DOCSLIB.ORG

The Making of the Indonesian Multiparty System: a Cartelized Party System and Its Origin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Making of the Indonesian Multiparty System: a Cartelized Party System and Its Origin THE MAKING OF THE INDONESIAN MULTIPARTY SYSTEM: A CARTELIZED PARTY SYSTEM AND ITS ORIGIN DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kuskridho Ambardi, MA * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee Professor R. William Liddle, adviser Approved by Professor Richard Gunther Professor Goldie Shabad ______________________________ Adviser Graduate Program in Political Science Copyright by Kuskridho Ambardi 2008 ABSTRACT This study explores the phenomenon of party interaction in a new democracy. It seeks to provide a systematic understanding of the nature of the Indonesian party system created since 1999. It is widely accepted that a free election with more than one participant is a primary indication of a competitive party system. This study goes beyond the electoral arena to see whether political parties still maintain a degree of competition after the election. The premise of the study is that political parties may exhibit a different pattern of interaction in another arena. Competitiveness may disappear once the parties leave the hurly-burly of the election and enter a new arena of interaction. To capture this possibility, party interaction is examined in three arenas: electoral, governmental, and legislative. The key concept of the study, cartelization, is adapted from Katz and Mair’s concept of cartel party. In their original application, Katz and Mair use this concept to describe the emergence of a new type of political party. This study argues that the concept of cartel should be applied not at the individual but at the system level to capture the nature of party interaction. Cartelization is thus understood as a collective decision made by parties to give up their ideological and programmatic differences. It is the opposite of competition. ii The primary finding of the study is that party competition ended after the election, and was followed by the creation of a cartel. The origin of the cartelized party system was the parties’ collective dependence on rent-seeking to meet their financial needs. This, in turn, created a situation in which parties’ political and economic fates were tied together as a collectivity. Their survival as individual parties is thus defined by their ability to maintain the existence of the cartel. This study offers a new context in which to evaluate the importance of electoral competitiveness for understanding the nature of party systems. It gives us a more complex framework in which to assess their contribution to the development of new democracies. It does this by applying Katz and Mair’s concept of cartelization at the system level, not at the party level as they do. Finally, it goes beyond Katz and Mair by specifying the source of cartelization in the state’s non-budgetary funds, which encourage political parties to perform illegal rent-seeking activities because these funds are not intended for financing the parties. iii Dedicated to: Susanti Kusumasari (wife), Marsa Harisa Daniswara (daughter), Hafid Sasayuda Ambardi (son) iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is the culmination of a three-year effort to write a research design, to collect and systematize data, and finally to compose an intelligible and hopefully convincing argument and to weave evidence into that argument. Numerous individuals were involved in these processes. I want to express my gratitude to those who helped me most: • My dissertation committee: Professor R. William Liddle (adviser and chair), for his uninterrupted support and encouragement since the early stages of my journey. The many conversations that I had with him – academic and non-academic – were always inspiring. I am very thankful to have had him as my adviser and still to be able to count him as a friend; Professor Richard Gunther, who gave me suggestions on how to refine my argument and evidence; and Professor Goldie Shabad who encouraged me to revise the introductory part of this dissertation. I must confess that at first, I thought they added to my burdens, but in the end I found their comments invaluable. • The “Columbus mafia”: Rizal Mallarangeng, Saiful Mujani, Eep Saefulloh Fatah, and Bang Salim Said for helping reacquaint me with Jakarta during my fieldwork. Their vast networks helped immensely to enable me to obtain access to my sources. In addition, Rizal Mallarangeng and Saiful Mujani gave me lasting v friendships for which I will always be grateful. Their homes and their families were my homes and families while I was doing my fieldwork. Rizal Mallarangeng also set up an office for me in the Freedom Institute and arranged some financial assistance for my research. • Journalists: For the sake of confidentiality, not all of them can be mentioned here. Two must be singled out, however, because they opened critical gates to my sources: Karaniya Dharmasaputra and Prasidono “Inod” Listiaji. • Several individuals who directly or indirectly helped me to finish this dissertation. Professor Mohtar Mas’oed, Dean of the College of Social and Political Sciences, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, who has always expected me to come back to Gadjah Mada and his faculty; Yohanes Sulaiman for his friendship in Columbus; Agus Sudibyo who helped me with the process of collecting documents in Jakarta, and Djayadi Hanan who helped me in the last stages of completing my data analysis; to all of them, my deepest thanks. • The Jakarta circle: Hamid Basyaib, Jeffrie Geovanie, Luthfi Assyaukanie, Ahmad Sahal, Ulil Abshar Abdalla, Nong Darul Mahmadan and Sarah “Aci” should be mentioned for their hospitality during my Jakarta fieldwork. They stimulated my thoughts and helped me to relax whenmy fieldwork began to wear me down. Included in this circle are Freedom Institute personnel who embraced me in their office. • My extended family in Batu, Malang, East Java, from whom I found more encouragement. My parents, Hari S. Singgih and Sutjiati, my brothers Himawan Bayu (he won the sibling race by completing his Ph.D. earlier than me) who vi helped me to acquire KPU data and Yos Puntohadi, and my sister Wilis Purnadewi, who patiently waited for me to come back to Indonesia. They all make my life more meaningful. • My other extended family, the Budiman family, who gave continual support in various forms. This included Leila Budiman, who babysat my new born son when I was carrying out my fieldwork, and Arief Budiman, who let his wife Leila spend an extended period of time with his grandson on a different continent, and Adrian Budiman’s family in Athens, Ohio, who cheerfully let my family stay with them on many weekends; for all of them I cannot say thank you enough. • Lastly, I owe special gratitude to my own family: my wonderful wife Susanti Kusumasari, my kind-hearted daughter Marsa Daniswara, and my energetic son Hafid Ambardi. My wife constantly had to juggle between her full-time job and her family which could be very stressful. Her success in handling both made it possible for me to concentrate on my dissertation. Marsa and Hafid were not thrilled with my dissertation project, which they saw as an incomprehensible burden – especially when they had to give up their playtime with the computer. But I think they knew intuitively that this burden would eventually make their life better. In any event, their smiles made every day cheerful. vii VITA 2003 Master of Arts (M.A.), Political Science The Ohio State University, Department of Political Science 2000 Master of Arts (M.A.) , Telecommunications The Ohio University, College of Communication 1992 Doktorandus (Drs.), Communication Science University of Gadjah Mada, The College of Social and Political Sciences * * * * * 2003-2007 Graduate Teaching Associate, The Ohio State University Department of Political Science 2000-2003 Graduate Research Associate, The Ohio State University Department of Political Science 1998-2000 Fulbright Scholarship recipient 1995- … Teaching Staff, Gadjah Mada University College of Social and Political Sciences FIELD OF STUDY Major Field: Political Science (Comparative Politics) Minor Field: Political Sociology Regions of Specialization: Southeast Asia and Eastern Europe viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract …………………………………………………………………………………. ii Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………. v Vita ……………………………………………………………………………………… viii List of Tables …………………………………………………………………………… xii List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………… xiv Chapters: 1. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………... 1 1.1 Research Question …………………………………………………………... 1 1.2 Significance of the Study …………………………………………………… 3 1.3 Theoretical Framework ……………………………………………………... 6 1.3.1 Sartori’s Model of Party System ………………………………….. 7 1.3.2 Dividing the Arena of Competition: A Justification ……………… 11 1.3.3 Competition and Cartelization ……………………………………. 13 1.3.4 Content of Party Competition: Two Approaches …………………. 18 1.3.5. Source of Cartelization …………………………………………… 27 1.4 Research Method ……………………………………………………………. 30 1.5. Structure of Analysis ……………………………………………………….. 32 2. Cleavages, Collective Interests, and Political Parties A Historical Overview ………………………………………………………….. 35 2.1 Formation of Two Cleavages ……………………………………………….. 36 2.2 Party Politics in the 1950s: Multiple Political Oppositions ………………… 39 2.2.1 The Campaigns and Issue Positions ………………………………. 43 ix 2.2.2 Two Views of Party Politics ………………………………………. 50 2.2.3 Cross-class Strategy: Case of PKI ………………………………… 56 2.3 Guided Democracy Interlude ……………………………………………….
