Annual Monitoring Report 2006
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Lichfield District Within The West Midlands Region Figure 1: Lichfield District within the West Midlands Region Contents Page Map – Lichfield District within the West Midlands region 2 Contents 3 Figures and Tables 4 Executive Summary 6 Core Output Indicators – Summary 9 Introduction 10 Structure of the AMR 10 Implementation of the LDS 11 Spatial Portrait of Lichfield District - Description and map 13 District Infrastructure - Description and map 14 Lichfield District Key Statistics- People and Society 15 Education 16 Economy and Employment 16 Housing 18 Crime 19 Indicators Business Development 21 Housing 25 Transport 31 Local Services 35 Flood Protection and Water Quality 39 Biodiversity 41 Renewable Energy 46 Tourism 46 Historic Environment 47 Glossary 48 2 Figures Page Figure 1 – Lichfield District within the West Midlands Region 2 Figure 2 – Spatial Portrait of Lichfield District 13 Figure 3 – District Infrastructure 14 Figure 4 – Employment by Sector 16 Figure 5 – Average House Prices 18 Figure 6 – Crimes per 1,000 Population 19 Figure 7 - Employment Land Status 23 Figure 8 – Housing Trajectory, Actual and Projected Completions 26 Figure 9 – Housing Trajectory, Cumulative Allocations and Completions 27 Tables Table 1 – Summary of Core Output Indicators 9 Table 2 – Targets for the Implementation of the LDS 11-12 Key Statistics Table 3 – People and Society 15 Table 4 – Education 16 Table 5 – Economy: Average Income 17 Table 6 – Housing: Average House Prices 18 Table 7 – Crime: Crimes per 1000 20 Indicators Table 8 – Developed Land 21 Table 9 – Loss of Land 21 Table 10 – Employment Land Supply 22 Table 11 – Employment Land Status 22 Table 12 – Employment Location 23 3 Tables Continued… Table 13 – Housing Core Indicators 25 Table 14 – Housing Need 28 Table 15 – Affordable Housing 29 Table 16 – Transport Core Indicators 31 Table 17-19 – Accessibility of New Development 31-32 Table 20-21 – Sustainable Transport 32 Table 22 – Bus Service Accessibility 33 Table 23 – Other Transport 33 Table 24 – Development of services 35 Table 25 – Green Flag Award 35 Table 26 – Retail and Leisure 36 Table 27 – Rural Services 36 Table 28 – Open Space 37 Table 29 – Quality of Open Space 37 Table 30 – Urban Open Space 37 Table 31 – Flood Protection 39 Table 32 – Water Quality 39 Table 33 – Biodiversity Core Indicators 41 Table 34 – Areas of Designation 41 Table 35 – Local Biodiversity 42 Table 36 – Quality of SSSI’s 42 Table 37 – Landscape 44 Table 38 – Tree Preservation 44 Table 39 – Works on Trees 46 Table 40 – Renewable Energy 47 Table 41 - Historical Environment 4 Executive Summary The purpose of Lichfield District Council’s Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) is to: • Monitor the effectiveness of its policies in relation to national and local targets and; • Monitor the Local Authority’s progress in putting it’s Local Development Framework (LDF) spatial policies in place The AMR also monitors related core indicators and local indicators for which data is available. A number of key issues have been highlighted across the range of Indicators: The AMR describes the progress that the Council has made in preparing a Local Development Framework. It does this by making reference to the approved Local Development Scheme (LDS). Monitoring shows that the authority achieved all the key milestones for the 2005/2006 financial year. However, Lichfield District Council will now have to revise the LDS to take account of the Inspector’s decision on the examined Core Strategy, which led to the withdrawal of all submitted Development Plan Documents. The Council and needs to carry out further work on several issues before a revised Core Strategy can be re-submitted. Monitoring has not identified any specific issues that suggest an urgent need to bring forward additional land for development, other than in relation to town centres. However, the forthcoming partial review of the Regional Spatial Strategy is likely to have significant implications for the review of the Core Strategy. Employment – What’s happening? • The district has a large bank of land with permission for the main employment types of B1, B2 and B8, although this is concentrated on a few large sites. • All land developed and under construction for employment is on previously developed land. • The Districts’ unemployment levels are well below the regional and national average but workers continue to commute outside the District in significant numbers for particular types of jobs. • No offices were constructed in town centre locations. What do we need to do? • The West Midlands Regional Centres Study prepared to inform the review of the Regional Spatial Strategy concluded that there was a substantial need for more offices in the strategic centre of Lichfield in the period up to 2021. This analysis needs to be taken into account in the preparation of future strategies and the production of the Local Development Framework. • There is the ongoing need to address the out commuting of workers to particular types of employment such as office based professional jobs. Again this will need to be incorporated into emerging strategies and policies. 