DOCSLIB.ORG

SOHASKY-DISSERTATION-2017.Pdf (2.074Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SOHASKY-DISSERTATION-2017.Pdf (2.074Mb) DIFFERENTIAL MINDS: MASS INTELLIGENCE TESTING AND RACE SCIENCE IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY by Kate E. Sohasky A dissertation submitted to the Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Baltimore, Maryland May 9, 2017 © Kate E. Sohasky All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Historians have argued that race science and eugenics retreated following their discrediting in the wake of the Second World War. Yet if race science and eugenics disappeared, how does one explain their sudden and unexpected reemergence in the form of the neohereditarian work of Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and Charles Murray? This dissertation argues that race science and eugenics did not retreat following their discrediting. Rather, race science and eugenics adapted to changing political and social climes, at times entering into states of latency, throughout the twentieth century. The transnational history of mass intelligence testing in the twentieth century demonstrates the longevity of race science and eugenics long after their discrediting. Indeed, the tropes of race science and eugenics persist today in the modern I.Q. controversy, as the dissertation shows. By examining the history of mass intelligence testing in multiple nations, this dissertation presents narrative of the continuity of race science and eugenics throughout the twentieth century. Dissertation Committee: Advisors: Angus Burgin and Ronald G. Walters Readers: Louis Galambos, Nathaniel Comfort, and Adam Sheingate Alternates: François Furstenberg and Sharon Kingsland ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………ii Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………iii List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………….iv Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….1 Chapter One……………………………………………………………………………...25 Chapter Two……………………………………………………………………………...70 Chapter Three…………………………………………………………………………..126 Chapter Four……………………………………………………………………………173 Chapter Five…………………………………………………………………………….221 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………...276 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………283 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………….302 Curriculum Vitae……………………………………………………………………….304 iii LIST OF FIGURES Group Examinations in a Hospital Ward, Camp Lee, October 1917…………………….32 Group Examination Alpha being taken by Black Recruits………………………………32 Eleven-year old Scottish School Children from the 1947 Scottish Mental Survey…….109 iv INTRODUCTION On March 2, 2017, protesters at Middlebury College in Vermont carrying signs that read “No Eugenics” interrupted an on-campus lecture given by Charles Murray, co- author of The Bell Curve. The protesters hurled accusations that Murray was a white nationalist, chanting, “racist, sexist, anti-gay, Charles Murray go away!” The protest forced the cancellation of the lecture, eliciting strong reactions from right-wing groups. Objectors to the protests decried the death of freedom of speech and the “intolerance” of the left. In an open letter, students protested that the matter was not one of free speech, but of scholarly integrity. The letter, which read, “in this case, there’s not really any ‘other side,’ only deceptive statistics masking unfounded bigotry,” argued that Murray’s research was pseudoscientific and therefore had no place on a university campus. Murray was forced to flee the campus and at least one individual sustained injuries as the protest turned riotous.1 The I.Q. controversy consists of the heated debates surrounding several key issues in intelligence testing in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries: the definition and measurement of intelligence, the factors that determine intelligence, intellectual differences between groups, and the relation of intelligence to differential fertility. This recent incident underscores the urgency and relevance of the I.Q. controversy in modern times. More than twenty years after its initial publication, The Bell Curve continues to stand as representative of the enduring influence of race science and eugenics within this broader controversy. The Middlebury protests reveal critical and enduring themes of the I.Q. controversy, including condemnations of racist science, often from the left; accusations of the oppressive consensus and intellectual fraudulence of the academic 1 Katharine Q. Seelye, “Protesters Disrupt Speech by ‘Bell Curve’ Author at Vermont College,” New York Times, March 2, 2017. 1 establishment, generally from the right; and the persistence of race science despite its discrediting by mainstream science. The Bell Curve, published in 1994 and authored by Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein, revived the I.Q. controversy of the 1970s when it reintroduced the polemical claim that differences in black and white students’ I.Q. test scores had a genetic basis. Reflecting on The Bell Curve twenty years after its first publication, Murray claimed in a 2014 interview conducted by the conservative think tank, the American Enterprise Institute, “the reaction to ‘The Bell Curve’ exposed a profound corruption of the social sciences that has prevailed since the 1960s. ‘The Bell Curve’ is a relentlessly moderate book – both in its use of evidence and in its tone – and yet it was excoriated in remarkably personal and vicious ways, sometimes by eminent academicians who knew very well they were lying.” He argued, “the social sciences have been in the grip of a political orthodoxy that has had only the most tenuous connection with empirical reality, and too many social scientists