Think Sex Jennifer Tyburczy Northwestern University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Think Sex Jennifer Tyburczy Northwestern University Criticism Volume 51 | Issue 2 Article 9 2009 The imeT Has Come to [Re]think Sex Jennifer Tyburczy Northwestern University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism Recommended Citation Tyburczy, Jennifer (2009) "The imeT Has Come to [Re]think Sex," Criticism: Vol. 51: Iss. 2, Article 9. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism/vol51/iss2/9 The imeT Has Come to [Re]think Sex Cover Page Footnote I dedicate this review to Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, who inspired all of us to rethink sex, sexuality, and gender in profoundly world-changing ways. She lives on through her passionate, innovative, and, as perhaps she might say about something she liked and admired, "textured" scholarship, as well as, of course, through the people who knew her well and loved her fiercely. This review is also for you. This book review is available in Criticism: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism/vol51/iss2/9 THE TIME HAS With the aim of celebrating the life and work of Gayle Rubin and com- COME TO [RE]THINK memorating the 1984 publication SEX of her essay “Thinking Sex: Notes Jennifer Tyburczy for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality,” Heather Love and her conference committee expertly Conference Review: “Rethinking curated a conference lineup of Sex: A State of the Field “thirty scholars working within a Conference in Gender and range of disciplines about the most Sexuality Studies,” University of signifi cant and pressing questions Pennsylvania, 4–6 March 2009 in gender and sexuality studies.” In so doing, “Rethinking Sex” sug- gested the current scheme for the discipline in unexpected ways that will, especially at a time of global movements and migrations, neo- liberal ideologies, and negative affects, inspire a return to the ar- chives, the tracing of realist gene- alogies, the reconfi guration of modes and methods for knowledge transmission, the reinvigoration of theoretical and pedagogical choreographies (not forward, but sideways or, even, spiral), and the recognition, as Gayle Rubin said twenty-fi ve years ago, of “the politi- cal dimensions of erotic life” (35).1 The conference organization was refl ective of Heather Love’s own philosophy (as articulated in her 2007 book Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer His- tory) that the fi eld needs to critique simplistically celebratory accounts of the queer past in order to create a queer future more in line with ever-diversifying queer constitu- encies. It seemed a consensus at the conference that in order for “queer” to open up intellectual, political, Criticism, Spring 2009, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 355–366. ISSN: 0011-1589. 355 © 2009 Wayne State University Press, Detroit, MI 48201-1309. 356 JENNIFER TYBURCZY and sexual possibilities we need to by these phone calls, confi scated relinquish nostalgia for what was, the conference handbook. Leafl ets is, and will be, always and every- circulated by Women Against Por- where, a intrapolitically fraught nography called the conference sexual community. Particularly in participants “deviants.” The Hel- today’s global economic crisis and ena Rubenstein Foundation the vicious competition for resou- dropped its funding for the event. rces, security, and a fi nancial leg to Still, eight hundred people gath- stand on, we must recognize that ered to attend, and the conference we feel “bad” and analyze and was sold out. use these energies to reinvigorate Thus, Rubin devoted a signifi cant sexuality studies to meet the chal- portion of her keynote address at lenges of the twenty-fi rst century. “Rethinking Sex” to the emergence “Rethinking Sex” was just as much of academic work on sexuality, of a conference about conducting which, she humbly noted, she only sexuality research as it was a con- played a part (e.g., she mentioned ference that suggested ways for other trailblazers such as Alan undoing particular epistemologi- Bérubé, Joan Nestle, Jonathan cal frameworks for understanding Katz, Jeffrey Weeks, Marjorie Gar- sexuality. ber, Esther Newton, and George For Love, “Rethinking Sex” Chauncey). Entitled “Blood Under mobilized a fantasy to actualize the Bridge: Refl ections on ‘Think- those “storied conferences of the ing Sex,’” Rubin’s keynote was a past,” such as “Pleasure and Dan- graphically rich and historically ger” at Barnard College in 1982, dense journey backward in time to where Rubin fi rst delivered “Think- revisit the context out of which ing Sex” as a talk.2 In the midst of “Thinking Sex” emerged in an ac- what Lisa Duggan and Nan D. ademic and political landscape that Hunter have named the “sex wars” was hostile to sexuality scholarship. and during one of the most vola- Rubin reminded us how her con- tile decades in the history of sex troversial presence at conferences education in the United States, the such as “Pleasure and Danger” ac- conference was, to make an under- companied a larger