Pages 1779-1831 ¿s \J* FEDERAL REGISTER \ 1 9 3 4 ^ VOLUME 29 NUMBER 26 ^ a/i t e d ^ Washington, Thursday, February 6, 1964

Contents

AGRICULTURAL MARKETING Notices FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Hearings, etc.: Rules and Regulations SERVICE Belt, Wesley D______1817 Rules and Regulations Sport fishing: Black Hills Video Corp____l__ 1817 Nebraska______1805 Packers and Stockyards Act, regu- Bruns, Nick______- 1819 lations; prompt payment. 1795 Myers, Leslie L______1819 Oregon (3 documents)______1806 Tomatoes for processing; stand­ Norrison, Gerald E______1819 ards for grade evaluation------1794 FOOD AND DRUG Notices ADMINISTRATION Washington County Stockyards, FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE Rules and Regulations Inc. et al.; changes in names of Color additives for use in food; posted stockyards------__ 1814 CORPORATION exempt from certification_____ 1801 Rules and Regulations Creamed cottage cheese; confir­ AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Discontinuance of insurance: mation of effective date of order See Agricultural Marketing Serv­ Potato crop______1795 amending standard of identity. 1802 ice; Federal Crop Insurance Tobacco crop______1795 Drugs; chloramphenicol sodium Corporation. succinate; toxicity___....____ _ 1802 Hazardous substances; labeling_ 1802 CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Tolerances and exemptions from FEDERAL MARITIME tolerances for pesticide chemi­ Notices cals in or on new agricultural Hearings, etc.: COMMISSION commodities; definitions and in- International Air Transport As­ Notices terpretations______1802 sociation ____ 1816 Agreements filed: Proposed Rule Making Intercontinental, U.S., Inc____ 1815 Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc., Antibiotics for growth promotion Puerto Rico-Virgin Islands and African Coasters (Pty) and feed efficiency.______1807 service case______1815 Ltd______1819 Antifoaming agents; use as op­ United States-Caribbean-South Ozean-Linie G.m.b.H. and Hoge tional ingredients in jellies and America investigation-___ — 1815 Stinnes______— ______1820 preserves.______1807 WITS Air Cargo Service et al__ 1815 U.S. Atlantic & Gulf/Australia- Fish ; definitions and standards New Zealand Conference___ 1820 of identity.______1807 CUSTOMS BUREAU United States Lines Co., and Gamma radiation for processing MANZ-Blue Star Joint Serv­ of food..______1808 Notices * 3* ice______.______1820 Fish; tariff-rate quota______1810 Notices New drugs; approval of applica­ d efen s e d e p a r t m e n t tions, November 1963__ 1814 See Navy Department. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Petition filed: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Rules and Regulations Co., Inc— ._— ______— 1814 fed er a l a v ia t io n a g e n c y Reserves of member banks; com­ United Carbon Co______1815 Rules and Regulations putation ______1796 Standard instrument approach GEOLOGICAL SURVEY p ro c e d u re s ; miscellaneous Notices amendments______1781 Montana; classification of coal FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION lands______1812 fed er a l communications Rules and Regulations c o m m is s io n Prohibited trade practices: HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND American Cement Corp______1797 WELFARE DEPARTMENT Proposed Rule Making Chori New York, Inc., et al___ 1796 Aviation services; authorization of Joycette Fabrics Corp. et al___ 1797 See Food and Drug Administra­ non-type accepted transmitters K. P. Industries, Inc., et al___ 1798 tion; Social Security Adminis­ at international gateway sta­ Leonard Margolis et al______1798 tration. tions.— ------1808 Nichimen Co., Inc., et al______1799 (Continued on next page) 1779 1780 CONTENTS

INTERIOR DEPARTMENT LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE See also Fish and Wildlife Serv­ Rules and Regulations COMMISSION ice; Geological Survey; Land Management Bureau; National General regulations involving ap­ Notices plications and entries: Hearings, etc.: Park Service. Elimination of oath requirement Notices on written statements in pub­ Continental Vending Machine lic land matters-______lfif« Corp------«20 Zia Pueblo Reservation, New Mex­ 1805 TaStee Freez Industries, Inc___ 1821 ico; resolution legalizing the in­ Rejection of applications..___ _ troduction, sale or possession Grazing; miscellaneous amend­ of intoxicants______1814 ments ______1803 SOCIAL SECURITY Notices ADMINISTRATION INTERSTATE COMMERCE Alaska; small tract classification; Rules and Regulations COMMISSION cancellation______1811 Statements and forms______1799 Notices Colorado; termination of proposed withdrawal and reservation of 1812 TREASURY DEPARTMENT Fourth section application of lands____i_____ t______relief—__‘__ __ 1828 See also Customs Bureau. Freight, all kinds, L.C.L.; con­ Notices tainer charges—U.SA.______1828 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Notices 3% percent Treasury Notes of Motor carrier alternate route de­ Series I>-1965; offering of notes. 1810 viation notices .1______1827 Superintendents et aL; delegation 4 percent Treasury Notes of Series Motor carrier, broker, water car­ of authority______1813 rier and freight forwarder ap­ A-1966; additional issue_____ 1811 plications ______:______1821 Motor carrier transfer proceed­ NAVY DEPARTMENT WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION ings ______— 1828 Rules and Regulations Notices Financial responsibility for costs Certificates authorizing employ­ LABOR DEPARTMENT incurred in support of courts- ment of learners at special min- See Wage and Hour Division. martial______-______1803 imum rates___:______1829 Codification Guide The ioUowing numerical guide is a list of 4he parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1964, and spécifiés how they are affected. 7 CFR 120___ — ______—— 1802 141d___ „__ —— ______1802 51— — ___ —— ___ _ 1794 191— ______1802 Volume 76 401 (2 documents).______1795 P roposed R u l e s : UNITED STATES 9 CFR 29___ 1807 37______1807 STATUTES AT LARGE 201____— ______1795 121 (2 documents)_____ 1807,1808 [87th Cong., 2d Sess.J 12 CFR 32 CFR ' 2 0 4 ______— ______— — 1796 Contains laws and concurrent resolutions 719.___——____ — ____— 1803 enacted by the Congress during 1962, 14 CFR Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1962, pro­ posed amendment to the Constitution, and 97______1781 43 CFR Presidential proclamations 63— — ___ 1803 16 CFR 101 (2 documents)______1805 Price: $10.00 13 (6 documents)__„ — „ 1796-1799 4 7 CFR Published by Office of the Federal Register, 20 CFR National Archives and Records Service, P roposed R u l e s : General Services Administration 422—____——— ————— ___ 1799 87— ______— ____ 1808 Order from Superintendent of Documents, 21 CFR Government Printing Office, 8______1801 50 CFR Washington, D.C., 20402 19— ______— ______1802 33 (4 documents)______1805,1806

Published daily, except Sundays, Mondays, and days following official Federal holidays, federa( ® register by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Serv­ ices Administration, pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal R egister Act, Telephone V , WOrth 3-3261 »34 approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., ch. 8B ), under regulations prescribed by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President. Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402. The F ederal R egister will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15.00 per year, payable in advance. The charge for individual copies (minimum 15 cents) varies in proportion to the size of the issue. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402. The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code op F ederal R egulations, which is published, under 50 titles, pur-' suant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended August 5, 1953. The Code of F ederal R egulations is sold by the Superin­ tendent of Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements vary. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R egister, or th e Code op F ederal R egulations. Rules and Regulations Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND SPACE Chapter I— Federal Aviation Agency SUBCHAPTER F— AIR TRAFFIC AND GENERAL OPERATING RULES (NEW] [Reg. Docket No. 3037; Arndt. 358] PART 97— STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES [NEW] Miscellaneous Amendments The amendments to the standard Instrument approach procedures contained herein are adopted to become effective when indicated in order to promote safety. The amended procedures supersede the existing procedures of the same classifi­ cation now in effect for the airports specified therein. For the convenience of the users, the complete procedure is republished in this amendment indicating the changes to the existing procedures. As a situation exists which demands immediate action in the interests of safety in air commerce, I find that compliance with the notice and procedure provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act is impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective within less than 30 days from publication. In view of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (24 F.R. 5662), Part 97 [New] (14 CFR Part 97 [New]) is amended as follows: 1. By amending the following low or medium frequency range procedures prescribed in § 97.11(a) to read:

LFR S tandard I nstru m ent A pproach P rocedure Bearings*; headings, courses and radiate are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be In accordance with the following instrument approach procedure unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below

Transition ^ ... ‘ ~ Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— - Coarse and 2-engine, T<^- distance altitude Condition (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 8 FEB. 64. City, Fort Wayne; State, Ind.; Airport Name, Baer Field; Elev., 801'; Fac. Class., SBMRLZ; Ident., FA; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 10; Eff. Date, 6 Oct 62- Sup Arndt No 0- Dated, 16 June 62 ' ’

MRB-VOR______M B -L FR ...... 3000 'T-Hn C-dn______500-1 500-1 600-1JÍ S-dn...... NA NA NA A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

■ Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn E side S W crs, 216° Outbnd, 036° Inbnd, 3000' within 10 miles. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1700'. ■ Crs and distance, facility to airport, (¿6°—2.5 miles. - tm to ^ ^ S l d ° S W on AIB^IdFR^M® 1^ndilSntouteZr^lR 1^^m min*inUmS 01 landing not accomplIshed within 2.5 miles after passing M B-LFR, make aright climbing

Caution; Terrain 1690' 5 miles W of airport. City, Martinsburg; State, W. Va.; Airport Name, Martinsburg Municipal; Elev., 556'; Fac. Class., SBMRLZ; Ident., MB; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 6; Eff Date 8 Feb 64- Sap. Arndt. No. 5; Dated, 31 Aug. 63 - ’ ’

R osw ell VOR RW-LFR...... W alker VOR 5000 300-1 300-1 *200- RW -LFR...... 6000 500-2 500-2 A-dn 800-2 800-2 800-2

vecroring using w aimer Jttadar authorized in accordance with approved radar patterns, procedure turn E side SE crs, 123° Outbnd, 303° Inbnd, 5000' within 10 miles. P Minimum altitude over facility on final approach ers, 4600'. ' g18.8*^ distance, facility to airport, 312°— 7.9 miles. crs R o S ^ L F R ^ fh ta ^ m ü ^ o f^ W -L F R ^ to authorized landin« minimums or if landing not accomplished within 7.9 miles after passing RW -LFR, climb to 6000' on N V Note: MSA: N—5500', S—5500', E—6000', W—6500. «09-1 on Runway 12.

City, Roswell; State, N. Mex.; Airport Name, Roswell Municipal; Elev., 3623'; Fac. Class., SBMRAZ; Ident., RW; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 8; Eff. Date, 8 Feb 64: Sup Arndt No. 7; Dated, 18 May 63

1781 1782 RULES AND REGULATIONS 2. By amending the following automatic direction finding procedures prescribed in § 97.1Kb) to read: A D F S tandard I nstru m ent A pproach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSB. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum From— To— altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 66 knots

T-dn______300-1 300-1 K 200-K C -dn...... 400-1 500-1y2 • 500-1U S-dn-18— ___ 400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn__:------800-2 800-2 E g 800-2

Procedure turn W side of final approach crs, 004° Outbnd, 184° Inbnd, 2000’ within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1400'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 184°—4.4 miles. . T,„T If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimumser if landing not accomplished within 4.4 miles after passmg APN KBn, make a climbing left turn, proceed direct to APN RBn at 2000’. - . . . .. _ . „ , . Caution: Report position altitude ETA and intentions as soon as practicable to tower when operating or to Unicom when tower not operating. Thereafter determine that adequate separation exists from other reported users and report changes in altitude and position. Maintain 1000’ above previously reported traffic until advised that aircraft making approach has landed. Consult NOT AMS for hours of operation of tower and dates and time controlled airspace is effective. N otes: (1) This procedure is effective from 1300 Z-2300 Z and at other times when control tower is in operation. (2) Runway lights on N-S runway only. Prior coordination necessary for runway lights. (3) Not authorized for air carrier use. (4) APN RBn operated by Alpena County. (5) Final approach from holding pattern not authorized. Procedure turn required. City. Alpena: State. Mich.; Airport Name, Phelps-Collins; Elev., 689’; Fac. Class., MH; Ident., APN; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 3; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; . Dated, 9 Juno 62

CSG RBn______-...... — 2000 T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 20043 n f t t t T,O M CSG RBn______-______2000 C-dn...... 600-1 600-1 600-1)3 CSG RBn______2000 S-dn-2...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring and transitions authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn E side of crs, 202° Outbnd, 022° Inbnd, 1900' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1100’. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 022°—2.9 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 2.9 miles after passmg CSG RBn, turn left, climb to 2000' and return to CSG RBn. Hold SW, 1-minute left turns. Caution: Jump towers 674’ 113 miles NE. R-3002 E and SE of Lawson AAF. N ote: Authorized for military use only except by prior arrangement. Citv Columbus: State. Ga.; Airport Name, Lawson AAF; Elev., 232’; Fac. Class., SBH; Ident., CSG; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 2; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 1; ’ • ’ Dated, 14 Sept. 63

1500 T-dn—,...... 300-1 300-1 20043 1500 C-dn...... 600-1 600-1 600-1)3 FLL RBn (final) ...... Direct______1000 S-dn-13...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 FLL R B n...... Direct______1500 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 FLL R B n...... Direct...... 2000 Martin VHF Tnt FLL RBn______-...... Direct...... 1500

Radar vectoring utilizing Miami Radar authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn N side of crs, 314° Outbnd, 134° Inbnd, 1600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1000' . Crs and distance, facility to airport, 133°—4.4 miles...... , , „ _ .___ - If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.4 miles after passmg RBn, make immediate left turn to a crs of 030°, climbing to 2000' and intercept the 100° crs from FLL RBn and proceed to Martin LF Int* or, when directed by ATC, make left climbing turn to 150tr returning direct to FLL RBn. ___ __ ‘ Martin LF Int: Int 100° bearing from FLL RBn and 168° bearing from PBY-RBn. MSA: 000-090°—1400', 090-180°—2100', 180-270°—1600', 270-360°—1400'. Citv Fort Lauderdale; State, Fla.; Airport Name, Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International; Elev.,10'; Fac. Class., MHW; Ident., FLL; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 6; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64

TM-LFR-...... GRF R B n ...... 2000 T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-13 OLM-VOR..,— GFR RBn 2000 C-dn...... 600-1 600-1 600-113 Burton VHF Int. GRF RBn ...... - 2000 A-dn...... — 800-2 800-2 800-2 Bayside VHF Int GRF RBn ...... 2000 . Carr VHF In t.... GRF RBn...... Direct______2000 £*', ,_. Radar transitions and vectoring utilizing McChord RAPCON Radar or Gray AAF Radar authorized in accordance with approved radar patterns. Procedure turn W side of crs, 325° Outbnd, 145° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Nor authorized beyond 10 miles. Minimum altitude over GRF RBn on final approach crs, 1500'. Crs and distance, GRF RBn to airport, 145°—3.9 miles. . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.9 miles after passing GRF RBn, turn left, ciimu 2000’ direct to GRF RBn or, when directed by ATC, turn right, climb to 3000’ on crs 270° to R-020 OLM-VOR, thence direct to OLM-VOR. N ote: Authorized for military use only except by prior arrangement. , _ Caution: 524' tower located 0.9 mile from approach end of Runway 14, 550' trees 0.8 mile from approach end of Runway 14,385' tower 0.1 mile E of Runway 14/

ADF Standard I nstru m ent Approach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Celling and visibility m in im u m s

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— T o - Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

F A R B n ___ 2000 T-dn 300-1 300-1 200-JUj C -dn...... 400-1 600-1 600-1/4 S-dn-4______400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn____ — - 800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring authorised In accordance with approved patterns. Aircraft will be released for final approach without procedure turn Inbnd on final approach crs 4 miles from RBn. Procedure turn S side of crs, 233° Outbnd, 053° Inbnd, 2000 within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over faculty on final approach crs. 1300'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 053°—2.6 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimum« or if landing not accomplished within 2.6 miles after passing RBn, climb to 2600' on crs of 053° and return to RBn. Final approach from holding pattern not authorized, procedure turn required. City, Fort Wayne; State, Ind.; Airport Name, Baer Field; Elev., 801'; Fac. Class., SABH; Ident., FA; Procedure No. 2, Arndt. Orig.; Eft. Date, 8 Feb. 64 or upon conversion oi LFR to SABH

Franklin RBn 3200 T -d n 300-1 3200 300-1 3200 800-2 800-2 NA

Procedure tum N side of crs 103° Outbnd, 283° Inbnd, 3200' within 10 miles. - Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs 2300'. Crs and distance, facility to airport 283°—3.6 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.6 miles after passing Franklin RBn, climb straight ahead to 3200' and return to Franklin RBn. Hold E 1-minute right turns, 286° Inbnd. City, Franklin; State, Pa.; Airport Name, Chess-Lamberton; Elev., 1640'; Fac. Class., MHW; Ident., FKL; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. Orig.; Efl. Date, 8 Feb. 64

OSH VOR___ De Pere Int**. Direct 2500 T - d n ____ 300-1 300-1 200-34 De Pere Int**— LOM (final).. Direct 2200 C -d n . 400-1 600-1 6 0 0 -1 /4 Wolf Int ...... LOM.______Direct 2300 400-1 400-1 400-1 Bear Creek Int. LOM______Direct 2300 A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2 ORB VOR___ LOM______Direct. 2300 Sherwood Int. LOM______Direct 2300 Waffle In t.....______LOM. Direct 2300 Nicollet Int. LOM. Direct 3000 Stadium Int__ LOM. Direct 2300 Freedom Int*.. LOM. Direct 2300 Pine Grove Int., LOM. Direct. 3000

Procedure turn S side of crs, 239° Outbnd, 059° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2200'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 059°—6.0 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 6.0 miles after passing OR LOM, make left turn climb­ ing to 2300' and return to LOM or, when directed by ATO, climb to 2300' on 069° bearing from LOM within 20 miles. Caution: 2049' tower 7 miles SE of airport. . Note: Due to 2049' tower 7 miles SE of airport, aircraft departing on Runway 18 which are SE-bnd, climb to 2500' on runway heading before proceeding on crs Air raft departing Runway 12 which are SE-bnd, turn left after takeoff, climb to above 2600' on an 075° magnetic bearing from the GR LOM before proceeding on crs. 'Freedom Int: Int GRB VOR R-204 and 239° bearing from GR LOM. ^ **De Pere Int: Int OSH VOR R-012 and 239° bearing from GR LOM. City, Green Bay; State, Wis.; Airport Name, Austin-Straubel; Elev., 694'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., GR; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 6; Efl. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sun. Arndt No 4- Dated, 18 May 63 V

Florence Int LOM_____ Direct 2000 T -dn— 300-1 Byram Int., 300-1 200-J4 LOM_____ Direct 2000 0 -d n .. 400-1 600-1 60 0 -1 H Trace In t... LOM___... Direct 2000 S-dn-15, 400-1 400-1 400-1 Branch Int.. LOM_____ Direct 2000 A -dn... 800-2 800-2 800-2 Rankin Int.. LOM___... Direct 2000 IAN VOR.. LOM (final) Direct 2000

Procedure turn W side of crs. 332° Outbnd, 152° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 162°—5.3 miles. If visual eontact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 6.3 miles after passing JA LOM, turn right, climb to aw on JAN VOR R-163 within 20 miles. ’ ’ City, Jackson; State, Miss.; Airport Name, Thompson Field; Elev., 345'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., JA; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 1; Efl. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sud Arndt No Orie • Dated, 23 Nov. 63 •

0AE VOR____ Fremont FM/RBn...... 4000 T-dn* 300-1 300-1 2 0 0 -/4 Fremont FM/RBn. LOM (final)______1700 C-dn** 600-1 500-1 500-1/4 S-dn-29______400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. tums0CedUre tUm n0t autbor*zed- maneuvering and descent to 4000’ shall be accomplished in the Fremont FM/RBn holding pattern; 293° Inbnd, 1-minute pattern right Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1700'. <^^,ance> facility to airport, 293°—5.2 miles. to ntSSLn?i. establishe“ upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.2 miles aft» passing LOM, climb straight ahead iSuLVeadinJg 288’', then make a right climbing turn, continuing climb to 2600' in a 1-minute holding pattern N W of LOM, 120° Inbnd, left to n s. « m required for takeoff on Runway 33. ’ ’ MS mtalmums d0 not Proylde standard clearance over tank 357'-1.6 miles N of Runway 15/33. City, Oakland; State, Calif.; Airport Name, Metropolitan Oakland International; Elev., 10'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., IN; Procedure No. 1 Arndt. 2; Efl Date 8 Feb 64- Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 4 May 63 * * 1784 RULES AND REGULATIONS

ADF Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimum

2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots. 65 knots

SSM RBn______Direct______2300 T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 R 200-K C-dn______500-1 500-1 500-1U S-dn-32...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 A-dn__...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure tum E side crs, 133° Outbnd, 313° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1300'. ^visualcontact nofStaW ishefdPon descentto authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 2.0 miles after passing SSM RBn, climb to 2500' on 313° crs, then return to SSM RBn, or as directed by ATC, climb to 2500' on crs of 313° and proceed direct to FSP VOR. N otes: Final approach from holding pattern not authorized. Procedure turn required. Runway lights R-14 and 32 only. Citv Sault Ste Marie1 State, Mich.: Airport Name, SaUlt Ste. Marie Municipal; Elev., 722'; Fac. Class., SABH; Ident., SSM; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 1; Efl. Date, 8 Feb. ' 64; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 18 Oct. 62

TOM 1600 T-dn______300-1 300-1 1 1 200-H Woodstown VOR C -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 - 800-2 S-dn-1...... 800-2 800-2 ■E 800-2 A-dn______800-2 800-2 ■ 800-2 If Stack Int# received the following minimums apply: C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1H S-dn-1...... 500-1 500-1 r 500-1

Procedure turn W side of final approach crs, 194° Outbnd, 014° Inbnd, 1600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1600'. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.3 miles after passing LOM, make climbing left turn to 1600' and return to Wilmington LOM. Hold S, Wilmington LOM, 1-minute right turns, 014° Inbnd. Caution: Turn left as soon as practical to avoid bolding pattern at Philadelphia LOM. #Stack Int: Int OOD VOR R-274 and 014° bearing from IL LOM. Citv Wilmineton: State, Del.; Airport Name, Greater Wilmington; Elev., 79'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., IL; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 7; Efl. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. " ° • . No. 6; Dated, 28 Apr. 62 3. By amending the following very high frequency omnirange (VOR) procedures prescribed in §97.11(0 to read:

VOR S tandard I nstru m ent A pproach P rocedure Bearings, w rin g s courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical mÍ1' H ^ X t S m t ^ p p K epróe^ ^ ^ t h S v I t y ¿ t e ec^ d u c t^ a ^ b e lo w named airport, it shan be in accordance with the foUowing instrument appr^ch ^ocedure, nniftgg an approach is «inducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the^Administra tor of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initialapproaciies shaU be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition more than distance (feet) 65 knots More than or less 65 knots 65 knots

ALS VOR...... Direct____. ____ 10,100 T-dn______400-1 400-1 30044 ALS VOR...... -...... Direct...... 10,100 C -dn.______600-1 600-1 600-1H A-dn%...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure tum.N side of crs 113° Outbnd, 293° Inbnd, 10,160' within 10 mUes. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs 9200'. ifvisual ecmtac? n^esteblishS^m descenU o^uthorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.6 miles after passing ALS VOR, climb to 10,000' on ALS VOR R-320 within 15 miles. . _ N ote: Voice communications with Denver ARTCC and Trinidad FS8. Caution: High terrain all quadrants...... ~ %Use as an alternate authorized only while Alamosa weather bureau is in operation from 0400 to 2000 M.b. l . ‘Romeo Int: 218 radial ALS VOR and 335 radial TA8 VOR or ALS VOR R-218 15-mile DM E fix. #Blanca Int: ALS VOR R-061 and TAS VOR R-008 or ALS VOR R-06115-mile DM E fix. City, Alamosa; State, Colo.; Airport Name, Alamosa Municipal; Elev., 7535'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., ALS; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. Orig.; Efl. Date, 8 Hfe.,

T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 *300-1 C-dn______600-1 500-1 500-1H S-dn-16...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 A-fin 800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn W side of crs, 334° Outbnd, 154° Inbnd, 1800' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1800'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 154°—5.0 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5 miles after passing ABY-VOR, climb to 1800 on R-175 within 20 miles of ABY-VOR. • „ N ote: MSA: 0-90°—1700', 90-180°—1900', 180-270°—1400', 270-360°—1800'. ‘200-H authorized forior takeofftaKeou nunwayRunway o-a3-21 uuiy.only.auinorizea . City Albany; State, Ga.; Airport Name, Municipal; Elev., 196'; Fac. Class., BVOR; Ident., ABY; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 10; Efl. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 9; Da , \ ’ 11 NoY. 61 Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAI REGISTER 1785

VOR Standard I nstru m ent A pproach P rocedure—-Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-englne or less Minimum More than From— To— Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 66 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Cotulla VOR______Direct______1900 T -d n .______300-1 300-1 C -dn...... 400-1 600-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N side crs, 075° Outbnd, 265° Inbnd, 1600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1600'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 265°—6 miles. -, If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimum» dr if landing not accomplished within 6 miles after passing COT-VOR, turn left, climb to 2000' on R-185 within 20 miles. Caution: 660'unlighted water tower 0.9 mile WS W, 860'tower 5.5 miles ESE of airport. Citv. Cotulla; State, Tex.; Airport Name, Municipal; Elev., 471'; Fac. Class., MBVOR; Ident., COT; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 4; Eft. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 3; Dated, 12 May 62

Final approach crs, R-188 GFL VOR 056°—6 miles...... 3000 T-dn...... - 300-1 300-1 *200-)3 (final) C-dn______800-1 800-1 800-1)3 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 Authorized after passing Glens Falls Fan Marker**: C-dn______600-1 600-1 600-1)3 S-dn-1...... - 600-1 600-1 600-1

Procedure turn E side of crs, 188° Outbnd, 008° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1100'.** Crs and distance, Qlens Falls Fan Marker to airport 008°—4.8 miles; breakoff point to Runway 01,012°—1J23 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing Qlens Falls VOR, make a right climbing turn to 3000'to Qlens Falls VOR. Hold S of Glens Falls VOR on R-188,1-minute right turns, 008° Inbnd. *300-1 required on Runway 30. City, Qlens Falls; State, N.Y.; Airport Name, Warren County; Elev., 328'; Fac. Class., VOR; Ident., GFL; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 2; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 20 Dec. 68

T-d...... 300-1 300-1 NA n-d 700-2 700-2 NA A-d...... NA •' NA NA

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn N side of crs 138° Outbnd, 318° Inbnd, 2000'within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs 1500'. Crs and distance, facility to airport 318°-h6.7 miles. - 8 visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 6.7 miles after passing HOP VOR, make a left climb- ing turn to 2000' bn crs 138° to HOP VOR. Hold SE 1-minute right turns, 320° Inbnd. < : Note: N o weather service. City, Hopkinsville; State, Ky.; Airport Name, Hopkinsville-Christian County; Elev., 540'; Fac. Class., VOR; Ident., HOP; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. Orig.; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64

TVS RRn . ji.» — . TYS-VOR...... 3100 T-dn...... -...... 300-1 300-1 200-H C-d...... 800-1 800-1 800-1)3 C-n______800-2 800-2 800-2 S-dn-22R...... 800-1 800-1 800-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 If aircraft has operating VOR and ADF receivers and Rockford Int* is received, following minimums authorized: C-d...... 600-1 600-1 600-1)3 C-n______600-1)3 600-1)3 600-1)3 S-dn-22R_____ 500-1 600-1 500-1

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn E side of crs, 041° Outbnd, 221° ihbnd, 3100’ within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2600' ;over Rockford Int,* 1800'. ' j. Crs and distance, facility to airport 221°—6.6 miles; Rockford Int* to airport, 221°—2.6 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 6.6 miles after passing TVS-VOR, turn right, climb to 3000' on R-248 TYS-VOR within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC, climb to 3000' on 225° magnetic bearing from LOM within 15 miles. ‘Rockford Int: Int R-221 TYS-VOR and 101° bearing to TYS.RBn. City, Knoxville; State, Tenn.; Airport Name, McGhee-Tyson; Elev., 989'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident. TYS; Procedure No. 1, Amdt.. 6; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 5; Dated, 29 June 63

Lexington HW. ’___ '...... 1__...... L E T V O R Direct—_____ :__ - 2600 T-dn...... 300-4 300-1 20 0 -)3 Richmond Int— ...... JLK.y V O R Direct.. __ __ 2600 C-d...... 600-1 600-1 60 0 -1 )3 Irvine Int— ...... „ L e x v o R ...... 2600 C-n______60 0 -1 )3 60 0 -1 )3 60 0 -2 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N side of crs, 124° Outbnd, 304° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2600'. Ore and distance, facility to airport, 304°—7.3 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 7.3 miles after passing LEX-VOR, make a left climbing turn to 2600', return to LEX-VOR. Hold SE 1-minute right turns, 309° Inbnd. City, Lexington; State, Ky.; Airport Name, Blue Grass Field; Elev., 978'; Fac. Class., BVORTACj-Ident., LEX; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 6; Eff. Date, 8 Feb, 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 5; Dated, 2 June 62 1786 RULES AND REGULATIONS

TOR Standard I n stru m ent Approach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility m in im u m s

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum From— To— altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

MRB VOR (final) ______3000 T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-}$ C-d...... 500-1 500-1 600-lù C~D_...... ----- 500-lJi 500-1}$ 600-2 S-dn______NA NA NA A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. . Procedure turn S side ol crs 110° Outbnd, 280° Inbnd. 3100' within 10 miles. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Nonstandard due to ATC requirements. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 300v. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 285°— 5.9 miles...... _ .... . ____ „ . ■ . . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.9 miles after passing M KB VOK, make immediate left climbing turn to 3100' direct to MRB VOR, hold SE on R-1101-minute left turns. _ „ ‘ Procedure turn not required if aircraft is positioned by Dulles Radaron final approach MRB VOR R-110 within 7milesfrom MRB VOR. N otes: Por W departure on V8, V44, V166 from Runway 26 make left climbing turn, after takeoff climb on 360° heading to 3000', proceed as cleared. For w departures from other runways after takeoff, climb on 360° heading to 3000', proceed as cleared. Caution: Terrain 1690' 5 miles W of airport. City Martinsburg- State W. Va.; Airport Name, Martinsburg Municipal; Elev., 556'; Fac. Class, M-BVORTAC; Ident., MRB; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 1; Eft. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 4 Aug. 63

T-dn...... 800-1 300-1 NA 1400-1 1400-1 NA A-dn______1800-2 1800-2 NA

Procedure turn E side of final approach crs, 157* Outbnd, 337* Inbnd, 4500' within 10 mfles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3300 . n*vfeual COT^^ncte^fabUsh^u^in descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.4 miles after passing MOW VOR, climb to 4500' on MOW R-337 within 10 miles. Reverse crs, proceed to MOW VOR. Hold SE l-minute right turns, 337° Inbnd. Caution: Antenna 1419' 1.7 miles SW of airport. Antenna 1384 1 mile SE of airport. Citv Morgantown1 State W. Va.; Airport Name, Morgantown Municipal; Elev., 1256'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., MOW; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 2; Eft. Date, 8 Feb. ' 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated 20 July 63

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 8 FEB. 64. City Newport- State Oreg • Airport Name, Newport; Elev., 160'; Fac. Class., VORW; Ident., ONP; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 1; Eft. Date, 12 Sept. 59; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; ' ’ Dated, 12 Nov. 55

Direct______4900 T -dn______300-1 800-1 am-M RAP VOR. C-dn...... 600-1 600-1 600-1H A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar transition to final approach authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Aircraft will be released for final approach without procedure turn on Inbnd final aPPP r^ d u re t^ tE sWe^fcrs, 32?°°Outtad. 141* Inbnd, 4900' within 10 miles of Sioux Int.* Nonstandard due to rising terrain to the W. Minimum altitude over Sioux Int* on final approach crs, 3900'. ^ v ^ a l^ o ^ a c t noil^tabHshe^upOT’d ^ ^ i t '^ ^ ttio rized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 1.8 miles after passing Sioux Int,* climb to 4600' 011 ^ crra^ L ^ U se ufttopreeedore authorized only for aircraft equipped with VOR and ADF receivers and Sioux Int* received. 2. Aircraft on missed approach may be radar controlled after radar identification. 3. Final approach from holding pattern at Sioux Int* not authorized. Procedure turn required. Other change: Deletes straight-in minimums. ___ •Sioux Int: In t RAP-VOR R-321 and 006* bearing from RAP RBn. City Rapid City; State, S. Dak.; Airport Name, Rapid City Municipal; Elev., 3181'; Fac. Class., B-VORTAC; Ident., RAP; Procedure No. 2, Arndt. 1; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64, Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 4 May 63

1500 T-dn 300-1 300-1 200-H SJP RBn___ SJU-VOR 600-1Vi SJU RBn.... sfrrr—yr m ____ Direct__ . ___ 1600 C-dn 600-1 600-1 k.ttt—v o r . ______Direct______500 A-dn 800-2 800-2 800-2 Isla Verde Int If aircraft equipped with VOR and ADF receivers and Isla Verde Int identified, the following minimums cXP.y;____ . . . 500-1 500-1 600-1&

Procedure turn N side of crs, 095* Outbnd, 275° Inbnd, 1300' within 15 miles.

Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 600'; if I sIa Verde Int identified, 500'. ■ . .... „ ».TrtT, .. ,... . i n o/wv n n b j î # If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mfle of VOR, turn right, climb to 2000 on R-359 within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC, turn right, climb to 1500' on R-095 within 20 miles of 8JU-VOR. MSA: 000-100°—1200', 100-180°—4500', 180-290°—4100', 290-360°—1000'. City San Juan; State, P.R.; Airport Name, Puerto Rico International; Elev., 9'; Fac. Class., BVOR; Ident, SJU; Procedure No. 1, A rndt 5; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 4; Dated, 20 July 63

NA Hopkins Int. s a n v n R mm*—ai n 2200 T-dn*______300-1 NA SSC VOR oa*°—12 5 ______2200 O-dn**______500-1 NA NA Charles Int._ A-dn#...... NA NA NA

Procedures turn## W side of crs 236° Outbnd, 056° Inbnd, 1800' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs 1500'. > If visual c

VOR Standard I nstru m ent Approach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— To— Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 66 knots More than more than : j p ||ï | or less 66 knots 66 knots

rri. T.FÏÏ ' ’ ' - __ : ______TAL VOR...... Direct...... 2000 T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 300-1 C-dn...... 600-1 500-1 500-1)3 S-dn...... NA NANA A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn 8 side of crs 207° Outbnd, 027° Inbnd, 1800' within 10 miles. Nonstandard due to terrain. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs 1166'. Crs and distance, facility to airport 071°—1.4 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 1.4 miles after passing TAL VOR, turn right, climb to 2600' on R-207 of TAL VOR within 10 miles. Caution: All maneuvering 8 of airport. 862' terrain 2.3 miles ENE of airport. City, Tanana; State, Alaska; Airport Name, Tanana; Elev., 228'; Fac. Class., H-VOR; Ident., TAL; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. Orig.; Efl. Date, 8 Feb. 64 4. By amending the following terminal very high frequency omnirange (TerVOR) procedures prescribed in § 97.13 to read:

T erm inal VOR S tandard I nstru m ent Approach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— To— Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 66 knots

CfiO VOR ...... LSF VOR...... 2200 T-dm ...... 300-1 300-1 200-'A LOO VOR ______..... LSF VOR...... 3000 600-1 600-1 600-1% EUF VOR...... LSF VOR...... 3000 S-dn-2...... 600-1 500-1 600-1 800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring and transitions authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn E side of crs 204° Outbnd, 024° Inbnd, 1900’ within 10 miles of CSG RBN. Minimum altitude over CSO RBN on final approach crs, 1100’. Crs and distance, CSO RBn to Runway 2,024s—2.9 miles. Crs and distance, breakoff point to Runway 2,022°—1.0 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing LSF VOR, turn left, climb to 2000’ on R-204 LSF VOR within 16 miles. Notes. (1) Authorized for military use only except by prior arrangment. (2) This procedure to be utilized only by aircraft having operating VOR and ADF receivers. Caution: Jump towers 680’ 114 miles NE, R-3002 E and SE of Lawson AAF. City, Columbus; State, Ga.; Airport Name, Lawson AAF; Elev., 232’; Fac. Class., VOR; Ident., LSF; Procedure No. TerVOR-2, Arndt. 2; Efl. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 14 Sept. 63

CSG VOR LSF VOR...... 2200 300-1 300-1 200-U LGC VOR...... LSF VOR...... 3000 800-1 800-1 800-1% EUF VOR...... B...... S .... LSF V O R ...... 3000 800-1 800-1 800-1” A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 If aircraft equipped with VOR and ADF receivers and Crawford Int* received, minimums become: C-dn______600-1 600-1 600-1)3 S-dn-14...... 600-1 600-1 600-1

Radar vectoring and transitions authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn W side of crs, 339° Outbnd, 159° Inbnd, 2200’ within 10 miles of CS LOM. Minimum altitude over CS LOM on final approach era, 2100’. Crs and distance, CS LOM to Runway 14,169°—6.9 miles; Crawford Int* to Runway 14,169°—3.2 miles. Crs and distance, breakoff point to Runway 14,143°—0.7 mile. -, J* visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or ii landing not accomplished within 0 mile of LSF VOR, turn right, climb to 2000’ on R-204 LSF VOR within 16 miles. . Caution: Jump towers 680’ 114 miles NE, R-3002 E and SE of Lawson AAF. N otes: (1) Authorized for military use only except by prior arrangement. (2) This procedure to be utilized only by aircraft having operating VOR and ADF receivers. •Crawford Int: Int R-339 LSF-VOR and 204° bearing from SG LM M . City, Columbus; State, Ga.; Airport Name, Lawson AAF; Elev., 282’; Fac. Class., VOR; Ident., LSF; Procedure No. TerVOR-14, Amdt. 2; Efl. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 14 Sept. 63

CSG VOR.. . Willett Int*...... 2200 300-1 300-1 200-43 EUF VOR LSF VOR...... 3000 600-1)3 600-1)3 600-1)3 LGC VOR. LSF VOR . 3000 600-1 " 600-1 ~ 600-1)3 A-dn__ ___;__ 800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring and transitions authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn W side of crs, 019° Outbnd, 199° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles of Willett Int,* Minimum altitude over Willett Int* on final approach era, 1800'. 8114 distance, Willett Int* to Runway 20,199°—8.0 miles, urs and distance, breakoff point to Runway 20, 202°—0.6 mile. r> ,4* visual.contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing LSF VOR, climb to 2000' on R-204 LSF-VOR within 16 miles. vn-D 0TE?: W Authorized for military use only except by prior arrangement. (2) This procedure to be utilized only by aircraft having two operating VOR receivers, or one VOR receiver and one ADF receiver. ^■Vtion: Jump towers 580' 1)3 miles NE, R-3002 E and SE of Lawson AAF. Willett Int: Int R-019 LSF and R-159 CSG or 096° bearing from CS LOM. City, Columbus; State, Ga.; Airport Name, Lawson AAF; Elev., 232'; Fac. Class., VOR; Ident.,;LSF; Procedure No. TerVOR-20, Amdt. 2; Efl. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 16 Feb. 63

No. 26------2 1788 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Terminal VOR Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— To— Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

PT,T. VOR ...... Direct______1500 T -dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-K Bradley VHF Int FLL VOR...... Direct______1500 C-dn______600-1 600-1 600-1U FT.T. VOR...... Direct______1500 S-dn-9...... 600-1 600-1 600-1 PT.T.VOR Direct______2000 A-dn______800-2 800-2 1 800-2 Tnt TÎSV-VOR-345/FL»L VOR-278 1500 If aircraft equipped with VOk and ADF receivers and Direct______600 Wagon Wheel Int* identified, the following minimum applies: S-dn-9...... 50(14 500-1 500-1

Radar vectoring utilizing Miami Radar authorized in accordance with approved patterns. -¡t. , Procedure turn N side of crs, 278° Outbnd, 098° Inbnd, 1500' within 10 miles. Nonstandard due Miami, Fla., terminal traffic. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 600'; over Wagon Wheel Int* 600', Crs and distance, Wagon Wheel Int* to VOR, 098°—4.0 miles; breakoff point to Runway 9,091°—0.3 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums of if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing FLL-VOR, turn left and climb to 2000' on R-079, and proceed to Martin VHF Int. MSA; 000-090°—1300', 090-180°—Mao', 180-270°—2100', 270-360°—1400'. City, Fort Lauderdale; State, Fla.; Airport Name, Fort Lauderdale-HollywoodInternational;Elev.,10';Fac. Class., VOR; Ident., FLL; Procedure No. TerVOR-9, Amdt. 5; Eft. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 4; Dated, 26 Oct. 63

PT.T/-VOR ___ ...... 1500 T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-H FLL V O R -...... Direct______1500 C-dn______:... 600-1 600-1 6C0-DS FT.T. VOR ______Direct______1500 S-dn-13...... 600-1 600-1 600-1 ' Tiftnia VTTP Tnt. FLL VOR. -■...... -...... 2000 A-dn______800-2 700-2 800-2 Int BSY-VOR-345/FLL VOR-306 - Direct—______1500 If aircraft equipped with VOR and ADF receivers and Direct.—____ .... 600 Levee Int* identified the following minimum applies: S-dn-13...... 500-1 500-1 600-1

Radar vectoring utilizing Miami Radar authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn N side of crs, 306° Outbnd, 126° Inbnd, 1500' within 10 miles. Nonstandard due Miami, Fla., terminal traffic. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs 600'; over Levee Int* 600'. Crs and distance, Levee Int* to VOR, 126°—4.5 miles; breakoff point to Runway 13,135°—0.3 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or.if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing FLL-VOR, turn left and climb to 2000' on Rr-079, and proceed to Martin VHF Int. MSA: 000-090°—1300', 090-180°—1400', 180-270°—2100', 270-360°—1400'. City, Fort Lauderdale; State, Fla.; Airport Name, Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International; Elev., 10'; Fac. Class., VOR; Ident., FLL; Procedure No. TerVOR-13, Amdt. 5; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 4; Dated, 26 Oct. 63

T -dm ...... 300-1 300-1 2004$ C-dn.. _____ 600-1 600-1 600-1)$ S-dn-4______600-1 600-1 600-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 •For aircraft equipped with VOR and ADF receiver FA-RBn or radar fix received the following mini- mums apply: C-dn______. 400-1 500-1 500-1)4 S-dn-4. _____ 400-1 400-1 400-1

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Aircraft will be released for final approach without procedure turn Inbnd on final approach crs 7 miles from VOR. Procedure turn S side of crs, 229° Outbnd, 049° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over faculty on final approach crs, 1400'.* Facility on airport. Crs and distance, breakoff point to approach end of Runway 4,044°—0.9 mile; FA-RBn to Runway 4,049°—2.6 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within Omile, climb to 2600' on R-091 and proceed to Monroe jn t or, when directed by ATC, make right climbing turn to 2100' and proceed direct to FW LOM. City, Fort Wayne; State, Ind.; Airport Name, Baer Field; Elev., 801'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., FWA; Procedure No. TerVOR-4, Amdt. 4; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 3; Dated, 6 Oct. 62______

T -d n _ . 300-1 300-1 200-H O -dn... 800-1 800-1 800-1)$ S—dn-9— 8004 8004 800-1 A-dn-______^ 800-2______800-2 v 800-2 •For aircraft equipped with VOR and ADF receiver and Robin Hit identified or radar fix obtained in lieu of Robin Int minimums are: C-dn...... 1 400-1 500-1 I M0-1H S-dn-9______400-1 400-1 400-1

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Aircraft will be released for final approach without procedure turn Inbnd on final approach crs 7 miles from VOR. Procedure tum S side of crs. 265° Outbnd, 085° Inbnd, 2200' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1600'.* Facility on airport. Crs ana distahce, breakoff point to approach end of Runway 9,090°—1.25 miles; Robin Int to Runway 9,085°—3.3 miles; Robin Int to VOR 3.9 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landira; minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile, climb to 2600' on R-091 and proceed to Monroe Int or, when directed by ATC. make right Climbing turn to 2100' and proceed direct to FW LOM. Robin Int: Int F WA VOR R-265 and bearing 326 from FA RBn. City, Fort Wayne; State, Ind.; Airport Name, Baer Field; Elev., 801'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., FWA; Procedure No. TerVOR-9, Amdt. 2; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 16 June 62 Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1789

T erm inai, VOR Standard Instru m ent Approach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Celling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition more than distance (feet) 66 knots More than or less 66 knots 66 knots

T -dn...... — 300-1 300-1 200->* O-dn.______600-1 600-1 600-1)* S—dn-13.___ __ 600-1 600-1 600-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 Aircraft equippee with VOR and ADF and Wayne Int# or radar fix received, following minimums apply: C-dn______400-1 500-1 600-1J* S-dn-13....___ 400-1 400-1 400-1

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Aircraft will be released for final approach without procedure turn Inbnd on final approach crs 7 miles from VOR. ' Procedure turn W side of crs, 320° Outbnd, 140° Inbnd, 2200' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1400'.* Facility on airport. ■ Crs and distance, breakoff point to approach end of Runway 13,135°—0.8 mile; Wayne Int# to Runway 13,140°—2.8 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile, climb to 2600f on R-091 and proceed to Monroe Int or, when directed by ATC, climb to 2100' and proceed direct to F w LOM. #Wayne Int: Int FWA R-320 and bearing 007® from FA RBn. City, Fort Wayne; State, Ind.; Airport Name, Baer Field; Elev., 801'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., FWA; Procedure No. TerVOR-13, Arndt. 3; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; Dated, 16 June 62

AZO-VOR...... 2400 T-dn______300-1 100-3 200-3* AZO-VOR...... 2600 C-dn-...... — 700-1 700-1 700-13* AZO-VOR______-...... 2600 S-dn-17...... 700-1 700-1 700-1 " 1900 A-dn##______800-2 800-2 800-2 UTT-VOR AZO-VOR...... -...... 2400 ÖRR-VOR ...... ~...... — AZO-VOR...... 2900 PMM-VOR ...... 1...... AZO-VOR...... -...... 2600 S-dn-17...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 AZO-VOR...... 2400

Procedure turn W side of crs, 002° Outbnd, 182° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1600’. Facility on airport. ts Crs and distance, Tower Int** to VOR, 182°—3.9 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing AZO-VOR, make climbing right turn to 3000' and proceed to Cooper Int via AZO R-321 or. when directed by ATC, climb to 2400' on AZO K-182, turn right and return to AZO-VOR. Other change: Deletes transition from ELX-VOR. •Plainwell Int: Int AZO R-002 and BTL R-205 r ••Tower Int: Int AZO R-002 and BTL R-269 ^Alternate minimums authorized only when AZO Tower operational or for air carrier with weather reporting service. Tower operates 0700-2300 local time. City, Kalamazoo;State, Mich.; Airport Name, Kalamazoo Municipal; Elev.,874'; Fac. Class., BVOR; Ident., AZO; Procedure No. TerVOR-17, Arndt. 4; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 3‘ Dated, 12 Oct. 63

T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-J* C-dn__ -...... 900-1 900-1 900-13* A-dn*...... 1000-2 1000-2 J 1000-2 Procedure turn W side of crs 163° Outbnd, 343° Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs 1100'. Facility on airport. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing ONP VOR, climb to 2700' on R-344 within 10 miles of ONP VOR. All maneuvering W of crs. N otes; *No public weather service. Alternae teminimums authorized only for those with approved weather reporting service on the airport. City, Newport;State, Oreg.; Airport Name, Newport Municipal; Elev., 160'; Fac. Class.,H-BVOR; Ident., ONP; Procedure No. TerVOR-34, Arndt. Orig.; Eff. Date, 8 Feb.64

OAK VOR...... 4000 T-dn# 300-1 300-1 OSI VOR...... __ 4000 C-dn* 600-1 Sunol Int... .. 6000 800-2 800-2 800-2 * Irvington Int/DME fix...... 3500 Decoto Int/DME fix...... Mount Eden Int/DME fix (final)...... 2600 Mount Eden Int/DME fix...... 1600 Ban Lorenzo Int/DME fix...... OAK VOR (final)...... Direct______600

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn not authorized. AH maneuvering and descent shall be accomplished in the Decoto Int/DM E fix holding pattern 114° Outbnd, 294° Inbnd, right turns *'m™ute, minimum altitude 4000'. Descent to 3600' authorized to cross Decoto Int/DME fix on final approach crs Inbnd. Minimum altitude over VOR on final approach, 600'. Facility on airport. Final approach crs Inbnd, 294°. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing the OAK VOR. climb to 3000' on OAK VOR R-313 to Richmond Int. ’ #300-1 required for takeoff on Runway 33. Maneuvering will be accomplished to the S of the OAK RBn. Circling minimums do not provide standard clearance over tank 357' 1.6 miles N of Runway 16/33. MSA: 000-090°—4900', 090-180°—4200', 180-270°—3000', 270-360°—3600'. City, Oakland; State, Calif.; Airport Name, Metropolitan-Oakland International; Elev., 10'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., OAK; Procedure No. TerVOR (R-114), Arndt 1; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 7 Apr. 62 1790 RULES AND RÉGULATIONS

T erminal VOR Standard Instrument Approach P rocedure

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimum«

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum From— T o— altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

SJU RBn. SJU VOR. Direct- 1600 T-dn____;___ 300-1 300-1 200-)4 SJP RBn. SJU VOR. Direct,. 1500 C-dn..__...... 900-1 900-1 900-1U S-dn-7...... 900-1 900-1 900-1 A-dn______900-2 900-2 900-2 If aircraft equipped with VOR and ADF receivers operating normally and Antenna Int# received, the following minimums are authorized: C-dn__...S 500-1 600-1 500-1U S-dn-7 500-1 600-1 500-1 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N side of crs, 260° Outbnd, 080° Inbnd, 1500' within 10 miles. Beyond 10 miles, not authorized. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 900'; if Antenna Int# or 6-mile DME fix identified, 500'. Facility on airport. Crs and distance, Antenna Int# to airport, 080°—4.6 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.6 miles after passing Antenna Int,# turn right and climb to 1500' on R-095 within 20 miles of SJU VOR. N o t e : Procedure turn nonstandard due high terrain S of area. MSA: 000-100°—1200', 100-180°—450C', 180-290°—4100', 290-360°—lOOO'. #Antenna Int: Int SJU VOR R-260 and 350° bearing from SJP RBn or 6-mile DM E fix cm SJU VOR R-260. Citv. San Juan: State. P.R.; Airport Name, Puerto Rico International; Elev., 9'; Fac. Class., BVOR; Ident., SJÙ; Procedure No. TerVOR-7, Arndt. 3; Eft. Daté, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 2; Dated, 27 July 63 5. By amending the following very high frequency omnirange-distance measuring equipment (VOR-DME) procedures prescribed in § 97.15 to read: VOR-DME Standard Instrument Approach Procedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSI*. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical mñas unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. . If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, miMs an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure tor such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shan be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

y •• - •; J ¿r , 1 2-engine or less More fiian Course and Minimum 2-engine, From— e To— altitude Condition more than distance (feet) 66 knots More than or less 66 knots 65 knots

T-dn.______300-1 300-1 NA C-d#*...... 600-1 600-1 NA C-n#*...... 600-2 600-2 NA A-dn#*...... 1000-2 1000-2 NA

Procedure turn E side of crs, 157° Outbnd, 337° Inbnd, 4500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over MOW VOR on final approach crs, 3300'; over Deck Int,% 2700'. ^visual cm fa^n^M tabfeh^upön^iescent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.4 miles after passing MOW VOR or 1.9 miles after passing Deck Int, climb to 4500' on MOW R-337 within 10 miles. Reverse crs, proceed to MOW VOR. Hold SE, 1-minute right turn, 337° Inbnd. #Do not descend below 2700'until, passing Deck Int. ___ »This approach authorized only for aircraft with installed operational VOR and DME equipment. %Deck Int: 3.6-mile DM E fix on MOW VOR R-337. City Morgantown: State, W. Va.; Airport Name, Morgantown Municipal; Elev, 1256'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., MOW; Procedure No. VOR/DME #1, Amdt. 1; ' ’ Eft. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 5 Oct. 63

20-mile DM E fix R-093. 3200 T-dn#...... 300-1 300-1 2 0 0 -H 2600 C-dn*...... 500-1 500-1 500-114 14-mile DME fix R-093. 800-2 9-mile DME fix R-093.. 1300 A-dn______800-2 800-2 4-mile DME fix R-093.. OAK VOR______Direct.. ______500

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. - , ' . _ _ . . Procedure turn not authorized. Aircraft must (1) proceed from Sunol Int, or (2) be radar vectored to final approach crs, 273 Inbnd. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs 500'. ITvisual contae^not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing OAK VOR, climb to 3000' on OAK VOR R-313 to Richmond Int (15-mile DME fix R-313). #300-1 required tor takeoff on Runway 33...... , , „ •Maneuvering will be accomplished to the S of the OAK RBn. Circling minimums do not provide standard clearance over tank 367 1.6 miles N of Runway City Oakland; State, Calif.; Airport Name, Metropolitan Oakland International; Elev., 10'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., OAK; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. li Amdt., l; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 7 July 62

15.6-mile DM E fix R-288. 8-mile DM E fix R-288. Direct. 2600 T-dn#. 300-1 300-1 200-H 600-1 600-1 BOO-lH 8-mile DM E fix R-288__ 6-mile DME fix R-288. Direct. 1600 C-dn*. 800-2 6-mile DM E fix R-288__ OAK V O R...... __- Direct. 600 A-dn.. 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn not authorized. Aircraft must (1) proceed from Commodore Int, or (2) be radar vectored to final approach crs, 108°. .. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs 500'. If visual contact*not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing OAK VOR, climb to 2600 on OAK VOR R-114 to Decoto Int (13.5-mile DME fix R-114). #300-1 required for takeoff on Runway 33. , • , , . , . iiuaa »Maneuvering will be accomplished to the S of the OAK RBn. Circling minimums do not provide Standard clearance over tank 357 1.6 miles N of Runway woo. MSA: 000-090°—4900’,090-180°—4200*, 180-270°—3000’,270-360°—3600’. •• • • ■ . ,, Caution: Extensive Navy jet operations between 8-mile DM E fix and 6-mile DME fix, R-288, Navy Alameda. City, Oakland; State, Calif.; Airport Name, Metropolitan Oakland International; Elev., 10'; Fac. Class. BVORTAC; Ident, OAK; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. , Amdt. I; Eft. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 7 July 62 Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1791

VOR-DME Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Mme than Course and Minimum From— To— altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 66 knots More than more than or less 66 knots 66 knots

„ TVMT?. fir R 204 . . . ______Direct...... 2600 T -dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-)3 C-dn...... 400-1 600-1 600-1)3 S-dn-12...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn S side of crs 294° Outbnd, 114° Inbnd, 2800' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over 3-mile DME fix R-114 on final approach crs, 1200'. CrS and distance 3-mile DM E fix R-114 to airport, 114°—3 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished at 6-mile DME fix R-114, make left turn, climb to 2600' and proceed to RFD VOR, or when directed by ATC, make right turn, climb to 2100' and proceed to RF LOM. note: When authorized by ATC, RFD DM E may be used to position aircraft tor straight-in approach at 2500 between R-234 clockwise to R-012 via 6-mile DM E arc with the elimination of procedure turn. City Rockford; State, 111.; Airport Name, Greater Rockford; Elev., 736'; Fac. Class» BVORTAC; Ident., RFD; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. 1, Arndt. Orig.; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64 6. By amending the following instrument landing system procedures prescribed in § 97.17 to read: IL S Standard Instrument Approach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— To— Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 66 knots More than more than or less 66 knots 66 knots

RTT.VOR 2600 T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-)3 Via LFD VOR 2600 C -dn.______400-1 600-1 500-1)3 R-294. S-dn-4______400-1 400-1 400-1 Direct______2600 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 AZO-VOR.....— .V ..i...... ___1___ .... Mendon Int* (final)______Via AZO R-130 2600 and SW ILS crs.

Procedure turn S side of crs, 224° Outbnd, 044° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles of Mendon Int.* No glide slope. No approach lights. Minimum altitude over Mendon Int* on final approach crs, 2600'. Crs and distance, Mendon Int* to airport, 044*—5.3 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.3 miles after passing Mendon Int,* make climbing left turn to 3000' and proceed to Hickory Int via BTL-VOR R-331 or, when directed by ATC, climb, to 2400' on NELcrs ILS to BT LOM. ♦Mendon Int: Int SW crs BTL ILS and AZO VOR R-091, or DM E fix 6.8 miles from BTL VOR. “ Vicksberg Int: Int AZO-VO R R-160 and S W crs BTL ILS. City, Battle Creek; State, Mich.; Airport Name, W. K. Kellogg Regional Airfield; Elev., 941'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-BTL; Procedure No. IL8-4, Arndt. 2; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 17 Mar. 63

Bismarck RBN LOM ______Direct __ 3300 T -dn______300-1 300-1 * 200-)3 Bismarck VOR. T.OM 3300 O-d _ ..... 400-1 600-1 600-1)3 Lincoln Int** LOM ...... Direct____ _ .... 3300 O-n______400-1)3 500-1)3 600-1)3 Bell Int***___ T.OM 3300 8 -d n -3iW ______300-1 • 300-1 ■ 300-1 A-dn______700-2 700-2 700-2

Procedure turn E side SE crs, 126° Outbnd, 306° Inbnd, 3300' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs 3000'. Distance to approach end of runway at OM 5.8 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 3800' on 261° bearing from BIS RBN or to 3800' on R-262 BIS-VOR within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC, make right climbing turn to 3800' on R-336 BIS-VOR within 20 miles. #No glide slope or middle marker. Check NOTAMs for commissioning date of glide slope and middle marker. *300-1 required on Runways 2, 20, 36 and 17. ♦‘Lincoln Int: Int BIS-VOR R-262 and SE crs ILS. ' “ Bell Int: Int BIS-VOR R-117 and 072° bearing from LOM. MSA: 000-090*—3400', 090-180°—3300', 180-270°—4100', 270-360°—3300'. City, Bismarck; State, N. Dak.; Airport Name, Municipal; Elev., 1663'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-BIS; Procedure No. ILS-80, Arndt. 16; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 15; Dated, 1 June 63

FA-RBn__ Ellis Int* Direct. 2200 T-dn ______300-1 300-1 200-H FWA-VOR. Ellis Int* Direct. 2200 400-1 600-1 600-1)3 R-dn-13 ■ 400-1 400-1 400-1 800-2 800-2 800-2

-cm,^r&^ar transition to final approach crs authorized. Aircraft will be released for final approach without procedure turn on Inbnd final approach crs at least 3 miles from i^uis int.* Procedure turn W side of final approach crs, 316° Outbnd, 135° Inbnd, 2200' within 10 miles of Ellis Int.* Minimum altitude over Ellis Int* on final approach crs, 1900'. Crs and distance, Ellis Int* to airport, 136°—3.5 miles. , visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.6 miles after passing Ellis Int,* climb to 2100' on SE WS kt an<^ Proceed to LOM or, when directed by ATC, make climbing right turn to 2600' and proceed to Rock Creek Int via R-218 FWA VOR. 4*0™: Procedure authorized only for aircraft equipped to receive ILS mid ADF simultaneously or when Ellis Int* determined by F t Wayne Radar. Ellis Int: Int NW crs FWA ILS and bearing 369° from FA-Rbn or NW crs FWA ILS and radar fix 3.5 miles from Runway 13. City, Fort Wayne; State, Ind.; Airport Name, Baer Field; Elev., 801'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-FWA; Procedure No. ILS-13, Arndt. 1; Eff. Date, 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 15 Apr. 61 1792 RULES AND REGULATIONS

ILS Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum 2-engine, Prom— To— altitude Condition distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 66 knots

Britton VOR__ __ Direct______3300 T-dn_ ___ — 300-1 300-1 2004$ Duncanville R B n.. 1500 C-dn______400-1 500-1 600-1)$ S-dn-31...... 300-1 300-1 300-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. . „ .. - , , Procedure turn E side crs, 129° Outbnd, 300° Inbnd, 2800 within 10 miles of Hensley Int.* Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Minimum altitude over Hensley Int* on final approach crs, 1500'. Crs and distance, Hensley Int* to airport, 309°—1.5 mites. If visual ronteet not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.5 miles after passing Hensley Int,* climb to 2000' on NW crs of GSW ILS within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC, turn left, proceed direct to FTW RBn, climb to 2000 . C aution- 1221' radio towers 5 miles N; 2349' TV towers 14 miles SSE; 1743' TV towers 12 miles WSW of airport. •Hensley lnt: Int DAL VOR R-220 or BRT VOR R-007 and GSW ILS SE crs. Citv Fort Worth- State, Tex.; Airport Name, Greater Southwest International, Dallas-Fort Worth Field; Elev., 668'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-GSW; Procedure No. ILS-31, . ' Amdt. 9; Eff. Date 8 Feb. 64-Sup. Arndt. No. 8; Dated, 28 Dec. 63

LOM (final)...... Direct______2200 T-dn------300-1 300-1 200-)$ Direct______2500 C-dn______. 400-1 500-1 600-1)$ LOM ...... -...... Direct______3000 S-dn-6...... 200-)$ 200-)$ 200-)$ LOM ___ - - - ___ Direct______2300 A-dn______600-2 600-2 600-2 LOM______Direct______2300 LOM______Direct______2300 "LOM...... -...... Direct______2300 LOM...... Direct______2300 LOM ...... Direct______2300 LOM______Direct______3000 LOM...... -...... -...... Direct______2300

