The Abel Prize Laureate 2016 Brochure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Abel Prize Laureate 2016 Brochure The Abel Prize Laureate 2016 Sir Andrew J. Wiles University of Oxford, England www.abelprize.no Sir Andrew J. Wiles receives the Abel Prize for 2016 “for his stunning proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem by way of the modularity conjecture for semistable elliptic curves, opening a new era in number theory.” Citation The Abel Committee The Norwegian Academy of Science and unveiled several basic notions in algebraic However, at the time the modularity The new ideas introduced by Wiles were Letters has decided to award the Abel Prize number theory, such as ideal numbers and conjecture was widely believed to be crucial to many subsequent developments, for 2016 to the subtleties of unique factorization. The completely inaccessible. It was therefore a including the proof in 2001 of the general complete proof found by Andrew Wiles stunning advance when Andrew Wiles, in case of the modularity conjecture by Sir Andrew J. Wiles, Mathematical Institute, relies on three further concepts in number a breakthrough paper published in 1995, Christophe Breuil, Brian Conrad, Fred University of Oxford theory, namely elliptic curves, modular introduced his modularity lifting technique Diamond, and Richard Taylor. As recently forms, and Galois representations. and proved the semistable case of the as 2015, Nuno Freitas, Bao V. Le Hung, “for his stunning proof of Elliptic curves are defined by cubic modularity conjecture. and Samir Siksek proved the analogous Fermat’s Last Theorem by way equations in two variables. They are the The modularity lifting technique of Wiles modularity statement over real quadratic of the modularity conjecture natural domains of definition of the elliptic concerns the Galois symmetries of the number fields. Few results have as rich a for semistable elliptic curves, functions introduced by Niels Henrik Abel. points of finite order in the abelian group mathematical history and as dramatic a opening a new era in Modular forms are highly symmetric analytic structure on an elliptic curve. Building upon proof as Fermat’s Last Theorem. number theory.” functions defined on the upper half of the Barry Mazur’s deformation theory for such complex plane, and naturally factor through Galois representations, Wiles identified Number theory, an old and beautiful branch shapes known as modular curves. An elliptic a numerical criterion which ensures that of mathematics, is concerned with the study curve is said to be modular if it can be modularity for points of order p can be lifted of arithmetic properties of the integers. In its parametrized by a map from one of these to modularity for points of order any power modern form the subject is fundamentally modular curves. The modularity conjecture, of p, where p is an odd prime. This lifted connected to complex analysis, algebraic proposed by Goro Shimura, Yutaka modularity is then sufficient to prove that geometry, and representation theory. Taniyama, and André Weil in the 1950s and the elliptic curve is modular. The numerical Number theoretic results play an important 60s, claims that every elliptic curve defined criterion was confirmed in the semistable role in our everyday lives through encryption over the rational numbers is modular. case by using an important companion algorithms for communications, financial In 1984, Gerhard Frey associated a paper written jointly with Richard Taylor. transactions, and digital security. semistable elliptic curve to any hypothetical Theorems of Robert Langlands and Jerrold Fermat’s Last Theorem, first formulated counterexample to Fermat’s Last Theorem, Tunnell show that in many cases the Galois by Pierre de Fermat in the 17th century, is and strongly suspected that this elliptic representation given by the points of order the assertion that the equation xn + yn = zn curve would not be modular. Frey’s non- three is modular. By an ingenious switch has no solutions in positive integers for n>2. modularity was proven via Jean-Pierre from one prime to another, Wiles showed Fermat proved his claim for n=4, Leonhard Serre’s epsilon conjecture by Kenneth Ribet that in the remaining cases the Galois Euler found a proof for n=3, and Sophie in 1986. Hence, a proof of the Shimura- representation given by the points of order Germain proved the first general result that Taniyama-Weil modularity conjecture five is modular. This completed his proof of applies to infinitely many prime exponents. for semistable elliptic curves would also the modularity conjecture, and thus also of Ernst Kummer’s study of the problem yield a proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem. Fermat’s Last Theorem. 