From Severnaya Zemlya (Russia)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From Severnaya Zemlya (Russia) Silurian and Lower Devonian anaspids (Agnatha) from Severnaya Zemlya (Russia) Tiiu MÄRSS Institute of Geology, Tallinn Technical University, 7 Estonia Avenue, 10143 Tallinn (Estonia) [email protected] Märss T. 2002. — Silurian and Lower Devonian anaspids (Agnatha) from Severnaya Zemlya 406 (Russia). Geodiversitas 24 (1) : 123-137. ABSTRACT In the Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago, Silurian anaspids are represented by scales of at least six different types of sculpture, and some subtypes, called Birkeniida sp. C, Birkeniida sp. C1, Birkeniida sp. C?, Birkeniida sp. D, KEY WORDS Agnatha, Birkeniida sp. F, Birkeniida sp. F?, Birkeniida sp. G., Birkeniida sp. H and Anaspida, Birkeniida sp. J. In addition, Birkenia? sp. was recognized. A new taxon was Silurian, Lower Devonian, erected on the basis of the material from the Severnaya Zemlya Formation, Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago, Lower Devonian. In the specimen, the trunk squamation is rather well pre- Russia, served, but the head and the caudal fin are lacking. Characteristic are very scale sculpture, new genus, big dorsal ridge scales. The stratigraphical range of anaspids on Severnaya new species. Zemlya is from Wenlock to Lochkov. RÉSUMÉ Anaspides (Agnatha) du Silurien et du Dévonien inférieur de Severnaya Zemlya (Russie). Dans l’archipel de Severnaya Zemlya, les anaspides siluriens sont représentés par des écailles appartenant à au moins six types (avec quelques sous-types) d’ornementation différents nommés Birkeniida sp. C, Birkeniida sp. C1, Birkeniida sp. C ?, Birkeniida sp. D, Birkeniida sp. F, Birkeniida sp. F ?, MOTS CLÉS Agnatha, Birkeniida sp. G., Birkeniida sp. H et Birkeniida sp. J. De plus, Birkenia ? sp. Anaspida, a été identifié. Un nouveau taxon a été créé à partir du matériel de la Silurien, Dévonien inférieur, Formation Severnaya Zemlya, Dévonien inférieur. Sur le spécimen, l’écaillu- archipel de Severnaya Zemlya, re du tronc est assez bien conservée mais la tête et la nageoire caudale lui font Russie, défaut. De fortes écailles faîtières dorsales sont caractéristiques de ce taxon. ornementation d’écailles, nouveau genre, Stratigraphiquement, les anaspides de Severnaya Zemlya ont une extension nouvelle espèce. verticale du Wenlock au Lochkovien. GEODIVERSITAS • 2002 • 24 (1) © Publications Scientifiques du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. www.mnhn.fr/publication/ 123 Märss T. INTRODUCTION be clearly identified as anaspid ones under the names Coccopeltus asmusi Pander, 1856 (taf. 5, Samples with vertebrate remains were collected fig. 1), Rytidolepis queenstedtii Pander, 1856 during the expeditions to Severnaya Zemlya by (taf. 5, fig. 2) and Schidiosteus mustelensis A. F. Khapilin and E. N. Lenkin in 1974, B. A. Pander, 1856 (taf. 5, fig. 13). Later, Rohon (1893: Klubov and E. I. Kachanov in 1976, V. V. 11-13) believed they represent invertebrate Menner and V. N. Talimaa in 1978, and groups like worms or crustaceans, and he did P. Männik and E. Kurik in 1978. The samples not include above-cited species in his work as were dissolved by V. N. Talimaa, Vilnius, and vertebrates. Later on, Pander’s taxa have not P. Männik, Tallinn, and the scales as well as the been used by subsequent authors. well-preserved anaspid specimen were given to The sculpture, its variability and microstructure the author for description. Anaspids are rather of scales of completely preserved Norwegian rare in the Silurian and Lower Devonian of the anaspids should be described, since no Silurian Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago. Their scale frag- (Wenlock, Ludlow) taxon can be erected on the ments have been found in the Samojlovich, Ust’ species, genus, or even the family level without Spokojnaya and Krasnaya Bukhta formations, knowing these characteristics. Only after that Silurian; in the Matusevich, Ushakov and can the comparison and identification of frag- Spokojnaya river sections of October Revo- mentary