Procedure turn S side of crs, 289® Outbnd, 059° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 mites. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2200'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 2138—5 miles; at M M , 882'—0.6 miles. . _ . „ ___ , . »„ T nnj If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, make left g ib in g tim to proceed direct to LOM or, when directed by ATC,

LOM...... -...... — Direct______1900 T-dn#...... 300-1 300-1 200-)$ LOM...... Direct______1900 C-dn...... 600-1 500-1 500-1)$ LOM...... Direct______1900 S-dn-35*...... 200-)$ 200-)$ 200- 1$ LOM...... Direct______1900 A -dn...... 600-2 600-2 800-2 LOM...... / - ...... Direct___ . . .. 1900

Radar vectoring authorized In accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn E side of crs, 174° Outbnd, 354° Inbnd, 1900' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1700'. . , Altitude of elide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1692'—4.7 miles; at MM, 527—0.6 mue. . . _ . . . . ,___r m f „in,in is If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 2500 on crs of 354 from LOM within 15 mtiPB or, when directed by ATC, turn left, climb to 1800' on R-271 MEM-VOR within 15 miles. Other change: Deletes transitions from Savage Int and Norfolk Int. *VKh% required when glide slope not utilized. ¿Air Carrier N ote-. Takeoff with less than 200-}-$ not authorized on Runway 14-32. MSA: 000-090°—2300', 090-180°—1700', 180-270°—1700', 270-360°—1700'. City Memphis; State, Tenn.; Airport Name, Memphis Metropolitan; Elev., 331'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-T8E; Procedure No. ILS-35, Amdt. 2; Eft. Date, 8 Feb. 64, v ’ Sup. Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 11 Jan. 64

300-1 800-1 200-’/$ Commodore Int. Direct______... 2500 T-dn#...... Direct— _____ 2500 C-dn*...... 500-1 500-1 600-1H Richmond In t_ 2000 S-dn-11...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 Island In t_____ A-dn.______800-2 800-2 800-2

P ro c u re tonno^^hO T U ^.^A hcraftm us? (l?^oceedPvia^OTnmodore Int, (2) via Richmond Int or (3) be radar vectored to final approach crs, 113*. No glide slope. - , , Minimum altitude over Tower Int on final approach ere, 2000 . ? fv ^ ^ ©M^ct D^^tebUsliMiau ^ ^ d a s^ t

ILS Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility m in im u m s

2-engine or less M in im u m More than From— Course and To— distance altitude Condition 2-engine, (fleet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Bay Point Int— - Hayward RBn... Direct. 6000 T-dn*____ 300-1 300-1 200-9$ Altamont Int------Hayward RBn... Direct. 5000 C-dn**___ _ 500-1 500-1 500-1)$ OAK VOR---- —: Hayward RBn_ Direct. 4000 S-dn-27R#_ 200-9$ 200-9$ 200-9$ Decoto Int------Hayward RBn... Direct. 4000 S-dn-27L##. 500-1 600-1 500-1 Fremont FM/RBn. Hayward RBn_ Direct. 4000 A-dn__ :__ 600-2 600-2 600-2 Sunol Int_,—...... Hayward RBn% Direct. 4000

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn S side of crs, 095° Outbnd, 275° Inbnd, 4Q007 within 10 miles of HWD RBn. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Procedure turn S side of crs, high terrain to N. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2700'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at HWD RBn,.2590'—8.2 miles; at OM, 1320'—4.1 miles; at MM 230'—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, proceed direct to o Xk VOR climbing to 3000' on OAK VOR R-313 to Richmond Int, % Descend on glide slope authorized to cross Hayward RBn at 2590'. *300-1 required for takeoff on Runway 33. ** Maneuvering will be accomplished to the south of the OAK RBn. Circling minimums do not provide standard clearance over tank 35?—1.6 miles N of Runway 15/33. #400—M required if glide slope not utilized. ##Crs and.distance OM to Runway 27L, 273°—4.2 miles. MSA; 000-090°—MOO7,090-180°—4200', 180-270°—3000', 270-360°—3600' City, Oakland; State, Calif.; Airport Name, Metropolitan Oakland International; Elev., 107; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-OAK; Procedure No ILS-27R/L Arndt is- v.n Date 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 17; Dated, 2 June 62 ‘ ’

OAK VOR...... ___ Fremont FM/RBn....______- ___ 4000 Mission Int ’-..- ______... __ 300-1 300-1 200“J^ 3700 600-1 600”1 600-19$ Sunol Int.. 3700 Fremont FM/RBn_ ._ . o nil ¿vn-ityo___ 200-K 200-}^ LOM (final)...... 1700 600-2 600-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Final abroach crs Inbndr*293°. Ataattfll must (1) proceed via Suno1 or Mlssion * * W <2> Ascend in the Fremont hording pattern or (3) be vectored to final approach crs. Minimum altitude at glide slope intercept, 17007. Altitudeof glide slope and distance to approach end of runway from Fremont FM/RBn 3700'—11.7 miles; LOM 1700'—*2 miles; LMM 2307—0.5 mile

■ Caution: In vicinity of LOM, heavy VFR traffic in Hayward traffic pattern. *,?^nway vis.ual r*mge 2600' authorized for takeoff Runway 29; providing high-intensity runway lights are operational. #3(^1 requirSgfOTTakeoff m fS u n ^ y 1^ 116 S °f thC 0AK EBn" Circlto£ minimums do not provide standard clearance over tank 357'—1.6 miles N of Runway 15/33.

Radar Standard I nstrum ent Approach P rocedure DKannanratonnutl«! in ^ below namedafrport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument procedure, unless an approach is conducted o , H ^ ^ c 1irT d^ L f0r aui b°r,iji0d b/ the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall bemade overspecified a^itude(s) shah correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below. Positive identification must be estab- * & ” !* « to final au thor^d laudiug minlmums, the instructions o f t h S r the established on final approach at or before descent to the authorized landing minimums, or (B) at pilot’s discretion if it appears desirable to discontinue S a m m S f k n ,^ nal? Uer dl,rect other7 |se Prlor to approach, a missed approach shall be executed as provided belowwhen (A) commimication (C) visua?EStS* * w 5 s?conds. ?uring a precision approach, or for more than 30 seconds during a surveillance approach; (B) directed by radar controller1 visual contact is not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums; or (D) if landing is not accomplished. * w»mrouer,

Radar terminal area maneuvering sectors and altitudes Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— ' , 2-engine, To— Distance altitude Condition more than (feet) 65 knots More than 65 knots or less 65 knots 000°.. 180°.. ------180°...... Within 15 miles... 3100 Precision approach _ 000°...... Within 15 miles__ 3700 S-dn-26______300-94 300-94 306-94 C-dn______500-1 500-i 500-iù A-dn-26______600-2 600-2 600-2 Surveillance approach T-dn.____ ..... 300-1 300-1 200-9$ C-dn______500-1 500-1 500-19$ S-dn-26 400-1 400-1 400-1 A -dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

D i S e i r t i t g 81ope“ terceptlonInbnd25007. VOR, hold SER ^io1MRBVOR1LmSmteiSt'turm authorized landtn« minimums or if landing not accomplished, make immediate left climbing turn to 31007 direct to MRB Th£ *? IPJp«^pe«ded alKl maintained faculty, hones of operations—Tuesday through

terrain io9ir 5 miles W of airport. F. artinsburg; State, W. Va.; Airport Name, Martinsburg Municipal; Elev., 556'; Fac. Class and Ident. MRB Air Force Radar; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. Orig ; Eff Date. 8 Feb. 64 1794 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Radar Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—Continued

Badar terminal area maneuvering sectors and altitudes Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Minimum 2-engine, From— To— Distance altitude Condition (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots ooo° ...... 200°...... Within 30 miles... 5000' Surveillance approach 200° ______000°...... Within 30 miles... 4000' T-dn%**...... 300-1 300-1 200-U C-dn#...... 500-1 500-1 500-1U S-dn-29-11...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 S-dn-27R-9L__ 500-1 500-1 500-1 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 Precision approach S-dn-29*...... 20O-H 200-H 200-H A-dn______600-2 600-2 600-2

Radar transitions and vectoring utilizing Oakland Radar authorized in accordance withi approved radar patterns and sector altitudes...... If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimum» or if landing not accomplished, Runway 27R: Climb to 2000 in a 1-minute holding pattern on R-300 OAK-VOR (300° Outbnd, 120° Inbnd), right turns (all turns W of crs). Runway 29: Climb to 1000' on magnetic heading 293°, then proceed direct to OAK-VOR, climbing to 2000' in a 1-minute Riming pattern on R-300 (300° Outbnd, 120° Inbnd), right turns. Runway 11: Proceed direct to the INB LOM, climbing to 2500' in a 1-minute holding pattern NW of LOM (300°t>utbnd, 120° Inbnd), left turns. Runway 9L: Climb to 1000' on magnetic heading 095°, then make right climbing turn, and proceed direct to OAK-VOR, climbing to 2000' in a 1-minute holding pattern on R-300 (300° Outbnd, 120° Inbnd), right turns. ^Runway^vSual?ange 2600' also authorized for landing on Runway 29; providing all components of the PAR, high-intensity runway lights, approach lights, condenser- discharge flasher, outer compass locator, and all related airborne equipment are operating satisfactorily. Descent below the authorized landing minimum altitude of 205' shall not be made unless visual contact with the approach lights has been established or the aircraft is clear of clouds. - * **Runway visual range 2600' also authorized for takeoff on Runway 29 and Runway 27R m lieu of 200-K, when 200-M authorized, providing high-intensity runway lights are tfMantSrciing will be accomplished to the S of the OAK RBn. Circling minimums do not provide standard clearance over tank 357'—1.6 miles N of Runway 15/33. Citv Oakland- State Calif.: Airport Name, Metropolitan Oakland International; Elev., 107; Fac. Class, and Ident., Oakland Radar; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 8; Eff. Date, ’ ' 8 Feb. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 7; Dated, 4 May 63 These procedures shall become effective on the dates specified therein. These amendments are made under the authority of sections 307(c) , 313(a), and 601 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348(c), 1354(a), 1421; 72 Stat. 749, 752, 775). Issued in Washington, D.C., on January 3,1964. G. S. Moore, Director, Flight Standards Service. [F.R. Doc. 64-212; Filed, Feb. 5,1964; 8:45 a.m.]

the East and Midwest, by 1959 a work­ electric instrument, and (2) subjective Title 7— AGRICULTURE able system had been developed and dem-! classification of defects. onstrated to growers and processors. Color measurement is made on a com­ Chapter I— Agricultural Marketing In 1960 and 1961 the Department offered, posite raw juice sample by the USDA Service (Standards, Inspections, to a limited number of processors on an Tomato Colorimeter in terms of a Marketing Practices), -^Department experimental basis, d service incorporat­ tomato color index. In addition, the fruit of Agriculture ing simultaneous .inspection of identical is classified into four categories: A, B, C samples by both the new and official and Culls. From the weights in these PART 51— FRESH FRUITS, VEGE­ grading methods, the purpose being to categories a “Percent Usable” is cal­ TABLES AND OTHER PRODUCTS provide a sound and satisfactory pur­ culated. The color and percent usable (INSPECTION, CERTIFICATION AND chasing system for raw tomatoes based factors are combined to give the grade STANDARDS) on the new standards. evaluation of a representative sample. In 1962 and 1963 one large Midwest After consideration of all relevant mat­ Subpart— United States Standards for processor used these standards in one ters presented, including the proposal Grade Evaluation of Tomatoes for area as the sole basis for contracting set forth in the aforesaid notice, the fol­ Processing 1 with growers. In order to provide the lowing United States Standards for industry ample time to study and apply Grade Evaluation of Tomatoes for Proc­ On November 1, 1962, a notice of pro­ these standards, a full crop season was essing are hereby promulgated pursuant posed rule making was published in the allowed for comments. In view of fa­ to the Agricultural Marketing Act of Federal Register (27 F.R. 10655) regard­ vorable comments from both industry 1946 (60 Stat. 1087, as amended; 7 U.S.C. ing the issuance of United States Stand­ and Department personnel, no changes 1621-1627). ards for Grade Evaluation of Tomatoes in the proposal were necessary. Further G eneral for Processing (7 CFR, §§ 51.3310- observations will be made of the ap­ Sec. 51.3318). plication of the standards under com­ 51.3310 General. Statement of considerations leading to mercial conditions so that modifications Defect Evaluation the issuance of the grade standards. In may be made as needed to maintain their 51.3311 Category A. 1950 representatives from tomato grower usefulness to the processing industry. 51.3312 Category B. and processor groups met with Depart­ These new standards do not replace 51.3313 Category C. ment personnel to discuss a grading sys­ the existing official tomato processing Culls tem which would employ objective to­ standards. The Department offers these 51.3314 Culls. mato color measurement rather than standards as a new approach in achiev­ Stems visual color determination. ing greater accuracy and efficiency in the 51.3315 Stem s. Research work was begun in 1952 and, grading process as well as providing a P ercent U sable after extensive field studies throughout more equitable basis of payment for both processor and grower. 51.3316 Percent usable. ' i Packing of the product in conformity with The new standards provide for an in­ P ercent Waste the requirements of these standards shall spection system for determining the 51.3317 Percent waste'. not excuse failure to comply with the pro­ quality of raw tomatoes for processing visions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cos­ Color Evaluation metic Act or with applicable State Laws and based on two factors: (1) Objective color regulations. measurement through the use of a photo­ 51.3318 Color evaluation. Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTE* 1795

Authority : The provision of this subpart P ercent W aste published in the F ederal R egister Au­ Issued under secs. 203, 205, 60 Stat. 1087, § 51.3317 Percent waste. gust 30, 1963 (28 F.R. 9142), which were as amended, 1090 as amended;. 7 U.SÆ. 1622, designated for tobacco crop insurance ; 1624. v "Percent Waste” is a calculation of G eneral for the 1964 crop year pursuant to the total weights of Culls and all defective authority contained in § 401.1 of the § 51.3310 General. portions of tomatoes in Category B, plus above-identified regulations. 20 percent of the weight of tomatoes in Hie standards contained in this sub­ Category C. (Secs. 506, 516, 52 Stat. 73, as amended, 77, part apply to an inspection procedure as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1506, 1516) for determining the quality of tomatoes C olor E v a l u a t io n 3 [ sea l] J o h n N . L u f t , for processing based on two factors: (1) Objective color measurement by use of a § 51.3318 Color evaluation. Manager. photoelectric instrument (USDA Tomato (a) The raw juice used for the color [FH. Doc. 64-1199; FUed, Feb. 5, 1964; Colorimeter!, and (2> subjective classi­ determination shall be extracted from a 8:50 a jn .[ fication of defects. representative sample by means of an USDA approved extractor fitted with a D efect E valuation PART 401— FEDERAL CROP .034 inch mesh screen juice attachment. INSURANCE §51.3311 Category A. (b) Color measurement shall be made “Category A” consists of tomatoes on a composite raw juice sample by Subpart— Regulations for the 1961 means of a photoelectric instrument and Succeeding Crop Years which are free from worms present and (USDA Tomato Colorimeter) in terms of feeding, and from worm injury that has A p p e n d ix ; D iscontinuance o f I n su rance penetrated through the outer wall and, tomato eolor index. which are free from mold or decay, but It is hereby found that good cause ex­ i n C o u n t ie s P r e v io u sl y D esignated which may have any other defect or ists for not postponing the effective date fo r P otato C rop I n su r a n c e combination of defects the removal of of these standards beyond the date of The counties listed below are hereby which in the process of trimming would publication hereof in the F ederal R eg­ deleted from the list of counties published ist er (5 U.S.C. 1001-1011), in that (1) cause a loss of not more than 5 percent, in the F ederal R egister August 20, 1963 by weight, of the tomato. grower-processor contracts for the 1964 (28 F.R. 9141), which were designated season are now being negotiated, many for potato crop insurance for the 1964 § 51.3312 Category B. of which will use these standards as basis crop year pursuant to the authority con­ “Category B” consists of tomatoes for payment, and to enable contracting tained in § 401.1 of the above-identified which are free from worms present and parties to cite officially promulgated regulations. feeding, and from worm injury that has standards it is in the interest of the pub­ Idaho penetrated through the outer wall and, lic and the industry that the standards be placed in effect at the earliest possible Canyon. M adison. which are free from mold or decay, but Frem ont. Power. which have any other defect or com­ date; and, (2) no special preparation Is Jerom e. T w in Falls. bination of def ects the removal of which required for compliance with these Jefferson. in the process of trimming would cause standards on the part of members of the Minnesota tomato industry or of others. a loss of more than 5 percent but not K ittson. Polk. more than 20 percent, by weight, of the Accordingly the United States Stand­ tomato. ards for Grade Evaluation of Tomatoes Oregon for Processing contained in this subpart Jefferson. § 51.3313 Category C. shall become effective upon publication (Secs. 506, 516, 52 Stat. 73, as amended, 77, F ederal R egister “Category C” consists of tomatoes in the February 6, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1506, 1516) which are free from worms present and 1964. feeding, and from worm injury that has Dated: January 31, 1964. [ sea l] J o h n N . L u f t , penetrated through the outer wall, and Manager. which are affected by mold or decay, or G . R . G range, [F.R. Doc. 64-1198; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; which have a combination of defects in­ Deputy Administrator, 8:49 a.m.J cluding mold or decay, the removal of Marketing Services. which in the process of trimming would [PH. Doc. 64-1180; Filed. Feb. 5, 1964; cause a loss of not more than 20 percent, 8:48 a jn .[ by weight, of the tomato. Title 9— ANIMALS AND CULLS ANIMAL PRODUCTS §51.3314 Colls. Chapter IV— Federai Crop Insurance Corporation, Department of Agri­ Chapter II— Agricultural Marketing “Culls” are tomatoes which do not culture Service (Packers and Stockyards Di­ meet the requirements of Category C. vision)/ Department of Agriculture S tem s PART 401— FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE PART 201— REGULATIONS UNDER § 51.3315 Stems. THE PACKERS AND STOCKYARDS Subpart— Regulations for the 1961 ACT Unless otherwise specified, tomatoes and Succeeding Crop Years with stems have no restrictions in any Prompt Payment or the foregoing categories. If specified A p p e n d ix ; D iscontinuance of I n su rance On September 25, 1963, a notice of free from stems” tomatoes with stems i n C o u n t ie s P r e vio u sly D esignated shall fall into Category C, unless addi­ fo r T obacco Crop I nsu r a n c e proposed rule making was published in tional defects make them Culls. the F ederal R eg ister (28 F Jt. 10383) Hartford County, Connecticut, and regarding the amendment of § 201.43 of P ercent U sable Hampshire County, Massachusetts, are the regulations (9 CFR 201.43) under the hereby deleted from the list of counties Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as § 51.3316 Percent usable. amended (7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.K Inter­ * The extractor and the USDA Tomato Col­ ested persons were given an opportunity Percent Usable” is a calculation of orimeter are commercially available. Infor­ to submit written data, views, and argu­ .weights of tomatoes in Category A mation on where they may be purchased and ments with respect to the proposed ana the proportion of sound tomatoes in additional details concerning them, may be amendment. After consideration of all category B, that remain after all defec- obtained from the Fresh Products Standard­ ization and Inspection Branch, Fruit and relevant matter submitted by interested îv® Portions are removed by tr im m in g, Vegetable Division, Agricultural Marketing persons, § 201.43, Part 201, Chapter n , Pius 80 percent of the weight of tomatoes Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Title 9 of the Code of Federal Regula­ in Category C. Washington, D.C., 20250. tions, is hereby amended as follows: No. 26------3 1796 RULES AND REGULATIONS

