DOCSLIB.ORG

Georgia Courts Directory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Georgia Courts Directory 2016 - 2017 GEORGIA COURTS DIRECTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS Georgia Judges Appellate Courts Supreme Court.............................................................................................................................3 Court of Appeals..........................................................................................................................4 General and Special Jurisdiction Courts Superior Court Judges.................................................................................................................5 Senior Judges ............................................................................................................................11 State Court Judges.....................................................................................................................15 Juvenile Court Judges................................................................................................................19 Probate Court Judges.................................................................................................................22 Magistrate Court Judges...........................................................................................................27 Special Court Judges..................................................................................................................39 Municipal Court Judges............................................................................................................40 Federal Judges........................................................................................................................................53 Georgia Court Personnel Judicial Administrative Districts.........................................................................................................57 Court Administrators............................................................................................................................58 Superior Court Clerks...........................................................................................................................60 State Court Clerks..................................................................................................................................65 Juvenile Court Clerks............................................................................................................................66 District Attorneys..................................................................................................................................67 Solicitors-General..................................................................................................................................69 Public Defenders....................................................................................................................................71 Accountability Courts Coordinators...................................................................................................73 Georgia Court Councils and Agencies Judicial Council of Georgia ..................................................................................................................77 Judicial Council Administrative Offices.............................................................................................78 Supreme Court Clerk............................................................................................................................79 Reporter of Decisions............................................................................................................................79 Office of Bar Admissions......................................................................................................................79 Council of Superior Court Judges.......................................................................................................80 Council of State Court Judges..............................................................................................................81 Council of Juvenile Court Judges........................................................................................................82 Council of Probate Court Judges.........................................................................................................83 TABLE OF CONTENTS cont. Council of Magistrate Court Judges....................................................................................................84 Council of Municipal Court Judges....................................................................................................85 Council of Accountability Court Judges.............................................................................................86 Board of Court Reporting.....................................................................................................................86 Council of Superior Court Clerks........................................................................................................87 Georgia Superior Court Clerks’ Cooperative Authority..................................................................87 Institute of Continuing Judicial Education........................................................................................88 Georgia State Department of Law.......................................................................................................89 Judicial Qualifications Commission....................................................................................................89 Georgia Commission on Family Violence..........................................................................................90 County and Municipal Probation Advisory Council.......................................................................90 Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution.....................................................................................90 Office of State Administrative Hearings.............................................................................................90 Georgia Board of Workers’ Compensation........................................................................................90 Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia.......................................................................................90 Georgia Public Defender Standards