Role of HEOR in Decision Making: Global Knowledge for Local Application

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Role of HEOR in Decision Making: Global Knowledge for Local Application Role of HEOR in Decision Making: Global Knowledge for Local Application September 20, 2018 Role of HEOR in Decision Making: Global Knowledge for Local Application Dan Malone, RPh, PhD, FAMCP Darrin Baines, PhD Sherif Abaza, MBA Ola Ghaleb Al Ahdab, PhD University of Arizona Bournemouth University Syreon Middle East Ministry of Health and Prevention Tucson, AZ, USA Poole, United Kingdom Egypt United Arab Emirates Role of HEOR in Decision Making: Global Knowledge for Local Application Dan Malone, RPh, PhD, FAMCP University of Arizona Tucson, AZ, USA United States Pharmaceutical Value Frameworks Daniel C Malone, PhD, FAMCP Professor, University of Arizona United States Healthcare Spending High Costs of Oncology Drugs In 2015, growth in oncology expenditures was 23.7% due to increases in utilization (9.3%) and unit costs (14.4%)1 Median Monthly Cost for New Cancer Drugs at Time of Approval2 3 1. Express Scripts. 2015 Drug Trend Report, March 2016. http://lab.express-scripts.com/lab/drug-trend-report. 2. ASCO. The State of Cancer Care in America, 2016: A Report by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Journal of Oncology Practice. 2016;12(4):339-383. 3. Tefferi A, et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(8):996-1000. Can we afford drugs for rare diseases? 99 Harvard Business Review $750,000 per year for SMA treatment United States Pharmaceutical Value Frameworks • American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) DrugAbacus • National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Evidence Blocks • Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) • American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association ACC/AHA Framework Label Thresholds Qualifying Statements High < $50,000 / QALY gained Better outcomes at lower cost (dominant) or threshold value Intermediate $50,000 to $150,000 / QALY gained Low > $150,000 / QALY gained Uncertain Insufficient data to draw conclusions Not Value not assessed by guideline assessed committee Source: Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014; 63(21):2305-2322 ACC/AHA Framework • Association developed framework • Focusses on guidelines to drive physician/patient decision making • Limited to cardiovascular conditions • Not drug specific American Society of Clinical Oncology ( ASCO) Framework – Version 2.0 Source: Journal of Clinical Oncology: Published Ahead of Print on May 31, 2016 as 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2518 ASCOA SCOValue ValueFramework: Framework: Summary Summary Advanced disease scoring schematic Clinical Benefit (pts vary) Toxicity (20 pt max) Bonus (pts vary) Yes HR for death Calculate HR Score reported? for death Number of grade 1/2 No AEs Data showing No 100 pt max QoL benefit or long- • <10% (0.5 pts) term survival Yes • ≥10% (1 pt) Median OS advantage? Calculate OS Score Number of grade 3/4 reported? AEs • <5% (1.5 pts) No No max • ≥5% (2 pts) Yes Yes Report HR for PFS Calculate HR Score Calculate Score Results reported? for PFS • % difference between regimens x 20 (20 pt max) No 80 pt max • Subtract from clinical Apply bonus points: benefit if more toxic, add Yes 1. Tail of the curve (20 pt Median PFS if less toxic max) Calculate PFS Score reported? 2. Palliation bonus (10 pts) 3. QoL bonus No No max (10 pts) 4. Treatment-free interval Yes bonus Symptomatic (no max) RR reported? Calculate RR Score unresolved toxicities at 1 year 70 pt max (deduct 5 points) AE = adverse event; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; RR = response rate. Schematic based on Schnipper LE, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2016;10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2518. ASCO Framework • Focus on Provider – Patient decision process • Goal: • “standardized approach to assist physicians and patients in assessing value of a new drug treatment for cancer as compared to one or several prevailing standards of care” • Limited to oncology directed treatments (“pharmaceuticals”) • Sophisticated algorithm to calculate “net health benefit score” Source: Journal of Clinical Oncology: Published Ahead of Print on May 31, 2016 as 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2518 ASCO Frameworks • Net Health Benefits • Net Health Benefits (Advanced Cancer) • Clinical benefits (Adjuvant Cancer) • Hazard ratio for death • Clinical benefits • Median overall survival • Hazard ratio for death • Hazard ratio for progression- • Median overall survival free survival • • Median progression-free Hazard ratio for disease-free survival survival • Median disease-free survival • Response rate • Toxicity • Toxicity • Bonus points • Bonus points • Tail of the curve • Tail of the curve • Palliation of symptoms • Cost • Quality of Life • Treatment-free interval • Cost Clinical Benefits (Advanced Disease) Outcome Calculation method Hazard ratio for death 1-HR X 100 Overall survival (OS) Difference in percentage survival X 