DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of Surface Water Quality Sampling on Sumas River and Tributaries Abbotsford, British Columbia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary of Surface Water Quality Sampling on Sumas River and Tributaries Abbotsford, British Columbia MMiinniissttrryy ooff WWaatteerr,, LLaanndd && AAiirr PPrrootteeccttiioonn LOWER MAINLAND REGION Summary of Surface Water Quality Sampling on Sumas River and Tributaries Abbotsford, British Columbia Y Y T T I I L L A A U U Q Q L L A A T T N N E E M M N N O O R R I I V V N N E E Summary of Surface Water Quality Sampling on Sumas River and Tributaries River and Tributaries Abbotsford, British Columbia Prepared by: Rod Shead Ministry of Water, Land & Air Protection Environmental Quality Section 2nd Floor, 10470 152 Street Surrey, B.C. V3R 0Y3 604-582-5200 October 2004 PREFACE This report is one in a series of water, groundwater, and air quality reports that are being issued by the Lower Mainland Regional Office in fiscal year 2004/05. It is the intention of the Regional Office to publish water, groundwater and air quality reports on our website (http://wlapwww.gov.bc.ca/sry/p2/eq/index.htm). in order to provide the information to industry and local government, other stakeholders and the public at large. By providing such information in a readily understood format, and on an ongoing basis, it is hoped that local environmental quality conditions can be better understood, and better decisions regarding water, groundwater, and air quality management can be made. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank Diane Sutherland, Trudy Pitre, Robbie Chen, Bev Anderson, and Brent Moore for their assistance in collecting samples, retrieving and compiling data, and reviewing this report. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................1 1.1 NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION OF SURFACE WATERS .....................................................................1 1.2 WATER QUALITY TREND MONITORING................................................................................................1 1.3 TREND MONITORING IN THE SUMAS RIVER WATERSHED .....................................................................2 2.0 STUDY AREA ..................................................................................................................................3 2.1 SUMAS RIVER WATERSHED ...............................................................................................................3 2.2 AGRICULTURE AND POTENTIAL WATER QUALITY IMPACTS...................................................................4 2.3 PREVIOUS WATER QUALITY STUDIES .................................................................................................6 2.4 FISH AND FISH HABITATS...................................................................................................................8 3.0 SAMPLING PROGRAM..................................................................................................................10 3.1 SAMPLED PARAMETERS ..................................................................................................................10 3.2 SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND DATES...................................................................................................10 3.3 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................................................11 3.3.1 Field Methodology .................................................................................................................11 3.3.2 Laboratory Methodology........................................................................................................11 4.0 WATER QUALITY CRITERIA .........................................................................................................12 5.0 SAMPLING RESULTS.....................................................................................................................14 5.1 SITE 1 - SUMAS RIVER AT WHATCOM ROAD BRIDGE .........................................................................14 5.2 SITE 2 - SAAR CREEK AT LAMSON ROAD BRIDGE..............................................................................15 5.3 SITE 3 - MARSHALL CREEK AT INDIAN ROAD.....................................................................................17 5.4 SITE 4 - SUMAS RIVER AT ATKINSON ROAD BRIDGE..........................................................................17 5.5 SITE 5 - SUMAS DRAINAGE CANAL AT NO. 3 ROAD ...........................................................................18 6.0 DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................................19 6.1 LIMITATIONS OF STUDY ...................................................................................................................19 6.2 GENERAL WATER CHEMISTRY .........................................................................................................19 6.3 BACTERIOLOGY...............................................................................................................................19 6.4 EUTROPHICATION............................................................................................................................20 6.5 METALS..........................................................................................................................................20 6.6 EMERGING CONTAMINANT CONCERNS .............................................................................................21 