DOCSLIB.ORG

Safe Harbor Agreement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Safe Harbor Agreement SAFE HARBOR AGREEMENT FOR THE RE-INTRODUCTION OF THE AMARGOSA VOLE (Microtus californicus scirpensis), IN SHOSHONE, CALIFORNIA Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office and Susan Sorrells July 7, 2020 2 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 5 Purpose .................................................................................................................................... 5 Enrolled Lands and Core Area ................................................................................................ 5 Regulatory Framework ........................................................................................................... 5 SHA Standard and Background .............................................................................................. 6 Assurances Provided ............................................................................................................... 6 Relationship to Other Agreements .......................................................................................... 6 2.0 STATUS AND BACKGROUND OF AMARGOSA VOLE .......................................... 7 2.1 Status and Distribution ................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Life History and Habitat Requirements ........................................................................ 8 2.3 Threats ........................................................................................................................ 10 2.4 Ad Hoc Amargosa Vole Recovery Team Conservation and Recovery Efforts to Date 15 2.5 Survival and Recovery Needs for the Species ............................................................ 16 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF ENROLLED PROPERTY and Core Area .................................... 16 3.1 Covered Lands ............................................................................................................ 16 3.2 Conditions on Covered Lands .................................................................................... 20 3.3 Role of the Covered Lands in the Conservation of the Amargosa vole ..................... 20 3.4 Threats ........................................................................................................................ 21 3.5 Baseline Determination .............................................................................................. 21 4.0 COVERED ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................. 22 4.1 Beneficial Management Activities ............................................................................. 22 4.2 Other Management Activities ..................................................................................... 24 4.3 Avoidance and Minimization Measures ..................................................................... 25 5.0 INCIDENTAL TAKE OF COVERED SPECIES ......................................................... 25 6.0 NET CONSERVATION BENEFIT............................................................................... 28 7.0 RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES ..................................................................... 28 8.0 AGREEMENT AND PERMIT DURATION ................................................................ 30 9.0 ASSURANCES TO LANDOWNER in case of changed or unforeseen circumstances 31 10.0 MODIFICATIONS ..................................................................................................... 32 11.0 OTHER MEASURES................................................................................................. 32 SIGNATURES .......................................................................................................................... 35 3 LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................................. 36 APPENDIX 1: Photographs of Core Area for Baseline Determination ....................................... 41 Marsh 31 ................................................................................................................................... 41 Marsh 31A ................................................................................................................................ 49 Marsh 31B ................................................................................................................................. 56 APPENDIX 2: Translocation Protocol for Amargosa voles......................................................... 61 4 SAFE HARBOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN SUSAN SORRELLS AND THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE FOR AMARGOSA VOLE TRANSLOCATION AND RE-INTRODUCTION IN SHOSHONE, CALIFORNIA This Safe Harbor Agreement (Agreement), effective and binding on the date of Permit issuance, is between Susan Sorrells (Landowner) and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), hereinafter referred to as the “Parties.” Service: The Service designates the following as the Agreement Contact: Assistant Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 777 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 208 Palm Springs, California 92262 760-322-2070 Landowner: P.O. Box 72 Shoshone, California 92384 702-596-2924 Cooperators: California Department of Fish and Wildlife 1701 Nimbus Road Suite D Rancho Cordova, California 95670 916-358-2790 University of California at Davis 1320 Tupper Hall Davis, California 95616 530-754-9740 Bureau of Land Management Barstow Field Office 2601 Barstow Road Barstow, California 92311 760-252-6033 Shoshone Village Old State Highway 127 Shoshone, California 92384 760-852-4335 Summary This Agreement will outline conservation actions that Landowner will implement and monitor on the enrolled property, described below, for the conservation and recovery of the federally endangered Amargosa vole (Microtus californicus scirpensis).The goal of the agreement is to 5 implement conservation actions for the Amargosa vole to provide a net conservation benefit to recovery. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Purpose The purpose of this Agreement is to join with the Landowner to implement the conservation measures for the Amargosa vole through the translocation and re-introduction of the subspecies to suitable habitat on lands owned and managed by the Landowner, and to maintain habitat for the subspecies on Landowner lands. The specific goals of this Agreement are to translocate wild (non-captive) Amargosa voles from a source population, informed by genetic analyses, to re- introduce and establish a self-sustaining population of Amargosa voles within its historical range on Landowner lands. Enrolled Lands and Core Area The properties subject to this Agreement (Enrolled Property) consist of two parcels owned by the Landowner: 1) APN 046-120-26 (220 acres) and 2) APN 046-120-25 (247 acres), totaling 467 acres. While this agreement covers the entire 467 acres, Beneficial Management Activities (including translocation and re-introduction) will only occur in approximately 0.5 acres of marsh habitat within the Enrolled Property where restoration activities have previously been implemented to return the habitat to its natural condition. This area (Core Area) consists of 3 connected marsh sites (Marshes 31, 31A, and 31B) on the west side of Highway 127 near the north end of Shoshone, California. A more detailed description and maps of the Enrolled Property are provided in section 3.1 of this Agreement. Regulatory Framework Sections 2, 7, and 10 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended, allow the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to enter into this SHA. Section 2 of the Act states that encouraging interested parties, through Federal financial assistance and a system of incentives, to develop and maintain conservation programs is a key to safeguarding the Nation’s heritage in fish, wildlife, and plants. Section 7 of the Act requires the Service to review programs that we administer and to utilize such programs in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. By entering into this SHA, we are utilizing our Recovery Program to further the conservation of the Nation’s fish and wildlife. Lastly, section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Act authorizes the issuance of permits to “enhance the survival” of a listed species. This Agreement follows the Service’s Safe Harbor Agreement policy (64 Federal Register [FR] 32717) and regulations (50 CFR 17.22(c) and 50 CFR 17.32(c)) and implements the intent of the Parties to follow the procedural and substantive requirements of section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). 6 For the purposes of this Agreement, we define “translocation” according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) position statement (IUCN 1987) as “the movement of living organisms from one area with free release in another.” SHA Standard and Background Before entering into a SHA, the Service must determine that the conservation measures to be implemented will contribute to recovering the species by providing a net conservation benefit. Safe Harbor Agreements encourage voluntary conservation efforts by non-Federal landowners and provide them assurances that future property-use restrictions will not be imposed if those efforts attract covered species to their Property or result in increased numbers or distributions of covered species already present. In return for voluntary conservation commitments, the Safe Harbor
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Levels of Gene Flow in the California Vole (Microtus Californicus) Are Consistent Across Spatial Scales," Western North American Naturalist: Vol
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 70 Number 3 Article 3 10-11-2010 High levels of gene flow in the California olev (Microtus californicus) are consistent across spatial scales Rachel I. Adams Stanford University, Stanford, California, [email protected] Elizabeth A. Hadly Stanford University, Stanford, California, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Adams, Rachel I. and Hadly, Elizabeth A. (2010) "High levels of gene flow in the California vole (Microtus californicus) are consistent across spatial scales," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 70 : No. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol70/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 70(3), © 2010, pp. 296–311 HIGH LEVELS OF GENE FLOW IN THE CALIFORNIA VOLE (MICROTUS CALIFORNICUS) ARE CONSISTENT ACROSS SPATIAL SCALES Rachel I. Adams1,2 and Elizabeth A. Hadly1 ABSTRACT.—Gene flow links the genetic and demographic structures of species. Despite the fact that similar genetic and demographic patterns shape both local population structure and regional phylogeography, the 2 levels of population connectivity are rarely studied simultaneously. Here, we studied gene flow in the California vole (Microtus californicus), a small-bodied rodent with limited vagility but high local abundance. Within a 4.86-km2 preserve in central California, genetic diversity in 6 microsatellites was high, and Bayesian methods indicated a single genetic cluster.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of the California Desert
