DOCSLIB.ORG

Kent County Council Community Infrastructure Provision: Review of Current and Future Service Strategies in Kent

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kent County Council Community Infrastructure Provision: Review of Current and Future Service Strategies in Kent Kent County Council Community Infrastructure Provision: Review of current and future service strategies in Kent March 2009 The information in this document is intended to assist local planning authorities in the preparation of Local Development Frameworks and in the determination of planning applications and any consequent planning appeals. The information has a base date of June 2008. The information will be updated on an annual basis to coincide with the publication of the Annual Monitoring Reports prepared under Regulation 48 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations (2004) as amended. The information contained in this document is copyright to Kent County Council and its use by third parties is at their own risk. To contact us on this document please email: [email protected] Kent County Council Community Infrastructure Provision Contents Evidence base statement for local planning authorities 1. Purpose and background of the study 3 2. The legal framework for securing development contributions 5 3. The National Planning Policy Framework 6 4. Overarching strategies and frameworks 10 5. The approach to securing development contributions 11 6. Guide to development contributions and the provision of community infrastructure (March 2007) 12 7. Service provider general statements: The County Strategy 13 p Communities 13 p Adult education 13 p KEY Training 16 p Libraries and archive service 16 p Youth service 21 p Gateway strategy 25 p Primary and secondary education 26 p Adult social services 32 1 Kent County Council Community Infrastructure Provision 8. Service provider district statements 40 Ashford 41 Canterbury 66 Dartford 84 Dover 103 Gravesham 125 Maidstone 144 Sevenoaks 165 Shepway 183 Swale 204 Thanet 227 Tonbridge and Malling 248 Tunbridge Wells 266 9. Appendices 288 I. County council statistical profile 288 II. Background and source information 290 2 Kent County Council Community Infrastructure Provision 1. Purpose and background 1.1 The purpose of this paper is to inform the preparation of and transport links; drainage and sewer systems; power Local Development Frameworks (LDFs) in terms of the likely supplies; telecommunications; open space and landscaping etc. service requirements of Kent County Council, in its role as More recently, the list has expanded to include both the on the provider of a number of key community services, and to and off-site provision of a range of community services, provide the background evidence base for the negotiation of regarded as necessary to promote sustainable development development contributions and/or the provision of offsite and to ensure that the occupants of new developments have and on site community facilities in relation to specific access to essential facilities.These facilities may incorporate development proposals. services for which the county council has a statutory responsibility: community services (including adult education, 1.2 The preparation of Local Development Frameworks has seen libraries and archives and youth service); primary and renewed emphasis on the compilation and analysis of evidence secondary education; and adult social services. in support of a development plan’s policies and proposals.The accuracy of this evidence is crucial to a plan’s progression to 1.5 It is accepted practice that developers may be required to pay adoption and several cases have emerged where plans have for the additional impacts of their schemes rather than pass been rejected due to inadequate reasoned argument and these costs directly to the ratepayers of a locality (Circular supporting factual content. 5/2005 refers). In order to be fair to both developers and the local community however, a distinction has to be drawn 1.3 Planning Policy Statement 12 identifies a list of tests, known as between meeting a deficiency in existing provision, which “tests of soundness” against which LDF policies and proposals should be paid for through central government grants and the are being judged. The timely provision of adequate local rates system, and the mitigation of the additional impacts infrastructure is crucial to this assessment. created by a new development. Distinguishing between an existing deficiency in provision and the mitigation of additional 1.4 In its broadest sense infrastructure can embrace a multiplicity impacts however can require quite sophisticated analysis to of different services required to support different forms of establish the baseline position for each service, from which development. Historically, infrastructure has been interpreted any additional funding might then be calculated. Once having as the provision of a number of key physical elements: roads established the potential deficit, each scheme has to be the 3 Kent County Council Community Infrastructure Provision subject of a financial viability test, to ensure that the cost of additional community infrastructure can reasonably be borne by the development in question.This process may trigger intensive negotiation between the parties, whilst failure to reach an agreement can result in the refusal to grant a planning permission. 