West Water Supplies – Thirlmere Transfer

United Utilities Plc

Environmental Statement

Volume 4

Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Revision | 0

24 March 2016

West Cumbria EIA Environmental Statement - Mitigati on Pr opos al United U tilities Plc

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

West Cumbria Water Supplies – Thirlmere Transfer

Project no: B2707061 Document title: Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule Revision: 0 Date: 24 March 2016 Client name: United Utilities Plc

Jacobs U.K. Limited

5 First Street Manchester M15 4GU T +44 (0)161 235 6000 F +44 (0)161 235 6001 www.jacobs.com

© Copyright 2015 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright.

Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Landscape and Visual Amenity 3. Arboriculture 4. Water Environment 5. Flood Risk 5.1 Flood Risk to the development 5.2 Flood Risk from the development 6. Ecology 6.1 Construction 6.2 Operation 7. Cultural Heritage 7.1 Archaeology 7.1.1 Construction Phase 7.2 Built Heritage and Historic Urban Landscape 7.2.1 Construction 7.2.2 Operation 7.3 Historic Hedgerows 7.4 Historic Landscape 7.4.1 Construction 7.5 Intangible Cultural Heritage and Associations 7.5.1 Construction 8. Soils, Geology and Hydrogeology 8.1.1 Construction Phase 8.1.2 Operation Phase 9. Materials and Waste Management 10. Public Access and Recreation 11. Socio-Economics 12. Agriculture 12.1 Pre-Commencement and Construction Phase 12.2 Soil Management Strategy 13. Traffic and Transport 14. Noise and Vibration 15. Air Quality and Odour

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

1. Introduction 1) The following appendix summarises the mitigation proposals which are presented in Volume 2 of the ES. The mitigation proposals have been collated from each of the technical chapters. While the appendix captures the mitigation proposals as they presently stand, it is acknowledged that some may continue to evolve and be further enhanced during the planning determination process and in the development of planning conditions, should the planning authorities be minded to approve the application. 2) The mitigation schedule links into an Environmental Masterplan for the Proposed Scheme (Appendix 23.2). The Masterplan comprises a series of drawings illustrating the locations at which both generic and site- specific mitigation measures are proposed. 3) The mitigation schedule is presented according to EIA topic areas, and follows the same order of topics as presented in the ES.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

2. Landscape and Visual Amenity

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Scheme-wide • Reduce tree loss – Designers and contractors to seek to reduce tree loss within the working width, where practicable. For example alter the proposed fence line in particular sections to reflect root protection areas identified in Volume 2 Chapter 8, Volume 3 Figures 8.1 – 8.3 and Volume 4 Appendix 8 • Topsoil and subsoil reinstatement - Overfilling within excavation areas during reinstatement to allow for future settlement of reinstated soils. Specification is included in a Construction Strategy, Volume 4 Appendix 4. • Tree protection – Where practicable work within the requirements of BS 5837:2012 • Soil Storage - Adhere to the Outline Soil Management Strategy presented in Volume 4 Appendix 4.

Scheme-wide • Grass Sward/ Species rich grassland - Seeding specification should be standard grass mix, special mixes to be agreed with individual landowners, over-seeding to be by agreement only • Planting near underground assets and pipelines – offset planting should follow United Utilities document ‘Standard Conditions for Works Adjacent to Pipelines’ (July 2015) • Soft landscape planting proposals - all plants to be bare root stock or in some cases container grown e.g. Ilex aquifolium - holly, Pinus sylvestris - Scots pine • Hedgerow protection - to be 1.6 m high post and rail fence, with cattle and rabbit proof netting.

Scheme-wide • Individual trees / Hedgerow trees - Native tree species to be planted as standard stock, bare root, 8-10 cm girth, 250/300 cm height, 2.0 m clear stem. Trees located within existing hedgerows should be planted with timber supporting stake(s) • Woodland belts/ woodland - Plant protection should be achieved by individual tree/shrub guards or deer proof fencing • Dry stone walls - Photographic record should be undertaken to enable reinstatement to original built style and character. Would vary throughout the scheme.

Scheme-wide • Watercourses - Reinstatement of riparian species/trees to be agreed with Ecological Clerk of Works • Planting over pipeline if feasible for bank stability, geotextile matting • Residual construction equipment /areas - Temporary fencing, hardstanding areas for laydown areas and access tracks to be removed as part of contract. No residual construction items to remain.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

RWA • Replacement tree planting • Reinstatement of hedgerows and woodland • Reinstatement of watercourses • Reinstatement of dry stone walls.

Proposed WTW • Screen earth bunding • Proposed green roof • Strengthening of existing hedgerows • Screen planting woodland and woodland edge.

Moota Hill SR • Screen planting (woodland belt and shrub planting) • Proposed hedgerow planting • Re-profiling

Network Main - Proposed WTW to Quarry Hill • Replacement tree planting • Reinstatement of dry-stone walls • Reinstatement of hedgerows and woodland • Reinstatement of watercourses.

Harrot Hill PS • Screen planting (tree and shrub planting) • Proposed hedgerow planting • Strengthening of existing hedgerows.

Network Main – Proposed WTW to Summergrove (including • Replacement tree planting High Leys to Kelton Fell and Cockermouth to Broughton • Reinstatement of dry-stone walls Cross) • Reinstatement of hedgerows and woodland • Reinstatement of watercourses.

High Leys SR and PS • Rebuilding of dry-stone walls • Strengthening of existing hedgerows • Screen earth bunding and re-profiling.

Slip-lined sections Broughton Cross to Stainburn Service • Reinstatement of hedgerows. Reservoir and Cockermouth to Cornhow

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

3. Arboriculture

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Scheme Wide – Construction • It is important that measures for protection are in place throughout the scheme and for as long as a risk of damage remains. Particular care and planning is necessary in the operation of excavators, lifting machinery and cranes so all vehicle movements and lifting operations will not impact on retained trees • The retained trees should be adequately protected by stout fencing, ‘fit for purpose’ and preferably as prescribed in section 6.2 of British Standard 5837: 2012 to provide an adequate RPA that will allow its successful retention within the development • The RPA should be regarded as sacrosanct and the fencing should be installed prior to construction works, and plant and machinery arriving on site. The fencing should remain intact throughout the duration of the scheme and only be removed upon completion. The position of the fencing around the trees should be shown on the tree protection plan (TPP) once the scheme layout has been finalised • During construction there should be no materials stored or dumped and no vehicular or plant movement within the RPA to minimise the risk to the trees from soil compaction. Where compaction has occurred advice should be sought from an arboriculturist and a structural engineer on decompaction methods. This is in accordance with Section 8.4 of BS5837:2012 • All site storage areas, cement mixing and washing points for equipment and vehicles and fuel storage areas should be outside RPAs unless otherwise agreed with the LPA. No discharge of potential contaminants should occur within the RPA of a retained tree stem or where there is a risk of run off into RPA • Excavations within the root protection area should be avoided. However, if excavations are necessary, works should be limited to the use of hand tools. Great care should be taken to preserve and work around roots greater than 25 mm in diameter and clusters of smaller roots avoiding damage to bark. Where it is necessary to sever roots greater than 25 mm in diameter, advice from an arboriculturist should be sought. Where smaller roots must be severed they should be cut back using secateurs or a sharp pruning saw • Where construction working space or temporary construction access is justified within the RPA, this should be facilitated by a setback in the alignment of the tree protection barrier. Where the set-back of the tree protection barrier would expose unmade ground to construction damage, new temporary ground protection should be installed as part of the implementation of physical tree protection measures prior to work starting on site.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

• New temporary ground protection should be capable of supporting any traffic entering or using the site without being distorted or causing compaction of underlying soil. The ground protection might comprise one of the following: a) For pedestrian movements only, a single thickness of scaffold boards placed either on top of a driven scaffold frame, so as to form a suspended walkway, or on top of a compression-resistant layer (e.g. 100 mm depth of woodchip), laid onto a geotextile membrane b) For pedestrian-operated plant up to a gross weight of 2 tonnes, proprietary, inter-linked ground protection boards placed on top of a compression-resistant layer (e.g. 150 mm depth of woodchip), laid onto a geotextile membrane c) For wheeled or tracked construction traffic exceeding 2 tonnes gross weight, an alternative system (e.g. proprietary systems or pre­ cast reinforced concrete slabs) to an engineering specification designed in conjunction with arboricultural advice, to accommodate the likely loading to which it will be subjected. • Wherever possible, underground utility services should be routed outside the RPA. Where underground apparatus is to pass within the RPA, detailed plans showing the proposed routing should be drawn up in conjunction with a competent arboriculturist.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

4. Water Environment

For information on mitigation for this section please refer to Volume 2 Chapter 9 Water Environment Section 9.6 and the Environmental Masterplan in Volume 4 Appendix 23.2.

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Scheme-wide • General Embedded Mitigation: Adopt construction good practice as summarised in the CCoP (Appendix 4.2) including but not limited to: Environment Agency’s Pollution Prevention Guidelines (PPG) CIRIA Report 648: Control of Water Pollution from Linear Construction Sites (2006) CIRIA Report 532: Control of Water Pollution from Construction Sites (2001) Ensuring that there is geomorphology and ecology input into the design and monitoring process Adopting appropriate water quality site management controls Pollution pathway management Drainage strategies to manage pollution risks (fine sediment and hydrocarbons) Further details can be obtained in Appendix 9.3.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

River Crossings • General Embedded Mitigation: compliance with relevant PPGs and construction good practice as outlined in the CCoP. Use of Drainage Strategy developed for the project Working on floodplains Suitable design of culverts (fish passage etc.) Soil Management Strategy Water quality monitoring • Specific Mitigation: Crossings with riparian trees requiring care of bank Crossing with soft banks requiring set-back working Active rivers with need for a minimum depth of pipe over longer sections Active rivers requiring drive-round or bailey bridge options instead of access track culverts Appropriate culvert design on rivers of certain width i.e. box culverts Salmonid Rivers: adhere to working window (i.e. even where drive around solutions are in place) Salmonid Rivers: Flow continuity issues (no over pumping) – e.g. any time a river is dammed Turbidity monitoring required at key times Turbidity monitoring required at all times. Further details can be found in Appendix 9.3.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Proposed WTW Construction • General site, plant and road controls • Site drainage and surface water runoff controls • Exposed ground and stockpile controls • Pollution prevention and response procedures • Implementation of CCoP including pollution and sediment control measures • Construction of realignment tie-ins with existing channel to be completed at the final stage • Construction of outfall to occur during low flow conditions or beck to be bunded upstream and downstream and over-pumped to create a dry working area • The time taken to complete the works once construction begins on installing the outfall and preparing the channel bank, should be kept to a minimum to reduce the potential impacts on the river bank • Outfall structure size to be minimised as far as possible • Sensitive design and location of outfall structure • Sufficiently dechlorinate treated water prior to discharging into Brides Beck during commissioning of WTW flows. • Phased increase of commissioning WTW flow rates/volumes into Brides Beck to reduce risk of scour and/or bank destabilisation. Operation • Suitably design outfall discharges to minimise potential erosion downstream in Brides Beck • No mitigation is required noting that any adverse effects would be subject to a remediation regime as agreed with the Environment Agency based on the extent of effects if they were to occur.