4 5 © Abelprisen/DNVA/Calle Huth © Alain Goriely decided that he would return to the an error like this, because of the mental A biography problem that so excited him as a child. “The exhaustion from trying it the first time challenge proved irresistible,” he said. around. No gaps were found in the revised of Andrew Wiles Wiles made the unusual choice to work proof and it was published in Annals of on Fermat alone, rather than collaborating Mathematics in 1995, with the title Modular Alexander Bellos with colleagues. Since the problem was so elliptic curves and Fermat’s Last Theorem. famous, he was worried that news he was As well as the attention of the global working on it would attract too much media, Wiles received many awards. Andrew Wiles is one of the very few connection with measuring the lengths attention and he would lose focus. The only They include the Rolf Schock Prize, the mathematicians – if not the only – whose of planetary orbits. Together they made person he confided in was his wife, Nada, Ostrowski Prize, the Wolf Prize, the Royal proof of a theorem has been international the first progress on one of the field’s who he married shortly after embarking on Medal of the Royal Society, the U.S. headline news. In 1994 he cracked Fermat’s fundamental conjectures, the Birch and the proof. National Academy of Science’s Award in Last Theorem, which at the time was the Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture, proving it for After seven years of intense and secret Mathematics, and the Shaw Prize. The most famous, and long-running, unsolved certain special cases. Wiles was awarded study, Wiles believed he had a proof. He International Mathematical Union presented problem in the subject’s history. his PhD in 1980 for the thesis Reciprocity decided to go public during a lecture series him with a silver plaque, the only time they Wiles’ proof was not only the high point laws and the conjecture of Birch and at a seminar in Cambridge, England. He have ever done so. He was awarded the of his career – and an epochal moment for Swinnerton-Dyer. did not announce it beforehand. The title of inaugural Clay Research Award. In 2000 he mathematics – but also the culmination of Between 1977 and 1980 Wiles was an his talk, Modular Forms, Elliptic Curves and was given a knighthood. a remarkable personal journey that began Assistant Professor at Harvard University, Galois Representations, gave nothing away, Wiles was at Princeton between 1982 three decades before. In 1963, when he where he started to study modular forms, although rumour had spread around the and 2010, except for short periods of leave. was a ten-year-old boy growing up in a separate field from elliptic curves. There mathematical community and two hundred In 2010 he returned to Oxford as a Royal Cambridge, England, Wiles found a copy he began a collaboration with Barry Mazur, people were packed in the lecture theatre to Society Research Professor. His address of a book on Fermat’s Last Theorem in his which resulted in their 1984 proof of the hear him. When he wrote the theorem up as at the Mathematical Institute is the Andrew local library. He became captivated by the main conjecture of Iwasawa theory, a field the conclusion to the talk, the room erupted Wiles Building, which opened in 2013 and problem – that there are no whole number within number theory. In 1982 he was made in applause. was named in his honour. solutions to the equation xn + yn = zn when a professor at Princeton University. Later that year, however, a referee n is greater than 2 – which was easy During the early years of Wiles’ checking the details of his proof found an Sources: to understand but which had remained academic career he was not actively trying error in it. It was devastating for Wiles to Fermat’s Last Theorem by Simon Singh. Wikipedia unsolved for three hundred years. “I knew to solve Fermat’s Last Theorem – nor was contemplate the idea that he had not, in Notices of the AMS from that moment that I would never let it anyone else, since the problem was fact, solved Fermat’s Last Theorem. He set Shawprize.org go,” he said. “I had to solve it.” generally regarded as too difficult, and to work trying to fix the issue, enlisting one BBC Horizon. Wiles studied mathematics at possibly unsolvable. A turning point came of his former students, Richard Taylor, to Merton College, Oxford, and returned in 1986 when it was shown that the three- help him with the task. After a year’s work, to Cambridge, at Clare College, for century-old problem could be rephrased Wiles found a way to correct the error. postgraduate studies. His research area using the mathematics of elliptic curves and “I had this incredible revelation,” a tearful was number theory, the mathematical field modular forms. It was an amazing twist of Wiles told a BBC documentary. “It was the that investigates the properties of numbers. fate that two subjects that Wiles had most important moment of my working life.” Under the guidance of his advisor John specialized in turned out to be exactly the Not only is it rare to announce the Coates, Wiles studied elliptic curves, a areas that were needed to tackle Fermat’s proof of a famous theorem, but it is also type of equation that was first studied in Last Theorem with modern tools.
