DOCSLIB.ORG

Subsistence Study for the North Aleutian Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Subsistence Study for the North Aleutian Basin _______________ OCS Study BOEM 2012-109 Subsistence Study for the North Aleutian Basin U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska Region www.boem.gov [PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] OCS Study BOEM 2012-109 Subsistence Study for the North Aleutian Basin Authors Katherine Reedy-Maschner, Ph.D. Herbert Maschner, Ph.D. Department of Anthropology, Idaho State University, 921 S. 8th Avenue, Stop 8005, Pocatello, ID 83209-8005 USA Prepared under BOEM Contract M08PC20053 by Idaho State University 921 S. 8th Avenue Pocatello, Idaho 83209 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska Region 2012 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and Idaho State University. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with BOEM editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY This report is available only in compact disc format from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Alaska Region, by referencing OCS Study BOEM 2012-109. The report may be downloaded from the boem.gov website through the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS). You will be able to obtain this report also from the National Technical Information Service in the near future. Here are the addresses. You may also inspect copies at selected Federal Depository Libraries. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Ocean Energy Management National Technical Information Service Alaska Region 5285 Port Royal Road 3801 Centerpoint Dr, Suite 500 Springfield, Virginia 22161 Anchorage, AK 99503-5820 Phone: (703) 605-6040 Fax: (703) 605-6900 Telephone requests may be placed at Email: [email protected] (907) 334-5200 Fax: (907) 334-5202 CITATION Reedy-Maschner, K.L. and H.D.G. Maschner. 2012. Subsistence Study for the North Aleutian Basin. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Alaska Region, Anchorage, AK. OCS Study BOEM 2012-109. 428 pp. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors and study team wish to thank the community leaders and residents of Akutan, False Pass, Nelson Lagoon and Port Heiden for their interest, participation and assistance in completing the project. The Idaho State University Informatics Research Institute, Corey Schou and Jonathan Holmes, provided invaluable work assistance in developing an entirely unique database and graphical network analysis tool that allowed us to track complex sharing and trading networks while maintaining genetic and marriage relationships. This innovative approach was critical to meeting project objectives. This report has been reviewed by the BOEM and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Bureau, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Project Management Katherine Reedy-Maschner, Ph.D., Principal Investigator and Herbert Maschner, Ph.D., co-Principal Investigator Research and Support Staff Dr. Corey Schou, ISU Informatics Research Institute Jonathan Holmes, M.S., ISU Informatics Research Institute Crystal Callahan, M.S., Field Assistant Buck Benson, B.A., GIS Technician Andrea Kayser, B.A., Data entry and analyses Grace Dotson, M.A., Data entry and analyses Katie Wilson, B.A., Data entry and analyses BOEM Technical Oversight Chris Campbell, M.A., Sociocultural Specialist Contracting Officer’s Representative Environmental Studies Section ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... viii ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... xiv PART I ............................................................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Scope of the Project ................................................................................................................ 1 Timeline .................................................................................................................................. 2 Research Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................... 3 Research Questions, Hypotheses, Tasks ................................................................................. 4 CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 9 Regional Background .................................................................................................................. 9 Study Background ..................................................................................................................... 15 Social Network Analysis....................................................................................................... 15 Petroleum Politics ................................................................................................................. 21 Subsistence-Commercial....................................................................................................... 22 Management Regimes ........................................................................................................... 25 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 28 CHAPTER 3. METHODS ............................................................................................................ 31 Ethnographic Methods .............................................................................................................. 31 Survey Methods ........................................................................................................................ 33 Database Construction .............................................................................................................. 