Annual Report on Competition Policy Developments in Germany
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Corporate Governance Germany
WWW.ICGG.BIZ ISSUE 11/2005 INSIGHT Corporate Governance Germany Essential: Information, Analysis and Opinion for Investment Professionals, Advisers and Academics CONTENTS 02 COMPANIES Buhlmann’s Corner: VW - the new old Germany Infineon in the sights of the financial authorities Federal judges have doubts about Mannesmann acquittals 06 financial investors Germany - the most exciting M&A country in Europe Enforcement: Little chance for pre-clearing 07 politics Acting in Concert - guidance sought Lufthansa buys into Fraport Platform for combative shareholders Deutsche Lufthansa has taken advantage of the sale of the government’s stake to acquire an around 4.95 % share of airport operator Fraport. 10 people Contract extension for The airline wants to beef up its holding to 5 % within a few weeks. Manfred Wennemer Additionally, Lufthansa is claiming a seat on the Fraport Supervisory Elmos Semiconductor’s CEO in waiting Board. That would enable it through the oversight body to exercise Hugo Boss makes management board influence on strategy and on investments in Fraport’s core business. A smaller representative on the Supervisory Board should also enhance planning security on the cost side. As regards potential conflicts of interest arising from the dual role as customer and co-owner of Fraport, the airline 12 campus Considerable potential for Supervisory points out that it has no intention of pushing through special condi- Board improvement tions for itself. The Federal Republic of Germany has sold its remaining High cost of IFRS shares (18.2 % of the share capital) in airport operator Fraport for over Groups often giving away money 660 million Euros, through direct placing with institutional investors plus an exchangeable bond. -
EU Counter-Terrorism Offences What Impact on National Legislation and Case-Law?
EU counter-terrorism offences What impact on national legislation and case-law? Edited by Francesca Galli, Anne Weyembergh ISBN 978-2-8004-1527-7 © 2012 by Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles Avenue Paul Héger 26- 1000 Bruxelles (Belgique) [email protected] http://www.editions-ulb.be Imprimé en Belgique Foreword This book is the result of the international conference “EU Counter-Terrorism Offences: What Impact on National Legislation and Case-law?” organised by ECLAN (European Criminal Law Academic Network) and the Institute for European Studies (Université Libre de Bruxelles) on 27-28 May 2011. This event took place in the framework of the project ECLAN II which has been carried out with the financial support of the European Commission (DG Justice), of the Ministry of Justice of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and of the Institute for European Studies (Université Libre de Bruxelles). The publication of this volume is funded by the Ministry of Justice of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. The editors would like to express their gratitude to all those who were involved in the preparation of the conference, particularly Emanuela Politi and Serge de Biolley. Special thanks are also due to Julian Hale for his help in the language proofreading of some chapters of the book. PART I Introduction and overview of EU legal instruments in the fight against terrorism Introduction Francesca GALLI and Anne WEYEMBERGH 1. The background to the publication In recent times, evaluations have become increasingly important when it comes to EU policy related to cooperation in penal matters. This has been recognised by the EU institutions, and especially by the European Commission 1 and by the Justice and Home Affairs Council 2. -
Annual Report the DAAD Worldwide
2013 Annual Report The DAAD worldwide St. Petersburg Northern, Southern and Western Europe: 150 Kazan Riga Novosibirsk Minsk Moscow London Berlin Bonn Warsaw North America: 20 Brussels Prague Kiev Paris Budapest Bucharest Toronto Rome Tashkent Almaty New York BelgradeIstanbul Tbilisi Madrid Baku Bishkek Athens Yerevan Beijing San Francisco Ankara Dushanbe Seoul Tokyo Tunis Tel Aviv Erbil Tehran Islamabad Amman Kabul Shanghai Cairo East Jerusalem New Delhi Guangzhou Abu Dhabi Taipei City Mexico City North Africa and the Middle East: 33 Hanoi Hong Kong Pune Chennai Bangkok San José Caracas Addis Ababa Ho Chi Minh City Accra Yaoundé Kuala Lumpur Bogotá Singapore Nairobi Jakarta Latin America: 34 Rio de Janeiro São Paulo Johannesburg Sydney Santiago de Chile Buenos Aires Central and Eastern Europe, CIS: 149 St. Petersburg Northern, Southern and Western Europe: 150 Kazan Riga Novosibirsk Minsk