Harrot Hill PS • General site, plant and road controls • Site drainage and surface water runoff controls • Exposed ground and stockpile controls • Pollution prevention and response procedures • Pollution and sediment control measures.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Moota Hill SR • General site, plant and road controls • Site drainage and surface water runoff controls • Exposed ground and stockpile controls • Pollution prevention and response procedures • Implementation of CCoP including pollution and sediment control measures • Construction of outfall to occur during low flow conditions or beck to be bunded upstream and downstream and over-pumped to create a dry working area • The time taken to complete the works once construction begins on installing the outfall and preparing the channel bank, should be kept to a minimum to reduce the potential impacts on the river bank • Outfall structure size to be minimised as far as possible • Sensitive design and location of outfall structure • Suitably design outfall to minimise potential local erosion risk or undermining of the outfall structure itself.

High Leys SR and PS • General site, plant and road controls • Site drainage and surface water runoff controls • Exposed ground and stockpile controls • Pollution prevention and response procedures • Implementation of CCoP including pollution and sediment control measures • Construction of outfall to occur during low flow conditions or beck to be bunded upstream and downstream and over-pumped to create a dry working area • The time taken to complete the works once construction begins on installing the outfall and preparing the channel bank, should be kept to a minimum to reduce the potential impacts on the river bank • Outfall structure size to be minimised as far as possible • Sensitive design and location of outfall structure • Suitably design outfall to minimise potential local erosion risk or undermining of the outfall structure itself.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Thirlmere Reservoir – Changes to Abstraction • United Utilities would commission a detailed geomorphological and sediment management study, to be undertaken by fluvial geomorphologists with upland river expertise, to identify through measured evidence • The amount and types of sediment entering St John’s Beck (including through the sediment management plan) • The relationship between flow and the movement and distribution of sediment through the system • The geomorphological study would then make recommendations to a stakeholder panel (including Natural , Environment Agency and United Utilities) for an appropriate managed high flow regime in St John’s Beck in support of appropriate geomorphological function, in the context of restoring and maintaining the appropriate extent and quality of fish spawning habitats • Considering feasibility, practicability and other stakeholder issues, a rule-based regime for managed release of high flows from Thirlmere Reservoir by United Utilities will be agreed with the Environment Agency and Natural England and included within a revised Section 20 Agreement for operation of the reservoir by United Utilities • United Utilities will commit to installing new high-flow release infrastructure (channel modifications and variable rate valves) at the proposed new valve house at Thirlmere Reservoir proposed that can deliver the full range of flows that might be recommended by these studies, acknowledging that the specifics of the flow regime would follow later and be based on the recommended studies and through agreement with Natural England and the Environment Agency • Updating of the (extant) Sediment Management Plan to ensure a formal process of annual review and adaptive management is included.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

5. Flood Risk

5.1 Flood Risk to the development

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Bridge End Connection • Reservoir Flooding: Weather forecasts should be monitored on a daily basis during the construction phase to plan for any future storms where strong winds could be likely. Strong winds have to potential to generate waves, potentially overtopping the reservoir and placing the works at risk.

5.2 Flood Risk from the development

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

RWA d) Surface Water: Excavated materials should be stored so as not to alter existing surface water flowpaths. Where this is not possible, topsoil bunds should be constructed with regular spaces between heaps to prevent surface water backing up behind the structure and being re-directed elsewhere.

Network Mains • Surface Water: Excavated materials should be stored so as not to alter existing surface water flowpaths. Where this is not possible, topsoil bunds should be constructed with regular spaces between heaps to prevent surface water backing up behind the structure and being re-directed elsewhere.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

6. Ecology

6.1 Construction

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Designated Sites

Scheme-wide River Derwent and SAC, • No in-river working Oct-May inclusive (for salmonids) including River Derwent and Tributaries SSSI, • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats

Bassenthwaite Lake SSSI, Bassenthwaite Lake • Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate

NNR installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance • Adherence to the CCoP including successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy • Removal of fish in all scheme sections, watching brief for fish • Avoidance of night-time working in river channels • Avoidance or minimisation of noise and lighting near rivers at night.

River Ehen SAC, including River Ehen (Ennerdale • Adherence to the CCoP including successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures Water to Keekle Confluence) SSSI • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Thirlmere Woods SSSI • Adherence to the CCoP including successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Little How RSV CWS • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Adams Cross RSV CWS • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Broadstones CWS • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats • Adherence to CCoP, specifically the drainage construction strategy • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Dale Bottom Marshy Grassland CWS • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats • Adherence to the CCoP including successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Adherence to CCoP, specifically the drainage construction strategy • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

River Greta Wood CWS • Adherence to CCoP, specifically the drainage construction strategy • Adherence to the CCoP including successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Shoulthwaite Moss CWS • Grip blocking, tree and rhododendron removal, Sphagnum sp. propagation where feasible to improve the remaining areas of habitat within UU ownership boundary. In the first instance this should focus on areas of the moss adjacent to the red line, however, if additional mitigation is required the above measures should be implemented across a wider area of the moss • Adherence to the CCoP including successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Adherence to the CCoP including successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Adherence to CCoP, specifically the drainage construction strategy • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Briery Wood and Meadow CWS • Adherence to CCoP, specifically the drainage construction strategy • Adherence to the CCoP including successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Blumer Cottage Wood CWS • Appropriate fencing in consultation with arboriculturalist to avoid root protection areas • Adherence to the CCoP including successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Ellers Wood (Blindcrake) CWS • Appropriate fencing in consultation with arboriculturalist to avoid root protection areas • Adherence to CCoP, specifically the drainage construction strategy • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Gill Wood (Blindcrake) CWS • Successful soil and vegetation reinstatement • Adherence to CCoP, specifically the drainage construction strategy • Adherence to the CCoP including successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Randle Cross RSV CWS • Adherence to the CCoP including successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Dub Beck CWS • Adherence to the CCoP including successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Rheda South Park CWS • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats • Adherence to the CCoP including successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy.

Notable non-designated habitats

Scheme Sections 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, Species-rich hedgerows • Reinstatement of habitats to include replanting of appropriate native species (both woody and non- 17, 18, 19 woody), see Environmental Masterplan Appendix 23.2 • Reinstatement of habitat connectivity to include replanting of appropriate native species (both woody and non-woody) • Some areas will not be reinstated due to operational requirements • Adherence to the CCoP, specifically Biosecurity Management Plan • Adherence to CCoP.

Scheme Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, Species-poor hedgerows • Reinstatement of habitats to include replanting of appropriate native species (both woody and non- 16, 17, 18, 19 woody) • Reinstatement of habitat connectivity to include replanting of appropriate native species (both woody and non-woody) • Some areas will not be reinstated due to operational requirements • Adherence to the CCoP, specifically Biosecurity Management Plan.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Scheme Section 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, Wet grassland • Reinstatement of habitats to include replanting of appropriate native species mix 16, 17 and 19 • Implementation of Drainage Strategy which aims to restore pre-construction drainage characteristics • Adherence to the CCoP Adherence to Biosecurity Management Plan (part of CCoP).

Scheme Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 15, 17, Species-rich grassland • Careful topsoil removal and reinstatement to preserve seed bank if deemed appropriate 18, 19 • Reseeding of habitats using appropriate native species mix • Adherence to Biosecurity Management Plan • Adherence to CCoP.

Scheme Sections 2, 4, 12 Peat habitat • Adherence to CCoP • Implementation of Drainage Strategy which aims to restore pre-construction drainage characteristics • Adherence to Biosecurity Management Plan.

Scheme Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, Deciduous woodland (non-ancient) • Reinstatement of habitats to include replanting of appropriate native woody species 16, 17, 18, 19 • Some areas will not be reinstated to woodland due to operational requirements • Reinstatement of habitats to include replanting of appropriate native woody species • Some areas will not be reinstated due to operational requirements • Adherence to CCoP • Adherence to Biosecurity Management Plan.

Ancient Woodland

Scheme Section 2 Storms Wood • Adherence to the CCoP, • Scheme Section 3 Briery Weir Wood Follow Land Drainage Plan • Follow Biosecurity Management Plan. Scheme Section 5 Howgill West

Scheme Section 5 Howgill East

Scheme Section 5 Howgill PAWs

Scheme Section 5 Messengermire West and South

Scheme Section 5 Messengermire PAWs

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Scheme Section 5 Ellers and Gill Wood

Scheme Section 7 Quarry Hill • Successful soil and vegetation reinstatement • Adherence to the Land Drainage Plan • Adherence to the CCoP • Adherence to the Biosecurity Management Plan.

Bats

Scheme Section 7 Nathusius’ bat population • Restoration of existing habitats • Reduce restoration time of hedgerows using semi-mature plants • Landscaping around new above-ground infrastructure • Planting of woodland gaps to manage as a woodland ride • Re-connect fragmented tree lines/scattered trees using shrub planting • Landscaping around new above-ground infrastructure • Reinstatement of appropriate woody species (see Environmental Masterplan Appendix 23.2) • Pre-felling checks • Roosts/potential roosts removed during winter when less likely to be in use • Installation of bat boxes to replace potential roosts lost from tree felling or crown lifting • Limit direction and intensity of artificial lighting • No night working adjacent to water courses • Maximise distance between high noise machinery and sensitive areas.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Scheme Section 4 Common bat species assemblage • Planting of woodland gaps to manage as a woodland ride • Re-connect fragmented tree lines/scattered trees using shrub planting. Landscaping around new above­ ground infrastructure. Reinstatement of appropriate woody species (see Environmental Masterplan Appendix 23.2) • Pre-felling checks. Roosts/potential roosts removed during winter when less likely to be in use • Installation of bat boxes to replace roosts/potential roosts lost from tree felling or crown lifting • Limit direction and intensity of artificial lighting adjacent to sensitive features. No night working adjacent to water courses • Limit distance between high noise machinery and sensitive areas.

Scheme Section 2, 4, 5, 15, 19 Predicted and actual rarer bat species • Restoration of existing habitats assemblages • Replace hedgerows with semi-mature planting • Use 'artificial hedges' during construction to continue linear features at key commuting routes • Planting of woodland gaps to manage as a woodland ride • Re-connect fragmented tree lines/scattered trees using shrub planting. Landscaping around new above­ ground infrastructure. Reinstatement of appropriate woody species (see Environmental Masterplan Appendix 23.2) • Pre-felling checks, roosts/potential roosts removed during winter when less likely to be in use • Installation of bat boxes to replace roosts/potential roosts lost from tree felling or crown lifting • Limit direction and intensity of artificial lighting adjacent to sensitive features. No night working adjacent to water courses • Limit distance between high noise machinery and sensitive areas.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Scheme Section 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 Predicted and actual common bat species • Restoration of existing habitats assemblages • Replace hedgerows with semi-mature planting • Use 'artificial hedges' during construction to continue linear features at key commuting routes • Planting of woodland gaps to manage as a woodland ride • Re-connect fragmented tree lines/scattered trees using shrub planting • Landscaping around new above-ground infrastructure • Reinstatement of appropriate woody species (see Environmental Masterplan Appendix 23.2) • Pre-felling checks, roosts/potential roosts removed during winter when less likely to be in use • Installation of bat boxes to replace roosts/potential roosts lost from tree felling or crown lifting • Limit direction and intensity of artificial lighting • No night working adjacent to water courses • Limit distance between high noise machinery and sensitive areas.