4 Kent County Council Community Infrastructure Provision 2. The legal framework for securing development contributions 2.1 The system for securing development contributions relies (iii) the item(s) sought should fairly and reasonably relate in extensively on the use of planning obligations using powers scale and kind to the proposed development and be under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 reasonable in all other respects; (as amended).This section provides the legal framework for setting planning obligations either for the collection of monies (iv) where instances of development viability are concerned or for securing community development on or off site, where it is for the local authority and other public agencies to planning conditions are not considered to be appropriate.The decide the balance between contributions and public policy guidance and legal framework has been subject to review sector provision, to enable the development to be by the government on several occasions and various circulars acceptable in planning terms. have been produced since the Act was first passed, explaining how the system might work in policy terms and its scope and extent. Circular 5/2005 provides the overarching guidance in respect of planning obligations at the present time.Annex B to the circular contains the principles that underpin the process. The circular sets out the Secretary of State’s policy tests that must be applied when seeking planning obligations: (i) the matter sought from an obligation should be necessary in terms of planning in order to ensure the development accords with sustainable development objectives and policies in the development plan; (ii) the obligation must be directly related to the development; i.e. there should be a functional or geographic link between the development and the item being provided as part of the developer’s contribution; 5 Kent County Council Community Infrastructure Provision 3. The national planning policy framework: Planning Policy Statement 1 (PPS 1): 3.4 The adopted Kent and Medway Structure Plan (K&MSP) Delivering Sustainable Development supports seeking contributions for necessary infrastructure to serve proposed development, including adult education; 3.1 PPS1 provides strategic guidance on the delivery of sustainable primary and secondary education; and community facilities. development.The statement advises that regional spatial The scale of community infrastructure that is proposed in the strategies and local development documents should include structure plan is outlined in Kent – What Price Growth, Kent policies that can impact upon land use by influencing demands County Council June 2003”1.Whilst Towards 2010 and Vision or needs for development which are not capable of being for Kent are the county council’s policy documents that give delivered solely through the grant of planning permission. the context to these areas of the county council’s services. The Vision for Kent 2 is the county council’s long term Planning Policy Statement 12 (PPS 12): community strategy for developing services to Kent residents. Local Development Frameworks Each service area then develops its own strategy exploring where and how services might be improved. 3.2 PPS 12 provides strategic guidance on the formulation and adoption of Local Development Frameworks.The statement Kent and Medway Structure Plan and the South East Plan highlights the importance of providing adequate infrastructure when considering new development.The assessment of the 3.5 The adopted policies for seeking community infrastructure (on existing capacity of infrastructure and the need for additional or off-site) or financial contributions towards its provision is facilities is considered to be crucial.A strategic approach to found in the Kent and Medway Structure Plan3 (K&MSP), policies infrastructure provision is required, including forward planning QL11, QL12 and IM1.These state as follows: to inform public agencies and statutory undertakers of the possible impacts of future development. 3.3 The adequacy of infrastructure can also be a material 1 www.kent.gov.uk/publications/council-and-democracy/what-price-growth.htm consideration when deciding whether planning permission 2 Kent.gov.uk/publications/council-and-democracy/vision-for-kent.html should be granted. 3 Kmsp.org.uk 6 Kent County Council Community Infrastructure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Allington Castle Conway
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society \ u"*_; <Ak_CL <&__•_ •E!**?f*K- TOff*^ ^ i if •P%% —5** **•"'. • . " ft - . if • i ' _! ' ' •_• .' |• > ' V ''% .; fl y H H i Pko^o.l ALLINGTON CASTLE (A): GENERAL VIEW FROM E. [W. ff.-B. ( 337 ) ALLINGTON CASTLE. BY SIR W. MARTIN CONWAY, M.A., E.S.A. THE immediate neighbourhood of Allington Castle appears to have been a very ancient site of human habitation. It lies close to what must have been an important ford over the Medway, at a point which was approximately the head of low-tide navigation. The road from the east, which debouches on the right bank of the river close beside the present Malta Inn, led straight to the ford, and its continua- tion on the other bank can be traced as a deep furrow through the Lock Wood, and almost as far as the church, though in part it has recently been obliterated by the dejection of quarry debris. This ancient road may be traced up to the Pilgrims' Way, from which it branched off. In the neighbourhood of the castle, at points not exactly recorded, late Celtic burials have been discovered containing remains of the Aylesford type. Where there were burials there was no doubt a settlement. In Roman days the site was likewise well occupied, and the buried ruins of a Roman villa are marked on the ordnance map in the field west of the castle. The site seems to be indicated by a level place on the sloping hill, and when the land in question falls into my hands I propose to make the researches necessary to reveal the situation and character of the villa.