Load more

Recommended publications
  • [Klikk Her Og Skriv Tittel]
    Drafting a democracy An analysis on the drafting process of the election laws after the fall of President Suharto in Indonesia,1998-1999 Gunnar Gase Handeland Hovedoppgave Institutt for statsvitenskap UNIVERSITETET I OSLO April 2007 2 3 Preface My interest for Indonesian politics started when I was on a study tour to the archipelago in 1995. At that time, Indonesia was a growing economy with a stabile but not democratic, political situation. What happened during the Asian crisis only three years later changed the situation rapidly, and I was curious to study the political turmoils that took place. Therefore, I was lucky to start my work with this thesis only months after Suharto stepped down in 1998, and I have to thank both the Faculty of Social Science at the University of Oslo and The Ryoichi Sasakawa Fund for the funding which enabled me to travel to Indonesia and do research there. I also want to thank Nordic Institute of Asian Studies (NIAS) in Copenhagen who gave me a Scholarship so I could stay at their institute for two weeks in 1999. Allthough everything seemed to be prepared for my studies I was unfortunately not able to finish the thesis on regular time. I got a job, dropped out of my studies and have been working with all other things than Indonesian politics for the last years. Nevertheless I have not given up my hope to finish it. Therefore, I would like to thank my supervisor, Olle Törnquist, for his encouragement and patience, for introducing me both to the theme and to a lof of his contacts in Indonesia in the late 90’s, and for continuing supervising when I decided to finish my thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare in Transition
    Welfare in Transition The Political Economy of Social Protection Reform in Indonesia Maryke van Diermen Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology and Development Studies School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts University of Adelaide December 2017 Declaration I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission in my name for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint award of this degree. I give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University's digital research repository, the Library Search and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time. I acknowledge the support I have received for my research through the provision of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Signature of candidate: Date: 10/07/18 ii Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the support I have received from many people. I am thankful to them all but I wish to mention some in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Deep State
    #1.12 PERSPECTIVES Political analysis and commentary from Turkey FEATURE ARTICLES TURKEY’S DEEP STATE CULTURE INTERNATIONAL POLITICS ECOLOGY AKP’s Cultural Policy: Syria: The Case of the Seasonal Agricultural Arts and Censorship “Arab Spring” Workers in Turkey Pelin Başaran Transforming into the Sidar Çınar Page 28 “Arab Revolution” Page 32 Cengiz Çandar Page 35 TURKEY REPRESENTATION Content Editor’s note 3 ■ Feature articles: Turkey’s Deep State Tracing the Deep State, Ayşegül Sabuktay 4 The Deep State: Forms of Domination, Informal Institutions and Democracy, Mehtap Söyler 8 Ergenekon as an Illusion of Democratization, Ahmet Şık 12 Democratization, revanchism, or..., Aydın Engin 16 The Near Future of Turkey on the Axis of the AKP-Gülen Movement, Ruşen Çakır 18 Counter-Guerilla Becoming the State, the State Becoming the Counter-Guerilla, Ertuğrul Mavioğlu 22 Is the Ergenekon Case an Opportunity or a Handicap? Ali Koç 25 The Dink Murder and State Lies, Nedim Şener 28 ■ Culture Freedom of Expression in the Arts and the Current State of Censorship in Turkey, Pelin Başaran 31 ■ Ecology Solar Energy in Turkey: Challenges and Expectations, Ateş Uğurel 33 A Brief Evaluation of Seasonal Agricultural Workers in Turkey, Sidar Çınar 35 ■ International Politics Syria: The Case of the “Arab Spring” Transforming into the “Arab Revolution”, Cengiz Çandar 38 Turkey/Iran: A Critical Move in the Historical Competition, Mete Çubukçu 41 ■ Democracy 4+4+4: Turning the Education System Upside Down, Aytuğ Şaşmaz 43 “Health Transformation Program” and the 2012 Turkey Health Panorama, Mustafa Sütlaş 46 How Multi-Faceted are the Problems of Freedom of Opinion and Expression in Turkey?, Şanar Yurdatapan 48 Crimes against Humanity and Persistent Resistance against Cruel Policies, Nimet Tanrıkulu 49 ■ News from hbs 53 Heinrich Böll Stiftung – Turkey Representation The Heinrich Böll Stiftung, associated with the German Green Party, is a legally autonomous and intellectually open political foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Rules and Elite Recruitment: a Comparative Analysis of the Bundestag and the U.S
