DOCSLIB.ORG

The Openness/Intellect Trait Domain As a Paradoxical Simplex ⇑ Colin G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Openness/Intellect Trait Domain As a Paradoxical Simplex ⇑ Colin G Journal of Research in Personality 46 (2012) 63–78 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Research in Personality journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jrp From madness to genius: The Openness/Intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex ⇑ Colin G. DeYoung a, , Rachael G. Grazioplene a, Jordan B. Peterson b a University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States b University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada article info abstract Article history: A novel theory of Openness/Intellect is proposed, which integrates intelligence and positive schizotypy Available online 16 December 2011 (or apophenia, false detection of patterns or causal connections) within the Big Five. Openness/Intellect comprises a simplex of subtraits arrayed along a single scaling dimension. Openness traits fall in one half Keywords: of the simplex, bounded by apophenia; Intellect traits fall in the other half, bounded by intelligence. The Openness to Experience simplex is paradoxical because intelligence and apophenia are negatively correlated despite both loading Intellect positively on the general Openness/Intellect factor. The model was supported in two samples and orga- Intelligence nizes theories of (1) the relation of intelligence and schizotypy to personality, (2) the psychological and Schizotypy biological mechanisms involved in Openness/Intellect, and (3) the costs and benefits of Openness, prox- Apophenia imally and evolutionarily. Ó 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Men have called me mad; but the question is not yet settled, Openness/Intellect (one of the ‘‘Big Five’’ personality traits), which whether madness is or is not the loftiest intelligence—whether is the basic dimension of personality most related to many psycho- much that is glorious—whether all that is profound—does not logical phenomena that are quintessentially human, including art, spring from disease of thought—from moods of mind exalted imagination, creativity, and intellectual curiosity. at the expense of the general intellect. They who dream by Central to the theory is a novel model of the structure of Open- day are cognizant of many things which escape those who ness/Intellect as a domain of personality traits, locating both intelli- dream only by night. In their gray visions they obtain glimpses gence and the positive symptoms of schizotypy as facets within this of eternity, and thrill, in waking, to find that they have been domain. This may at first seem unlikely. Surely, schizotypy and intel- upon the verge of the great secret. ligence should be inversely related (the empirical evidence suggests Edgar Allan Poe (1848/1975, p. 649) as much), let alone conceived as part of the same broad trait dimen- sion. Nonetheless, madness and genius may be similar in their asso- ciation with unconventional perspectives on the world. Both the 1. Introduction negative and the positive associations between schizotypy and intelligence are intuitively plausible, and this creates a puzzle. Even Genius has long been associated with madness in the popular as Poe, in our epigraph, vacillates between linking madness to the ‘‘loft- well as the artistic imagination. What do madness and genius have iest intelligence’’ and suggesting that it comes at the expense of in common, and what separates them? We believe these questions ‘‘general intellect’’. Which is it? Can this paradox be resolved? may be related to two seemingly more mundane questions from We propose that the full extent of the Openness/Intellect do- personality psychology and psychometrics: What is the relation main forms a paradoxical simplex, extending from intelligence at of intelligence to personality? and What is the relation of schizo- one end to apophenia at the other. Apophenia is the perception typy to personality? The theory we present here addresses the lat- of patterns or causal connections where none exist. (We discuss ter two questions by suggesting that their solutions are linked and below why this construct may be a desirable replacement for the that the existence of each as a problem is due in part to the solu- construct of positive schizotypy in the context of personality the- tion of the other. Our theory is designed to explain the nature of ory.) Extreme apophenia might be seen as the epitome of madness. It is, at least, one important form of madness and the defining fea- ture of psychosis. A simplex is an arrangement of variables along a single dimension, with those closest together most related and ⇑ Corresponding author. Address: Psychology Dept., 75 East River Rd., Minneapolis, those farthest apart least related. (Note that this is not a trait MN 55455, United States. Fax: +1 612 626 2079. dimension, which represents variability in a population, but a E-mail address: [email protected] (C.G. DeYoung). 