DOCSLIB.ORG

Alexandra Parade – Heritage Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alexandra Parade – Heritage Review Level 3, 124 Exhibition Street [GPO Box 2634, Melbourne 3001] Melbourne, Victoria 3000 [email protected] +61 (03) 9115 6566 gjmheritage.com ABN: 62 348 237 636 ARBV: 16044 BUILT FORM REVIEW: ALEXANDRA PARADE HERITAGE ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATIONS November 2020 PREPARED FOR: City of YArrA DATE: November 2020 FILE: 2020-008 © GJM Heritage (2020) All Rights Reserved As is the case for 37.5% of Victoria, no Traditional Owners have been formally recognized for parts of the land included in the study area. The land to the north of Alexandra Parade, however, forms part of the traditional lands of the Wurundjeri People, who are represented by the Wurundjeri Woi Wurrung Cultural Heritage Aboriginal Corporation. This report is limited in its scope to consideration of post-contact cultural heritage and does not provide advice on any Aboriginal cultural heritage significance. Nonetheless, we acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land at this place, including the Wurundjeri People, and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging. For more information on the Wurundjeri People, please visit https://www.wurundjeri.com.au. PROJECT TEAM Jim Gard’ner | Director Renae JArmAn | Director Ros ColemAn | AssociAte JessicA Hogg | HeritAge ConsultAnt Cover ImAge: Alexandra Parade looking east towards the Clifton Hill Shot Tower from the intersection with Wellington Street GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS Appendix 8 Incorporated Document ‘City of Yarra Review of HeritAge OverlAy Areas 2007: Appendix 8 (revised May 2018)’ C1Z CommerciAl 1 Zone C2Z CommerciAl 2 Zone DDO Design And Development OverlAy DELWP Department of Environment, LAnd, WAter and PlAnning GRZ GenerAl ResidentiAl Zone HO HeritAge OverlAy MAC MAjor Activity Centre MUZ Mixed Use Zone NAC Neighbourhood Activity Centre NRZ Neighbourhood ResidentiAl Zone PPN PlAnning PrActice Note VHR VictoriAn HeritAge Register All photos tAken by GJM HeritAge in MArch 2020 unless otherwise stAted. Alexandra Parade Built Form Review: Heritage Analysis & Recommendations | PAGE 2 DOCUMENT VERSIONS Project No. Version Issued To DAte Issued 2020-008 DrAft v0.1 City of YArrA 1 July 2020 Final DrAft v0.2 City of YArrA 10 November 2020 FInal City of YArrA 16 November 2020 DD November 2020 Alexandra Parade Built Form Review: Heritage Analysis & Recommendations | PAGE 3 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 6 PART I: THE PROJECT AND PLANNING FRAMEWORK...................................................... 8 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 YARRA’S HIGH STREETS & BOULEVARDS ................................................................................................... 9 1.2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ALEXANDRA PARADE PRECINCT ................................................................... 9 1.3 BRIEF HISTORY OF ALEXANDRA PARADE ................................................................................................. 11 1.2 SCOPE OF THE HERITAGE ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT ................................................... 13 1.3 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................... 14 2.0 ANALYSIS OF THE PLANNING CONTEXT ........................................................................................ 17 2.1 ACTIVITY CENTRE PLANNING AND HERITAGE ......................................................................................... 17 2.2 YARRA PLANNING SCHEME – HERITAGE PROVISIONS ............................................................................ 19 2.2.1 Heritage Policy ................................................................................................................................ 19 2.2.2 Landmarks and Tall Structures ........................................................................................................ 22 2.2.3 Heritage Overlay ............................................................................................................................. 24 3.0 HERITAGE IN DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAYS – PANEL FINDINGS ..................................... 27 3.1 YARRA PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C231 .................................................................................... 28 3.2 YARRA PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C220 .................................................................................... 28 3.3 YARRA AMENDMENT C191 ..................................................................................................................... 30 3.4 MORELAND AMENDMENT C134 ............................................................................................................. 30 3.5 BOROONDARA AMENDMENT C108 ........................................................................................................ 31 3.6 WHITEHORSE AMENDMENT C175 .......................................................................................................... 32 3.7 STONNINGTON AMENDMENT C223 ....................................................................................................... 33 3.8 DAREBIN AMENDMENT C161 ................................................................................................................. 33 3.9 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 34 4.0 MANDATORY AND DISCRETIONARY HEIGHT AND SETBACK CONTROLS ......................................... 37 PART II: HERITAGE ANALYSIS ....................................................................................... 