Media Students/0I/C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Media Students/0I/C Media students/11/c 3/2/06 8:35 am Page 358 1 11 ProductionProduction 2 3 4 organisationorganisation 5 6 7 • The production process in outline • Production 8 9 • Setting out • Post-production 10 • Negotiating a brief • References and further reading 11 • Pre-production 12 13 14 15 In this chapter we deal with the organisation and management of media 16 production tasks. Along with Chapter 12, the information and advice here 17 will enable you to understand the production process and to approach your 18 own productions with confidence. 19 20 21 The production process in outline 22 If you discuss the concept of the production process with professionals 23 who work in different media (e.g. magazine publishing, television, etc.), 24 they will probably stress the differences – the specificities – of their own 25 particular work practices. In Chapter 7 we outline a six-stage production 26 process which, while primarily concerned with film, will serve equally 27 well for other types of media production, even if the professionals 28 concerned would not necessarily recognise the terms used: 29 ‘Development’ is the term used • development or negotiating a brief 30 in the film industry. A ‘brief’ is a • pre-production 31 design industry term, also used production 32 in video production. In many • industries a freelance producer, • post-production 33 writer or director hopes to be • distribution 34 ‘commissioned’ by a ‘publisher’ • exhibition. 35 of some kind. These stages represent the production process for a single, coherent 36 product. An established, daily, media product like a newspaper won’t need 37 to involve endless negotiation and pre-production (although the inclusion 38 of some material will still need to be negotiated), but when the product 39 was first devised the production team will have gone through these stages. 40 A television or radio series is commissioned as a block – a set number of 41 episodes – and each commission can be treated as a single production. 42 358 Media students/11/c 3/2/06 8:35 am Page 359 11: PRODUCTION ORGANISATION Setting out 1 Setting out 2 Whatever the production task, there are several important questions 3 which need to be asked at the outset. 4 5 6 Purpose 7 Why are you producing a media text? Most likely it will be to ‘educate, 8 inform or entertain’. If it isn’t one of these, then it is probably intended to A criticism of some recent British 9 persuade. All production must be entertaining to a certain extent or else films is that they were made just 10 readers won’t persevere with the text. Your production will be assessed because the resources existed 11 to make them – not because the according to the extent to which it ‘fits its purpose’, and you should bear producers had something they 12 this in mind throughout each stage of the process. wanted to say or because they 13 wanted a big hit. Media products 14 need a clear purpose and a 15 Target audience recognised audience. 16 The meaning produced by a text depends to a large extent on the intended 17 reader, and it’s futile to try to construct a text if you don’t know who that 18 reader is. The audience profile will include the standard age, gender and 19 class information as well as more culturally based distinctions which 20 might include religion, sexual orientation, marital or family status, etc., 21 and environmental factors such as geographical location (see Chapter 8 for 22 further discussion of the descriptions used by media industries). 23 24 25 26 ACTIVITY 11.1 27 28 Thinking about audiences 29 If you are given a relatively ‘open brief’ on your course, it’s tempting to choose 30 something with a target audience made up of your own peers. It seems easier 31 because you understand the audience. But that can mean that you don’t really do 32 the work of thinking about the audience. It can be more useful to try to think about 33 a very different target audience. Imagine you are asked to produce a television 34 magazine format show (twenty minutes of different studio items and filmed 35 inserts). Brainstorm some ideas for a show to appeal to: 36 • a ‘daytime’ audience of parents with young children 37 • a Sunday morning audience of men aged 55+ 38 (Check the BBC website at www.bbc.co.uk/commissioning/marketresearch for 39 ideas about television audiences.) 