FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 32 NUMBER 3

Friday, January 6,1967 Washington, D.C. Pages 71-113

Agencies in this issue— Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Civil Service Commission Coast Guard Consumer and Marketing Service Federal Aviation Agency Federal Communications Commission Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Reserve System Fish and Wildlife Service Indian Affairs Bureau Interior Department Interstate Commerce Commission Labor Department Land Management Bureau National Park Service Securities and Exchange Commission Social Security Administration Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Subscriptions Now Bein3 Accepted SLIP LAWS

90th Congress, 1st Session 1967

Separate prints of Public Laws, published immediately after enactment, with marginal annotations and legislative history references.

Subscription Price: $12.00 per Session

Published by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration

Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402

Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, National fereraiM register Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail address National Area Code 202 Phone 963-3261™ Archives Building, Washington, D.C. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., Ch. 8B), under regulations prescribed by the Admin­ istrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The Federal Register will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15 per year, payable in advance. The charge for individual copies varies in proportion to the size of the issue (15 cents for the first 80 pages and 6 cents for each additional group of 40 pages, as actually bound). Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code op F ederal Regulations, which is published, under 50 titles, pur­ suant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended. The Code of F ederal R egulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first F ederal R egister issue of each month. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the Federal Register or the Code op F ederal Regulations. Contents

AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION Proposed Rule Making Notices Certain large airplanes and small Outer Continental Shelf; conser­ AND CONSERVATION SERVICE turbine-powered a i r p l a n e s ; vation jurisdiction in undis­ Rules and Regulations maintenance requirements____ 91 puted areas______.______95 National marketing quota refer­ Transition area; proposed desig­ endum result, 1967 crop: nation______94 INTERSTATE COMMERCE Extra long staple cotton------76 Upland cotton------75 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION COMMISSION Rules and Regulations AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Notices Commercial zone; Washington, See Agricultural Stabilization and D.C______^______76 Conservation Service; Consumer Hearings, etc.: and Marketing Service. American Telephone and Tele­ Notices graph Co. et al______96 Fourth section applications for ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Carterphone device in message relief______111 toll telephone service______98 Motor carrier: Notices Fine Music, Inc. (WFMI) et al. Broker, water c a r r i e r a n d Southern California Edison Co., (2 documents)______98,100 freight forwarder applica­ et al.; issuance of order extend­ Thistle, Arch and Tesco Com­ tions______103 ing completion date______96 munications______100 Temporary authority applica­ Uranium enrichment services; cri­ tions______111 teria; correction______96 FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD LABOR DEPARTMENT Notices Proposed Rule Making Rules and Regulations Bernard, J. E., & Co., Inc., et al.; Certain shake and shingle mill Rules pertaining to aircraft ac­ agreements filed for approval_ 101 occupations; h a z a r d s fo r cidents, incidents, overdue air­ Orders to show cause: craft, and safety investigations; minors______91 Acosta Shipping Corp______100 Notices immediate notification______Broad Street Forwarders, Inc_ 101 Unemployment compensation : CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION Certification of State laws to Rules and Regulations Secretary of the Treasury___ 102 Notices Certification of States to Secre­ Interior Department et al.; ex- Lesh Co., et al.; notice of applica­ tary of the Treasury______102 cepted service______75 tions for “small producer” cer­ Pay under other systems; maxi­ tificates ______101 LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU mum stipends______75 FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Notices COAST GUARD .Arizona; proposed withdrawal and Notices Rules and Regulations reservation of lands______95 Commercial Bancorp, Inc.; order Foreign or coastwise voyage; spe­ approving application______102 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE cial load line provisions appli­ Notices cable to certain ships—______77 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Point Reyes National Seashore; CONSUMER AND MARKETING Rules and Regulations notice of intention to issue con­ SERVICE Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge, cession permit______95 Mississippi; hunting______79 Rules and Regulations SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Celery grown in Florida; expenses HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND and rate of assessment______COMMISSION Proposed Rule Making WELFARE DEPARTMENT Notices Milk in Rio Grande Valley market­ See Social Security Administration. Pakco Companies, Inc.; order ing area; handling______91 INDIAN AFFAIRS BUREAU suspending trading______102 federal a v ia t io n a g e n c y Notices SOCIAL SECURITY Rules and Regulations Area field representatives; redele­ ADMINISTRATION gation of authority; correction. 95 Alterations: Rules and Regulations Control zone and transition area______80 INTERIOR DEPARTMENT Federal old-age, survivors, and disability insurance; correction. 75 Transition area______80 See also Fish and Wildlife Service ; Standard instrument approach Indian Affairs Bureau; Land P r o c e d u r e s; miscellaneous Management Bureau; National TREASURY DEPARTMENT amendments______81 Park Service. See Coast Guard. 73 74 CONTENTS

List of CFR Parts Affected (Codification Guide)

The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1967, and specifies how they are affected.

5 CFR 14 CFR 46 CFR 213______75 71 (2 documents) 80 43_— 77 534______75 97______81 320______90 49 CFR 7 CFR P roposed R ules: 722 (2 documents) 75, 76 21------91 170-a------76 967______76 43—------91 P roposed R ules: 65______91 50 CFR 1138______91 71—------94 32_____ 79 91______91 145—______91 20 CFR 404______75 29 CFR Proposed R ules: 1500______91 75 Rules and Regulations

for certain student employees, and the and other payments in money or kind) Title 20— EMPLOYEES’ addition of a new level, L-13, as set out are prescribed according to the academic below. levels of the approved training for which BENEFITS § 534.202 Maximum stipends. the positions are excluded from the Fed­ eral Employees Pay Act and the Classifi- Chapter III— Social Security Adminis­ (a) Maximum stipends (including overtime pay, maintenance allowances, cation Act. tration, Department of Health, Ed­ ucation, and Welfare Maximum Stipends P rescribed, E ffective January 1,1967 [Regs. No. 4, further amended] Maximum stipends 1 a Code Academic level of approved training program symbol PART 404— FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SUR­ Per year Per m onth Per week VIVORS, AND DISABILITY INSUR­ ANCE (1950------) L-A $3,243 $270 $62 L-l__ 3,526 293 67 L-2 3,837 319 73 Subpart J— Procedures, Payment of lr-3. 4,125 343 79 Benefits, and Representation of L-4 4,456 371 85 L-5. 4,803 400 : 92 Parties L-6 - 6,812 484 111 Miscellaneous Amendments L-7...... Third year postgraduate predoctoral______6,913 576 132 Correction L-8...... Fourth year postgraduate predoctoral...... 7,657 629 145 L-9______Fifth year postgraduate without doctorate______In F.R. Doc. 66-14056, appearing at First year postdoctoral (Ph. D.)______page 16765 of the issue for Saturday, 8,276 689 159 L -10--...... December 31, 1966, the phrase reading 9,790 815 188 “before a hearing is sought” in the sec­ L -ll 10,927 910 210 ond sentence of § 404.954(a) should read L-12...... 11,629 960 221 “before a hearing examiner is sought”. L-13 13,537 1,128 260 * Includes overtime pay, maintenance allowances, and other payments in money or kind. J Subject to adjustment for lesser periods. Title 5— ADMINISTRATIVE (b) * * * Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1281 et * * * * * seq.). This section announces the re­ Medical residents : sult of the national marketing quota PERSONNEL First year approved residency______L-9 referendum with respect to the 1967 crop Chapter I— Civil Service Commission Second year approved residency___ L-10 of upland cotton held during the period Third year approved residency_____ L -ll December 5 to 9,1966, each inclusive. PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICE Fourth year approved residency____ L-12 Since the only purpose of § 722.473 is Fifth year approved residency____ L-13 Department of the Interior; Depart­ to announce the referendum result, it is • * * * * hereby found and determined that com­ ment of Agriculture; Department of (5 U.S.C. 5102, 5351, 5352, 5541) pliance with the notice, public procedure Health, Education, and Welfare; and 30-day effective date requirements Office of Economic Opportunity U nited S tates Civil ^Serv­ of 5 U.S.C. 553 (80 Stat. 383) is unneces­ ice Commission, sary. Accordingly, § 722.473 shall be ef­ Effective on publication in the F ederal [seal] J ames C. S pry, fective upon filing this document with Register the following paragraphs hav­ Executive Assistant to the Director, Office of the Federal ing expired by their own terms, are re­ the Commissioners. Register. voked: Paragraph (h)(1) of §213.3112, [FJR. Doc. 67-122; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; paragraph (b) of § 213.3212, paragraph 8:46 a.m.] § 722.473 Result of the national mar­ (a) of § 213.3213, paragraph (b) of keting quota referendum for the § 213.3216, and p a r a g r a p h (a) of 1967 crop of upland cotton. § 213.3273. (a) Referendum period. The national (5 U.S.C. 3301, 3302, E.O. 10577, 19 F.R. 7521, Title 7— AGRICULTURE marketing quota referendum for the 1967 3 CFR, 1954-58 Comp., p. 218) Chapter VII— Agricultural Stabiliza­ crop of upland cotton was held by mail tion and Conservation Service ballot during the period December 5 to 9, U nited S tates Civil S erv­ 1966, each inclusive, in accordance with ice Commission, (Agricultural Adjustment), Depart­ § 722.472 (31 F.R. 13465) and Part 717 of [seal] James C. S pry, ment of Agriculture this chapter (§ 717.17, 31 F.R. 12011). Executive Assistant to SUBCHAPTER B— FARM MARKETING QUOTAS (b) Farmers voting. A total of 301,- the Commissioners. AND ACREAGE ALLOTMENTS 442 farmers engaged in the production [P.R. Doc. 67-123; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; of the 1966 crop of upland cotton voted 8:46 a.m.] PART 722— COTTON in the referendum. Of those voting, Subpart— 1967 Crop of Upland Cot­ 276,205 farmers, or 91.6 percent, favored the 1967 national marketing quota and PART 534— PAY UNDER OTHER ton; Acreage Allotments and Mar­ 25,237 farmers, or 8.4 percent, opposed SYSTEMS^ keting Quotas the 1967 national marketing quota. (c) 1967 national marketing quota Maximum Stipends N ational Marketing Quota R eferendum R esult continues in effect. The national mar­ keting quota for the 1967 crop of upland Section 534.202 is amended to show Basis and purpose. Section 722.473 cotton of 16,033,000 bales proclaimed in revision of the schedule of maximum is issued pursuant to the Agricultural § 722.463 (31 F.R. 10568) shall continue stipends prescribed by the Commission Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended (52 in effect since two-thirds or more of the

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 76 RULES AND REGULATIONS upland cotton farmers voting in the ref­ Signed at Washington, D.C., on De­ (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C erendum favored the quota. cember 30,1966. 601-674) (Sec. 343, 63 Stat. 670, as amended; 7 U.S.C. H. D. G odfrey, Dated: January 3, 1967. 1343) Administrator, Agricultural Sta­ bilization and Conservation P aul A. Nicholson, Effective date: Date of filing this docu­ Service. Deputy Director, Fruit and ment with the Director, Office of the Vegetable Division, Consumer Federal Register. [F.R. Doc. 67-120; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; 8:46 a.m.] and Marketing Service. Signed at Washington, D.C., on De­ [F.R. Doc. 67-139; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967.- cember 30,1966. 8:47 a.m.] H. D. Godfrey, Chapter IX— Consumer and Market­ Administrator, Agricultural Sta­ ing Service (Marketing Agreements bilization and Conservation Service. and O rd e rs; Fruits, Vegetables, Title 49— TRANSPORTATION Nuts), Department of Agriculture [F.R. Doc. 67-119; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; Chapter I— Interstate Commerce 8:46 a.m.] PART 967— CELERY GROWN IN Commission FLORIDA PART 722— COTTON SUBCHAPTER B— CARRIERS BY MOTOR VEHICLES Expenses and Rate of Assessment [Ex Parte No. MO-7] Subpart— 1967 Crop of Extra Long Staple Cotton; Acreage Allotments Notice of rule making regarding the PART 170— COMMERCIAL ZONES proposed expenses and rate of assess­ and Marketing Quotas ment, to be effective under Marketing Washington, D.C., Commercial N ational Marketing Quota R eferendum Agreement No. 149 and Order No. 967 Zone R esult (7 CFR Part 967; 30 F.R. 14266), regu­ At a session of the Interstate Com­ Basis and purpose. Section 722.557 is lating the handling of celery grown in merce Commission, Operating Rights Re­ issued pursuant to the Agricultral Ad­ Florida was published in the F ederal view Board Number 2, held at its office in justment Act of 1938, as amended (52 R egister November 29, 1966 (31 F.R. Washington, D.C., on the 16th day of Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1281 et 14990). This regulatory program is ef­ December 1966. seq.). This section announces the re­ fective under the Agricultural Market­ It appearing, that on February 5,1965, sult of the national marketing quota ing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended the Commission, Operating Rights Re­ referendum with respect to the 1967 (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The notice af­ view Board Number 1, made and filed its crop of extra long staple cotton held forded interested persons an opportunity second report on petition in this pro­ during the period December 5 to 9, 1966, to submit written data, views, or argu­ ceeding, 98 M.C.C. 106, and'order rede­ each inclusive. ments pertaining thereto not later than fining the limits of the zone adjacent to Since the only purpose of § 722.557 is 15 days following publication in the and commercially a part of Washington, to announce the referendum result, it F ederal R egister. None was filed. D.C., contemplated by section 203(b) (8) is hereby found and determined that After consideration of all relevant of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 compliance with the notice, public pro­ matters, including the proposals set U.S.C. 303(b)(8)); cedure and 30-day effective date require­ forth in the aforesaid notice which were It further appearing, that by petition ments of 5 U.S.C. 553 (80 Stat. 383) is recommended by the Florida Celery filed June 21, 1966, Sears, Roebuck & Co. unnecessary. Accordingly, § 722.557 Committee, established pursuant to said seeks modification so as to include an shall be effective upon filing this docu­ marketing agreement and this part, it additional area within the limits of the ment with the Director, Office of the is hereby found and determined that: commercial zone of Washington, D.C.; Federal Register. § 967.202 Expenses and rate of assess­ and good cause appearing therefor: § 722.557 Result of the national mar­ m ent. keting quota referendum for the It is ordered, That said proceeding be, 1967 crop of extra long staple cotton. (a) The expenses that are reasonable and it is hereby, reopened for further and likely to be incurred during the consideration. (a) Ref er endum period. The national fiscal year August 1, 1966, through July i t is further ordered, That 49 CFR 170.4 marketing quota referendum for the 31, 1967, by the Florida Celery Commit­ be, and it is hereby, revised as follows: 1967 crop of extra long staple cotton was tee for its maintenance and functioning held by mail ballot during the period and for such purposes as the Secretary § 170.4 Washington, D.C. December 5 to 9, 1966, each inclusive, may determine to be appropriate, will The zone adjacent to and commercially in accordance with § 722.556 (31 F.R. amount to $38,500. a part of Washington, D.C., within which 13465) and Part 717 of this chapter (b) The rate of assessment to be paid transportation by motor vehicle, in inter­ (§ 717.17, 31 F.R. 12011). by each handler in accordance with the state or foreign commerce, not under a (b) Farmers voting. A total of 2,813 marketing agreement and this part shall common control, management, or ar­ farmers engaged in the production of be one half of one cent ($0.005) per crate rangement for a continuous carriage or the 1966 crop of extra long staple cotton of celery handled by him as the first shipment to or from a point beyond such voted in the referendum. Of those vot­ handler thereof during said fiscal year. zone, is partially exempt from regulation ing, 2,205 farmers, or 78.4 percent, fa­ (c) Terms used in this section have under section 203(b) (8) of the Interstate vored the 1967 national marketing quota the same meaning as when used in the Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. 303(b) (8)) in­ and 608 farmers, or 21.6 percent, opposed cludes and is comprised of all points in the 1967 national marketing quota. marketing agreement and this part. It is hereby found that good cause ex­ an area bounded by a line as follows: (c) 1967 national marketing quota ists for not postponing the effective date Beginning at the intersection of Mac- continues in effect. The national mar­ of this section until 30 days after publi­ Arthur Boulevard and Falls Road (M ary lan d keting quota for the 1967 crop of extra Highway 189) and extending northeasterly long staple cotton of 79,761 bales pro­ cation in the Federal R egister (5 U.S.C. along Falls Road to its junction with Scott claimed in § 722.551 (31 FJt. 13132) shall 553 (1966)) in that: (1) The relevant Drive, thence west on Scott Drive to its continue in effect since two-thirds or provisions of said marketing agreement junction with Viers Drive, thence west on and this part require that rates of assess­ Viers Drive to its junction with Glenn Mill more of the extra long staple cotton ment fixed for a particular fiscal year Road, thence northeast on Glen Mill Road farmers voting in the referendum fa­ shall be applicable to all assessable celery to its junction with Maryland Highway 28, vored the quota. from the beginning of such fiscal year, thence west on Maryland Highway 28 to its (Sec. 343, 63 Stat. 670, as amended; 7 U.S.C. and (2) the current fiscal year began on junction with Shady Grove Road, thence 1343) northeast on Shady Grove Road approxi­ August 1, 1966, and the rate of assess­ mately 2.7 miles to Crabbs Branch, thence Effective date: Date of filing this docu­ ment herein fixed will automatically southeasterly along the course of Crabbs ment with the Director, Office of the apply to all assessable celery beginning Branch to Rock Creek, thence southerly Federal Register. with such date. along the course of Rock Creek to Viers Mill

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO, 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 77

Road (Maryland Highway 586), thence way 495 to its junction with Ash Grove Road The purpose of the convention is to southeasterly along Viers Mill Road approxi­ ( Highway 694), thence northwesterly establish uniform principles and rules mately 0.3 miles to its Junction with Aspen along Ash Grove Road to Jones Corners, Va., Hill Road, thence northeasterly along Aspen thence northeasterly along Swinks Mill Road with respect to the limits to which ships Hill Road to its junction with Brookeville (Virginia Highway 685) to Swinks Mills, Va., on international voyages may be loaded, Road (Maryland Highway 97), thence south­ thence along the course of Scott Run to the having regard to the need for safeguard­ easterly along Brookeville Road to its junc­ Potomac River, thence due north across the ing life and property at sea. Annexes, tion with Maryland Highway 183, thence river to MacArthur Boulevard, thence north- forming an integral part of the conven­ northeasterly along Maryland Highway 183 westerly along MacArthur Boulevard to its tion, embody regulations for determin­ to Colesville, Md., thence southeasterly along junction with Maryland Highway 189, the ing- load lines indicating the depth to Beltsville Road to its junction with Powder point of beginning. Milj Road (Maryland Highway 212), thence which vessels may be loaded according easterly over Powder Mill Road to its Junc­ (49 Stat. 546, as amended; 49 U.S.C. 304. In­ to the geographical zone and the season tion with Montgomery Road, thence north­ terprets or applies 49 Stat. 543, as amended, of the year in which they operate. Cer­ easterly along Montgomery Road, approxi­ 544, as amended; 49 U.S.C. 302, 303) tificates are prescribed for issuance to mately 0.2 miles, to its junction with an It is further ordered, That this order ships surveyed and marked in accord­ unnumbered highway extending northeast­ shall become effective on February 10, ance with the convention, or validly erly to the north of Ammendale Normal In­ exempted. stitute, thence along such unnumbered high­ 1967, and shall continue in effect until way for a distance of about 2.2 miles to its the further order of the Commission. The convention and regulations are junction somewhat north of Virginia Manor, And it is further ordered, That notice designed to bring up to date the prin­ Md., with an unnumbered highway extend­ of this order shall be given to the general ciples and rules that have been applied ing easterly through Muirkirk, Md., thence public by depositing a copy thereof in the for 33 years under the Load Line Con­ along such unnumbered highway through office of the Secretary of the Commis­ vention signed at London on July 5,1930 Muirkirk to its junction, approximately 1.8 sion at Washington, D.C., and by filing (47 Stat. 2228; Treaty Series 858). Sci­ miles east of the and Ohio Rail­ a copy with the Director, Office of the entific developments, improvements in road, with an unnumbered highway, thence Federal Register. ship structures, and the experience southwesterly along such unnumbered high­ gained in the past three decades have way for a distance of about 0.5 miles to its By the Commission, Operating Rights junction with an unnumbered highway, Review Board Number 2. indicated the need to revise load line thence southeasterly along such unnum­ regulations so as to improve economy bered highway through Springfield and Hill- [seal] H. N eil Garson, and safety in shipping. Great changes meade, Md., to its junction with Defense Secretary. have occurred in ship design and con­ Highway (U.S. Highway 50), thence south­ struction, shipbuilding technology and westerly along Defense Highway approxi­ [F.R. Doc. 67-129; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; ship operation. New types of closing mately 0.8 miles to its junction with Enter­ 8:47 am.] prise Road (Maryland Highway 556), thence appliances, in particular metal hatch southerly over Enterprise Road to its junc­ covers, have improved the watertight in­ tion with Central Avenue (Maryland High­ tegrity of ships. Other technical devel­ way 214), thence westerly over Central Ave­ Title 46— SHIPPING opments (the extensive use of welding, nue about 0.5 miles to its crossing of Western the rounded gunwale, etc.) have also be­ Branch, thence southerly down the course of Chapter I— Coast Guard, Department come widespread. The vast increase in Western Branch to Maryland Highway 202, the size of ships, particularly tankers thence westerly approximately 0.3 miles along of the Treasury Maryland Highway 202 to its junction with and bulk carriers, has made it necessary White House Road, thence southwesterly SUBCHAPTER E— LOAD LINES to extend the existing freeboard tables to along White House Road to its Junction with tCGFR 66-70] cover ships up to a length of 1,200 feet. Maryland Highway 221, thence southeasterly along Maryland Highway 221 to its junction PART 43— FOREIGN OR COASTWISE The convention does not apply to ships with Maryland Highway 4, thence westerly VOYAGE of war, new ships less than 24 meters along Maryland Highway 4 to the boundary (79 feet) long, existing ships of less than of Andrews Air Force Base, thence south and Subpart 43.03— Special Load Line west along said boundary to Brandywine 150 gross tons, pleasure yachts not en­ Road (Maryland Highway 5), thence north­ Provisions Applicable to Certain gaged in trade, and fishing vessels. westerly along Maryland Highway 5 to its Ships Ships solely navigating the Great Lakes junction with Maryland Highway 337, thence southwesterly along Maryland Highway 337 The International Convention on Load and the St. Lawrence River, the Caspian to its junction with Maryland Highway 224, Lines, 1966, with annexes, was signed for Sea, and certain South American rivers thence southerly along Maryland Highway the United States at London on April 5, are also excepted. A ship not normally 224 to a point opposite the mouth of Broad 1966, and recommended to the U.S. Sen­ Creek, thence due west across the Potomac engaged on international voyages but River to the west bank thereof, thence ate on September 12, 1966 (see Senate which, in exceptional circumstances, southerly along the west bank of the Poto- Ex. Doc. S, 89th Cong., 2d sess. for the must undertake such a voyage may be mac River to Gunston Cove, thence up the Committee on Foreign Relations). The course of Gunston Cove to Pohick Creek, U.S. Senate consented to its ratification exempted if safety requirements are toence up the course of Pohick Creek to on October 13, 1966. It was ratified by met. Exemptions are also available for Telegraph Road (Virginia Highway 611), the President on November 4, 1966, and ships engaged in sheltered voyages be­ thence northeasterly along Telegraph Road notice of the U.S. acceptance has been to its junction with Back Lick Road (Vir- tween neighboring ports and ships em­ ginia Highway 617), thence northerly along deposited with the Inter-Governmental bodying novel features useful in research Back Lick Road through Newington, Spring- Maritime Consultative Organization in London. and development, provided that safety Held, and Springfield Station, Va., to Annarn- requirements of the countries visited are ^a"’ tiience northerly along Virginia The International Convention on Load highway 649 to its junction with Virginia Lines, 1966, will enter into force 12 complied with. highway 709, thence northerly along Vir­ months after at least 15 governments, Existing treaties on load lines continue ginia Highway 709 to its junction with Vir- including 7 each with not less than 1 to have full effect as regards (a) ships m Highway 650, thence northerly along million gross tons of shipping, have be­ Vh-Ef |a HiShway 650 to its junction with to which the new convention does not rw^TT* HiShway 7, thence northwesterly come parties. Procedures are provided apply and (b) ships to which it applies, ver Virginia Highway 7 to its Junction with for amending the convention by (a) tue Duties Airport Access Highway, thence unanimous acceptance, (b) after con­ in respect of matters for which it has not east over the Dulles Airport Access Highway sideration in Inter-Governmental Mari­ expressly provided. w its junction with Interstate Highway 495, time Consultative Organization, or (c) When the International Convention on ence northeasterly over Interstate High­ after adoption by a special conference. Load Lines, 1966, does come into force,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 78 RULES AND REGULATIONS it will provide load lines for a different found that compliance with the Adminis­ (2) There can be no contravention of range of vessel size than the 1930 Con­ trative Procedure Act (respecting notice the International Load Line Convention, vention and additionally for unregistered of proposed rule making, public rule 1930, while it remains in force; and vessels. Specifically, new vessels 79 feet making procedures thereon and effective (3) In no case shall a freeboard be (length) or greater will require load date requirements) is contrary to the assigned to any vessel which is less than lines, while load lines for existing vessels public interest, and therefore, these ac­ the final freeboard expected when the are based on a minimum of 150 gross tions are exempt from such requirements International Convention on Load Lines, tons. Many large ships not covered in under the provisions of section 4 of that 1966, comes into force. full previously will now be covered by Act (5 U.S.C. 553). (b) The following three classes of definite regulations. Also, existing ships By virtue of the authority vested in ships having International “Load Line which meet the additional requirements me as Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard Certificates will be eligible for freeboards of the new convention will generally en­ by section 632 of Title 14, U.S. Code and assigned according to certain provisions joy a reduced freeboard (i.e. increased Treasury Department Orders 120, dated of the 1966 Convention: capacity) when compared with load lines July 31, 1950 (15 F.R. 6521) and 167-48, (1) Tankers over 600 feet in length. now assigned under the 1930 Conven­ dated October 19, 1962 (27 F.R. 10504). (2) Steamers, as defined in § 43.05-1 tion. All existing vessels which cannot and the authorities cited with the regu­ (a), over 750 feet in length. meet the additional requirements will re­ lations below, the following actions are (3) Special type ships over 600 feet in main under the 1930 Convention until it ordered: length. is renounced, at which time they will 1. The load line regulations in 46 CFR Cross R eference : See .Article 8 of Interna­ get a 1966 Load Line Certificate with a Part 43 shall be amended by inserting tional Load Line Convention, 1930, and para­ freeboard essentially identical to their after § 43.01-100 a new Subpart 43.03, graphs (7) to (9) of Regulation 27 of Inter­ present freeboard as a ship “not comply­ consisting of §§ 43.03-1 to 43.03-20, national Convention on Load Lines, 1966. ing with” additional requirements. inclusive. (c) Since the assignment of U.S. During the intermediate period before 2. The special load line provisions Coastwise Load Line Certificates is not the 1966 Convention comes into force, designated as 46 CFR Subpart 43.03 shall limited by the effective International it has been determined desirable to per­ be effective on and after the date of ¡Load Line Convention, the minimum mit Assigning Authorities under the In­ publication of this document. in the length limits in paragraph (b) of this ternational Load Lines Convention, 1930, F ederal R egister. section do not apply for the assignment as permitted by administrative provi­ Subpart 43.03— Special Load Line Provisions of coastwise load lines. Therefore, ef­ sions contained therein,, to utilize cer­ Applicable to Certain Ships fective immediately, existing §§ 43.15-98 tain provisions in the 1966 Convention Sec. and 43.39-75 may be considered replaced for those ships not specifically covered 43.03- 1 General. by the applicable provisions of the Inter­ in the 1930 Convention. For example, 43.03- 3 Special determinations. national Load Line Convention, 1966, the 1930 Convention does not prescribe 43.03- 5 General requirements for all ships. 43.03- 10 Additional requirements applicable without exception. However, existing tabular freeboards for tankers (and to tankers. vessels having load lines assigned in ac­ special type vessels as referred to in 43.03- 15 Ships, other than tankers, not sat­ cordance with § 43.15-98 or § 43.30-75 Art. 8 therein) above 600 feet in length isfying the flooding and damage may retain such assignments at the nor for other vessels above 750 feet in stability criteria. owner’s option. length, but leaves the tabular freeboards 43.03- 20 Ships, other than tankers, which of such vessels to be determined by the do satisfy the flooding and dam­ § 43.03—3 Special determinations. respective Governments. age stability criteria. (a) It is considered that the substitu­ For those vessels desiring to utilize Authority : The provisions of this Subpart tion of equivalent bow height for the certain provisions in the 1966 Conven­ 43.03 issued under sec. 2, 45 Stat. 1493, as forecastle required by Rule 94 of Inter­ tion and which meet certain prescribed amended, sec. 2, 49 Stat. 888, as amended; national Load Line Convention, 1930, is requirements, special load line provisions 46 U.S.C. 85a, 88a. Treasury Department Or­ ders 120, July 31, 1950, 15 F.R. 6521; 167-48, justified under Article 18 of the 1930 are prescribed as a new Subpart 43.03 in Oct. 19, 1962, 27 F.R. 10504. Convention, which allows “* * * any 46 CFR Part 43, which are set forth below Note: Except where specifically noted other arrangement: Provided, That such in this document. otherwise in Subpart 43.03, the regulation Administration shall have been satisfied It has been also determined that the numbers in the text of this subpart are those that the fitting, * * * or the arrangement substitution of an equivalent minimum of Annex I to the International Convention substituted is in the circumstances at bow height for the forecastle required on Load Lines, 1966. least as effective as that specified in this by Rule 94 of the International Load § 4 3 .0 3 —1 General. convention”. In this regard, the ar­ Line Convention, 1930, is permitted un­ rangement of bow height specified in der the substitution provision in Article (a) The International Convention onRegulation 39, Annex I, of the 1966 Con­ 18 of the 1930 Convention. In this re­ Load Lines, 1966, was ratified by the vention is accepted as at least as effective gard, the minimum bow height as speci­ President on November 4, 1966, and the as the requirement to have a forecastle fied in Regulation 39, Annex I, of the notice of U.S. acceptance has been de­ in Rule 94 of the 1930 Convention for 1966 Convention is accepted as being posited with the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization in tankers. at least as effective as the requirement (b) Any U.S. ship which may be given to have a forecastle in Rule 94 of the London. During the intermediate period 1930 Convention. before the 1966 Convention comes into a reduced freeboard as a or as a ship of special type shall have a forecastle Use of the load line provisions in 46 force, the provisions of that Conven­ CFR Subpart 43.03 below, which are ap­ tion may be utilized so far as they in no as prescribed or an equivalent bow height plicable to certain ships when qualify­ way contravene the provisions of the and be given a minimum Winter North ing under the requirements therein, will International Load Line Convention, Atlantic freeboard, which is the Winter not result in a load line on any such ves­ 1930, and if they are utilized in accord­ freeboard plus an addition at the rate sel which in the judgment of the Com­ ance with the special provisions in this of 1 inch per 100 feet in length, even mandant would be above the actual line subpart. The following general condi­ of safety. though this latter requirement is not in­ tions are necessary prerequisites to the It is hereby found that emergency con­ cluded in the 1966 Convention. More­ ditions exist and it is necessary in the use of the 1966 Convention: over, the flush deck penalty and the cor­ public interest to permit qualified ships (1) All applicable provisions of therection for round of beam shall be ap­ to utilize the special load line provisions International Convention on Load Lines, plied: Provided, That application of the as set forth in this document. It is 1966, must be met; latter must not result in the final as-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 79 signed freeboard being less than that midship superstructure is fitted. The of Annex I of the 1966 Convention, which permitted by the 1966 Convention. deduction will be calculated in accord­ are applicable to a Type “A” ship. § 43.03—5 General requirements for all ance with Regulation 38(15). (4) Where a forecastle, if fitted, is less ships. (b) After meeting the general require­than .07L, the percentage of deduction ments and special tanker requirements, in the table applicable to Type “B” ships (a) All three classes of vessels men­the new freeboard may be calculated in Regulation 37(2) will be reduced in tioned in § 43.03-1 (b) shall meet the fol­ using the basic freeboard table for Type accordance with the formula in Regula­ lowing requirements in order to be as­ “A” ship in accordance with Regulations tion 37(3) (c). signed freeboards under this subpart: 27 (2) to (4) and 28(1). (1) The Assigning Authority must be (b) After meeting the specified re­ satisfied that the structural strength of § 43.03—15 Ships, other than tankers, quirements, vessels eligible under this the vessel is sufficient for the draft cor­ not satisfying the flooding and dam­ section may have their freeboards cal­ responding to the freeboard assigned age stability criteria. culated in accordance with Regulations (Regulation 1). 27 (7), (8), and (9), as applicable, and (a) The following special provisionsthe Tables in Regulation 28. (2) Loading information must be pro­ shall apply to all vessels, where eligible vided to the master so he may arrange Dated: January 3,1967. for the loading and ballasting of his ship under this subpart, which do not satisfy in such a way as to avoid any unaccept­ the stipulated flooding and damage sta­ [seal] W. J. S m ith, able stresses in the ship’s structure bility criteria, and are in addition to Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, (Regulation 10(1)). those regulations mentioned in § 43.03-5 Commandant. (3) The ship must have a minimum for all vessels: [F.R. Doc. 67-132; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; height of bow in accordance with Regu­ (1) No flooding or damage stability 8:47 a.m.] lation 39. calculations are needed. (4) For any trunk to qualify for any (2) F.cposed hatchways on the free­ freeboard allowance, its breadth must be board and forecastle decks must be pro­ at least 60 percent of the breadth of the vided either with weathertight hatch- Title 50— WILDLIFE AND ship (Regulation 36(1) (g)), and where covers of steel or other equivalent mate­ there is no superstructure, the length of rial complying with Regulation 16, FISHERIES the trunk in order to qualify for an al­ (3) The vessel complies with all the Chapter I— Bureau of Sport Fisheries lowance must be at least 60 percent of conditions of assignment in Chapter II the length of the ship (Regulation 36(1) and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife of the 1966 Convention which are ap­ Service, Department of the Interior (h)). plicable to a Type “B” ship. (5) No freeboard allowance in respect PART 32— HUNTING of any superstructure shall be given un­ (4) "Where a forecastle, if fitted, is less less the superstructure is enclosed in ac­ than .07L the percentages of deduction in Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge, the table applicable to Type “B” ships in cordance with Regulation 3(10) (b). Miss. Closures of nonaccess type openings in Regulation 37(2) will be reduced in ac­ after bulkheads of superstructures will cordance with the formula in Regulation The following special regulation is is­ be recognized as weathertight if they 37(3)(c). sued and is effective on date of publica­ meet the following provisions: Ob) After meeting the general require­ tion in the F ederal R egister. (i) The closure shall be a steel plate ments and special steamer requirements, § 32.22 Special regulations; upland of equivalent strength and rigidity to the the new freeboard may be calculated game; for individual wildlife refuge surrounding bulkhead and which fays using the basic freeboard table for a Type areas. directly to the bulkhead, and is securely “B” ship in accordance with Regulations Mississippi hook bolted so as to effectively resist a 27 (5) and (6) and 28(2). hose test. NOXUBEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE § 43.03—20 Ships, other than tankers, (ii) The opening shall be as small as The public hunting of bobwhite quail practicable; shall have at least a 24-inch which do satisfy the flooding and damage stability criteria. .. on the Noxubee National Wildlife Ref­ sill; and shall not need to be opened at uge, Miss., is permitted only on the area sea. (a) Ships fully complying with thedesignated by signs as open to hunting. § 43.03—10 Additional requirements ap­ provisions of paragraphs (7) and (9) of This open area, comprising 21,900 acres, plicable to tankers. Regulation 27 of the International Con­ is delineated on maps available at refuge vention on Load Lines, 1966, are regarded headquarters, 13 miles northwest of (a) The following special regulationsas ships of special type referred to in apply (in addition to those in § 43.03-5) BrooksviUe, Miss., and from the Regional Article 8 of the International Load Line Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and to all tankers seeking freeboard accord­ Convention, 1930. Such ships, where ing to International Convention on Load Wildlife, 809 Peachtree-Seventh Build­ Lines, 1966: eligible under this subpart, may be as­ ing, Atlanta, Ga. 30323. Hunting shall signed the freeboards provided for in the be in accordance with all applicable State, (1) Where applicable, calculations in­1966 Convention subject to the following: dicating compliance with the flooding regulations governing the hunting of and damage stability criteria set out in (1) Flooding calculation indicating bobwhite quail subject to the following Regulations 27 (2) and (3) must be com­ compliance with the flooding and damage special conditions: pleted to the satisfaction of the Assign­ stability criteria set out in Regulations (1) The open season on the refuge ex­ ing Authority. 27 (7) and'(9), as applicable, shall be tends from January 5 through February ' (2) Exposed hatchways on the free­ submitted and approved. 18, 1967, excluding Sundays. board and forecastle decks and on the (2) Exposed hatchways on the free­ (2) The use of dogs is permitted. top of expansion trunks must be provided board and forecastle decks must be pro­ The provisions of this special regula­ with efficient watertight covers of steel vided either with weathertight hatch- tion supplement the regulations which or other equivalent material (Regulation covers of steel or other equivalent mate­ govern hunting on wildlife refuge areas 26(4)). rial complying with Regulation 16 or generally which are set forth in Title 50, (3) The tanker shall comply with all with pontoon covers complying with Reg­ Code of Federal Regulations, Part 32, and the conditions of assignment in Chapter ulation 15(7), the strength of which are effective through February 18,1967. shall be subject to the satisfaction of n of Annex I of the 1966 Convention the Assigning Authority. NOXUBEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE which are applicable to a Type “A” ship. (3) With the exception of hatchway The public hunting of wild turkey gob­ (4) The deduction for excess sheer will covers, the ship shall comply with the blers on the Noxubee National Wildlife no longer be allowed unless an enclosed conditions of assignment in Chapter n Refuge, Miss., is permitted only on the

