Learning from New Zealand's 30 Years of Experience Managing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Learning from New Zealand's 30 Years of Experience Managing Learning from New Zealand’s 30 Years of Experience Managing Fisheries under a Quota Management System 2 Learning from New Zealand’s 30 Years of Experience Managing Fisheries under a Quota Management System Editors Lynne Zeitlin Hale and Jeremy Rude, The Nature Conservancy Contributing Authors Michael Arbuckle, Independent Fisheries Consultant, New Zealand Raewyn Peart, Policy Director, Environmental Defence Society, New Zealand Lynne Zeitlin Hale, The Nature Conservancy Jeremy Rude, The Nature Conservancy Kate Kauer, The Nature Conservancy Michael Looker, The Nature Conservancy Carmen Revenga, The Nature Conservancy Design and Layout Arnaud Ghelfi, Atelier Starno Suggested Citation: Hale, L.Z. and J. Rude (eds.). (2017). Learning from New Zealand’s 30 Years of Experience Managing Fisheries Under a Quota Management System. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, USA. Copyright © The Nature Conservancy 2017 Published by The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, USA Cover Photography: Blue maomao round a lush bed of kelp in Poor Knights reserve. © Brian Skerry /National This report was prepared by The Nature Conservancy with the generous support of the Walton Family Foundation Geographic Creative 3 Learning from New Zealand’s 30 Years of Experience Managing Fisheries under a Quota Management System Acknowledgements We cannot express enough gratitude to those many individu- nation’s approach to managing them, has provided the founda- als from across a wide range of New Zealand institutions tion for this report. We would also like to acknowledge our TNC who took time over the last nine months to generously share teammates Michael Looker, Carmen Revenga, Kate Kauer, and their knowledge, perspectives, and passion for New Zealand’s Andrew Harmon who have all made significant contributions to fisheries and ocean environment with us. This report has been this report. We'd like to thank Andrea Moreno for helping carry enriched by the voices and views of members of Government, out overseas interviews and summarizing key topics of interest. Te Ohu Kaimoana, and the Fishing and Seafood Industry, as In addition, we wish to acknowledge Erika Feller, who played well as by those from environmental NGOs, academia, and a central role during the Project’s inception phase, and Ella recreational fishing groups. Arbuckle Page, for her assistance in preparing the chapter on the Central Role of the QMS in the Settlement of Māori Treaty Our sincere thanks and appreciation is extended to the over- Rights. We would also like to thank Elena Abbott for her editorial seas interview participants from the United States, Mexico, assistance and Arnaud Ghelfi for design and layout. Chile, Peru, Indonesia and Belize. These participants include Lisel Alamilla, Nicanor Requena, Larry Epstein, Fery Sutyawan, We are especially grateful to those individuals who reviewed a Elle Wibisono, Michael De Alessi, Azbas Taurusman, Oscar draft version of this report and provided thoughtful and help- Avilez, Darío Rivas, Jorge Farías, Stefan Gelcich, José Luis ful feedback and comments, including Tim Pankhurst, Matt Carrillo Galaz, Víctor Ibáñez, Raúl Villaseñor, Edaysí Bucio Dunn, George Clement, Stuart Brodie, Amanda Leathers, Geoff Bustos, Héctor Licón, Elena Conterno, Mariano Gutierrez, Rowling, Sean Cooper, Basil Sharp, Simon Thrush, Ray Hilborn, Carlos Paredes, Juan Carlos Sueiro, Andrés Chipollini, Kelly and Randall Bess. Denit, Lindsay Fullenkamp, Wendy Morrison, Margaret Spring, Jill Swasey, Ben Martens, Chris McGuire, Geoff Smith, Bob The information and interpretation of events provided by the Dooley, Hekia Bowditch, Joe Sullivan, and Rebecca Metzner. above individuals has been invaluable. However, their engage- Their input was central to shaping this report’s focus. ment in no way implies agreement with or endorsement of the report’s conclusions or accuracy. Responsibility for both these We would like to acknowledge and thank our outstanding aspects rests solely with us, the TNC editors. consultants, Raewyn Peart and Michael Arbuckle. Their deep knowledge of New Zealand’s fisheries and marine environment, —Lynne Hale and Jeremy Rude, Editors along with the people and institutions who have shaped the The Nature Conservancy 4 Learning from New Zealand’s 30 Years of Experience Managing Fisheries under a Quota Management System Preface The Nature Conservancy (www.nature.org) works around the world to conserve the lands and waters on which all life de- pends. We have been protecting important natural places for over 65 years and have steadily expanded the scale and scope Fishing vessels in the Whitanga Harbour of our work. One of the world’s largest conservation organiza- tions and a leader in coastal and marine conservation, The freshwater issues, emphasizing innovative, often market-based © Raewyn Peart Nature Conservancy brings together people of differing views solutions that can advance conservation and sustainable use. to find and apply science-based solutions that