    MAMMALS OF THE CALIFORNIA DESERT William F. Laudenslayer, Jr. Karen Boyer Buckingham Theodore A. Rado INTRODUCTION I ,+! The desert lands of southern California (Figure 1) support a rich variety of wildlife, of which mammals comprise an important element. Of the 19 living orders of mammals known in the world i- *- loday, nine are represented in the California desert15. Ninety-seven mammal species are known to t ':i he in this area. The southwestern United States has a larger number of mammal subspecies than my other continental area of comparable size (Hall 1981). This high degree of subspeciation, which f I;, ; leads to the development of new species, seems to be due to the great variation in topography, , , elevation, temperature, soils, and isolation caused by natural barriers. The order Rodentia may be k., 2:' , considered the most successful of the mammalian taxa in the desert; it is represented by 48 species Lc - occupying a wide variety of habitats. Bats comprise the second largest contingent of species. Of the 97 mammal species, 48 are found throughout the desert; the remaining 49 occur peripherally, with many restricted to the bordering mountain ranges or the Colorado River Valley. Four of the 97 I ?$ are non-native, having been introduced into the California desert. These are the Virginia opossum, ' >% Rocky Mountain mule deer, horse, and burro. Table 1 lists the desert mammals and their range 1 ;>?-axurrence as well as their current status of endangerment as determined by the U.S. fish and $' Wildlife Service (USWS 1989, 1990) and the California Department of Fish and Game (Calif.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Niche Evolution and Its Relation To
    514 G. Shenbrot Сборник трудов Зоологического музея МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова Archives of Zoological Museum of Lomonosov Moscow State University Том / Vol. 54 Cтр. / Pр. 514–540 ECOLOGICAL NICHE EVOLUTION AND ITS RELATION TO PHYLOGENY AND GEOGRAPHY: A CASE STUDY OF ARVICOLINE VOLES (RODENTIA: ARVICOLINI) Georgy Shenbrot Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; [email protected] Relations between ecological niches, genetic distances and geographic ranges were analyzed by pair-wise comparisons of 43 species and 38 intra- specifi c phylogenetic lineages of arvicoline voles (genera Alexandromys, Chi onomys, Lasiopodomys, Microtus). The level of niche divergence was found to be positively correlated with the level of genetic divergence and negatively correlated with the level of differences in position of geographic ranges of species and intraspecifi c forms. Frequency of different types of niche evolution (divergence, convergence, equivalence) was found to depend on genetic and geographic relations of compared forms. Among the latter with allopatric distribution, divergence was less frequent and convergence more frequent between intra-specifi c genetic lineages than between either clo sely-related or distant species. Among the forms with parapatric dis- tri bution, frequency of divergence gradually increased and frequencies of both convergence and equivalence gradually decreased from intra-specifi c genetic lineages via closely related to distant species. Among species with allopatric distribution, frequencies of niche divergence, con vergence and equivalence in closely related and distant species were si milar. The results obtained allowed suggesting that the main direction of the niche evolution was their divergence that gradually increased with ti me since population split.
    [Show full text]
  • Young, L.J., & Hammock E.A.D. (2007)
    Update TRENDS in Genetics Vol.23 No.5 Research Focus On switches and knobs, microsatellites and monogamy Larry J. Young1 and Elizabeth A.D. Hammock2 1 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, 954 Gatewood Road, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA 2 Vanderbilt Kennedy Center and Department of Pharmacology, 465 21st Avenue South, MRBIII, Room 8114, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA Comparative studies in voles have suggested that a formation. In male prairie voles, infusion of vasopressin polymorphic microsatellite upstream of the Avpr1a locus facilitates the formation of partner preferences in the contributes to the evolution of monogamy. A recent study absence of mating [7]. The distribution of V1aR in the challenged this hypothesis by reporting that there is no brain differs markedly between the socially monogamous relationship between microsatellite structure and mon- and socially nonmonogamous vole species [8]. Site-specific ogamy in 21 vole species. Although the study demon- pharmacological manipulations and viral-vector-mediated strates that the microsatellite is not a universal genetic gene-transfer experiments in prairie, montane and mea- switch that determines mating strategy, the findings do dow voles suggest that the species differences in Avpr1a not preclude a substantial role for Avpr1a in regulating expression in the brain underlie the species differences in social behaviors associated with monogamy. social bonding among these three closely related species of vole [3,6,9,10]. Single genes and social behavior Microsatellites and monogamy The idea that a single gene can markedly influence Analysis of the Avpr1a loci in the four vole species complex social behaviors has recently received consider- mentioned so far (prairie, montane, meadow and pine voles) able attention [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Mather Field Vernal Pools California Vole
    Mather Field Vernal Pools common name California Vole scientific name Microtus californicus phylum Chordata class Mammalia order Rodentia family Muridae habitat common in grasslands, wetlands Jack Kelly Clark, © University of California Regents and wet meadows size up to 14 cm long excluding tail description The California Vole is covered with grayish-brown fur. Its ears and legs are short and it has pale feet. It has a cylindrical shape (like a toilet paper roll) with a tail that is 1/3 the length of the body. fun facts California Voles make paths through the grasslands leading to the mouths of their underground burrows. These surface "runways" are worn into the grass by daily travel. When chased by a predator, a vole can make a fast dash for the safety of its underground burrow using these cleared runways. If you walk quickly across the grassland you will often surprise a California Vole and see it scurry to its burrow. life cycle California Voles reach maturity in one month. Female voles have litters of four to eight young. In areas with abundant food and mild weather, each female can have up to five litters in a year. ecology The California Vole can dig its own underground burrow system but it often begins by using Pocket Gopher burrows. The tunnels are usually 1 to 5 meters long and up to one half meter below ground, with a nesting den somewhere inside. The ends of the burrows are left open. Many insects, spiders, centipedes, and other animals live in their burrows. Thus, the California Vole creates habitat for other species and the Pocket Gopher improves habitat for the vole.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat, Home Range, Diet and Demography of the Water Vole (Arvicola Amphibious): Patch-Use in a Complex Wetland Landscape
