Legemiddelforbruket I Norge 2013–2017 Drug Consumption in Norway 2013–2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Legemiddelforbruket I Norge 2013–2017 Drug Consumption in Norway 2013–2017 LEGEMIDDELSTATISTIKK 2018:1 Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2013–2017 Drug Consumption in Norway 2013–2017 Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2013–2017 Drug Consumption in Norway 2013–2017 Solveig Sakshaug Hanne Strøm Christian Berg Hege Salvesen Blix Irene Litleskare Tove Granum Utgitt av Folkehelseinstituttet/Published by Norwegian Institute of Public Health Område for Helsedata og digitalisering Avdeling for Legemiddelstatistikk April 2018 Tittel/Title: Legemiddelstatistikk 2018:1 Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2013–2017/Drug Consumption in Norway 2013–2017 Forfattere/Authors: Solveig Sakshaug (redaktør) Hanne Strøm Christian Berg Hege Salvesen Blix Irene Litleskare Tove Granum Bestilling: Rapporten kan lastes ned som pdf på Folkehelseinstituttets nettsider: www.fhi.no The report is only available as pdf from www.fhi.no Grafisk design omslag: Fete Typer Kontaktinformasjon/Contact information: Folkehelseinstituttet/Norwegian Institute of Public Health P.O.Box 4404 Nydalen N‐0403 Oslo Tel: +47 21 07 70 00 ISSN:1890‐9647 ISBN elektronisk utgave: 978‐82‐8082‐916‐0 Sitering/Citation: Sakshaug, S (red), Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2013–2017 [Drug Consumption in Norway 2013–2017], Legemiddelstatistikk 2018:1, Oslo: Folkehelseinstituttet, 2018. Tidligere utgaver/Previous editions: 1977: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1974–1976 1978: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1975–1977 1980: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1975–1979 1981: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1980 1982: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1977–1981 1984: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1979–1983 1985: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1984 1986: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1981–1985 1987: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1986 1988: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1987 1989: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1984–1988 1990: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1989 1991: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1986–1990 1992: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1991 1993: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1988–1992 1994: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1989–1993 1995: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1990–1994 1996: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1991–1995 1997: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1992–1996 1998: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1993–1997 1999: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1994–1998 2000: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1995–1999 2001: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1996–2000 2002: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1997–2001 2003: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1998–2002 2004: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1999–2003 2005: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2000–2004 2006: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2001–2005 2007: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2002–2006 2008: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2003–2007 2009: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2004–2008 2010: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2005–2009 2011: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2006–2010 2012: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2007–2011 2013: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2008–2012 2014: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2009–2013 2015: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2010–2014 2016: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2011–2015 2017: Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 2012–2016 Innhold Oppsummering ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Innledning ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Datagrunnlag ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Anatomisk Terapeutisk Kjemisk (ATC) klassifikasjon ............................................................................... 9 Måleenheter ...........................................................................................................................................11 Reseptregisteret .....................................................................................................................................14 Kommentarer til statistikken ..................................................................................................................14 Kostnader 14 Salg i definerte døgndoser (DDD) 15 Salg fordelt på reseptkategorier 15 Salg per legemiddelgruppe 15 Salg av reseptfrie legemidler 17 Veterinære legemidler ............................................................................................................19 Folkemengde etter alder 2013 – 2017 ...................................................................................................24 Forkortelser ............................................................................................................................................25 Statistikk pr ATC hovedgruppe A Fordøyelsesorganer og stoffskifte .................................................................................................. 