No. 3----- 2 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 80 RULES AND REGULATIONS

area designated by signs as open, to hunt­ protect altitudes below 1,500 feet in that proposed regulations which would alter ing. This open area, comprising 42,590 area. The Agency reviewed the need for the Bradford, Pa., control zone and 700- acres, is delineated on maps available at the transition area and found that the foot floor transition area. refuge headquarters, 13 miles northwest area mentioned by the AOPA is required Subsequent to the publication of the of Brooksville, Miss., and from the Re­ to protect the procedure turn maneuver­ notice of proposed rule making, Coast gional Director, Bureau of Sport Fish­ ing area and provide protection for the and Geodetic Survey refined the ADF eries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree-Sev­ execution of straight-in approaches from and VOR-2 final approach courses by 1°. enth Building, Atlanta, Ga.. 30323. Hunt­ the proposed radio beacon. The ADF procedure was changed from ing shall be in accordance with all appli­ In consideration of the foregoing, Part 141° MB (134° TB) to 142° MB (135° cable State regulations governing the 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is TB) and the VOR-2 from 145° MR (138° hunting of wild turkey subject to the amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., March 2, TR) to 146° MR (139° H i) and thus the following special conditions: 1967, as hereinafter set forth. radials and bearings describing the con­ (1) The turkey hunting season on the In § 71.181 (31 F.R. 2149) the Colum­ trol zone extensions and transition area refuge extends from March 24, through bus, Ga., transition area is amended to must likewise be changed 1 °. April 5, and from April 15, through April read: Since these changes to the notice are 29,1967, excluding Sundays. C o l u m b u s , G a . minor in nature, notice and public proce­ (2) Weapons permitted: Shotguns ca­ That airspace extending upward from 700 dure thereon are unnecessary and they pable of holding no more than three feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius may be adopted with the final rule. Shells: rifles; and bow and arrow. of the Muscogee County Airport (latitude In view of the foregoing the proposed The provisions of this special regula­ 32°30'55'' N„ longitude 84°56'25" W.); regulations are hereby adopted effective tion supplement the regulations which within a 9-mile radius of the Lawson AAF (latitude 32°20'20" N., longitude 84°59'35" 0001 e.s.t. January 5, 1967, except as govern hunting on wildlife refuge areas W.); within 8 miles W and 5 miles E of the follows: generally which are set forth in Title 50, Columbus VOR 329° and 149° radiais extend­ 1. Under Item 1 of the notice, include Code of Federal Regulations, Part 32, and ing from the 7-mile and 9-mile radius areas the statement, “In the description of the are effective through April 29,1967. to 12 miles NW of the VOR; within 2 miles each side of the 214° bearing from the Law- Bradford, Pa., control zone delete the W alter A. G resh, son RBN, extending from the 9-mile radius numerals, “138°” and “134°”, and insert Regional Director, Bureau of area to 8 miles SW of the RBN; within 2 in lieu thereof the numerals, “139°” and Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. miles each side of the Lawson AAF VOR 209° “135°“ respectively.” [F.R. Doc. 67-105; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; radial extending from the Lawson 9-mile 2. Under Item 2 of the notice, include radius area to 8 miles SW of the Lawson the statement, “In the description of the 8:45 a.m.j RBN; within 8 miles W and 5 miles E of the Lawson ILS localizer SE course extending Bradford, Pa., 700-foot floor transition from the 9-mile radius area to 10 miles SE area delete the numerals, “138°” and of the LOM; and that airspace extending “134°”, and insert in lieu thereof the Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND upward from 1,200 feet above the surface numerals, “139°” and “135°” respec­ bounded on the NE by the arc of a 50-mile tively.” SPACE radius circle centered at the Atlanta, Ga., (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; Airport (latitude 33°38'42" N., 84°25'37" 72 Stat. 749; 49 US.C. 1348) Chapter I— Federal Aviation Agency W.), on the E by V-97, on the S by V-56 and the arc of a 26-mile circle centered at Lawson Issued in Jamaica, N.Y., on Novem­ SUBCHAPTER E— AIRSPACE AAF, and on the NW by V-20; and that air­ ber 28, 1966. [Airspace Docket No. 66-SO-74] space W of longitude 84°45'0O" W. within a 26-mile radius of Lawson AAF; and that Wayne Hendershot, Deputy Director, Eastern Region. PART 71— designation o f f e d e r a l airspace SE bounded on the NE by a line extending from latitude 32°15'00" N., longi­ AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, tude 84°45'00" W., to the intersection of the 1. Amend § 71.171 of Part 71 of the AND REPORTING POINTS 26-mile radius arc centered at Lawson AAF Federal Aviation Regulations so as to and longitude 84°39'00'' W., on the SE by add in the description of the Bradford, Alteration of Transition Area the 26-mile radius arc and on the W by Pa., control zone following the phrase, longitude 84°45'00" W.; excluding the por­ “to 7 miles SE of the VOR;”, the phrase On November 9, 1966, a notice of pro­ tions within R-3002A. “within 2 miles each side of the Bradford posed rule making was published in the (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; VOR 316° radial extending from the 5- F ederal R egister (31 F.R. 14499) stating 49 U.S.C. 1348(a)) mile radius zone to 7 miles NW of the that the Federal Aviation Agency was VOR; and delete the numerals, “138°” considering an amendment to Part 71 Issued In East Point, Ga., on Decem­ and “134°” and insert in lieu thereof the of the Federal Aviation Regulations that ber 27, 1966. numerals, “139°” and “135°”, respec­ would alter the Columbus, Ga., transi­ W illiam M. F lener, tively.” tion area. Acting Director, Southern Region. 2. Amend § 71.181 of Part 71 of the Interested persons were afforded an [F.R. Doc. 67-115; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; Federal Aviation Regulations so as to opportunity to participate in the rule 8:45 am.] add in the description of the Bradford, making through the submission of com­ Pa., 700-foot floor transition area follow­ ments. All comments received were fa­ vorable except those submitted by the [Airspace Docket No. 66-EA-50] ing the phrase, “to 8 miles SE of the VOR;”, the phrase, “within 2 miles each Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association p a r t 71—-designation o f f e d e r a l (AOPA). The AOPA states that there side of the Bradford VOR 316° radial ex­ is no need for the 700-foot transition area AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, tending from the 7-mile radius area to 15 to extend from the 9-mile radius area to AND REPORTING POINTS miles NW of the VOR; and delete the 10 miles SE of the LOM because the Alteration of Control Zone and numerals, “138°” and “134°” and insert existing 1,200-foot transition area pro­ vides ample controlled airspace for the Transition Area in lieu thereof the numerals, “139°” and protection of aircraft holding and ex­ On pages 11318 and 11319 of the “135°”, respectively.” ecuting instrument approaches to Law- F ederal R egister for August 26, 1966, [F.R. Doc. 67-116; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; son AAF and there is no valid reason to the Federal Aviation Agency published 8:45 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 81

SUBCHAPTER F— AIR TRAFFIC AND GENERAL OPERATING RULES [Beg. Docket No. 7827; Amdt. 517] PART 97— STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES Miscellaneous Amendments The amendments to the standard instrument approach procedures contained herein are adopted to become effective when indicated in order to promote safety. The amended procedures supersede the existing procedures of the same classifi­ cation now in effect for the airports specified therein. For the convenience of the users, the complete procedure is republished in this amendment indicating the changes to the existing procedures. As a situation exists which demands immediate action in the interests of safety in air commerce, I find that compliance with the notice and procedure provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act is impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective within less than 30 days from publication. In view of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (24 F.R. 5662), Part 97 (14 CFR Part 97) is amended as follows: 1. By amending the following automatic direction finding procedures prescribed in § 97.11(b) to read: ADF Standard Instrument Approach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches Bhall be made over specified routes. M inimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Cotuse and Minimum 2-engine, From— T o— altitude Condition distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Via R 259°, ACO 2100 T -d n ...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 VOR. C -dn...... 700-1 700-1 700-1 Mi Direct______2800 S-dn-25...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 Direct...... 2800 A -dm ______- 800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar available. Procedure turn S side of crs, 066° Outbnd, 246° Inbnd, 2800' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2100'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 246°—3.7 miles. .... , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.7 miles after passing AKR RBn, climb straight ahead to 3000', then turn right to a heading of 360°, intercept en route radial of V-30. Proceed via V-30 to ACO VOR, E, 1-minute right turns, 276° Inbnd. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2700*; 090°-180°—2800'; 180°-270°—2600'; 270°-360°—3000'. City, Akron; State, Ohio; Airport name, Akron Municipal; Elev., 1059'; Fac. Class., MH; Ident., AKR; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 25, Amdt. 4; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. ADF 1, Amdt. 3; Dated, 7 Nov. 64'

T -d n ...... 1000-1Vi 1000-1)4 1000-1)4 C -dn...... 2300-2 2300-2 2300-2 A -dn______NA NA NA

Procedure turn E side of crs, 351° Outbnd, 171° Inbnd, 4400' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3458'. Facility on airport. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished when over BML RBn, make a right-climbing turn to 4400', return to BML RBn. Hold N of BML RBn, 171° Inbnd, 1-minute left turns.* Notes: (1) Approach from a holding pattern not authorized. Procedure turn required. (2) Use Montpelier altimeter setting. (3) State-owned facility. *Climb in holding pattern to 5000' for communications w ith Boston A R TC C or Augusta FSS. IFR Departure: Enter overcast southbound. Cross BML RBn climbing on 171° bearing for 1 minute, then right-climbing turn tb 4400. Return to BML RBn. Climb in the holding pattern toM SA or airwayM EA. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—5000'; 090°-180°—5500'; 180°-270°—7500'; 270°-360°—5000'. City, Berlin; State, N.H.; Airport name, Berlin Municipal; Elev., 1158'; Fac. Class., HW; Ident., BML; Procedure No. NDB (ADF)-l, Amdt 5; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. ADF-1, Amdt. 4; Dated, 19 June 65 -

CLT VOR____ LOM...... Direct. 2300 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-J4 Fort Mill VOR._ Clover Int.. Direct. 2300 C -dn...... 500-1 500-1 200-1)4 Clover Int_____ LOM (final). Direct. 2300 S-dn-5...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 York Int______Clover I n t.. Direct. 2300 A -dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 Bradley In t____ LOM...... Direct. 2900 Mount Holly Int. LOM______Direct. 2300 Bethany In t____ LOM______Direct. 2300

Radar available. Procedure turn N side of SW crs, 230° Outbnd, 050° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over LOM Inbnd final, 2300'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 050°—4.6 miles...... ^ • . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished withm 4.6 miles of LOM, climb to 3000 on crs of 050 from LOM within 15 miles, or when directed by ATC, turn left, climb to 3000' on FML VO R, R 007° to Mount Holly Int. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—3000'; 090°-180°—2200'; 180°-270°—2100'; 270°-360°—2900'. City, Charlotte; State, N.C.; Airport name, Douglas Municipal; Elev., 748'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., CL; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 5, Amdt. 19; Efl. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. ADF1, Amdt. 18; Dated, 17 July 65

FEDERAL REGISTER. VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 82 RULES AND REGULATIONS

A D F Standard Instrument Approach Procedure— C ontinued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Minimum 2-engine, From— To— Course and altitude Condition distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

LOM______D irect_____ . . 1900 T -dn______300-1 300-1 200-1/2 LOM______D ire c t______2800 C -dn__ 400-1 500-1 500-11/, LOM . _ - ______Direct___ ...... 1900 S-dn-15L_____ 400-1 400-1 400-1 LOM______£______Direct______1900 A-dn ... _. 800-2 800-2 800 2 LOM______Direct______1900 .TAN VO RTAC LOM (final)... .. ______Direct______1900

Radar available. Procedure turn W side of crs, 333° Outbnd, 153° Inbnd, 1900' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1900'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 153°—5.3 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.3 miles after passing JA LOM, turn right, climb to 2000' on JAN VO RTAC, R 164° within 20 miles. MSA w ithin 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—1700'; 090°-180°—1800'; 180°-270°—3500'; 270°-360°—1700'. City, Jackson; State, Miss.; Airport name, Allen C. Thompson Field; Elev., 345'; Fac. Class., ROM; Ident., JA; Procedure No. N D B (ADF) Runway 15L, Arndt. 5; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Arndt. No. ADF 1, Amdt. 4; Dated, 11 June 66

PROCEDURE CANCELED, EFFECTIVE 28 JAN. 1967. City, Kokomo; State, Ind.; Airport name, Kokomo Municipal; Elev.,827'; Fac. Class., IIW; Ident., OKK; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 2; Eif. date, 17 Nov. 62; Sup. Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 15 Sept. 62

Montpelier VO R. . MVL RBn Direct. 5300 T -d n ...... 800-1)4 800-1H NA Burlington VOR.. MVL RBn. Direct. 6000 C -dn______1500-2 I 1500-2 NA Newport Int/RBn. MVL RBn. Direct. 4400 A -dn___ •_____ NA NA NA

Procedure turn E side of crs, 041° Outbnd, 221° Inbnd, 4400' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 221°—3 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3 miles after passing MVL RBn, make right-climbing turn to MVL RBn. Cross RBn at 2800' or above, and climb in holding pattern to MHA, 4400. Hold NE of MVL RBn, 221° Inbnd, 1-minute left turns. Notes: (1) Use Montpelier altimeter setting. (2) Do not descend below authorized minimums unless landing assured. (3) Approach from a holding pattern not author­ ized, procedure turn required. (4) State-owned facility must be monitored aurally during approach. IFR Departure: Enter overcast over the airport heading, 221°, make right-climbing turn to MVL RBn. Cross RBn at 2800' or above and climb in holding pattern to MHA, 4400'. Hold NE of MVL RBn, 221° Inbnd, 1-minute left turns. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—5000'; 090°-180°—4500'; 180°-360°—5500'. City, Morrisville; State, Vt.; Airport name, Morrisville-Stowe State; Elev., 732'; Fac. Class., MHW; Ident., MVL; Procedure No. NDB (ADF)-l, Amdt. 1; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67;: Sup. Amdt. No. ADF-1, Orig.; Dated, 7 Jan. 67

OWD R B n .. ______Direct. .. . _ 2000 T -d n ______300-1 300-1 NA C -dn...... 600-1 600-1 NA A -dn__ . ____ NA NA NA

Radar available. Procedure turn W side of crs, 176° Outbnd, 356° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 356°—1.1 miles. _ If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 1.1 miles after passing OW'D RBn, make left-climbing turn and return to OWD RBn at 2000'. Hold S, 356° Inbnd, 1-minute left turns. N otes: (1) Use Boston altimeter setting. (2) Monitor Boston approach until landing assured. (3) Night operations authorized for Runways 17-35 only. (4) State-owned facility must be monitored aurally during approach. Caution: 322' water tank, 1.2 mileslSE of airport. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-180°—1900'; 180°-360°—2500'. City, Norwood; State, Mass.; Airport name, Norwood Memorial; Elev. 50'; Fac. Class., MHW; Ident., OWD; Procedure No. NDF (ADF)-l, Amdt. 6; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. ADF-1, Amdt. 5; Dated, 8 Oct. 66

FSD VOR LOM______Direct___ . ___ 3200 T-dn% ______300-1 300-1 200-M LOM 3200 C -dn______500-1 500-1 500-1 LO M ... ______3200 S-dn-3______500-1 500-1 500-1 LOM. 3200 A -dn____ . .. 800-2 800-2 800-2 ' Procedure turn S side of crs, 206° Outbnd, 026° Inbnd, 3200' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2900'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 026°—5.8 miles. . , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.8 miles after passing LOM, climb to 2700 on 02« bearing from LOM within 10 miles. %300-l required for takeoff Runway 15. _ , n %For southeastbound aircraft, when weather is below 2100-2, flight below 3900' beyond 5 miles E and SE of airport is prohibited between R 095° and R 135 of the I VOR. Restriction due to 3444' tower, 10 miles SE of airport. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—4500'; 090-180°—3700'; 180°-360°—3000'. City, Sioux Falls; State, S. Dak.; Airport name, Joe Foss Field; Elev., 1428'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., FS; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 3, Amdt. 11; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. ADF 1, Amdt. 10; Dated, 20 Aug. 66

Elkhart VHF/DM E I n t ______2500 v 300-1 300-1 200- LOM______2200 C -d n ...... 500-1 500-1 500-1H Bristol VHF/DME Int______Elkhart VHF/DME Int______Direct...... 2400 S-dn-27______500-1 500-1 500-1 Elkhart VHF/DME Int______LOM (final)______1900 A -dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 North Liberty VHF/DME Int______LOM./___/ ______Direct______2900

Procedure turn N side of crs, 089° Outbnd, 269° Inbnd, 2900' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1900'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 269°—3.8 miles. . . . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.9 miles after passing LOM, make climbing rigtu turn to 2000' and proceed direct to SBN VO R, or when directed by ATC, make climbing right turn to 2200' and proceed direct to SBN LOM. Caution: 1918' tower, 5.6 miles S of LOM. - MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2400'; 090°-180°—3000'; 180°-270°—3000'; 270°-360°—2200'. City, South Bend; State, Ind.; Airport name, St. Joseph County; Elev., 785'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., SB; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 27, Amdt. 17; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. ADF1, Amdt. 16; Dated, 14 Nov. 64

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 83

A D F Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—C o n tin u ed

Transition Celling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimnrrs More than From— T o— Course and 2-engine, distance altitude Condition (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-J4 C -dn 700-1 700-1 700-1)4 S-dn-1 700-1 700-1 700-1 A -dn______NA NA NA

A luvmiuiu ram it d iu o u i u a , xvo UUIU11U, UlO u iu n u , ZUUU W1U1U1 1U mUeS. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1418'. Facility on airport. t u m ^ f t^ retu^to°RBnabllSlled nP°n deSCent; to authorized landing minimums or «landing not accomplished within 0 mile of RBn, climb to 2100' on crs of »15° of RBa, N ote: Use Green Bay, Wis., altimeter setting. MSA within 25 miles of facility; 000°-360°—2100' City, Sturgeon Bay; State, Wis; Airport name, Door County-Cherryland; Elev., 718'; Fac. Class., MHW; Ident., SUE; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runwavl Arndt One • Efl. date, 28 Jan. 67 or upon commissioning of facility i 2. By amending the following very high frequency omnirange~(VOR) procedures prescribed in 197.11(c) to read: VOR Standard Instrument Approach P rocedure Bearings, headings courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation Distance m in miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. 6 1011 eievaiion. distances are in nautical „ ffan Instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shaU be in accordance with the following instrument annroanh unless an approach is conducted in accordance w ith a different procedure for such airport authorized b v the Administrator of the iFVrier»i * nil tim nA ^™ iraPTrP« c7 Procedure, shall be made over specified routes. M inim um altitudes sh a u L re sp a n d with t h o S g d t e Z r o u t ^ ^ ¿ w . 1 aPPr0aches

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From- T o - Course and distance altitude Condition 2-engine, (feet) 65'knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Berlin R Bn...... Berlin VOR. D irect. 4400 T^dn Whitefield R B n. Berlin VOR. 1000-1)4 1000-1)4 1000- 1)4 Direct. fiOOO C-dn. 1800-2 1800-2 1800-2 A-dn. NA NA NA

Procedure turn E side of crs, 012° Outbnd, 192° Inbnd, 4400' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3300'. Crs---SV and U ll distance, facility to airport,l , AO«192°—3.2 ---- u ,« UUlUD«miles. r I ^---- i- ? • ° V i a^ 11 ln?i;es*ablis.hel VOTOW1WUW lupuii 1P0,}.4ei UTOWIll cent toW aUbUUIUCUauthorized lalanding minimums or « landing not accomplished within 3.2 miles after passing BML VOR or abeam BMT nght-cllmbing turn to BML VOR, cross VOR not less^ ^than S , 3000' 3000 climbing Climbin!5 to t0, 4400' 44^ ^in h holding o ld in g pattern. Hold N of BML VORV O R im1-mSute inute'¿ft left t'ntural, 192° ! X d * Procedure turn required. (2) Use Montpelier altimeter settiner. on state-nwn»ri •cU S^totto^B^ABTOC^SSi. &D“ M“,pe““ **“»- MSA or S w ^ M E A Enter overcast southbound. Over BML RBn, make right-climbing tu rn to BML VOR, cross VO R not less than 3000'. ‘ Climb in the holding pattern to MSA within 26 miles of facility: 000®-090°—5000'; 090°-180°—5500'; 180°-270°—7500'; 270°-360°—5000'. City, Berlin; State, N.H.; Airport name, Berlin Municipal; Elev., 1158'; Fac. Class., T-VOR; Ident., BML; Procedure No. VOR-1, Arndt. Orig.; Efl date 28 Jan 67 or unon , commissioning of facility UI UIJOU

T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-14 C -d n __ 400-1 600-1 500-1)4 S-dn-16______400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn______NA NA NA

Procedure turn N side of crs, 341“ O utbnd, 161“ Inbnd, 2200' w ithin 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach ere, 1900'. Lrs and distance, facility to airport, 161“—4.3 miles. climb to proœ e^to'oB ^^V ^T E^VOR^^Rllo“!3^™ 8 minteums OT * landinS * ot accomplished within 4.3 miles after passing OBEI VOR, make left turn, Note: Use Chicago O’Hare altimeter setting. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000“-090°—2100'; 090“-180°—2600'; 180”-270“—2600'; 270“-360°—2300' -, €h,W m , A bport n m e , VOB t o ™ , a s , t a d , . M . d * ,. S» t a . 87; Sup.

Beacon In t. VOR ...... 2500 300-1 200-34 C -dn . 600-1 600-1 600-1)4 A -dn______NA NA NA Minimums with dual VOR receivers: C -dn___ ... 400-1 600-1 500-1)4 Radar available. S , ™ S E ? i f side °LCI?K080<> Ootbnd, 240° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Mmuaum altitude over Toll In t on final approach crs, 1266'. Crs and distance, Toll In t to VOR, 3.1 miles, Kravog ° •'•"W** P»* VOB, righMtabtag m»a ’mb°l toata|! “ “ ” a- «I,CM»,, ^ «.*,,u, Abpc nme, ¿ g S j^ ^ » ¿ -¿ B |;P„«»to No.VOB-BtadAOri5,E«.da«,,28ta.e,;

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 84 RULES AND REGULATIONS

VOB Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure— C ontinued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and M inimum 2-§ngine, From— To— altitude Condition distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

O RR VOR ...... Stock Int (final)...... _...... i Via OBK, R 271°. 2400 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 NA C -dn______700-1 700-1 NA A -dn...... NANA NA

Procedure tum N side of crs, 091° Outbnd, 271 Inbnd, 2400' withui 10 miles of Stock Int. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach era, 2400'. Crs and distance, Stock Int to airport, 271—5.1 miles; VOR to airport, 17.1 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.1 miles after passing Stock Int, climb to 2400', turn right and return to Stock Int. N otes: (1 ) Use Chicago O’Hare altimeter setting. (2) Dual VOR or radar required. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2100'; 090°-180°—2600'; 180°-270°—2600'; 270°-360°—2300'. Citv. Crystal Lake; State, HI.; Airport name, Crystal Lake; Elev. 890'; Pac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., OBK; Procedure No. VOR-1, Arndt. Orig.; Efl. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. VOR/DME-1, Amdt. 1; Dated, 10 Aug. 63

R 237, E W V O R ...... Via 8-mi arc_____ 2400 T-dn*...... 300-1 300-1 20044 R 237,' Ë W V O R 2100 C -d...... 1100-1 1100-1 1100-1)4 E W VO R (final) ...... Direct...... 2100 C -n...... 1100-2 1100-2 1100-2 A -dn...... 1500-2 1500-2 1500-2 Minimums with DME: C -d...... 600-1 600-1 600-1)4 C -n...... 600-2 600-2 600-2

Procedure turn S side of era, 237° Outbnd, 057° Inbnd, 2100' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach era, 2100'; over 10-mile DME Fix, 1518'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 057°—12.4 miles...... If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 12.4 miles after passing E W VO R, climb to 2100' on E W VO R, R 057°, make right turn and return to E W VO R, or when directed by ATC, climb to 2000' and proceed to EV LOM. Caution: 933' tower in final approach area. *300-1 required on Runways 9-27. MSA w ithin 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2100'; 090°-180°—2500'; 180°-270°—1900'; 270°-360°—2700'. Citv. Evansville: State, Ind.; Airport name, Dress Memorial; Elev., 418'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Indet., E W ; Procedure No. VOR-1, Amdt. 2; Efl. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. VOR-1, Amdt. 1; Dated, 5 Nov. 66

OBK V O R ...... D irect...... 2500 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 NA OBK V O R ______Direct...... 2500 C -dn...... 500-1 500-1 NA S-dn-6______500-1 500-1 NA A -dn______NA NA NA

R adar available. Procedure turn N side of crs, 249° Outbnd, 069° Inbnd, 2200' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach era, 2200'. Crs and distance facility to airport, 069°—5.4 miles. , . . „„„ .. , . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished withm 5.4 miles after passing OBK VOR, make left-climbing turn to 2200' and return to OBK VOR. Hold E on R 091°, era Inbnd 271°; right turns, or when directed by ATC, climb to 2200' and hold NE FSN RBn on 060° bearing from R B n, Inbnd era 240°, right turns. , s N otes: (1) Advise Chicago approaefi control when landing assured. (2) Authorized for military use only, except by pnor arrangement. (3) Part-time weather service available. Use Chicago O’Hare altimeter setting when weather not available. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2000'; 090°-180°—2500'; 180°-270°—2500'; 270°-360°—2200'. City, Fort Sheridan; State, 111.; Airport name, Fort Sheridan AAF; Elev., 690'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., OBK; Procedure No. VOR Runway 6, Amdt. 1; Efl. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. VOR-1, Orig.; Dated, 20 June 64

MZZ VOR O K K VOR ______Direct...... 2200 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 20044 O K K V O R ______D irect...... 2200 C -dn______500-1 500-1 500-1)4 MZZ VOR D irect...... 2200 S-dn-22...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 3-mile DME Fix (final)...... • D irect______1327 A-dn**...... NA NA NA R 280°, OKK VOR clockwise . R 040°, OK K V O R ______Via 8-mile DME 2400 Minimums with DME: Arc. C -dn...... 400-1 500-1 500-1)4 R 040°, OK K VOR ______Via 8-mile DME 2400 S-dn-22...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 Arc.

