DOCSLIB.ORG

Winter 2014: First Issue!

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Winter 2014: First Issue! Winter 2014: First Issue! Volume 1, Number 1 Published quarterly by the Norton Air Force Base Museum, San Bernardino, California ake off on a flight to adventure! Head out on a mission to history when a small airport was transformed into the largest employer in the City and County of San Bernardino … Norton Air Force Base, named for native son, Captain Leland Norton. Norton T stories spanned the world and influenced events to this very day. Details inside. (A C-141B Starlifter takes off from Norton AFB in the 1980s – U.S. National Archives photo.) 1 The Norton Air Force Base Museum is a private, nonprofit organization not part of the U.S. government, the Department of Defense, or Department of the Air Force, the Inland Valley Development Agency or any government agency. Newsletter contents are not necessarily the official views of, or endorsed by, the NAFBM or its board of directors. The appearance of advertising and sponsorships does not constitute endorsement by the NAFBM. Contents: Message from the Museum President Robert Edwards ……. 3 From an empty room toward a commemorative community resource: How it was done. Editor’s note: Gary Jacobs ……. 6 I thought I knew all about Norton history. Turns out there’s a lot more … a lot more. Anniversaries: 20 Years since Norton AFB Closure This is a story with a beginning, then another beginning, then another and another. It’s never really over, even when it’s over. Much was asked of the City and County of San Bernardino, and each gave generously of its resources and people, and helped transform America. This is what happened: 1. In the Beginning ……. 8 2. BRAC to the Future: Closure ……. 19 3. Rebirth: Inland Valley Development Association ……. 22 The Hanoi Taxi Story The first pilot in to fly POWs out tells what it was like to make history. ……. 24 February: Black History Month Tuskegee Airman at Norton: From an Ohio orphanage to Norton base commander ……. 35 March: Women’s History Month Women in the Air Force or WAF Band, in time, in step, into history …….. 41 Captain Norton’s Footlocker ……. 45 Chow Hound ……. 46 Norton for Kids ……. 47 Legal stuff ……. 49 2 The Norton Air Force Base Museum is a private, nonprofit organization not part of the U.S. government, the Department of Defense, or Department of the Air Force, the Inland Valley Development Agency or any government agency. Newsletter contents are not necessarily the official views of, or endorsed by, the NAFBM or its board of directors. The appearance of advertising and sponsorships does not constitute endorsement by the NAFBM. A message from the NAFBM President … We’re open on March 13, 2013! Left to right, San Bernardino City Council member Fred Shorett; Catherine Pritchett, IVDA; Col. Gary Underwood, USAF, (ret.); Bob Edwards, NAFB Museum President, San Bernardino County Supervisor Josie Gozales; San Bernardino Mayor Patrick J. Morris; San Bernardino City Council Member Virginia Marquez. Photo by Ricardo Tomboc. 3 The Norton Air Force Base Museum is a private, nonprofit organization not part of the U.S. government, the Department of Defense, or Department of the Air Force, the Inland Valley Development Agency or any government agency. Newsletter contents are not necessarily the official views of, or endorsed by, the NAFBM or its board of directors. The appearance of advertising and sponsorships does not constitute endorsement by the NAFBM. he year was 2012, the month was about April and it was to be the beginning of an unbelievable journey for a dynamic group of volunteer strangers who quickly banded together to form an T unbelievable team of visionaries. Yes, visionaries as they were challenged to do what many thought was an impossible or improbable task of developing a museum in honor of a major USAF base that had closed almost 20 years prior and was named after a young USAAF Officer who was a local hero having lost his life on a bombing mission in a faraway country during WW II. But before I begin with that story, it is time for a commercial. This first (winter) addition of the Norton Flier is a classic example of the devotion to excellence that is displayed throughout the entire Norton AFB Museum and Veterans Memorial. Our Editor has the same vision as each of the Board Members and volunteers, only he has the ability to reflect it in print. This first edition and all sequent future additions of the Norton Flier are a true labor of love. The attention to detail is second to none, focus on accuracy, and professional journalism is not only reflective on the Editor but on the entire NAFBM Team. Continuing the story…As the Board of Directors began their quest, a common vision started to surface among them. Defining the necessary initial steps to be taken was not an easy task to overcome yet it happened without bloodshed. Aligning those steps came next and resulted in the adoption of our Mission Statement, ―To preserve, honor and promote the history of Norton Air Force Base.