27 B Blod og bloddannende organer ..................................................................................................... 35 C Hjerte og kretsløp ........................................................................................................................... 39 D Dermatologiske midler ................................................................................................................... 47 G Urogenitalsystem og kjønnshormoner........................................................................................... 51 H Hormoner til systemisk bruk, ekskl. kjønnshormoner og insuliner ............................................... 57 J Antiinfektiva til systemisk bruk ...................................................................................................... 61 L Antineoplastiske og immunmodulerende midler .......................................................................... 67 M Muskler og skjelett ......................................................................................................................... 75 N Nervesystemet ............................................................................................................................... 79 P Antiparasitære midler, insekticider og insektmidler ...................................................................... 87 R Respirasjonsorganer ....................................................................................................................... 89 S Sanseorganer .................................................................................................................................. 95 V Varia ............................................................................................................................................... 97 Endring av ATC koder og DDD 2018 .................................................................................................... 99 Legemiddelstatistikk 2018:1•Folkehelseinstituttet 5 Contents Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Data source .............................................................................................................................................. 8 The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system ......................................................... 9 Units of measurement ............................................................................................................................11 Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) ............................................................................................14 Comments to the statistics .....................................................................................................................14 Cost 14 Sales in defined daily dose (DDDs) 15 Sales according to prescription category 15 Turnover per ATC group 15 Sale of non‐prescription medicines (OTC) 17 Veterinary medicines 19 Population by age 2013 ‐ 2017 ...............................................................................................................24 Abbreviations .........................................................................................................................................25 Statistics for each ATC main group A Alimentary tract and metabolism .................................................................................................. 27 B Blood and blood forming organs .................................................................................................... 35 C Cardiovascular system .................................................................................................................... 39 D Dermatologicals.............................................................................................................................. 47 G Genito urinary system and sex hormones ..................................................................................... 51 H Systemic hormonal preparations, excl. sex hormones and insulins .............................................. 57 J Antiinfectives for systemic use ....................................................................................................... 61 L Antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents ............................................................................. 67 M Musculo‐skeletal system ................................................................................................................ 75 N Nervous system .............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Faldaprevir, Pegylated Interferon, and Ribavirin for Treatment-Naïve HCV Genotype-1: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Trials
    Faldaprevir, pegylated interferon and ribavirin. , 2016; 15 (3): 333-349 333 ORIGINAL ARTICLE May-June, Vol. 15 No. 3, 2016: 333-349 The Official Journal of the Mexican Association of Hepatology, the Latin-American Association for Study of the Liver and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver Faldaprevir, pegylated interferon, and ribavirin for treatment-naïve HCV genotype-1: pooled analysis of two phase 3 trials Donald M. Jensen,1 Tarik Asselah,2 Douglas Dieterich,3 Graham R. Foster,4 Mark S. Sulkowski,5 Stefan Zeuzem,6 Parvez Mantry,7 Eric M. Yoshida,8 Christophe Moreno,9 Denis Ouzan,10 Mark Wright,11 Luis E. Morano,12 Robert Buynak,13 Marc Bourlière,14 Tarek Hassanein,15 Shuhei Nishiguchi,16 Jia-Horng Kao,17 Masao Omata,18 Seung W. Paik,19 David K. Wong,20 Edward Tam,21 Kelly Kaita,22 S. Victor Feinman,23 Jerry O. Stern,24 Joseph Scherer,24 Anne-Marie Quinson,24 Florian Voss,25 John-Paul Gallivan,25 Wulf O. Böcher,25 Peter Ferenci26 1 University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 2 Hôpital Beaujon, APHP, University Paris-Diderot and INSERM CRB3, Clichy, France. 3 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 4 Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. 5 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 6 J.W.Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany. 7 The Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 8 University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 9 CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 10 Institut Arnault Tzanck, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Faldaprevir Combined with Peginterferon Alfa2a and Ribavirin In
