DOCSLIB.ORG

Long Range Financial Plan Update 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Long Range Financial Plan Update 2021 FINAL Long Range Financial Plan Update 2021 Honolulu Board of Water Supply February 2021 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................. i Table of Figures .................................................................................................................... ii Table of Tables .................................................................................................................... iii Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................... iv Section 1 Impetus for Update ............................................................................................ 1-1 Section 2 Review Current Status vs Long Range Financial Plan .......................................... 2-1 2.1 Comparison of Actuals vs Plan ............................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Revised Baseline ....................................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.2.1 Operations & Maintenance ..................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.2.2 Capital Improvement 6-Year Plan ....................................................................................................... 2-5 2.2.3 Revised Baseline Cashflow Forecast ................................................................................................... 2-6 Section 3 Trends and Sensitivity Analysis Update .............................................................. 3-1 3.1 Update of Scenarios based on Revised Baseline .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Aggressive Conservation ......................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.2 Aggressive Growth ..................................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.1.3 Climate Change............................................................................................................................................. 3-7 3.2 Pandemic Scenario ................................................................................................................................................... 3-9 3.2.1 Water Demands and Sales ....................................................................................................................... 3-9 3.2.2 Delinquencies ............................................................................................................................................ 3-15 3.2.3 Uncollectable Revenue ........................................................................................................................... 3-19 3.2.4 Expense Impacts ....................................................................................................................................... 3-23 3.3 Concurrent Pandemic and Hurricane Scenario ........................................................................................ 3-23 Section 4 Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 4-1 i Table of Contents Figures Figure 2-1. Annual Operations and Maintenance Expense Comparison, near-term ................................. 2-2 Figure 2-2. Annual Operations and Maintenance Expense Comparison, Coincident Years ................... 2-6 Figure 2-3. Capital Encumbered Projection Comparison, Coincident Years ................................................ 2-7 Figure 2-4. Capital Encumbered and Sources of Funding ..................................................................................... 2-8 Figure 2-5. Revised Baseline Operating Fund Balance .......................................................................................... 2-9 Figure 3-1. Long-Term Revenue and Revenue Requirements Trends Under Approved Rates ............ 3-1 Figure 3-2. Additional Revenue Needs Trend as a Percent of Existing Rate Based Revenue ................ 3-2 Figure 3-3. Revenue Impact due to Aggressive Conservation ............................................................................ 3-3 Figure 3-4. Additional Revenue Needs Trend as a Percent of Existing Rate-Based Revenue, Aggressive Conservation .................................................................................................................... 3-4 Figure 3-5. Revenue Impact due to Water Master Plan High Range Demand Growth ............................. 3-5 Figure 3-6. Revenue Impact due to Water Master Plan High Demand and Aggressive Growth .......... 3-5 Figure 3-7. Additional Revenue Needs Trend as a Percent of Existing Rate-Based Revenue, Water Master Plan High Demand Case ...................................................................................................... 3-6 Figure 3-8. Additional Revenue Needs Trend as a Percent of Existing Rate-Based Revenue, Aggressive Growth ................................................................................................................................ 