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 6-27-2014 Electoral Rules and Elite Recruitment: A Comparative Analysis of the Bundestag and the U.S. House of Representatives Murat Altuglu Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI14071144 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Altuglu, Murat, "Electoral Rules and Elite Recruitment: A Comparative Analysis of the Bundestag and the U.S. House of Representatives" (2014). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1565. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1565 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida ELECTORAL RULES AND ELITE RECRUITMENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE BUNDESTAG AND THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in POLITICAL SCIENCE by Murat Altuglu 2014 To: Interim Dean Michael R. Heithaus College of Arts and Sciences This dissertation, written by Murat Altuglu, and entitled Electoral Rules and Elite Recruitment: A Comparative Analysis of the Bundestag and the U.S. House of Representatives, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual
    [Show full text]
  • The Functioning of Democratic Institutions in Turkey
    http://assembly.coe.int Doc. 15272 21 April 2021 The functioning of democratic institutions in Turkey Report1 Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee) Co-rapporteurs: Mr Thomas HAMMARBERG, Sweden, Socialists, Democrats and Greens Group, and Mr John HOWELL, United Kingdom, European Conservatives Group and Democratic Alliance Summary The Monitoring Committee is deeply concerned about recent developments in Turkey which have further undermined democracy, the rule of law and human rights. Procedures seeking to lift the parliamentary immunity of a third of the parliamentarians (overwhelmingly from opposition parties), the attempt to close the Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) and the continued crackdown on its members put political pluralism and the functioning of democratic institutions at risk. The presidential decision of 20 March 2021 to withdraw from the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (CETS No.210, the Istanbul Convention) to combat violence against women and domestic violence is a regrettable step backwards, made without any parliamentary debate, which raises the question of the modalities of denunciation of conventions in democratic societies. The committee also urges the immediate release of Selahattin Demirtaş and Osman Kavala following the final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. In order to reverse these worrying trends, the Turkish authorities should seize the opportunity of implementing the Human Rights Action Plan and revising the legislation on elections and political parties to take meaningful steps, put an end to the judicial harassment of opposition and dissenting voices, improve freedom of expression and media and restore the independence of the judiciary, in co-operation with the Council of Europe 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Update Human Rights in Indonesia – 03-02-2014 Elections
    Weekly Update Human Rights in Indonesia – 03-02-2014 Indonesia Movement (Gerindra) Party chief patron Elections 2014 Lt. Gen. (ret) Prabowo Subianto. A public opinion survey by the Indonesian Survey Minister steps down to focus on Circle (LSI) has found that if a presidential election presidential campaign were to take place today, Jokowi would receive between 22.3 and 35.6 percent of the vote, against Kompas, 01-02-2014 Prabowo who would garner between 12.6 and 19.7 percent. Gita Wirjawan has stepped down as minister for Commerce by 1 February 2014. He has decided The survey estimated the largest amount of votes that he will try to win the nomination as garnered by both Jokowi and Prabowo could only presidential candidate for the Partai Demokrat. “I materialize if undecided voters — who made up 30 want to prevent getting into a conflict of interest percent of the electorate — made up their minds. with my daily work in the government,” he said in a press conference that lasted only five minutes LSI senior researcher Adjie Alfaraby said the and had no opportunity for questions from success of Jokowi would rub off on his political journalists. The same step has been taken by party, the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle others who want to get nominated: Anies (PDI-P), in the legislative election. Baswedan who has take leave as Rector of the “If Jokowi is nominated by the PDI-P, his position at Universitas Paramadina and Dino Patti Djalal who the top will be secured, leaving the fight for second stepped down as ambassador in the US.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties and Welfare Associations