Radar available. Procedure turn E side of final approach era, 40° Outbnd, 220° Inbnd, 2200' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over 3-mile D M E F ix on final approach crs, 1327'. . . . . ’ . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile of OKK VOR, make immediate leit turn, 2200' on era of 130° and return to O K K VOR. N ote: Use Bunker Hill AFB altimeter setting. **800-2 authorized for air carrier with approved weather reporting service. MSA w ithin 25 miles of facility: 000°-360°—2300'. City, Kokomo; State, Ind.; Airport name, Kokomo Municipal; Elev., 827'; Fac. Class., L-BVOR; Ident., OKK; Procedure No. VOR Runway 22, Amdt. 3; Efl. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. Ter VOR Runway 22, Amdt. 2; Dated, 8 Dec. 62

3-mile DME Fix (fined)...... D irect...... 1327 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 20044 MZZ VO R ...... 2200 C -dn...... 500-1 500-1 600-1)4 R 131°, OK K V O R ______2400 S-dn-31...... 500-1 500-1 600-1 Arc. A-dn*______NA NA NA R 131°, OKK V O R ______2400 Minimums with DME: Arc. C -dn...... 400-1 500-1 I 500-l)i S-dn-31...... — 400-1 400-1 400-1

Radar available. Procedure turn E side of era, 131° Outbnd, 311° Inbnd, 2200' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over 3-mile DME Fix on final approach era, 1327'. Crs and distance, breakofl point to approach end of Runway 31, 310°—0.7 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile, turn right immediately and climb to saiu on OKK VOR, R 039° and return to OKK VOR. N ote: Use Bunker H ill AFB altimeter setting. *800-2 authorized for air carrier with approved weather reporting service. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-360°—2300'. City, Kokomo; State, Ind.; Airport name, Kokomo Municipal; Elev., 827'; Fac. Class., L-BVOR; Ident., OKK; Procedure No. VOR Runway 31, Amdt. 5; Efl. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. Ter VOR-31, Amdt. 4; Dated, 2 Feb. 63

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 85

VOR S tandard I nstrument Approach P rocedure— C ontinued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and M inimum 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition more than distance (feet) 65 knots More than or less 65 knots 65 knots

R 153°, clockwise______R 232°______!.. 1700 300-1 300-1 200-34 C -dn______500-1 500-1 500-1)4 R 350®, counterclockwise______... R 232°______1700 500-1 500-1 500-1 Arc. A-dn#______NANA NA LAL VOR (final) Via R 232° 642

Procedure turn S side of crs, 232° Outbnd, 052° Inbnd, 2500' within 12 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 642'. Facility on airport. Breakoff point to Runway 4, 043°—0.5 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile of LAL VORTAC, turn left and climb to 1700' on R 046° of LAL VORTAC within 10 miles, return to LAL VORTAC. Hold SW, 232° Outbnd, 052® Inbnd, 1-minute right turns. Caution: 1549' tower in procedure turn area. ¡¡¡Limited weather information available to public. Use Tampa altimeter setting. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—1700'; 090°-180°—1700'; 180°-270°—2600'; 270”-360°—1500'. City, Lakeland; State, Fla.; Airport name, Municipal; Elev.,142'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., LAL; Procedure No. VOR Runway 4, Amdt. Orig.; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. VOR-DME 1, Orig.; Dated, 18 Sept. 65

R 219°, clockwise______R 288°______1800 T -d n __ 300-1 300-1 200-Vf; Orbit. C -d______500-1 500-1 500-1)4 R 028°, counterclockwise______R 288°...... _ 1800 C-n 500-2 500-2 500-2 Orbit. S-d-9*...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 10-mile DME Fix, R 288°______MOB VOR (final)______" R 288° 1800 S-n-9# 500-2 500-2 500-2 A -dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 If Lake Int is identified, the following minimums are authorized: C-dn____ 400-1 500-1 500-1)4 S-dn-9______400-1 400-1 400-1

Radar available. Procedure turn S side of crs, 288° Outbnd, 1089 Inbnd, 1800' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1800'; over Lake Int, 700'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 108°—6.3 miles; Lake Int to airport, 108°—3.3 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 6.3 miles after passing MOB VORTAC, turn right, climb to 1800' on MOB VORTAC, R 180® within 20 miles, or when directed by ATC, turn left, climb to 1800' on MOB VORTAC, R 058® within 20 miles. ‘Reduction below % mile not authorized. IReduction not authorized. MSA within 25 miles of the facility: 000°-090°—1900'; 090®-180°—1900'; 180°-270*—1500'; 270®-380°—1600'. City, Mobile; State, Ala.; Airport name, Bates Field; Eltev., 218'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., MOB; Procedure No. VOR Runway 9, Amdt. 16; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. VOR 1, Amdt. 14; Dated, 11 Dec. 65

T -d n ______300-1 300-1 200-34 C -dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)4 A -dn______•_ NA NA NA

Radar available. Procedure turn N side of crs, 309° Outbnd, 129° Inbnd, 2200' within 10 miles. . Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2200'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 129°—4.2 miles. visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or If landing not accomplished within 4.2 miles after passing OBK VOR, make left turn. 2500' and proceed direct to OBK VOR. Hold E, OBK VOR on R 091°, Inbnd crs, 271°, 1-minute right turns. Notes: (1) Use Chicago O’Hare altimeter setting. (2) Advise O’Hare approach control when landing assured. Caution: Gas tank, 905' located % mile N E of airport. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2100'; 090°-180°—2600'; 180°-270°—2600'; 270°-360°—2300'. City, Northbrook; State, 111.; Airport name, Sky Harbor; Elev., 681'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., OBK; Procedure No. VOR-1, Amdt. 4; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. VOR 1, A m dt. 3; D ated, 3 Apr. 65

T - d n ...... 300-1 300-1 NA C -dn______1000-2 1000-2 NA A -dn...... NA NA NA DME minimums: C -dn...... 600-1 600-1 NA

Radar available. Procedure turn S side of crs, 146° O utbnd, 326° Inbnd 2000', within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2000'; at 8 miles DME Fix, 1050'. fus and distance, facility to airport, 326°—11.1 miles. if visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimum s or if landing not accomplished w ithin *6 miles or 11.1 DME miles after passing HTM VOR- ^Omakeleft-climbmg turn to 2000\ Direct HTM VORTAC. Hold SE of HTM VORTAC, 1-minute left turns, 326° Inbnd. i1) Use Boston altimeter setting. (2) Monitor Boston approach until landing assured. (3) Night operations authorized for Runways 17-35 only. Caution: 322'water tank, 1.2 mfiesSE of airport, instance from point of visual contact to airport 5.1 miles. MBA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—1900'; 090°-180°—1500'; 180°-360°—2500'. City, Norwood; State, Mass.; Airport name, Norwood Memorial; Elev., 50'; Fac. Class., L-BVORTAC; Ident., HTM; Procedure No. VOR-1, Amdt. 1; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Amdt. No. VOR 1, Orig.; Dated, 10 July 65

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 86 RULES AND REGULATIONS

VOR Standard I n strum ent Approach P rocedure— C o n tin u e d

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition more than distance (feet) 65 knots More than or less 65 knots 65 knots

R 360°, SBN VO R T A C ...... Via 8-mile DME 2400 T -d n ______300-1 300-1 200-)3 Arc. C -dn______500-1 500-1 500-l)£ 8-milfi T)MP, F ît SBN, R 360° SBN VOR (final)...... D irect..,______1900 A -dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 R 120°, SBN VO RTAC counterclockwise.. R 360°, SBN VO RTA C ...... Via 8-mile DME 2400 Arc.

Procedure turn E side of crs, 360° Outbnd, 180° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1900'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 180°—3.7 miles. ■ , ...... „ „ TT_. _ , , . . . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.7 miles after passing SBN VO R, make right turn, climbing to 2000' and return to SBN VO R, or when directed by ATC : (1) Make a right-climbing turn to 2600' and proceed to North Liberty Int via the 209 radial of SBN VO R- Caution: 1918'tower, 5.6 miles S of LOM. - MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2400'; 090“-180°—3000 ; 180 -270 —2200 ; 270 -360 —2200 . Citv. South Bend: State, Ind.: Airport name, St. Joseph County; Elev., 785'; Fac. Class., L-BVORTAC; Ident., SBN; Procedure No. VO R-l, Arndt. 13; Efl. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Arndt. No. VOR 1, Arndt. 12; Dated, 14 Nov. 64

T -d n ______300-1 300-1 20043 C -d ...... - 600-1 600-1 600-1)3 C -n ...... 600-2 600-2 600-2 A-dn*...... NANA NA If Fairfax Int/DME Fix identified, the following min- imums apply: C -dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)3

Procedure tum N side of crs, 296° Outbnd, 116° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1700'; over Fairfax Int/DM E Fix, 742'. . Crs and distance, facility to airport, 099°—8.1 miles, Fairfax Int/DME Fix, 099°—4.6 miles...... „ , ,, If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing mimmums or if landing not accomplished within 8.1 miles after passing the VO RTAC or 4.6 miles after Dassing Fairfax Int/DME Fix, make climbing left tum to 2200', return to the VO RTAC and hold NW, 116° Inbnd, 296° Outbnd, 1-minute left turns. . .. . N otes: (1) This procedure usable only between the hours of 0600 and 2200 when Alma FSS is in operation, except scheduled air carrier with approved communication service. (2) ‘Alternate minimums 800-2 authorized for air carriers only; provided such air carriers have approval of their arrangements for weather service at this airport. Weather service not available to the general public. (3) Use Alma, Ga., altimeter setting. MSA w ithin 25 miles of facility: 000°-360°—2300'. Citv Wavcross; State, Ga.; Airport name, Waycross-Ware County;- Elev., 142'; Fac. Class., L-BVORTAC; Ident., AYS; Procedure No. VOR-1, Arndt Orig.; Efl. date, 23 . * Jan. 67; Sup. Arndt. No. VOR-DME-1, Arndt. 3; Dated, 1 Jan. 66. 3. By amending the following terminal very high frequency omnirange (TerVOR) procedures prescribed in § 97.13 to read: T erminal VOR Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure Bearings headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical mil^ ^ iS tr^ e n ra p p ro M h epro^dRre^theaboTO t^M conduwte^akthebelow named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition. Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Minimum 2-engine, Course and Condition From— T o - distance altitude more than (feet) 65 knots More than 65 knots or less 65 knots

PROCEDURE CANCELED, EFFECTIVE 28 JAN. 1967. City, Chicago (Wheeling); State, HI.; Airport name, Chicagoland; Elev., 666'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., OBK; Procedure No. TerVOR-13, Amdt. 2; Efl. date, 26 June 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 10 Apr, 65

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 87

4. By amending the following instrument landing system procedures prescribed in § 97.17 to read: IL S Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are In feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. _ _ — If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, nnip.^ an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition ■Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum 2-engine, From— T o - altitude Condition distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

LOM (final)______— ...... - Via R 259 ACO 2100 T -d n ..... _...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 VOR. C -dn______700-1 700-1 700-1% LOM______Direct______2800 S-dn-25______500-1 500-1 500-1 LO M ^______r-______Direct______2800 A -dn______800-2 . 800-2 800-2

Radar available. — Procedure turn S side of crs, 066° Outbnd, 246° Inbnd, 2800' within ID miles. No glide slope. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2100'. Crs and distance, LOM to airport, 246°—3.7 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished climb straight ahead to 3000', then turn right to a heading of W , intercept the en route radial of V-30. Proceed via V-30 to AGO VO It. Hold E, 1-minute right turns, 276° Inbnd. Note: Back crs unusable. MSA w ithin 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2700'; 090°-180°—2800'; 180°-270°—2600'; 270°-360°—3000'. City. Akron; State, Ohio; Airport name, Akron Municipal; Elev., 1059'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-AKR; Procedure No. LOG Runway 25, Arndt. 4; Efi. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Arndt. No. ILS-25, Arndt. 3; Dated, 7 Nov. 64 EO O ? CLTVORTAC LOM...... — Direct______2300 T-dn##_____ . . . 300-1 300-1 X Fort Mill VORTAC D irect______2300 C-dn______500-1 500-1 500-1% LOM (final)...... D irect______. 2300 S-dn-5*#______200-% 200-% 200-% D irect______2300 A -dn______600-2 600-2 600-2 LOM..______Direct.. ... ___ 2900 LOM______Direct______2300 Fort Mill VORTAC LOM ______D irect______2300 LOM....______D irect______2300 D irect . . . _____ 2300

Radar available. Procedure turn N side of SW crs, 230° Outbnd, 050° Inbnd, 2300' w ithin 10 miles. Minimum altitude a t glide slope interception Inbnd, 2300'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runw ay at OM, 2290'—4.6 miles, at MM, 950 —0.5 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.6 miles from LOM, climb to 3000' on CLT V O RTAC, R 060* within 20 miles, or when directed by ATC, turn left, climb to 3000' on FML VORTAC, R 007° to Mount Holly Int or turn right, climb to 2300' on R 007° to FML VORTAC. N ote: Glide slope unusable below 948'. Back crs unusable. *400-% (RVR 4000') required when glide slope inoperative. 400-% (RVR 2400') authorized, with operative ALS, except for 4-engine turbojets. #RVR 2400'. Descent below 948' not authorized unless ALS visible. ##RVR 2400' authorized Runw ay 5. City, Charlotte; State, N.C.; Airport name, Douglas Municipal; Elev., 748'; Fac.. Class., ILS; Ident., I-CLT; Procedure No. ILS Runway 5, Arndt. 20; Efi. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Arndt. No. ILS-5, Arndt. 19; Dated, 17 July 65

Florence In t___ LOM Direct______1900 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-% Branch In t____ LOM ...... 1900 C -dn...... 400-1 600-1 500-1% Byram In t____ LOM .. . 2800 S-dn-15L*_____ 200-% 200-% 200-% Trace In t_____ LOM .. ______1900 600-2 600-2 600-2 Rankin In t____ T.OM 1900 JAN VORTAC. LOM (final)...... J Direct-—--...... 1900

Radar available. Procedure tu rn W side of crs, 333® O utbnd, 153° Inbnd, 1900' w ithin 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1800'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway a t OM, 1778'—5.3 miles; a t MM, 489'—0.5 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.3 miles after passing LOM, turn right, climb to 2006' on JAN VORTAC, R 164° within 20 miles. *400-% required when glide slope not utilized. 400-% authorized, w ith operative ALS, except for 4-engine turbojets. City, Jackson; State, Miss.; Airport name, Allen C. Thompson Field; Elev., 345'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-JAN;; Procedure No. ILS Runway 15L, Arndt. 4; Eff. date, 28 ~ Jan. 67; Sup. Arndt. No. ILS-15L, Arndt. 3; Dated, 4 June 66

Blue Springs VOR LOM______D irect______.____ 2600 T-dn*______300-1 300-1 300-1 Kansas City VOR. LOM ______2600 C-dn% ...... 700-1 700-1 700-1% A -dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar available. Procedure turn W side of crs, 005® O utbnd, 185° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles, Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2600'. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2600'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at LOM, 2558'—4.5 miles; at Bluff FM, 1458'—0.7 mile. Crs Bluff FM to airport, 223°. • , visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.8 miles after passing ME LOM or at Bluff FM, make Tight turn, climbing to 2700' on a heading of 270°, intercept the STJ V O R, R 165°, turn N to Farley Int. . Unless radar vectored and the weather is below 1000-3: (a) Aircraft taking off SE, S, or SW and planned route is between 090° and 180°, intercept the RIS VOR, R 200° or MKC VO R, R 180°, climb to 2500' before proceeding on crs. (b) Aircraft taking off NW, N, or NE and planned route is between 090° and 180°, climb to 2500' before pro- eeeding S of the 090° ADF bearing from KC LMM. No reduction takeoff minimums except Runway 31. /^Circling SE of airport from 090° clockwise to 180° not authorized. caution: Numerous obstructions all quadrants. City, Kansas City; State, Kans.; Airport name, Fairfax Municipal; E Jev., 746'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident, I-MKC; Procedure ILS-1, Arndt. 8; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup; Arndt. No. ILS-22, Arndt. 7; Dated, 22 Oct. 66

FEDERAI REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 No. 3----- 3 88 RULES AND REGULATIONS

ILS Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— T o - Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

M K C V O R . ______LOM...... Direct____ ;______2600 T-dn*______300-1 300-1 **300-1 BSP VOR LOM...... D irect...... 2600 C-dn% ...... 600-1 700-1 700-1)$ S-dn-18@#...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 A -dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 Minimums with glide slope inoperative when bluff fan marker received (cross fan m arker no lower than 1458'): C -dn...... 600-1 700-1 700-13$ S-dn-18#...... 500-1 500-1 500-1

R adar available. Procedure turn W side of crs, 005° Outbnd, 185° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2600'. A ltitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 2558'—5.4 miles; at MM, 1030'—0.7 mile; If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or If landing not accomplished at KC LMM, make right turn, climbing to 2700' on a heading of 270°, intercept the STJ VOR, R 165°, turn N to Farley Int. •A ir Carrier N ote; N o reduction in takeoff minimums except Runway 36. **200-34 authorized Rim way 36 only. %Circling or straight-in approaches to Runways 3,35, and 36 nof&uthorized when MKC weather sequence remarks indicate cloud height below authorized minimums. Cir­ cling not authorized E of airport in sector from 090° through 180°. @Approach lights inoperative 500-1; glide slope not utilized 700-1. #Reduction not authorized. •Unless radar vectored when weather is below 1000-3; (a) Aircraft taking off S or SW and planned route Is between 090 and 180 , Intercept the RIS VOR, R 210 or MKC VOR, R 190°, climb to 2500' before proceeding on crs. (b) Aircraft taking off N or NE and planned route is between 090° and 180°, climb to 2500' before proceeding S of the 090° ADF bearing from KC LMM. Glide slope unusable below 1014'. Back crs unusable. Caution: Numerous obstructions all quadrants. MSA w ithin 25 miles of MK LOM: 090°-270°—3100'; 270°-090°—2400'; City, Kansas City; State, Mo.; Airport name, Kansas City Municipal; Elev., 758'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-MKC; Procedure No. ILS Runway 18, Arndt. 9; Eft. date, 28 Jan; 67; Sup. Arndt. No. ILS-18, Arndt. 8; Dated, 22 Oct. 66

LOM...... Direct______1600 T -d n ______300-1 300-1 200-3$ LOM ______D ire c t...... 1600 C -dn...... 400-1 500-1 500-13$ S-dn-14*...... 200-3$ 200-3$ i 200-3$ A -dn...... 600-2 600-2 600-2

Procedure turn W side of crs, 320° Outbnd, 140° Inbnd, 1600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1600'. A ltitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runw ay at OM, 1526'—4.6 miles; at MM, 429'—0.6 mile; : If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.6 miles after passing LOM, make right turn, climb to 1800' on 180° crs from LOM within 20 miles, or when directed by ATC, make right turn, proceed direct to MOB VORTAC climbing to 18007 and enter holding pattern. N ote: Back crs unusable. •400-M required when glide slope inoperative. 400-3$ authorized, with operative ALS, except for 4-engine turbojets. City, Mobile; State, Ala.; Airport name, Bates Field; Elev., 218'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-MOB; Procedure No. ILS Runway 14, Arndt. 17; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Arndt; No. ILS-14, Arndt. 16; D ated, 11 Dec. 65

R 145°, FSD VO R clockwise...... R 160°, FSD VO R ...... Via 17-mile DME 3400 T-dn%$...... 300-1 300-1 200-34 Arc. C -dn...... 500-1 500-1 600-13$ R 160°, FSD VOR clockwise...... R 194°, FSD V O R ...... Via 17-mile DME 3200 S-dn-3*#...... 200-3$ 200-3$ 200-3$ Arc. A -dn______600-2 600-2 600-2 R 297°, FSD VOR counterclockwise. R 194°, FSD V O R ...... Via 17-mile DME 3200 Arc. 17-mile DME Fix, R 194° FSD VOR. OM (fin a l).,.______Via FSD LOC-— 3200 Sioux Falls V O R ______LOM..;...... Direct______3200 Bestland Int______LOM...... 3200 Lennox In t______LOM ...... 3200 Russell In t______— LOM...... Direct______3200

Procedure turn S side of crs, 206° Outbnd, 026° Inbnd, 3200' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 3200'. A ltitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 3118'—5.8 miles; at MM, 1623'—0.5 mile; If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.8 miles after passing LOM, climb to 2700 on Nis crs of ILS within 10 miles. ... %For southeast bound aircraft when weather is below 2100-2, flight below 3900' beyond 5 miles E and SE of airport is prohibited between R 095 and R 135 of the I su VOR. Restriction due to 3444' tower, 10 miles SE of airport; %300-1 required for takeoff Rim way 15. $RVR 24

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY. JANUARY 6 , 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 89

ILS Standard instrum ent Approach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility m inim um s

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— To- Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

D irect______2700 T-dn% ...... 300-1 300-1 2004* Direct______2700 C -dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)* Direct______2500 S-dn-21*...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 N E crs, ILS (final).______Via R 046°, FSD 2500 A -dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 VOR. R 269°, FSD VOR clockwise------R 050°, FSD V O R ______Via 9-mile DME 3000 8-mile DME Fix, R 050° FSD V O R ------Renner In t (final)______Via FSD LOC.... 2500

Procedure turn N side of crs, 026° O utbnd, 206° Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles of Renner In t. v No glide slope. Minimum altitude over Renner Int, 2600'. No outer marker. No middle marker. Crs and distance, Renner In t to airport, 206°—3.7 miles. , 0

Prairie VHF/DME Int______Via OXI, R 345° 2400 T -d n...... 300-1 300-1 200-)* and W crs, ILS. C -dn______500-1 500-1 500-1)* Prairie VHF/DME Int Gordon VHF/DME (final)______Direct______2400 S-dn-9*...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 SBN VOR Gordon VHF/DM E In t______D irect______2400 A -dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 SB LO M _ Gordon VHF/DM E In t...... Direct______2400 Prairie VHF/DM E In t______D irect___ _ 2400 14-mile SBN ILS DME Fix, W crs Gordon VHF/DME Fix (final)______D irect...______2400 R 209°, SBN V ORTAC. SBN ILS, W crs______— 1___ . . Via SBN ILS 2400 DME 14-mile Arc. R 310°, SBN VORTAC counterclockwise.. SBN ILS, W crs______Via SBN ILS 2400 DME 14-mile Arc.

Procedure turn N side of crs, 269° O utbnd, 089° Inbnd, 2400' w ithin 10 miles of Gordon VH F/D M E In t. Minimum altitude over Gordon VHF/DM E In t on final approach crs, 2400'. Crs and distance, Gordon VHF/DM E In t to Runw ay 9, 089°—5.14 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.14 miles after passmg Gordon VHF/DME Int, climb to 2200* and proceed direct to SB LOM, or as directed by ATC, make left turn, climb to 2000' and proceed direct to SBN VOR. Notes: (1) No glide slope. No approach lights. (2) Dual VOR or DME required. (3) DME distance for Prairie and Gordon VHF/DME Int are predicated on zero reference point abeam SBN ILS (Channel 30) glide slope. Distance should not be used to determine aircraft position over runway threshold. Caution; 1918' tower, 5.6 miles S of LOM. *500-% authorized with operative H IR L except for 4-engine turbojets. City, South Bend; State, Ind.; Airport name, St. Joseph County; Eiev., 785'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-SBN; Procedure No. LOC (BC) Runway 9, Arndt. 4; Efl. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Arndt. No. ILS-9 (BC), Arndt. 3; Dated, 23 Apr. 66

Long Lake VHF/DME In t___ Elkhart VHF/DME Int . Via GSH, R 018° 2400 T-dn#______300-1 300-1 2Q0-K and E crs, ILS. C -dn...... *400-1 500-1 500-1)* North Liberty VHF/DM E In t LOM . 2900 S-dn-27*##_____ 200-)* 200-)* 200-)* South Bend V O R ____ . LOM ... 2400 A -dn______600-2 600-2 600-2 Bristol VHF/DME I n t _____ 1 Elkhart VHF/DME Int______Via E crs, ILS___ 2400 Elkhart VHF/DME In t...... - LOM (final)______1900 Goshen VOR______Norman VHF/DME Int______Via R 345°, GSH 2400 VOR. Norman VHF/DME In t...... LOM (final)...... — Direct______1900

Procedure turn N side of final approach crs, 089° O utbnd, 269° Inbnd, 2200' w ithin 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1900'. - Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1900'—3.8 miles; DME distance, 3.9 miles; at MM, 975'—0.6 mile; DME distance, 0.7 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.8 miles after passing OM, make climbing right turn to 2000' and proceed direct to the SBN VO R or make climbing right turn to 2200' and proceed direct to SB LOM. Caution: 1918' tower, 5.6 miles S of LOM. Note: DME distances are predicated on zero reference point abeam SBN ILS (Channel 30) glide slope. DME should not be used to determine aircraft position over MM, tonway threshold or runway touchdown point. 500-% required when glide slope not utilized. 500-)* authorized with operative ALS except for 4-engine turbojets. jRVR (2400') authorized Runway (27). ##RVR (2400'). Descent below 985' not authorized unless approach lights are visible. City, South Bend; State, End.; Airport name, St. Joseph County; Elev., 785'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-SB N ; Procedure No. ILS Runw ay 27, Arndt. 20; Efl. date, 28 June 67; Sup. Arndt. No. ILS-27, Arndt. 19; Dated, 23 Apr. 66

FEDERAL REGISTER, VQL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 90 RULES AND REGULATIONS 5. By amending the following radar procedures prescribed in § 97.19 to read: RADÀB Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet, MSB. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. . If a radar instrument approach is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes Minimum altitude(s) shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below. Positive identification must be estab­ lished with the radar controller. From initial contact with radar to final authorized landing minimums, the instructions of the radar controller are mandatory except when (A) visual contact is established on final approach at or before descent to the authorized landing minimums, or (B) at pilot’s discretion if it appears desirable to discontinue the approach, except when the radar controller may direct otherwise prior to final approach, a missed approach shall be executed as provided below when (A) communication on final approach is lost for more than 5 seconds during a precision approach, or for more than 30 seconds during a surveillance approach; (B) directed by radar controller; (O) visual contact is not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums; or-(D) if landing is not accomplished.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less M inimum More than Course and 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Within: T-dn% ...... 300-1 300-1 200-H 034' 107” 30 miles. 11,000 C -dn______600-1 600-1 600-1H 107' 147° 30 miles. 9,500 S-dn-30R/12L*_. 400-1 400-1 400-1 147' 198” 30 miles. 11,500 A -dn______800-2 800 2 800-2 198' 247' 30 miles. 8.500 247' 315' 30 miles. 6.500 315' 034' 30 miles. 12,000

If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb via TU8 VO R, R 260° to cross TUS RBn/Z at 5000’ minimum, or when directed by ATC, climb via TUS VOR, R 303° to cross Cortaro Int, minimum 6000’, then direct TUS RBn/Z or via 20-mile DME Orbit to TUS VOR R 260°. •Runw ay 30R —Maintain 3500’ or above u n til w ithin 3 miles of runway. •Runw ay 12L—M aintain 3800’ or above until w ithin 3 miles of runway. %AU directions (except V-16 and V-105 westbound) IF R departures m ust comply w ith published Tucson SID ’s. City Tucson; State, Ariz.; Airport name, Tucson International; Elev., 2630’; Fac. Class, and Ident., Davis-Monthan Radar; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 3; Eff. date, 28 Jan. 67; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; D ated, 1 .Oct. 66 These procedures shall become effective on the dates specified therein. These amendments are made under the authority of sections 307(c), 313(a), and 601 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348(c), 1354(a), 1421; 72 Stat. 749, 752, 775). Issued in Washington, D.C., on December 21,1966. J ames F. R udolph, Acting Director, Flight Standards Service, [F.R. Doc. 67-5; Filed, Jan. 5,1967; 8:45 a.m.]