3-7 Figure 3-9. Revenue Requirements Impact due to Climate Change and Aggressive Conservation .... 3-8 Figure 3-10. Additional Revenue Needs Trend as a Percent of Existing Rate-Based Revenue, Climate Change + Aggressive Conservation................................................................................................ 3-9 Figure 3-11. Total Island Potable Water Production since March 1, 2020 ................................................ 3-10 Figure 3-12. Rainfall Index for the Honolulu Watershed Area ........................................................................ 3-11 Figure 3-13. Single-Family Residential Monthly Demand ................................................................................. 3-12 Figure 3-14. Single-Family Residential Monthly Demand vs 5-Year Average .......................................... 3-13 Figure 3-15. Multi-Unit Residential Monthly Demand vs 5-year Average .................................................. 3-13 Figure 3-16. Non-Residential Monthly Demand vs 5-Year Average .............................................................. 3-14 Figure 3-17. Water Sales by Customer Class since January 2016 .................................................................. 3-15 Figure 3-18. Percentage of Water Accounts 30 days Past Due, 2017 to Present ..................................... 3-16 Figure 3-19. Monthly Residential Water Customer Delinquency, 2017 to 2020, Accounts ................ 3-17 Figure 3-20. Monthly Residential Water Customer Delinquency, 2017 to 2020, $ ................................ 3-17 Figure 3-21. Monthly Commercial Water Customer Delinquency, 2017 to 2020, Accounts .............. 3-18 Figure 3-22. Monthly Commercial Water Customer Delinquency, 2017 to 2020, $ .............................. 3-19 Figure 3-23. Residential Delinquency Scenarios ................................................................................................... 3-20 Figure 3-24. Commercial Delinquency Scenarios ................................................................................................. 3-21 Figure 3-25. Revenue Requirements Impact due to Pandemic ....................................................................... 3-22 Figure 3-26. Additional Revenue Needs Trend as a Percent of Existing Rate-Based Revenue, Pandemic ............................................................................................................................................... 3-23 ii Table of Contents Tables Table 1-1. Scenarios .............................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Table 2-1. Operations and Maintenance Comparison ............................................................................................ 2-1 Table 2-2. Capital Improvement Comparison - Historical and Budget Year ................................................ 2-2 Table 2-3. Capital Improvement Comparison - 6-Year Forecast (10/1/2020) ........................................... 2-3 Table 2-4. Capital Improvement Historical Cash Comparison ........................................................................... 2-3 Table 2-5. Comparison of Forecast and Actual Billed Water, mg ...................................................................... 2-4 Table 2-6. Comparison of Forecast and Actual Rate-Based Revenue, $M ..................................................... 2-4 Table 2-7. Operations and Maintenance Forecast through FY 2027, $M ............................................. 2-5 Table 2-8. Revised 6-Year Capital Budget, 11/25/2020 ....................................................................................... 2-5 Table 2-9. Historical Encumbrances .............................................................................................................................. 2-5 Table 2-10. Projected Capital to be Funded, FY 2021 - FY 2031, $M ............................................................... 2-7 Table 2-11. Projected Capital Sources and Uses of Funds, $M ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Douglas Downgraded to Tropical Storm After Skirting Hawaii 28 July 2020, by Ronen Zilberman