Scheme Section 2, 3, 7, 11, 17, 18 Predicted and actual rarer bat species • Restoration of existing habitats. Replace hedgerows with semi-mature planting. Use 'artificial hedges' assemblages during construction to continue linear features at key commuting routes • Planting of woodland gaps to manage as a woodland ride • Re-connect fragmented tree lines/scattered trees using shrub planting • Landscaping around new above-ground infrastructure. Reinstatement of appropriate woody species (see Environmental Masterplan Appendix 23.2). • Pre-felling checks, roosts/potential roosts removed during winter when less likely to be in use • Installation of bat boxes to replace roosts/potential roosts lost from tree felling or crown lifting • Limit direction and intensity of artificial lighting • No night working adjacent to water courses • Limit distance between high noise machinery and sensitive areas.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Scheme Section 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, Predicted and actual common bat species • Restoration of existing habitats. Installation of artificial hedges during construction 18, 19 assemblages • Replace hedgerows with semi-mature planting • Use 'artificial hedges' during construction to continue linear features at key commuting routes • Planting of woodland gaps to manage as a woodland ride • Re-connect fragmented tree lines/scattered trees using shrub planting • Landscaping around new above-ground infrastructure • Reinstatement of appropriate woody species (see Environmental Masterplan Appendix 23.2) • Pre-felling checks • Roosts/potential roosts removed during winter when less likely to be in use • Installation of bat boxes to replace roosts/potential roosts lost from tree felling or crown lifting • Limit direction and intensity of artificial lighting • No night working adjacent to water courses • Limit distance between high noise machinery and sensitive areas.

(Scheme Section 6, 14) Predicted rarer bat species assemblages • Reinstatement of habitats (see Environmental Masterplan Appendix 23.2). • Habitat creation through landscaping around new permanent buildings. Installation of bat boxes to replace potential roosts lost from felling or crown lifting of mature trees • Limit direction and intensity of artificial lighting • No night working adjacent to water courses • Limit distance between high noise machinery and sensitive areas.

Otters

Scheme-wide Otter populations in the Derwent catchment • Pre-construction checks for unforeseen otter holts and couches • Avoidance of night-time working in river channels • Avoidance or minimisation of noise and lighting near rivers at night • Phasing of construction on multiple proximate river crossings to minimise cumulative impacts • Adherence to the CCoP • Installation of directional fencing.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Red Squirrels

Scheme Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 15 Assumed red squirrel populations using woodlands • Replanting with diversity of tree species that favour red squirrel of high and medium value to the species, including • Tree clearance only during September-November outside of red squirrel breeding season Thirlmere, Storms Wood, Briery Weir Wood, • Phased tree clearance only during September-November outside red squirrel breeding season. Keswick A and B, Dodd Wood, Messengermire, Howgill Wood, Gill and Ellers Wood, Park Wood A and B, River Ellen woodland, Newbiggin Wood, Mafeking Wood

Scheme Sections 3, 4, 7, 15 Assumed red squirrel populations using woodlands • Replanting with diversity of tree species that favour red squirrel of low value to the species, including Keswick C • Tree clearance only during September-November outside of red squirrel breeding season

and D, Highfield Wood, High Woodnook, Foumart • Phased tree clearance only during September-November outside red squirrel breeding season. Wood, Summergrove Wood

Amphibians

Scheme Sections 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, Population of common toad • Adherence to CCoP, watching brief and multi-phased vegetation clearance in Section 2 and Section 4 16, 17, 18 and 19 and removal and relocation of individuals.

Reptiles

Scheme Section 2 – Shoulthwaite Moss Assumed assemblage of common reptile species • Pre-construction check using valley mire • Temporary exclusion, trapping and translocation.

Breeding Birds

Scheme Sections, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19 Assemblages of breeding birds using non- • Reinstatement of habitats (see Environmental Masterplan Appendix 23.2) woodland habitats • Habitat creation through landscaping around new permanent buildings (see Environmental Masterplan Appendix 23.2) • Avoidance through site clearance pre-bird breeding season.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Scheme Sections 3, 4, 5 Assemblages of breeding birds using woodland • Restoration of woodland habitat either side of pipeline habitats • Bird box scheme • Planting of scrub and tall herb community over the new pipeline • Planting of scrub and tall herb community typical of natural woodland edges and rides along pipeline route • Bird box scheme in adjacent habitat • Avoidance through site clearance pre-bird breeding season

Scheme Section 4 Breeding osprey population • Avoidance of works within a 1 km radius of nest site during the whole breeding season, and within 150 m of Bassenthwaite lake SSSI foraging habitat during peak breeding season • Avoidance through adherence to CCoP,

Scheme Section 4 Assemblage of breeding birds in Bassenthwaite • Avoid works within 150 m of SSSI during peak breeding season lake SSSI • Avoidance through adherence to CCoP.

Wintering Birds

Scheme Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, Assemblages of wintering birds using non- • Reinstatement of habitats (see Environmental Masterplan Appendix 23.2) 17, 19 woodland habitats • Habitat creation through landscaping around new permanent buildings.

Scheme Sections 3, 4 and 5 Assemblages of wintering birds using woodland • Restoration of woodland habitat either side of pipeline habitats • Planting of scrub and tall herb community over the new pipeline • Planting of scrub and tall herb community typical of natural woodland edges and rides along pipeline route • Reinstatement of habitats (see Environmental Masterplan Appendix 23.2).

Scheme Section 4 Wintering birds at Bassenthwaite Lake • Avoid works within 200 m of waterbody during winter season • Mitigation through installation of sound and visual barriers • Avoidance through adherence to CCoP,

Scheme Section 11, 15 Wintering birds at Mockerin Tarn and Keekle • Avoid works within 150 m during peak wintering season Flashes • Avoidance through adherence to CCoP.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Aquatic Ecology – Habitats

Scheme -wide Complex of habitats comprising the • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures River Derwent and Bassenthwaite Lake SAC • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy. Direct impacts: Total of 12 crossings within WFD waterbody ID: St John’s Beck GB112075070430 Naddle Beck GB112075070420 River Greta GB11207507356 River Derwent GB112075070520 Whit Beck to River Cocker GB112075070400 Cocker - Crummock Water to Whit Beck GB112075070370 River Marron GB112075070540

Complex of habitats comprising the River Ehen • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures SAC • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy. No direct impacts/watercourse crossings within the Ehen SAC, but eight crossings are located upstream of the SAC: 03_24 (Lingla Beck); and crossings 03_25 to 03_31 within the River Keekle Catchment Within WFD waterbody ID: River Ehen: GB112074069980 GB112074070010

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Rivers and streams adjacent and connected to • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures SAC or SSSI that contain one or more of the • Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate primary or qualifying habitat features of that SAC, installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance or other habitat important for supporting the SAC’s • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy. Annex II species populations.

Direct impacts: Total of 10 crossings within WFD waterbody ID: River Ellen GB112075073650 Black Beck and Snary Beck within River Marron GB112075070540 River Keekle GB112074070000 Lostrigg Beck GB112075070550 Paddle Beck GB112075070400 Hope Beck, Liza Beck GB112075070370

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Rivers and streams with CWS designation; or site • Full reinstatement/restoration of habitats has Good WFD status and physical and chemical • Directional drill method for Smithy Beck (03_20) and Colliergate Beck (03_21) properties capable of supporting significant • Maintain hydrological connectivity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate populations of aquatic NERC Section 41 species installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance and/or significant salmonid spawning/nursery • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats habitat. • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures

• Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate Direct impacts: installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance Total of 26 watercourse crossings within WFD • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy. waterbody ID: GB112075070420 GB112075070530 GB112075070562 GB112075070561 GB112075070580 GB112075070640 GB112075070540 GB112075070000 GB112075070520 GB112075070400 GB112075070370

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Rivers and streams which are not designated but • Full reinstatement/restoration of habitats capable of supporting a reasonably diverse fish, • Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate macrophyte or macroinvertebrate community. installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance Direct impacts: • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats Total of 55 watercourse crossings within WFD • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures waterbody ID: • Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate GB112075070420 installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance GB112075073561 • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy GB112075073562 GB112075073580 GB112075073620 GB112075073650 GB112075070520 GB112075070570 GB112075070400 GB112075070540

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

All remaining non-designated rivers and streams • Full reinstatement/restoration of habitats Direct impacts: • Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate Total of 119 watercourse crossings within WFD installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance waterbody ID: • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats GB112075070430 • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures GB112075070420 • Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate GB112075073561 installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance GB112075073562 • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy. GB112075073580 GB112075073570 GB112075073640 GB112075073520 GB112075070400 GB112075070540 GB112075070000 GB112075070010 GB112075070020 GB112075070370

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Fish populations

Scheme-wide Population of Atlantic salmon and/or • No in-river working Oct-May inclusive (for salmonids) (river/brook/sea) lamprey present as a qualifying • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats

feature River Derwent and Bassenthwaite Lake • No in-river working Oct-May inclusive (for salmonids) SAC • Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate

installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance (Annex II species). • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats

• Implementation of generic mitigation measures for disturbance

Total of 10 crossings • No night working. • Tunnelling/drilling works undertaken during daylight hours only • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy • Removal of fish in all scheme sections, watching brief for fish.

Population of Atlantic salmon and/or • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures (river/brook/sea) lamprey present as a qualifying • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy. feature of River Ehen SAC

(Annex II species).

No crossings are located within the River Ehen SAC, but a crossing in the headwaters of the Lingla Beck (03_24) is located upstream of the River Ehen SAC. The methodology employed is an open cut – flume using a temporary culvert for the construction access track

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Population of vendace using Bassenthwaite Lake • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures. SSSI

One crossing on the River Derwent (03_05) flows into Bassenthwaite Lake. A total of 32 crossings are located in tributaries that flow directly into Bassenthwaite Lake (01_21 to 01_52)

Significant population of Atlantic salmon or • No in-river working Oct-May including (salmonids) (river/brook/sea) lamprey in an undesignated • Full reinstatement/restoration of habitats watercourse adjacent and connected to an SAC • No in-river working Oct-May inclusive (for salmonids)

• Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate (Regional value) installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats Total of 11 crossings • Implementation of generic mitigation measures for disturbance • No night working • Tunnelling/drilling works undertaken during daylight hours only • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate installation of flumes and culverts • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy • Removal of fish in all scheme sections, watching brief for fish.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Smaller population of Atlantic salmon and/or • No in-river working Oct-May inclusive (for salmonids) (river/brook/sea) lamprey that is not a qualifying • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats

feature of an SAC • Directional drill method for Smithy Beck (03_20) and Colliergate Beck (03_21)

• Best practice culvert design

29 crossings • No in-river working Oct-May inclusive (for salmonids) • Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats • Implementation of generic mitigation measures for disturbance • No night working • Tunnelling/drilling works undertaken during daylight hours only • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy • Removal of fish in all scheme sections, watching brief for fish.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Populations of brown trout, bullhead and/or • No in-river working Oct-May inclusive (for salmonids) European eel • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats • Best practice culvert design • No in-river working Oct-May inclusive (for salmonids) • Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats • Implementation of generic mitigation measures for disturbance • No night working • Tunnelling/drilling works undertaken during daylight hours only • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Maintain hydrological continuity between upstream and downstream habitats through appropriate installation of flumes and culverts in line with Environment Agency Guidance • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy • Removal of fish in all scheme sections, watching brief for fish.

Macrophyte populations

Scheme-wide Population of Luronium natans in Bassenthwaite • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures Lake, present as a qualifying species of an SAC • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy. (Annex II species)

Population of the nationally rare moss, Schistidium • Ecological Clerk of Works, Remove rocks containing Schistidium ahead of works under supervision of an agassizii found in the River Cocker catchment ecologist and place them back after the works downstream of Crummock Water • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Ecological Clerk of Works, Remove rocks containing Schistidium ahead of works under supervision of an ecologist and place them back after the works.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Macrophyte populations that form the Littorelletea • Reinstatement/restoration of habitats uniflorae, Isoëto-Nanojuncetea, Ranunculion • Directional drill method for Smithy Beck (03_20) and Colliergate Beck (03_21) fluitansis and/or Callitricho-Batrachion vegetation • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures assemblages. • Allow continuation of flow by use of flumes to prevent M. alterniflorum and C. brutia spp. hamulata from drying out • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy • At Naddle Beck (01_80) and St Johns Beck (01_91), physical damage to macrophytes will be minimised by removing riparian and submerged species at water crossigns that contain Littorelletea uniflorae, Isoëto-Nanojuncetea, Ranunculion fluitansis and/or Callitricho-Batrachion vegetation assemblages • No specific measures proposed for other crossings – stay within planning application boundary (red line boundary).

