DOCSLIB.ORG

4 March 1998 Dear Sir Sigmund, I Want to Congratulate You on Being

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4 March 1998 Dear Sir Sigmund, I Want to Congratulate You on Being THE SECRETARY-GENERAL 4 March 1998 Dear Sir Sigmund, I want to congratulate you on being named the recipient of the 1998 Terapleton Prize for Progress in Religion. This is a great honour and recognizes your untiring efforts on behalf of tolerance and peace among people of all faiths. Your lifelong dedication to deepening this dialogue inspires us all. Thank you for your kind words of support for my recent mission to Baghdad. Your good wishes and prayers are deeply appreciated. Yours sincerely, Kofi A. Annan Sir Sigmund Sternberg O.St.J.KCSG JP London 27-FEB-1998 11:44 FROM STERNBERQ 0171 485 4512 TO 0012129631185 P.02 Slar House Sir Sigmund Stemberg Grafton Ftoad London NWS <IBD O. StJ. KCSG JP Telephone 01T1 485-2S38 Facaiinila 0171 485-4512 February 27,1998 H.E. Mr. Kofi Anan lUJJL Secretary-Genera! of the United Nations UN Plaza New York, New York I am sure that the overwhelming majority of what we call the civilised world stands in your following the ^rafJjLa^a||y_successFi£ outcome _ . BaghdigrTwould wish to add"my thanks and admiration to theirs. When we stood together a year ago at the unveiling of the Wallenberg Monument in London, I thought for a moment that it would also fall to you to save possibly thousands of innocent people from death and destruction. 1 will be in New York nex^week for the_anno^ncgrrierit that l^ami^tojgcejye this year jgropj?to£jgrcre^ I would like to refer jn^rny press conference statement to your mission as a prime exampie of how dialogue underpins true diplomacy and how open and honest exchanges can contribute to the betterment of mankind, on every level. Your contribution was at the level of world leadership. But I have no doubt at all that the principles of dialogue have a constructive contribution to make in enabling not just nation to speak peace unto nation, but also religions to understand each other employer and employees to appreciate each other, even individuals to respect each other. Please accept my most sincere good wishes and thanks. Sincerely, Sir Siamund Steinberg TOTAL P.02 FOR PROGRESS IN RELIGION This award is especially for originality.or. research in religion.or spirituality. , PURPOSE he Templeton Award is not for good works. It is an award for progress in religion. The judges ask first what has this person done which was entirely original? Secondly, was it primarily spiritual rather than merely humanitarian? Lastly, did this original contribution by this nominee result in a great increase in either humankind's love of God or understanding of God? To clarify this important difference, for example, if a church should found a hospital, that is humanitarian, but if out of the witness of the hospital new congregations were formed, that is originality in religion. Many other awards honour wonderful humanitarian works, but this award is especially for originality or research in religion or spirituality. This award is intended to encourage the concept that resources and manpower are needed for progress in spiritual knowledge. We hope that by learning about the lives of the awardees, million of people will be uplifted and inspired to be enthusiastic about the further study and worship of God. The Prize is intended to help people see the infinity of the Universal Spirit still creating the galaxies and all living things and the variety of ways in which the Creator is revealing himself to different people. We hope all religions may become more dynamic and inspirational. We hope that mon resources will be devoted to research and discovery in spiritual forces than in the physical sciences. We hope that everyone will study and work for persona spiritual growth and progress. Progress comes in many different forms and by their fruits you shall know them. The Templeton Prize is awarded annually to a living person of any religious tradition or movement. The Templeton Prize does not encourage syncretism but rather an understanding of the benefits of diversity. It seeks to focus attention on the wide variety of highlights in present-day religious thought and work. It does not seek a unity of denominations or a unity of world religions; but rather it seeks to encourage understanding of the benefits of diversity. There is no limitation of race, creed, sex, or geographical background. OBJECTIVE Progress is needed in religion as in all other dimensions of human experience and endeavour. There has been a long departure, at least in Western culture, from the last synthesis when religious knowledge and scientific knowledge were organically related. It is urgent that progress in religion be accelerated as progress in other disciplines take place. A wider universe demands deeper awareness of the dimension of the spirit and of spiritual resources available for humankind, of the infinity of God, and of the divine knowledge and understanding still to be claimed. The Templeton Prize serves to stimulate this quest for deeper understanding and pioneering breakthroughs in religious knowledge by calling attention annually to the achievements in this area. It is hoped that there will result from this enterprise a deeper spiritual awareness on the part of humankind, a better understanding of the meaning of life, heightened quality of devotion and love, and a greater emphasis on the kind of dedication that brings the human life more into concert with the divine will, thus releasing new and creative energies into human society today. CRITERIA The judges consider a nominee's contribution to progress in religion made either during the