Council.....................................................................................90 Judicial Nominating Commission.......................................................................................................90 Criminal Justice Coordinating Council..............................................................................................90 Georgia Appellate Practice and Educational Resource Center.......................................................90 MAP AND INDEX Judicial District Map.............................................................................................................................91 County, Circuit, and District................................................................................................................92 Circuits and Counties............................................................................................................................93 Districts, Circuits, and Counties..........................................................................................................94 Index........................................................................................................................................................95 SUPREME COURT Chief Justice Hugh P. Thompson Supreme Court Clerk 507 State Judicial Building Therese “Tee” Barnes Alphabetical Listing Atlanta, GA 30334 Suite 572 404-656-3470 244 Washington Street, SW Benham, Robert Atlanta, GA 30334 Justice retiring 1/15/17 404-656-3470 404-656-3476/F 657-4329 Presiding Justice P. Harris Hines Reporter of Decisions Blackwell, Keith R. 501 State Judicial Building Jean Ruskell Justice Atlanta, GA 30334 Suite 423 404-656-3471/F 657-7576 404-656-3470 244 Washington Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30334 Hines, P. Harris Justice Robert Benham 404-656-3460 Presiding Justice 527 State Judicial Building 404-656-3473/F 651-8566 Atlanta, GA 30334 404-656-3470 Hunstein, Carol W. Justice Justice Carol W. Hunstein 404-656-3475/F 657-9586 533 State Judicial Building Atlanta, GA 30334 Melton, Harold D. 404-656-3470 Justice 404-656-3477/F 657-4211 Justice Harold D. Melton 523 State Judicial Building Nahmias, David E. Atlanta, GA 30334 Justice 404-656-3470 404-656-3474/F 657-6997 Justice David E. Nahmias Thompson, Hugh P. Chief Justice 514 State Judicial Building 404-656-3472/F 651-8642 Atlanta, GA 30334 404-656-3470 Justice Keith R. Blackwell 536 State Judicial Building Atlanta, GA 30334 404-656-3470 position vacant position vacant 3 COURT OF APPEALS Chief Judge Sara Doyle Judge Amanda Mercier Court of Appeals Clerk/ 47 Trinity Avenue, Suite 501 47 Trinity Avenue, Suite 501 Administrator Alphabetical Listing Atlanta, GA 30334 Atlanta, GA 30334 Stephen E. Castlen 404-656-3450/F 651-6187 404-656-3450/F 651-6187 47 Trinity Avenue, Suite 501 Andrews, Gary B. Atlanta, GA 30334 Presiding Judge Presiding Judge Gary B. Andrews Judge Nels Peterson 404-656-3450/F 651-6187 404-656-3456/F 463-0546 47 Trinity Avenue, Suite 501 47 Trinity Avenue, Suite 501 [email protected] Atlanta, GA 30334 Atlanta, GA 30334 Barnes, Anne Elizabeth 404-656-3450/F 651-6187 404-656-3450/F 651-6187 Reporter of Decisions Presiding Judge Jean Ruskell 404-656-3454/F 463-8303 Presiding Judge
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guide to Judicial Branch
    ’s Legislator Guide to the Judicial Branch January 2007 2 Table of Contents Georgia’s Court System . .4 Supreme Court . .5 Court of Appeals . .7 Superior Court . .8 State Court . .8 Juvenile Court . .9 Probate Court . .10 Magistrate Court . .11 Municipal Court . .11 Georgia Court System (with appellate routes) . .12 Judicial Circuit Map . .13 Judicial Council of Georgia . .14 Judicial Council Budget Developments . .15 Judicial Council Programs . .16 Judicial Council Commissions and Committees . .18 Judge’s Councils . .23 Council of Superior Court Judges . .23 Council of State Court Judges . .24 Council of Juvenile Court Judges . .25 Council of Probate Court Judges . .26 Council of Magistrate Court Judges . .27 Council of Municipal Court Judges . .28 Georgia’s Accountability Courts . .29 Administrative Office of the Courts . .31 3 Georgia's Court System felony offenses, divorce cases and open, independent, n civil matters involving corporations. impartial court system pre- The appellate courts review records serves the fundamental of cases tried in limited and general rights of citizens. Almost all citizens jurisdiction courts to determine if willA come in contact with a court at procedural errors or errors of law that some point in their lives: could have altered the outcome of • to report for jury duty the case were made at trial. The • to settle a traffic ticket Supreme Court of Georgia is the • to testify in court final appellate court in Georgia. • to settle a lawsuit • to probate a family member’s will Managing today’s court operations • to adopt a child requires the expertise of many profes- • to get a divorce, request child sup- sionals other than judges.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Reform, Texas Style
    SMU Law Review Volume 21 Issue 2 Article 3 1967 Court Reform, Texas Style Clarence A. Guittard Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation Clarence A. Guittard, Court Reform, Texas Style, 21 SW L.J. 451 (1967) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol21/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. COURT REFORM, TEXAS STYLE by Clarence A. Guittard* R EFORM of the judiciary has been a perennial theme among Texas lawyers. In July, 1918, the Texas Bar Association, meeting at Wich- ita Falls, heard an address by Roscoe Pound on "Judicial Organization"' and adopted the report of a special committee proposing to replace article V of the Constitution of 1876 with a judicial article that would be con- sidered advanced, even by the standards of 1967. The proposal embodied the principles of unification, flexibility of jurisdiction and assignment of judicial personnel, and responsible supervision of the entire system by the supreme court, all as recommended by Pound.! In support of this proposal, the association published a pamphlet point- ing out the need for judicial reform in emphatic terms: The public is in open rebellion. The best of our judges, working in the present machine, cannot always administer justice. The rightful compen- sation of lawyers is enormously decreased, their labors increased, by the intolerable expense, complication, delays and uncertainties inherent in the system.