0092-6566/$ - see front matter Ó 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.003 64 C.G. DeYoung et al. / Journal of Research in Personality 46 (2012) 63–78 scaling dimension describing the magnitudes of relations among and scales from personality questionnaires (John, Naumann, & Soto, variables.) In this case, the simplex is paradoxical in that its oppo- 2008; Markon, Krueger, & Watson, 2005)—with the other four being site ends are hypothesized to be unrelated or even negatively re- Extraversion, Neuroticism, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. lated, despite the fact that all of its elements load positively on The Big Five model captures most of the covariance among more the same latent trait. This situation would imply that intelligence specific personality traits. Although some argument exists as to and apophenia may share some cause in common related to Open- whether a six factor model might be more appropriate in lexical re- ness/Intellect, though some other force drives them apart. search (Ashton et al., 2004; Saucier, 2009), the five and six factor A key motive for developing this theory is desire for a structural models are very similar and both include Openness/Intellect as model that can integrate the growing literature on the psycholog- one broad domain including traits related to imagination, curiosity, ical and biological mechanisms that may be causes of traits in the creativity, intellectual interests, perceived intelligence, artistic and Openness/Intellect domain (e.g., DeYoung, Peterson, & Higgins, aesthetic interests, and unconventionality. Given the goal of a com- 2005; DeYoung, Shamosh, Green, Braver, & Gray, 2009; Jung, Graz- prehensive taxonomy and the content of Openness/Intellect, it is ioplene, Caprihan, Chavez, & Haier, 2010; Kaufman et al., 2010; reasonable to investigate whether intelligence and schizotypal traits Peterson, Smith, & Carson, 2002). The hierarchical organization of can be incorporated within this domain. personality traits indicates that causes need to be considered at As reflected in its compound label, the Openness/Intellect do- multiple breadths (DeYoung, 2010a). Some causal forces will influ- main has been the most difficult of the Big Five for which to pro- ence Openness/Intellect as a whole, whereas others will be specific vide an adequate concise description. One early suggestion, to lower-level traits within this domain. This principle has been Culture, has been deemed clearly inadequate, and the two most demonstrated in behavior genetics, where lower-level traits in common labels currently are Openness to Experience and Intellect. the Big Five hierarchy are found to be influenced by specific genetic The trend toward a compound label reflects the recognition that factors that are independent of the genetic factors influencing the Openness and Intellect reflect two equally important aspects of entirety of each Big Five domain (Jang, McCrae, Angleitner, Rie- the broader trait, which are separable despite being correlated mann, & Livesley, 1998; Jang et al., 2002). The Openness/Intellect (DeYoung, Quilty, & Peterson, 2007; Johnson, 1994; Saucier, domain appears likely to have a particularly complex array of cau- 1992, 1994). In the hierarchical organization of personality, Open- sal sources because of the diversity of traits it encompasses, and its ness and Intellect can be considered distinct traits below the Big structure needs to be modeled in a manner reflecting this Five, whereas the Big Five domain itself (Openness/Intellect) re- complexity. flects the shared variance of these two lower-level traits. Saucier The incentive for integrating intelligence and apophenia with (1992, 1994) has proposed that ‘‘Imagination’’ might be a good sin- the Big Five model stems from two premises. First, the Big Five gle label for the domain as a whole, given the existence of both can provide a reasonably comprehensive taxonomy for all broad intellectual and aesthetic forms of imagination. However, we categories of variability in psychological function in which there maintain the more common, compound label ‘‘Openness/Intellect,’’ is substantial variation (e.g., reward sensitivity for Extraversion, when referring to the domain as a whole, because colloquially cognitive exploration for Openness/Intellect; DeYoung, 2010b; ‘‘imagination’’ has specific connotations that are too narrow to cap- Van Egeren, 2009). Given this premise, important traits such as ture the full extent of this complex trait domain. Whenever we re- intelligence and positive schizotypy must be integrated with the fer to ‘‘Openness’’ or ‘‘Intellect’’ alone, we are referring to a subtrait Big Five or else deemed to be unique to more specific categories that constitutes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Being of Analogy Noah Roderick Noah Roderick the Being of Analogy
    Noah Roderick The Being of Analogy Noah Roderick Noah Roderick The Being of Analogy The Being of Modern physics replaced the dualism of matter and form with a new distinction between matter and force. In this way form was marginalized, and with it the related notion of the object. Noah Roderick’s book is a refreshing effort to reverse the consequences of this now banal mainstream materialism. Ranging from physics through literature to linguistics, spanning philosophy from East to West, and weaving it all together in remarkably lucid prose, Roderick intro- duces a new concept of analogy that sheds unfamiliar light on such thinkers as Marx, Deleuze, Goodman, Sellars, and Foucault. More than a literary device, analogy teaches us something about being itself. OPEN HUMANITIES PRESS Cover design by Katherine Gillieson · Illustration by Tammy Lu The Being of Analogy New Metaphysics Series Editors: Graham Harman and Bruno Latour The world is due for a resurgence of original speculative metaphysics. The New Metaphys- ics series aims to provide a safe house for such thinking amidst the demoralizing caution and prudence of professional academic philosophy. We do not aim to bridge the analytic- continental divide, since we are equally impatient with nail-filing analytic critique and the continental reverence for dusty textual monuments. We favor instead the spirit of the intel- lectual gambler, and wish to discover and promote authors who meet this description. Like an emergent recording company, what we seek are traces of a new metaphysical ‘sound’ from any nation of the world. The editors are open to translations of neglected metaphysical classics, and will consider secondary works of especial force and daring.