Chapter II— Civil Aeronautics Board lation lists the location of the CAB field of the Safety Investigation Regulations offices. The Board is opening a new (14 CFR 320.5), effective January 26, [Regulation SIR-8; Arndt. 1] field office at Dulles International Air­ 1967, by amending footnote No. 1 to that PART 320— RULES PERTAINING TO port, Washington, D.C., and we are cor­ regulation to read as follows: AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS, INCIDENTS, recting the footnote to include this new 1CAB field offices are listed under U.S. OVERDUE AIRCRAFT, AND SAFETY office in the listing. Since the addition Government in the telephone directories in is solely for purposes of information to the following cities : Anchorage, Alaska; C h i­ INVESTIGATIONS the public, public procedures, and notice cago, HI.; Denver, Colo.; Port Worth, Tex.; Kansas City, Mo.; Los Angeles, Calif.; Miami, Immediate Notification hereon are unnecessary. This regulation is issued by the un­ Fla.; New York, N.Y.; Oakland, Calif.; S e a t­ Rule 5 of the Board’s Safety Investiga­ tle, Wash.; Washington, D.C. (Dulles Interna­ dersigned, pursuant to a delegation of tional Airport). tion Regulations (14 CFR 320.5) provides authority from the Board to the General that the operator of an aircraft shall Counsel in 14 CFR 385.20, and shall be­ Adopted: January 3,1967. notify the “nearest Civil Aeronautics come effective 20 days after publication Effective: January 26,1967. Board, Bureau of Safety Field Office” in the Federal R egister. Procedures for when there is either an accident or any review by the Board of this amendment By the Civil Aeronautics Board. of a number of other specified opera­ are set forth in Subpart C of Part 385 [seal] J oseph B. Goldman, tional difficulties, or when an aircraft (14 CFR 385.50-385.54). General Counsel. is overdue and believed to have been in In consideration of the foregoing, the [F.R. Doc. 67-125; FUed, Jan. 5, 1967; an accident. A footnote to this regu­ Board hereby amends § 320.5 of Part 320 8:46 a.m.]

s,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 91 Proposed Rule Making

Proposal No. 4. In § 1138.88, delete athy certifying the minor capable of DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE the words “4 cents” and substitute there­ performing this work; for the words “5 cents”. 3. Cleanup work outside the mill Consumer and Marketing Service Proposed by the Dairy Division, Con­ proper, except when the mill is in sumer and Marketing Service: operation; [ 7 CFR Part 1138 1 Proposal No. 5. Make such changes as 4. Splitting shakes manually from pre­ [Docket No. AO 335-A9] may be necessary to make the entire cut and split blocks with a froe and marketing agreement and the order con­ mallet, except inside the mill proper. MILK IN RIO GRANDE VALLEY form with any amendments thereto that Copies of this report are available to MARKETING AREA may result from this hearing. interested persons upon request to the Copies of this notice Of hearing and Bureau of Labor Standards, U.S. Depart­ Notice of H e a rin g on Proposed the order may be procured from the ment of Labor, Washington, D.C. 20210. Amendments to Tentative Market­ Market Administrator, Earl C. Bom, On the basis of such recommendation, ing Agreement and Order Post Office Box 8636, Albuquerque, pursuant to section 3(1) of the Fair La­ N. Mex. 87108, or from the Hearing bor Standards Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 1061, Pursuant to the provisions of the Agri­ Clerk, Room 112-A, Administration as amended, 29 U.S.C. 203) and Reor­ cultural Marketing Agreement Act of Building, U.S. Department of Agricul­ ganization Plan No. 2 of 1946 (3 CFR, 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), ture, Washington, D.C. 20250 or may be 1943-1948 Comp., p. 1064), and in ac­ and the applicable rules of practice and there inspected. cordance with 29 CFR Part 1500, Subpart procedure governing the formulation of D, it is proposed to amend Hazardous- marketing agreements and marketing Signed at Washington, D.C., on De­ Occupations Order No. 4 (29 CFR orders (7 CFR Part 900), notice is hereby cember 30, 1966. 1500.54) by adding thereto the recom­ given of a public hearing to be held in R oy W . Lennartson, mended exceptions. the Sheraton Western Skies Motel, 13400 Acting Administrator. Accordingly, notice is hereby given of Central SE., Albuquerque, N. Mex., be­ [F.R. Doc. 67-140; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; a hearing to be held on February 15,1967, ginning at 9:30 a.m., local time, on Jan­ 8:48 a.m.] commencing at 10 a.m., in Room 1902 of uary 19, 1967, with respect to proposed the Smith Tower Building, 506 Second amendments to the tentative marketing Avenue, Seattle, Wash., before a presid­ agreement and to the order, regulating ing officer to be hereafter designated, at the handling of milk in the Rio Grande DEPARTMENT OF LABOR which interested parties may appear and Valley marketing area. be heard with respect to this proposal. The public hearing is for the purpose Office of the Secretary All interested persons desiring to appear of receiving evidence with respect to the at the hearing are requested to notify the economic and marketing conditions E 29 CFR Part 1500 ] Secretary of Labor at least 5 days prior which relate to the proposed amend­ [Hazardous-Occupations Order No. 4] to the date fixed for the hearing. Any ments, hereinafter set forth, and any interested person may also file a written appropriate modifications thereof, to the CERTAIN SHAKE AND SHINGLE MILL comment or brief with the Secretary of tentative marketing agreement and to OCCUPATIONS Labor not later than the day prior to the the order. hearing in order that the same may be The proposed amendments, set forth Hazards for Minors made a part of the record at the hearing. below, have not received the approval of In accordance with the procedure gov­ Signed at Washington, D.C., this 15th the Secretary of Agriculture. erning determinations of hazardous oc­ day of December 1966. Proposed by Dairy Farmers Associa­ cupations (29 CFR Part 1500, Subpart tion and New Mexico Milk Producers W. W illard Wirtz, D ), an investigation has been conducted Secretary of Labor. Association: for the purpose of ascertaining whether Proposal No. 1. In § 1138.10, add a certain shake and shingle mill occupa­ [F.R. Doc. 67-1; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; new paragraph (c) as follows: tions continue to be particularly hazard­ 8:46 a.m.] § 1138.10 Pool plant. ous for the employment of minors between 16 and 18 years of age'. A re­ * * * * ♦ port of the investigation entitled “Occu­ (c) Any plant, hereinafter referred to pational Hazards to Young Workers— FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY as a “cooperative standby plant” located Report on the Advisability of Amending [ 14 CFR Parts 21, 43, 65, 91, 145 1 within the marketing area, which has Hazardous-Occupations Order No. 4 [Docket No. 7847; Notice No. 66-45] been approved by a health authority (Logging and Sawmilling Operations) ” having jurisdiction in the marketing has been submitted by the Bureau of La­ MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR area, at which milk is received from bor Standards. The report recommends CERTAIN LARGE AIRPLANES AND dairy farmers holding permits or author­ an amendment to Hazardous-Occupa­ ization from such authority and which tions Order No. 4 to add thereto excep­ SMALL TURBINE-POWERED AIR­ js operated by a cooperative association tions for the following occupations: PLANES having member producers over half of 1. Manual loading of bundles of shin­ whose milk is delivered during the month gles or shakes into trucks or railroad Notice of Proposed Rule Making to pool plants of other handlers. cars: Provided, That the employer has The Federal Aviation Agency is con­ Proposal No. 2. In § 1138.51 (a), delete on file a statement from a licensed doctor sidering amending Parts 21, 43, 65, 91, t“e Phrase “During the period from the of medicine or osteopathy certifying the and 145 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ effective date of this order until March 1, minor capable of performing this work; tions to require that all large airplanes 1967,” and capitalize the following word 2. Packing shingles or shakes into bun­ and small turbine-powered airplanes not "The”. dles, except returning defective shingles maintained under Parts 121 and 127 of Proposal No. 3. In § 1138.55, delete or shakes to the sawyer: Provided, That the Federal Aviation Regulations be the date “February 1967” and substitute the employer has on file a statement from maintained under a continuous mainte­ therefor the date “August 1968”. a licensed doctor of medicine or osteop­ nance program. The proposal would

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 92 PROPOSED RULE MAKING also allow owners or operators of other nance requirements, dependent on its (§43.9) by stating in such case that the general aviation aircraft to elect to have materials, design, and use in the air­ work was performed in accordance with their aircraft maintained under such a craft. It is reasonable, therefore, that the applicable documented maintenance program. Finally, it is proposed to inspections and other maintenance be plan. eliminate the progressive inspection. tailored to the characteristics of the in­ Air taxi operators and commercial op­ Interested persons are invited to par­ dividual systems. Because of the great erators of small aircraft, whose opera­ ticipate in the making of the proposed number of items involved and their tions come under Part 135, generally rule by submitting such written data, widely divergent maintenance time re­ conduct their maintenance under Part views, or arguments as they may desire. quirements, this ideal maintenance pro­ 91. The proposed amendment would Communications should identify the gram, in practice, becomes continuous. therefore have substantial impact on docket number and be submitted in du­ For the foregoing reasons, it is pro­ Part 135 operators of large airplanes, plicate to the Federal Aviation Agency, posed to eliminate progressive inspec­ small turbine-powered airplanes and Office of the General Counsel, Attention: tions as a regulatory device and to delete other aircraft voluntarily placed on 'a Rules Docket, 800 Independence Avenue all reference to them in the various sec­ continuous program. However, those SW., Washington, D.C. 20553. All com­ tions of Parts 21, 43, 65, 91, and 145 of Part 135 operators whose operation munications received on or before the FARs. At the same time, an amend­ specifications require maintenance under March 7, 1067, will be considered by the ment to § 91.165 would make mandatory Part 121 or 127 would be unaffected. Administrator before taking action upon a continuous maintenance program for In consideration of the foregoing, it is the proposed rule. The proposals con­ large airplanes and small turbine- proposed to amend the Federal Aviation tained in this notice may be changed in powered airplanes and make optional the Regulations as follows: the light of comments received. All use of such a program for any other air­ § 21.329 [Amended] comments will be available, both before craft operated under the maintenance and after the closing date for comments, rules of Part 91. The requirements for 1. By amending § 21.329(c) by striking in the Rules Docket for examination by the continuous maintenance program out the words “progressive inspection” in interested persons. would be set forth in a new Subpart D the last sentence and inserting the words General operating and flight rules in Part 91. The maintenance require­ “continuous maintenance program” in (now contained in Part 91 of the Federal ments proposed herein would not be place thereof. Aviation Regulations) have for many applicable to any aircraft being main­ 2. By amending Part 43 as follows : years required that all aircraft operated tained in accordance with a continuous §§ 43.3, 43.9, 43.11, 43.15 [Amended] under such rules have periodic inspec­ airworthiness maintenance program un­ a. By striking out reference to “pro­ tions geared to relatively simple aircraft der Part 121 or Part 127. gressive” inspections in the text of §§ 43.3 for which a single inspection interval Under this proposal, the owner or (i) (3), 43.9(c), 43.11 (a) and (b), 43.15 was adequate. These inspections are operator would have to set forth the (a) and (b), and Appendix C, paragraph referred to as annual inspections for all details of his specific maintenance pro­ (a). aircraft and 100-hour inspections ap­ gram in a documented maintenance b. 'By striking out reference to “pro­ plicable to aircraft used for hire. In plan. The proposal permits the owner gressive” inspections in the catchlines of addition, and as an alternative to the an­ or operator to develop the plan in its §§ 43.9,43.11,43.15, and Appendix C. nual and 100-hour inspections. Part 91 entirety or to incorporate manufacturers’ c. By inserting the following before the permits registered owners or operators manuals or other documents relating to period at the end of § 43.9(a) (1) : “, and to have their aircraft maintained by the required material, i.e., maintenance in the case of an aircraft being main­ progressive inspections. cycles, scope of maintenance, etc. The tained in accordance with Subpart D of For today’s large airplanes and com­ proposed maintenance program is not Part 91 of this chapter, a statement that plex small airplanes, the rigid annual required to be approved under this the work was performed in accordance and 100-hour inspections do not estab­ proposal. lish an adequate maintenance program. Among other things, the Agency con­ with the documented maintenance plan Likewise, the progressive inspection, a siders that the documented maintenance for that aircraft”. variation of the annual that allows an en­ plan must contain details concerning d. By deleting §§ 43.11(a) (6), 43.15 tire inspection to be done piecemeal if the program which the owner or operator (d), and Appendix C, paragraph (c). completed within 12 months, provides has designed to assure that all mechan­ 3. By amending Part 65 as follows: some flexibility but is inadequate to in­ ical irregularities on his aircraft are re­ § 65.91 [Amended] sure a realistic maintenance program for corded and corrected. In order to im­ these airplanes. There has been virtu­ plement this provision, the Agency a. By striking out reference to “pro­ ally no election of progressive inspections considers it appropriate to specifically gressive” inspections in the text of § 65.91 by general aviation owners and operators. require the pilot-in-command of aircraft (c)(5). In the quest for reliability and safety, maintained under a continuous mainte­ § 65.93 [Amended] following the lead of manufacturers, air nance program to enter each mechanical carriers, and the military, many general irregularity that comes to his attention b. By deleting § 65.93(a) (3). aviation owners and operators have ac­ during flight time into the logbook for § 65.95 [Amended] cepted the concept of continuous aircraft the aircraft and to ascertain, before each c. By striking out the words “, or per­ maintenance. They have adopted con­ flight, the status of each irregularity form or supervise a progressive” in tinuous maintenance procedures even entered into the logbook at the end of though, under the present regulatory the preceding flight. § 65.95(a) (2). scheme, they are not relieved of the ap­ As proposed herein, each owner of an 4. By amending Part 91 as follows: propriate annual, 100-hour, or progres­ aircraft being maintained under the new § 91.1 [Amended] sive inspections. The validity of the continuous maintenance program would continuous maintenance concept has be required to provide a means for noti­ a. By amending § 91.1(b) (3) to insert also been recognized by the Flight Safety fying any pilot-in-command that the the words “Subparts A, C, and D” in Foundation and in a number of articles aircraft is maintained under such a pro­ place of the words “Subparts A and C”. published by the Society of Automotive gram. This is particularly important b. By amending Subpart C to read as Engineers in its report of the Business for aircraft which are being maintained follows: Aircraft Conference advocating its use. under a continuous maintenance pro­ Subpart C— Maintenance, Preventive The Agency has observed that aircraft gram at the election of the owner. Maintenance, and Alterations; maintained under continuous mainte­ The adoption of regulations requiring nance procedures are generally in above- a continuing maintenance program will General average condition. Each of the intricate necessitate minor changes elsewhere in § 91.161 Applicability. systems—engine, hydraulic, electrical the regulations to achieve clarity and avionic, instrument and pressurization consistency. In this connection it Is (a) This subpart prescribes rules gov­ among others—that make up today’s proposed to amplify the description of erning the maintenance, preventive complex aircraft, has its own mainte- work entered in the maintenance record maintenance, and alteration of U.S. reg-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 93 istered civil aircraft operating within or mental or provisional certificate or for (2) A chronological listing of compli­ without the United States. an aircraft being maintained in accord­ ance with mandatory service bulletins, (b) Sections 91.165, 91.169, 91.170, and ance with Subpart D of this part: Airworthiness Directives, and the method 91.173 do not apply to an aircraft main­ (a) No person may operate an aircraft of compliance. tained in accordance with a continuous unless, within the preceding 12 calendar (3) The current empty weight, empty airworthiness program under Part 121 months, it has had— center of gravity, and useful load. or Part 127 of this chapter. (1) An annual inspection in accord­ (4) The addition or removal of op­ § 91.163 General. ance with Part 43 of this chapter and has tional equipment. been approved for return to service by a (5) The addition or removal of re-^ (a) The owner or operator of an air­ person authorized by § 43.7 of this quired equipment in exchange for op­ craft is primarily responsible for main­ chapter; or tional equipment. taining that aircraft in an airworthy (2) An inspection for the issue of an (6) The total time in service and his­ condition, including compliance with airworthiness certificate. tory of each engine overhauled, repaired, Part 39 of this chapter. (b) No person may perform mainte­ No inspection performed under para­ or reassembled to standards other than graph (b) of this section may be sub­ those for rebuilt engines as defined in nance, preventive maintenance, or al­ § 91.175. terations on an aircraft other than as stituted for any inspection required by prescribed in this subpart and other ap­ this paragraph unless it is performed by (7) The total time in service of the plicable regulations, including Part 43 a person authorized to perform annual aircraft. inspections, and is entered as an annual (c) Each registered owner or operator of this chapter. shall— § 91.165 Maintenance required. inspection in the required maintenance records. (1) Present the maintenance record (a) Each owner or operator of a large (b) No person may operate an aircraft for required entries each time inspec­ airplane or a small turbine-powered air­ carrying any person (other than a crew­ tion or maintenance is done on the air­ plane shall have that airplane main­ member) for hire or to give flight in­ craft or engine; tained as prescribed in Subpart D of this struction for hire unless, within the pre­ (2) Upon disposing of the aircraft or part. ceding 100 hours of time in service, it engine, give the maintenance record to (b) Each owner or operator of an air­ has been inspected in accordance with the new registered owner or operator; craft, other than an airplane covered by Part 43 of this chapter and approved for and paragraph (a) of this section, shall have return to service by a person authorized (3) Make the maintenance record that aircraft either maintained in ac­ by § 43.7 of this chapter. The 100-hour available for inspection by the Adminis­ cordance with Subpart D of this part or limitation may be exceeded by not more trator or any authorized representative inspected as prescribed in § 91.169. If than 10 hours if necessary to reach a of the Civil Aeronautics Board. he elects to have it maintained in ac­ place at which the inspection can be § 91.175 Rebuilt engine maintenance cordance with Subpart D of this part, done, The excess time, however, is in­ records. he shall so notify the nearest General cluded in computing the next 100 hours (a) The owner or operator may use a Aviation District Office of the Federal of time in service. Aviation Agency in writing and shall fur­ new maintenance record, without pre­ nish that office the make, model, and § 91.170 Altimeter system tests and in­ vious operating history, for an aircraft registration number of the aircraft. If spections. engine rebuilt by the manufacturer or he elects to have it inspected as pre­ (a) No person may operate an airplane by an agency approved by the manu­ scribed in § 91.169, he shall, in the case in controlled airspace under IFR unless, facturer. of each defect that occurs between re­ ■within the preceding 24 calendar months, (b) Each manufacturer or agency quired inspections, have that defect re­ each static pressure system and each al­ that grants zero time to an engine re­ paired as prescribed in Part 43 of this timeter instrument has been tested and built by it shall enter, in the new chapter. inspected and found to comply with Ap­ record— (c) Each owner or operator of an air­ pendix E of Part 43 of this chapter. The (1) A signed statement of the date craft covered by paragraph (a) or (b) altimeter must be tested by an appropri­ the engine was rebuilt; of this section, shall ensure that main­ ately rated repair station. (2) Each change made as required by tenance personnel make appropriate en­ (b) Compliance with this section is Airworthiness Directives; and tries in the aircraft and maintenance not required until August 1,1967. How­ (3) Each change made in compliance records indicating the aircraft has been ever, the first test and inspection re­ with manufacturer’s service bulletins, if released to service. quired by this section for airplanes under the entry is specifically requested in that bulletin. § 91.167 Carrying persons other than annual inspection is not required to be crewmembers after repairs or altera­ made until the first annual inspection (c) For the purposes of this section, tions. after July 31, 1967. a rebuilt engine is a used engine that has been completely disassembled, inspected, (a) No person may carry any person §91.173 Maintenance records. repaired as necessary, reassembled, (other than crewmembers) in an aircraft (a) Each registered owner or operator tested, and approved in the same manner that has been repaired or altered in a and to the same tolerances and limits as manner that may have appreciably of an aircraft shall keep a separate, cur­ rent, and permanent maintenance record a new engine with either new or used changed its flight characteristics, or sub­ parts. However, all parts used in it stantially affected its operation in flight, for the aircraft and each engine and shall must conform to the production drawing until it has been approved for return to identify each record as to make, model, tolerances and limits for new parts or be service in accordance with Part 43 of serial number, and, if applicable, regis­ of approved oversized or undersized di­ this chapter and an appropriately rated mensions for a new engine. pilot, with at Jleast a private pilot’s cer­ tration number of the aircraft or engine tificate, flies the aircraft, makes an op­ concerned. c. By adding a new Subpart D to read erational check of the repaired or altered (b) Each registered owner or operator as follows: part, and logs the flight in the aircraft’s shall use a record of sufficient size and records. shall include in it the following informa­ Subparf D— Continuous Maintenance (b) Paragraph (a) of this section does tion: Program for Large Airplanes and not require that the aircraft be flown if Small Turbine-Powered Airplanes sound tests or inspections, or both, show (1) The kind and extent of mainte­ nance and alteration, and the time in Not Maintained Under Parts 121 or conclusively that the repair or alteration 127 of This Chapter nas not appreciably changed the flight service and date when the work is done. characteristics, or substantially affected However, major repairs or major altera­ § 91.180 Responsibility for airworthi­ e flight operation of the aircraft. tions may be logged by making reference ness. § 91.169 Inspections. to the FAA Form ACA-337 by date, or to Each owner of aircraft maintained *or 811 a*rcraft that carries a the work order (by number) and the under this subpart is primarily respon­ pccial flight permit or a current experi- approving agency. sible for the performance of the mainte- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 94 PROPOSED RULE MAKING nance of its aircraft, including airframes, ing the aircraft registration number and Federal Aviation Regulations that would aircraft engines, propellers, or appli­ the make and model of the aircraft. designate the Marianna, Fla., transition ances, and parts thereof, in accordance area. § 91.186 Pilot-in-command to report The transition area so proposed would with the appropriate maintenance pro­ mechanical irregularities. gram and the regulations of this chapter. be designated as follows: The pilot-in-command of an aircraft § 91.182 Pilot-in-command notification. maintained under this subpart shall M a r ia n n a , F la . enter or have entered in the logbook of That airspace extending upward from 700 Each owner of an aircraft maintained feet above the surface within an 8-mile radius under this subpart shall keep in that the aircraft each mechanical irregular­ of the Marianna Municipal Airport (latitude aircraft a copy of the documented main­ ity that comes to his attention during 30°50'08" N., longitude 85°11'02'' W.), and tenance plan for the aircraft. The flight time. Before each flight, he shall within 2 miles each side of the Marianna owner shall also provide a means for ascertain the status of each irregularity VOR 127° radial extending from the 8-mile notifying each pilot-in-command that entered in the log at the end of the pre­ radius area to 8 miles SE of the VOR. the aircraft is maintained under a con­ ceding flight. The proposed amendment would pro­ tinuous maintenance program. § 91.188 Continuing analysis and sur­ vide controlled airspace required for the § 91.184 Continuous maintenance pro­ veillance. protection of IFR operations at Marianna gram. (a) Each owner of an aircraft main­ Municipal Airport. A prescribed instru­ (a) No person may operate a large air­ tained under this subpart shall establish ment approach procedure utilizing the plane, a small turbine-powered airplane, and maintain a system for the continu­ Marianna VOR is proposed in conjunc­ or an aircraft for which an election has ing analysis and surveillance of the per­ tion with the designation of this transi­ been made to have it maintained under formance and effectiveness and for the correction of any deficiency in that pro­ tion area. * this subpart, unless it is currently being Interested persons may submit such maintained in accordance with a mainte­ gram. nance program meeting the requirements (b) Whenever the Administrator finds written data, views, or arguments as they of this section. that the program described in paragraph may desire. Communications should be (b) Each continuous maintenance pro­ (a) of this section does not contain submitted in triplicate to the Area Man­ gram must be fully described in a docu­ adequate procedures and standards to ager, Miami Area Office, Attention: mented maintenance plan that must be meet the requirements of this subpart, the owner shall, after notification by the Chief, Air Traffic Branch, Federal Avia­ followed in performing maintenance and tion Agency, Post Office Box 2014, AMF preventive maintenance of the aircraft, Administrator, make any changes in airframe, aircraft engines, propellers, those programs that are necessary to Branch, Miami, Fla. 33159. All com­ appliances, or parts thereof. The main­ meet those requirements. munications received within 30 days tenance plan must take into considera­ (c) An owner may petition the Ad­ after publication of this notice in the tion the information contained in any ministrator to reconsider the notice to F ederal R egister will be considered be­ make a change in a program. The peti­ Maintenance Alert Bulletins submitted fore action is taken on the proposed to the owner by the Administrator and tion must be filed with the nearest Gen­ may reference manufacturer’s manuals eral Aviation District Office within 30 amendment. No hearing is contemplated or other documents if those manuals or days after the owner receives the notice. at this time, but arrangements for in­ documents contain appropriate details. Except in the case of an emergency re­ formal conferences with Federal Avia­ The maintenance program must include quiring immediate action in the inter­ tion Agency officials may be made by con­ at least the following : est of safety, the filing of the petition tacting the Chief, Air Traffic Branch. (1) Maintenance periods expressed in stays the notice pending a decision by the Administrator. Any data, views, or arguments presented terms of hours of time in service, calen­ during such conferences must also be dar time, or cycles of aircraft systems § 145.51 [Amended] operation, or any combination of these. submitted in writing in accordance with (2) The scope of the maintenance to 5. By amending 1145.51(c) by strik­this notice in order to become part of be performed during maintenance period. ing out reference to “progressive” in­ the record for consideration. The pro­ (3) The acceptable methods, tech­ spections. These amendments are proposed under posal contained in this notice may be niques, and practices to be employed in changed in the light of comments performing routine and nonroutine the authority of sections 313(a), 601, 604, maintenance and preventive mainte­ and 609 of the Federal Aviation Act of received. nance. 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354,1421,1424,1429). The official docket will be available (4) The manner in which mechanical Issued in Washington, D.C., on De­ for examination by interested persons at irregularities noted in flight are recorded cember 30,1966. the Southern Regional Office, Federal and corrected and the fact of correction Aviation Agency, Room 724, 3400 Whip­ entered in the maintenance records of C. W. Walker, the aircraft and engine concerned. Director, Flight Standards Service. ple Street, East Point, Ga. (c) Each registered owner complying [F.R. Doc. 67-118; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; This amendment is made under the with this section shall furnish to the 8:46 a.m.] authority of section 307(a) of the Fed­ nearest FAA General Aviation District eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348 Office, the name of the person managing [ 14 CFR Part 71 1 (a)). the maintenance of the aircraft if that person is other than the registered owner [Airspace Docket No. 66-SO-93] Issued in East Point, Ga., on Decem­ or operator of the aircraft. TRANSITION AREA ber 23, 1966. (d) A registered owner shall, upon dis­ W illiam M. F lener, continuing maintenance under this sec­ Proposed Designation Acting Director, Southern Region. tion, notify the nearest FAA General The Federal Aviation Agency is con­ [F.R. Doc. 67-117; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; Aviation District Office, in writing, giv- sidering an amendment to Part 71 of the 8:46 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 95 Y Notices

G ila and S alt R iver B ase M e r id ia n , Arizona Office of the Secretary DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR T. 41 N„ R. 11 W„ OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF Bureau of Indian Affairs Sec. 3, lots 2, 3, and 4, SW^NE»4, Sy2 NW y4, and SW% : Conservation Jurisdiction in [Ju n e au Area Office Redelegation Order 2, Sec. 4, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, S ^ N ^ . and S^: Amdt. 1] Sec. 5, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, S ^ N ^ . and S%; Undisputed Areas Sec. 6 , lots 1 and 2, SVkNE(4, and SE}4; AREA FIELD REPRESENTATIVES Sec. 7, NEV4; Under authority of section 5 of the Sec. 8 , Ni/ 2 and SE»4 ; Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of Redelegation of Authority With Re­ Sec. 9; 1953 (43 U.S.C., sec. 1334) notice is spect to Indian Lands and Minerals Sec. 10, Ny2 NW>4, SWV4 NW1/4 , and NW(4 hereby given that : SW1 4 . 1. The Secretary of the Interior has Correction T. 42 Nv, R. 11 W., exclusive conservation jurisdiction over In FR. Doc. 66-13815, appearing at Sec. 31, lots 1 and 2, and SE%; all undisputed areas of the Outer Conti­ page 16580 of the issue for Wednesday, Sec. 32, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, and S l/2; Sec. 33, lots 1,2, 3, and 4, and 8 % ; nental Shelf of the United States. December 28, 1966, the bracket in the Sec. 34, lots 1,2, 3, and 4, and Syj. 2. In the exercise of this jurisdiction, heading should read as set forth above. the Secretary has delegated to Oil and The areas described above aggregate Gas Supervisors authority to regulate Bureau of Land Management 4,748.93 acres. operations on oil and gas leases in the [Arizona 510] Dated: December 27, 1966. undisputed areas of the Outer Continen­ tal Shelf (30 CFR, Part 250). ARIZONA F red J. Weiler, 3. As to undisputed areas of the Outer Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and £ tate Director. Continental Shelf from which oil and Reservation of Lands [F.R. Doc. 67-106; Piled, Jan. 5, 1967; gas is currently being produced, the 8:45 a.m.] Supervisor shall, after consultation with The Bureau of 'Reclamaton, Depart­ State conservation authorities, prepare ment of the Interior, has filed an appli­ and submit to the Secretary proposed cation, Serial Number Arizona 510 for National Park Service General Orders containing rules and pro­ the withdrawal of the lands described cedures pursuant to which the conserva­ below, from all forms of location, sale, POINT REYES NATIONAL SEASHORE tion jurisdiction of the Secretary over or entry under the mineral and non­ lease operations, including proration of mineral public land laws, except the Notice of Intention To Issue production, shall be exercised on oil and mineral leasing laws, subject to valid ex­ Concession Permit gas leases in these areas. The General isting rights. Orders approved by the Secretary will be The Bureau of Reclamation desires the Pursuant to the provisions of section published in the F ederal R egister as lands for the implementation and con­ 5, Public Law 89-249, public notice is proposed rule making on or about March struction of the Dixie Project located hereby given that the Department of 1, 1967. It is intended that the proposed on the boundary of Arizona and Utah, Interior, through the Superintendent of General Orders, as finally approved by approved by the Act of September 2, Point Reyes National Seashore, National the Secretary, shall become effective on 1964. This project involves reclama­ Park Service, proposes, thirty (30) days or about July 1, 1967. Such orders shall tion of water and lands for irrigation after the date of publication of this then comprise the exclusive rules and purposes. notice, to issue for the period January 1, The proposed use of the lands will not procedures governing development of oil 1967, through December 31, 1967, the and gas leases on the Outer Continental result in any contamination of the lands. concession permit under which Ralph’s Any use of water in connection with Lunchette, 622 Lindaro, San Rafael, Shelf, including the proration of produc­ the development of this land will be in Calif., provides concession facilities and tion. accordance with the Federal and State services for the public with mobile re­ 4. The conservation rules and proce­ laws governing the use of water. freshment services. dures referred to shall be administered For a period of 30 days from the date The foregoing concessioner lias per­ of publication of this notice, all per­ in a manner compatible with conserva­ formed its obligations under a prior per­ tion principles accepted by interested sons who wish to submit comments, sug­ mit to the satisfaction of the National gestions, or objections in connection 'Park Service and, therefore, pursuant to States. with the proposed withdrawal may pre­ the act cited above is entitled to be given 5. This notice shall not apply to lands sent their views in writing to the under­ preference in the renewal of the permit of the United States within the bound­ signed officer of the Bureau of Land Management, Department of the In­ and in the negotiation of a new permit. aries of the several States. Present con­ terior, 3022 Federal Building, Phoenix, However, under the act cited above the servation practices and procedures shall, Ariz. 85025. Service is also required to consider and until further notice, continue as to any If circumstances warrant it, a public evaluate all proposals received as a re­ areas of the Continental Shelf in dispute, hearing will be held at a convenient time sult of this notice. and those involved in litigation, between and place, which will be announced. the Federal and State governments. The determination of the Secretary on Dated: December 1, 1966. the application will be published in the S tewart L. Udall, eslie rnberger Federal Register. A separate notice L P. A , Secretary of the Interior. will be sent to each interested party of Superintendent, record. Point Reyes National Seashore. D ecember 30,1966. The lands involved in this application [F.R. Doc. 67-107; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; [F.R. Doc. 67-108; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; are: 8:45 a.m.] 8:45 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 No. 3----- 4 96 NOTICES 1966, and the Seaboard Air Line Railroad filed late;1 (9) opposition of The Western ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Co. dated December 9, 1966, which were Union Telegraph Co. to petition for re­ [Docket No. 50-206] concurred in or joined in by The Chi­ consideration and modification, request­ cago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific ing the Commission to deny the joint pe­ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. Railroad; Chicago, Rock Island and Pa­ tition for partial reconsideration and ET AL. cific Railroad Co.; Bessemer and Lake modification filed by Aeronautical Radio, Erie Railroad Co.; the Lake Terminal Inc., et al. Notice of Issuance of Order Railroad Co.; the Clinchfield Railroad 2. Our memorandum opinion and or­ Extending Completion Date Co.; the Pennsylvania Railroad Co.; and der (FCC 66-1005), released Novem­ Please take notice that the Atomic the Erie-Lackawana Railroad Co.; which ber 10, 1966, ordered, in paragraph 5 Energy Commission has issued an order petitions requested the Commission to thereof: extending to June 30, 1967, the latest modify paragraph 5 of said order by * * * That, within 60 days from the date completion date specified in Construction changing the phrase “effective on 30 of this order AT&T shaU file revised tariff Permit No. CPPR-13 for construction of days’ notice” to read “effective on 180 schedules, effective on 30 days notice, which the pressurized, light water reactor being days’ notice;” (2) petitions for reconsid­ will eliminate the unlawful discrimination eration filed by the Associated Press; and which has been found to exist between constructed on the Pacific coast near TELPAK A and B classifications on the the northern boundary of Camp Pendle­ Aeronautical Radio, Inc., both dated De­ cember 1,1966, requesting that the Com­ one hand and private line rates on the other, ton, San Diego County, Calif. so as to unify the rates for the separate Copies of the Commission’s order and mission modify paragraph 5 of said or­ tariffs at appropriate levels, together with of the application filed by Southern Cali­ der by changing the phrase “effective on data to support the revised tariff schedules; fornia Edison Co., San Diego Gas & Elec­ 30 days’ notice” to “effective on April 1, It is further ordered, that, upon the filing tric Co., Bechtel Corp., and Westinghouse 1967;” (3) petitions for reconsideration of such tariff schedules and supporting data Electric Corp., are available for public by NAM Telecommunications Committee in compliance herewith, the proceedings in and American Trucking Association, Inc., Docket No. 14251 shall be deemed termi­ inspection at the Commission’s Public nated; Document Room, 1717 H Street NW., both dated December 12,1966, requesting Washington, D.C. the Commission to change paragraph 5 3. In order that determination on of said order by changing the phrase these petitions be fully effective, timely Dated at Bethesda, Md., this 29th day “effective on 30 days’ notice” to “effective execution of our functions requires that of December 1966. on 60 days’ notice;” (4) a petition for re­ we act on said petitions prior to the full For the Atomic Energy Commission. consideration by the Administrator of time allotted by our rules for filing of General Services requesting the Commis­ oppositions and replies to oppositions. P eter A. Morris, sion to reconsider said order and to (a) We will therefore consider the petitions Director, clarify that order with respect to the rate Division of Reactor Licensing. on their merits without further delay. issues now considered to be within Docket 4. The petitions filed by the various [F.R. Doc. 67-97; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; No. 16258; (b) specify the nature of the railroad companies rely on the petition 8:45 a.m.] evidentiary showing required prior to the of the New York Central Railroad Co. termination of proceedings in Docket No. for the factual basis supporting their 14251; and (c) permit the filing of pro­ request. In brief, they aver that a mini­ URANIUM ENRICHMENT SERVICES posed revisions in rates for TELPAK A, mum of 90 days from the date of the fil­ Criteria B, and Private Line rates rather than ing of any tariff changes would be re­ tariff schedules; (5) a petition for par­ quired in order for them to evaluate the Correction tial reconsideration and modification impact of such changes, to engineer al­ In F.R. Doc. 66-13756 appearing in the filed jointly by Aeronautical Radio, Inc., terations to their communications net­ issue for Friday, December 23, 1966, at Air Transport of America, American Air works, and to order facilities thereafter page 16479, in paragraph 1(b), line 18, Lines, Inc., Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Amer­ required. An additional 90 days is re­ the word “is” should read “in”. ican Trucking Associations, Inc., Twin quested to permit delivery of any facili­ Coast Newspapers, Inc., Lockheed Air­ ties ordered from AT&T, but no specific craft Corp., and United Air Lines, Inc., facts justifying these time intervals are requesting that the Commission modify offered. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS paragraph 5 of said order by deleting the 5. The Associated Press and AR3NC, second ordering clause, which, the peti­ in their petitions, detail the extent of COMMISSION tions state, provide for the termination TELPAK circuitry which they now lease of Docket No. 14251 “upon the filing of [Docket Nos. 14251 etc.; FOC 66-1188] from AT&T and the problems which may tariffs unifying TELPAK A and B private be involved in the event that AT&T AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND line rates” and direct that “any specific eliminates TELPAK A and B service of­ TELEGRAPH CO. ET AL. rate issues with respect to TELPAK C ferings. They further state that because and D be reserved for determination in of the extent of the network involved Memorandum Opinion and Order existing Docket No. 14251;” (6) a state­ and the possible rearrangement required, ment in support of petitions for recon­ In the matter of American Telephone 30 days is not sufficient within which to siderations filed by the Bell System Re­ accomplish such rearrangement and re­ and Telegraph Co., Docket No. 14251; spondents dated December 12, 1966, regulations and charges for TELPAK quests that the tariff changes be made service and channels; in the matter of which generally supports the requests for effective April 1. AP and AR2NC point American Telephone and Telegraph Co., additional time contained in the peti­ out that they will not have an opportu­ ¿and the Associated Bell System Com­ tions for reconsideration of Aeronautical nity to know what the new rates are panies, Docket No. 16258; charges for Radio, Inc., the Associated Press, and the until January 9, 1967. AT&T, in order interstate and foreign communication New York Central Railroad Co.; (7) op­ to provide new or different private line service; in the matter of American Tele­ position of The Western Union Telegraph services to a customer, requires that or­ phone and Telegraph Co., Docket No. Co. to petitions for reconsideration of or­ ders be placed by the 15th of the prior 15011; charges, practices, classifications, der released November 10, 1966, urging month. AP and ARINC point out that And regulations for and in connection that the Commission deny all petitions they thus have less than a week to re­ with teletypewriter exchange service. for reconsideration filed herein, which arrange their systems in light of the new 1. The Commission has before it vari­ seek extensions of time; (8) a “Motion ous petitions for reconsideration seeking to Accept Partial Late Filing,” filed by 6. 'The NAM Telecommunications amendment of its memorandum opinion The Western Union Telegraph Co. on Committee, in its petition, states that a and order (FCC 66-1005) released No­ December 15,1966, requesting that its op­ vember 10,1966, as follows: (1) Petitions position to the petitions for reconsidera­ 1 We accept Western Union’s opposition for reconsideration filed by the New York tion of Aeronautical Radio, Inc. and As­ even though filed late as to these two Central Railroad Co. dated December 6, sociated Press be accepted even though petitions for reconsideration.