    [Show full text]
  • English Regional Dialect Lexis in the Names and Occupations of the Gloucestershire Cotswolds: a Reassessment of the Relationship Between Names and Dialects
    English regional dialect lexis in the names and occupations of the Gloucestershire Cotswolds: a reassessment of the relationship between names and dialects Item Type Article Authors Parkin, Harry Citation Parkin, H. (2015), ‘English regional dialect lexis in the names and occupations of the Gloucestershire Cotswolds: a reassessment of the relationship between names and dialects’, Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 23, 1, pp. 24–37. DOI 10.1515/dialect-2015-0002 Publisher De Gruyter Journal Dialectologia et Geolinguistica Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Download date 24/09/2021 11:02:04 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/621769 English regional dialect lexis in the names and occupations of the Gloucestershire Cotswolds: A reassessment of the relationship between names and dialects David Harry Parkin Abstract A number of surname-based studies have presented a relationship between medieval regional dialect lexis and the distribution of associated modern-day surnames. However, by carrying out localised research, it appears that the two might not be so closely linked as previously thought, with discrepancies in the distribution of regionally specific names and equivalent occupational descriptions. As a result, there seems to be a need to reconsider the connection between regional lexicons and corresponding name stocks, which may have been less closely related, at a period of non-hereditary by-naming, than current knowledge suggests. 1. Surnames and dialect It has been widely recognised that the regional distribution of certain by-names and surnames,1 from the medieval period up to the present day, can represent regional distinctions in Middle English (ME) dialect lexis and phonology.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Catherine E. Weaver
    Catherine E. Weaver Associate Professor, LBJ School of Public Affairs Distinguished Scholar and Research Coordinator, Robert S. Strauss Center for International Security and Law The University of Texas at Austin 2315 Red River Street, SRH 3.358 Austin, Texas 78712 email: [email protected] Strauss Center main phone: (512) 471-6267 Office Phone: (512) 232-3443 Education Ph.D., Political Science May 2003 University of Wisconsin, Madison BA, Political Science and Russian April 1994 University of Michigan Academic Positions Associate Professor, LBJ School of Public Affairs, September 2010 – present University of Texas at Austin Assistant Professor, LBJ School of Public Affairs, January 2009 – August 2010 University of Texas at Austin Assistant Professor of Political Science August 2002 – December 2008 University of Kansas Research Fellow, Brookings Institution August 2001-2002 Washington, D.C. Publications Books: Catherine Weaver. 2008. Hypocrisy Trap: The World Bank and the Poverty of Reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ~Co-recipient of the Chadwick Alger Prize for best book on International Organizations and Multilateralism, International Studies Association, 2009. (Co-recipient with Benjamin Schiff) ~Winner of the Society of Policy Scientists 2009 Harold D. Lasswell Prize. Catherine Weaver and Nicola Phillips, eds. 2010. International Political Economy and the Transatlantic Divide. London, UK: Routledge Press. 1 Articles and Book Chapters (* = in peer review journal or reviewed as part of book project): *Catherine Weaver and Susan Park. Forthcoming 2012.“The Anatomy of IO Agency: Anticorruption and Environmental Reform at the World Bank.” In Joel Oestreich, ed. Agency in International Organizations. London: Routledge Press. *Catherine Weaver. 2010. "The Politics of Performance Evaluation: Independent Evaluation at the International Monetary Fund" Review of International Organizations, September 2010, pp.365-385.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notices & the Courts
