Religious Freedom Violations Continue, Claims New CSW Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Religious Freedom Violations Continue, Claims New CSW Report briefing Belarus Religious Freedom Violations FOR PUBLIC USE JANUARY 2008 PO Box 99, New Malden, Surrey KT3 3YF T: 0845 456 5464 E: [email protected] W: www.csw.org.uk REGISTERED CHARITY NO. 281836 © Copyright Christian Solidarity Worldwide 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying, mechanical, recording and/or otherwise without the prior written permission of Christian Solidarity Worldwide. "I look forward to the day when Belarus takes its rightful place in a European family that shares the values of democracy, respect for human rights and the rule of law, and that yearns for long-lasting shared peace and prosperity" José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission Table of contents: 1. Executive Summary............................................................................................................................3 2. Introduction.........................................................................................................................................4 3. Recommendations:.............................................................................................................................5 3.1. CSW calls on the Belarusian government to ..................................................................................5 3.2. CSW calls on the European Union to ..............................................................................................5 4. Law on Freedom of Conscience and religious organisations ..................................................6 5. Official warnings for violating the law ...........................................................................................8 6. Refusal to register properties for religious use ..........................................................................9 7. Denial of official permission to rent premises ......................................................................... 10 8. Deportation of non-Belarusian religious workers................................................................... 11 9. Detention of religious leaders...................................................................................................... 14 10. Military conscripts questioned on their religious affiliation ............................................. 17 11. Responses from Belarusian churches and civil society...................................................... 18 11.1. A nationwide campaign to change 2002 religious law................................................................ 18 11.2. Christians’ protest against continued violations of religious freedom.................................... 19 11.3. Catholics ’campaign for the return of St Joseph church and monastery................................ 19 12. Political and legal background..................................................................................................21 13. Appendix I.................................................................................................................................... 22 14. Additional sources ..................................................................................................................... 22 Page 2 1. Executive Summary In recent years, respect for human rights and civil liberties, including freedom of speech, assembly, association, religion, worship and expression, have continued to deteriorate in Belarus. International standards of human rights are not upheld by the government. Instead, the government itself repeatedly violates the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) to which it is a party. Religious freedom is restricted both directly and indirectly by the authorities. Non- governmental organisations (NGOs), religious institutions and religious leaders are subjected to frequent harassment, prosecution, fines, repression and even imprisonment under the terms of the 2002 Law on Freedom of Conscience and Religious Organisations. Over the past eighteen months, two pastors and one human rights defender were arrested for so- called unregistered activities, a practice not heard of since the fall of the Soviet Union. A number of foreign religious workers have been accused of organising illegal religious activity, deported or failed to have their visas renewed. Under the country’s National Security Concept, the work of foreigners was considered a potential threat to national security. Foreign religious leaders were also not allowed to take part in any religious activity outside of the inviting organisation. The government made it almost impossible for religious groups to register buildings for religious use, forcing them to carry out their activities outside of the law. As a result many religious leaders were fined for their use of residential premises for religious purposes. In response, members of different churches and denominations went on hunger strikes. One of them, a twenty day round-the-clock protest vigil, was the largest in the history of Belarus. Belarusian Christians vigorously opposed the continued violations of religious freedom. Not only did they appeal against the illegal activities of local authorities by organising press conferences, campaigns, and protests but in mid-2007 they launched a nation-wide petition calling for changes to