Recommended publications
  • La Controverse De 1874 Entre Camille Jordan Et Leopold Kronecker
    La controverse de 1874 entre Camille Jordan et Leopold Kronecker. * Frédéric Brechenmacher ( ). Résumé. Une vive querelle oppose en 1874 Camille Jordan et Leopold Kronecker sur l’organisation de la théorie des formes bilinéaires, considérée comme permettant un traitement « général » et « homogène » de nombreuses questions développées dans des cadres théoriques variés au XIXe siècle et dont le problème principal est reconnu comme susceptible d’être résolu par deux théorèmes énoncés indépendamment par Jordan et Weierstrass. Cette controverse, suscitée par la rencontre de deux théorèmes que nous considèrerions aujourd’hui équivalents, nous permettra de questionner l’identité algébrique de pratiques polynomiales de manipulations de « formes » mises en œuvre sur une période antérieure aux approches structurelles de l’algèbre linéaire qui donneront à ces pratiques l’identité de méthodes de caractérisation des classes de similitudes de matrices. Nous montrerons que les pratiques de réductions canoniques et de calculs d’invariants opposées par Jordan et Kronecker manifestent des identités multiples indissociables d’un contexte social daté et qui dévoilent des savoirs tacites, des modes de pensées locaux mais aussi, au travers de regards portés sur une histoire à long terme impliquant des travaux d’auteurs comme Lagrange, Laplace, Cauchy ou Hermite, deux philosophies internes sur la signification de la généralité indissociables d’idéaux disciplinaires opposant algèbre et arithmétique. En questionnant les identités culturelles de telles pratiques cet article vise à enrichir l’histoire de l’algèbre linéaire, souvent abordée dans le cadre de problématiques liées à l’émergence de structures et par l’intermédiaire de l’histoire d’une théorie, d’une notion ou d’un mode de raisonnement.
    [Show full text]
  • A MATHEMATICIAN's SURVIVAL GUIDE 1. an Algebra Teacher I
    A MATHEMATICIAN’S SURVIVAL GUIDE PETER G. CASAZZA 1. An Algebra Teacher I could Understand Emmy award-winning journalist and bestselling author Cokie Roberts once said: As long as algebra is taught in school, there will be prayer in school. 1.1. An Object of Pride. Mathematician’s relationship with the general public most closely resembles “bipolar” disorder - at the same time they admire us and hate us. Almost everyone has had at least one bad experience with mathematics during some part of their education. Get into any taxi and tell the driver you are a mathematician and the response is predictable. First, there is silence while the driver relives his greatest nightmare - taking algebra. Next, you will hear the immortal words: “I was never any good at mathematics.” My response is: “I was never any good at being a taxi driver so I went into mathematics.” You can learn a lot from taxi drivers if you just don’t tell them you are a mathematician. Why get started on the wrong foot? The mathematician David Mumford put it: “I am accustomed, as a professional mathematician, to living in a sort of vacuum, surrounded by people who declare with an odd sort of pride that they are mathematically illiterate.” 1.2. A Balancing Act. The other most common response we get from the public is: “I can’t even balance my checkbook.” This reflects the fact that the public thinks that mathematics is basically just adding numbers. They have no idea what we really do. Because of the textbooks they studied, they think that all needed mathematics has already been discovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Gromov Receives 2009 Abel Prize