    PUBLIC NOTICES B1 DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2021 dailybusinessreview.com & THE COURTS BROWARD PUBLIC NOTICES BUSINESS LEADS THE COURTS WEB SEARCH FORECLOSURE NOTICES: Notices of Action, NEW CASES FILED: US District Court, circuit court, EMERGENCY JUDGES: Listing of emergency judges Search our extensive database of public notices for Notices of Sale, Tax Deeds B5 family civil and probate cases B2 on duty at night and on weekends in civil, probate, FREE. Search for past, present and future notices in criminal, juvenile circuit and county courts. Also duty Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach. SALES: Auto, warehouse items and other BUSINESS TAX RECEIPTS (OCCUPATIONAL Magistrate and Federal Court Judges B14 properties for sale B8 LICENSES): Names, addresses, phone numbers Simply visit: CALENDARS: Suspensions in Miami-Dade, Broward, FICTITIOUS NAMES: Notices of intent and type of business of those who have received https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/public-notices/ and Palm Beach. Confirmation of judges’ daily motion to register business licenses B3 calendars in Miami-Dade B14 To search foreclosure sales by sale date visit: MARRIAGE LICENSES: Name, date of birth and city FAMILY MATTERS: Marriage dissolutions, adoptions, https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/foreclosures/ DIRECTORIES: Addresses, telephone numbers, and termination of parental rights B8 of those issued marriage licenses B3 names, and contact information for circuit and CREDIT INFORMATION: Liens filed against PROBATE NOTICES: Notices to Creditors, county
    [Show full text]
  • D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center Probate Training - Webinar March 16, 2021
    D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center Probate Training - Webinar March 16, 2021 Kisha L. Woolen, Esquire Jennifer C. Concino, Esquire • Provide overview of the multiple services and tasks appropriately handled in the Probate Court. • Introduce basic large estate administration practices and procedures for matters heard before the Probate Court. • Jurisdiction/law • Large versus Small Estates • Opening Probate of Decedent’s Estates • Administration of Large Estates Goals of Training • Closing Probate of Decedent’s Estates • Introduce basic Intervention case practices and procedures for matters heard before the Probate Court. • Jurisdiction/law • Guardianship v. Conservatorship • Opening an Intervention proceeding • Closing an Intervention proceeding • Building A - 515 5th Street NW, Third Floor • Building Museum/F Street exit of the Judiciary Square Metro stop (Red Line) • The building to your left as you face the Building Location Museum • Main entrance on 5th Street • Handicap entrance on F Street • Probate Clerk’s Office located in room 314 • http://www.dccourts.gov/superior-court/probate-division What is in Probate? Other Probate Matters • Request Record Searches • Foreign Intervention Proceeding (FOI) • Disclaimers (DIS) • Conservatorship Proceeding (CON) • Major Litigation (LIT) • Notice of Revocable Trust (NRT) Administration of Decedent’s Estates Jurisdiction/Law • DC Code § 11-921 - Civil jurisdiction • Decedent’s who died domiciled in the District of Columbia • Special basis for jurisdiction must be proved • There have been three major revisions to the laws governing the administration of estates. The date of the death determines the applicable statute and forms used to open the estate. • July 1, 1995-Present • 1981-June 30, 1994 • Pre 1981 Petitions for Probate • 1995 - Two types of estate administration established • Supervised DC Code § 20-401 • Inventories (DC Code § 20-711) and accounts (DC Code § 20-712) must be sent to interested persons and filed with the Court.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of the STATE of DELAWARE in the MATTER OF: ) ) No. 11, 2013 PEIERLS FAMILY ) TESTAMENTARY TRUSTS )
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) No. 11, 2013 PEIERLS FAMILY ) TESTAMENTARY TRUSTS ) Court Below: Court of Chancery ) of the State of Delaware ) ) Case No.16810 Submitted: July 10, 2013 Decided: October 4, 2013 Before STEELE , Chief Justice, HOLLAND, BERGER, JACOBS , and RIDGELY , Justices, constituting the Court en Ban c. Upon appeal from the Court of Chancery. AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part. Peter S. Gordon (argued), Gordon, Fournaris & Mammarella PA, Wilmington, Delaware for appellant. Collins J. Seitz (argued), Seitz Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, Delaware for appellee. STEELE , Chief Justice: This Opinion is one of a trilogy of opinions, issued concurrently, addressing issues arising out of Petitions, filed by members of the Peierls family, requesting the Court of Chancery to accept jurisdiction over, and then modify, thirteen (13) trusts created during the period 