material, collected during more than lution Island, and in the coeval strata of half a century from different parts of the north- Komsomolets and Pioneer islands where forma- ern hemisphere (Severnaya Zemlya, Canadian tions are not yet established. Arctic, Britain, Baltic), be realized. For such Data on the geology of the region, as well as de- research the articulated exoskeleton of a specimen tailed descriptions of the sections, can be found in must be dissolved to reveal the sculpture which Klubov et al. (1980), and in Matukhin & Menner nearly always remains in the rock, and latex-casts (1999). Thus, they are not repeated here. made from the sculpture moulds. The sculpture The taxonomy of anaspids is based on charac- of fragmentary material can be compared with teristics of the overall body form, head and mid- that of latex-casts, and proper generic and species dorsal ridge scales, number of branchial names given. Until then, following Märss (1986) openings, and lateral and anal fins of articulated and Fredholm (1988, 1990), it seems reasonable specimens, mainly from Scotland and Norway. to establish on Severnaya Zemlya new forms They have been studied for over a century by in open nomenclature: Birkeniida sp. C1, Traquair (1898, 1899, 1905), Kiaer (1911, 1924), Birkeniida sp. F, Birkeniida sp. G, Birkeniida sp. Stetson (1928), Berg (1940, 1955), Smith (1956, H, and Birkeniida sp. J. Three forms, Birkeniida 1957), Stensiö (1958, 1964), Obruchev (1964), sp. C, Birkeniida sp. C? and Birkeniida sp. D, are Ritchie (1964, 1980), and others. Besides articu- known from two regions – Severnaya Zemlya lated specimens, the fragments of Silurian and the Baltic (see Märss 1986). Birkeniida sp. A, anaspid scales have gained some attention. Their Birkeniida sp. B and Birkeniida sp. E, described sculpture and/or microstructure, the only fea- from the Baltic (Märss 1986), were not found tures preserved in the material from the acetic on Severnaya Zemlya. Birkenia? sp. and acid preparation residues, have been described Vilkitskilepis valentinae n. gen., n. sp. are identi- from Baltic bedrock and boulders of the North fied and described in the present paper. German Lowland (Gross 1938, 1958, 1968; Märss 1986; Fredholm 1988, 1990). Only one taxon, Saarolepis oeselensis (Robertson, 1941), BIOSTRATIGRAPHICAL REMARKS has been identified by Gross (1958). Still, Pander (1856), writing a pioneer work, About 20 samples from the upper Wenlock to described the fragments of vertebrates that can Přidoli interval contained fragments of anaspid 124 GEODIVERSITAS • 2002 • 24 (1) Silurian and Devonian anaspids from Severnaya Zemlya ? sp. SERIES SAMPLES Birkenia n. gen., sp. FORMATION Birkeniida sp. J Birkeniida sp. F Birkeniida sp. D Birkeniida sp. C Birkeniida sp. H Birkeniida sp. G Birkeniida sp. F? Birkeniida sp. C1 Birkeniida sp. C? Vikitskilepis valentinae Vikitskilepis Severnaya Zemlya 67-12 + . Krasnaya ř P Bukhta MF 157-2 + MF 157-3 2055zh u. + Ust’ 2-3 2803; 20568 + m. 2-12; 2-14 + Spokojnaya 30; 30-1; 47-14 + + + + ++ l. 2-21; MF 157-4 5m + + + + + + SILURIAN DEV. SYSTEM 31-208 8g-1; 8g + + + + Samojlovich MF 46-23 5d +++ + LI. W. Ludlow Loch. FIG. 1. — Distribution of the anaspids in the sections of the Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago. Sample numbers from October Revolution Island on the left side, sample numbers from Pioneer and Komsomolets islands on the right. Abbreviations: Dev., Devonian; Ll., Llandovery; Loch., Lochkov; Př., Přidoli; W., Wenlock. scales, and a limestone nodule from the lower part of the Ust’ Spokojnaya Formation, upper Lochkov, Lower Devonian, yielded a trunk Ludlow (samples 2-3 and MF 157-3 on October squamation. Three main anaspid assemblages Revolution Island, 2055 zh and 2803 on Pioneer can be recognized in the Silurian sequence Island, and 20568 on Komsomolets Island) the (Fig. 1). The first assemblage characterizes the third assemblage was identified. It does not Samojlovich Formation, Wenlock, on October contain any forms from the lower assemblages; Revolution Island (samples 31-208 and MF 46- a new