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 NOTICES 97 restructuring of TELPAK facilities will After the necessary decisions have been type of determination. As we have pre­ require a comprehensive réévaluation made, additional time will be required for viously stated, the only issue remaining and analysis of virtually each communi­ processing the orders for the services de­ with respect to TELPAK C and D is cations circuit used by a given manufac­ sired,’’ and in support of the petitions of whether the rates are compensatory. As turing company in its nationwide com­ Aeronautical Radio, , Inc., Associated stated in paragraph 12 hereof, this issue munications network. It supplies details Press, and the New York Central Rail­ deals with the overall level of earnings by reference to two TELPAK users and road Co., states that the time between and does not relate to a detailed analysis concludes that 30 days is not a sufficient the filing of the tariff revisions and their of the specific rates involved, and is time to permit required changes of pres­ effective dates “should be extended to a therefore appropriate for determination ent facilities, and requests that the tariff date which will meet the requirements of in Docket No. 16258. changes be made effective on 60 days the users for reasonable time to accom­ 14. We can see no value in the proposal notice. plish the necessary modifications.” that AT&T file proposed revisions in rates 7. The American Trucking Association, 11. Western Union, in its opposition rather than tariff schedules. Orderly Inc., in its petition, outlines the com­ to the foregoing petitions and in urging procedures require that a date certain plexity of the trucking industry’s shared the Commission to deny said petitions, be fixed for the elimination of the un­ TELPAK A and B networks and the re­ states that petitioners have had ample lawful discrimination by means of effec­ quired AT&T policy with regard to notice time to consider and evaluate the com­ tive tariff changes. In order to eliminate of changes and concludes that 30 days munications requirements in view of the the discrimination which we have found is insufficient to permit a proper re­ extended period of litigation involving to exist as rapidly as possible and con­ examination, and requests that 60 days these rates. It points out that petition­ sistent with our responsibilities, we will notice be given before tariff revisions be­ ers have enjoyed the benefits of rates not amend our order requiring AT&T to come effective. which have been found to be unlawfully file revised tariff schedules. As stated 8. Aeronautical Radio, Inc., and those discriminatory for nearly 6 years. It above, if petitions are filed with respect joining in its petition for partial recon­ also points out that no actual service to those tariff schedules, or on our own sideration and modification, urges that will be lost by virtue of the new rates. motion, we may review such schedules to Docket No. 14251 not be terminated, and With regard to the petitions which would assure conformity with our prior deter­ that any rate issues with respect to TEL­ continue the proceedings within the minations with respect to TELPAK rates PAK C and D be reserved for determina­ framework of Docket No. 14251, Western and charges or as to whether they are tion in that docket, and cites the Com­ Union contends that any problems aris­ otherwise lawful. Of course, such pro­ mission’s own order (37 PCC 1111, 1118) ing with respect to the new rates should cedure may not be utilized to reassert to demonstrate that the Commission be considered in a new proceeding. the same issues as were resolved in anticipated determining the remaining 12. The Commission, in amending its Docket No. 14251. issues with respect to TELPAK C and D order of October 27, 1965, in Docket No. 15. We agree generally with Western in Docket No. 14251. It further states 16258 (PCC 65-959) to include a con­ Union that after nearly 6 years and much that the Commission has made it clear sideration of TELPAK’s C and D within (litigation the unlawful discrimination that it will not inquire into internal rate that docket, was mindful of the fact that should be eliminated without undue de­ components, practices, and regulations the only remaining issue with respect lay. We do recognize, however, the ad­ within each of the principal rate clas­ to TELPAK C and D was whether the ministrative problem pointed out by AP sifications of service in Docket No. 16258 existing rates were compensatory. This and ARINC occasioned by the more or wherein the record in Docket No. 14251 issue deals with the overall level of earn­ less fortuitous circumstance that the has been incorporated by reference. ings for the services and does not relate date for the effectuation of our order 9. The Administrator of General Serv­ to a detailed analysis of the specific rates falls on the 9th day of the month, where­ ices, in his petition for reconsideration, involved. Accordingly, since Docket No. as private line services are normally or­ requests the Commission to clarify its 16258 contains within it the issues of dered on the 15th for service on the first order and to modify it in the following the proper rate of return and the rela­ day of the next month. For this reason, respects: tionships of the level of earnings of we will modify our order to provide that (1) Inclusion in th a t order of con­ the different classes of service, it is the the revised tariff schedules may become firmation th at rate issues will be resolved proper proceeding within which to deter­ effective May 1, 1967. We are not im­ in Docket No. 16258; mine the compensatory nature of pressed by the fears expressed by the rail­ (2) Inclusion in that order of a spe­ TELPAK C and D and their relationship roads based on their speculation as to cific requirement that TELPAK rates be to the other services. what may be entailed in the way of plant shown on the record to be nondiscrimina- 13. The Commission has several times rearrangement when the revised tariff tory, just and reasonable prior to the in formal orders stated that it will not schedules are filed. It should be borne termination of proceedings in Docket No. deal with specific rate issues in Docket in mind that such revised schedules will 14251; and No. 16258. That docket, among other not cause the loss of any existing service, (3) Inclusion in that order of permis­ things, deals with the overall rate of even though such service may be priced sion for the filing of proposed revisions return of the Bell System Respondents differently. m rates, rather than tariff schedules, for and the level of earnings of different Accordingly, it is ordered, This 21st TELPAK’s A, B, and Private Line serv­ classes of service and not with individual day of December 1966, that: ices. rate components within rate classifica­ (1) Paragraph 5 of our order of No­ 10. The Bell System Respondents in tions. Sports Network, Inc., 3 PCC 2d vember 10, 1966, is hereby amended by pheir statement in support of petitions 618, 624 (1966); in the matter of AT&T deleting from the first ordering para­ Revision of Definition of Service Points, graph thereof the words “effective on 30 for reconsideration state that “The elim­ 2 PCC 2d 359, 360 (1966); AT&T, PCC ination of TELPAK A and B, together days notice” and substituting therefor with the concomitant changes in the 66-1005 (Nov. 10, 1966). We see no rea­ son to depart from our prior determina­ the words “effective May 1, 1967.” rates for private line telephone and tele­ (2) Hie petitions for reconsideration graph grade services which may be called tions in this matter. The filing of or m compliance With the Commission's revised tariff schedules with respect to are granted to the extent indicated and in will inevitably dictate major re- TELPAK A and B classifications and all other respects are denied. tructuring of these networks. The users private line rates could raise anew the issue of their justness or reasonableness Released: December 28,1966. esf services must evaluate a multi- or discriminatory nature and if so the nf eu°i combinations of a wide range Commission, on its own motion or upon F ederal Communications vot i-matives mduding TELPAK, pri- Commission, JroL , telePhone, private line tele- receipt of a complaint, could issue an I seal] B en F. Waple, graph, WATS and message toll tele- order instituting an investigation into Secretary. f.ir. ® service, as well as possible varia­ those matters. Docket No. 16258 is not [F.R. Doc. 67-133; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; nt their own methods of operations. an appropriate vehicle for making that 8:47 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 98 NOTICES [Docket No. 16942; FCC 67M-1] No. BP-16721; Requests: 1000 kc, 10 kw, (d) On June 13,1966, Fine Music filed DA, Day, Class n; for standard broad­ an amendment modifying its proposal in USE OF CARTERPHONE DEVICE IN cast construction permits. such a way as to eliminate any question MESSAGE TOLL TELEPHONE SERVICE 1. The Commission has before it for of conflict between it and the Florida consideration (a) the above-captioned proposals. Memorandum Opinion and Order applications; (b) an amendment to the (e) On October 28, 1966, the Florida Regarding Procedural Dates Tenneessee Valley application, tendered applications were d esig n a ted for 1. The Hearing Examiner has for con­ for filing on June 13, 1966; and (c) an hearing. sideration a motion for deferment of “Application for Review,” filed by Rocket 3. We do not find, on the basis of these hearing schedule filed by Bell System on City in response to the Commission’s facts, that Rocket City is entitled, as a December 29,1966, together with a letter previous refusal to accept the Rocket matter of right, to acceptance and con­ dated December 28, 1966, addressed to City application for filing. sideration of its application with the 2. Rocket City’s present request that Tennessee Valley and Fine Music pro­ the Hearing Examiner by counsel for posals. Notwithstanding any subsequent Carter.1 its application be accepted for filing has 2. Movant seeks continuance of the been considered in the light of the fol­ developments, the fact remains that, on procedural dates in this hearing pending lowing facts: the date of its original tender, Rocket resolution of certain pleadings which (a) The Rocket City application was City failed to include evidence sufficient have been filed by Carter. It further originally tendered on May 10, 1965. It to warrant a conclusion that there was asserts that all parties have authorized was returned as unacceptable on June no conflict between the Florida and Fine it to state that they do not oppose a grant 16, 1965, on the ground that it had been Music applications. For that reason, the of the motion and that they consent to tendered too late for comparative con­ Rocket City application was properly sideration with other applications with found to be unacceptable for filing. immediate consideration thereof. Car­ 4. Although Rocket City’s subsequent ter’s letter avers that it does not oppose which it was mutually exclusive because a reasonable continuance of the hearing, of interlinking prohibited overlap of submission (on July 16,1965) of adequate contours. Sections 1.571(c) and 73.37 measurement data and our separate con­ but suggests that it be rescheduled for solidation of the Florida applications do March 1, 1967. of the Commission’s rules. Specifically, 3. Good cause has been shown for a the Rocket City application involved not alter Rocket City’s rights in this mat­ grant of the requested relief. Without prohibited overlap with the Fine Music ter, they do argue forcefully for a waiver speculating as to the probable disposition application, which in turn appeared to of the “cut-off” rule and nunc pro tunc of Carter’s pending pleadings, it is prob­ involve prohibited overlap with applica­ acceptance of its application. When tions for stations at Blountstown and Rocket City first tendered its applica­ able that this record would be kept open tion, the best available data on file indi­ until after they have been acted upon. Quincy, Fla. The lead “cut-off” date for ail these applications was that of the cated that the Florida and Fine Music Thus, little time could be saved by adher­ proposals involved an engineering con­ ing to the present schedule, and a more Quincy, Fla., application—February 15, 1965.1 Since the Rocket City application flict necessitating a hearing and that, by orderly record may be developed if fur­ virtue of this conflict, the “cut-off” date ther proceedings are stayed until the fi­ had been tendered after that date, it was found to be untimely even though it was of the Quincy proposal precluded accept­ nal scope of the issues becomes clear. ance of Rocket City’s application. The However, since it is impossible to predict tendered on the published “cut-off” date of the Fine Music application. absence of this conflict, however, is no the time which will be required to dis­ longer subject to dispute since the Fine pose of Carter’s pleadings, it would be (b) In an effort to avert that result, Rocket City included, in its original ap­ Music, Inc. amendment of June 13, 1966 inappropriate to attempt to set a specific and, therefore, we are persuaded to waive date at this time. plication, field intensity measurements purporting to show that there was no the “cut-off” rule on our own motion Accordingly, it is ordered, This 3d day and to accept the application for filing. of January 1967, that the subject motion engineering conflict between the Florida proposals and Fine Music. Thus, Rocket 5. As indicated above, the Commission is granted, and all procedural dates here­ also has before it an amendment ten­ tofore established are continued pending City argued, the early Quincy, Fla., “cut­ dered on June 13, 1966, by Tennessee further order. off” date did not bar acceptance of its application. Rocket City concluded that, Valley, changing the antenna and trans­ Released: January 3, 1967. mitter location and the proposed direc­ since its application was tendered on or tional radiation pattern. Examination F ederal Communications before the published “cut-off” dates of of that amendment indicates that it does Commission, the Fine Music and Tennessee applica­ not afford adequate protection to co­ [seal] B en F. W aple, tions, it should be accepted for filing. By channel Class I-B Station WCFL, Chi­ Secretary. letter dated June 16, 1965, the Commis­ sion rejected Rocket City’s application cago, HI., in that, at an azimuth of 19 [FH. Doc. 67-134; Filed, Jan. 6, 1967; degrees true, the proposed radiation is 8:47 am.] on the ground that its measurement data approximately 20 mv/m in excess of that were not adequate to establish the ab­ permitted by § 73.187 of the Commis­ sence of a conflict between the Florida sion’s rules. Accordingly, Tennessee [Docket Nos. 17058—17060; FCC 66—1148] and Fine Music proposals. Valley’s June 13, 1966, amendment will (c) On July 16, 1965, Rocket City re­ FINE MUSIC, INC. (WFMI) ET AL. tendered its application with new meas­ be returned as unacceptable for filing. Memorandum Opinion and Order urement data demonstrating that, on the 6. The Commission finds that the Designating Applications for Con­ date of original tender of its application, above-captioned applications are mutu­ solidated Hearing on Stated Issues no prohibited overlap existed between the ally exclusive because of interlinking Fine Music and Florida proposals. With prohibited overlap and hence must be In re applications of Fine Music, Inc. its retendered application, Rocket City designated for hearing in a consolidated (WFMI), Montgomery, Ala., Docket No. submitted an “Application for Review”, 17058, File No. BP-16502; Has: 1500 kc, requesting that the Commission recon­ proceeding; and that, except as indicate 500 w, Day, Class n, Requests: 1000 kc, sider its previous refusal to accept the by the issues specified below, each of the 5 kw, Day, Class II; Tennessee Valley application. applicants is legally, technically, finan­ Broadcasting Co., Inc., Huntsville, Ala., cially, and otherwise qualified to con­ Docket No. 17059, File No. BP-16609; iThe published cut-off dates were: (a) D. struct and operate as proposed. Requests: 1000 kc, 10 kw, DA, Day, Class & F. Broadcasting Co. (Quincy, Fla.; File No. 7. For the following reasons, an issue II; Rocket City Broadcasting Co., Inc., BP-16431), Feb. 15, 1965; (b) Fine Music, will be specified as to Rocket City’s finan­ Huntsville, Ala.; Docket No. 17060, File Inc. (WFMI, Montgomery, Ala.; File No. BP- 16502), May 10, 1965; (c) The Maupin Broad­ cial qualifications to construct and op­ 1 The letter, copies of which were mailed to casting Co. (WKMK, Blountstown, Fla.; File erate as proposed: The figures s u b m itte d counsel of record for all parties, is considered No. BP-16600), Aug. 17, 1965; (d) Tennessee by Rocket City indicate its p r o p o s a ls for the purposes of this order as a reply to Valley Broadcasting Co., Inc. (Huntsville, initial construction and first-year op the Bell System motion. Ala.; File No. BP-16609), Aug. 17, 1965.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 NOTICES 99 erating expenses will total $128,960.* It these expenses it proposes to reply upon operating revenues may be relied upon proposes to meet these expenses by re­ an $18,900 bank loan and net operating to yield, necessary funds for the initial liance upon $2,000 of existing capital, profits. However, the applicant’s bal­ construction cost of the proposal. $8,000 to be obtained through the sale of ance sheet is more than 2 years old, as c. Whether, in the light of the evi­ capital stock, and $74,000 to be loaned to are the credit commitment letter from dence adduced pursuant to items 5-a it by its principals. However, the bal­ the equipment manufacturer and the and 5-2, Fine Music is financially ance sheets submitted by the stock sub­ loan commitment letter from the bank. qualified. scribers and prospective lenders are in Moreover, the October 1964 balance 6. To determine, with respect to the each case more than a year old, as are sheet submitted by the applicant indi­ Rocket City financial proposal: the credit commitment letters from the cates current liabilities well in excess of a. The availability to the applicant of equipment manufacturer (to Rocket current assets. Furthermore, the appli­ credit from an equipment manufacturer, City) and from a local bank (to one of cant states that, during the 2 years pre­ as described in. the application. the prospective lenders, who proposes to ceding the filing of its application, 1962 b. The availability to the applicant of rely upon it as a source of funds for his and 1963, it suffered net losses of, re­ $8,000 which it proposes to obtain from loan). Because of the absence of more spectively, $13,962 and $21,326.84. Both the sale of capital stock to its principals, current supporting documentation, a because of the absence of more current and $74,000 which it proposes to obtain question exists as to the availability of documentation and the adverse financial from loans to it by. its principals. the above-mentioned funds. Even as­ data contained in the material supplied c. Assuming that all of the funds upon suming, however, that such funds are by the applicant, a question exists as to which the applicant relies will be avail­ available to the extent claimed, i.e., the availability to Fine Music, of the able to it, how the applicant will obtain $84,000, some $45,000 more will be needed contemplated equipment credit and bank sufficient additional funds to construct to cover expenses totaling $128,960. loan. Also, the applicant has failed to and operate the proposed station for 1 8. A financial issue will also be spec­ indicate, in any detail, the basis for its year. ified, for the following reasons, as to the firstryear revenue estimate of $64,000. In d. Whether, in the light of the evidence financial qualifications of Tennessee view of that fact, the Commission is un­ adduced pursuant to items 6-a through Valley to construct and operate as pro­ able to appraise the reasonableness of 6-c, Rocket City is financially qualified. posed: Figures submitted by Tennessee Fine Music’s revenue estimate and the 7. To determine, with respect to the Valley indicate that applicant’s initial extent to which revenue in excess of Tennessee Valley financial proposal: construction and first-year operating ex­ operating costs (net operating profits) a. The availability to the applicant of penses will total $156,886.® Tennessee can be relied upon to meet its initial con­ credit from an equipment manufacturer, Valley proposes to meet these expenses struction expenses. as described in the application. by reliance upon $12,000 existing capital, 10. The site photographs submitted b. The availability to the applicant of obtained from the sale of capital stock; by Tennessee Valley and Rocket City do $45,000 which it proposes to obtain from $45,000 to be loaned to it by stockholders; not adequately show the terrain in the loans to it by stockholders, and $66,500 and an open line of credit of $66,500 from vicinity of the proposed transmitter sites which it proposes to obtain via bank a bank. However, the balance sheets and therefore an issue will be included. loans. submitted by the prospective lenders are In view of the foregoing: It is ordered, c. Assuming that all of the funds upon in each case more than a year old, as are That, pursuant to section 309(e) of the which the applicant relies will be avail­ the credit commitment letters to the Communications Act of 1934, as able to it, how the applicant will obtain applicant from the equipment manufac­ amended, the applications are designated sufficient additional funds to construct turer and the bank. Because of the ab­ for hearings in a consolidated proceed­ and operate the proposed station for 1 sence of more current supporting docu­ ing, at a time and place to be specified year. mentation, a question exists as to the in a subsequent order, upon the follow­ d. Whether, in the light of the evi­ availability of funds. Even assuming, ing issues: dence adduced pursuant to items 7-a moreover, that such funds are available 1. To determine the areas and popula­ through 7-c, Tennessee Valley is financi­ to the extent claimed, i.e., $123,500, some tions which would receive primary serv­ ally qualified. $33,383 more will be needed to cover ex­ ice from the Tennessee Valley and 8. To determine whether the sites penses totaling $156,886. Rocket City proposals, and the availa­ proposed by Tennessee Valley and Rocket 9. A financial qualification issue will bility of other primary service to such City are satisfactory. also be specified regarding the Fine areas and populations. 9. To determine, in the light of the Music application. Fine Music estimates 2. To determine the areas and popula­ evidence adduced pursuant to the fore­ that the cost of construction of its pro­ tions which may be expected to gain or going issues, which, if any, of the ap­ posal will total $36,770, that its operating lose service from the proposed operation plications should be granted. expense for the first year after the pro­ of Station WFMI, Montgomery, Ala., It is further ordered, That the above- posed WFMI modification will be $42,000, and the availability of other primary captioned Rocket City Broadcasting Co., and that its first-year revenue will be service to such areas and populations. Inc., application is accepted for filing, $64,000. The figures submitted by Fine 3. To determine, in the light of section nunc pro tunc, as of May 10, 1965. Music indicate that its initial construc­ 307(b) of the Communications Act of It is further ordered, That the “Ap­ tion expenses will total $24,154/ To meet 1934, as amended, which of the proposals plication for Review” submitted by would best provide a fair, efficient, and Rocket City Broadcasting Co., Inc., is t first-year operating expense, equitable distribution of radio service. granted to the extent indicated above $81,629; and (b) initial construction ex­ 4. To determine, in the event it is con­ and is denied in all other respects. pense, $47,332, consisting of (1) 25 percent cluded that a choice between the appli­ flown payment for equipment, $11,262; (2) It is further ordered, That the amend­ rst year’s monthly payments (10) for equip­ cations should not be based solely on ment tendered for filing on June 13,1966, ment, $11,070; (3) building, $15,000; and (4) considerations relating to section 307(b), by Tennessee Valley Broadcasting Co., miscellaneous, $1 0 ,0 0 0 . which of the operations proposed in the Inc., is returned. nmonX first-year operating expenses, above-captioned applications would It is further ordered, That, in the event Lo and (P) initial construction costs, best serve the public interest. of a grant of any of the above-captioned . consisting of (1) down payment for 5. To determine, with respect to the applications, the construction permit quipment, $13,250; (2) first-year’s monthly Fine Music financial proposal: shall contain the following condition: P ^ f nts (12) for equipment, $15,636; (3) a. The availability to the applicant of Pending a final decision in Docket No. $10 000^' and (4) miscellaneous, credit from an equipment manufacturer, 14419 with respect to presunrise opera­ and a loan from a bank, as described in pmiw?nsisiing of down payment for tion with daytime facilities, the present S j ? ? * $5’563: (to first year’s monthly the application. provisions of § 73.87 of the Commission’s hnn?entS for equipment, $5,190; (c) b. The basis for the applicant’s rules are not extended to this authoriza­ $1 onn.nS/ ^4,000: (d) down payment for land, estimate of revenues in its first year of tion, and such operation is precluded. $2 0 7 i’