§ 201.43 [Amended] § 204.2 Computation of reserves. (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets * • * * * or applies sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended, 67 1. Add a descriptive heading to present Stat. Ill, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45, HQi) § 201.43 to read: “Payment and account­ (b) Deductions allowed in computing[Cease and desist order, Chori New York, Inc., ing for livestock and live poultry”; reserves. In determining the reserve et al., New York, N.Y., Docket C-682, Jan. 21, 2. Designate the descriptive heading balances required under the terms of this 1964] and text of present § 201.43 as paragraph part, member banks may deduct from In the Matter of Chori New York, Inc„ a “(a)”; and the amount of their gross demand de­ Corporation, and Shosuke Tanikaga, 3. Add a new paragraph “(b) ” reading posits the amounts of balances subject Kunio Misaki and Akira Utsumi, Indi­ as follows: to immediate withdrawal due from other vidually and as Officers of Said Cor­ banks and cash items in process of col­ poration (b) Purchasers to^pay promptly for lection as defined in § 204.1(g) . Bal­ livestock. Each packer, market agency, ances “due from other banks” do not in­ Consent order requiring New York City or dealer purchasing livestock shall, be­ clude balances due from Federal Re­ importers to cease violating the Flam­ fore the close of the next business day serve banks, balances (payable in dollars mable Fabrics Act by importing and dis­ following the purchase of livestock and or otherwise) due from foreign banks or tributing in commerce fabrics which were the determination of the amount of the branches thereof wherever located, or so highly flammable as to be dangerous purchase price, transmit or deliver to the balances due from foreign branches of when worn. seller or his duly authorized agent the domestic banks.® The order to cease and desist, includ­ full amount of the purchase price, unless ***** ing further order requiring report of otherwise expressly agreed between the 2a. The purpose of this amendment is compliance therewith, is as follows: parties before the purchase of the live­ to eliminate from § 204.2(b) the sentence I, It is ordered, That the respondent stock. Any such agreement shall be dis­ thereof which excluded private banks or Chori New York, Inc., a corporation, closed in the purchaser’s records and on bankers from the word “banks” in the and its officers, and respondents, Shosuke the accountings or other documents is­ term “due from other banks”, so as to sued by the purchaser relating to the Tanikaga, Kunio Misaki and Akira conform the language of § 204.2(b) in Utsumi, individually and as officers of transaction. this respect to section 19, paragraph 11, said corporation, and respondents’ repre­ The purpose of the amendment is to of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. sentatives, agents and employees, directly establish a uniform rule regarding pay­ 465). or through any corporate or other device, ment for livestock purchased by packers, b. The notice, public participation, do forthwith cease and desist from: market agencies, and dealers consistent and deferred effective date described in (a) Importing into the United States; with (1) the established custom that section 4 of the Administrative Pro­ or sales of livestock are on a cash basis, and cedure Act are not followed in connection (b) Selling, offering for sale, intro­ (2) the provisions of present § 201.43 of with this relaxing amendment for the ducing, delivering for introduction, the regulations under which market reasons and good cause found as stated transporting, or causing to be trans­ agencies selling livestock on a commis­ in paragraph (e) of § 262.1 of the Board’s ported, in commerce, as “commerce” is sion basis transmit or deliver net pro­ rules of procedure (Part 262 of this chap­ defined in the Flammable Fabrics Act; or ceeds to shippers before the close of the ter), and specifically because in connec­ (c) Transporting or causing to be next business day following the sale of tion with this amendment such proce­ transported, for the purpose of sale or the shippers’ livestock. The amendment dures are unnecessary as they would not delivery after sale in commerce, requires that if the parties to a livestock aid the persons affected and would serve sales transaction enter into an agree­ no other useful purpose. any fabric which, under the provisions of ment referred to in the regulation, the Section 4 of the said Flammable Fabrics (Sec. 11 (i), 38 Stat. 262; 12 U.S.C. 248(i). In­ Act, as amended, is so highly flammable substance of such agreement must be terpret or apply 12 U.S.O. 248(c), 461, 462, disclosed by the packer, market agency, 462a-l, 462b, 464, 465) as to be dangerous when worn by in- or dealer in his records and on the ac­ dividuals. countings or other documents issued by B oard o p G overnors o p th e Provided, however, that nothing con­ him relating to such transaction. F ederal R eserve S y st e m , tained herein shall affect any rights af­ [ sea l] M erritt S h e r m a n , forded to the respondents by Section 11 This amendment shall become effec­ Secretary. of the Flammable Fabrics Act. tive on March 15,1964. [F.R. Doc. 64-1146; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; II. It is further ordered, That respond­ (Sec. 407(a), 42 Stat. 169, 72 Stat. 1750; 7 8:45 a.m.] ents hereinbefore named furnish to the U.S.C. 228(a); interprets or applies secs. 202, Federal Trade Commission within 5 days 307, 312, 401, 42 Stat. 169; 7 U.S.C. 192, 208, after service of this order a special re­ 213, 221) port which: Title 16-COMMERCIAL (a) Contains a list of the names and Done at Washington, D.C., this 3d addresses of all of the corporate respond­ day of February 1964. PRACTICES ents’ customers to whom shipments were C larence H . G irard, Chapter I— Federal Trade Commission made, since July 1, 1963, of fabric Style Deputy Administrator, [Docket C-682] AK 7331 and/or of any other fabric which Regulatory Programs. under the provisions of section 4 of the PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE said Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended, [FJR. Doc. 64-1196; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; PRACTICES f l n w-\ wv n Vil û OC! f r t dfl.TISiGl “ 8:49 a.m.] ous when worn by individuals. Chori New York, Inc., et al. (b ) Shows that respondents have Subpart—Importing, selling, or trans­ notified in writing the customers of the porting flammable wear: § 13.1060 Im­ corporate respondent to whom any of the Title 12— BANKS AND BANKING porting, selling, or transporting flam­ shipments referred to in subparagraph mable wear. (a) above were made, as to the ques­ Chapter II— Federal Reserve System tionable flammable nature of the fabrics SUBCHAPTER A— BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF «A member bank exercising fiduciary contained in such shipments. THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM powers may not include in balances “due (c) Contains copies of the aforesaid from other banks” amounts of trust funds notification to each of the customers [Reg. D] deposited with other banks and due to it as referred to in subparagraph (a) ana trustee or other fiduciary. If trust funds are copies of any and all responses to tne PART 204— RESERVES OF MEMBER deposited by the trust department of a mem­ aforesaid notification. BANKS ber bank in its commercial or savings de­ partment and are then redeposited in another III. It is further ordered. T h a t re­ Computation of Reserves bank subject to immediate withdrawal they spondents, hereinbefore named, snau may be included by the member bank in 1. Effective January 29, 1964, § 204.2 balances “due from other banks,” subject to forward to the Commission, within two (b) is amended to read as follows: the provisions of § 204.2(b). (2 ) days after receipt thereof, copies oi Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1797 any and all responses to the notification rate or other device, do forthwith cease Textile Fiber Products Identification required by Subparagraph (c) of Para­ and desist from: Act. graph 33 above which are received by 1. (a) Importing into the United III. it is further ordered, That re­ respondents after the due date of the States; or spondents hereinbefore named, furnish aforesaid special report. (b) Selling, offering for sale, intro­ to the Federal Trade Commission within IV. It is further ordered, That the re­ ducing, delivering for introduction, five (5> days after service of this order, spondents, hereinbefore named, shall, transporting, or causing to be transport­ a special report which: within five (5) days after service upon ed, in bommeree, as “commerce” is de­ (a) Contains a list of the names and them of this order, file with the Com­ fined in the Flammable Fabrics Act; or addresses of all of the corporate respond­ mission a report in writing setting forth (c) Transporting or causing to be ents’ customers to whom shipments were in detail the manner and form in which transported, for the purpose of sale or made, since July 1, 1963, of fabric Style they have complied with paragraph I of delivery after sale in commerce, AK 7331 and/or of any other fabric this order. - v T - any fabric, which under the provisions which under the provisions of section 4 Issued: January 21,1964. of section 4 of the said Flammable Fab­ of the said Flammable Fabrics Act, as rics Act, as amended^ is so highly flam­ amended, is so highly flammable as to By the Commission. mable as to be dangerous when worn by be dangerous when worn by individuals. [seal! ;, J o se p h W . S hea, individuals. (b) Shows that respondents have Secretary. Provided, however, That nothing con­ notified, in writing the customers of the tained herein shall affect any rights af­ corporate respondent to whom any of [PJEt. Doc. 64-1147; Piled, Feb. 5, 1964; the shipments referred to in subpara­ 8:45 a.m .] forded to the respondents by section 11 of the Flammable Fabrics Act. graph (a) above were made, as to the 2. Furnishing to any person a guaranty questionable flammable nature of the [Docket 0-683] with respect to any fabric which re­ fabrics contained in such shipments. (c) Contains copies of the aforesaid PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE spondents, or any of them, have reason to believe may be introduced, sold or notification to each of the customers re­ PRACTICES ferred to in subparagraph (a) and copies transported in commerce, which guaran­ of any and all responses to the aforesaid joycette Fabrics Corp. et al. ty represents, contrary to fact, that rea­ sonable and representative tests made notification. Subpart—Furnishing false guaranties: under the procedures provided in section IV. It is further ordered, That re­ § 13.1053 Furnishing false guaranties; 4 of the Flammable Fabrics Act, as spondents, hereinbefore named, shall § 13.1053-30 Flammable Fabrics Act. amended, and the rules and regulations forward to the Commission, within two Subpart—Importing, selling, or trans­ thereunder, show and wifi show that the C2> days after receipt thereof, copies of porting flammable wear: § 13.1060 Im­ fabric covered by the guaranty, is not, any and all responses to the notification porting, selling, or transporting flam­ in the form delivered or to be delivered required by Subparagraph (e> of para­ mable wear. Subpart—Neglecting, un­ by the guarantor, so highly flammable^ graph n above which are received by fairly or deceptively, to make material under the provisions of the Flammable respondents after the due date of the disclosure: § 13.1845 Composition; Fabrics Act as to be dangerous when aforesaid special report. § 13.1845-70 Textile Fiber Products Iden­ worn by individuals, provided, however, V. It is further ordered, That the re­ tification Act. that this prohibition shall not be appli­ spondents hereinbefore named, shall, (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Inter­ cable to a guaranty furnished on the within fire C5) days after service upon pret or apply sec. 5,38 Stat. 719, as amended; basis of, and in reliance upon, a guaran­ them of this order, file with the Commis­ 67 Stat. Ill, as amended; 72 Stat. 1717; 15 ty to the same effect received by re­ sion a report in writing setting forth in U.S.C. 45, 70, 1191) [Cease and d esist order, spondents in good faith signed by and detail the manner and form in which Joycette Fabrics Corp., et al., New York, N.Y., containing the name and address of the they have complied with paragraph I of Docket C-683, Jan. 21, 1964] person by whom the fabric was manu­ this order. In the Matter of Joycette Fabrics Corp., factured or from whom it was received. Issued: January 21, 1964. a Corporation, and Louis A. Levine and n . It is further ordered, That re­ David Sherman, Individually and as spondents Joycette Fabrics Corp., a cor­ By the Commission. Officers of Said Corporation poration, and Its officers, and Louis A. [ seal] -r J o se ph W . S h ea , Consent order requiring NewYork City Levine and David Sherman, individually Secretary. converters and distributors of imported and as officers of said corporation, and [FJt. Doc, 64-1148; Filed, Feb, 5, 1964; respondents’ representatives, agents and 8:45 a m .) fabric to cease violating the Flammable employees, directly or through any cor­ Fabrics Act by importing or selling flam­ porate or other device, in connection mable fabrics in commerce, and falsely [Docket C-681] representing to customers that they had with the introduction, delivery for in­ troduction, sale, advertising or offering PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE a continuing guarantee with the Federal for sale, in commerce, or in the trans­ Trade Commission to the effect that PRACTICES tests required under the Act showed cer­ portation or earning to be transported in tain fabrics not to be dangerously flam­ commerce, or the importation into the American Cement Corp. mable; and to furnish to the C om m is sion United States of any textile fiber prod­ uct; or in connection with the sale, of­ Subpart—Acquiring corporate stock or Within five days a list of customers to fering for sale, advertising, delivery, assets: § 13.5 Acquiring corporate stock whom flammable fabrics were shipped, or assets1 along with a showing that such cus­ transportation or causing to be trans­ tomers were notified of the questionable ported, of any textile fiber product which (Sec. 6,38 Stat. 721; 15 UJ9.C. 46. Interprets flammable nature of the fabrics; and to has been advertised or offered for sale or applies sec. 7, 38 Stat. 731, as amended; 15 cease violating the Textile Fiber Prod­ in commerce; or in. connection with the U.S.C. 18) [Cease and desist order, American sale, offering for sale, advertising, de­ Cement Corporation, New York, N.Y., Docket ucts Identification Act by failing to affix C-681, Jan. 20,1964] required labels to textile products im­ livery, transportation or causing to be ported or sold in commerce. transported, after shipment in com­ Consent order requiring a Portland The order to cease and desist, includ­ merce, of any textile fiber product, cement manufacturer in Los Angeles— ing further order requiring report of whether in its original state or con­ one of the ten largest in the United compliance therewith, is as follows: tained in other textile fiber products, States, operating seven cement manu­ as the terms “commerce” and “textile facturing plants in Pennsylvania, Michi­ . ft & ordered, That the respondent fiber product” are defined in the Textile gan, California, Arizona, and Hawaii, and Joycette Fabrics Corp., a corporation, Fiber Products Identification Act do a principal supplier in the New York and its officers, and Louis A. Levine and forthwith cease and desist from mis­ City area herein concerned—to divest it­ yavid Sherman, individually and as of- branding textile fiber products by fail­ self of all the stock, assets and tangible ncers of said corporation, and respond- ing to affix labels to such products show­ and intangible properties, rights and ents representatives, agents and em­ ing each element of information required ployees, directly or through any corpo- to be disclosed by section 4 Cb) of the 1 H eading am ended. 1798 RULES AND REGULATIONS privileges acquired in its acquisition of a who, at the time of said divestiture, re­ ployees, directly or through any corpo­ manufacturer operating four ready- spondent knows or has reason to know rate or other device, in connection with mixed concrete plants in the New York is an officer, director, employee or agent the offering for sale, sale and distribu­ City area and one of the five largest con­ of a corporation, which at the time of tion of the product designated as sumers of Portland cement in that area, such sale or transfer, is a manufacturer “Chrome & Aluminum Touch-Up” or the subject to the provisions of the order or substantial distributor of Portland component parts thereof, “Magichrome below set out. cement anywhere in the United States, Cleaner” and “Magichrome” whether The order to cease and desist, includ­ or is engaged in the production or sale sold under the same names or any other ing further order requiring report of of ready-mixed concrete in the New York names, or any product of similar or like compliance therewith, is as follows: City area, as defined in the complaint. composition, in commerce, as “com­ It is further ordered, That respondent merce” js defined in the Federal Trade It is ordered, That respondent, Ameri­ shall, within sixty (60) days after serv­ Commission Act, do forthwith cease and can Cement Corporation, a corporation, ice upon it of this Order, file with the desist from: through its officers, directors, agents, Federal Trade Commission a report, in 1. Using the word “Chrome” or any representatives and employees shall, writing, setting forth in detail its plan other terms of similar import or mean­ within nine months from the date of for carrying out the provisions of this ing as part of a product name or trade service upon it of this Order, divest it­ Order. In the event divestiture has not name for such product, or representing self, in good faith, and in so far as been accomplished within this sixty day in any other manner that respondents’ reasonably possible as a unit, and to a period, respondent will thereafter report products contain chrome. purchaser, or purchasers, approved by each sixty days its progress in carrying 2. Representing, directly or by impli­ the Federal Trade Commission, of all out the provisions of this Order. cation: stock or of all rights, title and interest A. That the product will restore or re­ in all assets, properties, rights and priv­ Issued: January 20, 1964. finish automobile chrome; ileges, tangible and intangible, includ­ By the Commission. B. That the product will stop rust or ing but not limited to, all properties, render metal impervious to weather, cor­ plants, machinery, equipment, raw ma­ [sea l] J o seph W. S hea, rosion or salt; v terial reserves, trade names, contract Secretary. C. That the product will remove rust rights, trade marks and good will ac­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1149; Mled, Feb. 6, 1964; instantly or effortlessly or that it will quired by respondent as a result of its 8:45 a.m.] be effective in removing rust in any man­ acquisition of the stock and assets of ner not in accordance with the facts; the M. F. Hickey Company, Inc., to­ D. That any of respondents’ products gether with all plants, machinery, build­ [Docket C-679] are guaranteed, unless the nature and ings, land, raw material reserves, im­ extent of the guarantee and the manner provements, equipment and other prop­ PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE in which the guarantor will perform erty of whatever description that have PRACTICES thereunder are clearly and conspicuously been added to or placed upon the prem­ K. P. Industries, Inc., et al. set forth. ises of the former M. F. Hickey Com­ 3. Placing in the hands of others any pany, Inc., as may be necessary to re­ Subpart—Advertising falsely or mis­ means or instrumentalities by or through store or continue the M. F. Hickey Com­ leadingly: § 13.30 Composition of goods; which they may mislead the public as to pany, Inc., insofar as reasonably pos­ § 13.70 Fictitious or misleading guaran­ any of the matters and things set out in sible, as a going concern and an effec­ tees; § 13.170 Qualities or properties of. paragraphs 1 and 2 above. tive competitor in the manufacture and product or service; § 13.170-70 Preven­ It is further ordered, That the re­ sale of ready-mixed concrete. tive or protective; § 13.170-78 Renewing, spondents herein shall, within sixty (60)* It is further ordered, That, except in restoring. Subpart—Using misleading days after service upon them of this the ordinary course of business pending name—Goods: 1 13.2280 Composition; order, file with the Commission a report divestiture, respondent shall not, with­ § 13.2325 Qualities or properties. in writing setting forth in detail the out prior approval of the Federal Trade (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret manner and form in which they have Commission, make any changes in any or apply sec. 5, 38 Stat 719, as amended; 15 complied with this order. of the plants, machinery, buildings, U.S.C. 45) [Cease and desist order, K. P. equipment, or other property of what­ Industries, Inc., et al., Chicago, DI., Docket Issued: January 13,1964. ever description of the former M. F. C-679, Jan. 13,1964] By the Commission. Hickey Company, Inc., which shall im­ In the Matter of K. P. Industries, Inc., a [ seal] J o se p h W. S hea, pair its present capacity for the produc­ Corporation, and Yale Engineering Secretary. tion, sale and distribution of ready- Company, a Corporation, and William mixed concrete, or its market value, un­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1150; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; M. Karesh, and Morton J. Smith, In­ 8:45 a.m.] less such capacity or value is restored dividually and as Officers of Said prior to divestiture. Corporation It is further ordered, That, without prior approval of the Federal Trade Consent order requiring Chicago dis­ [Docket 8561] Commission, the aforesaid assets or stock tributors of various automotive products, PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE including a kit designated as “CHROME required to be divested under this Order PRACTICES shall not be sold or transferred, directly & ALUMINUM TOUCH-UP” consisting or indirectly, to anyone who, at the time of two components “MAGICHROME Leonard Margolis et al. CLEANER” and “MAGICHROME”, to of the divestiture, respondent knows or Subpart—Advertising falsely or mis­ has reason to know is a stockholder, cease representing falsely, in advertising and by the aforesaid trade names, that leadingly: § 13.155 Prices; § 13.155-60 officer, director, employee, or agent, or List or catalog as regular selling; § 13.- otherwise is directly or indirectly con­ the products contained chrome and would restore chrome, stop rust and re­ 155-80 Retail as cost, wholesale, dis­ nected with or under the control of re­ counted, etc. ' spondent or any of its subsidiaries or move it instantly, render metal imper­ affiliated companies, except that the cur­ vious to weather, corrosion and salt, and (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret were fully guaranteed. or apply sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 rent stockholdings of former owners, The order to cease and desist, includ­ U.S.C. 45) [Cease and d esist order, Leonard Lawrence F. Hickey and Jamily, shall ing further order requiring report of Margolis et al. trading as Silvo Hardware not prevent divestiture to them with the Company, Philadelphia, Pa., Docket 8561, approval of the Federal Trade Com­ compliance therewith, is as follows: Jan. 24,1964] mission. It is ordered, That respondents K. P. In the Matter of Leonard Margolis, and It is further ordered, That, without Industries, Inc., a corporation and Yale Norton Berger, Individually a n d as prior approval of the Federal Trade Engineering Company, a corporation, Copartners Trading as Silvo Hardware Commission, in said divestiture, respond­ their officers, and William M. Karesh and Company ent shall not sell or transfer, directly or Morton J. Smith individually and as of­ indirectly, any of the aforesaid stock or ficers of said corporations, and respond­ Order requiring Philadelphia mail or­ assets, to any corporation, or to anyone ents’ agents, representatives and em­ der distributors of hardware, housewares, Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1799 typewriters, toys, and other general mer­ form in which they have Complied With Style AK 4100 and/or AK 777 and/or chandise, to cease representing falsely the order to cease and desist. of any other fabric which under the in catalogs distributed to prospective provisions of section 4 of the said Flam­ purchasers that higher prices quoted in Issued: January 24, 1964. mable Fabrics Act; as amended, is so juxtaposition with lower stated code By the Commission. highly flammable as to be dangerous prices were the usual retail prices in all [ seal] J o se p h W . S hea, when worn by individuals. the trade areas in which the catalogs Secretary. (b) Shows that respondents have noti­ were distributed; and by such statements fied in writing the customers of the cor­ in catalogs as “wholesalers and distrib­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1151: Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; porate respondent to whom any of the utors”, “Buy at Wholesale Prices”, that 8:45 a jn .] shipments referred to in subparagraph they sold all their merchandise at whole­ (a) above were made, as to the question­ sale prices. [Docket C-684] able flammable nature of the fabrics The order to cease and desist is as contained in such shipments. follows: ;5 PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE (c) Contains copies of the aforesaid PRACTICES notification to each of the customers re­ It is ordered, That respondents Leon­ ferred to in subparagraph (a) and ard Margolis and Norton Berger, indi­ Nichimen Co., Inc., et al. copies of any and all responses to the vidually and as copartners trading as Subpart—Importing, selling, or trans­ aforesaid notification. Silvo Hardware Company, or under any porting flammable wear: § 13.1060 Im­ HI, It is further ordered, That re­ other name or names, and their agents, porting, selling, or transporting flam­ spondents hereinbefore named shall for­ representatives and employees, directly mable wear. ward to the Commission, within two (2 ) or through any corporate or other device, days after receipt thereof, copies of any in connection with the offering for sale, (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended, and all responses to the notification re­ sale or distribution of hardware, house- 67 Stat. Ill, as amended; 15 UJ3.C. 45, 1191) quired in subparagraph (c) of Para­ wares, appliances, typewriters, fishing [Cease and desist order, Nichimen Company, graph n above which are received by re­ gear, and other articles of merchandise Inc., et al., New York, N.Y., Docket C-684, spondents after the due date of the in commerce, as “commerce” is defined Jan. 21, 1963] aforesaid special report. in the Federal Trade Commission Act, IV. It is further ordered, That the re­ do forthwith cease and desist from: in the Matter of Nichimen Company, L Representing, directly or by im­ Inc., a Corporation, and Shunji Uyeda spondents hereinbefore named shall, plication, that any amount is the usual Individually and as an Officer of the within five (5) days after service upon Said Corporation them of this order, file with the Commis­ and customary retail or wholesale price sion a report in writing setting forth of merchandise in any trade area to Consent order requiring a New York in detail the manner and form in which which the respondents distribute their City importer to cease violating the they have complied with Paragraph I of catalogs when it is in excess of the gen­ Flammable Fabrics Act by importing this order. erally prevailing retail or wholesale into the United States and selling in price (as the case may be) at which such commerce fabric which was so highly Issued: January 21,1964. merchandise is sold in such trade area. flammable as to be dangerous when By the Commission. 2. Representing in any manner that worn. savings are made available to purchas­ The order to cease and desist, includ­ [ sea l] J o s e p h W . S h e a , ers of respondents’ merchandise when ing further order requiring report of Secretary. it is offered by them at prices which are compliance therewith, is as follows: [F.R. Doc. 64-1152; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; identified with, or placed in juxtaposi­ I. It is ordered, That the respondent 8:46 a m .] tion with, or compared to, prices or fig­ Nichimen Company, Inc., a corporation, ures which purport to be the prices at and its officer, and respondent, Shunji which the same or similar merchandise Uyeda, individually and as an officer of is customarily sold by competitors or said corporation, and respondents’ rep­ Title 20— EMPLOYEES’ BENEFITS other vendors in the usual course of resentatives, agents and employees, di­ business in the trade area or areas where rectly or through any corporate or other Chapter III— Social Security Adminis­ the offerings are made unless such other device, do forthwith cease and desist tration, Department of Health, Ed­ prices or figures are, in truth and in from: ucation, and Welfare fact, the actual prices or figures at (a) Importing into the United States; which such merchandise is customarily or PART 422—-STATEMENTS OF sold in the usual course of business in (b) Selling, offering for sale, introduc­ PROCEDURE such trade areas. ing, delivering for introduction, trans­ 3. Using the word “wholesale” or any porting, or causing to be transported, in Statements pnd Forms other word or term of similar import or commerce, as “commerce” is defined in meaning, in connection with the direct the Flammable Fabrics Act; or Part 422 (20 CFR 422.1 et seq.) is or indirect solicitation of sales to in­ amended as follows: (c) Transporting or causing to be 1. Subpart A is amended by changing dividual members of the public or other transported, for the purpose of sale or the heading from “Bureau of Old-Age consumers, to describe a price which is delivery after sale in commerce, and Survivors Insurance” to “General higher than the generally prevailing any fabric which, under the provisions Procedures”. price at which the merchandise is sold of section 4 of the said Flammable Fab­ by wholesalers to retailers who purchase rics Act, as amended, is so highly flam­ § 422.1 [Amended] in the quantity range at which such mable as to be dangerous when worn by 2. Section 422.1(a) is amended by merchandise is offered and who are en­ individuals. changing “Bureau”, in the first sentence, gaged in business in the trade area or Provided, however, That nothing con­ to “Social Security Administration”. areas where such use is made. tained herein shall affect any rights 3. Section 422.1(b) is amended by afforded to the respondents by section 11 changing “Bureau of Old-Age and Sur­ By “Order Denying Motion for Post­ of the Flammable Fabrics Act. vivors Insurance, Baltimore 35, Mary­ ponement of Oral Argument,” etc,, fur­ II, , It is further ordered, That re­land”, in the second sentence, to “Social ther order requiring report of compli­ spondents hereinbefore named, furnish Security Administration, Baltimore, ance is as follows: to the Federal Trade Commission within Maryland, 21235”. 5 days after service of this order a spe­ 4. Section 422.1(c) is amended by ft is further ordered, That the re­ cial report which: changing “Bureau”, in the second and spondents shall, within sixty (60) days (a) Contains a list of the names andlast sentences, to “Social Security Ad­ after service upofi them of this order, file addresses of all of the corporate re­ ministration”, and by changing “Bu­ with the Commission a written report spondents’ customers to whom shipments reau’s”, in the second sentence, to “Ad­ setting forth in detail the manner and Were made, since July 1, 1963, of fabric ministration’s”.'. 1800 RULES AND REGULATIONS 5. Section 422.1

clarification of the labeling requirements more, by weight, of toluene or xylene . in duplicate with the authorized officer 7. Section 63.23 is renumbered as 2. The caption of § 63.11 is amended, within 90 days of its execution. Assign­ ? 63.24 and a new § 63;23 is added as set paragraph (a) is revised, and a new ments will be executed on Form 4-1574 forth below. paragraph (c) is added as set forth and must be accompanied by the applica­ § 63.23 Grazing trespass. below. tion Form 4-469, executed in duplicate, together with the same showing by the (a) Grazing livestock upon, allowing § 63.11 Annual rental; amount; adjust­ assignee as to qualifications and stock livestock to drift and graze on, or driv­ ment ; waiver; effect of failure to pay. development schedule as would be re­ ing livestock across lands that are sub­ quired of applicants for a new lease, ject to lease or permit tinder the provi­ (a) Unless otherwise provided, eachincluding financial responsibility when sions of this part or within a stock lessee shall pay to the Bureau of Land specifically requested by the manager. driveway, without a lease or other au­ Management such rental per acre, per The assignee’s acceptance of the lease thorization from the Bureau of Land head, or per animal unit month, as may offered pursuant to the grazing lease Management, is prohibited and consti­ be determined to be a fair charge for assignment shall constitute his accept­ tutes trespass. Trespassers will be liable grazing of livestock on the leased land. ance of the lease terms. No assignment in damages to the United States for the The rental under any grazing lease may will be recognized nor will it confer on forage consumed and for injury to Fed­ be adjusted every 3 years. The date for the assignee any rights to the leased eral property, and may be subject to making the annual payment will be spec­ area until a lease therefor is issued to civil and criminal prosecution for such ified in the lease. If the rental is to be him. unlawful acts. A lessee who grazes live­ paid according to the number of animals (c) An application for renewal of a stock in violation of the terms and grazed, no charge will be made for the grazing lease should be executed and filed conditions of his lease by exceeding natural increase of grazing animals until in duplicate on Form 4-469 not less than numbers specified, or by allowing the the beginning of the following lease year. 4 months nor more than 8 months before livestock to be on Federal land in an area * - * * * * the expiration date of the lease term. or at a time different from that desig­ Ce) The first rental payment required The renewal lease, if issued, will contain nated in his lease shall be in default and the return of the proposed lease duly such terms and conditions as the author­ and shall be subject to the provisions executed by the prospective lessee shall ized officer may determine. of § 63.19. Under section 2 of the act, be made within 30 days of receipt of the any person who wilfully grazes livestock 5. Paragraph t upon conviction, be punished by a fine returned within the prescribed time, the §63.17 Stock driveways; crossing per­ of not more than $500. offer shall be null and void and of no mits ; quarantine regulations. (b) Whenever it appears that a vio­ • * * * • lation exists the authorized officer shall effect, and all rights of the prospective serve written notice upon the alleged lessee thereunder or under the applica­ (b) A permit for the crossing of live­violator. The notice shall set forth the tion upon which it is based shall be con­ stock on a stock driveway or other pub­ act or omission constituting such viola­ sidered as terminated. Subsequent rent­ lic lands, including lands under grazing tion and will allow the party involved a al payments for succeeding lease periods lease, may be issued free of charge, upon reasonable specified time from receipt of are payable in advance. In the event the filing of an application on Form 4- notice to demonstrate that there has such payment is not received in the 1367, in duplicate, with the authorized been no violation or that he has since proper office by the last day of the cur- , officer at least 30 days prior to the date achieved compliance. If the showing is rent lease period or within the time pre­ the crossing is to begin. scribed in the billing notice, whichever satisfactory to the authorized officer he is the later, the lease shall be considered 6. Section 63.20 is revised to read as will close the case; if satisfactory show­ follows: ing is not made within the time allowed, canceled and all rights terminated there­ the violation alleged in the notice will under as of the end of such current lease § 63.20 Permits for construction and be deemed to have been wilful. period; except the lease shall not termi­ maintenance of improvements; (c) Where the owner of the trespass­ nate if the lessee submits payment to fences; assignment of improvements* ing livestock, or his representative, is the proper office within a grace period Application for a permit to construct known, the authorized officer shall de­ of sixty days following the last day of and maintain range improvements termine the amount of the damage to the current lease period together with a should be filed with the authorized of­ the public land and other property of showing satisfactory to the authorized ficer in duplicate on Form 4-1115. The the United States and shall make a de­ officer that the delay in rental payment lessee, upon obtaining an executed per­ mand for payment upon the alleged vio­ was for unavoidable reasons and that mit from the authorized officer, may con­ lator setting forth the foregoing values termination of the lease would cause un­ struct, maintain, and utilize authorized including the value of the forage con­ due hardship to the lessee. fences, buildings, corrals, reservoirs, sumed. Such forage value shall be com­ 3. Section 63.13 is revised to read as wells, or other improvements needed for puted at the commercial rates, if sus­ follows: the exercise of the grazing privileges ceptible to proof by reasonably available under the lease. The lessee will be re­ and reliable data; otherwise, a minimum § 63.13 Free grazing permits. quired to comply with the laws of the charge of $2 ,per animal unit month for Any person may file application in State of Alaska with respect to the con­ trespass not clearly wilful will be made. duplicate on Form 4-469 for a permit to struction and maintenance of fences, Where the trespasses are repeated and/ graze, free of charge, not to exceed the hut any such fence shall be constructed or wilful, a minimum charge of $4 per number of livestock whose products are to permit the ingress and egress of animal unit month for forage consumed consumed or whose work is directly and miners, prospectors for minerals, and will be charged. All offers for settle­ other persons entitled to enter such area ment for value of forage consumed and exclusively used by the applicant or his for lawful purposes. The lessee upon for damage to the public land or to family, for a term of not more than one written approval by the authorized of­ other property of the United States re­ year. The permit for such use will be ficer, may improve by seeding or reseed­ sulting from an alleged violation of any issued on Form 4-1309. ing within the lease area and may har­ provision of the act or regulations found 4. Paragraphs (bl and (c) of § 63.16 vest hay, or ensilage from such seeded within 43 CFR 63.1 et seq. in the amount are revised as follows: or reseeded areas provided that the of $2,060 or less may be accepted by the Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1805 authorized officer. Offers for settlement § 101.2 Payments required to effect in excess of $2,000 will be transmitted to segregation of land; rejection of ap­ Title 50— WILDLIFE AND the State Director for appropriate ac­ plications. tion. An offer of settlement will not * * * * * FISHERIES constitute satisfaction of civil liability (c) Except where regulations provide for consumed forage and damage in­ otherwise, all applications must be ac­ Chapter I— Bureau of Sport Fisheries volved until finally accepted by the au­ cepted for filing. However, applications and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife thorized officer or the State Director, which are accepted for filing must be Service, Department of the Interior and in no event will it relieve the viola­ rejected and cannot be held pending pos­ tor of criminal liability. No lease or sible future availability of the land or PART 33— SPORT FISHING permit will be issued or renewed until interests in land, when approval of the payment of any amount found to be due application is prevented by: National Wildlife Refuges, Nebraska the United States under this section has (1) Withdrawal or reservation of the The following special regulation is is­ been offered. lands; sued and is effective on date of publica­ 8. Section 63.24 is revised to read as (2) An allowed entry or selection of tion in the F ederal R egister. follows: record; § 33.5 Special regulations; sport fish­ (3) An irrevocable lease which grants § 63.24 Hearings ; appeals. ing; for individual wildlife refuge the lessee exclusive use of the land; areas. (a) Any lessee of or applicant for (4) Classification under appropriate N ebraska grazing privileges may procure a review law; of any action or decision of the author­ (5) The fact that for any reason the NORTH PLATTE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ized officer by filing with such officer an land has not been made subject, or re­ Sport fishing on the North Platte Na­ application for a hearing, stating the stored, to the operation of the public tional Wildlife Refuge, Nebraska, is per­ nature of the action or decision com­ land laws. mitted only on the areas designated by plained of and the grounds of complaint. Stewart L. Udall, signs as open to fishing. This open area, The filing of any such application and Secretary of the Interior. comprising 3300 acres or 90 percent of the conduct of the proceedings before an J anuary 30, 1964. the total water area of the refuge, is examiner shall be governed by the» rules delineated on a map available at the ref­ of practice pertaining to contests (Part [F.R. Doc. 64-1159; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; uge headquarters and from the office of 221 of this chapter), 8:46 a.m.] the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport (b) An appeal may be taken from any Fisheries and Wildlife, 1006 West Lake decision of the authorized officer to the [Cir. 2131] Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55408. Director of the Bureau of Land Manage­ PART 101— GENERAL REGULATIONS Sport fishing is subject to the following ment, and from any decision of the Di­ INVOLVING APPLICATIONS AND conditions: rector to the Secretary of the Interior, (a) Species permitted to be taken: pursuant to the rules of practice (Part ENTRIES Northern pike, crappies, bullheads and 221 of this chapter). Elimination of Requirements of Oaths other minor species as permitted under [F.R. Doc, 64-1158; Piled, Feb. 5, 1964; on Written Statements in Public State regulations. 8:46 a.m.] (b) Open season: From effective date Land Matters of publication through September 30, The purpose of this amendment is to 1964. SUBCHAPTER B— APPLICATIONS AND ENTRIES incorporate into the regulations the prin­ (c) Daily creel limits: In accordance [Cir. No. 2130] ciple that false statements as to any ma­ with species limits as prescribed by Ne­ terial fact made in connection with appli­ braska State regulations. PART 101— GENERAL REGULATIONS cations for privileges under 43 CFR, (d) Methods of fishing: INVOLVING APPLICATIONS AND Chapter I, will be a basis for denial of (1) No more than two lines with two ENTRIES such applications, where allowance is hooks on each line may be used. One discretionary. hook means a single, double or treble Rejection of Applications These rules involve matters relating pointed hook and all hooks attached to to public property and are not required an artificial bait are counted as one hook. The purpose of this amendment is to by law to be published as proposed rule (2) Boats, motorboats and other float­ list various factual situations which un­ making. This Department, nevertheless, ing craft may be used. der existing rules require rejection of customarily gives such notice and public (e) Other provisions: applications. Each inclusion is substan­ procedure thereon. However, that prac­ (1) The provisions of this special tiated by Departmental decision. The tice is deemed unnecessary in this in­ regulation supplement the regulations amendment also incorporates into the stance because the changes merely in­ which govern fishing on wildlife refuge regulations the long established practice corporate into the regulations principles areas generally which are set forth in of the Department of the Interior that, enunciated in Departmental decisions. Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, except where regulations provide other­ Accordingly, this amendment shall be­ Part 33. wise, all applications must be accepted come effective on publication in the F ed­ (2) A Federal permit is not required for filing, it also corrects a reference. eral R egister. to enter the public fishing area. These rules involve matters relating to Section 101.18 is amended to add a new (3) The provisions of this special reg­ public property and are not required by paragraph, designated (d): law to be published as proposed rule ulation are effective to October 1, 1964. making. This Department nevertheless, § 101.18 Elimination of the require­ CRESCENT LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ments of oaths on written statements customarily gives such notice and public Sport fishing on the Crescent Lake Na­ Procedure thereon. However, that prac­ in public land matters. * - * * * * tional Wildlife Refuge, Nebraska, is per­ tice is deemed unnecessary in this in­ mitted only on the areas designated by stance because the changes being made (d) False statements as to any mate­signs as open to fishing. This open area, incorporate into the regulations princi­ rial fact made by an applicant in con­ comprising 1330 acres or 32 percent of ples contained in Departmental decisions. nection with applications, allowance of the total water area of the refuge, is Accordingly, this amendment shall be­ which is discretionary with the author­ delineated on a map available at the come effective on publication in the ized officer, are a proper basis for rejec­ refuge headquarters and from the office Federal R egister. tion of the applications. of the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport JP Paragraph (b) of § 101.2 is amend­ Stewart L. Udall, Fisheries and Wildlife, 1006 West Lake ed to correct the reference therein which Secretary of the Interior. Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55408. reads “§ 216.30” to read “§ 216.2.” Sport fishing is subject to the following (2) The caption to. § 101.2 is revised J anuary 30, 1964. conditions: and new paragraph (c) is added to read as follows: [F.R. Doc. 64-1160; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; (a) Species permitted to be taken: 8:46 a.m.] Northern pike, crappies, bullheads and 1806 RULES ANO REGULATIONS other minor species as permitted under < 3) The provisions of this special reg­ Wildlife, 1002 Northeast Holladay Street, State regulations. ulation are effective to January 1, 1965. Portland, Oregon, 97208. Sport fishing (b) Open season: Prom effective date shall be in accordance with all applicable R. W. B u r w el l , State regulations, subject to the follow­ of publication through September 30, Regional Director, Bureau of ing special conditions: 1964; daylight hours only. Sport Fisheries and Wildlife.