    Faldaprevir Combined With Peginterferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin in Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype-1 Patients With Prior Nonresponse: SILEN-C2 Trial Mark S. Sulkowski,1 Marc Bourlie`re,2 Jean-Pierre Bronowicki,3 Tarik Asselah,4 Jean-Michel Pawlotsky,5 Stephen D. Shafran,6 Stanislas Pol,7 Stefan Mauss,8 Dominique Larrey,9 Yakov Datsenko,10 Jerry O. Stern,11 George Kukolj,12 Joseph Scherer,11 Gerhard Nehmiz,10 Gerhard G. Steinmann,10 and Wulf O. B€ocher13 Faldaprevir (BI 201335) is a potent, hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor. In all, 290 noncirrhotic HCV genotype (GT)-1 patients with prior null (<1log10 viral load [VL] drop at any time on treatment) or partial response (1log10 VL drop but never undetectable on treatment) were randomized 2:1:1 to receive 48 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) in combination with faldaprevir 240 mg once daily (QD) with 3 days PegIFN/RBV lead-in (LI), 240 mg QD without LI, or 240 mg twice daily (BID) with LI. Patients in the 240 mg QD/LI group achieving maintained rapid virologic response (mRVR; VL <25 IU/mL [Roche TaqMan] at week 4 and undetectable at weeks 8 to 20) were rerandomized to cease all treatment at week 24 or continue PegIFN/RBV up to week 48. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 32%, 50%, and 42% in prior partial responders, and 21%, 35%, and 29% in prior null responders in the faldaprevir 240 mg QD/LI, 240 mg QD, and 240 mg BID/LI groups, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • UNO Template
    26 November 2013 Americas/United States Equity Research Biotechnology Global Biotech & Pharma: The HCV Revolution - Edition 2 Research Analysts COMMENT Ravi Mehrotra PhD 212 325 3487 [email protected] What Is The N Number: Keeping An Eye On Vamil Divan, MD 212 538 5394 Potential Longer Term Pricing Disruption [email protected] Koon Ching PhD ■ No pricing disruption expected in the near-term, but potential exists in 212 325 6286 the medium- to long-term. OK this is somewhat obvious, but bear with us: [email protected] Value/NPV = Price x Mkt Share x Mkt Size x Mkt Longevity. This is the Bruce Nudell PhD second note in our "The HCV Revolution" series. HCV is clearly a highly 212 325 9122 competitive therapeutic area with many players vying for their share of the [email protected] potentially >$15B/year HCV market. We previously addressed immediate- European Pharma Team 44 207 888 0304 term pricing of next-generation regimens, specifically for Sofosbuvir (LINK). [email protected] In this note, we simply highlight the potential number of competing all-oral, Ronak H. Shah, Pharm.D., CFA IFN-free regimens, and timing of key data, in HCV (Exhibits 1-7). The 212 325 9799 number of ultimate competitors has important implications for the HCV [email protected] market. In our view, in a HCV market with up to 4−5 players, we expect Lee Kalowski "normal drug rules" to apply: i.e. the order to market, overall clinical profile of 212 325 9683 drug, and commercial prowess will primarily dictate market share, with price [email protected] used as a tool but not in a "disruptive" way.
    [Show full text]
  • Ribavirin) Tablets Initial U.S
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION ------------------------------ CONTRAINDICATIONS -----------------------------­ These highlights do not include all the information needed to use • Pregnant women and men whose female partners are pregnant (4, 5.1, COPEGUS safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for 8.1) COPEGUS. • Hemoglobinopathies (4) • Coadministration with didanosine (4, 7.1) ® COPEGUS (ribavirin) Tablets Initial U.S. Approval: 2002 COPEGUS in combination with PEGASYS is contraindicated in patients with: WARNING: RISK OF SERIOUS DISORDERS AND RIBAVIRIN­ • Autoimmune hepatitis (4) ASSOCIATED EFFECTS • Hepatic decompensation in cirrhotic patients (4, 5.3) See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. • Ribavirin monotherapy, including COPEGUS, is not effective for ----------------------- WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ----------------------­ the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection (Boxed • Birth defects and fetal death with ribavirin: Do not use in pregnancy and Warning). for 6 months after treatment. Patients must have a negative pregnancy • The hemolytic anemia associated with ribavirin therapy may result test prior to therapy, use at least 2 forms of contraception and undergo in worsening of cardiac disease and lead to fatal and nonfatal monthly pregnancy tests (4, 5.1, 8.1) myocardial infarctions. Patients with a history of significant or unstable cardiac disease should not be treated with COPEGUS (2.3, PEGASYS/COPEGUS: Patients exhibiting the following conditions should be 5.2, 6.1). closely monitored and may require dose reduction or discontinuation of • Significant teratogenic and embryocidal effects have been therapy: demonstrated in all animal species exposed to ribavirin. Therefore, • Hemolytic anemia may occur with a significant initial drop in COPEGUS is contraindicated in women who are pregnant and in hemoglobin.
