DOCSLIB.ORG

The Whole World Is Under the Control of the Evil

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Whole World Is Under the Control of the Evil The whole world is under the control of the evil one: a disturbing title, but if you are reading this book then I guess that you are brave enough to deepen this statement. You can read these words in 1st John chapter 5 verse 19 from the Bible, God’s word. Saying that the whole world is under the control of the evil one seems to be a heavy statement but we must not forget that Satan offered the rulership on all the kingdoms of the earth as an act of worship as quoted in the Gospels. It was like this two millennia ago and it’s like this today. How much trust do you put in the Bible? The Bible is an outstanding book, demonstrated by its scientific accuracy. For example, the sphericity of the earth in Isaiah 40:22 and it's being suspended in the vacuum in Job 26:7. The only point in which the Bible and science disagree is the origin of man. According to the Bible, man has been created by God while according science man is the product of evolution. The Bible also proves historical accuracy, but what continues to surprise most are the prophecies that are always fulfilled. Take for example the seventy weeks contained in Daniel’s book where 500 years before has been exactly foretold the year in which Christ would have been born ( Daniel 9:24-27 ). I’ll not spend more words on these facts; that you can examine more deeply on your own as they would be outside of the goal of this book. Now, the first time the Bible talks about Satan, a name that means opposer, is in the book of Genesis. Satan accuses God of being a liar and he disguises himself as a snake in front of the incautious first woman whose name was Eve. The Bible provides three occasions in writing of the devil or Satan’s work. Satan talks to Eve in Genesis 3:1-5. In the book of Job, he had a dispute with God Himself, stating that every creature has a price ( Job 1:9-11, Job 2:4 ) and in the Gospels, he tempts Jesus Christ ( Matthew 4:1-11, Mark 1:12,13 and Luke 4:1-13 ). These records do not provide much information about his doings and his personality. The name Satan tells us that he is an opposer and therefore we should have historical tracks of this. Human history divides itself in two ages: the antediluvian one and the postdiluvian one. The first is recounted only in the Bible, while for the second, there are both biblical and non-biblical testimonies until our days. Being the flood characterized by a hugely destructive force as narrated by ancient writings, we don’t have written testimonies apart from the post-dated ones contained in the Bible of what was happening in those days. Anyway, ancient buildings, that now lie 3000 feet beneath the sea, have been found as the street off of Bimini’s island in the Bahamas discovered in 1968 by Dr. J. Manson Valentine. Another similar street in Florida’s backdrop was discovered by the submarine Aluminaut in 1969. The giant buildings off of Yonaguni’s island discovered by scientist Masaaki Kimura in Japan and the submerged city in the Gulf of Khambhat ( Cambay ) announced by science and technology minister of India Murli Manohar Joshi in 2001 where also have been found pieces of carbonized wood with the carbon-14 dating method dated at a time before the flood happened. The only written testimonies on the antediluvian age are found in the Bible and are narrated in the book of Genesis (completed in 1513 BC) by Moses. He lived after the flood which is spoken of in the epic of Gilgamesh where Gilgamesh meets the survivor of the flood Utanapistim to whom gods give the gift of immortality. Jesus Christ himself talks about the flood like a real event and as a warning for the future generations in the gospel of Matthew 24:37-39. He narrated how mankind didn’t take notice of the surrounding wickedness until the flood came and swept them away. Another extra-biblical source that talks about the flood was the Matsya Purana (ancient sacred Hindu text) where it talks about a vessel on which were hosted many animals and plants to save them. This writing, completed about 300 AC, is composed of parts that are about two millennia before Christ. Before the flood, there was great wickedness and angels (described as gods in other cultures) materialized themselves to have sexual intercourses with earthly women from which were born evil and violent giants. These giants have been called the heroes of old times and men of