7.0 SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................................21 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................................................................23 9.0 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................25 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.0 Sumas River Watershed and Major Tributaries 3 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.0 Sample Sites and Sampling Dates 10 Table 2.0 Water Quality Criteria 13 Table 3.0 Summary of Water Quality Criterion Exceedances: Sumas River at Whatcom Road Bridge 14 Table 4.0 Summary of Water Quality Criterion Exceedances: Saar Creek at Lamson Road Bridge 15 Table 5.0 Summary of Water Quality Criterion Exceedances Sumas River at Atkinson Road Bridge 16 APPENDICES Appendix A Water Quality Parameters Appendix B Sampling Locations Appendix C Sampling Data - Sumas River at Whatcom Road Bridge Appendix D Sampling Data - Saar Creek at Lamson Road Bridge Appendix E Sampling Data - Marshall Creek at Indian Road Appendix F Sampling Data - Sumas River at Atkinson Road Bridge Appendix G Sampling Data - Sumas Drainage Canal at No. 3 Road Summary of Surface Water Quality Sumas River and Tributaries Abbotsford, B.C. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Non-Point Source Pollution of Surface Waters The British Columbia Environmental Management Act defines pollution as the presence in the environment of substances that substantially alter or impair the environment. Pollution can result from naturally occurring events such as forest fires and floods, or from anthropogenic1 activities such as land development, industrial/municipal waste discharges, stormwater runoff, agriculture and forest harvesting. Pollution sources are generally classified as being either "point source" or "non-point source". A point source pollutant enters the receiving environment from a specific outlet such as a pipe, while a non-point source pollutant enters the receiving environment from a diffuse source that is not easily identifiable (1). Non-point source (NPS) water pollution is the release of pollutants to surface/ground water from activities that occur over a large area, and results from water flowing over (and through) the land surface and transporting contaminants (e.g. pathogens, oxygen depleting substances, suspended materials, toxic chemicals) and debris into water bodies. The cumulative effect of multiple non-point sources has potential to diminish fish and wildlife resources, degrade drinking water, impact on agricultural and other industrial water uses, impair aesthetic values, and reduce recreational opportunities. NPS pollution is recognized as a major cause of water pollution in British Columbia and it represents a significant threat to water resources (1). NPS pollution is difficult to manage using traditional regulatory mechanisms (e.g. discharge permits) because identifying and controlling NPS pollution over large areas is impractical, if not impossible. Therefore, NPS is best managed through source control, planning, and education. In British Columbia, various levels of government, industry, stakeholders, and resource users have addressed NPS water pollution through a variety of strategies such as public education programs, best management practice documents (e.g. Land Development Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Habitat), codes of practice documents (e.g. Code of Agricultural Practice for Waste Management) and development of industry specific regulations (e.g. Agricultural Waste Control Regulation). The effectiveness of the above-noted strategies on reducing NPS water pollution is measured by monitoring receiving environments to determine if water quality is improving, declining, or unchanging. 1.2 Water Quality Trend Monitoring Water quality trend monitoring is used to detect subtle changes over time that may result from an ongoing activity or land-use within the catchment area of the watercourse. Trend monitoring generally involves taking water quality measurements at regular time
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fraser Valley Geotour: Bedrock, Glacial Deposits, Recent Sediments, Geological Hazards and Applied Geology: Sumas Mountain and Abbotsford Area
    Fraser Valley Geotour: Bedrock, Glacial Deposits, Recent Sediments, Geological Hazards and Applied Geology: Sumas Mountain and Abbotsford Area A collaboration in support of teachers in and around Abbotsford, B.C. in celebration of National Science and Technology Week October 25, 2013 MineralsEd and Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada Led by David Huntley, PhD, GSC and David Thompson, P Geo 1 2 Fraser Valley Geotour Introduction Welcome to the Fraser Valley Geotour! Learning about our Earth, geological processes and features, and the relevance of it all to our lives is really best addressed outside of a classroom. Our entire province is the laboratory for geological studies. The landscape and rocks in the Fraser Valley record many natural Earth processes and reveal a large part of the geologic history of this part of BC – a unique part of the Canadian Cordillera. This professional development field trip for teachers looks at a selection of the bedrock and overlying surficial sediments in the Abbotsford area that evidence these geologic processes over time. The stops highlight key features that are part of the geological story - demonstrating surface processes, recording rock – forming processes, revealing the tectonic history, and evidence of glaciation. The important interplay of these phenomena and later human activity is highlighted along the way. It is designed to build your understanding of Earth Science and its relevance to our lives to support your teaching related topics in your classroom. Acknowledgments We would like to thank our partners, the individuals who led the tour to share their expertise, build interest in the natural history of the area, and inspire your teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon and Steelhead Limiting Factors in WRIA 1, the Nooksack Basin, 2002