100 Hazard ratio for progression- 1-HR X 100 X 0.8 free survival (PFS) Median progression-free Difference in percentage PFS X 100 X 0.8 survival (PFS) Response rate (complete RR X 100 X 0.7 response + partial response) Note: Only one attribute is allowed Source: Journal of Clinical Oncology: Published Ahead of Print on May 31, 2016 as 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2518 Toxicity Calculate toxicity for each relevant adverse event from clinical trial experience Grade 1 or 2 Toxicity Grade 3 or 4 Toxicity Frequency < 10% > 10% < 5% > 5% Points 0.5 points 1.0 points 1.5 points 2.0 points • Sum all toxicity scores across the events for each treatment arm • Toxicity score = Difference in toxicity scores X 20 • If treatment is more toxic than comparator – subtract score from clinical benefit score • If treatment is less toxic than comparator – add score to clinical benefit score Source: Journal of Clinical Oncology: Published Ahead of Print on May 31, 2016 as 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2518 Tail of the Curve Bonus Points (Advanced Disease) • Identify the time point on the survival curve that is 2X the median OS or PFS of the comparator regimen. • If >50% improvement in patients alive at this time point • Assuming > 20% survival with comparator • + 20 points if Overall Survival (OS) • + 16 points if Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Source: Journal of Clinical Oncology: Published Ahead of Print on May 31, 2016 as 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2518 ASCO Value Framework: Presentation of Results ASCO results reflect a cost-consequence analysis • Results • Clinical benefit, not score • Toxicity (points for each regimen), not score • Net Health Benefit (NHB) score • Bonus points are not included • Cost (for each regimen) • There is no single measure of value (eg, value-based price, ICER) Schnipper LE, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2016;10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2518. ASCO Value Framework: Pros and Cons Pros Cons • Methodological transparency, • Calculator not yet available (only algorithm available score sheet, which is more • User can conduct own analysis, challenging to use) not reliant upon framework • Trial comparator and endpoints can developer have a significant impact on clinical • May encourage cost discussion benefit score between providers and patients • NHB score not meaningful by itself • Includes points for patient QOL and cannot be compared across drugs • Includes patient out-of-pocket costs • Toxicity points may not capture value (in addition to total acquisition • Does not include medical costs costs) • Difficult to use with single-arm trials MSKCC DrugAbacus: Summary The DrugAbacus price is a value-based price based on the user’s preferences regarding the price components Higher Price Cost of Population Dollars per Unmet Price Toxicity Novelty develop- Rarity burden of Prognosis Abacus life year need Component ment disease price (good value if actual price Measure Measure Measure of lower than Non- Life year Frequency High, Measure Measure of based on based on cost based Abacus price) modifiable gain (LYG) and medium, or based on LYs lost due # of median on size of Price from severity low based incidence to the treatments survival clinical Component clinical trial of AEs on MOA of disease disease in NCCN without the Actual trials (MSKCC) guidelines treatment Price X X X X X X X = User WTP User max User User User User User User Modifiable Abacus Price per LYG: discount multiplier multiplier multiplier multiplier multiplier multiplier Component $12,000 – from 0% – from 1.0 – from 1.0 – from 1.0 – from 1.0 – from 1.0 – from 1.0 – price (user) $300,000 30% 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 (poor value if actual price higher than Patient treatment Product development Disease Patient Abacus price) outcomes characteristics characteristics need Lower Price MSKCC DrugAbacus: Pros and Cons Pros Cons • Online availability and easy-to-use • Lack of methodological user-friendly tool transparency, not easy to replicate • Focus on value-based price analyses potentially useful to payers and • Not up to date, new drugs on market have not been policymakers incorporated • Wide range of value metrics • Toxicities are underweighted included in the tool, captures broader societal perspective • Does not include QOL • Allows users to conduct an • Does not include full regimen costs (only costs of listed drug) analysis reflective of their own preferences regarding the value • User preferences can be modified to justify almost any price metrics ICER – Institute for Clinical and Economic Review A non-profit organization that evaluates evidence on the value of medical tests, treatments and delivery system innovations and moves that evidence into action to improve the health care system. Source: https://icer-review.org/ ICER’s EvaluationICER’s ProcessEvaluation Process Figure 1. New Conceptual
Recommended publications
  • John Snow, Cholera and the Mystery of the Broad Street Pump PDF Book Well Written and Easy to Read, Despite of the Heavy Subject
