DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring the Black Hole Information Paradox

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EXPLORING THE BLACK HOLE INFORMATION PARADOX Item Type Electronic Thesis; text Authors Rathi, Chirag Citation Rathi, Chirag. (2020). EXPLORING THE BLACK HOLE INFORMATION PARADOX (Bachelor's thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA). Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 03/10/2021 21:23:31 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/651341 EXPLORING THE BLACK HOLE INFORMATION PARADOX. By CHIRAG RATHI. A Thesis Submitted to The Honors College In Partial Fulfillment of the Bachelor's degree With Honors in Astronomy THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA MAY 2020 Approved by: Dr. Dimitrios Psaltis Department of Astronomy Abstract.| Mere weeks after Albert Einstein published his theory of general relativity, Karl Schwarzschild came up with the simplest, static solution to Einstein's field equations. This solu- tion implied the existence of a compact object with an infinite potential well. This implied that even photons could not crawl out of this potential well and hence the phrase "even light cannot escape a black hole" came into being. Black holes are characterized by the existence of an event horizon, a surface that disconnects the interior regions of the black hole from the exterior universe. These compact objects existed on paper, without any direct observational evidence, for a century. However, with the recent shift in interests towards gravitational wave astronomy and the success of projects like the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT), we have been able to image the "shadow" of the M87 black hole. General relativity predicts that the shadow of the black hole is going to be stationary while the weather around the black hole can be turbulent. The EHT project not only has the potential to look for any classical evidence for the quantum structure of black holes but also allows us to investigate further into the Black Hole Information Paradox. So, in this project, we develop a method to analyze the Fourier transforms of the perturbed metric around a black hole and describe the macroscopic consequences of each of the proposed solutions to the information paradox. If we analyze the Fourier transforms of the perturbations, we can test the validity of general relativity's prediction about the black hole's shadow. Version 1.0 - May 7, 2020 Information Paradox Chirag Rathi Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 The Information Paradox.................................4 2 Solutions to the Information Paradox6 2.1 The Remnant Solution...................................6 2.2 Gravastars..........................................9 2.3 Firewalls........................................... 10 2.4 Fuzzballs.......................................... 11 2.5 Naked Singularity...................................... 12 2.6 Non-Kerr Black Holes................................... 15 2.7 Wormholes......................................... 16 2.8 Boson stars......................................... 17 2.9 Superspinars........................................ 19 3 Event Horizon Telescope Project 20 3.1 Why are we testing GR with EHT?............................ 22 3.2 Properties of Black Hole Shadows:............................ 22 3.3 Proposed Tests:....................................... 23 3.4 Challenges and Implementation:............................. 24 4 Empirical evidence of Black Hole Perturbations 25 5 Observations from the code 28 6 Conclusions 29 May 7, 2020 2 Information Paradox Chirag Rathi 1 Introduction The twentieth century witnessed an exponential growth in the field of theoretical physics. Two of the most groundbreaking contributions that swept the physics community of its feet were the classical theory of general relativity and quantum mechanics. These two theories have been the most successful in describing the universe and have withstood the test of time. However, these two theories have been at the throats of each other for the past century. There is no smooth transition between the quantum and the classical realms of reality. When we try to reconcile general relativity with quantum mechanics, it looks like we are trying to fit square pegs into round holes. One of the major problems we face on astronomical scales is the Black Hole Information Paradox. Before we begin to understand the crux of the information paradox and what problems it presents to fundamental physics, we need to understand two of the most basic principles{unitarity and equivalence{presented by quantum mechanics and general relativity respectively. Principle of Unitarity: The principle of unitarity is taken as an axiom or a basic postulate of quantum mechanics. It basically states that a pure quantum state must evolve into a pure quantum state. So, initially if we have a pure quantum state and it obeys unitarity then: j finali = Smn j initiali : (1) Here j initiali is the initial (pure) quantum state, j finali is the final quantum state and Smn is the density