fame, represented as demigods in parallel tales, as is narrated in Genesis 6:4,5. After the flood, new mankind came from Noah. His sons and their wives which complete genealogy is written in the book of Genesis and Jesus Christ’s lineage recorded in the Gospels. Abraham, who is the origin of the jews namely the nation of Israel, was a son of Terah who was supposedly serving other gods as perceived from what is written in Joshua 24:2. At the same time, there was a contemporary of Shem who was Noah’s son and was a survivor of the flood that swept away wicked mankind. From all this, we arrive at a very important question: how can contemporary, but born after the flood, of Shem, who was a worshiper of the true God, worship pagan gods? The Bible doesn’t explain how such apostasy took place after the flood. However, we should consider that men have always shown a certain spirituality in the wrongest ways by worshiping the sun like Egyptians and other people did. Can we think that however human beings would be influenced by powerful and wicked spiritual beings driving them away from pure worship? Could the ancient gods be the divinization of wicked spiritual beings? The first time the Bible speaks about the divinization is when it makes mention of the teraphim in Genesis 31:30,34. It referred to an event that took place around two millennia before Christ. The teraphim were little statues which represented gods or family gods and they are quoted when spoken about Rachael, the wife of Jacob son of Isaac, who stole them from his father. Spiritism has its origins in the necromancy that has a goal to get in touch with the spirits of the dead. This practice comes from ancient Egypt with its book of the dead that has been written nearly contemporarily with the Bible. The immortality of the soul, which is a fundamental of necromancy, comes from very ancient times being taught in religions like Hinduism that comes from Vedism which sacred texts are dated two millennia before Christ. An architectural example that is representative of the teaching of the immortality of the soul is the Egyptian pyramid. The pyramids were huge tombs that only pharaohs could have. At the same time, they appear in every ancient culture like the Mesoamerican one, the European one (they can be found in Visoko in Bosnia) and also in the Asiatic one (the monument of Yonaguni in japan and Xian in China). The pyramid on the dollar seems to resemble the one of Cheope in Giza in Egypt. On the dollar bill we have the statement “in God we trust”, but how is possible to link a pagan symbol like the pyramid to faith in the Creator? Besides the pyramid, we find the statements “novus ordus seclorum” and “annuit coeptis” which mean respectively “new order of the ages” and “(God) approves our enterprises”. The Italian President Giorgio Napolitano said, “per contribuire alla creazione di un nuovo ordine mondiale” (to contribute to the creation of new world order). Similar things have been said by famous personalities like the Pope Benedetto XVI (Ratzinger) who said, “ti incoraggia a impegnarti nell’edificazione di un nuovo ordine mondiale” (it encourages you to engage in the edification of new world order). Pope Giovanni Paolo II (Wojtyla) said, “respect for the unique dignity of every human being a new world order”. The American President George H.W. Bush stated, “for ourselves and for future generations a new world order” and President Barack Obama said, “world order that I think all of us would like to see”. We can see the complicity between religion and politics. This should induce us to reflect on how this is different from Jesus Christ who said “my kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). Now the pyramid with the eye inside is a masonic symbol. The Roman number MDCCLXVVI means 1776; that is the year in which has been declared the independence of the United States of America. Also, there is an eagle, that is their symbol, with above the Star of David formed by 13 stars (symbolizing the 13 colonies that together proclaimed the independence from the United Kingdom the 4th of July 1776) and the Latin “e pulribus unum” which means “out of many, one”. David’s star is a Zionist symbol and it’s widely used in the esoteric Kabbalah and the general occultism. We find it also in other cultures, like for example, on a stone above an idol contained in the ruins of a temple protected by a pyramid in Nouga Kogen in Japan. The eye inside the triangle is also called “the Eye of the Providence”. It symbolizes the eye of God that examines us, its being included in a triangle comes from a trinitarian conception.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Giving Alexander Oparin's Origin of Life Postulates a Future