work locally and In addition, this programme seeks to learn from New Zealand’s globally. We engage in conservation in 69 countries and all 50 long experience and many achievements in conservation and U.S. states. resource management in order to aid conservation in other places facing similar issues. Given TNC’s engagement in fisher- For TNC, sustainable fisheries mean secure livelihoods, stable ies management around the world, it is keen to learn and share seafood supplies, strong coastal communities, and a healthy insights from New Zealand’s 30 years of experience in manag- ocean. Our fisheries work is based on a proven track record of collaborating with fishers and the fishing industry to use ing their fisheries through a rights-based approach. science, technology, and policy to achieve tangible outcomes. This report attempts to document New Zealand’s approach to We believe that by engaging with fishers, seafood companies, fisheries management and how that approach has evolved over communities, and policymakers we can ensure that fishers and time. We have striven to provide a technically robust, balanced the seafood industry do not have to choose between making a living today and ensuring that their livelihoods last far into review by separating facts from perspectives and by reflecting the future. Together, we protect and restore fisheries and fish the diversity of perspectives that exist. It is our sincere hope habitats while making sure that fishing remains a sustainable that this work is both a contribution to New Zealand and a re- business. source for other nations and groups working towards the com- mon objective of putting fisheries on the path to sustainability. In 2016, TNC launched a new country programme in New Zealand. Adopting a partner approach, we aspire to bring —Dr. Michael Looker, New Zealand Country Director experience, tools, and capacity to support the greater vision for The Nature Conservancy conservation in New Zealand. Our focus here is on marine and November 2017 5 Learning from New Zealand’s 30 Years of Experience Managing Fisheries under a Quota Management System Guide to Using this Report The Report is designed to enable read- ers to rapidly access key insights and lessons from the New Zealand fisher- ies management experience as well as to present a much fuller account of the history and current operation of New Fisherman holds a Zealand’s Quota Management System very large snapper (QMS). Overall insights and lessons © iStock.com / learned from the New Zealand experience Chameleonseye Summary of the Report’s SECTION 2: The New Zealand are summarized in Section 1. Our hope Quota Management System is that by providing this first overview of Major Sections This section provides a comprehensive lessons learned, the reader can be guided SECTION 1: Insights and Lessons overview of how New Zealand manages to specific and in-depth coverage of each from the New Zealand Fisheries its fisheries under the QMS and how area related to the QMS. Each summative Management Experience the system has evolved over its 30-year lesson references a subsequent section of This section draws out insights into and history. It is divided into 4 sub-sections the report that provides more complete lessons from the New Zealand experi- as follows: and detailed information. A summary of ence that we believe will be of interest to each section of the report is found below. overseas audiences. For each lesson, we 2A: The Context for the Introduction We hope that this format facilitates navi- provide a small amount of context and of the Quota Management System into gation through the document and allows refer readers to parts of the report where New Zealand describes the status of readers to hone in on those areas that are they can find more substantial informa- fisheries and the major fishing sectors of most interest to them. tion on the topic. (inshore and deepwater) prior to the Learning from New Zealand’s 30 Years of Experience 6 Managing Fisheries under a Quota Management System Guide to Using this Report introduction of the QMS along with the and TACCs are set, and how research is Monitoring system aimed at obtaining political context that existed in New prioritised and used within these pro- better information for better manage- Zealand when the QMS was first intro- cesses. The section concludes with a de- ment systems and increasing confidence duced in 1986. scription of how allocations are made in in compliance and enforcement is then shared fisheries (fisheries that have both described. 2B: Key Components of the Quota commercial and substantial recreational Management System defines the core and customary harvests). 2D: Funding Fisheries Management components of New Zealand’s QMS describes the components (the Individual Transferable Quota 2C: Fishing Under the Quota (Management, Information, Operational (ITQ), Annual Catch Entitlement (ACE), Management System describes what a Advice, and Services, including research Total Allowable Catch (TAC), and Total fisher needs to be able to fish each year and policy) and cost of implement- Allowable Commercial Catch (TACC)). (a permit and ACE) and how the system ing the QMS.