36 Mapping, GIS, and Traditional Ecological Geographies .......................................................... 36 PART II ......................................................................................................................................... 38 VILLAGE PROFILES AND SURVEY RESULTS ..................................................................... 39 CHAPTER 4. NELSON LAGOON .............................................................................................. 39 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 39 Recent Village History .............................................................................................................. 39 Political Landscape of Nelson Lagoon ..................................................................................... 41 Demographic Profile ................................................................................................................. 43 Fisheries and Economic Development...................................................................................... 44 Subsistence Practices ................................................................................................................ 45 Subsistence Security ............................................................................................................. 52 Spatial Information ............................................................................................................... 60 Crews and Cooperative Hunting and Fishing ....................................................................... 60 Networks ............................................................................................................................... 61 Environmental and Harvest Abundance Issues ..................................................................... 62 Community Economics ......................................................................................................... 63 Expenses and Expense Networks .......................................................................................... 65 iii Subsistence Equipment Owned, Shared, Purchased ............................................................. 68 Positive Influence on Community Life ..................................................................................... 69 Summary ..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GASTROPOD CARE SOP# = Moll3 PURPOSE: to Describe Methods Of
    GASTROPOD CARE SOP# = Moll3 PURPOSE: To describe methods of care for gastropods. POLICY: To provide optimum care for all animals. RESPONSIBILITY: Collector and user of the animals. If these are not the same person, the user takes over responsibility of the animals as soon as the animals have arrived on station. IDENTIFICATION: Common Name Scientific Name Identifying Characteristics Blue topsnail Calliostoma - Whorls are sculptured spirally with alternating ligatum light ridges and pinkish-brown furrows - Height reaches a little more than 2cm and is a bit greater than the width -There is no opening in the base of the shell near its center (umbilicus) Purple-ringed Calliostoma - Alternating whorls of orange and fluorescent topsnail annulatum purple make for spectacular colouration - The apex is sharply pointed - The foot is bright orange - They are often found amongst hydroids which are one of their food sources - These snails are up to 4cm across Leafy Ceratostoma - Spiral ridges on shell hornmouth foliatum - Three lengthwise frills - Frills vary, but are generally discontinuous and look unfinished - They reach a length of about 8cm Rough keyhole Diodora aspera - Likely to be found in the intertidal region limpet - Have a single apical aperture to allow water to exit - Reach a length of about 5 cm Limpet Lottia sp - This genus covers quite a few species of limpets, at least 4 of them are commonly found near BMSC - Different Lottia species vary greatly in appearance - See Eugene N. Kozloff’s book, “Seashore Life of the Northern Pacific Coast” for in depth descriptions of individual species Limpet Tectura sp. - This genus covers quite a few species of limpets, at least 6 of them are commonly found near BMSC - Different Tectura species vary greatly in appearance - See Eugene N.
    [Show full text]
  • MARINE TANK GUIDE About the Marine Tank
    HOME EDITION MARINE TANK GUIDE About the Marine Tank With almost 34,000 miles of coastline, Alaska’s intertidal zones, the shore areas exposed and covered by ocean tides, are home to a variety of plants and animals. The Anchorage Museum’s marine tank is home to Alaskan animals which live in the intertidal zone. The plants and animals in the Museum’s marine tank are collected under an Alaska Department of Fish and Game Aquatic Resource Permit during low tide at various beaches in Southcentral and Southeast Alaska. Visitors are asked not to touch the marine animals. Touching is stressful for the animals. A full- time animal care technician maintains the marine tank. Since the tank is not located next to the ocean, ocean water cannot be constantly pumped through it. This means special salt water is mixed at the Museum. The tank is also cleaned regularly. Equipment which keeps the water moving, clean, chilled to 43°F and constantly monitored. Contamination from human hands would impact the cleanliness of the water and potentially hurt the animals. A second tank is home to the Museum’s king crab, named King Louie, and black rockfish, named Sebastian. King crab and black rockfish of Alaska live in deeper waters than the intertidal zone creatures. This guide shares information about some of the Museum’s marine animals. When known, the Dena’ina word for an animal is included, recognizing the thousands of years of stewardship and knowledge of Indigeneous people of the Anchorage area and their language. The Dena’ina & Marine Species The geographically diverse Dena’ina lands span both inland and coastal areas, including Anchorage.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleutians PPOR Map 02
