lao PDR's most prized protected area: Nam Et - Phou Louey * Akchousanh Rasphone a, , Marc Kery b, Jan F. Kamler a, David W. Macdonald a a Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, OX13 5QL, UK b Swiss Ornithological Institute, Seerose 1, CH-6204, Sempach, Switzerland article info abstract Article history: The Nam Et - Phou Louey National Protected Area (NEPL) is known for its diverse com- Received 15 April 2019 munity of carnivores, and a decade ago was identiﬁed as an important source site for tiger Received in revised form 24 August 2019 conservation in Southeast Asia. However, there are reasons for concern that the status of Accepted 24 August 2019 this high priority diverse community has deteriorated, making the need for updated in- formation urgent. This study assesses the current diversity of mammals and birds in NEPL, Keywords: based on camera trap surveys from 2013 to 2017, facilitating an assessment of protected Clouded leopard area management to date. We implemented a dynamic multispecies occupancy model ﬁt Dhole Dynamic multispecies occupancy model in a Bayesian framework to reveal community and species occupancy and diversity. We Laos detected 43 different mammal and bird species, but failed to detect leopard Panthera Nam Et - Phou Louey National Protected pardus and only detected two individual tigers Panthera tigris, both in 2013, suggesting that Area both large felids are now extirpated from NEPL, and presumably also more widely Tiger throughout Lao PDR.
[Show full text]