    [Show full text]
  • Cortical and Subcortical Neuroanatomical Signatures of Schizotypy in 3,004 Individuals Assessed in a Worldwide ENIGMA Study
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.29.21255609; this version posted April 30, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Cortical and Subcortical Neuroanatomical Signatures of Schizotypy in 3,004 Individuals Assessed in a Worldwide ENIGMA Study Matthias Kirschner, MD1,2*; Benazir Hodzic-Santor, BA1*; Mathilde Antoniades, PhD3; Igor Nenadic, MD4; Tilo Kircher, MD PhD4; Axel Krug, PhD4;29; Tina Meller, PhD4; Dominik Grotegerd, PhD6; Alex Fornito, PhD5; Aurina Arnatkeviciute, PhD5; Mark A Bellgrove, PhD5; Jeggan Tiego, PhD5; Udo Dannlowski, MD PhD6; Katharina Koch, PhD6; Carina Hülsmann, MSc6; Harald Kugel, PhD35; Verena Enneking, MSc6; Melissa Klug, PhD6; Elisabeth J. Leehr, PhD6; Joscha Böhnlein, MSc6; Marius Gruber, MSc6; David Mehler, PhD6; Pamela DeRosse, PhD7,30,31; Ashley Moyett, MSc7; Bernhard T. Baune, MD PhD6,8; Melissa Green, PhD9,32; Yann Quidé, PhD9,32; Christos Pantelis, MD10; Raymond Chan, PhD 11; Yi Wang, PhD11; Ulrich Ettinger, PhD12; Martin Debbané, PhD13; Melodie Derome, PhD13; Christian Gaser, PhD14; Bianca Besteher, MD14; Kelly Diederen, PhD3; Tom J Spencer, PhD3; Paul Fletcher, MD, PhD36; Wulf Rössler, MD15,33,34; Lukasz Smigielski, PhD15; Veena Kumari, PhD16; Preethi Premkumar, PhD16; Haeme R. P. Park, PhD17; Kristina Wiebels, PhD17; Imke Lemmers-Jansen, PhD18; James Gilleen, PhD3,19; Paul Allen, PhD19; Petya Kozhuharova, MSc19; Jan-Bernard Marsman, PhD20; Irina Lebedeva, PhD21; Alexander Tomyshev, MSc21; Anna Mukhorina, PhD21; Stefan Kaiser, MD22; Anne-Kathrin Fett, PhD3,23; Iris Sommer, MD PhD20; Sanne Schuite-Koops, PhD20; Casey Paquola, PhD1; Sara Larivière, MSc1; Boris Bernhardt PhD1; Alain Dagher, MD1; Phillip Grant, PhD24; Theo G.