    Center of map at 54˚ 11.10’ N Lat., 162˚ 59.63’ W Lon. GRS GRS AEA-16 AEA-12 King 35-LII Cove BERING SEA 38-LII Moffet Pt. GRS AEA-15 Amak Is. Cold Bay Kudiakof Islands GRS AEA-16 GRS GRS Fox Is. 37-LII AEA-11 Deer AEA-14 35-LIIGRS38-LII Island AEA-15Cold 36-LII Bay Volcano GRS Bay AEA-14 5 nm 5 nm 5 mi. 5 mi. GRS 5,000 yds. Scale 5,000 yds. Scale Morzhovoi Bay 05-D 57-LI AEA-12 56-LI Cold Bay. Fox Island. King 39-LII Cove False Pass 5 nm GRS GRS 5 mi. 37-LII AEA-11 AEA-12 58-LI Fox Is. 5,000 yds. Scale for Aleutians Subarea Deer False 58-LI Island Pass 57-LI Ikatan Bay Unimak Island Ikatan Bay 03-D 56-LI 03-D 04-D King Cove Otter Cove Unimak Bight (1 nm South) 39-LII 04-D 0.25 nm 0.25 mi. Otter Cove 250 yds. Scale Sanak Island King Cove. False Pass, Otter Cove and Ikatan Bay. 2 nm 2 mi. 2,000 yds. Scale 20 nm r 20 mi. Scale Aleutian Subarea 20,000 yds. Mao p This is not intended for navigational use. Soundings in fathoms t 36-LII a GRS Anchorage # Existing GRS Volcano Bay A# Map c Mooring Fish Hatchery M# Aleutian PPOR o Dock/pier Private Cabins D# L Crane Public Use Cabins Map 02 Volcano Bay. Airport Boat Harbor Legend Potential Places of Refuge Potential NUKA Research & Planning Group, LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Noaa Coastal Mapping Program Project Completion Report
    NOAA COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT PROJECT AK0502 Western Krenitzin Islands and Northeast Unalaska Island Aleutian Islands, Alaska Introduction Coastal Mapping Program (CMP) Project AK0502 provides coastal zone mapping data of the area around the Krenitzin Islands. This area includes Akun Island, Akun Bay, Tangik Island, Poa Island, Akutan Island, Akutan Bay, Akutan Pass, Unaiga Island, Unaiga Pass, Egg Island, Sedanka Island, Udagak Strait and Unalaska Island from Cape Cheerful through Unalaska Bay and Dutch Harbor to Beaver Inlet, almost to Kayak Cape. The digital cartographic feature file (DCFF) may be used in support of the NOAA Nautical Charting Program (NCP) as well as geographic information systems (GIS) for a variety of coastal zone management applications. Project Design This project was designed per a request from the NOAA Hydrographic Surveys Division (HSD) of the Office of Coast Survey, NOAA, for GIS data in support of HSD operations. Based on an analysis of project requirements and results of a source data search, it was determined that CMP procedures for multiple source projects would apply for this project. Available source data deemed adequate for successful completion of this project included sources acquired between January 2000 and April 2002. Field Operations Routine CMP field operations did not apply for this project based on the origin of the project source data. Aerotriangulation The aerotriangulation task was accomplished by Western Air Maps, Inc. personnel in mid October, 2005. The image files were imported into SOCET SET, Version 5.0, using the DataThruWay, Version 5.0 software. The import process also converted the stored and compressed files to a recognized native SOCET SET format (NITF 2.0) and included supporting data extension files consisting of previously measured sensor model parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Generality of the Trophic Cascade Paradigm for Sea Otters: a Case Study with Kelp Forests in Northern Washington, USA
    Hydrobiologia (2007) 579:233–249 DOI 10.1007/s10750-006-0403-x PRIMARY RESEARCH PAPER Testing the generality of the trophic cascade paradigm for sea otters: a case study with kelp forests in northern Washington, USA Sarah K. Carter Æ Glenn R. VanBlaricom Æ Brian L. Allen Received: 6 April 2006 / Revised: 24 August 2006 / Accepted: 15 September 2006 / Published online: 31 January 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract Trophic cascade hypotheses for biolog- followed by a decline in diversity as one or a few ical communities, linking predation by upper tro- perennial algal species become dominant. Both sea phic levels to major features of ecological structure otter predation and commercial sea urchin harvest and dynamics at lower trophic levels, are widely are ecologically and economically important subscribed and may influence conservation policy. sources of urchin mortality in nearshore benthic Few such hypotheses have been evaluated for systems in northern Washington marine waters. We temporal or spatial generality. Previous studies of recorded changes in density of macroalgae in San sea otter (Enhydra lutris) predation along the outer Juan Channel, a marine reserve in the physically coast of North America suggest a pattern, often protected inland waters of northern Washington, elevated to the status of paradigm, in which sea otter resulting from three levels of experimental urchin presence leads to reduced sea urchin (Strongylo- harvest: (1) simulated sea otter predation (monthly centrotus spp.) biomass and rapid increases in complete harvest of sea urchins), (2) simulated abundance and diversity of annual algal species, commercial urchin harvest (annual size-selective harvest of sea urchins), and (3) no harvest (control).