think that threats to the orthodoxy should be suppressed by any means necessary. Corruption is the only word for it.” In Murray’s view, corruption, however, was not solely responsible for the mainstream scientific community’s outspoken defamation of The Bell Curve. Murray continued, “now that I’ve said that, I’m also thinking of all the other social scientists who have come up to me over the years and told me what a wonderful book ‘The Bell Curve’ is. But they never said it publicly. So corruption is one thing that ails the social sciences. Cowardice is another.”2 Murray denied that The Bell Curve was ever about race or the genetic basis of I.Q.: their work had been misconstrued and misrepresented by its critics who exaggerated 2 Natalie Goodnow, “‘The Bell Curve’ 20 years later: A Q&A with Charles Murray,” AEIdeas, October 16, 2014, http://www.aei.org/publication/bell-curve-20-years-later-qa-charles-murray/. 2 the book’s emphasis on race and twisted their words on the influence of genetics in the development of group and individual intelligence.3 He attributed this libel to the corruption and cowardice of the establishment, stating that “fifty years from now, I bet those claims about ‘The Bell Curve’ will be used as a textbook case of the hysteria that has surrounded the possibility that black-white differences in IQ are genetic.” Recounting the passage from the book that concluded, “it seems highly likely to us that both genes and the environment have something to do with racial differences,” he stated, “that’s it. The whole thing. The entire hateful Herrnstein-Murray pseudoscientific racist diatribe about the role of genes in creating the black-white IQ difference.” Murray thus portrayed himself and Herrnstein as the victims of the oppressive political orthodoxy of the scientific establishment, explaining, “if you say it is likely that there is any genetic component to the black-white difference in test scores, the roof crashes in on you.” Yet, Murray countered, “on this score, the roof is about to crash in on those who insist on a purely environmental explanation of all sorts of ethnic differences, not just intelligence. Since the decoding of the genome, it has been securely established that race is not a social construct, evolution continued long after humans left Africa along different paths in different parts of the world, and recent evolution involves cognitive as well as physiological functioning.”4 This revealing claim casts doubt on Murray’s assertion that The Bell Curve was never about race or the genetic basis of intellectual differences between groups. In a subsequent interview with the American Enterprise Institute, Murray asserted, “the dirty little secret about ‘The Bell Curve’ is that it did not push the scientific envelope 3 Ibid. 4 Ibid. 3 at all. We were in the scientific mainstream. Every single significant statement we made – scientific statement we made – has not only not been refuted; they have been confirmed by subsequent research.”5 Murray’s representation of mainstream science on I.Q. recalls the claims of neohereditarians of the 1970s, including Richard Herrnstein, William Shockley, and Arthur Jensen, who accused the liberal establishment of covering up unpleasant scientific truths about race and class differences in intelligence, and of placing a gag on dissenters by defaming them publicly. The corruption Murray describes similarly resonates with the claims of hereditarian experts of the 1990s who accused the liberal political orthodoxy of silencing researchers for voicing politically incorrect scientific truths. Such accusations of Lyseknoism, so-named after the Soviet program in genetics run by Trofim Lysenko that actively promoted disproven scientific theories about heredity for political ends, had abounded in the United States since the 1950s and served as powerful tools in the hands of hereditarians eager to demonstrate the scientific invalidity of their opposition. Murray elaborated further that I.Q. had significant policy implications that were
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reforming Eugenics
    Working Papers on the Nature of Evidence: How Well Do “Facts” Travel? No. 12/06 Confronting the Stigma of Perfection: Genetic Demography, Diversity and the Quest for a Democratic Eugenics in the Post-war United States Edmund Ramsden © Edmund Ramsden Department of Economic History London School of Economics August 2006 how ‘facts’ “The Nature of Evidence: How Well Do ‘Facts’ Travel?” is funded by The Leverhulme Trust and the E.S.R.C. at the Department of Economic History, London School of Economics. For further details about this project and additional copies of this, and other papers in the series, go to: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collection/economichistory/ Series Editor: Dr. Jon Adams Department of Economic History London School of Economics Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0) 20 7955 6727 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7955 7730 Confronting the Stigma of Perfection: Genetic Demography, Diversity and the Quest for a Democratic Eugenics in the Post- war United States1 Edmund Ramsden Abstract Eugenics has played an important role in the relations between social and biological scientists of population through time. Having served as a site for the sharing of data and methods between disciplines in the early twentieth century, scientists and historians have tended to view its legacy in terms of reduction and division - contributing distrust, even antipathy, between communities in the social and the biological sciences. Following the work of Erving Goffman, this paper will explore how eugenics has, as the epitome of “bad” or “abnormal” science, served as a “stigma symbol” in the politics of boundary work.