form, Birkeniida sp. J, appears and ranges 23) and its equivalents on Pioneer Island (sam- into the lower part of Přidoli (sample MF 157- ples 5d, 8g-1 and 8g). The assemblage comprises 2). In the Severnaya Zemlya Formation, lower Birkenia? sp., Birkeniida sp. C, Birkeniida sp. Lochkov, Lower Devonian, a new anaspid, F, Birkeniida sp. F? and Birkeniida sp. G. The Vilkitskilepis valentinae n. gen., n. sp., occurs second assemblage was established in the lower (sample 67-12). part of the Ust’ Spokojnaya Formation (sam- Birkeniida sp. C, Birkeniida sp. C? and ples 30, 30-1, 47-14, 2-21 and MF 157-4), Birkeniida sp. D from the Samojlovich and Ust’ Ludlow, and coeval strata on Pioneer Island Spokojnaya formations, Wenlock and Ludlow, (sample 5m). On that level the abundance of are identical to the Baltic forms and the beds can scales and the variability of the sculpture are be correlated with the Rootsiküla and Paadla largest. In addition to the Wenlock forms, stages of the East Baltic, and the Halla and Birkeniida sp. C1, Birkeniida sp. C?, Birkeniida Hemse beds of Gotland, Sweden (Märss 1986; sp. D and Birkeniida sp. H appear, but Fredholm 1988, 1990). Anaspid forms from the Birkeniida sp. G disappears. In the middle part Krasnaya Bukhta Formation, Přidoli, and high- of the Ust’ Spokojnaya Formation, middle part er have no similarities with the Baltic ones, and of Ludlow, the diversity of forms decreases no anaspid-based correlation can be made at the markedly (samples 2-12, 2-14). In the upper present stage of study. GEODIVERSITAS • 2002 • 24 (1) 125 Märss T. SYSTEMATICS REMARKS Scales have rounded or just slightly elongated, Scales with collection numbers prefixed by Pi triangular keel-like tubercles (Fig. 2A-C). The are deposited in the palaeontological collection anterior margin of the scales is smooth or cov- of the Institute of Geology, Tallinn Technical ered with low, rounded tubercles. In the basal University; those prefixed by LIG 35 are kept in part of broken tubercles (Fig. 2D), microscopic the Institute of Geology, Vilnius. holes, vascular canals (= Gefässkanal by Gross 1958) can be seen.
Recommended publications
  • THE CLASSIFICATION and EVOLUTION of the HETEROSTRACI Since 1858, When Huxley Demonstrated That in the Histological Struc
    ACTA PALAEONT OLOGICA POLONICA Vol. VII 1 9 6 2 N os. 1-2 L. BEVERLY TARLO THE CLASSIFICATION AND EVOLUTION OF THE HETEROSTRACI Abstract. - An outline classification is given of the Hetero straci, with diagnoses . of th e following orders and suborders: Astraspidiformes, Eriptychiiformes, Cya­ thaspidiformes (Cyathaspidida, Poraspidida, Ctenaspidida), Psammosteiformes (Tes­ seraspidida, Psarnmosteida) , Traquairaspidiformes, Pteraspidiformes (Pte ras pidida, Doryaspidida), Cardipeltiformes and Amphiaspidiformes (Amphiaspidida, Hiber­ naspidida, Eglonaspidida). It is show n that the various orders fall into four m ain evolutionary lineages ~ cyathaspid, psammosteid, pteraspid and amphiaspid, and these are traced from primitive te ssellated forms. A tentative phylogeny is pro­ posed and alternatives are discussed. INTRODUCTION Since 1858, when Huxley demonstrated that in the histological struc­ ture of their dermal bone Cephalaspis and Pteraspis were quite different from one another, it has been recognized that there were two distinct groups of ostracoderms for which Lankester (1868-70) proposed the names Osteostraci and Heterostraci respectively. Although these groups are generally considered to be related to on e another, Lankester belie­ ved that "the Heterostraci are at present associated with the Osteostraci because they are found in the same beds, because they have, like Cepha­ laspis, a large head shield, and because there is nothing else with which to associate them". In 1889, Cop e united these two groups in the Ostracodermi which, together with the modern cyclostomes, he placed in the Class Agnatha, and although this proposal was at first opposed by Traquair (1899) and Woodward (1891b), subsequent work has shown that it was correct as both the Osteostraci and the Heterostraci were agnathous.