the 2002 religious law. By the end of the year, 35,000 people had signed up to the campaign. Under Belarusian law, once 50,000 signatures are gathered, the petition can be submitted to the Constitutional Court for further examination. The Belarusian government has been repeatedly condemned by democratic governments in Europe and North America for its continued repression of fundamental human rights. Religious freedom continues to be severely curtailed and religious leaders and communities are often subjected to harassment and prosecution by the authorities. Over the past year and a half reports of violations of religious freedom have increased significantly and this report seeks to document some of the most significant cases. Page 3 2. Introduction In recent years, respect for human rights and civil liberties, including freedom of speech, assembly, association, religion, worship and expression, have continued to deteriorate in Belarus. International standards of human rights are not upheld by the government. Instead, the government itself repeatedly violates the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) to which it is a party. Religious freedom is restricted both actively and indirectly by the authorities. Non- governmental organisations (NGOs), religious institutions and religious leaders are subjected to frequent harassment, prosecution, fines, repression and even imprisonment under the terms of the 2002 Law on Freedom of Conscience and Religious Organisations. A number of foreign religious workers have been deported or failed to have their visas renewed. The government makes it almost impossible for religious groups to register buildings for religious use, forcing them to carry out their activities outside of the law. Page 4 3. Recommendations: 3.1. CSW calls on the Belarusian government to • Uphold and ensure the protection of all fundamental human rights and ensure its compliance with international standards and in particular Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). • Revise the 2002 Law on Freedom of Conscience and Religious Organisations and restore procedures guaranteeing respect for freedom of religion; • Cease its harassment and prosecution of religious leaders; • Allow NGOs to carry out their work, free from government interference; • Ensure that all Belarusian citizens, regardless of religious faith, are accorded equal rights and treated with equal respect. 3.2. CSW calls on the European Union to • Ensure that religious freedom concerns are raised consistently with the Belarusian government as an essential ingredient of genuine and meaningful political dialogue; • Implement the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders by increasing contact with NGOs, churches, and religious leaders, particularly those who are targets for government harassment and surveillance, providing assistance and support to these groups whenever possible; • Strongly encourage Belarusian officials, including the members of the House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, and the Department of Religious Affairs and Nationalities at the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus to reconsider the 2002 Law On Freedom of Conscience and Religious Organisations and to draft and adopt new legislation in accordance with the Belarus Constitution and international covenants, such as the ICCPR; • Monitor the progress of the campaign in Defence of the Right to Freedom of Conscience, protesting the 2002 religious legislation currently circulating and, when appropriate, urge the Belarusian government to ensure that it responds under the terms set out by Belarusian law, and complies with the decision laid down by the Constitutional Court; • Continue to promote moves towards democracy in Belarus, and to set a series of benchmarks to evaluate progress in this area, focusing on free and fair elections, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and association, and religious freedom; • Add Alla Ryabitseva, the head of the Department of Religious Affairs and Nationalities at the Minsk Executive Committee, to the EU visa ban list. This decision by the EU would be welcomed
Recommended publications
  • The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr
    BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION EDITED BY DR. HANS-GEORG WIECK AND STEPHAN MALERIUS VILNIUS 2011 UDK 327(476+4) Be-131 BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION Authors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Dr. Vitali Silitski, Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann, Andrei Yahorau, Dr. Svetlana Matskevich, Valeri Fadeev, Dr. Andrei Kazakevich, Dr. Mikhail Pastukhou, Leonid Kalitenya, Alexander Chubrik Editors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Stephan Malerius This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. Sole responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication rests with the authors. The Centre for European Studies, the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility either for the information contained in the publication or its subsequent use. ISBN 978-609-95320-1-1 © 2011, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin / Berlin © Front cover photo: Jan Brykczynski CONTENTS 5 | Consultancy PROJECT: BELARUS AND THE EU Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck 13 | BELARUS IN AN INTERnational CONTEXT Dr. Vitali Silitski 22 | THE EU and BELARUS – A Relationship WITH RESERvations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann 34 | CIVIL SOCIETY: AN analysis OF THE situation AND diRECTIONS FOR REFORM Andrei Yahorau 53 | Education IN BELARUS: REFORM AND COOPERation WITH THE EU Dr. Svetlana Matskevich 70 | State bodies, CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY AND FORMS OF RULE Valeri Fadeev 79 | JudiciaRY AND law