    _________________________________________________________________________Swansea University E-Theses Habitat, home range, diet and demography of the water vole (Arvicola amphibious): Patch-use in a complex wetland landscape. Neyland, Penelope Jane How to cite: _________________________________________________________________________ Neyland, Penelope Jane (2011) Habitat, home range, diet and demography of the water vole (Arvicola amphibious): Patch-use in a complex wetland landscape.. thesis, Swansea University. http://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa42744 Use policy: _________________________________________________________________________ This item is brought to you by Swansea University. Any person downloading material is agreeing to abide by the terms of the repository licence: copies of full text items may be used or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission for personal research or study, educational or non-commercial purposes only. The copyright for any work remains with the original author unless otherwise specified. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder. Permission for multiple reproductions should be obtained from the original author. Authors are personally responsible for adhering to copyright and publisher restrictions when uploading content to the repository. Please link to the metadata record in the Swansea University repository, Cronfa (link given in the citation reference above.) http://www.swansea.ac.uk/library/researchsupport/ris-support/ Habitat, home range, diet and demography of the water vole(Arvicola amphibius): Patch-use in a complex wetland landscape A Thesis presented by Penelope Jane Neyland for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Conservation Ecology Research Team (CERTS) Department of Biosciences College of Science Swansea University ProQuest Number: 10807513 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Approximately 220 Species of Wild Mammals Occur in California And
    Mammals pproximately 220 species of wild mammals occur in California and the surrounding waters (including introduced species, but not domestic species Asuch as house cats). Amazingly, the state of California has about half of the total number of species that occur on the North American continent (about 440). In part, this diversity reflects the sheer number of different habitats available throughout the state, including alpine, desert, coniferous forest, grassland, oak woodland, and chaparral habitat types, among others (Bakker 1984, Schoenherr 1992, Alden et al. 1998). About 17 mammal species are endemic to California; most of these are kangaroo rats, chipmunks, and squirrels. Nearly 25% of California’s mammal species are either known or suspected to occur at Quail Ridge (Appendix 9). Species found at Quail Ridge are typical of both the Northwestern California and Great Central Valley mammalian faunas. Two California endemics, the Sonoma chipmunk (see Species Accounts for scientific names) and the San Joaquin pocket mouse, are known to occur at Quail Ridge. None of the mammals at Quail Ridge are listed as threatened or endangered by either the state or federal governments, although Townsend’s big-eared bat, which is suspected to occur at Quail Ridge, is a state-listed species of special concern. Many mammal species are nocturnal, fossorial, fly, or are otherwise difficult to observe. However, it is still possible to detect the presence of mammals at Quail Ridge, both visually and by observation of their tracks, scat, and other sign. The mammals most often seen during the day are mule deer and western gray squirrels.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Species Included in ACE-II Native and Harvest Species Richness Counts (Appendix C)
    Appendix C. Species included in native and harvest species richness counts. Animal Species Included in the Range Analysis....... ............................ ................................. C-01 Animal Species with Range Models Not Included in the Analysis......................... ................. C-20 Animal Species without Range Models, therefore not Included in the Analysis......... ............ C-20 Fish Species Included in the Range Analysis.................................................................... ....... C-30 Fish with Ranges not Included in the Analysis because neither Native nor Harvest................ C-33 Native Plants Species Included in the Range Analysis............................................................. C-34 CWHR Species and ACEII hexagon analysis of ranges. Of the 1045 species in the current CWHR species list used in ACE-II, 694 had range models digitized for use. Of those, 688 are included in this hexagon analysis of the state of Cailfornia, with 660 of those classified as native to California. There were no additional species picked up offshore due to the use of hexagon centroid points. Animal species INCLUDED in this analysis. CODE COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME A001 CALIFORNIA TIGER SALAMANDER Ambystoma californiense NATIVE A002 NORTHWESTERN SALAMANDER Ambystoma gracile NATIVE A003 LONG-TOED SALAMANDER Ambystoma macrodactylum NATIVE A047 EASTERN TIGER SALAMANDER Ambystoma tigrinum INTROD A021 CLOUDED SALAMANDER Aneides ferreus NATIVE A020 SPECKLED BLACK SALAMANDER Aneides flavipunctatus NATIVE A022
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Model Prototype for California Vole
