DOCSLIB.ORG

San Felasco Hammock Preserve State Park 2019 Approved

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Felasco Hammock Preserve State Park 2019 Approved San Felasco Hammock Preserve State Park Approved Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks June 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 8 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 8 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 9 Management Coordination ................................................................... 9 Public Participation ..............................................................................9 Other Designations ........................................................................... 10 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 17 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 17 Topography .................................................................................. 17 Geology ....................................................................................... 18 Soils ............................................................................................ 19 Minerals ....................................................................................... 23 Hydrology .................................................................................... 23 Natural Communities (FNAI) ........................................................... 33 Imperiled Species ......................................................................... 61 Exotic and Nuisance Species ........................................................... 68 Special Natural Features ................................................................ 73 Cultural Resources ............................................................................ 75 Condition Assessment .................................................................... 75 Level of Significance ...................................................................... 75 Prehistoric and Historic Archaeological Sites ..................................... 76 Historic Structures ........................................................................ 78 Collections ................................................................................... 78 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ................................................. 85 Management Goals, Objectives and Actions .......................................... 85 Natural Resource Management ........................................................... 86 Hydrological Management .............................................................. 86 Natural Communities Management .................................................. 89 Imperiled Species Management .................................................... ..96 i Exotic Species Management ......................................................... 100 Cultural Resource Management ........................................................ 101 Special Management Considerations .................................................. 103 Multiple Uses .............................................................................. 103 Timber Management Analysis ....................................................... 103 Arthropod Control Plan ................................................................. 104 Additional Considerations ............................................................. 104 Resource Management Schedule ....................................................... 107 Land Management Review ............................................................... 107 LAND USE COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 109 EXTERNAL CONDITIONS .................................................................. 109 Existing Use of Adjacent Lands ......................................................... 112 Planned Use of Adjacent Lands ......................................................... 112 Florida Greenways and Trails System (FGTS) ..................................... 115 PROPERTY ANALYSIS ...................................................................... 115 Recreation Resource Elements .......................................................... 116 Land Area .................................................................................. 116 Water Area ................................................................................. 116 Natural Scenery .......................................................................... 116 Significant Habitat ....................................................................... 117 Natural Features ......................................................................... 117 Archaeological and Historic Features .............................................. 117 Assessment of Use .......................................................................... 117 Past Uses ................................................................................... 117 Future Land Use and Zoning ......................................................... 