‖ Some of the Board Members had talents that they did not know they had, others had to dust off their attributes having been retired for any number of years. Coupled to this effort was the fact that the Inland Valley Development Agency was willing to be supportive in more ways than ever realized. Our biggest asset was the assigned advisor the IVDA allowed to help, guide, assist, suggest, and physicality work with us to achieve this common goal that was before us. Fast forwarding to January 2013, the Board of Directors felt it was time to set aside the mountain of plans, directions and focus on the Museum itself. We had a big empty room to that was molded into the brightest new star in San Bernardino. Nothing to display and nothing to display it on. But, there was no absence of heart. The call went out to the media that this newest attraction in town was starting to stir and the Museum needed to hear from the many military and civilians who once had a tie to Norton AFB at some point in their careers. In short, I asked for their ―stuff‖. I reminded everyone that the stuff we need could be found under their beds, in the back of their closets or in the rafters in the garages. I also reminder these same Nortonites they could not take this treasured ―stuff‖ with them on their next assignment, so I asked just what were they going to do with it? I suggested they bring it to the Museum and let us use it to tell the interesting, historical, and colorful story of Norton AFB. This approach worked beyond belief. So much so, that even today we continue to receive these treasured mementoes that often come with a story or two tied the stuff. What we have received in the short amount of time allowed us to open the Norton AFB Museum to the public March 13th, 2013, just about 80 days of highly focused effort. 4 The Norton Air Force Base Museum is a private, nonprofit organization not part of the U.S. government, the Department of Defense, or Department of the Air Force, the Inland Valley Development Agency or any government agency. Newsletter contents are not necessarily the official views of, or endorsed by, the NAFBM or its board of directors. The appearance of advertising and sponsorships does not constitute endorsement by the NAFBM. Needless to say, inside the museum was a beehive of activity with everyone including a band of most helpful volunteers from the 63rd / 445th Norton Veterans Group. Our Grand Opening on the 13th was enjoyed by more than 450 guests. During this time we also worked with a fantastic Friend / Donor / Sponsor and he constructed the Veterans Memorial just outside the Museum. Memorial bricks were sold for the Memorial and sales continue today too. There is lots of room for newly sold bricks. Fast forward to today. We are at the threshold of being open one year, March 2014! Additionally, the (former) Norton AFB will also be remembered as it will be closed in March 2014 for 20 years. These two milestones have now set the stage for many other chapters in the Norton Flier. I salute each of the Norton AFB Museum Board Members, current and past, who have given so much of their time and energy without it, we would still be in the planning stage. And the interesting volunteers who have also been devoted to this common goal, they too have carried more than their share of the responsibility in making the Norton AFB Museum a reality. Last but not least, I extend my sincere thank-you to all the Friends and Sponsors of this Museum. They have played a major part in the Museum creation and the entire team of Board of Directors thank you. Until next the next edition of the Norton Flier … bring us your “stuff”, and thank you for your interest in the Norton AFB Museum. Many things are ongoing or being planned for the short and long future, so stay tuned and watch our Website for updating. Bob Edwards President, Board of Directors Norton AFB Museum and President, 63rd / 445th Norton Veterans Group NAFBM Web site: http://www.nafbmuseum.org/ Hours: Thursdays and Saturdays, 10 a.m. - 2 p.m. Address: 1601 3rd St. San Bernardino CA 92408 Message Ph: (909) 382-7307 e-mail: [email protected] C-141s in a line, ready to make history. (U.S. Air Force photo) 5 The Norton Air Force Base Museum is a private, nonprofit organization not part of the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 Be It Enacted Hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the ^^"'^'/Or^ C ^ United States Of