    Giving Alexander Oparin’s Origin of Life Postulates a Future Jeffrey J. Wolynski [email protected] April 17, 2016 Cocoa, FL 32922 Abstract: Alexander Oparin was a Soviet scientist working behind the Iron Curtain. Many of his ideas are true and can be further developed by utilizing the General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis. Explanation is with author’s writing in dark green. Although Oparin's started out reviewing various panspermia theories, including those of Hermann von Helmholtz and William Thomson Kelvin,[3] he was primarily interested in how life began. As early as 1922, he asserted that: 1. There is no fundamental difference between a living organism and lifeless matter. The complex combination of manifestations and properties characteristic of life must have arisen as a part of the process of the evolution of matter. The complex combination of manifestations and properties characteristic of life arise as a part of the evolution of a single star as it evolves, cools and dies becoming an “exoplanet/planet”, as stellar evolution is planet formation itself. 2. Taking into account the recent discovery of methane in the atmospheres of Jupiter and the other giant planets, Oparin suggested that the infant Earth had possessed a strongly reducing atmosphere, containing methane, ammonia, hydrogen and water vapor. In his opinion, these were the raw materials for the evolution of life. Earth had a very violent hot past before it even possessed a reducing atmosphere, it was big, hot and bright like the Sun before it was cool enough to allow for the formation of ammonia, methane, hydrogen gas and water vapor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science of Astrobiology
    The Science of Astrobiology Cellular Origin, Life in Extreme Habitats and Astrobiology ________________________________________________________________ Volume 20 (Second Edition) ________________________________________________________________ Julian Chela-Flores The Science of Astrobiology A Personal View on Learning to Read the Book of Life Julian Chela-Flores The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics P.O. Box 586 34014 Trieste Italy [email protected] ISSN 1566-0400 ISBN 978-94-007-1626-1 e-ISBN 978-94-007-1627-8 DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1627-8 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011934255 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) The cupola in the West Atrium of St. Mark's Basilica in Venice, Italy representing the biblical interpretation of Genesis (Cf., also pp. 215-216 at the beginning of Part 4: The destiny of life in the universe. With kind permission of the Procuratoria of St. Mark's Basilica.) For Sarah Catherine Mary Table of contents Table of contents vii Preface xvii Acknowledgements xxi Recommendations to the readers xxiii INTRODUCTION The cultural and scientific context of astrobiology I.1 Early attempts to read the Book of Life 3 ARISTARCHUS OF SAMOS AND HIPPARCHUS 4 NICHOLAS OF CUSA (CUSANUS) 4 NICHOLAS COPERNICUS 4 GIORDANO BRUNO 5 CHARLES DARWIN 6 I.2 Some pioneers of the science of astrobiology 8 ALEXANDER OPARIN 8 STANLEY MILLER 10 SIDNEY W.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1910.06396V4 [Physics.Pop-Ph] 12 Jun 2021 ∗ Rmtv Ieeitdi H R-Oa Eua(Vni H C System)
    Nebula-Relay Hypothesis: Primitive Life in Nebula and Origin of Life on Earth Lei Feng1,2, ∗ 1Key Laboratory of Dark Matter and Space Astronomy, Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210023 2Joint Center for Particle, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, Nanjing University – Purple Mountain Observatory, Nanjing 210093, China Abstract A modified version of panspermia theory, named Nebula-Relay hypothesis or local panspermia, is introduced to explain the origin of life on Earth. Primitive life, acting as the seeds of life on Earth, originated at pre-solar epoch through physicochemical processes and then filled in the pre- solar nebula after the death of pre-solar star. Then the history of life on the Earth can be divided into three epochs: the formation of primitive life in the pre-solar epoch; pre-solar nebula epoch; the formation of solar system and the Earth age of life. The main prediction of our model is that primitive life existed in the pre-solar