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Schizophrenia Symptoms, Schizotypy, and Normal Personality
    Schizophrenia Bulletin doi:10.1093/schbul/sbz005 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/schizophreniabulletin/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/schbul/sbz005/5310427 by [email protected] on 27 August 2019 Common Taxonomy of Traits and Symptoms: Linking Schizophrenia Symptoms, Schizotypy, and Normal Personality David C. Cicero*,1, Katherine G. Jonas2, , Kaiqiao Li2, Greg Perlman2, and Roman Kotov2 1Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI; 2Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY *To whom correspondence should be addressed; tel: 808-956-3695, fax: 808-956-4700, e-mail: [email protected] The associations among normal personality and many Introduction mental disorders are well established, but it remains Trait-based paradigms, which have treated psychopa- unclear whether and how symptoms of schizophrenia and thology as fully dimensional, have been useful in under- schizotypal traits align with the personality taxonomy. standing psychopathology, particularly internalizing and This study examined the joint factor structure of nor- externalizing disorders.1–3 The Hierarchical Taxonomy mal personality, schizotypy, and schizophrenia symptoms of Psychopathology (HiTOP) seeks to improve on tra- in people with psychotic disorders (n = 288) and never- ditional diagnostic systems, such as the Diagnostic and psychotic adults (n = 257) in the Suffolk County Mental Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and Health Project. First, we evaluated the structure of International Classification of Diseases (ICD), and con- schizotypal (positive schizotypy, negative schizotypy, and ceptualize psychopathology dimensionally.4 A major mistrust) and normal traits. In both the psychotic-disor- dimension within HiTOP is the psychotic spectrum, der and never-psychotic groups, the best-fitting model had which ranges from normal personality to schizotypal 5 factors: neuroticism, extraversion, conscientiousness, traits to frank psychosis.
    [Show full text]
  • THE KING JAMES VERSION at 400 Biblical Scholarship in North America
    THE KING JAMES VERSION AT 400 Biblical Scholarship in North America Number 26 THE KING JAMES VERSION AT 400 Assessing Its Genius as Bible Translation and Its Literary Influence THE KING JAMES VERSION AT 400 ASSESSING ITS GENIUS AS BIBLE TRANSLATION AND ITS LITERARY INFLUENCE Edited by David G. Burke, John F. Kutsko, and Philip H. Towner Society of Biblical Literature Atlanta THE KING JAMES VERSION AT 400 Assessing Its Genius as Bible Translation and Its Literary Influence Copyright © 2013 by the Society of Biblical Literature All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permit- ted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Offi ce, Society of Biblical Literature, 825 Houston Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The King James version at 400 : assessing its genius as Bible translation and its literary influence / edited by David G. Burke, John F. Kutsko, and Philip H. Towner. p. cm. — (Society of Biblical Literature Biblical Scholarship in North America ; number 26) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-58983-800-0 (hardcover : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-58983-798-0 (pbk. : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-58983-799-7 (electronic format) 1. Bible. English. Authorized—History—Congresses. 2. Bible. English. Authorized— Influence—Congresses. 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Creative Genius As Inherently Relevant and Beneficial: the View from Mount Olympus
    138 Vol. 5, Issue 2, 2018 Theories – Research – Applications Creative Genius as Inherently Relevant and Beneficial: The View from Mount Olympus Dean Keith Simonton University of California, Davis, USA E-mail: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The author responds to Kaufman’s (2018) target essay from a unique perspective – research on creative genius. Alt- Genius hough the author began studying little-c creativity, he Big-C versus little-c creativity switched to Big-C creativity when he did his doctoral disser- Costs versus benefits tation, and continued that work for the rest of his career. One Creativity training implication of such research is that the relevance of creative Article history: genius cannot be questioned, even if its benefits are some- Received 15 November 2018 times ambiguous (however obviously consequential). Anoth- Received in revised form 20 November 2018 er implication is that creative geniuses do not require training Accepted 20 December 2018 in creativity, whatever usefulness such instruction may pos- sess for everyday creativity. ISSN: 2354-0036 DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2018-0009 James Kaufman (2018) raises some critical issues with which I have some sympathy. Af- ter all, I have made a long-term commitment to creativity research under the assumption that it was and remains a significant topic. Indeed, I started conducting my own original inquiries into creativity in the late 1960s while still an undergraduate (e.g., Simonton, 1980, published a decade later). Thus that initial interest was sparked about a half centu- ry ago! Moreover, I continued that fascination in graduate school despite being warned by various well-intentioned advisors that it was a dead topic that no longer attracted leading- edge research (Simonton, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Musical Genius--Evolution and Origins of a Concept Author(S): Edward E
