Chondrodactylus Bibronii Bibrons Thick Toed Gecko.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Herpetofauna of the Cubango, Cuito, and Lower Cuando River Catchments of South-Eastern Angola
Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 10(2) [Special Section]: 6–36 (e126). The herpetofauna of the Cubango, Cuito, and lower Cuando river catchments of south-eastern Angola 1,2,*Werner Conradie, 2Roger Bills, and 1,3William R. Branch 1Port Elizabeth Museum (Bayworld), P.O. Box 13147, Humewood 6013, SOUTH AFRICA 2South African Institute for Aquatic Bio- diversity, P/Bag 1015, Grahamstown 6140, SOUTH AFRICA 3Research Associate, Department of Zoology, P O Box 77000, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth 6031, SOUTH AFRICA Abstract.—Angola’s herpetofauna has been neglected for many years, but recent surveys have revealed unknown diversity and a consequent increase in the number of species recorded for the country. Most historical Angola surveys focused on the north-eastern and south-western parts of the country, with the south-east, now comprising the Kuando-Kubango Province, neglected. To address this gap a series of rapid biodiversity surveys of the upper Cubango-Okavango basin were conducted from 2012‒2015. This report presents the results of these surveys, together with a herpetological checklist of current and historical records for the Angolan drainage of the Cubango, Cuito, and Cuando Rivers. In summary 111 species are known from the region, comprising 38 snakes, 32 lizards, five chelonians, a single crocodile and 34 amphibians. The Cubango is the most western catchment and has the greatest herpetofaunal diversity (54 species). This is a reflection of both its easier access, and thus greatest number of historical records, and also the greater habitat and topographical diversity associated with the rocky headwaters. -
Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica. -
Repeated Origin and Loss of Adhesive Toepads in Geckos
Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Biological Sciences Faculty Research and Publications Biological Sciences, Department of 6-27-2012 Repeated Origin and Loss of Adhesive Toepads in Geckos Tony Gamble Eli Greenbaum Todd R. Jackman Anthony P. Russell Aaron M. Bauer Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/bio_fac Part of the Biology Commons Repeated Origin and Loss of Adhesive Toepads in Geckos Tony Gamble1,2, Eli Greenbaum3¤, Todd R. Jackman3, Anthony P. Russell4, Aaron M. Bauer3* 1 Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America, 2 Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America, 3 Department of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, United States of America, 4 Department of Biological Sciences, University Department of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Abstract Geckos are well known for their extraordinary clinging abilities and many species easily scale vertical or even inverted surfaces. This ability is enabled by a complex digital adhesive mechanism (adhesive toepads) that employs van der Waals based adhesion, augmented by frictional forces. Numerous morphological traits and behaviors have evolved to facilitate deployment of the adhesive mechanism, maximize adhesive force and enable release from the substrate. The complex digital morphologies that result allow geckos to interact with their environment in a novel fashion quite differently from most other lizards. Details of toepad morphology suggest multiple gains and losses of the adhesive mechanism, but lack of a comprehensive phylogeny has hindered efforts to determine how frequently adhesive toepads have been gained and lost. Here we present a multigene phylogeny of geckos, including 107 of 118 recognized genera, and determine that adhesive toepads have been gained and lost multiple times, and remarkably, with approximately equal frequency. -
Description of a New Flat Gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Afroedura) from Mount Gorongosa, Mozambique
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320043814 Description of a new flat gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Afroedura) from Mount Gorongosa, Mozambique Article in Zootaxa · September 2017 DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4324.1.8 CITATIONS READS 2 531 8 authors, including: William R Branch Jennifer Anna Guyton Nelson Mandela University Princeton University 250 PUBLICATIONS 4,231 CITATIONS 7 PUBLICATIONS 164 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Andreas Schmitz Michael Barej Natural History Museum of Geneva Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiver… 151 PUBLICATIONS 2,701 CITATIONS 38 PUBLICATIONS 274 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Monitoring and Managing Biodiversity Loss in South-East Africa's Montane Ecosystems View project Ad hoc herpetofauna observations View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jennifer Anna Guyton on 27 September 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Zootaxa 4324 (1): 142–160 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4324.1.8 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B4FF9A5F-94A7-4E75-9EC8-B3C382A9128C Description of a new flat gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Afroedura) from Mount Gorongosa, Mozambique WILLIAM R. BRANCH1,2,13, JENNIFER A. GUYTON3, ANDREAS SCHMITZ4, MICHAEL F. BAREJ5, PIOTR NASKRECKI6,7, HARITH FAROOQ8,9,10,11, LUKE VERBURGT12 & MARK-OLIVER RÖDEL5 1Port Elizabeth Museum, P.O. Box 13147, Humewood 6013, South Africa 2Research Associate, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, P.O. -
