Developing the Modern Scene Design Process: Cognition and the New Stagecraft

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Developing the Modern Scene Design Process: Cognition and the New Stagecraft DEVELOPING THE MODERN SCENE DESIGN PROCESS: COGNITION AND THE NEW STAGECRAFT by David Bisaha BA, The College of William and Mary, 2007 MA, University of Pittsburgh, 2010 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2015 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by David Bisaha It was defended on April 8, 2015 and approved by Christopher Drew Armstrong, Associate Professor, History of Art and Architecture Michelle Granshaw, Assistant Professor, Theatre Arts Lisa Jackson-Schebetta, Assistant Professor, Theatre Arts Dissertation Advisor: Bruce McConachie, Professor, Theatre Arts ii Copyright © by David Bisaha 2015 iii DEVELOPING THE MODERN SCENE DESIGN PROCESS: COGNITION AND THE NEW STAGECRAFT David Bisaha, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2015 This dissertation examines the working processes and professional activities of American scenic designers between 1910 and 1950. Beginning with the assertion that a common idea of design process has persisted among American professionals for much of the century, my case studies probe the history of “the process.” Previous historians have noted that the modern scene design process was heavily informed by the New Stagecraft movement and promulgated its aesthetic values: simplicity, unification, collaboration. Inspired by European modernist production, especially the work of Edward Gordon Craig, Adolph Appia, and Max Reinhardt, New Stagecraft artists produced simplified or abstract settings, unified design concepts, and introduced a more collaborative production model. This dissertation argues that the New Stagecraft revolution was not only an aesthetic shift, but also the beginning of theatrical design as a profession. I do so by analyzing ways in which New Stagecraft designers defined and defended their professional status. They developed new tools for script analysis and documenting their work, published books and articles demonstrating the value of good design, and strategically allied themselves with organized labor and major universities. They also institutionalized their practices in labor regulations, entrance exams, and educational curricula. The perceived stasis of the design process can be attributed to the preservation of specific design behaviors in these institutions. Methodologically I draw on studies of designing based in the cognitive and design sciences. Archived remnants of past designers are analyzed through iv principles of situated and extended cognition, such as offloading, affordances, and artifact use. I then develop my conclusions through concepts of professional expertise, including reflective practice and practicum education, and finally link individual practices to social change by applying the history of professionalization as it has been developed by sociologists. In total this dissertation charts a method for applying cognitive studies research to theatrical design history, and a way of linking private creative practices to larger changes in theatrical production methods. By studying the behavior of influential scenic designers, both in the studio and in their professional networks, I show how strategically placed individuals’ processes came to define the field. v TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................... X 1.0 INTRODUCTION: DESIGN, COGNITION, AND THE NEW STAGECRAFT . 1 1.1 WHAT IS DESIGN?............................................................................................ 3 1.2 THEORETICAL CONTEXTS........................................................................... 6 1.3 RELATED WORK IN THEATRE STUDIES ................................................ 11 1.4 DESIGN OF THE DISSERTATION ............................................................... 15 1.5 CHAPTER SUMMARIES ................................................................................ 20 2.0 FINDING AND DEFINING DESIGN PROCESS .................................................. 24 2.1 A SNAPSHOT OF MIDCENTURY PROCESSES ........................................ 28 2.2 PHASES OF THE DESIGN PROCESS .......................................................... 32 2.2.1 Analysis and Problem-Structuring .............................................................. 37 2.2.2 Idea Generation and Abduction ................................................................... 