    Gromov Receives 2009 Abel Prize . The Norwegian Academy of Science Medal (1997), and the Wolf Prize (1993). He is a and Letters has decided to award the foreign member of the U.S. National Academy of Abel Prize for 2009 to the Russian- Sciences and of the American Academy of Arts French mathematician Mikhail L. and Sciences, and a member of the Académie des Gromov for “his revolutionary con- Sciences of France. tributions to geometry”. The Abel Prize recognizes contributions of Citation http://www.abelprisen.no/en/ extraordinary depth and influence Geometry is one of the oldest fields of mathemat- to the mathematical sciences and ics; it has engaged the attention of great mathema- has been awarded annually since ticians through the centuries but has undergone Photo from from Photo 2003. It carries a cash award of revolutionary change during the last fifty years. Mikhail L. Gromov 6,000,000 Norwegian kroner (ap- Mikhail Gromov has led some of the most impor- proximately US$950,000). Gromov tant developments, producing profoundly original will receive the Abel Prize from His Majesty King general ideas, which have resulted in new perspec- Harald at an award ceremony in Oslo, Norway, on tives on geometry and other areas of mathematics. May 19, 2009. Riemannian geometry developed from the study Biographical Sketch of curved surfaces and their higher-dimensional analogues and has found applications, for in- Mikhail Leonidovich Gromov was born on Decem- stance, in the theory of general relativity. Gromov ber 23, 1943, in Boksitogorsk, USSR. He obtained played a decisive role in the creation of modern his master’s degree (1965) and his doctorate (1969) global Riemannian geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • MY UNFORGETTABLE EARLY YEARS at the INSTITUTE Enstitüde Unutulmaz Erken Yıllarım
    MY UNFORGETTABLE EARLY YEARS AT THE INSTITUTE Enstitüde Unutulmaz Erken Yıllarım Dinakar Ramakrishnan `And what was it like,’ I asked him, `meeting Eliot?’ `When he looked at you,’ he said, `it was like standing on a quay, watching the prow of the Queen Mary come towards you, very slowly.’ – from `Stern’ by Seamus Heaney in memory of Ted Hughes, about the time he met T.S.Eliot It was a fortunate stroke of serendipity for me to have been at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, twice during the nineteen eighties, first as a Post-doctoral member in 1982-83, and later as a Sloan Fellow in the Fall of 1986. I had the privilege of getting to know Robert Langlands at that time, and, needless to say, he has had a larger than life influence on me. It wasn’t like two ships passing in the night, but more like a rowboat feeling the waves of an oncoming ship. Langlands and I did not have many conversations, but each time we did, he would make a Zen like remark which took me a long time, at times months (or even years), to comprehend. Once or twice it even looked like he was commenting not on the question I posed, but on a tangential one; however, after much reflection, it became apparent that what he had said had an interesting bearing on what I had been wondering about, and it always provided a new take, at least to me, on the matter. Most importantly, to a beginner in the field like I was then, he was generous to a fault, always willing, whenever asked, to explain the subtle aspects of his own work.
    [Show full text]
  • Kummer, Regular Primes, and Fermat's Last Theorem
    e H a r v a e Harvard College r d C o l l e Mathematics Review g e M a t h e m Vol. 2, No. 2 Fall 2008 a t i c s In this issue: R e v i ALLAN M. FELDMAN and ROBERTO SERRANO e w , Arrow’s Impossibility eorem: Two Simple Single-Profile Versions V o l . 2 YUFEI ZHAO , N Young Tableaux and the Representations of the o . Symmetric Group 2 KEITH CONRAD e Congruent Number Problem A Student Publication of Harvard College Website. Further information about The HCMR can be Sponsorship. Sponsoring The HCMR supports the un- found online at the journal’s website, dergraduate mathematics community and provides valuable high-level education to undergraduates in the field. Sponsors http://www.thehcmr.org/ (1) will be listed in the print edition of The HCMR and on a spe- cial page on the The HCMR’s website, (1). Sponsorship is available at the following levels: Instructions for Authors. All submissions should in- clude the name(s) of the author(s), institutional affiliations (if Sponsor $0 - $99 any), and both postal and e-mail addresses at which the cor- Fellow $100 - $249 responding author may be reached. General questions should Friend $250 - $499 be addressed to Editors-In-Chief Zachary Abel and Ernest E. Contributor $500 - $1,999 Fontes at [email protected]. Donor $2,000 - $4,999 Patron $5,000 - $9,999 Articles. The Harvard College Mathematics Review invites Benefactor $10,000 + the submission of quality expository articles from undergrad- uate students.