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 100 NOTICES present evidence on the issues specified (c) of the Commission’s rules, in per­ censes; and Tesco Communications, El Centro, Calif., Docket No. 17068; for au­ in this order ; and son or by attorney, shall, within 20 days It is further ordered, That the Chief, of the mailing of this order, file with thorizations in the business radio service. At a session of the Federal Commu­ Safety and Special Radio Services Bu­ the Commission in triplicate, a written reau, and the Chief, Field Engineering appearance stating an intention to ap­ nications Commission held at its offices in Washington, D.C., on the 21st day of Bureau, shall, within 10 days after the pear on the date fixed for the hearing release of this order, furnish Bills of and present evidence on the issues spec­ December 1966, the Commission had un­ der consideration (1) the captioned ap­ Particulars to the applicants herein set­ ified in this order. ting forth the basis for the above issues. It is further ordered, That the appli­ plications and (2) the Commission’s field cants herein shall, pursuant to section inquiry with respect to radio activities Released: December 29,1966. 311(a) (2) of the Communications Act of of Tesco Communications and Arch F ederal Communications 1934, as amended, and § 1.594 of the Thistle, one of the two Tesco partners. Commission,1 ' Commission’s rules, give notice of the 1. There is a substantial question as [seal] B en F. W aple, hearing, either individually or, if feasible to whether Arch Thistle and Tesco Secretary. Communications have operated radio and consistent with the rules, jointly, [F.R. Doc. 67-137; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; within the time and in the manner pre­ transmitting equipment in violation of 8:47 am.] scribed in such rule, and shall advise the section 301 of the Communications Act Commission of the publication of such of 1934, as amended. notice as required by § 1.594(g) of the 2. There is a substantial question as rules. to whether Thistle and Tesco Commu­ FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION nications have directed and advised Adopted: December 15,1966. [Independent Ocean Freight Forwarder others in the unlicensed operation of License No. 352] Released: December 30,1966. radio equipment. 3. In view of those questions, the ACOSTA SHIPPING CORP. F ederal Communications Commission is unable to find that a Commission,® grant of the captioned applications would Order To Show Cause [seal] B en F. W aple, serve the public interest, convenience On December 16, 1966, the St. Paul Secretary. and necessity and must, therefore, desig­ Mercury Insurance Co. notified the Com­ [F.R. Doc. 67-135*. Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; nate the applications for hearing. mission that the surety bond filed pur­ 8:47 am.] 4. Except for the issues specified here­ suant to section 44(c), Shipping Act, in, tiie applicants are otherwise qualified. 1916 (46 U.S.C. 841b) by Acosta Shipping Corp., 38 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. [Docket Nos. 17058-17060; FCC 66M-1757] Therefore, it is ordered, Pursuant to section 309(e) of the Communications 10064, would be canceled effective 12:01 FINE MUSIC, INC. (WFMI) ET AL. Act of 1934, as amended, and § 1.84 of the a.m., January 15, 1967. Commission’s rules, that the captioned Section 44(c) of the Shipping Act, Order Scheduling Hearing applications are designated for consoli­ 1916 (46 U.S.C. 841b) and § 510.5(f) of In re applications of Fine Music, Inc. dated hearing at a time and place to be General Order 4 (46 CFR) provide that (WFMI), Montgomery, Ala., Docket No. specified by subsequent order, upon the no license shall remain in force unless 17058, File No. BP-1'6502; Tennessee Val­ following issues: such forwarder shall have furnished a ley Broadcasting Co., Inc., Huntsville, (a) To determine whether Tesco Com­ bond. Ala., Docket No. 17059, File No. BP- munications, Arch Thistle, or both, oper­ Section 44(d) of the Shipping Act, 16609; Rocket City Broadcasting Co., ated radio apparatus in violation of sec­ 1916 (46 U.S.C. 841b) provides that li­ Huntsville, Ala., Docket No. 17060, File tion 301 of the Communications Act of censes may, after notice and hearing, No. BP-16721; for standard broadcast 1934, as amended ; be suspended or revoked for willful construction permits. (b) To determine whether Tesco Com­ failure to comply with any provision of It is ordered, This 21st day of Decem­ munications, Arch Thistle, or both, the Act, or with any lawful rule of the ber 1966, that Millard F. French shall caused the operation by others of radio Commission promulgated thereunder. serve as Presiding Officer in the above- apparatus without a license, in viola­ Now, therefore, by virtue of authority entitled proceedings; that the hearings tion of section 301 of the Communica­ vested in me by the Federal Maritime therein shall be convened on January 31, tions Act of 1934, as amended; Commission, as set forth in Manual of 1967, at 10 a.m.; and that a prehearing (c) To determine whether Tesco Com­ Orders, Commission Order 201.1 (re­ conference shall be held on January 17, munications, Arch Thistle, or both, vised) section 6.03: 1967, commencing at 9 a.m.: And, it is caused the operation of radio apparatus It is ordered, That Acosta Shipping further ordered, That all proceedings at locations other than those specified in Corp., on or before January 9, 1966, shall be held in the offices of the Com­ the instruments of authorization there­ either (1) submit a valid bond effective mission, Washington, D.C. for, in violation of section 301 of the on or before January 15, 1967, or (2) Communications Act of 1934, as amend­ show cause in writing or request a hear­ Released: December 30, 1966. ed, and the Commission’s rules ; ing to be held at 10 a.m. on January 13. F ederal Communications (d) To determine whether, in the light 1967, in Room 505, Federal Maritime Commission, of the evidence adduced with respect to Commission, 1321 H Street NW., Wash­ [ seal] B en F. W aple, the foregoing issues, Arch Thistle and ington, D.C. 20573, to show cause why its Secretary. Tesco Communications possess the req­ license should not be suspended ^e” uisite qualifications to be licensees of the voked pursuant to section 44(d) Ship­ [FJl. Doc. 67-136; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; 8:47 a.m.] Commission; ping Act, 1916. .. (e) To determine whether, in the light It is further ordered, That License no. of the evidence adduced with respect to 352 be forthwith revoked if the licensee [Docket Nos. 17067,17068; FCC 66-1181] the foregoing issues, the grant of the fails to comply with this order. captioned applications would serve the It is further ordered, That a copy oi ARCH THISTLE AND TESCO public interest, convenience, and ne- this order to show cause and all subse­ COMMUNICATIONS cessity • quent orders in this matter be served Order Designating Applications for It is further ordered, That, to avail upon the licensee and be published i themselves of the opportunity to be ederal egister Consolidated Hearing on Stated the F R . heard, the applicants herein, pursuant James E. Mazure, Issues to § 1.221 of the Commission’s rules, in Director, In re applications of Arch Thistle, El person or by attorney, shall within 20 Bureau of Domestic Regulation. Centro, Calif., Docket No. 17067; for re­ days Of the mailing of this order file with [F .R . D o c . 6 7 -1 2 6 ; Filed, Jan. 5, newal of radiotelephone first class and the Commission in triplicate a written 8:46 a.m.] radiotelegraph second class operator li- appearance stating an intent to appear 1 Commissioner Wadsworth absent. 6 Commissioner Wadsworth absent. on the date fixed for the hearing and FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 NOTICES 101 [Independent Ocean Freight Forwarder mission, Washington, D.C. 20573, within H. A. Gogarty, Inc., New Orleans, License No. 261] 20 days after publication of this notice La., and C. H. Powell Co., Inc., BROAD STREET FORWARDERS, INC. in the F ederal R egister. A copy of any New York, N.Y______FF-3235 such statement or request for a hearing Buchholz, & Kuttruff, Inc., New Or­ Order To Show Cause leans, La., and D. Hauser, Inc., should also be forwarded to each of the New York, N.Y______FF-3236 On December 16, 1966, the Royal In­ parties to the agreement (as indicated W. G. Carroll & Co., Inc., Atlanta, demnity Co. notified the Commission hereinafter), and the comments should Ga„ and Pafco Forwarders, Inc., that the surety bond filed pursuant to indicate that this has been done. Miami, Fla______FF-3237 section 44(c), Shipping Act, 1916 (46 Unless otherwise indicated, these John W. Newton, Jr., Beaumont, U.S.C. 841b) by Broad Street Forwarders, agreements are nonexclusive, cooperative Tex., and Universal Transconti­ working agreements under which the nental Corp., New York, N.Y_____ FF-3238 Inc., 1212 Avenue of the Americas, New Samuel Shapiro & Co., Baltimore, York, N.Y. 10036, would be canceled parties may perform freight forwarding Md., and Bernadine Shipping Co., effective 12:01 a.m„ January 15, 1967. services for each other. Forwarding and Inc., New York, N.Y______FF-3239 Section 44(c) of the Shipping Act, 1916 service fees are to be agreed upon on each (46 U.S.C. 841b) and § 510.5(f) of Gen­ transaction. Ocean freight compensa­ Dated: January 3, 1967. eral Order 4 (46 CFR) provide that no tion is to be divided as agreed between the Thomas Lis i, license shall remain in force unless such parties. Secretary. forwarder shall have furnished a bond. J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc., New York, [F.R. Doc. 67-128; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; Section 44(d) of the Shipping Act, 1916 N.Y., and Circle Forwarders, Inc., 8:46 a.m.] (46 U.S.C. 841b) provides that licenses Detroit, Mich______FF-3213 Dever, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., and J. may, after notice and hearing, be sus­ R. Michels, Inc., Houston, Tex___ FF-3214 pended or revoked for willful failure to J. S. Lipinski Co., Baltimore, Md., comply with any provision of the Act, and C. H. Powell Co., Inc., New FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION or with any lawful rule of the Commis­ York, N.Y______FF-3215 [Docket Nos. CS67-28—CS67-30] sion promulgated thereunder. A. A. Barone Forwarding, New Or­ Now, therefore, by virtue of authority leans, La., and Express Forwarding LESH CO. ET AL. vested in me by the Federal Maritime & Storage Co., Inc., New York, Commission, as set forth in Manual of N.Y------FF-3216 Notice of Applications for “Small Waters Shipping Co., Wilmington, Producer” Certificates 1 Orders, Commission Order 201.1 (re­ N.C., and C. H. Powell Co., Inc., vised) section 6.03: New York, N.Y______FF-3217 D ecember 28, 1966. It is ordered, That Broad Street For­ H. A. Gogarty, Inc., New York, N.Y., Lesh Company, Docket No. CS67-28; warders, Inc., on or before January 6, and Carson M. Simon & Co., Phila­ sWm.;R. Wray, Docket No. CS67-29; 1967, either (1) submit a valid bond delphia, Pa______FF-3218 George D. Gould, Trustee, Docket No. effective on or before January 15, 1967, C. H. Powell Co., Inc., New York, CS67-30. or (2) show cause in writing or request N.Y., and F. J. Herbelin Forward­ a hearing to be held at 10 a.m. on Janu­ ing Co., Inc., Houston, Tex. Take notice that on December 14,1966, (Branches) ______FF-3219 Lesh Co., 109 West Austin, Kermit, Tex. ary 11,1967, in Room 505, Federal Mari­ Freedman & Slater, Inc., New York, 79745, on December 16, 1966, Wm. R. time Commission, 1321 H Street NW., N.Y., and Fillette, Green & Oo., Wray, 1612 West 23d, Odessa, Tex. 79760, Washington, D.C. 20573, to show cause Inc., Pensacola, Fla______FF-3220 and on December 19, 1966, George D. why its license should not be suspended Wilfred Schade & Co., Inc., Newport Gould, Trustee, 1509 West Wall Street, or revoked pursuant to section 44(d) News, Va„ and Atlantis Shipping Shipping Act, 1916. Co., Ltd., New York, N.Y______FF-3221 Midland, Tex. 79701, filed in Docket Nos. It is further ordered, That License No. R. J. Bolte, Philadelphia, Pa., and CS67-28, CS67-29, and CS67-30, respec­ 261 be forthwith revoked if the licensee Alro Forwarding Co., Ltd., New tively, applications pursuant to section fails to comply with this order. York, N.Y------FF-3222. 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act and § 157.40 Marine Agency of Tampa, Inc., of the regulations thereunder for “small It is further ordered, That a copy of Tampa, Fla., and Intercontinental producer” certificates of public conven­ this order to show cause and all subse­ Forwarders, Inc., Miami, Fla_____ FF-3223 ience and necessity authorizing the sale quent orders in this matter be served Luiga Serra, Inc., New York, N.Y., upon the licensee and be published in and The J. D. Richardson Co., for resale and delivery of natural gas in the Federal Register. Detroit, Mich______FF-3224 interstate commerce from the Permian Luiga Serra, Inc., New York, N.Y., Basin area of Texas and New Mexico, all James E. Mazure, and Ray C. Fischer Co., Inc., Min­ as more fully set forth in the applica­ Director, neapolis, Minn______FF-3225 tions which are on file with the Commis­ Bureau of Domestic Regulation. Ralph Vails, Corpus Christ!, Tex., sion and open to public inspection. and Barr Shipping Co., Inc., New Protests or petitions to intervene may [F.R. Doc. 67-127; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; York, N.Y------FF-3226 8:46 a.m.] William H. Masson, Inc., Baltimore, be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ Md., and Gerhard & Hey Co., Inc. sion, Washington, D.C. 20426, in accord­ and Intersped, Inc., New York, ance with the rules of practice and pro­ J. E. BERNARD & CO., INC. ET AL. N.Y ------t FF-3227 cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before Heemsoth-Kerner Corp., New York,* January 16, 1967. Notice of Agreements Filed for N.Y., and Godwin Shipping Co., Take further notice that, pursuant to Approval Inc., Mobile, Ala______FF-3228 the authority contained in and subject John S. Connor, Inc., Baltimore, to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Notice is is hereby given that the fol- Md., and Marion International, wing freight forwarder cooperative Inc., New York, N.Y______FF-3229 Federal Power Commission by sections Seaway Forwarding Co., Cleveland, 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the woriong agreements have been filed with Commission's rules of practice and pro­ ^ e Commission for approval pursuant Ohio, and Pafco Forwarders, Inc., w section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, Miami, Fla------FF-3230 cedure, a hearing will be held without W. O. Smith & Co., Inc., Norfolk, further notice before the Commission on 4fin2e«ded*6 U.S.C. 814). (39 stat- 733> 75 Stat. 7g3, Va., and Trans-Atlantic Shipping all applications in which no protest or Co., Ltd., New York, N.Y______FF-3231 petition to intervene is filed within the J e s t e d parties may inspect and ob- United Forwarders Service, Miami, time required herein, if the Commission nJL* of the agreements at the Fla., and Natural Nydegger Trans­ Washington office of the Federal Mari- port Corp., New York, N.Y______FF-3232 on its own review of the matter believes ¿^S^^sslon, 1321 H Street NW., Natural Nydegger Transport Corp., that a grant of the certificates is re­ New York, N.Y., and John S. Con­ quired by the public convenience and an Comments with reference to nor, Inc., Baltimore, Md______FF-3233 heari^fe^1^nt includinS a request for A. J. Arango, Inc., Tampa, Fla., and 1 This notice does not provide for consoli­ thA desired, may be submitted to C. H. Powell Co., Inc., New York, dation for hearing of the several matters Secretary, Federal Maritime Com­ N.Y ------FF—3234 covered herein, nor should it be so construed.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 102 NOTICES provided in section 3304 of the Internal necessity. Where a protest or petition Dated at Washington, D.C. this 29th day of December 1966. Revenue Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. 3304) , for leave to intervene is timely filed, or are hereby certified, pursuant to para­ where the Commission on its own mo­ By order of the Board of Governors.2 graph (1) of section 3303(b) of the In­ tion believes that a formal hearing is [seal! Merritt S herman, ternal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. required, further notice of such hearing Secretary. 3303(b)(1)), to the Secretary of the will be duly given. Treasury for the taxable year 1966. Under the procedure herein provided [F.R. Doc. 67-102; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; for, unless otherwise advised, it will be 8:45 a.m.] Alabama. Montana. unnecessary for Applicants to appear or Alaska. Nebraska. Arizona. Nevada. be represented at the hearing. Arkansas. New Hampshire. Gordon M. Grant, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR California. New Jersey. Acting Secretary. Colorado. New Mexico. Office of the Secretary Connecticut. New York. JF.R. Doc. 67-100; Piled, Jan. 5, 1967; Delaware. North Carolina. 8:45 a.m.] UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION District of Columbia. North Dakota. Florida. Ohio. Certification of States to Secretary Georgia. Oklahoma. of the Treasury Hawaii. Oregon. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Idaho. Pennsylvania. Pursuant to section 3304(a) of the In­ Illinois. Rhode Island. COMMERCIAL BANCORP, INC. ternal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 JJ.S.C. Indiana. South Carolina. 3304(a)) the unemployment compensa­ Iowa. South Dakota. Order Approving Application Under tion laws of the following States have Kansas. Tennessee. Bank Holding Company Act Kentucky. Texas. heretofore been approved: Louisiana. Utah. In the matter of the application of Alabama. Montana. Maine. Vermont. Commercial Bancorp, Inc., Miami, Fla., Alaska. Nebraska. Maryland. Virginia. for approval of the acquisition of voting Arizona. Nevada. Massachusetts. Washington.1 shares of Bank of Palm Beach and Trust Arkansas. New Hampshire. Michigan. West Virginia. California. New Jersey. Minnesota. Wisconsin. Co., Palm Beach, Fla. Colorado. New Mexico. Mississippi. Wyoming. There has come before the Board of Connecticut. New York. Missouri. Governors, pursuant to section 3(a) of Delaware. North Carolina. the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 District of Columbia. North Dakota. W. W illard W irtz, (12 U.S.C. 1842(a), as amended by Pub­ Florida. Ohio. Secretary of Labor. lic Law 89-485), and § 222.4(a) of Fed­ Georgia. Oklahoma. Hawaii. Oregon. D ecember 31,1966. eral Reserve Regulation Y (12 CFR 222.4 Pennsylvania. (a)), an application by Commercial Idaho. [F.R. Doc. 67-110; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; Illinois. Puerto Rico. 8:45 am.] Bancorp, Inc., Miami, Fla., a registered Indiana. Rhode Island. bank holding company, for the Board’s Iowa. South Carolina. Kansas. South Dakota. approval of the acquisition of a mini­ Kentucky. Tennessee. mum of 80 percent of the outstanding Louisiana. Texas. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE voting shares of Bank of Palm Beach Maine. Utah. Maryland. Vermont. COMMISSION and Trust Co., Palm Beach, Fla. Massachusetts. Virginia. As required by section 3(b) of the Act, Michigan. Washington. [File No. 0-592] the Board notified the Comptroller of Minnesota. West Virginia. Mississippi. Wisconsin. PAKCO COMPANIES, INC. the State of Florida of receipt of the ap­ Missouri. Wyoming. plication and requested his views and Order Suspending Trading recommendation thereon. The State In accordance with the provisions of section 3304(c) of the Internal Revenue D ecember 29,1966. Comptroller recommended approval of Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. 3304(c)), I here­ It appearing to the Securities and Ex­ the application. by certify the foregoing States to the change Commission that the summary Notice of receipt of the application was Secretary of the Treasury for the taxable suspension of trading in the common published in the Federal R egister on year 1966. stock of Pakco Companies, Inc., and all October 21, 1966 (31 F.R. 13624), which W. W illard Wirtz, other securities of Pakco Companies, Secretary of Labor. provided an opportunity for submission Inc., being traded otherwise than on a national securities exchange is required D ecember 31,1966. of comments and views regarding the in the public interest and for the protec­ application. Time for filing such com­ [F.R. Doc. 67-109; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; 8:45 am.] tion of investors: ic ments and views has expired and all It is ordered, Pursuant to section id comments and views filed with the Board (c) (5) of the Securities Exchange Act oi have been considered by it. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 1934, that trading in such securities It is hereby ordered, For the reasons otherwise than on a national securities Certification of State Laws to exchange be summarily suspended, this set forth in the Board’s statement1 of Secretary of the Treasury order to be effective for the period De­ this date, that said application be and cember 30, 1966, through January », hereby is approved: Provided, That the The unemployment compensation laws 1967, both dates inclusive. of the States listed below, having been acquisition so approved shall not be con­ certified pursuant to paragraph (3) of By the Commission. summated (a) before the 30th calendar section 3303(b) of the Internal Revenue day following the date of this order or [ seal] Orval L. D uBois, Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. 3303(b) (3)) and Secretary. (b) later than 3 months after the date each of the States so listed having been of the order. certified by me to the Secretary of the [F.R. Doc. 67-111; Filed, Jan. 5, l967' Treasury for the taxable year 1966 as 8:45 a.m.] 1 Filed as part of the original document. 2Voting for this action: Governors Rob­ Copies available upon request to the Board i No reduced rates were allowed to em- of Governors of the. Federal Reserve System, ertson, Shepardson, Mitchell, Daane, Maisel, and Brimmer. Absent and not voting: loyers for taxable year 1966 under the nn- Washington, D.C. 20551, or to the Federal nployment compensation law of this fat Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Chairman Martin.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 NOTICES 103 by Commission order which will be served Evansville, Ind., and Louisville, Ky. INTERSTATE COMMERCE on each party of record. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, The publications hereinafter set forth applicant requests it be held at Colum­ COMMISSION reflect the scope of the applications as bus, Ohio, Indianapolis, Ind., or Wash­ [Notice 1010] filed by applicants, and may include de­ ington, D.C. scriptions, restrictions, or limitations No. MC 5888 (Sub-No. 27), filed De­ MOTOR CARRIER, BROKER, WATER which are not in a form acceptable to cember 12, 1966. Applicant: MID­ CARRIER AND FREIGHT FOR­ the Commission. Authority which ulti­ AMERICAN TRUCK LINES, INC., 900 WARDER APPLICATIONS mately may be granted as a result of the North Indiana Avenue, Kansas City, Mo. applications here noticed will not neces­ 64120. Applicant’s representative: Rob­ D ecember 30,1966. sarily reflect the phraseology set forth ert D. Schuler, Suite 1700, 1 Woodward The following applications are gov­ in the application as filed, but also will Avenue, Detroit, Mich. 48226. Authority erned by Special Rule 1.2471 of the eliminate any restrictions which are not sought to operate as a common carrier, Commission’s general rules of practice acceptable to the Commission. by motor vehicle, over regular routes, (49 CPR, as amended), published in the No. MC 844 (Sub-No. 5), filed Decem­ transporting: General commodities (ex­ F ederal Register issue of April 20, 1966, ber 16, 1966. Applicant: C. O. HAY, do­ cept those of unusual value, classes A effective May 20, 1966. These rules pro­ ing business as HAY TRUCKING CO., and B explosives, household goods as de­ vide, among other things, that a protest 954 Barton Street, Memphis, Term. Ap­ fined by the Commission, commodities in to the granting of an application must be plicant’s representative : R. Connor Wig­ bulk, and those requiring special equip*- filed with the Commission within 30 days gins, Jr., Suite 909,100 North Main Build­ ment), serving the plantsite of Ford after date of notice of filing of the ap­ ing, Memphis, Tenn. 38103. Authority Motor Co. on Sheldon Road, Plymouth plication is published in the F ederal sought to operate as a common carrier, Township, Wayne County, Mich., as an R e g ist e r . Failure seasonably to file a by motor vehicle, over regular routes, off-route point in connection with appli­ protest will be construed as a waiver of transporting: General commodities (ex­ cant’s authorized service to and from opposition and participation in the pro­ cept those of unusual value, classes A and Detroit, Mich. N ote: If a hearing is ceeding. A protest under these rules B explosives, household goods as defined deemed necessary, applicant requests it should comply with § 1.247(d) (3) of the by the Commission, commodities in bulk, be held at Lansing, Mich. rules of practice which requires that it and commodities requiring special equip­ No. MC 9268 (Sub-No. 11), filed set forth specifically the grounds upon ment), between Brinkley and Lonoke, December 16,1966. Applicant: ALBERT which it is made, contain a detailed Ark., over U.S. Highway 70 (also over FILLMORE, doing business as FILL­ statement of protestant’s interest in the Interstate Highway 40), serving the in­ MORE TRANSPORTATION, 132 West proceeding (including a copy of the termediate points of Carlisle and Hazen, Dudley town Road, Bloomfield, Conn. specific portions of its authority which Ark. Note: Applicant states it intends Applicant’s representative: Thomas W. Protestant believes to be in conflict with to tack at Brinkley, Ark., with presently Murrett, 410 Asylum Street, Hartford, that sought in the application, and de­ held authorized authority between Mem­ Conn. Authority sought to operate as a scribing in detail the method—whether phis, Tenn., and Brinkley, Ark. If a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over by joinder, interline, or other means— hearing is deemed necessary, applicant irregular routes, transporting: Meat and by which protestant would use such au­ requests it be held at Little Rock, Ark., meat products, in refrigerated vehicles, thority to provide all or part of the serv­ or Memphis, Tenn. from points in the New York, N.Y., com­ ice proposed), and shall specify with No. MC 2392 (Sub-No. 52), filed De­ mercial zone to Springfield, Mass., and particularity the facts, matters, and cember 19, 1966. Applicant: WHEELER points within 10 miles thereof. N ote: things relied upon, but shall not include TRANSPORT SERVICE, INC., Post Of­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ issues or allegations phrased generally. fice Box 432, Genoa, Nebr. Applicant’s cant requests it be held at New York, Protests not in reasonable compliance representative: Leonard A. Jaskiewicz, N.Y., or Hartford, Conn. with the requirements of the rules may Madison Building, 1155 15th Street NW., No. MC 11207 (Sub-No. 258), filed be rejected. The original and one (1) Washington, D.C. 20005. Authority December 12, 1966. Applicant: DEA­ copy of the protest shall be filed with the sought to operate as a common carrier, TON, INC., 3409 10th Avenue North, Commission, and a copy shall be served by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Birmingham, Ala. 35204. Applicant’s concurrently upon applicant’s represen­ transporting: Anhydrous ammonia and representative: A. Alvis Layne, Pennsyl­ tative, or applicant if no representative fertilizer solutions, in bulk, in tank vehi­ vania Building, Washington, D.C. 20004. is named. If the protest includes a re­ cles from the plantsite of Allied Chemical Authority sought to operate as a common quest for oral hearing, such requests Corp. located at Laplatte, Nebr., to points carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular shall meet the requirements of § 1.247 in Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Mis­ routes, transporting: Gypsum and gyp­ (d) (4) of the special rule, and shall in­ souri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South sum products, and building materials and clude the certification required therein. Dakota, and Wisconsin. Restricted au­ equipment, materials and supplies used in Section 1.247(f) of the Commission’s thority sought could not be combined or the manufacture or processing of gypsum rules of practice further provides that joined with any other authority now held products (except liquid commodities in each applicant shall, if protests to its by applicant. N ote : If a hearing is bulk), betweenx Savannah and Port application have been filed, and within deemed necessary, applicant requests it Wentworth, Ga., on the one hand, and, M) days of the date of this publication, be held at Washington, D.C. on the other, points in Alabama. N ote : notify the Commission in writing (1) that No. MC 2401 (Sub-No. 33), filed De­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ t is ready to proceed and prosecute the cember 15, 1966. Applicant: MOTOR cant requests it be held at Savannah or ,tPFu!fation’ or *-2) that it wishes to FREIGHT CORPORATION, 2345 South Atlanta, Ga. u aw the application, failure in 13th Street, Terre Haute, Ind. 47802. No. MC 11207 (Sub-No. 259), filed mch the application will be dismissed Applicant’s representative: John P. Mc­ oy the Commission. December 12, 1966. Applicant: DEA­ Mahon, 100 East Broad Street, Columbus, TON, INC., 3409 10th Avenue North, m^r«ther Processing steps (whether Ohio 43215. Authority sought to operate Birmingham, Ala. 35204. Applicant’s ained procedure, oral hearing, or other as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, representative: A. Alvis Layne, Pennsyl­ p cedures) will be determined generally over regular routes, transporting: Gen­ vania Building, Washington, D.C. 20004. accordance with the Commission’s eral commodities (except those of un­ Authority sought to operate as a common general Policy Statement Concerning usual value, dangerous explosives, house­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular nnhnfi, 9 a.rrier Licensing Procedures, hold goods as defined in Practices of routes, transporting: (1) Boards, build­ A,s"e^ m toe F ederal R egister issue Motor Common Carriers of Household ing wall, and/or insulating, and parts, May 3, 1966. This assignment will be Goods, 17 M.C.C. 467, commodities in materials and accessories incidental bulk, and those requiring special equip­ thereto; and (2) composition boards, and SPecial Rule 1.247 (as amended) ment) , serving points in Ohio and Muh­ parts, and materials and accessories in­ Internaltnmed by writinS to the Secretary, lenberg Counties, Ky., as off-route points cidental thereto, from the plantsite of ton. D S 2S S UnerCe Commlssion- Washing- in connection with applicant’s presently The Celotex Corp., located at Marrero, authorized regular route operations to La., to points in Florida. N ote: If a