39 2.2.3 Refinement, Specification, and the Cognitive Artifact ............................... 40 2.3 A CASE STUDY IN ROUGH DRAFTS: HENRY HEYMANN ................... 43 2.3.1 Analysis and Problem-Structuring .............................................................. 46 2.3.2 Idea Generation and Conversation with the Sketch .................................. 50 2.3.3 Artifacts in Problem Solving ........................................................................ 60 2.4 JO MIELZINER’S DEATH OF A SALESMAN DESIGN PROCESS ......... 66 vi 2.4.1 Overview of Salesman Design Phases .......................................................... 68 2.4.2 Mielziner’s Spatial Analytics ........................................................................ 72 2.4.3 Mielziner’s Use of Sketches and Models...................................................... 75 2.4.4 Collaborative Artifact Use ............................................................................ 78 2.5 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................. 83 3.0 FROM MODEL BOXES TO RENDERINGS: ROBERT EDMOND JONES’ DEVELOPMENT OF EUROPEAN RENDERING TECHNIQUES .................................... 85 3.1 DESIGN AS MODEL BUILDING BEFORE 1912 ........................................ 91 3.1.1 Model-Box Processes ..................................................................................... 95 3.1.2 “Belasco Realism”........................................................................................ 100 3.2 NEW STAGECRAFT TECHNIQUES .......................................................... 105 3.2.1 Design Techniques of Robert Edmond Jones ........................................... 112 3.3 RENDERING AS EUROPEAN TECHNIQUE ............................................ 122 3.3.1 Ernst Stern and Max Reinhardt................................................................. 123 3.3.2 Other European Influences on Rendering ................................................ 135 3.4 JONES RETURNS, JONES DRAWS............................................................ 138 3.5 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................ 144 4.0 DESIGN PROFESSIONALISM, UNIONISM, AND CLASS TENSIONS ........ 146 4.1 UNIONISM AND THE PROFESSION ......................................................... 151 4.2 DESIGNERS IN THE UNION: NEGOTIATING INDEPENDENCE....... 156 4.2.1 The Economics of Theatre Design after World War I ............................. 157 4.2.2 USA Local 829 “Goes After” the Designers .............................................. 161 4.2.3 Standard Contracts and the Rise of the ‘Independent’ Freelancer ........ 165 vii 4.2.4 Depression-Era Protectionism and Class Tensions .................................. 172 4.3 DESIGNERS OUTSIDE THE UNION: PROMOTING DESIGN PROFESSIONALISM ..................................................................................................... 182 4.3.1 Lee Simonson’s Authorial Interventions ................................................... 187 4.3.2 Publishing Theatrical Design Labor after Simonson ............................... 196 4.3.3 Design Professionalism Diversifies ............................................................. 199 4.4 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................ 202 5.0 FASHIONING THE “WORKING MODEL:” DESIGN PROCESS PEDAGOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY............................................................................................................. 206 5.1 DESIGN THEORIES AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES .................... 210 5.2 GEORGE PIERCE BAKER’S WORKSHOP AS PRACTICUM .............. 219 5.3 OENSLAGER’S CURRICULUM AS STUDIO EDUCATION.................. 226 5.4 DONALD OENSLAGER’S NEW STAGECRAFT PHILOSOPHY .......... 239 5.5 YALE’S COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE .................................................... 243 5.6 A CONTRASTING MODEL OF DESIGN EDUCATION: CARNEGIE TECH.................................................................................................................................249 5.7 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................ 255 6.0 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................... 258 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................... 265 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Balyasnikov Concept Sketch #1 .................................................................................... 52 Figure 2. Balyasnikov Concept Sketch #2 .................................................................................... 53 Figure 3. Balyasnikov Concept Sketch #3 .................................................................................... 54 Figure 4. Balyasnikov Ground Plan