Recommended publications
  • Incidental Catch of Seabirds in Longline Fisheries
    Final United States National Plan of Action for Reducing the Incidental Catch of Seabirds in Longline Fisheries Silver Spring, MD 20910 February 2001 Photograph of Short-tailed Albatross by Dr. Hiroshi Hasegawa DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Final United States National Plan of Action for Reducing the Incidental Catch of Seabirds in Longline Fisheries Silver Spring, MD 20910 February 2001 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Donald L. Evans, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Scott B. Gudes, Acting Under Secretary National Marine Fisheries Service William T. Hogarth, Ph.D., Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Table of Contents Executive Summary . .1 Introduction . 2 Purpose . 4 Background . 5 Statutory Authority and Agency Responsibility . .6 International Fishery Management Measures to Conserve Seabirds . 9 U.S. Fishery Management Measures to Conserve Seabirds . .10 The U.S. National Plan of Action for Reducing the Incidental Catch of Seabirds in Longline Fisheries (NPOA-S) . .11 Development of the NPOA-S . 11 Implementation of the NPOA-S . 12 Role of the Interagency Seabird Working Group . 12 Action Elements of the NPOA-S . .12 Table of Proposed Timeline for NPOA-S Implementation . 16 Table of Organizational Roles for Seabird Bycatch Reduction . .17 Appendices (Updated August 1, 2001) I. International Plan of Action for Reducing Incidental Catch of Seabirds in Longline Fisheries II. Longline Fisheries of the United States: Seabird Bycatch Assessments, Descriptions, Regulations, Current Mitigation Efforts, Current Research Efforts, and Monitoring of Seabird Bycatch by Fishery Management Councils and International Agreements III. NMFS National Bycatch Plan Executive Summary IV. FWS Waterbird Bycatch Policy Statement V.
    [Show full text]
  • Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan Review Landscape Report
    HAURAKI GULF ISLANDS DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW LANDSCAPE REPORT September 2006 1 Prepared by Hudson Associates Landscape Architects for Auckland City Council as part of the Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan Review September 2006 Hudson Associates Landscape Architects PO Box 8823 06 877-9808 Havelock North Hawke’s Bay [email protected] 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 5 Landscape Character 10 Strategic Management Areas 13 Land Units 16 Rakino 31 Rotoroa 33 Ridgelines 35 Outstanding Natural Landscapes 38 Settlement Areas 40 Assessment Criteria 45 Appendix 48 References 51 3 LIST OF FIGURE Figure # Description Page 1. Oneroa 1920’s. photograph 6 2. Oneroa 1950’s photograph 6 3 Great Barrier Island. Medlands Settlement Area 7 4 Colour for Buildings 8 5 Waiheke View Report 9 6 Western Waiheke aerials over 20 years 11 7 Great Barrier Island. Natural landscape 11 8 Karamuramu Island 11 9 Rotoroa Island 12 10 Rakino Island 12 11 Strategic Management Areas 14 12 Planning layers 15 13 Waiheke Land Units 17 14 Great Barrier Island Land Units 18 15 Land Unit 4 Wetlands 19 16 Land Unit 2 Dunes and Sand Flats 19 17 Land Unit 1 Coastal Cliffs and Slopes 20 18 Land Unit 8 Regenerating Slopes 20 19 Growth on Land Unit 8 1988 21 20 Growth on Land Unit 8, 2004 21 21 LU 12 Bush Residential 22 22 Land Unit 20 Onetangi Straight over 18 years 23 23 Kennedy Point 26 24 Cory Road Land Unit 20 27 25 Aerial of Tiri Road 28 26 Land Unit 22 Western Waiheke 29 27 Thompsons Point 30 28 Rakino Island 32 29 Rotoroa Island 34 30 Matiatia, house on ridge 36 31 Ridge east of Erua Rd 36 32 House on secondary ridge above Gordons Rd 37 4 INTRODUCTION 5 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared to document some of the landscape contribution made in the preparation of the Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan Review 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Catch Share Management in New England: Groundfish Sectors