    [Show full text]
  • Prvních Deset Abelových Cen Za Matematiku
    Prvních deset Abelových cen za matematiku The first ten Abel Prizes for mathematics [English summary] In: Michal Křížek (author); Lawrence Somer (author); Martin Markl (author); Oldřich Kowalski (author); Pavel Pudlák (author); Ivo Vrkoč (author); Hana Bílková (other): Prvních deset Abelových cen za matematiku. (English). Praha: Jednota českých matematiků a fyziků, 2013. pp. 87–88. Persistent URL: http://dml.cz/dmlcz/402234 Terms of use: © M. Křížek © L. Somer © M. Markl © O. Kowalski © P. Pudlák © I. Vrkoč Institute of Mathematics of the Czech Academy of Sciences provides access to digitized documents strictly for personal use. Each copy of any part of this document must contain these Terms of use. This document has been digitized, optimized for electronic delivery and stamped with digital signature within the project DML-CZ: The Czech Digital Mathematics Library http://dml.cz Summary The First Ten Abel Prizes for Mathematics Michal Křížek, Lawrence Somer, Martin Markl, Oldřich Kowalski, Pavel Pudlák, Ivo Vrkoč The Abel Prize for mathematics is an international prize presented by the King of Norway for outstanding results in mathematics. It is named after the Norwegian mathematician Niels Henrik Abel (1802–1829) who found that there is no explicit formula for the roots of a general polynomial of degree five. The financial support of the Abel Prize is comparable with the Nobel Prize, i.e., about one million American dollars. Niels Henrik Abel (1802–1829) M. Křížek a kol.: Prvních deset Abelových cen za matematiku, JČMF, Praha, 2013 87 Already in 1899, another famous Norwegian mathematician Sophus Lie proposed to establish an Abel Prize, when he learned that Alfred Nobel would not include a prize in mathematics among his five proposed Nobel Prizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Algebra
    Cornerstones Series Editors Charles L. Epstein, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Steven G. Krantz, University of Washington, St. Louis Advisory Board Anthony W. Knapp, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Emeritus Anthony W. Knapp Basic Algebra Along with a companion volume Advanced Algebra Birkhauser¨ Boston • Basel • Berlin Anthony W. Knapp 81 Upper Sheep Pasture Road East Setauket, NY 11733-1729 U.S.A. e-mail to: [email protected] http://www.math.sunysb.edu/˜ aknapp/books/b-alg.html Cover design by Mary Burgess. Mathematics Subject Classicification (2000): 15-01, 20-02, 13-01, 12-01, 16-01, 08-01, 18A05, 68P30 Library of Congress Control Number: 2006932456 ISBN-10 0-8176-3248-4 eISBN-10 0-8176-4529-2 ISBN-13 978-0-8176-3248-9 eISBN-13 978-0-8176-4529-8 Advanced Algebra ISBN 0-8176-4522-5 Basic Algebra and Advanced Algebra (Set) ISBN 0-8176-4533-0 Printed on acid-free paper. c 2006 Anthony W. Knapp All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Birkhauser¨ Boston, c/o Springer Science+Business Media LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA) and the author, except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology and Metaphysics in the Development of Dedekind's Theory
    Methodology and metaphysics in the development of Dedekind’s theory of ideals Jeremy Avigad 1 Introduction Philosophical concerns rarely force their way into the average mathematician’s workday. But, in extreme circumstances, fundamental questions can arise as to the legitimacy of a certain manner of proceeding, say, as to whether a particular object should be granted ontological status, or whether a certain conclusion is epistemologically warranted. There are then two distinct views as to the role that philosophy should play in such a situation. On the first view, the mathematician is called upon to turn to the counsel of philosophers, in much the same way as a nation considering an action of dubious international legality is called upon to turn to the United Nations for guidance. After due consideration of appropriate regulations and guidelines (and, possibly, debate between representatives of different philosophical fac- tions), the philosophers render a decision, by which the dutiful mathematician abides. Quine was famously critical of such dreams of a ‘first philosophy.’ At the oppos- ite extreme, our hypothetical mathematician answers only to the subject’s internal concerns, blithely or brashly indifferent to philosophical approval. What is at stake to our mathematician friend is whether the questionable practice provides a proper mathematical solution to the problem at hand, or an appropriate mathematical understanding; or, in pragmatic terms, whether it will make it past a journal referee. In short, mathematics is as mathematics does, and the philosopher’s task is simply to make sense of the subject as it evolves and certify practices that are already in place.
    [Show full text]
  • Quadratic Forms and Automorphic Forms
    Quadratic Forms and Automorphic Forms Jonathan Hanke May 16, 2011 2 Contents 1 Background on Quadratic Forms 11 1.1 Notation and Conventions . 11 1.2 Definitions of Quadratic Forms . 11 1.3 Equivalence of Quadratic Forms . 13 1.4 Direct Sums and Scaling . 13 1.5 The Geometry of Quadratic Spaces . 14 1.6 Quadratic Forms over Local Fields . 16 1.7 The Geometry of Quadratic Lattices – Dual Lattices . 18 1.8 Quadratic Forms over Local (p-adic) Rings of Integers . 19 1.9 Local-Global Results for Quadratic forms . 20 1.10 The Neighbor Method . 22 1.10.1 Constructing p-neighbors . 22 2 Theta functions 25 2.1 Definitions and convergence . 25 2.2 Symmetries of the theta function . 26 2.3 Modular Forms . 28 2.4 Asymptotic Statements about rQ(m) ...................... 31 2.5 The circle method and Siegel’s Formula . 32 2.6 Mass Formulas . 34 2.7 An Example: The sum of 4 squares . 35 2.7.1 Canonical measures for local densities . 36 2.7.2 Computing β1(m) ............................ 36 2.7.3 Understanding βp(m) by counting . 37 2.7.4 Computing βp(m) for all primes p ................... 38 2.7.5 Computing rQ(m) for certain m ..................... 39 3 Quaternions and Clifford Algebras 41 3.1 Definitions . 41 3.2 The Clifford Algebra . 45 3 4 CONTENTS 3.3 Connecting algebra and geometry in the orthogonal group . 47 3.4 The Spin Group . 49 3.5 Spinor Equivalence . 52 4 The Theta Lifting 55 4.1 Classical to Adelic modular forms for GL2 ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Interviewed by T. Christine Stevens)
    KENNETH A. ROSS JANUARY 8, 2011 AND JANUARY 5, 2012 (Interviewed by T. Christine Stevens) How did you get involved in the MAA? As a good citizen of the mathematical community, I was a member of MAA from the beginning of my career. But I worked in an “AMS culture,” so I wasn’t actively involved in the MAA. As of January, 1983, I had never served on an MAA committee. But I had been Associate Secretary of the AMS from 1971 to 1981, and thus Len Gillman (who was MAA Treasurer at the time) asked me to be MAA Secretary. There was a strong contrast between the cultures of the AMS and the MAA, and my first two years were very hard. Did you receive mentoring in the MAA at the early stages of your career? From whom? As a graduate student at the University of Washington, I hadn’t even been aware that the department chairman, Carl Allendoerfer, was serving at the time as MAA President. My first mentor in the MAA was Len Gillman, who got me involved with the MAA. Being Secretary and Treasurer, respectively, we consulted a lot, and he was the one who helped me learn the MAA culture. One confession: At that time, approvals for new unbudgeted expenses under $500 were handled by the Secretary, the Treasurer and the Executive Director, Al Wilcox. The requests usually came to me first. Since Len was consistently tough, and Al was a push-over, I would first ask the one whose answer would agree with mine, and then with a 2-0 vote, I didn’t have to even bother the other one.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Overview of Activities, April, 2005-March, 2006 …
    MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2005-2006 I. Overview of Activities, April, 2005-March, 2006 …......……………………. 2 Innovations ………………………………………………………..... 2 Scientific Highlights …..…………………………………………… 4 MSRI Experiences ….……………………………………………… 6 II. Programs …………………………………………………………………….. 13 III. Workshops ……………………………………………………………………. 17 IV. Postdoctoral Fellows …………………………………………………………. 19 Papers by Postdoctoral Fellows …………………………………… 21 V. Mathematics Education and Awareness …...………………………………. 23 VI. Industrial Participation ...…………………………………………………… 26 VII. Future Programs …………………………………………………………….. 28 VIII. Collaborations ………………………………………………………………… 30 IX. Papers Reported by Members ………………………………………………. 35 X. Appendix - Final Reports ……………………………………………………. 45 Programs Workshops Summer Graduate Workshops MSRI Network Conferences MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2005-2006 I. Overview of Activities, April, 2005-March, 2006 This annual report covers MSRI projects and activities that have been concluded since the submission of the last report in May, 2005. This includes the Spring, 2005 semester programs, the 2005 summer graduate workshops, the Fall, 2005 programs and the January and February workshops of Spring, 2006. This report does not contain fiscal or demographic data. Those data will be submitted in the Fall, 2006 final report covering the completed fiscal 2006 year, based on audited financial reports. This report begins with a discussion of MSRI innovations undertaken this year, followed by highlights
    [Show full text]
  • Programme 2009 the Abel Prize Ceremony 19 May 2009 Procession Accompanied by the “Abel Fanfare” Music: Klaus Sandvik
    Programme 2009 The Abel Prize Ceremony 19 May 2009 Procession accompanied by the “Abel Fanfare” Music: Klaus Sandvik. Performed by three musicians from the Staff Band of the Norwegian Defence Forces Their Majesties King Harald and Queen Sonja enter the hall Soroban Arve Henriksen (trumpet) (Music: Arve Henriksen) Opening by Øyvind Østerud President of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Eg veit i himmerik ei borg Trio Mediæval, Arve Henriksen (Norwegian folk tune from Hallingdal, arr. Linn A. Fuglseth) The Abel Prize Award Ceremony Professor Kristian Seip Chairman of the Abel Committee The Committee’s citation His Majesty King Harald presents the Abel Prize to Mikhail Leonidovich Gromov Acceptance speech by Mikhail Leonidovich Gromov Closing remarks by Professor Øyvind Østerud President of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Till, till Tove Trio Mediæval, Arve Henriksen, Birger Mistereggen (percussion) (Norwegian folk tune from Vestfold, arr. Tone Krohn) Their Majesties King Harald and Queen Sonja leave the hall Procession leaves the hall Other guests leave the hall when the procession has left to a skilled mathematics teacher in the upper secondary school is called after Abel’s own Professor Øyvind Østerud teacher, Bernt Michael Holmboe. There is every reason to remember Holmboe, who was President of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Abel’s mathematics teacher at Christiania Cathedral School from when Abel was 16. Holmboe discovered Abel’s talent, inspired him, encouraged him, and took the young pupil considerably further than the curriculum demanded. He pointed him to the professional literature, helped Your Majesties, Excellencies, dear friends, him with overseas contacts and stipends and became a lifelong colleague and friend.
    [Show full text]