Recommended publications
  • Stagehand Course Curriculum
    Alaska Center for the Performing Arts Stagehand Training Effective July 1, 2010 1 Table of Contents Grip 3 Lead Audio 4 Audio 6 Audio Boards Operator 7 Lead Carpenter 9 Carpenter 11 Lead Fly person 13 Fly person 15 Lead Rigger 16 Rigger 18 Lead Electrician 19 Electrician 21 Follow Spot operator 23 Light Console Programmer and Operator 24 Lead Prop Person 26 Prop Person 28 Lead Wardrobe 30 Wardrobe 32 Dresser 34 Wig and Makeup Person 36 Alaska Center for the Performing Arts 2 Alaska Center for the Performing Arts Stagecraft Class (Grip) Outline A: Theatrical Terminology 1) Stage Directions 2) Common theatrical descriptions 3) Common theatrical terms B: Safety Course 1) Definition of Safety 2) MSDS sheets description and review 3) Proper lifting techniques C: Instruction of the standard operational methods and chain of responsibility 1) Review the standard operational methods 2) Review chain of responsibility 3) Review the chain of command 4) ACPA storage of equipment D: Basic safe operations of hand and power tools E: Ladder usage 1) How to set up a ladder 2) Ladder safety Stagecraft Class Exam (Grip) Written exam 1) Stage directions 2) Common theatrical terminology 3) Chain of responsibility 4) Chain of command Practical exam 1) Demonstration of proper lifting techniques 2) Demonstration of basic safe operations of hand and power tools 3) Demonstration of proper ladder usage 3 Alaska Center for the Performing Arts Lead Audio Technician Class Outline A: ACPA patching system Atwood, Discovery, and Sydney 1) Knowledge of patch system 2) Training on patch bays and input signal routing schemes for each theater 3) Patch system options and risk 4) Signal to Voth 5) Do’s and Don’ts B: ACPA audio equipment knowledge and mastery 1) Audio system power activation 2) Installation and operation of a mixing consoles 3) Operation of the FOH PA system 4) Operation of the backstage audio monitors 5) Operation of Center auxiliary audio systems a.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Essay in Theatre
    Extended Essay in Theatre Japanese Noh and the Stanislavski method meet Shakespeare How do Eastern and Western theatrical approaches, Japanese Noh and the Stanislavski method, make an audience see the same play differently? Word Count: 3623 Table of Contents I. Introduction……………………………………………………….…………1 II. Main Body A. Part 1. Similarities and differences in the Stanislavski method and Japanese Noh….....................................................................................4 B. Part 2. Effects of the Stanislavski method and Japanese Noh and the conveyance of its themes and ideas…………….........................….....8 III. Conclusion……………………………………………………...………......16 IV. Works Cited………………………………………………………...…........18 Introduction As Amy Cook saliently states in her essay titled, ‘Staging Nothing: ‘Hamlet’ and Cognitive Science’, “in Hamlet, few things are as powerful as nothing. ... The presence of nothing in the text calls attention to what nothing is supposed to stand for” (83). Indeed, the idea of nothing pertains to existential crisis and nihilism: the former is defined as a state of panic or feeling of intense psychological discomfort about questions of existence (Existential-Crisis) and the latter is defined as a viewpoint that traditional values and beliefs are unfounded and that existence is senseless and useless (Nihilism). Shakespeare’s Hamlet explores the psychological processes which Hamlet experiences throughout the play alongside the concept of nothing. In referring to the presence of nothing as “powerful” in her essay, Cook identifies that the existence of nothing asks the audience to imagine and contemplate what their motive and point of life are. The audience is allowed to acknowledge the artistic intention through witnessing the development of Hamlet’s mental state. The tragedy of Hamlet displays Hamlet’s psychological state, which entails Hamlet’s languishment along with existential crisis and nihilism.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Function of Theoretical Theatre Ideas, Given the Content Presented in Modern Theatre?