Population of freshwater mussel present in the • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures River Ehen as a qualifying feature of an SAC • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy. (Annex II species)

RWA Population of nationally rare beetle Donacia • Ecological Clerk of Works for reedbed habitats aquatica or snail Vertigo lilljeborgi recorded as part • Restoration of reedbed habitats (Carex spp.)

of SSSI citation (NERC Section 41 species) • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy • Ecological Clerk of Works for reedbed habitats • Minimise areas of Carex spp. affected within SSSI.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

(Scheme Section 4) (Scheme Section 15) Population of nationally scarce riffle beetle • Restoration of riffle-pool sequency habitats (that support Oulimnius troglodytes , Siphlonurus lacustris Oulimnius troglodytes recorded as part of SSSI and Capnia bifrons and river shingle (Bembidion testaceum) citation. • Successful implementation of all pollution prevention measures Populations of Siphlonurus lacustris • Allow continuation of flow Populations of Capnia bifrons • Successful implementation of biosecurity policy Populations of Bembidion testaceum (NERC • No specific measures proposed – minimise working area. Section 41 species) in the River Keekle)

Siphlonurus lacustris: Dash/Halls Beck 01_22

Capnia bifrons: River Derwent

Bembidion testaceum And other notable/rare species in River Keekle catchment

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

6.2 Operation

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Otters

Otter population in the Derwent catchment • Detailed geomorphological study and fish monitoring followed by implementation of resulting recommendations (including updated Sediment Management Plan), as described in Section 7.7 of Appendix 11.13.

Aquatic Ecology

Section 2 Thirlmere and St. John’s Beck • See Appendix 9.5A: Thirlmere Reservoir abstraction regime.

Habitats

RWA Complex of aquatic habitats comprising the River • Detailed geomorphological and hydrological study and fish monitoring, followed by implementation of Derwent and Bassenthwaite Lake SAC, which resulting recommendations (including updated Sediment Management Plan), as described in includes the St John’s Beck up to Thirlmere Section 7.7 of Appendix 11.13. Reservoir

RWA Complex of aquatic habitats comprising the River • Detailed geomorphological and hydrological study and fish monitoring, followed by implementation of Derwent & Tributaries SSSI, which includes the St resulting recommendations (including updated Sediment Management Plan), as described in John’s Beck up to Thirlmere Reservoir Section 7.7 of Appendix 11.13.

Fish populations

RWA Population of river lamprey in Thirlmere Reservoir. • Not enough is currently known about Arctic char and lamprey populations in Thirlmere Reservoir to Population of Arctic char in Thirlmere Reservoir design and implement meaningful mitigation measures. Bespoke surveys of lamprey and Arctic char life history and population composition are therefore recommended as a step to reducing the uncertainty and to determine appropriate mitigation, if required.

Population of Atlantic salmon present as a • Bespoke surveys of Atlantic salmon smolts and juveniles are required in St John’s Beck against a control qualifying feature of an SAC (Annex II species). (Glenderamackin). No monitoring of the adult Atlantic salmon populations is proposed • Population of river/brook lamprey present as a Targeted monitoring of lamprey populations is required in St John’s Beck qualifying feature of an SAC (Annex II species). • Fisheries and macrophyte monitoring are to be meshed with geomorphological studies and updating of the (extant) Sediment Management Plan. Populations of brown/sea trout in, and migrating through, St John’s Beck

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Scheme Section/ Receptor Mitigation Chainage

Macrophytes and phytoplankton

RWA Macrophyte populations that form the Ranunculion • Monitoring of macrophyte habitats and populations is proposed in St John’s Beck fluitansis and Callitricho-Batrachion (Sub-type 3) • Fisheries and macrophyte monitoring are to be meshed with geomorphological studies and updating of vegetation community, including Myriophyllum the (extant) Sediment Management Plan. alterniflorum, Fontinalis antipyretica and starworts Callitriche spp.

Macroinvertebrates

Scheme-wide Populations of the nationally rare beetle Donacia • Detailed geomorphological study followed by implementation of resulting recommendations (including aquatica, snail Vertigo lilljeborgi and riffle beetle updated Sediment Management Plan), as described in Section 7.7 of Appendix 11.13. Oulimnius troglodytes recorded in River Derwent & Tributaries SSSI (exact locations not specified)

Fish

Scheme-wide Significant population of Atlantic salmon and/or • United Utilities have committed to investigating the options and impacts of abstraction-related (river/brook/sea) lamprey in Chapel House infrastructure (including weir removal) at the site as part of a compensatory measures package. Reservoir (not adjacent or connected to an SAC)

Populations of brown trout and European eel in Chapel House Reservoir

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

7. Cultural Heritage

7.1 Archaeology

7.1.1 Construction Phase

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference)

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN17 Roman Road from Keswick to Caermote Fort, • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for Underskiddaw an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN21 Cockermouth, Keswick and Penrith Railway • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the (site of) Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Reinstatement.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN40 Narrow Ridge and Furrow and field-system • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the near Low Crosthwaite Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN58 Township boundary: Keswick/St Johns, • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Castlerigg, and Wythburn Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN63 Township boundary: • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Bassenthwaite/Underskiddaw Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN70 Causeway (site of) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference) an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN73 Site of toll bar shown on Greenwich enclosure • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for plan an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN96 Strip fields south-west of • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN97 Enclosed fields south-west of Applethwaite • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief -Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN107 Broad Ridge and Furrow • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN111 Broad Ridge and Furrow (4) • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN114 Roman gully • Excavation prior to construction - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for archaeological excavation.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN120 Dyke and enclosure, St John’s, Castlerigg, and • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Wythburn Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN127 Field-system at Highfield Wood, Bassenthwaite • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference) an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN128 Field-system at Highfield Wood, Bassenthwaite • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN148 Township boundary: Keswick/St Johns, • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Castlerigg, and Wythburn respecting Castlerigg Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, Common 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN150 Broad and narrow Ridge and Furrow visible on • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the aerial photographs Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN151 Broad and narrow Ridge and Furrow visible on • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the aerial photographs (1) Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN152 Broad and narrow Ridge and Furrow visible on • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the aerial photographs (2) Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN155 Broad Ridge and Furrow visible on aerial • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the photographs (1) Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN165 Turnpike Road near Shoulthwaite Farm (site of) • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Reinstatement.

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN171 Boundary Bank near Storms • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference) Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN179 Trackway near Smaithwaite (site of) • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Reinstatement.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN184 Relict field boundary near Little Dodd Garden • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Centre Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN185 Field boundary near Little Dodd Garden Centre • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN187 Earthworks/retting ponds near Little Dodd • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Garden Centre Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN188 Field Boundary near Dancing Gate • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN194 Enclosures/Field Boundaries near rose Cottage • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007)

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN195 Area of Narrow Ridge and Furrow near High • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Fieldside Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN201 Carriage Drive or Trackway at Fieldside • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Grange (site of) Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Reinstatement.

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN208 Field Boundary near Greta Bank Farm • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN213 Field system near Thrushwood • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN217 Lynchet near North Row Bridge • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN218 Green lane near North Row Bridge (1) • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Reinstatement.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference)

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN219 Lynchet near North Row Bridge (1) • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN220 Lynchet near Crookelty Bridge • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN222 Field boundary near Long Close Farm • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN224 Narrow Ridge and Furrow cultivation near • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Green Hill Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN225 Possible building platform at Highfield Wood • Evaluation by trial trenching.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN230 Field boundaries near Mire House Cottage • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN231 Green Lane near Black Moss • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage,

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference) 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN233 Broad Ridge and Furrow near Low House • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN234 Broad Ridge and Furrow near Low House • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN236 Roman road following line of A595 • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN238 Field-system at Redmain • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN246 Broad Ridge and Furrow south of Blindcrake • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN247 Earthworks within Isel Park • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN248 Linear earthworks south-east of Gill Wood, • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Blindcrake Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN250 Ridge and Furrow at Isel Grange, Blindcrake • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference) Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN251 Mill, Isel, Blindcrake (site of) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN252 Field boundaries north of Isel Hall, Blindcrake • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN261 Green Lane south-west of Blindcrake • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN262 Earthworks south-west of Blindcrake • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN263 Broad Ridge and Furrow east of Redmain • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN265 Site of building, east of Redmain • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN269 Ridge and Furrow east of Blindcrake • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN273 Site of buildings north of Isel Hall • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference) an archaeological watching brief.

RWA - Scheme Section 5 OAN277 Earthworks south of Bank Head • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief -Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN278 Field boundary near Low Barn • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief -Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN279 Trackway at Hunter How • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Reinstatement.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN290 Parish Boundary, near Coal Beck Farm • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN297 Narrow Ridge and Furrow near Low Barn • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN317 Field Boundaries near Scarness Farm • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN332 Field Boundary near Burnside Caravan Park • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference)

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN338 Enclosure/Field Boundaries near Naddle • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Bridge Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN340 Field-system/Farmstead near Naddle Bridge • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN341 Longhouse near Naddle Bridge (site of) • Strip map and record prior to construction - Excavation prior to construction - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for archaeological excavation or reduce the working width to avoid if possible.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN346 Field boundaries near Goosewell Farm • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN347 Ruin/structure near Castlerigg Stone Circle • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief or reduce the working width to avoid if possible.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN348 Field boundaries near Castlerigg Stone Circle • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN353 Field boundaries near Low Nest • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN370 Cropmark enclosure near Bank Head • Evaluation by trial trenching - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for archaeological field evaluation.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference)

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN373 Circular feature near Brackenplace Wood • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN375 Earthworks near • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN376 Linear cropmark near Little Crosthwaite • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN377 Possible cropmark enclosure near Thrushwood • Evaluation by trial trenching - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for archaeological field evaluation.

Cockermouth to Broughton Cross (Network Main WA9 Site of Tramway • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the West) Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

Proposed WTW to Quarry Hill (Network Main WA30 Site of Bog Hall • Excavation prior to construction - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard North) and guidance for archaeological excavation.

Proposed WTW to Summergrove (Network Main WA38 Site of Small Rectangular Building • Strip map and record - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and North) guidance for archaeological excavation.

Proposed WTW to Summergrove (Network Main WA43 Site of Rectangular Building (5) • Strip map and record - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and North) guidance for archaeological excavation.

Proposed WTW to Quarry Hill (Network Main WA130 Ridge and Furrow (2) • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the North) Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

Proposed WTW to Quarry Hill (Network Main WA132 Earthworks (3) • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for North) an archaeological watching brief.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference)

Network Main – WG – QH (Network Main North) WA187 Site of Settlement of Williamsgate • Topographic survey and watching brief.

Network Main – WG – QH (Network Main North) WA216 Ridge and Furrow (4) • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

Network Main – WG – QH (Network Main North) WA218 Ridge and Furrow (5) • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

Network Main – WG – QH (Network Main North) WA228 Ridge and Furrow (6) • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

Network Main – WG – QH (Network Main North) WA236 Ridge and Furrow (7) • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

Network Main – WG – QH (Network Main North) WA375 Possible Medieval Settlement • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Excavation.