    [Show full text]
  • Bed-Blocking Crisis As Care Targets Missed
    Four editions delivered to over 88,000 homes every month downsmail.co.uk MaidstoneMaidstone TownTown EditionEdition Maidstone & Malling’s No. 1 newspaper FREE Maidstone Town | Maidstone East | Maidstone South | Malling November 2015 No. 223 News Bed-blocking crisis County departure KCC is planning to remove its services from Maidstone Gate- way in King Street to save as care targets missed money. 4 BED-blocking in local hospitals has reached an “unprecedented level”, with Donations suffer KCC flouting care transfer targets by more than nine times. CHARITIES are missing out due In July 2015 there were 1,529 in- and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust. gent Care Network – has been inef- to a loss of business car stances – more than double the total The trust board was told that un- fective.” parks to housing. 6 a year earlier – where patients were less the issues were resolved the hos- During July in the Maidstone and stuck in beds in West Kent hospitals pitals would struggle to cope with Tunbridge Wells hospitals there (covering Maidstone, Tonbridge, demand, even when a new ward were 250 patients waiting for trans- Objection promise Sevenoaks and Tunbridge Wells) opens at Tunbridge Wells Hospital. fer. The situation improved slightly A KCC vow could be tested by a without a suitable place of transfer. The problem is compromising in August, but there were still care proposal to build 250 24 Of these, 687 were due to a lack of standard four-hour A&E waiting transfer delays for 181 inpatients homes near Sutton Road. social care capacity – massively time targets, as well as care for pa- (7.1%) in the two hospitals.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Area 3.Cdr
    Area 3: Wormshill to Area 3: Wormshill to Landscape Character Areas Landscape Character Areas Otterden North Downs Otterden North Downs Area: From west of the Physical Influence Key Characteristics: A249 to the eastern The chalk landform is very dominant here, with an exhilarating, large-scale boundary of the Borough, character that is reinforced by the medium to large-scale field pattern. The 2 including Bicknor, topography is dramatically undulating, except in the vicinity of Bicknor, with , high, rolling chalk downland Wormshill and Frinstead; extensive views both north and south. The cruciform war memorial, carved dominates; northwards from into the chalk above Lenham, is visible over an extensive area. Harrietsham to the , less extensive dip slope; Borough boundary. , Historical and Cultural Influences wide arable fields contained Although there are few settlements of any size, hamlets such as Otterden by dense woodland belts; have Old English place names (Otter's people rather than to do with otters) , network of small, often and are long established, unlike the central part of the North Downs dip sunken, narrow lanes; Area 3 slope. Wormshill means 'Woden's Hill', dedicated to the chief of the , Teutonic gods. This variant dates from the 13th century. occasional dramatic extensive views over the 5 Low Weald. 4 6 7 Scale Bar 5 Chestnut coppice with oak standards 0 1 2 4 8 km Torry Hill Park lies 1¼ miles east of Frinstead village. This private family home, a copy of the original Georgian building, lies within a 930ha/2,300 Landscape Character acre estate with extensive mid-19th century parkland and 4ha of largely This continuation of the North Downs dipslope is characterised by the very undulating topography, with a very small 20th century garden.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Parish Registers the Kent History and Library Centre
    A Guide to Parish Registers The Kent History and Library Centre Introduction This handlist includes details of original parish registers, bishops' transcripts and transcripts held at the Kent History and Library Centre and Canterbury Cathedral Archives. There is also a guide to the location of the original registers held at Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre and four other repositories holding registers for parishes that were formerly in Kent. This Guide lists parish names in alphabetical order and indicates where parish registers, bishops' transcripts and transcripts are held. Parish Registers The guide gives details of the christening, marriage and burial registers received to date. Full details of the individual registers will be found in the parish catalogues in the search room and community history area. The majority of these registers are available to view on microfilm. Many of the parish registers for the Canterbury diocese are now available on www.findmypast.co.uk access to which is free in all Kent libraries. Bishops’ Transcripts This Guide gives details of the Bishops’ Transcripts received to date. Full details of the individual registers will be found in the parish handlist in the search room and Community History area. The Bishops Transcripts for both Rochester and Canterbury diocese are held at the Kent History and Library Centre. Transcripts There is a separate guide to the transcripts available at the Kent History and Library Centre. These are mainly modern copies of register entries that have been donated to the