Annotated Checklist and Provisional Conservation Status of Namibian Reptiles
Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 1 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST AND PROVISIONAL CONSERVATION STATUS OF NAMIBIAN REPTILES MICHAEL GRIFFIN BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM PRIVATE BAG 13306 WINDHOEK NAMIBIA Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 2 Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 3 CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 5 INTRODUCTION 5 METHODS AND DEFINITIONS 6 SPECIES ACCOUNTS Genus Crocodylus Nile Crocodile 11 Pelomedusa Helmeted Terrapin 11 Pelusios Hinged Terrapins 12 Geochelone Leopard Tortoise 13 Chersina Bowsprit Tortoise 14 Homopus Nama Padloper 14 Psammobates Tent Tortoises 15 Kinixys Hinged Tortoises 16 Chelonia GreenTurtle 16 Lepidochelys Olive Ridley Turtle 17 Dermochelys Leatherback Turtle 17 Trionyx African Soft-shelled Turtle 18 Afroedura Flat Geckos 19 Goggia Dwarf Leaf-toed Geckos 20 Afrogecko Marbled Leaf-toed Gecko 21 Phelsuma Namaqua Day Gecko 22 Lygodactylus Dwarf Geckos 23 Rhoptropus Namib Day Geckos 25 Chondrodactylus Giant Ground Gecko 27 Colopus Kalahari Ground Gecko 28 Palmatogecko Web-footed Geckos 28 Pachydactylus Thick-toed Geckos 29 Ptenopus Barking Geckos 39 Narudasia Festive Gecko 41 Hemidactylus Tropical House Geckos 41 Agama Ground Agamas 42 Acanthocercus Tree Agama 45 Bradypodion Dwarf Chameleons 46 Chamaeleo Chameleons 47 Acontias Legless Skinks 48 Typhlosaurus Blind Legless Skinks 48 Sepsina Burrowing Skinks 50 Scelotes Namibian Dwarf Burrowing Skink 51 Typhlacontias Western Burrowing Skinks 51 Lygosoma Sundevall’s Writhing Skink 53 Mabuya Typical Skinks 53 Panaspis Snake-eyed Skinks 60 Annotated -
Herpetological Survey of Iona National Park and Namibe Regional Natural Park, with a Synoptic List of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Namibe Province, Southwestern
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301732245 Herpetological Survey of Iona National Park and Namibe Regional Natural Park, with a Synoptic List of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Namibe Province, Southwestern .... Article · May 2016 CITATIONS READS 12 1,012 10 authors, including: Luis Miguel Pires Ceríaco Suzana Bandeira University of Porto Villanova University 63 PUBLICATIONS 469 CITATIONS 10 PUBLICATIONS 33 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Edward L Stanley Arianna Kuhn Florida Museum of Natural History American Museum of Natural History 64 PUBLICATIONS 416 CITATIONS 3 PUBLICATIONS 28 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Global Assessment of Reptile Distributions View project Global Reptile Assessment by Species Specialist Group (International) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Luis Miguel Pires Ceríaco on 30 April 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Reprinted frorm Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences , ser. 4, vol. 63, pp. 15-61. © CAS 2016 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Series 4, Volume 63, No. 2, pp. 15–61, 19 figs., Appendix April 29, 2016 Herpetological Survey of Iona National Park and Namibe Regional Natural Park, with a Synoptic List of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Namibe Province, Southwestern Angola Luis M. P. Ceríaco 1,2,8 , Sango dos Anjos Carlos de Sá 3, Suzana Bandeira 3, Hilária Valério 3, Edward L. Stanley 2, Arianna L. Kuhn 4,5 , Mariana P. Marques 1, Jens V. Vindum 6, David C. -
The Burrowing Geckos of Southern Africa 5 1976.Pdf
ANNALS OF THE TRANSVAAL MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE TRANSVAAL-MUSEUM- < VOL. 30 30 JUNE 1976 No. 6 THE BURROWING GECKOS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA, 5 (REPTILIA: GEKKONIDAE) By W.D. HAACKE Transvaal lvIllseum, Pretoria (With four Text-figures) ABSTRACT This study deals with the entirely terrestrial genera of southern African geckos and is published in five parts in this journal. In this part the phylogenetic and taxono mic affinities of these genera based on pupil shape and hand and foot structure are discussed. PHYLOGENETIC AND TAXONOMIC AFFINITIES In his classification of the Gekkonidae, Underwood (1954) placed six South African genera into the subfamily Diplodactylinae. These genera, i.e. Cho!ldrodac~ylus, Colopus, Palmatogecko, Rhoptropus, Rhoptropella