Regional Oral History Off Ice University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional Oral History Off Ice University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Regional Oral History Off ice University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California California Land-Use Planning Series SAVE SAN FRANCISCO BAY ASSOCIATION, 1961-1986 with an Introduction by Harold Gilliam and an Afterword by Me1 Scott Interviews with Barry Bunshoft Esther Gulick Catherine Kerr Sylvia McLaughlin Interviews conducted by Malca Chall 1985 and 1986 Copyright @ 1987 by The Regents of the University of California This manuscript is made available for research purposes. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the Univer- sity of California at Berkeley. Requests for permission to quote for publication should be addressed to the Regional Oral History Office, 486 Library, and should include identification of the specific passages to be quoted, anticipated use of the passages, and identification of the user. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: To cite the volume: Save San Francisco Bay Association, 1961-1986, an oral history conducted in 1985 and 1986 by Malca Chall, Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft ~ibrar~, University bf calif ornia, Berkeley, 1987. To cite individual interview: Barry Bunshoft, "Save San Francisco Bay Association and the Courts," an oral history conducted in 1986 by Malca.Chal1, Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, 1987. Copy No. DEDICATION THE SAVE SAN FRANCISCO BAY ASSOCIATION DEDICATES THIS ORAL HISTORY TO THE MEMORY OF DOROTHY AND MORSE ERSKINE IN APPRECIATION OF THEIR MANY YEARS OF WISE COUNSEL AND SUPPORT. TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION PREFACE INTRODUCTION by Harold Gilliam INTERVIEWS WITH ESTHER GULICK, KAY BRR, SYLVIA McLAUGHLIN BRIEF BIOGRAPHIES viii BAY OR RIVER? ESTHER GULICK, KAY KERR, SYLVIA McLAUGHLIN DECIDE TO SAVE THE BAY IN 1961 University Friends Are Helpful First Targets: Berkeley and Albany Creating Save The Bay Association Expansion of Membership Organizational Structure Setting the Goals; Dividing the Tasks The Berkeley Plan is Defeated First Experiences With the State Legislature RECALLING TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE WITH THE STATE LEGISLATURE The Many Attempts to Halt Bay Fill Assemblyman Nicholas Petris's Interest Senator Eugene McAteer Sponsors the Bay Study Commission Legislation, SB 14, 1964 Help From the Media Working with Conservationists Around the Bay The San Francisco Bay Study Commission Gets to Work The San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission: The McAteer-Petris Act, 1965-1969 BCDC Becomes a Permanent Agency, 1969 Hard Work and Drama Save San Francisco Bay Association Develops its Public Education Program Bay Farm Island, Alameda: "One We Lost ," 1965 The Corps Turns over Bay Fill Authority to the State I11 THE ASSOCIATION IS INVOLVED WITH REGION-WIDE BAY ACTIVITIES The Bay Conservation and Development Commission The Importance of the McAteer-Petris Act The BCDC Staff The BCDC Chairman Save The Bay: Consistent and Long-Term Participation Formulating the Bay Plan The Special Area Plan Committee The Plan for the Sea Ports Opposition to Placing BCDC within a Regional Government The Recurring Issue of the Public Trust on Navigable Waters The One Hundred-Foot Shoreline Band Jurisdiction Over Wetlands Behind Dikes The Role of the Federal Government in the Bay The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The Albany Dump: The Bulkhead Lines The Corps' Jurisdiction Over Wetlands The Wetlands Coalition The U.S. Navy The U.S. Coast Guard The Environmental Protection Agency Dredging Policies: The Baldwin Ship Channel The Bay Model of the Army Corps of Engineers IV SAVE THE BAY ASSOCIATION ADAPTS ITS PROCEDURES, GOALS, AND ORGANIZATION TO CHANGING NEEDS The Board How Kerr, Gulick, and McLaughlin Fit into the Scheme The Staff The Off ices Handling Court Cases: The Legal Committee Working with Other Organizations on Common Goals Present Problems and Expectations Current Knowledge Changes the Association's Expectations The Biennial Conferences Concerns About the Future The Commitment of BCDC The Founders Look Toward The Future Effectiveness of the Save San Francisco Bay Association INTERVIEii WITH BARRY L. BUNSHOFT 106 INTERVIEW HISTORY 108 BRIEF BIOGRAPHY 109 I SAVE SAN FRANCISCO BAY ASSOCIATION AND THE COURTS 110 Barry Bunshoft: Background on his Relationship with Save 110 San Francisco Bay Association The Legal Committee and the Courts The Westbay Case: Save the Bay Association Intervenes Other Court Cases: The Process of Deciding to Become Involved