    [Show full text]
  • Startverso4 PHASE III TRIAL of FALDAPREVIR PLUS PEGYLATED INTERFERON Α-2A and RIBAVIRIN in PATIENTS with HIV and HCV GENOTYPE-1 CO-INFECTION
    STARTVerso4 PHASE III TRIAL OF FALDAPREVIR PLUS PEGYLATED INTERFERON α-2a AND RIBAVIRIN IN PATIENTS WITH HIV AND HCV GENOTYPE-1 CO-INFECTION JK Rockstroh1, M Nelson2, V Soriano3, K Arastéh4, J Guardiola5, S Bhagani6, J Mallolas7, C Tural8, M Puoti9, P Ingiliz10, M Battegay11, MK Jain12, M Núñez13, K Marks14, J Kort15, JO Stern15, R Vinisko15, M Manero16, D Dieterich17, on behalf of the STARTVerso4 Study Group 1University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; 2Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK; 3Hospital Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; 4EPIMED, Vivantes Auguste-Viktoria Hospital, Berlin, Germany; 5Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; 6Royal Free Hospital, London, UK; 7Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Jürgen K. Rockstroh 1099 8Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; 9AO Ospedale Niguarda Cà Granda, Milan, Italy; 10Medizinisches Infektiologiezentrum Berlin (MIB), Berlin, Germany; 11Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Basel, Switzerland; 12UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; 13Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; 14Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; 15Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA; 16Boehringer Ingelheim España S.A., Barcelona, Spain; 17Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA [email protected] BACKGROUND RESULTS EFFICACY FIGURE 4e. SVR4 by ART (total population) TABLE 5. AE summary ●● SVR4 was achieved by 74% of patients overall (Figure 3). FDV 120 mg FDV 240 mg + PR + PR Total ●● Faldaprevir (FDV) is a potent inhibitor of HCV NS3/4A.1 PATIENTS - SVR4 rates were comparable across FDV doses and durations of treatment. 24 weeks Total FDV + PR a ●● 1 n (%) (N=123) (N=185) (N=308) FDV has antiviral activity against HCV genotypes (GT) 1, 4, 5, and 6 in vitro.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Synthesis of Hepatitis C Virus NS3 Protease Inhibitors
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Pharmacy 197 Design and Synthesis of Hepatitis C Virus NS3 Protease Inhibitors Targeting Different Genotypes and Drug-Resistant Variants ANNA KARIN BELFRAGE ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6192 ISBN 978-91-554-9166-6 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-243317 2015 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in B41 BMC, Husargatan 3, Uppsala, Friday, 27 March 2015 at 09:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Faculty of Pharmacy). The examination will be conducted in Swedish. Faculty examiner: Ulf Ellervik (Lunds tekniska högskola). Abstract Belfrage, A. K. 2015. Design and Synthesis of Hepatitis C Virus NS3 Protease Inhibitors. Targeting Different Genotypes and Drug-Resistant Variants. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Pharmacy 197. 108 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-554-9166-6. Since the first approved hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3 protease inhibitors in 2011, numerous direct acting antivirals (DAAs) have reached late stages of clinical trials. Today, several combination therapies, based on different DAAs, with or without the need of pegylated interferon-α injection, are available for chronic HCV infections. The chemical foundation of the approved and late-stage HCV NS3 protease inhibitors is markedly similar. This could partly explain the cross-resistance that have emerged under the pressure of NS3 protease inhibitors. The first-generation NS3 protease inhibitors were developed to efficiently inhibit genotype 1 of the virus and were less potent against other genotypes. The main focus in this thesis was to design and synthesize a new class of 2(1H)-pyrazinone based HCV NS3 protease inhibitors, structurally dissimilar to the inhibitors evaluated in clinical trials or approved, potentially with a unique resistance profile and with a broad genotypic coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • F.8 Ethinylestradiol-Etonogestrel.Pdf
    General Items 1. Summary statement of the proposal for inclusion, change or deletion. Here within, please find the evidence to support the inclusion Ethinylestradiol/Etonogestrel Vaginal Ring in the World Health Organization’s Essential Medicines List (EML). Unintended pregnancy is regarded as a serious public health issue both in developed and developing countries and has received growing research and policy attention during last few decades (1). It is a major global concern due to its association with adverse physical, mental, social and economic outcomes. Developing countries account for approximately 99% of the global maternal deaths in 2015, with sub-Saharan Africa alone accounting for roughly 66% (2). Even though the incidence of unintended pregnancy has declined globally in the past decade, the rate of unintended pregnancy remains high, particularly in developing regions. (3) Regarding the use of contraceptive vaginal rings, updated bibliography (4,5,6) states that contraceptive vaginal rings (CVR) offer an effective contraceptive option, expanding the available choices of hormonal contraception. Ethinylestradiol/Etonogestrel Vaginal Ring is a non-biodegradable, flexible, transparent with an outer diameter of 54 mm and a cross-sectional diameter of 4 mm. It contains 11.7 mg etonogestrel and 2.7 mg ethinyl estradiol. When placed in the vagina, each ring releases on average 0.120 mg/day of etonogestrel and 0.015 mg/day of ethinyl estradiol over a three-week period of use. Ethinylestradiol/Etonogestrel Vaginal Ring is intended for women of fertile age. The safety and efficacy have been established in women aged 18 to 40 years. The main advantages of CVRs are their effectiveness (similar or slightly better than the pill), ease of use without the need of remembering a daily routine, user ability to control initiation and discontinuation, nearly constant release rate allowing for lower doses, greater bioavailability and good cycle control with the combined ring, in comparison with oral contraceptives.