40 41 42 359 Media students/11/c 3/2/06 8:35 am Page 360 Setting out THE MEDIA STUDENT’S BOOK Budget and funding 1 Media production requires money – large amounts in many cases. Where 2 does it come from? 3 4 5 Direct sales 6 This is a typical ‘cash flow’ Not many producers can be self-funding – generating enough income 7 problem. The business may be from sales to fund the next production. In most cases, the preparation 8 financially viable, but the money costs and the delay in receiving income mean that the outlay is too big 9 coming in isn’t always at the right 10 time to cover the necessary for a small company to cover. expenditure. Smaller companies There are then a limited number of options available. Borrowing the 11 are often forced to pay bills on money from a bank will mean high interest payments, putting more 12 time, whereas larger companies pressure on the ‘need to succeed’. Selling an interest in your production to 13 can make their smaller suppliers 14 wait. a backer is perhaps a less risky venture, but of course it means that, if you do well, a share of the profits goes to your backers. 15 16 17 Pre-sales 18 Continuing production can be guaranteed if you can ‘pre-sell’ your 19 products at a fixed price. This way you may cover the whole of your 20 budget with a guaranteed sale. The disadvantage is that if your product is 21 very successful and could command a higher price, you will have forgone 22 potential profits. 23 24 25 Selling rights to a distributor 26 This saves you the trouble and the risk of selling your product in 27 territories (or to other media) which you don’t know much about. 28 A distributor pays you a fixed sum. Once again, you lose profits if the 29 product is successful. 30 31 32 Selling ideas 33 If you can sell your production idea, you can save yourself the bother of 34 producing at all. You can also negotiate to make your product as a 35 commission for a major producer, leaving someone else to worry about 36 budgets while you just take a fee. 37 38 39 Sponsorship or advertising 40 You may get someone else to pay for the production (or part of it) as part 41 of a sponsorship deal. Companies may be interested in being associated 42 360 Media students/11/c 3/2/06 8:35 am Page 361 11: PRODUCTION ORGANISATION Setting out 1 with a ‘quality’ product, especially if it addresses a specific target audience 2 that they want to reach. A specialised form of sponsorship involves 3 product placement. Print products and possibly radio broadcasts may be Product placementThis refers 4 funded by the direct sale of advertising space. The danger of sponsorship to the prominent position of 5 is that the sponsors’ views on the production may compromise your consumer items in the decor of films and television programmes 6 own aims. and crucially the use of such 7 products by stars. Coca-Cola and 8 Pepsi are reputed to have spent Grant-aid millions on getting their products 9 used by stars in Hollywood 10 If you have no money and little experience, you may actually be better features (see Chapter 9 and its 11 placed to get started on a project than if you have a track record. Many arts case study). 12 agencies offer grants to new producers. These may be quite small – a few Grant aid has enabled many 13 hundred pounds up to a few thousand – but enough to get started. Look currently successful film-makers 14 in the reference section below for details of the UK Film Council, Arts to make a start. Lottery funding is 15 Council, etc. Be warned: grant applications have strict schedules tied to an important source of support, 16 annual budgets and quite detailed application forms. Make sure you have mainly for organisations but also for smaller ventures. Check with 17 enough time to get advice and fill in the forms properly. You will also your local arts board or screen 18 need to evaluate your work – you will probably find that your media agency. 19 studies work is useful in explaining what you want to do. Many grants are 20 aimed at giving help to particular groups of new producers or new forms 21 of production. 22 For many producers, ‘independence’ from control or ‘interference’ by 23 funders is a big issue. On the other hand, some funders can be helpful 24 in budgeting for you (and also giving you ‘backing’ which will allow you 25 entry into other negotiations with potential buyers etc.). 26 27 Style 28 29 What style or genre will you use? No matter how ‘original’ you attempt to 30 be, you will be making references to media conventions. If you don’t make 31 these references your readers may have difficulty following the text. You 32 will perhaps be warned not to imitate professional work slavishly, but, at 33 least when you first start out, it is difficult not to draw on work you enjoy 34 or admire.
