DOCSLIB.ORG

Canada Institute

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CANADA INSTITUTE Report on Activities OCTOBER 1, 2005 – MARCH 31, 2007 Canada’s profile among Americans remains more limited than it should in spite of the enormous trading and cultural relationship between the two countries. In an effort to highlight the importance of the Canada- U.S. relationship among U.S. policymakers and the infor- med public, the Canada Institute was founded in 2001. The Canada Institute, an integral program of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, promotes a free flow of ideas and policy options for deepening understan- ding, communication, and cooperation between the United States and Canada by engaging policymakers and members of the scholarly, business, and not-for-profit communities in creative dialogue. The Canada Institute does not have a policy or legislative agenda. Rather, reflecting the Wilson Center’s tradition of providing a non-partisan forum to foster and advance dialogue on important issues of the day, the Canada Institute’s programming and publications—both in the United States and in Canada—seek to generate discussion and increase awareness of the bilateral relationship on a broad scope of issues including energy and environmental policy, trade and economic issues, and border security and the shared defense relationship. The Institute’s programs, publications, and partnerships in Canada and the United States consistently encourage open dialogue, bringing to the fore positive as well as critical views on the issue at hand. Outside of Washington, D.C., the Canada Institute strives to encourage a full discussion of bilateral policy by organizing programs throughout Canada that include U.S. perspectives on key bilateral issues. 1 The Woodrow Wilson International issues between our two countries. Center for Scholars was established by David Biette and his staff, as well as Note from the United States Congress in 1968 to the scholars affiliated with the Canada honor the memory of the 28th presi- Institute, have done an excellent job dent. The Center is headquartered in keeping Canada front and center Lee H. Washington, D.C., and is the living, na- in the United States. The Canada tional memorial to President Wilson. Institute continues to find ways to Hamilton The Wilson Center’s mission is reach a broader audience on Canada- to commemorate the ideals and con- U.S. relations through such initia- cerns of Woodrow Wilson by pro- tives as hosting programs outside of viding a link between the world of Washington, and sending U.S. schol- ideas and the world of policy and ars to Canada to give a different per- by fostering research, study, dis- spective to bilateral issues there. cussion, and collaboration among a As always, I am grateful for the broad spectrum of individuals con- invaluable support and guidance the cerned with policy and scholarship Canada Institute’s Advisory Board has in national and international affairs. provided to me and to David in shap- At the Woodrow Wilson Center, we ing the direction of the Institute. I bring together the thinkers and the must also thank C. Warren Goldring, doers—policymakers, scholars, jour- whose leadership and vision have been nalists, and business leaders—in the essential to the Institute’s efforts to ex- hope that a frank and open dialogue pand its programming in Canada. will lead to better understanding, I would also like to express my ap- cooperation, and public policy. preciation for the generous support The Canada Institute, like other of the Canada Institute’s donors, par- programs at the Wilson Center, does ticularly the Canadian Imperial Bank not have a legislative or policy agenda. of Commerce, and the numerous cor- The Canada Institute provides a non- porations and individuals who have partisan forum to discuss current and supported the award dinners, most re- emerging issues in the U.S.-Canada cently held in Calgary. Their contri- relationship, and plays a vital role in butions allow the Canada Institute to highlighting the importance of the continue to provide an open forum to most successful bilateral relationship discuss the leading bilateral issues of between two neighbors in history. the day. Such a forum offers a unique Since its establishment in 2001, opportunity to freely exchange ideas the Canada Institute has become one and perspectives from both sides of of the most active programs at the the border so that we maintain an Center, and has emerged as the prin- open and strong relationship between cipal forum in Washington to discuss our two countries. Lee H. Hamilton President and Director Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars 2 Through ongoing efforts to expand and Global Public Affairs as partners in enhance our programming, the Canada producing these forums, and thank Institute has emerged as the premier our Calgary donors for their ongoing forum in Washington for discussion on support and assistance in creating this bilateral issues between Canada and the highly successful series. United States. We