Network Main – WG – QH (Network Main North) WA508 Projected line of Roman Road • Watching brief - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

Network Main – WG – QH (Network Main North) WA514 Ridge and Furrow (10) • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

Network Main – WG - SG (Network Main South) CFA16 Roman Road, Whitehaven Co Constituency • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Excavation prior to construction - Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for archaeological excavation.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference)

Network Main – WG - SG (Network Main South) CFA18 L & NW & Furness Joint Railway, Whitehaven, • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Cleator & Egremont Branch (site of) Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Reinstatement.

Network Main – WG - SG (Network Main South) CFA23 Cleator and Workington Junction Railway, • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Rowrah Branch (site of) Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Reinstatement.

Network Main – WG - SG (Network Main South) CFA76 Ridge and Furrow • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007).

Network Main – WG - SG (Network Main South) CFA82 Settlement 25m SE of Gatra. • Temporary fencing will be erected around its site for the duration of the construction works. It will be clearly signed to warn of its presence.

Network Main – WG - SG (Network Main South) CFA83 Asby Banks: Cropmark • Watching brief -Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

Network Main – WG - SG (Network Main South) CFA93 Arlecdon Vicarage Enclosures, Arlecdon and • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the Frizington; (The Parsonage, Arlecdon) Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Watching brief -Chartered Institute for Archaeologists, 2014 Standard and guidance for an archaeological watching brief.

Network Main – WG - SG (Network Main South) CFA102 Cleator and Workington Junction Railway (site • Topographic survey - Level 2 survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding the of) Archaeology of Landscape - A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2007) • Reinstatement.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

7.2 Built Heritage and Historic Urban Landscape

7.2.1 Construction

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference)

Cockermouth to Broughton Cross (Network Main WA196 Milestone east of Broughton Cross • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic West) Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the milestone. Careful removal of the milestone and storage in a secure and weatherproof location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the milestone to their original location.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN161 Gatepost near Sykes Farm • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the gatepost. Careful removal of the gatepost and storage in a secure and weatherproof location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the gatepost to their original location.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN181 Gatepost near Smaithwaite • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the gatepost. Careful removal of the gatepost and storage in a secure and weatherproof location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the gatepost to their original location.

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN196 Gatepost near High Fieldside • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the gatepost. Careful removal of the gatepost and storage in a secure and weatherproof location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the gatepost to their original location.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN210 Stile near Thorny Plats • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference) the existing setting of the stile. Careful removal of the stile and storage in a secure and weatherproof location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the stile to their original location.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN268 Gatepost, south-west of Williamsgate • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the gatepost. Careful removal of the gatepost and storage in a secure and weatherproof location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the gatepost to their original location.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN270 Gatepost west of Isel Hall • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the gatepost. Careful removal of the gatepost and storage in a secure and weatherproof location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the gatepost to their original location.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN304 Gatepost near North Row Bridge • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the gatepost. Careful removal of the gatepost and storage in a secure and weatherproof location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the gatepost to their original location.

OAN324 Gatepost near Green Hill • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the gatepost. Careful removal of the gatepost and storage in a secure and weatherproof location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the gatepost to their original location.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN333 Gatepost near Burnside Caravan Park (1) • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the gatepost. Careful removal of the gatepost and storage in a secure and weatherproof location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the gatepost to their original location.

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN339 Gatepost near Naddle Bridge (1) • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference) Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the gatepost. Careful removal of the gatepost and storage in a secure and weatherproof location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the gatepost to their original location.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN356 Gatepost near Dale Bottom • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the gatepost. Careful removal of the gatepost and storage in a secure and weatherproof location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the gatepost to their original location.

RWA – Scheme Section 2 OAN357 Gatepost near Sykes • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the gatepost. Careful removal of the gatepost and storage in a secure and weatherproof location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the gatepost to their original location.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 OAN298 Sheepfold near Lingeybank Wood • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the sheepfold.

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN203 Bridge at Fieldside Grange • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the bridge.

RWA – Scheme Section 3 OAN204 Bridge at Fieldside Grange (1) • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the bridge.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN227 Bridge near Mire House • A photographic survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings – A guide to good recording practice (English Heritage, 2006) to document the existing setting of the bridge.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN86 Gardens of Mirehouse • A Level 1 survey of the cast-iron railings in accordance with guidance in Understanding Historic Buildings- A guide to good recording practise (English Heritage, 2006). Careful removal of the section of cast-iron railings and storage in a secure and weatherproof

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component, Scheme Section and Asset Number Receptor Mitigation Chainage (where applicable) (for cross reference) location for the duration of the construction works. Reinstatement of the cast-iron railings to their original location and style.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN200 Pleasure gardens and rockery at Fieldside • A Level 2 Historic Building Survey in accordance with guidance in Understanding Grange Historic Buildings - A guide to good recording practise (English Heritage, 2006). Watching brief during the removal of historic building fabric.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 J09 Mirehouse • Ensure position of air valve and washout chambers are located behind existing areas of planting to preserve the principal views of Mirehouse. Landscape and planting.

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN86 Gardens of Mirehouse • Ensure position of air valve and washout chambers are located behind existing areas of planting to preserve the principal views of the gardens of Mirehouse. Landscape and planting.

7.2.2 Operation

Scheme Component/ Section/ Chainage Asset Number Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Mitigation (for cross Construction Stage/ activity reference)

RWA – Scheme Section 4 J04 Chestnut Hill House Shelley Cottage with Landscape planting along pre-existing garden boundaries. Adjoining Stables and Coach House and gardens

RWA – Scheme Section 4 OAN312 Gateway near Pooley Beck (1) Landscape and planting.

RWA – Scheme Section 5 J43 Blindcrake Conservation Area Landscape planting along pre-existing field and hedgerow boundaries.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

7.3 Historic Hedgerows 4) During construction, the proposed scheme is predicted to have a temporary impact on 117 hedgerows identified as archaeologically or historically important under The Hedgerow Regulations 1997 as a result of the removal of sections of hedgerow along the route of the Proposed Scheme. It is proposed that impacted Hedgerows would be reinstated once the construction phase has been completed. See Environmental Masterplan for details in Appendix 23.2.

7.4 Historic Landscape

7.4.1 Construction

Scheme Component/ Section/ Chainage Asset Number Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Mitigation (for cross Construction Stage/ activity reference)

Scheme-wide HLT2 Roads and Tracks Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like. Directional drilling may be undertaken.

Scheme-wide HLT4 Tree Plantation Reinstatement in line with pipeline constraints as outlined in the Planting Strategy in Appendix 23.3.

Scheme-wide HLT5 Ancient Enclosure Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Scheme-wide HLT7 Settlement Pre-1770 Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like. Directional drilling may be undertaken.

Scheme-wide HLT8 Ancient Enclosures of Fell – modified Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Scheme-wide HLT9 Recent Enclosure – modified Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Scheme-wide HLT11 Recent Enclosure Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Section/ Chainage Asset Number Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Mitigation (for cross Construction Stage/ activity reference)

Scheme-wide HLT12 Settlement 1864 – 1950 Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like. Directional drilling may be undertaken.

Scheme-wide HLT13 Ornamental Parkland Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Scheme-wide HLT14 Railways – disused Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like. Directional drilling may be undertaken.

Scheme-wide HLT15 Settlement Post-1950 Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like. Directional drilling may be undertaken.

Scheme-wide HLT16 Settlement 1770-1864 Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like. Directional drilling may be undertaken.

Scheme-wide HLT18 Ancient Enclosures – modified Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Scheme-wide HLT19 Discrete Farm Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Scheme-wide HLT20 Former Common Arable Land Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Scheme-wide HLT22 Fossilised Strip Where possible landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like. Where impact relates to construction of new built elements, no mitigation is proposed.

Scheme-wide HLT23 Ancient Close Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Section/ Chainage Asset Number Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Mitigation (for cross Construction Stage/ activity reference)

Scheme-wide HLT24 Ancient Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Scheme-wide HLT25 River Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to culverting. Directional drilling may be undertaken.

Scheme-wide HLT26 Road Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction. Directional drilling may be undertaken.

Scheme-wide HLT28 Parliamentary Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Scheme-wide HLT31 Nucleated Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like. Directional drilling may be undertaken.

Scheme-wide HLT32 Private Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like subject to agreement with landowners.

Scheme-wide HLT33 Meadow Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Scheme-wide HLT36 Intake Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Scheme-wide HLT37 Designed Landscapes Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction, including reinstatement of all field boundaries like for like.

Scheme-wide HLT40 Playing Field Landscaping would be undertaken to return area to its condition prior to construction.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

7.5 Intangible Cultural Heritage and Associations

7.5.1 Construction

Scheme Component/ Section/ Chainage Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Mitigation Stage/ activity Loweswater Shepherds’ Meet Cockermouth to Cornhow (Slip-lining) J48 No compound present during the duration of the annual Show in September. Restoration of the surface and grass in advance of the show.

Scheme-wide J52 Arcadian sense of tranquillity Take all noise reducing construction options as outlined in Noise Chapter. Landscape and planting.

Scheme-wide J55 Early Tourism Reinstate all existing field boundaries and access points.

RWA J58 The Lake District National Park Reinstate all existing field boundaries and access points.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

8. Soils, Geology and Hydrogeology

8.1.1 Construction Phase

Scheme Component/ Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation Section/ Chainage

Scheme-wide • Construction workers, site workers and users of adjacent sites near potentially • Sites identified through ground investigation and suitable measures put in place to contaminated land parcels (1-5,9,11-13,15-19) protect the health of construction workers and other health receptors. Surface Water – WFD Catchments • Measures to control the zone of influence of dewatering effects. Groundwater • St Johns Beck (2) control will be operated for the minimum duration required to enable construction • Naddle Beck (2) • Measures to prevent or limit the release of contaminants and to limit potential • Derwent upstream Bassenthwaite Lake (2-4) impacts. • Derwent downstream Bassenthwaite Lake (4, 5) • Ellen (upper) (7) • Ellen (middle) (7) • Ellen (lower) (7) • Threapland Gill (7) • Broughton Beck (7, 9) • Derwent –conference Cocker to tidal (9, 11, 16) • Cocker –conference Whit Beck to conference Derwent (11, 18, 19) • Marron (11-13) • Dub Beck (12, 15) • Keekle (lower) (15)

Bedrock Principal aquifers • Measures to control the zone of influence of dewatering effects. Groundwater • Network Main (12, 13, 15) control will be operated for the minimum duration required to enable construction • High Leys SR & PS (14). • Measures to prevent or limit the release of contaminants and to limit potential impacts.

Bedrock Secondary A aquifers • Measures to control the zone of influence of dewatering effects. Groundwater • Raw Water Aqueduct (5) control will be operated for the minimum duration required to enable construction • Measures to prevent or limit the release of contaminants and to limit potential

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation Section/ Chainage • Proposed WTW (6) impacts • Network Main (7, 9, 11 – 13, 15-16) • Review and consultation if contaminated groundwater is encountered. • Moota Hill SR (8) • Slip-lining (17).

Bedrock Secondary B aquifers • Measures to control the zone of influence of dewatering effects. Groundwater • Bridge End Connection (1) control will be operated for the minimum duration required to enable construction • Raw Water Aqueduct (2 - 5) • Measures to prevent or limit the release of contaminants and to limit potential impacts • Network Main (9, 11 – 13, 16) • • Harrot Hill PS (10) Review and consultation if contaminated groundwater is encountered. • Slip-lining (18, 19).

Superficial Secondary A aquifers • Measures to control the zone of influence of dewatering effects. Groundwater • Raw Water Aqueduct (2 - 5) control will be operated for the minimum duration required to enable construction • Network Main (7, 9, 11 – 13, 15, 16) • Measures to prevent or limit the release of contaminants and to limit potential • High Leys SR & PS (14) impacts • • Slip-lining (17 - 19). Review and consultation if contaminated groundwater is encountered.