No. 3----- s FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 104 NOTICES hearing is deemed necessary, applicant hold goods, as defined by the Commis­ rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular requests it be held at Washington, D.C., sion, commodities in bulk, commodities routes, transporting: (1) Foodstuffs, or Atlanta, Ga. requiring special equipment and those frozen or unfrozen, from Westfield, No. MC 13367 (Sub-No. 11), filed De­ injurious or contaminating to other lad­ Hamlin, Holley, and Williamson, N.Y., cember 19, 1966. Applicant: ROBERT ing, between St. Joseph and Kansas City, and North East and Erie, Pa., to points MERLEY, U.S. 20, Post Office Box 1312, Mo., on the one hand, and, on the other, in Virginia, and (2) foodstuffs, frozen or New Carlisle, Ind. 46552. Applicant’s points in Iowa (except Council Bluffs, unfrozen and carbonated beverages in representative: Wm. L. Carney, 105 East Red Oak, and Shenandoah), Hlinois (ex­ cans and glass bottles from Bergen, Oak- Jennings Avenue, South Bend, Ind. cept those in the Chicago, HI., commer­ field, Leroy, Mount Morris, Alton, South 46614. Authority sought to operate as cial zone, as defined by the Commission, Dayton, Phelps, Gorham, and Shorts- a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over and Springfield), points in Nebraska ville, N.Y., to points in Virginia. Note: irregular routes, transporting: (1) Fer­ (except Omaha), and points in Kansas, If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ tilizer, dry in bulk, from Plymouth, Ind., limited to (1) movements between points cant requests it be held at Washington, to points in the Lower Peninsula of on applicant’s regular routes in Missouri, D.C., or New York, N.Y. Michigan (except Allegan, Berrien, Iowa, Nebraska, and Kansas, on the one No. MC 52110 (Sub-No. 101), filed De­ Branch, Cass, Kalamazoo, Saint Joseph, hand, and, on the other, points in the cember 11, 1966. Applicant: BRADY Van Buren, Kalkaska, Mecosta, Mis­ irregular-route territory described here­ MOTORFRATE, INC., 1223 6th Avenue, saukee, Muskegon, Newaygo, Osceola, in (except points in Kansas), and (2) Des Moines, Iowa 50314. Applicant’s and Ottawa Counties, Mich.), and (2) movements between Chicago and representative: Robert D. Schuler, Suite fertilizer, in packages and fertilizer ma­ Springfield on the one hand, and, on the 1700,1 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, Mich. terials, dry in bulk and in packages, from other, points in Kansas. N ote: Appli­ 48226. Authority sought to operate as a cant states it has authority to transport common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Plymouth, Ind., to points in the Lower regular routes, transporting: General Peninsula of Michigan. N ote: Appli­ general commodities as described above: cant states it intends to tack at Between Maryville, Mo., and points with­ commodities (except those of unusual Plymouth, Ind., in connection with au­ in 10 miles of Maryville, on the one hand, value, classes A and B explosives, house­ thorized authority serving points in and, on the other, points in Iowa (except hold goods as defined by the Commis­ Michigan from Calumet City, 111. If a Council Bluffs, Red Oak, and Shenan­ sion, commodities in bulk, and those re­ hearing is deemed necessary, applicant doah) , Illinois (except those in the Chi­ quiring special equipment), serving the requests it be held at Indianapolis, Ind., cago, 111., commercial zone, as defined by plantsite of Ford Motor Co. on Sheldon or Washington, D.C. the Commission, and Springfield), Road, Plymouth Township, Wayne No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 250), filed De­ points in Nebraska (except Omaha), County, Mich., as an off-route point in cember 19, 1966. Applicant: BOS and points in Kansas. The authority connection with applicant’s authorized LINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, here sought will be used for the purpose service to and from Detroit, Mich. Marshalltown, Iowa 50158. Applicant’s of eliminating the necessity of going N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, representative: William C. Harris (same through the Maryville gateway on oper­ applicant requests it be held at Lansing, address as applicant. Authority ations presently being conducted. Ap­ Mich. sought to operate as a common carrier, plicant states that joinder or tacking is No. MC 55072 (Sub-No. 11), filed De­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, not intended. If a hearing is deemed cember 12, 1966. Applicant: LAW­ necessary, applicant requests it be held RENCE HAUSMAN, doing business as transporting: Foodstuffs (other than HAUSMAN TRUCKING, 912 Cutler frozen), canned, preserved, or prepared, at Kansas City, Mo. No. MC 31520 (Sub-No. 3), filed De­ Street, Waterloo, Iowa 50703. Appli­ from Coloma, Mich., to points in Kansas cant’s representative: William A. Lan­ and Missouri. Note: If a hearing is cember 9, 1966. Applicant: SALVA­ TORE SOLDANI, doing business as dau, 1307 East Walnut Street, Des deemed necessary, applicant requests it Moines, Iowa 50306. Authority sought be held at Lansing, Mich., or Chicago, SOLDANI OF BOSTON, 363 Levin Road, Rockland, Mass. 02370. Applicant’s rep­ to operate as a common carrier, by motor in. resentative: Gerard J. Donovan, 12 vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 25823 (Sub-No. 2), filed De­ ing: Meats, meat products, meat byprod­ cember 15, 1966. Applicant: WERCH Stanson Drive, North Attleboro, Mass. 02670. Authority sought to operate as a ucts, dairy products, and articles dis­ TRUCKING CO., INC., 519 East Huron, tributed by meat packing houses, as de­ Berlin, Wis. Applicant’s representative: common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: New fur­ scribed in appendix I to the report in Donald A. Morken, 1000 First National Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certifi­ Bank Building, Minneapolis, Minn. niture, imcrated (except household goods, as defined by the Commission), cates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from Water­ 55402. Authority sought to operate as a loo, Iowa, to Bloomington, Champaign, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over between Hingham, Mass., and points in Connecticut, Rhode Island, and that part Galesburg, Springfield, and Urbana, 111- irregular routes, transporting: (1) Ani­ N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, mal and poultry feed, and ingredients of New York bounded by a line beginning at the New York-Connecticut State line applicant requests it be held at Des thereof, insecticides and related items, Moines, Iowa. including empty bags and containers, and extending along U.S. Highway 202 to junction U.S. Highway 9W, thence No. MC 55811 (Sub-No. 88), filed De­ from Burlington, Wis., to points in Iowa, cember 9, 1966. Applicant: CRAIG Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Min­ along U.S. Highway 9W to junction U.S. Highway 44, thence along U.S. Highway TRUCKING, INC., Albany, Ind. 47320- nesota and (2) ingredients used in the Applicant’s representative: Ferdinand manufacture of animal and poultry feed, 44 to the New York-Connecticut State line to point of beginning, including Born, 601 Chamber of Commerce Build­ from points in Iowa, Michigan, Illinois, ing, Indianapolis, Ind. 46204. Authority Wisconsin, and Minnesota to Burling­ points on the indicated portions of the highways specified; Mount Kisko, N.Y.; sought to operate as a common carrier, ton, Wis. N ote: If a hearing is deemed and points in New York on U.S. Highway by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, necessary, applicant requests it be held 9W between and including Newburgh transporting: Matches, wooden or pap^r> at Chicago, 111., Minneapolis, Minn., and Albany, N.Y.; and points in New from the plantsite and storage facilities Madison or Milwaukee, Wis. York on U.S. Highway 9, between and of Hunt Foods and Industries, Inc., lo­ No. MC 26739 (Sub-No. 58), filed No­ including Poughkeepsie and Albany, cated at Willis Day Industrial Park near vember 30, 1966. Applicant: CROUCH Rossford, Ohio, which is in the com­ BROTHERS, INC., Post Office Box 1059, N.Y. N ote: If a hearing is deemed nec­ essary, applicant requests it be held at mercial zone of Toledo, Ohio, to points m St. Joseph, Mo. 64502. Applicant’s rep­ Boston, Mass., or Providence, R.I. Indiana, Hlinois, the Lower Peninsula oi resentative: Clarence D. Todd, 1825 Jef­ No. MC 41255 (Sub-No. 66), filed De­ Michigan, St. Louis, Mo., Louisville, ana ferson Place NW., Washington, D.C. cember 19, 1966. Applicant: GLOSSON Covington, Ky., Davenport, Iowa, ana 20036. Authority sought to operate as MOTOR LINES, INC., Hargrave Road, those in West Virginia within 10 miles oi a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Lexington, N.C. Applicant’s representa­ the Ohio-West Virginia State line- irregular routes, transporting: General tive: Frank B. Hand, Jr., 921 17th Street N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary. commodities, except those of unusual NW., Washington, D.C. 20006. Author­ nwmAat.s it. hfi held at Colum value, classes A and B explosives, house­ ity sought to operate as a common car­ bus, Ohio.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 NOTICES 105 No. MC 55843 (Sub-No. 13), filed Portage, Ind., and points in Alabama, near Winside, Nebr., to points in Iowa December 12, 1966. Applicant: SAG­ Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, and Minnesota. N ote: If a hearing is INAW TRANSFER COMPANY, INC., Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, deemed necessary, applicant requests it 2130 Midland Road, Saginaw, Mich. Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Mis­ be held at Sioux City, Iowa, or Omaha, 48603. Applicant’s representative: souri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Nebr. Walter N. Bieneman, Suite 1700, One Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, No. MC 94265 (Sub-No. 198) Amend­ Woodward Avenue, Detroit, Mich. 48226. Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Note : ment) , filed November 29,1966, published Authority sought to operate as a common Common control may be involved. If a F ederal R egister issue of December 15, carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular hearing is deemed necessary, applicant 1966, amended December 21, 1966, and routes, transporting: General commodi­ requests it be held at Chicago, 111., or republished as amended this issue. Ap­ ties (except those of unusual value, Washington, D.C. plicant: BONNEY MOTOR EXPRESS, classes A and B explosives, household No. MC 72140 (Sub-No. 51), filed De­ INC., Post Office Box 12388, Thomas goods as defined by the Commission, cember 12, 1966. Applicant: SHIPPERS Corner Station, Norfolk, Va. Applicant’s commodities in bulk, and those requiring DISPATCH, INC., 1216 West Sample representative: Wilmer B. Hill, 529 special equipment), serving the plant- Street, South Bend, Ind. 46624. Appli­ Transportation Building, Washington, site of Ford Motor Co. on Sheldon Road, cant’s representative: Robert D. Schuler, D.C. 20096. Authority sought to operate Plymouth Township, Wayne County, Suite 1700,1 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Mich., as an off-route point in connection Mich. 48226. Authority sought to oper­ over irregular routes, transporting: with applicant’s authorized service to and ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ Frozen foods, from Cleveland, Ohio, to from Detroit, Mich. N ote : If a hearing hicle, over regular routes, transporting: points in Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, is deemed necessary, applicant requests General commodities, except those of un­ Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, it be held at Lansing, Mich. usual value, classes A and B explosives, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jer­ No. MC 60879 (Sub-No. 5), filed De­ household goods as defined by the Com­ sey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode cember 12, 1966. Applicant: F. T. mission, commodities in bulk, and those Island, Virginia, Wisconsin, and the Dis­ TRUCKING CO., INC., Post Office Box requiring special equipment, serving the trict of Columbia, N ote : Applicant 33, Bremen Station, St. Louis, Mo. 63160. plantsite of Ford Motor Co., located on states it could tack at Crozet, Va., into Authority sought to operate as a common Sheldon Road, Plymouth Township, the States of North Carolina, South Caro­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Wayne County, Mich, as an off-route lina, Georgia, and Florida. The pur­ routes, transporting: Iron and steel, and point in connection with presently au­ pose of this republication is to reflect iron and steel articles, and equipment, thorized regular route operations to and the tacking information. If a hearing is materials, and supplies used in the man­ from Detroit, Mich. N ote: If a hearing deemed necessary, applicant requests it ufacture or processing of iron and steel is deemed necessary, applicant requests be held at Washington, D.C., or articles, between Portage, Ind., on the it be held at Detroit, Mich. Cleveland, Ohio. one hand, and, on the other, points in No. MC 83539 (Sub-No. 203), filed De­ No. MC 98885 (Sub-No. 3), filed No­ Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, Georgia, cember 16, 1966. Applicant: C & H vember 18, 1966. Applicant: PAUL F. Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana, TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., 1935 MARTIN, doing business as MARTIN Arkansas, Texas, Kansas, Missouri, Iowa, West Commerce Street, Dallas, Tex. MOTOR LINES, 716 East 18th Street, Michigan, Indiana, Minnesota, Wiscon- 75222. Applicant’s representative: W. T. Winston-Salem, N.C. 27102. Applicant’s son, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Brunson, 419 Northwest Sixth Street, representative: A. W. Flynn, Jr., Box Dakota, Oklahoma, and Illinois. N ote: Oklahoma City, Okla. 73102. Authority 127, Greensboro, N.C. 27402. Authority Applicant has pending in MC 128281 an sought to operate as a common carrier, sought to operate as a common carrier, application for contract authority, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, therefore dual operations may be in­ transporting :(1) Electrical trans­ transporting: General commodities (ex­ volved. If a hearing is deemed neces­ formers, circuit breakers, switchgear, in­ cept those requiring special equipment), sary, applicant requests it be held at St. sulators, air switches and/or parts of air conditioning supplies and equipment Louis, Mo., or Chicago, 111. these items, which by reason of size or and tools (.new and used), and leaf to­ No. MC 61396 (Sub-No. 171), filed De­ weight require the use of special equip­ bacco packing in hogsheads, baskets, or cember 19, 1966. Applicant: HERMAN ment, (2) electrical transformers, cir­ sheets, empty hogsheads, hogshead ma­ BROS. INC., 2501 North 11th Street, cuit breakers, switchgear, air switches, terial, and equipment and supplies used Omaha, Nebr. 68102. Applicant’s repre­ insulators and/or parts of these items, in the handling and packing of leaf sentative: Donald L. Stem, 630 City Na­ which do not require the use of special tobacco, between points in Haywood, tional Bank Building, Omaha, Nebr. equipment when moving in the same Transylvania, Henderson, Buncombe, 68102. Authority sought to operate as vehicle at the same time with the com­ Madison, Mitchell, Yancey, McDowell, a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over modities in (1) above, and (3) trans­ Rutherford, Polk, Cleveland, Burke, irregular routes, transporting: Anhy­ former oil in containers, paint in con­ Caldwell, Avery, Watauga, Ashe, Alle­ drous ammonia and fertilizer solutions, tainers, and iron and steel forms used in ghany, Wilkes, Alexander, Catawba, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from the plant- or on the commodities named in (1). Lincoln, Gaston, Mecklenburg, Cabarrus, site of Allied Chemical Corp. at La Platte, above, when transported in mixed loads Iredell, Yadkin, Surry, Stokes, Forsyth, Nebr., to points in Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, with the commodities named in (1) and Davie, Rowan, Union, Anson, Stanly, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North (2) above, from Crystal Springs, Miss., Davidson, Guilford, Rockingham, Cas­ Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin, to points in the United States (except well, Alamance, Randolph, Montgomery, W e d against combining or joining Alaska, Florida, Hawaii, Maine, Missis­ Richmond, Scotland, Hoke, Moore, Chat­ with any other authority now held by sippi, and Vermont). N ote : If a hearing ham, Orange, Person, Granville, Dur­ applicant. Note : Common control may is deemed necessary applicant requests it ham, Wake, Harnett, Lee, Cumberland, ~e mvolved. If a hearing is deemed nec- be held at Washington, D.C., New Robeson, Bladen, Sampson, Wayne, essary, applicant requests it be held at Orleans, La., or Jackson, Miss. Johnston, Wilson, Nash, Halifax, War­ Washington, D.C. No. MC 88384 (Sub-No. 4), filed De­ ren, Vance, and Franklin Counties, N.C. No. MC 64994 (Sub-No. 86), filed De- cember 15, 1966. Applicant: ALVIN E. Note: Applicant states that the afore­ S ? tt16’ 1966- Applicant: HENNIS SCHMODE AND FRANK F. WEIBLE, named 65 counties located in North Caro­ kINES, INC., Post Office Box a partnership, doing business as lina all lie within a radius of 150 miles of Winston-Salem, N.C. 27102. Appli- SCHMODE-WEIBLE TRANSFER, Post Pilot Mountain, N.C., which territory the X ^ ~ presentatives: Prank C. Philips, Office Box 278, Winslde, Nebr. 68790. applicant is presently serving under his rostofficeBox 612, Winston-Salem, N.C. Applicant’s representative: John V. Ad­ certificate of registration as issued in MC «I™? a?d James E. Wilson, 1735 K dison, 122 Vk Main Street, Wayne, Nebr. An«?*1 NW., Washington, D.C. 20006. 69787. Authority sought to operate as a 98885 Sub 1. This is an application to Tmvn Pn^y. s°nght to operate as a com- common carrier, by motor vehicle, over convert the certificate of registration to reenif^mer’ by mo^or vehicle, over ir- irregular routes, transporting: Alfalfa an interstate certificate. If a hearing is steei Z I°.utes’ transporting: Iron and dehy and sun cured pellets, from the deemed necessary, applicant requests it and won and steel articles, between plantsite of Winside Dehy, Inc., located be held at Greensboro or Raleigh, N.C.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 106 NOTICES No. MC 103191 (Sub-No. 21), filed De­ ty, Term., to points in Alabama, Ar­ plicant requests it be held at Washing­ cember 19, 1966. Applicant: THE GEO. kansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, ton, D.C. A. RHEMAN CO., INC., Post Office Box Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, No. MC 112520 (Sub-No. 155), filed 2095, Station A, Charleston, S.C. 29403. Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachu­ December 19, 1966. Applicant: Mc- Applicant’s representative: Frank A. setts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, KENZIE TANK LINES, INC., New Graham, Jr., 707 Security Federal Build­ New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Quincy Road, Post Office Box 1200, Tal­ ing, Columbia, S.C. 29201. Authority North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Penn­ lahassee, Fla. 32302. Applicant’s repre­ sought to operate as a common carrier, sylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, sentative: Normal J. Bolinger, 1730 by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, American Heritage Life Building, Jack­ transporting: Petroleum products, in West Virginia, Wisconsin, and the Dis­ sonville, Fla. 32202. Authority sought to bulk, in tank vehicles, from points in trict of Columbia. N ote: If a hearing is operate as a common carrier, by motor Georgetown County, S.C., to points in deemed necessary, applicant requests it vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ North Carolina. Note: If a hearing is be held at Washington, D.C. ing: Liquefied petroleum gas, in bulk, in deemed necessary, applicant requests it No. MC 107295 (Sub-No. 98), filed De­ tank vehicles, from Panama City, Fla., be held at Columbia, S.C., Charlotte, cember 16, 1966. Applicant: PRE-FAB to points in Alabama. N ote: If a hear­ N.C., or Atlanta, Ga. TRANSIT CO., a corporation, 100 South ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ No. MC 105350 (Sub-No. 11), filed De­ Main Street, Farmer City, 111. 61842. Au­ quests it be held at Birmingham, Ala. cember 12, 1966. Applicant: NORTH thority sought to operate as a common No. MC 112582 (Sub-No. 29), filed De­ PARK TRANSPORTATION CO., a cor­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular cember 19, 1966. Applicant: T. M. ZIM­ poration, 1600 Eliot Street, Denver, Colo. routes, transporting: Pipe conduit and MERMAN COMPANY, a corporation, 80204. Applicant’s representative: Leslie tubing and fittings, steel with or without Post Office Box 380, Chambersburg, Pa. R. Kehl, 420 Denver Club Building, Den­ coating, from Doraville, Ga., to points in Applicant’s representative: John M. ver, Colo. 80202. Authority sought to Tennessee and Kentucky. N ote: If a Musselman, 400 North Third Street, Har­ operate as a common carrier, by motor hearing is- deemed necessary, applicant risburg, Pa. 17108. Authority sought to vehicle, over regular routes, transport­ requests it be held at Atlanta, Ga., or operate as a common carrier, by motor ing: Ore and ore concentrates, from the Washington, D.C. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport- . minesite and facilities of American Metal No. MC 108460 (Sub-No. 23), filed De­ ing: Bakery products requiring refriger­ Climax, Inc. located at Urad, Colo, (ap­ cember 16, 1966. Applicant: PETRO­ ation, from Cincinnati, Ohio, to the proximately seven miles southwest of LEUM CARRIERS COMPANY, a corpor­ plantsites of Pet Inc. at Allentown and Empire (Clear Creek County), Colo.) to ation, 5104 West 14th Street, Sioux Falls, Chambersburg, Pa. N ote: If a hearing Golden, Colo.; from said minesite and S. Dak. 57101. Applicant’s representa­ is deemed necessary, applicant requests facilities to U.S. Highway 40, thence east tive: Ervin A. Hutchinson, 420 Security it be held at Washington, D.C. on U.S. Highway 40 to the junction of Bank Building, Sioux City, Iowa 51101. No. MC 112841 (Sub-No. 6), filed De­ U.S. Highway 40 and U.S. Highway 6, Authority sought to operate as a com­ cember 7, 1966. Applicant: ILLINOIS- thence east along U.S. Highway 6 to mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over irreg­ RUAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION, Golden, serving no intermediate points. ular routes, transporting: Liquefied pe­ 205 Old St. Louis Road, Wood River, HI. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, troleum gas, in bulk, in tank vehicles, 62095. Applicant’s representative: H. L. applicant requests it be held at Denver, from the terminal outlet of the Mid- Fabritz, Keosauqua Way at Third, Post Colo. America Pipeline Co., located at or near Office Box 855, Des Moines, Iowa 503G4. No. MC 105413 (Sub-No. 24), filed De- Whiting, Iowa, to points in Minnesota, Authority sought to operate as a com­ cember 19, 1966. Applicant: PETRO­ Nebraska, and South Dakota. Note: If mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ LEUM TRANSPORT SERVICE, INC., a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant regular routes, transporting: Petroleum Rural Route No. 3, Highway 275, Council requests it be held at Minneapolis, Minn. asphalt and road oils, in bulk, from Bluffs, Iowa. Applicant’s representa­ No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 810), filed De­ Wood River, HI., to points in Missouri. tive: Einar Viren, 904 City National Bank cember 8, 1966. Applicant: CHEMICAL N ote: If a hearing is_deemed necessary, Building, Omaha, Nebr. 68102. Author­ LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 East applicant requests it be held at Chicago, ity sought to operate as a common car­ 19335. Applicant’s representatives: HI., or St. Louis, Mo. rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Leonard A. Jaskiewicz, Madison Building, No. MC 113760 (Sub-No. 4), filed De­ routes, transporting: Anhydrous am­ 1155 15th Street NW., Washington, D.C. cember 11,1966. Applicant: H. M. POPP monia and fertilizer solutions in bulk, in 20005, and Edwin H. van Deusen (same TRUCK LINE, INC., doing business as tank vehicles, from the plantsite of Allied address as applicant). Authority sought PETCO INC., Post Office Box 447, Com­ Chemical Corp. at La Platte, Nebr., to to operate as a common carrier, by motor merce City, Colo. 80022. Applicant’s points in Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minne­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ representative: John- P. Thompson, 450 sota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, ing: Petroleum and petroleum products, Capitol Life Building, Denver, Colo. South Dakota, and Wisconsin. Note: If in bulk, in tank vehicles, from Albany, 80203. Authority sought to operate as a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant N.Y., and points within 10 miles thereof, a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over requests it be held at New York, N.Y., or to points in Vermont (except Brattleboro, irregular routes, transporting:^ Petro­ Washington, D.C. Rutland, Bennington, and White River leum and petroleum products, in bulk, No. MC 106644 (Sub-No. 77), filed De­ Junction). N ote: If a hearing is deemed in tank vehicles, from points in El Paso cember 12,1966. Applicant: SUPERIOR necessary, applicant requests it be held County, Colo., to points in Kansas lo­ TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., 2770 Pey­ at Washington, D.C. cated on and west of U.S. Highway 183, ton Road NW., Post Office Box 17050, No. MC 110525 (Sub-Nb. 811), filed De­ points in Colfax and Union Counties, Chattahoochee Station, Atlanta, Ga. cember 15, 1966. Applicant: CHEMICAL N. Mex.; and points in Cimarron ana 30321. Applicant’s representative: Otis LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 East Texas Counties, Okla. N ote: If a hear­ E. Stovall (same address as above). Lancaster Avenue, Downington, Pa. ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ Authority sought to operate as a common 19335. Applicant’s representative: quests it be held at Denver, Colo. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Leonard A. Jaskiewicz, Madison Build­ routes,’transporting: (1) Heat exchang­ ing, 1155 15th Street NW., Washington, No. MC 114457 (Sub-No. 66), filed De­ ers or equalizers for air, gas, or liquids; D.C. 20005, and Edwin H. van Deusen cember 9, 1966. Applicant: DARi ( ) machinery and equipment for heat­ (same address as above). Authority TRANSIT COMPANY, a corporation, 2 North Prior Avenue, St. Paul, Minn. ing, cooling, conditioning, humidifying, sought to operate as a common carrier, 55104. Applicant’s representative. dehumidifying, and moving of air, gas, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, or liquids; and (3) parts, attachments, transporting: Liquid fertilizer solutions Charles W. Singer, 33 North La Sane Street, Chicago, 111. 60602. Authority and accessories for use in the installation and ingredients, in bulk, in tank vehicles, sought to operate as a common carrw, and operation of items in (1) and (2) (1) from Eaton and Thomtown, Ind., to by motor vehicle, over Irregular routes, above (except such commodities requir­ points in Ohio, and (2) from Warsaw, ing the use of special equipment) from transporting: (1) Meats, meat the plant and warehouse facilities of The Ind., to points in Illinois and Ohio. N ote : and meat byproducts and articles a Trane Co. located in Montgomery Coun­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, ap­ tributed by meat packinghouses as ae-

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 NOTICES 107 scribed in sections A and C of appendix serve points in the District of Columbia, thority sought to operate as a common I to the Report in Descriptions in Motor Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, Rhode routes, transporting: Meats, meat prod­ 766, from points in Watonwan and Blue Island, Connecticut, Vermont, Maine, ucts, meat byproducts, and articles dis­ Earth Counties, Minn., to points in and New Hampshire. If a hearing is tributed by meat packinghouses, as de­ Kansas, Missouri, Illinois, Wisconsin, In­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it scribed in appendix I to the report in diana, Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia, be held at Washington, D.C. Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certifi­ Kentucky, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, No. MC 115379 (Sub-No. 30), filed De­ cates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from Good­ Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, New cember 20, 1966. Applicant: JOHN D. ing, Idaho, and points within 5 miles York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode BOHR, INC., Post Office Box 217, Ann- thereof, to points in Florida, Georgia, Island, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Mary­ ville, Pa. Applicant’s representative: Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, land, Delaware, Michigan, and Florida; Christian V. Graf, 407 North Front Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North and, (2) material, equipment and sup­ Street, Harrisburg, Pa. 17101. Author­ Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Ten­ plies used by meat packinghouses, from ity sought to operate as a common car­ nessee, and Wisconsin'. N ote : If a hear­ points in Kansas, Missouri, Illinois, Wis­ rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ consin, Indiana, Ohio, Virginia, West routes, transporting: Limestone, quests it be held at Boise, Idaho. Virginia, Kentucky, Iowa, Minnesota, crushed, ground, or pulverized, from the No. MC 115946 (Sub-No. 41), filed Nebraska, Maine, New Hampshire, Ver­ plantsite of National Gypsum Co. lo­ December 7, 1966. Applicant: GAY mont, New York, Massachusetts, Con­ cated in West Manchester Township, TRUCKING COMPANY, a corporation. necticut, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, York County, Pa., to points in Delaware, Post Office Box 7055, Savannah, Ga. New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Michi­ Maryland, and Accomack and North­ 31408. Applicant’s representative: Wil­ gan, and Florida, to points in Watonwan ampton Counties, Va. N ote: If a hear­ liam P. Sullivan, 1825 Jefferson Place County, Minn. Note: If a hearing is ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ NW., Washington, D.C. 20036. Authority deemed necessary, applicant requests it quests it be held at Washington, D.C., sought to operate as a common carrier, be held at Chicago, 111., or Minneapolis, or Harrisburg, Pa. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Minn. No. MC 115826 (Sub-No. 163), filed transporting: Gypsum and gypsum prod­ No. MC 114699 (Sub-No. 36) (Clarifi­ December 12, 1966. Applicant: W. J. ucts, and building materials and equip­ cation), filed November 22, 1966, pub­ DIGBY, INC., Post Office Box 5088, Ter­ ment, materials, and supplies used in the lished F ed er a l R egister issue of Decern-^ minal-Annex, Denver, Colo. 80217. Au­ manufacture or processing of gypsum ber 15,1966, and republished as clarified, thority sought to operate as a common products (except liquid commodities in this issue. Applicant; TANK LINES, IN­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular bulk), between Savannah and Port CORPORATED, Post Office Box 6415, routes, transporting: Malt beverages, Wentworth, Ga., on the one hand, and, Dabney Road, Richmond, Va. 23230. Ap­ from Golden, Colo., to Covina, Long on the other, points in Alabama. N ote: plicant’s representative: E. Stephen Beach, Redondo Beach, and Riverside, If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ Heisley, 529 Transportation Building, Calif. Note: The purpose of this appli­ cant requests it be held at Savannah or Washington, D.C. 20006. Authority- cation is to provide direct service in place Atlanta, Ga. sought to operate as a common carrier, of present interline service which appli­ No. MC 116474 (Sub-No. 9), filed De­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, cant is performing under its authority cember 9, 1966. Applicant: LEAVITTS transporting: (1) Animal oils, in bulk, in in MC 115826 Sub 158, interchanging FREIGHT SERVICE, INC., Route 1, Box tank vehicles, from points in the District with a connecting line’ at Mojave, Calif. 170B, Springfield, Oreg. Applicant’s of Columbia to points in Virginia; and If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ representative: Earle V. White, 2130 (2) animal and vegetable oils, in bulk, cant requests it be held at Los Angeles, Southwest Fifth Avenue, Portland, Oreg. in tank vehicles, (a) from Richmond, Calif. 97201. Authority sought to operate as a Va., to points in North Carolina, South No. MC 115826 (Sub-No. 164), filed contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, West Vir­ December 15, 1966. Applicant: W. J. irregular routes, transporting : Poles, pil­ ginia, Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, DIGBY, INC., Post Office Box 5088, Ter­ ings, lumber, laminated wood products, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, and minal Annex, Denver, Colo. 80217. Au­ and prefabricated wood timbers, trusses, the District of Columbia, (b) from points thority sought to operate as a common and beams (including accessories used in m North Carolina, South Carolina, Geor­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular the erection, construction, and comple­ gia, Tennessee, West Virginia, Virginia, routes, transporting: Frozen foods, from tion of the laminated wood products and Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Lafayette, Ind., to points in Kentucky, prefabricated wood items listed, when Jersey, New York, and the District of Tennessee, and Georgia. Note: If a transported therewith), from points in Columbia, to Richmond, Va. Note: Ap­ hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Lane and Douglas Counties, Oreg., to the plicant states it could tack over Suffolk requests it be held at Chicago, 111. sites of docks located in Coos, Lane, Lin­ va. to serve points in North Carolina, No. MC 115826 (Sub-No. 165), filed coln, and Multnomah Counties, Oreg., south Carolina, Georgia, and Tennessee December 19, 1966. Applicant: W. J. and Clark County, Wash., under con­ on animal oils, and could tack over Rich- DIGBY, INC., Post Office Box 5088, Ter­ tracts with Duco-Lam, Inc., Rosboro Va-’ to serve Points in Georgia, minal Annex, Denver, Colo. 80217. Au­ Lumber Co., J. H. Baxter & Co., and L. D. twith Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, thority sought to operate as a common McFarland 7o. Note: If a hearing is Delaware, Pennsylvania, and carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular deemed necessary, applicant requests it nf Columbia. The purpose routes, transporting: Meat, meat prod­ be held at Portland, Oreg. this republication is to clarify applica- ucts, meat byproducts, and articles dis­ No. MC 117036 (Sub-No. 14), filed • a hearing is deemed necessary, tributed by meat packinghouses, as de­ December 19, 1966. Applicant: H. M. ton D cf requests lt be held at Washing - scribed in sections A and C of appendix I KELLY, INC., Rural Delivery No. 1, New to the report in Descriptions in Motor Oxford, Pa 17350. Applicant’s repre­ 114699 (Sub-No. 37), filed E Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and sentative: Christian V. Graf, 407 North Lin it q L J 966- Applicant: TAI 766, from Chicago, HI., to points in Ari­ Front Street, Harrisburg, Pa. Authority & 1kINt? ? RPORATED. post Off zona, California, and Nevada, and Butte sought to operate as a common carrier, 1 a’ DabneY Road, Richmond, T and Billings^Mont., Seattle and Spokane, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, stpnv-io. APPlicant’s representative : Wash., Portland, Oreg., Boise, Idaho, and transporting: Brick, from Williamsport, ^ isley, 529 Transportati Salt Lake City and Ogden, Utah. N ote : M‘d., to points in West Virginia, Virginia, thortt?g’ Wt Shlngton’ D c - 20006. A If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ District of Columbia, Delaware, Ohio, carriZ to operate as a comm cant requests it be held at Los Angeles Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, • by motor vehicle, over irregul or San Francisco, Calif. Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachu­ routes, transporting: Caprolactam, No. MC 115826 (Sub-No. 166), filed setts, Indiana, and Michigan. N ote: u ) in tank vehicles, from Augus December 19, 1966. Applicant: W. J. Applicant states that tacking is possible in conjunction with its present authority ^ a;’ to Hopewell, Va. N o t e : Applica DIGBY, INC., Post Office Box 5088, Ter­ in MC 117036 (Sub-No. 10) to points in ates it would tack at Hopewell, Va., minal Annex, Denver, Colo. 80217. Au­ Kentucky, Illinois, Maine, New Hamp-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 108 NOTICES shire, North Carolina, Tennessee, and tinuing contract or contracts, with Steele cant’s representative: Arthur J. Piken, Vermont. If a hearing is deemed neces­ Canning Co. of Springdale, Ark. N ote: 160-16 Jamaica Avenue, Jamaica, N.Y. sary, applicant requests it be held at If a hearing is deemed necessary, appli­ 11432. Authority sought to operate as Washington, D.C., or Baltimore, Md. cant requests it be held at Washington, a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over No. MC 117119 (Sub-No. 393), filed De­ D.C., or Little Rock, Ark. irregular routes, transporting: (l) cember 19, 1966. Applicant: WILLIS No. MC 117574 (Sub-No. 160), filed Canned meat, from piers located at Phil­ SHAW FROZEN EXPRESS, INC., Elm December 13, 1966. Applicant: DAILY adelphia, Pa.; Boston, Mass.; Baltimore, Springs, Ark. 72728. Applicant’s repre­ EXPRESS, INC., Post Office Box 39, Md.; and the Port of New York harbor, as sentative: John H. Joyce, 26 North Col­ Motor Route 3, Carlisle, Pa. 17013. Au­ defined by the Interstate Commerce lege, Fayetteville, Ark. 72702. Authority thority sought to operate as a common Commission, to the warehousing, proc­ sought to operate as a common carrier, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular essing, and manufacturing facilities of by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, routes, transporting: Pipe, conduit, tub­ J. S. Hoffman Co. at Chicago, HI., and transporting: Foodstuffs, between ing, fittings, supplies, and accessories Monroe, Wis.; (2) cheese, from piers lo­ used in connection with pipe, conduit, cated at Philadelphia, Pa.; Boston, Blytheville, Ark., and Jackson, Tenn. Mass.; Baltimore, Md.; and the Port of N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, and tubing, between Terre Haute, Ind., applicant requests it be held at Memphis, on the one hand, and, on the other, points New York harbor, as defined by the In­ Tenn., or Little Rock, Ark. in Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, terstate Commerce Commission, to the No. MC 117119 (Sub-No. 394), filed Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Is­ warehousing, processing, and manufac­ December 19, 1966. Applicant: WILLIS land, New York, New Jersey, Pennsyl­ turing facilities of J. S. Hoffman Co. at SHAW FROZEN EXPRESS, INC., Elm vania, Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia, Chicago, HI.; (3) sliced meat, from the Springs, Ark. 72728. Applicant’s rep­ Maryland, Delaware, and the District warehousing, processing, and manufac­ resentative: John H. Joyce, 26 North of Columbia, restricted against the trans­ turing facilities of J. S. Hoffman Co. at College, Fayetteville, Ark. 72702. Au­ portation of iron and steel articles or Chicago, HI., and Monroe, Wis.; and, thority sought to operate as a common articles which because of size or weight cheese from the warehousing, processing, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular require the use of special equipment. and manufacturing facilities of J. S. routes, transporting: Canned goods, N ote: Common control may be involved. Hoffman Co. at Chicago, HI.,'to points in from Cecilia, New Orleans, and Ville Applicant states it wants to preserve its Maryland, New York, New Jersey, Mas­ Platte, La., to Blytheville, Ark., and Jack- right to tack if and when the occasion sachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, son, Tenn. Note: If a hearing is deemed arises. If a hearing is deemed necessary Delaware, and the District of Columbia necessary, applicant requests it be held applicant does not specify a location. and points on and east of U.S. Highway at Little Rock, Ark., or New Orleans, La. No. MC 117815 (Sub-No. 117), filed 5 from the Maryland-Pennsylvania State No. MC 117304 (Sub-No. 15), filed De­ December 14,1966. Applicant: PULLEY line to its intersection with the Pennsyl­ cember 9, 1966. Applicant: DON PAF- FREIGHT LINES, INC., 405 Southeast vania-New York State line. Note: If a FILE, doing business as PAFFILE 20th Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50316. hearing is deemed necessary, applicant TRUCK LINES, 2906 29th Street North, Applicant’s representative: John P. requests it be held at Chicago, HI. Lewiston, Idaho 83501. Authority Burroughs (same address as applicant). No. MC 119944 (Sub-No. 10), filed De­ . sought to operate as a common carrier, Authority sought to operate as a com­ cember 15, 1966. Applicant: BROCK­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over WAY FAST MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., transporting: Wood chips and sawdust, irregular routes, transporting: Meats, 568 Central Avenue, Somerville, N.J. in bulk, in special equipment, from St. meat products, meat byproducts, and Applicant’s representative: Bert Collins, Maries, Coeur d’Alene, and Albeni Falls, articles distributed by meat packing­ 140 Cedar Street, New York, N.Y. 10006. houses, as described in appendix I to the Authority sought to operate as a com­ Idaho, to Millwood, Wash. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ requests it be held at Spokane, Wash. Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from regular routes, transporting: (1) Dry No. MC 117391 (Sub-No. 8), filed De­ Chicago and Lemont, HI., to points in plastics, in bulk, from points in Bridge- cember 15, 1966. Applicant: E. L. RED­ Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, water Township, N.J., to points in Mas­ DISH TRANSPORTATION, INC., 1020 Nebraska, Wisconsin, and the Upper sachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Schmieding Lane, Post Office Box 207, •Mir.higan Peninsula. N ote: If a hear­ New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Springdale, Ark. 72764. Applicant’s rep­ ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and the resentative: A. Alvis Layne, 948 Penn­ quests it be held at Chicago, 111. District of Columbia, and (2) rejected, sylvania Building, Washington, D.C. No. MC 119531 (Sub-No. 61), filed De­ returned, or damaged shipments, on re­ 20004. Authority sought to operate as a cember 9, 1966. Applicant: DIECK- turn. Restricted to shipments having a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over BRADER EXPRESS, INC., 5391 Wooster prior movement by rail to Bridgewater irregular routes, transporting: (1) Road, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226. Appli­ Township, N.J. N ote: If a hearing is Canned goods, (a) from Springdale, cant’s representative: Charles W. Singer, deemed necessary, applicant requests it Lowell, and Fort Smith, Ark., and West- 33 North La Salle Street, Suite 3600, Chi­ be held at Washington, D.C., or New ville, Okla., to Chicago, 111., Wichita, cago, 111. 60602. Authority nought to York, N.Y. Kans., St. Louis, Kansas City, Spring- operate as a common carrier, by motor No. MC 119974 (Sub-No. 14) (Amend­ field, and Joplin, Mo., Oklahoma City, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ ment) , filed September 2,1966, published and Tulsa, Okla., Memphis, Tenn., and ing: Paper and paper products, (1) from F ederal R egister issue of September 29, Dallas and Fort Worth, Tex.; and, (b) the plantsite of St. Regis Paper Co., at or 1966, amended and republished as from Haskell, Stigler, and Spiro, Okla., near Willis (Washtenaw County), Mich., amended, this issue. Applicant: L.C.L. to points in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, to points in Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio, TRANSIT COMPANY, a corporation, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, and (2) from Medina, Ohio, to points in 520 North Roosevelt Street, Green Bay, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Ken­ Kentucky and New York. Note: Appli­ Wis. 54305. Applicant’s representative: tucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, cant states in (1) above it would tack at Charles E. Dye (same address as appli­ Mississippi, Missouri, Maryland, Ne­ Cleveland, Ohio, in connection with cant) . Authority sought to operate as braska, New Jersey, New Mexico, North presently held authorized authority serv­ a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Carolina, South Carolina, North Dakota, ing points in New Jersey, New York, and irregular routes, transporting: Fresh South Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Penn­ Pennsylvania, and in (2) above at Cir- meat, carcasses, and cuts, from Green sylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, cleville, Ohio, serving points in Kentucky Bay, Wis., to points in Upper Michigan, West Virginia, and Wisconsin; and (2) and West Virginia. If a hearing is restricted against the transportation oi canned goods, and materials and sup­ deemed necessary, applicant requests it hides and further restricted to traffic plies used in manufacturing, labeling, be held at Chicago, 111., or Washington, originating at Green Bay, Wis. N o t e . packing, and transporting canned goods, D.C. The purpose of this republication is to on return in (a) and (b), above. Re­ No. MC 119619 (Sub-No. 3), filed De­ broaden the destination territory and striction: The operations authorized cember 8, 1966. Applicant: DISTRIBU­ TORS SERVICE CO., a corporation, 2000 to add the restriction. If a hearing is above are limited to a transportation deemed necessary, applicant requests i service to be performed under a con­ West 43d Street, Chicago, HI. Appli­