    Musical Genius--Evolution and Origins of a Concept Author(s): Edward E. Lowinsky Source: The Musical Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 3 (Jul., 1964), pp. 321-340 Published by: Oxford University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/741019 . Accessed: 07/04/2013 10:19 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Oxford University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Musical Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 143.107.252.222 on Sun, 7 Apr 2013 10:19:11 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions MUSICAL GENIUS - EVOLUTION AND ORIGINS OF A CONCEPT* By EDWARD E. LOWINSKY ARE livingin an age in which musical and technicaldevelop- WE ments suggest the possibilitythat mathematical formulas and computermachines or "chance"I may take over essentialareas of musical creativity."Total organization"or "chance" are two sides of the same process.Both rule out the freeact of creationthat we ordinarilyassociate with the nature of genius. At the same time we observe a deflationof the idea of genius. In a recentbook the Italian architectLeonardo Ricci wrote:"if we say we no longerbelieve in genius,this does not mean only the genius of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Lexical Creativity and Humor in Translation: on Rabelais’ Linguistic Genius and the Difficulties in Translating His Works
    Lexis Journal in English Lexicology 17 | 2021 Humor, creativity and lexical creation Lexical creativity and humor in translation: On Rabelais’ linguistic genius and the difficulties in translating his works Adrienn Gulyás Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/lexis/5143 DOI: 10.4000/lexis.5143 ISSN: 1951-6215 Publisher Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 Electronic reference Adrienn Gulyás, “Lexical creativity and humor in translation: On Rabelais’ linguistic genius and the difficulties in translating his works”, Lexis [Online], 17 | 2021, Online since 15 August 2021, connection on 20 August 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/5143 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ lexis.5143 This text was automatically generated on 20 August 2021. Lexis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Lexical creativity and humor in translation: On Rabelais’ linguistic genius a... 1 Lexical creativity and humor in translation: On Rabelais’ linguistic genius and the difficulties in translating his works Adrienn Gulyás Introduction 1 Translating humor deriving from lexical creativity, often bound to the form of the source text, is an imposing challenge for literary translators. The main concern of this article is to observe lexical creativity at work in François Rabelais’ Pantagruel and Gargantua and the translators’ solutions to render it in English and Hungarian. First, the theoretical background of the notion of “lexical creativity” will be explored, and a theoretical framework adopted from translation theory for the discussion of examples. In the analysis, a systematic contrastive approach will be applied to compare Screech’s English [2006] and my own Hungarian translations [Pantagruel 2010; Gargantua 2015].
    [Show full text]
  • Aesthetics After Finitude Anamnesis Anamnesis Means Remembrance Or Reminiscence, the Collection and Re- Collection of What Has Been Lost, Forgotten, Or Effaced
    Aesthetics After Finitude Anamnesis Anamnesis means remembrance or reminiscence, the collection and re- collection of what has been lost, forgotten, or effaced. It is therefore a matter of the very old, of what has made us who we are. But anamnesis is also a work that transforms its subject, always producing something new. To recollect the old, to produce the new: that is the task of Anamnesis. a re.press series Aesthetics After Finitude Baylee Brits, Prudence Gibson and Amy Ireland, editors re.press Melbourne 2016 re.press PO Box 40, Prahran, 3181, Melbourne, Australia http://www.re-press.org © the individual contributors and re.press 2016 This work is ‘Open Access’, published under a creative commons license which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form whatso- ever and that you in no way alter, transform or build on the work outside of its use in normal aca- demic scholarship without express permission of the author (or their executors) and the publisher of this volume. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. For more information see the details of the creative commons licence at this website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Title: Aesthetics after finitude / Baylee Brits, Prudence Gibson and Amy Ireland, editors. ISBN: 9780980819793 (paperback) Series: Anamnesis Subjects: Aesthetics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creative Advantages of Schizophrenia