Superficial Secondary B and Secondary Undifferentiated aquifers • Measures to control the zone of influence of dewatering effects. Groundwater • Bridge End WTW (1) control will be operated for the minimum duration required to enable construction • Raw Water Aqueduct (2 - 5) • Measures to prevent or limit the release of contaminants and to limit potential impacts • Proposed WTW (6) • • Network Main (7, 9, 11 – 13, 15, 16) Review and consultation if contaminated groundwater is encountered. • Harrot Hill PS (10) • Slip-lining (17 - 19).

River Greta crossing (3) • Measures to control the zone of influence of dewatering effects (e.g. groundwater • Bedrock Secondary B aquifer cut-off walls) • Superficial Secondary A aquifer • Measures to prevent or limit the release of contaminants and to limit potential

• River Greta impacts • Review and consultation if contaminated groundwater is encountered. • Buildings and Infrastructure (Keswick urban area)

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation Section/ Chainage

River Derwent and A66 crossing (9) • Measures to control the zone of influence of dewatering effects (e.g. groundwater • Bedrock Secondary B aquifer cut-off walls) • Superficial Secondary A aquifer • Measures to prevent or limit the release of contaminants and to limit potential impacts • River Derwent • • Buildings and Infrastructure (including A595 Papcastle bridge) Review and consultation if contaminated groundwater is encountered.

Groundwater abstractions • Measures to control the zone of influence of dewatering effects. Groundwater • Mealsgate, agricultural purposes (7) control will be operated for the minimum duration required to enable construction • Great Clifton, pump and treat process (17) • Measures to prevent or limit the release of contaminants and to limit potential • Cockermouth, brewery process (18) impacts.

Ecological sites with potential groundwater dependency • Measures to control the zone of influence of dewatering effects. Groundwater • Shoulthwaite Moss County Wildlife Site (2) control will be operated for the minimum duration required to enable construction • Bassenthwaite Lake SSSI (4) • Measures to prevent or limit the release of contaminants and to limit potential • Bassenthwaite Lake valley mire & Lowland Fen area (4) impacts. • Swamp area and area of marshy grassland (11) • Lowland fen and marshy grassland (12) • Tarn Dale and Stanger Spa County Wildlife Site (19)

Buildings and Infrastructure • Measures to control the zone of influence of dewatering effects. Groundwater • Grade I Listed Buildings within proximity of the route (16) control will be operated for the minimum duration required to enable construction. • Grade II Listed Buildings and other existing buildings within proximity of the route (2, 3, 11-13, 15, 16) • Existing roads within proximity of the route (2-13, 15, 16)

Geological Designated Sites • Through route optioneering and design the RWA avoids the protected geological • Adverse impacts on the protected geology at Gill Beck SSSI (5) exposure, as such the crossing location of Gill Beck SSSI should be maintained in an area of low sensitivity.

Soil Quality • Adoption of the Outline Soil Management Plan to limit loss or degradation of the • Water Treatment Works (6) soil resource. • Moota Hill SR (8)

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation Section/ Chainage • High Leys SR & PS (14) • Bridge End Connection (1) • Raw Water Aqueduct (3)

Harrot Hill PS (10) • Adoption of the Outline Soil Management Plan to limit the loss or degradation of the soil resources.

• Adoption of the Outline Soil Management Plan to limit the loss or degradation of Raw Water Aqueduct (2, 3) the soil resources.

• Adoption of the Outline Soil Management Plan and Method Statement for Raw Water Aqueduct and Network Main (4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19) Construction through Shoulthwaite Moss (Atkins & Farrans, 2015) to limit the loss or degradation of the soil resources.

8.1.2 Operation Phase

Scheme Component/ Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation Section/ Chainage Scheme –wide • St Johns Beck (2) • Measures to prevent groundwater drainage via pipe trenches (e.g. installation of • Naddle Beck (2) • Derwent upstream Bassenthwaite Lake (2-4) impermeable bunds). • Derwent downstream Bassenthwaite Lake (4, 5) • Ellen (upper) (7) • Ellen (middle) (7) • Ellen (lower) (7) • Threapland Gill (7) • Broughton Beck (7, 9) • Derwent –conference Cocker to tidal (9, 11, 16) • Cocker –conference Whit Beck to conference Derwent (11, 18, 19) • Marron (11-13) • Dub Beck (12, 15) • Keekle (lower) (15) Superficial Secondary B and Secondary Undifferentiated aquifers • Measures to prevent groundwater drainage via pipe trenches (e.g. installation of impermeable bunds).

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation Section/ Chainage • Raw Water Aqueduct (2 - 5) • Network Main (7, 9, 11 – 13, 15, 16)

Superficial Secondary A aquifers • Measures to prevent groundwater drainage via pipe trenches (e.g. installation of • Raw Water Aqueduct (4, 5) impermeable bunds). • Network Main (7, 9) • Slip-lining (17 - 19)

Superficial Secondary A aquifers within high permeability sand and gravel deposits • Measures to prevent groundwater drainage via pipe trenches (e.g. installation of • Raw Water Aqueduct (2, 3) impermeable bunds). • Network Main (11 – 13, 15, 16)

Groundwater abstractions • Measures to prevent groundwater drainage via pipe trenches (e.g. installation of • Mealsgate, agricultural purposes (7) impermeable bunds). • Great Clifton, pump and treat process (17) • Cockermouth, brewery process (18)

Ecological sites with potential groundwater dependency • Measures to prevent groundwater drainage via pipe trenches (e.g. installation of • Shoulthwaite Moss County Wildlife Site (2) impermeable bunds • Bassenthwaite Lake valley mire & Lowland Fen area (4) • Pipe trench backfill material at Shoulthwaite Moss with permeability matching in-

• Lowland fen and marshy grassland (12) situ deposits.

Bedrock Secondary A aquifers • Measures to control the zone of influence of dewatering effects. Groundwater • Raw Water Aqueduct (5) control will be operated for the minimum duration required to enable construction • Proposed WTW (6) • Measures to prevent or limit the release of contaminants and to limit potential impacts • Network Main (7, 9, 11 – 13, 15-16) • • Moota Hill SR (8) Review and consultation if contaminated groundwater is encountered. • Slip-lining (17)

Buildings and Infrastructure • Measures to prevent groundwater drainage via pipe trenches (e.g. installation of • Existing buildings within 10 m of the route (in high permeability superficial deposits) (3) impermeable bunds). • Existing buildings within 50 m of the route (in high permeability superficial deposits) (16) • Existing roads within proximity of the route (2-13, 15, 16)

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component/ Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation Section/ Chainage

Human Health • Ground investigation, gas monitoring and assessment of risks. Design appropriate • Health of future site users, maintenance workers or users of nearby sites remedial measures if assessments identify a requirement.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

9. Materials and Waste

Scheme Component/ Section/ Chainage Project Activity Mitigation

Scheme-wide Site Preparation • Use of recycled materials for creation of construction compounds, laydown areas and haul roads. This material would also be suitable for recycling post construction.

• No trees or shrubs would be sent for disposal, this material would be recycled.

Construction • Outline design has been successful in avoiding areas of potential ground contamination where practicable.

• Materials and products with recycled content can be sourced by the contractor where suitable • Opportunities for reuse and recycling of large quantities of aggregate and soils within this project.

• Attention to the Waste Hierarchy to prevent waste and promote reuse and recycling • Use of Definition of Waste: Development Industry Code of Practice to prevent waste and allow re-use of site won and imported materials, which are suitable for the intended use • Use of Materials Management Plan to promote reuse and recycling of excavated materials • Use of Site Waste Management Plans to set waste targets, predict and monitor the waste off-site • Duty of Care to find appropriate carriers and final destinations for waste materials • Use of good practice techniques to promote recycling and significantly reduce construction wastes.

Operation • Drinking Water Inspectorate approved chemicals would be supplied by United Utilities approved suppliers • Best available techniques would be designed in to the works for efficiencies and environmental considerations.

• Sludge output from Proposed WTW via underground pipeline to Cockermouth wastewater treatment works • Design of The Proposed WTW to allow for segregation of waste for optimised recycling.

Decommissioning of Existing • Waste to be reduced by assessing redundant assets for use at alternative United Utilities sites Assets • Items and materials to be discarded would be managed in accordance with the Waste Hierarchy; preference given to reuse and recycling prior to option to dispose.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

10. Public Access and Recreation

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Bridge End Connection • The access route would be clearly signposted to allow safe access to these activities Activities on Thirlmere Reservoir • Local groups would be informed of the construction works and latest construction programme.

Raw Water Aqueduct – Bridge End to A66 Slip Road • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary 249056, 249067, 249025 , 249026, 249028, 249076, 249017, 249027 and 249014 working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of the general public, the PRoWs would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW. • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised. • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP • For footpaths 249056 and 249067, a diversion link, as shown on the Environmental Masterplan (Appendix 23.2), could potentially be created to join these together, so that some connection would be retained, subject to landowner agreements.

249044 • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoW would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP •

249029 • Safety measures would be put in place on the access route. Safety measures would include clear signage, safety mirrors and clear communication with contractors.

An Open Access Area • Measures to reduce the generation of nuisances would be put in place, these are detailed within the CCoP.

Bridge End Farm (Campsite and Caravan Site) / Thirlmere Climbing Hut / Shoulthwaite Farm • The access route would be clearly signposted to allow safe access to these facilities. Caravan Site

Dale Bottom (Cottage and Caravan Park) / Causeway Foot Holiday Park • Two way traffic would be maintained on the A591 near Naddle Beck. A traffic management system, including traffic lights, would be put in place to keep the minor roads open to access these facilities.

Castlerigg Stone Circle / Keswick Climbing Wall • Two lanes of traffic would be maintained for the A66 east of Keswick during the construction period. There would be a diversion for the A66 slip road to A591 leading to Keswick. Furthermore, the A591 south of Keswick would be open using traffic lights to maintain a single carriageway for traffic.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

RWA – Keswick • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of 255014 (Cumbria Way) the general public, the PRoW would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoW would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

NCN71 (C2C Route) and Keswick Railway Path • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

238024 • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of the general public, the PRoW would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW • In order to maintain access to St Herbert’s School, and minimise effects on school pupils, teachers and parents, the closure would coincide with the school holidays • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that the closures can be publicised and temporary closures agreed • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoW would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

Keswick Bridge, Denton House Activity Centre / Keswick Mountain Festival / Derwent Epic • There would not be any closures in the town centre. However, there may be an increase in traffic as a result Lakes Swim / Calvert Trust, Equestrian Centre of deliveries to and from compound locations, which may have an indirect effect on the facilities Consultation would be undertaken closer to the time of the construction works to raise awareness.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

RWA - Crosthwaite Roundabout to Castle Inn • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of 255010, 255001, 206023, 206022, 206029, 206041, 206017, 206019, 206004, 206005, the general public the PRoWs would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity 206029 of the PRoW • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can

be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP • Consultation would be carried out with St. Bega’s Church to understand vehicular access requirements and arrangements made to minimise disruption.

206042 • Safety measures would be put in place along the access route, which uses an unnamed road that connects with footpath 206042. Safety measures would include clear signage, safety mirrors and clear communication with contractors.

Mirehouse and Garden (including concessionary routes) • It is anticipated that the A591 west of Dodd Wood would be closed for approximately 12 weeks; however traffic would be diverted around Bassenthwaite Lake. Access would be maintained for Footpath 206023 for the majority of the construction works, which could be used to access the wooded area in Mirehouse Gardens.