1953 through 2005. None of these trusts were created or settled under Delaware law, and none were ever administered in Delaware. The Petitioners sought relief under recently-adopted Court of Chancery Rules 100-103, inclusive, which were designed to create an orderly procedure for entertaining petitions to modify a trust. No respondent was named in the Petitions, which the Court of Chancery denied on various grounds, including lack of jurisdiction. The Petitioners appealed to this Court, which appointed Collins J. Seitz, as amicus curiae to brief and argue in opposition to the Petitions.1 This Opinion, in No. 11, 2013, addresses the issues arising out of the seven (7) Peierls family testamentary trusts. Our opinions in the companion cases, Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Map for Developing & Strengthening The
    KENYA ROAD MAP FOR DEVELOPING & STRENGTHENING THE PROCESSED MANGO SECTOR DECEMBER 2014 TRADE IMPACT FOR GOOD The designations employed and the presentation of material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Trade Centre concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This document has not formally been edited by the International Trade Centre. ROAD MAP FOR DEVELOPING & STRENGTHENING THE KENYAN PROCESSED MANGO SECTOR Prepared for International Trade Centre Geneva, december 2014 ii This value chain roadmap was developed on the basis of technical assistance of the International Trade Centre ( ITC ). Views expressed herein are those of consultants and do not necessarily coincide with those of ITC, UN or WTO. Mention of firms, products and product brands does not imply the endorsement of ITC. This document has not been formally edited my ITC. The International Trade Centre ( ITC ) is the joint agency of the World Trade Organisation and the United Nations. Digital images on cover : © shutterstock Street address : ITC, 54-56, rue de Montbrillant, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Postal address : ITC Palais des Nations 1211 Geneva, Switzerland Telephone : + 41- 22 730 0111 Postal address : ITC, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland Email : [email protected] Internet : http :// www.intracen.org iii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Unless otherwise specified, all references to dollars ( $ ) are to United States dollars, and all references to tons are to metric tons. The following abbreviations are used : AIJN European Fruit Juice Association BRC British Retail Consortium CPB Community Business Plan DC Developing countries EFTA European Free Trade Association EPC Export Promotion Council EU European Union FPEAK Fresh Produce Exporters Association of Kenya FT Fairtrade G.A.P.
    [Show full text]
  • 3207 [email protected]
    The Media & Communications Committee present First Amendment and the U.S. Supreme Court Friday, June 28, 2019, 2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. COURSE CLASSIFICATION: INTERMEDIATE Course 3207 [email protected] Moderator: Thomas R. Julin, shareholder, Gunster Yoakley & Stewart, P.A. Panel: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Judge Adalberto Jordan; U.S. District Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks; University of Miami Law Professor Lili Levi; Florida International University Law Professor Howard Wasserman; Leslie Rothenberg, Retired Chief Judge, Florida Third District Court of Appeal and partner, the Ferraro Law Firm; Carlton Fields Jorden Burt shareholder Richard J. Ovelmen; and Timothy J. McGinn of Gunster Yoakley & Stewart, P.A. This panel will take its first in‐depth look at the First Amendment philosophy of Justice Brett Kavanaugh through the prism of eight new controversial Supreme Court cases. One was written in just a single day. The 5‐4 decision overturned a Judge Stanley Marcus stay of the execution of a Muslim prisoner because Georgia would not let an imam into the death chamber. The Supreme Court will take much more time to decide whether a massive stone cross must be removed from a traffic intersection in Maryland. The Court also is expected to put to rest its long debate over legislators favoring their own parties through gerrymandering. A police bust of a partier at ArcticMan in the Hoodoo Mountains of Alaska should set the rules for speech‐based retaliatory arrests. Two years ago the Court opened the door to disparaging trademarks. Now the owner of the FUCT mark wants the ban on scandalous and immoral marks gone too.