    [Show full text]
  • Regime and Churches: What Is Therebetween? Religion In
    Issue 8 (38), 2013 RELIGION IN BELARUS: LIMITED INDEPENDENCE Since the concept of secular state has become a issue of “The Bell” is dedicated to answer these standard in a Western world long time ago, the questions. position of the Church is not very much discussed while speaking about the political issues. How- In the first article Anton Radniankou analyses the ever, there are tendencies of the rising interest of three biggest confessions in Belarus and reveals the Putin’s regime on involving Russian Orthodox their connection with the regime. He states, that Church to strengthening its power. while the Orthodox Church is the most familiar Anton Radniankou is a project to the government, Protestants are the least loyal manager of the Local Foundation And we might find similar approach of the Belar- to A.Lukashenka. “Interakcia”. He also edits intellec- usian regime. A.Lukashenka calls the Orthodox tual online magazine IdeaBY. Church as the main ideologist of the statehood, In the second article Natallia Vasilevich takes while remaining a non-believer – some kind of a deeper look into relations between Orthodox Natallia Vasilevich is a politi- strange “Orthodox atheist” composition. More- Church and the regime. She finds out that there cal scientist, lawyer and theolo- over, the Russian Orthodox Church authorities are different groups among the Church branches, gian. She is director of Centre have a direct influence on the Belarusian Church, which position ranges from pro-Russian to pro- “Ecumena” and editor of website forming its shape and ideology. It is clear that Nationalist wings. All in all, it is mostly influ- “Carkwa”.
    [Show full text]
  • Through the Reign of Catherine the Great
    Chapter Thirty-two Religion in Eastern Europe and the Middle East from 1648 through the Reign of Catherine the Great What in Polish and Lithuanian history is called “the Deluge” began in 1648, with the revolt of Ukraine from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Ukraine has been important in the history of religion, and especially of Judaism. The Hasidic movement began in Ukraine in the eighteenth century. A century earlier, Ukraine had been the scene of an especially dark chapter in Jewish history. In what is conventionally called “the Khmelnytsky Uprising” (1648-1654) Orthodox Christians killed many thousands of Judaeans, and those who survived were forced temporarily to flee for safety to other lands. In order to see the Khmelnytsky Uprising and the rise of Hasidism in perspective, a summary glance at earlier Ukrainian history is necessary. Early history of Ukraine: Judaism and Orthodox Christianity in Kievan Rus We have seen in Chapter 24 that from the eighth century to the 960s the steppe country above the Black Sea, the Caucasus range and the Caspian had been ruled by the khan or khagan of the Khazars. Prior to the arrival of the Khazars the steppe had been controlled consecutively by coalitions of mounted warriors named Sarmatians, Goths, Huns and Avars. Under these transient overlords the valleys of the great rivers - Bug, Dniester, Dnieper, Don, Volga - were plowed and planted by a subject population known to the historian Jordanes (ca. 550) as Antes and Sclaveni. From the latter designation comes the name, “Slavs,” and it can be assumed that the steppe villagers spoke a variety of Slavic dialects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship of Church and State in Belarus: Legal Regulation and Practice Alexander Vashkevich
    BYU Law Review Volume 2003 | Issue 2 Article 11 5-1-2003 The Relationship of Church and State in Belarus: Legal Regulation and Practice Alexander Vashkevich Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Alexander Vashkevich, The Relationship of Church and State in Belarus: Legal Regulation and Practice, 2003 BYU L. Rev. 681 (2003). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2003/iss2/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VAS-FIN 31.05.2003 1:10 The Relationship of Church and State in Belarus: Legal Regulation and Practice Alexander Vashkevich∗ I. INTRODUCTION The freedoms of thought, conscience, and religion are fundamental human rights, and researchers who consider freedom of religion to be the foundation for all other civil rights stand on solid ground. Freedom of religion is vital in Belarus1 for two primary reasons: first, Belarus is a multi-religious country,2 and second, due to its geographic location, Belarus acts as a political and ideological bridge between Russian Orthodoxy in the East and Catholic and Protestant Christianity in the West. In fact, Belarus is one of the few ∗ Deputy Head of the Department of International Law, Faculty of International Relations, Belarusian State University; Professor, International Institute for Labour and Social Relations; Executive Director, Belarusian Center for Constitutionalism and Comparative Legal Studies, Max Planck Institute; Former Justice of the Constitutional Court of Belarus.