    SALMON AND STEELHEAD HABITAT LIMITING FACTORS IN WRIA 1, THE NOOKSACK BASIN July, 2002 Carol J. Smith, Ph.D. Washington State Conservation Commission 300 Desmond Drive Lacey, Washington 98503 Acknowledgements This report was developed by the WRIA 1 Technical Advisory Group for Habitat Limiting Factors. This project would not have been possible without their vast expertise and willingness to contribute. The following participants in this project are gratefully thanked and include: Bruce Barbour, DOE Alan Chapman, Lummi Indian Nation Treva Coe, Nooksack Indian Tribe Wendy Cole, Whatcom Conservation District Ned Currence, Nooksack Indian Tribe Gregg Dunphy, Lummi Indian Nation Clare Fogelsong, City of Bellingham John Gillies, U.S.D.A. Darrell Gray, NSEA Brady Green, U.S. Forest Service Dale Griggs, Nooksack Indian Tribe Milton Holter, Lummi Indian Nation Doug Huddle, WDFW Tim Hyatt, Nooksack Indian Tribe Mike MacKay, Lummi Indian Nation Mike Maudlin, Lummi Indian Nation Shannon Moore, NSEA Roger Nichols, U.S. Forest Service Andrew Phay, Whatcom Conservation District Dr. Carol Smith, WA Conservation Commission Steve Seymour, WDFW John Thompson, Whatcom County Tyson Waldo, NWIFC SSHIAP Bob Warinner, WDFW Barry Wenger, DOE Brian Williams, WDFW Stan Zyskowski, National Park Service A special thanks to Ron McFarlane (NWIFC) for digitizing and producing maps, to Andrew Phay (Whatcom Conservation District) for supplying numerous figures, to Llyn Doremus (Nooksack Indian Tribe) for the review, and to Victor Johnson (Lummi Indian Nation) for supplying the slope instability figure. I also extend appreciation to Devin Smith (NWIFC) and Kurt Fresh (WDFW) for compiling and developing the habitat rating standards, and to Ed Manary for writing the “Habitat Limiting Factors Background”.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Control and Sediment Transport Study of The
    FLOOD CONTROL AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT STUDY OF THE VEDDER RIVER by DAVID GEORGE McLEAN .A.Sc., University of British Columbia, 1975 \ THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF APPLIED SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES The Department of Civil Engineering We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April, 1980 (5) David George McLean In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Cim / moo^i^y The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 E-6 BP 75-51 1 E ABSTRACT The Chilliwack River flows through the Cascade Mountains until reaching a narrow gorge near Vedder Crossing where it flows onto the Fraser Lowlands and eventually meets the Fraser River. Below Vedder Crossing, the river is actively building an alluvial fan by depos• iting its sediment load of gravel and sand. This deposi• tion has resulted in frequent channel shifts over the fan surface with the most recent migration occurring around 1894 when the river shifted down Vedder Creek. Over the last century the Vedder River has been undergoing very complex changes in response to changes in the incidence of severe floods, changes in sediment supply and interference from river training.
    [Show full text]
  • Swift Creek Consent Decree Final
    }: s FILFD COQ N'Y "L-FRK 1 10 k 43 2 3 4 BY ---- 5 6 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON 8 WHATCOM COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 9 STATE OF WASHINGTON, ° 9 2 0 2 7 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, NO. 37 10 Plaintiff, 11 CONSENT DECREE V. RE: SUMAS MOUNTAIN 12 LANDSLIDE WHATCOM COUNTY; WHATCOM 13 . COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT; GREAT WESTERN 14 LUMBER COMPANY; and MILLMAN FAMILY LLC, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS 19 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 3 20 II. JURISDICTION ........................................................................................................... 5 III. PARTIES BOUND ....................................................................................................... 6 21 IV. DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................. 6 22 V. FINDINGS OF FACTS ................................................................................................ 7 VI. WORK TO BE PERFORMED ................................................................................... 14 23 VII. DURATION OF DECREE ......................................................................................... 21 VIII. DESIGNATED PROJECT COORDINATORS ......................................................... 22 24 IX. PERFORMANCE .......................................................................................................23 X. ACCESS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Trans Mountain Expansion Project