and Ptmopus were supposed to share a peculiar variant of the straight vertical pupil which he called Rhoptropus-type. He notes that all of them occur in "desert or veldt" and appear to be adapted to the special conditions of South Africa. He further states that "Such a number of genera with several peculiar forms of feet in such a restricted area is somewhat surprising". At that time all except Rhoptropuswere considered to be monotypic genera. Since then two more species of Ptmopus and also the terrestrial, obviously related genus Kaokogecko have been described. In the present paper a special study has been made of the ground living, burrowing genera, which excludes Rhoptropus and Rhoptropella. Although it has been pointed out that the classification of the Gekkonidae according to the form of the digits (Boulenger, 1885) and the shape of the pupil (Underwood, 1954) is unsatisfactory (Stephenson, 1960; Kluge, 72 1964 and 1967) the possibilities of these characters as taxonomic indicators were reinvestigated in the genera in question and related forms. -
New Verified Nonindigenous Amphibians and Reptiles in Florida Through 2015, with a Summary of Over 152 Years of Introductions
WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNALTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & IRCF AMPHIBIANS REPTILES • VOL &15, AMPHIBIANS NO 4 • DEC 2008 • 189 23(2):110–143 • AUG 2016 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCED SPECIES FEATURE ARTICLES . Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: New VerifiedOn the Road to Understanding the Nonindigenous Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Amphibians Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 and ReptilesRESEARCH ARTICLES in Florida through 2015, with a . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 Summary. The Knight Anole of(Anolis equestris over) in Florida 152 Years of Introductions .............................................Brian J. Camposano, Kenneth L. Krysko, Kevin M. Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 1 1 2 3 3 4 Kenneth L. KryskoCONSERVATION, Louis A. Somma ALERT, Dustin C. Smith , Christopher R. Gillette , Daniel Cueva , Joseph A. Wasilewski , 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kevin M. Enge. , Steve A. Johnson , Todd S. Campbell , Jake R. Edwards , Michael R. Rochford , Rhyan Tompkins , World’s Mammals11 in Crisis .............................................................................................................................................................12 -
1 §4-71-6.5 List of Restricted Animals [ ] Part A: For
§4-71-6.5 LIST OF RESTRICTED ANIMALS [ ] PART A: FOR RESEARCH AND EXHIBITION SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Hirudinea ORDER Gnathobdellida FAMILY Hirudinidae Hirudo medicinalis leech, medicinal ORDER Rhynchobdellae FAMILY Glossiphoniidae Helobdella triserialis leech, small snail CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Haplotaxida FAMILY Euchytraeidae Enchytraeidae (all species in worm, white family) FAMILY Eudrilidae Helodrilus foetidus earthworm FAMILY Lumbricidae Lumbricus terrestris earthworm Allophora (all species in genus) earthworm CLASS Polychaeta ORDER Phyllodocida FAMILY Nereidae Nereis japonica lugworm PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Arachnida ORDER Acari FAMILY Phytoseiidae 1 RESTRICTED ANIMAL LIST (Part A) §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Iphiseius degenerans predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus longipes predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus macropilis predator, spider mite Neoseiulus californicus predator, spider mite Neoseiulus longispinosus predator, spider mite Typhlodromus occidentalis mite, western predatory FAMILY Tetranychidae Tetranychus lintearius biocontrol agent, gorse CLASS Crustacea ORDER Amphipoda FAMILY Hyalidae Parhyale hawaiensis amphipod, marine ORDER Anomura FAMILY Porcellanidae Petrolisthes cabrolloi crab, porcelain Petrolisthes cinctipes crab, porcelain Petrolisthes elongatus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes eriomerus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes gracilis crab, porcelain Petrolisthes granulosus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes japonicus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes laevigatus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes -
Utilization of the Termite Hodotermes Mossambicus (Hagen) by Gekkonid Lizards Near Keetmanshoop, South West Africa