    [Show full text]
  • Gospel Images of Jesus Christ in Church Tradition
    Gospel Images of Jesus Christ in Church Tradition and in Biblical Scholarship ISBN: Fifth International East-West Symposium of New Testament 9783161519086 (hb) Scholars, Minsk, September 2 to 9, 2010 PRICE: edited by Christos Karakolis, Karl-Wilhelm Niebuhr and Sviatoslav $168.00 (hb) Rogalsky PUBLICATION DATE: DESCRIPTION: 31 December 2012 (hb) This collection of essays contains the papers given at the Fifth International East-West Symposium of New Testament Scholars in Minsk (Belarus). The symposium was a project of the Eastern Europe BINDING: Liaison Committee of Studiorum Novi Testamenti Societas. Main subject matters of the volume are hardback the history and methodological questions of modern Jesus research, approaches to the Jesus of history in ancient and modern Christian exegesis, Jesus as a Jew in ancient and modern exegesis, PAGES: and the portraits of Jesus in Luke and John. The authors of these papers deal with the parables of 458 Jesus, with his Galilean ministry, with the passion narrative in Mark and with the death of Christ according to Paul's letters. All topics are discussed from a Western (Protestant and Roman-Catholic) ILLUSTRATIONS: exegetical perspective as well as from an Orthodox point of view. A concluding report recapitulates Illus. the group discussions and seminar sessions of the symposium. Contributors: Charalampos Atmatzidis, Reimund Bieringer, Predrag Dragutinoviä?, Carl R. Holladay, Christos Karakolis, PUBLISHER: Dominika A. Kurek-Chomycz, Ulrich Luz, Joel Marcus, Vasile Mihoc, Tobias Nicklas, Karl-Wilhelm Mohr Siebeck Niebuhr, Marius Reiser, Armand Puig i Tàrrech, Sviatoslav Rogalsky, Ekaterini G. Tsalampouni, Konstantinos Th. Zarras IMPRINT: Mohr Siebeck TABLE OF CONTENTS: Preface<br> Karl-Wilhelm Niebuhr: Introduction SERIES: Wissenschaftliche I Biblical Scholarship in Russia and Belarus<br> Metropolitan Philaret of Minsk and Slutsk: Church Untersuchungen zum Life and Biblical Scholarship in Belarus.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western Or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 78 | Number 78 Article 5 4-2018 Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Murzionak, Piotra (2018) "Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization?," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 78 : No. 78 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol78/iss78/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Murzionak: Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or t Comparative Civilizations Review 41 Does Belarusian-Ukrainian Civilization Belong to the Western or the Latin Civilization? Piotra Murzionak Abstract The aim of this article is to further develop the idea of the existence of a distinct Belarusian-Ukrainian/Western-Ruthenian civilization, to define its place among Western sub-civilizations, as well as to argue against the designation of Belarus and Ukraine as belonging to the Eurasian civilization. Most of the provided evidence will be related to Belarus; however, it also applies to Ukraine, the country that has had much in common with Belarus in its historical and cultural inheritance since the 9th and 10th centuries. Key words: designation, Belarus, Europe, civilization Introduction The designation of a modern country or group of countries to one or another civilization bears two aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Philaret of New York
    Metropolitan Philaret of New York That blessed day will come when the Lord will have mercy on the Russian land and Russian people, and piety will be enthroned there, as once it had been in Holy Russia. But while we live this lot in exile, while we belong to this Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia, I repeat again, let us thank the Lord for this and try to be true to Her in every way. Faithfulness to the Truth in Sermons and Teachings of His Eminence Metropolitan Philaret (Vol. 1). Introduction On Sunday 21 November 2010, all churches of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia (ROCOR) commemorated the twenty-fifth anniversary of the repose of Metropolitan Philaret (Voznesensky), her third First Hierarch. Metropolitan of ROCOR, he was also a priest of the much-suffering Patriarchal Church for sixteen years between 1945 and 1961, and so is a bond of unity between the two parts of the Russian Orthodox Church. Moreover, he also represents hope for the future of Orthodoxy in China, where he lived for over forty years. A priest for thirty-one years and a bishop for twenty-two years, he is venerated by many as a holy man. Indeed, there are those who believe that one day, just like St John of Shanghai, he will be canonised by the whole Russian Orthodox Church, both in New York and in Moscow. We know that within ROCOR a service has already been composed to him and there are those who are now collecting testimonies about him. Let us look at his life and achievements.