matrix. Smn takes the initial quantum state to the final quantum state [28]. Principle of Equivalence: This principle in general relativity dictates that an observer falling into the black hole experiences nothing extraordinary at the event horizon. The information paradox puts the principle of unitarity into jeopardy and when one tries to preserve unitarity, the equivalence principle is perilled. Since quantum mechanics is considered simply to be a more fundamental description of reality, theorists are willing to consider general relativity as an approximation to quantum gravity. May 7, 2020 3 Information Paradox Chirag Rathi 1.1 The Information Paradox Although there has been a lot of work in the last four decades, it is fair to say that we are nowhere near a self-consistent theory of quantum gravity. Classical general relativity provides the most successful description of gravitational fields and the space-time metric. Although it is reasonable to ignore quantum gravitational effects on large scales, quantization plays an important role in the behavior of matter fields described by Einstein's equations. Thus, the problem arises when one has to connect classical space-time metric to quantum mechanical matter fields. Towards the end of the twentieth century, it was well understood that black holes behave like thermodynamic systems [7][8]. The laws of black hole mechanics were also developed. The first law of black hole mechanics states: dE = T dSBH + ΩdJ + ΦdQ: (2) Here T, Ω and Φ are interpreted as the temperature, the angular velocity and electric potential of the black hole [22]. The second law states that the quantity SBH does not decrease with time. This quantity was interpreted as the entropy of the black hole by Bekenstein. The Einstein-Hilbert theory of gravity it was found that SBH depends on the surface area, A, of the black hole horizon [22]. A S = ; (3) BH 4¯hG whereh ¯ is the Planck's constant and G is the universal gravitational constant. These results of black hole dynamics are consequences of the classical theories of gravity. In lieu of a perfect quantum- mechanical description of gravity, Stephen Hawking applied quantum field theory to curved space- time as a decent approximation to quantum gravity in the classical limit. In 1974, he proposed that quantum mechanical effects cause black holes to emit particles as if they were hot bodies [16]. The temperature of the black hole is expected to be: hκ M = 10−6 o ; (4) 2kπ M where k is the Boltzmann constant, κ is the surface gravity of the black hole, Mo is the mass of the May 7, 2020 4 Information Paradox Chirag Rathi Sun and M is the mass of the black hole. The emission of radiation confirms the thermodynamic nature of black holes. Consider the gravitational collapse of a star into a black hole. In the classical theory of gravity, the black hole will rapidly settle down into a stationary state characterized only by its mass, charge and angular momentum (the no-hair theorem). The Schwarzschild solution, the Reissner-Nordstrom metric, the Kerr metric and the Kerr-Newman metric are the four solutions that represent the black hole solutions of general relativity [1]. Hawking predicted that the event horizon produces pairs of quanta. One particle of each pair escapes into space towards infinity while its partner falls into the singularity. Hawking traced the wave packets associated with these particles, backwards in time and found that they originated from two distinct waves: one with positive frequency and another with negative frequency. However, the mixing of positive and negative frequencies in the stationary black hole solution does not happen and hence, particle creation should not be expected. So far, we have not considered superradiance. Zel'dovich showed that low-frequency electro- magnetic (EM) waves scattered by a rotating cylinder, are amplified [10]. Following this proposal, Misner suggested that rotating black holes would also amplify the scattered EM low frequency waves [25]. Upon quantization, this amplification leads to the emission of particles from the rotat- ing black holes. This emission was a precursor to Hawking radiation. Stephen Hawking proposed that in addition to the radiation in the superradiant modes, there is a steady emission at all modes κ by the black hole with temperature 2π [16]. The thermal emission from the black hole is dubbed the Hawking radiation. If the thermal emissions are highly mixed, it is impossible to reconstruct any information about the black hole that emitted this radiation. This conclusion violates the principle of Unitarity in quantum mechanics and the principle of equivalence in general relativity. This leads to the infamous Black Hole Information Paradox. The main idea is that a black hole, initially in a pure quantum state, evaporates out of existence by emitting highly mixed states. A typical initial state of the black hole is consid- ered to be non-degenerate. So, at a later time, the full quantum state of the system must be jΨi = j0initiali j radiationi.
Recommended publications
  • Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves

    Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves

    Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Ue-Li Pen, Lindsay King, Latham Boyle CITA Feb 15, 2012 U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Overview I Pulsar Scattering I VLBI ISM holography, distance measures I Enhanced Pulsar Timing Array gravity waves I fuzzballs U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Pulsar Scattering I Pulsars scintillate strongly due to ISM propagation I Lens of geometric size ∼ AU I Can be imaged with VLBI (Brisken et al 2010) I Deconvolved by interstellar holography (Walker et al 2008) U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Scattering Image Data from Brisken et al, Holographic VLBI. U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary ISM enigma −8 I Scattering angle observed mas, 10 rad. I Snell's law: sin(θ1)= sin(θ2) = n2=n1 −12 I n − 1 ∼ 10 . I 4 orders of magnitude mismatch. U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Possibilities I turbulent ISM: sum of many small scatters. Cannot explain discrete images. I confinement problem: super mini dark matter halos, cosmic strings? I Geometric alignment: Goldreich and Shridhar (2006) I Snell's law at grazing incidence: ∆α = (1 − n2=n1)/α I grazing incidence is geometry preferred at 2-D structures U.
  • A Conceptual Model for the Origin of the Cutoff Parameter in Exotic Compact Objects

    A Conceptual Model for the Origin of the Cutoff Parameter in Exotic Compact Objects

    S S symmetry Article A Conceptual Model for the Origin of the Cutoff Parameter in Exotic Compact Objects Wilson Alexander Rojas Castillo 1 and Jose Robel Arenas Salazar 2,* 1 Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá UN.11001, Colombia; [email protected] 2 Observatorio Astronómico Nacional, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá UN.11001, Colombia * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 October 2020; Accepted: 30 November 2020 ; Published: 14 December 2020 Abstract: A Black Hole (BH) is a spacetime region with a horizon and where geodesics converge to a singularity. At such a point, the gravitational field equations fail. As an alternative to the problem of the singularity arises the existence of Exotic Compact Objects (ECOs) that prevent the problem of the singularity through a transition phase of matter once it has crossed the horizon. ECOs are characterized by a closeness parameter or cutoff, e, which measures the degree of compactness of the object. This parameter is established as the difference between the radius of the ECO’s surface and the gravitational radius. Thus, different values of e correspond to different types of ECOs. If e is very big, the ECO behaves more like a star than a black hole. On the contrary, if e tends to a very small value, the ECO behaves like a black hole. It is considered a conceptual model of the origin of the cutoff for ECOs, when a dust shell contracts gravitationally from an initial position to near the Schwarzschild radius. This allowed us to find that the cutoff makes two types of contributions: a classical one governed by General Relativity and one of a quantum nature, if the ECO is very close to the horizon, when estimating that the maximum entropy is contained within the material that composes the shell.
  • Constraints on Black-Hole Charges with the 2017 EHT Observations of M87*