Santa Fe and Murphy v. Berkeley The Legal Committee and the Bay Conservation and Development Commission The Port of San Francisco Revising the BCDC Plan Relationships with Other Conservation Organizations Reviewing Some of the Problems and Failures in the Battles to Save the Bay AFTERWORD by Me1 Scott TAPE GUIDE APPENDIX Background for Interviews Prepared by Esther Gulick, Kay Kerr, and Sylvia McLaughlin Sampling of Communications to Members, 1961-1986 Saving the Bay Inspires Poet Josephine Miles; Folksingers Malvina Reynolds and Pete Seeger; Cartoonist Robert Bastian Awards : Sol Feinstone Environmental Award, 1981 Robert C. Kirkwood Award, 1986 The Program of the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Association, December 6, 1986 Bibliography: A Partial List Compiled by the Staff of Save San Francisco Bay Association, 1962-1987 INDEX PREFACE They are a legend in their own time, the three women who in 1961, sounded the alarm to "Save San Francisco Bay." In large measure Catherine Kerr, Esther Gulick, and Sylvia McLaughlin achieved their goal. Without their concerted skills as leaders, organizers, researchers, writers, public speakers, fund raisers, and arm twisters there would be no Save San Francisco Bay Association, no Bay Conservation and Development Commission as we know it, few court cases on behalf of the public trust--in short there would be a diminished bay, diminished public access, and diminished public awareness of the value of San Francisco Bay as a resource for ecological balance, public recreation, and for simply enjoying its natural beauty. Their oral history, framed by an introduction by Harold Gilliam, and an afterword by Me1 Scott, documents how these talented and dedicated women began to change public perception and hence public policy toward the Bay even before the advent of the environmental movement. In 1981 the Regional Oral History Office began efforts to develop an oral history of the Save the Bay Association as part of a series on the history of land-use in California. In November, 1982 the Board of the Association decided to honor the memories of long-time environmentalists Dorothy and Morse Erskine with an oral history of the Association based primarily on the experiences of its three founding members. On November 23, 1982, I met with Kay Kerr and Esther Gulick to discuss the oral history process and possible scope of the interviews. They reported that the three women who had worked closely as a team throughout the previous twenty-five years expected to be interviewed together as a team. Group inter- views have always been considered an ill-advised oral history technique. But they were right. The joint interviews brought the history of the Association and the importance of their working relationship into sharp focus. Interviewing was delayed until mid-summer 1985. Association duties kept them occupied. Furthermore, Mrs. Kerr traveled frequently with her husband, Clark Kerr, former president of the University of California, and Mrs. Gulick and Mrs. McLaughlin were caring for their husbands, Professor of Economics Emeritus Charles Gulick, and professor, dean, and former president of the University of California Board of Regents Donald McLaughlin, both of whom died in 1984. By August 13, 1985 the women were ready to tackle the memoir. They had prepared for the oral history as carefully as they had prepared for all of their work on behalf of the Bay. Months earlier they had met to consider the scope of the interview and had developed ten excellent questions and a page of general background on various personal, political, and other factors that had motivated their efforts." These formed the core of the outlines prepared for.each of the three two-hour interview sessions that followed between October and December, 1985. * See Appendix, p.133. We worked in the small family dining room of the Kerr home in El Cerrito overlooking the expanse of garden and the Bay, sitting around the glass-topped table set with cups for hot tea and a pitcher of lemon juice. This had been their working procedure through the years. Now, the only difference was the addition of the tape recorder on the table among the notes, newsclippings, and other relevant material. These women are strong willed, well educated, and intelligent. Each has found her special niche within the organization. Kay Kerr does the writing and research; Sylvia McLaughlin works in organizations through which she can promote interest in and education about the Bay and the environment. She is often the Association's spokesperson. Esther Gulick handles the Association's financial and organizational details and has been tagged the "glue" that has held the team together. To