    [Show full text]
  • Synchrotron-Aided Reconstruction of the Conodont Feeding Apparatus and Implications for the Mouth of the first Vertebrates
    Synchrotron-aided reconstruction of the conodont feeding apparatus and implications for the mouth of the first vertebrates Nicolas Goudemanda,1, Michael J. Orchardb, Séverine Urdya, Hugo Buchera, and Paul Tafforeauc aPalaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, CH-8006 Zürich, Switzerland; bGeological Survey of Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6B 5J3; and cEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 38043 Grenoble Cedex, France Edited* by A. M. Celâl Sxengör, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, and approved April 14, 2011 (received for review February 1, 2011) The origin of jaws remains largely an enigma that is best addressed siderations. Despite the absence of any preserved traces of oral by studying fossil and living jawless vertebrates. Conodonts were cartilages in the rare specimens of conodonts with partly pre- eel-shaped jawless animals, whose vertebrate affinity is still dis- served soft tissue (10), we show that partial reconstruction of the puted. The geometrical analysis of exceptional three-dimensionally conodont mouth is possible through biomechanical analysis. preserved clusters of oro-pharyngeal elements of the Early Triassic Novispathodus, imaged using propagation phase-contrast X-ray Results synchrotron microtomography, suggests the presence of a pul- We recently discovered several fused clusters (rare occurrences ley-shaped lingual cartilage similar to that of extant cyclostomes of exceptional preservation where several elements of the same within the feeding apparatus of euconodonts (“true” conodonts). animal were diagenetically cemented together) of the Early This would lend strong support to their interpretation as verte- Triassic conodont Novispathodus (11). One of these specimens brates and demonstrates that the presence of such cartilage is a (Fig. 2A), found in lowermost Spathian rocks of the Tsoteng plesiomorphic condition of crown vertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of Evolutionary Theory George M
    Fort Hays State University FHSU Scholars Repository Fort Hays Studies Series 1942 Some Aspects of Evolutionary Theory George M. Robertson Fort Hays State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/fort_hays_studies_series Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Robertson, George M., "Some Aspects of Evolutionary Theory" (1942). Fort Hays Studies Series. 50. https://scholars.fhsu.edu/fort_hays_studies_series/50 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fort Hays Studies Series by an authorized administrator of FHSU Scholars Repository. FORT HAYS KANSAS STATE COLLEGE STUDIES ,· GENERAL SERIES NUMBER FOUR SCIENCE SERIES No. 1 SOME ASPECTS OF EVOLUTIONARY THEORY BY GEORGE M. ROBERTSON -II- HAYS, KANSAS STATE COLLEGE PRESS 1 9 4 2 I\ '. r .l ~- , FORT HAYS KANSAS STATE COLLEGE STUDIES GENERAL SERIES NUMBER i'OUR s ·cIENCE SERIES No. 1 F. B. Streeter, Editor SOME ASPECTS OF EVOLUTIONARY THEORY BY GEORGE M. ROBERTSON -II- HAYS, KANSAS STATE COLLEGE PRESS 1 9 4 2 Some Aspects of Evolutionary Theory by George M~ Robertson HE PRESENT CONTRIBUTION is not a unified account, but is a series of essays dealing with some T aspects of evolutionary theory which have especially interested me. The data which is used in them is not new but is used in new ways in some cases. A research worker needs occasionally to set down the thoughts which arise from his study. Often his research publications need to be condensed and limited to the factual data, leaving these other features out.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish/Tetrapod Communities in the Upper Devonian
    Fish/tetrapod Communities Examensarbete vid Institutionen för geovetenskaper in the Upper Devonian ISSN 1650-6553 Nr 301 Maxime Delgehier Fish/tetrapod Communities Vertebrate communities including tetrapods and fishes are known from a in the Upper Devonian limited number of Late Devonian localities from several areas worldwide. These localities encompass a wide variety of environments, from true marine conditions of the near shore neritic province, to fluvial or lacustrine conditions. These localities form the foundation for a number of data matrices from which three different sets of cluster analyses were made. The first set practices a strait forward taxonomical framework using present/absent data on species and genus level to test similarity between the various localities. The second set of analyses builds on the Maxime Delgehier first one with the integration of artificial hierarchies to compensate taxonomical biases and instead infer relationship. The third also builds on the previous ones, but integrates morphological data as indicators of relationships between taxa. From this, a critical review was made for each method which comes to the conclusion that the first analysis and the first artificial level of the second analysis provide the distinctions between Frasnian and Frasnian/Famennian locality whereas the second artificial level of the second analysis and the third analysis need to be improved. Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för geovetenskaper Examensarbete D/E1/E2/E, Geologi/Hydrologi/Naturgeografi /Paleobiologi, 15/30/45
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Microfossil Diversity from the Tremp Formation
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials dʼinvestigació i docència en els termes establerts a lʼart. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix lʼautorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No sʼautoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes dʼexplotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des dʼun lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc sʼautoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs. ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis doctoral y su utilización debe respetar los derechos de la persona autora. Puede ser utilizada para consulta o estudio personal, así como en actividades o materiales de investigación y docencia en los términos establecidos en el art. 32 del Texto Refundido de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual (RDL 1/1996). Para otros usos se requiere la autorización previa y expresa de la persona autora. En cualquier caso, en la utilización de sus contenidos se deberá indicar de forma clara el nombre y apellidos de la persona autora y el título de la tesis doctoral.
    [Show full text]
  • Osteichthyan Feeding and Respiration
    Contributions to Zoology, 72 (I) 17-37 (2003) SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague The clavobranchialis musculature in sarcopterygian fishes, and contribution to osteichthyan feeding and respiration Zerina Johanson Palaeontology, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia, e-mail: [email protected] Keywords:: Clavobranchiales, Sarcopterygii, Actinopterygii, Chondrichthyes, coracobranchiales, Dipnoi, Neoceratodus, Strepsodus Abstract Introduction Various fossil distinct the lungfish taxa preserve depressions on Muscles originating on pectoral girdle and in- the smooth postbranchial lamina ofthe dermal pectoral girdle. serting anteriorly on the mandible and branchial These depressions are largely unknown in other sarcopterygian arches depress or lower the mandible, hyoid arch, fishes, are but present in the rhizodont sarcopterygian Strepsodus. and more posterior gill arches. Of these muscles, Comparisons extant fishes these with actinopterygian suggest much of the research into ver- depressions mark the point of origin for the clavobranchialis gnathostome (jawed and has musculature, extending anterodorsally into the gill chamber to tebrates) feeding respiration focused on the insert on the ventral surface ofthe Studios ceratobranchial(s). sternohyoideus and coracomandibularis. The sterno- examining feeding and respiratory mechanisms ofbony fishes hyoideus (= rectus cervicus) attaches to the ventral (Osteichthyes) have emphasised the role of mandibular depres- of the hyoid arch and lowers the mandible within the oral portions sion in generating negative pressures cavity to draw in via the the latter run- water/air/food via suction. However, phylogenetically mandibulohyoid ligament, basal dorsal and actinopterygians, fossil lungfish and other fossil sarcoptc- ning between the ceratohyal the rear of rygians (such as Strepsodus) lack the apomorphies that increase the mandible (Lauder, 1979, 1980, 1982, 1983a, b, suction among bony fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Family-Group Names of Fossil Fishes