    Constraints on Black-Hole Charges with the 2017 EHT Observations of M87*

    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 103, 104047 (2021) Constraints on black-hole charges with the 2017 EHT observations of M87* – Prashant Kocherlakota ,1 Luciano Rezzolla,1 3 Heino Falcke,4 Christian M. Fromm,5,6,1 Michael Kramer,7 Yosuke Mizuno,8,9 Antonios Nathanail,9,10 H´ector Olivares,4 Ziri Younsi,11,9 Kazunori Akiyama,12,13,5 Antxon Alberdi,14 Walter Alef,7 Juan Carlos Algaba,15 Richard Anantua,5,6,16 Keiichi Asada,17 Rebecca Azulay,18,19,7 Anne-Kathrin Baczko,7 David Ball,20 Mislav Baloković,5,6 John Barrett,12 Bradford A. Benson,21,22 Dan Bintley,23 Lindy Blackburn,5,6 Raymond Blundell,6 Wilfred Boland,24 Katherine L. Bouman,5,6,25 Geoffrey C. Bower,26 Hope Boyce,27,28 – Michael Bremer,29 Christiaan D. Brinkerink,4 Roger Brissenden,5,6 Silke Britzen,7 Avery E. Broderick,30 32 Dominique Broguiere,29 Thomas Bronzwaer,4 Do-Young Byun,33,34 John E. Carlstrom,35,22,36,37 Andrew Chael,38,39 Chi-kwan Chan,20,40 Shami Chatterjee,41 Koushik Chatterjee,42 Ming-Tang Chen,26 Yongjun Chen (陈永军),43,44 Paul M. Chesler,5 Ilje Cho,33,34 Pierre Christian,45 John E. Conway,46 James M. Cordes,41 Thomas M. Crawford,22,35 Geoffrey B. Crew,12 Alejandro Cruz-Osorio,9 Yuzhu Cui,47,48 Jordy Davelaar,49,16,4 Mariafelicia De Laurentis,50,9,51 – Roger Deane,52 54 Jessica Dempsey,23 Gregory Desvignes,55 Sheperd S. Doeleman,5,6 Ralph P. Eatough,56,7 Joseph Farah,6,5,57 Vincent L.
  • Active Galactic Nuclei: a Brief Introduction

    Active Galactic Nuclei: a Brief Introduction

    Active Galactic Nuclei: a brief introduction Manel Errando Washington University in St. Louis The discovery of quasars 3C 273: The first AGN z=0.158 2 <latexit sha1_base64="4D0JDPO4VKf1BWj0/SwyHGTHSAM=">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</latexit> <latexit sha1_base64="H7Rv+ZHksM7/70841dw/vasasCQ=">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</latexit> The power source of quasars • The luminosity (L) of quasars, i.e. how bright they are, can be as high as Lquasar ~ 1012 Lsun ~ 1040 W. • The energy source of quasars is accretion power: - Nuclear fusion: 2 11 1 ∆E =0.007 mc =6 10 W s g−
  • Arxiv:0905.1355V2 [Gr-Qc] 4 Sep 2009 Edrt 1 O Ealdrve) Nti Otx,Re- Context, Been Has As This Collapse in Denoted Gravitational of Review)

    Arxiv:0905.1355V2 [Gr-Qc] 4 Sep 2009 Edrt 1 O Ealdrve) Nti Otx,Re- Context, Been Has As This Collapse in Denoted Gravitational of Review)

    Can accretion disk properties distinguish gravastars from black holes? Tiberiu Harko∗ Department of Physics and Center for Theoretical and Computational Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong Zolt´an Kov´acs† Max-Planck-Institute f¨ur Radioastronomie, Auf dem H¨ugel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany and Department of Experimental Physics, University of Szeged, D´om T´er 9, Szeged 6720, Hungary Francisco S. N. Lobo‡ Centro de F´ısica Te´orica e Computacional, Faculdade de Ciˆencias da Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Gama Pinto 2, P-1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal (Dated: September 4, 2009) Gravastars, hypothetic astrophysical objects, consisting of a dark energy condensate surrounded by a strongly correlated thin shell of anisotropic matter, have been proposed as an alternative to the standard black hole picture of general relativity. Observationally distinguishing between astrophysical black holes and gravastars is a major challenge for this latter theoretical model. This due to the fact that in static gravastars large stability regions (of the transition layer of these configurations) exist that are sufficiently close to the expected position of the event horizon, so that it would be difficult to distinguish the exterior geometry of gravastars from an astrophysical black hole. However, in the context of stationary and axially symmetrical geometries, a possibility of distinguishing gravastars from black holes is through the comparative study of thin accretion disks around rotating gravastars and Kerr-type black holes, respectively. In the present paper, we consider accretion disks around slowly rotating gravastars, with all the metric tensor components estimated up to the second order in the angular velocity.
  • Undergraduate Thesis on Supermassive Black Holes