strive to encourage The Canada Institute also takes full dialogue in all of the Canada Institute’s advantage of the Woodrow Wilson programming and publications, and Center’s resources. At times, we partner work to ensure that a variety of stake- with other programs at the Center to holders on both sides of the border—in- host events in an effort to broaden our cluding members of the public, private, own programming and reach a greater and not-for-profit sectors—have an op- number of public officials, scholars, and Message portunity to voice their opinion, ideas, business leaders who may not know that and concerns on bilateral issues in a they are actually involved in Canada- non-partisan forum. U.S. relations. A good example of this from the Nowhere is the Canada Institute’s was our May 2006 conference on cli- effort to bring both a Canadian and mate change, which we organized with Canada American perspective on important bi- the Center’s Environmental Change lateral issues more evident than in our and Security Program. We are also Institute One Issue, Two Voices series. The series using our website more and more, to takes an idea and looks at it from each archive webcasts of programs, post pre- side of the Canada-U.S. border—not sentations, as well as provide links and Director necessarily from opposite points of related publications for those interested view, but from the perspective of the in acquiring a deeper understanding of author’s country, in order to encour- the subjects we address. age additional dialogue on the issue. Our efforts to improve and broaden In most cases, the Canada Institute our programming are achieved with a accompanies the release of the publi- talented and dedicated staff. Stephanie cation with a public conference that McLuhan, our program consultant promotes conversation and enables al- in Toronto, has continued to do an ternative views to be voiced. outstanding job organizing events in The Canada Institute has contin- Canada since joining the Institute in July ued to expand its already extensive of 2005. We also benefit tremendously schedule of conferences, seminars, from the programmatic and develop- discussions, and briefings, particularly ment advice of our Toronto consultant in Canada. Over the past 18 months, Rudyard Griffiths, and the work of the we have held high-profile conferences Wilson Center’s Development team. in Toronto, Calgary, Ottawa, and Of course, we recognize that our Vancouver, often in partnership with work would not be possible without Canadian organizations. Similarly, for the ongoing support of our donors. We our programs held in Washington, are particularly grateful to C. Warren the Institute has been fortunate to Goldring and the Canada Institute collaborate closely with other orga- on North American Issues for their nizations that share our goal of ex- generous contributions to our work ploring current and emerging issues in Canada, as well as the Canadian in Canada-U.S. relations. Our Cross- Embassy for its financial support of Border Forums on Energy Issues provide our conferences in Washington. We an excellent example of the value of are also indebted to the corporations building lasting partnerships. The fo- and individuals who participated in David N. Biette rums have emerged as a regular part our Woodrow Wilson Awards din- Director, of our programming and provide U.S. ner in Calgary. Finally, I would like to Canada Institute and Canadian government officials, thank Gerry McCaughey, who serves as industry representatives, and energy chair of the Canada Institute’s Advisory experts a unique opportunity to dis- Board. His leadership and support have cuss a variety of bilateral energy issues. been instrumental to the extraordinary We are grateful to have the Canadian success the Canada Institute has enjoyed Centre for Energy Information and this past year and a half. 3 The Canada Institute, founded in 2001, seeks to promote debate and analysis of key issues and policy questions of bilateral concern between Canada and the United States; highlight the importance of the U.S.-Canada relationship, both in the United States and in Canada; increase knowledge about Canada among U.S. policymakers; create new channels of communication among scholars, business leaders, public officials, and non-governmental representatives in both countries; generate discussion about future visions for North America; and share relevant pro- gramming and publications with the appropriate partners in Canada to encourage dialogue on those issues with Canadian audiences. 4 The Canada Institute hosted another Governance in Canada and the Events and successful biennial conference on “The United States: A Comparative View.” State of the Canada-U.S. Relationship” Professor Jay Lorsch of the Harvard in partnership with the Association for Business School and Edward Waitzer, Programs: Canadian Studies in the United States. chair of the Canadian law firm The conference featured presenta- Stikeman Elliott, lent their expertise Washington tions from six Canadian and U.S.
Recommended publications