    TRANS MOUNTAIN PIPELINE ULC TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL HDD FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT SUMAS RIVER AT V10 RK 1114.6 PROJECT NO.: 0095150-04 DISTRIBUTION: DATE: February 20, 2015 TMP ULC: 2 copies DOCUMENT NO.: 0095150-14-SUM BGC: 2 copies OTHER: 1 copy Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC February 20, 2015 Sumas River at V10 RK 1114.6 Project No.: 0095150-04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As part of the engineering design and assessment for the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMEP), BGC Engineering Inc. (BGC) has been retained to complete geotechnical feasibility assessments for horizontal directional drilling (HDD) at select stream crossings along the proposed pipeline corridor. In September 2014, BGC supervised the drilling of three boreholes adjacent to the proposed HDD alignment at Sumas River east of Abbotsford, BC. WorleyParsons, under subcontract to BGC, completed geophysical surveys at the same site in August 2013 and November 2014. Analysis of historical aerial photographs shows that the banks of Sumas River appear stable with respect to bank erosion and avulsion, and the proposed HDD alignment is not expected to be compromised by these hydrotechnical hazards. Results from the scour analysis estimate a maximum scour depth of approximately 2.0 m below the channel thalweg during a 200-year flood event, corresponding to an elevation of 1.5 m below sea level. Given this result, the depth of cover above the proposed HDD borepath remains adequate for the entire HDD length. The HDD entry and exit points are located beyond the dykes that parallel the Sumas River at an elevation of approximately 3.8 and 11.8 masl, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stō:Ló Is a River of Knowledge, Halq'eméylem Is a River of Stories
    Walking Backwards into the Future with Our Stories: The Stō:ló is a River of Knowledge, Halq’eméylem is a River of Stories by lolehawk Laura Buker M.A. (Education), Simon Fraser University, 1980 B.Ed., University of British Columbia, 1975 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Curriculum Theory & Implementation Program Faculty of Education © lolehawk Laura Buker Simon Fraser University Summer 2011 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for "Fair Dealing." Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. APPROVAL Name: Laura Buker Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis: Walking Backwards Into the Future With Our Stories: The St6:lo is a River of Knowledge, Haq'emeylem is a River of Stories Examining Committee: Chair: Robin Brayne, Adjunct Professor Allan MacKinnon, Associate Professor Senior Supervisor Vicki Kelly, Assistant Professor Committee Member Elizabeth Phillips, Elder, St6:lo Nation Committee Member Heesoon Bai, Associate Professor Internal/External Examiner Jan Hare, University of British Columbia External Examiner Date Defended/Approved: ii Partial Copyright Licence Abstract Storytelling is the original form of education for the indigenous families along the Fraser River. These stories have informed ecological, linguistic and cultural knowledge for thousands of years. This story begins in the time of the oldest inhabitants of the Fraser Valley along the St ó:lō where the river and the indigenous peopleevolutionary share changethe same and name: transformation Stó:lō, People that of is the personal River.
    [Show full text]
  • Explore Local History Through Collage: Semá:Th Xόtsa (Sumas Lake) and Sumas Prairie
    Explore Local History through Collage: Semá:th Xόtsa (Sumas Lake) and Sumas Prairie Self-guided activity OVERVIEW Try your hand at an art making activity inspired by historical photographs from The Reach Gallery Museum archives1 of Semá:th Xόtsa (Sumas Lake, pronounced seMATH hOTsa) and our permanent museum exhibition Voices of the Valley.2 This Edukit uses Historical Thinking Concepts to encourage participants to use primary resources and to develop historical literacy. Both experiences use Visual Thinking Strategies to encourage participants to construct meaning based on their own observations. Figure 1. Collage example. Through this project participants will: Explore connections to identity, place, culture, and belonging through creative expression. Create works of art, collaboratively or individually using imagination, inquiry, experimentation, and purposeful play. Examine relationships between local history, the arts, and the wider world. Experience, document, and present creative works in a variety of ways. Figure 2 (above left). Semá:th Xόtsa in 1920 prior to the drainage. Catalogue no. P188, The Reach Gallery Museum archive. Figure 3 (above right). Contemporary image of Sumas Prairie. 1 For more information on The Reach Gallery Museum archives, visit https://www.thereach.ca/research-and-collections/ 2 For more information on Voices of the Valley, visit https://www.thereach.ca/exhibitions/voices-of-the-valley/ The Importance of Place and Language The Reach Gallery Museum acknowledges that the City of Abbotsford is located on S’olh Temexw. [pronounced: suh-oll TUMM ook] S’olh Temexw is the unceded, traditional, ancestral shared territory of the Semá:th First Nation and Mathekwi First Nation. These two First Nations are part of the Stό:lō Nation, the People of the River.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Action Plan for British Columbia