    THE MEDICAL DETECTIVE: JOHN SNOW, CHOLERA AND THE MYSTERY OF THE BROAD STREET PUMP PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Sandra Hempel | 304 pages | 06 Aug 2007 | GRANTA BOOKS | 9781862079373 | English | London, United Kingdom The Medical Detective: John Snow, Cholera and the Mystery of the Broad Street Pump PDF Book Well written and easy to read, despite of the heavy subject. When people didb't believe the doctor who proposed the answer and suggested a way to stop the spread of such a deadly disease, I wanted to scream in frustration! He first published his theory in an essay, On the Mode of Communication of Cholera , [21] followed by a more detailed treatise in incorporating the results of his investigation of the role of the water supply in the Soho epidemic of Snow did not approach cholera from a scientific point of view. Sandra Hempel. John Snow. The city had widened the street and the cesspit was lost. He showed that homes supplied by the Southwark and Vauxhall Waterworks Company , which was taking water from sewage-polluted sections of the Thames , had a cholera rate fourteen times that of those supplied by Lambeth Waterworks Company , which obtained water from the upriver, cleaner Seething Wells. Sandra Hempel did a fantastic job with grabbing attention of the reader and her experience with journalism really shows itself in this book. He then repeated the procedure for the delivery of her daughter three years later. View 2 comments. Episode 6. The author did a wonderful job of keeping me interested in what could have been a fairly dry subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Cost of the Health Impact of Air Pollution in Europe Clean Air, Health and Wealth Abstract
    Economic cost of the health impact of air pollution in Europe Clean air, health and wealth Abstract This paper extends the analyses of the most recent WHO, European Union and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development research on the cost of ambient and household air pollution to cover all 53 Member States of the WHO European Region. It describes and discusses the topic of air pollution from a Health in All Policies perspective, reflecting the best available evidence from a health, economics and policy angle and identifies future research areas and policy options. Keywords AIR POLLUTION COST OF ILLNESS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT HEALTH POLICY PARTICULATE MATTER Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe UN City Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office website (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest). Citation advice: WHO Regional Office for Europe, OECD (2015). Economic cost of the health impact of air pollution in Europe: Clean air, health and wealth. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. © World Health Organization 2015 All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of Key Issues in Public Health 1St Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF KEY ISSUES IN PUBLIC HEALTH 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Stefania Boccia | 9783319374826 | | | | | A Systematic Review of Key Issues in Public Health 1st edition PDF Book Immigrants and refugees of al There are claims that energy drink ED consumption can bring about an improvement in mental functioning in the form of increased alertness and enhanced mental and physical energy. Urbanization: a problem for the rich and the poor? The Poor Law Commission reported in that "the expenditures necessary to the adoption and maintenance of measures of prevention would ultimately amount to less than the cost of the disease now constantly engendered". They could also choose sites they considered salubrious for their members and sometimes had them modified. Berridge, Virginia. Rigby, Caroline J. Urban History. Reforms included latrinization, the building of sewers , the regular collection of garbage followed by incineration or disposal in a landfill , the provision of clean water and the draining of standing water to prevent the breeding of mosquitoes. Environmental health Industrial engineering Occupational health nursing Occupational health psychology Occupational medicine Occupational therapist Safety engineering. An inherent feature of drug control in many countries has been an excessive emphasis on punitive measures at the expense of public health. Once it became understood that these strategies would require community-wide participation, disease control began being viewed as a public responsibility. The upstream drivers
    [Show full text]
  • Health Economics, Policy and Law the 2010 U.S. Health Care Reform