  • October 20, 2017

    Distributed Free Each Friday Since 2009 October 20, 2017 www.pcpatriot.com Locally Owned And Operated ELECTION PREVIEW INSIDE Candidates sharply differ on gun issues RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — The two major party to be able to carry a concealed candidates in Virginia's race for governor sharply handgun without a permit. disagree when it comes to guns. Earlier this year, Democratic Republican Ed Gillespie has an A rating from the Gov. Terry McAuliffe vetoed National Rifle Association. He pledged to "oppose legislation allowing that — any and all attempts to weaken the Second against the wishes of the GOP- Amendment." controlled General assembly. Democrat Ralph Northam said he favors stricter Democrats in the legislature controls on gun ownership. He's backed by former have pushed unsuccessfully for New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's group Gillespie universal background checks, as well as by former Democratic Rep. Gabrielle including mandatory checks at Giffords, who was grievously wounded in a 2011 gun shows. shooting. Governors also can take uni- The positions play against type. Northam grew lateral action on guns, like up hunting on Virginia's Eastern Shore and owns McAuliffe did in banning guns two shotguns. from certain state-owned office Gillespie wrote in his 2006 book that he doesn't buildings by executive order. own a gun and recently declined to answer whether Guns on campuses are also a that was still the case. regular and poignant point of discussion due to the 2007 THE ISSUE: mass shooting at Virginia Tech. Northam Debates about guns take up a significant amount Liberty University President WEEKEND WEATHER of time each legislative session and groups on both Jerry Falwell Jr.
  • Ameroca's New World Order

    Ameroca's New World Order

    Ameroca’s New World Order Copyright 2008 Christian Patriot All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Contents • Preface ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 • Chapter 1 The North American Union and the End of America’s Sovereignty? ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................4 • Chapter 2 The New World Order’s Global Agenda, Ten World Unions of Revelation ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……8 • Chapter 3 Who’s behind the New World Order? A Brief History of the NWO? …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………11 • Chapter 4 Law – Patriot Act, Coming Martial Law, UN LOST Treaty (World Law) …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….17 • Chapter 5 Military –REX 84, FEMA Camps, UN Peacekeeping Force (World Military) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………...25 • Chapter 6 Economics – Amero (World Currency), Historical Transactions, NWO Banks …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….39 • Chapter 7 Politics – CFR & TLC, Bilderberg Group, United Nations (World Government) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..44 • Chapter 8 Mental – The Media (World Propaganda), Tavistock Institute, MK Ultra …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….55 • Chapter 9 False Religion – Bohemian Grove, Skull & Bones, Freemasons, WCC …..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..60
  • DIRECTING the Disorder the CFR Is the Deep State Powerhouse Undoing and Remaking Our World

    DIRECTING the Disorder the CFR Is the Deep State Powerhouse Undoing and Remaking Our World

    DEEP STATE DIRECTING THE Disorder The CFR is the Deep State powerhouse undoing and remaking our world. 2 by William F. Jasper The nationalist vs. globalist conflict is not merely an he whole world has gone insane ideological struggle between shadowy, unidentifiable and the lunatics are in charge of T the asylum. At least it looks that forces; it is a struggle with organized globalists who have way to any rational person surveying the very real, identifiable, powerful organizations and networks escalating revolutions that have engulfed the planet in the year 2020. The revolu- operating incessantly to undermine and subvert our tions to which we refer are the COVID- constitutional Republic and our Christian-style civilization. 19 revolution and the Black Lives Matter revolution, which, combined, are wreak- ing unprecedented havoc and destruction — political, social, economic, moral, and spiritual — worldwide. As we will show, these two seemingly unrelated upheavals are very closely tied together, and are but the latest and most profound manifesta- tions of a global revolutionary transfor- mation that has been under way for many years. Both of these revolutions are being stoked and orchestrated by elitist forces that intend to unmake the United States of America and extinguish liberty as we know it everywhere. In his famous “Lectures on the French Revolution,” delivered at Cambridge University between 1895 and 1899, the distinguished British historian and states- man John Emerich Dalberg, more com- monly known as Lord Acton, noted: “The appalling thing in the French Revolution is not the tumult, but the design. Through all the fire and smoke we perceive the evidence of calculating organization.
  • Provincial Solidarities: a History of the New Brunswick Federation of Labour