Recommended publications
  • Drug Education and Its Publics in 1980S Britain
    International Journal of Drug Policy 88 (2021) 103029 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Drug Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/drugpo Policy Analysis Just say know: Drug education and its publics in 1980s Britain Alex Mold Centre for History in Public Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Until the 1980s, anti-drug education campaigns in the UK were rare. This article examines the reasons behind a Heroin policy shift that led to the introduction of mass media drug education in the mid 1980s. It focuses on two Drug education campaigns. ‘Heroin Screws You Up’ ran in England, and ‘Choose Life Not Drugs’ ran in Scotland. The campaigns Health education were different in tone, with ‘Heroin Screws You Up’ making use of fear and ‘shock horror’ tactics, whereas History of drug use ‘Choose Life Not Drugs’ attempted to deliver a more positive health message. ‘Heroin Screws You Up’ was criticised by many experts for its stigmatising approach. ‘Choose Life Not Drugs’ was more favourably received, but both campaigns ran into difficulties with the wider public. The messages of these campaigns were appro­ priated and deliberately subverted by some audiences. This historical policy analysis points towards a complex and nuanced relationship between drug education campaigns and their audiences, which raises wider questions about health education and its ‘publics’. In April 1986, the cast of teen TV soap, Grange Hill, released a song wanted to be seen to take action on drugs, leading to the introduction of titled ‘Just say no’.
    [Show full text]
  • Jayne Chard Producer
    Jayne Chard Producer Jayne is an award winning producer working in TV and Film. She has produced for SKY studios and for the BBC on the BAFTA winning series Casualty. Jayne has produced three feature films – Two Heads Creek; B&B and Dartmoor Killing, which between them have won over fourteen awards, including Best Thriller at the National Film Awards for Dartmoor Killing and Best LGBTQ Film at the London Independent Film Festival for B&B. Agents Georgina Carrigan [email protected] Credits Television Production Company Notes THE RISING Sky Studios Producer 2 episodes. Executive Producer Serena 2021 Thompson. CASUALTY BBC 1 Producer 5 episodes. Series Producer Loretta Preece 2021 CASUALTY BBC 1 Producer 2018 - 2019 10 episodes. Series Producer Lucy Raffety. THE BENCH ITV Director Single Drama. Producer Grace Kitto HOLLYOAKS Channel Four Director 6 episodes. Producer Juliette Charlesworth GRANGE HILL BBC 1 Director 2 episodes. Producer Karl Dolan United Agents | 12-26 Lexington Street London W1F OLE | T +44 (0) 20 3214 0800 | F +44 (0) 20 3214 0801 | E [email protected] Production Company Notes BROOKSIDE Channel Four Director 2 episodes. Producer David Richardson Film Production Company Notes TWO HEADS CREEK Storm Vision; Dicentium Films Producer 2019 Hummingbird Films Wr. Jordan Waller. Dir. Jesse O'Brien. B&B Creative England/ Film Wales Producer 2017 Hummingbird Films Wr./Dir. Joe Ahearne. Distributors: Pecadillo (UK) Breaking Glass (USA) DARTMOOR KILLING PNF/Hummingbird Films Producer/Line Producer 2015 Wr. Isabelle Grey. Dir. Peter Nicholson. Shown theatrically in 35 screens in the UK. Documentaries Production Company Notes CVS: SAFE OR SORRY Channel Four Producer/Line Producer.