    Douglas downgraded to tropical storm after skirting Hawaii 28 July 2020, by Ronen Zilberman hurricane to make such a close approach was Dot, passing 60 miles southwest. Evacuation centers had been opened over the weekend in Honolulu, a city of 350,000, but fears of coronavirus spread made them "a last resort," the city's mayor Kurt Caldwell said. "If you are sheltering away from home today, please remember that #COVID19 is not taking a break for the storm," Caldwell tweeted Sunday evening. A cyclist rides along an empty Waikiki Beach in Honolulu, Hawaii as Hurricane Douglas veers northward, sparing Oahu from a direct hit Hurricane Douglas was downgraded on Monday as it narrowly avoided the Hawaiian coast, after fears it would become only the third storm of its size to make landfall on the Pacific island chain since records began. The tropical storm was moving westward past the Hawaiian islands, packing winds of 70 miles (110 People line up to shelter at the Hawaii Convention kilometers) per hour, according to the National Center, seeking a safe place to weather Hurricane Hurricane Center. Douglas in Honolulu, Hawaii, on July 26, 2020 It is rare for severe storms to make landfall in Hawaii, which has been hit by hurricanes just twice in its modern history—Dot in 1959 and Iniki in 1992. Large swells generated by Douglas were expected to hit the islands into Monday, raising the risk of Although Douglas stayed off the coast, it still made damage from high surf to shoreline property. history—no hurricane has ever taken a path closer to Oahu island since the government started Hurricane conditions were expected across keeping records in the 1950s, according to the northern Kauai, including up to six inches of rain, Central Pacific Hurricane Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific Ab Sins Nicholas S
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School March 2019 Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific aB sins Nicholas S. Grondin Louisiana State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Climate Commons, Meteorology Commons, and the Physical and Environmental Geography Commons Recommended Citation Grondin, Nicholas S., "Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific asinB s" (2019). LSU Master's Theses. 4864. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/4864 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLIMATOLOGY, VARIABILITY, AND RETURN PERIODS OF TROPICAL CYCLONE STRIKES IN THE NORTHEASTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC BASINS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by Nicholas S. Grondin B.S. Meteorology, University of South Alabama, 2016 May 2019 Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my family, especially mom, Mim and Pop, for their love and encouragement every step of the way. This thesis is dedicated to my friends and fraternity brothers, especially Dillon, Sarah, Clay, and Courtney, for their friendship and support. This thesis is dedicated to all of my teachers and college professors, especially Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Nearly 20 Years Since Hurricane Iniki
    Nearly 20 Years Since Hurricane Iniki by Steven Businger and Tom Schroeder [email protected], [email protected] Professors of Meteorology at the University of Hawaii at Manoa On September 11, 1992 hurricane Iniki scored a direct hit on the island of Kauai. Over a period of only three hours, the category-3 hurricane caused damage equivalent to the total general fund budget of the state of Hawaii at that time and wiped out the historical profits of the Hawaii homeowners insurance industry. Economic impacts were felt even a decade after the event. As the 20th anniversary of Iniki nears (2012) it is appropriate that we take stock of where Hawaii stands. We are fortunate in Hawaii that our island chain presents a small target for relatively rare central Pacific hurricanes. Although Kauai has been impacted by three hurricanes since the mid-1950s (Dot in 1959, Iwa in 1982, and the category- 3 Iniki on this day in 1992), it has been over a century since a major hurricane has struck the Island of Hawaii and Maui. On August 9, 1871 a major hurricane struck both the Island of Hawaii and Maui, leaving tornado-like destruction in its wake. This event was well documented in the many newspapers of the time, which allowed us to determine that the hurricane was at least a category-3 storm. There is much the public can do to mitigate the damage in advance of hurricanes (hurricane clips to keep the roof from blowing off, and storm shutters to protect windows, etc.). Insurance risk models begin projecting property losses as winds hit 40 mph.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Enforcement and Security Awards Banquet
    The Law Enforcement and Security Coalition of Hawaii presents 34th Annual Law Enforcement and Security Awards Banquet Recognizing Excellence in Law Enforcement and Security October 25, 2018 Prince Waikiki, Honolulu HI CONTENTS 05 BANQUET PROGRAM Opening ceremonies, invocation, welcome notes, awards... 06 WE ARE ONE Welcome note by Jim Frame, CPP, president of LEASC 07 BOB FLATING SCHOLARSHIP For an individual pursuing a degree in law enforcement or security. Recognizing Excellence 08 TOP COP SPONSORS in Law Enforcement Thanks for the support by Platinum, Diamond, and Gold Sponsors. and Security 16 MISTRESS OF CEREMONIES Profile of Paula Akana from KITV 4 Island News, our banquet emcee. 