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleuts: an Outline of the Ethnic History
    i Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Roza G. Lyapunova Translated by Richard L. Bland ii As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has re- sponsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Shared Beringian Heritage Program at the National Park Service is an international program that rec- ognizes and celebrates the natural resources and cultural heritage shared by the United States and Russia on both sides of the Bering Strait. The program seeks local, national, and international participation in the preservation and understanding of natural resources and protected lands and works to sustain and protect the cultural traditions and subsistence lifestyle of the Native peoples of the Beringia region. Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Author: Roza G. Lyapunova English translation by Richard L. Bland 2017 ISBN-13: 978-0-9965837-1-8 This book’s publication and translations were funded by the National Park Service, Shared Beringian Heritage Program. The book is provided without charge by the National Park Service. To order additional copies, please contact the Shared Beringian Heritage Program ([email protected]). National Park Service Shared Beringian Heritage Program © The Russian text of Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History by Roza G. Lyapunova (Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka” leningradskoe otdelenie, 1987), was translated into English by Richard L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Multiple Predators on the Size Structure of Red Urchin Populations in British Columbia
    The Effects Of Multiple Predators On the Size Structure of Red Urchin Populations in British Columbia An undergraduate Directed Studies (BISC 498) research project by Christine Stevenson Introduction Predator-prey body size relationships influence trophic structure, transfer efficiency, and interaction strength within a food web (Jonsson and Ebenman 1998). Size distributions of both predators and prey are an important component to the population dynamics of a community. Knowledge of the strength of predatory interactions within a food web can provide insight to the relationships between the sizes of prey and their predators. Predators are generally larger than the size their prey and predator size is often positively correlated to prey size (Vezina 1985, Warren and Lawton 1987, Cohen et al. 1993). The relative body size of a predator and its prey largely contribute to the ecology and evolutionary consequences of predator-prey relationships. This is most defined in systems involving size- dependent predators. These predators are effective agents of selection among prey species that differ in body size or growth rate. Size dependent predators therefore influence the structure of prey populations by diminishing prey species of a preferred size (Kerfoot and Peterson 1980). Prey species that can reach a large size through embellishments of the exoskeleton can often attain a size refuge from predators (Sousa 1992). Thus, the risk of predation may be lower for larger prey compared to smaller individuals. The risk of an individual prey being consumed may also depend on the size- structure of the predator population, as larger predators generally have the ability to handle and consume larger prey (Sousa 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: the Molluscan Genera Cymatona and Fusitriton (Gastropoda, Family Cymatiidae)
    ISSN 0083-7903, 65 (Print) ISSN 2538-1016; 65 (Online) The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: The Molluscan Genera Cymatona and Fusitriton (Gastropoda, Family Cymatiidae) by A. G. BEU New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir 65 1978 NEW ZEALAND DEPARTMENT OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: The Molluscan Genera Cymatona and Fusitriton (Gastropoda, Family Cymatiidae) by A. G. BEU New Zealand Geological Survey, DSIR, Lower Hutt New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir 65 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Citation according to ''World List of Scientific Periodicals" (4th edn.): Mem. N.Z. oceanogr. Inst. 65 Received for publication September 1973 © Crown Copyright 1978 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ CONTENTS Page Abstract . � 5 INTRODUCTION 5 4AXONOMY 10 Family CYMATIIDAE 10 Genus Cymatona 10 Cymatona kampyla 10 Cymatona kampyla kampyla 12 Cymatona kampyla tomlini . 18 Cymatona kampyla jobbernsi 18 Genus Fusitriton 18 Fusitriton cancellatus 22 Fusitriton cancellatus retiolus 22 Fusitriton cance/latus laudandus 23 ECOLOGY . 25 Benthic sampling programme of N.Z. Oceanographic Institute 25 Sampling methods 25 Distribution anomalies 25 Distribution 26 Distribution with depth 26 Distribution with latitude 27 Distribution with sediment type 27 Ecological conclusions 33 Dispersal times and routes of Fusitriton, and their effect on Cymatona 34 Dispersal and distribution 34 Ecological displacement of Cymatona kampyla kampyla 35 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 36 REFERENCES 36 APPENDIX 1: Station List 38 APPENDIX 2: Dimensions of Cymatona 41 APPENDIX 3: Dimensions of Fusitriton 42 INDEX 44 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 212/Friday, October 31
    Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 212 / Friday, October 31, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 64881 compliance with the requirements of National Archives and Records the airspace description revealed that it paragraph (f)(2) of this AD. Administration (NARA). For information on contained two items that were the availability of this material at NARA, call FAA AD Differences unnecessary. The Norton Sound Low (202) 741–6030, or go to: http:// _ 1,200 foot description for Selawik, AK, Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ www.archives.gov/federal register/ is not required. Similarly, the 1,200 ft. or service information as follows: No code_of_federal_regulations/ differences. ibr_locations.html. description for Control 1234L had duplicate references to Eareckson Air Other FAA AD Provisions Issued in Renton, Washington, on October Force Station. These two items are 9, 2008. (g) The following provisions also apply to addressed in the airspace descriptions Ali Bahrami, this AD: below. With the exception of editorial (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, changes, this amendment is the same as (AMOCs): The Manager, International Aircraft Certification Service. that proposed in the NPRM. Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane [FR Doc. E8–25307 Filed 10–30–08; 8:45 am] These airspace areas are published in Directorate, FAA, has the authority to BILLING CODE 4910–13–P paragraph 6007 of FAA Order 7400.9R, approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested signed August 15, 2007, and effective using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. September 15, 2007, which is Send information to ATTN: Shahram DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf of Al Aska
    274 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 9, Chapter 6 Chapter 9, Pilot Coast U.S. 160°W 158°W 156°W 154°W 152°W 150°W Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 9—Chapter 6 C OOK INLET NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml Cape Douglas 166°W 164°W 162°W 16603 AFOGNAK ISLAND I T 58°N 16575 A R T 16576 S BRISTOL BAY F 16570 O ND I K LA L IS E H K S IA A D L O S U K I N N E P 16566 16587 N 16568 A Trinity Islands K S A L A 56°N Semidi Islands 16556 Chirikof Island 16553 16561 PAVLOV BAY 16580 16551 Kupreanof Point ISANOTSKI STRAIT 16549 Shumagin Island Unimak Island 16535 GULF OF ALASKA Sanak Island UNIMAK PASS 16547 54°N 16540 26 SEP2021 26 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 9, Chapter 6 ¢ 275 Alaska Peninsula (1) This chapter describes the south coast of the Alaska (7) Peninsula from Cape Douglas to Isanotski Strait as well Local magnetic disturbance as the Semidi Islands, Shumagin Islands, Sanak Islands (8) Differences from the normal variation of as much as and many other smaller off-lying islands that fringe this 14° have been observed along the Alaska Peninsula. part of the coast. Also described are Katmai Bay, Wide (9) Bay, Chignik Bay, Stepovak Bay, Unga Strait, Pavlof Currents Bay, Ikatan Bay, Isanotski Strait and many smaller bays (10) A continual current of considerable strength follows and lagoons, and the fishing communities of Sand Point, the coast all the way from Shelikof Strait to the Aleutian King Cove, Cold Bay and False Pass.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Umnak and Bogoslof Islands Aleutian Islands Alaska
    Geology of Umnak and Bogoslof Islands Aleutian Islands Alaska By F. M. BYERS, JR. INVESTIGATIONS OF ^ALASKAN VOLCANOES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1028-L Prepared in cooperation with the Office, Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. PEEFACE In October 1945 the War Department (now Department of the Army) requested the Geological Survey to undertake a program of volcano investigations in the Aleutian Islands-Alaska Peninsula area. Field studies under general direction of G. D. Robinson, were begun as soon as weather permitted in the spring of 1946. The results of the first year's field, laboratory, and library work were assembled as two administrative reports. Part of the data was published in 1950 in Geological Survey Bulletin 974-B, "Volcanic Activity in the Aleutian Arc", by Robert R. Coats. The rest of the data has been included in Bulletin 1028. The geologic investigations covered by this report were recon­ naissance. The factual information presented is believed to be accu­ rate, but many of the tentative interpretations and conclusions will be modified as the investigations continue and knowledge grows. The investigations of 1946 were supported almost entirely by the Military Intelligence Division of the Office, Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army. The Geological Survey is indebted to that Office for its early recognition of the value of geologic studies in the Aleutian region, which made this report possible, and for its continuing support.
    [Show full text]