    [Show full text]
  • Combination Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B: Current Indications
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central Curr Hepatitis Rep (2011) 10:98–105 DOI 10.1007/s11901-011-0095-1 Combination Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B: Current Indications Navin Paul & Steven-Huy Han Published online: 19 February 2011 # The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Hepatitis B infection remains a major public infected adults in the United States alone and an annual health problem globally and in the United States, with financial burden of $1.3 billion [1, 2•]. Currently available significant use of healthcare resources. Several therapeu- therapeutic options include both parenteral and oral agents, tic agents active against viral and host targets are which act on various host and viral targets. These include currently available for its treatment. The success of medications such as standard interferon and pegylated combination therapy in HIV infection, which has simi- interferon (peg-interferon), which target receptors on the larities to hepatitis B in both therapeutic targets and host cell membranes, and nucleotide and nucleoside treatment options, stimulated studies on the efficacy and analogues, which inhibit HBV RNA-dependent DNA safety of various combinations of available drugs in the polymerase (lamivudine, telbivudine, entecavir, adefovir treatment of hepatitis B infection. In this review, we dipivoxil, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) [3]. analyze the current role of combination therapy in The availability of agents acting on different targets chronic hepatitis B infection. makes the option of combination therapy to achieve better therapeutic results particularly attractive.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaginal Administration of Contraceptives
    Scientia Pharmaceutica Review Vaginal Administration of Contraceptives Esmat Jalalvandi 1,*, Hafez Jafari 2 , Christiani A. Amorim 3 , Denise Freitas Siqueira Petri 4 , Lei Nie 5,* and Amin Shavandi 2,* 1 School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK 2 BioMatter Unit, École Polytechnique de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 50-CP 165/61, 1050 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] 3 Pôle de Recherche en Gynécologie, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] 4 Fundamental Chemistry Department, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes 748, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil; [email protected] 5 College of Life Sciences, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (E.J.); [email protected] (L.N.); [email protected] (A.S.); Tel.: +32-2-650-3681 (A.S.) Abstract: While contraceptive drugs have enabled many people to decide when they want to have a baby, more than 100 million unintended pregnancies each year in the world may indicate the contraceptive requirement of many people has not been well addressed yet. The vagina is a well- established and practical route for the delivery of various pharmacological molecules, including contraceptives. This review aims to present an overview of different contraceptive methods focusing on the vaginal route of delivery for contraceptives, including current developments, discussing the potentials and limitations of the modern methods, designs, and how well each method performs for delivering the contraceptives and preventing pregnancy.
    [Show full text]
  • EXAMPLE Alteplase Thrombolytic Central Changes Noted
    INTERIM ACS STEMI Alteplase Thrombolysis Orders Place Label Here Allergies: Ht. cm Wt. kg Diagnosis: Acute Coronary Syndrome C C M M Date (yyyy-Mon-dd) Time R Sign Physician Orders P E P R TIMI score ____________ GRACE Score (risk) ____________________ Monitor Admit to or transfer to _______________________ Oxygen per nasal cannula at 4 L/min or adjust to keep SpO2 greater than 92% Start a large bore IV – 250 mL NS TKVO (40 mL/h); saline lock IV when stable Do bilateral manual BP and notify physician if more than 20 mmHg difference between the 2 sides VS q1h until stable then q4h x 12 h, then TID & prn Neuro VS pre and 15 min post thrombolysis, then q1h x 4, q4h x 12 h, TID and prn CBC, PT, PTT, ALT, creatinine, electrolytes, glucose, magnesium, TnI and urea (if not already done in ED) Order urgent Repeat CBC, creatinine, electrolytes, glucose on Day 2 (Presentation to ED is Day 0) Cancel all pending requests for TnI ordered at time of initial presentation to ED TnI at 6 – 8 h TnI at 18 – 24 h Fasting glucose and fasting lipid profile (do within 24 h after a 10 –12 h fast) HbA1C (if diabetic) Other _______________________________________________________________ ECG stat repeat at 45 min, 60 min, 90 min: then daily x 3 (and prn with chest pain and/or significant arrhythmias) CXR – as soon as possible ASA – 162 mg chew now (if not already given) Given at h Then EC ASA 81 mg daily. Alteplase BOLUS dose Alteplase FIRST infusion Alteplase SECOND infusion 15 mg/15 mL IV bolus over 2 min 0.75 mg/kg from Table A 0.5 mg/kg from Table A _____ mg infusion over 30 min _____ mg infusion over 60 min Given at ______h By:_________ Given at _____ h By: ________ Given at _____ h By: _____ Enoxaparin Less than 75 years and eGFR at least 30 mL/min 30 mg IV bolus 30 mg IV bolus immediately prior to administration of alteplase Within 30 minutes of initiating alteplase infusion and then q12h, give Given at _______h Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg deep subcutaneous (Max.