17 2018 TOP COP AWARDS For the past 34 years, the committed board members Exceptional Hawaii law enforcement and security individuals. of the Law Enforcement and Security Coalition of Hawaii have produced the Law Enforcement and 48 ELWOOD J. MCGUIRE AWARD Security Award Banquet in an effort to promote, en- Individual with outstanding service, support, assistance or activity that courage, and recognize excellence in the field of law has benefited the fields of law enforcement, security, or criminal justice. enforcement and security. 52 JUDGE C. NILS TAVARES AWARD All of the law enforcement agencies and security cor- Outstanding law enforcement or emergency management organization porations serving and operating in the state of Hawaii in Hawaii. are invited to nominate their TOP COPS who have distinguished themselves above the rest with their 56 OUTSTANDING ORGANIZATION AWARD dedication to duty, pursuit of excellence, and service Organization or association showing the greatest initiative and/or inno- to the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Douglas
    eVENT Hurricane Tracking Advisory Hurricane Douglas Information from NHC Advisory 13, 5:00 AM HST Thu July 23, 2020 Douglas is moving toward the west-northwest near 20 mph (31 km/h), and this motion is expected to continue for the next few days with a gradual decrease in forward speed and a slight turn toward the west. Maximum sustained winds remain near 120 mph (195 km/h) with higher gusts. Douglas is a category 3 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale. Some strengthening is possible today before a gradual weakening starts on Friday and continues through the weekend. Intensity Measures Position & Heading U.S. Landfall (NHC) Max Sustained Wind 120 mph Position Relative to 1335 mi ESE of Hilo Hawaii Speed: (Cat 3) Land: late Sat/ early Sun Est. Time & Region: on Hawaii’s Big Island Min Central Pressure: 964 mb Coordinates: 13.6 N, 135.9 W Trop. Storm Force Est. Max Sustained 75 mph 105 miles Bearing/Speed: WNW or 290 degrees at 20 mph Winds Extent: Wind Speed: (Cat 1) Forecast Summary ■ The NHC forecast map (below left) and the wind-field map (below right), which is based on the NHC’s forecast track, both show Douglas approaching the Hawaii island on early Friday or Saturday. To illustrate the uncertainty in Douglas’s forecast track, forecast tracks for all current models are shown on the wind-field map in pale gray. ■ Douglas is category 3 scale on Saffir Simpson hurricane wind scale with maximum winds of 120 mph with strong gusts. ■ Douglas is expected to move near or over portions of the Hawaiian Islands this weekend, and there is an increasing chance that strong winds, dangerous surf, and heavy rainfall could affect portions of the state beginning on Sunday.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Sustainability Report
    The Cliffs at Princeville Sustainability Report 2018 The Cliffs at Princeville 3811 Edward Road Princeville, Kauai, Hawaii 96722 April 2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 3 The Cliffs at Princeville ....................................................................................... 3 Sustainability Overview ..................................................................................... 3 The 2018 Sustainability Report .......................................................................... 4 Sustainability Focus at The Cliffs Today ................................................................ 5 Climate Change and Resiliency ............................................................................. 5 Results 2018: ...................................................................................................... 5 Operations and Community Engagement ............................................................. 6 Results 2018 ....................................................................................................... 6 2019 Additional Goals: ....................................................................................... 8 Energy Use ............................................................................................................. 8 Results 2018: .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of the Endemic Hawaiian Lysimachia (Primulaceae) Including Three New Species!