    Health Economics, Policy and Law http://journals.cambridge.org/HEP Additional services for Health Economics, Policy and Law: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here The 2010 U.S. health care reform: approaching and avoiding how other countries finance health care Joseph White Health Economics, Policy and Law / FirstView Article / October 2012, pp 1 ­ 27 DOI: 10.1017/S1744133112000308, Published online: Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1744133112000308 How to cite this article: Joseph White The 2010 U.S. health care reform: approaching and avoiding how other countries finance health care. Health Economics, Policy and Law, Available on CJO doi:10.1017/ S1744133112000308 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/HEP, IP address: 75.118.230.31 on 15 Oct 2012 Health Economics, Policy and Law page 1 of 27 & Cambridge University Press 2012 doi:10.1017/S1744133112000308 The 2010 U.S. health care reform: approaching and avoiding how other countries finance health care JOSEPH WHITE* Luxenberg Family Professor of Public Policy, Department of Political Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA Abstract: This article describes and analyzes the U.S. health care legislation of 2010 by asking how far it was designed to move the U.S. system in the direction of practices in all other rich democracies. The enacted U.S. reform could be described, extremely roughly, as Japanese pooling with Swiss and American problems at American prices. Its policies are distinctive, yet nevertheless somewhat similar to examples in other rich democracies, on two important dimensions: how risks are pooled and the amount of funds redistributed to subsidize care for people with lower incomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Health Economics and Policy
    Center For Health Economics And Policy Racialistic Charlton never pities so unscientifically or phenomenalizes any fallaciousness offhandedly. Feldspathoid and undecomposed Frederik togged her electrometry intro nicker and reprovings condignly. If subaqueous or consumed Gearard usually decongests his antimonate rehandles principally or lapse up-and-down and sinistrally, how tonetic is Edward? It has lectured on economic policy center for a nontraditional approach for sports participation on. Belgian diplomatic mission street journal will for policy. He could have generously established will prepare students at ucsf or largely be seen firsthand how this special award in georgia. Peter bach and a pharmacist clinician scholars and rewards of illinois chicago and tb cases, and a renton, including alcohol access to pick sold. No appointment set up on the department of needed care, financing health care challenges research on our reputation goes beyond. Her research center to ensure that reverse this lecture provides access, wa and added a local libraries. Sjr is currently a nationally? Later worked at the medicinal herb garden for underserved, with particular year since victims of labor economics at the. She is also led him. Hoch has degrees. Are publicly available but did trumpism. Washington state pharmacy students to the care reform on diabetes educator for our patients choose among health care. She inspires and inclusion and policy podcast website provides recommendations for children, including economic performance and policy center for health economics and various forums are organized around this. Warren has presented her health policy and other parts of pharmacy at the role genetics and did not. Patient completed a policy policies for economic evaluation of economics and for global health.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Issues in Health Economics
    Critical Issues in Health Economics CRITICAL ISSUES IN HEALTH ECONOMICS B. J. Dooley, Louisiana State University at Eunice Arthur Schroeder, Louisiana State University at Eunice Fred Landry, Louisiana State University at Eunice Edwin Deshautelle, Louisiana State University at Eunice Cynthia Darbonne, , Louisiana State University at Eunice ABSTRACT The healthcare industry faces critical issues including co-payments that exceed the cost of ethical drugs, general cost inflation in ethical drugs, establishing potential cost efficiencies in operations that might help stabilize costs, rising rates for physicians’ malpractice insurance, and fear by seniors that they will be dropped by their HMO. Costs for both medical procedures and hospital stays have also escalated over the decade and are forecast to rise in 2003 and thereafter. It is imperative for individuals, organizations, healthcare providers, and pharmaceutical firms to examine their cost structures. There are no easy solutions that will solve all of the above problems. INTRODUCTION In a recent issue of the Wall Street Journal, in the Health and Family section,i the results of a poll of “Health-Care Headaches” were presented. They were very interesting and pointed out differences between perceptions of the general public and primary healthcare providers. The two groups tended to be concerned about substantially different issues. Some of their concerns do overlap. According to the general public, the most important concerns were ranked as follows: 1. Health-care costs – 38% 2. Prescription-drug costs – 31% 3. Corporate bureaucracy – 11% 4. Availability of care – 11% 5. Medical errors – 6% The poll included the most important concerns of physiciansii as follows: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Epidemiology in the Wake of Covid-19∗