    324 PUBLIC LAW 161-JULY 15, 1955 [69 STAT. Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 July 15.1955 AN ACT THa R 68291 *• * To authorize certain construction at inilitai-y, naval, and Air F<n"ce installations, and for otlier purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the an^^"'^'/ord Air Forc^e conc^> United States of America in Congress assembled^ struction TITLE I ^'"^" SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army is authorized to establish or develop military installations and facilities by the acquisition, con­ struction, conversion, rehabilitation, or installation of permanent or temporary public works in respect of the following projects, which include site preparation, appurtenances, and related utilities and equipment: CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES TECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Troop housing, community facilities, utilities, and family housing, $1,736,000. Black Hills Ordnance Depot, South Dakota: Family housing, $1,428,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Operational and mainte­ nance facilities, $509,000. Erie Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities and utilities, $1,933,000. Frankford Arsenal, Pennsylvania: Utilities, $855,000. LOrdstown Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities, $875,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, (^olorado: Operational and maintenance facilities, $1,843,000. Ked River Arsenal, Texas: Operational and maintenance facilities, $140,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Research and development facilities and community facilities, $2,865,000. E(.>ck Island Arsenal, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facil­ ities, $347,000. Rossford Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Utilities, $400,000. Savanna Ordnance Depot, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facilities, $342,000. Seneca Ordnance Depot, New York: Community facilities, $129,000.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-95-139 Military Bases B-261073
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee GAO on National Security, International Affairs, and Criminal Justice, Committee on Governmental Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives August 1995 MILITARY BASES Case Studies on Selected Bases Closed in 1988 and 1991 GAO/NSIAD-95-139 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-261073 August 15, 1995 The Honorable William H. Zeliff, Jr. Chairman, Subcommittee on National Security, International Affairs, and Criminal Justice Committee on Governmental Reform and Oversight House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: As part of an earlier review of 37 bases closed by the first two base realignment and closure rounds, we reported in late 1994 on expected revenues from land sales, resources requested from the federal government, and issues delaying reuse planning.1 As requested in your letter of March 21, 1995, we collected more recent information on reuse planning and implementation at the 37 bases. Specifically, we are providing updated summaries on the planned disposal and reuse of properties, successful conversions, problems that delay planning and implementation, and assistance provided to communities. We are also including a profile of each of the 37 installations in appendix III. Under current plans, over half of the land will be retained by the federal Results in Brief government because it (1) is contaminated with unexploded ordnance, (2) has been retained by decisions made by the base realignment and closure commissions or by legislation, or (3) is needed by federal agencies. Most of the remaining land will be requested by local reuse authorities under various public benefit transfer authorities or the new economic development conveyance authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with John Borling # VRV-A-L-2013-037.05 Interview # 05: April 23, 2014 Interviewer: Mark Depue