    Catch Share Management in New England: Groundfish Sectors Kimberly Gordon Date: _________________________ Approved: ________________________________ Dr. Douglas Nowacek, Advisor Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Master of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences of Duke University May 2010 ABSTRACT: The management of domestic fisheries by the use of catch shares has become a topic of increased attention in recent years. The New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC) recently voted to adopt a catch share program for their Northeast Multispecies Fishery, proposing the addition of 17 new sectors which will manage a collective quota for the multispecies complex. This paper discusses the specifics of the Fishery Management Plan amendment as it pertains to the sector program and highlights three potential concerns that have been raised with regard to the implementation of sectors: insufficient monitoring, excessive consolidation, and impacts on communities. An exploration of actions taken by other regional Fishery Management Councils to address these concerns provides insight into potential management options that the New England Fishery Management Council may wish to consider as they move forward. These options are evaluated in the context of New England’s groundfish fishery, culminating in recommended actions that would enhance the ability of the management program to achieve its desired goals. Evaluation of the monitoring program in the British Columbia Groundfish Fishery reveals the potential benefits of full monitoring coverage for the Northeast Multispecies Sector program. Considering accumulation limits set in 10 domestic catch share programs to address consolidation reveals the need for the NEFMC to establish accumulation limits at a level commensurate with the management plan’s total objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinitiated Biological Opinion on Groundfish Fisheries Affecting Humpback Whales
    Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological and Conference Opinion Continuing Operation of the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery (Reinitiation of consultation #NWR-2012-876) – Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) NMFS Consultation Number: WCRO-2018-01378 ARN 151422WCR2018PR00213 Action Agency: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Affected Species and NMFS’ Determinations: ESA-Listed Species Status Is Action Is Action Is Action Is Action Likely Likely to Likely To Likely to To Destroy or Adversely Jeopardize Adversely Adversely Affect the Species? Affect Modify Critical Species? Critical Habitat? Habitat? Humpback whale Endangered Yes No No No (Megaptera novaeangliae) – Central America DPS Humpback whale – Threatened Yes No No No Mexico DPS Consultation Conducted By: National Marine Fisheries Service, West Coast Region Issued By: _______________________________ Barry A. Thom Regional Administrator Date: October 26, 2020 ESA Section 7 Consultation Number WCRO-2018-01378 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 7 1.1. Background ..................................................................................................................................................................7 1.2. Consultation History ................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3. Proposed Federal Action .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 | North Kaipara 2.0 | North Kaipara - Overview
    Part 2 | North Kaipara 2.0 | North Kaipara - Overview | Mana Whenua by the accumulation of rainwater in depressions of sand. Underlying There are eight marae within the ironstone prevents the water from North Kaipara community area (refer leaking away. These are sensitive to the Cultural Landscapes map on environments where any pollution page 33 for location) that flows into them stays there. Pananawe Marae A significant ancient waka landing Te Roroa site is known to be located at Koutu. Matatina Marae Te Roroa To the east of the district, where Waikara Marae the Wairoa River runs nearby to Te Roroa Tangiteroria, is the ancient portage Waikaraka Marae route of Mangapai that connected Te Roroa the Kaipara with the lower reaches Tama Te Ua Ua Marae of the Whangārei Harbour. This Te Runanga o Ngāti Whātua portage extended from the Northern Ahikiwi Marae Wairoa River to Whangārei Harbour. Te Runanga o Ngāti Whātua From Tangiteroria, the track reached Taita Marae Maungakaramea and then to the Te Runanga o Ngāti Whātua canoe landing at the head of the Tirarau Marae Mangapai River. Samuel Marsden Ngāuhi; Te Runanga o Ngāti Whātua (1765-1838), who travelled over this route in 1820, mentions in his journal There are a number of maunga that Hongi Hika conveyed war and distinctive cultural landscapes canoes over the portage (see Elder, significant to Mana Whenua and the 1932). wider community within the North Kaipara areas. These include Maunga Mahi tahi (collaboration) of Te Ruapua, Hikurangi, and Tuamoe. opportunities for mana whenua, Waipoua, and the adjoining forests wider community and the council of Mataraua and Waima, make up to work together for the good of the largest remaining tract of native the northern Kaipara area are vast forests in Northland.