39 5.0 STUDY AREA ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................ 40 5.1 PRECINCT BOUNDARY ............................................................................................................................. 40 5.2 HERITAGE CHARACTERISTICS .................................................................................................................. 40 5.3 LOCAL LANDMARKS ................................................................................................................................ 42 Alexandra Parade Built Form Review: Heritage Analysis & Recommendations | PAGE 4 6.0 ALEXANDRA PARADE HERITAGE ANALYSIS................................................................................... 44 6.1 HERITAGE STATUS ................................................................................................................................... 44 6.1.1 Existing conditions .......................................................................................................................... 44 6.1.2 Recommended Changes .................................................................................................................. 47 6.2 ZONING ................................................................................................................................................... 48 6.2.1 Existing conditions .......................................................................................................................... 48 6.2.2 Recommended Changes .................................................................................................................. 48 6.3 POTENTIAL FUTURE CHARACTER CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................................. 48 6.4 RECOMMENDED BUILT FORM PARAMETERS ......................................................................................... 49 7.0 BUILT FORM TESTING .................................................................................................................. 51 PART III: BUILT FORM RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................ 52 8.0 BUILT FORM RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................. 53 8.1 RECOMMENDED DDO CONTROLS .......................................................................................................... 54 8.2 ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE .......................................................................................................................... 55 APPENDIX I - Alexandra Parade Precinct Anomalies..................................................... 58 A1.1 QualificAtions .......................................................................................................................................... 58 A1.2 AnomAlies MAp ....................................................................................................................................... 58 A1.3 AnomAlies ............................................................................................................................................... 59 APPENDIX II – Citation and Statement of Significance: The Gasometer Hotel, 484 Smith Street, Collingwood ........................................................ 63 APPENDIX III – Citation and Statement of Significance: Quonset Warehouse, 20 Reeves Street, Clifton Hill .................................................................... 71 Alexandra Parade Built Form Review: Heritage Analysis & Recommendations | PAGE 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HAnsen PArtnership, on behalf of the City of YArrA (Council), has prepAred A Built Form Review of three precincts: AlexAndrA PArAde,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SEA of Orkney Islands Local Transport Strategy
    STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE ORKNEY ISLANDS LOCAL TRANSPORT STRATEGY APPENDIX A: Table 3 Other plans and programmes which are relevant to the Orkney Islands Local Transport Strategy APPENDIX A: TABLE 3.1 REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN POLICY Name of PPS/ Title of legislation and main requirements of PPS / How it affects, or is affected by, The Orkney Islands Local environmental Environmental protection objective Transport Strategy in terms of SEA issues* at Schedule 3 protection objective of the Environmental Assessment (Scotland) Act 2005 UN Framework Energy Act 2004 Climatic factors and local air quality. Convention on The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change was established Sets CO2 reduction targets that the LTS needs to take into Climate Change & in 1992 as an international framework to agree strategies to reduce account. its Kyoto Protocol emissions of greenhouse gases in relation to their impact on global climate. The Kyoto Protocol established a timetable for reduction in the emissions of these gases as well as a framework for sequestration of carbon by vegetation. Water Framework The Water Environment & Water Services (Scotland) Act 2003. Water, soil and biodiversity. Directive The Water Framework Directive establishes a new legal framework Sets targets for the chemical and ecological quality of water (2000/60/EC)(WFD) for the protection, improvement and sustainable use of surface bodies that the LTS must take into account. waters, transitional waters, coastal waters and groundwater across Europe. Groundwater The Groundwater Regulations 1998 Water. Directive 80/68/EEC The Regulations list substances which, based on toxicity, (Expected to be The prevention of pollution or over-abstraction of groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Terminologies
    FISH TERMINOLOGIES Monument Type Thesaurus Report Format: Hierarchical listing - class Notes: Classification of monument type records by function.