gather background I spent some days in the Association's office reading minutes of Board meetings, newsletters and alerts, annual and biennial meeting materials. All provided rich knowledge of the Association's concerns and activities. Most of this excellent collection has been deposited in The Bancroft Library, where all the Save the Bay papers will ultimately be deposited. Association staff members Janice Kittredge and Nancy Goetzl helped locate some of the rare historical material for the appendix. Transcribing the tapes posed some problems until the typist learned to distinquish the four voices and to hear them over the sounds of pouring tea, the clatter of cups, fast cross talk, and the laughter that punctuated the discussion when the women recalled something amusing. The typist, a student majoring in environmental studies, claimed that she was having more fun with this project than any others she had encountered in the office.
Recommended publications
  • LONGFIN SMELT Spirinchus Thaleichthys USFWS: None CDFG: Threatened
    LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. PUBLIC DRAFT SOLANO HCP JULY 2012 SOLANO COUNTY WATER AGENCY NATURAL COMMUNITY AND SPECIES ACCOUNTS LONGFIN SMELT Spirinchus thaleichthys USFWS: None CDFG: Threatened Species Account Status and Description. The longfin smelt is listed as a threatened species by the California Fish and Game Commission. Abundance of the longfin smelt has reached record lows in the San Francisco-Delta population, and the species may already be extinct in some northern California estuarine populations, resulting in an overall threat of extinction to the species within California (Federal Register 2008). The longfin smelt was also proposed for federal listing, but on April 8, 2009 the USFWS determined that the San Francisco Bay Estuary population does not qualify for listing as a distinct population segment under federal regulations. Further assessment of the entire population is being conducted, however, and future listing may be considered. Photo courtesy of California Department of Fish and Game Longfin smelt, once mature, are slim, silver fish in the family Osmeridae (true smelts). Moyle (2002) describes the species as being 90-110 mm (standard length) at maturity, with a translucent silver appearance along the sides of the body, and an olive to iridescent pinkish hue on the back. Mature males are often darker than females, with enlarged and stiffened dorsal and anal fins, a dilated lateral line region, and breeding tubercles on paired fins and scares. Longfin smelt can be distinguished from other California smelt by their long pectoral fins (which reach or nearly reach the bases of the pelvic fins), incomplete lateral line, weak or absent striations on the opercular bones, low number of scales in the lateral line (54-65) and long maxillary bones (which in adults extent just short of the posterior margin of the eye).
    [Show full text]
  • About Aquarium of the Bay
    Aquarium of the Bay Bay Ecotarium Press Kit Aquarium of the Bay Press Kit About Aquarium of the Bay Aquarium of the Bay Exhibit Highlights Aquarium of the Bay Fact Sheet Aquarium of the Bay Fun Facts Sustainability at Aquarium of the Bay About Bay Ecotarium Contact About Aquarium of the Bay i and indigenous - offering — Bay Ecotarium has a shared mission Sierra to the Sea™ Exhibit Highlights DISCOVER THE BAY UNDER THE BAY in length Go With The Flow jellies Nearshore Tunnel 0 15 Octopus and Friends Gallery This gallery features the newest aquatic additions to the Aquarium— the Pacific spiny lumpsuckers. Other animals that can be found in this gallery include a giant Pacific octopus, Dungeness crabs, and abalone. Offshore Tunnel (Sharks of Alcatraz) (Sharks of Alcatraz) Exhibit Highlights TOUCH THE BAY Touchpools touch Bay Lab RIVER OTTERS: WATERSHED AMBASSADORS : San Francisco Aquarium of the Bay Fact Sheet Overview: Aquarium of the Bay, located at the world-famous PIER 39, is the only aquarium dedicated to the diverse marine life and distinctive ecosystems of San Francisco Bay. Aquarium of the Bay is home to over 20,000+ marine and indigenous animals that can be found in San Francisco Bay and along the California coast. With more than 500,000 visitors annually, Aquarium of the Bay provides an unmatched window through which to view local marine life. Mission: Aquarium of the Bay is an institution of Bay.org DBA Bay Ecotarium, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization with a mission to enable conversations on climate resilience and ocean conservation globally, while inspiring actionable change locally by protection and preservation of the San Francisco Bay and its ecosystems, from Sierra to the Sea™.