    [Show full text]
  • Skins and the Impossibility of Youth Television
    Skins and the impossibility of youth television David Buckingham This essay is part of a larger project, Growing Up Modern: Childhood, Youth and Popular Culture Since 1945. More information about the project, and illustrated versions of all the essays, can be found at: https://davidbuckingham.net/growing-up-modern/. In 2007, the UK media regulator Ofcom published an extensive report entitled The Future of Children’s Television Programming. The report was partly a response to growing concerns about the threats to specialized children’s programming posed by the advent of a more commercialized and globalised media environment. However, it argued that the impact of these developments was crucially dependent upon the age group. Programming for pre-schoolers and younger children was found to be faring fairly well, although there were concerns about the range and diversity of programming, and the fate of UK domestic production in particular. Nevertheless, the impact was more significant for older children, and particularly for teenagers. The report was not optimistic about the future provision of specialist programming for these age groups, particularly in the case of factual programmes and UK- produced original drama. The problems here were partly a consequence of the changing economy of the television industry, and partly of the changing behaviour of young people themselves. As the report suggested, there has always been less specialized television provided for younger teenagers, who tend to watch what it called ‘aspirational’ programming aimed at adults. Particularly in a globalised media market, there may be little money to be made in targeting this age group specifically.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Ofcom Discussion Paper: Citizens, Communications and Convergence
    Response to discussion paper: Citizens, Communications and Convergence The starting point in my response to Ofcom's discussion paper on Citizens, Communications and Convergence is the wording from paragraph 2.21, namely "An important principle is that all citizens are equal and have the same rights and responsibilities. In relation to media and communications services, this includes a right to have the access to services and content that are needed to participate in society." My concern is that the BBC, one of the world's most renowned broadcasting organisations, does not abide by this principle - resulting in harm to UK society. If all citizens are equal, shouldn't they be entitled to roughly equal services by public service broadcasters? But if we look at BBC children's television services, which are split into different age groups, we find that the Corporation fails to treat teenagers as anything like equal to younger children. CBBC, which is aimed at 6 to 12 year olds, provides about 100 hours of TV programmes per week, including a choice of channel at some times of the day. BBC Switch, on the other hand, provides only two hours per week of programmes for 13-17 year olds. There isn't even any pretence that the BBC treats teenagers as equal citizens. In 2006 the Corporation implemented a covert policy which discarded feedback to CBBC Newsround from children over the age of 13. It seems that this malfeasant practice has now been relaxed, though wrongdoing hasn’t been admitted and the paucity of services for teens is worse than it has been for some time.
    [Show full text]
  • BROOKSIDE Christine Geraughty
    February 1984 Marxism Today 37 BROOKSIDE Christine Geraughty Soap opera is a despised genre. Mention pushes it further, to question why the want programmes that tell the truth and Crossroads, Triangle, Angels or Emmerdale fictional affairs of Ken, Deirdre and Mike show society as it really is.' What is Farm and back come words like 'boring', Baldwin should capture the imagination interesting about Brookside then is that it 'humourless', 'unbelievable', 'contrived'. and the headlines, or challenges the shares the Left's general criticism of soap Its makers either refuse to acknowledge patronising criticism of the audience which opera, articulates the realist aesthetic which that they work in the genre — 'it's an is implied in the ready dismissal of soap lurks behind such criticism and offers the hour's drama a week, with all the operas as 'escapist' because they deal with possibility (although I think Redmond advantages of a cumulative tradition,' said personal relationships. would deny it) of a progressive soap opera. one of Coronation Street's producers — or In such a situation it was encouraging to Certainly, Brookside is different from the admit it with a resigned awareness that it hear that Channel 4 was prepared to invest other serials in its format, the stories it will win them no professional kudos. On £3m in a twice-weekly soap opera, deals with and the characters it represents. the Left, serials are seen as at best mildly produced by Phil Redmond whose com- Serials such as Angels, Coronation Street and addictive rubbish; at worst as a distraction mitment to the serial format had been Crossroads are very much based on the from the serious issues which have to be apparent in his work on Grange Hill and notion of a community — a street or a tackled.