year prior to his selection or during his entire career. The qualities sought in awarding the Prize are: freshness, creativity, innovation and effectiveness. Such contributions may involve new concepts of the spirit, new organizations, new methods of evangelism, new and effective ways of communicating God's wisdom and infinite love, creation of new schools of thought, creation of new structures of understanding the relationship of the Creator to his ongoing creation of the universe, to the physical sciences, the life sciences, and the human or man sciences, the releasing of new and vital impulses into old religious structures and forms, etc. AWARD The Prize, a sum in the amount of £750,000 sterling or its equivalent, is awarded each year at a ceremony in honour of the recipient, at which the recipient delivers a lecture. NOMINATIONS The Templeton Prize is awarded annually on the decision of a panel of nine judges from the major faiths of the world today. Nominations are sought from all major religions of the world. Leaders of theological and religious institutions and those engaged in innovative and creative work are invited to submit nominations. Other persons desiring to nominate should write to the Templeton Prize, P.O. Box N7776, Nassau, Bahamas. The good influence of the prize is increased by a wide diversity of winners. Accordingly, if for five years no scientist has been elected, then only scientists may be circulated to the judges the following year. Similar procedures may apply also to evangelists and nominees from different races, sexes, and religions. All nominations are considered by a central committee, with finalists then being submitted to the panel of judges, whose decision is final. No additional votes can be taken after the public announcement of the awardee. JUDGES His All Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew was born on 29 February, 1940 on the Island of Imvros (Turkey). He studied for the Orthodox ministry at the Theological School of Halki, Istanbul, and in Rome, Switzerland and Germany. He is a specialist in Canon Law. He served on the Holy and Sacred Synod from 1974. He was elected as Metropolitan of Chalcedon in 1990 and Patriarch in 1991. A member of the Faith and Order Committee of the World Council of Churches for 15 years, he was elected a member of the Central and Executive Committees of that body at the Seventh Assembly, held in Canberra, Australia, 1991. Dr M A Zaki Badawi is the Principal of the post-graduate Muslim College in London, England and is chairman of the Imams and Mosques Council in England. He is also chairman of the Muslim Law (Shariah) Council in England and a Vice Chairman of the World Congress of Faiths. Educated at the Al-Azhar University in Cairo he also holds a PhD from London University. He was a lecturer in Islamic Studies and Arabic at the University of Malay in Singapore and Professor of Islamic Studies at the Ahmadu Bello University in Nigeria and also at King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Dr Badawi was the Director and Chief Imam of the Islamic Cultural Centre and Regent's Park Mosque in London. Paul Davies is a scientist and author. He was the recipient of the Templeton Prize in 1995. Prior to holding the Chair of Natural Philosophy at the University of Adelaide in South Australia he was professor of theoretical physics at England's University of Newcastle upon Tyne. He resides in Adelaide, South Australia. Dr Carl M. Kuttler, Jr serves as President of St. Petersburg Junior College (over 65,000 students) in Florida and has served as: honorary President of Leningrad University in Russia; Baoji Teachers College in China; an education advisor to the President of the United States and the U. S. Secretary of Education; a judge for the outstanding high schools in America; and co- sponsor with Presidents Ford and Carter on seminars for leadership. He has been honoured as one of America's outstanding college Presidents; "Honorary Father" of the Russian community college system; and as Distinguished Floridian by the honour students of Phi Theta Kappa.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • John Stapylton Habgood
    Communication The Untidiness of Integration: John Stapylton Habgood The Untidiness of Integration: John Stapylton Habgood Kevin S. Seybold uring the Middle Ages, it was not Born in 1927, John Habgood was edu- Dunusual for theologians to study the cated at King’s College, Cambridge, where physical world. In fact, there was an he read natural sciences specializing in amazing lack of strife between theology and physiology. After earning a Ph.D., he became science at this time. One reason for this a demonstrator in pharmacology and a fel- cooperation was the large number of indi- low of his college at Cambridge. In response viduals trained in both theology and medi- to a mission effort in Cambridge, Habgood eval science. It was the medieval theologian converted to Christianity in 1946 and began who tried to relate theology to science and the life-long process of wrestling with his science to theology.1 Today, it is uncommon new faith, a process that is central to his to have a theologian also easily conversant understanding of what it means to be a 2 Kevin S. Seybold in the scientific literature. John Polkinghorne, Christian. Habgood eventually served in a Arthur Peacocke, and Alister McGrath are number of church roles, but maintained a well-known contemporary examples of sci- dedication to his family and the people of his Born in 1927, entists who later have been trained in parish (regardless of how large that parish theology and turned their attention to the became). He also wrote several books dur- John Habgood integration of the two.