    Pacific Science (1997), vol. 51, no. 3: 254-287 © 1997 by University of Hawai'i Press. All rights reserved A Taxonomic Revision of the Endemic Hawaiian Lysimachia (Primulaceae) Including Three New Species! KENDRICK L. MARR AND BRUCE A. BOHM2 ABSTRACT: A taxonomic revision of the endemic Lysimachia of the Hawaiian Islands was undertaken with the goal of clarifying species boundaries, especially within the L. hillebrandii/L. remyi complex of the previous taxonomic treatment. The endemic species appear to be monophyletic with Malesian affinities. The revision presented here is based upon observations of morphological characters. Sixteen species are recognized, of which three are probably extinct. Most species have narrow ecological preferences and are endemic to a single island. Species differ from each other most notably in the size, shape, and venation of the leaves; the size, shape, and pigmentation of the calyx and corolla lobes; and the presence or absence of viscid stems and leaves. Populations previously classified within L. hillebrandii or L. remyi differ in a number of characters not previously evaluated including vestiture, leaf color and venation, pedicel position and color, and calyx shape and color. Three new species, L. iniki, L. pendens, and L. scopulensis, are described. A key to species, species descriptions, and distribution maps are provided. Lysimachia, ONE OF the largest genera of the sented by the indigenous coastal Lysimachia Primulaceae, consists of approximately 180 spe­ mauritiana Lam. and subgen. Lysimachiopsis cies of upright or sprawling perennial or annual (Heller) Hand.-Mazz., which consists of species herbs, shrubs, or subshrubs. Southwest China, endemic to the Hawaiian Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Media Coverage of Climate Change and Global Warming in 2020 Special Issue 2020
    A REVIEW OF MEDIA COVERAGE OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND GLOBAL WARMING IN 2020 SPECIAL ISSUE 2020 MeCCO monitors 120 sources (across newspapers, radio and TV) in 54 countries in seven different regions around the world. MeCCO assembles the data by accessing archives through the Lexis Nexis, Proquest and Factiva databases via the University of Colorado libraries. Media and Climate Change Observatory, University of Colorado Boulder http://mecco.colorado.edu Media and Climate Change Observatory, University of Colorado Boulder 1 MeCCO SPECIAL ISSUE 2020 A Review of Media Coverage of Climate Change and Global Warming in 2020 At the global level, 2020 media attention dropped 23% from 2019. Nonetheless, this level of coverage was still up 34% compared to 2018, 41% higher than 2017, 38% higher than 2016 and still 24% up from 2015. In fact, 2020 ranks second in terms of the amount of coverage of climate change or global warming (behind 2019) since our monitoring began 17 years ago in 2004. Canadian print media coverage – The Toronto Star, National Post and Globe and Mail – and United Kingdom (UK) print media coverage – The Daily Mail & Mail on Sunday, The Guardian & Observer, The Sun & Sunday Sun, The Telegraph & Sunday Telegraph, The Daily Mirror & Sunday Mirror, and The Times & Sunday Times – reached all-time highs in 2020. has been As the year 2020 has drawn to a close, new another vocabularies have pervaded the centers of critical year our consciousness: ‘flattening the curve’, in which systemic racism, ‘pods’, hydroxycholoroquine, 2020climate change and global warming fought ‘social distancing’, quarantines, ‘remote for media attention amid competing interests learning’, essential and front-line workers, in other stories, events and issues around the ‘superspreaders’, P.P.E., ‘doomscrolling’, and globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Iniki Make a Plan Now in September 1992 (Photo: FEMA) Below: Plywood Spears a Palm Tree During Hurricane Andrew in Know Your Hazards August 1992
    President’s Message Summer is just around the corner. Kauai is expecting an increase of visitors over 2014. What that means is Nihilani will also experience an increase in vacation renters. Our goal, as well for Owners who operate vacation rentals, is for those visitors to enjoy their trip to Paradise. One of the key objectives for Nihilani is to prevent problems before they occur. In order to achieve that objective, the Board has directed our Site Managers to be proactive with visitors. When the Site Manager(s) are at work and they see people they do not know, they will go over to them and introduce themselves. The Manager will ask if they have had a chance to read the “Short List” of rules. If they do not have a copy, the Manager will provide one. They will point out to them the key rules which visitors often violate. The Managers will also tell the visitor(s), if they have any questions to please contact them. This approach will ensure that the first (and hopefully the last) contact with the Site Manager is a positive one. What the Board expects Owners, who rent their units out for vacation rentals, is to make sure each renter gets a copy of the “Short List” of rules and ask each renter to read them before they arrive. The Board also expects that you to work with your property manager to ensure they are not telling the renters anything that conflicts with the rules. As you know, we have had problems with property managers telling renters they can park anywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Version of Global Guide to Tropical Cyclone Forecasting