    [Show full text]
  • Draught Copy Distribution List
    Angel The Green Addington Poppy Fields St. Laurence Avenue Allington Bush Rochester Road Aylesford Chequers High Street Aylesford Lower Bell Old Chatham Road Aylesford Bull Tonbridge Road Barming Redstart North Street Barming Lion Of Kent Ashford Road Bearsted Oak on the Green The Green Bearsted White Horse The Green Bearsted Rose Ashford Bearsted Bull The Street Benenden Woolpack Benover Road Benover Red Lion High Street Biddenden Three Chimneys Hareplain Road Biddenden Nevill Bull Ryarsh Road Birling Beer Barn Sutton Road Boughton Monchelsea Cock Heath Road Boughton Monchelsea Mulberry Tree Hermitage Lane Boughton Monchelsea Kings Arms The Street Boxley Lord Raglan Chart Hill Road Chart Sutton George Hotel Stone Street Cranbrook White Horse Carriers Road Cranbrook Bull Lower Road East Farleigh Horseshoes Dean St East Farleigh Tickled Trout Lower Road East Farleigh Walnut Tree Forge Lane East Farleigh King & Queen New Road East Malling Rising Sun Mill Street East Malling Bush, Blackbird and Thrush Bush Road East Peckham Bell & Jorrocks Biddenden Road Frttenden Goudhurst Inn Cranbrook Road Goudhurst Star & Eagle High Street Goudhurst Vine High Street Goudhurst Kings Head Headcorn Road Grafty Green Who'd A Thought It Headcorn Road Grafty Green Early Bird Grove Green Centre Grove Green Fox & Goose Weavering Street Grove Green Rose & Crown Otford Lane Halstead Hawkenbury Hawkenbury Road Hawkenbury Eight Bells The Moor Hawkhurst Great House Gills Green Hawkhurst Oak & Ivy Rye Road Hawkhurst Queens Inn Rye Road Hawkhurst Royal Oak Rye Road
    [Show full text]
  • Maidstone Borough Council Joint Transportation Board
    MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD 23RD JANUARY 2013 Report of the Director of Highways and Transportation Member Highway Fund program update for Maidstone Borough. The following schemes are those which have been approved by both the relevant Member and have been approved by John Burr, the Director of Highways and Transportation. This information is up to date as of 11th January 2013. For any further information on any of the schemes below, please liaise with the Member Highway Fund Officer. Paul Carter – Maidstone Rural North Scheme CSM Cost Status Yeoman Way, Bearsted – Reinstatement of 16900466 £510 Programmed for tree on central island completion by end of Jan – weather dependant The Orchard , Bearsted – Installation of 12400499 £650 Programmed – safety related restrictions awaiting date Church Lane, Boxley – Installation of Salt 12400498 £350 Completed Bin Walderslade Woods Road – Installation of 16900346 £15,000 Works On-Site Safety Improvements and alteration of speed limit Cuckoowood Ave – Installation of Parking 16900337 £1500 Further works Restrictions required Grovewood Drive South – Installation of 16900336 £1300 Completed 2No. sets of dropped kerbs Restharrow Road, Grove Green – 16900335 £2500 Awaiting Installation of Street Light and warning residents signage feedback Various Locations in Boxley – Installation 16900889 £1050 Completed of Salt Bins Bearsted Green – Restoration of fingerpost 16900819 £1500 Works ordered sign Boxley Parish – Provision of 2No. Salt 16900815 £2118 Ordered Spreaders Boxley Parish
    [Show full text]
  • Maidstone Borough Council INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING STATEMENT (2019-2020)
    INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING STATEMENT: 2019/2020 MAIDSTONE’S APPROACH TO SECURING CONTRIBUTIONS FROM DEVELOPMENT DECEMBER 2020 1 Contents 1. Introduction and Strategic importance of the IFS ............................................ 3 2. Maidstone Borough Council Infrastructure Priorities ....................................... 4 3. Developer Contributions ................................................................................... 4 a. Overview ....................................................................................................... 4 b. Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and Spending Protocol .................. 4-5 c. Section 106 Agreements ............................................................................... 6 d. Other Funding Sources .................................................................................. 6 e.Who are the main infrastructure partners for what types of infrastructure?... 6 4. Developer contributions received in 2019/2020 including opening balance ... 6 a. CIL .................................................................................................................. 6 b. S106 ............................................................................................................... 7 c. Totals ............................................................................................................. 7 5. Developer contributions spent in 2019/2020 including closing balances ........ 8 a. Neighbourhood CIL ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australian and International Laws on Export Controls for Cultural Heritage
    AUSTRALIAN AND INTERNATIONAL LAWS ON EXPORT CONTROLS FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE Linda Young Cultural Heritage Management, University of Canberra, ACT Paper presented at the Art Crime Protecting Art, Protecting Artists and Protecting Consumers Conference convened by the Australian Institute of Criminology and held in Sydney, 2-3 December 1999 Almost every country has laws to protect its cultural heritage. But the effectiveness of these laws is significantly shaped by the pressures of internal economics and international markets, with the result that legal protection and the possibilities of legal action have very different consequences in different locations. At root is the market inequity of so-called ‘art-supply’ countries and ‘art-market’ countries. These euphemisms are a dry economic way to describe the dynamic created by rich nations whose citizens want to own art products and poor nations whose citizens can sell items harvested from their local environments. To the latter people, pottery from Peruvian graves or sculpture from Cambodian temples are economic survival resources in the same way as forests provide timber and rivers provide fish. Selling ceramics and stone-sculpture brings cash into poor communities in need of every penny they can get. The goods they sell are desired by another kind of society altogether, where such objects placed on display in homes and offices constitute evidence of the new owner’s taste, knowledge and wealth. This need grows from the Renaissance tradition of collecting art and antiquities as an activity of the rich and aristocratic; it has been transformed thanks to the 20th century democratisation of wealth. Today (notwithstanding local inequalities) a comparatively huge number of people can afford the pleasures and trappings of art, which still expresses a special aura of prestige.
    [Show full text]
  • Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre
    GB 1204 Ch 46 Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 22324 ! National Arc F Kent Archives Offic Ch 46 Watts Charity MSS., 1579-1972 Deposited by Mr. Chinnery, Clerk to the Charity, Rochester, 1st May 1974, and 5th February, 1976 Catalogued by Alison Revell, June 1978 INTRODUCTION For information concerning the establishment of Watts's Charity, under Richard Watts of Rochester's will, in 1579 and its subsequent history, The Report of Commissioners for Inquiring Concerning Charities - Kent, 1815-39 Pp. 504-9, provides most of the basic facts. Other Rochester Charities are dealt with in the same Report (see pages 55-57, and 500-513). The Report also deals with various early legal cases concerning the Charity, and the uses to which its funds should be put, most notably the cases of the parishes of St. Margaret 's Rochester, and Strood, against the parishioners of St. Nicholas in 1680, and of the parishioners of Chatham against the Trustees of the Charity in 1808 (see L1-4B in this catalogue). The original will of Richard Watts, drawn up in 1579 and proved in the following year in the Consistory Court of Rochester, is kept in this Office under the catalogue mark, DRb PW12 (1579), with a registered copy in the volume of registered wills, DRb PWr 16 (ffl05-107). A copy is also catalogued in this collection as Ch46 L1A. Further Watts Charity material is found in the Dean and Chapter of Rochester MSS, under the KAO catalogue number, DRc Cl/1-65, and consists mainly of accounts of the Providers of the Poor of Rochester, between the years 1699 and 1819.