    Undergraduate Thesis on Supermassive Black Holes

    Into the Void: Mass Function of Supermassive Black Holes in the local universe A Thesis Presented to The Division of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Reed College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts Farhanul Hasan May 2018 Approved for the Division (Physics) Alison Crocker Acknowledgements Writing a thesis is a long and arduous process. There were times when it seemed further from my reach than the galaxies I studied. It’s with great relief and pride that I realize I made it this far and didn’t let it overpower me at the end. I have so many people to thank in very little space, and so much to be grateful for. Alison, you were more than a phenomenal thesis adviser, you inspired me to believe that Astro is cool. Your calm helped me stop freaking out at the end of February, when I had virtually no work to show for, and a back that ached with every step I took. Thank you for pushing me forward. Working with you in two different research projects were very enriching experiences, and I appreciate you not giving up on me, even after all the times I blanked on how to proceed forward. Thank you Johnny, for being so appreciative of my work, despite me bringing in a thesis that I myself barely understood when I brought it to your table. I was overjoyed when I heard you wanted to be on my thesis board! Thanks to Reed, for being the quirky, intellectual community that it prides itself on being.
  • Chapter 22 Neutron Stars and Black Holes Units of Chapter 22 22.1 Neutron Stars 22.2 Pulsars 22.3 Xxneutron-Star Binaries: X-Ray Bursters

    Chapter 22 Neutron Stars and Black Holes Units of Chapter 22 22.1 Neutron Stars 22.2 Pulsars 22.3 Xxneutron-Star Binaries: X-Ray Bursters

    Chapter 22 Neutron Stars and Black Holes Units of Chapter 22 22.1 Neutron Stars 22.2 Pulsars 22.3 XXNeutron-Star Binaries: X-ray bursters [Look at the slides and the pictures in your book, but I won’t test you on this in detail, and we may skip altogether in class.] 22.4 Gamma-Ray Bursts 22.5 Black Holes 22.6 XXEinstein’s Theories of Relativity Special Relativity 22.7 Space Travel Near Black Holes 22.8 Observational Evidence for Black Holes Tests of General Relativity Gravity Waves: A New Window on the Universe Neutron Stars and Pulsars (sec. 22.1, 2 in textbook) 22.1 Neutron Stars According to models for stellar explosions: After a carbon detonation supernova (white dwarf in binary), little or nothing remains of the original star. After a core collapse supernova, part of the core may survive. It is very dense—as dense as an atomic nucleus—and is called a neutron star. [Recall that during core collapse the iron core (ashes of previous fusion reactions) is disintegrated into protons and neutrons, the protons combine with the surrounding electrons to make more neutrons, so the core becomes pure neutron matter. Because of this, core collapse can be halted if the core’s mass is between 1.4 (the Chandrasekhar limit) and about 3-4 solar masses, by neutron degeneracy.] What do you get if the core mass is less than 1.4 solar masses? Greater than 3-4 solar masses? 22.1 Neutron Stars Neutron stars, although they have 1–3 solar masses, are so dense that they are very small.
  • Quantum-Corrected Rotating Black Holes and Naked Singularities in (2 + 1) Dimensions

    Quantum-Corrected Rotating Black Holes and Naked Singularities in (2 + 1) Dimensions