    WMO-No. 1194 © World Meteorological Organization, 2017 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate this publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chairperson, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix P.O. Box 2300 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland ISBN 978-92-63-11194-4 NOTE The designations employed in WMO publications and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WMO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by WMO in preference to others of a similar nature which are not mentioned or advertised. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in WMO publications with named authors are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of WMO or its Members. This publication has not been subjected to WMO standard editorial procedures. The views expressed herein do not necessarily have the endorsement of the Organization. Preface Tropical cyclones are amongst the most damaging weather phenomena that directly affect hundreds of millions of people and cause huge economic loss every year. Mitigation and reduction of disasters induced by tropical cyclones and consequential phenomena such as storm surges, floods and high winds have been long-standing objectives and mandates of WMO Members prone to tropical cyclones and their National Meteorological and Hydrometeorological Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaiʻi Disaster Recovery Preparedness Guidance
    Guidance for Disaster Recovery Preparedness in Hawai‘i Funding from: NOAA FY16 Regional Coastal Resilience Grants Program State of Hawaii, Office of Planning Guidance for Disaster Recovery Preparedness in Hawaiʻi SUGGESTED CITATION: Courtney, C.A; Gelino, K; Romine, B.M.; Hintzen, K.D.; Addonizio-Bianco, C.; Owens, T.M.; Lander, M.; and Buika, J. 2019. Guidance for Disaster Recovery Preparedness in Hawai'i. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. for the University of Hawai'i Sea Grant College Program and State of Hawai'i Department of Land and Natural Resources and Office of Planning, with funding from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office for Coastal Management award no. NA16NOS4730016. Hawaiʻi Disaster Recovery Preparedness Guidance Preface Through a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Regional Coastal Resilience Grant, the Hawaiʻi Sea Grant College Program together with the State of Hawaiʻi Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR), Office of Planning, and Tetra Tech, Inc., developed statewide guidance documents and tools to improve community resilience to coastal hazards and sea level rise. These guidance documents and tools support implementation of the recommendations of the Hawaiʻi Sea Level Rise Vulnerability and Adaptation Report (Hawai'i Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Commission 2017) especially to integrate sea level rise adaptation plans and policies into state, county and community plans and to develop pre-disaster recovery frameworks at the state and county levels that incorporate opportunities to adapt to sea level rise through disaster recovery. These statewide guidance documents and tools include: . Hawaiʻi Sea Level Rise Viewer: An online interactive atlas supporting the Hawaiʻi Sea Level Rise Vulnerability and Adaptation Report, providing map data depicting projections of future hazard exposure and vulnerabilities due to rising sea levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Relief History
    2020 2020 2020 544 Jonesboro, AR. Tornado 20-Mar 543 Tishomingo, MS. Tornado 20-Mar 542 Williamsburg, KY., Jackson, MS, Ridgeland,MS. & Walla Walla, WA. Flooding 20-Feb 542 Nashville, Mt. Juliet, & Cookeville, TN. Tornado 20-Mar 2019 2019 2019 541 Decatur County, TN. Severe Storm 19-Oct 540 Beaumont, Baytown, Orange, & Port Arthur, TX. Flooding 19-Sep 539 New Iberia & Sulphur, LA. Hurricane Barry 19-Jul 538 Dayton, OH. Tornado 19-May 537 Jay, OK. Tornado 19-May 536 Alteimer, Dardanelle, Pine Bluff & Wright, AR; Fort Gbson, Gore & Sand Springs, OK. Flooding 19-May 535 Longview, TX. Tornado 19-May 534 Rusk, TX. Tornado 19-Apr 533 Hamilton, MS. Tornado 19-Apr 532 Bellevue, Fremont, & Nebraska City, NE; Mound City, & St. Joseph, MO. Flooding 19-Mar 531 Savannah, TN Flooding 19-Mar 530 Opelika, & Phenix City, AL; Cataula, & Talbotton, GA Tornado 19-Mar 529 Columbus, MS Tornado 19-Feb 2018 2018 2018 528 Taylorville, IL Tornado 18-Dec 527 Chico, & Paradise (Butte County), CA Wildfire 18-Nov 526 Kingsland, & Marble Falls, TX Flooding 18-Oct 525 Carabelle, Eastpoint, Marianna & Panama City, FL; Blakely, Camilla, Hurricane Michael 18-Oct Dawson, & Donalsonville, GA 524 Sonora, TX Flooding 18-Sep 523 Elizabethtown, Fayetteville, Goldsboro, Grantsboro, Havelock, Jacksonville, Hurricane Florence 18-Sep Laurinburg, Lumberton, Morehead City, New Bern, Riverbend & Wilmington, NC; Dillon, Loris & Marion, SC 522 Shasta County, & Trinity County, CA Wildfires 18-Jul 521 Blanca, Alamosa, & Walsenburg, CO Wildfires 18-Jul 520 Des Moines, & Marshalltown,IA
    [Show full text]