5 Housing – What’s happening? • House prices continue to be the highest in the County. • Studies show that accommodation in the District is not affordable for particular sectors. A single person on an average wage cannot afford to live alone. • The housing trajectory shows a probable over provision of homes, in relation to the RSS until 2013, followed by a shortfall thereafter when set against Staffordshire Structure proportions, if projected potential sites stay the same without the release of new sites. • 91% of new builds completed were over the minimum 30 dwelling per hectare national density guideline. What do we need to do? • Seek to build a higher proportion of affordable homes. • Consider an interim strategy for the management of housing land prior to the adoption of the revised Core Strategy. • Develop strategies that will provide for future housing requirements for the district including that currently being considered at the regional level and take these forward into Development Plan Documents. Transport – What’s happening? • Lichfield District has high car ownership and subsequently a high proportion of people travelling to work by car. • Accessibility of vital services by public transport from our new developments is below our targets despite the fact that land released is principally within our urban areas. • Resident’s proximity to bus stops vary greatly. Burntwood has the highest percentage of people within 350m of a bus stop in the county, Lichfield one of the lowest. What do we need to do? • Work with the County Council towards implementing sustainable transport measures including improving bus services and continue to give Community Transport priority to help less mobile groups, particularly in Lichfield and some large villages that have a very limited service. • Make sure Green Travel Plans submitted with major applications are implemented properly. 6 Other Key Issues • Local Services – The proportion of Burntwood resident’s expenditure on retail retained within the town is very low, particularly for comparison goods shopping. • Action – To move forward as quickly as possible with the process of building a new town centre for Burntwood, to meet local needs. To be incorporated into the emerging LDF Core Strategy. • Biodiversity - There is need for more specific policies and targets to monitor the different aspects of Biodiversity effectively. • Action - To consider policies and targets more closely when the LDF monitoring requirements are reviewed alongside the revised Core Strategy. • Recreation, Community Services and Facilities - There is a need to ensure that existing and developing communities have access to an appropriate range of local facilities. • Action - To prepare open space sport and recreation strategies and to invest in community facilities to meet needs of areas of new housing. • Monitoring Data - There are some key areas in relation to sustainable development where data sources are available but require refinement, such as monitoring provision for renewable energy in new development • Action – Need to work with internal and external partners to identify new and better ways of measuring progress. 7 Summary of Core Output Indicators: Table 1: Summary of Core Output Indicators Core Output Indicators ☺ 1a Amount of land developed for employment by type Amount of land developed for employment by type, ☺ 1b which is in development and/or regeneration areas defined in the Local Development Framework Percentage of 1a, by type which is on previously 1c ☺ developed land Target to be 1d developed Employment land supply by type Losses of employment land in (i) development/ 1e regeneration areas and (ii) local authority area 1f Amount of employment land lost to residential use ☺ 2a Housing trajectories Percentage of new and converted dwellings on 2b ☺ previously developed land Percentage of new dwellings completed at designated 2c ☺ density rates ☺ 2d Affordable housing completions Percentage of completed non-residential development ☺ 3a complying with car parking standards set out in the local development framework Percentage of new residential development within 30 3b minutes public transport time of a GP, hospitals, schools, employment and a major health centre Amount of completed retail, office and leisure 4a ☺ development Percentage of completed retail, office and leisure 4b* development in town centres Percentage of eligible open