enumerated in paragraph 1 of this sec­ IV. Payment. 1. Payment for the DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY tion are offered the privilege of exchang­ face amount of notes allotted hereunder ing all or any part of such securities for must be made on or before February 17, Bureau of Customs 4 percent Treasury Notes of Series A- 1964, or on later allotment, and may be [T.D. 561031 1966 (additional issue), which offering is made only in securities of the two issues set forth in Department Circular, Pub­ enumerated in paragraph 1 of section I FISH lic Debt Series—No. 4-64, issued simul­ hereof, which will be accepted at par, Tariff-Rate Quota taneously with this circular. and should accompany the subscription. n . Description of notes. 1. The notes Payment will not be deemed to have been F ebruary 3,1964. will be dated February 15, 1964, and will completed where registered notes are re­ The tariff-rate quota for the calendar bear interest from that date at the rate quested if the appropriate identifying year 1964 on certain fish dutiable under of 37a percent per annum, payable on a number, as. required by paragraph 2 of item 110.50,' Tariff Schedules of the semiannual basis on August 15,1964, and section HI hereof, has not been fur­ United States. February 15 and August 13, 1965. They nished; provided, however, if a subscriber In accordance with item 110.50 of part will mature August 13, 1965, and will not has applied for but is unable to furnish 3, schedule 1, Tariff Schedules of the be subject to call for redemption prior to the identifying number by the payment United States, it has been ascertained .maturity. date only because it has not been issued, that the average aggregate apparent an­ 2. The income derived from the notes he may elect to receive, pending the fur­ nual consumption in the United States is subject to all taxes imposed under the nishing of the identifying number, in­ of fish, fresh, chilled or frozen, fillets, Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The terim receipts and in this case payment steaks, and sticks, of cod, cusk, haddock, notes are subject to estate, inheritance, will be deemed to have been completed. hake, pollock, and rosefish, in the three gift or other excise taxes, whether Fed­ Coupons dated February 15, 1964, should eral or State, but are exempt from all be detached from the certificates and years preceding 1964, calculated in the bonds in bearer form and cashed when m a n n e r provided for in headnote 1, part taxation now or hereafter imposed on 3A, schedule 1, was 165,744,467 pounds. the principal or interest thereof by any due. The cash payment of $1.25 per The quantity of such fish that may be im­ State, or any of the possessions of the $1,000 on account of the issue price of ported for consumption during the cal­ United States, or by any local taxing the notes will be made to subscribers, endar year 1964 at the reduced rate of authority. in the case of bearer securities following 3. The notes will be acceptable to se­ acceptance of the securities, and in the duty under item 110.50 is, therefore, case of registered bonds following dis­ 24,861,670 pounds. cure deposits of public moneys. They will not be acceptable in payment of charge of registration. In the case of [ sea l] L ester D. J o h n s o n , ta>x6s. registered bonds, the final interest due Acting Commissioner of Customs. 4. Bearer notes with interest coupons on February 15, 1964, together with the [F.R. Doc. 64-1193; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; attached, and notes registered as to prin­ cash payment of $1.25 per $1,000 due sub­ 8:49 a.m.] cipal and interest, will be issued in de­ scribers, will be paid by check drawn in nominations of $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, accordance with the assignments on the $100,000, $1,000,000, $100,000,000 and bonds surrendered, or by credit in any Office of the Secretary $500,000,000. Provision will be made for account maintained by a banking insti­ tution with the Federal Reserve Bank of [Dept. Circular; Public Debt the interchange of notes of different de­ Series—No. 3-64] nominations and of coupon and regis­ its District. tered notes, and for the transfer of regis­ V. Assignment of registered bonds. 3% PERCENT TREASURY NOTES OF tered notes, under rules and regulations 1. Treasury Bonds of 1964 in registered form tendered in payment for notes of­ SERIES D—1965 prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. fered hereunder should be assigned by Offering of Notes 5. The notes will be subject to the gen­ the registered payees or assignees there­ of, in accordance with the general regu­ J anuary 31,1964. eral regulations of the Treasury Depart­ ment, now or hereafter prescribed, gov­ lations of the Treasury Department gov­ 1. Offering of notes. 1. The Secretary erning United States notes. erning assignments for transfer or ex­ of the Treasury, pursuant to the author­ ttt Subscription and Allotment. change, in one of the forms hereafter ity of the Second Liberty Bond Act, as 1. Subscriptions will be received at the set forth, and thereafter should be sur­ amended, invites subscriptions, at 99.875 Federal Reserve Banks and Branches rendered with the subscription to a Fed­ percent of their face value, from the and at the Office of the Treasurer of the eral Reserve Bank or Branch or to the people of the United States for notes of United States, Washington, D.C., 20220. Office of the Treasurer of the United the United States, designated 3% per­ Banking institutions generally may sub­ States, Washington, D.C., 20220. The cent Treasury Notes of Series D-1965, in mit subscriptions for account of cus­ maturing bonds must be delivered at the exchange for the following securities tomers, but only the Federal Reserve expense and risk of the holder. If the maturing February 15, 1964, singly or in Banks and the Treasury Department are notes are desired registered in the same combinations aggregating $1,000 or mul­ authorized to act as official agencies. name as the bonds surrendered, the as­ tiples thereof: 2. All subscribers requesting registered signment should be to “The Secretary of 314 percent Treasury Certificates of In­ notes will be required to furnish appro­ the Treasury for exchange for 3% per­ debtedness of Series A—1964; or 3 per­ priate identifying numbers as required cent Treasury Notes of Series D-1965”; cen t Treasury Bonds of 1964. on tax returns and other documents sub­ if the notes are desired registered in an­ The cash payment due subscribers on mitted to the Internal Revenue Service, other name, the assignment should be i.e., an individual’s social security num­ to “The Secretary of the Treasury for account of the issue price of the notes exchange for 3% percent Treasury Notes will be made as set forth in Section IV ber or an employer identification number. hereof. The amount of the offering 3. The Secretary of the Treasury re­ of Series D-1965 in the name 01 serves the right to reject or reduce any ______if notes in coupon form under this circular will be limited to the are desired, the assignment should be to amount of eligible securities tendered in subscription, and to allot less than the exchange and accepted. The books will amount of notes applied for; and any “The Secretary of the Treasury for ex­ be open only on February 3 through Feb­ action he may take in these respects shall change for 3% percent Treasury Notes¡oi ruary 5,1964, for the receipt of subscrip­ be final. Subject to these reservations, Series D-1965 in coupon form to be de­ tions for this issue. all subscriptions will be allotted in full. livered t o ------, Allotment notices will be sent out VI. General provisions. 1. As nscai 2. In addition to the offering under agents of the United States, Federal Re- this circular, holders of the securities promptly upon allotment. 1810 Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1811 serve Banks are authorized and requested 1. The notes will be dated February 18, 1964, should be detached from the cer­ to receive subscriptions, to make allot­ 1962, and will bear interest from that date at tificates and bonds in bearer form and ments on the basis and up to the amounts the rate of 4 percent per annum, payable semiannually on August 15, 1962, and there­ cashed when due. In the case of reg­ indicated by the Secretary of the Treas­ after on February 15 and August 15 in each istered bonds, the final interest due on ury to the Federal Reserve Banks of the year until the principal amount becomes February 15, 1964, will be paid by check respective Districts, to issue allotment payable. They will mature August 15, 1966, drawn in accordance with the assign­ notices, to receive payment for notes al­ and will not be subject to call for redemption ments on the bonds surrendered, or by lotted, to make delivery of notes on full- prior to m aturity. credit in any account maintained by a paid subscriptions allotted, and they may 2. The income derived from the notes is banking institution with the Federal Re­ issue interim receipts pending delivery subject to all taxes imposed under the In­ ternal Revenue Code of 1954. The notes are serve Bank of its District. of the definitive notes. subject to estate, inheritance, gift or other V. Assignment of registered bonds. 1. 2. The Secretary of the Treasury may excise taxes, whether Federal or State, but Treasury Bonds of 1964 in registered at any time, or from time to time, pre­ are exempt from all taxation now or here­ form tendered in payment for notes of­ scribe supplemental or amendatory rules after imposed on the principal or Interest fered hereunder should be assigned by and regulations governing the offering, thereof by any State, or any of the posses­ the registered payees or assignees there­ which will be communicated promptly to sions of the United States, or by any local of, in accordance with the general reg­ file Federal Reserve Banks. taxing authority. 3. The notes will be acceptable to secure ulations of the Treasury Department [ se a l ] D ouglas D il l o n , deposits of public moneys. They will not governing assignments for transfer or Secretary of the Treasury. be acceptable in payment of taxes. exchange, in one of the forms hereafter 4. Bearer notes with interest coupons at­ set forth, and thereafter should be sur­ [FB. Doc. 64-1194; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; tached, and notes registered as to principal rendered with the subscription to a Fed­ 8:49 ajn .] and interest, will be issued in denominations eral Reserve Bank or Branch or to the of $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, $100,000, $1,000,000, $100,000,000 and $500,000,000. Provision will Office of the Treasurer of the United [Dept. Circular; Public Debt be made for the interchange of notes of dif­ States, Washington, D.C., 20220. The Series—No. 4-64] ferent denominations and of coupon and bonds must be delivered at the expense registered notes, and for the transfer of and risk of the holder. If the notes are 4 PERCENT TREASURY NOTES OF registered notes, under rules and regulations desired registered in the same name as SERIES A-1966 prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. the bonds surrendered, the assignment 5. The notes will be subject to the general should be to “The Secretary of the Treas­ regulations of the Treasury Department, now Additional Issue or hereafter prescribed, governing United ury for exchange for 4 percent Treasury States notes. Notes of Series A-1966’’; if the notes are J anuary 31,1964. desired registered in another name, the 1. Offering of notes. 1. The Secretary in . Subscription and allotment. 1. assignment should be to “The Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to the author­ Subscriptions will be received at the Fed­ of the Treasury for exchange for 4 per­ ity of the Second Liberty Bond Act, as eral Reserve Banks and Branches and cent Treasury Notes of Series A-1966 in amended, invites subscriptions, at par, at the Office of the Treasurer of the the name of------”; if notes in coupon from the people of the United States for United States, Washington, D.C., 20220. form are desired, the assignment should notes of the United States, designated 4 Banking institutions generally may sub­ be to “The Secretary of the Treasury for percent Treasury Notes of Series A—1966, mit subscriptions for account of cus­ exchange for 4 percent Treasury Notes in exchange for the following securities tomers, but only the Federal Reserve of Series A-1966 in coupon form to be maturing February 15, 1964, singly or in Banks and the Treasury Department are delivered t o ______”. combinations aggregating $1,000 or authorized to act as official agencies. VI. General provisions. 1. As fiscal multiples thereof: 2. All subscribers requesting registered agents of the United States, Federal Re­ 3*4 percent Treasury Certificates of In­ notes will be required to furnish appro­ serve Banks are authorized and request­ debtedness of Series A-1964; or 3 per­ priate identifying numbers as required ed to receive subscriptions, to make al­ cent Treasury Bonds of 1964. on tax returns and other documents sub­ lotments on the basis and up to the mitted to the Internal Revenue Service, amounts indicated by the Secretary of The amount of the offering under this i.e., an individual’s social security num­ the Treasury to the Federal Reserve circular will be limited to the amount of ber or an employer identification number. Banks of the respective Districts, to is­ eligible securities tendered in exchange 3. The Secretary of the Treasury re­ sue allotment notices, to receive payment and accepted. The books will be open serves the right to reject or reduce any for notes allotted, to make delivery of only on February 3 through February 5, subscription, and to allot less than the notes on full-paid subscriptions allotted, 1964, for the receipt of subscriptions for amount of notes applied for; and any and they may issue interim receipts this issue. action he may take in these respects pending delivery of the definitive notes. 2. In addition to the offering under this shall be final. Subject to these reserva­ 2. The Secretary of the Treasury may circular, holders of the securities enu­ tions, all subscriptions will be allotted at any time, or from time to time, pre­ merated in paragraph 1 of this section in full. Allotment notices will be sent scribe supplemental or amendatory rules are offered the privilege of exchanging all out promptly upon allotment. and regulations governing the offering, or any part of such securities for 3% per­ IV. Payment. 1. Payment for the facewhich will be communicated promptly cent Treasury Notes of Series D-1965, amount of notes allotted hereunder must to the Federal Reserve Banks. which offering is set forth in Department be made on or before February 17, 1964, Circular, Public Debt Series—No. 3-64, or on later allotment, and may be made [ seal] D ouglas D il l o n , issued simultaneously with this circular. only in securities of the two issues enu­ Secretary of the Treasury. n. Description of notes. 1. The notes merated in paragraph 1 of section I here­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1195; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; now offered will be an addition to and of, Which will be accepted at par, and 8:49 a.m.] will form a part of the 4 percent Treas­ should accompany the subscription. ury Notes of Series A-1966 issued pur­ Payment will not be deemed to have been suant to Department Circular, Public completed where registered notes are re­ Debt Series—No. 3-62, dated February quested if the appropriate identifying DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 5> 1962, will be freely interchangeable number, as required by paragraph 2 of therewith, and are identical in all re­ section m hereof, has not been fur­ Bureau of Land Management spects therewith except that interest on nished; provided, however, if a subscrib­ [B ureau Order 684] the notes to be issued under this circular er has applied for but is unable to fur­ will accrue from February 15, 1964. nish the identifying number by the pay­ ALASKA Subject to the prrovision for the accrual ment date only because it has not been Small Tract Classification Order No. of interest from February 15, 1964, on issued, he may elect to receive, pending the notes now offered, the notes are de­ the furnishing of the identifying num­ 92; Cancellation scribed in the following quotation from ber, interim receipts and in this case J anuary 30,1964. Department Circular, Public Debt payment will be deemed to have been 1. Pursuant to the authority redele- Series—No. 3-62: completed. Coupons dated February 15, ?ated to me from Bureau Order 684, No. 26— 5 1812 NOTICES T. 18 N., R. 34 E., dated August 28, 1961 (26 P.R. 6215), Geological Survey Sec. 1, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, SyN y, NWy as amended by the Alaska State Director [Coal Land Classification Order, Montana SEy; in Section 3, Delegation of Authority No. 249] Sec. 2, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, SyN E y; (F.R. Doc. 63-219) dated January 9,1963, Sec. 3, lots 3 and 4, S yN y, Sy; Small Tract Classification Order No. 92 MONTANA Secs. 4 to 9, inclusive; of December 22, 1954 (F.R. Doc. 54- sec. io, Ny2, N ysw y, sw y sw y . Nwy4 10331), as amended by the General Classification of Coal Lands S E y ; Sec. ll.N W y N W y ; Amendment to Small Tract Classifica­ Sec. 16, NEy, W y, NW ySEy; tion Orders No. 1 to 96, inclusive, which Pursuant to authority under the Act of March 3, 1879 (20 Stat. 394; 43 U.S.C. Secs. 17 to 20, inclusive; classified the following lands for title Sec. 21, NEyNW y, W y W y; transfer under the Small Tract Act of 31), and as delegated to me by Depart­ Sec. 29, N y,N ySW y, NWySEy; June 1, 1938 (52 Stat. 609; 43 U.S.C. mental Order 2563 of May 2, 1950, under Sec. 30, lots 1, 2, and 3, E yN E y, NEySEy4. 682a), as amended, for residential sites authority of Reorganization Plan No. 3 T. 19 N., R. 34 E., is hereby cancelled in its entirety: of 1950 (64 Stat. 1262), the following de­ Sec. 1, SWySWy; scribed lands, insofar as title thereto re­ Sec. 2, lot 2, SEy; College Area U n it No 1 (M uskox R eserve) mains in the United States, are hereby Sec. 3, s w y s w y ; classified as follows: Secs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9; FAIRBANKS AREA Sec. 10, Ny2NEV4. SW yNEy, N W y , W>/2 Montana P rincipal M eridian, Montana s w y 4 ; Fairbanks Meridian Sec. 11, NEyNEy, NW yNW y; COAL LA N D S T. 1 N., R. 1 W., Sec. 12, W>/2NWy4; Sec. 29, lots 1-16 inclusive, lots 18-29 T. 17 N., R. 33 E., Sec. 14, NWy4NW]4, SyN W y; in clusive. Sec. 2, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, SW ^NEy, S l/2 Sec. 15, NEyNEy, syN Ey, NWyNWy4 NW&, NySW]4; s p w y 4,sy2; Comprising 28 lots aggregating 73.35 Sec. 3, lots 1, 2, and 3, S^N E y, sy 2NW»4, Secs. 16,17, and 18; Sec. 19, lots 1,2, and 3, E y, ; acres. Ny2s y 2; 2. This order will take effect immedi­ Sec. 4, lo t 1, Sy2Ny2, N % sy2; Secs. 20,21, and 22; Sec. 5, SW 1/4NW 14, N W y s W y ; Sec. 23, SW yNW y, swy. swy say ; ately upon publication, but this order will Sec. 25, SWi/4NWy4, NW ySW y. sy2swy4; not affect any valid existing rights aris­ Sec. 6, SE& NE& , N E y S E y . T. 18 N., R. 33 E., Secs. 26 to 29, Inclusive; ing under Small Tract Classification Or­ Sec. 1, lots 1, 2, and 4, S y N E y , S E y ; Sec. 30, E y, E»/2W y; der No. 92. Sec. 2, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, SW y, W ySEy, Sec. 31; P edro D e n t o n , S E y SE y ; Sec. 82; Acting Chief .Branch of Sec. 3, lot 1, NEySEy; Sec. 33, NEy, N yN W y, SEyNW y, NW>/4 Lands and Minerals Operations. Sec. 9, SEy SEy; SW y, Sy SWy, SWySEy; Sec. 10, S E y N W y , S y ; Sec. 34, N y , NEySW y. SEy! [ P .R . Doc. 64-1161; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; Secs. 11 and 12; Sec. 35; 8:46 a.m.] Sec. 13, Ey, NyNWy, SEyNWy, Ey Sec. 36, SW yNEy, W y, W ySEy. SW %; T. 20 N.. R. 34 E., Sec. 14, W yNEy, W y, SWySEy; sec. 1, NEyswy. sysw y, NwysEy, S y S E y ; [Colorado 017977] Sec. 15; Sec. 16, Ey, NyNWy, SEyNWy, Ny2 Sec. 4, NW yswy; Sec. 5, S W y , N E y S E y . S y S E y ; COLORADO swy, SEyswy; Sec. 21, NEyNEy; Sec. 6, lot 14, EySW y, SEy; Secs. 7 an d 8; Notice of Termination of Proposed Sec. 22, Ni/2NE»4 , SW yNEy, NWy4, Eya s w y , S E y , sec. 9, swyNwy, swy4, N w y4sEy4, sy2 Withdrawal and Reservation of Sec. 23, N y, Wy2SW y, NW ySEy; SEy; se c. 24, Ey2, EyNwy, swyNwy, swy; Sec. 10, swyswy; Lands Sec. 11, NEyNEy, SyN E y, SE%; J anuary 28,1964. Sec. 25, NEy, NEyNWy, NySEy, SEy SE %; Sec. 12, NEyNEy, W yNEy, NWy, NEy4 Notices of an application, Serial No. Sec. 26, SW yNEy, NWy , W y S W y ; swy, wyswy; Colorado 017977, for withdrawal and Sec. 27, NEy, SyNWy, S%; Sec. 13, EyNEy, W yw y, reservation of lands were published as Sec. 28, NEy, NEySEy; Sec. 14, N E y . S y ; Sec. 33, NEyNEy; sec. 15, sw yN sy, NwyNwy, sy2Nwy4, F.R. Doc. No. 58-8258 on page 7770 of Sec. 34, E y2, NyNW y, SEySWy; Nwyswy, syswy. the issue for October 8, 1958; No. 59- Sec. 35, W yNW y, SWy, W ySEy. Secs. 16 to 21, inclusive; 2754 on page 2564 of the issue for April 2, T. 19 N., R. 33 E., sec. 22, NwyNEy, syNEy, wy.SEy; 1959; and No. 59-6337 on page 6204 of Sec. 1, lots 3 and 4, SWy, W y S E y , S E y Sec. 23; the issue for August 1,1959. Hie appli­ S E y ; Sec. 24, WyW%; cant agency has canceled its application Sec. 2, lots 1 and 2, NEySEy, SySEy; Sec. 26, NE%NEy4, Wy2NE]4, NW>/4: insofar as it involved the land described Sec. 10, S E y ; Sec. 27, Ny,, Ny2sw y . NW ySEy; below. Therefore, pursuant to the reg­ Sec. 11, N E y , EyNW y, Sy2; Sec. 28, NEy, , NySE%; Secs. 12 and 13; Sec. 29 to 32, inclusive; ulations contained in 43 CFR Part 295, Sec. 14, Ny2, NEySEy; sec. 33, swyNEy, wy, wysE y4 , sei/4 such lands will be at 10:00 a.m. on March Sec. 15, Ey2NE%; sEy. 4, 1964, relieved of the segregative effect Sec. 24, Ny, SWySWy, NySEy, SE% T. 17 N., R. 35 E., of the above-mentioned application. S E y ; Sec. 14, SW*4; The lands involved in this notice of Sec. 35, SEyNEy, EySW y, SE Sec. 15, SW%SWy4, SEV4SEy4; termination are: Sec. 36,,NWyNEy, SyNEy, NEyNWy, Sec. 18,NE%SW%; sy2Nwy4, sy . Sec. 19,Ey2NEy4; N ew Mexico P rincipal Meridian, Colorado T. 20 N., R. 33 E., sec. 20, w y N w y ; Sec. 1, sy2sy2; sec. 21, sy2NEy, NysE%, SEysEy; T. 36 N., R. 14 W. Sec. 2, SyN W y, S y; Sec. 22,NW%NWy4; Sec. 20, all portions of the SE^NW y and Sees 3 and 4* Sec. 25, SW]4SWy4; the wy2SEy4 lying south of the right of Sec. 5, lots i, 2, 3, and 4, SyN y, NEy Sec. 26, sy2sw y , SE%; way of U.S. Highway 160. S W y, S E y ; Sec. 27, N W y, Ey2SW«4, SE»4; Sec. 30, all portions of the NW% lying Sec. 6, lo ts 1 and 2, S E y N E y ; Sec. 28, N ^ N E y ; south of the right of way of U.S. High'' se c. 29, NEyNEy, sysw ^ ; Sec. 9, Ey, NyNW y, SEyNWy; , n»/2 w ay 160. Secs. 10 to 14, inclusive; Sec. 30, lot 2, SW yNEy, SE%NW y4 Sec. 32, SW>ANE%, E^NWVi. W ySW y, Sec. 15, Ny2, NEySEy; sEy; N&NE^SW^, SW&NE&SWft. Sec. 32.NEV4NW14; Sec. 16, NEyNEy; Sec. 34,NE%NW%; The above area aggregates approxi­ Sec. 23, Ey2, NyNWy, SEyNWy, NEy Sec. 35, N.% NWi/4 , sE y4N w y4 ; mately 300 acres. s w y ; Sec. 36,Nysrwy4. Secs. 24 and 25; T. 20 N„ R. 35 E., J. E lliott H all, Sec. 26, Ny2NEy, SEyNEy, E^SE%; Sec. 6, SEy4SWy, S W y S E y 4 ; Chief .Lands and Minerals. S e c . 35, N EyN Ey, SyNEy, SEySWy, Sec. 7, NW yNEy, NE^NW y; [F.R. Doc. 64-1162; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; S E y ; Sec. 18, lots 1 and 2; Sec. 19, lo t 1. 8:46 a.m.] Sec. 36. Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1813

RECLASSIFIED c o a l l a n d s f r o m n o n c o a l l a n d s Sec. 29. SHSH. NEHSEH; T. 20 N., R. 35 E.. Prior classification of the following sub­ Sec. 30. lot 4, SEHSEH; Secs. 1 to 5, Inclusive; divisions as no n co al is hereb y revoked and Secs. 31 to 36, Inclusive. Sec. 6, lots 1 to 7, inclusive, SHNEH. SEH the lands are reclassified as coal lands: T. 19 N., R. 34 E., NWH, NEHSWH. NHSEH. SEHSEH; Sec. 1, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, SHNH. NHSWH. Sec. 7, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, NEHNEH. SH T 19 N., R. 34 E.t SEHSWH, SEH; n e h . s e h n w h . e h s w h . s e h ; Sec. 3. SEH SW H . S H S E H ; Sec. 2, lots 1, 3, and 4, SHNH. NHSWH. Secs. 8 to 17, inclusive; Sec. 10, SEJ4NEJ4. SEHSWH; Sec. 18, lots 3 and 4, EH, EH WH; NONCOAL LANDS Sec. 3, lots 1,2,3, and 4, SH NH ; Sec. 19, lots 2, 3, and 4. EH, EHWH: Sec. 10, EHSWH; Secs. 20 to 36, inclusive. T. 17 N., R. 33 E., Sec. 11, NWi/4NE‘/4 , SH N E H , Ey2N W H ,S H Sec. 1; SW H . SEH; The area classified totals 268,919 acres, Sec. 2, SEH NEH . S H S W H . SEH; Sec. 12, NEH, EHNWH. Sy2; more or less, of which about 63,261 acres Sec. 3, lo t4 , S H S H ; ' Sec. 13; are classified as coal lands, about 160 Sec.4, lots 2,3, and 4, S H S H ; Sec. 14, NEH, NEHNWH. SH; acres are reclassified as coal lands that Sec. 5, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Sy2N EH . SEH Sec. 15, NWy4NEy4, NEH NW H ; were formerly classified as noncoal NWH. NEHSWH. SHSWH. SEH; Sec. 19, lot 4; lands, and about 205.498 acres are classi­ Sec. 6, lots 1 to 7, inclusive, SW H N EH . Sec. 23, NEH, N%NWH, SEHNWH, NH fied as noncoal lands. SE&NW&,E^SWft, NW&SE14, S& SEH> SEHSEH; SEH; Sec. 24; Dated: January 28,1964. Secs. 7 to 36, inclusive. Sec. 25. EH. NHNWH. SEHNWH. NEH T. 18 N., R. 33 E., SW%; T hom as B . N o la n , Sec. l,lo t 3 , SW H; Sec. 30, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4; Director. Sec. 2, NEH SEH; Sec. 33, SWHNWH, NEHSWH, NHSEH. IF.R. Doc. 64-1157; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; Sec. 3, lots 2, 3, and 4, SW H . Wy2SE H , SEHSEH; • 8:46 a m .] SEHSEH: Sec. 34, NWHSWH, SHSWH: Secs. 4 to 8, inclusive; Sec. 36, EHEH.-NWHNEH- Sec. 9, NE14, Wy2. N E H SE H . W H SE H ; T. 20 N., R. 34 E., Sec. 10, NE%, NE14NWV4, Wy2NW%; Sec. 1, lo ts 1, 2, 3, and 4, 3%Vt%. NWH National Park Service sec. 13, swy4Nwy4, w h s w h ; SWH, NEHSEH; [Order No. 3, Arndt. 13] Sec. 14, E y2 Ey2, NW h SE y4 ; Secs. 2 and 3; Sec. 16, SW H NW H . SW H SW H ; Sec. 4, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, SHNH, NEH NATIONAL PARK SERVICE SUPERIN­ Secs. 17 to 20, inclusive; s w h , s h s w h , SEH; TENDENTS ET AL. Sec. 21, NW H NEH . SH N E H . W H . SEH ; Sec. 5, lots 1 to 12, inclusive, NWHSEH; Sec. 22, SEH NEH , W H SW H I Sec. 6, lots 1 to 13, inclusive; Delegation of Authority Sec. 23, EH SW H , NE H SE H . S H SE H ; Sec. 9. NEH. Ny2NWH. SEHNWH. NEH Sec. 24, NWJ4NWJ4; SEH; Order No. 3, issued August 28,1957 (21 Sec. 25, NW HNW H, S H N W H . SW H . SW H Sec. 10, N H , N y2SW H , SE>4SWJ4, SEV4; FJt. 1493) is amended by changing the SEH; Sec. 11, NW^NEy4, W ^; wording in section 1(f), section 2 (g), and Sec. 26, Ny2NEH. SEHNEH, Ey2SWH. Sec. 12, SEy4NEi,4, SE%SW%, SE»^; section 3(m), and by adding (h) to sec­ SEH; Sec. 13, W ^NE^, E^W%, SE%; tion 1, (i) to section 2, and (o) to sec­ Sec. 27, N%NW%; Sec. 14, NWy4 ; Sec. 28, Wy2, W H SE H , S E H S E H ; Sec. 15, Ny2NEi4, SE^NE^, NE%NWi/4, tion 3 as follows: Secs. 29 to 32, inclusive; NEi/4SWy4 , SE%; S ection. 1. * * * Sec. 33, NW H NEH . Sy2NE%, W H , SE%; Sec. 22, NE}4NE%; • * * • * Sec. 34, Sy2NW%, N H SW H , SW H SW H ; Sec. 24, EH, Ey2WH; Sec. 35,N E % ,E ^N W % ,E y2SE%; Sec. 25; (f) Approval of preliminary construc­ Sec. 36. Sec. 26, SE14N E H , SH I tion plans not requiring approval by the T. 19 N., R. 33 E„ Sec. 27, SHSWH, NfeHSEH. SHSEH; Director, and preliminary and final con­ Sec. 1, lots 1 and 2, sy2NH, NEHSEH; Sec. 28, SHSE%; cessioners’ drawings. Sec. 2, lots 3 and 4, S H N H . SW H , NWH Sec. 33, NHNEH. SEHNEH, NEHSEH; (h) Acceptance of donations of lands SEH; Secs. 34, 35, and 36. Secs. 3 to 9, inclusive; T. 17 N., R. 35 E„ and water rights, exchanges of lands and Sec. 10, NEH. W H; Secs. 1 to 13, inclusive; water rights, and purchase of lands and Sec.ll.wy2NW%; Sec. 14, N H , SE%; water rights. Sec. 14, SW H, N W H SEH . SH S E H ; Sec. 15, NH, N%SWH. SEHSWH, NH S ec. 2. * * * Sec. 15, W%NE%, W H . SEH ; SEH. SW%SEH; Secs. 16 to 23, inclusive; Secs. 16 and 17; * * * * * Sec. 24, N H SW H . SE H SW H . SW H SEH ; Sec. 18, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, EH. EHNWH. (g) Approval of preliminary construc­ Secs. 25 to 34, Inclusive; SEHSWH; tion plans not requiring approval by the Sec. 35, NE%NE%, W H N E H , N W H , W14 Sec. 19, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, WHNEH, EH Director and preliminary and final con­ SWJ4; w h . s e h ; cessioners’ drawings. Sec. 36, NE^NEW , NW14NW14. Sec. 20, EH, EHNWH, SWJ4; T. 20 N., R. 33 E., Sec. 21, NHNEH, WH, SWHSEH; (i) Acceptance of donations of lands Sec. 1, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, S H N H , N H S H ; Sec. 22, EH, NEHNWH. SHNWH. SWH; and water rights, exchanges of lands and Sec. 2, lots 1 ,2 ,3 . and 4, S H N E H ; Secs. 23 and 24; water rights, and purchase of lands and Sec. 5, NWH SW H. SH SW H ; Sec. 25, EH, NWH. Ny2SWH. SEHSWH; water rights. Sec. 6, lots 3 to 7, inclusive, SW H N E H . Sec. 26, NH, NHSWH; SE%NW%, EH SW y4, SEH; Sec. 27, NEH, wy2swH; Sec. 3. * * * Secs. 7 and 8; Sec. 28, SHNEH, w h , s e h ; * ■ • * * Sec. 9, SW HNW H. SW H; Sec. 29, NWHNEH. SHNEH. NWH. NH (m) Approval of preliminary con­ Sec. 15, SW H, NW%SE%, Sy2SE^4; SWH, s e h ; struction plans not requiring approval Sec. 16, N W H N E H .S H N E H , W H . SEH ; Sec. 30, lots 1, 3, and 4, NHNEH. SEH by the Director and preliminary and final Secs. 17 to 22, inclusive; n e h . n e h n w h . e Hsw h . s h s e h ; Sec. 23, SW H NW H . W H SW H , SE H SW H ; Sec. 31; concessioners’ drawings. sec. 26, s w h n e h , w y 2, w h s e h ; Sec. 32, e h , n w h n w h , s h n w h . SW H; (o) Acceptance of donations of lands Secs. 27 to 34, inclusive; Sec. 33; and water rights, exchanges of lands and ^ •a s. nwhneh. nwj4, nehsw h. wh Sec. 34, s h n w h , swy4. EH, NWHNWH, SWH; water rights and purchase of lands and Sec. 35, e h , s w h n w h , SW H; water rights. Z" 112" R ‘ 34 E-» entire tow nship. Sec. 36, EH. SHNWH. SWH- T. 18 N., R. 34 E., T. 18 N., R. 35 E., entire township. (National Park Service Order No. 14 (19 FR. Sec. 1, SWH. NEHSEH, SHSEH; T. 19 N., R. 35 E.. 8824), as amended; 39 Stat. 535, 16 U.S.C., Sec. 2 ,8% N W ^, SJ4; Sec. 1; Sec. 2; Southeast Region Order No. 3 (21 F.R. Sec. 3, lots 1 and 2; Sec. 2, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, SHNH. NHSH. 1493)) J?' ®E&SW%. NEHSEH, SHSEH; SEHSWH. SHSEH; Dated : January 21,1964. s®®- lo ****4* NEftNW H, SHNW54, S&; Sec. 3, n h s w h . s w h s w h ; Sec. 12 to 15, inclusive; Secs. 4 to 9, inclusive; E. M. Lisle, Sec. 16, NEH SEH , Sy2S E H l : Sec. 10, w h n w h . s h ; Acting Regional Director. Sec. 21, EH , SEH NW H , EH SW H : Sec. 11, EH.EHWH, s w h s w h . e h s w h ; Secs. 22 to 28, inclusive; [F.R. Doc. 64-1163; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; Secs. 12 to 36, inclusive. 8:46 a.m .] 1814 NOTICES