118 Current Recreation Use and Visitor Programs .................................. 118 Other Uses ................................................................................. 119 Protected Zones .......................................................................... 119 Existing Facilities ............................................................................ 119 Recreation and Support Facilities .................................................. 120 CONCEPTUAL LAND USE PLAN ......................................................... 123 Potential Uses ................................................................................ 123 Public Access and Recreational Opportunities .................................. 123 Proposed Facilities .......................................................................... 124 Capital Facilities and Infrastructure ............................................... 124 Facilities Development ..................................................................... 126 Recreational Carrying Capacity ......................................................... 126 Optimum Boundary ......................................................................... 129 ii IMPLEMENTATION COMPONENT MANAGEMENT PROGRESS ................................................................ 133 Park Administration and Operations .................................................. 133 Resource Management .................................................................... 134 Natural Resources ........................................................................... 134 Cultural Resources ...................................................................... 134 Recreation and Visitor Services ......................................................... 134 Park Facilities ................................................................................. 135 MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION .......................................... 135 TABLES TABLE 1 – San Felasco Hammock Preserve State Park Management Zones . 12 TABLE 2 – Imperiled Species Inventory .................................................. 64 TABLE 3 – Inventory of FLEPPC Category I and II Exotic Plant Species ....... 70 TABLE 4 – Cultural Sites Listed in the Florida Master Site File ................... 80 TABLE 5 – Prescribed Fire Management .................................................. 90 TABLE 6 – Resource Based Recreational Opportunities Near San Felasco Hammock Preserve State Park ............................................ 110 TABLE 7 – Zoning and Future Land Use Designations for Alachua County . 114 TABLE 8 – Recreational Carrying Capacity ............................................ 129 TABLE 9 – Implementation Schedule and Cost Estimates........................ 137 MAPS Vicinity Map ...........................................................................................3 Reference Map .......................................................................................5 Management Zones Map........................................................................ 13 Topographic Map .................................................................................. 15 Soils Map ............................................................................................ 21 Natural Communities Map ...................................................................... 37 Natural Communities Desired Future Conditions Map ................................ 97 Base Map .......................................................................................... 121 Conceptual Land Use Plan .................................................................... 127 Optimum Boundary Map ...................................................................... 131 LIST OF ADDENDA ADDENDUM 1 Acquisition History ......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids
    Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • SHORT-TERM EFFECTS of SPRINGTIME PRESCRIBED FIRES on ADULT POPULATIONS of SOIL-EMERGING WEEVILS in CENTRAL APPALACHIAN HARDWOOD STANDS David P
    SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF SPRINGTIME PRESCRIBED FIRES ON ADULT POPULATIONS OF SOIL-EMERGING WEEVILS IN CENTRAL APPALACHIAN HARDWOOD STANDS David P. McGann, David W. McGill, Thomas M. Sehuler, and W Mark Ford' Absmct-Numerous biotic and abtotic factors Interact to affect oak regeneration in the central Appalachians. F~re,whtte- tailed deer, rodents, other vertebrate seed predators, inmlve plants, Insects, fungi, climate, and tree physrology contribute singularly or addit~velyto oak regeneration problems. Moreaver, fire suppressron has signifi~antlyenhanced the deleter~ous impacts of several of these brotrc tnfluences. The relattonshrp between fire and acorn werrJils IS unknom, but acorn weevils are significant contributors to regeneraon problems in some oak stands and may be vuineraMe to fire at certain life stages. As part of a broader tnvest~gationof ftre use as a silvicuitural tool, we examined