    Provincial Solidarities: a History of the New Brunswick Federation of Labour

    provincial solidarities Working Canadians: Books from the cclh Series editors: Alvin Finkel and Greg Kealey The Canadian Committee on Labour History is Canada’s organization of historians and other scholars interested in the study of the lives and struggles of working people throughout Canada’s past. Since 1976, the cclh has published Labour / Le Travail, Canada’s pre-eminent scholarly journal of labour studies. It also publishes books, now in conjunction with AU Press, that focus on the history of Canada’s working people and their organizations. The emphasis in this series is on materials that are accessible to labour audiences as well as university audiences rather than simply on scholarly studies in the labour area. This includes documentary collections, oral histories, autobiographies, biographies, and provincial and local labour movement histories with a popular bent. series titles Champagne and Meatballs: Adventures of a Canadian Communist Bert Whyte, edited and with an introduction by Larry Hannant Working People in Alberta: A History Alvin Finkel, with contributions by Jason Foster, Winston Gereluk, Jennifer Kelly and Dan Cui, James Muir, Joan Schiebelbein, Jim Selby, and Eric Strikwerda Union Power: Solidarity and Struggle in Niagara Carmela Patrias and Larry Savage The Wages of Relief: Cities and the Unemployed in Prairie Canada, 1929–39 Eric Strikwerda Provincial Solidarities: A History of the New Brunswick Federation of Labour / Solidarités provinciales: Histoire de la Fédération des travailleurs et travailleuses du Nouveau-Brunswick David Frank A History of the New Brunswick Federation of Labour david fra nk canadian committee on labour history Copyright © 2013 David Frank Published by AU Press, Athabasca University 1200, 10011 – 109 Street, Edmonton, ab t5j 3s8 isbn 978-1-927356-23-4 (print) 978-1-927356-24-1 (pdf) 978-1-927356-25-8 (epub) A volume in Working Canadians: Books from the cclh issn 1925-1831 (print) 1925-184x (digital) Cover and interior design by Natalie Olsen, Kisscut Design.
  • The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck a Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment O

    The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck a Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment O

    The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 2015 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Kim Fridkin, Chair Mark Ramirez Patrick Kenney ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2015 ABSTRACT Do fact-checks influence individuals' attitudes and evaluations of political candidates and campaign messages? This dissertation examines the influence of fact- checks on citizens' evaluations of political candidates. Using an original content analysis, I determine who conducts fact-checks of candidates for political office, who is being fact- checked, and how fact-checkers rate political candidates' level of truthfulness. Additionally, I employ three experiments to evaluate the impact of fact-checks source and message cues on voters' evaluations of candidates for political office. i DEDICATION To My Husband, Aza ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincerest thanks to the many individuals who helped me with this dissertation and throughout my graduate career. First, I would like to thank all the members of my committee, Professors Kim L. Fridkin, Patrick Kenney, and Mark D. Ramirez. I am especially grateful to my mentor and committee chair, Dr. Kim L. Fridkin. Your help and encouragement were invaluable during every stage of this dissertation and my graduate career. I would also like to thank my other committee members and mentors, Patrick Kenney and Mark D. Ramirez. Your academic and professional advice has significantly improved my abilities as a scholar. I am grateful to husband, Aza, for his tireless support and love throughout this project.
  • 105Th American Assembly on "U.S.-Canada