    [Show full text]
  • 13Th Pune International Film Festival (8Th - 15Th January 2015 )
    13th Pune International Film Festival (8th - 15th January 2015 ) SR. NO. TITLE ORIGINAL TITLE RUNTIME YEAR DIRECTOR COUNTRY OPENING FILM 1 Timbuktu Timbuktu 98 2014 Abderrahmane Sissako France WORLD COMPITITION 1 Priklyuchenie Adventure 102 2014 Nariman Turbayeu Kazakhstan 2 Pelo malo Bad Hair 93 2013 Mariana Rondón Venezuela, Peru, Argentina, Germany 4 Silsile Consequences 105 2014 Ozan Aciktan Turkey 5 Court Court 116 2014 Chaitanya Tamhane India 6 Difret Difret 99 2014 Zeresenay Berhane Mehari Ethiopia 7 Hotel Nueva Isla Hotel Nueva Isla 71 2014 Irene Gutierrez Spain, Cuba 8 Jako Nikdy Like Never Before 93 2013 Zdenek Tyc Czech Republic 9 Nabat Nabat 105 2014 Elchin Musaoglu Azerbaijan 10 En el último trago One for the Road 91 2014 Jack Zagha Kababie Mexico 11 Annemin Sarkisi Song of My Mother 90 2014 Erol Mintas Turkey 12 Ispytanie Test 95 2014 Alexander Kott Russia 13 Haganenet The Kindergarten Teacher 119 2014 Nadav Lapid Israel, France 14 The Owners The Owners 93 2014 Adilkhan Yerzhanov Kazakhstan MARATHI COMPITITION 1 Ek Hazarachi Note 1000 Rupee Note 89 2014 Shrihari Sathe India 2 Elizabeth Ekadashi Elizabeth Ekadashi 90 2014 Paresh Mokashi India 3 Killa The Fort 107 2014 Avinash Arun India 4 Khwada Obstacle 115 2014 Bhaurao Karhade India Dr. Prakash Baba Amte - 5 Dr. Prakash Baba Amte 117 2014 Samruddhi Porey India The Real Hero 6 Salaam Salute 120 2014 Kiran Yadnyopavit India 7 Yellow Yellow 130 2014 Mahesh Limaye India STUDENT COMPITITION ANIMATION 1 Ab Ovo Ab Ovo 5:23 PWSFTviT Poland 2 Crochet Noir Crochet Noir 7:58 VCA Australia
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire and Derby City Agreed Syllabus for Religious Education 2020–2025
    Derbyshire and Derby City Agreed Syllabus for Religious Education 2020–2025 Public 20/04/2020 Public 20/04/2020 i Written by Stephen Pett, Kate Christopher, Lat Blaylock, Fiona Moss, Julia Diamond-Conway Images, including cover images, courtesy of NATRE/Spirited Arts © NATRE Published by RE Today Services, 5–6 Imperial Court, 12 Sovereign Road, Birmingham, B30 3FH © RE Today 2019. This syllabus was written by RE Today Services and is licensed to Derbyshire and Derby City SACRE for use in the schools in Derbyshire and Derby City for 2020–2025. All rights reserved. Permission is granted to schools in Derbyshire and Derby City to photocopy pages for classroom use only. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, recorded or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Derbyshire and Derby City Agreed Syllabus for RE, 2020–2025 © RE Today Services 2019 Public 20/04/2020 ii Contents page: Page Foreword 1 Introduction 2 A What is RE for? A1 The purpose of RE 6 A2 The aim(s) of RE 7 A3 How to use this agreed syllabus: 12 steps 8 B What do we need to do? B1 Legal requirements 11 B2 What religions are to be taught? 13 B3 Time for religious education 14 C What do pupils learn in RE? C1 Religious Education key questions: an overview 16 C2 RE in EYFS Programme of Study 19 EYFS Units of Study 23 C3 RE in KS1 Programme of Study and planning steps 31 KS1 Units of study 35 C4 RE in KS2 Programme of Study and planning steps 45 Lower KS2 Units
    [Show full text]
  • News and Notices SCIENCE-SPIRIRTUALITY
    News and Notices SCIENCE‐SPIRIRTUALITY Templeton Prize The winner of the 2001 Templeton Prize for Progress in Religion is The Revd Canon Dr Arthur Peacocke of Oxford University. As a physical biochemist specialising in biological macromolecules, Dr Peacocke pioneered early research into the structure of DNA, showing that the chains in the molecule are not branched but form a double helix. In 1971, the one‐ time agnostic became an Anglican priest. The only Oxford University Theology faculty member to hold both a Doctor of Science and a Doctor of Divinity degree, Dr Peacocke is a strong proponent of "critical realism," holding that both science and theology aim to depict reality and must be subject to scrutiny, while recognising their creative interaction. Created by global investor and philanthropist Sir John Templeton in 1972, each year the Templeton Prize acknowledges a living person who has shown extraordinary originality in advancing humanity's understanding of God and the role of spirituality in people's lives. Sir John has sought to honour progress in religion just as the Nobel Prizes recognise advances in economics, medicine, and chemistry. Currently valued at £700,000 sterling, the Prize represents the world's largest annual monetary award given to an individual and is always set at a level that exceeds that of the Nobels. Dr Peacocke joins an illustrious group of professional scientists who have won the Templeton Prize: last year's winner, Freeman Dyson, a physicist whose futuristic views have consistently called for the reconciliation of technology and social justice; physicist and theologian Ian Barbour in 1999; astrophysicist Paul Davies in 1995; physicist Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker in 1989; and Benedictine monk and professor of astrophysics Stanley Jaki in 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • Passage 1: Direction: Read the Following Passage and Answer The