    © European Journal of Taxonomy; download unter http://www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu; www.zobodat.at European Journal of Taxonomy 466: 1–167 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.466 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2018 · Van der Laan R. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1F74D019-D13C-426F-835A-24A9A1126C55 Family-group names of fossil fi shes Richard VAN DER LAAN Grasmeent 80, 1357JJ Almere, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:55EA63EE-63FD-49E6-A216-A6D2BEB91B82 Abstract. The family-group names of animals (superfamily, family, subfamily, supertribe, tribe and subtribe) are regulated by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Particularly, the family names are very important, because they are among the most widely used of all technical animal names. A uniform name and spelling are essential for the location of information. To facilitate this, a list of family- group names for fossil fi shes has been compiled. I use the concept ‘Fishes’ in the usual sense, i.e., starting with the Agnatha up to the †Osteolepidiformes. All the family-group names proposed for fossil fi shes found to date are listed, together with their author(s) and year of publication. The main goal of the list is to contribute to the usage of the correct family-group names for fossil fi shes with a uniform spelling and to list the author(s) and date of those names. No valid family-group name description could be located for the following family-group names currently in usage: †Brindabellaspidae, †Diabolepididae, †Dorsetichthyidae, †Erichalcidae, †Holodipteridae, †Kentuckiidae, †Lepidaspididae, †Loganelliidae and †Pituriaspididae.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the World
    Fishes of the World Fishes of the World Fifth Edition Joseph S. Nelson Terry C. Grande Mark V. H. Wilson Cover image: Mark V. H. Wilson Cover design: Wiley This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with the respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be createdor extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Attempts at Phylogeny of Early Vertebrates
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 60 Annual Issue Article 96 1953 Some Attempts at Phylogeny of Early Vertebrates George M. Robertson Grinnell College Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1953 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Robertson, George M. (1953) "Some Attempts at Phylogeny of Early Vertebrates," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 60(1), 725-737. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol60/iss1/96 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Robertson: Some Attempts at Phylogeny of Early Vertebrates Some Attempts at Phylogeny of Early Vertebrates By GEORGE M. ROBERTSON There is an often-quoted reply of a mountain-climber to the question of his motives in mountain climbing. "Why do I want to climb that mountain?· Because it is there." The same char­ acteristic of curiosity has driven men to investigate all sorts of things aside from mountains, and in many, perhaps most, cases we make the same reply if we are really honest. So in paleontology one generally starts with the small-boy motive and some fortunate souls continue with it. They are the rock­ hounds, the human "pack-rats", like the famous Lauder Dick, the Baker of Thurso. For some of us the study of fossils becomes a more sophisticated business and we pursue that subject, still with the driving power of curiostiy but with developing objectives beyond that.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Aspidin and the Evolutionary Origin of Bone
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0624-1 The nature of aspidin and the evolutionary origin of bone Joseph N. Keating 1,2*, Chloe L. Marquart1, Federica Marone3 and Philip C. J. Donoghue 1* Bone is the key innovation underpinning the evolution of the vertebrate skeleton, yet its origin is mired by debate over inter- pretation of the most primitive bone-like tissue, aspidin. This has variously been interpreted as cellular bone, acellular bone, dentine or an intermediate of dentine and bone. The crux of the controversy is the nature of unmineralized spaces pervad- ing the aspidin matrix, which have alternatively been interpreted as having housed cells, cell processes or Sharpey’s fibres. Discriminating between these hypotheses has been hindered by the limits of traditional histological methods. Here, we use synchrotron X-ray tomographic microscopy to reveal the nature of aspidin. We show that the spaces exhibit a linear morphol- ogy incompatible with interpretations that they represent voids left by cells or cell processes. Instead, these spaces represent intrinsic collagen fibre bundles that form a scaffold about which mineral was deposited. Aspidin is thus acellular dermal bone. We reject hypotheses that it is a type of dentine, cellular bone or transitional tissue. Our study suggests that the full repertoire of skeletal tissue types was established before the divergence of the earliest known skeletonizing vertebrates, indicating that the corresponding cell types evolved rapidly following the divergence of cyclostomes and gnathostomes. he origin of the vertebrate mineralized skeleton, and of its of living vertebrates, allowing us to test hypotheses concerning the canonical suite of cell and tissue types, predates the radiation identity of the aspidin spaces and, in turn, reveal the nature of this Tof crown gnathostomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Discriminating Signal from Noise in the Fossil Record of Early Vertebrates