nebula (even in the current nebulas) and the celestial body formed therein (i.e. solar system). arXiv:1910.06396v4 [physics.pop-ph] 12 Jun 2021 ∗Electronic address: [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION Generally speaking, there are several types of models to interpret the origin of life on Earth. The two most persuasive and popular models are the abiogenesis [1, 2] and pansper- mia theory [3]. The modern version of abiogenesis is also known as chemical origin theory introduced by Oparin in the 1920s [1], and Haldane proposed a similar theory independently [2] at almost the same time. In this theory, the organic compounds are naturally produced from inorganic matters through physicochemical processes and then reassembled into much more complex living creatures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mystery of Life's Origin
    The Mystery of Life’s Origin The Continuing Controversy CHARLES B. THAXTON, WALTER L. BRADLEY, ROGER L. OLSEN, JAMES TOUR, STEPHEN MEYER, JONATHAN WELLS, GUILLERMO GONZALEZ, BRIAN MILLER, DAVID KLINGHOFFER Seattle Discovery Institute Press Description e origin of life from non-life remains one of the most enduring mysteries of modern science. e Mystery of Life’s Origin: e Continuing Controversy investigates how close scientists are to solving that mystery and explores what we are learning about the origin of life from current research in chemistry, physics, astrobiology, biochemistry, and more. e book includes an updated version of the classic text e Mystery of Life’s Origin by Charles axton, Walter Bradley, and Roger Olsen, and new chapters on the current state of the debate by chemist James Tour, physicist Brian Miller, astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, biologist Jonathan Wells, and philosopher of science Stephen C. Meyer. Copyright Notice Copyright © 2020 by Discovery Institute, All Rights Reserved. Library Cataloging Data e Mystery of Life’s Origin: e Continuing Controversy by Charles B. axton, Walter L. Bradley, Roger L, Olsen, James Tour, Stephen Meyer, Jonathan Wells, Guillermo Gonzalez, Brian Miller, and David Klinghoffer 486 pages, 6 x 9 x 1.0 inches & 1.4 lb, 229 x 152 x 25 mm. & 0.65 kg Library of Congress Control Number: 9781936599745 ISBN-13: 978-1-936599-74-5 (paperback), 978-1-936599-75-2 (Kindle), 978-1-936599-76-9 (EPUB) BISAC: SCI013040 SCIENCE / Chemistry / Organic BISAC: SCI013030 SCIENCE / Chemistry / Inorganic BISAC: SCI007000 SCIENCE / Life Sciences / Biochemistry BISAC: SCI075000 SCIENCE / Philosophy & Social Aspects Publisher Information Discovery Institute Press, 208 Columbia Street, Seattle, WA 98104 Internet: http://www.discoveryinstitutepress.com/ Published in the United States of America on acid-free paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of the Origin and Early Evolution of Life
    Scholars Crossing Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of Biology and Chemistry 2000 Theories of the Origin and Early Evolution of Life David A. DeWitt Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/bio_chem_fac_pubs Part of the Biology Commons, and the Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation DeWitt, David A., "Theories of the Origin and Early Evolution of Life" (2000). Faculty Publications and Presentations. 93. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/bio_chem_fac_pubs/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology and Chemistry at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. T tect the animals and their habitats, and to pro­ Further Reading Life mote a sense of stewardship of the environment. Goodall's Roots and Shoots children's program, Books Sciences Fossey, D. Gorillas in the Mist. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, for example, promotes environmental education 1983. 1950-present and compassion toward the Earths living things. Goodall,]. The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behav­ She originally began the program in the hopes of ior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986. influencing young people in Africa. The pro­ Stone, L. Kinship and Gender. Boulder: Westview Press, gram qUickly spread and now has chapters Harper-Collins, 1997. worldwide. Goodall has also been influential in establishing wildlife sanctuaries in Africa, in­ Periodical Articles cluding one in Congo and another in Uganda. Bower, B. "Monkeys Provide Models of Child Abuse." Sci­ Fossey's research and educational efforts were ence News (23 May 1998): 324.