    [Show full text]
  • ARV73: Annual Report, Vol. 73, Statistical Review of Mineral Industry
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Horse Todos a B Alliebelle 23.072 a Big To'do 26.392 a Bit
    HORSE TODOS A B ALLIEBELLE 23.072 A BIG TO'DO 26.392 A BIT STORMY 25.592 A BOY NAMED EM 28.675 A BRILLIANT IDEA 31.402 A BRUSH OF BEAUTY 21.393 A CAT NAMED SNIPE 28.551 A CAT THAT FLIES 25.368 A CENTURIAN 29.172 A DEVILISH RIDE 24.916 A DIEHL 34.923 A DOS PUNTAS 42.616 A E PHI SENSATION 23.497 A FLEET OF NINE 23.302 A GIRL NAMED MARIA 29.537 A GLASS OF WATER 22.147 A GOLDEN JET 22.575 A GRAND N' MORE 19.560 A JEALOUS WOMAN 36.719 A LA MODA 28.673 A LIL DUMAANI 27.721 A LISTER 25.068 A LITTLE AT A TIME 26.233 A LITTLE OFF 31.467 A LITTLE TOO LATE 25.373 A LOT OF ACTION 26.490 A LOT OF MON 27.211 A MATTEROFSPEAKING 24.041 A MCCOUGHTRY 25.178 A MI ZORRITO 44.348 A MILLION FIELDS 25.005 A MOMENT IN TIME 29.541 A NATIONALTREASURE 33.592 A NATURAL 29.383 A NEW DAWN 25.094 A NEW YORK PHILLIE 23.229 A P MINK 29.223 A P VALOR 30.045 A PERFECT SQUEEZE 28.415 A PINT FOR MARY 26.393 A PLUS TOPPER 28.873 A QUESTION OF TIME 21.185 A RACING DELIGHT 28.495 A RANG A TANG 26.600 A ROCKY STORM 21.775 A ROD 33.263 A ROGUE SNUCK IN 24.666 A ROYAL FLUSH A 18.962 A SHE'S ADORABLE 33.925 A SHOT AWAY 28.920 A SINGLE MAN 21.532 A SMART JUDGE 23.806 A STAR IS GORN 23.954 A STORY OF REVENGE 29.442 A STUDENT 29.494 A T MONEY 30.054 A TOE BY THREE 25.800 A TOUT L'HEURE 42.875 A TRIPP ROYALE 29.433 A USED GUN 23.246 A WALK ABOVE 25.728 A WINK AND A SMILE 32.705 A WISH FOR KOSUTE 20.514 A WORD TO THE WISE 30.596 A Z WARRIOR 35.400 A'INTYOUDREAMIN 22.520 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century
    Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control.
    [Show full text]
  • Evanton Wartime Remains: Sites and Features
    Evanton Wartime Remains: sites and features During the first half of 2013 a group gathered at the Cornerstone Cafe on Wednesday evenings to remember and research the wartime remains in Evanton – buildings, sites, or monuments which were new, modified or no longer there. Using old maps, photographs (some over 90 years old), aerial photographs from the wartime and later, military archives and plans, memories spanning over 70 years and details gleaned by walking over the area, information about over 160 sites was gathered. Some pupils from the Kiltearn Primary school, Inverness Young Archaeologists Club and Dingwall Academy joined us as well, recording remains and learning about the wartime and later activities in Evanton. This report summarises the results of this research. Most of the recorded sites relate to wartime remains, but a few other unrecorded sites were also noted. The details and more photos will also be forwarded to the Highland Council Historic Environment Record (HER) (http://her.highland.gov.uk), the RCAHMS Canmore database (http://www.rcahms.gov.uk/canmore.html), and the SCAPE/SCH@RP coastal sites at risk database (http://scharp.co.uk/) where they will provide valuable new information about Evanton’s past. It is clear that this is not the last word, and we hope this report will encourage others to share any other memories and photographs they might have. The sessions were organised by ARCH which provides opportunities for people interested in learning about and helping to preserve their heritage. Evanton Wartime Remains was funded by the European Community Highland LEADER 2007-2013 Programme, Kiltearn Community Council’s Novar Windfarm funding (supported by RWEnpower renewables), The Highland Council, the Co- operative Membership Community Fund and the Robert Kiln Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • The BG News February 5, 2008
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU BG News (Student Newspaper) University Publications 2-5-2008 The BG News February 5, 2008 Bowling Green State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news Recommended Citation Bowling Green State University, "The BG News February 5, 2008" (2008). BG News (Student Newspaper). 7874. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news/7874 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in BG News (Student Newspaper) by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. ESTABLISHED 1920 A daily independent student press serving THE BG NEWS the campus and surrounding community Tuesday February 5,2008 Volume 102, Issue 97 Students discuss 'Falcon issues' at forum WWWBGNEWS.COM ByKristanVaM. 