    [Show full text]
  • Black-White Differences on IQ and Grades: the Mediating Role of Elementary Cognitive Tasks Bryan Pesta Cleveland State University, [email protected]
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Business Faculty Publications Monte Ahuja College of Business 2008 Black-White Differences on IQ and Grades: The Mediating Role of Elementary Cognitive Tasks Bryan Pesta Cleveland State University, [email protected] Peter J. Poznanski Cleveland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/bus_facpub Part of the Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons How does access to this work benefit oy u? Let us know! Publisher's Statement NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Intelligence/ Science Direct. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Intelligence/ Science Direct, 36, 4, (2008); 10.1016/j.intell.2007.07.004 Original Published Citation Pesta, B., Poznanski, P. (2008). Black-White Differences on IQ and Grades: The eM diating Role of Elementary Cognitive Tasks. Intelligence/ Science Direct, 36(4), pp. 323-329. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Monte Ahuja College of Business at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Business Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. shared by variance in IQ. The direction of causality, performance on jobs where the public's safety might be however, and whether third variables explain the at risk (e.g., fire fighters; see te Nijenhuis & van der relationship, remain empirical questions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideological Origins of the Population Association of America
    Fairfield University DigitalCommons@Fairfield Sociology & Anthropology Faculty Publications Sociology & Anthropology Department 3-1991 The ideological origins of the Population Association of America Dennis Hodgson Fairfield University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/sociologyandanthropology- facultypubs Archived with permission from the copyright holder. Copyright 1991 Wiley and Population Council. Link to the journal homepage: (http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/padr) Peer Reviewed Repository Citation Hodgson, Dennis, "The ideological origins of the Population Association of America" (1991). Sociology & Anthropology Faculty Publications. 32. https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/sociologyandanthropology-facultypubs/32 Published Citation Hodgson, Dennis. "The ideological origins of the Population Association of America." Population and Development Review 17, no. 1 (March 1991): 1-34. This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Ideological Origins of the Population Association of America DENNIS HODGSON THE FIELD OF POPULATION in the United States early in this century was quite diffuse. There were no academic programs producing certified demographers, no body of theory and methods that all agreed constituted the field, no consensus on which population problems posed the most serious threat to the nation or human welfare more generally.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Design: Testing Measures of Merit
    MORE INTELLIGENT DESIGN: TESTING MEASURES OF MERIT Kimberly West-Faulcon This Article articulates the theoretical, legal, and policy implications of new and improved theories of intelligence and recent research finding that conventional mass-marketed standardized tests, or “factorist tests,” have less predictive power and larger racial differences in scores than newer multi- dimensional “systems-based” tests. It raises a new question about the fairness of the role that traditional admissions tests like the SAT, GRE, LSAT, and MCAT currently play in selective higher education admissions—whether basing admissions on scores on such tests unfairly distorts the true admissions-related merit of individual applicants and racial groups. The core of this argument is not that selective universities rely on a flawed definition of merit or that traditional factorist tests are racially, economically, or culturally biased. Instead, this Article considers the ramifications of social science evidence suggesting that the admissions tests most commonly relied upon today are less successful in predicting applicants’ future academic performance and have more racially skewed scores because they are designed according to a scientifically flawed theory of intelligence. It argues that this analysis is particularly salient in light of recent scientific studies, such as one finding that the currently dominant factorist college admissions test—the SAT— produces significantly larger racial group differences in test scores but with only half the predictive power