    [Show full text]
  • New England Retreat
    2011 California Switzer Fellows Retreat Agenda DRAFT FRIDAY, September 30 th (Evening arrival for all 2011 California Fellows and out of town travelers. New Fellows please arrive in tme for dinner!) 5:00 pm Check-in 6 :00 – 7:00 pm DINNER 7:00 – 9:00 pm INTRODUCTIONS, ORIENTATION FOR NEW FELLOWS. This evening will allow tme for welcoming and introductons for new Fellows, as well as presentaton of leadership concepts to be explored throughout the weekend. Fellows will have a chance to identfy topics for networking over the weekend. Partcipant and staf introductons will be made. SATURDAY, October 1 st 8:00 – 9:00 am BREAKFAST and check-in for new arrivals 9:00 – 9:15 am INTRODUCTIONS. Lissa Widof, Executve Director of the Switzer Foundaton, will welcome partcipants and introduce the Communicatons training, trainers and context for this work. 9:15 – 12:30 TRAINING: MESSAGING AND COMMUNICATIONS We ofer this training at the fall retreat as the frst step in our efort to help Fellows develop efectve communicatons skills. For these trainings, we have the great privilege of engaging with a terrifc group of trainers and practtoners. Liz Neeley of COMPASS (Communicaton Partnership for Science and the Sea) specializes in training scientsts and experts to hone their messages so they can communicate their work to a wide range of audiences. The morning session will include training with actve feld journalists and topics such as - Welcome to My World – real world stories from professional journalists - Bridging the worlds of science and journalism - Show Don’t Tell: The Storytelling Process - An introducton to messaging using a tool called the Message Box, a simple yet powerful tool for organizing and focusing any message for any audience that will be useful beyond the workshop setng.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Trends of Indicators of Ecosystem Health
    STATUS AND TRENDS OF INDICATORS OF ECOSYSTEM HEALTH THE ESTUARY SAN FRANCISCO BAY AND SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN RIVER DELTA The San Francisco Estuary Partnership collaborates with partners throughout the Bay and Delta on regional, science-based programs to increase the health and resilience of the San Francisco Estuary. Established as part of the National Estuary Program over 25 years ago by the State of California and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Partnership manages multi-benefit projects that improve the well-being of wildlife and human communities from the inland rivers to the Golden Gate. More information can be found at sfestuary.org SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP 375 Beale Street, Suite 700, San Francisco, CA 94105 © 2019 San Francisco Estuary Partnership. All rights reserved. Please cite as The State of the Estuary 2019, San Francisco Estuary Partnership. The Delta Stewardship Council was created in 2009 by the California Legislature to advance the state’s coequal goals for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta through the development and enforcement of a long-term sustainable management plan. Informed by the Delta Science Program and Delta Independent Science Board, the Council oversees implementation of this plan through coordination and oversight of state and local agencies proposing to fund, carry out, and approve Delta-related activities. More information can be found at deltacouncil.ca.gov STATUS AND TRENDS OF INDICATORS OF ECOSYSTEM HEALTH THE ESTUARY SAN FRANCISCO BAY AND SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN RIVER DELTA SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY A NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ESTUARY THAT INCLUDES THE SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, SUISUN BAY, SAN PABLO BAY, AND SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • The Estuary Project'snon-Profit Partner