    Coastal Carolina University CCU Digital Commons Honors College and Center for Interdisciplinary Honors Theses Studies Spring 5-10-2020 What is the function of theoretical theatre ideas, given the content presented in Modern Theatre? James Carson Jester Coastal Carolina University, [email protected] Robert Earnest [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/honors-theses Part of the Dramatic Literature, Criticism and Theory Commons Recommended Citation Jester, James Carson and Earnest, Robert, "What is the function of theoretical theatre ideas, given the content presented in Modern Theatre?" (2020). Honors Theses. 326. https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/honors-theses/326 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College and Center for Interdisciplinary Studies at CCU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of CCU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. What is the function of theoretical theatre ideas, given the content presented in Modern Theatre? By James Jester Theatre Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In the HTC Honors College at Coastal Carolina University Spring 2019 Louis E. Keiner Dr. Steve Earnest Director of Honors [Title] HTC Honors College [Theatre] [Edwards] i. ABSTRACT In this work, I will look at the implications and history of theatre theory, then lay the ground work for what works will be used in this examination. Then, I look at the definition of form and content in theatrical terms and introduce the issue of this work, what is the function of Theoretical Theatre ideas, given the content presented in modern theatre? Then, I will talk about the work of Aristotle, giving brief biographical information and some of his theory on creating theatrical work, citing his work known as The Poetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Document
    Copyright By Christin Essin Yannacci 2006 The Dissertation Committee for Christin Essin Yannacci certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Landscapes of American Modernity: A Cultural History of Theatrical Design, 1912-1951 Committee: _______________________________ Charlotte Canning, Supervisor _______________________________ Jill Dolan _______________________________ Stacy Wolf _______________________________ Linda Henderson _______________________________ Arnold Aronson Landscapes of American Modernity: A Cultural History of Theatrical Design, 1912-1951 by Christin Essin Yannacci, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December, 2006 Acknowledgements There are many individuals to whom I am grateful for navigating me through the processes of this dissertation, from the start of my graduate course work to the various stages of research, writing, and editing. First, I would like to acknowledge the support of my committee members. I appreciate Dr. Arnold Aronson’s advice on conference papers exploring my early research; his theoretically engaged scholarship on scenography also provided inspiration for this project. Dr. Linda Henderson took an early interest in my research, helping me uncover the interdisciplinary connections between theatre and art history. Dr. Jill Dolan and Dr. Stacy Wolf provided exceptional mentorship throughout my course work, stimulating my interest in the theoretical and historical complexities of performance scholarship; I have also appreciated their insights and generous feedback on beginning research drafts. Finally, I have been most fortunate to work with my supervisor Dr. Charlotte Canning. From seminar papers to the final drafts of this project, her patience, humor, honesty, and overall excellence as an editor has pushed me to explore the cultural implications of my research and produce better scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Resume Examples
    RÉSUMÉ TEMPLATES The following examples are provided to help you create your first résumé. There are six templates: 1) actor 2) designer/technician 3) stage manager 4) director 5) playwright 6) first-time résumé for someone just out of high school, combined with a general theatre résumé covering multiple areas of experience Length: An actor’s résumé should be a single page in length. When attached to a headshot, it should be trimmed to 8” x 10”. Résumés for other areas do not need to be limited to one page. There are many possible variations in style and format, and each template has a slightly different approach. Look over all of the samples for formatting ideas, even those that do not apply to your specific area of