    [Show full text]
  • Balanced Biosocial Theory for the Social Sciences
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-2004 Balanced biosocial theory for the social sciences Michael A Restivo University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Restivo, Michael A, "Balanced biosocial theory for the social sciences" (2004). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 1635. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/5jp5-vy39 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BALANCED BIOSOCIAL THEORY FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES by Michael A. Restivo Bachelor of Arts IPIoridkijSjlarrhcIJiuAHsrsity 2001 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillm ent ofdœnxpnnnnenkfbrthe Master of Arts Degree in Sociology Departm ent of Sociology College of Liberal Arts Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas M ay 2004 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1422154 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • ISIR Program 2012 FIN
    Thirteenth Annual Conference of the International Society for Intelligence Research (ISIR) San Antonio, Texas, USA December 13–15, 2012 Sir Francis Galton San Antonio Marriott Riverwalk Hotel 889 East Market Street, San Antonio, TX 78205 Phone: 1-210-224-4555 Fax: 1-210-224-2754 Toll-free: 1-800-648-4462 Acknowledgements 2012 ISIR Board of Directors Linda Gottfredson, President University of Delaware David Lubinski, President Elect Vanderbilt University Earl Hunt, Past President University of Washington, Seattle Wendy Johnson, Board Member (exp. 2012) University of Edinburgh Keith Widaman, Board Member (exp. 2013) University of California, Davis Richard Haier, Board Member (exp. 2014), Secretary-Treasurer University of California, Irvine The Board would like to thank all the ISIR committees for their hard work in making this conference possible. We also thank Elsevier for helping to sponsor the Reception. i 2012 ISIR Committees Program Committee Yulia Kovas, Chair Yulia Dodonova, Paul Irwing, Wendy Johnson Conference Site Committee Thomas Coyle & Timothy Keith, Co-Chairs Distinguished Contributor Interview and Keynote Speaker Committee Sherif Karama, Chair Roberto Colom, Earl Hunt Holden Memorial Address on Science Writing Committee Linda Gottfredson, Chair James Thompson, Jonathan Wai Lifetime Achievement Award Committee Con Stough, Chair Wendy Johnson, Tim Keith, Aljoscha Neubauer, Jelte Wickerts Nominations and Elections Committee David Lubinski, Chair Tim Bates, Wendy Johnson, Mike McDaniel, Heiner Rindermann President’s Symposia Committee Richard Haier, Chair Linda Gottfredson Student Awards Committee Keith Widaman, Chair Roberto Colom, Matthew Reynolds Website Committee Linda Gottfredson, Chair James Thompson, Jonathan Wai ii In Memoriam Arthur R. Jensen 1923-2012 J. Philippe Rushton 1943-2012 iii Short schedule for ISIR 2012 (#) – Page of Abstract DAY 1: Thursday, Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Survival and Apparent Resurgence of Sociobiology
    This is a repository copy of The strange survival and apparent resurgence of sociobiology. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/118157/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Dennis, A. orcid.org/0000-0003-4625-1123 (2018) The strange survival and apparent resurgence of sociobiology. History of the Human Sciences, 31 (1). pp. 19-35. ISSN 0952- 6951 https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695117735966 Dennis A. The strange survival and apparent resurgence of sociobiology. History of the Human Sciences. 2018;31(1):19-35. Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695117735966. Article available under the terms of the CC- BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ The strange survival and apparent resurgence of sociobiology Abstract A recent dispute between Richard Dawkins and Edward O. Wilson concerning fundamental concepts in sociobiology is examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychometric G: Definition and Substantiation