struggle in the statement, controversial. Antipor- academy at the time. Namely, ac- nography and antisadomasochism cording to Rubin, conducting re- feminists targeted the conference search on sex and sexuality issues and tried to shut it down. Calls was the equivalent of “academic came in claiming that harm would suicide.” befall the women at Barnard be- On an optimistic note, Rubin cause of the conference. Barnard assessed the current academic en- President Ellen V. Futter, whose vironment as one of “sea change” suspicion was apparently aroused and commented that pursuing ON “RETHINKING SEX” 357 queer scholarship is no longer a bodies and populations; peda- “death sentence” for university gogy and the institutionaliza- research careers. Perhaps the rela- tion of gender and sexuality tive calm and quiet with which studies; sexual practice, plea- “Rethinking Sex” proceeded (one sure, and community; new Penn graduate student commented imaginaries of kinship and that many students at the univer- sociality; globalization and its sity were not even aware that the effects; histories of HIV; the conference was taking place) was a politics of emotion; and the direct result of this “sea change” queer afterlife of confl icts in in the academy, notably the insti- feminism. tutionalization of gender and sexuality studies at top research Queer and sexuality studies, at least universities; or, as Valerie Traub for the scholars presenting at “Re- explained during the graduate thinking Sex,” has emerged as a student open discussion, the “qui- highly theoretical, rigorous, and etness” surrounding the conference respected area of study. Yet, in her could be construed “as a good opening remarks, Heather Love thing,” an indication that queer acknowledged a profound sense of scholars have successfully navi- “FOMS” ( fear of missing some- gated their way to tenured posi- thing), and I wonder if it was the tions and that the scholarship of heightened sense of danger sur- Rubin and other senior academics rounding the incorporation of presenting at “Rethinking Sex” “sex” into the academy at “Pleasure have achieved a kind of alternative and Danger” that Love and others canon status. Rubin’s insistence on feared they had missed in being viewing sex and sexuality as intri- born “too late.” cately interwoven in the fabric of Although “Rethinking Sex” everyday life, politics, and the law, came and went without one verbal as well as the emphasis on interdis- attack of “antifeminism” or “sex ciplinarity in the academy, have perversion,” Rubin pointedly argued also laid the groundwork for sexu- that the panics forged in the name ality scholars to simultaneously of sexual security are far from be- speak of and about sexuality while hind us. Since 1984, according to also attending to, according to the Rubin, the antigay right has be- program’s “Welcome” address, come an even bigger apparatus, “a subterranean system of roots and intersections with gender, race, tubers ready to sprout under the class, and disability; neoliberal- right conditions” that “we ignore . ism and sexual politics; trans- at our [own] peril.” What troubles gender lives; queer diasporas; Rubin today is how the charmed health and management of circle of heteronormativity has 358 JENNIFER TYBURCZY been taken up by “the racist white But it is precisely at times such supremacist right” to defi ne the as these, when we live with parameters of citizenship and the the possibility of unthinkable scope of national human rights. destruction, that people are Twenty years ago, Rubin argues, likely to become dangerously no social conservative or white crazy about sexuality. Con- supremacist group would have sequently, sexuality should be associated homosexuality with the treated with special respect in disqualifi cation of citizenship. Ru- times of great social stress. bin’s talk argued that these efforts to link citizenship, race, and ho- The two days that followed the mosexuality point to a troubling evening of “Blood Under the trend of using sexuality as way of Bridge” approached sex and sexu- measuring who and what is ality with the utmost respect dur- American. ing these “very perilous and very Rubin’s keynote reminded the dangerous times.” audience that while sexuality stud- Nine panels, a music concert by ies has emerged as a major institu- Matmos (Drew Daniel and M. C. tional force in the academy, many Schmidt), the electronica “thought of the attacks waged against queers experiment” duo best known for and other heteronormative failures their work with avant-garde pop “look (and sound) like the ‘good’ princess Björk, and two fi lm old days” of 1984. In a comment screenings by fi lmmaker Abigail looming large on the mind of every Child followed Rubin’s keynote. In audience member during the worst homage to Jasbir Puar’s concept economic crisis of any of our life- “queer assemblage,” Matmos com- times (no need for FOMS here), poses their queer soundscapes with Rubin sums up the dangerous rela- the unexpected collisions of objects tionship between sexuality and (things, yes, but also objects of economic recession; namely, that it desire).