    [Show full text]
  • Vladimir Vernadsky
    The Transition From the Biosphere To the Noösphere by Vladimir Vernadsky Excerpts from Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon 1938 Translated by William Jones Vladimir Ivanovich Vernadsky 1863-1945 10 Spring-Summer 2012 21st CENTURY Introduction deleyev, and the renowned soil scientist V.I. Dokuchaev, Vernadsky was first drawn to the study of crystallogra- by William Jones phy and mineralogy. Vernadsky went on expeditions he name of Vladimir Ivanovich Vernadsky may be with Dokuchaev to study the fertile “black earth” of familiar to many people involved in the area of sci- Ukraine, where his attention was first attracted to the el- Tence, particularly in the geological and so-called ements of living organisms that contributed to that soil’s “earth” sciences, but most of these scientists, without a tremendous productivity. Indeed, it would be later, dur- good working knowledge of Russian, will only have ing his temporary exile in Ukraine after the Bolshevik known his work, at best, through the publication of his Revolution that Vernadsky would first develop his own 1926 monograph, “The Biosphere,” which brought him unique concept of the role of the “biosphere.” some immediate international attention since it soon ap- But Vernadsky, like Leonardo da Vinci, one of his peared (in 1929) in a French edition. This has since been great heroes in the realm of science, was also something translated into many languages, although first appearing of a universal genius. His interests spread over the entire in English only in 1986. Since the 1980s, the work of Ver- gamut of scientific thought. And like Leonardo, his sem- nadsky has been widely circulated and popularized by inal work in so many areas provided the basis for further the movement led by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Examining life's origins : history and epistemic principles in the search for the origins of life Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/09p75718 Author Martin, Eric Collin Publication Date 2010 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Examining Life’s Origins: History and Epistemic Principles in the Search for the Origins of Life A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy (Science Studies) by Eric Collin Martin Committee in charge: Professor William Bechtel, Chair Professor Craig Callender Professor Nancy Cartwright Professor Naomi Oreskes Professor Robert Westman ` 2010 The Dissertation of Eric Collin Martin is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2010 iii DEDICATION For my parents, Sandy Martin and Robert Martin iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page …………………………………………………………………………. iii Dedication ……………………………………………………………………………… iv Table of Contents ……………………………………………………………………… v List of Figures ………………………………………………………………………… vi Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………. vii Vita……………………………………………………………………………………… ix Abstract of the Dissertation …………………………………………………………... xv Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………. 1 Chapter 1: J.B.S. Haldane between holism and mechanism ………………………….. 21 Chapter 2: Haldane, expertise, and the popular press ………………………………… 58 Chapter 3: “Not just talk”: The Miller-Urey experiment in context …………………… 84 Chapter 4: Origins of life and evolutionary theory ……………………………………. 97 Chapter 5: The Principle of Continuity in origins of life research ………………….. 116 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………... 151 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Illustration from Haldane’s book, My Friend, Mr. Leakey..………………. 60 Figure 2 – Haldane in Black Watch uniform ………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Ivanovich Oparin [Darwin of the 20Th Century]
    Glossary on Kalinga Prize Laureates UNESCO - Kalinga Prize Winner- 1976 Alexander Ivanovich Oparin [Darwin of the 20th Century] Soviet Biologist and Bio-Chemist Acclaimed as one of the Greatest Authorities on the Origin of Life. [Born : March 2, 1894 in the Old Russian City Uglitsch (Jaroslavl), located to borders of the Volga River Died : April 21, 1980, Moscow] There is no fundamental difference between a living Organism and Lifeless mater. The complex combination of manifestations and properties so characteristics of life must have arisen in the process of the evolution of matter. ….Alexander Oparin 1 Glossary on Kalinga Prize Laureates Oparin, Aleksandr Ivanovich (1894-1980) A Brief Biographical Profile Russian biochemist who, in 1924, wrote a pamphlet on the origin of life (based on ideas presented at the Russian Botanical Society in 1922) and provided what Bernal called “the first and principal modern appreciation of the problem”. His writings only reached the West, however, in the late 1930s1. Although Oparin began by reviewing the various panspermia theories, he was primarily interested in how life initially began. He asserted. There is no fundamental difference between a living organism and lifeless matter. The complex combination of manifestations and properties so characteristic of life must have arisen in the process of the evolution of matter. But what was that process? Taking into account the recent discovery of methane in the atmospheres of Jupiter and the other giant planets, Oparin postulated that the infant Earth had possessed a strongly reducing atmosphere, containing methane, ammonia, hydrogen, and water vapor. In his opinion, these were the raw materials for the evolution of life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Modern Synthesis the Genetic Basis of Natural Selection, the Origin