    Passage 1: Direction: Read the following Passage and answer the following questions: Gandhiji had to travel by train from Durban to Pretoria in connection with his job. Once while travelling by train, he was asked by the white passengers to leave the first class compartment and shift to the van compartment. He refused to do so. Thereafter he was pushed forcibly out of the compartment and his luggage was thrown on the platform. It was winter and he kept shivering all night. He did not go to the waiting room because the white men sleeping there might insult him further. This event was a turning point in the life of Gandhiji and he decided to stay back in South Africa and fight against this blatant injustice. 1. The white people asked Gandhiji to abandon the first class compartment because (a) they wanted to annoy him (b) They wanted to avenge themselves on Gandhi. (c) They treated Indians as inferior to them (d) they were looking for a chance to talk to him. 2. Why was he thrown out of the compartment? Because……. (a) he misbehaved with the whites (b) they wanted him to spend the night in the waiting room. (c) they wanted to insult him. (d)he refused to shift to the van compartment 3. Why did he not go to the waiting room to spend the night? (a)The room was unclean. (b)He wanted to sleep in the open. (c)He was badly hurt and so could not move to the room. (d)He feared that the White men there might insult him further.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The churches and the bomb = an analysis of recent church statements from Roman Catholics, Anglican, Lutherans and Quakers concerning nuclear weapons Holtam, Nicholas How to cite: Holtam, Nicholas (1988) The churches and the bomb = an analysis of recent church statements from Roman Catholics, Anglican, Lutherans and Quakers concerning nuclear weapons, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/6423/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 The Churches and the Bomb = An analysis of recent Church statements from Roman Catholics, Anglican, Lutherans and Quakers concerning nuclear weapons. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Nicholas Holtam M„Ae Thesis Submitted to the University of Durham November 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENT V. DEVELOPMENT REVISITED: CONTRIBUTIONS of INDIA's JUDICIARY to the CONFLICT RESOLUTION
    ENVIRONMENT v. DEVELOPMENT REVISITED: CONTRIBUTIONS OF INDIA'S JUDICIARY TO THE CONFLICT RESOLUTION Rahmatullah Khan*' 1. INTRODUCTION On 7 November 1990, the Supreme Court of India issued a significant Order (Writ Petition No 12819 of 1985, mimeograph copy) dismissing a petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by the Tehri Bandh Virodh Sangarsh Samiti [Tehri Dam Opposition Committee] and others. Petitioners had requested the Court to issue a restraint order to the Gov­ ernment of India preventing it from constructing a huge hydro-power project and a dam on the river Tehri on the ground that the dam posed a serious threat to the life, ecology and environment of the entire northern India as the site of the dam was prone to earthquakes. It was argued that expert testimony indicated that the pattern and consistency of earth­ quakes in the region were likely to have left a 200 to 300 kilometres length of fracture along the convergence boundary roughly covering the region from Dehradun on the west to the India-Nepal border in the east. Petition­ ers had good expert testimony on their side. The project had been considered by the Environmental Appraisal Committee (EAC) of the Ministry of Environment and Forests which unan­ imously rejected it on the ground that its geological and seismic setting posed grave hazards, and the accompanying ecological and social conse­ quences were unacceptable. Petitioners also highlighted the rather belated note of dissent submitted by Professor V. K. GAUR to the subse­ quent clearance given to the project by a High Level Committee of * ,Jawaharlal Nehru Professor of Environmental Law, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi; member of the Editorial Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Time for Reflection
    All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group TIME FOR REFLECTION A REPORT OF THE ALL-PARTY PARLIAMENTARY HUMANIST GROUP ON RELIGION OR BELIEF IN THE UK PARLIAMENT The All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group acts to bring together non-religious MPs and peers to discuss matters of shared interests. More details of the group can be found at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmallparty/190508/humanist.htm. This report was written by Cordelia Tucker O’Sullivan with assistance from Richy Thompson and David Pollock, both of Humanists UK. Layout and design by Laura Reid. This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its committees. All-Party Groups are informal groups of Members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this