    PublicationsPublications TheThe EstuaryEstuary Project’sProject’s Non-ProfitNon-Profit PartnerPartner (PRINT AND ON-LINE) ESTUARY, an eight-page, bi-monthly newsletter that includes fre- The Friends of the San The San Francisco quent, comprehensive inserts about CALFED’s Science Program and the Regional Monitoring Program led by the San Francisco Francisco Estuary is a 501(c)(3) Estuary Project is a federal-state- Estuary Institute non-profit organization associated with local partnership working to restore water Courtesty Delta In-Channel Island Work Group. Bay-Delta Environmental Report Card, March 1999 the Estuary Project. Its goal is to quality and manage the natural resources of Bay-Delta Environmental Report Card, September 2001 increase public awareness of the the San Francisco Bay-Delta Estuary while Baylands Ecosystem Habitat Goals Estuary and to encourage Baylands Ecosystem Species and Community Profiles maintaining the region’s economic vitality. Boater’s Pumpout Map & Guides for San Francisco Bay and the San public involvement in The Estuary Project oversees and tracks Joaquin & Sacramento River Delta decision-making processes implementation of a Comprehensive CCMP Workbook, October 1996 about the Estuary. Conservation and Management Plan— Erosion and Sediment Control Field Manual and Guidebook for Construction Projects and videos:“Keep it Clean”;“Hold On To The Friends support the the “CCMP”—for preserving, restoring, and Your Dirt” education programs begun enhancing the Bay-Delta Estuary.The Estuary Introduction to the Ecology of the San Francisco Bay by the Estuary Project by Project disseminates newsletters, fact sheets, SFEP web site: http://sfep.abag.ca.gov sponsoring workshops for videos, and other materials to educate the public SFEP Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan State of the Estuary 2002: Science and Strategies for Restoration students and teachers and about Bay-Delta wetlands, wildlife, aquatic State of the Estuary 2000: Restoration Primer by helping community groups conduct resources, and land use issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The MCL “North Marin Unit” Always Has a Full Plate
    May-June 2009 May-June 2009 EDITORIAL Focus on North Marin Is the MTC too HOT to Trot? Why The MCL MCL is Concerned About HOT Lanes “North Marin The long- awaited Unit” Always Highway 101 Gap Closure project’s HOV Has a Full Plate lanes, funded by Susan Stompe and Nona Dennis by Measure A, could Geographic “Units” of Marin potentially Conservation League be converted to HOT lanes When Marin Conservation League was under the launched by its founders as the “Marin MTC plan County Survey Committee” in late 1934, one of the fi rst objectives was to engage rep- resentatives from all parts of the county in photo: Dru Parker planning for its future. As the “Committee” evolved into “Marin Conservation League” n occasion, Marin Conservation The claimed attractions of the concept are and gained wide support, the representation OLeague fi nds itself questioning threefold: coalesced into geographic units – initially whether “the Emperor is wearing any It expands mobility options by providing Mill Valley, San Rafael, West Marin, and clothes” – or, put another way: is the pub- an opportunity for reliable travel times to then North Marin and Rural Land Use. At a lic being given all the facts while a grand users willing to pay a signifi cant premium time when there were few environmental plan is rushed forward with inadequate for this service (hence the nickname, organizations in the county, the League’s public education? The current discussion “Lexus Lanes”); Units provided an opportunity for people about implementing High Occupant Toll in a region to get together to discuss local (HOT) Lanes along 800 miles of Bay Area HOT lanes generate a source of revenue, issues, track local developments, meet with freeways seems to fall into this category.