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 NOTICES 109 be held at Madison, Wis., or Minneapolis, routes, transporting: Juices and drinks, sought to operate as a common carrier, Minn. not frozen and fruit salads, in mixed by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, No. MC 120543 (Sub-No. 52), filed De­ loads with juices and drinks, not frozen, transporting: Lumber, between points in cember 16, 1966. Applicant: FLORIDA from Umatilla, Fla., to points in South New Hampshire on the one hand, and, on REFRIGERATED SERVICE, INC., U.S. Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Ohio, the other, points in Maine. Note : Appli­ Highway 301 North, Dade City, Fla. Kentucky, West Virginia, Alabama, cant states it intends to tack at points in 33525. Applicant’s representative: Law­ Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, New Hampshire with authorized author­ rence D. Fay, Post Office Box 1086, Jack­ Minnesota, Missouri, Louisiana, Kansas, ity serving points in Maine, New Hamp­ sonville, Fla. 32201. Authority sought to Iowa, Oklahoma, Texas, Mississippi, shire, Massachusetts, Vermont, Con­ operate as a common carrier, by motor Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont, necticut, and Rhode Island. If a hearing vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ under contract with Doric Foods Corp. is deemed necessary, applicant requests ing: (1) Outboard motors, power lawn Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, it be held at Montpelier, Vt. mowers, power chain saws, power head applicant requests it be held at Wash­ No. MC 127625 (Sub-No. 6), filed assemblies, and other products of Out­ ington, D.C., or Jacksonville, Fla. December 19,1966. Applicant: SANTEE board Marine Corp. of Canada, Ltd. and No. MC 125996 (Sub-No. 8), filed De­ CEMENT CARRIERS, INC., Post Office parts thereof, (2) grain flour (bread­ cember 12, 1966. Applicant: JENSEN Box 597, Holly Hill, S.C. 29059. Appli­ ing), and (3) cheese and cheese prod­ TRUCKING CO., INC., 220 16th Street, cant’s representative: Frank B. Hand, Jr., ucts, from the ports of entry on the Gothenburg, Nebr. Applicant’s repre­ 921 17th Street NW., Washington, D.C. international boundary line between the sentative : Charles J. Kimball, Post Office 20006. Authority sought to operate as a United States and the Province of On­ Box 2028, 605 South 14th Street, Lincoln, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over tario, Canada, to points in Florida and Nebr. 68501. Authority sought to oper­ irregular routes, transporting: Clay Georgia, restricted to traffic originating ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ products, from Columbia, S.C., to points at points in the Province of Ontario, hicle, over irregular routes, transport­ in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Canada. Note: If a hearing is deemed ing: Bird, fish, poultry, and animal feed Virginia. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held ingredients and bird, fish, poultry, and necessary, applicant requests it be held at at New York, N.Y., or Washington, D.C. animal feed, from points in California Columbia or Charleston, S.C. No. MC 123393 (Sub-No. 172), filed to points in Idaho and Utah. N ote: No. MC 127834 (Sub-No. 5), filed De­ December 12, 1966. Applicant: BILYEU Applicant states that tacking is possi­ cember 7, 1966. Applicant CHEROKEE REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT CORP., ble at Buhl and Hagerman, Idaho, for HAULING & RIGGING, INC., 546-42 2105 East Dale Street, Springfield, Mo. service to points in Iowa, Minnesota, Merritt Avenue, Nashville, Tenn. 37203. 56803. Applicant’s representative: Har­ Missouri, Nebraska, Wisconsin, Arkansas, Applicant’s representative: Robert M. ley E. Laughlin, Post Office Box 948, Colorado, Montana, and Wyoming. If Pearce, Central Building, 1033 State Commercial Station, Springfield, Mo. a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Street, Bowling Green, Ky. 42101. Au­ 65803. Authority sought to operate as requests it be held at Boise, Idaho. thority sought to operate as a common a common carrier,"by motor vehicle, over No. MC 126098 (Sub-No. 1), filed De­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular irregular routes, transporting: Frozen cember 20, 1966. Applicant: STORMS routes, transporting: Signs, sign poles, foods, from Cleveland, Ohio, to points TRUCKING, INC., 1 TUpper Lane, West parts and accessories therefor, except in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Nyack, N.Y. 10994. Applicant’s repre­ commodities requiring special equipment, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, sentative: William D. Traub, 10 East from points in Knox County, Tenn., to Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, 40th Street, New York, N.Y. 10016. Au­ points in Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Illi­ West Virginia, and the District of Co­ thority sought to operate as a common nois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, lumbia. Note: Common control may be carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Mis­ involved. If a hearing is deemed neces­ routes, transporting: Stone, on flatbed souri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North sary, applicant requests it be held at vehicles, from points in Rockland, Ulster, Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Da­ Cleveland, Ohio. Dutchess, and Westchester Counties, kota, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wiscon­ No. MC 124796 (Sub-No. 24), filed De­ N.Y., to points in Connecticut, Massa­ sin, and Wyoming. Note: If a hearing cember 14, 1966. Applicant: CONTI­ chusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island. is deemed necessary, applicant requests NENTAL CONTRACT CARRIER CORP., N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, it be held at Nashville, Tenn., or Wash­ 7236 East Slauson Avenue, Los Angeles, applicant requests it be held at New York, ington, D.C. Calif. 90022. Applicant’s representative: N.Y., or Newark, N.J. No. MC 128104 (Sub-No. 1), filed De­ J. Max Harding, 605 South 14th Street, No. MC 126118 (Sub-No. 5), filed cember 19, 1966. Applicant: CARROLL Post Office Box 2028, Lincoln, Nebr. December 12,1966. Applicant: GEORGE HOPKINS, Box 626, Ronan, Mont. 59864. 68501. Authority sought to operate as M. HILL, doing business as HILL Applicant’s representative: Leif Erick­ a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, TRUCKING COMPANY, Route No. 8, son, 347 North Last Chance Gulch, Hel­ over irregqlar routes, transporting: (1) Johnson City, Tenn. Applicant’s rep­ ena, Mont. 59601. Authority sought to Metal castings, from Albert Lea, Minn., resentative: Clifford E. Sanders, 321 East operate as a contract carrier, by motor jjo Lake Mills, Iowa, and Holly Springs, Center Street, Kingsport, Tenn. 37662. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Miss., and (2) oil filters, air filters, and Authority sought to operate as a common ing: Lumber, plywood, and charcoal bri­ component parts for oil filters and air carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular quets, from Columbia Falls (Flathead from West Salem, 111., to Lake routes, transporting: Malt beverages (1) County), and Pablo (Lake County), Mills and Mason City, Iowa, and Holly from Evansville and South Bend, Ind.; Mont., to points in North Dakota, South prings, Miss., under contract with Detroit, Mich.; Louisville and Newport, Dakota, Wyoming, and Idaho, under con­ bimoniz Co., Alberto-Culver Co., Walker Ky.; and Cincinnati, Ohio, to Knoxville, tract with Plum Creek Lumber Co., a anufacturing Corp., Roberts Consoli- Tenn.; and (2) from South Bend, Ind.; corporation, of Pablo, Mont. N ote: If uateq industries, Inc., and Pacific Cast Louisville and Newport, Ky.; and Cincin­ a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant w \ PlPe & Fittlng Co. Note: If a hear- nati, Ohio, to Johnson City, Tenn. N ote : requests it be held at Missoula, Great mr Is deemed necessary, applicant re- Applicant states that it intends to tack Falls, or Helena, Mont. Wests it be held at Chicago, HI., or with its present authority in MC 126118, No. MC 128578 (Sub-No. 1), filed De­ °maha, Nebr. and subs thereunder, wherein it is au­ cember 15, 1966. Applicant: ANTHONY rnwh ^2^964 (Sub-No. 6), filed De- thorized to operate in Georgia, Illinois, J. GARCIA, doing business as TONY’S M RnrJ?ix19!!6' Applicant: JOSEPH Tennessee, Virginia, Maryland, and In­ TRAILER CONVOY, 2385 Table Rock dt>lng business as J. M. diana. If a hearing is deemed necessary, Road, Medford, Oreg. 97501. Applicant’s 907 TRUCKING, Post Office Box applicant requests it be held at Wash­ representative: Brian B. Mullen, 332 ’ Gustos, Fla. 32726. Applicant’s ington, D.C., or Nashville, Tenn. Medical Center Building, 33 North Cen­ Presentative: George A. Olsen, 69 No. MC 127616 (Sub-No. 6), filed tral Avenue, Medford, Oreg. 97501. Au­ December 16, 1966. Applicant: HAN­ aJmS t Avenue> Jersey City, N.J. 07306. thority sought to operate as a common SON M. SAVAGE, doing business as carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular carr °n^ sougbt to operate as a contract SAVAGE TRUCKING COMPANY, Box routes, transporting: Trailers and mobile ler> by motor vehicle, over irregular 105, Chester Depot, Vt. 05144. Authority homes, between points in Jackson and

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 110 NOTICES tive: Philip A. Lee, 100 North La Salle sengers and their baggage in the same \ Josephine Counties, Oreg., on the one vehicle, in special and charter opera- j hand, and, on the other, points in Del Street, Chicago, HI. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor tions, limited to the transportation of j Norte and Siskiyou Counties, Calif. not more than 11 passengers in any one Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ ing: (1) Anhydrous ammonia and liquid vehicle not including the driver thereof, j applicant requests it be held at Medford, and not including children years of; or Portland, Oreg., or San Francisco, nitrogen fertilizer solutions, in bulk, in 10 tank vehicles, and (2) ammonium ni­ age who do not occupy a seat or seats, i Calif. from Fort Dix and McGuire Air Force No. MC 128750 filed December 1, 1966. trate fertilizer, dry, in bulk, from Mar­ seilles, 111., and points within 5 miles Base, N.J., to New York, N.Y., Philadel- : Applicant: PITT TRUCK, INC., Post Of­ phia, Pa., and the Philadelphia Interna­ fice Box 172, Augusta, Hi. 62311. Appli­ thereof to points in Indiana, Iowa, Ken­ tucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, tional Airport, near Philadelphia, Pa. cant’s representative: Leonard A. Jas- N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, ] kiewicz, 1155 15th Street NW., Washing­ Ohio, and Wisconsin. N ote: If a hear­ ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ applicant requests it be held at Washing­ ton, D.C. 20005. Authority sought to ton, D.C., or Trenton, N.J. operate as a common carrier, by motor quests it be held at Chicago, HI., Wash­ ington, D.C., or St. Louis, Mo. No. MC 128212 (Amendment), filed vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ May 16,1966, published F ederal Register ing : Anhydrous ammonia, and liquid fer­ No. MC 128762, filed December 19, 1966. Applicant: P. L. LAWTON, INC., issues of June 23, 1966, June 30, 1966, ; tilizer materials, in bulk, in tank vehi­ and July 8, 1966, and further cles, from the plant and storage site Post Office Box 325, Berwick, Pa. 18603. Applicant’s representative: John M. amended December 9, 1966, and repub­ of Mobil Chemical Co. located at or near lished as further amended, this" Meredosia, HI., to points in Arkansas, Il­ Musselman, 400 North Third Street, Harrisburg, Pa. 17108. Authority sought issue. Applicant: CREST TRANSIT linois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, CORP., 38 Lyncrest Avenue, New City, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebras­ to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ N.Y. Applicant’s representative: Robert ka, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and E. Goldstein, 8 West 40th Street, New Wisconsin. Restricted against tacking ing: Aluminum building sections, panels, architectural shapes, curtain wall units, York, N.Y. 10018. Authority sought to or interlining for the purpose of per­ operate as a common carrier, by motor forming through service. Note: If a sheets, doors and door frames, windows and window frames, parts and accessories vehicle, over regular routes, transport­ hearing is deemed necessary, applicant ing : Passengers and their baggage in the requests it be held at Washington, D.C., therefor, materials and supplies used in the production, erection and use thereof, same vehicle with passengers, (1) be­ St. Louis, Mo., or Chicago, 111. tween junction U.S. Highway 202 and No. MC 128755, filed December 12,1966. and aluminum scrap, between Blooms- burg, Pa., on the one hand, and, on the New York Highway 45 and New York, Applicant: RALPH KOLAN, doing busi­ N.Y.; from junction U.S. Highway 202 ness as KOLAN DRAY COMPANY, 337 other, points in Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and New York Highway 45 to Mount Ivy, Monroe Street, Spring Green, Wis. 53588. N.Y., south on New York Highway 45 to Authority sought to operate as a common Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michi­ gan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Maple Avenue, thence west on Maple carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular Avenue to New York Highway 306, thence routes, transporting: General commodi­ York, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and the Dis­ south on New York Highway 306 to Sec­ ties (except those of unusual value, ond Street, thence west on Second Street classes A and B explosives, household trict of Columbia, under contract with Kawneer Co., Inc., Division of Ameri­ to Saddle River Road, thence south on goods, as defined by the Commission, Saddle River Road to East Allendale Ave­ and commodities in bulk) having a prior can Metal Climax, Inc., Niles, Mich. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, nue, thence east on East Allendale Ave­ or subsequent movement in interstate nue to East Saddle River Road, thence commerce by common motor carrier, (1) applicant requests it be held at Wash­ ington, D.C., or Harrisburg, Pa. south on East Saddle River Road to New between Plain and Spring Green, Wis., Jersey Highway 17, thence over New Jer­ over Wisconsin Highway 23, serving all Motor Carriers op Passengers sey Highway 17 to Interstate Highway 80, intermediate points, and (2) between No. MC 1200 (Sub-No. 9), filed Decem­ thence over Interstate Highway 80 to junction Wisconsin Highway 23 and U.S. ber 19, 1966. Applicant: RHODE George Washington Bridge Plaza to New Highway 14 and Wisconsin Highway 130 ISLAND BUS CORP., 375 Promenade York, N.Y., and return over the same and U.S. Highway 14 over U.S. Highway Street, Providence, R.I. Applicant’s rep­ route, serving all intermediate.points; al­ 14, serving all intermediate points and resentative: John R. Sims, Jr., 1700 so along the exit ramp of New Jersey the off-route point of Lone Rock, Wis. Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, Highway 17 at or near Paramus, N.J-, N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, D.C. 20006. Authority sought to operate thence over New Jersey Highway 17 exit applicant requests it be held at Madison, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, ramp to junction Farview Avenue, thence Wis. over regular routes transporting: Pas­ over Farview Avenue to Plaza Way, No. MC 128756, filed December 12, sengers and their baggage in the same thence over Plaza Way to the entrance o 1966. Applicant: LYNN TOWING, INC., vehicle with passengers, express and the Shopping Center, Paramus, N.J.; anfl 201 Wright Street, St. Louis, Mo. 63102. newspapers, between Providence, R.I., also from the Shopping Center at Par­ Applicant’s representative: R. W. Bur­ and New London, Conn., from Provi­ amus, N.J., to New Je rse y Highway J, gess, 8514 Midland Boulevard, St. Louis, dence, R.I., over Rhode Island Highway thence over New Jersey 4 to junction in Mo. 63114. Authority sought to oper­ 14 to the Rhode Island-Connecticut Jersey Highway 17 ramp, and return over ate as a contract carrier, by motor ve­ State line, thence over Connecticut High­ the same route, serving all intermedia hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: way 14 to intersection Connecticut High­ points, and . h Wrecked and disabled vehicles, and re­ way 12, thence over Connecticut Highway (2) Between junction New York High­ placement power units, and/or trailers, 12 to Norwick, Conn., thence over Con­ way 45 and Eckerson Road and Map* (1) between St. Louis, Mo., on the one necticut Highway 32 to -New London, Avenue and New York Highway 3 ’ hand, and, on the other, points in Illi­ Conn., and return over the same route from junction New York Highway 45 a nois, Arkansas, Indiana, and Iowa, and with service at all intermediate points. Eckerson Road at Hillcrest, N.Y., w . (2) between points in Missouri on the Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, on Eckerson Road to Union Avenue, one hand, and, on the other, points in applicant requests it be held at Provi­ thence south on Union Avenue to Myrt e Illinois, Arkansas, Indiana, and Iowa, dence, R.I., or New London, Conn. Avenue, thence south on Myrtle Aven_ under contracts with Roadway Express, No. MC 125494 (Sub-No. 3), filed De­ to Maple Avenue, thence west on Mapi Inc., and Daniel Hamm Drayage Co., cember 14, 1966. Applicant: D & M Avenue to New York Highway 306, an« Inc. N ote: If a hearing is deemed nec­ TAXI COMPANY, INC., Post Office Box return over the same route, serving essary, applicant requests it be held at 38, Fort Dix, N.J. 08640. Applicant’s intermediate points. The opera St. Louis, Mo. representative: John D. Hawke, Jr., 1229 above shall be restricted against tn No. MC 128759, filed December 16, 49th Street NW., Washington, D.C. transportation of passengers betw 1966. Applicant: RICHARDS MOTOR 20036. Authority sought to operate as junction Lake Street (Ramsey Ro ’ SERVICE, INC., 5040 West 39th Street, a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over and Saddle River Road in Upper Sadai River, N.J., inclusive on the one nan , Stickney, HI. Applicant’s representa­ irregular routes, transporting: Pas­

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 NOTICES 111 and, on the other, New York, N.Y. and italicized portions of its authorized reg­ the applicant, or its authorized repre­ points intermediate thereto, to and from ular route. sentative, if any, and the protest must New York, N.Y. N ote: The purpose of By the Commission. certify that such service has been made. this republication is to broaden the route The protest must be specific as to the description. If a hearing is deemed nec­ [seal] H. Neil Garson, service which such protestant can and essary, applicant requests it be held at Secretary. will offer, and must consist of a signed New York, N.Y. [F.R. Doc. 67-84; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; original and six copies. Applications in W hich Handling W ith­ 8:45 a.m.] A copy of the application is on file, and out Oral Hearing Have Been R e­ can be examined, at the Office of the Secretary, Interstate Commerce Com­ quested FOURTH SECTION APPLICATIONS mission, Washington, D.C., and also in No. MC 127577 (Sub-No. 2), filed De­ the field office to which protests are to cember 13, 1966. Applicant: D. DON­ FOR RELIEF be transmitted. NELLY LIMITED, a corporation, 191 J anuary 3, 1967. Motor Carriers of P roperty Murray Street, Montreal 3 Quebec, Can­ Protests to the granting of an appli­ ada. Applicant’s representative: W. cation must be prepared in accordance No. MC 1759 (Sub-No. 21 TA), filed Norman Charles, 80 Bay Street, Glens with Rule 1.40 of the general rules of December 28,1966. Applicant: FROEH- Palls, N.Y. 12801. Authority sought to practice (49 CFR 1.40) and filed within LICH TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., 31 operate as a common carrier, by motor 15 days from the date of publication of Victory Street, Stamford, Conn. 06902. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ this notice in the F ederal R egister. Applicant’s representative: Reubin Ka­ ing: Rock salt, in bulk, in dump vehicles, minsky, 410 Asylum Street, Hartford, from the ports of entry on the interna­ Long- and-S hort H aul Conn. Authority sought to operate as a tional boundary line between the United PSA 40852—Iron or steel skelp to common carrier, by motor vehicle, over States and Canada located in Vermont, Houston, Tex. Piled by Southwestern irregular routes, as follows: Bakery to points in Caledonia, Chittenden, Es­ Freight Bureau, agent (No. B-8944), for products, fresh, except frozen and un­ sex, Franklin, Grand Isle, Lamoille, Or­ interested carriers. Rates on iron or leavened bakery products, from the leans, and Washington Counties, Vt. steel skelp, in carloads, subject to aggre­ plantsite of Nancy Lynn Bakery, Divi­ Motor Carrier of P assengers gate minimum weights of 600 and 1,200 sion of Grand Union Co. at Bridgeport, gross tons of 2,240 pounds each, from Conn., to shipper’s distribution center at No. MC 70947 (Sub-No. 22), filed De­ New Boston and Portsmouth, Ohio, to Landover, Md., and stale, damaged, re­ cember 6, 1966. Applicant: MT. HOOD Houston, Texas. fused, rejected, and nonsalable bakery STAGES, INC., doing business as PA­ Grounds for relief— competition. products, fresh, except frozen and un­ CIFIC TRAILWAYS, 1068 Bond Street, Tariff—Supplement 220 to South­ leavened bakery products, and contain­ Bend, Oreg. 97701. Applicant’s repre­ western Freight Bureau, agent, tariff ers, from shipper’s distribution center sentative: Donald A. Schafer, 12321 ICC 4503. at Landover, Md., to the plantsite of Southeast Evergreen Highway, Van­ PSA 40853—Returned shipments— Nancy Lynn Bakery, Division of Grand couver, Wash. 98664. Authority sought sand. Filed by Traffic Executive Asso­ Union Co. at Bridgeport, Conn., for 150 to operate as a common carrier, by motor ciation—Eastern Railroads, agent (E.R. days. Supporting shipper: N. J. Jordan, vehicle, over regular routes, transport­ No. 2876), for carriers parties to its tariff Traffic Manager, The Grand Union Co., ing: Passengers, their baggage, express ICC C-391. Rates on sand, in carloads, 100 Broadway, East Paterson, N.J, Send and newspapers in the same vehicle with applicable between points within official protests to: District Supervisor David J. passengers, between Klamath Palls, and territory, including northern Illinois, Kiernan, Bureau of Operations and Com­ The Dalles, Oreg., from Klamath Palls southern Wisconsin, and Extended Zone pliance, Interstate Commerce Commis­ over U.S. Highway 97 to Biggs, Oreg., “C” in Wisconsin, on shipments returned sion, 324 U.S. Post Office Building, 135 thence over U.S. Highway 30 (Inter­ from original destinations to origin High Street, Hartford, Conn. 06101. state Highway 80N) to The Dalles, and points of shipment. No. 3018 (Sub-No. 16 TA), filed De­ return over the same route, serving all Grounds for relief—Carrier competi­ cember 29, 1966. Applicant: McKEOWN intermediate points. Applicant presently tion. TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, 10448 holds authority as follows: Passengers South Western Avenue, Chicago, 111. and their baggage, and express and news­ By the Commission. 60643. Authority sought to operate as a papers in the same vehicle with pas­ contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over [seal] H. Neil Garson, sengers, between Klamath Falls and The irregular routes, as follows: Hydrogen Dalles, Oreg., serving all intermediate Secretary. gas, in tube trailers, from Painesville, Points: From Klamath Palls over U.S. [F.R. Doc. 67-130; Filed, Jan, 5, 1967; Ohio, to Port Wayne, Kokomo, Indianap­ Highway 97 to Modac Point, Oreg., 8:47 a.m.] olis, Franklin, and Bloomington, Ind.; thence over unnumbered highway (for- Holland, Mich.; East Chicago, Ind.; and Merly u.S. Highway 97) via a point one- Coldwater, Mich., for 150 days. Support­ half mile north of Williamson River [Notice 314] ing shipper: Union Carbide Corp., Linde Bridge and Klamath Agency, Oreg., to Division, Chicago, 111. Send protests to: lunction Oregon Highway 232 (formerly MOTOR CARRIER TEMPORARY District Supervisor Charles J. Kudelka, U-S. Highway 97), thence over Oregon AUTHORITY APPLICATIONS Interstate Commerce Commission, Bu­ reau of Operations and Compliance, Highway 232 to junction U.S. Highway J anuary 3,1967. W, thence over U.S. Highway 97 to junc­ Room 1086, U.S. Courthouse and Federal The following are notices of filing of Office Building, 219 South Dearborn tion Oregon Highway 230 (formerly applications for temporary authority un­ Street, Chicago, 111. 60604. shown as Crater-Diamond Lake June- der section 210a(a) of the Interstate No. MC 107496 (Sub-No. 518 TA), filed Hon), thence over U.S. Highway 97 via Commerce Act provided for under the December 29, 1966. Applicant: RUAN emult and Redmond, Oreg., to junc- new rules in Ex Parte No. MC 67 (49 CFR TRANSPORT CORPORATION, Keo- Part 246) published in the F ederal R eg­ suaqua Way at Third, Post Office Box hon unnumbered highway (formerly U.S. ister, issue of April 27, 1965, effective ighway 97), thence over unnumbered 855, Des Moines, Iowa 50304. Appli­ July 1, 1965. These rules provide that cant’s representative: H. L. Fabritz 9 way via Culver and Metolius, Oreg, protests to the granting of an application (same address as above). Authority must be filed with the field official named 10 Madras, Oreg., thence over U.S. High­ sought to operate as a common carrier, way 97 to Biggs, Oreg., thence over U.S. in the F ederal R egister publication, within 15 calendar days after the date by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, ovAr«fy T^e ^ aHes» and return notice of the-filing of the application is as follows: To transport petroleum and curL+f Same route' Applicant is con- published in the F ederal R egister. One petroleum products, in bulk from Du­ ently requesting revocation of the copy of such protest must be served on buque, Iowa, to Belvidere, 111, for 180

No. 3---- 6 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 112 NOTICES Avenue Findlay, Ohio 45840. Applicant’s and Barbourville, Ky., and points with­ days. Supporting shipper: Apco Oil in 5 miles thereof, to Parsons, W. Va. Corp., Liberty Bank Building, Oklahoma representative: Clarence J. Leopold, 511 Nottingham Street, Toledo, Ohio 43610. ant) points within 5 miles thereof, for 180 City, Okla. Send protests to: Ellis L. days. Supporting shipper: Levem N. Annett, District Supervisor, Bureau of Authority sought to operate as a com­ Operations and Compliance, Interstate mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ Forseth, Traffic Manager, Kingsford Co., regular routes, as follows: Property hav­ Post Office Box 1033, Louisville, Ky. Commerce Commission, 227 Federal Of­ Send protests to: R. W. Schneiter, Dis­ fice Building, Des Moines, Iowa 50309. ing either a prior or subsequent move via air transportation from Bowling Green, trict Supervisor, Bureau of Operations No. MC 118989 (Sub-No. 10 TA), filed and Compliance, Interstate Commerce December 28, 1966. Applicant: CON­ Ohio, to Toledo Express Airport, Ohio, Highway 2 near Swanton, Ohio, and from Commission, 207 Exchange Building, 147 TAINER TRANSIT, INC., 5323 South North Upper Street, Lexington, Ky. Ninth Street, Milwaukee, Wis. 53221. Toledo Express Airport, Ohio, Highway 2 near Swanton, Ohio, to Bowling Green, 40507. Applicant’s representative: Richard A. No. MC 128774 TA, filed December 28, Heilprin, Post Office Box 941, 222 South Ohio, for 180 days. Supporting ship­ pers: Daybrook-Ottawa Corp., 1175 1966. Applicant: RICE TRUCKING, Hamilton Street, Madison, Wis. 53701. INC., 151 St. James Street, Mansfield, Authority sought to operate as a com­ North Main Street, Bowling Green, Ohio 43402; Marathon Special Products, Pa. 16933. Applicant’s representative: mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ Edward H. Owlett, 19 Central Avenue, regular routes, as follows: Cans, liQuid Bowling Green, Ohio 43402; Lincolm Floor Machinery Co., 1100 Haskins Road, Wellsboro, Pa. Authority sought to op­ capacity not exceeding 1 gallon and/or erate as a contract carrier, by motor ve­ covers, and incidental parts thereof, Bowling Green, Ohio 43402. Send pro­ tests to: Keith D. Warner, District Su­ hicle, over irregular routes, as follows: from (1) Ripon, Wis., to Niles, Mich, and Corrugated metal pipes, and parts and (2) from Milwaukee and Racine, Wis., to pervisor, Bureau of Operations and Compliance, Interstate Commerce Com­ accessories, from the plantsite of Armco Niles, Mich., on movements having a Steel Corp., Mansfield, Pa., to points in prior origin in Ripon, Wis., with storage mission, 5234 Federal Office Building, Toledo, Ohio 43504. New York and Ohio, for 180 days. Sup­ in transit at Milwaukee and Racine, porting shipper: Armco Steel Corp., Wis.; (3) return of refused or rejected No. MC 128220 (Sub-No. 2 TA), filed December 28, 1966. Applicant: RALPH Post Office Box 157, Mansfield, Pa. Send shipments from Niles, Mich., to the des­ protests to: Kenneth R. Davis, District tination shown in (1) and (2) above, LATHAM, doing business as LATHAM for 180 days. Supporting shipper: Green TRUCKING COMPANY, Post Office Box Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and Giant Co., Le Sueur, Minn. 56058 (K. O. 508, Burnside, Ky. 42519. Applicant’s Compliance, Interstate Commerce Com­ Petrick, Motor Transportation Super­ representative: Louis J. Amato, Central mission, 309 Ü.S. Post Office Building, visor) . Send protests to: W. F. Sibbald, Building, 1033 State Street, Bowling Scranton, Pa. 18503. Jr., District Supervisor, Bureau of Op­ Green, Ky. 42101. Authority sought to erations and Compliance, Interstate operate as a common carrier, by motor By the Commission. vehicle, over irregular routes, as fol­ Commerce Commission, 135 West Wells [seal] H. N eil Garson, Street, Room 807, Milwaukee, Wis. 53203. lows: Charcoal, charcoal briquettes, ux>od Secretary. No. MC 120378 (Sub-No. 3 TA), filed chips, vermiculite, lighter fluid, and December 29, 1966. Applicant: FIND­ spices and sauces used in outdoor cook­ [PB. Doc. 67-131; Filed, Jan. 5, 1967; LAY TRUCK LINE, INC., 420 Trenton ing, from Albany, Burnside, Morehead, 8:47 am.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 3— FRIDAY, JANUARY 6, 1967 FEDERAL REGISTER 113 CUMULATIVE LIST OF PARTS AFFECTED— JANUARY The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during January.

3 CFR Paee 9 CFR Page 29 CFR Page xecutive rders E O : 92______P roposed R ules: June 24,1914 (revoked in part 1500______91 by PLO 4127)______54 14 CFR 824 (revoked in part by PLO 39 (3 documents) _ ___ _ 5 ,6 32 CFR 4128)______54 61 81------52 Proclamations: 71 ______Nov. 6, 1906 (revoked in part 97 __ _ 43 CFR 183_ by PLO 4128)______54 P ublic Land Orders : June 29,1911 (revoked in part 320 by PLO 4128)______1259 (revoked by PLO 4121)___ 52 54 P roposed R ules: 4111 (see PLO 4120) ____ 6 3759------31 21 __ 4120 ______e 39 ______4121 ------„ I . ! 52 5 CFR 43______4122 ------53 65______213...... 7, 75 4123— ----- 53 534_!______7c 71 _____ 4124— ------53 73 ____ 4125— ---- 53 550______7 91______4126 ______54 145 ___ 4127 ------54 7 CFR 4128 ______54 210.. . ___ 0 9 19 CFR 220—_ t___ zzzzz::::: 33 P roposed R ules : 46 CFR 1 ______43------77 4 _ 815------40 49 CFR 907...... - 43 20 CFR 73------6 967...... 404 ______170...... 76 H24.— H P roposed R ules: 21 CFR Proposed Rules : 71-90 (2 documents)______10 8— . - 1137______56 50 56 19_. 51 50 CFR 1138______It91 121. 51 32_...... 79

KNOW YOUR GOVERNMENT U.S. GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION MANUAL

The United States Presents avthorifaHve information about Government agencies (updated and republished annually). Government Describes the creation and authority, organization, and func­ Organization Manual tions off the agencies in the legislative, judicial, and executive is the official guide branches. to the functions of the This handbook is an indispensable reference tool for teachers, Federal Government librarians, scholars, lawyers, and businessmen who need cur­ rent official information about the U.S. Government.

$ 2 0 0 per copy. Paperbound, with charts

Order from t 20402. Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.