presctibed fire impacts on acorn weevils (genera: Cumuiio and Conotractieius)that inhibit oak (Quemus spp.! regeneration by lam! consumption of embryonic or newly dropped acorns. We prescribe burned two stands on the Fernow Experimental Forest in north-central West Virginia: One was burned April, 2002, and the other Aprii, 2003. We placed soil emergence traps under oak and other tree species on five plots within each burn treatment and four adjacent unburned plots. Arthropod samples were collected April to October in 2003 and 2004. We collected 233 weevils representing 11 species from 9 genera. CuwIio and Cyrtepistomus species predominated; Gono~chelusspecies were notable. Our preliminary data indicates that acorn weevil emergence may not be reduced following a stngle spring fire. Herein, we describe the pattern and intensity of acorn weevil emergence during the first 2 years of our study.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the World Amphibulus Kriechbaumer (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae, Phygadeuontinae)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida September 1991 A Revision of the World Amphibulus Kriechbaumer (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae, Phygadeuontinae) John C. Luhman Minnesota Department of Agriculture, St. Paul, MN Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Luhman, John C., "A Revision of the World Amphibulus Kriechbaumer (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae, Phygadeuontinae)" (1991). Insecta Mundi. 410. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/410 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Vol. 5, No. 3-4, September-December 1991 129 A Revision of the World Amphibulus Kriechbaumer (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae, Phygadeuontinae) John C. Luhman Plant Industry Division Minnesota Department of Agriculture St. Paul, MN 55107 Abstract Amphibulus Kriechbaumer (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae, Phygadeuontinae = Gelinae, Gelini) is revised world-wide. It is separated from its sister group genus Endasys Foerster by means of a key and a di- agnosis. Keys are given to 3 speciesgroupsand 25 species, including EuropeangracilisKriechbaumer and fen- nicus Sawoniewicz. Mexican satageus (Cresson)isredescribed, and 22 species are newly described:africanus, awanticeps, aurarius, aweolus, bicolor, borealis, carinarum, dentatus, duodentatus, eurystomatus, flavipes, htioris, nigripes, orientalis, pentatylus, pilosus, pseudopustulae, pustulae, pyrrhoborealis, rugosus, salicis, and tetratylus. Thirty figures illustrate diagnostic characters. Introduction Acknowledgments This is the first revision of the known species of This study was based on specimens borrowed Amphibulus Kriechbaumer world-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera) (Excluding Anthribidae
    A FAUNAL SURVEY AND ZOOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE CURCULIONOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) (EXCLUDING ANTHRIBIDAE, PLATPODINAE. AND SCOLYTINAE) OF THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY OF TEXAS A Thesis TAMI ANNE CARLOW Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 1997 Major Subject; Entomology A FAUNAL SURVEY AND ZOOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE CURCVLIONOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) (EXCLUDING ANTHRIBIDAE, PLATYPODINAE. AND SCOLYTINAE) OF THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY OF TEXAS A Thesis by TAMI ANNE CARLOW Submitted to Texas AgcM University in partial fulltllment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved as to style and content by: Horace R. Burke (Chair of Committee) James B. Woolley ay, Frisbie (Member) (Head of Department) Gilbert L. Schroeter (Member) August 1997 Major Subject: Entomology A Faunal Survey and Zoogeographic Analysis of the Curculionoidea (Coleoptera) (Excluding Anthribidae, Platypodinae, and Scolytinae) of the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. (August 1997) Tami Anne Carlow. B.S. , Cornell University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Horace R. Burke An annotated list of the Curculionoidea (Coleoptem) (excluding Anthribidae, Platypodinae, and Scolytinae) is presented for the Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) of Texas. The list includes species that occur in Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and Wigacy counties. Each of the 23S species in 97 genera is tteated according to its geographical range. Lower Rio Grande distribution, seasonal activity, plant associations, and biology. The taxonomic atTangement follows O' Brien &, Wibmer (I og2). A table of the species occuning in patxicular areas of the Lower Rio Grande Valley, such as the Boca Chica Beach area, the Sabal Palm Grove Sanctuary, Bentsen-Rio Grande State Park, and the Falcon Dam area is included.
    [Show full text]
  • Instituto Tecnológico De Cd. Victoria División De Estudios De Posgrado E Investigación