Recommended publications
  • Fifty Shades of Leather and Misogyny: an Investigation of Anti- Woman Perspectives Among Leathermen
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 5-2020 Fifty Shades of Leather and Misogyny: An Investigation of Anti- Woman Perspectives among Leathermen Meredith G. F. Worthen University of Oklahoma, [email protected] Trenton M. Haltom University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Worthen, Meredith G. F. and Haltom, Trenton M., "Fifty Shades of Leather and Misogyny: An Investigation of Anti-Woman Perspectives among Leathermen" (2020). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 707. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/707 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. digitalcommons.unl.edu Fifty Shades of Leather and Misogyny: An Investigation of Anti-Woman Perspectives among Leathermen Meredith G. F. Worthen1 and Trenton M. Haltom2 1 University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA; 2 University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA Corresponding author — Meredith G. F. Worthen, University of Oklahoma, 780 Van Vleet Oval, KH 331, Norman, OK 73019; [email protected] ORCID Meredith G. F. Worthen http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6765-5149 Trenton M. Haltom http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-4644 Abstract The Fifty Shades books and films shed light on a sexual and leather-clad subculture predominantly kept in the dark: bondage, discipline, submission, and sadomasoch- ism (BDSM).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Lori Marso, Union College Simone De Beauvoir's the Second Sex
    1 Lori Marso, Union College Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex Comments presented at: A Revolutionary Moment: Women's Liberation in the late 1960s and early 1970s A conference organized by the Women's, Gender, & Sexuality Studies Program Boston University, March 27-29, 2014 Please do not circulate or cite without permission from the author: [email protected] Since its publication in 1949, reception of The Second Sex has been ambivalent and fraught with emotion. Listen to how Beauvoir describes early response to the book in her 1963 autobiography, Force of Circumstance: “Unsatisfied, frigid, priapic, nymphomaniac, lesbian, a hundred times aborted, I was everything, even an unmarried mother. People offered to cure me of my frigidity or to temper my labial appetites; I was promised revelations, in the coarsest terms but in the name of the true, the good and the beautiful, in the name of health and even of poetry, all unworthily trampled underfoot by me” (FC, 197). Beauvoir goes on for several pages documenting violent and aggressive reactions to her book. In an opposing stance, also emotional and deeply ambivalent, Beauvoir was cast as the “mother” of feminism, a label she disavowed in a 1974 interview remarking that “mother-daughter relations are generally catastrophic” (Schwarzer, 94) and “people don’t tend to listen to what their mothers are telling them” (Patterson, 92). Her text has also been called “the feminist bible” even though Beauvoir herself was an atheist (Thurman, xii). Over half a decade later, the text still solicits powerful reactions. Reviewing the new 2010 translation in the New York Times, Francine du Plessix Gray says: “Beauvoir’s truly paranoid hostility toward the 2 institutions of marriage and motherhood — another characteristic of early feminism — is so extreme as to be occasionally hilarious.” She goes on to say that “pessimism runs through the text like a poisonous river” while reassuring us that Beauvoir did not hate men (Plessix-Gray, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: an Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory Author(S): Judith Butler Source: Theatre Journal, Vol
    Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory Author(s): Judith Butler Source: Theatre Journal, Vol. 40, No. 4 (Dec., 1988), pp. 519-531 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3207893 Accessed: 06/08/2009 15:26 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=jhup. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Theatre Journal. http://www.jstor.org Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory Judith Butler Philosophers rarely think about acting in the theatrical sense, but they do have a discourse of 'acts' that maintains associative semantic meanings with theories of performance and acting.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Leather Archives and Museum