    [Show full text]
  • +Tuhinga 27-2016 Vi:Layout 1
    27 2016 2016 TUHINGA Records of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa Tuhinga: Records of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa The journal of scholarship and mätauranga Number 27, 2016 Tuhinga: Records of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa is a peer-reviewed publication, published annually by Te Papa Press PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand TE PAPA ® is the trademark of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa Te Papa Press is an imprint of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa Tuhinga is available online at www.tepapa.govt.nz/tuhinga It supersedes the following publications: Museum of New Zealand Records (1171-6908); National Museum of New Zealand Records (0110-943X); Dominion Museum Records; Dominion Museum Records in Ethnology. Editorial board: Catherine Cradwick (editorial co-ordinator), Claudia Orange, Stephanie Gibson, Patrick Brownsey, Athol McCredie, Sean Mallon, Amber Aranui, Martin Lewis, Hannah Newport-Watson (Acting Manager, Te Papa Press) ISSN 1173-4337 All papers © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa 2016 Published June 2016 For permission to reproduce any part of this issue, please contact the editorial co-ordinator,Tuhinga, PO Box 467, Wellington. Cover design by Tim Hansen Typesetting by Afineline Digital imaging by Jeremy Glyde Tuhinga: Records of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa Number 27, 2016 Contents A partnership approach to repatriation: building the bridge from both sides 1 Te Herekiekie Herewini and June Jones Mäori fishhooks at the Pitt Rivers Museum: comments and corrections 10 Jeremy Coote Response to ‘Mäori fishhooks at the Pitt Rivers Museum: comments 20 and corrections’ Chris D.
    [Show full text]
  • Legacy – the All Blacks
    LEGACY WHAT THE ALL BLACKS CAN TEACH US ABOUT THE BUSINESS OF LIFE LEGACY 15 LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP JAMES KERR Constable • London Constable & Robinson Ltd 55-56 Russell Square London WC1B 4HP www.constablerobinson.com First published in the UK by Constable, an imprint of Constable & Robinson Ltd., 2013 Copyright © James Kerr, 2013 Every effort has been made to obtain the necessary permissions with reference to copyright material, both illustrative and quoted. We apologise for any omissions in this respect and will be pleased to make the appropriate acknowledgements in any future edition. The right of James Kerr to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 All rights reserved. This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. A copy of the British Library Cataloguing in Publication data is available from the British Library ISBN 978-1-47210-353-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-47210-490-8 (ebook) Printed and bound in the UK 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 Cover design: www.aesopagency.com The Challenge When the opposition line up against the New Zealand national rugby team – the All Blacks – they face the haka, the highly ritualized challenge thrown down by one group of warriors to another.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Humpback Whale Bycatch in the U.S. West Coast Groundfish Fisheries, 2002 - 2019
    Agenda Item G.4.a NMFS Report 4 June 2021 Estimated Humpback Whale Bycatch in the U.S. West Coast Groundfish Fisheries, 2002 - 2019 M. Bradley Hanson1, Thomas P. Good1, Jason E. Jannot2, and Jason Eibner2 Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA 2725 Montlake Blvd. E. Seattle, WA 98112 2021-05-24 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction and Background ............................................................................................................................. 4 U.S. West Coast Groundfish Fisheries ......................................................................................................... 8 Northwest Fisheries Science Center Groundfish Observer Program ............................................ 9 Humpback Whale Bycatch in West Coast Groundfish Fisheries ..................................................... 9 Methods ..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Data Sources ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 Estimating
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Watch Report on the Pacific Sardine
    Seafood Watch Seafood Report: Sardines Volume I image© Monterey Bay Aquarium Pacific sardine Sardinops sagax Alice Cascorbi Fisheries Research Analyst Monterey Bay Aquarium final 10 February 2004 Seafood Watch® Pacific Sardine Report February 10, 2004 About Seafood Watch® and the Seafood Reports Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long- term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from the Internet (seafoodwatch.org) or obtained from the Seafood Watch® program by emailing [email protected]. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices”, “Good Alternatives” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request. In producing the Seafood Reports, Seafood Watch® seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of information include government technical publications, fishery management plans and supporting documents, and other scientific reviews of ecological sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Studies of Estuarine Turbidity Under Different Freshwater Flow Conditions, Kaipara River, New Zealand