    [Show full text]
  • Athe Complexity of Religious Persecution@
    The Complexity of Religion in Determining Refugee Status T. Jeremy Gunn Emory University, USA This paper was prepared as a background paper for an expert discussion on religion organized as part of the follow-up to the Agenda for Protection. The views expressed in this paper are not necessarily those of UNHCR. The paper is available online at http://www.unhcr.org/protect. “The Complexity of Religion in Determining Refugee Status” Roundtable on Religion-Based Refugee Claims United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and Church World Service by T. Jeremy Gunn 8 a revised version of this paper will be published in a forthcoming issue of the Harvard Human Rights Journal October 24, 2002 Introduction....................................................................................................................................3 I. Understanding (rather than defining) Religion...........................................................................5 A. The understandable search for a legal definition ..........................................................6 B. Difficulties in the legal definition of religion ...............................................................8 1. Characteristics of definitions of religion ...........................................................8 a. Assumptions about the underlying nature of religion............................8 b. Types of definition: essentialist or polythetic ........................................8 2. Typical shortcomings in legal definitions of religion......................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Denominations in the Republic of Belarus
    November 2011 Religion and denominations in the Republic of Belarus Multi-confessional structure of the Belarusian society has been forming over more than a thousand year history of the nation; it became an important factor that had a great influence on the formation of culture, mentality and state traditions of the present-day Belarus. The experience of our state, where more than 25 different denominations and religious movements organically coexist, is unique. The Orthodox Church has been of great 58.9 per cent of Belarusians consider importance on the Belarusian lands themselves believers. 82 per cent of since the adoption of Christianity in them are Orthodox, 12 per cent are the 10th century and today still attracts Roman Catholic and 6 per cent are a significant number of representatives of other believers. Four 58,9 % denominations. centuries later the of Belarusians are Catholic Church believers. 82 % of them are In the 16th came to the orthodox, 12 % are catholics, century the Grand Duchy E u r o p e a n of Lithuania that 6% represent other Reformation was created on the denominations resulted in the basis of the Belarusian arrival of Protestant territory. Since that time Catholicism movements, among which Lutheran made a great contribution to the and Calvinist ideas became widespread culture of Belarus and its history. on the territory of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Even earlier, at the end of Protestant religious organizations the 14th -15th centuries, Muslims and are represented by 1005 religious Jews settled in Belarus. A large number communities, 21 associations, of religious denominations appeared 22 missions and 5 religious during the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Religious Situation in Belarus in 2002
    The Religious Situation in Belarus in 2002 Vera Rich Vera Rich is a freelance writer. Belarus is supposed to be a secular state. President Lukashenka describes himself as a nonbeliever, but aims to reintegrate Belarus into the Soviet Union, and he sees an alliance with the Orthodox Church as useful in this respect. The latter is an exarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate), and its head is still Filaret of Minsk, as it was in Soviet times. Lukashenka has given the Orthodox Church many privileges, many of which are unconstitutional. For example any religious publishing house in Belarus has to have the approval of the Orthodox Church, whatever its denomination. The president has often denounced the Roman Catholic Church as a tool of NATO and anti-Belarusian. More and more restrictions are placed on foreign clergy. Now the situation is that no 'servant of a foreign religion' can go to