    SUBSECRETARÍA DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR TECNOLÓGICA INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE CD.VICTORIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- U n a P u b l i c a c i ó n d e l I n s t i t u t o T e c n o l ó g i c o d e C d. V i c t o r i a Volumen 10 No.1 Abril 2013 ISSN 1665-983X CIENCIAS EXACTAS Y NATURALES Tabla de vida de Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemíptera: Psyllidae) de la región centro del estado de Tamaulipas, México. C. H. Lugo-Garza, C. A. Salazar-Olivo & O. J. González-Gaona……….…………................1 Estudio preliminar de productividad vegetal estacional en diversos ecosistemas de agostadero en el estado de Tamaulipas, México. Y. A. García-Carbonell, A. Mora-Olivo, A. Moreno-Valdez & O. S. Escamilla- Gallegos…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…7 Nivel de preferencia de plantas en Alta Cimas (Reserva de la Biosfera El Cielo), Tamaulipas, México. S. G. Medellín-Morales, L. Barrientos-Lozano, S. Del Amo-Rodríguez, P. Almaguer-Sierra & C. S. Venegas- Barrera…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………..12 Degradación física del suelo por actividades antrópicas en la Zona II de la Cuenca de Burgos, Tamaulipas, México. F. Arias-Miño, M. Espinosa-Ramírez, E. Andrade-Limas, B. Castro-Meza, F. Briones- Encinia & W. Salinas-Castillo………………………………………………………………………………..……….…….25 Contribución al conocimiento de la fauna Orthoptera (Insecta) en la “Sierra de Tamaulipas”, México. L. Barrientos-Lozano, J.B. Ramírez-Núñez, A.Y. Rocha-Sánchez, J.V. Horta-Vega & P. Almaguer-Sierra….…..32 INGENIERÍA Y TECNOLOGÍA Fórmulas para el cálculo de deflexiones en armaduras isostáticas de cuerdas paralelas.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Represented by 47 Spp. India’S Independence,Pp
    Odonatological Abstracts 1997 mation Lanthus and abundance on sp. Cordulegastersp. and biomass is included. (14416) ALFRED, J.R.B. & A. KUMAR, 1997. Fauna 1998 ofDelhi: faunal analysis (basedon available data). Slate Fauna Ser. zool. Surv. India 6: 891-903. — (Second Author: Northern Regional Stn, Zool. Surv. India, (14420) ALFRED, A.K. DAS & A.K. Dehra Dun-248195,India). SANYAL, [Eds], 1998. [Faunal diversity in India:] Odonata. In\ J.R.B. Alfred Faunal A tabelar review of animal spp. recorded from Delhi, et al., [Eds], diversity fam. The odon. in India: commemorative volume in the 50th India;no species lists, numbers per only. a year of 172-178, ENVIS Centre, are represented by 47 spp. India’s independence,pp. Zool. Surv. India, Calcutta. — (First Author: Director, (14417) KUMAR, A., 1997. Fauna of Delhi: Odonata, Zool. Surv. India, 234/4, A.J.C. Bose Rd, Calcutta- imagos. State Fauna Ser. zool. Surv. India 6: 147-159. -700020, India). in — (Northern Regional Stn, Zool. Surv. India, Dehra The earliest reference to Indian dragonflies appears Dun-248195,India). the Sangam literature, dated prior to the 8th century and known from the A revised and updatedchecklist (47 spp.) ofthe odon. AD. At present, 449 spp. sspp. are inch 4 for the first Indian 23% of which endemic. A review fauna ofDelhi, India, spp. published territory, are and is ofthe numbers of known from various time. Precise locality data, descriptive notes presented spp. for 21 remarks onbionomy are presented spp. regions, and some considerations on conservation future studies strategies and are provided. (14418) KUMAR, A., 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN)
    Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) ‐ Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Animals ‐ 2020 MOLLUSKS Common Name Scientific Name G‐Rank S‐Rank Federal Status State Status Mucket Actinonaias ligamentina G5 S1 Rayed Creekshell Anodontoides radiatus G3 S2 Western Fanshell Cyprogenia aberti G2G3Q SH Butterfly Ellipsaria lineolata G4G5 S1 Elephant‐ear Elliptio crassidens G5 S3 Spike Elliptio dilatata G5 S2S3 Texas Pigtoe Fusconaia askewi G2G3 S3 Ebonyshell Fusconaia ebena G4G5 S3 Round Pearlshell Glebula rotundata G4G5 S4 Pink Mucket Lampsilis abrupta G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Plain Pocketbook Lampsilis cardium G5 S1 Southern Pocketbook Lampsilis ornata G5 S3 Sandbank Pocketbook Lampsilis satura G2 S2 Fatmucket Lampsilis siliquoidea G5 S2 White Heelsplitter Lasmigona complanata G5 S1 Black Sandshell Ligumia recta G4G5 S1 Louisiana Pearlshell Margaritifera hembeli G1 S1 Threatened Threatened Southern Hickorynut Obovaria jacksoniana G2 S1S2 Hickorynut Obovaria olivaria G4 S1 Alabama Hickorynut Obovaria unicolor G3 S1 Mississippi Pigtoe Pleurobema beadleianum G3 S2 Louisiana Pigtoe Pleurobema riddellii G1G2 S1S2 Pyramid Pigtoe Pleurobema rubrum G2G3 S2 Texas Heelsplitter Potamilus amphichaenus G1G2 SH Fat Pocketbook Potamilus capax G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Inflated Heelsplitter Potamilus inflatus G1G2Q S1 Threatened Threatened Ouachita Kidneyshell Ptychobranchus occidentalis G3G4 S1 Rabbitsfoot Quadrula cylindrica G3G4 S1 Threatened Threatened Monkeyface Quadrula metanevra G4 S1 Southern Creekmussel Strophitus subvexus
    [Show full text]