    [Show full text]
  • Oyster Growers and Oyster Pirates in San Francisco Bay
    04-C3737 1/20/06 9:46 AM Page 63 Oyster Growers and Oyster Pirates in San Francisco Bay MATTHEW MORSE BOOKER The author is a member of the history department at North Carolina State University, Raleigh. In the late nineteenth century San Francisco Bay hosted one of the American West’s most valuable fisheries: Not the bay’s native oysters, but Atlantic oysters, shipped across the country by rail and seeded on privately owned tidelands, created private profits and sparked public resistance. Both oyster growers and oyster pirates depended upon a rapidly changing bay ecosystem. Their struggle to possess the bay’s productivity revealed the inqualities of ownership in the American West. An unstable nature and shifting perceptions of San Francisco Bay combined to remake the bay into a place to dump waste rather than to find food. Both growers and pirates disappeared following the collapse of the oyster fishery in the early twentieth century. In 1902 twenty-two-year-old Oakland writer Jack London published his first book, an adventure story for boys. In the novel, London’s boy hero runs away from a comfortable middle-class home to test his mettle in the rough world of the San Francisco waterfront. Plucky but naïve, Joe Bronson soon finds himself sailing down San Francisco Bay in a rickety sloop called the Dazzler, piloted by hard-drinking French Pete and his tough orphan sidekick, the ’Frisco Kid. The Dazzler joins a small fleet of boats congregating in the tidal flats along the eastern shoreline of San Francisco Bay where French Pete orders Joe and the Kid to drag a triangular piece of steel, an oyster dredge, over the muddy bottom.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Inbenthic Macrofauna at a South San Francisco Bay Salt Marsh Brian T
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research 1996 A Survey of inbenthic macrofauna at a South San Francisco Bay salt marsh Brian T. Pittman San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Pittman, Brian T., "A Survey of inbenthic macrofauna at a South San Francisco Bay salt marsh" (1996). Master's Theses. 1398. http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/1398 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript bas been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 the San Francisco Bay Area Water Trail
    SAN FRANCISCO BAY TRAIL AND SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA WATER TRAIL 2016 HIGHLIGHTS THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA WATER TRAIL A growing network of launching and landing sites for human-powered boats and beachable sail craft (kayak, SUP, kiteboards, etc.) encouraging the exploration of the historic, scenic, cultural and environmental richness of the 450-square-mile San Francisco Bay estuary. Major funding is provided by the State Coastal Conservancy. 30 $596,900 14 TOTAL WATER TRAIL GRANT FUNDS AWARDED TO DATE SITES DESIGNATED SITES DESIGNATED IN 2016 $490,400 $1,153,480 GRANT FUNDS AWARDED 2016 $’S LEVERAGED THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY TRAIL A planned 500-mile shoreline path around the entire San Francisco Bay running through all nine Bay Area counties and 47 cities, connecting schools, neighborhoods, jobs, and parks to the shoreline and to each other. Major funding is provided by the State Coastal Conservancy. MILES CONNECTED BY NEW 2016 350 10 47 SEGMENTS MILES COMPLETED MILES CONSTRUCTED IN 2016 $18,788,326 144 GRANT FUNDS AWARDED TO DATE TOTAL MILES PLANNED/ DESIGNED 64 $113,682,562 TOTAL MILES $’S LEVERAGED CONSTRUCTED TRAIL BAY 2016 SAN FRANCISCO BAY TRAIL HIGHLIGHTS 2.5 miles of new Bay Trail Bay Bridge East Span Pathway Completion of new trail along Silicon Valley Trail Loop Study adjacent to Sears Point Wetland connects to Yerba Buena Island Christie Avenue between Powell released in partnership with Ridge Restoration Area opens linking and Shellmound streets closes Trail and the City of San Jose to 2.5 miles of existing shoreline a small but significant gap to demonstrate GHG emissions Bay Trail at Sonoma Baylands in Emeryville reductions along the South Bay Trails network Bay Trail Design Guidelines Google completes resurfacing of First 2016 episode of Open Road Explore the Coast grant awarded and Toolkit released four miles of Bay Trail linking with Doug McConnell features for five additional Bay Trail smart Sunnyvale and Mountain View.