    FEATURE ARTICLE Lessons from The Leather Archives and Museum On The Promises of BDSM ADAM j. GRETEMAN School of the Art Institute of Chicago We cannot make or force our students to expose themselves to what is other and different and strange. The only thing we can do is to make sure that there are at least opportunities within education to meet and encounter what is different, strange, and other, and also that there are opportunities for our students to really respond, to find their own voice, their own way of speaking. (Biesta, 2005, p. 6) STAND AT THE PODIUM IN THE SMALL THEATRE at the start of the museum tour for I the Leather Archives and Museum (LA&M). Surrounded by iconic images from gay artist Etienne – images of sado–masochistic sexual practices between men – I make a joke about phallic knowledge and size. We all giggle nervously. Etienne, like Tom of Finland, painted in a stylized and rather exaggerated, though highly erotic, fashion. The pieces – all from historic leather bars that existed at various times in Chicago, Illinois – illustrate, quite literally, sexual subjects subjecting themselves and being subjected to any number of (fantastical) sexual practices. These are the images that surround us – a Master’s level class in Social Theory for Artists and Cultural Workers – as we begin our lessons on sexuality, sex, and the “art of cruelty”. 1 They represent not only sexual practices, but also the (sexual) history of the city we all call home. Yet, this art of cruelty is not to be understood as mere “cruelty”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feminist Sex Wars: 1975-1986 University of Michigan Winter 2018 January 3, 2018
    The Feminist Sex Wars: 1975-1986 University of Michigan Winter 2018 January 3, 2018 ANTHROPOLOGY 658.003 WOMEN’S STUDIES 698.004 AMERICAN CULTURE 601.011 Wednesday 1:00PM-4:00PM 210 West Hall Professor: Gayle Rubin [email protected] Office Hours: Monday 1:30- 3PM or by appointment 104B West Hall 647-0947 COURSE DESCRIPTION This seminar is an excavation and exploration of a piece of the history of the present. The aim is to make sense of some common contemporary discourses on pornography, sexual representation, and sexual conduct by exploring their sources in feminist political conflicts of four decades ago, as well as examining how the feminist engagement in these issues was entangled in other trajectories of conflicts over sexual representation and sexual media. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the feminist movement was rent by a series of acrimonious debates over issues relating to sexual conduct and representation. While there were disputes over many aspects of sexual behavior, some of the most intense controversy focused on “pornography,” although the definition of what constituted “pornography” was itself contested. Nonetheless, the roles of certain kinds of sexual imagery and behaviors in the creation and maintenance of male supremacy, and their causal relationships to violence against women, were contested with unusual ferocity. While these debates have largely subsided within feminism, they have not disappeared. Moreover, they continually affect a variety of other cultural conflicts which erupt on an almost daily basis. Debates about government funding of sexually explicit art, concern over the putative dangers of on-line sexual content, and struggles over what imagery is appropriate for public display are constant features of the cultural landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of BDSM Community Formation in Budapest and London
    Reframing Exclusionary Identities Through Affective Affinities: A comparative study of BDSM community formation in Budapest and London By Heath Pennington Submitted to: Central European University Department of Gender Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Gender Studies Supervisors: Eszter Timár and Nadia Jones-Gailani CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2018 Abstract In this comparative thesis, I investigate how BDSM communities in Budapest and London form around affective affinities that do not rely on the exclusionary mechanisms of identity politics. I strive for an open, ambiguous definition of kink to support my framing of BDSM as an affective praxis that need not rely on normative identities. My analysis is based on 20 semi-structured interviews and a literature review drawing from sexological, psychoanalytic, gender studies, and ethnographic fields, which chronicles the historical and contemporary social construction of BDSM. Situating myself and my research locations, I discuss what it means to utilize a feminist, embodied, interdisciplinary praxis in my fieldwork. I describe my participant observation and interview methodologies, and detail the pros and cons of mobilizing the term “community” in my research. Illustrating the problem with using identity as a tool for community formation, I explore how identity creates normativities and develop the idea of kinknormativity, unique from other normativities in linking the legitimacy of informed consent to social privilege. Moving away from identity, I argue that affect provides the necessary opening for BDSM communities to form, analyzing two main affective modes: feelings of belonging and discussions of gender. I show that affective belonging is built in both locations through solidarity and educational events, which are more frequent in London than in Budapest.