Dodd Wood Visitor Centre (including Osprey Viewing Platform) • It is anticipated that the A591 west of Dodd Wood would be closed for approximately 12 weeks; however traffic would be diverted around Bassenthwaite Lake.

Calvert Trust Adventure Centre / Stables • It is anticipated that the A591 west of Dodd Wood would be closed for approximately 12 weeks; however traffic would be diverted around Bassenthwaite Lake In addition, access would be maintained for Footpath 206023 for the majority of the construction period, which would allow users of the Calvert Trust access to Bassenthwaite Lake.

Old Barn, Bassenthwaite Lakeside Lodges, Broadness Cottages, Traffords Caravan Park • In order to maintain access during construction, a traffic management system, including traffic lights, would be in place to ensure that these facilities could be accessed via the B5291.

Acorn Lodge Burnside Park • Access would be maintained during construction, by implementing speed restrictions on the A66 east of Keswick for approximately 4 weeks.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Activities on Bassenthwaite Lake • It is anticipated that the A591 west of Dodd Wood would be closed for approximately 12 weeks. In order to maintain access, a diversion around Bassenthwaite Lake would be implemented. In addition, a traffic management system, including traffic lights, would also be in place on the B5291, which would allow a single lane of traffic to be kept open.

St Begas’ Ultra • It is anticipated that the A591 Dodd Wood road closure would not coincide with St Bega’s Ultra and therefore would not be an issue. The route of the race includes, Footpath (255001). Access would be maintained for Footpath (255001) for the majority of the construction period. The construction programme could be amended to ensure that pipe laying did not coincide with the race.

RWA - Castle Inn to Proposed WTW • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoW would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP. 206032

• 210009, 210004, 210002 • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of the general public, the PRoWs would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

210003 • The access route at the entrance to the PRoW should be clearly signposted to warn pedestrians of the works and allow pedestrians to access the footpath safely.

NCN10 / L and D Loop • Cyclists would be able to utilise the road diversion route during the temporary closure of Outgang Wood Road. The diversion route should be clearly signposted.

Armathwaite Hall Equestrian Centre, Lake District Wildlife Park • It is anticipated that a traffic management system, including traffic lights, would be in place to ensure that the B5291 would be kept open and the facilities accessible during the construction period.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Proposed WTW to Quarry Hill • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of 213005, 213002, 213010 the general public the PRoWs would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

Proposed WTW to Harrot Hill/ Sludge Main from Proposed WTW to Cockermouth • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary WwTW working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of the general public the PRoWs would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity 247002, 216002 of the PRoW • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

215005, 215015, 247003, 216005 • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

NCN71 (C2C Route) • It is anticipated that Papcastle Road would be closed for a 2 weeks, during this time a diversion route would be put in place. The diversion route would be clearly signposted and safe for cyclists.

Harrot Hill to Ullock • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of 225029, 225013, 225021, 225023, AG00165592 the general public the PRoWs would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

High Dyke Equestrian Centre • Designated routes and times of travel would be agreed with the local authority as part of the Traffic Management Plan.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Ullock to High Leys • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of 412006 the general public the PRoW would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoW would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

High Leys to Kelton Fell • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of 412011 the general public the PRoW would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoW would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

412009 • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoW would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

Cumbria Kart Racing • The Proposed Scheme crosses the A5086 northeast of Rowrah, however it is anticipated that this stretch of road would be kept open during the construction period to all access to this facility. It is likely that traffic lights would be in place for approximately 2-3 weeks in order to maintain this access.

High Leys to Summergrove • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of 429001 the general public the ProW would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoW would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

401016 • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoW would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

Broughton Cross to Stainburn • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP Furthermore clear signage should be visible to make people aware 230002, 241010, 230007, 230001, 230005 of the construction works and location of the access tracks.

230003, 231006 • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of the general public the PRoWs would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

Great Clifton Village Hall / Great Clifton Rugby League Pitch • Applethwaite Road, which could provide access to Great Clifton, would be closed for approximately two weeks between March- September 2017.

Cockermouth to Southwaite Farm • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP. 228019, 228029

223011, 225015 • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of the general public the PRoWs would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW. • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised. • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

223008, 223019 • The entrance/ exit to these PRoWs may be temporarily closed for a short duration at the time of pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW. The main length of the PRoW could remain open throughout the construction period to allow access to Lakeland Business Park and residential areas • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that the closures can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

Southwaite Farm to Cornhow • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP Furthermore, clear signage would be visible to make people aware 242004, 242003, 228017, 228015, 242002 of the construction works.

209009 • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so, wicket gates would be incorporated into the temporary working area demarcation fence line to allow continuity of access across the working width. For the safety of the general public the PRoW would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoW would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

209009 • Where it is technically possible and safe to do so access would be maintained across the working area. For the safety of the general public the PRoW would be closed for a short duration at the time of the pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures and diversions can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoW would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

228018, 242005 • The entrance/ exit to these PRoWs would be temporarily closed during the construction period. There it is technically possible and safe to do so access would be maintained across the working areas. In the interest of safety of the general public the entrance/ exit to the PRoWs would be closed for a short duration during at the time of pipe laying in the vicinity of the PRoW. The main length of the PRoWs would remain open throughout the construction period • Consultation with PRoW officers and local groups would be carried out so that all closures can be agreed, publicised and the disturbance minimised • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoWs would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP.

228016 • The access track would be clearly signposted.

L and D Loop, NCN 71 (C2C Route) • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the routes would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP. Furthermore, clear signage would be visible to make cyclists aware of the construction works.

Moota Hill SR • Measures to reduce nuisances (including dust and noise) experienced by users of the PRoW would be put in place; these are detailed within the CCoP. 210015

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

11. Socio-Economics

Scheme Component Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

RWA Communities of Underskiddaw and Applethwaite • UU would commit to not allowing road crossing no’s 17 and 18 to occur during the same 2 week period between March and September 2017.

Network Main – Community of Blindcrake • United Utilities would commit to not allowing road crossing no’s 33 and 34 to occur during the same 2 week Proposed WTW to period between March and August 2017. Quarry Hill

Network Main – Community of Deanscales • UU would commit to not allowing road crossing no’s 53 and 54 to occur during the same 2 week period Proposed WTW to between May 2018 and June 2018. Summergrove

Network Main – Community of Bridekirk • UU would commit to not allowing crossing no. 45 to occur during school term time. This will prevent the main Proposed WTW to isolation issue. Summergrove

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

12. Agriculture

12.1 Pre-Commencement and Construction Phase

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Scheme Wide • Compliance with the Code of Practice for Pipelaying: Consultation with landowners and occupiers should be undertaken when developing the programme of works to reduce disturbance where appropriate and without detriment to the overall programme. Specifically, the pre-construction consultation with agricultural and sporting land interests should result in agreement of farm specific procedures and dates of entry and expected exit dates. It should also identify the need for and extent of derogations to environmental agreements and Basic Payment Scheme.

Scheme Wide • Compliance with the Code of Practice for Pipelaying: Notice of Entry and Notice to Carry out Works provided to the owners and occupiers of affected land interests in writing prior to the commencement of works. This should provide information on the construction works and should include a plan to illustrate land interests to amend Basic Payment Scheme claims and support submission of environmental agreement derogations.

Scheme Wide • Compliance with the Code of Practice for Pipelaying, Soil Management Strategy, Drainage Strategy and Biosecurity Management Plan: Pre-construction surveys of land and drainage to provide a schedule of condition and inform soil management strategy, drainage strategy and biosecurity management procedures. Additionally, the survey should identify the location of existing field watering points and access arrangements and should identify the need for alternative provision.

Scheme Wide • Compliance with the Code of Practice for Pipelaying: Temporary fences in appropriate locations during construction should be provided for the health and safety of the public, protection of animals, and to avoid trespass. Where appropriate, fencing of the working area, site compounds and laydown areas is to be to a standard adequate to exclude any stock kept on adjoining land. Stockproof fencing should be maintained during the course of the works and any new fencing should be strained next to the existing fencing through provision of straining posts.

Scheme Wide • Compliance with the Code of Practice for Pipelaying: Water troughs and field supplies located within the working area should be moved to a new temporary or agreed permanent location. Where required, alternative watering points for livestock in severed areas should be provided through provision of temporary alternative supplies linked to existing water supply systems or, failing that, provided by bowser.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Scheme Wide • Compliance with the Code of Practice for Pipelaying: Access to agricultural and sporting land managed by the land interest should be maintained at all times during the construction process. Existing means of access should be maintained where practicable. Where a common access is to be shared use, the access should be kept as clear as possible from materials arising from the construction works and there should be a minimum interference for emergency vehicles. Public access rights should be maintained.

Scheme Wide • Compliance with the Code of Practice for Pipelaying: Where access points require temporary or permanent alteration as a result of construction, alternative access for stock and machinery should be provided as appropriate in consultation with the land owner/ occupier. If appropriate, temporary foot crossings, gates, steps and stiles should be provided.

Scheme Wide • Compliance with the Code of Practice for Pipe Laying: Measures to prevent the straying of livestock onto the working width or other designated construction areas should be implemented during the construction period.

Scheme Wide • Compliance with the Materials Management Plan, Code of Practice for Pipe Laying: Where removal of boundary features is required to allow construction, existing materials such as stone from walls should be protected where practicable and stored to facilitate their re-use in reinstatement. The effect of works on field boundary hedges should be subject to the Hedgerow Regulations 1997 as amended.

Scheme Wide • Compliance with Drainage Strategy, Code of Practice for Pipe Laying: Particular care should be taken to reduce damage or disturbance to known land drainage systems. Where required, the integrity of the existing land drainage system should be secured in advance through the installation of new drains to facilitate construction.

Scheme Wide • Compliance with Soil Management Strategy, Drainage Strategy and Code of Practice for Pipe Laying: Potential for damage to the integrity and agricultural capability of topsoils and subsoils should be minimised by the adoption of appropriate measures and in accordance with good practice during topsoil and subsoil stripping and storage. Topsoil should be stored separately from other materials and should not be compacted by machinery. Topsoil stores should be managed to prevent erosion and ingress of weeds.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Scheme Wide • Compliance with Drainage Strategy and Code of Practice for Pipe Laying: Where land drainage systems are disturbed, these should be reinstated or replaced to the same standard as existed prior to the works and as recorded in the schedule of condition survey to ensure that agricultural land capability is maintained and flooding is not exacerbated. Where unknown land drainage systems are discovered, the land interest should be informed. The land interest should be informed of the timing of remedial works and be given the opportunity to inspect the site. A record of the land drains disturbed and the replacement/reconnection work carried out should be made and a copy made available to the land interest. In the event that land drainage system is deemed by the land interest to be not adequately reinstated to the state recorded in the schedule of condition, an independent drainage specialist may be engaged to provide advice.

Scheme Wide • Compliance with Soil Management Strategy and Code of Practice for Pipe Laying: Potential for damage to the integrity and agricultural capability of topsoil and subsoil should be minimised by the adoption of appropriate measures and in accordance with good practice during excavation of topsoil storage mounds, loose tipping of topsoil, levelling, stone picking, removal of debris and their subsequent reinstatement to grass or crop. Subsoil preparations should be undertaken prior to replacing topsoil to reduce compaction. Excavated topsoil should be replaced to the same location as it was stripped and to the same topsoil depth. If, for any reason, the same topsoil that was removed cannot be replaced, it should, unless otherwise agreed, be replaced with soil of a similar nature, structure and quality. The land should be restored to the same condition that it was in before works commenced and as recorded in the schedule of condition survey. Before land in the working area is handed back, a joint inspection should be completed to determine its condition against the schedule of condition. In the event that the land in the working area is deemed by the land interest to be not adequately reinstated to the state recorded in the schedule of condition at the point of handing back, an independent agricultural specialist may be engaged to provide advice.