    The Modern Synthesis The genetic basis of natural selection, the origin of life, and the evolution of human beings Waseda University, SILS, History of Modern Earth and Life Sciences “Swamping” Darwin and Galton had believed that the characteristics of the parents are blended in the offspring, and Dalton had shown that those of the progeny will regress towards the mean of the population. This made it difficult to understand how advantageous traits could increase in the population. In 1867, Fleeming Jenkin (1833–1885) pointed out that blending will render any advantageous variation ineffective because it will be “swamped” by intermixture with the rest of the population. This objection disturbed Darwin, and he was unable to see how to reconcile it with his theory. This shows that both Darwin and Jenkin were still thinking of natural selection acting on individuals, with incrementally different characteristics. In order for the theory of evolution by natural selection to be established on a firm footing, it was necessary to change the perspective to one of selection acting on discrete factors in a population. Modern Synthesis 1 / 32 The biometricians and the ancestral law Two of Galton’s followers, Karl Pearson (1857–1936) and W.F.R. Weldon (1860–1906) founded the journal Biometrika in 1902 to publish and promote their work on continuous variation. The biometricians used Galton’s ancestral law of inheritance: p0:5q ` p0:5q2 ` p0:5q3 ` ¨ ¨ ¨ “ 1: By focusing on traits that tend to be blended, they argued that the ancestral law of heredity was more fundamental to inheritance than Mendel’s law, which they thought operated only in special circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of Life
    The origin of life Curators: Thomas Henning Max Planck Institute for Astronomy Andrei Lupas Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology The origin of life at a glance The study of the fundamental pathways from non-living matter to life, starting with the build-up of simple organic molecules, over the synthesis of nucleotides and finally to the formation of RNA and DNA - the messenger material for all present life on Earth - is entering a phase where major progress can be expected. In parallel, the discovery of planets outside of the Solar System and the detection of Earth-like planets in regions around other stars where liquid water can exist has opened up a new line of research with the goal to find life elsewhere by tracing biological activity on other planets through the spectroscopy of their atmospheres. The research topic The origin of life has preoccupied humans since the dawn of civilization and has led to a wide range of creation myths involving superhuman agents. The ancient Greek were the first to seek a scientific explanation and proposed spontaneous generation as a path for the emergence of complex organic forms from simpler inorganic matter. With the rise of European science after the Middle Ages, biologists gradually refuted this hypothesis, showing instead a seemingly unbridgeable gulf between life and inanimate matter (“omne vivum ex vivo”). At the same time, however, chemists gradually proved the validity of chemical principles across all matter, living and dead, leading them from the synthesis of an organic substance from inorganic precursors (urea) to the establishment of organic chemistry and biochemistry as scientific disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Origin of Life & Building Blocks of Life
    1 Origin of Life & Building Blocks of Life 1.1 What is life? Astrobiology studies the origins, evolution, distribution, and future of life in the universe. 4.6 Gyr ago: Earth formation 3.5 Gyr ago: Evidence for life forms The subject of our lecture today is what could have happened in the intervening period. The very first hypothesis on the origin of life was spontaneous origin of life from “mud”. It was convincingly disproved by Luis Pasteur (1822-1895) who demonstrated that sterilized solution excluded from contact with microorganisms would remain sterile indefinitely. A new, more difficult question was raised: If all life comes from existing life, where did the first life come from? Still, an inescapable and logical conclusion is that the very first life may have arisen from non- living materials present in the Universe. Two key features indicate life: the capacity for self-replication the capacity to undergo Darwinian evolution (natural selection) Some failures of the definition: A mule as an offspring of a donkey and a horse cannot breed and, thus, incapable of taking part in the process of self-replication and Darwinian evolution. Yet it is alive. etc. 1.2 Building blocks of life Carbon The only element that can form large molecules It can form chemical bonds with many other atoms Many carbon compounds are readily dissolved in water which makes possible chemical reactions. Organic matter is the compounds based on carbon Most common elements of life H, O, C and N are the most abundant non-nobel gas elements in the Universe S and P are also important elements of life and are the 10th and 15th most abundant elements in the Universe Astrobiology: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limits of Organic Life in Planetary Systems
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/11919 SHARE The Limits of Organic Life in Planetary Systems DETAILS 116 pages | 8.5 x 11 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-10484-5 | DOI 10.17226/11919 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Committee on the Limits of Organic Life in Planetary Systems; Committee on the Origins and Evolution of Life; Space Studies Board; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Board on Life Sciences; Division on Earth and Life Studies; FIND RELATED TITLES National Research Council Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. The Limits of Organic Life in Planetary Systems The Limits of Organic Life in Planetary Systems Committee on the Limits of Organic Life in Planetary Systems Committee on the Origins and Evolution of Life Space Studies Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences Board on Life Sciences Division on Earth and Life Studies Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. The Limits of Organic Life in Planetary Systems THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
    [Show full text]