    [Show full text]
  • Production Notes
    PRODUCTION NOTES Director | Nick Gillespie Producer | Finn Bruce Cast | Tom Meeten, Kris Marshall, Johnny Vegas, Katherine Parkinson, Kevin Bishop, Steve Oram, Alice Lowe, Jarred Christmas, Mandeep Dhillon, Pippy Haywood, Craig Parkinson, Steve BroDy, Neil EDmonD, Lloyd Griffith Executive Producers| Finn Bruce, Pandora Edmiston, Matthew ShreDer, James Appleton Writers | Brook Driver, Matt White & Nick Gillespie Editor | Tom Longmore Cinematographer | Billy J Jackson Run Time | 1h 35m 05s Rating | TBC Company | Belstone Pictures Publicity Contact The DDA Group [email protected] LOGLINE: When Paul’s chances of winning a national talent competition are ruined and his dreams of fame slashed, he plans a deathly revenge mission. One lunch break, five spectacular murders! Will the sparkly suited Paul pull it off, stay one step ahead of the cops and find the fame he’s always longed for? SYNOPSIS: Paul, a weedy charity-shop worker has his heart set on winning a national talent competition. With a sparkly suit, killer routine, and his dear old mother in tow… this is his big chance. But when the actions of five intransigent, selfish people get in his way and cause him to miss the audition, Paul plans a deathly revenge mission. One lunch break, five spectacular murders! Each wrongdoer seemingly dispatched in a fitting manner by a sparkly-suited Paul on a revenge rampage around his small hometown. But will he pull it off, stay one step ahead of the cops and find the fame he’s always longed for? DIRECTOR’S STATEMENT | NICK GILLESPIE “This story for me has always been an uplifting one but at the heart of which it’s essentially about grief and loss and how people deal with that.
    [Show full text]
  • Spaces of Preparation: the Acton 'Hilton' and Changing Patterns of Television Drama Rehearsal
    Spaces of preparation: The Acton ‘Hilton’ and changing patterns of television drama rehearsal Hewett, RJ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01439685.2014.937179 Title Spaces of preparation: The Acton ‘Hilton’ and changing patterns of television drama rehearsal Authors Hewett, RJ Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/34038/ Published Date 2014 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. SPACES OF PREPARATION: THE ‘ACTON HILTON’ AND CHANGING PATTERNS OF TELEVISION DRAMA REHEARSAL (6,770 words including notes & references) Dr Richard Hewett1 Correspondence: Richard Hewett, Flat 4, 158 Muswell Hill Road, London N10 3JE, UK, Email: [email protected] Biography Richard Hewett teaches television and film at Royal Holloway, the University of London. His PhD thesis, Acting for Auntie: From Studio Realism to Location Realism in BBC Television Drama, 1953-2008, was completed in 2012 at the University of Nottingham. Publications include the article ‘Acting in the New World: Studio and Location Realism in Survivors’ for the Journal of British Cinema and Television Volume 10.2, and ‘Who is Matt Smith?: Performing the Doctor’ in O'Day, Andrew (ed.), The Eleventh Hour: A Critical Celebration of the Matt Smith and Steven Moffat Era (I.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Create.Canterbury.Ac.Uk
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Canterbury Research and Theses Environment Canterbury Christ Church University’s repository of research outputs http://create.canterbury.ac.uk Please cite this publication as follows: Blackman, S. J., Bradley, R., Fagg, M. and Hickmott, N. (2017) Towards ‘sensible’ drug information: critically exploring drug intersectionalities, ‘Just Say No,’ normalisation and harm reduction. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy. ISSN 0968-7637. Link to official URL (if available): https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2017.1397100 This version is made available in accordance with publishers’ policies. All material made available by CReaTE is protected by intellectual property law, including copyright law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Contact: [email protected] Towards ‘Sensible’ Drug Information: critically exploring drug intersectionalities, ‘just say no,’ normalisation and harm reduction. Shane Blackman, Rick Bradley, Matt Fagg and Nick Hickmott Formatted: Font color: Text 1 4 Authors Abstract This article examines the impact of new psychoactive substances (NPS) on drug service interventions using a case study of regional professional practitioners in South East England. We assess how professionals seek to develop an innovative approach towards providing ‘sensible drug information.’ The research methods include observations, and individual and collective ethnographic interviews with 13 professionals who work with young people across the county. We argue that the notion of sensible is untheorised at present; therefore, we take up this challenge and use the ideas of Gilles Deleuze, which according to Mazzei and McCoy (2010: 504) “prompts the possibilities of new questions and different ways of thinking research.” It is important to theorise sensible drug information because it is a key element in contemporary professional drug practice as part of a harm reduction approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Stuart Organ Shaftesbury Avenue London W1D 6LD
    www.cam.co.uk Email [email protected] Address 55-59 Stuart Organ Shaftesbury Avenue London W1D 6LD Telephone +44 (0) 20 7292 0600 Film Title Role Director Production MARINA AND ADRIENNE (Short) Skipper Lucy Campbell Delaval Films FORK IN THE ROAD The Golfer Barrie White Signals PRESENT SPIRITS David Cole Matthew Thomas Observatory Films THOSE GLORY GLORY DAYS Peter Baker Philip Saville Film Four Television Title Role Director Production DOCTORS Bill Richards Christiana Ebohon BBC LAW AND ORDER Aaron Walker Joss Agnew Kudos LUCAN Sir Stanley Rees Adrian Shergold ITV LAW AND ORDER Aaron Walker Joss Agnew Kudos MEET THE PARENTS Sir George Adrian Johnson Objective Productions TRUE CRIME Doug Harper Paul Marquess Freemantle ABOVE SUSPICION D.I Morgan Gillies McKinnon La Plante DOCTORS Martin Kane Paul Gibson BBC SECRET DIARY OF A CALL GIRL (2A) Niall Fraser Macdonald Tiger Aspect Productions SECRET DIARY OF A CALL GIRL Niall Sue Tully Tiger Aspect Productions MAXWELL Peter Laister Colin Barr BBC RANDOM QUEST Bates Luke Watson - HOLBY CITY Leighton Peters Nigel Douglas BBC DOCTORS Dave Parks Christina Ebohon BBC JUDGE JOHN DEED Johnathan Powell Steve Kelly BBC NEW TRICKS DI Tyson Martyn Friend BBC DOWN TO EARTH Parker Simon Massey BBC FORTY The Registrar David Moore Company Pictures GRANGE HILL Peter Robson- Regular Phillipa Langdale/Various BBC THE WAITING TIME Perry Johnson Stuart Orme Carlton Television THIS LIFE Monk Nigel Douglas BBC WYCLIFFE III Eddie Sowden Michael Morris HTV BROOKSIDE Kevin Cross Various Mersey Television Theatre
    [Show full text]
  • Jessica Lea Writer
    Jessica Lea Writer Agents Charles Walker Assistant [email protected] Olivia Martin +44 (0) 20 3214 0874 [email protected] +44 (0) 20 3214 0778 Credits Other Production Company Notes MA Writing Liverpool John Moores University BA Drama Liverpool John Moores University Television Production Company Notes HOPE STREET BBC/BritBox Writer 2021 2 episodes HOLLYOAKS Lime Pictures / Channel 4 2000 - present 2014 - 2019 Over 100 episodes, inc. double, triple and special episodes Winner 2019 RTS Best Continuing Drama Series Nomination for Best Single Episode at 2014 British Soap Awards, for John Paul's Rape Ordeal United Agents | 12-26 Lexington Street London W1F OLE | T +44 (0) 20 3214 0800 | F +44 (0) 20 3214 0801 | E [email protected] Production Company Notes EASTENDERS BBC 2014 - present 2017 Writer Under annual contract THE DUMPING GROUND BBC 1 x 30' 2015 Series 4 "This is Abuse" Scripts for Government Winner of the Campaign Media Award for 2014 advert campaign. Public Sector and Charities Nominated for Broadcast Digital Award. Nominated for Innovation in Multiplatform at the RTS North West Awards HOLLYOAKS REUNITED Lime Pictures / Channel 