    105Th American Assembly on "U.S.-Canada

    The 105th American Assembly ENEWING THE U. S. ~ Canada R ELATIONSHIP The American Assembly February 3–6, 2005 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 456 Arden House New York, New York, 10115 Harriman, New York Telephone: 212-870-3500 Fax: 212-870-3555 E-mail: [email protected] www.americanassembly.org Canada Institute Canadian Institute The Woodrow Wilson CANADIAN INSTITUT INSTITUTE OF CANADIEN DES of International Affairs International Center for Scholars INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRES AFFAIRS INTERNATIONALES 205 Richmond Street West One Woodrow Wilson Plaza Suite 302 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. CIIA/ICAI Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5V 1V3 Washington, D.C. 20004-3027 Telephone: 416-977-9000 Telephone: 202-691-4270 Fax: 416-977-7521 Fax: 202-691-4001 www.ciia.org www.wilsoncenter.org/canada/ PREFACE On February 3, 2005, seventy women and men from the United States and Canada including government officials, representatives from business, labor, law, nonprofit organizations, academia, and the media gathered at Arden House in Harriman, New York for the 105th American Assembly entitled “U.S.-Canada Relations.” Assemblies had been sponsored on this topic in 1964 and 1984, and this third Assembly on bilateral relations was co-sponsored by the Canada Institute of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, the Canadian Institute for International Affairs (CIIA), and The American Assembly of Columbia University. The participants, representing a range of views, backgrounds, and interests, met for three days in small groups for intensive, structured discussions to examine the concerns and challenges of the binational relationship. This Assembly was co-chaired by Allan Gotlieb, former Canadian ambassador to the United States, former under secretary of state for External Affairs, and senior advisor at Stikeman Elliot LLP in Toronto and James Blanchard, former U.S.
  • Discover Canada the Rights and Responsibilities of Citizenship 2 Your Canadian Citizenship Study Guide

    Discover Canada the Rights and Responsibilities of Citizenship 2 Your Canadian Citizenship Study Guide

    STUDY GUIDE Discover Canada The Rights and Responsibilities of Citizenship 2 Your Canadian Citizenship Study Guide Message to Our Readers The Oath of Citizenship Le serment de citoyenneté Welcome! It took courage to move to a new country. Your decision to apply for citizenship is Je jure (ou j’affirme solennellement) another big step. You are becoming part of a great tradition that was built by generations of pioneers I swear (or affirm) Que je serai fidèle before you. Once you have met all the legal requirements, we hope to welcome you as a new citizen with That I will be faithful Et porterai sincère allégeance all the rights and responsibilities of citizenship. And bear true allegiance à Sa Majesté la Reine Elizabeth Deux To Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second Reine du Canada Queen of Canada À ses héritiers et successeurs Her Heirs and Successors Que j’observerai fidèlement les lois du Canada And that I will faithfully observe Et que je remplirai loyalement mes obligations The laws of Canada de citoyen canadien. And fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen. Understanding the Oath Canada has welcomed generations of newcomers Immigrants between the ages of 18 and 54 must to our shores to help us build a free, law-abiding have adequate knowledge of English or French In Canada, we profess our loyalty to a person who represents all Canadians and not to a document such and prosperous society. For 400 years, settlers in order to become Canadian citizens. You must as a constitution, a banner such as a flag, or a geopolitical entity such as a country.
  • If We Could All Be Peter Lougheed” Provincial Premiers and Their Legacies, 1967-2007 1

    If We Could All Be Peter Lougheed” Provincial Premiers and Their Legacies, 1967-2007 1

    “If we could all be Peter Lougheed” Provincial premiers and their legacies, 1967-2007 1 J.P. Lewis Carleton University [email protected] Paper for Presentation at The Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association Concordia University, Montreal June 2010 Introduction For a variety of reasons, the careers of Canadian provincial premiers have escaped explicit academic attention. Premiers are found frequently in Canadian political science literature, but more for direct roles and actions – in questions of the constitution, federalism, public policy and electoral and legislative studies – instead of longitudinal study and analysis. This fits a pattern of neglect in the field; some academics have lamented the lack of direct attention to provincial politics and history (Brownsey and Howlett 2001). The aggregate imprints of premiers are relatively ignored outside of regional and provincial treatments. No pan- Canadian assessment of premiers exists, and probably for good reason. The theoretical and methodological concerns with asking general research questions about premiers are plenty; leadership theory and historical approaches provide some foundations but any approach is going to confront conceptual challenges. This is where this study is found – in a void of precedents but a plethora of qualitative data. 2 Regardless of methodological challenges, some historians, political scientists and members of the media have not shied away from ranking and assessing national leaders. Some of the more popular treatments (from the popular culture version to the more academic approach) include Ferguson’s Bastards and Boneheads , Granatstein and Hillmer’s Prime Ministers: Ranking Canada’s Leaders , and Bliss’s Right Honourable Men . Bliss (xiv), the esteemed historian, is skeptical of such endeavours, “While this is Canadian history from Parliament Hill, I am not a Hegelian and I do not believe that political leaders, least of all prime ministers of Canada, are personifications of the world spirit.
  • Canadian Media Directors' Council