    Wetland Action Plan for British Columbia IAN BARNETT Ducks Unlimited Kamloops, 954 A Laval Crescent, Kamloops, BC, V2C 5P5, Canada, email [email protected] Abstract: In the fall of 2002, the Wetland Stewardship Partnership was formed to address the need for improved conservation of wetland ecosystems (including estuaries) in British Columbia. One of the first exercises undertaken by the Wetland Stewardship Partnership was the creation of a Wetland Action Plan. The Wetland Action Plan illustrates the extent of the province's wetlands, describes their value to British Columbians, assesses threats to wetlands, evaluates current conservation initiatives, and puts forth a set of specific actions and objectives to help mitigate wetland loss or degradation. It was determined that the most significant threats to wetlands usually come from urban expansion, industrial development, and agriculture. The Wetland Stewardship Partnership then examined which actions would most likely have the greatest positive influence on wetland conservation and restoration, and listed nine primary objectives, in order of priority, in a draft ‘Framework for Action’. Next, the partnership determined that meeting the first four of these objectives could be sufficient to provide meaningful and comprehensive wetland protection, and so, committed to working together towards enacting specific recommendations in relation to these objectives. These four priority objectives are as follows: (1) Work effectively with all levels of government to promote improved guidelines and stronger legislative frameworks to support wetlands conservation; (2) Provide practical information and recommendations on methods to reduce impacts to wetlands to urban, rural, and agricultural proponents who wish to undertake a development in a wetland area; (3) Improve the development and delivery of public education and stewardship programs that encourage conservation of wetlands, especially through partnerships; and (4) Conduct a conservation risk assessment to make the most current inventory information on the status of B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Trumpeter Swan Lead Shot Poisoning Investigation in Northwest Washington and Southwest British Columbia
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Environmental Contaminants Program Off-Refuge Investigations Trumpeter Swan Lead Shot Poisoning Investigation in Northwest Washington and Southwest British Columbia Project ID: 200310003.1 June 2009 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE REGION 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINANTS PROGRAM OFF-REFUGE INVESTIGATIONS SUB-ACTIVITY WA -Trumpeter Swan Lead Shot Poisoning Investigation in Northwest Washington and Southwest British Columbia –FINAL REPORT Project ID: 200310003.1 (filename: EC_TRUSLead Shot Poisoning Final Report.doc) by Cindy M. Schexnider Environmental Contaminants Specialist Washington Fish & Wildlife Office Lacey, Washington Mike Smith Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit University of Washington Laurie Wilson Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Delta, British Columbia Abstract Trumpeter (Cygnus buccinator) and tundra swan (Cygnus columbianus) populations wintering in northwest Washington State and on the Sumas Prairie, British Columbia, from 1999-2008, lost over 2,574 members, the majority (62%, 1,586) were confirmed as lead poisoned caused by the ingestion of lead pellets. Although mortalities occurred in both trumpeter and tundra swans, over 95% of lead poisoned swans were trumpeter swans. In 2001, an international effort was initiated to locate the source(s) of the lead. Participants in the investigation include the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Environment Canada – Canadian Wildlife Service, The Trumpeter Swan Society and the University of Washington (Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit) with assistance from numerous other government and non-government organizations. The partners took a multi-faceted approach to investigate the swan die-off and potential secondary exposures to other wildlife, including bald eagles.
    [Show full text]
  • Dionisio Point Excavations
    1HE• Publication of the Archaeological Society of Vol. 31 , No. I - 1999 Dionisio Point Excavations ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF &MIDDEN BRITISH COLUMBIA Published four times a year by the Archaeological Society of British Columbia Dedicated to the protection of archaeological resot:Jrces and the spread of archaeological knowledge. Editorial Committee Editor: Heather Myles (274-4294) President Field Editor: Richard Brolly (689-1678) Helmi Braches (462-8942) arcas@istar. ca [email protected] News Editor: Heather Myles Publications Editor: Robbin Chatan (215-1746) Membership [email protected] Sean Nugent (685-9592) Assistant Editors: Erin Strutt [email protected] erins@intergate. be.ca Fred Braches Annual membership includes I year's subscription to [email protected] The Midden and the ASBC newsletter, SocNotes. Production & Subscriptions: Fred Braches ( 462-8942) Membership Fees I SuBSCRIPTION is included with ASBC membership. Individual: $25 Family: $30 . Seniors/Students: $I 8 Non-members: $14.50 per year ($1 7.00 USA and overseas), Send cheque or money order payable to the ASBC to: payable in Canadian funds to the ASBC. Remit to: ASBC Memberships Midden Subscriptions, ASBC P.O. Box 520, Bentall Station P.O. Box 520, Bentall Station Vancouver BC V6C 2N3 Vancouver BC V6C 2N3 SuBMISSIONs: We welcome contributions on subjects germane ASBC on Internet to BC archaeology. Guidelines are available on request. Sub­ http://home.istar.ca/-glenchan/asbc/asbc.shtml missions and exchange publications should be directed to the appropriate editor at the ASBC address. Affiliated Chapters Copyright Nanaimo Contact: Rachael Sydenham Internet: http://www.geocities.com/rainforest/5433 Contents of The Midden are copyrighted by the ASBC.