Scheme Wide • Compliance with Code of Practice for Pipe Laying: Where boundary features have been damaged or removed, these should be repaired or replaced as necessary and, in the case of walls, using original material where practicable. Where hedges have been damaged or removed, these should be replanted with appropriate species and a secure protective fence should be erected to allow the hedge to become established. Repaired or replaced fencing should be stockproof fencing.

Scheme Wide • Compliance with Code of Practice for Pipe Laying: Sporting or fishing rights which exist within the working area should not be accessible during the construction period. Where there are sporting or fishing rights adjacent to the working area, reasonable endeavours should be taken to minimise interference or enjoyment of them while recognising the primary objective to maintain a safe working environment for both contractors and users of the land.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Scheme Wide • Compliance with Code of Practice for Pipe Laying and Biosecurity Management Plan: Reasonable precautions should be taken during the enabling works, construction and reinstatement to avoid the spreading of soil borne pests and diseases, animal and crop diseases, tree diseases, aquatic pests and diseases, and invasive species in accordance with Defra, Animal and Plant Health Agency, and Forestry Commission guidance. Where diseases notifiable under the Animal Health Act (1981) as amended, are known to be present and restrictions are in place, Defra and/or Animal and Plant Health Agency requirements should be followed.

12.2 Soil Management Strategy

Volume 4, Appendix 4.2.16 Construction Strategy Outline Soil Management Plan provides further detail on the proposed mitigation for soil resources.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

13. Traffic and Transport

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Scheme Wide – Construction Stage Traffic Management Plan – keys Heads of Terms to be agreed with Cumbria County Council and Highways England for inclusion within a Construction Management Plan for contractors to follow including: • Routeing Strategy HGV Movements associated with the Import and Export of Materials shall observe the proposed routeing strategy, following the principal roads operated by Cumbria CC and Highways England. This includes the following: Pipes would be imported by sea to either Barrow-in-Furness, Heysham or Workington ports, depending on the favoured location of the appointed contractors. The pipes would be delivered to the temporary compound locations closest to the working area. It is expected that Cumbria CC, Highways England and the Police would be involved in discussions with the contractors and that the favoured routeing for pipe movements from the identified ports would be via the A590 / M6 / A66 to the southern/western section and A590 / M6 / A595 to the northern sections. Where the existing road network is not suitable for articulated lorries, the delivery would take place at the nearest laydown area on route to the working area, where the pipes would be stored and should then be distributed along the pipeline spread via suitable means, such as tractor and trailer. All other materials would be delivered to the site as follows: • A66 through M6 Junction 40 at Penrith, then A591: this route would be used for deliveries to Raw Water Aqueduct from Bridge End connection to associated laydown areas • A66 through M6 Junction 40 at Penrith, then A595: this route would be used for deliveries to new mains from Cockermouth to Bridekirk, including Water Treatment Works. • A66 through M6 Junction 40 at Penrith: this route would be used for deliveries to both slip-lines, connecting through B5292 / B5289 to Cornhow. • A66 through M6 Junction 40 at Penrith, then A5086: this route would be used for deliveries to new mains from Cockermouth to Summergrove, including Harrot Hill Pumping Station and High Ley Service Reservoir. • A595 through Junction 44, at Carlisle, then A689, and A595: this route would be utilised for deliveries to new mains from the Proposed WTW to Quarry Hill, Moota Hill Service Reservoir, the north of Raw Water Aqueduct and associated compound/laydown areas.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Any surplus excavated materials to be removed to Moota Quarry (CEMEX) and Lillyhall Landfill using the A66 and A595 as follows: • To Moota Quarry (CA13 0QE), the surplus excavated material from: - New mains from Proposed WTW to Quarry Hill - The first 6 km of new mains from Proposed WTW to Summergrove - Cockermouth to Cornhow - 30% of Raw Water Aqueduct (the last 9.6 km) - Moota Hill Service Reservoir • To Lillyhall Landfill (CA14 4JH): the surplus excavated material from: - The last 19.4 km from Proposed WTW to Summergrove. - Stainburn to Papcastle - 70% of Raw Water Aqueduct (the first 22 km) - High Leys Service Reservoir and Pumping Station - Harrot Hill Pumping Station It would be the responsibility of the contractor to ensure that its own vehicles and those of third party sub-contractors adhere to the routeing strategy. The following measures are proposed with respect to ensuring compliance: • Driver information / training and provision of copies of the appropriate local HGV routeing plans to drivers • Driver disciplinary procedures, including banning from site / dismissal should repeated flouting of the local routeing strategy be identified • Community liaison and encouragement of local residents to report of incorrectly driven vehicles.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

It is noted that there are a number of locations where the receptors are classed as sensitive, namely areas where there is frontage property including retail and a school, where the presence of HGV activity may not be suitable at specific peak periods of the day due to on-street parking and inherent width constraints in the highway. Specific areas where this should be noted are at Bothel, Rowrah, Frizington, and Cleator Moor. In this instance, a dialogue should be opened with Cumbria to ensure that HGV movements do not coincide with periods where the presence of HGVs would be most apparent and potentially problematic, namely school opening and closing times. Agreement of an appropriate strategy at these specific locations should serve to minimise any impacts that may arise in association with HGVs using local roads.

Construction Travel Plan It is fully recognised that the potential to reduce private car usage through the promotion of sustainable alternatives is limited within the rural context of the proposed construction period and subsequently operable pipeline infrastructure. As such the following measures are proposed as a means to limit the impacts that employee travel may have on the local highway network and the immediate environs of the laydown areas: • Encouraging staff involvement in a car sharing scheme. Employees should be encouraged to car share with other staff members via a staff matching scheme operated on recruitment. Alternatively staff should be encouraged to investigate other car sharing options (where practical, dependent on staff shift times) including national car share websites such as www.liftshare.com or www.nationalcarshare.co.uk • Management of the car parking resource within compound areas to ensure that local parking does not become problematic within surrounding residential areas. Where demand exceeds supply, steps would be taken to ensure staff travel in multi-occupancy vehicles from a remote location, based on proximity of residence.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation

Highway Stakeholder Group A stakeholder liaison group would be convened between United Utilities and their contractors with the following groups on a bi-monthly basis, or more frequently depending on the progress of the work • Cumbria County Council • Highways England • Other developers constructing major schemes within West Cumbria: - NuGen - National Grid - West Cumbria Mining A stakeholder liaison group is critical to the expedient operation of both the local and strategic highway networks during the construction period, notably with regard to the following: • Understanding the coincidence of other construction programmes • Understanding the potential for coincidence of construction works in the highway associated with the West Cumbria scheme and other construction projects – e.g. any requirements for closure • Understanding the planned maintenance programmes of the two highway authorities and other undertakers that may have a bearing on the West Cumbria construction programme.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

14. Noise and Vibration

Scheme Component Receptor/ Scheme Component / construction stage/ activity Mitigation

Scheme-wide General Mitigation: • Avoid revving of engines and ensure that plant and equipment is switched off when it is not in use for longer periods of time • Ensure construction activities are undertaken during the least sensitive periods i.e. avoiding night-time and weekend working • Should blasting be required then blasts shall be designed to minimise adverse impacts and meet the requirements outlined within BS 6472-2, namely: “Blasts should be designed to result in a vibration level of no greater than 3 mm/s at the nearest residential properties (6 mm/s is the limit for residential properties, but BS 6472-2 suggests that blasts need to be designed to ensure that the average level of vibration is approximately half of the specified limit). In terms of air overpressure blasts should be designed to result in levels that do not exceed 120 dB (lin) at the nearest properties” • Keep haul roads well maintained and avoid steep gradients • Start-up plant and machinery sequentially rather than all together • Select low noise and vibration emitting plant where available and suitable, particularly when working in noise and vibration sensitive areas • Use audible reversing warning systems on mobile plant and vehicles should be of a type that, whilst ensuring that they give proper warning have a minimum noise impact on nearby sensitive receptors • Vibration soil compaction plant shall be set to a low amplitude setting when operating in close proximity to sensitive receptors

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component Receptor/ Scheme Component / construction stage/ activity Mitigation

Scheme-wide • Develop and maintain good relations with people living and working in the vicinity of site operations and ensure that residents are given advanced notice of any construction activities that should be particularly noisy • Establish agreement with the LPA on appropriate controls for undertaking particularly noisy works or vibration causing operations close to receptors • Implement an efficient communications strategy with local residents and businesses including a compliance procedure • Avoid hammer driven piles where practicable and where sheet piles are required consider the use of acoustically dampened sheet steel piles to reduce levels of resonant vibrant. • Where viable, the use of temporary noise screens around particularly noisy activities (or stationary plant such as generators) • Regular plant maintenance • Where practicable consider the use of low noise equipment.

Construction Noise

RWA Scheme Section 2-5 (Bridge End Connection and RWA) • An assessment should be carried out in any areas where rock is encountered and proposed rock breaking methods are to be used. A full risk assessment should be undertaken on a case-by-case basis and appropriate control measures implemented • Where high strength rock is encountered, blasting techniques should be undertaken in accordance with the guidance contained within BS 6472-2. Advance warning should be provided to residents in affected areas.

Scheme Section 3 – Keswick (Tunnelling and Piling) • Consideration of alternative methods of piling such as secant (auger bored) piling • Low vibration techniques for tunnelling within Keswick

Proposed WTW Scheme Section 6 – Proposed WTW • Erection of temporary noise barriers around particularly noisy plant or equipment or around the site perimeter • Creation of permanent bunds at the start of works where practicable.

Proposed WTW to Scheme Section 11-15 (Harrot Hill PS to Summergrove) • Erection of temporary noise barriers around noisy equipment and plant or around the perimeter of the compounds Summergrove Laydown locations near: Spring Wells in Dean scales; Keekle • Reuse of excavation material to create temporary bunds at the edge of the compound / laydown area to mitigate Terrace in Cleator Moor and Wood Moor in Lamplugh noise.

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

Scheme Component Receptor/ Scheme Component / construction stage/ activity Mitigation

Network Main – Scheme Section 18 – (Cockermouth to Southwaite Farm) • Erection of temporary noise barriers around particularly noisy plant or equipment or around the site perimeter of the Stainburn to Cornhow Laydown areas in particular the compound directly north of The compounds/ laydown areas Vicarage (Ch.CM-HL 7700) • Reuse of excavation material to create temporary bunds at the edge of the compound to mitigate noise

Operation Noise

Scheme-wide Scheme Operation General Embedded Mitigation: • Enclose noise sources within buildings, where practicable • Locating fixed installations away from noise sensitive receptors • Restricting WTW deliveries to daytime hours

Environmental Statement Volume 4 Appendix 23.1: Mitigation Schedule

15. Air Quality and Odour

Scheme Component/ Receptor/ Scheme Component/ Construction Stage/ activity Mitigation Section/ Chainage

Scheme-wide Dust emissions • Standard good practice measures to mitigate dust emissions from the proposed development should be included within a CCoP to prevent or reduce the release of dust entering the atmosphere and/or being deposited on nearby receptors. Particular attention should be paid to operations which must unavoidably take place close to the site boundary • The risk of dust soiling and impacts on human health and ecological receptors associated with construction activities for this development are outlined in Chapter 20 of the Environmental Statement • Mitigation measures appropriate for the identified likely level of risk are outlined in Chapter 20 Section 20.6 and the CCoP, which should be agreed with the local authority