Office of the Secretary which were posted oh the respective dates Act, 1921, as amended (7 U.S.C.i 181 specified below as being subject to the et seq.), have been changed as indicated ZIA PUEBLO RESERVATION, NEW provisions of the Packers and Stockyards below. MEXICO Resolution Legalizing the Introduction, Alabam a Sale or Possession of Intoxicants Original name of stockyard, Current name of stockyard location, and date of posting and date of change in name Pursuant to the Aet of August 15,1953 Washington County Stockyards, Inc., Chatom, May Washington County Stockyards, Nov. (Public Law 277, 83d Congress, 1st Ses­ 18.1959. 11,1963. sion; 67 Stat. 586), I certify that Zia A rk a n sa s Pueblo Council Resolution was enacted Arkansas National Stockyards Co., Little Rock, Dec. Arkansas National Stockyards Co., on September 8, 1963, determining that 17.1959. — Inc., Jan. 14,1964. the introduction, sale and possession of Buddy Shoffner Auction Co., Newport, Jan. 11, 1962.. Newport Livestock Auction, July 25, intoxicating beverages shall be lawful 1963. in accordance with the laws of the State Arkansas National Stockyards, North Little Rock, Arkansas National Stockyards Co., of New Mexico on the Zia Pueblo Re­ Oct. 9,1959. Inc., Jan. 14,1964. servation, New Mexico. Relevant por­ Colorado tions of the Resolution read as follows: Hess Livestock Commission Company; Pueblo, Mar. Pueblo Livestock Auction Company, Whereas, Public Law 277, 83d Congress, 7, 1957. Oct. 8,1963. approved August 15, 1953, provides that sec­ K ansas tions 1154, 1156, 3113, 3488 and 3618 of Title 18, United States Code, commonly referred Koenig Sale Company, Inc., Junction City, June 10, Koenig Sale Barn, Jan. 1,1964. to as the Federal Indian Liquor Laws, shall 1959. not apply to any act or transaction within N ebraska any area of Indian country provided such Iowa-Nebraska Salés Yards, Inc., Council Bluffs, May Iowa Nebraska Sale Yards, Dec. 7, act or transaction is in conformity with both 22, 1959. 1963. the laws of the State in which such act or Oklahom a transaction occurs and with an ordinance duly adopted by the Tribe having Jurisdic­ H o m in y Sale Company, Hominy, Oct. 20, 1949_t_____- Oklahoma Auction Yards, Aug. 8, tion over such area of Indian country, cer­ 1963. tified by the ( Secretary of the Interior, and T exas published in the F ederal Register, and Whereas at a special general meeting of Marshall-Longview Livestock Auction, Inc., Long- .Longview Livestock Auction, Inc., the adult membership of the Pueblo Of Zia view, Jan. 10,1957. Sept. 16,1963. called by the Pueblo Governor on September Farmers & Ranchers Commission Company, Tyler, Farmer’s & Rancher’s Commission 8, 1963, the membership by a vote of twenty- Feb. 21, 1961. Company, Sept. 26,1963. six (26) for, and none against, requested the W is c o n s in tribal council to enact a resolution provid­ ing that the introduction, sale or posses­ Nolan Livestock Auction Market, Inc., Lomira, Dec. Nolan Livestock Auction, Inc., Dec, sion of intoxicating beverages shall be law­ 13, 1963. 13,1963. ful within the lands under the jurisdiction Done at Washington, D.C., this 31st day of January 1964. of the Zia Pueblo Tribe, and further, that H. L. J o n es, such introduction, sale or possession be in conformity with the laws of the State of New ,Chief, Rates and Registration Branch, Packers and Mexico; Stockyards Division, Agricultural Marketing Service. Therefore, be it enacted by thé Zia Pueblo [F.R. Doc. 64-1197; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; 8:49 a.m.] Council that said introduction, sale or pos­ session of intoxicating beverages shall be lawful within the Indian country under the jurisdiction of the Zia Pueblo Tribe of the lished in the Journal of Agricultural and Zia Pueblo Reservation: Provided, T h at such DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDU­ Food Chemistry, volume II, page 476 introduction, sale or possession is in con­ (1954) for monuron, with modifications formity with the laws of the State of New CATION, AND WELFARE for 3- (3,4-dichlorophenyl) -1 -methoxy- M exico. 1-methylurea, and the chromatographic Be it further enacted that any tribal laws, Food and Drug. Administration resolutions or ordinances heretofore enacted separation technique of Bleidner (ibid., which prohibit the sale, introduction or pos­ E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND page 682). It is proposed that paper session of intoxicating beverages are hereby CO., INC. chromatography be used for specific repealed. identification of linuron residues. S t e w a r î L U dall, Notice of Filing of Petition Regarding Dated: January 31,1964. Secretary of the Interior. Pesticide Chemical Linuron M alcolm R . S tep h e n s, J anuary 30,1964. Pursuant to the provisions of the Fed­ Assistant Commissioner [F.R. Doc. 64-1164; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; eral Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. for Regulations. 8:46 a.m.] 408(d)(1), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U.S.C. 346a (d)(1)), notice is given that a petition {F.R. Doc. 64-1177; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; (PP 413) has been filed by E. I. du Pont 8:48 a m .] DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE de Nemours and Company, Inc., Wil­ mington, Delaware, 19898, proposing the NEW DRUGS Agricultural Marketing Service establishment of a tolerance of 1 part per million for residues of the herbicide Approval of Applications, November WASHINGTON COUNTY STOCK- linuron (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl) -1-meth- 1963 YARDS, INC., ET AL. oxy-l-methylurea) in or on the raw As provided in § 130.33 of the new-drug agricultural commodities carrots (with or Notice of Changes in Names of Posted without tops) and carrot tops, potatoes, regulations (21 CFR 130.33; 28 F.R. Stockyards and soybean forage and hay. 6377), notice is given of the following It has been ascertained, and notice The analytical method proposed in the new drugs for which applications have is hereby given, that the names of the petition for determining residues of lin­ been approved during thé month of No­ livestock markets referred to herein, uron is as follows: Bleidnèr et al., pub- vember 1963; Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1815

[Docket 14808] Established name Date How dis­ (if any) or active Trade name Class of compound Applicant approved pensed i WITS AIR CARGO SERVICE, ET AL. ingredients Proposed Approval of Control and DRUGS FOR HUMAN USE Interlocking Relationships Meprobamate. Tranquilizer. Truett Labs., Dallas, Nov. 20,1963 Rx Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Tex. statutory requirements of section 408(b), »RUGS FOR VETERINARY that the undersigned intends to issue Halothane. Fluothane. Anesthetic______Ayerst Labs., 685 Third Nov. 21,1963 fix the attached order under delegated Ave., New York, authority. Interested persons are here­ N.Y. Mepivacaine hydro­ Carbocaine Hy­ Anesthetic, sym­ Winthrop Labs., 1450 Nov. 25,1963 Rx by afforded a period of fifteen days from chloride, epineph­ drochloride 2 pathomimetic. Broadway, New York, date of service within which to file com­ rine bitartrate. percent with N.Y. Supra renin. ments or request a hearing with respect Tylosin...... Tylocine Inj___ Antibacterial. Com States Labs., Inc., Nov. 27,1963 Rx to the action proposed in the order. Omaha, Nebr. Furazolidone. nf-180 Dust. ___ do...... là Hess and Clark, 7th and Nov. 29,1963 OTC Dated at Washington, D.C., February Orange Sts., Ashland, Ohio. 3,1964. [ seal] J. W. R o sen th a l, i The abbreviation “ Rx” means restricted by law to prescription only; the abbreviation “ OTC” applies to drugs Chief, Routes and Agreements that by law are not required to be sold on prescription. Division, Bureau of Eco­ Dated: January 30,1964. nomic Regulation. G e o . P . L a r r ic k , [Docket 14808] Commissioner of Food and Drugs. WITS, I n c ., d/ b / a W IT S Air Cargo S ervice, [F.R. Doc. 64-1178; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; 8:48 a.m.] ET AIi.