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Portsmouth University Research Portal (Pure) Field studies of estuarine turbidity under different freshwater flow conditions, Kaipara River, New Zealand Steven B Mitchell1, Malcolm O Green2, Iain T MacDonald2, Mark Pritchard2 1School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Portsmouth, PO1 3AH, UK 2National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Hamilton, New Zealand Abstract We present a first interpretation of three days of measurements made in 2013 from the tidal reaches of the Kaipara River (New Zealand) under both low and high freshwater inputs and a neap tidal cycle. During the first day, we occupied two stations that were approximately 6 km apart in a tidal reach that runs for 25 km from the river mouth to the upstream limit of tidal influence. During the second day, longitudinal surveys were conducted over a distance of 6 km centred on the upstream station. The data reveal a turbidity maximum in the form of a high-concentration ‘plug’ of suspended mud that was advected downstream on the ebbing tide past the upper (HB) measurement station and which exchanged sediment with the seabed by settling at low slack water and by resuspension in the early flooding tide. The data suggest that fine sediment is transported landwards and trapped in the upper part of the tidal reach under these low-flow conditions. On the third day of measurements we repeated the experiments of the first day but later in the year, for a much higher freshwater flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaipara Harbour Sediment Mitigation Study: Summary
    Kaipara Harbour Sediment Mitigation Study: Summary 1 Action Name Date Draft prepared by Malcolm Green and Adam Daigneault 8 November 2017 Reviewed by Ngaire Phillips 8 December 2017 Final prepared Malcolm Green and Adam Daigneault 20 December 2017 Minor revision Malcolm Green and Adam Daigneault 30 January 2018 Report NRC1701–1 Prepared for Northland Regional Council and Auckland Council January 2018 (minor revision) © Streamlined Environmental Limited, 2018 Green, M.O. and Daigneault, A. (2018). Kaipara Harbour Sediment Mitigation Study: Summary. Report NRC1701–1 (minor revision), Streamlined Environmental, Hamilton, 64 pp. Streamlined Environmental Ltd Hamilton, New Zealand www.streamlined.co.nz [email protected] 2 Contents Key messages ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Baseline scenario .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Mitigation ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 Afforestation scenarios ................................................................................................................................ 10 Practice-based
    [Show full text]
  • PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Management Approach The
    PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Management Approach The productivity of the North Pacific ecosystem is acknowledged to be among the highest in the world. For the past 25 years, the Council management approach has incorporated forward looking conservation measures that address differing levels of uncertainty. This management approach has, in recent years, been labeled the precautionary approach. The Council’s precautionary approach is about applying judicious and responsible fisheries management practices, based on sound scientific research and analysis, proactively rather than reactively, to ensure the sustainability of fishery resources and associated ecosystems for the benefit of future as well as current generations. Recognizing that potential changes in productivity may be caused by fluctuations in natural oceanographic conditions, fisheries, and other, non-fishing, activities, the Council intends to continue to take appropriate measures to insure the continued sustainability of the managed species. It will carry out this objective by considering reasonable, adaptive management measures as described in the Magnuson Stevens Act and in conformance with the National Standards, the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act and other applicable law. This management approach takes into account the National Academy of Science’s recommendations on Sustainable Fisheries Policy. As part of its policy, the Council intends to consider and adopt, as appropriate, measures that accelerate the Council’s precautionary, adaptive management
    [Show full text]