    Species Notes for California Vole (Microtus californicus): California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR) System Level II Model Prototype William F. Laudenslayer, Jr. (author)1and Monica D. Parisi (editor)2 California Department of Fish and Game California Interagency Wildlife Task Group October, 2007 1 United States Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station (ret.) 2 California Department of Fish and Game, Biogeographic Data Branch PREFACE This document is part of the California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR) System, operated and maintained by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) in cooperation with the California Interagency Wildlife Task Group (CIWTG). The information will be useful for environmental assessments and wildlife habitat management. For more information on the CWHR System and all of its components, please see http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cwhr/. Notes such as these were prepared for 32 species by the US Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station as part of a 2000/2001 contract with CDFG. Each is part of a prototypical “Level II” model for a species. As compared with the “Level I” or matrix models initially available in the CWHR System, “Level II” models incorporate spatial issues such as size of a habitat patch and distance between suitable habitat patches. The notes are divided into three major sections. First, “Distribution, Seasonality and Habitats” represents information in the existing Geographic Information System (GIS) range data and in the Level I matrix model for a species. There is a vector-based GIS layer of geographic range and seasonality for each species in CWHR as well as a matrix containing all suitability ratings – High (H), Medium (M), Low (L) or Unsuitable (-) – by habitat (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • WHITE SPOTTING in the CALIFORNIA VOLE Second
    Heredity (1976), 37 (1), 113-128 WHITESPOTTING IN THE CALIFORNIA VOLE AYESHA E. GILL Museum of Vertebrate Zoology ond Department of Genetics, University of California, Berkeley 94720, and Department of Biology, University of California, Los Angeles 90024* Received24.i.76. SUMMARY Previously unreported white spotting was found in two subspecies of the California vole, Microtus caljfornicus. The pattern of spots on the ventral coat of the animals differs between the subspecies, and there is variation in the expressivity of the white spots. Expression of white spotting is greatly reduced by the epistatic action of another coat colour gene, the recessive buffy (bf). The incidence of white spotting, its variation in expression, and its inheritance were investigated in this study. The reproductive performance of white spotted voles was also analysed, and effects on fertility and litter size were found asso- ciated with the trait. 1. INTRODUCTION ONLY a few cases of polymorphism have been reported for the California vole, Microtus ca1fornicus. One that has been well documented is the agouti-buffy coat-colour polymorphism discovered in the population of California voles on Brooks Island in San Francisco Bay (Lidicker, 1963; Gill, 1972). Now, a second polymorphism, previously unreported for this species, has been detected in the same population. I observed white spotting in some of the Brooks Island voles and found the trait to be heritable. Individuals from two mainland populations of the same subspecies (M. c. ca4fornicus) in the San Francisco Bay area also carry white spotting genes, and a variation of the trait is found in a mainland population of another subspecies, M.
    [Show full text]
  • (Arborimus Longicaudus), Sonoma Tree Vole (A. Pomo), and White-Footed Vole (A
    United States Department of Agriculture Annotated Bibliography of the Red Tree Vole (Arborimus longicaudus), Sonoma Tree Vole (A. pomo), and White-Footed Vole (A. albipes) Forest Pacific Northwest General Technical Report August Service Research Station PNW-GTR-909 2016 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all pro- grams). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimi- nation Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/com- plaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Microevolution of Puumala Hantavirus in Its Host, the Bank Vole (Myodes Glareolus)
    Microevolution of Puumala hantavirus in its host, the bank vole (Myodes glareolus) Maria Razzauti Sanfeliu Research Programs Unit Infection Biology Research Program Department of Virology, Haartman Institute Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki and the Finnish Forest Research Institute Academic dissertation Helsinki 2012 To be presented for public examination, with the permission of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, in Lecture Hall 2, Haartman Institute on February the 24th at noon Supervisors Professor, docent Alexander Plyusnin Department of Virology, Haartman Institute P.O.Box 21, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland e-mail: [email protected] Professor Heikki Henttonen Finnish Forest Research Institute (Metla) P.O.Box 18, FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland e-mail: [email protected] Reviewers Docent Petri Susi Biosciences and Business Turku University of Applied Sciences, Lemminkäisenkatu 30, FI-20520 Turku, Finland e-mail: [email protected] Professor Dennis Bamford Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences Division of General Microbiology P.O.Box 56, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland e-mail: [email protected] Opponent Professor Herwig Leirs Dept. Biology, Evolutionary Ecology group Groenenborgercampus, room G.V323a Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020 University of Antwerpen, Belgium e-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-952-10-7687-9 (paperback) ISBN 978-952-10-7688-6 (PDF) Helsinki University Print. http://ethesis.helsinki.fi © Maria Razzauti Sanfeliu, 2012 2 Contents
    [Show full text]