    Downloaded from http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on December 19, 2014 Discriminating signal from noise in the rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org fossil record of early vertebrates reveals cryptic evolutionary history Robert S. Sansom1,2, Emma Randle1 and Philip C. J. Donoghue2 Research 1Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK 2 Cite this article: Sansom RS, Randle E, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK Donoghue PCJ. 2015 Discriminating signal from The fossil record of early vertebrates has been influential in elucidating the noise in the fossil record of early vertebrates evolutionary assembly of the gnathostome bodyplan. Understanding of the reveals cryptic evolutionary history. timing and tempo of vertebrate innovations remains, however, mired in a literal Proc. R. Soc. B 282: 20142245. reading of the fossil record. Early jawless vertebrates (ostracoderms) exhibit http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2245 restriction to shallow-water environments. The distribution of their stratigraphic occurrences therefore reflects not only flux in diversity, but also secular variation in facies representation of the rock record. Using stratigraphic, phylogenetic and palaeoenvironmental data, we assessed the veracity of the fossil records of the Received: 10 September 2014 jawless relatives of jawed vertebrates (Osteostraci, Galeaspida, Thelodonti, Accepted: 21 November 2014 Heterostraci). Non-random models of fossil recovery potential using Palaeozoic sea-level changes were used to calculate confidence intervals of clade origins. These intervals extend the timescale for possible origins into the Upper Ordovician; these estimates ameliorate the long ghost lineages inferred for Osteostraci, Galeaspida and Heterostraci, given their known stratigraphic occur- Subject Areas: rences and stem–gnathostome phylogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 8 – History of Fishes Agnathans Major Groups Of
    Structural Patterns and Trends in Lecture 8 – History of fishes Diversification • Fish subsumed (since Cope (1889) proposed - Agnatha - jawless fishes and Gnathostome lines - hasn't really stood the test of time (explain later). • Consider Agnathan briefly. • Earliest fish-like vertebrates with reasonable fossil record - middle Ordovician (440-510 mya) of North America, Europe and Australia. Ray Troll • Many early vertebrate groups tried hard external armor (dermal bone) – this is Picture = preserved. ~ 500 mya dermal bone with structural complexity evolved. CARD • Evolution of calcified tissues has had profound effect on vertebrate SHARKS evolution - and the origin of vertebrate skeletal structure - considerable interest • All oldest fish-like vertebrates sometimes called ostracoderms (shell-like skin). • All (at least partly) encased in some bony armor, lacked jaws, paired lateral fins. • Mouth was slit or oval opening towards front of animal. • From tail structure - adapted to bottom dwelling existence, feeding probably by suction?? using flexible floor of oralobranchial chamber and associated ventral branchial muscles as a pump. Agnathans Major Groups of Agnathans • Class – Pteraspidomorphi • 1. Osteostracida • 2. Anaspida • Class – Myxini?? (living) • 3. Pteraspidomorphida • Class – Cephalaspidomorphi • 1) Osteostracidan – Osteostraci agnathans - include thumb sized cephalaspids (see – Anaspidiformes Stensio) - characteristic anatomy = head shield, pair – Petromyzontiformes (living) of openings (presumably for the eyes) and single aperture for naso-hypohyseal canal. 1 Major Groups of Agnathans Major Groups of Agnathans • 1. Osteostracida, 2. Anaspida, 3. Pteraspidomorphida • 3) Pteraspidomorphidan agnathans - Most successful in 1. Osteostracida abundance, taxonomic diversity and duration in fossil 2. Anaspida record – head, trunk enclosed in bony plates 3. Pteraspidomorphida 2 - Anaspidian agnathans - streamlined bodies and small scales suggest strong swimmers.
    [Show full text]