    Interview with John Borling # VRV-A-L-2013-037.05 Interview # 05: April 23, 2014 Interviewer: Mark DePue COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 Note to the Reader: Readers of the oral history memoir should bear in mind that this is a transcript of the spoken word, and that the interviewer, interviewee and editor sought to preserve the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the memoir, nor for the views expressed therein. We leave these for the reader to judge. DePue: Today is Wednesday, April 23, 2014. My name is Mark DePue, Director of Oral History with the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. Today, once again, I’m in Rockford, Illinois with General John Borling. Good morning, Sir. Borling: Good morning to you. Spring is almost here, although it was thirty-three degrees when I ran this morning. I went out in shorts and ended up with red legs and watching other people come bundling down the path, looking like it was midwinter again, although it looks to be a pleasant day.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 85-325-Feb
    72 ST AT. ] PUBLIC LAW 85-325-FEB. 12, 1958 11 Public Law 85-325 AN ACT February 12, 1958 To authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to establish and develop certain [H. R. 9739] installations for'the national security, and to confer certain authority on the Secretary of Defense, and for other purposes. Be it enacted Ify the Senate and House of Representatives of the Air Force instal­ United States of America in Congress assembled^ That the Secretary lations. of the Air Force may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, converting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site prep­ aration, appurtenances, utilities, and equipment, for the following projects: Provided^ That with respect to the authorizations pertaining to the dispersal of the Strategic Air Command Forces, no authoriza­ tion for any individual location shall be utilized unless the Secretary of the Air Force or his designee has first obtained, from the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, approval of such location for dispersal purposes. SEMIAUTOMATIC GROUND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEM (SAGE) Grand Forks Air Force Base, Grand Forks, North Dakota: Admin­ Post, p. 659. istrative facilities, $270,000. K. I. Sawyer Airport, Marquette, Michigan: Administrative facili­ ties, $277,000. Larson Air Force Base, Moses Lake, Washington: Utilities, $50,000. Luke Air Force Base, Phoenix, Arizona: Operational and training facilities, and utilities, $11,582,000. Malmstrom Air Force Base, Great Falls, Montana: Operational and training facilities, and utilities, $6,901,000. Minot Air Force Base, Minot, North Dakota: Operational and training facilities, and utilities, $10,338,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Installation Restoration Program Basewide Record
    SDMS DOCID# 1106888 INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM BASEWIDE RECORD OF DECISION FORMER NORTON AIR FORCE BASE SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 2005 FINAL Prepared by EARTH TECH, INC. 1461 E. COOLEY DRIVE, SUITE 100 COLTON, CA 92324 CONTRACT NO. FY1624-00-D-8023 DELIVERY ORDER NO. 004 Prepared for AIR FORCE REAL PROPERTY AGENCY NORTON OPERATING LOCATION MCCLELLAN, CALIFORNIA Jerry Bingham CONTRACTING OFFICER’S REPRESENTATIVE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION DIVISION BROOKS CITY-BASE, TX 78235-5363 INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM BASEWIDE RECORD OF DECISION FORMER NORTON AIR FORCE BASE SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 2005 FINAL Prepared by EARTH TECH, INC. 1461 E. COOLEY DRIVE, SUITE 100 COLTON, CA 92324 CONTRACT NO. FY1624-00-D-8023 DELIVERY ORDER NO. 004 Prepared for AIR FORCE REAL PROPERTY AGENCY NORTON OPERATING LOCATION MCCLELLAN, CALIFORNIA Jerry Bingham CONTRACTING OFFICER’S REPRESENTATIVE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION DIVISION BROOKS CITY-BASE, TX 78235-5363 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 DECLARATION ................................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 DECISION SUMMARY.................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION...............................................................2-1 2.1.1 History of Norton Air Force Base ...........................................................................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • Up from Kitty Hawk Chronology