Moscow London Berlin Bonn Warsaw Brussels Prague Kiev Paris Budapest Bucharest Toronto Rome Tashkent Almaty New York BelgradeIstanbul Tbilisi Madrid Baku Bishkek Athens Yerevan Beijing San Francisco Ankara Dushanbe Seoul Tokyo Tunis Tel Aviv Erbil Tehran Islamabad Amman Kabul Shanghai Cairo East Jerusalem New Delhi Guangzhou Abu Dhabi Taipei City Mexico City North Africa and the Middle East: 33 Hanoi Hong Kong Pune Chennai Bangkok San José Caracas Addis Ababa Ho Chi Minh City Asia-Pacific: 75 Accra Yaoundé Kuala Lumpur Bogotá Singapore Nairobi Jakarta Sub-Saharan Africa: 20 Rio de Janeiro São Paulo Johannesburg Sydney Santiago de Chile Buenos Aires 15 Regional Offices 55 Information Centres (ICs) Liaison Offices 481 DAAD Lektors As of April 2014 Annual Report of the German Academic Exchange Service 2013 There are no film studios in Chile, and no structures. -
Al-Qaida Und Ihr Umfeld in Deutschland –
Gerhard Piper Al-Qaida und ihr Umfeld in Deutschland – Who´s Who? Berlin September 2008 1 Impressum: Gerhard Piper c/o BITS Rykestraße 13 10405 Berlin Tel: 030 / 44 68 58 25 Fax: 030 / 441 02 21 Email: [email protected] Druck: Eigendruck Alle Rechte vorbehalten Berlin August 2008 2 Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort 4 Zur Einschätzung der Terrorgefahr in Deutschland 5 Anmerkungen zur Namensliste 16 Die Namensliste 19 Ortsverteilung 98 Chronologie 104 Organisationszugehörigkeit 107 Bedrohungsperzeption seit dem 11. September: 123 Drohungen, (Ent-)warnungen, (Fehl-) Alarme und Waffenstillstandangebote Anschläge, Anschlagsversuche und Kampfhandlungen 130 AQ-Todesfälle (im Ausland) 132 Deutsche Mordopfer des AQ-Netzwerkes (im Ausland) 133 Opfer des deutschen Angriffs auf Afghanistan 137 Nachrichtendienstliche Aufklärung 138 Verurteilungen 142 Abschiebungen, Ausweisungen und Auslieferungen 144 Staatsschutzapparat 145 Literaturverzeichnis 172 3 Vorwort Unter den deutschen „Terrorexperten“ heißt es, die Frage sei nicht mehr, ob es in der Bundesrepublik zu einem Terroranschlag kommt, sondern nur wann, wo und wie. Zwar vertritt nur ein Bruchteil der 3,4 Millionen Muslime in der BRD radikal-islamistische Ansichten, aber die Zahl der Terrorverdächtigen hat in den letzten Jahren erheblich zugenommen. Gegenwärtig sind bei den Behörden 187 Ermittlungsverfahren anhängig. Seitdem die Sicherheitsbehörden am 11. September 2001 „Tabula rasa“ machten, um ihre bis dahin gesammelten Informationen über radikale Muslime zu sichten, mussten sie ihr Bild vom „Schläfer“ erheblich überarbeiten. Als Gefährder gilt heute nicht mehr der immigrierte Akademiker arabischer Provenienz, sondern das Gastarbeiterkind mit einschlägigen Erfahrungen in der Straßen- und Kleinkriminalität. Deutsche Konvertiten sind als neuer Bedrohungsfaktor hinzu gekommen. Trotz aller Anstrengungen und dem fortschreitenden Ausbau des Sicherheitsapparates haben die Staatsschützer nach wie vor Schwierigkeiten, die tatsächlich gefährlichen Leute zu identifizieren. -
Report by the Commissioner for Human Rights Mr Thomas Hammarberg
Strasbourg, 11 July 2007 CommDH(2007)14 Original version REPORT BY THE COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS MR THOMAS HAMMARBERG ON HIS VISIT TO GERMANY 9 – 11 and 15 – 20 October 2006 For the attention of the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly CommDH(2007)14 Table of contents Introduction..........................................................................................................................4 Outline and purpose of the visit.......................................................................................4 Note on methodology.......................................................................................................4 1. National system for human rights protection...............................................................5 1.1. Status of international human rights standards....................................................5 1.2. Complaints bodies and human rights structures ..................................................6 1.2.1. Parliamentary Petition Committees.............................................................6 1.2.2. Committee on Human Rights and Humanitarian Aid of the Bundestag......8 1.2.3. Commissioners.............................................................................................8 1.2.4. German Institute for Human Rights...........................................................10 1.3. Judicial system...................................................................................................11 1.4. Police .................................................................................................................12