    The Creative Advantages of Schizophrenia The Creative Advantages of Schizophrenia: The Muse and the Mad Hatter By Paul Kiritsis The Creative Advantages of Schizophrenia: The Muse and the Mad Hatter By Paul Kiritsis This book first published 2019 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2019 by Paul Kiritsis All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-3165-1 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-3165-9 For Christos Stamboulakis TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations ...................................................................................................... ix Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................... xi Foreword........................................................................................................................ xiii Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One ..................................................................................................................... 7 Schizophrenia as a Social Construct Chapter Two .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Dimensions in Schizotypy: Factor Structure Replication and External Validation of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire – Brief Revised Updated (SPQ-BRU)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research: Psychology, Department of Department of Psychology Winter 12-12-2016 Defining Dimensions In Schizotypy: Factor Structure Replication And External Validation Of The chiS zotypal Personality Questionnaire – Brief Revised Updated (SPQ-BRU). Elaina Montague University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychdiss Part of the Clinical Psychology Commons Montague, Elaina, "Defining Dimensions In Schizotypy: Factor Structure Replication And External Validation Of The chiS zotypal Personality Questionnaire – Brief Revised Updated (SPQ-BRU)." (2016). Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research: Department of Psychology. 90. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychdiss/90 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Psychology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research: Department of Psychology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Defining Dimensions in Schizotypy: Factor Structure Replication and External Validation of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire – Brief Revised Updated (SPQ-BRU). by Elaina Montague, M.A. A Research Proposal Presented to the Faculty of The Clinical Psychology Training Program In Fulfillment of the Masters-Equivalent Research Project (MERP) Proposal
    [Show full text]
  • Galton, Terman, Cox: the Distinctive Volume II in Genetic Studies Of
    GCQXXX10.1177/0016986220921360Gifted Child QuarterlySimonton 921360research-article2020 Article Gifted Child Quarterly 1 –10 Galton, Terman, Cox: © 2020 National Association for Gifted Children Article reuse guidelines: The Distinctive Volume II sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220921360 10.1177/0016986220921360 in Genetic Studies of Genius journals.sagepub.com/home/gcq Dean Keith Simonton1 Abstract With just one exception, all of the volumes in Terman’s Genetic Studies of Genius report the results of a longitudinal study of more than a thousand intellectually gifted children. That single exception is Volume II, Cox’s single-authored The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses, which instead was a retrospective study of 301 eminent creators and leaders, using historiometric methods to estimate their IQs (as well as to assess a subset of 100 on 67 character traits). This article discusses how this volume actually fits with the other four volumes in the set. After giving the historical background, discussion turns to the emergence of Cox’s doctoral dissertation. Then comes a narrative of the aftermath, including subsequent contributions by Cox, Terman, and numerous other researchers extending into the 21st century. The article closes by treating the ways that the intellectually gifted and the historic geniuses are not comparable, thus indicating the need for more recent replications and extensions of her work. Keywords archival, biographical, historical analysis, early childhood, gifted, intelligence Strictly speaking, Lewis M. Terman’s (1925-1959) monu- complete list of impressive big names provided on multiple mental and highly influential Genetic Studies of Genius con- occasions throughout the volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigating the Attraction Effect with Visualizations Evanthia Dimara, Gilles Bailly, Anastasia Bezerianos, Steven Franconeri
    Mitigating the Attraction Effect with Visualizations Evanthia Dimara, Gilles Bailly, Anastasia Bezerianos, Steven Franconeri To cite this version: Evanthia Dimara, Gilles Bailly, Anastasia Bezerianos, Steven Franconeri. Mitigating the Attrac- tion Effect with Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Insti- tute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2019, TVCG 2019 (InfoVis 2018), 25 (1), pp.850 - 860. 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865233. hal-01845004v2 HAL Id: hal-01845004 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01845004v2 Submitted on 22 Aug 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865233, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics Mitigating the Attraction Effect with Visualizations Evanthia Dimara, Gilles Bailly, Anastasia Bezerianos, and Steven Franconeri Abstract—Human decisions are prone to biases, and this is no less true for decisions made within data visualizations. Bias mitigation strategies often focus on the person, by educating people about their biases, typically with little success. We focus instead on the system, presenting the first evidence that altering the design of an interactive visualization tool can mitigate a strong bias – the attraction effect.
    [Show full text]