ORDER APPROVING CONTROL AND INTERLOCKING RELATIONSHIPS UNITED CARBON CO., A DIVISION OF Conference Room 420 at 45 Broadway, Application for approval of control and in­ New York, New York. terlocking relationships pursuant to sections ASHLAND OIL & REFINING CO. 408 and 409 of the Federal Aviation Act of Notice of Filing of Petition Regarding Dated at Washington, D.C., January 1958, as am ended. 31, 1964. By application filed October 14, 1963, as Food Additives amended December 23, 1963,1 the Board is [ sea l] R ichard A. W a l sh , requested to approve pursuant to section 408 Pursuant to the provisions of the Fed­ Hearing Examiner. eral Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as [F.R. Doc. 64-1184; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; amended, (the Act) the control relationships 409(b) (5), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 UJS.C. 348 8:49 a m .] resulting from the ownership by Ralph F. (b) (5)), notice is given that a petition Sites, Lloyd A. Burgess and Howard Hogue, (PAP 937) has been filed by United Car­ in equal amounts, of all the outstanding bon Company, a division of Ashland Oil stock of WITS, Inc., d/b/a WITS Air Cargo & Refining Company, P.O. Box 1503, [Docket 14642] Service (WITS), A domestic and interna­ Houston 1, Texas, proposing that tional air freight forwarder, and 52.2 percent PUERTO RICO-VIRGIN ISLANDS of the outstanding stock of Western Interna­ § 121.2526 Resinous and polymeric coat­ SERVICE CASE tional Travel Service, Inc., a Washington ings for paper and paperboard be corporation (Travel Service of Washington), amended to provide for the use of the Notice of Prehearing Conference which in turn owns 100 percent of the out­ following substances as components of Notice is hereby given that a prehear­ standing stock of Western International food-contact coatings for paper and ing conference is assigned to be held in Travel Service of Alaska, Inc. (Travel Serv­ paperboard: ice of Alaska). Approval is also requested this proceeding on February 18, 1964, at pursuant to section 409 of the Act for inter­ Butadiene-styrene copolymers containing a 10:00 a.m., e.s.t., in Room 911, Universal locking relationships resulting from Mr. total of no more than 5 percent of units Building, Connecticut and Florida Ave­ Sites’ positions as president and director of derived by copolymerization with one or nues Northwest, Washington, D.C., be­ WITS and Travel Service of Washington and more of the following monomers: fore the undersigned Examiner. vice president and director of Travel Serv­ Acrylic acid. ice of Alaska.8 In addition, applicants also Itaconic acid. Dated at Washington, D.C., February request the Board to approve certain pro­ MethacryUc acid. 3, 1964. posed control and interlocking relationships Sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate for use as which will result from reorganization plans a polymerization catalyst. [sea l] W illiam F . C u s ic k , which will be put into effect in the near Sodium o-phenylphenate for use as a pre­ Hearing Examiner. future, subject to Board approval. Under servative. [F.R. Doc. 64-1185; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; the proposed reorganization plans, all of the Dated: January 31, 1964. 8:49 a.m.] outstanding stock of WITS will be trans­ ferred to Travel Service of Washington which M alcolm R . S t e p h e n s , will continue to own all the outstanding Assistant Commissioner stock of Travel Service of Alaska, and the for Regulations. [Docket 12895] present stockholders of Travel Service of Washington will each acquire 10 percent of [F.R. Doc. 64-1179; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; UNITED STATES-CARIBBEAN-SOUTH the stock of a recapitalized Travel Service of 8:48 a.m.] AMERICA INVESTIGATION Washington. The proposed interlocking re­ lationships for which approval is requested are set forth in the appendix hereto. Notice of Prehearing Conference The application states that both Travel CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Notice is hereby given that a further Service of Washington and Travel Service of prehearing conference will be held in Alaska are travel agencies authorized to [Docket 14490] this proceeding on February 19, 1964, at represent certain airline members of the International Air Transport Association in INTERCONTINENTAL, U.S., INC. 10:00 a.m., e.s.t., in Room 725, Universal the sale of passenger air transportation. Building, Connecticut and Florida Ave­ Travel Service of Washington is also au­ Enforcement Proceeding; Notice of nues, Northwest, Washington, D.C., be­ thorized to represent certain airline mem- Postponement of Hearing fore the undersigned Examiner. Public hearing in the above-entitled 1A supplemental statement was submitted Dated at Washington, D.C., February by letter dated January 13, 1964. Proceeding previously assigned to be held 3, 1964. 2 With respect to these control and inter­ °n February 17, 1964, is hereby post­ [ sea l] W illiam F . C u s ic k , locking relationships, it has been decided poned and is now assigned to be held Hearing Examiner. not to enforce the doctrine expressed in or® foe undersigned examiner on Sherman Control and Interlocking Relation­ [F.R. Doc. 64-1186; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; ships, 15 CAB 876 (1952) and to consider the March 9, 1964, at 10:00 am., e.s.t., in 8:49 a.m.] application on its merits. 1816 NOTICES bers of the Air Traffic Conference of America the individual applicants of the positions now in effect or as hereafter amended, the in the sale of passenger air transportation, set forth in the appendix hereto. However, existing Interlocking relationships resulting it is further stated that WITS, in addition we have concluded that a due showing has from Mr. Sites’ present positions as an officer to its authority to engage in domestic and been made in the form and manner prescribed and director of WITS, Travel Service of international air freight forwarding, also that the interlocking relationships will not Washington and Travel Service of Alaska holds motor eommon carrier authority from adversely affect the public interest; and the Interlocking relationships resulting the State of Alaska to transport general com­ Pursuant to authority duly delegated by from the proposed holding by the individual modities in Zone 5B having an immediate the Board in the Board’s Regulations, 14 applicants of the positions set forth in the prior or subsequent movement by aircraft CFR 385.13, it is found that the foregoing appendix hereto be and they hereby are in air freight forwarder service.® control relationships should be approved approved. Applicants state that the proposed reor­ under section 408(b) of the Act, without a Persons entitled to petition the Board for ganization is motivated by a desire to ob­ hearing and that the interlocking relation­ review of this Order pursuant to the Board’s tain additional financing, and to effect ships should be approved under section Regulations, 14 CFR 385.50, may file such greater efficiency in operation, customer 409.6 petitions within five days after the date of Accordingly, it is ordered: service and corporate savings through the service of this Order. 1. That the existing control relationships elimination of duplicate bookkeeping and T his Order sh all be effective and become overhead expenses. The application also resulting from the common control by the action of the Civil Aeronautics Board states that approval of the present and pro­ Messrs. Sites, Hogue and Burgess of WITS, posed relationships is warranted because such Travel Service of Washington and Travel upon expiration of the above period unless relationships will not restrain competition, Service of Alaska and the proposed control w ith in su ch period a p etition for review Create a monopoly or Jeopardize any other relationships resulting from the common thereof Is filed, or the Board gives notice air carrier as the activities of WITS and control by Travel Service of Washington of that it will review this Order on its own Travel Service of ^Washington and Travel WITS and Travel Service of Alaska be and m otion. Service of Alaska are non-competitive; there they hereby are approved; and have been no professional, financial, or other 2. That, subject to the provisions of Part (seal) Harold R. Sanderson, business transactions involving the appli­ 251 of the Board’s Economic Regulations, as Secretary, cants within one year prior to the date of Proposed Interlocking Relationships the filing of this application and none are contemplated; and such approval would be consistent with the Board’s actions in pre­ Individual WITS Travel Service of Washington Travel Service of Alaska vious cases involving similar relationships between air freight forwarders and travel Ralph F. Sites...... President and Director__ _ President and Director ___ Vice President and Director. agencies* Director...... _• Director. No adverse comments or requests for a Do. Do. h earing have been received. Earl Sommerfeld_____ Vice President and Director. Vice President and Director. Do. Notice of intent to dispose of the applica­ Director______Do. tion without a hearing has been published Do. In th e Federal Register, and a copy of such Miriam Lippincott___ Secretary/Treasurer______Secretary/Treasurer.___ ... notice has been furnished by the Board to the Attorney General not later than the day [F.R. Doc. 64-1188; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; 3:49 a.m.J following the date of such publication, both in accordance with the requirements of section 408(b) of the Act. [Docket 13777; Order No. E-20425] Upon consideration of the application, we Agree­ IATA Com­ have concluded that Travel Service of Wash­ INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ment memo­ mod­ Rates ington and Travel Service of Alaska are ASSOCIATION C.A.B. randum ity persons engaged in a phase of aeronautics, 17280 item and that the existing common control of Agreement Relating to Specific WITS, Travel Service of Washington and R-50...... TCl/Rates 7105 50 cents per kilogram; Travel Service of Alaska by Messrs. Sites, Commodity Rates 1883. minimum weight, Hogue and Burgess and the proposed control 45 kilograms; Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Buenos Aires to of WITS and Travel Service of Alaska by San Juan. Travel Service of Washington are subject Board at its office in Washington, D.C., R-51...... TCl/Rates 100 46/44/39 cents per to section 408 of the Act. on the 31st day of January 1964. 1888. kilogram; mini- * mum weight, 45/ However, It has been further concluded Agreement adopted by Traffic Confer- 400/500 kilograms, that such relationships do not affect the „ ence 1 of the International Air Transport respectively; control of an air carrier directly engaged" Association relating to specific com­ Managua to New In the operation of aircraft in air transporta­ modity rates; Docket 13777, Agreement . Orleans. tion, do not result in creating a monopoly, n.ncreate of the statements should be filed with 1962. new relationships requiring prior approval 6 See footnote 4, supra. by the Board. the Board’s Docket Section. The Board Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1817 may, upon consideration of any such It is further ordered, That the Secre­ plicant’s reply to Common Carrier Bu­ statements filed, modify or rescind its tary send a copy of this Order by Certi­ reau’s response to Heart of the Black action herein by subsequent order. fied Mail—Return Receipt Requested to Hills petition for condition, filed Decem­ This order will be published in the the said licensee at his last known ad­ ber 30, 1963. Federal R e g is t e r . dress of 1575 Placentia Avenue, Newport 2. Black Hills Video, the licensee of Beach, California. microwave radio stations in the Domestic By the Civil Aeronautics Board. Released: January 30, 1964. Public Point-to-Point Microwave Radio [ s e a l ] H arold R . S a n d e r so n , Service, applied for renewal of its licenses Secretary. F ederal C ommunications for the stations serving community an­ C o m m is s io n , tenna television systems (CATV) in [F.R, Dc». 64-1187; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; [s e a l ] B e n F . W a p l e , Rapid City, South Dakota; Victoria, 8:49 aon.] Secretary. Texas and Clovas, New Mexico; and for [F.R. Doc. 64-1201; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; the renewal and modification of license 8:50 a.m .] to cover a construction permit for addi­ tional facilities for the station serving FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS a CATV system at Poplar Bluff and Dex­ [Docket No. 14321-14328; FCC 64-54] ter, Missouri. By Order released October COMMISSION BLACK HILLS VIDEO CORP. 30,1961, the applications were designated [Docket No. 15292] for hearing to determine whether there Memorandum Opinion and Order was a public need for the common car­ WESLEY D. BELT Designating Additional Issues for rier communications service offered by Hearing the applicant. Order to Show Cause 3. In an Initial Decision released No­ In the matter of Wesley D. Belt, New­ In re applications of Black Hills Video vember 26, 1962 (FCC 62D-92), the port Beach, California, order to show Corporation, for renewal of the license hearing examiner concluded that the cause why there should not be revoked for Station KAR42, a facility in the Do­ need for the continued holding out of the license for radio station WH-8673 mestic Public Point-to-Point Microwave the applicant as a communications com­ aboard the vessel South Seas. Radio Service at Fredericktown, Missouri, mon carrier had not been demonstrated The Commission, by the Chief, Safety Docket No. 14321, File No. 223-C1-R-61; and he recommended denial of all the and Special Radio Sèrvices Bureau, un­ for a modification of license to cover a applications. However, by Memoran­ der delegated authority, having under construction permit for additional fa­ dum Opinion and Order released Jan­ consideration the matter of certain al­ cilities for Station KAR42 in the Domes­ uary 8, 1963 (FCC 63-18) the Commis­ leged violations of the Commission’s rules tic Public Point-to-Point Microwave Ra­ sion granted the applicant’s motion to in connection with the operation of the dio Service at Fredericktown, Missouri, enlarge issues and remanded the pro­ above-captioned station; Docket No. 14322, File No. 361-C1-ML- ceedings to the hearing examiner for It appearing, that, pursuant to § 1.89, 61; for renewal of the license for Station the purpose of determining (1) the formerly § 1.76 of the Commission’s rules, KKU98, a facility in the Domestic Public amount of applicant’s investment and written notice of violation of the Com­ Point-to-Point Microwave Radio Service the period of time necessary to recover mission’s rules was served upon the at Davy, Texas, Docket No. 14323, File any unamortized portion thereof; (2 ) above-named licensee at his address of No. 338-C1-R-61; for renewal of the li­ the availability and suitability of equip­ record as follows: Commission letter cense for Station KAP22, a facility in the ment for use by the applicant in the dated October 23, 1963, referring to al­ Domestic Public Point-to-Point Micro- Business Radio Service, and (3) when leged violation of §§ 8.102(a), 8.367(b), wave Radio Service at Weld County, and under what circumstances the ap­ and 8.601(a) (now §§ 83.102(a), 83.367 Colorado, Docket No. 14324, File No. 752- plicant was first informed that it would (b), and 83.601(a) ) of the Commission’s Cl-R-61; for renewal of the license for be required on renewal to establish usage rules. Station KAP23, a facility in the Domestic of its facilities by non-related subscrib­ It further appearing, that said licensee Public Point-to-Point Microwave Radio ers. By Memorandum Opinion and did not reply to such communication or Service at Mitchell, Nebraska, Docket Order released July 26, 1963 (FCC 63R- to a follow-up letter dated November 6, No. 14325, File No. 753-C1-R-61; for 360), the Review Board added additional 1963, also mailed to the licensee at his renewal of the license for Station KAP25, issues relating to the alleged transfer address of record; and a facility in the Domestic Public Point- of facilities in violation of section 310(b) It further appearing, that, in view of to-Point Microwave Radio Service at of the Communications Act (47 U.S.C. the foregoing, the licensee has repeatedly Crawford, Nebraska, Docket No. 14326, 310(b)). On August 12,1963 the Exam­ violated § 1.89 of the Commission’s rules; File No. 754-C1-R-61; for renewal of the iner granted leave for applicant to and license for Station KOY47, a facility in tender amendments reflecting current It further appearing, that the viola­ the Domestic Public Point-to-Point Mi­ changes in the use of the facilities which tions of § 1.89 of the Commission’s rules, crowave Radio Service at Albin, Wyo­ may, upon hearing the evidence, demon­ and the related facts create apparent ming, Docket No. 14327, File No. 755-C1- strate sufficient public need for its Rapid liability by the respondent to a monetary R-61 ; for renewal of the license for Sta­ City, South Dakota, microwave system forfeiture of $100 under section 510 of tion KAQ88, a facility in the Domestic by providing a new service to an inde­ the Communications Act of 1934, as Public Point-to-Point Microwave Radio pendent subscriber in the vicinity. The amended, and § 1.80 of the Commission’s Service at Custer, South Dakota, Docket case is now pending before the examiner rules; and also subject the license of the No. 14328, File No. 756-Cl-R^61. on the foregoing issues. The matters above-captioned station to revocation 1. The Commission has before it for brought to light by the instant petition under the provisions of section 312 of the consideration (a) the “Petition for Con­ are directed only at those renewal ap­ Communications Act of 1934, as dition” filed by the Heart of the Black plications for the stations which com­ amended; but further proceedings in this Hills Stations (KRSD-TV) on Septem­ prise the Rapid City, South Dakota mi­ Docket should be limited to action look­ ber 11,1963 ; (b) the “Opposition to ‘Peti­ crowave system. ing toward a determination as to whether tion for Condition’ and Motion to Strike” 4. The Heart of the Black Hills Sta­ an order of revocation should be issued; filed by Black Hills Video Corporation tions (hereinafter referred to as KRSD- 1 y zs ordered, This 30th day of January (the applicant) on September 24, 1963; TV) is the licensee of Station KRSD-TV 1964, pursuant to section 312 (a) (4) and (c) the “Heart of the Black Hills Reply operating on Channel 7 at Rapid City, (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, to Opposition to Petition for Conditions, as amended, and 10.331(b)(8) of the and Motion to Strike” filed September South Dakota. KRSD-TV asserts that commission’s rules, that the said licensee 26, 1963; (d) “Response to Heart of the the microwave facilities of Black Hills snow cause why the license for the above- Black Hills Petition for Condition” filed Video enables the CATV system serving captioned radio station should not be by the Common Carrier Bureau on Oc­ Rapid City to provide three television revoked, and appear and give evidence tober 9, 1963; (e) the “Motion to Strike channels from Denver, Colorado, one of in respect thereto at a hearing to be held Common Carrier Bureau ‘Response to which duplicates the NBC network pro­ at a time and place to be specified by Heart of the Black Hills Petition for Con­ gramming carried by KRSD-TV; that subsequent order; and dition’ ” filed October 21, 1963; (f) ap­ the CATV system reduces the number of i818 NOTICES potential Channel 7 viewers not only CATV system camé to Petitioner’s at­ 11. We consider that the matter dis­ by program competition but also by elec­ tention.“ We do not consider the allega­ cussed above are dispositive of all prayers trical interference which affects recep­ tion to be a sufficient justification for so for relief raised by the pleadings filed tion of the Channel 7 programs on sets long a delay before seeking to intervene in conjunction with the Petition for connected to the cable system; and that in this proceeding. Both KRSD-TV and Condition, including Black Hills Video’s the financial loss resulting from sueh the applicant have been in operatioirfor Motion to Strike. competition impairs the ability of KRSD- several years but the facts alleged to have 12. In view of the foregoing, It is TV to provide the best possible quality been only recently learned are not set ordered, This 29th day of January 1964, of local television programming. Re­ forth and no explanation is offered as to That the following additional issues are quest is therefore made that any grant why the potential injury now claimed did designated for hearing at the Commis­ to Black Hills Video be made only on not previously come to petitioner’s at­ sion’s offices in Washington, D.C., on a condition that the programs of the local tention. The petition of KRSD-TV Is date to be hereafter specified: television station not le duplicated simul­ clearly subject to dismissal unless com­ (a) To determine what impact a grant taneously, or within a specified period, pelling public interest considerations re­ of the renewal of the licenses of Stations- and that the CATV system, upon request, quire that the requested hearing issues KAP22, KAP23, KAP25, KOY47, arid carry the signal of the local station with­ be added, and that KRSD-TV be per­ KAQ88 which are used to serve a CATV out material degradation in quality. mitted to participate in the hearing. system at Rapid City, South Dakota, will Should the Commission conclude that a 8. Where the economic injury to a local have upon the operation of Stations hearing is necessary to determine wheth­ television station from the grant of au­ KRSD-TV, and KOTA-TV, both of Rapid er the conditions should be included, thorizations for microwave stations to City, South Dakota, and the resulting petitioner requests that it be permitted relay television signals will result in the injury, if any, to the public now served to intervene as a party-to the proceeding. demise or diminution of local program­ thereby. The Common Carrier Bureau recom­ ming service, a serious problem affecting (b) To determine in light of evidence mends that additional issues be desig­ the public interest is presented which re­ adduced in issue (a) whether the appli­ nated for hearing to determine whether quires thé attention of the Commission. cations fcfr renewal of the above-men­ the imposition of conditions upon any Carroll Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 103 U.S. tioned stations should be granted on grant to Black Hills Video is warranted App. D.C. 346, 258 F. 2d 440; Carter condition that the CATV customer pro­ since "a factual situation is presented Mountain Transmission Corp., 32 FCC vide for protection against duplication which is fraught with public interest 459, 32 FCC 1181, affirmed sub nom. of local programming and the carrying considerations, namely, the possible Carter Mountain Transmission Corp. v. of the signals of KRSD-TV and KOTA- FCC, 321 F. 2d 359 (D.C. Cir. 1963). Our TV, and if so, the nature and toms of impairment of a local television service.” concern with the possible adverse effect such conditions. 5. Black Hills Video moves to deny upon local television service from the (e) To determine in light of evidence the petition of KRSD-TV, insofar as in­ competition of CATV systems utilizing adduced on the foregoing issues whether tervention is sought, on the ground that microwave facilities was again expressed a grant of the aforesaid applications petitioner has not complied with the iri the Notice of Proposed Rule Making with or without conditions would serve requirements of § 1.104 (b) and (d) (now in Docket Nos. 14895 and 15233 released the public interest, convenience or nec- § 1.223 (b) and (d) ) of the Commission’s December 13, 1963 (28 FR . 13789, De­ Bssity*- rules; and to strike the pleading filed cember 18,1963). The Commission may It is further ordered, That Heart of by the Common Carrier Bureau on the not neglect its obligation to protect the the Black Hills Stations (KRSD-TV) ground that it is riot a pleading con­ public against loss or deterioration of and Duhamel Broadcasting Enterprise templated by 1 1.13 (now § 1.45) of the local television service merely because (KOTA-TV), Rapid City, South Dakota, rules. the pleadings calling the matter to our and the Broadcast Bureau are made 6. The pleadings filed by the Common attention were not timely filed. We have parties to the proceeding herein; Carrier Bureau do not contravene the therefore examined the material sub­ It is further ordered, That to avail limitations imposed by Section 1.13 and mitted to determine whether a hearing themselves of the opportunity to be the motion to strike must be denied.1 on the requested issues is required in the heard, each of the parties specified in the Musical Heights, Inc., FCC 58-1094, 17 public interest. clause immediately above, in person or Pike & Fischer, RR 1101, 1104. The 9. The allegations of KRSD-TV are by attorney, shall within 20 days of the motion to strike the Petition for Condi­ that both tiie duplication of its network mailing of this Order, file with the Com­ tion presents a more difficult problem. programming by the CATV and the in-, mission, in triplicate, a written appear­ KRSD-TV clearly qualifies as a party in terference with the reception of the local ance stating an intention to appear on interest and its petition to intervene is station’s programs on sets hooked up to the date fixed for the hearing and pre­ therefore governed by § 1.104(a) rather the cable system will impair its ability to sent evidence on the issues specified in than by § 1.104(b) . Carroll Broadcast­ operate profitably and to provide the best this Order; ing Company v. FCC, 103 U.S. App. D.C. possible local programming. In our It is further ordered, That the burden 346,258 F. 2d 440. However, trader either Notice of Proposed Rule in Docket Nos. of proceeding with the introduction of provision, a petition to intervene is re­ 14895 and 15233, we recognized that the evidence with respect to Issue (a) herein quired to be filed not later than 10 days failure or refusal of the CATV to carry is placed upon KRSD-TV insofar as its prior to the date of hearing. the local station and the duplication by station operations are concerned and, 7. The renewal applications were des­ the CATV of the local station’s program­ upon KOTA-TV if it becomes a party ignated for hearing on October 30, 1961 ming were factors which might adversely insofar as its station operations are con­ and evidentiary hearings were com­ affect local service. Because of the com­ cerned; and the burden of proceeding menced on June 4, 1962. Nevertheless, pelling public interest considerations with the introduction of evidence with petitioner made no effort to intervene or respect to Issue (b) herein is placed with otherwise participate in the proceedings presented, our duty to serve that public until the filing of its Petition for Condi­ interest requires us to designate for hear­ Black Hills Video. ing, on our own motion, these additional Released: January 31,1964. tion on September 11,1963. To meet the Carroll Issues. requirements of § 1.104(d) that reasons 10. So that our determination in this F ederal C ommunications be set forth why the petition was not case may be based upon a fully developed C o m m is s io n ,1 timely filed, KRSD-TV alleges only that record, we are joining both KRSD-TV, [s e a l ! Ben F. W a p l e , the “petition for condition was filed as Rapid City, South Dakota and the Secretary. soon as the facts concerning the destruc­ Broadcast Bureau as parties to the hear­ D is s e n t in g S t a t e m e n t o p C ommissioner tive impact of competition from the ing in this matter. Duhamel Broadcast­ R o b e r t T. B a r tle y ing Enterprises is the licensee of Station I woud not add the issues on our own 1 The Bureau requested that the pleading KOTA-TV, the other local Rapid City be accepted even though not timely filed station, which broadcasts on Channel 3. motion. ; ’ . • since Bureau counsel was not served with the The petition not only fails procedur- Petition for Condition as required by I 1.56 The licensee of that station is a party ally but also is grossly inadequate, in my (c), (now § 1.47(c) of the rules). Good cause in interest to this matter and should be i See attached dissenting statement of for the late filing having been shown, the afforded an opportunity to be heard on pleading will be considered. the issues designated herein. Commissioner Bartley. Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1819 opinion, to raise a public interest ques­ [Docket No. 15298] why there should not be revoked the li­ tion. * , LESLIE L. MYERS cense for Radio Station KID-1715 in the [P.R. Doc. 64-1202; Piled, Peb. 5, 1964; Citizens Radio Service. 8:50 a.m .] Order to Show Cause The Commission, by the Chief, Safety In the matter of Leslie L. Myers, and Special Radio Services Bureau, un­ [Docket No. 15301] der delegated authority, having under Delray Beach, Florida, order to show consideration the matter of certain al­ NICK BRUNS cause why there should not be revoked the license for radio station 7W1465 in leged violations of the Commission’s Order to Show Cause the Citizens Radio Service. rules in connection with the operation In the matter of Nick Bruns, Baldwin The Commission, by the Chief, Safety of the above-captioned station; Park, California, order to show cause- and Special Radio Services Bureau, un­ It appearing, that, pursuant to § 1.89, why there should not be revoked the der delegated authority, having under formerly § 1.76, of the Commission’s license for Radio Station KEJ-4095 in consideration the matter of certain al­ rules, written notice of violation of the the Citizens Radio Service. leged violations of the Commission’s rules Commission’s rules was served upon the The Commission, by the Chief, Safety in connection with the operation of the above-named licensee at his address of and Special Radio Services Bureau, un­ above-captioned station; record as follows: Official Notice of Vio­ der delegated authority, having under It appearing, that, pursuant to § 1.89 lation dated October 28, 1963, alleging consideration the matter of certain al­ (formerly § 1.76) of the Commission’s violation of § 19.33 (now § 95.45) of the leged violations of the Commission’s rules rules, written notice of violation of the Commission’s rules. in connection with the operation of the Commission’s rules was served upon the It further appearing, that said licensee above-captioned station; above-named licensee at his address of did not reply to such-communication or It appearing, that, pursuant to § 1.89 record as follows: Official Notice of Vio­ to a follow-up letter dated November 26, (formerly § 1.76) of the Commission’s lation dated September 12,1963, alleging 1963, also mailed to the licensee at his rules, written notice of violation of the violation of § 19.33 (now § 95.45) of the address of record; and Commission’s rules was served upon the Commission’s rules. It further appearing, that, in view of above-named licensee at his address of It further appearing, that said licensee the foregoing, the licensee has repeat­ record as follows: Official Notice of Vio­ did not reply to such communication or edly violated § 1.89 of the Commission’s lation dated October 24, 1963, alleging to a follow-up letter dated November 13, rules; and violation of § 19.33 (now § 95.45) of the 1963, also mailed to the licensee at his It further appearing, that the viola­ Commission’s rules. address of record; and tions of § 1.89 of the Commission’s rules It further appearing, that said licensee It further appearing, that, in view of and the related facts -create apparent did not reply to such communication or the foregoing, the licensee has repeatedly liability by the respondent to a monetary to a follow-up letter dated November 19, violated § 1.89 of the Commission’s rules; forfeiture of $100 under section 510 of 1963, also mailed to the licensee at his and the Communications Act of 1934, as address of record; and It further appearing, that the viola­ amended, and § 1.80 of the Commission’s It further appearing, that, in view of tions of § 1.89 of the Commission’s rules rules; and also subject the license of the foregoing, the licensee has rfepeatedly and the related facts create apparent the above-captioned station to revoca­ violated § 1.89 of the Commission’s rules; liability by the respondent to a monetary tion under the provisions of section 312 and forfeiture of $100 under section 510 of the of the Communications Act of 1934, as It further appearing, that the viola­ Communications Act of 1934, as amended; but further proceedings in this tio n s of § 1.89 of the Commission’s rules amended, and § 1.80 of the Commission’s Docket should be limited to action look­ and the related facts create apparent rules; and also subject the license of the ing toward a determination as to wheth­ liability by the respondent to a monetary above-captiofoed station to revocation er an order of revocation should be forfeiture of $100 under section 510 of under the provisions of section 312 of issued; the Communications Act of 1934, as the Communications Act of 1934, as It is ordered, This 30th day of January amended, and § 1.80 of the Commission’s amended; but further proceedings in this 1964, pursuant to section 312 (a) (4) and rules; and also subject the license of Docket should be limited to action look­ (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, the above-captioned station to revoca­ ing toward a determination as to whether as amended, and § 0.331(b) (8 ) of the tion under the provisions of section 312 an order of revocation should be issued; Commission’s rules, that licensee show of the Communications Act of 1934, as It is ordered, This 30th day of January cause why the license for the above- amended; but further proceedings in 1964, pursuant to section 312 (a) (4) and captioned radio station should not be this Docket should be limited to action (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, revoked, and appear and give evidence looking toward a determination as to as amended, and § 0.331(b) (8) of the in respect thereto at a hearing to be whether an order of revocation should Commission’s rules, that licensee show held at a time and place to be specified be issued; cause why the license for the above-cap­ by subsequent order; and It is ordered, This 30th day of January tioned radio station should not be re­ It is further ordered, That the Secre­ 1964, pursuant to section 312 (aK4) and voked, and appear and give evidence in tary send a copy of this Order by Certi­ (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, respect thereto at a hearing to be held fied Mail—Return Receipt Requested to as amended, and § 0.331(b) (8 ) of the at a time and place to be specified by licensee at his last known address of RD Commission’s rules, that licensee show subsequent order; and 2, Decker Road, Marion, New York. cause why the license for the above- It is further ordered, That the Secre­ Released: January 30,1964. captioned radio station should not be tary send a copy of this Order by Certi­ revoked, and appear and give evidence fied Mail—Return Receipt Requested to F ederal C ommunications in respect thereto at a hearing to be held licensee at his last known address of C o m m is s io n , at a time and place to be specified by RFD 1, Box 206, Delray Beach, Florida. [ se a l ] B e n F . W a p l e , subsequent order; and Released: January 30,1964. Secretary. It is further ordered, That, the Secre­ [F.R Doc. 64-1205; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; F ederal C ommunications 8:51 a.m.] tary send a copy of this Order by Certi­ C o m m is s io n , fied Mail—Return Receipt Requested to [s e a l ] B e n F . W a p l e , i if?see k*8 last known address of Secretary. 14441 East Vavette Place, Baldwin Park, California. [PJt. Doc. 64-1204; Piled, Fteb. 5, 1964; FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 8:51 a.m .] Released: January30,1964. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP COMPANY, F ederal C ommunications [Docket No. 15293] INC. AND AFRICAN COASTERS C o m m is s io n , GERALD E. NORRISON (PTY) LTD. I seal] B e n F . W a p l e , Secretary. Order to Show Cause Notice of Filing of Agreement [F.R. Doc. 64-1203; Piled, Peb. 5, 1964; In the matter of Gerald E. Norrison, Notice is hereby given that the follow­ 8:50 am.] , Marion, New York, order to show cause ing described agreement has been filed No. 26------6 1820 NOTICES with the Commission for approval pur­ as to approval, disapproval, or modifica­ Interested parties may inspect this suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, tion, together with a request for hearing, agreement and obtain copies thereof at 1916 (39 Stat. 733; 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C. should such hearing be desired. the Bureau of Foreign Regulation, Fed­ eral Maritime Commission, Washington, 814): Dated: January 31,1964. Agreement 9299 between Lykes Bros. D.C., 20573, or may inspect a copy at Steamship Company, Inc., and African By order of the Federal Maritime the offices of the District Managers of Coasters (Pty> Ltd., provides for a Commission. the Commission in New York, N.Y., New through billing arrangement for cargo T h o m as L i s i , Orleans, La., and San Francisco, Calif., transported in the trade from United Secretary. and may submit to the Secretary, Federal States ports in the Gulf of Mexico to [F .R . Doc. 64-1190; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C., ports in Malagasy, Mauritius, and Re­ 8:49 a.m .] 20573, within 20 days after publication union with transhipment at a Southern of this notice in the F ederal R egister, African port in the range Cape Town/ written statements with reference to the Beira inclusive in accordance with terms U.S. ATLANTIC & GULF/AUSTRALIA- agreement and their position as to ap­ and conditions set forth in the agree­ NEW ZEALAND CONFERENCE proval, disapproval, or modification, to­ ment. gether with a request for hearing, should Interested parties may inspect this Notice of Filing of Agreement such hearing be desired. agreement and obtain copies thereof at Notice is hereby given that the follow­ Dated: January 31, 1964. the Bureau of Foreign Regulation, Fed­ ing described agreement has been filed eral Maritime Commission, Washington, with the Commission for approval pur­ By order of the Federal Maritime suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, Commission. D.C., 20573, or may inspect a copy at T hom as L i s i , the offices of the District Managers of the 1916 (39 Stat. 733; 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C. Secretary. Commission in New York, N.Y., New 814)4- Orleans, La., and San Francisco, Calif., Agreement No. 6200-9, between the [F.R. Doc. 64-1192; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; and may submit to the Secretary, Fed­ member lines of the U.S. Atlantic & 8:49 a m .] eral Maritime Commission, Washington, Gulf/Australia-New Zealand Conference, D.C., 20573, within 20 days after publi­ modifies the basic agreement of this con­ cation of this notice in the F ederal ference, No. 6200 as amended, to provide R eg ister, written statements with refer­ for a system of self policing pursuant SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ence to the agreement and their position to General Order 7. as to approval, disapproval, or modifica­ Interested parties may inspect this COMMISSION tion, together with a request for hearing, agreement and obtain copies thereof at [FUe No. 1-3421] should stlch hearing be desired. the Bureau of Foreign Regulation, Fed­ eral Maritime Commission, Washington, CONTINENTAL VENDING MACHINE Dated: January 31,1964. D.C., 20573, or may inspect a copy at CORP. By order of the Federal Maritime the offices of the District Managers of Commission. the Commission in New York, N.Y., New Order Summarily Suspending Trading Orleans, La., and San Francisco, Calif., J anuary 31,1964. T h om as L i s i , and may submit to the Secretary, Federal Secretary. Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C., The common stock, 10 cents par value, |F.R. Doc. 64-1189; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; of Continental Vending Machine Corp., 20573, within 20 days after publication being listed and registered on the Amer­ 8:49 a.m.] of this notice in the F ederal R eg ister, written statements with reference to the ican Stock Exchange and having unlisted agreement and their position as to ap­ trading privileges on the Philadelphia- OZEAN-LINIE G.m.b.H. and HUGO proval, disapproval, or modification, to­ Baltimore-Washington Stock Exchange, STINNES and the 6% convertible subordinated de­ '■ • ■ I ■ -V -- - \ : r " • • ; e: T ...... gether with a request for hearing, should bentures due September 1, 1976 being Notice of Filing of Agreement such hearing be desired. listed and registered on the American Notice is hereby given that the follow­ Dated: February 3, 1964. Stock Exchange; and ing described agreement has been filed By order of the Federal Maritime The Commission being of the opinion with the Commission for approval pur­ Commission. that the public interest requires the sum­ suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, T h om as L i s i , mary suspension of trading in such se­ 1916 (39 Stat. 733; 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C. Secretary. curities on such Exchanges and that such 814): action is necessary and appropriate for Agreement 8810-1 between Ozean- [F.R. Doc. 64-1191; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; the protection of investors; and Linie G.m.b.H. and Hugo Stinnes in the 8:49 a m .] The Commission being of thè opinion trades between ports of the United States further that such suspension is neces­ and ports in Europe, modifies the basic sary in order to prevent fraudulent, de­ joint service agreement by eliminating UNITED STATES LINES CO. AND ceptive or manipulative acts or prac­ the revenue pooling provision from MANZ-BLUE STAR JOINT SERVICE tices, with the result that it will be un­ Article 2 and providing in lieu thereof lawful under section 15(c) (2) of the Se­ that there shall be no pooling or other Notice of Filing of Agreement curities Exchange Act of 1934 and the sharing of profits or losses between the Notice is hereby given that the follow­ iCommission’s Rule 15c2-2 thereunder parties except as may be provided under ing described agreement has been filed for any broker or dealer to m a k e use of other articles of the basic agreement. with the Commission for approval pur­ tiie mails or of any means or instru­ Interested parties may inspect this suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, mentality of interstate commerce to ef­ agreement and obtain copies thereof at 1916 (39 Stat. 733; 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C. fect any transaction in, or to induce or the Bureau of Foreign Regulation, Fed­ 814): attempt to induce the purchase or sale of eral Maritime Commission, Washington, Agreement 8690-2 between United any such security, otherwise than on a D.C., 20573, or may inspect a copy at the States Lines Company and MANZ-Blue national securities exchange; offices of the District Managers of the Star Joint Service (No. 9050), modifies It is ordered, Pursuant to section 19 Commission in New York, N.Y„ New the approved joint cargo and passenger (a) (4) of the Securities Exchange Act of Orleans, La., and San Francisco, Calif., Agreement No. 8690, so as to provide 1934, that trading in such securities on and may submit to the Secretary, Fed­ that the parties to the joint service the American Stock Exchange and the eral Maritime Commission, Washington, agreement shall be separate members of Philadelphia - Baltimore - Washington D.C., 20573, within 20 days after publi­ conference or other section 15 agreements Stock Exchange be summarily suspended cation of this notice in the F ederal and to delete Montreal Australia New in order to prevent fraudulent, deceptive R eg ister, written statements with refer­ Zealand Line, Ltd. as a party to the or manipulative acts or practices, this ence to the agreement and their position agreement. order to be effective for the period Feb- Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1821 ruary 1,1964 through February 10,1964, a protest to the granting of an applica­ vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ both dates inclusive. tion must be filed with the Commission porting : Pipe, pipeline machinery, equip­ By the Commission. within 30 days after date of notice of ment, materials and supplies used in or filing of the application is published in in connection with the construction, op­ [ se a l ] O rval L. D uB o is, the F ederal R eg ister. Failure season­ eration, maintenance, servicing, repair, Secretary. ably to file a protest will be construed as or dismantling of pipelines, between rp.R. DOC. 64-1160; Piled, Feb. 6, 1964; a waiver of opposition and participation points in the United States (except 8:46 a m .] in the proceeding. A protest under these California). rules should comply with section 1.40 of No. MC 19778 (Sub-No. 60), filed Janu­ the general rules of practice which re­ ary 16,1964. Applicant: THE MILWAU­ [File No. 1-4722] quires that it set forth specifically the KEE MOTOR TRANSPORTATION CO., tastee FREEZ INDUSTRIES, INC. grounds upon "which it is made and a corporation, 516 West Jackson Boule­ specify with particularity the facts, vard, Chicago, HI. Applicant’s attorney: Order Summarily Suspending Trading matters, and things relied upon, but shall Robert F. Munsell (same address as ap­ not include issues or allegations phrased J anuary 31,1964. plicant). Authority sought to operate generally. Protests not in reasonable as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, The common stock, 67 cents par value, compliance with the requirements of the over regular routes, transporting: Gen­ of Tastee Freez Industries, Inc., being rules may be rejected. The original and eral commodities (except household listed and registered on the American six (6) copies of the protest shall be filed goods as defined by the Commission), (1) Stock Exchange; and with the Commission, and a copy shall be between Sioux City, Iowa, and Wessing- The Commission being of the opinion served concurrently upon applicant’s ton Springs, S. Dak.; from Sioux City that the public interest requires the sum­ representative, or applicant if no repre­ over Interstate Highway 29 to Sioux mary suspension of trading in such se­ sentative is named. If the protest in­ Falls, S. Dak., thence north over U.S. curity on such Exchange and that such cludes a request for oral hearing, such Highway 77 to junction South Dakota action is necessary and appropriate for request shall meet the requirements of Highway 34, thence west over South Da­ the protection of investors; and § 1.247(d)(4) of the special rule. Sub­ kota Highway 34 to Wessington Springs, The Commission being of the opinion sequent assignment of these proceedings and return over the same route; (2) be­ further that such suspension is neces­ for oral hearing, if any, will be by Com­ tween Canton and Mitchell, S. Dak.; sary in order to prevent fraudulent, de­ mission order which will be served on f;rom Canton over U.S. Highway 18 to ceptive or manipulative acts or practices, each party of record. with the result that it will be unlawful junction U.S. Highway 77, thence north under section 15(c) (2 ) of the Securities M otor Carriers of P roperty over U.S. Highway 77 to junction South Exchange Act of 1934 and the Commis­ No., MC 704 (Sub-No. 24), filed Jan­ Dakota Highway 44, thence west over sion’s Rule 15c2-2 thereunder for any uary 15, 1964. Applicant: J. O. (RED) South Dakota Highway 44 to junction broker or dealer to make use of the mails WILLETT PIPE LINE STRINGING South Dakota Highway 19, thence north or of any means or instrumentality of CORPORATION, Monroe, La. Appli­ over South Dakota Highway 19 to junc­ interstate commerce to effect any trans­ cant’s attorney: Tom B. Kretsinger, 510 tion U.S. Highway 16 near P u m p k in action in, or to induce or attempt to in­ Professional Building, Kansas City 6, Center, S. Dak., thence west over U.S. duce the purchase or sale of any such Mo. Authority sought to operate as a Highway 16 to Mitchell, and return over security, otherwise than on a national common carrier, by motor vehicle, over the same route; (3) between junction securities exchange; irregular routes, transporting: Pipe, Interstate Highway 29 and South Dakota It is ordered, Pursuant to section 19 pipeline machinery, equipment, mate­ Highway 50 and junction South Dakota (a) (4) of the Securities Exchange Act of rials, and supplies used in connection Highways 37 and 34; from junction In­ 1934, that trading in such security on with the construction, operation, main­ terstate Highway 29 and South Dakota the American Stock Exchange be sum- tenance, servicing, repair, and disman­ Highway 50, thence over South Dakota marily suspended in order to prevent tling of pipelines, between points in the Highway 50 to junction South Dakota fraudulent, deceptive or manipulative United States (except California). Highway 35, thence north over South Da­ acts or practices, this order to be effective No. MC 4966 (Sub-No. 13), filed Jan­ kota Highway 35 to junction U.S. High­ for the period February 1, 1964 through uary 21, 1964. Applicant: JONES way 18, thence west over U.S. Highway February 10, 1964, both dates inclusive. TRANSFER COMPANY, a corporation, 18 to junction South Dakota Highway 37, 927 Washington Street, Monroe, Mich. thence over South Dakota Highway 37 to By the Commission. junction South Dakota Highway 34, and Applicant’s attorney: Rex Eames, 1800 return over the same route, serving all (sea l} O rval L . D u B o is, Buhl Building, Detroit 26, Mich. Au­ Secretary. thority sought to operate as a common intermediate points in (1), (2 ), and (3) carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular above, and the off-route points of Cut- [FA. Doc. 64-1107; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; bert, Dolton, Fairview, Freeman, Hudson, 8:46 a m .] routes, transporting: General commodi­ ties (except those of unusual value, Loomis, Marion Junction, and Menno, classes A and B explosives, household S. Dak.; and (4) between Sioux Falls, S. goods as defined by the Commission, Dak. and junction U.S. Highway 16 and INTERSTATE COMMERCE commodities in bulk) and those requir­ South Dakota Highway 38; from Sioux ing special equipment), (1) serving Brit­ Falls over South Dakota Highway 38 to COMMISSION ton and Ridgeway, Mich., as intermediate junction U.S. Highway 16 north of Alex­ or off-route points in connection with andria, S. Dak., and return over the same [Notice No. 597] applicant’s operations between Tecumseh route, serving no intermediate points, as an alternate route in connection with ap­ motor carrier, broker, water and Monroe, Mich., over Michigan High­ way 50, and (2) between Morenci, Mich., plicant’s regular-route operations. CARRIER AND FREIGHT FORWARD­ and Toledo, Ohio; from Morenci over No. MC 21720 (Sub-No. 4), filed Jan­ ER APPLICATIONS Michigan Highway 156 to Ohio Highway uary 16, 1964. Applicant: WILLIAM M. STEGMEEER, doing business as J anuary 31,1964. 108, thence over Ohio Highway 108 to junction with U.S. Highway 20, thence PANTHER VALLEY CARRIERS, Rural n i i wo^ce< The following a] over U.S. Highway 20 to Toledo, and Delivery 3, Tamaqua, Pa. Applicant’s 1947i01is.Jare governed by special ru return over the same route serving all attorney: John B. Lieberman, m , Union « toe Commission’s general rul Intermediate points. National Bank Building, Mahanoy City, th i^ ° tiCe (49 CPR 1.247), published No. MC 19416 (Sub-No. 13), filed Jan­ Pa. Authority sought to operate as a 3 i< S DE« L R egister, issue of Decemb uary 15,1964. Applicant: DUNN BROS., common carrier, by motor vehicle, over nuoo eff?ctlve January 1,1964. The irregular routes, transporting: Malt bev­ es Pr°vide, among other things, th INC., 801 Mercantile Securities Building, Post Office Box 5771, Dallas, Tex. Appli­ erages, from Mahanoy City, Pa., to points taiwSPvit °L 8peclai rule 1-247 can be 0 cant’s attorney: Tom B. Kretsinger, in New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Dela­ statA vrriting to the Secretary, lute Suite 510, Professional Building, Kansas ware, Maryland, Virginia, and the Dis­ I^ 20423merCe Commlaslon* W ashingto City 6, Mo. Authority sought to op­ trict of Columbia, and empty containers erate as a common carrier, by motor or other such incidental facilities (not 1822 NOTICES specified) used in transporting the transporting the commodities specified No. MC 42963 (Sub-No. 20), filed Janu- above-specified commodities and dam­ above, on return. ary 24, 1964. Applicant: DANIEL aged and rejected merchandise, on No. MC 37896 (Sub-No. 15), filed Jan­ HAMM DRAYAGE COMPANY, a corpo­ return. uary 22, 1964. Applicant: YOUNG­ ration, Second and Tyler Streets, St. No. MC 30824 (Sub-No. 16), filed Jan­ BLOOD TRUCK LINES, INC., Fletcher, Louis, Mo. Applicant’s attorney: Ernest uary 23, 1964. Applicant: AALCO EX­ N.C. Applicant’s attorney: Guy H. Pos- A. Brooks, H, 1311-12 Ambassador Build, PRESS COMPANY, INC., 3514 Good- tell, Suite 693,1375 Peachtree Street NE., ing, St. Louis, Mo. Authority sought to fellow, St. Louis, Mo. Applicant’s at­ Atlanta 9, Ga. Authority sought to op­ operate as a common carrier, by motor torney: Ernest A. Brooks, n , 1311-12 erate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Ambassador Building, St. Louis 1, Mo. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ ing: Coke, in bulk, from St. Louis, Mo., Authority sought to operate as a com­ ing: General commodities (except those to points in Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Ken­ mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ of unusual value, and except dangerous tucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Oklahoma, regular routes, transporting: Uncrated explosives, livestock, household goods Kansas, and Nebraska. commercial refrigeration cases, and re­ as defined in Practices of Motor Carriers No. MC 42963 (Sub-No. 21), filed lated parts and equipment thereof, when of Household Goods, 17 M.C.C. 467, com­ January 24, 1964. Applicant: DANIEL moving therewith, from Haddonfield, modities in bulk, and those requiring HAMM DRAYAGE COMPANY, Second N.J., to St. Louis, Mo. special equipment), between Rabun Gap and Tyler Streets, St. Louis, Mo. Appli­ cant’s attorney: Ernest A. Brooks, n, N o te: Applicant states it holds authority and Atlanta, Ga. in Certificate No. MC 30824 (Sub-No. 14) to 1311-12 Ambassador Building, St. Louis No t e : Applicant states it "already holds 1, Mo. Authority sought to operate as a transport these same commodities here the same authority by observing other gate­ sought, in the reverse direction. common carrier, by motor vehicle, over way points” but "seeks no duplicating au­ irregular routes, transporting: General No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 137), filed Jan­ th o rity .” commodities (except those of unusual uary 20, 1964. Applicant: KROBLIN No. MC 40858 (Sub-No. 53), filed Jan­ value, classes A and B explosives, live­ REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., Post uary 2, 1964. Applicant: THE SILVER stock, household goods as defined by the Office Box 218, Sumner, Iowa. Authority FLEET MOTOR EXPRESS, INC., East­ Commission, and those requiring special sought to operate as a common carrier, man Road, Kingsport, Tenn. Applicant’s equipment), between points in the St. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, attorney: Clifford E. Sanders, 321 East Louis, Mo.-East St. Louis, 111., commer­ transporting: Meats, meat products, and Center Street, Kingsport, Tenn. Author­ cial zone as defined by the Commission. meat byproducts, dairy products, and ity sought to operate as a common car­ No. MC 43038 (Sub-No. 433), filed articles distributed p by meat packing­ rier, by motor vehicle, over regular January 23, 1964. Applicant: COM­ houses, as described in sections A, B, and routes, transporting: General commodi­ MERCIAL CARRIERS, INC., 10701 C of appendix I to the report in Descrip­ ties (except those of unusual value, Middlebelt Road, Romulus, Mich. Ap­ tions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 classes A and B explosives, household plicant’s attorney: Louis E. Smith, Suite M. C.C. 209 and 766, from Columbus, goods as defined by the Commission, 511, Fidelity Building, Indianapolis 4, Junction, Iowa, to points in Colorado, commodities in bulk, those requiring spe­ Ind. Authority sought to operate as a Connecticut, Delaware, District of Co­ cial equipment, and those injurious or common carrier, by motor vehicle, over lumbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, contaminating to other lading), between irregular routes, transporting: New and Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Kingsport, Tenn., and Appalachia, Va., used trucks, in secondary movements, in Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, over U.S. Highway 23, as an alternate truckaway and driveaway service, and New Jersey, New-York, Ohio, Oklahoma, route for operating convenience only, new and used automobiles, in secondary Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, in connection with applicant’s authorized movements, in driveaway service, be­ Virginia, and West Virginia. regular-route operations, serving no in­ tween points in California, Colorado, No. MC 31600 (Sub-No. 560), filed Jan­ termediate points, and serving Kings­ Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washing­ uary 22, 1964. Applicant: P. B. MUTRIE ton, and Wyoming. MOTOR TRANSPORTATION, INC., port, Tenn., and Appalachia, Va., for the Calvary Street, Waltham, Mass. Appli­ purpose of joinder only. No te: Common control may be involved. cant’s attorney: K. B. Williams, 111 N o te: Common control may be involved. No. MC 43608 (Sub-No. 13), filed Jan­ State Street, Boston, Mass. Authority No. MC 41255 (Sub-No. 40), filed Jan­ uary 21, 1964. Applicant: SOUTHERN sought to operate as a common carrier, uary 20, 1964. Applicant: GLOSSON EXPRESS, INC., Old Statesville Road, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, MOTOR LINES, INC., Route 9, Box 11-A, Charlotte, N.C. Applicant’s representa­ transporting: Feldspar, in bulk, in tank Hargrave Road, Lexington, N.C., Appli­ tive: W. D. Turner, Post Office Box 3661, and hopper type vehicles, from Alstead, cant’s attorney: James E. Wilson, 1111 Charlotte, N.C., 28203. ' Authority sought N. H., to points in. Connecticut, Massa­ E Street NW., Washington 4, D.C. Au­ to operate as a common carrier, by motor chusetts, and Rhode Island. thority sought to operate as a common vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 35465 (Sub-No. 1), filed Jan­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular ing: Textile waste materials, including uary 20, 1964. Applicant: GRANE routes, transporting: Furniture, crated sweepings, scrap, threads, and bagging, TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., 4449 West and uncrated, as described in appendix and cotton in bales and bags, in the same Division, Chicago, HI. Applicant’s at­ II to the report in Descriptions in Motor vehicle, between points in Alabama, torney: Charles B. Myers, 611 Field Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209, from Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Building, Chicago 3, 111. Authority points in Alamance, Beaufort, Chatham, Tennessee; and Virginia. sought to operate as a common carrier, Davie, Davidson, Forsyth, Guilford, Lee, No. MC 44932 (Sub-No. 12), filed Jan­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Moore, Nash, Orange, Randolph, Rowan, uary 23, 1964. Applicant: W. W. transporting: Gypsum, gypsum products, Stanly, Surry, and Wayne Counties, N.C., YOUNG & SON, INC., 11861 Cottage and asbestos wallboard, from the plant to points in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisi­ Grove, Chicago 28, 111. Applicant’s at­ site of the United States Gypsum Com­ ana, Mississippi, Kentucky, Tennessee, torney: Charles B. Meyers, 611 Field pany, located at East Chicago, Ind., to Texas, and Oklahoma and refused and Building, Chicago 3, 111. Authority points in Illinois, and points in Adams, rejected shipments on return. sought to operate as a common carrier, Brown, Calument, Columbia, Crawford, No. MC 41849 (Sub-No. 19), filed Janu­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Dane, Dodge, Fond du Lac, Grant, Green, ary 24, 1964. Applicant: KEIGHTLEY transporting: Iron and steel pipe, having Green Lake, Iowa, Jefferson, Juneau, BROS., INC., 1616 South 39th Street, St. prior or subsequent transportation by Kenosha, Kewaunee, LaCrosse, Lafay­ Louis, Mo. Applicant’s attorney: Ernest railroad and consigned from or to tne ette, Manitowoc, Marquette, Milwaukee, A. Brooks, H, 1311-12 Ambassador Build­ United States Pipe & Foundry Company, Monroe, Outagamie, Ozaukee, Portage, ing, St. Louis 1, Mo. Authority sought from Chicago, 111., to points in Illinois, Racine, Richland, Rock, Sauk, Sheboy­ to operate as a common carrier, by mo­ Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin lying gan, Vermon, Walworth, Washington, tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ within 75 miles of Chicago, HI., ana Waukesha, Waupaca, Waushara, Winne­ porting: Coke, in bulk, from St. Louis, empty containers or other such inci­ bago, and Wood Counties, Wis., and only Mo., to points in Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, dental facilities (not specified) used empty containers or other such inci­ Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Okla­ transporting the above-described co " dental facilities (not specified), used in homa, Kansas, and Nebraska. modities, and refused, rejected ana Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1823 turned shipments, of iron and steel pipe, FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., 3100 South Missouri, Illinois, Kansas, Nebraska, on return. Wolcott Avenue, Chicago 8, 111. Appli­ Oklahoma, Iowa, Indiana, Ohio, Penn­ No. MC 46219 (Sub-No. 3), filed Jan­ cant’s attorney: David Axelrod, 39 South sylvania, Colorado, Arkansas, Minnesota, uary 6, 1964. Applicant: STERN- La Salle Street, Chicago 3, 111. Author­ Tennessee, Mississippi, Michigan, Texas, BERGER MOTOR CORPORATION, 44- ity sought to operate as a common car­ Kentucky, and Wisconsin, and (4) fer­ 55 Pearson Street, Long Island City, N.Y. rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular tilizers, in bag and in bulk, from East St. Applicant’s representative: Charles H. routes, transporting: Liquid plastics, in Louis, HI., and points in Kansas, to Trayford, 220 East 42d Street, New York sealdtand containers, from North Tona- points in Johnson, Cass, Henry, and 17, N.Y. Authority sought to operate as wanda, N.Y., to Lake Mills, Iowa, Mil­ Bates Counties, Mo. a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over waukee and Middleton, Wis., Kenton, No. MC 83539 (Sub-No. 110) (COR­ [ irregular routes, transporting: New fur- Ohio, and Providence, R.I. RECTION), filed January 9, 1964, pub­ | niture, between Hampton, Va., on the No. MC 71234 (Sub-No. 9), filed Jan­ lished F ederal R e g is t e r issue January one hand, and, on the other, points in uary 22, 1964. Applicant; THE GORE 29, 1964, and republished as corrected New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, FREIGHT LINE, INCORPORATED, 641 this issue. Applicant: C & H TRANS­ Ohio, Mississippi, Delaware, Maryland, Connecticut Avenue, South Norwalk, PORTATION CO., INC., 1935 West Com­ District of Columbia, Virginia, North Conn. Applicant’s representative: Wil­ merce Street, Post Office Box 5976, Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, liam D. Traub, 10 East 40th Street, New Dallas, Tex. Applicant’s attorney: W. Florida, West Virginia, Louisiana, Ala­ York 16, N.Y. Authority sought to op- T. Brunson, 419 Northwest Sixth Street, bama, and Texas. perate as a common carrier, by motor Oklahoma City. Okla. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Note: Applicant states It proposes to tack No te: The above-specified application was the above-proposed service with its existing ing: Such commodities, as are dealt in filed with the Commission on January 9, authority. Common control may be involved. or sold by retail mail order houses (ex­ 1964, in lieu of the date of January 14, 1964, cept commodities in bulk, in tank vehi­ as shown in previous pubUcation. No. MC-52704 (Suh-No. 42), filed Jan­ cles), from points in Connecticut, to uary 24, 1964. Applicant: GLENN Norwalk, Cojín., and Springfield, Mass. No. MC 86003 (Sub-No. 8), filed Jan­ McClendon t r u c k in g c o m p a n y , uary 21,1964. Applicant: HOWARD G. INC., Lafayette, Ala. Applicant’s at­ No te: Applicant states that no duplica­ SLAUGHTER, doing business as torney: D. H. Markstein, Jr., 818-821 tions with its present authority are requested.' SLAUGHTER BEVERAGE TRANS­ Massey Building, Birmingham 3, Ala. Common control may be involved. PORT, Rural Delivery No. 1, Townsend, Authority sought to operate as a common No. MC 77016 (Sub-No. 3), filed ■DeL Applicant’s representative: Don­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular January 22, 1964. Applicant: BUDIG ald E. Freeman, 172 East Green Street, routes, transporting: Bottle carrying TRUCKING CO., a corporation, 1151 Westminster, Md. Authority sought to boxes (soft drink crates), from West Harrison Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio, operate as a contract carrier, by motor Memphis, Ark. and Memphis, Tenn., to 45214. Applicant’s attorney: Jack B. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ points in Alabama, Florida, Géorgia, Josselson, Atlas Bank Building, Cincin­ ing: (1) Luggage, finished and unfin­ Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North nati 2, Ohio. Authority sought to op­ ished, (2) materials, accessories and Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and erate as a common carrier, by motor hardware, used in the manufacture Virginia. vehicle, over regular routes, transport­ thereof, and (3) empty containers or No. MC 52709 (Sub-No. 235) . filed Jan­ ing: General Commodities (except those other incidental facilities (not speci­ uary 22, 1964. Applicant: RINGSBY of unusual value, classes A and B ex­ fied) used in transporting the above-de­ TRUCK LINES, INC., 3201 Ringsby plosives, household goods as defined by scribed commodities, between Clayton, Court, Denver, Colo. Authority sought the Commission, commodities in bulk, Del., on the one hand, and, on the other, to operate as a common carrier, by and those requiring special equipment), points in New Jersey, points in Nassau motor vehicle, over irregular routes, between Cincinnati, Ohio and Loveland, and Suffolk Counties, N.Y., and New transporting: Meats, meat products, and Ohio, from Cincinnati over Camargo York, N.Y., those in that part of Penn­ neat byproducts, dairy products, and ar­ Pike to junction Loveland Road, thence sylvania on and east of U.S. Highway 1, ticles distributed by meat packinghouses, over Loveland Road to Loveland, and re­ and Downington and Greenville, Pa., as described in sections A, B, and C, of turn over the same route, serving all Louisville, Ohio, Weldon, N.C., and Win­ appendix I to Descriptions in Motor intermediate points. chester, Va. Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209, from No. MC 82808 (Sub-No. 6), filed Jan­ N o te: Applicant has pending common i Grand Island, Nebr., to points in Con- uary 23, 1964. Applicant: LEWIS R. carrier application in MC 125513; It is I necticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, HUNT AND C. L. HUNT, doing business further noted that common control may be I Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New as HUNT AND SON, Holden, Mo. Ap­ involved. Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, plicant’s attorney: Joseph R. Nacy, 117 No. MC 95540 (Sub-No. 566), filed Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Ver- West High Street, Jefferson City, Mo. f mont. January 22,1964. Applicant WATKINS Authority sought to operate as a common MOTOR LINES, INC., Albany Highway, Note: Common control may be involved. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Thomasville, Ga. Authority sought to routes, transporting: (1) Permanent operate as a common carrier, by motor No. MC 60012 (Sub-No. 60), filed Jan- mould machines and equipment, alumi­ K , 20’1964- Applicant: RIO GRANDE vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ MOTOR WAY, INC., 775 Wazee Street, num castings, and finished and unfin­ ing: Meats, meat products and meat by­ ished materials, from Kingsville, Mo., to products, from points in Dallam and r enve5> Colo. Applicant’s attorney: points in Missouri, Illinois, Kansas, ^or^er 1531 Stout Street, Denver Hartley Counties, Tex., to points in 23 to Philadelphia, and return over the Secretary. 8:48 a.m.] same route. [F.R. Doc. 64-1110; Piled, Feb. 5, 1964; No. MC 1515 (Deviation No. 146) 8:45 a.m .] [N otice No. 936] (Canceling MC 1504 Deviation Nos. 1 and 3), GREYHOUND LINES, INC. [No. 33977] MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER (Southern Greyhound, Lines Division), PROCEEDINGS 219 East Short Street, Lexington, Ky., FREIGHT, ALL KINDS, L.C.L., CON­ F ebruary 3,1964. filed January 20,1964. Carrier proposes TAINER CHARGES— U.S.A. to operate as a common Carrier, by motor Synopses of orders entered pursuant vehicles, of passengers and their baggage, Notice of Oral Agrument to section 212(b) of the Interstate Com­ over a deviation route as follows: be­ merce Act, and rules and regulations!) tween Abingdon, Va., and Greensboro, J anuary 31,1964. scribed thereunder (49 CFR Part 17 > N.C., over Interstate Highway 40, for The above-entitled proceeding is as­ ippear below: - , . operating convenience only. The notice signed for oral argument on March 17, As provided in the Commission s sp indicates that the carrier is presently 1964, at 10:00 a.m. U.S. standard time dal rules of practice any interested p -authorized to transport passengers over at the office of Interstate Commerce on may file a petition seeking re a pertinent service route, a portion of -Commission, Washington, D.C., 5before ¿deration of the- following numbered which follows: * * * thence over U.S. the Commission. iroceedings within ,20 days iromJ^®_iant Highway 421 via North Wilkesboro and Any interested person or organization, >f publication of this notice, Winston-Salem, N.C., to junction relo- whether or not at present a party hereto, o section 17(8) of the Interstate com Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1829 merce Act, the filing of such a petition within 15 miles of Elsmore, on the one connection with the exhibition of motion will postpone the effective date of the hand, and, on the other, Kansas City, pictures, between Boston, Mass., and order in that proceeding pending its dis- Mo. Robert L. Briley, Balch &. Briley, Fort Kent, Maine. Raymond Jensen, 477 | position. The matters relied upon by Chanute, Kans., attorneys for applicants. Congress Street, Portland, Maine, at­ ( petitioners must be specified in their No. MC-FC 66462. By order of Janu­ torney for applicants. [ petitions with particularity. ary 29, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ No. MC-FC 66413. By order of Janu­ proved the transfer to Eva J. Kominars, [ sea l] H arold D . M cC o y , ary 30, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ doing business as Ann’s Towing Service, Secretary. proved the transfer to Ann L. McCartney, Villa Park, 111., of Certificate in No. [F.R. Doc. 64-1182; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; doing business as Ann’s Travel Service, MC 114435 issued June 9,1958, to Jerome 8:48 a m .] Fredonia, Pa., of the operating rights in J. Kominars, doing business as Ann’s License in No. MC 12724, issued Decem­ Towing Service, Villa Park, 111., authoriz­ ber 6, 1960, to George W. Bax, doing ing the transportation of: Used motor f business as Bax Travel Service, Lake vehicles dispatched to relieve wrecked, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ! city, Pa., authorizing service in connec- damaged or disabled vehicles, when Wage and Hour Division I tion with transportation by motor ve- towed by wrecker-type equipment, from ! hide, of passengers and their bag­ points in Illinois, Indiana, and Michi­ CERTIFICATES AUTHORIZING EM­ gage, in special and charter operations, gan, to points in Arkansas, Illinois, In­ PLOYMENT OF LEARNERS AT SPE­ in all expense round-trip tours, begin- diana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisi­ CIAL MINIMUM RATES r ring and ending at points in Erie and ana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Warren Counties, Pa., and extending to Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Notice is hereby given that pursuant points in the United States (except York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, to section 14 of the Fair Labor Standards points in Alaska and Hawaii). William Texas, West Virginia, and Wisconsin; Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 1060, as amended, W. Knox, 23 West 10th Street, Erie, Pa., and wrecked, disabled, and damaged 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), and Administra­ attorney for applicants. motor vehicles when towed by wrecker- tive Order No. 579 (28 F.R. 11524) the No. MC-FC 66431. By order of Janu­ type equipment, from points in Arkansas, firms listed in this notice have been is­ ary 30, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Ken­ sued special certificates authorizing the proved the transfer to Russell C. Soren­ tucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, employment of learners at hourly wage sen, Wakefield, Nebr., of the operating Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New rates lower than the minimum wage rights issued by the Commission October Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, rates otherwise applicable under section 18,1949, and May 29,1951, under Certifi­ Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia, and 6 of the act. The effective and expira­ cates Nos. MC 93156 and MC 93156 (Sub- Wisconsin, to points in Illinois, Indiana, tion dates, occupations, wage rates, num­ No. 3), to Rollen Dunn, Dixon, Nebr., and Michigan. ber or proportion of learners and learn­ authorizing the transportation, over ir­ No. MC-FC 66471. By order of Janu­ ing periods, for certificates issued under regular routes, of scrap iron, from farms ary 30, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ general learner regulations (29 CFR in 8 townships of Dixon County, Nebr., to proved the transfer to Ludlow Ware­ 522.1 to 522.9), and the principal prod­ Sioux City, Iowa; building materials, house, Inc., Yonkers, N.Y., of the operat­ uct manufactured by the employer are coal, feed, posts, salt, seed, and wire, ing rights issued by the Commission No­ as indicated below. Conditions provided from Sioux City, Iowa, to the above- vember 25, 1949, under Certificate No. in certificates issued under the supple­ specified origin points; hay and live­ MC 18727, to George J. Dearden, Yonk­ mental industry regulations cited in the stock, from farms in 8 townships of ers, N.Y., authorizing the transportation captions below are as establish«! in those Dixon County, Nebr., with exceptions, to over irregular routes, of household goods, regulations. Sioux City, Iowa; hay and livestock, and between points in Westchester County, Apparel Industry Learner Regulations grain, between Wayne, Nebr., and points N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, (29 CFR 522.1 to 522.9, as amended, and within 20 miles of Wayne, on the one points in Connecticut, Massachusetts, 29 CFR 522.20 to 522.25, as amended). hand, and, on the other, Sioux City, New York, New Hampshire, New Jersey, The following learner certificates were Iowa; livestock, from points in various Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virgina, issued authorizing the employment of townships of Dixon County and Wayne and the District of Columbia. Alvin 10 percent of the total number of fac­ County, Nebr., to Sioux City, Iowa; and Altman, % Brodsky, Linett and Altman, tory production workers for normal feed, coke, fence posts, brick, livestock, 1776 Broadway, New York 19, N.Y., at­ labor turnover purposes. The effective and general farm supplies, from Sioux torneys for applicants. and expiration dates are indicated. City to points in the above-specified Ne­ No. MC-FC 66539. * By order of Janu­ Big Yank Corp., Central Street, Water braska townships. ary 29,1964, the Transfer Board approved Valley, Miss.; effective 1-28-64 to 1-27-65 No. MC-FC 66450. By order of Jan­ the transfer to Wall Truck Line, Inc., (m en ’s con tin en tal p a n ts ). uary 30, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ Holden, Mo., of Certificate in No. MC Blue Ridge Manufacturers, Inc., Second proved the transfer to Edith Powell, do­ and Poplar Streets, Murray, Ky.; effective 547, issued August 30, 1962, to Lawrence 2-7-64 to 2-6-65 (men’s and boys’ work ing business as Powell Trucking Service, Zoacek, doing business as Wall Truck trou sers). Chanute, Kans., of the operating rights Line, Holden, Mo., authorizing the trans­ Cathage Garment Corp., Carthage, Miss.; issued by the Commission September 6, portation of: general, with the usual ex­ effective 1-22-64 to 1-21-65 (boys’ sport 1961, in Permit No. MC 115132 (Sub-No. ceptions including household goods and sh ir ts). 2), to H. E. Powell, doing business as commodities in bulk, sand, lumber, feed, Eastwill Sportswear Co. Inc., Greenwood, Bud Powell Trucking Co., Chanute, meats, oil and grease in containers, live­ S.C.; effective 2-2-64 to 2-1-65 (men’s and Kans., authorizing the transportation, stock, iron and steel articles, and pre­ boys’ sport s h ir ts). oyer irregular routes, of clay brick and Ely & Walker, a division of Burlington fabricated parts used in the manufacture Industries, Inc., Heber Springs, Ark.; effective clay tile, from Humboldt, Kans., to points of agricultural implements, from, to, or 1-23-64 to 1-22-65 (boys’ sport shirts). in Missouri on and west of U.S. Highway between specified points in Kansas and Hollywood Vassarette, Arkadelphia, Ark.; 63; points in 18 counties in Arkansas, and Missouri. Carll V. Kretsinger, 510 Pro­ effective 1-22-64 to 1-21-65 (brassieres). points in Oklahoma; and of the operat­ fessional Building, Kansas City 6, Mo., Hollywood Vassarette, Athens, Tex.; ef­ ing rights in Certificate No. MC 29603, attorney for applicants. fective 1-22-64 to 1-21-65 (brassieres). jssued May 29, 1959, to Allen Brothers No. MC-FC 66577. By order of Janu­ Hollywood Vassarette, Paris, Tex.; effective truck Line, Inc., and acquired by trans- ary 30, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ 1- 22-64 to 1-21-65 (brassieres). eror herein pursuant to order entered Lowenstein Dress Corp., 425 Pleasant proved the transfer to Norther Film Street, Fall River, Mass.; effective 1-22-64 ovember 13, 1962, as amended Febru- Transport, Inc., Presque Isle, Maine, of to 1-21—65 (ladies’ dresses). ¡2. t 1*1963 in MC-FC 65366, permitting the operating rights in Certificate in No. MonticeUo Manufacturing, Inc., Warren m l i porta^i°n °f lubricating oil, in MC 111408 (Sub-No. 1), issued April 3, Street, Monticello, Ga.; effective 2-10-64 to ntamers, feed, agricultural machinery, 1951, to Aroostock Film Transport Com­ 2- 9-65 (boys’ and men’s casual slacks). nardware, and fertilizer, from Kansas pany, Inc., Presque Isle, Maine, author­ The Raleigh Corp., Raleigh, Miss.; effective iritK- *° Eismore, Kans., and points 1- 31-64 to 1-30-65 (ladies’ slacks). izing the transportation, over a regular Sanford Manufacturing Co., 44 48 Lehigh st/wrirV l5 1111168 of Elsmore; and live­ route, of motion picture film, film ac­ Street, Wilkes-Barre, Pa.; effective 2-3-64 to stock, between Elsmore, Kans., and points cessories and advertising matter used in 2- 2-65 (boys’ and men’s pants). 1830 NOTICES