    Psychometric g: Definition and Substantiation Arthur R. Jensen University of Culifornia, Berkeley The construct known as psychometric g is arguably the most important construct in all of psychology largelybecause of its ubiquitous presence in all tests of mental ability and its wide-ranging predictive validity for a great many socially significant variables, including scholastic performance and intellectual attainments, occupational status, job performance, in- come, law abidingness, and welfare dependency. Even such nonintellec- tual variables as myopia, general health, and longevity, as well as many other physical traits, are positively related to g. Of course, the causal con- nections in the whole nexus of the many diverse phenomena involving the g factor is highly complex. Indeed, g and its ramifications cut across the behavioral sciences-brainphysiology, psychology, sociology-perhaps more than any other scientific construct. THE DOMAIN OF g THEORY It is important to keep in mind the distinction between intelligence and g, as these terms are used here. The psychology of intelligence could, at least in theory, be based on the study of one person,just as Ebbinghaus discov- ered some of the laws of learning and memory in experimentswith N = 1, using himself as his experimental subject. Intelligence is an open-ended category for all those mental processes we view as cognitive, such as stimu- lus apprehension, perception, attention, discrimination, generalization, 39 40 JENSEN learning and learning-set acquisition, short-term and long-term memory, inference, thinking, relation eduction, inductive and deductive reasoning, insight, problem solving, and language. The g factor is something else. It could never have been discovered with N = 1, because it reflects individual di,fferences in performance on tests or tasks that involve anyone or moreof the kinds of processes just referred to as intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographic Annual in Speech Communication 1973
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 088 129 CS 500 620 AUTHOR Kennicott, Patrick C., Ed. TITLE Bibliographic Annual in Speech Communication 1573. INSTITUTION Speech Communication Association, New York, N.Y. PUB DATE 74 NOTE 267p. AVAILABLE FROM Speech. Communication Association, Statler Hiltcn Hotel, New York, N. Y. 10001 ($8.00). EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC-$12.60 DESCRIPTORS *Behavioral Science Research; *Bibliographies; *Communication Skills; Doctoral Theses; Literature Reviews; Mass Media; Masters Theses; Public Speaking; Research Reviews (Publications); Rhetoric; *Speech Skills; *Theater Arts IDENTIFIERS Mass Communication; Stagecraft ABSTRACT This volume contains five subject bibliographies for 1972, and two lists of these and dissertations. The bibliographies are "Studies in Mass Communication," "Behavioral Studies in Communication," "Rhetoric and Public Address," "Oral Interpretation," and "Theatrical Craftsmanship." Abstracts of many of the doctcral disertations produced in 1972 in speech communication are arranged by subject. ALso included in a listing by university of titles and authors of all reported masters theses and doctoral dissertaticns completed in 1972 in the field. (CH) U S Ol l'AerVE NT OF MEAL.TH r DUCA ICON R ,Stl. I, AWE NILIONAt. INST I IUI EOF E DOCA I ION BIBLIOGRAPHIC ANNUAL CO IN CD SPEECH COMMUNICATION 1973 STUDIES IN MASS COMMUNICATION: A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY, 1972 Rolland C. Johnson BEHAVIORAL STUDIES IN COMMUNICATION, 1972 A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY Thomas M. Steinfatt A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF RHETORIC AND PUBLIC ADDRESS, 1972 Harold Mixon BIBLIOGRAPHY OF STUDIES IN ORAL INTERPRETATION, 1972 James W. Carlsen A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THEATRICAL CRAFTSMANSHIP, 1972. r Christian Moe and Jay E. Raphael ABSTRACTS OF DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS IN THE FIELD OF SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Genetics in Britain: Origins and Development