interest. You are also encouraged to contact faculty for advice and feedback on your drafts. Please note, résumés for graduate schools in theatre, professional theatres, and theatre internships are different from your typical business résumés. The sample résumés provided by the Center for Community Engagement and Career Education <http://www.csub.edu/cece/students/who_method.shtml> are useful if you are applying for a position outside of theatre, but their formats should not be used for jobs or graduate school applications within the theatre field. ACTOR TEMPLATE DAVID DRAMA [email protected] Height: 5’ 11” (661) 123-5678 Hair: Brown Tenor Theatre Death of a Salesman Biff Anita DuPratt Bakersfield Community Theatre Lend Me a Tenor Max Zoe Saba CSU Bakersfield Antigone in New York Sasha * Maria-Tania Becerra CSUB Evita Magaldi Mandy Rees CSUB Richard III Hastings Peter Brook Empty Space “Wiley and the Hairy Man” Wiley Kamala Kruszka CSUB and on tour “Unwrapped” (premiere) John Jessica Boles CSUB * Kennedy Center American College Theater Festival Irene Ryan Acting Scholarship nominee Education/Training B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Electrician
    MASTER ELECTRICIAN Position Description Position Title: Circle Theatre Master Electrician Reports To: Technical Director and Lighting Designer Compensation: $500.00 per show stipend - paid at end of run Total Hours: Varies by needs of show Work Dates: Cabaret, July 5-Aug 1; Noises Off! Aug 2-29; Hair, Aug 30 – Sept 26. *Dates include the performance runs, which MEs are not required to attend but will need to be available to come in for repairs if needed during the run of the show. General Purpose Responsible for reading lighting designers plans and implementing the hanging of instruments; work with the Lighting Designer during focus and tech week. Up to 3 positions to fill (or one person for all three shows). 1 load-in/focus/strike period per production, $500 stipend per production. Minimum Job Requirements Education / Experience • Experience with theatrical stage lighting (conventional and LED), and with standard lighting conversion (i.e. desk lamps conversion to stage pin) Experience • Photography, graphic design, communications LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMER The above internship description is meant to describe the general nature and level of work being performed; it is not intended to be construed as an exhaustive list of all responsibilities, duties and skills required for the position. All job requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Some requirements may exclude individuals who pose a direct threat or significant risk to the health and safety of themselves or other employees. This job description in no way states or implies that these are the only duties to be performed by the employee occupying this position.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee William‟S Contribution to American Drama
    © January 2019 | IJIRT | Volume 5 Issue 8 | ISSN: 2349-6002 Tennessee William‟s Contribution to American Drama Mrs.M.Kokila1, T.Akhila2 1M.A., M.Phil, Assistant Professor, Nadar Saraswathi College of Arts and Science, Theni 2M.A., English, Nadar Saraswathi College of Arts and Science, Theni Abstract- Tennesse Williams is a dramatist of lost souls. seen in the work of Europeans such as John Osborne, His milieu is the south, a tense and unreconstructed Harold Pinter and Jean Genet as well as in that of locale typical only of an environment we all inhabit. In Americans such Williams Inge, paddy Chayefsky and the mythology of his work, the south is an antebellum Edward Albee. mansion of faded elegance inhabited by gentle dreamers, misfits, fugitives and outcasts losers who are WILLIAMS, THE MOST POPULAR not meant to win. Always the gothic focus of his work echoes an awareness of loneliness and loss a sense of PLAYWRIGHT AND A MAJOR DRAMATIST corruption and the physical violence which is an aspect of southern romanticism. His theme is the plight of the William‟s claims to the status of a major dramatist individual trapped by his environment, the loneliness rests, in large measure, on the significant and popular and lack of communication between human beings acceptance accorded four works: THE GLASS unable to reconcile the flesh with sprit. It is his special MENAGERIE (1945), A STREETCAR NAMED to temper extremes of physical violence, brutality and DESIRE (1947), SUMMER AND SMOKE (1948) perversion with gentle, loving glimpses of humanity and and CAT ON A HOT TIN ROOF (1955).