    [Show full text]
  • Maidstone Borough Council Freedom of Information Act Request Ref: FOI
    Maidstone Borough Council Freedom of Information Act Request Ref: FOI 7420 Date: 6 September 2018 Request and Response I would be most grateful if you would supply me with data under the Freedom of Information Act on the local authority’s transfer of each public building or land which provides, or has done so in the recent past, community, cultural or leisure amenity. This includes any transfer since January 2007 of the ownership and/or management from the Local Authority to one of the following groups: A charity, community interest or industrial and provident society; Social enterprise; Private company; other public sector body, e.g. Parish council or other local authority; and any other body. Please note provision of the following information will be sufficient. The details required include: • Name of the building • Address and postcode • Function of the building (e.g. Library, Community centre, Sports facility, Youth centre, Theatre, Public convenience, Allotment, Sports field, Wildlife Garden, others, etc.) • Name of the organisation taking on the asset • Ongoing transfer details (Freehold, Leasehold, Agreement to use/licence, length of lease/licence, month/year of transfer) • Indicate if transfer was undertaken through a policy of Community Asset Transfer • Details of retracted transfers (if applicable). Please find attached an excel spreadsheet for your convenience. Please see attached name of organisation Ongoing Retracted name address postcode function Transfer Year taking on transfers transfers asset Library, Community centre, Sports facility, Youth Transfer undertaken centre, Theatre, Licence / length of through Community Start and end Public Freehold Leasehold Agreement to use lease/licence Asset Transfer dates of transfer convenience, policy? (YES/NO) Allotment, Sports field, Wildlife Garden, other, etc Armstrong P.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Church House YALDING • KENT
    Church House YALDING • KENT Church House HIGH STREET • YALDING • MAIDSTONE • KENT • ME18 6HU Handsome Grade II* listed Georgian village home with fine period features, secondary accommodation and set within charming walled gardens Reception hall, Drawing room, Dining room, Sitting room, Kitchen/Breakfast room, Cloakroom Cellar Master Suite, Four further Bedrooms (2 En suite), Family Bathroom Second Floor 1 bedroom Flat Detached former Coach House with Garaging, Workshop and Storage Summer House Delightful Walled Gardens Total area approximately 0.5 of an acre Savills Sevenoaks 74 High Street Sevenoaks Kent TN13 1JR [email protected] 01732 789 700 DESCRIPTION • The kitchen/breakfast room is fitted with a comprehensive range of bespoke wall and base units by Church House is a superb example of a Grade II* listed Georgian house centrally located in the Causeway Joinery Ltd, with granite work surfaces incorporating two sinks and a matching movable popular village of Yalding and is mentioned in Pevsner although under a former name of Holborough island unit. There is a gas fired Aga and space for a fridge, freezer, dishwasher, washing machine House. The house is of mixed ages with the listing dating it from the C17 with later C18 additions. The and tumble dryer. A spacious larder cupboard provides excellent storage and there is access to the property has been in the same occupancy for 25 years and has been meticulously maintained over the secondary staircase to the first floor. The kitchen is double aspect with direct access to the rear years, providing well presented accommodation ideal for both formal and informal living.
    [Show full text]
  • West Byfleet No. of Polling Stations
    Byfleet and West Byfleet Polling Polling Place Electorate Polling Place Details District (01/09/18) A1 - West St Johns Cornerstone 2,771 No. of Polling Stations: 3 (one polling Byfleet Centre station for J4) On Site Parking: Yes On Site Disabled Parking: Yes Accessible: Yes Comments There is adequate room and sufficient equipment to accommodate the polling stations that are located here. This polling district is the same County Electoral Division to J4 (Pyrford North) Street and Property Details Birchdale Close All properties Birchwood Drive All properties Birchwood Road All properties Blackwood Close All properties Briar Close All properties Briar Walk All properties Camphill Court All properties Camphill Road All properties Claremont Road All properties Dartnell Avenue All properties Dartnell Close All properties Dartnell Court All properties Dartnell Crescent All properties Dartnell Park Road All properties Dartnell Place All properties Dashwood Close All properties Drayton Court All properties Fleetwood Court All properties Gorselands Close All properties Hatfield Close All properties Highfield Close All properties A1 - West Highfield Road Apple Tree House; Archways; Ardeen Cottage; Aston Byfleet House; Berecroft; Boxgrove Cottage; Bramcote; Camphill Cottage; Castlerigg; Chedworth House; Copperkins; Coralie; Dornie; Flat 1-6(Cont) Dovecourt; Farthings; Foxley; Grove Villa; Highfield Cottage; Highfield End; Highfield House; Inishfree; Jasper House; Kennesaw; Kernow Cottage; Little Gables; Little Highfield; Little Norwood; Lower House;
    [Show full text]