0MUME:USG|«sedthe2ht fxbyertal Is a double major Reporter wjhdiangesgotobc/iewscornto leanmom worth the effort? * Everything from toilet seat covers to both Meijer on East Wooster Students may want to topartatigproblems was discussed Street and Wal-Mart on South pursue two subjects, but at last night's Undergraduate Main Street. getting an additional StudentGovernment open forum: "I don't have very many bachelor's degree may "What are your Falcon Issues?'' friends who drive or who have USG President lohnnie L. a car," senior Terri Melton said. not reap the rewards of Lewis began the discussion by "Having a shuttle that would a master's degree, some opening the floor to students eat- take us to those places just University advisers say ing in the Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Aa Box ABATTOIR ABBEY Abbey Barn Abbey Barn Abbey Bridge Abbey Bridge Abbey Church Abbey Church Abbey Gate Abbey Gate Abbey Gate
    Aa Box Abbey Bridge USE : MOTORING TELEPHONE BOX USE : ABBEY ABATTOIR Abbey Bridge UF : Slaughter House USE : BRIDGE UF : Butching House BT : FOOD PROCESSING SITE Abbey Church RT : BUTCHERY SITE USE : ABBEY RT : SHAMBLES RT : SMOKE HOUSE Abbey Church RT : GLUE FACTORY USE : CHURCH RT : TANNERY RT : HORSEHAIR FACTORY Abbey Gate SN : A building where animals are slaughtered. USE : ABBEY ABBEY Abbey Gate UF : Benedictine Abbey UF : Arrouiasian Abbey USE : GATE UF : Augustinian Abbey UF : Victorine Abbey Abbey Gatehouse UF : Tironian Abbey USE : GATEHOUSE UF : Savigniac Abbey UF : Premonstratensian Abbey Abbey Gatehouse UF : Franciscan Abbey USE : ABBEY UF : Cistercian Abbey UF : Cluniac Abbey Abbey Kitchen UF : Bridgettine Abbey USE : ABBEY UF : Convent Chapel UF : Abbey Barn Abbey Kitchen UF : Abbey Bridge USE : KITCHEN UF : Abbey Church UF : Abbey Gate Abbey Wall UF : Abbey Gatehouse USE : PRECINCT WALL UF : Abbey Kitchen UF : Independent Abbey UF : Tironensian Abbey Abbots House UF : Conventual Chapel USE : MONASTIC DWELLING UF : Conventual Church UF : Farmery Abbots Lodging BT : RELIGIOUS HOUSE USE : MONASTIC DWELLING RT : ALMONRY RT : GUEST HOUSE ABBOTS PALACE RT : KITCHEN BT : PALACE RT : CHAPTER HOUSE SN : The official residence of an abbot. RT : CATHEDRAL RT : PRECINCT WALL ABBOTS SUMMER PALACE RT : DOUBLE HOUSE BT : PALACE RT : FRIARY RT : BISHOPS SUMMER PALACE RT : MONASTERY SN : An official residence of an abbot during the summer RT : NUNNERY months. RT : PRECEPTORY RT : PRIORY ABLUTIONS BLOCK RT : GATEHOUSE BT : DOMESTIC MILITARY BUILDING RT : REFECTORY BT : WASHING PLACE RT : CONVENT SCHOOL SN : A building housing washing facilities and toilets. The RT : CURFEW BELL TOWER term occurs mainly in a military context.
    [Show full text]
  • Scheyville National Park Conservation Management Plan
    SCHEYVILLE NATIONAL PARK CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Volume 1 HISTORY March 2009 Prepared for the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Environment and Climate Change Disclaimer The Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW has compiled this document in good faith exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability for any particular purpose of the source material included in this report. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the content for their needs. The Department of Environment and Climate Change is pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial use provided the meaning is unchanged and its source acknowledged. Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change 59-61 Goulburn Street, Sydney PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Phone: 02 9995 5000 (switchboard) Fax: 02 9995 5999 TTY: 02 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au ISBN 978 1 74232 200 1 DECC 2009/232 March 2009 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Scheyville National Park is located in the Hawkesbury region, approximately 50 km north west of Sydney and 5 km east of the town of Windsor. It is situated within the local government area of Hawkesbury City Council. The Park covers an area of 954 hectares. Scheyville National Park has a multi-layered history which provides great potential for the place as a destination for cultural tourism and education. This draft CMP was commissioned by The Parks and Wildlife Division (PWD) of the NSW Dept of Environment and Conservation1 (DECC).