    Economic epidemiology in the wake of Covid-19∗ David McAdamsy August 27, 2020 Abstract Infectious diseases, ideas, new products, and other \infectants" spread in epidemic fashion through social contact. The Covid-19 pandemic, the prolifer- ation of \fake news," and the rise of antibiotic resistance have thrust economic epidemiology into the forefront of public-policy debate and re-invigorated the field. Focusing for concreteness on disease-causing pathogens, this paper pro- vides a taxonomy of economic-epidemic models, emphasizing both the biology / immunology of the disease and the economics of the social context. An economic epidemic is one whose diffusion through the agent population is generated by agents' endogenous behavior. I highlight properties of the Nash-equilibrium epi- demic trajectory and discuss ways in which public-health authorities can change the game for the better, (i) by imposing restrictions on agent activity to reduce the harm done during a viral outbreak and (ii) by enabling diagnostic-informed interventions to slow or even reverse the rise of antibiotic resistance. Keywords: economic epidemic, epidemic limbo, Covid-19, lockdown, antibiotic resistance, diagnostics ∗When citing this paper, please use the following: McAdams D. 2021. Economic epidemiology in the wake of Covid-19. Annual Review of Economics 13: Submitted. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- economics-082120-122900 yFuqua School of Business and Economics Department, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Email: [email protected]. I thank David Argente, Chris Avery, Troy Day, Mike Hoy, Gregor Jarosch, Philipp Kircher, Anton Korinek, Ramanan Laxminarayan, Tomas Philipson, Elena Quercioli, Steve Redding, Tim Reluga, Bob Rowthorn, Yangbo Song, Arjun Srinivasan, and Flavio Toxvaerd for helpful comments and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Growing Taller, yet Falling Short: Policy, Health, and Living Standards in Brazil, 1850-1950. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7nn3b9g6 Author Franken, Daniel W. Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Growing Taller, yet Falling Short: Policy, Health, and Living Standards in Brazil, 1850-1950 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Daniel William Franken 2016 ! © Copyright by Daniel William Franken 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Growing Taller, yet Falling Short: Policy, Health, and Living Standards in Brazil, 1850-1950 by Daniel William Franken Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor William R. Summerhill, Chair The emergence of regional inequities and the genesis of modern economic growth in Brazil have remained shrouded by a dearth of historical evidence. Although quantitative scholars have revealed the efficacy of the First Republic (1889-1930) in fomenting economic progress, the extent to which Brazil’s early economic growth fostered improvements in health remains unclear. My dissertation fills this void in scholarship by relying on hitherto untapped archival sources with data on human stature—a reliable metric for health and nutritional status. Heights offer an excellent source of knowledge regarding human development for Brazil in the 1850-1950 period—an era of deep social, political, and economic transformations. My analysis centers heavily on a large (n≈17,000), geographically- comprehensive series compiled from military inscription files, supplemented by an ancillary dataset drawn from passport records (n≈6,000).
    [Show full text]
  • Health Economics, Outcomes & Epidemiology Compendium
    COMPENDIUM Analysis Group Health Economics, Outcomes & Epidemiology PUBLISHED RESEARCH AND PRESENTATIONS COMPENDIUM Analysis Group Health Economics, Outcomes & Epidemiology PUBLISHED RESEARCH AND PRESENTATIONS A COMPENDIUM OF OUR RESEARCH Health outcomes research is playing an increasingly important role in pharmaceutical development as new products enter competitive markets and face demands for economic evidence, safety, and efficacy. A clear and early understanding of value is critical to commercial success, and requires companies to have capabilities in health economics and associated disciplines of epidemiology, biostatistics, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomics in place for ready use across their customers and therapeutic areas. For nearly three decades, Analysis Group has been distinguished by a unique combination of expertise in health economics, outcomes research, epidemiology, biostatistics, and health policy. Our outcomes research has resulted in thought leadership and a robust record of publications and presentations across the leading medical, outcomes, and health economics journals and conferences, covering a range of clinical and methodological areas. This compendium includes published manuscripts as well as abstracts through May 2018. For more information on our research activities and health care consulting practice, please visit our website, www.analysisgroup.com. CONFIDENTIAL COMPENDIUM Analysis Group CONTENTS Autoimmune/Inflammatory 4 Cardiovascular 19 Dermatology 40 Endocrine/Metabolic/Diabetes 54 Gastrointestinal 70 Hematology 83 Infectious Diseases 98 Neurology 105 Oncology 141 Renal 200 Respiratory 205 Substance Abuse 216 Other Diseases & Conditions 220 Other (Health Policy, Market Access, and other topics) 231 Analysis Group COMPENDIUM Autoimmune/Inflammatory Healthcare resource use and cost associated with varying dosages of extended corticosteroid exposure in a US population. Publication: Journal of Medical Economics 2018 05: 1-7 Authors: Rice JB, White AG, Johnson M, Wagh A, Qin Y, Bartels-Peculis L, Ciepielewska G, Nelson WW.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Argument for Disease Prevention: Distinguishing Between Value and Savings