    [Show full text]
  • Programmatic Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Assessment for the Long-Term Management Strategy for the Placement of Dredged Material in the San Francisco Bay Region
    Programmatic Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Assessment for the Long-Term Management Strategy for the Placement of Dredged Material in the San Francisco Bay Region July 2009 Executive Summary Programmatic Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Assessment for the Long-Term Management Strategy for the Placement of Dredged Material in the San Francisco Bay Region Pursuant to section 305(b)(2) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. §1855(b)), the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), as the federal lead and co-lead agencies, respectively, submit this Programmatic Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Assessment for the Long-Term Management Strategy for the Placement of Dredged Material in the San Francisco Bay Region. This document provides an assessment of the potential effects of the on-going dredging and dredged material placement activities of all federal and non-federal maintenance dredging projects in the action area (see Figure 1.1 located on page 3). The SF Bay LTMS program area spans 11 counties, including: Marin, Sonoma, Napa, Solano, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo and San Francisco counties. It does not include the mountainous or inland areas far removed from navigable waters. The geographic scope of potential impacts included in this consultation (action area) comprises the estuarine waters of the San Francisco Bay region, portions of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) west of Sherman Island and the western portion of the Port of Sacramento and Port of Stockton deep water ship channels. It also includes the wetlands and shallow intertidal areas that form a margin around the Estuary and the tidal portions of its tributaries.
    [Show full text]
  • MCL Tours Watershed to Observe French Broom Invasion Control
    March-April 2009 MCL Tours Watershed to Observe French Broom Invasion Control Methods By Alison Seaman MMWD’s 21,000 acres of watersheds and ment; managing vegetation over- forests make up a jewel of natural beauty for growth; controlling invasive weeds; over 900 native plant species. The vegeta- and maintaining biodiversity. See tion creates many diverse wildlife habitats MMWD’s website, marinwater.org, and provides the public an extensive network for a list of public documents, etc of recreational access routes. pertaining to the Update process. The entire vegetation is managed follow- French Broom, a non-native plant ing specifi c procedures defi ned in a Vegeta- species found throughout the San tion Management Plan (VMP), published Francisco Bay Region, constitutes in 1995. The 1995 plan focused on the 90% of invasive vegetation within risk posed by uncontrolled wild fi res and the entire 21,000 acres. It is pres- recommended the use of prescribed burns ent in over 60% of the fuel break It was crystal clear that broom is incred- system where the native vegetation ibly hard to eradicate...! has undergone some form of control and removal. Indeed, maintaining and the construction of ridge top fuel breaks viable access routes and fuel breaks to lessen that risk. Over the last few years that are unimpeded by overgrowth Ecologist Janet Klein (right) displays broom the focus has changed: while fuel breaks and fl ammable, invasive vegetation, samples to Tom Roberts and Carolynn Kanas are still considered critical to fi re manage- creates a plethora of environmental ment, the emphasis is shifting to defensible challenges that consumes 100% of MMWD’s application of 2% glyphosate (for 4 years space immediately adjacent to structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Marsh Harvest Mice, Urban Development, and Rising Sea Levels Author(S): Howard S
    Society for Conservation Biology Salt Marsh Harvest Mice, Urban Development, and Rising Sea Levels Author(s): Howard S. Shellhammer Source: Conservation Biology, Vol. 3, No. 1 (Mar., 1989), pp. 59-65 Published by: Wiley for Society for Conservation Biology Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2385990 Accessed: 19-11-2018 23:28 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Society for Conservation Biology, Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Conservation Biology This content downloaded from 216.73.253.254 on Mon, 19 Nov 2018 23:28:28 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Salt Marsh Harvest Mice, Urban Development, and Rising Sea Levels HOWARD S. SHELLHAMMER Department of Biological Sciences San Jose State University 1 Washington Square San Jose, California 95192-0100, U.S.A. Abstract: The salt marsh harvest mouse, Reithrodontomys Resumen: El roedor recolector de sal Reithrodontomys ra- raviventris, is endemic to the marshes of San Francisco Bay. viventris es endemico a las marismas de la Bahia de San Ultimate factors such as rising sea level and tectonic
    [Show full text]