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Rapid Response
    A S S A L O C R I A A S S U T A L O C R I A T I U T O T I C O C E N E N T T I O I O H F C H K F R E A C N K E Y R A H E T A N E Y A H T AAK COVID-19 RAPID RESPONSE PROPOSED GUIDELINES ON PLANNING AND DESIGN OF COVID-19 QUARANTINE AND TREATMENT CENTRES, AND LONG TERM INFRASTRUCTURAL INTERVENTIONS FOR THE KENYAN CONTEXT. 2020 FIRST EDITION AAK COVID-19 RESPONSE APRIL 20201 A S S A L O C R I A U T T I C O E N T I O H F C K R E A N E Y A H TABLE OF CONTENTS T Introduction....................................................................................................................3 • Introduction............................................................................................................................................4 • Participating Volunteer Professionals.............................................................................................5 • Leadership Team....................................................................................................................................6 • Editorial Team.........................................................................................................................................7 • Interventions...........................................................................................................................................9 Chapter Two: Planning Considerations for setting up of quarantine facilities.........10 • Background Information on COVID-19......................................................................................12 • Definition
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Building Recording at White Hill Grain Store, Boughton Aluph, Kent
    HISTORIC BUILDING RECORDING AT WHITE HILL GRAIN STORE, BOUGHTON ALUPH, KENT 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................PAGE 3 2.0 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND...........................PAGE 3 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUILDING..................................................PAGE 5 4.0 INTERIOR....................................................................................PAGE 7 5.0 DISCUSSION...............................................................................PAGE 8 6.0 PARAMETERS..............................................................................PAGE 9 7.0 REFERENCES...............................................................................PAGE 9 Front cover: 20th century photograph of the site (looking north) Appendix 1. Building description Appendix 2. Digital photography list Figure 1. Site location 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 In March 2017 Dr Paul Wilkinson of SWAT Archaeology carried out a historic building recording of a Romney Shed at White Hill Grain Store, White Hill, Boughton Aluph in Kent (Figure 1). The building is presently unoccupied and is about to be demolished. 1.2 The building recording was carried out on 21st March 2017 in accordance with a Level 1 survey as detailed in the English Heritage publication ‘Understanding Historic Buildings: A Guide to Good Recording Practice’ (2016). The Chartered Institute of Field Archaeologists Standard and Guidance for the archaeological investigation and recording of standing buildings or structures (2017) and the KCC Historic Building Recording Requirements Part C. This is essentially a visual record. Historic England guidelines suggest that written information should be the minimum to identify the building’s location, age, type, materials, use and when and whom compiled the report. General photographs of the exterior as well as any specific architectural or historic features (both internal and external) should be taken. 1.3 In summary the work consists of a basic descriptive report accompanied by digital photographs.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Watching Brief on Land at White Hill Grain Store, White Hill, Boughton Aluph January 2018
    Archaeological Watching Brief on land at White Hill Grain Store, White Hill, Boughton Aluph January 2018 Archaeological Watching Brief on land at White Hill Grain Store, White Hill, Boughton Aluph, Kent Site Code WHIT/WB/17 Report for T. Denne & Sons SWAT ARCHAEOLOGY Swale and Thames Archaeological Survey Company The Office, School Farm Oast, Graveney Road Faversham, Kent ME13 8UP Tel; 01795 532548 or 07885 700 112 [email protected] www.swatarchaeology.co.uk 1 Contents 1.0 SUMMARY..........................................................................................................................4 2.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................4 2.1 PLANNING BACKGROUND..................................................................................................4 3.0 SCHEDULE OF VISITS...........................................................................................................5 4.0 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES.......................................................................................................5 4.1 PROPOSED GROUNDWORKS..............................................................................................5 4.2 CONFIDENCE RATING.........................................................................................................5 5.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL & GEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND...........................................................5 6.0 METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]