    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 99, 104023 (2019) Quantum-corrected rotating black holes and naked singularities in (2 + 1) dimensions † ‡ Marc Casals,1,2,* Alessandro Fabbri,3, Cristián Martínez,4, and Jorge Zanelli4,§ 1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, CEP 22290-180, Brazil 2School of Mathematics and Statistics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland 3Departamento de Física Teórica and IFIC, Universidad de Valencia-CSIC, C. Dr. Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot, Spain 4Centro de Estudios Científicos (CECs), Arturo Prat 514, Valdivia 5110466, Chile (Received 15 February 2019; published 13 May 2019) We analytically investigate the perturbative effects of a quantum conformally coupled scalar field on rotating (2 þ 1)-dimensional black holes and naked singularities. In both cases we obtain the quantum- backreacted metric analytically. In the black hole case, we explore the quantum corrections on different regions of relevance for a rotating black hole geometry. We find that the quantum effects lead to a growth of both the event horizon and the ergosphere, as well as to a reduction of the angular velocity compared to their corresponding unperturbed values. Quantum corrections also give rise to the formation of a curvature singularity at the Cauchy horizon and show no evidence of the appearance of a superradiant instability. In the naked singularity case, quantum effects lead to the formation of a horizon that hides the conical defect, thus turning it into a black hole. The fact that these effects occur not only for static but also for spinning geometries makes a strong case for the role of quantum mechanics as a cosmic censor in Nature.
  • Pulsar Physics Without Magnetars

    Pulsar Physics Without Magnetars

    Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys. Vol.8 (2008), Supplement, 213–218 Chinese Journal of (http://www.chjaa.org) Astronomy and Astrophysics Pulsar Physics without Magnetars Wolfgang Kundt Argelander-Institut f¨ur Astronomie der Universit¨at, Auf dem H¨ugel 71, D-53121 Bonn, Germany Abstract Magnetars, as defined some 15 yr ago, are inconsistent both with fundamental physics, and with the (by now) two observed upward jumps of the period derivatives (of two of them). Instead, the class of peculiar X-ray sources commonly interpreted as magnetars can be understood as the class of throttled pulsars, i.e. of pulsars strongly interacting with their CSM. This class is even expected to harbour the sources of the Cosmic Rays, and of all the (extraterrestrial) Gamma-Ray Bursts. Key words: magnetars — throttled pulsars — dying pulsars — cavity — low-mass disk 1 DEFINITION AND PROPERTIES OF THE MAGNETARS Magnetars have been defined by Duncan and Thompson some 15 years ago, as spinning, compact X-ray sources - probably neutron stars - which are powered by the slow decay of their strong magnetic field, of strength 1015 G near the surface, cf. (Duncan & Thompson 1992; Thompson & Duncan 1996). They are now thought to comprise the anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs), soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs), recurrent radio transients (RRATs), or ‘stammerers’, or ‘burpers’, and the ‘dim isolated neutron stars’ (DINSs), i.e. a large, fairly well defined subclass of all neutron stars, which has the following properties (Mereghetti et al. 2002): 1) They are isolated neutron stars, with spin periods P between 5 s and 12 s, and similar glitch behaviour to other neutron-star sources, which correlates with their X-ray bursting.
  • Final Fate of a Massive Star

    Final Fate of a Massive Star

    FINAL FATE OF A MASSIVE STAR Modern science has introduced the world to plenty of strange ideas, but surely one of the strangest is the fate of a massive star that has reached the end of its life. Having exhausted the fuel that sustained it for millions of years, the star is no longer able to hold itself up under its own weight, and it starts collapsing catastrophically. Modest stars like the sun also collapse but they stabilize again at a smaller size, whereas if a star is massive enough, its gravity overwhelms all the forces that might halt the collapse. From a size of Fig. 1 Black Hole (Artist’s conception) millions of kilometers across, the star crumples to a pinprick smaller than the dot on an “i.” What is the final fate of such massive collapsing stars? This is one of the most exciting questions in astrophysics and modern cosmology today. An amazing inter-play of the key forces of nature takes place here, including the gravity and quantum mechanics. This phenomenon may hold the key secrets to man’s search for a unified understanding of all forces of nature. It also may have most exciting connections and implications for astronomy and high energy astrophysics. This is an outstanding unresolved issue that excites physicists and the lay person alike. The story really began some eight decades ago when Subrahmanyan Fig. 2 An artist’s conception of Chandrasekhar probed the question of final fate of stars such as the Sun. He naked singularity showed that such a star, on exhausting its internal nuclear fuel, would stabilize as a `white dwarf', which is about a thousand kilometers in size.
  • Progenitors of Magnetars and Hyperaccreting Magnetized Disks