    [Show full text]
  • Mango Fruit Quality Improvements in Response to Water Stress: Implications for Adaptation Under Environmental Constraints
    Horticultural Science (Prague), 48, 2021 (1): 1–11 Original Paper https://doi.org/10.17221/45/2020-HORTSCI Mango fruit quality improvements in response to water stress: implications for adaptation under environmental constraints Víctor Hugo Durán Zuazo1*, Dionisio Franco Tarifa2, Belén Cárceles Rodríguez1, Baltasar Gálvez Ruiz1, Pedro Cermeño Sacristán3, Simón Cuadros Tavira4, Iván Francisco García-Tejero3 1IFAPA Centro “Camino de Purchil”, Granada, Spain 2Auntamiento de Almuñécar, Almuñécar, Spain 3IFAPA Centro “Las Torres”, Sevilla, Spain 4Departemento de Ingeniería Forestal, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain *Corresponding author: [email protected] Citation: Durán Zuazo V.H., Franco T.D., Cárceles R.B., Gálvez R.B., Cermeño S.P., Cuadros T.S., García T.I.F. (2021): Mango fruit quality improvements in response to water stress: implications for adaptation under environmental con- straints. Hort. Sci. (Prague), 48: 1–11. Abstract: Mediterranean farming is facing increasing periods of water shortage and, in the coming decades, the water reduction is expected to exert the most adverse impact upon growth and productivity. This study was performed to assess the response of the physico-biochemical quality parameters of mango fruits to different doses of irrigation in a Mediterranean subtropical area in Spain. During two-monitoring seasons, trees were subjected to deficit-irrigation strategies receiving 33, 50, and 75% of a crop evapotranspiration (ETC), and a control at 100% ETC. According to the findings and respect to control, the yield was reduced in 8, 11, and 20% for the water-stressed trees at 75, 50, and 33% ETC, respectively, producing smaller fruits in line with the amount of applied irrigation.
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Study of the Ideologies of Judges on the Unites States
    JUDGED BY THE COMPANY YOU KEEP: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE IDEOLOGIES OF JUDGES ON THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS Corey Rayburn Yung* Abstract: Although there has been an explosion of empirical legal schol- arship about the federal judiciary, with a particular focus on judicial ide- ology, the question remains: how do we know what the ideology of a judge actually is? For federal courts below the U.S. Supreme Court, legal aca- demics and political scientists have offered only crude proxies to identify the ideologies of judges. This Article attempts to cure this deficiency in empirical research about the federal courts by introducing a new tech- nique for measuring the ideology of judges based upon judicial behavior in the U.S. courts of appeals. This study measures ideology, not by subjec- tively coding the ideological direction of case outcomes, but by determin- ing the degree to which federal appellate judges agree and disagree with their liberal and conservative colleagues at both the appellate and district court levels. Further, through regression analysis, several important find- ings related to the Ideology Scores emerge. First, the Ideology Scores in this Article offer substantial improvements in predicting civil rights case outcomes over the leading measures of ideology. Second, there were very different levels and heterogeneity of ideology among the judges on the studied circuits. Third, the data did not support the conventional wisdom that Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush appointed uniquely ideological judges. Fourth, in general judges appointed by Republican presidents were more ideological than those appointed by Democratic presidents.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Government Manual 2009/2010
    The United States Government Manual 2009/2010 Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration The artwork used in creating this cover are derivatives of two pieces of original artwork created by and copyrighted 2003 by Coordination/Art Director: Errol M. Beard, Artwork by: Craig S. Holmes specifically to commemorate the National Archives Building Rededication celebration held September 15-19, 2003. See Archives Store for prints of these images. VerDate Nov 24 2008 15:39 Oct 26, 2009 Jkt 217558 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6996 Sfmt 6996 M:\GOVMAN\217558\217558.000 APPS06 PsN: 217558 dkrause on GSDDPC29 with $$_JOB Revised September 15, 2009 Raymond A. Mosley, Director of the Federal Register. Adrienne C. Thomas, Acting Archivist of the United States. On the cover: This edition of The United States Government Manual marks the 75th anniversary of the National Archives and celebrates its important mission to ensure access to the essential documentation of Americans’ rights and the actions of their Government. The cover displays an image of the Rotunda and the Declaration Mural, one of the 1936 Faulkner Murals in the Rotunda at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Building in Washington, DC. The National Archives Rotunda is the permanent home of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights. These three documents, known collectively as the Charters of Freeedom, have secured the the rights of the American people for more than two and a quarter centuries. In 2003, the National Archives completed a massive restoration effort that included conserving the parchment of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, and re-encasing the documents in state-of-the-art containers.
    [Show full text]