    CLINICAL GENETICS IN BRITAIN: ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT The transcript of a Witness Seminar held by the Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL, London, on 23 September 2008 Edited by P S Harper, L A Reynolds and E M Tansey Volume 39 2010 ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 2010 First published by the Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL, 2010 The Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL is funded by the Wellcome Trust, which is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 085484 127 1 All volumes are freely available online following the links to Publications/Wellcome Witnesses at www.ucl.ac.uk/histmed CONTENTS Illustrations and credits v Abbreviations vii Witness Seminars: Meetings and publications; Acknowledgements E M Tansey and L A Reynolds ix Introduction Sir John Bell xix Transcript Edited by P S Harper, L A Reynolds and E M Tansey 1 Appendix 1 Initiatives supporting clinical genetics, 1983–99 by Professor Rodney Harris 83 Appendix 2 The Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors (AGNC) by Professor Heather Skirton 87 References 89 Biographical notes 113 Glossary 133 Index 137 ILLUSTRATIONS AND CREDITS Figure 1 Professor Lionel Penrose, c. 1960. Provided by and reproduced with permission of Professor Shirley Hodgson. 8 Figure 2 Dr Mary Lucas, clinical geneticist at the Galton Laboratory, explains a poster to the University of London’s Chancellor, Princess Anne, October 1981. Provided by and reproduced with permission of Professor Joy Delhanty. 9 Figure 3 (a) The karyotype of a phenotypically normal woman and (b) family pedigree, showing three generations with inherited translocation.
    [Show full text]
  • “Scientific” Racism and the Evidence on Race and Intelligence
    ANDREW M. COLMAN 'Scientific' Racism and the Evidence on Race and Intelligencea In his recent book, Race, Intelligence and Education,b H. J. Eysenck has written: 'I would be prepared to assert that experts (real experts, that is) would agree with at least 90 per cent of what I am going to say-probably the true figure would be a good deal higher, but there is no point in exaggerating' (p. 15). The major thesis which his book sought to establish was that 'all the evidence to date suggests the strong and indeed over­ whelming importance of genetic factors in producing the great variety of intellectual differences which we observe in our culture, and much of the difference observed between certain racial groups' (p. 130). This latter assertion is demonstrably false, as will become apparent, since 'all the evidence to date' does not speak with one voice. The thesis contains two latent propositions: (a) that intellectual differences among people in our culture are overwhelmingly determined by genetic factors, and (b) that the 15-point mean I.Q. gap between black and white Americans is largely determined by genetic factors. This paper centres on the second proposi­ tion, which (as will be demonstrated) is logically and empirically inde­ pendent of the first, although the vital distinction has recently been blurred by A. R. Jensen (1969)C and subsequently by Eysenck in the quotation above, and throughout his book, which draws heavily on Jensen's controversial paper. Eysenck's claims concerning the consensus of the 'experts' have been widely interpreted as implying that there is general agreement with him on the crucial second proposition concerning race and intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictors Discriminating Morality from Legality :: Moral Responsibility's Bottom Line. Kathleen M
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1994 Predictors discriminating morality from legality :: moral responsibility's bottom line. Kathleen M. Shanahan University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Shanahan, Kathleen M., "Predictors discriminating morality from legality :: moral responsibility's bottom line." (1994). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 2258. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/2258 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PREDICTORS DISCRIMINATING MORALITY FROM LEGALITY: MORAL RESPONSIBILITY'S BOTTOM LINE A Thesis Presented by KATHLEEN M. SHANAHAN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE February 1994 Department of Psychology PREDICTORS DISCRIMINATING MORALITY FROM LEGALITY: MORAL RESPONSIBILITY'S BOTTOM LINE. A Thesis Presented by KATHLEEN M. SHANAHAN Approved as to style and content by: Marian L. Ma6Bdhald,X^Ijair Ronnie J(a^^l(^f-Bulman, Member ^^^nold D. Well, Member ^^Wt^s E. Clifton, 6epar)ment Head - Department of Psychology ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee chair and advisor, Marian MacDonald, for her support and guidance from the inception to the completion of this study. Her passion for research is contagious, and she has encouraged me to believe that I, too, might be a scientist-practitioner. I am also grateful to my committee members, Ronnie Janoff-Bulman, Sally Powers, and Arnie Well.
    [Show full text]