    [Show full text]
  • Swift Creek Consent Decree Final Exhibits A-E (December 2019)
    EXHIBIT A SCSMAP South Pass Setback Levee Phase I Implementation SOUTH PASS RD. Proposed Phase I Project Elements Levees Sediment Basins Upper Goodwin Reach Instream Sediment Traps . D Canyon Reach Instream S R Debris Flow/Setback Levee w N I Sediment Traps . if Roads D t W k R C e D e r r wift C Williams Pipelines S ork S e O North F E Goodwin Reach ek O L Existing Stockpile Levees G Sou O th For C Sediment Basins k Sw if Swift Creek T t A C reek O Sumas River Alluvial Fan ² Feet 0 1,000500 Lower Goodwin Reach Setback Levee MASSEY RD. Figure 1 Phase I Structure Locations EXHIBIT B SWIFT CREEK ACTION PLAN Whatcom County, Washington December 2019 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Cris Matthews (Primary contact) Toxics Cleanup Program - Bellingham Field Office 913 Squalicum Way, Suite 101 Bellingham, WA 98225 (360) 255-4379 or [email protected] Tamara Cardona-Marek Toxics Cleanup Program – NW Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE, Bellevue, WA 98008 (425) 649-7058 or [email protected] Pete Kmet (Retired) Washington State Department of Ecology Toxics Cleanup Program - Headquarters Office 300 Desmond Drive P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose 1.2 Previous Studies 1.3 Regulatory Framework 2.0 Site Description and History 3.0 Action Alternatives and Screening Level Analysis 4.0 Proposed Selected Action and Analysis of Compliance with MTCA 4.1 Definition of Site 4.2 Description of Proposed Action 4.3 Analysis of Selected Remedy for Compliance with MTCA 5.0 Environmental Standards 6.0 Applicable Local, State, and Federal Laws 7.0 Institutional Controls and Site Use Restrictions 8.0 Compliance Monitoring 9.0 Schedule for Implementing the Selected Action 10.0 State Environmental Policy Action Compliance References and Technical Investigations List of Tables TABLE 1 Soil / Sediment results for selected substances TABLE 2 Estimated excess lifetime cancer risks for various exposure scenarios using asbestos dust concentrations generated in August 2006 EPA activity based sampling study.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2. Hazard Summaries
    Whatcom County SECTION 2: HAZARD SUMMARIES Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan SECTION 2. HAZARD SUMMARIES The following seven natural hazards were identified to be significant risks to the county, and specifically hazardous to the populated western areas of Whatcom County: 1. Earthquakes 2. Flooding 3. Geologic Hazards 4. Severe Storms 5. Tsunamis 6. Volcanoes 7. Wildland Fires The updated HIVA was received late in the plan update process and will be the basis for the next version of the all hazards plan. The following sections describe the seven significant natural hazards and their potential threats to Whatcom County. Much of the information collected in these hazard summaries came from local experts working in hazard assessment or hazard mitigation for a specific hazard. The summaries describe the hazards, convey the areas at potential risk from each hazard, and describe mitigation measures as implemented in the past or to be implemented in the future to manage the effects of natural disasters in Whatcom County. Each hazard description is organized into the following parts: Hazard Related Definitions Background Information General description of the hazard relevant to Whatcom County and Washington State History Historical background on the presence of the hazard in Whatcom County; much of this information was obtained from agencies such as FEMA, the Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR), and the U.S. Geological Society (USGS) Vulnerability Assessment Descriptions of specific areas within the county at risk for each hazard, when this information was available Mitigation Strategies Recommended mitigation strategies to lessen the dangers posed by each hazard Whatcom County Sheriff’s Office Division of Emergency Management Original Submission: June 1, 2015 2 - 1 FEMA Approval: Dec 15, 2016 Whatcom County SECTION 2: HAZARD SUMMARIES Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Whatcom County’s Planning and Development Services provided the entire hazard GIS datasets, except for the Wildland Fire data, which came from WDNR’s North Region.
    [Show full text]