report are those of the Group. © All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group, 2019-20. TIME FOR REFLECTION CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 INTRODUCTION 6 Recommendations 7 THE CHAPLAIN TO THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS 8 BISHOPS IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 10 Cost of the Lords Spiritual 12 Retired Lords Spiritual 12 Other religious leaders in the Lords 12 Influence of the bishops on the outcome of votes 13 Arguments made for retaining the Lords Spiritual 14 Arguments against retaining the Lords Spiritual 15 House of Lords reform proposals 15 PRAYERS IN PARLIAMENT 18 PARLIAMENT’S ROLE IN GOVERNING THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND 20 Parliamentary oversight of the Church Commissioners 21 ANNEX 1: FORMER LORDS SPIRITUAL IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 22 ANNEX 2: THE INFLUENCE OF LORDS SPIRITUAL ON THE OUTCOME OF VOTES IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 24 Votes decided by the Lords Spiritual 24 Votes decided by current and former bishops 28 3 All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group FOREWORD The UK is more diverse than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Hospice Philosophy in Practice Toward an Authentic Death Poulsen Graven, Vibeke; Timm, Helle Ussing
    University of Southern Denmark Hospice Philosophy in Practice Toward an Authentic Death Poulsen Graven, Vibeke; Timm, Helle Ussing Published in: Omega: Journal of Death and Dying DOI: 10.1177/0030222819852850 Publication date: 2021 Document version: Accepted manuscript Citation for pulished version (APA): Poulsen Graven, V., & Timm, H. U. (2021). Hospice Philosophy in Practice: Toward an Authentic Death. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 83(2), 325-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222819852850 Go to publication entry in University of Southern Denmark's Research Portal Terms of use This work is brought to you by the University of Southern Denmark. Unless otherwise specified it has been shared according to the terms for self-archiving. If no other license is stated, these terms apply: • You may download this work for personal use only. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying this open access version If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details and we will investigate your claim. Please direct all enquiries to [email protected] Download date: 26. Sep. 2021 Hospice Philosophy in Practice: Toward an Authentic Death Abstract This article examines how hospice philosophy works in contemporary Danish hospice practice. The still sparse literature on Danish hospices indicates that hospice philosophy is influencing professional practice. In international palliative care literature hospice philosophy is challenged for being overly normative in its ideal of “the good death” or on the other hand as threatened by the medical model.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Atlas of Palliative Care at the End of Life
    Global Atlas of Palliative Care at the End of Life January 2014 Acknowledgements and authorship Edited by: Stephen R. Connor, PhD, Senior Fellow to the Worldwide Palliative Care Alliance (WPCA). Maria Cecilia Sepulveda Bermedo, MD, Senior Adviser Cancer Control, Chronic Diseases Prevention and Management, Chronic Diseases and Health Promotion, World Health Organization. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the World Health Organization. This publication was supported in part by a grant from the Open Society Foundations’ International Palliative Care Initiative. Special thanks to Mary Callaway and Dr Kathleen Foley. Contributing writers: Sharon Baxter, MSW, Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association, Canada Samira K. Beckwith, ACSW, LCSW, FACHE, Hope Hospice, Ft Myers, FL, USA David Clark, PhD – University of Glasgow, Scotland James Cleary, MD – Pain and Policies Study Group, Madison, WI, USA Dennis Falzon, MD – WHO Global TB Program, WHO Geneva Philippe Glaziou, MD, MPhil, Dip Stat – WHO Global TB Program, WHO Geneva Peter Holliday, St. Giles Hospice, Litchfield, England Ernesto Jaramillo, MD – WHO Global TB Program, WHO Geneva Eric L. Krakauer, MD, PhD – Harvard Medical School Center for Palliative Care, Boston, MA, USA Suresh Kumar, MD – Neighborhood Network in Palliative Care, Kerala, India Diederik Lohman – Human Rights Watch, New York, USA Thomas Lynch, PhD – International Observatory for End of Life Care, Lancaster, England Paul Z. Mmbando (MBChB, MPH, DrH) Evangelical Lutheran Church, Arusha, Tanzania Claire Morris, Worldwide Palliative Care Alliance, London, England Daniela Mosoiu, MD – Hospice Casa Sperantei, Brasov, Romania Fliss Murtagh FRCP PhD MRCGP, Cicely Saunders Institute, Kings College London Roberto Wenk, MD – Programa Argentino de Medicina Paliativa Fundación, Argentina In addition, the editors would like to thank the following: All WHO collaborating centres on palliative care (see appendix for details) Ricardo X.