    Canadian Media Directors' Council

    Display until February 28, 2011 PUBLICATIONS MAIL aGREEMENT 40070230 pOstaGe paiD in tOrOntO MarketinG MaGazine, One MOunt pleasant RoaD, tOrOntO, CanaDa M4y 2y5 September 2010 27, $19.95 Pre P ared by: MEDIA Canadian Media Directors’ Council Directors’ Media Canadian DIGEST 10 Published by: 11 4 Y CELEBRATING E A 0 RS www.marketingmag.ca Letter from the President CMDC MEMBER AGENCIES Agency 59 Canadian Media Directors’ Council AndersonDDB Cossette Welcome readers, Doner DraftFCB The Canadian Media Directors’ Council is celebrating the 40th anniversary of the Genesis Vizeum Media Digest with the publication of this 2010/11 issue you are accessing. Forty years is Geomedia quite an achievement of consistently providing the comprehensive source of key trends GJP and details on the full media landscape in the Canadian marketplace. Fascinating to Initiative consider how the media industry has evolved over those forty years and how the content M2 Universal of the Digest has evolved along with the industry. MPG As our industry has transformed and instant digital access has become such an import- MediaCom ant component of any reference source, we are pleased to make the Digest and its valu- Mediaedge.cia able and unique reference information freely available to the industry online at www. Media Experts cmdc.ca and www.marketingmag.ca, in addition to the hard copies distributed through Mindshare Marketing Magazine and our member agencies. OMD The CMDC member agencies play a crucial role in updating and reinventing the PHD Digest content on a yearly basis, and we thank each agency for their contribution. The Pegi Gross and Associates 2010/11 edition was chaired by Fred Forster, president & CEO of PHD Canada and RoundTable Advertising produced by Margaret Rye, the CMDC Digest administrator.
  • Government of Alberta News Release for Immediate Release October 21

    Government of Alberta News Release for Immediate Release October 21

    Government of Alberta News Release For Immediate Release October 21, 1999 "The appointment of the Information and Communications Technology committees marks the beginning of an exciting new initiative in which the government and industry will work closely together to strengthen our technological infrastructure, and build an economic sector that will help this province succeed in the new global economy." Dr. Lorne Taylor Minister, Innovation and Science Technology leaders to work with government to strengthen information and communications technology sector EDMONTON -- Individuals from some of Alberta's leading information and communications technology organizations are partnering with the government to help the province's technology sector grow to a $30 billion a year industry by 2010. Minister of Innovation and Science Lorne Taylor announced October 21 the appointment of a number of technology and business leaders to three committees that will oversee and advise the government on the implementation of strategies outlined in a provincial Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Strategy. Implementation of the strategy, presented to the government by the Alberta Science and Research Authority (ASRA) in October 1998, is one of the key responsibilities assigned to the department by Premier Ralph Klein when he created the department of Innovation and Science in May 1999. The ICT strategy, which was developed in consultation with business, industry, universities and government departments, is aimed at growing Alberta's ICT sector to a $30 billion a year industry by 2010. The ICT industries and businesses in the province currently generate about $8 billion a year. Another goal of the strategy is to increase the number of jobs in the sector by 35,000 by the province's centennial in 2005.
  • SENATE MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 3