A. J. Schnelerson & Son, Inc., Sanford, Regulations Applicable to the Employ­ fective 1-13-64 to 1-12-65; 10 learners for N.C.; effective 1-20-64 to 1-19-65. Learners ment of Learners (29 CFR 522-1 to 522.9, normal labor turnover purposes in the oc­ may not be employed at special minimum cupations of: (1) sewing machine operator wages in the production of ladles’ slips made as amended). for a learning period of 480 h ours at the from knit fabrics (ladies’ slips and dresses)* The following learner certificates were rates of 75 cents an hour for the first 240 Soperton Manufacturing Co., Soperton, issued in Puerto Rico to the companies hours and 88 cents an hour for the remain­ Ga.; effective 2-3-64 to 2-2-65 (men’s sport hereinafter named. The effective and ing 240 hours; and (2) presser other than sliir ts). expiration dates, learner rates, occupa­ final presser; machine operator other Tompkinsville Manufacturing CO., Tomp- tions, learning periods, and the number sewing (hook and eye); (sliders and stops); kinsville, Ky.; effective 1-25-64 to 1-24-65 or proportion of learners authorized to final inspection of fully assembled garments’, (men’s cotton pants). each for a learning period of 160 hours at thè be employed, are indicated. rate of 75 cents an hour. (Men’s slacks) The following learner certificates were American Bonfil Corp., Industrialville issued for normal labor turnover pur­ Building No. 11, Road No. 26, Km. 9.4—Isla The following learner certificates were poses. The effective and expiration Verde, Carolina, P.R.; effective 1-15-64 to 7— issued in the Virgin Islahds to the com­ 14-64; 16 learners for plant expansion pur­ panies hereinafter named. The effective dates and the number of learners au­ poses, in the occupation of machine operator and expiration dates, learner rates, oc­ thorized are indicated. for a learning period of 240 horns at the rate cupations, learning periods, and the num­ Arotex Uniform Co., Inc., 201 North Waco, of 74 cents an horn (textured synthetic ber or proportion of learners authorized Wichita, Kans.; effective 1-27-64 to 1-26-65; yarn ). to be employed, are indicated. 10 learners (men’s and women’s washable Mayaguez Shoe Corp., State Road No. 2, Km. 190.2, Guaanjibo Industrial Subdivision, Quality Products Co., Inc., 78-79 Kron- service garments). prindsens Gade, P.O. Box 2446, Charlotte The H. W. Gossard Co., corner of Pine and Mayaguez, PH.; effective 1-15-64 to 7-14-64; 100 learners for plant expansion purposes, Amalie, St. Thomas, VJ.; effective 1-4-64 to 'Jasper Streets, Gwinn, Mich.; effective 2—9—64 7-3-64; six learners for plant expansion pur­ ito 2-6-65; 10 learners (ladies' foundation in any factory productive occupation (with certain exceptions), each for a learning pe­ poses, in th è occupation of watch assembler g a rm en ts). riod of 480 hours at the rates of 71 cents an for a learning period of 480 hours at the Nightingale Uniform Co., Mill Street, rates of $1.00 an hour for the first 240 hours Géorgiana, Ala.; effective 1—22-64 to 1—21—65; hour for the first 240 hours and 76 cents an hour for the remaining 240 hours (women’s and $1.05 an hour for the remaining 240 10 learners (nurses’ uniform s). hours (assembly of watch movements). Supreme Sportswear Co., 421 Front Street, shoe uppers). Milles Engineering, Inc., P.O. Box 131, Las St. Croix Textile Mills, Inc., Christiansted, Roseto, Pa.; effective 1-24-64 to 1-23-65; five St. Croix, VJ.; effective 1-3-64 to 1-2-65; learners (ladies’ and children’s blouses). Marias, PH.; effective 1-7-64 to 7-6-64; 29 learners for plant expansion purposes, in the seven learners for norm al labor turnover The following learner certificates were occupation of wirer (assembler); inspector- purposes, in the occupation of machine op­ tester; technician, each for a learning period erator for a learning period of 240 hours at issued for plant expansion purposes. of 480 hours at the rates of 95 cents an hour the rate of 70 cents an hour (wool yam). The effective and expiration dates and for the first 240 hours and $1.05 an hour for Standard Time Corp., 102 Richmond, Chris­ the number of learners authorized are the remaining 240 hours. On and after tiansted, St. Croix, VJ.; effective 1-13-64 to indicated. March 13, 1964, learner rates of 98 cents an 11-15-64; 10 learners for normal labor turn­ hour for the first 240 hours and $1.05 an hour over purposes, in the occupation of watch as­ Carthage Garment Corp„ Carthage, Miss.; for the remaining 240 hours (frequency sembler for a learning period of 480 horns effective 1-22-64 to 7-21-64; 60 learners modulated receivers and related electronic at' th e rates of $1.00 an hour for the first 240 -(boys’ sport shirts). equipment). hours and $1.05 an h o w for the remaining !; Longley Manufacturing Co., Inc., 1511 Wil­ Ponce Mills, Inc., Hostos Avenue, P.O. Box 240 h o w s (w atches) (replacem ent certi­ liams Street, Chattanooga, Tenn.; effective 224, Station No. 6, Ponce, PJEt.; effective ficate) . 1-22-64 to 7-21-64; 20 learners (children’s, 1-3-64 to 7-2-64; 30 learners for plant ex­ boys’, and m en ’s je a n s). pansion purposes, in the occupation of cir­ Each, learner certificate has been is­ Pert Sportswear, Inc., Blue Rapids, Kans.; cular knitter machine operator for a learn­ sued upon the representations of the em­ effective 1-20-64 to 7-19-64; five learners. ing period of 240 hours at the rate of 72 ployer which, among other things, were Learners may not be employed at special cents an hour (knitted cloth). that employment of learners at special minimum wages in the production of Ricardo Corp., P.O. Box 127, Hormigueros, m in im u m rates is necessary in order to women’s, misses’, and Juniors’ skirts (ladles’ P.R.; effective 1-7-64 to 1-6-65; 13 learners prevent curtailment of opportunities for ap ron s). for normal labor turnover purposes, in the employment, and that experienced work­ A. J. Schneierson & Son, Inc., Sanford, N.C.; occupations of; (1) machine stitcher; lay- ers for the learner occupations are not effective 1-20-64 to 7-19-64; 75 learners. ers-off, each for a learning period of 480 available. Any person aggrieved by the Learners may not be employed at special hours at the rates of 73 cents an horn for the minimum wages in the production of ladies’ first 240 hours and 84 cents an hour for the issùance of any of these certificates may slips made from knit fabrics (ladies’ slips remaining 240 hours; and (2) die and clicker seek a review or reconsideration thereof and d resses). machine operator for a learning period of 160 within fifteen days after publication of hours at the rate of 73 cents an hour (fabric this notice in the F ederal R egister pur­ Hosiery Industry Learner Regulations and leather gloves). suant to the provisions of 29 CFR 522.9. (29 CFR 522.1 to 522.9. as amended, and Ricardo Corp., P.O. Box 127, Hormigueros, The certificates may be annulled or with­ 29 CFR 522.40 to 522.43, as amended). PH.; effective 1-7-64 to 7-6-64; 17 learners drawn, as indicated therein, in the man­ for plant expansion purposes, in the oc­ ner provided in 29 CFR Part 528. Belmont Knitting Co., Belmont, N.C.; ef­ cupations of: (1) machine stitcher; layers- fective 1-30-64 to 1-29-65; 5 percent of the off, each for a learning period of 480 hours Signed at Washington, D.C., this 31st total number of factory production workers at the rates of 73 cents an hour for the first day of January 1964. for n o rm al labor turnover purposes (seam­ 240 hours and 84 cents an hour for the re­ less) . maining 240 hours; and (2) die and clicker R obert G . G ronewald, Powell Knitting Co., P.O. Box 1712, Spar­ machine operator for a learning period of Authorized Representative of tanburg, S.C.; effective 1-24-64 to 1—23—65; 160 hours at 73 cents an hour (fabric and the Administrator. 5 percent of the total number of factory leather gloves). production workers for normal labor turn­ Sagner International, Inc., 151 Marina {F.R. Doc. 64-1165; Filed, Feb. 5, 1964; over purposes (seamless). Street, P.O. Box 4128, San Juan, P.R.; ef­ 8:46 a ju .l Thursday, February 6, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 1831

CUMULATIVE CODIFICATION GUIDE— FEBRUARY

The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during February.

3 CFR Page 14 CFR P age 32 CFR Pa®e Proclamations: 44______— ___ 1719 719------— 1— — ___— _ 1803 3572— ______1717 97______— _ 1781 1001------— ___ 1680 Executive O r d e r s : 129 [New]______1719 1003______1681 Feb. 23, 1928 (See PLO 3323) _ 1723 507______1680, 1721 1007------__------1682 9993 (See EO 11140) _____ 1637 P r o po sed R u l e s : 1009------1682 10031 (See EO 11140)_____ 1637 4b______1692 1012______1688 10280 (See EO 11140)______1637 71 [New]__ 1693-1696 1054______— 1689 10354 (See EO 11140)__ 1637 241______1658,1737 10497 (See EO 11140)_____ 1637 507.___ — — _ 1739 36 CFR 10506 (See EO 11140)_____ 1637 P ro po sed R u l e s : 11140____ 1637 16 CFR 1------— — 1736 13__— ______1644,1721, 1796-1799 7 CFR 41 CFR 51______— . __ 1794 20 CFR 1-5------— ------— — __ 1690 401— ______------— 1795 422— ____ _ 1799 8- 4------1690 724______— ...... 1639,1641 8-11------1690 907...... — 1642,1643,1719 21 CFR 9- 5 - 1645 910...... _ _ ------1643 8— ______1801 Proposed Rules: 19______— 1802 43 CFR 916______— . 1736 120______1802 63------1803 987______------1737 141d______— 1802 101------— 1805 1001______------1646 191— __ — 1802 P u b l ic L and O r d e r s : 1002...... ------1646 P r o po se d R u l e s : 3321----- 1722 1003- ______---- — 1646 29______---- 1807 3322— ------„------1723 1004...... ______1646 37______1807 3333— ------1723 1006...... — 1646 121______1807,1808 1007______— 1646 46 CFR 1014 _____ — - 1646 25 CFR 171__— ______1690,1691 1015 _____ ------1646 P r o po sed R u l e s : P r o po se d R u l e s : 1016— ______------1646 221——. 1736 35___— ___ 1646 1049______------1656 78______- 1646 1138...... ------1656 26 CFR 97______1646 9 CFR P r o po sed R u l e s : 186— ___ 47 CFR 29...... 1725 ___ 1679 201— ____¡t. 1725 P r o po sed R u l e s : 78______1679,1719 1------1660 201. ______— 1795 28 CFR 73_----- 1739 Proposed Rules: 87------——— ...... 1808 17 ___* ___ 1696 1644 18 ___ 1657,1696 29 CFR 49 CFR 27_. ______- 1696 P r o po sed R u l e s : 12 CFR 526— 1722 131—------1740 1719 31 CFR 50 CFR 1796 3 1 6 - 1645 33...... — 1691,1723,1724,1805,1806

Latest Edition in the sériés o f . . . PUBLIC PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES John F. Kennedy, 1962 Contains verbatim transcripts of the President’s news conferences and speeches and full texts of messages to Congress and other materials released by the White House during the period January 1-December 31, 1962. Among the 557 items in the book are: special messages to the Congress on education, national health needs, and foreign aid; reports to the American people concerning the state of the national economy, nuclear testing and dis­ armament, and the Cuban crisis; joint statements with leaders of foreign gov­ ernments; and a special interview with representatives of the radio and television networks in which the President reviewed some of the highlights of his first 2 years in office. A valuable reference source for scholars, reporters of current affairs and the 1108 pages Price: $9.00 events of history, historians, librarians, and Government officials.

VOLUMES of PUBLIC PAPERS of the PRESIDENTS currently available: Contents: HARRY S. TRUMAN: • Messages to the Congress 1945______$5.50 • Public speeches 1946______$6.00 1947______$5.25 • News conferences

DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER: • Radio and television reports to the 1953----- ______$6.75 1957______— $6.75 American people 1954— ..______$7.25 1958______$8.25 1955----- $6.75 1959------__ $7.00 • Remarks to informal groups 1956----- ______$7.25 1960-61______$7.75 • Public letters JOHN F. KENNEDY: 1961-______— $9.00 1962______$9.00 Volumes are published annually, soon after the close of each year. Order from the: Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Earlier volumes are being issued periodically, beginning with 1945. Washington, D.C., 20402