    airforcemag.com Up From Kitty Hawk Chronology AIR FORCE Magazine's Aerospace Chronology Up From Kitty Hawk PART ONE PART TWO 1903-1979 1980-present 1 airforcemag.com Up From Kitty Hawk Chronology Up From Kitty Hawk 1980-1989 F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighters, first flight June 1981. Articles noted throughout the chronology are hyperlinked to the online archive for Air Force Magazine and the Daily Report. 1980 March 12-14, 1980. Two B-52 crews fly nonstop around the world in 43.5 hours, covering 21,256 statute miles, averaging 488 mph, and carrying out sea surveillance/reconnaissance missions. April 24, 1980. In the middle of an attempt to rescue US citizens held hostage in Iran, mechanical difficulties force several Navy RH-53 helicopter crews to turn back. Later, one of the RH-53s collides with an Air Force HC-130 in a sandstorm at the Desert One refueling site. Eight US servicemen are killed. Desert One May 18-June 5, 1980. Following the eruption of Mount Saint Helens in northwest Washington State, the Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Service, Military Airlift Command, and the 9th Strategic Reconnaissance Wing conduct humanitarian-relief efforts: Helicopter crews lift 61 people to safety, while SR–71 airplanes conduct aerial photographic reconnaissance. May 28, 1980. The Air Force Academy graduates its first female cadets. Ninety-seven women are commissioned as second lieutenants. Lt. Kathleen Conly graduates eighth in her class. Aug. 22, 1980. The Department of Defense reveals existence of stealth technology that “enables the United States to build manned and unmanned aircraft that cannot be successfully intercepted with existing air defense systems.” Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boneyard & Beyond
    AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 25 • Number 2 • Spring 2017 The Boneyard & Beyond Tales of Aircraft Storage, Disposal and Regeneration Pages 8-13 2017 A/TA Convention & Symposium Registration Form Pages 24 CONTENTS… Association News A/TA UpFront ....................................................................................2-5 Chairman’s Comments ........................................................................2 President’s Message ...............................................................................3 2016 Year End Financial Report ...........................................................5 AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 25 • Number 2 • Spring 2017 A/TA Salutes the Life of Hall of Fame Inductee Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by MSgt Theodore (Ted) R. Venturini, USAF (Ret) 1932-2017 .....................6-7 the Airlift/Tanker Association, 655 Julian Road, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421. Postage paid at Belleville, Illinois. Subscription rate: $40.00 per year. Change of address requires four weeks notice. The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profit professional Cover Story organization dedicated to providing a forum for people interested in improving the capability of U.S. air mobility forces. Membership in the Airlift/Tanker Association is $40 The Boneyard & Beyond annually or $110 for three years. Full-time student membership Tales of Aircraft Storage, Disposal and Regeneration ............... 8-13 is $15 per year. Life membership is $500. Industry Partner membership includes five individual
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 15780.Pdf
    FOREWARD Your Air Force Reserve is a combat- ready force, composed of more than 70,000 proud reservists, stationed locally throughout the United States, serving globally for every Combatant Command around the world. We provide our Nation with operational capability, strategic depth and surge capacity whenever America needs us. We are an integrated Total Force partner in every Air Force core mission: Air and Space Superiority, Global Strike, Rapid Global Mobility, Intelligence, Surveillance, James F. Jackson, and Reconnaissance, and Command Lt Gen, USAF and Control. In an increasingly limited fiscal environment, reservists remain efficient and cost-effective solutions to our nation’s challenges. The majority of our Citizen Airmen serve part time, making us a highly efficient force, averaging about a third of the cost of active duty Airmen. Perhaps our greatest strength is we retain ‘Airmen for life,’ preserving the considerable investments and expertise of our Airmen beyond their Cameron B. Kirksey, active duty service. In times of crisis, we Command CMSgt can call upon our strategic depth of an additional 785,000 Airmen from the Individual Ready Reserve, Standby Reserve, Retired Reserve and Retired Active Duty. To meet future challenges, the Air Force Reserve works as a member of the “Total Force”, alongside active duty and Air National Guardsmen. This strong, three-component team is ready for combat or humanitarian relief operations worldwide. Since 2012, the Air Force Reserve can also be mobilized to respond to domestic requirements here at home. 01 Dual-use capabilities such as airlift, aeromedical evacuation and personnel recovery are equally valuable, both in-theater and for homeland support.