    [Show full text]
  • A Memory of Two Mondays (1955)
    Boris Aronson: An Inventory of His Scenic Design Papers at the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center Descriptive Summary Creator: Aronson, Boris, 1900-1980 Title: Boris Aronson Scenic Design Papers Dates: 1939-1977 Extent: 5 boxes, 4 oversize boxes, 47 oversize folders (4.1 linear feet) Abstract: Russian-born painter, sculptor, and most notably set designer Boris Aronson came to America in 1922. The Scenic Design Papers hold original sketches, prints, photographs, and technical drawings showcasing Aronson's set design work on thirty-one plays written and produced between 1939-1977. RLIN Record #: TXRC00-A6 Language: English. Access: Open for research Administrative Information Acquisition: Gift and purchase, 1996 (G10669, R13821) Processed by: Helen Baer and Toni Alfau, 1999 Repository: Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center, University of Texas at Austin Aronson, Boris, 1900-1980 Biographical Sketch Boris Aronson was born in Kiev in 1900, the son of a Jewish rabbi. He came of age in pre-revolutionary Russia in the city that was at the center of Jewish avant-garde theater. After attending art school in Kiev, Aronson served an apprenticeship with the Constructivist designer Alexandre Exter. Under Exter's tutelage and under the influence of the Russian theater directors Alexander Tairov and Vsevolod Meyerhold, whom Aronson admired, he rejected the fashionable realism of Stanislavski in favor of stylized reality and Constructivism. After his apprenticeship he moved to Moscow and then to Germany, where he published two books in 1922, and on their strength was able to obtain a visa to America. In New York he found work in the Yiddish experimental theater designing sets and costumes for, among other venues, the Unser Theatre and the Yiddish Art Theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Cultures by Designing Buildings: Corporatism, Eero Saarinen, and Thevivian Beaumont Repertory Theater at the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts
    85TH ACSA ANNUAL MEETING ANDTECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE 457 Building Cultures by Designing Buildings: Corporatism, Eero Saarinen, and theVivian Beaumont Repertory Theater at the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts WESLEY R. JANZ, AIA Ball State University In 1964, the inaugural production of the Lincoln Center the temporary facility. The second considers the architec- repertory company opened to critical acclaim. The debut of tural intentions of these non-architects as they gave physical Arthur Miller's play After The Fall was "an impressive start" form to the preeminent culture they envisioned. (chapman); one that would "arouse an audience and enrich a season" (Nadel). The cast, which included Faye Dunaway, THE CAMPUS OF THE LINCOLN CENTER FOR Hal Holbrook, and leading man Jason Robards, Jr. was THE PERFORMING ARTS lauded: "no performance was less than compelling," stated Lincoln Center was the focus of the eighteen-block Lincoln Howard Taubman, the theater critic of the New York Times. Square Urban Redevelopment Project on the Upper West The theater, a temporary facility that was designed and Side of New York City. Spearheading the Lincoln Center built under the guidance of co-producing directors Robert component were Coinmissioner Robert Moses, Dwight Whitehead and Elia Kazan, was also praised. The critic John Eisenhower, the President of the United States; Nelson A. McClain termed the playhouse "a quite fabulous structure," Rockefeller, the Governor of the State of New York; and the and Howard Clunnan agreed; "the moment you enter it your third John D. Rockefeller. The Center's unofficial title, the attention is riveted on the stage" (Hyams).
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisitions Edited.Indd