    [Show full text]
  • A Queer Studies Foremother: Review of Deviations, a Gayle Rubin Reader by Gayle Rubin
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies Faculty Publication Series Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies 2012 A Queer Studies Foremother: Review of Deviations, A Gayle Rubin Reader by Gayle Rubin Svati P. Shah University of Massachusetts Amherst, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/wost_faculty_pubs Recommended Citation Shah, Svati P., "A Queer Studies Foremother: Review of Deviations, A Gayle Rubin Reader by Gayle Rubin" (2012). Women's Review of Books. 23. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/wost_faculty_pubs/23 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies Faculty Publication Series by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Buck's poem "Wild Poppies" reveals her spirit. In midnight lights under Wacker Drive. then I was captured, locked into a cell of addition to being part of this collection, it is the title Uptown. South Side. Slapped sewer water poem of a 2004 CD on which two dozen poets, by self-determination for taking Freedom spirit deflated. I survived, carried on, glad to be including Sonia Sanchez and Devorah Major, whom Wall photos without asking like a weed, a wild red poppy Buck admired, read her works aloud. One could love on t0 California, driving at 3:00 in the r°°ted in Hfe' this writer on the strength of this poem alone: morning in the mountains Wild Poppies I got it: what self-determination means There are some writers-Karen Blixen, Flannery t , i ., j , i .
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Gayle S. Rubin: Deviations. A Gayle Rubin Reader. Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2011 Reviewed by Angelika Tsaros Gayle Rubin’s first essays, “The Traffic in Women” (1975) and “Thinking Sex” (1984), changed the way we think about sexuality. The publication of these semi- nal essays provided the then-emerging field of sexuality studies and the developing women’s movement with the vocabulary to tackle some of the problems we are still discussing today. Rubin tackled issues such as the sex/gender divide, and did not shy away from dicussing inter-generational sex, pornography, and sadomasochism at a time when this meant alienating herself not only from study groups and networks but making herself academic outcast. She is a fixture in the queer pantheon: a feminist, an anthropologist, and an archaeologist of the layers of sexual studies previously forgotten, who has entranced generations of students in women’s studies, queer stud- ies, and anthropology. The aptly titled Deviations: A Gayle Rubin Reader is a collection of Rubin’s most influential essays. While it does not include much of her more activist writing in community publications, it gives a coherent and in-depth picture of what I must call a genealogy of sexuality studies from the 1970s until today. Most notably, Rubin is a pioneer of intersectional research, even if she would quite vocally disagree and insist on crediting not herself but a number of scientists from the 19th century who provided some of the layers on which her work builds. Nonetheless, she pioneered academic enquiry into sexual subcultures through her combination of theoretical research and anthropological field studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Passion, Politics, and Politically Incorrect Sex: Towards a History Of
    PASSION, POLITICS, AND POLITICALLY INCORRECT SEX: TOWARDS A HISTORY OF LESBIAN SADOMASOCHISM IN THE USA 1975-1993 by Anna Robinson Submitted to the Department of Gender Studies, Central European University In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Erasmus Mundus Master's Degree in Women's and Gender Studies CEU eTD Collection Main supervisor: Francisca de Haan (Central European University) Second reader: Anne-Marie Korte (Utrecht University) Budapest, Hungary 2015 PASSION, POLITICS, AND POLITICALLY INCORRECT SEX: TOWARDS A HISTORY OF LESBIAN SADOMASOCHISM IN THE USA 1975-1993 by Anna Robinson Submitted to the Department of Gender Studies, Central European University In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Erasmus Mundus Master's Degree in Women's and Gender Studies Main supervisor: Francisca de Haan (Central European University) Second reader: Anne-Marie Korte (Utrecht University) CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2015 Approved by: ________________________ Abstract This thesis is an exploration of the largely underexamined history of lesbian sadomasochism (SM) in the United States between the mid-1970s, when the first organised lesbian feminist SM groups were founded, and 1993, by which time public debates about lesbian SM were becoming less visible. I engage with feminist discourses around lesbian SM within the so- called feminist sex wars of the 1980s, tracing the sometimes dramatic rise to prominence of lesbian SM as a feminist issue. Entwined in this web of controversy, I assert, is the story of a perceived fundamental split in the feminist movement between those who believed SM was patriarchal, abusive and violent, and those who saw it as a consensual expression of sexual freedom and liberation.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesizing the Manipulation of Corporeal and Affective Bodies in Feminist Theory