S. Afr. J. Zoo!. 1989,24(4) 239 Utilization of the termite Hodotermes mossambicus (Hagen) by gekkonid lizards near Keetmanshoop, South West Africa A.M. Bauer* Biology Department, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085, U.S.A. A. P. Russell Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.w., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4 B.D. Edgar University Research Expeditions Program, The University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. Received 17 April 1988; accepted 8 November 1988 Five species of primarily nocturnal geckos (Ptenopus ga"ulus maculatus, Chondrodactylus angulifer angulifer, Pachydactylus bibronii, P. mariquensis latirostris and P. punctatus) collected near Keetmanshoop, South West Africa on the night of 3 October 1987 were found to contain large numbers of thel1arvester termite Hodotermes mossambicus. The mass of termites consumed ranged up to 61,1 % of empty gecko body weight. Termite consumption of this magnitude and extensive above-ground foraging by large numbers of Ptenopus appear to be uncommon and probably reflect gecko usage of a large-scale Hodotermes foraging bout associated with the onset of the rainy season. The availability of such a concentrated food resource may be particularly important for vitellogenic female geckos. Groot hoeveelhede van die grootgrasdraertermiet Hodotermes mossambicus het in die spysverteringskanaal van vyf spesies van hoofsaaklik naglewende geitjies (Ptenopus garrulus maculatus, Chondrodactylus angulifer angulifer, Pachydactylus bibronii, P. mariquensis latirostris en P. punctatus), wat gedurende die nag van 3 Oktober 1987 naby Keetmanshoop, Suidwes-Afrika versamel is, voorgekom. Die massa van die verorberde termiete het tot 61,1 % van die ongevoede liggaamsmassa van die geitjie beslaan. -
JMS-22-026-OK-HUSSAIN-BLINDED-LIZARD.Pdf
International Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences ISSN: 2277-2103 (Online) An Online International Journal Available at http://www.cibtech.org/jms.htm 2013 Vol. 3 (3) September-December, pp.152-156/Arshad et al. Case Report DISPELLING MYTH AND INSTILLING CONFIDENCE: TALE OF HOUSE LIZARD CAUSING POISONING Arshad Anjum1, *Munawwar Husain1, Minakshi Sardha2, Diwan Israr Khan2, Javed A Usmani1 and Farha Azmi3 1Department of Forensic Medicine 2University Health Service 3School of Nursing, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, (UP) *Author for Correspondence ABSTRACT Lizards are probably the most easily spotted of all reptiles. There are over 3500 different types of lizards, existing in all climates throughout the world. In many countries, the wall lizard or gecko is a welcome house guest, chasing and eating many irksome insects. They walk the walls and ceilings and live their lives unharmed by peacefully understanding their niche. They are often misunderstood and large numbers of poisoning cases are blamed on this innocent creature for lack of knowledge and exposure. The wall lizard found in most homes in India is not poisonous at all. They do not have any venomous apparatus and just helps in checking insect population. Only two species of lizards are poisonous i.e. Gila monster (heloderma suspectum) and Mexican beaded Lizards (heloderma hornidum). They are found in large numbers in Mexico and near the Gila River in south-west of United States. None of these varieties are found in India and South Africa. Here we highlight spate of incidences where chance detection of lizard in food was held responsible for rendering food poisonous. -
Results and Perspectives
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Reptiles in Space Missions: Results and Perspectives Victoria Gulimova 1,*, Alexandra Proshchina 1 , Anastasia Kharlamova 1 , Yuliya Krivova 1, Valery Barabanov 1, Rustam Berdiev 2, Victor Asadchikov 3 , Alexey Buzmakov 3 , Denis Zolotov 3 and Sergey Saveliev 1 1 Research Institute of Human Morphology, Ministry of Science and Higher Education RF, Tsurupi street, 3, 117418 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (Y.K.); [email protected] (V.B.); [email protected] (S.S.) 2 Research and Educational Center for Wild Animal Rehabilitation, Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 1/12, 119899 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 3 Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of FSRC “Crystallography and Photonics”, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Ave, 59, 119333 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (V.A.); [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (D.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-916-135-96-15 Received: 7 May 2019; Accepted: 17 June 2019; Published: 20 June 2019 Abstract: Reptiles are a rare model object for space research. However, some reptile species demonstrate effective adaptation to spaceflight conditions. The main scope of this review is a comparative analysis of reptile experimental exposure in weightlessness, demonstrating the advantages and shortcomings of this model. The description of the known reptile experiments using turtles and geckos in the space and parabolic flight experiments is provided. Behavior, skeletal bones (morphology, histology, and X-ray microtomography), internal organs, and the nervous system (morphology, histology, and immunohistochemistry) are studied in the spaceflight experiments to date, while molecular and physiological results are restricted.