    1998 Acquisitions PAINTINGS PRINTS Carl Rice Embrey, Shells, 1972. Acrylic on panel, 47 7/8 x 71 7/8 in. Albert Belleroche, Rêverie, 1903. Lithograph, image 13 3/4 x Museum purchase with funds from Charline and Red McCombs, 17 1/4 in. Museum purchase, 1998.5. 1998.3. Henry Caro-Delvaille, Maternité, ca.1905. Lithograph, Ernest Lawson, Harbor in Winter, ca. 1908. Oil on canvas, image 22 x 17 1/4 in. Museum purchase, 1998.6. 24 1/4 x 29 1/2 in. Bequest of Gloria and Dan Oppenheimer, Honoré Daumier, Ne vous y frottez pas (Don’t Meddle With It), 1834. 1998.10. Lithograph, image 13 1/4 x 17 3/4 in. Museum purchase in memory Bill Reily, Variations on a Xuande Bowl, 1959. Oil on canvas, of Alexander J. Oppenheimer, 1998.23. 70 1/2 x 54 in. Gift of Maryanne MacGuarin Leeper in memory of Marsden Hartley, Apples in a Basket, 1923. Lithograph, image Blanche and John Palmer Leeper, 1998.21. 13 1/2 x 18 1/2 in. Museum purchase in memory of Alexander J. Kent Rush, Untitled, 1978. Collage with acrylic, charcoal, and Oppenheimer, 1998.24. graphite on panel, 67 x 48 in. Gift of Jane and Arthur Stieren, Maximilian Kurzweil, Der Polster (The Pillow), ca.1903. 1998.9. Woodcut, image 11 1/4 x 10 1/4 in. Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Frederic J. SCULPTURE Oppenheimer in memory of Alexander J. Oppenheimer, 1998.4. Pierre-Jean David d’Angers, Philopoemen, 1837. Gilded bronze, Louis LeGrand, The End, ca.1887. Two etching and aquatints, 19 in.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Acquisitions
    1998 Acquisitions PAINTINGS PRINTS Carl Rice Embrey, Shells, 1972. Acrylic on panel, 47 7/8 x 71 7/8 in. Albert Belleroche, Rêverie, 1903. Lithograph, image 13 3/4 x Museum purchase with funds from Charline and Red McCombs, 17 1/4 in. Museum purchase, 1998.5. 1998.3. Henry Caro-Delvaille, Maternité, ca.1905. Lithograph, Ernest Lawson, Harbor in Winter, ca. 1908. Oil on canvas, image 22 x 17 1/4 in. Museum purchase, 1998.6. 24 1/4 x 29 1/2 in. Bequest of Gloria and Dan Oppenheimer, Honoré Daumier, Ne vous y frottez pas (Don’t Meddle With It), 1834. 1998.10. Lithograph, image 13 1/4 x 17 3/4 in. Museum purchase in memory Bill Reily, Variations on a Xuande Bowl, 1959. Oil on canvas, of Alexander J. Oppenheimer, 1998.23. 70 1/2 x 54 in. Gift of Maryanne MacGuarin Leeper in memory of Marsden Hartley, Apples in a Basket, 1923. Lithograph, image Blanche and John Palmer Leeper, 1998.21. 13 1/2 x 18 1/2 in. Museum purchase in memory of Alexander J. Kent Rush, Untitled, 1978. Collage with acrylic, charcoal, and Oppenheimer, 1998.24. graphite on panel, 67 x 48 in. Gift of Jane and Arthur Stieren, Maximilian Kurzweil, Der Polster (The Pillow), ca.1903. 1998.9. Woodcut, image 11 1/4 x 10 1/4 in. Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Frederic J. SCULPTURE Oppenheimer in memory of Alexander J. Oppenheimer, 1998.4. Pierre-Jean David d’Angers, Philopoemen, 1837. Gilded bronze, Louis LeGrand, The End, ca.1887. Two etching and aquatints, 19 in.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    THE NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS THE OLIVE WONG PROJECT PERFORMANCE COSTUME DESIGN RESEARCH GUIDE INTRODUCTION COSTUME DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE WRITTEN AND EDITED BY AILEEN ABERCROMBIE The New York Public Library for the Perform- newspapers, sketches, lithographs, poster art ing Arts, located in Lincoln Center Plaza, is and photo- graphs. In this introduction, I will nestled between four of the most infuential share with you some of Olive’s selections from performing arts buildings in New York City: the NYPL collection. Avery Fisher Hall, Te Metropolitan Opera, the Vivian Beaumont Teater (home to the Lincoln There are typically two ways to discuss cos- Center Teater), and David H. Koch Teater. tume design: “manner of dress” and “the history Te library matches its illustrious location with of costume design”. “Manner of dress” contextu- one of the largest collections of material per- alizes the way people dress in their time period taining to the performing arts in the world. due to environment, gender, position, economic constraints and attitude. Tis is essentially the The library catalogs the history of the perform- anthropological approach to costume design. ing arts through collections acquired by notable Others study “the history of costume design”, photographers, directors, designers, perform- examining the way costume designers interpret ers, composers, and patrons. Here in NYC the the manner of dress in their time period: where so many artists live and work we have the history of the profession and the profession- an opportunity, through the library, to hear als. Tis discussion also talks about costume sound recording of early flms, to see shows designers’ backstory, their process, their that closed on Broadway years ago, and get to relationships and their work.
    [Show full text]