Representations to the Revision Committee for the Draft Cathedrals Measure (GS 2136)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Updated September 26th 2019 - CM(RC)(19)3 Representations to the Revision Committee for the Draft Cathedrals Measure (GS 2136) Contents 1. The Right Revd Revd Dr John Inge (42 – Bishop of Worcester) ........................................................................ 2 2. The Very Revd David Ison (54 – Dean of St Paul’s) ............................................................................................. 3 3. The Very Revd Andrew Nunn (55 – Dean of Southwark) ................................................................................... 9 4. The Very Revd Jane Hedges (56 – Dean of Norwich) ......................................................................................... 13 5. The Very Revd Peter Bradley (57 –Sheffield) ...................................................................................................... 15 6. The Ven Douglas Dettmer (116 – Exeter) ........................................................................................................... 19 7. The Revd Neil Patterson (128 – Hereford) .......................................................................................................... 21 8. The Revd Canon Pat Hawkins (144 – Lichfield): ................................................................................................. 22 9. The Revd Canon Martyn Taylor (152 – Lincoln) ................................................................................................. 24 10. Mr Jeremy Sheehy (173 – Manchester) .............................................................................................................. 25 11. The Revd Canon Dr Tim Bull (202 – St Albans) ............................................................................................... 26 12. The Revd Canon Kevin Goss (204 – St Albans) ................................................................................................. 27 13. The Revd Andrew Dotchin (208 – St Edmundsbury & Ipswich) ..................................................................... 28 14. The Ven Dr Jane Steen (225 – Southwark) ........................................................................................................ 29 15. The Very Revd Tim Barker (236 – Winchester/Channel Islands) ................................................................... 31 16. The Ven Nikki Groarke (239 – Worcester) ....................................................................................................... 32 17. The Revd Canon Peter Moger (244 – York) ...................................................................................................... 33 18. Dr Christopher Angus (265 – Carlisle) ............................................................................................................... 35 19. Ms Christina Baron (245 – Bath & Wells) .......................................................................................................... 37 20. Mrs Anne Foreman (308 – Exeter) ..................................................................................................................... 38 21. Canon Margaret Sheather (315 – Gloucester) & The Revd Canon Richard Mitchell (121 – Gloucester) . 40 22. Mr Jonathan Cryer (334 – Leicester) .................................................................................................................. 42 23. Prof. Muriel Robinson (343 – Lincoln) ................................................................................................................ 43 24. Mr Clive Scowen (358 – London) ........................................................................................................................ 44 25. Mr Tim Fleming (396 – St Albans) ...................................................................................................................... 45 26. Mr Adrian Greenwood (411 – Southwark) ........................................................................................................ 51 27. Mrs Alison Coulter (425 – Winchester) ............................................................................................................. 52 28. The Rt Worshipful Charles George (454 – Dean of the Arches) .................................................................... 58 29. Mrs Mary Chapman (463 – Archbishops’ Council) ........................................................................................... 59 30. Ms Annika Mathews (481 - Church of England Youth Council): ..................................................................... 61 31. The Very Revd Andrew Tremlett (Dean of Durham Cathedral -not a member of the General Synod).. 62 32. Late Submission: Chapter of Canterbury Cathedral ...................................................................................... 63 1 1. The Right Revd Revd Dr John Inge (42 – Bishop of Worcester) Bishop to appoint one non-executive member who shall be Vice Chair (Schedule 1.3.3. and 1.5) I agree with the Dean and Chapter of Worcester in welcoming the proposal that the Bishop should appoint one non-executive member since it is an appropriate way for the Bishop to help shape the composition of the Chapter. I do not think, however, think that that person should ex officio be Vice Chair. I believe that the role of Vice Chair should, rather, be one that each Chapter has the power to create and define, or not, within the Constitution and Statutes of each Cathedral, and that the Chapter should make that appointment. I might add that, whether or not the bishop should appoint a vice-chair, the legislation as proposed would give me much less influence over appointments to Chapter since at present I appoint all non-executive members. I am content with this. Election of members of the Cathedral community to the Chapter (Schedule 1.3.2) I share the concern of the Dean and Chapter of Worcester that the Cathedral community is nowhere defined and that the phrasing of the Draft Measure will encourage an irresistible expectation on the part of the congregation to elect ‘their’ representative to the Chapter. This would, as the Chapter asserts, cut across the requirement to provide a balance and variety of skills, backgrounds and experience among the non-executive members. I agree that to say that the Chapter may ensure that a proportion of non-executive members be ‘drawn from the Cathedral community’ would be more realistic and helpful rather than ‘elected by and from’ the Cathedral community. Bishop’s attendance at Chapter (Measure 7.6 and 9.2) I agree with the Dean and Chapter of Worcester that the Bishop should not be entitled to attend all or any Chapter meeting, or that the onus should be on a majority of the Chapter to exclude the Bishop from any particular item. I believe that this provision could compromise the visitatorial role of the Bishop. The Bishop, rather, should be entitled to attend once in the year. I further agree that there should be a meeting of the Bishop and the members of the Chapter at least once in the year when (a) the Chapter consult the Bishop on the general direction and mission of the Cathedral and (b) the Bishop may seek the advice of the Chapter on any particular matter. Bishop’s power to commission a review (Measure 7.7-9) I share the concern that Bishops could resort to this too easily and too readily, as a way of dealing with any difficulty that arises. I therefore echo the request that the Measure should make clear who is to bear the cost of any review; the word ‘co-operate’ is very vague. A crucial issue, as the Dean and Chapter of Worcester have asserted, is whether the Measure will bind the Chapter to follow any recommendations or directions made in a review. I agree that binding directions should only be made by the Bishop in the context of a formal visitation. 2 2. The Very Revd David Ison (54 – Dean of St Paul’s) In common with many others I want to pay tribute to the work of the Cathedrals Working Group, the Third Estates Commissioner and the Legal team at Church House in producing what overall is a very helpful Draft Measure. My comments are intended to strengthen it and shape it for the future, in the light of comments and responses of others as well as myself. The deans as a group have had a range of responses, but over the last year have been coming to much of a common mind; and the submission from AEC/CAFA is generally in line with that thinking. I am making this submission to the Revision Committee as an individual, but informed by discussions among the deans, AEC/CAFA discussion, papers and submission, and my experience of three very different cathedrals over the last 24 years. I have some general points for the Committee’s consideration, before moving on to specific comments and suggestions. 1. The point about the need for flexibility has been made in the Synod debates and in the CWG Report; having had the experience of serving on three different Chapters I want to re-emphasise this strongly as it lies behind many of the suggestions below, which relate to my own and to others’ experience. Having the minimum necessary legislation in the Measure itself, and being alert to the different circumstances of cathedrals as you do your work of revision, will be very helpful for our successors. 2. Three ‘hot button issues’ which have been prominent – the roles of the vice-chair, of the bishop and of residentiary canons – are closely connected, all revolving around the question of accountability. Getting the balance of accountability as good as possible in relation to these three roles is at the heart of the