    [Show full text]
  • ALTEPLASE: Class: Thrombolytic Agent (Fibrinolytic Agent
    ALTEPLASE: Class: Thrombolytic Agent (Fibrinolytic Agent ). Indications: - Management of acute myocardial infarction for the lysis of thrombi in coronary arteries; management of acute ischemic stroke -Acute myocardial infarction (AMI): Chest pain ≥20 minutes, ≤12-24 hours; S-T elevation ≥0.1 mV in at least two ECG leads -Acute pulmonary embolism (APE): Age ≤75 years: Documented massive pulmonary embolism by pulmonary angiography or echocardiography or high probability lung scan with clinical shock . -Restoration of central venous catheter function *Unlabeled/Investigational :Acute peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Dosage: -Coronary artery thrombi: Front loading dose (weight-based): -Patients >67 kg: Total dose: 100 mg over 1.5 hours; infuse 15 mg over 1-2 minutes. Infuse 50 mg over 30 minutes. Infuse remaining 35 mg of alteplase over the next hour. Maximum total dose: 100 mg -Patients ≤67 kg: Infuse 15 mg I.V. bolus over 1-2 minutes, then infuse 0.75 mg/kg (not to exceed 50 mg) over next 30 minutes, followed by 0.5 mg/kg over next 60 minutes (not to exceed 35 mg) Maximum total dose: 100 mg. See “Notes.” Note: Concurrently, begin heparin 60 units/kg bolus (maximum: 4000 units) followed by continuous infusion of 12 units/kg/hour (maximum: 1000 units/hour) and adjust to aPTT target of 1.5-2 times the upper limit of control. Note: Thrombolytic should be administered within 30 minutes of hospital arrival. Administer concurrent aspirin, clopidogrel, and anticoagulant therapy (ie, unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, or fondaparinux) with alteplase (O’Gara, 2013). -Acute massive or submassive pulmonary embolism: I.V. (Activase®): 100 mg over 2 hours; may be administered as a 10 mg bolus followed by 90 mg over 2 hours as was done in patients with submassive PE (Konstantinides, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Management of Troublesome Vaginal Bleeding with Progestogen-Only Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC)
    Guidance for management of troublesome vaginal bleeding with progestogen-only long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) Initial consultation Management of troublesome bleeding Provide accurate Information about expected bleeding patterns, 1. Exclude other causes emphasising that troublesome bleeding is likely to improve with time: Pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including chlamydia, liver-enzyme Implant: 1/5 amenorrhoea, 3/5 infrequent, irregular bleeding, 1/5 frequent or inducing medications (implant only) and vaginal, cervical or uterine pathology prolonged bleeding; approximately 1/2 with frequent or prolonged bleeding will 2. If no suspicion of another cause for bleeding improve after three months. Reassure this is ‘normal’ and not harmful Hormonal IUD: frequent spotting/bleeding common in first 3-5 months; either 3. Advise medication management amenorrhoea, light irregular or light regular bleeding common after six months. Ensure no contraindications and explain risks and side effects DMPA Injection: 1/2 amenorrhoea, 1/6 infrequent irregular bleeding, 1/3 frequent/ prolonged bleeding; amenorrhoea increases over time. 4. Advise that the implant or hormonal IUD can be removed any time or the depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injection discontinued. Be proactive in offering management advice for troublesome bleeding Actively encourage review of troublesome bleeding. First line options: • A combined hormonal contraceptive1 taken continuously or cyclically for three months • Five day course of NSAID2 such as mefenamic acid 500mg bd-tds • Five day course of tranexamic3 acid 500mg bd, particularly if bleeding is heavy Second line options Contraindications include: 1 migraine with aura, personal and family history of venous thromboembolism, risk factor for cardiovascu- With low level, anecdotal or conflicting evidence: lar disease and smoking >35 years of age, active breast cancer.
    [Show full text]