    [Show full text]
  • To Develop Understanding of Community Involvement and Social Work in HPC in Poland
    National Chaplain of Hospices To develop understanding of community involvement and social work in HPC in Poland Rev. Piotr Krakowiak PhD [email protected] INSPIRATIONS FOR MODERN HOSPICE MOVEMENT The modern hospice movement started in St. Christopher's Hospice, London in 1967. From there it spread rather quickly within the United Kingdom and to many other countries worldwide. Dame Cicely Saunders has been named the Founder of the Modern Hospice Movement. She was a great friend of Poles! She received her first donation for a future hospice house from Polish Jew, David Tasma, who was dying under her special care in London – he told her it would be for a future „window in the house for dying” Religious and spiritual care has been fundamental for holistic care offered by interdisciplinary hospice team in London FIRST STEPS OF HOSPICE-PALLIATIVE CARE IN POLAND 1978: Visits and lectures of Dr Cicely Saunders in Poland (Cracow, Warsaw and Gdansk) 1980… Spring of Solidarity Movement in Poland 1981: Cracow – first Hospice project - NGO 1983: Gdansk – first Home Care Hospice team 1984: Poznan – first University Department of Palliative Care in Poland & Eastern E. 1994: Warsaw – first Child Hospice in Poland 1998: Warsaw – Hospice-Palliative care (with religious-spiritual care) fully implemented into health care system and subsidised in Poland SOLIDARITY & FIGHT FOR FREEDOM (1980-1981-1989) 1980-1981: Within the Solidarity Movement there was a strong group of „Solidarity in Health and Social Care” members – asking for changes in caring 1983: in Gdansk doctors, nurses, social workers and volunteers in cooperation with the Catholic Church started hospice home care – it became a model for creating more than 100 home care programmes in Poland, based on the voluntary work of physicians, nurses, chaplains, and others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Personality of Chiara Lubich
    ow does change occur in society? How does it occur in religion? A sociological approach to this question, espe- cially if focused on a specific historical phenomenon and Ha particular personality, must deal with questions different from those faced by the historian. Is a given change primarily a ques- Between Tradition tion of contextual factors, or do individual personalities have an independent role in bringing about such change? and Prophecy The retelling of the story of the Focolare Movement and its The Impact of the Personality of founder, Chiara Lubich, is an interesting case. Here one might ask whether Chiara Lubich and the Focolare really made an impact Chiara Lubich that cannot be attributed merely to the normal flow of historical processes. What part does tradition play in this story, and what Bernhard Callebaut part may be attributed eventually to innovation? Sophia University Institute Regarding the appearance of the worker- priests, the French sociologist and specialist of recent Catholic history, Ėmile Poulat wrote: “On a long- prepared soil, patiently worked, but not ahead Abstract: How does change occur in society? How does it occur in re- of them . they appear to be as a sudden invention.”1 I think ligion? A sociological approach to these questions deals with issues not something similar can be said of the Focolare Movement and addressed by historians. Is a given change primarily a question of con- Chiara Lubich. At the beginning of my study2 on the origins of textual factors, or do individual personalities have an independent role the Focolare, I tried to understand the religious, social, and politi- in bringing about such change? The author examines the case of Chiara cal context in Italy around World War II, especially the situation Lubich and the foundation of the Focolare Movement.
    [Show full text]