    [Show full text]
  • 166 Public Law 86-500-.June 8, 1960 [74 Stat
    166 PUBLIC LAW 86-500-.JUNE 8, 1960 [74 STAT. Public Law 86-500 June 8. 1960 AN ACT [H» R. 10777] To authorize certain construction at military installation!^, and for other pnriwses. He it enacted hy the Hemite and House of Representatives of the 8tfiction^'Acf°^ I'raited States of America in Congress assemoJed, I960. TITLE I ''^^^* SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con- \'erting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equip­ ment, for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES I'ECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Training facilities, medical facilities, and utilities, $6,221,000. Benicia Arsenal, California: Utilities, $337,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Utilities and ground improvements, $353,000. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey: Research, development, and test facilities, $850,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, Colorado: Operational facilities, $369,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Community facilities and utilities, $1,000,000. Umatilla Ordnance Depot, Oregon: Utilities and ground improve­ ments, $319,000. Watertow^n Arsenal, Massachusetts: Research, development, and test facilities, $1,849,000. White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico: Operational facilities and utilities, $1,2'33,000. (Quartermaster Corps) Fort Lee, Virginia: Administrative facilities and utilities, $577,000. Atlanta General Depot, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, $365,000. New Cumberland General Depot, Pennsylvania: Operational facili­ ties, $89,000. Richmond Quartermaster Depot, Virginia: Administrative facili­ ties, $478,000. Sharpe General Depot, California: Maintenance facilities, $218,000. (Chemical Corps) Army Chemical Center, Maryland: Operational facilities and com­ munity facilities, $843,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Year Review
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street Sa n Francisco, CA 941 05-3901 September 30, 2010 Jerry W. Bingham, YD-02 Program Manager/COR AFCEEJEXC 2261 Hughes Ave, Suite 155 Lackland AFB, TX 78236 Re: Final Third Five-Year Review Report fo r Former Norton Air Force Base Dear Mr. Bingham: We have received the Final Third Five-Year Review Report!or Fonner NOrlon Air Force Base, San Bernardino County, California, dated September 2010 (5YR Report). EPA reviewed the 5YR Report along with other supporting documents and concurs with the findings, recommendations, and protectiveness statements of the 5YR Report. We agree that the current remedy for CBA OU Component 1 is prOleclive in the short term since there is no exposure to contaminated groundwater, and in the long term due 10 the presence of institutiona1 controls to prevent use of groundwater as a drinking source. Nonetheless, the 5YR confirms the uncertainty regarding the relationship between long term management of the groundwater table and remaining vadose zone contamination, ifany. As documented in the 5YR and other site reporting, there has been a general decline in groundwater elevation attributed to an extended period of drought and continued production of groundwater for municipal uses. As a result of this decline, monitoring wells that previously had shown contamination above ARARs have gone dry and are no longer able to provide information on remedy effectiveness. We are concerned about the potential that remaini ng vadose zone contamination could be mobilized to groundwater if the groundwater table returns to historic levels at some point in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-05-614 Military Base Closures: Observations on Prior and Current
    United States Government Accountability Office Statement GAO Before the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission For Release on Delivery Expected at 9:30 a.m. EDT Military Base Closures Tuesday, May 3, 2005 Observations on Prior and Current BRAC Rounds Statement of Barry W. Holman, Director Defense Capabilities and Management a GAO-05-614 May 3, 2005 MILITARY BASE CLOSURES Accountability Integrity Reliability Highlights Observations of Prior and Current BRAC Highlights of GAO-05-614, a statement Rounds before the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The Defense Base Closure and DOD indicates that recommendations from the previous BRAC rounds were Realignment Act of 1990, as implemented within the 6-year period mandated by law. As a result, DOD amended, authorized a new round estimated that it reduced its domestic infrastructure by about 20 percent; of base realignment and closures about 90 percent of unneeded BRAC property is now available for reuse. (BRAC) in 2005, the fifth such Substantial net savings of approximately $29 billion have been realized over round in recent years but the first since 1995. The legislation requires time. Most communities surrounding closed bases are continuing to recover the Secretary of Defense to submit from the impact of BRAC and faring well compared with average U.S. rates his list of bases recommended for for unemployment and income growth. In examining DOD’s proposed closure and realignment to an closures and realignments, the Commission may want to ensure that all independent BRAC commission by proposed closure and realignment actions can be implemented within the May 16, 2005.
    [Show full text]