    Progenitors of Magnetars and Hyperaccreting Magnetized Disks

    Feeding Compact Objects: Accretion on All Scales Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 290, 2012 c International Astronomical Union 2013 C. M. Zhang, T. Belloni, M. M´endez & S. N. Zhang, eds. doi:10.1017/S1743921312020340 Progenitors of Magnetars and Hyperaccreting Magnetized Disks Y. Xie1 andS.N.Zhang1,2 1 National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy Of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, P. R.China email: [email protected] 2 Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, P. R. China email: [email protected] Abstract. We propose that a magnetar could be formed during the core collapse of massive stars or coalescence of two normal neutron stars, through collecting and inheriting the magnetic fields magnified by hyperaccreting disk. After the magnetar is born, its dipole magnetic fields in turn have a major influence on the following accretion. The decay of its toroidal field can fuel the persistent X-ray luminosity of either an SGR or AXP; however the decay of only the poloidal field is insufficient to do so. Keywords. Magnetar, accretion disk, gamma ray bursts, magnetic fields 1. Introduction Neutron stars (NSs) with magnetic field B stronger than the quantum critical value, 2 3 13 Bcr = m c /e ≈ 4.4 × 10 G, are called magnetars. Observationally, a magnetar may appear as a soft gamma-ray repeater (SGR) or an anomalous X-ray pulsar (AXP). It is believed that its persistent X-ray luminosity is powered by the consumption of their B- decay energy (e.g. Duncan & Thompson 1992; Paczynski 1992). However, the formation of strong B of a magnetar remains unresolved, and the possible explanations are divided into three classes: (i) B is generated by a convective dynamo (Duncan & Thompson 1992); (ii) B is essentially of fossil origin (e.g.
  • Light Rays, Singularities, and All That

    Light Rays, Singularities, and All That

    Light Rays, Singularities, and All That Edward Witten School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA Abstract This article is an introduction to causal properties of General Relativity. Topics include the Raychaudhuri equation, singularity theorems of Penrose and Hawking, the black hole area theorem, topological censorship, and the Gao-Wald theorem. The article is based on lectures at the 2018 summer program Prospects in Theoretical Physics at the Institute for Advanced Study, and also at the 2020 New Zealand Mathematical Research Institute summer school in Nelson, New Zealand. Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Causal Paths 4 3 Globally Hyperbolic Spacetimes 11 3.1 Definition . 11 3.2 Some Properties of Globally Hyperbolic Spacetimes . 15 3.3 More On Compactness . 18 3.4 Cauchy Horizons . 21 3.5 Causality Conditions . 23 3.6 Maximal Extensions . 24 4 Geodesics and Focal Points 25 4.1 The Riemannian Case . 25 4.2 Lorentz Signature Analog . 28 4.3 Raychaudhuri’s Equation . 31 4.4 Hawking’s Big Bang Singularity Theorem . 35 5 Null Geodesics and Penrose’s Theorem 37 5.1 Promptness . 37 5.2 Promptness And Focal Points . 40 5.3 More On The Boundary Of The Future . 46 1 5.4 The Null Raychaudhuri Equation . 47 5.5 Trapped Surfaces . 52 5.6 Penrose’s Theorem . 54 6 Black Holes 58 6.1 Cosmic Censorship . 58 6.2 The Black Hole Region . 60 6.3 The Horizon And Its Generators . 63 7 Some Additional Topics 66 7.1 Topological Censorship . 67 7.2 The Averaged Null Energy Condition .