Belarus without the permission of the government's Committee for Religious Affairs. There has been an attempt by two or three priests of the Orthodox Church to link up with the Autocephalous Belarusian Orthodox Church based in Canada. When the Eastern-Rite Catholic (Uniate) Church was crushed in 1839 many Belarusians became 'Church Poles': that is, although officially classed as Orthodox they would frequent Polish Catholic churches on Sundays. There are many more Catholics in Belarus than people who claim to be Poles. Nevertheless the Roman Catholic Church is dubbed the Polish church. The abrupt cancelling of broadcasts of the mass in January this year has caused enormous resentment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Church-State Symphonia Resounding
    Linköping University | Department of Political Science Master’s thesis, 30 ECTS credits | International and European Relations Spring term 2020 | LIU-IEI-FIL-A--20/03450--SE The Church-State Symphonia Resounding Through Third Rome: The Strive for Transnational Religious Identity and Unity Author: Zoran Zivkovic Supervisor: Mikael Blomdahl Glossary Autocephaly Independent of external patriarchal authority.1 Ecclesiastical Established church institution.2 Ecumenical Representant of a whole body of churches.3 Clergy People ordained to perform pastoral functions in Christian Church.4 Metropolitan The bishop of an ecclesiastical province.5 Patriarch The head of an Eastern Orthodox Church.6 Patriarchate The office of a Patriarch.7 Parish The ecclesiastical unit of area committed to one pastor.8 Schism Formal separation from a Church.9 Symphonia Diarchic rule between a regent and a Patriarch.10 1 Merriam-Webster. Autocephalous 2 Ibid., Ecclesiastical. 3 Ibid., Ecumenical. 4 Ibid., Clergy. 5 Ibid., Metropolitan. 6 Ibid., Patriarch. 7 Ibid., Patriarchate. 8 Ibid., Parish. 9 Ibid., Schism. 10 Knox, Z. (2004) Russian Society and the Orthodox Church: Religion in Russia after Communism, pp.25 Abstract The Soviet Union population was unified under the shared belief of being a part of a common goal for proletarianism, in disregard of religion. These sentiments were prevalent up until the union’s dissolution. Something which created an identity void, reinvigorating the need for spirituality. The idea of belonging to a Church was encouraged, in which Orthodoxy emerged as a solution for the lack of identity and provided a source of piety for the people. Amalgamating the scattered religious community, essentially providing a catalyst for creating an identity based on a cultural belonging to a historical past.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Philaret of New York and the 'Heresy of Ecumenism
    ST. PHILARET OF NEW YORK AND THE ‘HERESY OF ECUMENISM’ https://www.academia.edu/19643413/ST._PHILARET_OF_NEW_YORK_AND_T HE_HERESY_OF_ECUMENISM Retrieved on 5/30/2016 When St. Philaret became Metropolitan of New York, he was hardly known outside China and Australia. And yet his career was already one of immense courage and holiness. In the 1940s he had suffered torture at the hands of the Japanese for refusing to bow to an idol in Harbin; in 1945 he was the only clergyman in the city who refused to accept a Soviet passport or commemorate the Soviet authorities that now took control of China; and in the 1950s he was subjected to torture by the Chinese communists, who unsuccessfully tried to blow him up but left him permanently injured. Involuntarily, after 1945 he found himself in the Moscow Patriarchate. But this burdened his conscience greatly, and he continued to denounce the Soviet Antichrist. Finally he got his chance to escape the nets of the communists and Soviet church: in 1961 he was able to leave China. “When, finally, with the help of God I managed to extract myself from red China, the first thing I did was turn to the First Hierarch of the Russian Church Abroad, Metropolitan Anastasy, with a request that he consider me again to be in the jurisdiction of the Russian Church Abroad. Vladyka Metropolitan replied with mercy and love, and immediately blessed me to serve in Hong Kong already as a priest of the Synodal jurisdiction, and pointed out that every church server passing into this jurisdiction from the jurisdiction of Moscow must give a special penitential declaration to the effect that he is sorry about his (albeit involuntary) stay in the Moscow jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]