    Peer Reviewed Title: A Radical Theory of Bodies: Synthesizing the Manipulation of Corporeal and Affective Bodies in Feminist Theory Journal Issue: Global Societies Journal, 3 Author: Baker, Sally, UC Santa Barbara Publication Date: 2015 Permalink: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3m41z83s Keywords: Gender Performativity, Corporeality, Affectivity, Bodies, Cultural Mediation Local Identifier: gis_globalsocieties_29255 Abstract: Drawing chiefly upon Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity, this article argues that feminist theory does not operate in isolation from the body, but rather that the body is a medium through which feminist theory is performed. It examines how various feminist theorists conceive of the body, both corporeally and affectively, and how the body is mediated by a variety of culturally specific forces. Through a carefully crafted Butlerian lens, the article examines the body of the third world prostitute, the body of the fetus, the invasion of bodies by modern capitalism, the reimagining of the body in radical feminist utopia, and other constructions of the body. By placing the work of multiple feminist theorists in conversation with one another, the article offers theoretical insight by synthesizing seemingly disparate feminist theories. Copyright Information: All rights reserved unless otherwise indicated. Contact the author or original publisher for any necessary permissions. eScholarship is not the copyright owner for deposited works. Learn more at http://www.escholarship.org/help_copyright.html#reuse eScholarship
    [Show full text]
  • Crozier on Bauer, 'Queer BDSM Intimacies: Critical Consent and Pushing Boundaries'
    H-Histsex Crozier on Bauer, 'Queer BDSM Intimacies: Critical Consent and Pushing Boundaries' Review published on Sunday, May 24, 2015 Robin Bauer. Queer BDSM Intimacies: Critical Consent and Pushing Boundaries. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2014. vii + 289 pp. $95.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-137-43501-9. Reviewed by Ivan Crozier (The University of Sydney)Published on H-Histsex (May, 2015) Commissioned by Chiara Beccalossi BDSM at the Boundaries Sadomasochism is becoming mainstream. This would, I imagine, be as surprising to those original Viennese readers who had their femme-domme fantasies ignited by Leopold von Sacher-Masoch's Venus im Pelz (1870), as to the clandestine frequenters of the back rooms of San Francisco's gay leather bars in the 1960s, which can be now seen on the current postage stamps of Finland.[1] BDSM (the acronym now widely accepted to stand for Bondage & Discipline, Domination/submission, and Sadism & Masochism) has never been so widely exposed in our culture, even despite recent prohibitions of sadomasochistic pornography in the United Kingdom (with the recent criminalization of the depiction of activities that are otherwise legal, such as face-smothering, fist-fucking, or water sports). E. L. James's best-selling Fifty Shades of Grey (2012), with its sequels and the blockbuster movie, made sure that everybody has now heard of "The Lifestyle." Yet the Fifty Shades phenomenon is widely reviled within BDSM communities, where it is claimed vociferously that James's book has nothing to do with "real" BDSM.[2] Detractors from James's work point to the (implausible) protagonist Christian Grey's lack of concern with consent as a clear indicator thatFifty Shades is rather the story of a sexual psychopath who preys unethically on his naïve but willing victim, Anastasia Steele (their relationship is represented as a heterosexual love story).
    [Show full text]
  • From De Beauvoir to Butler How Gendered Categories Have Been Used in Five Classical Texts on Gender
    Linnéuniversitetet Institutionen för samhällsvetenskap 2010-01-08 SOD543 From De Beauvoir To Butler How gendered categories have been used in five classical texts on gender Författare David Sandin Handledare Glenn Sjöstrand Abstract The focus of this thesis is to investigate how gender related concepts have used in practise from Simone De Beauvoir’s ―The second sex‖, to Judith Butler’s ―Bodies that matters‖. The other texts used are ―the traffic in women‖ by Gayle Rubin, ―Gender: an ethnomethodological approach‖ by Suzanne Kessler and Wendy McKenna and ―Gender and power‖ by Robert Connell. In my theoretical part I use the idea that categories are human inventions and that no categories including those important to the gender issue are more correct than any other and that the usefulness of categories can only be measured by the usefulness of the theories attached to it. I am also inspired by the theory of critical realism that claims that research must focus on the internal mechanisms that causes the effects that we are observing. The method used is an adaptation of philosophical concept analysis where I have analyzed how gender related concepts such as ―men‖ and ―women‖ are used in my empirical material. The focus was to create an understanding of how gender categories where used in the texts that I where analyzing. There is also a metatheoretical approach where the empirical material is used in order to get an understanding on how to create new theories. The conclusions of this thesis is that the theoretical concept of gender has developed from a description of how social forces affected people in the category ―women‖ different from those in the category ―men‖ to a more and more intricate philosophical and theoretical discussion of how to understand and analyze this difference.
    [Show full text]