4 Late night series 2009 HOLLYOAKS LATER Lime Pictures / Channel 4 One hour special 2008 GRANGE HILL CBBC / BBC1 RTS Awards 2008 Best Children's series 2007 THE STORY OF TRACY BBC1 Series 5 BEAKER RTS Awards 2005 - Best Children's Drama 2005 nominee FAMILY AFFAIRS Thames TV 16 episodes 2003 2003-2005 GIRLS IN LOVE Granada 2 episodes 2003 2003-2004 SUGAR BBC Children's Drama 2003 Northern Exposure 2K2 BBC Joint winner Competition 2002 THE BILL ITV 2002 NICE GUY EDDIE BBC1 Series 2 2002 1 x 60' MASTERCLASS Zenith North Ltd With Alan Plater 1999 Theatre Production Company Notes BEAUTY AND THE The Black-E Arts Jess has been commissioned to write an adaption BEAST Centre for December 2017 2017 United Agents | 12-26 Lexington Street London W1F OLE | T +44 (0) 20 3214 0800 | F +44 (0) 20 3214 0801 | E [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Made on Merseyside List
    Made on Merseyside Charlie Noads RIP (2007) The Pool (2007) Three and Out (2007) Awaydays (2007) Mr. Bhatti on Holiday (2007) Outlaws (2007) Feature Films: Grow Your Own (2006) Under the Mud (2006) 2020’s Sparkle (2006) The Batman (2020) Across the Universe (2006) Munich 38 (2020) Beyond Friendship (2005) 2010’s: X (2005) Little Joe (2019) Dead Man’s Cards (2005) Fated Ip Man 4 (2018) (2004) Yesterday (2018) Alfie (2003) Tolkien (2017) Digital (2003) Triple Word Score (2017) Millions (2003) Pulang (2016) The Virgin of Liverpool (2002) Film Stars Don’t Die in Liverpool (2016) Shooters (2001) Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them Boomtown (2001) (2015) Revenger’s Tragedy (2001) Florence Foster Jenkins (2015) John Lennon-In His Life (2000) Genius (2014) Parole Officer (2000) The Boy with a Thorn in His Side (2014) The 51st State (2000) Big Society the Musical (2014) My Kingdom (2000) 71 (2013) Al’s Lads (2000) Christina Noble (2013) Liam (2000) Fast and Furious 6 (2012) Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit (2012) Blood (2012) Kelly and Victor (2011) Captain America: The First Avenger (2010) 2000’s: Route Irish (2009) Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (2009) Nowhere Fast (2009) Powder (2009) Nowhere Boy (2009) Sherlock Holmes (2008) Salvage (2008) Kicks (2008) Of Time in the City (2008) Act of Grace (2008) Appuntamento a Liverpool (1987) No Surrender (1986) Letter to Brezhnev (1985) Dreamchild (1985) Yentl (1983) Champion (1983) Chariots of Fire (1981) 1990’s: 1970’s: Goin’ Off Big Time (1999) Yank (1979) Dockers (1999) Gumshoe (1971) Heart (1998)
    [Show full text]
  • Cast Interviews
    Cast interviews Neil Pearson plays Trevor “I used to play table tennis for Suffolk … not many people know that.” Neil Pearson was born in South London. His cope with the monstrous egos of sports stars. His previous television credits include Drop The business partner is Sammy who has absolutely no Dead Donkey, Between The Lines, and playing qualms about the venality of the profession they’re John Diamond in A Lump In My Throat. His in but Trevor’s having doubts. He’s having doubts extensive theatre credits include Henry IV, pt because his marriage is going down the toilet and 1, and the Olivier Award-winning drama he and his wife find it increasingly difficult to Closer. In Trevor’s World Of Sport, Neil plays communicate.When his wife starts throwing Trevor. allegations at him that it’s because of his immersion in his work, he starts to question whether he should be there at all …” Can you tell me about the character you play? How did you prepare for the part? “Trevor tries to be the voice of calm and reason in “I’m not obsessive about research but you have to an insane working environment. He’s dealing with a get things right.When I did Between The Lines,we slightly eccentric workforce and he’s also trying to took great care to make sure that we got the little Trevor’s World Of Sport 4 Cast interviews things right because, if you don’t, no one believes used to play with her a lot – I lost a lot too! I also you on the big things.
    [Show full text]