    Department of Sociology Umeå University Political parties and welfare associations by Ingrid Grosse Doctoral theses at the Department of Sociology Umeå University No 50 2007 Department of Sociology Umeå University Thesis 2007 Printed by Print & Media December 2007 Cover design: Gabriella Dekombis © Ingrid Grosse ISSN 1104-2508 ISBN 978-91-7264-478-6 Grosse, Ingrid. Political parties and welfare associations. Doctoral Dissertation in Sociology at the Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University, 2007. ISBN 978-91-7264-478-6 ISSN 1104-2508 ABSTRACT Scandinavian countries are usually assumed to be less disposed than other countries to involve associations as welfare producers. They are assumed to be so disinclined due to their strong statutory welfare involvement, which “crowds-out” associational welfare production; their ethnic, cultural and religious homogeneity, which leads to a lack of minority interests in associational welfare production; and to their strong working-class organisations, which are supposed to prefer statutory welfare solutions. These assumptions are questioned here, because they cannot account for salient associational welfare production in the welfare areas of housing and child-care in two Scandinavian countries, Sweden and Norway. In order to approach an explanation for the phenomena of associational welfare production in Sweden and Norway, some refinements of current theories are suggested. First, it is argued that welfare associations usually depend on statutory support in order to produce welfare on a salient level. Second, it is supposed that any form of particularistic interest in welfare production, not only ethnic, cultural or religious minority interests, can lead to associational welfare. With respect to these assumptions, this thesis supposes that political parties are organisations that, on one hand, influence statutory decisions regarding associational welfare production, and, on the other hand, pursue particularistic interests in associational welfare production.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Asia Office: 2038 Derby Fall 2001 Hours: MW 10:30-12:30 Or CL 171, MW 1:30-3:18 by Appointment
    Political Science 636: Southeast Asia Office: 2038 Derby Fall 2001 Hours: MW 10:30-12:30 or CL 171, MW 1:30-3:18 by appointment. Professor Liddle INTERPRETING INDONESIAN POLITICS Introduction. The purpose of this course is to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of alternative interpretations of Indonesian political developments since independence in 1945. We begin with basic description of pre-colonial and Dutch colonial history, the experience of Japanese occupation, revolution, and the independence period, divided into subperiods of parliamentary democracy, Guided Democracy, the New Order, and the current reform era. Several alternative interpretations are then examined, beginning with the most popular, culture, and ending with Professor Liddle’s own research emphasis on leadership and agency. There will be a mid-term, worth one-third of the course grade, and a final exam worth two-thirds. Both will be in-class exams, but the exam questions will be handed out several days before the exam date. The mid-term will be on Monday, October 15, the final on Tuesday, December 4 from 11:30AM-1:18PM. Students are expected to read the assigned materials before class, which will be conducted as a seminar to the extent possible. One additional grade level (for example, from B to B+) will be given for regular and effective participation. Book and article availability. Two books will be available for purchase: Benedict Anderson and Audrey Kahin, Interpreting Indonesian Politics: Thirteen Contributions to the Debate, Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1982; and Robert Hefner, Civil Islam, Princeton University Press, 2000. Soemarsaid Moertono, State and Statecraft in Old Java, can also be ordered from the publisher if desired.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: a Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System
    Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: A Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System Yu Un Oppusunggu A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: John O. Haley, Chair Michael E. Townsend Beth E. Rivin Program Authorized to Offer Degree School of Law © Copyright 2015 Yu Un Oppusunggu ii University of Washington Abstract Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: A Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System Yu Un Oppusunggu Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor John O. Haley School of Law A sweeping proviso that protects basic or fundamental interests of a legal system is known in various names – ordre public, public policy, public order, government’s interest or Vorbehaltklausel. This study focuses on the concept of Indonesian public order in private international law. It argues that Indonesia has extraordinary layers of pluralism with respect to its people, statehood and law. Indonesian history is filled with the pursuit of nationhood while protecting diversity. The legal system has been the unifying instrument for the nation. However the selected cases on public order show that the legal system still lacks in coherence. Indonesian courts have treated public order argument inconsistently. A prima facie observation may find Indonesian public order unintelligible, and the courts have gained notoriety for it. This study proposes a different perspective. It sees public order in light of Indonesia’s legal pluralism and the stages of legal development.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy
    Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy How do democracies form and what makes them die? Daniel Ziblatt revisits this timely and classic question in a wide-ranging historical narrative that traces the evolution of modern political democracy in Europe from its modest beginnings in 1830s Britain to Adolf Hitler’s 1933 seizure of power in Weimar Germany. Based on rich historical and quantitative evidence, the book offers a major reinterpretation of European history and the question of how stable political democracy is achieved. The barriers to inclusive political rule, Ziblatt finds, were not inevitably overcome by unstoppable tides of socioeconomic change, a simple triumph of a growing middle class, or even by working class collective action. Instead, political democracy’s fate surprisingly hinged on how conservative political parties – the historical defenders of power, wealth, and privilege – recast themselves and coped with the rise of their own radical right. With striking modern parallels, the book has vital implications for today’s new and old democracies under siege. Daniel Ziblatt is Professor of Government at Harvard University where he is also a resident fellow of the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies. He is also currently Fernand Braudel Senior Fellow at the European University Institute. His first book, Structuring the State: The Formation of Italy and Germany and the Puzzle of Federalism (2006) received several prizes from the American Political Science Association. He has written extensively on the emergence of democracy in European political history, publishing in journals such as American Political Science Review, Journal of Economic History, and World Politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Greco Eval III Rep 2009 5E Final Turkey PF PUBLIC
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND LEGAL AFFAIRS DIRECTORATE OF MONITORING Strasbourg, 26 March 2010 Public Greco Eval III Rep (2009) 5E Theme II Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Turkey on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II) Adopted by GRECO at its 46 th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 22-26 March 2010) Secrétariat du GRECO GRECO Secretariat www.coe.int/greco Conseil de l’Europe Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex +33 3 88 41 20 00 Fax +33 3 88 41 39 55 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Turkey joined GRECO in 2004. GRECO adopted the Joint First and Second Round Evaluation Report (Greco Eval I Rep (2005) 3E) in respect of Turkey at its 27 th Plenary Meeting (10 March 2006). The aforementioned Evaluation Report, as well as its corresponding Compliance Report, are available on GRECO’s homepage ( http://www.coe.int/greco ). 2. GRECO’s current Third Evaluation Round (launched on 1 January 2007) deals with the following themes: - Theme I – Incriminations: Articles 1a and 1b, 2-12, 15-17, 19 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS 173), Articles 1-6 of its Additional Protocol (ETS 191) and Guiding Principle 2 (criminalisation of corruption). - Theme II – Transparency of party funding: Articles 8, 11, 12, 13b, 14 and 16 of Recommendation Rec(2003)4 on Common Rules against Corruption in the Funding of Political Parties and Electoral Campaigns, and - more generally - Guiding Principle 15 (financing of political parties and election campaigns) . 3. The GRECO Evaluation Team for Theme II (hereafter referred to as
    [Show full text]
  • The Contestation of Social Memory in the New Media: a Case Study of the 1965 Killings in Indonesia
    Aktuelle Südostasienforschung Current Research on Southeast Asia The Contestation of Social Memory in the New Media: A Case Study of the 1965 Killings in Indonesia Hakimul Ikhwan, Vissia Ita Yulianto & Gilang Desti Parahita ► Ikhwan, H., Yulianto, V. I., & Parahita, G. D. (2019). The contestation of social memory in the new media: A case study of the 1965 killings in Indonesia. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 12(1), 3-16. While today’s Indonesian democratic government remains committed to the New Order orthodoxy about the mass killings of 1965, new counter-narratives challenging official history are emerging in the new media. Applying mixed-methods and multi-sited ethnography, this study aims to extend our collaborative understanding of the most re- cent developments in this situation by identifying multiple online interpersonal stories, deliberations, and debates related to the case as well as offline field studies in Java and Bali. Practically and theoretically, we ask how the tragedy of the 1965 killings is contest- ed in the new media and how social memory plays out in this contestation. The study finds that new media potentially act as emancipatory sites channeling and liberating the voices of those that the nation has stigmatized as ‘objectively guilty’. We argue that the arena of contestation is threefold: individual, public vs. state narrative, and theoretical. As such, the transborder space of the new media strongly mediates corrective new voices to fill missing gaps in the convoluted history of this central event of modern Indonesian history. Keywords: 1965 Killings; Master vs. Counter Narratives; Memory Studies; New Media; Southeast Asia INTRODUCTION Indonesia experienced one of the 20th century’s worst mass killings.
    [Show full text]