    SENATE MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 3

    SENATE MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 3, 2009 ___________________________________________________________________________ 4:30 p.m. Light dinner will be served in The Commons, Jorgenson Hall, Room POD-250. 5:00 p.m. Meeting starts (POD-250). ___________________________________________________________________________ . Transfer from Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology - MTCU Presentation to Provincial Credit Transfer Steering Committee, August, 2009 (See Supplementary Report #1) 1. Call to Order/Establishment of Quorum 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Announcements Pages 1-3 4. Minutes of Previous Meeting Motion: That Senate approve the minutes of the October 6, 2009 meeting 5. Matters Arising from the Minutes Page 4 5.1 Letter to faculty – Provincial Day of Action for a Poverty-free Ontario 6. Correspondence 7. Reports: 7.1 Report of the President Pages 5-8 7.1.1 President’s update Pages 9-15 7.1.2 Achievement Report 7.2 Report of the Secretary 7.3 Report from Vice Provost, University Planning - Highlights of Surveys: (See Supplementary Report #2) - National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2008 - Comprehensive Student Survey 2008 - Canadian Graduate and Professional Student Survey (CGPSS) 2007 Pages 16-18 7.4 Update from the Commission on the Academic Structure of Ryerson University …/ii 7.5 Committee Reports Pages 19-20 7.5.1 Report #F2009-1of the Awards and Ceremonials Committee Page 21 7.5.2 Report of the Academic Governance and Policy Committee – List of members of Nominating Committee Pages 22-30 7.5.3 Report #F2009-1 of the Academic Standards Committee: Motion #1: That Senate approve the proposed revisions to admission requirements for the Direct Entry program in Early Childhood Education.
  • Receiver's Reply to Zi Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition to Receiver's Motion for Contempt and for Sanction S

    Receiver's Reply to Zi Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition to Receiver's Motion for Contempt and for Sanction S

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION NIGHT BOX FILE D SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION , K' - 6 2006 Plaintiff, ;. t 4 MADDAX ~' . U~ACISDpldlMIA V. MICHAEL LAUER, LANCER MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, and LANCER MANAGEMENT GROUP II, LLC, Case No. 03-80612 CIV-MARRA Defendants, Jointly Administere d and LANCER OFFSHORE, INC ., LANCER PARTNERS, LP, OMNIFUND, LTD., LSPV, INC ., and LSPV, LLC , Relief Defendants . / In re : Chapter 11 Cas e LANCER PARTNERS L .P., Case No. : 04-8021 1 -CIV-MARRA Debtor. RECEIVER'S REPLY TO ZI CORPORATION'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO RECEIVER'S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND FOR SANCTION S Marty Steinberg, Esq ., the court-appointed receiver (the "Receiver") for the Lancer Entities' submits this Reply to Zi Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition to Receiver's Motion for Contempt and for Sanctions (the "Response Brief') . 'Lancer Management Group LLC ("Lancer Management"), Lancer Management Group II LLC ("Lancer Management II"), Lancer Offshore Inc . ("Offshore"), Omnifund Ltd . ("Omnifund"), LSPV Inc . ("Offshore LSPV"), LSPV LLC ("Partners LSPV"), Alpha Omega Group, Inc . ("AOG"), G .H. Associates LLC, and CLR Associates, LLC (the "Receivership Entities" ), and Lancer Pa rtners, L.P. ("Partners") . CASE NO. 03-80612 -CIV-MARRA /VITUNAC Case No.: 04-80211 -ClV-MARRA - Jointly Administere d 1. INTRODUCTION In a feeble attempt to hopefully avoid the inherent problems created for Zi Corp . ("Zi") by the Voting Rights Agreement ("VRA") it executed on July 15, 2004, coupled with this Court's Receivership Order and Case Management Order ("CMO"), Zi asserts futile and/or inapplicable legal doctrines and principles in its Response Brief as purported justification for the Court's denial of the Receiver's Motion for Contempt and for Sanctions (the "Contempt Motion").