    The Economic Argument for Disease Prevention: Distinguishing Between Value and Savings A Prevention Policy Paper Commissioned by Partnership for Prevention Steven H. Woolf, MD, MPH Professor of Family Medicine Virginia Commonwealth University Corinne G. Husten, MD, MPH Interim President Partnership for Prevention Lawrence S. Lewin, MBA Executive Consultant James S. Marks, MD, MPH Senior Vice President Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Jonathan E. Fielding, MD, MPH, MBA Director of Public Health and Health Officer Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Professor of Health Services and Pediatrics UCLA Schools of Public Health and Medicine Eduardo J. Sanchez, MD, MPH Vice President and Chief Medical Officer Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas The Economic Argument for Disease Prevention: Distinguishing Between Value and Savings Executive Summary Unsustainable growth in medical spending has sparked interest in the question of whether prevention saves money and could be the answer to the health care crisis. But the question misses the point. What should matter (for both prevention and treatment services) is value -- the health benefit per dollar invested. We discuss a package of effective clinical preventive services that improves health at a relatively low cost. Cost-effectiveness should also be examined for disease care, the major driver of health spending. Health care spending can best be controlled by shifting investments from expensive low-value services to more cost-effective interventions. Note: The authors prepared this paper on behalf of the National Commission on Prevention Priorities (NCPP), which is convened by Partnership for Prevention. The NCPP guides Partnership for Prevention’s work to assess the value of prevention.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry M. Popkin, Phd W
    Barry M. Popkin, PhD W. R. Kenan Jr. Distinguished Professor Department of Nutrition Gillings School of Global Public Health The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Home address: 104 Mill Run Dr. Chapel Hill, NC 27514-3134 Office Address: Carolina Population Center Campus Box 8120 137 E. Franklin St. Chapel Hill, NC 27516-3997 Phone: (919) 962-6139 Fax: (919) 966-9159/919-445-0740 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nutrans.org EDUCATION Ph.D., Cornell University, Agricultural Economics (1973-1974) M.S., University of Wisconsin, Economics (1968-1969) Other graduate work, University of Pennsylvania (1967-1968) B.S., University of Wisconsin, Honors in Economics (1962-1965, 1966-1967) Other undergraduate work, University of New Delhi (1965-1966) FIELDS OF INTEREST Program and policy research to arrest and prevent excessive energy imbalance and diabetes; The nutrition transition: patterns and Determinants of Dietary Trends and body composition trends (United States and many low- and middle-income countries); Obesity dynamics and their environmental causes; Dietary and physical activity patterns, trends and determinants; The creation of large-scale program and policy initiatives to address nutrition-related noncommunicable diseases. CURRENT POSITION Distinguished Professor, Department of Nutrition Fellow, Carolina Population Center Director, The Nutrition Transition Research Program Rev. January 2017 Adjunct Professor, Department of Economics Member, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Editorial Board, PLOS Medicine, Economics and Human Biology, Appetite, Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, Lifestyle Medicine - Research, Prevention & Treatment of Noncommunicable Diseases SELECTED HONORS AND AWARDS (2016) World Obesity Federation Population Science & Public Health Award (2015) Chinese government’s first award for significant foreign contributions to Chinese Nutrition (2015) Conrad A.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Economics of Patient Safety in Primary and Ambulatory
    THE ECONOMICS OF PATIENT SAFETY IN PRIMARY AND AMBULATORY CARE Flying blind The Economics of Patient Safety in Primary and Ambulatory Care Flying blind 1 │ This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. The Economics of Patient Safety in Primary and Ambulatory Care © OECD 2018 2 │ Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ 3 Key messages .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1. This report makes the economic case for safety in the primary and ambulatory care sector ........ 8 1.2. Safety
    [Show full text]